WEBVTT - It Could Happen Here Weekly 254

0:00:01.730 --> 0:00:02.910
<v Speaker 1>Call zone media.

0:00:03.350 --> 0:00:03.990
<v Speaker 2>Hey, everybody.

0:00:04.210 --> 0:00:06.100
<v Speaker 3>Robert Evans here, and I wanted to let you know

0:00:06.380 --> 0:00:09.860
<v Speaker 3>this is a compilation episode. So every episode of the

0:00:09.900 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 3>week that just happened is here in one convenient and

0:00:13.740 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 3>with somewhat less ads package for you to listen to

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:19.330
<v Speaker 3>in a long stretch if you want. If you've been

0:00:19.370 --> 0:00:21.370
<v Speaker 3>listening to the episodes every day this week, there's going

0:00:21.390 --> 0:00:23.430
<v Speaker 3>to be nothing new here for you, but you can

0:00:23.450 --> 0:00:24.410
<v Speaker 3>make your own decisions.

0:00:28.870 --> 0:00:33.750
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to It Could Happen Here. I'm Garrison Davis, joined

0:00:33.810 --> 0:00:34.850
<v Speaker 2>by Robert Evans.

0:00:35.250 --> 0:00:35.610
<v Speaker 1>Hello.

0:00:36.340 --> 0:00:40.919
<v Speaker 2>Hello, Garrison Davis. How are you doing today? I'm doing okay.

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:45.519
<v Speaker 2>I'm really, I'm getting prepared to vote. I'm psyching myself up.

0:00:45.540 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 3>Just like the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps told you to do, huh?

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:53.590
<v Speaker 2>I think that's what we want to start with. In general,

0:00:53.630 --> 0:00:56.690
<v Speaker 2>this episode will be kind of going over the midterm

0:00:56.730 --> 0:01:01.330
<v Speaker 2>polls as they are. in early October, kind of what

0:01:01.350 --> 0:01:03.170
<v Speaker 2>we can get a sense of the election about a

0:01:03.210 --> 0:01:05.250
<v Speaker 2>month out, now that we're just a few weeks away

0:01:05.290 --> 0:01:10.140
<v Speaker 2>from the election. But a few weeks ago, the IRGC,

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:13.740
<v Speaker 2>the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps... Prince of the Pod.

0:01:15.500 --> 0:01:15.780
<v Speaker 4>Sure.

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 2>At this point, man... One bad day, full Stalinist, full Maoist.

0:01:26.459 --> 0:01:31.380
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's more, it's a slightly different-ist. A few

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:36.530
<v Speaker 2>weeks ago, the IRGC released a 26-page letter, not short.

0:01:36.730 --> 0:01:42.030
<v Speaker 2>Not strong on brevity, the IRGC. Addressed to the American people,

0:01:42.130 --> 0:01:46.229
<v Speaker 2>a spokesperson from the IRGC told Reuters, quote, the American

0:01:46.270 --> 0:01:50.350
<v Speaker 2>people are not knowledgeable about many developments. We believe if

0:01:50.430 --> 0:01:55.690
<v Speaker 2>they knew more, they would think differently and take other decisions, unquote.

0:01:56.330 --> 0:01:58.390
<v Speaker 3>You guys might have more faith in the American people

0:01:58.430 --> 0:01:59.450
<v Speaker 3>than I do at this point.

0:02:00.470 --> 0:02:02.780
<v Speaker 2>The start of the letter and how it's addressed reads,

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 2>to the honorable people of the United States of America,

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 2>the scholars, the students, and the members of the media.

0:02:09.300 --> 0:02:12.079
<v Speaker 2>I think that last part is important because at least

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:14.460
<v Speaker 2>some of them know that The American people are not

0:02:14.510 --> 0:02:17.140
<v Speaker 2>reading a 26-page letter. This is going to be mostly

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 2>read by journalists. This is going to be read by

0:02:19.139 --> 0:02:22.100
<v Speaker 2>nerds on Twitter. And blue sky, I guess. And nerds

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:22.620
<v Speaker 2>on Twitter.

0:02:23.300 --> 0:02:23.580
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Now, I actually was able to get a short video.

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:29.020
<v Speaker 2>The IRGC also released a short video kind of summarizing

0:02:29.380 --> 0:02:32.940
<v Speaker 2>the letter. And I will play that here for Robert.

0:02:45.770 --> 0:02:48.890
<v Speaker 2>So that's, yeah, that's the special, that's the special video. Yeah,

0:02:48.950 --> 0:02:51.809
<v Speaker 2>that really is. That's something else. So there's a few

0:02:51.850 --> 0:02:54.510
<v Speaker 2>sections before. The bulk of the letter is arguing why

0:02:54.530 --> 0:02:57.710
<v Speaker 2>Iran is the victor in the war, concrete evidence of

0:02:57.730 --> 0:03:00.989
<v Speaker 2>Iran's victory. They have a section on the meaning of, quote,

0:03:01.070 --> 0:03:04.889
<v Speaker 2>death to America. Yeah. Which reads, quote, Death to America

0:03:04.910 --> 0:03:07.390
<v Speaker 2>does not in any way express any ill will toward

0:03:07.410 --> 0:03:10.670
<v Speaker 2>the American people who have themselves suffered through the same oppression.

0:03:11.230 --> 0:03:13.950
<v Speaker 2>Death to America is a prayer for the eradication of

0:03:14.010 --> 0:03:17.190
<v Speaker 2>the diabolical ruling elite whose seat of power is in

0:03:17.230 --> 0:03:19.950
<v Speaker 2>the White House. And the letter goes on to say

0:03:19.990 --> 0:03:22.650
<v Speaker 2>that the RGC and the people of Iran have no

0:03:22.710 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 2>feeling of hostility toward the American people. And then they ask,

0:03:26.419 --> 0:03:30.239
<v Speaker 2>how can the U.S. be saved? And this is what

0:03:30.300 --> 0:03:32.500
<v Speaker 2>leads to the bulk of the letter saying, which is

0:03:32.540 --> 0:03:36.450
<v Speaker 2>essentially trying to get Americans to vote harder. Oh, which...

0:03:37.290 --> 0:03:38.910
<v Speaker 2>You're finished, fascism.

0:03:39.830 --> 0:03:40.270
<v Speaker 3>Oh, man.

0:03:40.290 --> 0:03:42.970
<v Speaker 2>But there's also a few other interesting kind of like

0:03:43.950 --> 0:03:47.630
<v Speaker 2>name drops here. Quote, God will come to the aid

0:03:47.650 --> 0:03:50.670
<v Speaker 2>of the American people if they decide to change course. Thankfully,

0:03:50.780 --> 0:03:52.980
<v Speaker 2>Americans are waking up to the truth. Over the past

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:55.900
<v Speaker 2>two years, Americans have participated in numerous demonstrations in cities

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:59.060
<v Speaker 2>across the U.S. to express their outrage at Israel's genocidal

0:03:59.180 --> 0:03:59.980
<v Speaker 2>actions in Gaza.

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 5>Moreover.

0:04:01.770 --> 0:04:06.250
<v Speaker 2>The No Kings rallies that swept across the U.S. last

0:04:06.270 --> 0:04:09.710
<v Speaker 2>year were a nation- Okay, IRGC. Were a nation, right?

0:04:10.390 --> 0:04:14.710
<v Speaker 2>Repudiation of the burgeoning autocratic tendencies within the American government.

0:04:15.130 --> 0:04:17.750
<v Speaker 2>These powerful manifestations of collective action are evidence of a

0:04:17.770 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 2>national awakening spreading through the U.S. Polls show that the

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:26.300
<v Speaker 2>majority of Americans, especially younger Americans, no longer wish to

0:04:26.339 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 2>be complicit in their government's crimes against other nations, unquote.

0:04:30.910 --> 0:04:32.950
<v Speaker 2>Part of what makes this so funny to me is

0:04:33.750 --> 0:04:37.770
<v Speaker 2>how diametrically opposed it is to the messaging coming out

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.900
<v Speaker 2>of like, you know, U.S. based like Maoists or like anti-imperialists,

0:04:40.940 --> 0:04:44.039
<v Speaker 2>you know? Oh yeah, like the U.S. far left. Absolutely.

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 3>They're so much, so much more generous to the American people.

0:04:49.900 --> 0:04:53.020
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's something that's really, that's really funny to me.

0:04:53.500 --> 0:04:57.260
<v Speaker 2>As for the vote harder section, let's read one paragraph here.

0:04:58.190 --> 0:05:00.530
<v Speaker 2>Your response may be that you do not accept these

0:05:00.770 --> 0:05:03.390
<v Speaker 2>atrocious actions, but are powerless to do anything about them.

0:05:03.910 --> 0:05:07.150
<v Speaker 2>This answer, however, is not acceptable. You are the ones

0:05:07.210 --> 0:05:10.630
<v Speaker 2>who empower with your votes. The government had allowed to

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 2>do what it wants. Although American politicians often win your

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 2>votes through deception of false promises, as Trump did, you

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 2>can change the makeup of the government if you apply

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 2>the criteria for good leadership in choosing the people you

0:05:21.500 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 2>vote into office.

0:05:23.020 --> 0:05:25.730
<v Speaker 3>See, guys, I gotta tell you, it's not that easy.

0:05:28.339 --> 0:05:30.679
<v Speaker 3>First off, I've voted every time I've gotten the chance,

0:05:30.740 --> 0:05:32.860
<v Speaker 3>pretty much. I don't think I've ever empowered anyone with

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:33.659
<v Speaker 3>my votes.

0:05:33.900 --> 0:05:37.830
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's one of those kind of Adam Curtis moments. Yeah.

0:05:37.850 --> 0:05:43.300
<v Speaker 2>We have the IRGC advocating the ideal of electoral politics,

0:05:43.540 --> 0:05:46.580
<v Speaker 2>something that does not exist really in Iran either.

0:05:47.020 --> 0:05:50.020
<v Speaker 3>It's consistent with there's that one famous interview with an

0:05:50.060 --> 0:05:53.040
<v Speaker 3>Iranian cleric where he's like, as Alexander de Tocqueville, who

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:57.339
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure all Americans have read once said, he's like, guys,

0:05:57.839 --> 0:05:59.940
<v Speaker 3>you are way overestimating us.

0:06:02.900 --> 0:06:05.940
<v Speaker 2>So, yeah, if you have any sort of anti-imperialist impulses

0:06:06.430 --> 0:06:10.450
<v Speaker 2>as per as per the IRGC, get your voter registration

0:06:10.570 --> 0:06:11.330
<v Speaker 2>up to date.

0:06:12.110 --> 0:06:14.910
<v Speaker 3>Get your voter registration card and get out there.

0:06:15.900 --> 0:06:21.050
<v Speaker 2>If you're in line, stay in line. That's right. So

0:06:21.310 --> 0:06:23.110
<v Speaker 2>part of why this letter was released is because it

0:06:23.150 --> 0:06:26.029
<v Speaker 2>is just a few weeks away from the midterms. We

0:06:26.050 --> 0:06:29.049
<v Speaker 2>are less than a month away from the 2026 midterm elections.

0:06:29.390 --> 0:06:30.590
<v Speaker 2>And so I thought we should do a little update

0:06:30.630 --> 0:06:32.210
<v Speaker 2>on polling and take a look at some of the

0:06:32.330 --> 0:06:33.210
<v Speaker 2>close races.

0:06:34.089 --> 0:06:34.330
<v Speaker 6>Sure.

0:06:34.610 --> 0:06:37.660
<v Speaker 2>And let's start by talking about the current makeup of Congress.

0:06:37.940 --> 0:06:40.620
<v Speaker 2>Right now in the House, 218 seats are held by Republicans,

0:06:40.620 --> 0:06:47.060
<v Speaker 2>214 by Democrats, and there's one independent who caucuses with

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:52.260
<v Speaker 2>the Republicans. 218 seats are what's needed for a majority.

0:06:52.339 --> 0:06:56.420
<v Speaker 2>This has been a very small majority that the Republicans

0:06:56.460 --> 0:06:58.260
<v Speaker 2>have been able to hold onto in the House these

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:02.820
<v Speaker 2>past few years. The Cook Political Report is forecasting that

0:07:02.850 --> 0:07:06.049
<v Speaker 2>the Dems will pick up around five to 15 seats

0:07:06.270 --> 0:07:08.969
<v Speaker 2>in the midterms, likely putting them in charge of the

0:07:09.010 --> 0:07:14.690
<v Speaker 2>House with anywhere between 220 to 230 seats. And this

0:07:14.830 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 2>lead in polling and their projected victory has only grown

0:07:18.380 --> 0:07:21.060
<v Speaker 2>these past few weeks. It's not becoming a closer race

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 2>for the Republicans.

0:07:22.220 --> 0:07:26.620
<v Speaker 3>No, things don't look good for them because gasoline costs

0:07:26.770 --> 0:07:28.070
<v Speaker 3>all of the money in your pocket now.

0:07:28.550 --> 0:07:30.650
<v Speaker 2>That is a huge factor. That's a big part of

0:07:30.690 --> 0:07:32.770
<v Speaker 2>the reason. I'll go over some of the kind of

0:07:32.830 --> 0:07:36.330
<v Speaker 2>main issues driving the election person polling and gas prices

0:07:36.490 --> 0:07:38.450
<v Speaker 2>is like number one or number two.

0:07:38.650 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I have trouble imagining anything other than other cost

0:07:42.940 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 3>of living stuff being like a larger impact on voters.

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:52.500
<v Speaker 2>Something that is interesting, the redistricting across Alabama, California, Florida, Louisiana,

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:56.340
<v Speaker 2>North Carolina, Ohio, Tennessee, Texas, and Utah is will likely

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:59.460
<v Speaker 2>have a minimal impact in the results, like in total.

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 2>There's obviously for the people actually impacted, the people whose

0:08:02.740 --> 0:08:04.380
<v Speaker 2>votes are being diluted, especially.

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:06.890
<v Speaker 3>Not that this is not bad or a problem. It's

0:08:06.950 --> 0:08:09.470
<v Speaker 3>just they have fucked up enough that it's not going

0:08:09.510 --> 0:08:10.989
<v Speaker 3>to benefit them to the extent.

0:08:11.030 --> 0:08:11.810
<v Speaker 2>That's what it.

0:08:11.750 --> 0:08:13.830
<v Speaker 3>Seemed like to me, that they're not going to benefit

0:08:13.870 --> 0:08:14.570
<v Speaker 3>the way that they were.

0:08:15.350 --> 0:08:18.070
<v Speaker 2>No. So I don't want to discount the impact of

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:20.580
<v Speaker 2>the erosion of the Voting Rights Act by any means,

0:08:21.220 --> 0:08:25.070
<v Speaker 2>or the just larger structural issues of partisan gerrymandering. But

0:08:25.410 --> 0:08:28.230
<v Speaker 2>an analysis by Harvard estimated a net gain of only

0:08:28.650 --> 0:08:32.890
<v Speaker 2>two seats for Republicans in these midterms, though other estimates

0:08:33.100 --> 0:08:35.719
<v Speaker 2>give them a few more seats, anywhere between five to nine.

0:08:36.900 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 2>So we're looking at somewhere between a couple seats. I

0:08:40.059 --> 0:08:43.339
<v Speaker 2>think nine is probably a bit optimistic. Yeah, for the Republicans.

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:46.780
<v Speaker 2>Around two to five seats they could net because of

0:08:47.500 --> 0:08:57.230
<v Speaker 2>the redistricting measures. Could, might, yeah. coming years, going into 2028,

0:08:57.230 --> 0:09:00.470
<v Speaker 2>when Virginia is able to push forward its redistricting again,

0:09:00.510 --> 0:09:02.490
<v Speaker 2>which they tried to do earlier, but because of a

0:09:02.530 --> 0:09:06.610
<v Speaker 2>procedural error, it was shot down. So that will also

0:09:06.770 --> 0:09:09.089
<v Speaker 2>net Democrats a few more seats that will start to

0:09:09.110 --> 0:09:11.530
<v Speaker 2>kind of even things out. And then we had this

0:09:11.550 --> 0:09:13.780
<v Speaker 2>whole little fun redistricting for nothing.

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a real, just a marker of how badly

0:09:17.020 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 3>they have botched their starting position going into this administration.

0:09:23.980 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 3>Just kind of a catastrophic series of political decisions. We'll

0:09:27.380 --> 0:09:29.490
<v Speaker 3>see if any of that matters, but it really does

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:31.990
<v Speaker 3>highlight how pissed off people are.

0:09:32.850 --> 0:09:37.010
<v Speaker 2>Now, obviously, the Senate is kind of the big question here.

0:09:37.390 --> 0:09:37.650
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:09:37.870 --> 0:09:40.460
<v Speaker 2>Will Democrats be able to actually take the Senate? Will

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 2>they be able to control all of Congress, not just

0:09:42.780 --> 0:09:46.740
<v Speaker 2>the House? Yeah. Currently, the Republicans have a 53-seat majority,

0:09:47.100 --> 0:09:48.180
<v Speaker 2>plus a Fetterman.

0:09:48.540 --> 0:09:48.740
<v Speaker 7>Mm-hmm.

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:52.580
<v Speaker 2>And the vice president who can vote. So that kind

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:54.940
<v Speaker 2>of really throws a wrench in all these numbers, the

0:09:54.960 --> 0:10:00.339
<v Speaker 2>Fetterman factor and the Vance factor. Democrats just have 45

0:10:00.340 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 2>seats plus two independents who caucus with the Democrats, like

0:10:03.500 --> 0:10:07.900
<v Speaker 2>Bernie Sanders. So essentially, things actually sit at like 54

0:10:07.900 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 2>to 46, adjusting for independents and Fetterman. So Democrats really

0:10:14.179 --> 0:10:16.260
<v Speaker 2>need a net gain of like four to five seats

0:10:16.970 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 2>to be able to have the Senate be more of

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:26.420
<v Speaker 2>a competitive voting arena, also considering J.D. Vance. There are

0:10:26.420 --> 0:10:30.709
<v Speaker 2>35 Senate seats on the ballot next month. So Democrats

0:10:30.730 --> 0:10:33.670
<v Speaker 2>will need to flip around four to five seats, like

0:10:33.730 --> 0:10:36.569
<v Speaker 2>I said, and one of the seats Democrats have wanted

0:10:36.630 --> 0:10:39.990
<v Speaker 2>to flip for a long time, and especially this year,

0:10:40.630 --> 0:10:45.220
<v Speaker 2>is Maine, with Susan Collins. One of our worst lawmakers.

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:45.900
<v Speaker 8>Yes.

0:10:46.100 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 2>And ProPublica, as I reported on ED a few weeks ago,

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:56.189
<v Speaker 2>ProPublica did that great investigation into military contracting corruption and

0:10:57.050 --> 0:11:02.170
<v Speaker 2>bribery involving Susan Collins. So union logger Troy Jackson is

0:11:02.330 --> 0:11:07.150
<v Speaker 2>trying to unseat Collins. Right now, this race leans D

0:11:07.429 --> 0:11:12.010
<v Speaker 2>or is a toss up. Morrist has Jackson up four

0:11:12.110 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 2>points ahead of Collins among registered voters, but with a

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 2>margin of error of 3.8%. So that's essentially still almost

0:11:21.460 --> 0:11:23.679
<v Speaker 2>within the margin of error. This is going to be

0:11:23.700 --> 0:11:25.780
<v Speaker 2>a very close race, right? A margin of error like that.

0:11:26.460 --> 0:11:29.660
<v Speaker 2>This is still basically a toss up. Other polling shows

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 2>roughly the same results. Jackson up a few points, but

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:39.890
<v Speaker 2>within the margin of error. Per Morrist, among the Maine electorate, 57%

0:11:39.890 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 2>think Collins will win. That's not saying 57% want Collins

0:11:43.820 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 2>to win, but they think that will happen, right? That's

0:11:46.059 --> 0:11:48.959
<v Speaker 2>what they think is more likely. A survey from the

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:54.959
<v Speaker 2>Maine People's Resource Center found Jackson ahead among independent voters, 58%

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:59.660
<v Speaker 2>to 33% for Collins. The Maine People's Resource Center is

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:04.580
<v Speaker 2>a progressive-leaning institution. Obviously, this race in Maine has been

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:08.470
<v Speaker 2>a big shit show, to say the least. And since

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:13.350
<v Speaker 2>Jackson has taken over as the nominee, Democratic Party establishment

0:12:13.370 --> 0:12:16.150
<v Speaker 2>consultants have really swooped into Maine and have been trying

0:12:16.170 --> 0:12:19.929
<v Speaker 2>to keep Jackson on a tight leash. Jackson's campaign has

0:12:20.090 --> 0:12:24.630
<v Speaker 2>not replicated the Platner-style intensive town hall strategy.

0:12:24.650 --> 0:12:27.220
<v Speaker 3>I think that would be a bad idea. Like, it

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:29.459
<v Speaker 3>would be really obvious if he just tried to be

0:12:29.540 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 3>Graham Platner without the scandal, right?

0:12:31.780 --> 0:12:35.390
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, let's try to be Graham Plattner, but I

0:12:35.410 --> 0:12:38.910
<v Speaker 2>think it is, the style of campaigning is very different.

0:12:39.890 --> 0:12:43.170
<v Speaker 2>Jackson's not as accessible to the electorate. Consultants have tried

0:12:43.190 --> 0:12:44.550
<v Speaker 2>to keep him from doing Q &amp; As at the

0:12:44.590 --> 0:12:47.670
<v Speaker 2>events that he does end up doing. They've been dissuading

0:12:47.710 --> 0:12:52.090
<v Speaker 2>him from talking about ICE and Israel and Palestine.

0:12:52.110 --> 0:12:52.570
<v Speaker 8>Great.

0:12:52.990 --> 0:12:56.490
<v Speaker 2>So they really have been trying to keep him on

0:12:56.510 --> 0:12:58.550
<v Speaker 2>a pretty tight leash. There's a story in New York

0:12:58.610 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Magazine a few weeks ago that kind of details how

0:13:02.130 --> 0:13:06.150
<v Speaker 2>Democratic establishment consultants have been trying to lead the Jackson

0:13:06.170 --> 0:13:09.530
<v Speaker 2>campaign that if people are interested in that specific topic,

0:13:09.610 --> 0:13:13.709
<v Speaker 2>I recommend they check out. So this is one of

0:13:13.730 --> 0:13:16.990
<v Speaker 2>the races that Democrats really do need to flip if

0:13:17.510 --> 0:13:20.190
<v Speaker 2>they have a chance of winning the Senate. And it is,

0:13:20.410 --> 0:13:24.410
<v Speaker 2>you know, theoretically possible, you know, he may be slightly

0:13:24.460 --> 0:13:27.460
<v Speaker 2>ahead in the polls, but only very slightly. But I think, yeah,

0:13:27.630 --> 0:13:30.570
<v Speaker 2>this is this is essentially a toss up. especially looking

0:13:30.590 --> 0:13:34.150
<v Speaker 2>back at 2020 when the Democrat in that race also was,

0:13:34.380 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, a little bit ahead and Collins still ended

0:13:37.020 --> 0:13:37.830
<v Speaker 2>up walking away with it.

0:13:38.300 --> 0:13:41.380
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think they're I mean, they're they're both trying

0:13:41.420 --> 0:13:44.820
<v Speaker 3>to avoid having another platner who gets like out of

0:13:44.900 --> 0:13:47.719
<v Speaker 3>control of them and is saying shit that the DNC

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 3>does not want to have to stand by. And I

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 3>think they are also hoping that that Plattner's campaign at

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:56.020
<v Speaker 3>least did enough damage to Collins that she isn't going

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 3>to be able to like pull out a win this time.

0:13:57.800 --> 0:13:59.380
<v Speaker 3>And maybe that'll be the case, you know, that might

0:13:59.420 --> 0:14:01.059
<v Speaker 3>wind up being a play that works.

0:14:01.460 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Definitely.

0:14:02.020 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 3>It's not a great position to have someone who is

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:08.070
<v Speaker 3>doing as well as Plattner had been doing get dropped

0:14:08.140 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 3>out with a scandal that fucked up. Like that's a,

0:14:10.610 --> 0:14:12.690
<v Speaker 3>that's a, that's not easy to handle.

0:14:12.990 --> 0:14:13.210
<v Speaker 8>Yes.

0:14:13.510 --> 0:14:16.709
<v Speaker 2>Especially mobilizing that many people who were already kind of

0:14:16.770 --> 0:14:19.570
<v Speaker 2>disillusioned with politics, giving them that sort of hope and

0:14:19.590 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 2>then having that hope be ripped away And then those

0:14:21.900 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 2>people who maybe, some of them who even still want

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:28.820
<v Speaker 2>to be politically engaged, the Jackson campaign is not letting

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 2>them touch the campaign with a 10-foot pole, which you

0:14:30.540 --> 0:14:33.780
<v Speaker 2>could maybe understand their reasons for. But there's a lot

0:14:33.820 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 2>of grassroots, very working-class-oriented activists who want to be involved

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:42.060
<v Speaker 2>in some way that are not being tapped.

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:14:42.700 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 2>And as strong as Plattner's campaign was, it was because

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 2>it was built on the work that they were doing.

0:14:47.180 --> 0:14:47.370
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:14:47.550 --> 0:14:50.310
<v Speaker 2>Not just him as a person. Yeah. So those are

0:14:50.350 --> 0:14:52.110
<v Speaker 2>sort of complicating factors in this race.

0:14:52.610 --> 0:14:55.950
<v Speaker 3>And you know what's a complicating factor in this podcast episode, Garrison?

0:14:56.090 --> 0:14:57.869
<v Speaker 2>The fact that we have to pivot to ads in

0:14:57.890 --> 0:14:59.810
<v Speaker 2>order to pay the bills. We have to pivot to

0:14:59.890 --> 0:15:00.470
<v Speaker 2>ads right now.

0:15:00.530 --> 0:15:00.710
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:15:00.890 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. That is a complicating factor in our lives. And

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:14.900
<v Speaker 2>we're back.

0:15:15.580 --> 0:15:18.550
<v Speaker 3>How do you feel about North Carolina, Robert? Of the Carolinas,

0:15:18.690 --> 0:15:19.770
<v Speaker 3>definitely my favorite.

0:15:20.530 --> 0:15:22.490
<v Speaker 2>That's so true, actually.

0:15:22.590 --> 0:15:26.910
<v Speaker 3>Easily the best of the Carolinas. Top 50% Carolina. Sorry

0:15:26.930 --> 0:15:29.380
<v Speaker 3>to everyone in South Carolina. I'm not apologizing. I did

0:15:29.410 --> 0:15:32.020
<v Speaker 3>not apologize, South Carolina. You need to know that.

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, North Carolina could also be one of the states

0:15:36.300 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 2>that flip for the Dems. Former Democratic Governor Roy Cooper

0:15:40.860 --> 0:15:45.810
<v Speaker 2>is facing former RNC Chair Michael Watley. What a name.

0:15:46.250 --> 0:15:49.740
<v Speaker 2>Who is running to replace Republican Senator Tom Tillis.

0:15:50.250 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 3>Those are both silly names. Have some self-respect.

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:56.900
<v Speaker 2>God damn it. This race is leaning Democrat. This is

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:57.580
<v Speaker 2>not a toss-up.

0:15:57.720 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:15:58.260 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 2>Polls from late September have Cooper ahead 5 to 13 points. Yeah,

0:16:02.850 --> 0:16:06.450
<v Speaker 2>that's pretty good. And last week, a Republican super PAC

0:16:06.610 --> 0:16:09.130
<v Speaker 2>pulled $ 30 million of ad money out of the state

0:16:09.630 --> 0:16:13.980
<v Speaker 2>to use in other races. So... That's a sign that

0:16:14.060 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 2>at least even among some Republicans, they're kind of giving

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 2>up on this. Roy Cooper is a pretty strong candidate

0:16:19.940 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 2>for this state. I should say, as we're going through

0:16:23.700 --> 0:16:26.110
<v Speaker 2>all of these sort of candidates, this is not, it

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:29.770
<v Speaker 2>could happen here, endorsing any candidate just because they belong

0:16:29.790 --> 0:16:33.230
<v Speaker 2>to one party or another. Not our thing. I'm just

0:16:33.270 --> 0:16:35.770
<v Speaker 2>talking about this in terms of what the Democrats want

0:16:35.810 --> 0:16:38.030
<v Speaker 2>in order to take back power and the sort of

0:16:38.350 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 2>how these candidates relate to each state. Roy Cooper... is

0:16:42.180 --> 0:16:46.580
<v Speaker 2>a relatively liked figure in North Carolina. That is reflected

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 2>in the polling for this. His campaign is also helped

0:16:48.580 --> 0:16:50.510
<v Speaker 2>by the fact he's not going up against an incumbent.

0:16:50.530 --> 0:16:54.290
<v Speaker 2>He's not going up against someone who voters already are

0:16:54.310 --> 0:16:56.630
<v Speaker 2>familiar with, already like, who they just want to keep

0:16:56.670 --> 0:16:58.780
<v Speaker 2>in power. He's going up against a new guy, a

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:02.700
<v Speaker 2>former RNC chair. So this is one of those states

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:05.340
<v Speaker 2>where the Democrats will probably flip. You can kind of

0:17:05.420 --> 0:17:08.869
<v Speaker 2>count this on the four to five states needed to flip.

0:17:08.980 --> 0:17:11.449
<v Speaker 2>This is the most kind of certain one. There'd be

0:17:11.470 --> 0:17:14.410
<v Speaker 2>a massive polling error if it goes the other way

0:17:14.609 --> 0:17:18.190
<v Speaker 2>or some sort of fuckery. And just a total misread

0:17:18.770 --> 0:17:21.409
<v Speaker 2>of the situation on the ground. Now, one of the

0:17:21.430 --> 0:17:26.470
<v Speaker 2>more interesting kind of surprises is Alaska, which could also

0:17:26.630 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 2>flip for Democrats. The former Democratic congressman, Mary Peltola, is

0:17:31.500 --> 0:17:35.859
<v Speaker 2>going up against sitting Senator Dan Sullivan. Paltola is definitely

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:40.640
<v Speaker 2>running more as, like, a centrist. Very pro-fossil fuels. You're

0:17:40.820 --> 0:17:41.400
<v Speaker 2>in Alaska.

0:17:41.420 --> 0:17:41.870
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:17:42.570 --> 0:17:48.770
<v Speaker 2>Pro-gun, too. Pro-gun. Her campaign slogan is Fish Family Freedom.

0:17:49.390 --> 0:17:49.550
<v Speaker 7>Yep.

0:17:49.910 --> 0:17:50.470
<v Speaker 2>That makes sense.

0:17:50.910 --> 0:17:52.909
<v Speaker 3>Not a terrible slogan for running in Alaska.

0:17:52.950 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 2>Not bad for Alaska. And rather than attacking Republicans, a

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:00.859
<v Speaker 2>lot of her campaign messaging is focused on taking on, quote, D.C.,

0:18:01.550 --> 0:18:04.930
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's very much like Alaska versus D.C. Yeah. Yeah.

0:18:04.990 --> 0:18:07.970
<v Speaker 3>Corruption is a massive issue for the whole electorate. So

0:18:08.490 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 3>that makes sense. Like that's, yeah, kind of the obvious play.

0:18:12.060 --> 0:18:15.619
<v Speaker 2>And really prioritizing Alaska as like its own special interest

0:18:15.660 --> 0:18:19.580
<v Speaker 2>because it's so different from every other state. Part of

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:21.260
<v Speaker 2>Feltola's strategy is trying to, you know, is trying to

0:18:21.300 --> 0:18:25.149
<v Speaker 2>attract certain Republicans. So she's not really going hard against

0:18:25.330 --> 0:18:27.970
<v Speaker 2>Republicans per se, but attacking the sort of like D.C.

0:18:28.070 --> 0:18:31.649
<v Speaker 2>swamp establishment. That's that's that's her main strategy here. New

0:18:31.670 --> 0:18:35.859
<v Speaker 2>York Times-Siena poll from late September to early October has

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Peltola up seven points.

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:43.060
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's a pretty solid lead. Alaska's been wavering the

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:46.700
<v Speaker 3>last couple of elections between blue and red. So this

0:18:46.780 --> 0:18:50.500
<v Speaker 3>is not like a sea change, right? This is kind

0:18:50.540 --> 0:18:54.100
<v Speaker 3>of an incremental change in some of the And obviously,

0:18:54.540 --> 0:18:58.379
<v Speaker 3>the disaster that is this administration has pushed things further

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 3>along than I think it otherwise would be. But this

0:19:00.300 --> 0:19:01.980
<v Speaker 3>is it's been moving in this direction a while.

0:19:02.090 --> 0:19:02.350
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:04.989
<v Speaker 2>And like Alaska hasn't had a Democratic senator in like

0:19:05.010 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 2>almost 20 years. this would be a significant event if

0:19:08.340 --> 0:19:10.340
<v Speaker 2>this happened. Oh yeah, yeah, yeah. I didn't mean to

0:19:10.380 --> 0:19:11.020
<v Speaker 2>say it wouldn't.

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 3>I've just been like this, this pattern has been occurring

0:19:13.380 --> 0:19:15.400
<v Speaker 3>since before like Trump too.

0:19:15.700 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 9>Right.

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:20.780
<v Speaker 2>And obviously there's this general pattern of in the midterms, usually,

0:19:21.660 --> 0:19:24.300
<v Speaker 2>especially the house, but sometimes the Senate as well, shifts

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 2>to the opposition party. You know, this is like politics 101.

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:30.670
<v Speaker 2>This is a very basic pattern. And what we're looking

0:19:30.690 --> 0:19:32.850
<v Speaker 2>at is this, this could be even stronger this year

0:19:32.930 --> 0:19:35.369
<v Speaker 2>than some years previously, probably not as strong as 2018, but,

0:19:36.510 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 2>But taking back the Senate and the House would be huge,

0:19:40.060 --> 0:19:41.780
<v Speaker 2>especially because of how far they have to go in

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:45.239
<v Speaker 2>the Senate in order to retake it. Yeah. Now, the

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:47.730
<v Speaker 2>race in Alaska, this definitely used to lean Republican, right?

0:19:47.770 --> 0:19:49.970
<v Speaker 2>This was not seen to be a very competitive race.

0:19:50.700 --> 0:19:53.940
<v Speaker 2>But recently, this went to a toss-up, right? And now,

0:19:54.570 --> 0:19:57.850
<v Speaker 2>some models even have it leaning Democrat. So this is

0:19:57.890 --> 0:20:00.510
<v Speaker 2>one race where there's been a lot of movement. And J.D.

0:20:00.550 --> 0:20:05.690
<v Speaker 2>Vance was dropped into Alaska to campaign for Sullivan last week.

0:20:06.010 --> 0:20:08.109
<v Speaker 2>something that they may not have needed to do or

0:20:08.150 --> 0:20:11.110
<v Speaker 2>thought they needed to do a few months ago. But

0:20:11.330 --> 0:20:13.470
<v Speaker 2>now now this is competitive enough that they're sending in

0:20:13.490 --> 0:20:16.210
<v Speaker 2>the vice president. Will J.D. Vance actually help Republicans win

0:20:16.350 --> 0:20:20.300
<v Speaker 2>the state? That's that's certainly debatable. But I don't know

0:20:20.340 --> 0:20:22.700
<v Speaker 2>if I would be putting J.D. in as my pen.

0:20:22.740 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 2>That's the thing, right? I don't like it. Like, I

0:20:25.220 --> 0:20:26.100
<v Speaker 2>don't know who.

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 3>I put in as my pen shitter right now in

0:20:27.859 --> 0:20:30.350
<v Speaker 3>the Republican bench, but it would not advance would be

0:20:30.390 --> 0:20:31.609
<v Speaker 3>the bottom of my list.

0:20:32.650 --> 0:20:38.530
<v Speaker 2>Like, honestly, send in Fetterman. No, legitimately, yes. He'll do

0:20:38.650 --> 0:20:41.690
<v Speaker 2>better for you in this instance. Sending Fetterman to campaign

0:20:41.710 --> 0:20:45.859
<v Speaker 2>for the Republicans would be, I think, probably a smarter move. Yeah,

0:20:45.950 --> 0:20:49.360
<v Speaker 2>you could convince him to do it. What a nightmare.

0:20:49.619 --> 0:20:54.810
<v Speaker 3>What a horrible situation. It's it's things are really bad, buddy.

0:20:55.470 --> 0:20:59.090
<v Speaker 3>Things are really bad. I know when like we were

0:20:59.170 --> 0:21:02.230
<v Speaker 3>getting shot at by federal agents in Portland, things were bad,

0:21:02.270 --> 0:21:03.570
<v Speaker 3>but things are a lot darker.

0:21:03.590 --> 0:21:06.230
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, I'm about to get maybe shot at by

0:21:06.350 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 2>federal agents in like 20 minutes. So, yeah, because they

0:21:09.619 --> 0:21:11.740
<v Speaker 2>just shot a dude with an actual gun in New York.

0:21:11.780 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:21:12.580 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Time is a spiral.

0:21:13.859 --> 0:21:14.659
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:21:15.540 --> 0:21:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about Texas.

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Sure.

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:21.980
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm excited to talk about Texas because this is

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 3>the first time I get to be like a little

0:21:25.340 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 3>optimistic about more than like two Texas elections, actually.

0:21:29.140 --> 0:21:33.629
<v Speaker 2>So, yeah, I'm I'm excited. Let's talk about Talafrico. Talafrico.

0:21:36.270 --> 0:21:38.870
<v Speaker 2>In terms of the big, big question is Texas with

0:21:38.910 --> 0:21:43.540
<v Speaker 2>James Talarico going up against Kenny Pax, Ken Paxton. K-Pax,

0:21:43.619 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 2>as I like to call him. You probably didn't see

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:48.369
<v Speaker 2>that movie, Garrison. It's not good. No, no. I did

0:21:48.410 --> 0:21:51.250
<v Speaker 2>just see Out of Sight, the Steven Soderbergh movie. I

0:21:51.470 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 2>don't know if I've seen that one. From like the 90s.

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 2>It's like the proto Ocean's Eleven. Okay. It's the hottest

0:21:57.880 --> 0:22:00.820
<v Speaker 2>I've ever seen George Clooney. Oh, Cloon Tang. Okay. He

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:03.740
<v Speaker 2>plays like a serial bank robber. That's a good role

0:22:03.780 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 2>for him. Who keeps going to jail, prison, then he

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:09.629
<v Speaker 2>breaks out. And then it kind of cuts between a

0:22:09.650 --> 0:22:12.050
<v Speaker 2>few different timelines as he gets into a sort of

0:22:12.210 --> 0:22:15.909
<v Speaker 2>doomed romance with a federal marshal played by Jennifer Lopez.

0:22:16.510 --> 0:22:18.709
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I was going to say I've seen this movie

0:22:18.869 --> 0:22:21.870
<v Speaker 3>and then... Well, no, I have seen this movie with J-Lo. Yeah, yeah,

0:22:21.910 --> 0:22:23.869
<v Speaker 3>I have seen this movie. It's hard to tell because

0:22:23.910 --> 0:22:26.189
<v Speaker 3>like the first half of that description is like 18

0:22:26.190 --> 0:22:27.150
<v Speaker 3>different George Clooney movies.

0:22:27.190 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 2>Exactly. He's like a bank robber. He keeps going to prison. No,

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:34.740
<v Speaker 2>especially like the late 90s, early 2000s. This is like

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:37.730
<v Speaker 2>his role. He had this like on lock. Yeah. The

0:22:37.790 --> 0:22:40.830
<v Speaker 2>hottest bank robber you've ever seen. Yeah, people love a criminal.

0:22:41.550 --> 0:22:48.770
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of, Ken Paxton, not doing great in the polls. Yeah.

0:22:49.350 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 2>Marist and New York Times have Tallarico up six points

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 2>as of late September, with a recent Fox News poll

0:22:57.380 --> 0:23:04.150
<v Speaker 2>showing Tallarico at 51% to Paxton's 49%. Not good for

0:23:04.390 --> 0:23:09.379
<v Speaker 2>old Kay Pax. No. There's also this big enthusiasm gap

0:23:09.500 --> 0:23:17.500
<v Speaker 2>that the Fox News poll really focused on. Among MAGA Republicans, 64%

0:23:17.500 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 2>say they're extremely interested in the midterms. But for non-MAGA Republicans,

0:23:22.260 --> 0:23:25.830
<v Speaker 2>only 50% is extremely interested in the midterms. So that's

0:23:25.850 --> 0:23:30.950
<v Speaker 2>almost like a 15% gap among Republicans for Republicans. how

0:23:31.030 --> 0:23:34.129
<v Speaker 2>much they're invested in these midterms. And this difference does

0:23:34.150 --> 0:23:37.070
<v Speaker 2>not exist on the Democratic side. The Fox News polling

0:23:37.090 --> 0:23:40.119
<v Speaker 2>has Democrats broken down into two categories, similar to MAGA

0:23:40.140 --> 0:23:47.180
<v Speaker 2>or non-MAGA. They have DSA Democrats and non-DSA Democrats. Which

0:23:47.260 --> 0:23:50.260
<v Speaker 2>is funny on its face. DSA Democrats are at 68%,

0:23:50.260 --> 0:23:52.120
<v Speaker 2>non-DSA is at 67%. So basically no gap.

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:52.500
<v Speaker 10>Jeez.

0:23:57.030 --> 0:23:59.630
<v Speaker 3>And I think this has less to do with Tallarico's

0:23:59.710 --> 0:24:03.290
<v Speaker 3>specific characteristics as a candidate and everything to do with

0:24:03.310 --> 0:24:05.750
<v Speaker 3>the fact that Ken Paxton is the literal Christian devil.

0:24:05.810 --> 0:24:08.429
<v Speaker 2>Yes, he is Satan. And people want to see him beaten.

0:24:08.730 --> 0:24:09.050
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

0:24:11.210 --> 0:24:13.370
<v Speaker 2>But I mean, these numbers are not just interesting because

0:24:13.430 --> 0:24:16.210
<v Speaker 2>of the gap between MAGA and non-MAGA Republicans, but also

0:24:16.570 --> 0:24:21.290
<v Speaker 2>MAGA Republicans are at 64% for enthusiasm versus Democrats are

0:24:21.310 --> 0:24:25.790
<v Speaker 2>at 67, 68. So that's a few points ahead just

0:24:25.830 --> 0:24:30.250
<v Speaker 2>for enthusiasm. against the mega kind of hardcore. And the

0:24:30.270 --> 0:24:33.430
<v Speaker 2>other really worrying part of this for Republicans is that

0:24:33.650 --> 0:24:36.460
<v Speaker 2>out of the percent that say that they will vote,

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:38.590
<v Speaker 2>mega is at 76%, non-mega is at 65%. That's an 11% gap.

0:24:39.380 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 2>And similarly, this gap does not exist for the Democrats,

0:24:41.100 --> 0:24:42.540
<v Speaker 2>DSA or otherwise. That is really interesting.

0:24:51.580 --> 0:24:54.780
<v Speaker 3>And it says a lot about MAGA Republicans that they

0:24:54.820 --> 0:24:58.219
<v Speaker 3>have just completely given up any kind of like moral.

0:24:58.140 --> 0:25:00.899
<v Speaker 2>Standards for their candidates. Do not care. Does not matter

0:25:00.940 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 2>at all.

0:25:02.020 --> 0:25:04.700
<v Speaker 3>In a lot of the country, Republicans and MAGA Republicans

0:25:04.910 --> 0:25:07.550
<v Speaker 3>are synonyms, but that's not the case in a lot

0:25:07.609 --> 0:25:10.970
<v Speaker 3>of Texas. Like Texas has a lot of Bush Republicans still. Yeah.

0:25:11.030 --> 0:25:13.550
<v Speaker 2>I mean, like those people still likely are going to

0:25:13.950 --> 0:25:17.930
<v Speaker 2>vote for Trump in the presidential election. Absolutely. But oversimplifying their,

0:25:18.130 --> 0:25:21.729
<v Speaker 2>like all of their politics to MAGA is, I think

0:25:21.770 --> 0:25:24.310
<v Speaker 2>it's a sort of theoretical mistake. It's a mistake.

0:25:24.750 --> 0:25:27.790
<v Speaker 3>Those people are not, some of them are, because there's

0:25:27.830 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 3>a chunk of Republicans that look like they're going to Tallarico, but.

0:25:30.540 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 2>It's not a huge chunk.

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 3>It's more that some of them just aren't going to

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 3>vote or are going to put in like a protest candidate.

0:25:36.500 --> 0:25:38.830
<v Speaker 3>You know, I've read some interviews to that stance with

0:25:38.850 --> 0:25:41.090
<v Speaker 3>like Republican voters who are on sort of the Bush

0:25:41.109 --> 0:25:42.790
<v Speaker 3>Republican side of things being like, I'm just going to

0:25:43.369 --> 0:25:45.310
<v Speaker 3>put in a protest vote or something, which in this

0:25:45.410 --> 0:25:48.869
<v Speaker 3>instance is just as good as voting for Tallarico in

0:25:48.910 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 3>terms of stopping Paxton from winning again, because the Republicans

0:25:52.340 --> 0:25:54.640
<v Speaker 3>who have some degree of moral fiber left are also

0:25:54.700 --> 0:25:56.020
<v Speaker 3>disgusted with Ken Paxton.

0:25:56.060 --> 0:25:58.740
<v Speaker 2>He's gross. On that topic. I don't know if you

0:25:58.780 --> 0:26:03.810
<v Speaker 2>saw this. Ken Paxton's ex-wife. who is a Texas state senator,

0:26:04.850 --> 0:26:08.210
<v Speaker 2>was tapped for an election ad where she does not

0:26:08.369 --> 0:26:12.500
<v Speaker 2>even say her ex-husband's name, but just begs people to

0:26:12.580 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 2>vote for the quote Republican ticket to stay on the team.

0:26:17.020 --> 0:26:18.060
<v Speaker 2>I want to play the ad.

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:19.139
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:26:19.220 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 2>God, this is great.

0:26:20.369 --> 0:26:22.210
<v Speaker 11>I'm Texas Senator Angela Paxton.

0:26:22.790 --> 0:26:24.149
<v Speaker 2>People have asked my thoughts about.

0:26:23.990 --> 0:26:27.290
<v Speaker 12>This election and turns out I have some. Let's talk

0:26:27.350 --> 0:26:28.270
<v Speaker 12>about the elephant.

0:26:27.990 --> 0:26:28.210
<v Speaker 10>In the room.

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 11>In a general election, it's not as much about the

0:26:31.619 --> 0:26:32.860
<v Speaker 11>individual players on the team.

0:26:33.220 --> 0:26:35.780
<v Speaker 12>It's about getting the whole team across the finish line.

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:39.199
<v Speaker 11>Either we hold every Republican seat or we hand the

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:42.590
<v Speaker 11>future of Texas to the other team. That's why I'm

0:26:42.630 --> 0:26:46.030
<v Speaker 11>voting for the Republican ticket on November 3rd. Let's hold

0:26:46.070 --> 0:26:47.190
<v Speaker 11>the line together.

0:26:47.770 --> 0:26:50.869
<v Speaker 2>Texas PAC is responsible for the content of this advertising. Rousing.

0:26:50.950 --> 0:26:53.470
<v Speaker 3>Won't even say his name. Crazy stuff.

0:26:54.369 --> 0:26:59.360
<v Speaker 2>Wow. Wild stuff. Hold your nose and vote for my

0:26:59.540 --> 0:27:02.270
<v Speaker 2>shitty ex, the psychopath. Especially because she starts by saying,

0:27:02.290 --> 0:27:05.310
<v Speaker 2>let's address the elephant in the room. And then doesn't.

0:27:05.550 --> 0:27:07.210
<v Speaker 2>Does not at all. Does not address the elephant.

0:27:07.490 --> 0:27:10.090
<v Speaker 3>Can't bring herself to say his name.

0:27:10.390 --> 0:27:12.730
<v Speaker 2>Oh my God, that's amazing. It's one of the most

0:27:12.810 --> 0:27:15.869
<v Speaker 2>incredible political ads I've ever seen. Almost as good as,

0:27:16.170 --> 0:27:19.340
<v Speaker 2>we may as well play this one. This is technically

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 2>a House ad. Unfortunately, we're going to drop it here

0:27:22.380 --> 0:27:24.739
<v Speaker 2>in the Senate section. But in terms of talking about

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 2>political ads. This is an ad running in Ohio in

0:27:28.660 --> 0:27:32.540
<v Speaker 2>response to a series of anti-trans ads that the Republicans

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 2>have been blasting in the airwaves.

0:27:35.330 --> 0:27:36.210
<v Speaker 8>Seen these ads?

0:27:36.490 --> 0:27:37.930
<v Speaker 2>They're a complete lie.

0:27:38.230 --> 0:27:41.250
<v Speaker 8>Records show not only is this woman actually from Texas,

0:27:41.510 --> 0:27:46.400
<v Speaker 8>she didn't have any surgery as He protected men who

0:27:46.460 --> 0:27:49.879
<v Speaker 8>abused young girls by voting in the Senate to block

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:53.619
<v Speaker 8>the release of the Epstein files. Maybe that's because Husted

0:27:53.660 --> 0:27:56.940
<v Speaker 8>took one hundred and sixteen thousand dollars from associates of

0:27:57.020 --> 0:28:01.290
<v Speaker 8>Jeffrey Epstein. Ten times more than any other senator. John

0:28:01.330 --> 0:28:02.869
<v Speaker 8>Husted should be ashamed.

0:28:03.050 --> 0:28:04.970
<v Speaker 13>I'm sure Brown and I approve this message.

0:28:05.250 --> 0:28:07.650
<v Speaker 2>It's that easy. It's that easy, folks. Yeah.

0:28:08.390 --> 0:28:10.170
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah.

0:28:10.230 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 2>The ads made for you, really. If the Republicans want

0:28:13.100 --> 0:28:17.010
<v Speaker 2>to make, quote unquote, protecting young girls the center of

0:28:17.050 --> 0:28:17.770
<v Speaker 2>their politics.

0:28:17.810 --> 0:28:18.010
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:28:18.450 --> 0:28:22.050
<v Speaker 2>They fucking handed you the silver platter. The Epstein's right there. Yeah.

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 3>It's frustrating because Tallarico has fucking recently made some kind

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 3>of bows to the anti-trans kids in sports panic shit,

0:28:31.859 --> 0:28:33.740
<v Speaker 3>which was very wishy-washy.

0:28:33.780 --> 0:28:37.330
<v Speaker 2>Wishy-washy, flippy-floppy, not standing firmly where he should be, certainly.

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:40.050
<v Speaker 3>No, and I don't think that's helping him. Honestly, I

0:28:40.070 --> 0:28:42.090
<v Speaker 3>think the primary thing helping him is that Ken Paxton

0:28:42.150 --> 0:28:43.670
<v Speaker 3>is an abominable monster.

0:28:44.310 --> 0:28:47.910
<v Speaker 2>He's awful. He's the devil. Like.

0:28:49.110 --> 0:28:51.150
<v Speaker 3>And to run against the devil, you simply have to

0:28:51.270 --> 0:28:52.230
<v Speaker 3>not be the devil.

0:28:52.450 --> 0:28:53.900
<v Speaker 2>I guess it's harder than that. Trump won.

0:28:54.260 --> 0:28:56.220
<v Speaker 3>And also offer people real things as well. I think

0:28:56.440 --> 0:28:58.580
<v Speaker 3>I'm not being fair to the campaign. Like he has

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:00.010
<v Speaker 3>run a much better campaign than that.

0:29:00.230 --> 0:29:02.590
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm also just saying like in general, I think

0:29:02.610 --> 0:29:05.670
<v Speaker 2>the sort of running as just not Trump. Yes. That's

0:29:05.710 --> 0:29:08.050
<v Speaker 2>not one as a strategy. That's not enough.

0:29:08.810 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 3>Tallarico has worked hard to portray himself as, other than

0:29:12.460 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 3>being a Democrat, like a Texas Christian that Texans can

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 3>find respectable, right?

0:29:19.940 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:24.790
<v Speaker 2>We'll talk a little bit more about Texas, but first,

0:29:25.510 --> 0:29:26.470
<v Speaker 2>here are some ads.

0:29:37.420 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 3>And we're back. I did want to mention one more

0:29:40.500 --> 0:29:44.430
<v Speaker 3>thing about the KPAX campaign. Paxton's Senate campaign recently put

0:29:44.590 --> 0:29:48.550
<v Speaker 3>out a series of missing posters demanding proof of life

0:29:48.630 --> 0:29:51.580
<v Speaker 3>for James Tallarico. Oh, yeah. A little less than two

0:29:51.630 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 3>weeks ago, he took sick with the flu. He got

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:58.150
<v Speaker 3>diagnosed on September 30th. And after that, he had to

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:01.300
<v Speaker 3>like attend. He attended like a Hispanic Business Council meeting

0:30:01.540 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 3>via video that had been scheduled to attend in person.

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:04.420
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:06.590
<v Speaker 3>He told attendees, I'm running a fever and I'm at

0:30:06.620 --> 0:30:08.209
<v Speaker 3>my most contagious right now. And I guess I've been

0:30:08.230 --> 0:30:10.010
<v Speaker 3>shaking too many hands on the campaign trail. So I

0:30:10.050 --> 0:30:12.290
<v Speaker 3>want to keep everybody safe. He stated that if he

0:30:12.310 --> 0:30:15.010
<v Speaker 3>passed his illness to somebody's grandmother or baby, he couldn't

0:30:15.070 --> 0:30:19.850
<v Speaker 3>live with himself. Totally reasonable thing. But Paxton's campaign put

0:30:19.910 --> 0:30:23.570
<v Speaker 3>out this like old West looking like wanted poster of

0:30:23.610 --> 0:30:26.410
<v Speaker 3>him demanding proof of life because he's been absent 12

0:30:26.410 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 3>days from the campaign trail.

0:30:28.340 --> 0:30:32.460
<v Speaker 2>They're doing the fucking Mitch McConnell bullshit. Yeah, it's it's nonsense.

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 3>He's been making statements. He's just not. He's sick.

0:30:36.340 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 2>That happens.

0:30:37.300 --> 0:30:39.500
<v Speaker 3>He's booked for a CNN town hall on October 14th.

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:43.560
<v Speaker 3>There's been a pretty bad illness going around. I think

0:30:43.580 --> 0:30:44.540
<v Speaker 3>there's probably a few.

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:47.340
<v Speaker 2>There is a cold. There is a COVID strain.

0:30:47.440 --> 0:30:49.390
<v Speaker 3>And he's young for politics, but he's also at the

0:30:49.490 --> 0:30:51.030
<v Speaker 3>age in which flus and shit hit yard.

0:30:51.750 --> 0:30:54.690
<v Speaker 2>He's not a baby. I did see a clip from

0:30:54.870 --> 0:30:57.450
<v Speaker 2>the president in the past few days talking about this.

0:30:57.510 --> 0:31:01.100
<v Speaker 2>And he said that Paxton's hiding because he's been forced

0:31:01.140 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 2>to eat meat when running. And so he's been vomiting

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:08.969
<v Speaker 2>up meat all the time. And that's why he's not... What? Non-visible. Donald, what?

0:31:09.730 --> 0:31:14.970
<v Speaker 2>What the fuck? Because Trump just learned what veganism is. Yeah.

0:31:15.050 --> 0:31:17.170
<v Speaker 2>And he says it really funny. And it's been like

0:31:17.210 --> 0:31:20.430
<v Speaker 2>the main thing he's been attacking Talafrico with is that

0:31:20.450 --> 0:31:21.450
<v Speaker 2>the fact that he's like.

0:31:22.020 --> 0:31:25.140
<v Speaker 3>Alleged vegan, right? Because he's not a vegan.

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:25.740
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 3>No, even if you were a vegan, if you wanted

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:31.300
<v Speaker 3>to win a major election in Texas, you would lie

0:31:31.360 --> 0:31:31.900
<v Speaker 3>about that.

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:31:32.300 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 3>That's almost more of a disqualifying factor in Texas politics

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:36.380
<v Speaker 3>than being a Democrat.

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:36.540
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

0:31:37.950 --> 0:31:39.970
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, that's been the main thing Trump's been trying

0:31:40.010 --> 0:31:44.690
<v Speaker 2>to attack Talifrico for is this alleged vegan status and

0:31:44.750 --> 0:31:47.970
<v Speaker 2>the idea that Talifrico is having to fake being a

0:31:48.050 --> 0:31:51.750
<v Speaker 2>meat eater and has gotten sick from eating meat and

0:31:52.010 --> 0:31:56.020
<v Speaker 2>is thus vomiting. And that's why he's out of the spotlight. Yeah,

0:31:56.080 --> 0:32:00.540
<v Speaker 2>of course. That's definitely it. Simple, basic stuff. Politics 101.

0:32:00.540 --> 0:32:05.220
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, politics something or other. The gubernatorial election is also

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:08.830
<v Speaker 3>going to be this year for Texas. And this is

0:32:08.890 --> 0:32:11.510
<v Speaker 3>like the first time in a while that it's looked

0:32:11.950 --> 0:32:18.190
<v Speaker 3>actually kind of competitive. Gina Hinojosa is running against Greg Abbott,

0:32:18.430 --> 0:32:21.950
<v Speaker 3>who is. right up there with Ken Paxton in terms

0:32:21.970 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 3>of being an evil scumbag. Like he is just a monster,

0:32:24.860 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 3>although a much more popular monster than Ken Paxton is

0:32:28.020 --> 0:32:32.060
<v Speaker 3>with voters. But even so, Hinojosa is giving him a

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:35.700
<v Speaker 3>run for his money. Right now, the real clear politics

0:32:36.090 --> 0:32:41.410
<v Speaker 3>average trend has Abbott at 48.1 and Hinojosa at 46.4.

0:32:41.410 --> 0:32:45.530
<v Speaker 3>But there are several polls that have Hinojosa ahead, including

0:32:45.550 --> 0:32:48.450
<v Speaker 3>YouGov and The New York Times Siena poll has her

0:32:48.510 --> 0:32:52.580
<v Speaker 3>up by three. Marist has her up by three. Recon

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:54.780
<v Speaker 3>MR at Siena has her up by four. Now, obviously,

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:57.260
<v Speaker 3>there are some like Telemundo has Abbott up by seven.

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 3>Fox has Abbott up by five. And there are definitely

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 3>more polls that have Abbott ahead. But this looks close

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:06.270
<v Speaker 3>enough that like it's being considered by a lot of

0:33:06.290 --> 0:33:06.870
<v Speaker 3>people to be a.

0:33:06.890 --> 0:33:09.570
<v Speaker 2>Toss up or close to a toss up. It's competitive.

0:33:10.070 --> 0:33:10.850
<v Speaker 2>It's competitive.

0:33:10.950 --> 0:33:14.150
<v Speaker 3>Like she really could pull it off. I'm not saying

0:33:14.190 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 3>I think that's the likeliest. thing to happen here because

0:33:17.980 --> 0:33:20.780
<v Speaker 3>this is still Texas. And I just can't be that

0:33:20.940 --> 0:33:24.550
<v Speaker 3>optimistic about the gubernatorial race. But I would love it

0:33:24.810 --> 0:33:27.790
<v Speaker 3>if Gina could unseat Greg Abbott because he is just

0:33:27.870 --> 0:33:28.830
<v Speaker 3>a fucking monster.

0:33:29.470 --> 0:33:32.630
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, she's running a really good campaign.

0:33:32.810 --> 0:33:33.010
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:33:33.050 --> 0:33:36.350
<v Speaker 3>She's currently in the House of Representatives representing the 49th District.

0:33:36.630 --> 0:33:39.470
<v Speaker 2>The Texas House or the federal? In the Texas House.

0:33:39.530 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 2>She's a state legislator. The Texas House.

0:33:41.130 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 9>Okay.

0:33:41.710 --> 0:33:42.300
<v Speaker 2>Got it. Yeah.

0:33:42.390 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 3>And she worked for the AFL prior to that. She's

0:33:45.300 --> 0:33:47.300
<v Speaker 3>been a lawyer for quite some time. She was part

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:50.460
<v Speaker 3>of the legal team that sued Tom DeLay. The Hinojos

0:33:50.500 --> 0:33:52.780
<v Speaker 3>are like a prominent North Texas family. I went to

0:33:52.820 --> 0:33:55.260
<v Speaker 3>school with one of her, I don't know if it

0:33:55.300 --> 0:33:57.610
<v Speaker 3>was her kid or like a cousin or something, but

0:33:57.650 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 3>like the Hino Yoses are like a prominent wealthy family in,

0:34:00.700 --> 0:34:01.420
<v Speaker 3>in North Texas.

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:01.940
<v Speaker 14>Hmm.

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:05.810
<v Speaker 3>So, It's very interesting that she's and I haven't enough

0:34:05.850 --> 0:34:08.510
<v Speaker 3>of a deep dive. I think a lot of what's

0:34:08.550 --> 0:34:11.780
<v Speaker 3>helping her is just the general unpopularity of the Republican

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:14.839
<v Speaker 3>Party right now. And I do kind of suspect that

0:34:14.900 --> 0:34:17.540
<v Speaker 3>Greg Abbott is being dragged down a little bit by

0:34:17.580 --> 0:34:21.660
<v Speaker 3>Ken Paxton, too, like that, just the general the overall trend.

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:24.239
<v Speaker 3>And also, like, I think he knows is probably benefiting

0:34:24.300 --> 0:34:27.239
<v Speaker 3>from some of the enthusiasm that Tallarico's campaign has helped

0:34:27.260 --> 0:34:27.879
<v Speaker 3>to generate, too.

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 9>Right.

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:30.540
<v Speaker 3>Obviously, she's also made a lot of really good moves

0:34:30.600 --> 0:34:33.489
<v Speaker 3>on her own that have increased enthusiasm. But in general,

0:34:33.989 --> 0:34:37.770
<v Speaker 3>I think because Texas looks competitive in a way it

0:34:37.850 --> 0:34:41.129
<v Speaker 3>really hasn't, it's benefiting probably both candidates a lot. Just

0:34:41.150 --> 0:34:43.730
<v Speaker 3>that that is bringing more people out to volunteer. It's

0:34:43.770 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 3>bringing more people out to donate. Just creating this impression

0:34:47.060 --> 0:34:49.700
<v Speaker 3>that like this might be a winnable fight has done

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 3>a lot.

0:34:50.380 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 3>So that's one to keep watch on. Again, I would

0:34:53.580 --> 0:34:56.719
<v Speaker 3>say a gun to my head. Abbott's still probably going

0:34:56.739 --> 0:34:59.320
<v Speaker 3>to eke out a victory, but I can't say definitely.

0:34:59.850 --> 0:35:03.350
<v Speaker 2>Right. Yeah, he does have that sort of incumbent advantage.

0:35:03.370 --> 0:35:07.660
<v Speaker 2>And that's another factor with the Tallarico-Paxton thing. Paxton does

0:35:07.700 --> 0:35:10.259
<v Speaker 2>not have that incumbent advantage. I think Corbyn would be

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:13.219
<v Speaker 2>a much harder candidate for Tallarico to beat.

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:15.500
<v Speaker 3>This wouldn't be an election if Corbyn had won the primary.

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:19.440
<v Speaker 2>That's why we were sort of softly excited when Paxton won.

0:35:19.780 --> 0:35:23.540
<v Speaker 2>Because as dangerous as it is for Paxton to potentially

0:35:23.580 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 2>be in the Senate... He has a much bigger attack

0:35:27.739 --> 0:35:33.820
<v Speaker 2>radius or attack surface than Cornyn does. Another one of

0:35:33.860 --> 0:35:36.489
<v Speaker 2>these kind of long shots, actually, I would say the

0:35:36.550 --> 0:35:40.049
<v Speaker 2>biggest long shot for a flip is in Florida with

0:35:40.090 --> 0:35:44.350
<v Speaker 2>progressive Democrat Angie Nixon running against Ashley Moody, who took

0:35:44.630 --> 0:35:48.650
<v Speaker 2>Rubio's seat. The best poll for Nixon as of a

0:35:48.700 --> 0:35:52.810
<v Speaker 2>few days ago is by Florida Politics, and according to them,

0:35:52.910 --> 0:35:56.870
<v Speaker 2>the race is at a tie, 45%. But a recent

0:35:56.890 --> 0:36:01.660
<v Speaker 2>poll from Stetson University has Moody leading 51 to 40,

0:36:01.660 --> 0:36:05.560
<v Speaker 2>so 11 points. A YouGov poll from late September to

0:36:05.620 --> 0:36:08.820
<v Speaker 2>early October has Moody five points ahead, with 5% of

0:36:08.860 --> 0:36:13.259
<v Speaker 2>likely voters still undecided. Though, actually, as of just a

0:36:13.280 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 2>few hours ago, as of recording, we're recording this on

0:36:16.180 --> 0:36:21.489
<v Speaker 2>Thursday night, Florida Politics did another poll, which shows Moody

0:36:21.590 --> 0:36:26.530
<v Speaker 2>at 47% and Angie Nixon at 45% within margin of error.

0:36:27.010 --> 0:36:31.470
<v Speaker 2>So a slight difference from the last poll that had

0:36:31.530 --> 0:36:35.260
<v Speaker 2>them tied. This is one of those races that the Democrats,

0:36:35.700 --> 0:36:38.900
<v Speaker 2>as the DNC, is not actually expecting Nixon to win.

0:36:39.040 --> 0:36:41.759
<v Speaker 2>They're not really pumping much money in, or really any

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:46.230
<v Speaker 2>money in. They're not helping. All of this is the

0:36:46.270 --> 0:36:49.610
<v Speaker 2>result of just Nixon being a really good politician. The

0:36:49.650 --> 0:36:52.910
<v Speaker 2>fact that the race is this close. And the Nixons

0:36:52.930 --> 0:36:55.550
<v Speaker 2>are sort of like sleeper candidates. I was not familiar

0:36:55.570 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 2>with Nixon until the primary. Since then, I've watched videos

0:36:59.560 --> 0:37:02.790
<v Speaker 2>of her working in the state house. from these past

0:37:02.830 --> 0:37:07.129
<v Speaker 2>few years and then campaign appearances, she is great. She

0:37:07.250 --> 0:37:11.430
<v Speaker 2>is really good. A really clear communicator of working class issues,

0:37:11.550 --> 0:37:14.859
<v Speaker 2>issues of impacting the black community in Florida, right? This

0:37:14.900 --> 0:37:16.759
<v Speaker 2>Florida is a state we often like reduced to kind

0:37:16.780 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 2>of the worst of the worst people, but there's a

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:23.180
<v Speaker 2>lot of like good people in Florida as well. They

0:37:23.200 --> 0:37:27.290
<v Speaker 2>just haven't been represented in, in politics for almost, almost

0:37:27.330 --> 0:37:28.310
<v Speaker 2>as long as I've been alive. Yeah.

0:37:28.790 --> 0:37:29.009
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

0:37:29.370 --> 0:37:29.790
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:37:29.910 --> 0:37:32.750
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it gets forgotten, but there's like a reason

0:37:32.810 --> 0:37:35.569
<v Speaker 3>why the 2000 election hinged on Florida. And it was

0:37:35.590 --> 0:37:36.870
<v Speaker 3>because it was really close.

0:37:37.730 --> 0:37:39.450
<v Speaker 2>And I'm really interested to see what the results of

0:37:39.489 --> 0:37:41.620
<v Speaker 2>this race is, because this will indicate kind of how

0:37:41.660 --> 0:37:44.660
<v Speaker 2>much Trump is hurting the Republicans. If it's like a really,

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:47.660
<v Speaker 2>really close race, if the results are really close. And

0:37:47.700 --> 0:37:50.200
<v Speaker 2>it will also point to Nixon's strength as a candidate.

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:53.870
<v Speaker 2>And I'm interested to watch what she does after this election,

0:37:54.190 --> 0:37:56.989
<v Speaker 2>whether or not she wins. Now, of course, there's the

0:37:57.030 --> 0:38:00.350
<v Speaker 2>other close race, which is in Michigan, which currently leans

0:38:00.390 --> 0:38:04.110
<v Speaker 2>Democrat with Abdul El-Sayed on average, polling about 3% ahead

0:38:04.290 --> 0:38:08.850
<v Speaker 2>of former Republican Congressman Mike Rogers. A Mars poll from

0:38:08.870 --> 0:38:12.830
<v Speaker 2>late September has El-Sayed at 51 to Rogers 44, a

0:38:13.250 --> 0:38:17.319
<v Speaker 2>seven point lead. That's El-Sayed's most favorable poll. A New

0:38:17.340 --> 0:38:20.440
<v Speaker 2>York Times Siena poll from mid-September shows El-Sayed up five points.

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:24.710
<v Speaker 2>A Fox poll has him up one point. If Abdul wins,

0:38:25.090 --> 0:38:28.390
<v Speaker 2>Dems could hold on to this seat, strengthening their chances

0:38:28.830 --> 0:38:30.980
<v Speaker 2>of controlling the Senate. But this would not be a flip.

0:38:31.380 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 2>So this is something that they really need to hold

0:38:33.120 --> 0:38:35.700
<v Speaker 2>on to in order to have a chance. But this

0:38:35.719 --> 0:38:37.379
<v Speaker 2>will not go towards the sort of four to five

0:38:37.420 --> 0:38:41.120
<v Speaker 2>seats they need in order to flip. Before we close,

0:38:41.160 --> 0:38:42.299
<v Speaker 2>I do want to just mention a few of the

0:38:42.340 --> 0:38:45.610
<v Speaker 2>sort of underlying factors that could be influencing this election.

0:38:46.230 --> 0:38:49.029
<v Speaker 2>One of the big ones just is Trump and how

0:38:49.070 --> 0:38:51.930
<v Speaker 2>much everyone hates him. He has a 36% approval rating.

0:38:53.570 --> 0:38:58.180
<v Speaker 2>which is the lowest pre-midterm approval rating in 50 years. Yeah,

0:38:58.219 --> 0:39:02.180
<v Speaker 2>that makes sense. Not good. Not great for the Republicans.

0:39:02.500 --> 0:39:04.920
<v Speaker 2>Not what you'd want, yeah. Not what you would want.

0:39:05.040 --> 0:39:07.460
<v Speaker 2>And remember when I was talking about the enthusiasm gap

0:39:07.620 --> 0:39:11.709
<v Speaker 2>that the Fox poll was showing? The latest KFF health

0:39:11.750 --> 0:39:15.250
<v Speaker 2>tracking poll, it's from the organization formerly known as Kaiser

0:39:15.270 --> 0:39:20.030
<v Speaker 2>Family Foundation. They found a very large enthusiasm gap between

0:39:20.090 --> 0:39:24.060
<v Speaker 2>parties in their last poll with Democratic voters... Much more

0:39:24.100 --> 0:39:26.660
<v Speaker 2>likely than Republican voters to say they're, quote, more motivated

0:39:26.780 --> 0:39:32.120
<v Speaker 2>to vote this year. Way more than usual. It's 63%

0:39:32.120 --> 0:39:37.339
<v Speaker 2>to 38%. That's a huge gap. The cost of healthcare

0:39:37.570 --> 0:39:43.270
<v Speaker 2>and gas tie as voters' top affordability worries. A quarter

0:39:43.469 --> 0:39:45.950
<v Speaker 2>of respondents said that they are very worried about affording

0:39:46.130 --> 0:39:51.069
<v Speaker 2>each ahead of food, utilities, and housing. So 25% said

0:39:51.110 --> 0:39:54.450
<v Speaker 2>they were very worried about affording health care. 25% said

0:39:54.690 --> 0:39:58.270
<v Speaker 2>they're very worried about affording gas. So that's the tie.

0:39:58.690 --> 0:40:03.700
<v Speaker 2>It's 50% of the concern. It's those two. The Democratic

0:40:03.719 --> 0:40:06.259
<v Speaker 2>Party has a clear edge over the Republican Party on

0:40:06.400 --> 0:40:09.200
<v Speaker 2>who voters trust to handle many top issues in the election,

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:13.239
<v Speaker 2>including cost of health care. 42% of respondents trust the

0:40:13.260 --> 0:40:16.770
<v Speaker 2>Democrats more on these issues. For cost of living, 39%

0:40:16.770 --> 0:40:23.799
<v Speaker 2>of respondents trust Democrats more, going to 25% for the Republicans.

0:40:24.380 --> 0:40:26.950
<v Speaker 2>And the cost of living was the top issue for

0:40:27.030 --> 0:40:31.570
<v Speaker 2>both Democrat and independent voters, while Republican voters wanted candidates

0:40:31.610 --> 0:40:36.090
<v Speaker 2>to discuss, quote, fraud. That's the big issue for Republicans

0:40:36.150 --> 0:40:38.450
<v Speaker 2>right now. This is, you know, J.D. Vance's task force,

0:40:38.489 --> 0:40:41.250
<v Speaker 2>the post kind of doge thing, is they're really obsessed

0:40:41.270 --> 0:40:44.870
<v Speaker 2>with this idea of fraud, and not really the type

0:40:44.930 --> 0:40:48.250
<v Speaker 2>of fraud that Robert or I would talk about. You know,

0:40:48.430 --> 0:40:52.239
<v Speaker 2>I think Everyone's pretty familiar with how much we're all

0:40:52.260 --> 0:40:56.040
<v Speaker 2>being ripped off all the time. Scam culture is huge.

0:40:56.080 --> 0:41:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Corporate fraud. The only culture. It's everything, right? And that's

0:41:00.700 --> 0:41:03.960
<v Speaker 2>not what Republicans are interested in. They are wanting to

0:41:04.040 --> 0:41:06.540
<v Speaker 2>kick people off public benefits, right? That's the type of

0:41:06.600 --> 0:41:10.259
<v Speaker 2>fraud that they are mostly interested in. To close, the

0:41:10.320 --> 0:41:13.920
<v Speaker 2>most interesting part about this KFF poll, though, is the

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:18.459
<v Speaker 2>numbers around Medicare for all. Quote, two thirds of the public, 66%,

0:41:18.460 --> 0:41:21.900
<v Speaker 2>said they favor Medicare for All, the highest share KFF

0:41:21.960 --> 0:41:26.870
<v Speaker 2>has recorded since it began polling the idea in 2016. And,

0:41:27.230 --> 0:41:31.810
<v Speaker 2>this is the really crazy part, quote, about half, 52%,

0:41:31.810 --> 0:41:34.730
<v Speaker 2>said they would favor Medicare for All if it eliminated

0:41:35.050 --> 0:41:39.719
<v Speaker 2>private health insurance companies, while 47% oppose. That is a

0:41:39.800 --> 0:41:44.020
<v Speaker 2>huge change from like five years ago. This has been

0:41:44.040 --> 0:41:46.840
<v Speaker 2>the biggest kind of protest against Medicare for All is

0:41:46.860 --> 0:41:48.839
<v Speaker 2>the idea that it would take away your private health care.

0:41:49.260 --> 0:41:52.580
<v Speaker 2>When respondents get told this in polling, historically, we've seen

0:41:52.620 --> 0:41:55.460
<v Speaker 2>support for Medicare for All take a big dip. This

0:41:55.520 --> 0:41:58.640
<v Speaker 2>is the first time a majority of respondents have said

0:41:58.660 --> 0:42:01.839
<v Speaker 2>they would still support Medicare for All if it took

0:42:01.890 --> 0:42:05.140
<v Speaker 2>away private health care. To quote KFF, quote, This marks

0:42:05.200 --> 0:42:08.279
<v Speaker 2>a departure from when KFF last asked this question in

0:42:08.360 --> 0:42:11.900
<v Speaker 2>October 2020, when the prospect of eliminating private health insurance

0:42:11.940 --> 0:42:14.750
<v Speaker 2>companies led to lower support for Medicare for All at

0:42:14.770 --> 0:42:18.509
<v Speaker 2>just 37%. So this is a huge thing. And I

0:42:19.610 --> 0:42:21.730
<v Speaker 2>would be remiss to mention, you know, most of these

0:42:21.870 --> 0:42:25.480
<v Speaker 2>candidates we're talking about in the Senate, the Democratic ones,

0:42:25.520 --> 0:42:29.690
<v Speaker 2>you know, Troy Jackson, Angie Nixon, Abdul, Al-Said, they are

0:42:29.989 --> 0:42:32.989
<v Speaker 2>running on Medicare for all. This has become a big

0:42:33.050 --> 0:42:36.550
<v Speaker 2>resurgent topic, this election. The cost of healthcare is a

0:42:36.570 --> 0:42:39.430
<v Speaker 2>big topic in these midterms. And rather than doing this

0:42:39.450 --> 0:42:44.430
<v Speaker 2>sort of Pete Buttigieg style, Medicare for all who want it,

0:42:44.489 --> 0:42:47.450
<v Speaker 2>you know, just kind of vaguely talking about having a

0:42:47.570 --> 0:42:51.020
<v Speaker 2>public option, right? These candidates are being a bit more

0:42:51.080 --> 0:42:54.819
<v Speaker 2>strict about Medicare for all as like an actual policy

0:42:54.900 --> 0:42:59.180
<v Speaker 2>and as a policy guarantee. I think Abdul's policy has

0:42:59.239 --> 0:43:02.980
<v Speaker 2>some slight differences where it does not completely eliminate private

0:43:03.040 --> 0:43:05.680
<v Speaker 2>health care, but it says that private health care should

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:09.410
<v Speaker 2>become redundant and still has a focus on a universal

0:43:09.530 --> 0:43:12.569
<v Speaker 2>single payer system, which is much closer to the Bernie

0:43:12.610 --> 0:43:16.009
<v Speaker 2>Sanders version than the sort of like half-assed versions that

0:43:16.030 --> 0:43:19.840
<v Speaker 2>we've seen from other progressive candidates, you know, running for

0:43:19.880 --> 0:43:23.089
<v Speaker 2>president like six years ago. So something that, you know,

0:43:23.730 --> 0:43:25.410
<v Speaker 2>maybe two or three years ago, I felt like is

0:43:25.450 --> 0:43:27.650
<v Speaker 2>kind of like a political, you know, bygone. This is

0:43:27.690 --> 0:43:30.410
<v Speaker 2>focused on like Medicare for all is definitely coming back

0:43:30.760 --> 0:43:33.920
<v Speaker 2>in a big way. And people are not nearly as

0:43:33.940 --> 0:43:36.300
<v Speaker 2>scared of the prospect of them not having private insurance

0:43:37.219 --> 0:43:41.700
<v Speaker 2>because private insurance sucks. Yeah, it's gotten even worse. Like

0:43:41.780 --> 0:43:45.739
<v Speaker 2>we're what, like two years after the Mangione assassination, things

0:43:45.800 --> 0:43:48.200
<v Speaker 2>still suck. Everyone still hates health care companies.

0:43:48.640 --> 0:43:48.819
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:43:49.420 --> 0:43:52.290
<v Speaker 2>Only hate them more as time goes on. So, yeah,

0:43:52.330 --> 0:43:55.210
<v Speaker 2>that is the kind of rough overview of the issues

0:43:55.250 --> 0:43:59.190
<v Speaker 2>affecting the midterms and where the polling stands now just

0:43:59.390 --> 0:44:02.930
<v Speaker 2>a few weeks away from November. I want to say third.

0:44:03.130 --> 0:44:04.710
<v Speaker 2>Let's see if I'm right. I am right.

0:44:04.830 --> 0:44:05.069
<v Speaker 7>Boom.

0:44:05.469 --> 0:44:07.910
<v Speaker 2>We'll probably do a few more polling updates on executive

0:44:07.930 --> 0:44:11.640
<v Speaker 2>disorder as we get closer to to Election Day. Absolutely.

0:44:12.160 --> 0:44:14.200
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, that's that's all for me here. Yeah.

0:44:14.910 --> 0:44:17.799
<v Speaker 3>Remember, guys, do what the IRGC would want you to do.

0:44:18.540 --> 0:44:21.940
<v Speaker 3>Register to vote. We're not telling you to vote.

0:44:21.960 --> 0:44:25.089
<v Speaker 2>The IRGC is. No, the Iranian government is. We're not.

0:44:30.080 --> 0:44:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Good stuff.

0:44:41.830 --> 0:44:44.049
<v Speaker 9>Welcome to It Could Happen Here, a podcast where the

0:44:44.150 --> 0:44:47.310
<v Speaker 9>here is France and the it is it.

0:44:47.950 --> 0:44:49.470
<v Speaker 2>I am your host, Mia Wong.

0:44:50.130 --> 0:44:53.330
<v Speaker 9>And today we are going to be talking about the

0:44:53.770 --> 0:44:57.370
<v Speaker 9>enormous and incredibly militant student protests in France.

0:44:57.530 --> 0:45:00.680
<v Speaker 2>And with me to talk about this is Faiza, who

0:45:00.739 --> 0:45:04.259
<v Speaker 2>is a political analyst and feminist theorist in France. And Faiza,

0:45:04.320 --> 0:45:05.100
<v Speaker 2>welcome to the show.

0:45:05.120 --> 0:45:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for having me, Mia.

0:45:07.140 --> 0:45:11.310
<v Speaker 2>Hello, everybody. Yeah, I'm really excited to talk with you

0:45:11.350 --> 0:45:16.220
<v Speaker 2>about this because there has been so much unbelievably wild

0:45:16.320 --> 0:45:20.580
<v Speaker 2>stuff happening both good and bad and like oh my.

0:45:20.440 --> 0:45:25.339
<v Speaker 4>God it's like hundreds of thousands of people in the

0:45:25.380 --> 0:45:36.850
<v Speaker 4>streets most of whom are like 15 16 like oh my.

0:45:33.790 --> 0:45:37.509
<v Speaker 1>God it is so exciting to watch I mean, I've

0:45:37.750 --> 0:45:41.299
<v Speaker 1>wanted to see such an uprising for so long. And

0:45:41.380 --> 0:45:44.820
<v Speaker 1>it's finally starting to happen.

0:45:45.239 --> 0:45:45.919
<v Speaker 12>Yeah.

0:45:46.500 --> 0:45:49.100
<v Speaker 1>It was a slow build up this past couple of years.

0:45:49.640 --> 0:45:53.440
<v Speaker 1>But I feel like something is maybe happening. And not

0:45:53.480 --> 0:45:58.489
<v Speaker 1>just in France. Like the whole Gen Z worldwide is

0:45:58.690 --> 0:46:05.210
<v Speaker 1>really tired of this shit. And is hitting the streets.

0:46:05.270 --> 0:46:07.350
<v Speaker 1>And I love it. And I'm here for it.

0:46:07.790 --> 0:46:08.450
<v Speaker 2>It's amazing.

0:46:08.469 --> 0:46:09.220
<v Speaker 5>It is.

0:46:09.360 --> 0:46:11.939
<v Speaker 9>And yeah, we're going to be getting more into every

0:46:12.100 --> 0:46:13.480
<v Speaker 9>other country that's also.

0:46:13.239 --> 0:46:16.399
<v Speaker 2>Going on right now because it's, you know, it's like.

0:46:16.860 --> 0:46:18.840
<v Speaker 9>It's like India and Spain and Chile.

0:46:18.880 --> 0:46:21.280
<v Speaker 2>We've seen a whole bunch of other countries in the past.

0:46:21.620 --> 0:46:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Yes, we have.

0:46:22.580 --> 0:46:25.340
<v Speaker 2>Six months go up. But I guess I want to

0:46:25.540 --> 0:46:30.299
<v Speaker 2>start with going a bit in to sort of the

0:46:30.380 --> 0:46:33.480
<v Speaker 2>background of this and going into what, what the political

0:46:33.520 --> 0:46:37.580
<v Speaker 2>situation has been in France that's sort of been leading

0:46:37.640 --> 0:46:39.799
<v Speaker 2>up to this and what kinds of conditions have been

0:46:39.820 --> 0:46:41.480
<v Speaker 2>sort of producing this?

0:46:42.440 --> 0:46:49.650
<v Speaker 1>Well, have you heard of neoliberalism? No, like seriously, like that.

0:46:49.950 --> 0:46:50.270
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:46:50.350 --> 0:46:54.710
<v Speaker 1>I mean, well, we've had Macron, which is our very

0:46:54.750 --> 0:46:58.750
<v Speaker 1>dear president. No, I'm kidding. We fucking hate the guy.

0:47:00.190 --> 0:47:02.700
<v Speaker 1>The guy is rotten to his very core. So, yeah,

0:47:03.460 --> 0:47:05.299
<v Speaker 1>he's been president for almost 10 years now.

0:47:05.780 --> 0:47:06.549
<v Speaker 2>Jesus Christ.

0:47:07.300 --> 0:47:07.590
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:47:09.150 --> 0:47:09.430
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:47:10.210 --> 0:47:14.969
<v Speaker 1>And the utter and complete destruction of anything public, like

0:47:15.030 --> 0:47:19.280
<v Speaker 1>public education, public health and everything, didn't start with him.

0:47:20.360 --> 0:47:25.180
<v Speaker 1>But let's just say that he put the final nail

0:47:25.840 --> 0:47:31.029
<v Speaker 1>on the proverbial coffin. And he's been like dismantling public

0:47:31.090 --> 0:47:35.399
<v Speaker 1>education ever since he arrived in And took his job

0:47:35.420 --> 0:47:40.970
<v Speaker 1>as president. And if you want an analogy or something

0:47:40.989 --> 0:47:44.030
<v Speaker 1>in comparison with what's happening in the U.S. with respect

0:47:44.050 --> 0:47:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to your public education. Well, when I saw, like, 10

0:47:49.320 --> 0:47:54.339
<v Speaker 1>years ago, Betsy DeVos arrived as the Secretary of Education. Yeah. Well,

0:47:54.380 --> 0:48:01.540
<v Speaker 1>you remember her? She basically destroyed anything public education-wise. Like

0:48:01.760 --> 0:48:06.000
<v Speaker 1>she wanted to funnel all the money to private schools

0:48:06.060 --> 0:48:09.950
<v Speaker 1>and charter schools. And that's basically what has been happening

0:48:09.969 --> 0:48:13.910
<v Speaker 1>in France too, like in these past 10 years. All

0:48:13.989 --> 0:48:18.890
<v Speaker 1>the money has been funneled in public. More or less

0:48:19.610 --> 0:48:23.529
<v Speaker 1>legal ways to private schools. Yes, I see more or

0:48:23.550 --> 0:48:26.110
<v Speaker 1>less legal ways because there are a lot of loopholes.

0:48:27.489 --> 0:48:35.080
<v Speaker 1>And Macron and his government are experts at using those loopholes. Basically,

0:48:35.440 --> 0:48:37.739
<v Speaker 1>they can look at you in the eye and tell

0:48:37.780 --> 0:48:40.719
<v Speaker 1>you that what they're doing is legal, technically.

0:48:40.739 --> 0:48:41.899
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:48:42.480 --> 0:48:45.560
<v Speaker 1>You know what I mean. And they will say that

0:48:45.580 --> 0:48:50.330
<v Speaker 1>to your face while... destroying everything you hold near and

0:48:50.350 --> 0:48:55.090
<v Speaker 1>dear at the same time. So these past 10 years,

0:48:55.110 --> 0:49:02.420
<v Speaker 1>the money allocated to education has decreased. The number of

0:49:02.440 --> 0:49:07.120
<v Speaker 1>teachers has tremendously decreased, like dramatically decreased.

0:49:07.260 --> 0:49:07.720
<v Speaker 2>Jesus.

0:49:08.320 --> 0:49:13.779
<v Speaker 1>The number of students by class has increased. The way

0:49:14.050 --> 0:49:18.080
<v Speaker 1>this project started is, well, A school year in France

0:49:18.100 --> 0:49:23.960
<v Speaker 1>started in September. It's basically from September to June, July. And, well,

0:49:24.760 --> 0:49:30.220
<v Speaker 1>in the poorest areas of France, high schoolers arrived in

0:49:30.239 --> 0:49:34.870
<v Speaker 1>their high schools and found basically not enough desks, not

0:49:34.910 --> 0:49:41.550
<v Speaker 1>enough chairs, no teachers, holes everywhere. In the roof, water

0:49:41.630 --> 0:49:43.190
<v Speaker 1>leaking in the classrooms.

0:49:44.050 --> 0:49:44.570
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:49:45.390 --> 0:49:47.689
<v Speaker 1>No AC, like that goes without saying, like we don't

0:49:47.730 --> 0:49:52.200
<v Speaker 1>have AC, like this is not the standard thing in France.

0:49:52.239 --> 0:49:56.280
<v Speaker 1>So you could have like a hundred degrees Fahrenheit in,

0:49:56.880 --> 0:49:59.779
<v Speaker 1>you know, and with no AC, like people, like high

0:49:59.800 --> 0:50:03.160
<v Speaker 1>schoolers were cooking in their schools during the winter.

0:50:03.239 --> 0:50:03.390
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:50:06.620 --> 0:50:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Some of these schools, the poorest schools, also don't have heat.

0:50:10.780 --> 0:50:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Oh, Jesus. Yeah.

0:50:12.100 --> 0:50:13.980
<v Speaker 1>So it's freezing.

0:50:14.000 --> 0:50:14.500
<v Speaker 2>Oh, exactly.

0:50:14.520 --> 0:50:16.660
<v Speaker 1>I'll let you imagine how you can, how can you...

0:50:17.600 --> 0:50:21.489
<v Speaker 1>learn anything in school while freezing by, I don't know,

0:50:21.489 --> 0:50:23.410
<v Speaker 1>50 degrees in your school.

0:50:23.469 --> 0:50:26.390
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Like, you know, like, I remember thinking back to

0:50:26.410 --> 0:50:29.730
<v Speaker 2>my high school, and it's like, well, like, we occasionally

0:50:29.750 --> 0:50:32.740
<v Speaker 2>had drowned rafts falling out of the ceiling, but, like,

0:50:32.840 --> 0:50:34.839
<v Speaker 2>at least we had heat in the winter. Like, we

0:50:34.900 --> 0:50:36.100
<v Speaker 2>would have all died.

0:50:36.120 --> 0:50:38.779
<v Speaker 1>Even if the heat is out of the window, like,

0:50:40.300 --> 0:50:43.790
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing left in some high schools. Like, really nothing.

0:50:44.290 --> 0:50:46.890
<v Speaker 1>And The egregious thing is that you can have a

0:50:46.930 --> 0:50:52.500
<v Speaker 1>very poor area with the poorest high schoolers, with the

0:50:52.520 --> 0:50:56.900
<v Speaker 1>most destroyed high school you can see. And in the

0:50:56.940 --> 0:51:03.840
<v Speaker 1>town nearby, you will find the best high schools with

0:51:03.930 --> 0:51:09.049
<v Speaker 1>the richest population, like, For instance, in Paris, like you

0:51:09.090 --> 0:51:13.919
<v Speaker 1>have Paris, the capital, and you have Parisian suburbs. Some

0:51:14.020 --> 0:51:17.440
<v Speaker 1>are extremely rich and some are basically the poorest ones

0:51:18.219 --> 0:51:22.799
<v Speaker 1>in the whole country. So what has happened is that

0:51:23.020 --> 0:51:27.160
<v Speaker 1>we don't have states. We basically have regions and departments

0:51:27.180 --> 0:51:29.839
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like that, like the way France is cut.

0:51:30.980 --> 0:51:34.700
<v Speaker 1>The map is cut like that. And so the president of,

0:51:35.300 --> 0:51:38.489
<v Speaker 1>it's called the Île-de-France. Basically, Paris is part of a region.

0:51:39.160 --> 0:51:43.410
<v Speaker 1>The president of this region is a right-winger, pretty much

0:51:43.510 --> 0:51:48.970
<v Speaker 1>far right, but officially she's only right-winger. And her specialty

0:51:49.010 --> 0:51:53.570
<v Speaker 1>is to funnel money, public money, to private schools, private

0:51:53.590 --> 0:51:54.430
<v Speaker 1>Catholic schools.

0:51:55.210 --> 0:51:55.990
<v Speaker 2>Jesus Christ.

0:51:56.670 --> 0:51:58.310
<v Speaker 1>Of course.

0:51:58.330 --> 0:51:59.290
<v Speaker 2>Many, many such cases.

0:51:59.410 --> 0:52:04.910
<v Speaker 1>I know, right? Amazing. You see the similarities with Betsy DeVos?

0:52:05.030 --> 0:52:06.530
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah.

0:52:06.690 --> 0:52:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's basically, those two women are the same picture.

0:52:10.940 --> 0:52:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's just say it like that. So that president has

0:52:13.680 --> 0:52:16.920
<v Speaker 1>been putting a lot of public money in private schools

0:52:17.360 --> 0:52:20.900
<v Speaker 1>in Paris and in the Paris suburb. Rich ones. But

0:52:21.400 --> 0:52:22.719
<v Speaker 1>where is she taking that money?

0:52:22.980 --> 0:52:23.280
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:52:23.320 --> 0:52:23.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:52:24.100 --> 0:52:29.219
<v Speaker 1>Well, instead of distributing this money equally across the whole

0:52:29.320 --> 0:52:34.150
<v Speaker 1>territory that she's leading, she's only distributing that money to

0:52:34.170 --> 0:52:38.910
<v Speaker 1>private schools, Catholic schools, and schools that are in the

0:52:38.950 --> 0:52:41.280
<v Speaker 1>richest suburbs and in the richest area.

0:52:41.520 --> 0:52:42.140
<v Speaker 2>That makes sense.

0:52:42.580 --> 0:52:46.259
<v Speaker 1>So that's how you find yourself when you're poor, when

0:52:46.280 --> 0:52:48.720
<v Speaker 1>you're a poor kid. growing up in a poor suburb

0:52:49.010 --> 0:52:51.670
<v Speaker 1>that's how you find yourself going in a high school

0:52:52.150 --> 0:52:55.670
<v Speaker 1>that has holes basically everywhere that doesn't have enough teachers

0:52:55.969 --> 0:52:59.770
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't have enough desks enough chairs that is lacking

0:52:59.830 --> 0:53:03.910
<v Speaker 1>basically everything that has rats running in in the hallways

0:53:04.030 --> 0:53:09.359
<v Speaker 1>and yeah yeah so came last september like a month

0:53:09.420 --> 0:53:15.930
<v Speaker 1>ago high schoolers went back to they found their school

0:53:16.330 --> 0:53:19.710
<v Speaker 1>being just as bad as it was just before when

0:53:19.730 --> 0:53:23.529
<v Speaker 1>they went for the summer holidays and stuff like that.

0:53:23.610 --> 0:53:27.180
<v Speaker 1>And so they came back and they found no teacher.

0:53:28.100 --> 0:53:34.200
<v Speaker 1>They found no desk, no chair, no nothing. And yeah,

0:53:34.320 --> 0:53:37.040
<v Speaker 1>they were mad and they were right. And so they

0:53:37.140 --> 0:53:44.650
<v Speaker 1>started to protest to ask for teachers, money for... desks

0:53:44.810 --> 0:53:48.569
<v Speaker 1>for chairs I mean it's the most basic things like

0:53:48.590 --> 0:53:52.299
<v Speaker 1>they're not asking for they're not asking for the the

0:53:52.340 --> 0:53:55.500
<v Speaker 1>latest uh I don't know iPhone or iPad or whatever

0:53:55.520 --> 0:53:58.580
<v Speaker 1>you know whatever the fuck no no they're asking for

0:53:58.600 --> 0:54:02.240
<v Speaker 1>like the most basic necessities.

0:54:02.040 --> 0:54:05.259
<v Speaker 2>Yeah like we're asking for to be a school like

0:54:05.360 --> 0:54:09.620
<v Speaker 2>exactly desk plus teacher is like the most basic school

0:54:10.450 --> 0:54:12.230
<v Speaker 2>like what what are we doing.

0:54:12.070 --> 0:54:16.439
<v Speaker 1>Here And they're asking for a chance at life.

0:54:16.760 --> 0:54:17.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:54:17.260 --> 0:54:19.380
<v Speaker 1>You know what I mean? Like, we have a system.

0:54:19.960 --> 0:54:21.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a system that has been in place since 2018.

0:54:21.920 --> 0:54:28.090
<v Speaker 1>It started, so, under Macron, again. And it's a very,

0:54:28.510 --> 0:54:32.279
<v Speaker 1>very opaque system. It's a system that is designed... It's

0:54:32.340 --> 0:54:36.870
<v Speaker 1>an algorithm, basically, that is designed to... Think for you

0:54:38.670 --> 0:54:41.210
<v Speaker 1>what you're going to do next. Basically, when you're in

0:54:41.390 --> 0:54:44.049
<v Speaker 1>10th grade, so I was telling you that before we

0:54:44.090 --> 0:54:48.080
<v Speaker 1>started taping, but high school in France only has three

0:54:48.120 --> 0:54:52.000
<v Speaker 1>years in it, like 10th to 12th grade. So when

0:54:52.040 --> 0:54:56.060
<v Speaker 1>you get in 10th grade, you have to choose in

0:54:56.120 --> 0:54:59.030
<v Speaker 1>10th grade what you're going to do in college or university.

0:54:59.910 --> 0:55:00.970
<v Speaker 2>Which is ridiculous.

0:55:01.150 --> 0:55:02.490
<v Speaker 1>It is utterly ridiculous.

0:55:02.510 --> 0:55:03.190
<v Speaker 2>Like, granted.

0:55:03.310 --> 0:55:03.670
<v Speaker 4>Awful.

0:55:03.969 --> 0:55:10.410
<v Speaker 1>Why? You're... You're 15. You're 15. And people are asking

0:55:10.410 --> 0:55:14.529
<v Speaker 1>15 years old to pick with high accuracy what they're

0:55:14.550 --> 0:55:17.229
<v Speaker 1>going to do as adults for the rest of their lives.

0:55:17.370 --> 0:55:21.750
<v Speaker 1>That is stressful. The level of stress these kids are

0:55:21.810 --> 0:55:24.670
<v Speaker 1>facing is humongous. Ridiculous. Yeah.

0:55:25.270 --> 0:55:26.050
<v Speaker 2>It is ridiculous.

0:55:26.510 --> 0:55:32.580
<v Speaker 1>And the level of attempted suicide among high schoolers. has

0:55:32.820 --> 0:55:37.529
<v Speaker 1>increased in a way that you cannot comprehend. Like, the

0:55:37.590 --> 0:55:44.589
<v Speaker 1>numbers are terrifying. Also, that algorithm is a very racist one.

0:55:45.350 --> 0:55:46.609
<v Speaker 1>It's a very classist one.

0:55:47.070 --> 0:55:47.850
<v Speaker 9>Yeah. Yeah.

0:55:47.890 --> 0:55:51.330
<v Speaker 1>It basically is a black box. Like people, we, the public,

0:55:51.370 --> 0:55:54.420
<v Speaker 1>we don't know what's in the algorithm. Like we do

0:55:54.440 --> 0:55:57.279
<v Speaker 1>not have access to it. The only thing that we

0:55:57.360 --> 0:56:01.000
<v Speaker 1>know is the result. And the result is poor kids

0:56:01.400 --> 0:56:08.090
<v Speaker 1>coming from poor areas have basically zero chance at getting

0:56:08.120 --> 0:56:13.149
<v Speaker 1>access to a proper university or a university at all.

0:56:13.670 --> 0:56:14.010
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:56:14.230 --> 0:56:19.759
<v Speaker 1>Like you could end in a queue, but like the

0:56:19.760 --> 0:56:25.960
<v Speaker 1>5,000 kids in a queue to access a public university.

0:56:26.180 --> 0:56:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not talking about private schools. I'm talking about public schools.

0:56:29.940 --> 0:56:30.300
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:56:30.880 --> 0:56:35.370
<v Speaker 1>It's something that is deeply unfair. It's a system of,

0:56:35.930 --> 0:56:39.029
<v Speaker 1>that when I was in high school didn't exist. When

0:56:39.050 --> 0:56:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I was in high school, like it was 20, 25

0:56:41.520 --> 0:56:44.860
<v Speaker 1>years ago, I'm old. But yeah, when I was in

0:56:44.940 --> 0:56:46.779
<v Speaker 1>high school, basically the only thing you had to do,

0:56:47.020 --> 0:56:49.380
<v Speaker 1>you had an exam at the end of high school.

0:56:49.920 --> 0:56:53.390
<v Speaker 1>And if you pass that exam, you could go to university.

0:56:54.010 --> 0:56:56.589
<v Speaker 1>And that was it. And then the only thing that

0:56:56.670 --> 0:57:00.630
<v Speaker 1>matters is was your grades in university. That's it.

0:57:00.890 --> 0:57:02.969
<v Speaker 2>Which is also still like a stressful system, but it's like,

0:57:03.010 --> 0:57:04.310
<v Speaker 2>we've made it worse.

0:57:06.469 --> 0:57:13.030
<v Speaker 1>Exactly. It was a stressful system, but it made some sense.

0:57:13.250 --> 0:57:14.430
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah.

0:57:14.450 --> 0:57:15.850
<v Speaker 9>There's a one-to-one correlation.

0:57:16.090 --> 0:57:20.290
<v Speaker 1>Exactly. There was some logic behind it. The logic now

0:57:20.570 --> 0:57:24.750
<v Speaker 1>is cruelty. It is violence. It is class violence. It

0:57:24.830 --> 0:57:33.980
<v Speaker 1>is race violence. It is ableism, obviously, also. And kids, well,

0:57:34.000 --> 0:57:36.000
<v Speaker 1>they arrive in high school and they already know that

0:57:36.060 --> 0:57:42.480
<v Speaker 1>their life is screwed. That's what's happening. And the government,

0:57:42.500 --> 0:57:46.950
<v Speaker 1>the state, doesn't give a fuck. Which is basically why

0:57:46.970 --> 0:57:50.130
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing the footage you've been seeing for the last weeks.

0:57:50.750 --> 0:57:53.310
<v Speaker 1>This is why the cops have been beating the shit

0:57:53.370 --> 0:57:55.980
<v Speaker 1>out of high schoolers. because they don't give a fuck

0:57:56.020 --> 0:57:59.820
<v Speaker 1>yeah and also they know that they don't have a

0:57:59.880 --> 0:58:01.000
<v Speaker 1>choice what they're going to.

0:58:01.000 --> 0:58:04.200
<v Speaker 9>Do yeah it reminds me so much of the protest

0:58:04.220 --> 0:58:06.439
<v Speaker 9>in india where it's like yeah you're facing the same

0:58:06.500 --> 0:58:08.780
<v Speaker 9>thing of like this i guess is one of the

0:58:08.900 --> 0:58:11.020
<v Speaker 9>one of the things of neoliberalism was like on the

0:58:11.140 --> 0:58:15.180
<v Speaker 9>one hand education was supposed to be like your ticket

0:58:15.340 --> 0:58:16.990
<v Speaker 9>out right it was supposed to be like if you

0:58:17.640 --> 0:58:19.730
<v Speaker 9>you know, like meritocratic, if you were like good enough,

0:58:19.770 --> 0:58:22.490
<v Speaker 9>you could get into a like elite university and that

0:58:22.510 --> 0:58:25.590
<v Speaker 9>was your like ticket out of poverty. And then simultaneously,

0:58:25.630 --> 0:58:28.710
<v Speaker 9>we're going to make that impossible. And yeah, I mean,

0:58:28.730 --> 0:58:31.550
<v Speaker 9>just like thinking about like, yeah, like this, the stories

0:58:31.590 --> 0:58:35.550
<v Speaker 9>of these kids were forced into this like unbelievably intense,

0:58:36.370 --> 0:58:41.130
<v Speaker 9>like competitive pressure and are just getting screwed out of

0:58:41.170 --> 0:58:45.010
<v Speaker 9>the ability to fight their way out of the poverty

0:58:45.050 --> 0:58:46.710
<v Speaker 9>that they've been born into and just.

0:58:46.570 --> 0:58:49.980
<v Speaker 2>Being like, fuck this. If they're going to rig the system,

0:58:50.000 --> 0:58:51.700
<v Speaker 2>we're like, the only thing we can go do is

0:58:51.740 --> 0:58:52.180
<v Speaker 2>fight them.

0:58:52.420 --> 0:58:56.180
<v Speaker 1>Exactly. And, you know, you were talking about like meritocracy,

0:58:56.560 --> 0:58:58.920
<v Speaker 1>like I'm putting it in between quotes for people who

0:58:58.940 --> 0:58:59.520
<v Speaker 1>can see me.

0:58:59.940 --> 0:59:02.230
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Well, I mean, it was, that, that term was

0:59:02.290 --> 0:59:07.190
<v Speaker 2>originally a joke. It was originally a joke. It was

0:59:07.230 --> 0:59:08.330
<v Speaker 2>invented as a joke.

0:59:08.790 --> 0:59:11.240
<v Speaker 9>Like, and it's, it's the same thing with like the

0:59:11.280 --> 0:59:14.040
<v Speaker 9>like pulling yourself up by your bootstraps the whole point

0:59:14.080 --> 0:59:15.820
<v Speaker 9>of that is that you can't it was a joke

0:59:16.160 --> 0:59:17.990
<v Speaker 9>but no we've like we decided this is a thing

0:59:18.010 --> 0:59:21.290
<v Speaker 9>that exists in the world even though it doesn't god

0:59:22.170 --> 0:59:25.050
<v Speaker 9>uh makes me insane all the time you can not.

0:59:25.300 --> 0:59:28.580
<v Speaker 1>Create a parody out of this reality. Like the, it's

0:59:29.140 --> 0:59:33.610
<v Speaker 1>the level of like a comedy of dramedy is, is

0:59:34.030 --> 0:59:34.590
<v Speaker 1>got here.

0:59:34.730 --> 0:59:35.210
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

0:59:36.010 --> 0:59:40.130
<v Speaker 1>I mean, talking about that, like a few days ago, um,

0:59:41.050 --> 0:59:45.090
<v Speaker 1>we on my stream were watching a clip from the news.

0:59:45.150 --> 0:59:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember which news outlet it was, but they

0:59:48.860 --> 0:59:52.140
<v Speaker 1>were basically talking about a high school, a very famous one, uh,

0:59:52.640 --> 0:59:55.860
<v Speaker 1>which is called Henri Quatre, Henry the fourth. And this

0:59:55.950 --> 0:59:59.070
<v Speaker 1>high school is inside of Paris and it is well

0:59:59.110 --> 1:00:02.330
<v Speaker 1>known for being like a very bourgeois high school. Like

1:00:02.780 --> 1:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>this is like basically as bourgeois as you can do,

1:00:08.880 --> 1:00:11.110
<v Speaker 1>as you can get. Yeah, it's a rich kid one.

1:00:11.930 --> 1:00:14.790
<v Speaker 1>The anchor, the news anchor, introduced this high school by

1:00:14.830 --> 1:00:20.010
<v Speaker 1>telling that it was basically poster child for meritocracy. And

1:00:20.130 --> 1:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I choked. I choked on my saliva. I was like, no, no,

1:00:25.540 --> 1:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>you mean it's bourgeoisie. You used a word instead of

1:00:29.780 --> 1:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>another word. That's not meritocracy. That's bourgeoisie. But basically, that's

1:00:34.390 --> 1:00:36.430
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. And thank you for saying it out loud.

1:00:36.510 --> 1:00:37.510
<v Speaker 1>I was like, thank you.

1:00:38.110 --> 1:00:38.490
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:00:38.830 --> 1:00:41.090
<v Speaker 9>And it's so funny because it's like it is in

1:00:41.140 --> 1:00:44.160
<v Speaker 9>the original sense, which is that it was a joke

1:00:44.220 --> 1:00:46.520
<v Speaker 9>about how it was just rich kids who got into college.

1:00:46.840 --> 1:00:48.920
<v Speaker 9>But like it's not in the sense you're trying to

1:00:49.070 --> 1:00:49.510
<v Speaker 9>use it.

1:00:49.610 --> 1:00:50.570
<v Speaker 2>Like, come on.

1:00:50.610 --> 1:00:53.790
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, neoliberalism saw the joke and was like, yeah, you

1:00:53.810 --> 1:00:56.150
<v Speaker 1>know what I can do about it? I can rip

1:00:56.210 --> 1:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the joke out of it. And I can just keep

1:00:58.320 --> 1:01:01.420
<v Speaker 1>the word and make it something real. How about it?

1:01:01.480 --> 1:01:01.620
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:01:01.680 --> 1:01:04.380
<v Speaker 9>It's like, what if all of the metaphors became literal now?

1:01:05.040 --> 1:01:06.860
<v Speaker 9>And that's like the world that we live in.

1:01:07.060 --> 1:01:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Exactly.

1:01:07.620 --> 1:01:11.760
<v Speaker 1>That's the fucking world we live in. Absolutely. The kids

1:01:11.920 --> 1:01:14.940
<v Speaker 1>have no prospects. I mean, they don't have any in

1:01:14.960 --> 1:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the US. Like Gen Z won't be able to buy

1:01:19.540 --> 1:01:22.700
<v Speaker 1>a house. That's the same thing in France. Like that's

1:01:22.720 --> 1:01:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the same thing in Spain. That's the same thing in Chile.

1:01:25.320 --> 1:01:30.130
<v Speaker 1>That's the same thing in every country. capitalist capitalistic based

1:01:30.170 --> 1:01:34.690
<v Speaker 1>society basically so yeah what we're seeing worldwide what we

1:01:34.730 --> 1:01:38.730
<v Speaker 1>were seeing in france right now is the product of

1:01:39.170 --> 1:01:41.430
<v Speaker 1>what you're seeing in the u.s it's product of what

1:01:41.450 --> 1:01:46.350
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing in spain it's yeah the neoliberal order it's

1:01:46.490 --> 1:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>white supremacy and of course i mean to be honest

1:01:51.360 --> 1:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>it's the least surprising thing ever like It's basically one

1:01:55.340 --> 1:01:58.450
<v Speaker 1>plus one equals two. That's what we're seeing. It's a

1:01:58.490 --> 1:02:03.050
<v Speaker 1>logical product of our society. So yeah, the kids are mad.

1:02:03.390 --> 1:02:05.610
<v Speaker 1>They have the right to be, and I'm fully supportive.

1:02:05.970 --> 1:02:06.790
<v Speaker 9>Like, really.

1:02:07.010 --> 1:02:07.190
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:02:08.170 --> 1:02:11.390
<v Speaker 9>So we're going to take an ad break because, yeah,

1:02:11.430 --> 1:02:15.940
<v Speaker 9>we too are subject to the horrifying violence and whimsy

1:02:16.200 --> 1:02:18.340
<v Speaker 9>of neoliberal capitalism.

1:02:18.740 --> 1:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I hear you.

1:02:19.220 --> 1:02:20.000
<v Speaker 14>I hear you.

1:02:30.710 --> 1:02:36.040
<v Speaker 9>And we are back. So let's talk about what the

1:02:36.100 --> 1:02:37.860
<v Speaker 9>students have been up to.

1:02:37.880 --> 1:02:40.760
<v Speaker 1>You mean on the streets or do you mean on

1:02:41.500 --> 1:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>social media?

1:02:42.460 --> 1:02:46.150
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, let's get into, I guess, the streets first. What

1:02:46.210 --> 1:02:48.690
<v Speaker 9>have the students been doing? What kinds of tactics have

1:02:48.710 --> 1:02:49.470
<v Speaker 9>they been using?

1:02:49.490 --> 1:02:53.570
<v Speaker 1>So they've been using blockades, a lot of them. Which

1:02:53.620 --> 1:02:57.410
<v Speaker 1>is basically a French tradition. We're very good at that.

1:02:57.470 --> 1:03:00.830
<v Speaker 1>Like whenever there's a protest, especially high school protests and

1:03:00.890 --> 1:03:05.950
<v Speaker 1>student protests, we build blockades. So we go for a disruption.

1:03:06.450 --> 1:03:10.690
<v Speaker 1>So the purpose is to disrupt high schools, is to

1:03:10.710 --> 1:03:18.830
<v Speaker 1>disrupt universities, and to push the adults, basically. to listen

1:03:18.850 --> 1:03:22.450
<v Speaker 1>to the kids and what they want. So that's what

1:03:22.510 --> 1:03:29.910
<v Speaker 1>has been happening, except that our dear government basically says, fuck,

1:03:30.390 --> 1:03:35.950
<v Speaker 1>we don't care, and sent the fuzz. So the cops

1:03:36.030 --> 1:03:40.950
<v Speaker 1>have been answering to the protest by mutilating kids.

1:03:40.970 --> 1:03:41.090
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:03:41.950 --> 1:03:46.910
<v Speaker 1>And mutilating adults, basically. That's been this government's response to

1:03:47.070 --> 1:03:52.530
<v Speaker 1>any protest since 2017, since Macron arrived in the Élysée,

1:03:52.550 --> 1:03:57.970
<v Speaker 1>which is our White House, basically. So this time around,

1:03:58.330 --> 1:04:02.410
<v Speaker 1>even news anchors have been taken aback by the violence

1:04:03.250 --> 1:04:04.190
<v Speaker 1>coming from the cops.

1:04:04.990 --> 1:04:09.570
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because it's like actual children. It is.

1:04:10.170 --> 1:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>It's children... But on the other side, you have an

1:04:14.020 --> 1:04:20.300
<v Speaker 1>authoritarian regime. Yeah. And what is evidently behaving as a

1:04:20.320 --> 1:04:23.070
<v Speaker 1>police state. I mean, come on.

1:04:24.470 --> 1:04:27.210
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like you're blowing kids' hands off.

1:04:28.910 --> 1:04:32.370
<v Speaker 1>You know who they've been getting their inspiration from?

1:04:32.390 --> 1:04:33.930
<v Speaker 2>The US?

1:04:34.730 --> 1:04:34.890
<v Speaker 10>ICE.

1:04:35.590 --> 1:04:36.250
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:04:36.410 --> 1:04:36.770
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:04:37.030 --> 1:04:37.490
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

1:04:38.300 --> 1:04:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Our government, when they saw ICE, when they saw... how,

1:04:42.400 --> 1:04:48.980
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote, effective ICE is at handling the public and

1:04:49.000 --> 1:04:49.840
<v Speaker 1>handling protests.

1:04:50.300 --> 1:04:50.680
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

1:04:51.110 --> 1:04:53.910
<v Speaker 1>They didn't even hide that it was their wood dreams.

1:04:54.630 --> 1:04:59.610
<v Speaker 1>What we're seeing is the logical evolution of policing in

1:04:59.650 --> 1:05:01.270
<v Speaker 1>a neoliberal society.

1:05:01.370 --> 1:05:01.690
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

1:05:02.010 --> 1:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Like the kids are asking for the most basic stuff

1:05:05.320 --> 1:05:09.250
<v Speaker 1>and the most basic stuff could lead to a semblance

1:05:09.450 --> 1:05:15.010
<v Speaker 1>of equality. And they cannot have that. So let's just

1:05:15.070 --> 1:05:18.010
<v Speaker 1>send the cops. Let's just bit the shit out of

1:05:18.070 --> 1:05:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the kids and terrorize the fuck out of adults. And

1:05:23.360 --> 1:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>let's teach everybody, the whole population, what protest looks like.

1:05:28.720 --> 1:05:33.740
<v Speaker 1>It looks like blood. It looks like amputation. It looks

1:05:33.780 --> 1:05:36.840
<v Speaker 1>like losing an eye. The purpose is very clear. It's

1:05:36.860 --> 1:05:40.030
<v Speaker 1>to put the fear of God in the population. Once

1:05:40.110 --> 1:05:44.550
<v Speaker 1>the population is scared shitless, the said population will stop

1:05:44.590 --> 1:05:46.930
<v Speaker 1>protesting and start complaining. Yeah.

1:05:47.330 --> 1:05:52.070
<v Speaker 2>Which, I will say, the kind of upside of drawing

1:05:52.390 --> 1:05:55.660
<v Speaker 2>from the American ICE anti-protest model is that that didn't work.

1:05:56.300 --> 1:05:58.660
<v Speaker 2>Doing that stuff in the US just pissed everyone off,

1:05:58.740 --> 1:06:00.520
<v Speaker 2>and it was only when they stopped doing that kind

1:06:00.540 --> 1:06:04.710
<v Speaker 2>of confrontation and, like, move to this like quiet ethnic

1:06:04.750 --> 1:06:07.880
<v Speaker 2>cleansing model i guess where they didn't do comfort mass

1:06:07.890 --> 1:06:12.360
<v Speaker 2>confrontation that like everything kind of i don't know that

1:06:12.380 --> 1:06:14.600
<v Speaker 2>they were like really effectively able to carry out the

1:06:14.640 --> 1:06:17.910
<v Speaker 2>ethnic cleansing which is bleak in its own right but

1:06:17.950 --> 1:06:20.610
<v Speaker 2>like it did it did backfire on them like sort

1:06:20.650 --> 1:06:21.890
<v Speaker 2>of spectacularly yeah.

1:06:22.490 --> 1:06:25.790
<v Speaker 1>But it was a polite ethnic cleansing like What is

1:06:25.830 --> 1:06:29.390
<v Speaker 1>scaring me, and it's not surprising, but it's still scary

1:06:29.430 --> 1:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>as fuck, is that you can do the most violent

1:06:32.480 --> 1:06:36.450
<v Speaker 1>things with a polite tone and people just.

1:06:36.890 --> 1:06:38.150
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah.

1:06:38.560 --> 1:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Stop look at it and just keep living their lives

1:06:41.550 --> 1:06:44.210
<v Speaker 1>as long as it's polite as long as it doesn't

1:06:44.230 --> 1:06:46.130
<v Speaker 1>make a lot of noise as long as it's not

1:06:46.150 --> 1:06:51.170
<v Speaker 1>disruptive yeah and our government really understands that but yours also.

1:06:50.950 --> 1:06:53.930
<v Speaker 9>Does sort of i feel like they're they're kind of

1:06:53.990 --> 1:06:58.180
<v Speaker 9>like like our government's like because our entire government is

1:06:58.240 --> 1:07:02.220
<v Speaker 9>like designed to produce content it took them a while

1:07:02.240 --> 1:07:03.720
<v Speaker 9>to figure out that this is the way that you

1:07:03.740 --> 1:07:06.180
<v Speaker 9>should actually do it because their initial instinct was just

1:07:06.200 --> 1:07:09.820
<v Speaker 9>to like do these giant confrontations to produce content out of,

1:07:09.860 --> 1:07:13.300
<v Speaker 9>and then eventually they realize, like, if you just do

1:07:13.360 --> 1:07:15.600
<v Speaker 9>it quietly, then you can actually do the thing.

1:07:15.620 --> 1:07:15.690
<v Speaker 10>But.

1:07:16.580 --> 1:07:20.180
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because if you do it quietly, then you get

1:07:20.240 --> 1:07:23.330
<v Speaker 1>the liberals behind you. Because liberals, at the end of

1:07:23.350 --> 1:07:26.730
<v Speaker 1>the day... They're not disruptive. Like, they want to keep

1:07:26.770 --> 1:07:27.650
<v Speaker 1>on living their lives.

1:07:27.790 --> 1:07:28.150
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

1:07:28.330 --> 1:07:31.140
<v Speaker 1>They want to keep on, like, being able to consume.

1:07:31.180 --> 1:07:34.500
<v Speaker 1>They want to be able to go to the movies

1:07:34.620 --> 1:07:41.300
<v Speaker 1>and go on vacation. And, like, they need that kind

1:07:41.320 --> 1:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of scope. They need that sense of normalcy to keep

1:07:45.380 --> 1:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>on going and protest, like, disrupt that sense of normalcy.

1:07:48.660 --> 1:07:48.780
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:07:48.800 --> 1:07:53.700
<v Speaker 1>So once you get back to a semblance of normalcy, you...

1:07:53.810 --> 1:07:57.030
<v Speaker 1>Get liberals on your side, basically. Or at least you

1:07:57.050 --> 1:08:01.010
<v Speaker 1>stop having liberals against you. Yeah. And yeah, that's what

1:08:01.050 --> 1:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>has been happening in the US. That's how our government

1:08:04.700 --> 1:08:09.180
<v Speaker 1>has been rolling for the past almost 10 years now.

1:08:10.340 --> 1:08:12.660
<v Speaker 1>What has been happening, though, with this protest is that

1:08:12.760 --> 1:08:16.620
<v Speaker 1>liberals have been watching their own kids being beaten up.

1:08:16.920 --> 1:08:17.270
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

1:08:17.400 --> 1:08:22.050
<v Speaker 1>They've been watching their own kids losing eyes, like being arrested.

1:08:22.070 --> 1:08:22.150
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

1:08:23.050 --> 1:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Put up in jail and stuff like that. And that

1:08:26.120 --> 1:08:30.400
<v Speaker 1>is way too disruptive. This doesn't fly. So they're going

1:08:30.439 --> 1:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to find another way to do things. I mean, I

1:08:34.100 --> 1:08:36.200
<v Speaker 1>know how they're going to do stuff. They're just going

1:08:36.240 --> 1:08:40.470
<v Speaker 1>to point their fingers at black and brown folks and

1:08:40.870 --> 1:08:44.559
<v Speaker 1>say that these kids are the bad ones. And they

1:08:44.600 --> 1:08:49.430
<v Speaker 1>deserve everything that's happening to them and that they are

1:08:49.729 --> 1:08:52.670
<v Speaker 1>like manipulating the good white kids and stuff like that,

1:08:52.810 --> 1:08:57.439
<v Speaker 1>like through social media, through So what our government also

1:08:57.470 --> 1:09:01.769
<v Speaker 1>has been doing these past almost 10 years is vilifying

1:09:02.430 --> 1:09:06.650
<v Speaker 1>anything remotely left-wing. Like, I don't know if you know

1:09:06.670 --> 1:09:07.530
<v Speaker 1>Jean-Luc Mélenchon.

1:09:07.810 --> 1:09:12.100
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, he's the kind of... The media used to describe

1:09:12.110 --> 1:09:17.940
<v Speaker 9>him as like Francis Birdie, but he's like, Actually.

1:09:18.160 --> 1:09:21.150
<v Speaker 1>That's not so far-fetched. I would say that he's not

1:09:21.370 --> 1:09:23.929
<v Speaker 1>as left-leaning as Bernie.

1:09:24.350 --> 1:09:24.790
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:09:25.250 --> 1:09:27.670
<v Speaker 9>It's very funny because, like, when you read about him

1:09:27.689 --> 1:09:30.410
<v Speaker 9>in the press, he gets described as, like, the hard

1:09:30.510 --> 1:09:31.030
<v Speaker 9>left guy.

1:09:31.060 --> 1:09:33.019
<v Speaker 2>And he's like, no, he's not. This guy's, like, to

1:09:33.040 --> 1:09:35.080
<v Speaker 2>the right of, like, the PCF, who were, like.

1:09:35.360 --> 1:09:40.939
<v Speaker 1>Oh, no, no. His political party, France Unabashed, La France Insoumise,

1:09:41.300 --> 1:09:47.070
<v Speaker 1>has been categorized as far-left. It's social democracy.

1:09:47.090 --> 1:09:50.470
<v Speaker 2>Social democracy, yeah. It's like, what are we doing here?

1:09:50.490 --> 1:09:53.300
<v Speaker 2>They're not revolutionary at all.

1:09:53.340 --> 1:09:54.759
<v Speaker 1>They're not anti-capitalist.

1:09:54.780 --> 1:09:59.139
<v Speaker 2>They're trying to save capitalism from you. And you're like, no,

1:09:59.180 --> 1:10:00.660
<v Speaker 2>you're communist. It's like, no.

1:10:00.700 --> 1:10:06.960
<v Speaker 1>No, they're not even socialist. They're not a less harmful capitalism.

1:10:06.979 --> 1:10:13.030
<v Speaker 1>It's really social democracy. It's Bernie core democracy. basically. But

1:10:13.610 --> 1:10:16.439
<v Speaker 1>they might be a little bit more radical than Bernie

1:10:16.900 --> 1:10:20.200
<v Speaker 1>here and there. Bernie can be more radical in some stances,

1:10:20.640 --> 1:10:23.680
<v Speaker 1>but you know, none of them, neither Bernie nor Mélenchon

1:10:23.820 --> 1:10:27.460
<v Speaker 1>are far, far left. Like they're not, they're just not.

1:10:27.800 --> 1:10:32.820
<v Speaker 1>But when you have such reactionary politics in power, anything

1:10:32.880 --> 1:10:38.070
<v Speaker 1>remotely left-leaning seems far left. So This is how they've

1:10:38.090 --> 1:10:41.370
<v Speaker 1>been presenting our opposition. And so coming back to what

1:10:41.390 --> 1:10:44.850
<v Speaker 1>I was telling you, they are linking the protest to

1:10:45.210 --> 1:10:48.990
<v Speaker 1>the France Unabashed Party, saying that it was created.

1:10:49.010 --> 1:10:49.770
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:10:50.189 --> 1:10:54.680
<v Speaker 1>It originated from France Unabashed and that this political party

1:10:55.120 --> 1:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>is instrumentalizing the protest and is basically, it's a big puppeteer.

1:11:02.550 --> 1:11:05.110
<v Speaker 9>The youth yeah this is like exactly the same shit

1:11:05.130 --> 1:11:07.470
<v Speaker 9>they did in india except for india there was like

1:11:07.510 --> 1:11:10.490
<v Speaker 9>i guess well actually i i don't know if if

1:11:10.530 --> 1:11:13.070
<v Speaker 9>the french government has pulled the islamist card yet but

1:11:13.170 --> 1:11:15.450
<v Speaker 9>like that was the other one oh it already has

1:11:15.470 --> 1:11:17.820
<v Speaker 9>yeah yeah they're all the same like.

1:11:18.350 --> 1:11:26.580
<v Speaker 1>Scott islamophobia transphobia those two things are at the very

1:11:26.620 --> 1:11:32.300
<v Speaker 1>core of our reactionary figures political figures and as they

1:11:32.520 --> 1:11:37.060
<v Speaker 1>are as yours and and my like this is white

1:11:37.100 --> 1:11:42.009
<v Speaker 1>supremacy basically like they're defending what they see as whiteness

1:11:42.990 --> 1:11:48.089
<v Speaker 1>and white femininity and islam to them is a danger

1:11:48.130 --> 1:11:52.130
<v Speaker 1>to white women and so is the existence of trans

1:11:52.210 --> 1:11:59.560
<v Speaker 1>folks so yeah yeah they're coming they're trying left-leaning to

1:12:00.580 --> 1:12:07.580
<v Speaker 1>trans folks islam uh hamas obviously of course and yeah

1:12:07.600 --> 1:12:09.820
<v Speaker 1>the muslim brotherhood jesus.

1:12:09.600 --> 1:12:11.860
<v Speaker 9>Christ at least well okay i'm not gonna say at

1:12:11.960 --> 1:12:15.640
<v Speaker 9>least but like that that was the the one thing

1:12:15.700 --> 1:12:17.850
<v Speaker 9>in the u.s to be at least kind of moved

1:12:17.930 --> 1:12:22.599
<v Speaker 9>past was like we at least kind of stopped accusing

1:12:22.660 --> 1:12:25.019
<v Speaker 9>everything of being the Muslim Brotherhood because a bunch of

1:12:25.050 --> 1:12:26.510
<v Speaker 9>people started taking money from the UAE.

1:12:27.150 --> 1:12:29.809
<v Speaker 2>And then it was like, okay, we're going to quiet

1:12:29.830 --> 1:12:30.540
<v Speaker 2>it down a little bit.

1:12:30.550 --> 1:12:33.750
<v Speaker 1>It's the same thing in France. The UAE have a

1:12:33.790 --> 1:12:37.950
<v Speaker 1>lot of financial interest in France. But they're the good ones.

1:12:38.170 --> 1:12:39.840
<v Speaker 2>But they still do the loss of brotherhood.

1:12:39.910 --> 1:12:42.180
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but they're the good Muslims because, you know, they

1:12:42.200 --> 1:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>invest a lot of money. Yeah, yeah. So that's okay.

1:12:46.020 --> 1:12:48.220
<v Speaker 1>We can do business with them. So if we want

1:12:48.240 --> 1:12:51.300
<v Speaker 1>to do business with them, we have to be able

1:12:51.320 --> 1:12:54.590
<v Speaker 1>to say that they're the good ones. So the good ones.

1:12:55.460 --> 1:12:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:12:56.280 --> 1:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Algeria.

1:12:57.300 --> 1:12:57.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

1:12:57.760 --> 1:13:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Palestine and other Muslim countries. Not so much. Not so much.

1:13:02.979 --> 1:13:05.760
<v Speaker 9>I feel like we kind of moved from like, it

1:13:05.820 --> 1:13:07.640
<v Speaker 9>used to be everything was the Muslim Brotherhood and then

1:13:07.660 --> 1:13:11.640
<v Speaker 9>that changed into everything is Hamas. But it's like, at

1:13:12.090 --> 1:13:15.809
<v Speaker 9>least we moved from one to the other. But it's like, no, no,

1:13:15.830 --> 1:13:18.920
<v Speaker 9>we're still doing the Muslim Brotherhood thing. God damn it.

1:13:18.930 --> 1:13:22.470
<v Speaker 1>Islamophobia is so... Raw.

1:13:22.600 --> 1:13:23.689
<v Speaker 2>Like, so raw.

1:13:24.110 --> 1:13:27.630
<v Speaker 1>They don't even think about, like, are they Shiite? Are

1:13:27.670 --> 1:13:29.590
<v Speaker 1>they Sunni? Are they, like... No.

1:13:29.689 --> 1:13:29.889
<v Speaker 8>No.

1:13:30.130 --> 1:13:31.590
<v Speaker 1>Not at all. No, that's like.

1:13:31.710 --> 1:13:33.299
<v Speaker 2>They're just Muslim.

1:13:34.280 --> 1:13:38.219
<v Speaker 1>The problem is Islam. The problem is brown and black people. Yeah.

1:13:38.380 --> 1:13:42.540
<v Speaker 1>And the problem is the left... which is defending Hamas,

1:13:42.580 --> 1:13:46.840
<v Speaker 1>which is defending the Muslim Brotherhood, which is defending trans folks.

1:13:47.420 --> 1:13:51.170
<v Speaker 1>When you look at the arguments, that's basically what they're saying.

1:13:53.110 --> 1:13:55.330
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not even exaggerating. I wish I were, but

1:13:55.370 --> 1:14:00.710
<v Speaker 1>I'm not. And it's like, they're not even trying. It's

1:14:00.770 --> 1:14:04.150
<v Speaker 1>so obvious. But it's the same argument that has been

1:14:04.290 --> 1:14:10.300
<v Speaker 1>fed to the population through our media platforms. for years now.

1:14:10.460 --> 1:14:13.970
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, people like just eat it up.

1:14:14.590 --> 1:14:14.940
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

1:14:15.070 --> 1:14:17.490
<v Speaker 9>And I guess that leads into this question of like,

1:14:17.930 --> 1:14:22.370
<v Speaker 9>how has the rest of French society been reacting to this?

1:14:22.590 --> 1:14:25.110
<v Speaker 9>Have other sort of like movements been mobilizing?

1:14:25.130 --> 1:14:26.690
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:14:27.479 --> 1:14:32.060
<v Speaker 1>Well, I was going to say apathy, which is kind

1:14:32.100 --> 1:14:35.580
<v Speaker 1>of true. If you look at people on the center

1:14:36.200 --> 1:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and on the right, it's apathy. It is, They just

1:14:39.960 --> 1:14:43.020
<v Speaker 1>want to be able to wear their heads in the

1:14:43.080 --> 1:14:46.979
<v Speaker 1>sand and keep on going, just like doing business as usual.

1:14:47.780 --> 1:14:52.059
<v Speaker 1>Left-leaning people, some of them are scared. Some of them

1:14:52.120 --> 1:14:55.910
<v Speaker 1>are in disbelief. Like they want to believe that if

1:14:55.970 --> 1:14:59.729
<v Speaker 1>things were as bad as Gen Z is saying it is,

1:15:00.450 --> 1:15:03.730
<v Speaker 1>they would have somehow managed to see it.

1:15:03.729 --> 1:15:05.769
<v Speaker 15>Yeah.

1:15:06.830 --> 1:15:10.220
<v Speaker 1>The majority of people still believe that the media are

1:15:10.240 --> 1:15:13.940
<v Speaker 1>a honest actor, which they are not. They haven't been

1:15:13.979 --> 1:15:18.100
<v Speaker 1>for years. And as long as, basically, as long as

1:15:18.140 --> 1:15:23.510
<v Speaker 1>people keep believing what the media, like mainstream media, traditional

1:15:23.550 --> 1:15:27.750
<v Speaker 1>media feeds them, then they're not going to be able

1:15:27.790 --> 1:15:28.970
<v Speaker 1>to see the problem.

1:15:29.010 --> 1:15:29.190
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

1:15:30.189 --> 1:15:32.270
<v Speaker 1>And it's the same thing in the US. I mean,

1:15:32.979 --> 1:15:36.360
<v Speaker 1>if people keep watching CNN and MSNBC and stuff like that,

1:15:36.840 --> 1:15:41.180
<v Speaker 1>how can they possibly know how bad things are on

1:15:41.200 --> 1:15:48.550
<v Speaker 1>the ground? They cannot. They cannot. So that's where we are.

1:15:49.450 --> 1:15:52.469
<v Speaker 1>And it's scary, but it's the truth.

1:15:53.030 --> 1:15:58.750
<v Speaker 9>There's this quote from the sociologist Raul Zebechi about how Basically,

1:15:59.030 --> 1:16:00.910
<v Speaker 9>one of the things that social movements do is like

1:16:00.990 --> 1:16:03.870
<v Speaker 9>in these moments of rupture, they act like bolts of

1:16:03.930 --> 1:16:07.710
<v Speaker 9>lightning across the sky, like illuminating the darkness. And that's

1:16:08.250 --> 1:16:11.729
<v Speaker 9>what social movements do to the actual fundamental nature of reality.

1:16:11.750 --> 1:16:14.910
<v Speaker 9>They reveal the structures of like power and domination in

1:16:14.950 --> 1:16:18.429
<v Speaker 9>the world that are otherwise hidden by the sort of darkness.

1:16:18.470 --> 1:16:20.940
<v Speaker 9>And that's what you're trying. But part of what you're

1:16:20.979 --> 1:16:24.380
<v Speaker 9>trying to do with these protests is to like make

1:16:24.439 --> 1:16:28.160
<v Speaker 9>the actual function of society visible. clear for a moment

1:16:28.280 --> 1:16:31.400
<v Speaker 9>where i don't know if there is a more clear

1:16:31.439 --> 1:16:35.019
<v Speaker 9>expression of what neoliberalism is than we took all the

1:16:35.060 --> 1:16:37.240
<v Speaker 9>money from the schools and gave it to the cops.

1:16:37.680 --> 1:16:41.230
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah a lot of signs during the protest like

1:16:41.530 --> 1:16:46.250
<v Speaker 1>down the streets explicitly say that yeah like the kids

1:16:46.350 --> 1:16:50.189
<v Speaker 1>know where the money is yeah it is funneled to

1:16:50.210 --> 1:16:53.850
<v Speaker 1>the very rich through state subsidies and stuff like that

1:16:53.880 --> 1:16:57.070
<v Speaker 1>and it is funneled to the cops and to the

1:16:57.150 --> 1:17:01.510
<v Speaker 1>military complex, defense complex, and contractors and stuff like that.

1:17:01.630 --> 1:17:04.150
<v Speaker 1>They know where it's going. So they know there is money.

1:17:05.100 --> 1:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Even when our presidents say that there is no money

1:17:07.840 --> 1:17:11.990
<v Speaker 1>left for anything. Like, no, there's always money for the rich, somehow.

1:17:12.790 --> 1:17:13.269
<v Speaker 12>Go figure.

1:17:13.290 --> 1:17:13.950
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah.

1:17:13.970 --> 1:17:16.190
<v Speaker 2>There's always money for the police, too.

1:17:16.830 --> 1:17:19.430
<v Speaker 1>Exactly, there's always more money for the police, there's always

1:17:19.490 --> 1:17:23.030
<v Speaker 1>more budget for the military, there's always more budget for

1:17:23.060 --> 1:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the cops, there's always less budget for hospitals, there's always

1:17:27.979 --> 1:17:30.639
<v Speaker 1>less budget for teachers and schools and stuff like that. So,

1:17:31.420 --> 1:17:34.880
<v Speaker 1>people are not stupid. So they kind of, like, can

1:17:34.900 --> 1:17:39.480
<v Speaker 1>put two and two together. But, People knowing what's happening

1:17:39.520 --> 1:17:42.860
<v Speaker 1>and people acting on what they know, that's two entirely

1:17:43.300 --> 1:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>different things.

1:17:44.160 --> 1:17:44.559
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

1:17:44.760 --> 1:17:49.479
<v Speaker 1>And that's where the issue is, is what people know,

1:17:49.880 --> 1:17:54.370
<v Speaker 1>people feel the problem like every end of the month

1:17:55.010 --> 1:17:57.550
<v Speaker 1>when they realize that they don't have any money left

1:17:57.610 --> 1:18:02.250
<v Speaker 1>in the bank for food and for anything. Yeah. But

1:18:02.930 --> 1:18:06.490
<v Speaker 1>they don't act on it. Like, it feels impossible to

1:18:06.530 --> 1:18:11.729
<v Speaker 1>get out of this way of life for the majority

1:18:11.770 --> 1:18:12.170
<v Speaker 1>of people.

1:18:12.670 --> 1:18:12.810
<v Speaker 16>Yeah.

1:18:14.390 --> 1:18:17.839
<v Speaker 1>Call that the liberal mindset also? Like, do you know

1:18:17.850 --> 1:18:20.300
<v Speaker 1>Thought Slime? Like, do you know the YouTuber Thought Slime?

1:18:20.580 --> 1:18:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Vaguely familiar.

1:18:23.260 --> 1:18:27.640
<v Speaker 1>They made a wonderful video about the way liberals think

1:18:27.680 --> 1:18:32.780
<v Speaker 1>inside of a box and how even the most revolutionary

1:18:33.060 --> 1:18:38.900
<v Speaker 1>thoughts are still imprisoned within that scope of thought for liberals.

1:18:38.979 --> 1:18:43.930
<v Speaker 1>Like that scope of thought basically is what makes Bernie

1:18:43.930 --> 1:18:46.450
<v Speaker 1>or Mélenchon far left to them.

1:18:46.450 --> 1:18:46.860
<v Speaker 13>Yeah.

1:18:47.420 --> 1:18:52.180
<v Speaker 1>Because it is so out of their deep possibilities to

1:18:52.220 --> 1:18:56.300
<v Speaker 1>them that it feels revolutionary, even though it is absolutely

1:18:56.360 --> 1:18:57.220
<v Speaker 1>not revolutionary.

1:18:57.320 --> 1:18:57.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:18:58.040 --> 1:19:02.550
<v Speaker 1>And that's why people stay in that apathetic state. Like,

1:19:02.770 --> 1:19:07.230
<v Speaker 1>it feels impossible to them to ask for the most

1:19:07.250 --> 1:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>basic stuff. And that's what keeps... people in that loop

1:19:12.080 --> 1:19:16.140
<v Speaker 1>of work, waking up, going to work, going back home,

1:19:16.200 --> 1:19:19.360
<v Speaker 1>wondering how you're going to pay the bills, going to

1:19:19.400 --> 1:19:22.979
<v Speaker 1>sleep and going back to work the next morning. So

1:19:24.020 --> 1:19:26.700
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that people don't know what the issue is.

1:19:27.450 --> 1:19:30.189
<v Speaker 1>But I think the issue is that people feel like

1:19:30.229 --> 1:19:33.090
<v Speaker 1>they have no leverage on their own lives and on

1:19:33.130 --> 1:19:38.450
<v Speaker 1>their own governments. And if we stay in a liberal mindset,

1:19:38.570 --> 1:19:41.390
<v Speaker 1>I think they're right. Which is why we have to

1:19:41.430 --> 1:19:43.850
<v Speaker 1>get out of that liberal mindset. Which is how we

1:19:43.890 --> 1:19:50.330
<v Speaker 1>have to throw away the liberal playbook. Because if we

1:19:50.390 --> 1:19:53.189
<v Speaker 1>keep on playing by those rules, we're fucked.

1:19:53.970 --> 1:20:00.019
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, you either get more Macron or you get the inheritors.

1:20:00.180 --> 1:20:03.160
<v Speaker 9>You either get the indirect inheritors of the SS or

1:20:03.180 --> 1:20:04.640
<v Speaker 9>you get the direct inheritors of the SS.

1:20:06.120 --> 1:20:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Exactly, exactly. And they're all defending the same thing. They're

1:20:09.380 --> 1:20:14.260
<v Speaker 1>defending capitalism. Yeah. They're defending the very rich. And we

1:20:14.300 --> 1:20:18.019
<v Speaker 1>already know who the very rich are. We saw that

1:20:18.060 --> 1:20:21.980
<v Speaker 1>about 100 years ago. So we know who they're rolling for.

1:20:22.620 --> 1:20:23.920
<v Speaker 1>They're rolling for fascism.

1:20:23.939 --> 1:20:25.660
<v Speaker 13>Yeah.

1:20:26.010 --> 1:20:28.390
<v Speaker 1>That's all there is. So as long as we keep

1:20:28.810 --> 1:20:32.510
<v Speaker 1>trying to adapt and keep on trying to save liberalism,

1:20:33.689 --> 1:20:37.450
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to save us, ourselves. Like, we're not

1:20:37.470 --> 1:20:41.030
<v Speaker 1>going to save the population. We're just going to save capitalism.

1:20:41.950 --> 1:20:55.260
<v Speaker 1>It drives me crazy.

1:20:55.300 --> 1:21:01.080
<v Speaker 9>Speaking of doing things, of, like, finding alternatives to saving liberalism, like,

1:21:01.100 --> 1:21:06.030
<v Speaker 9>this is all happening... At the same time as the

1:21:06.090 --> 1:21:09.139
<v Speaker 9>giant sort of mass movement in Spain has kicked off.

1:21:09.300 --> 1:21:09.610
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

1:21:10.520 --> 1:21:14.560
<v Speaker 9>Which is about, for people unfamiliar, I guess the short

1:21:14.600 --> 1:21:19.740
<v Speaker 9>and incredibly bleak version is that basically Spanish authorities evicted a.

1:21:19.840 --> 1:21:22.259
<v Speaker 2>I think it was like an 80, 90-year-old woman.

1:21:22.280 --> 1:21:24.900
<v Speaker 1>She was 87, I think. Yeah.

1:21:24.960 --> 1:21:25.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, 87.

1:21:25.680 --> 1:21:29.120
<v Speaker 9>And she fucking died because of it. And this has

1:21:29.160 --> 1:21:33.240
<v Speaker 9>set off a massive, massive, series of protests I think

1:21:33.260 --> 1:21:35.520
<v Speaker 9>they put like a couple days ago so we're recording

1:21:35.560 --> 1:21:38.320
<v Speaker 9>this on like Friday October 9th I think like I

1:21:38.340 --> 1:21:40.430
<v Speaker 9>think on like the 8th they put a hundred thousand

1:21:40.470 --> 1:21:44.410
<v Speaker 9>people like in the streets of Barcelona over this there's

1:21:44.450 --> 1:21:47.340
<v Speaker 9>been a you know they've been reoccupying some of like

1:21:47.420 --> 1:21:50.980
<v Speaker 9>the core sort of places where Like the year the

1:21:50.979 --> 1:21:53.670
<v Speaker 9>2011 protests were born and like that sort of the thing,

1:21:53.689 --> 1:21:55.870
<v Speaker 9>the thing that became Occupy, like the movement of the squares.

1:21:56.270 --> 1:21:59.310
<v Speaker 1>There still is a massive protest in Madrid. And yeah,

1:21:59.410 --> 1:21:59.630
<v Speaker 1>it is.

1:21:59.790 --> 1:22:00.310
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:22:00.870 --> 1:22:04.010
<v Speaker 1>It is beautiful to see the solidarity around that woman

1:22:04.870 --> 1:22:09.690
<v Speaker 1>and around her situation, how she's been evicted from the

1:22:09.710 --> 1:22:12.830
<v Speaker 1>place she was living for over seven decades.

1:22:14.350 --> 1:22:15.230
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:22:15.510 --> 1:22:18.349
<v Speaker 1>It resonated with so many people.

1:22:20.610 --> 1:22:23.519
<v Speaker 9>I mean, it's social murder, but it's like normally social

1:22:23.530 --> 1:22:26.800
<v Speaker 9>murder happens at like one more degree of remove than that.

1:22:26.880 --> 1:22:29.400
<v Speaker 9>And this is like, no, actually, yeah, she was just

1:22:29.500 --> 1:22:31.060
<v Speaker 9>murdered by the state and the landlords.

1:22:31.260 --> 1:22:32.660
<v Speaker 1>Exactly. Exactly.

1:22:33.360 --> 1:22:34.800
<v Speaker 2>So directly. And yeah.

1:22:34.900 --> 1:22:36.160
<v Speaker 1>And for everybody to see.

1:22:36.560 --> 1:22:36.940
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

1:22:37.100 --> 1:22:38.600
<v Speaker 9>And so I guess I guess my question is like,

1:22:39.320 --> 1:22:42.270
<v Speaker 9>how are you and how are also like people in

1:22:42.330 --> 1:22:44.970
<v Speaker 9>the streets kind of like are people looking at this

1:22:45.030 --> 1:22:47.590
<v Speaker 9>in the context of like the other movements that are

1:22:47.610 --> 1:22:49.269
<v Speaker 9>happening at the same time? Or are we kind of

1:22:49.350 --> 1:22:53.110
<v Speaker 9>still in that? what I would call the 2018-2019 mode

1:22:53.130 --> 1:22:55.349
<v Speaker 9>of isolation, where it's hard for people to see themselves

1:22:55.410 --> 1:22:56.809
<v Speaker 9>as part of a broader thing?

1:22:57.150 --> 1:22:59.670
<v Speaker 1>That's a very good question, and I think it's the latter.

1:22:59.689 --> 1:23:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that people are so depoliticized that it is

1:23:05.520 --> 1:23:09.960
<v Speaker 1>hard for them to link the most obvious linkable stuff together.

1:23:10.990 --> 1:23:14.549
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, or it's like you and the kids in India.

1:23:14.890 --> 1:23:16.110
<v Speaker 1>Exactly.

1:23:16.130 --> 1:23:17.010
<v Speaker 2>I believe in us.

1:23:17.090 --> 1:23:23.960
<v Speaker 1>That's manufactured. The depoliticization of your population, mine, it's not random.

1:23:24.100 --> 1:23:28.260
<v Speaker 1>To be able to keep us doing the 9 to

1:23:28.260 --> 1:23:33.590
<v Speaker 1>5 and complying and everything, they need a depoliticized population

1:23:34.010 --> 1:23:38.410
<v Speaker 1>to keep on going forward. So I think that social

1:23:38.450 --> 1:23:41.809
<v Speaker 1>media managed to get through Gen Z. So they managed

1:23:41.880 --> 1:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to see that what's happening, what has been happening in

1:23:45.080 --> 1:23:48.420
<v Speaker 1>France has also been happening in other countries. And they

1:23:49.220 --> 1:23:51.120
<v Speaker 1>managed to put two and two together. And they managed

1:23:51.140 --> 1:23:54.500
<v Speaker 1>to see that, yeah, the issue is capitalism. The issue

1:23:54.520 --> 1:23:59.750
<v Speaker 1>is white supremacy. The issue is patriarchy and imperialism. But

1:24:01.130 --> 1:24:04.950
<v Speaker 1>when you start looking at millennials, Gen Xers....

1:24:07.689 --> 1:24:11.189
<v Speaker 9>That's... Which is also like, hey, if you're a millennial,

1:24:11.210 --> 1:24:13.589
<v Speaker 9>we've literally, you've done this twice already.

1:24:13.790 --> 1:24:15.030
<v Speaker 2>I know!

1:24:15.490 --> 1:24:17.290
<v Speaker 9>We did 2011, we did 2020. I believe in us.

1:24:17.570 --> 1:24:19.030
<v Speaker 9>I believe we can figure this out.

1:24:21.050 --> 1:24:22.099
<v Speaker 2>I know we can do this.

1:24:22.380 --> 1:24:24.120
<v Speaker 1>There's a part of me that believes in us, but

1:24:24.160 --> 1:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>there's also a part of me that knows how effective

1:24:27.560 --> 1:24:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the capitalistic propaganda is. So the moment you start owning stuff...

1:24:34.750 --> 1:24:37.530
<v Speaker 1>like a house, you know, an apartment and stuff like that,

1:24:38.189 --> 1:24:41.309
<v Speaker 1>you start wanting to keep that stuff for yourself. Like,

1:24:41.650 --> 1:24:47.679
<v Speaker 1>you deserve it. Like, suddenly, meritocracy seems real. And that's

1:24:47.720 --> 1:24:48.620
<v Speaker 1>where the danger's at.

1:24:48.640 --> 1:24:48.920
<v Speaker 14>Yeah.

1:24:49.260 --> 1:24:52.300
<v Speaker 1>And that's where the danger's at. So, I mean, I

1:24:52.380 --> 1:24:56.580
<v Speaker 1>see people living their lives and having zero realization.

1:24:56.720 --> 1:24:57.180
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:24:57.320 --> 1:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Like, with respect to what's happening in the streets. Like,

1:25:00.380 --> 1:25:03.900
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't hit them at all. Like, they keep on going...

1:25:04.220 --> 1:25:07.840
<v Speaker 1>doing their stuff, and they just don't see how it

1:25:07.860 --> 1:25:11.540
<v Speaker 1>affects them. Or worse than that, they see how it

1:25:11.560 --> 1:25:16.160
<v Speaker 1>affects them, but they seem to have accepted, like.

1:25:16.540 --> 1:25:17.849
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, nothing can be done about it.

1:25:18.560 --> 1:25:22.350
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's like, I've suffered, you're going to suffer.

1:25:22.620 --> 1:25:22.900
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

1:25:23.060 --> 1:25:25.870
<v Speaker 1>That's how shit works. And to me, this is the

1:25:25.910 --> 1:25:28.979
<v Speaker 1>scariest thing. This is the scariest thing. I don't have

1:25:29.020 --> 1:25:32.519
<v Speaker 1>an answer to how I have to deal with that.

1:25:32.780 --> 1:25:35.950
<v Speaker 1>I just know that, again, liberal mindset, and we have

1:25:35.970 --> 1:25:38.790
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of that. I don't think that we're

1:25:38.830 --> 1:25:42.350
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to convince the majority of people

1:25:42.790 --> 1:25:45.710
<v Speaker 1>that what we are doing is the right thing. But

1:25:45.729 --> 1:25:50.099
<v Speaker 1>then again, a hundred years ago, when we were fighting

1:25:50.120 --> 1:25:59.680
<v Speaker 1>against fascism and Nazism, the majority of people So we

1:25:59.729 --> 1:26:00.930
<v Speaker 1>don't need a majority of people.

1:26:01.750 --> 1:26:04.650
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, this is the actual lesson of the storming of

1:26:04.670 --> 1:26:09.430
<v Speaker 9>the Winter Palace. The actual lesson of the October Revolution

1:26:09.610 --> 1:26:12.760
<v Speaker 9>is that You don't need everyone on your side. You

1:26:12.780 --> 1:26:14.240
<v Speaker 9>just need your enemies to stay home.

1:26:14.400 --> 1:26:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Exactly.

1:26:14.979 --> 1:26:17.979
<v Speaker 2>Then you can knock off Kerensky.

1:26:18.000 --> 1:26:21.960
<v Speaker 9>All you need is for them to stay home. Your

1:26:22.040 --> 1:26:24.810
<v Speaker 9>enemies to stay home and enough of your allies to

1:26:24.850 --> 1:26:25.210
<v Speaker 9>come out.

1:26:25.630 --> 1:26:26.450
<v Speaker 2>And you can do this.

1:26:27.050 --> 1:26:30.130
<v Speaker 1>You can see this liberal mindset is so hell-bent on

1:26:30.189 --> 1:26:34.210
<v Speaker 1>trying to convince the majority of people. Like, No, we're

1:26:34.250 --> 1:26:36.310
<v Speaker 1>not going to make it. It's not going to happen.

1:26:36.530 --> 1:26:39.910
<v Speaker 1>This is why the very rich are owning all the media.

1:26:40.430 --> 1:26:40.790
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:26:41.010 --> 1:26:44.559
<v Speaker 1>Because they know. They know what you want to do.

1:26:45.220 --> 1:26:47.420
<v Speaker 1>And they see what you want to do. And they

1:26:47.760 --> 1:26:55.479
<v Speaker 1>have already put their chess pieces in place to disrupt that.

1:26:55.720 --> 1:26:59.510
<v Speaker 1>So you have to do stuff differently. We have to

1:26:59.570 --> 1:27:00.310
<v Speaker 1>organize differently.

1:27:00.330 --> 1:27:00.769
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:27:01.530 --> 1:27:06.340
<v Speaker 9>Speaking of doing something differently, I want to close on... So, okay,

1:27:06.380 --> 1:27:10.240
<v Speaker 9>I think people in France kind of understand logistically what

1:27:10.300 --> 1:27:13.180
<v Speaker 9>it means when you're doing a blockade of a school.

1:27:13.860 --> 1:27:16.480
<v Speaker 9>But for people, for example, in the US, we're like,

1:27:17.140 --> 1:27:21.070
<v Speaker 9>I guess I have seen schools... I have seen colleges blockaded,

1:27:21.689 --> 1:27:24.570
<v Speaker 9>but I've never been involved in a high school blockade.

1:27:24.810 --> 1:27:27.830
<v Speaker 9>What does that actually just look like on a practical level?

1:27:27.950 --> 1:27:28.370
<v Speaker 2>Is it like.

1:27:29.060 --> 1:27:32.340
<v Speaker 9>We're, like, blockading the street leading up to the school?

1:27:32.460 --> 1:27:35.170
<v Speaker 9>Is it like we're barring the entrance? What does that actually, like,

1:27:35.670 --> 1:27:36.870
<v Speaker 9>physically look like?

1:27:37.370 --> 1:27:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, basically, physically, you are barring the entrance... Borrowing the

1:27:42.000 --> 1:27:46.300
<v Speaker 1>street is complicated because for a lot of legal reasons

1:27:46.600 --> 1:27:49.639
<v Speaker 1>and logistical reasons, it can be really difficult to block

1:27:50.200 --> 1:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>a whole street.

1:27:51.320 --> 1:27:51.620
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

1:27:51.820 --> 1:27:54.080
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, you can block the entry of the school.

1:27:54.860 --> 1:27:58.400
<v Speaker 1>You can put in front of the school whatever you want,

1:27:58.479 --> 1:28:05.660
<v Speaker 1>like trash bins, barriers. Whatever. You can take desks from

1:28:05.700 --> 1:28:11.650
<v Speaker 1>the inside, put them outside, pile them up. Yeah. Like anything.

1:28:12.189 --> 1:28:15.479
<v Speaker 9>Classic French revolutionary tradition. Stack all the desks.

1:28:16.360 --> 1:28:17.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, it surprised me when you asked me that

1:28:17.820 --> 1:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>because I was like, what? People don't know that? You

1:28:20.500 --> 1:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>take shit and you put that in front of the

1:28:23.140 --> 1:28:24.950
<v Speaker 1>door and that's it.

1:28:25.479 --> 1:28:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. We have less of a tradition of that.

1:28:29.720 --> 1:28:34.530
<v Speaker 1>Exactly. Just like burning trash cans and stuff like that.

1:28:35.270 --> 1:28:38.689
<v Speaker 1>It's a tradition. We do that all the time. That's

1:28:38.750 --> 1:28:43.220
<v Speaker 1>protest shit. Like, of course, we're going to burn the trash.

1:28:43.729 --> 1:28:45.460
<v Speaker 12>Like, it's normal.

1:28:45.760 --> 1:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>It's normal. But yeah, it's really, it's that simple. The

1:28:49.439 --> 1:28:53.780
<v Speaker 1>purpose is to disrupt. So you do everything in your

1:28:53.820 --> 1:28:56.820
<v Speaker 1>power to stop people from getting in the school.

1:28:56.840 --> 1:28:57.240
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

1:28:57.790 --> 1:28:59.349
<v Speaker 1>Because you don't want them to be able to get

1:28:59.410 --> 1:29:02.170
<v Speaker 1>into school because you want them to ask for the

1:29:02.189 --> 1:29:04.820
<v Speaker 1>same thing as you do so that they can go

1:29:05.420 --> 1:29:06.179
<v Speaker 1>back to school.

1:29:07.200 --> 1:29:07.639
<v Speaker 17>Yeah.

1:29:07.760 --> 1:29:10.800
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, you forbid them from getting into school and

1:29:10.840 --> 1:29:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you push them to support you. That's the whole blockade mindset.

1:29:15.729 --> 1:29:16.229
<v Speaker 2>Makes sense.

1:29:16.550 --> 1:29:18.330
<v Speaker 1>That's how strikes work, basically, also.

1:29:19.090 --> 1:29:19.990
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah.

1:29:20.030 --> 1:29:23.139
<v Speaker 9>Which I guess is the other angle of like... Something

1:29:23.160 --> 1:29:25.200
<v Speaker 9>I've been thinking about a lot, talking to you, because

1:29:25.240 --> 1:29:26.970
<v Speaker 9>one of the things that struck me about these protests

1:29:26.990 --> 1:29:29.689
<v Speaker 9>is the extent to which when you like read over

1:29:29.729 --> 1:29:32.210
<v Speaker 9>the student grievances, it's like, oh, this is like exactly

1:29:32.229 --> 1:29:34.170
<v Speaker 9>the same grievances you would have for a teacher strike.

1:29:34.590 --> 1:29:34.810
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:29:35.170 --> 1:29:37.880
<v Speaker 9>Like it's the same things. It's like, oh, wow, class

1:29:37.900 --> 1:29:39.520
<v Speaker 9>size too big. Don't have teachers.

1:29:39.979 --> 1:29:41.920
<v Speaker 1>That's very good that you talk about that because our

1:29:41.979 --> 1:29:44.280
<v Speaker 1>teachers are not really supportive.

1:29:43.840 --> 1:29:46.660
<v Speaker 2>Of Yeah, which is like, what is wrong with you? Like,

1:29:47.380 --> 1:29:48.280
<v Speaker 2>you gotta go now.

1:29:48.340 --> 1:29:50.640
<v Speaker 9>Like, if you want your conditions to suck less, you

1:29:50.660 --> 1:29:51.900
<v Speaker 9>need to move right now.

1:29:52.200 --> 1:29:53.729
<v Speaker 2>Like, this is the best you're gonna get.

1:29:54.020 --> 1:29:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, in France, like, a few decades ago, teachers used

1:29:56.700 --> 1:30:00.620
<v Speaker 1>to be seen as left-leaning, left-wing. They're no longer left-wing.

1:30:00.740 --> 1:30:04.969
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure they're really, like, right-wingers. Like, they want to

1:30:05.010 --> 1:30:08.970
<v Speaker 1>be paid more, which they deserve to be paid more. Like, really,

1:30:09.070 --> 1:30:10.889
<v Speaker 1>they're not paid enough.

1:30:11.090 --> 1:30:11.350
<v Speaker 2>But.

1:30:12.110 --> 1:30:15.979
<v Speaker 1>they're not asking for it like in a disruptive manner

1:30:16.000 --> 1:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and basically they're not getting paid more. Oh, shocking. I know.

1:30:20.060 --> 1:30:24.320
<v Speaker 1>But so yeah, the, the teachers are not really supportive

1:30:24.760 --> 1:30:28.510
<v Speaker 1>of the, their students, which shows you everything you need

1:30:28.530 --> 1:30:31.970
<v Speaker 1>to know about the state of affairs basically. Yeah.

1:30:32.010 --> 1:30:33.450
<v Speaker 9>Which like that has been like one of the things

1:30:33.490 --> 1:30:36.689
<v Speaker 9>that's been heartening in the U S is seeing a

1:30:36.729 --> 1:30:39.700
<v Speaker 9>lot of kind of like, like students coming out to

1:30:39.740 --> 1:30:42.570
<v Speaker 9>support teacher strikes and like, things like that, where, like,

1:30:42.590 --> 1:30:45.469
<v Speaker 9>teachers are sometimes, like, are supporting, like, student walkouts and stuff.

1:30:45.490 --> 1:30:47.030
<v Speaker 2>And that's really sad.

1:30:47.050 --> 1:30:50.939
<v Speaker 9>Because, like, I don't know, like, if you were a teacher, like,

1:30:50.979 --> 1:30:54.080
<v Speaker 9>the thing that you have the responsibility to do is

1:30:54.120 --> 1:30:56.880
<v Speaker 9>to care for your students. And if you're not doing that, then, like, yeah,

1:30:56.920 --> 1:30:58.840
<v Speaker 9>I mean, I guess you are just the kind of, like,

1:30:59.620 --> 1:31:02.060
<v Speaker 9>you're doing education in the Napoleonic sense, if, like, yeah,

1:31:02.100 --> 1:31:04.100
<v Speaker 9>we're cranking you out so you can, like, be cannon

1:31:04.140 --> 1:31:06.750
<v Speaker 9>fodder for, like, the French Imperial Army.

1:31:06.830 --> 1:31:06.990
<v Speaker 7>Like.

1:31:07.310 --> 1:31:09.030
<v Speaker 1>Exactly. No, that's what's happening.

1:31:09.250 --> 1:31:09.390
<v Speaker 2>Like.

1:31:10.410 --> 1:31:17.230
<v Speaker 1>Again, neoliberalism is a deeply individualistic way of life. And

1:31:17.590 --> 1:31:20.390
<v Speaker 1>you can see that in the way teachers are not

1:31:20.430 --> 1:31:25.360
<v Speaker 1>supporting their students who are asking for stuff that teachers

1:31:25.540 --> 1:31:30.270
<v Speaker 1>are also asking for. So logically, you should see teachers

1:31:30.310 --> 1:31:34.800
<v Speaker 1>support students. But when you look at reality, they are not.

1:31:35.200 --> 1:31:38.760
<v Speaker 1>They're not. So, yeah, because they only think about what's

1:31:38.800 --> 1:31:41.700
<v Speaker 1>in it for me. And we've been molded into only

1:31:41.740 --> 1:31:44.809
<v Speaker 1>thinking about what's good for me, what's in it for me.

1:31:45.610 --> 1:31:49.010
<v Speaker 1>And we've stopped thinking us as a society, but just

1:31:49.050 --> 1:31:52.150
<v Speaker 1>as a set of individuals. And that's one of the

1:31:52.170 --> 1:31:54.549
<v Speaker 1>biggest issues we're facing, politically speaking.

1:31:54.750 --> 1:31:58.990
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. Yeah, do you

1:31:59.010 --> 1:32:01.670
<v Speaker 2>have anything else that you want to make sure people

1:32:01.850 --> 1:32:03.330
<v Speaker 2>know before we wrap things up?

1:32:03.990 --> 1:32:06.540
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I really want to stress the fact that what's

1:32:06.580 --> 1:32:09.820
<v Speaker 1>happening in France and the problem is at its root.

1:32:10.580 --> 1:32:14.280
<v Speaker 1>It's the same problem that is happening in the US.

1:32:14.420 --> 1:32:16.740
<v Speaker 1>It's the same one that is happening in Spain, in

1:32:16.780 --> 1:32:22.229
<v Speaker 1>the UK, in Germany, and basically the whole West and

1:32:22.390 --> 1:32:25.510
<v Speaker 1>even more like in Japan, in South Korea.

1:32:25.530 --> 1:32:25.769
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

1:32:26.320 --> 1:32:30.160
<v Speaker 1>In India, just like what we're talking about, that is neoliberalism,

1:32:30.229 --> 1:32:34.590
<v Speaker 1>that is capitalism, that is imperialism, that is white supremacy,

1:32:35.010 --> 1:32:38.350
<v Speaker 1>that is patriarchy. And we need to come together. I

1:32:38.470 --> 1:32:42.390
<v Speaker 1>don't think that fighting within our borders is going to

1:32:42.470 --> 1:32:47.050
<v Speaker 1>lead to anything, but we cannot change stuff by just

1:32:47.510 --> 1:32:51.470
<v Speaker 1>fighting for our countries individually.

1:32:51.900 --> 1:32:52.139
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

1:32:52.260 --> 1:32:55.260
<v Speaker 1>Like we have to fight together because, well, capital doesn't

1:32:55.300 --> 1:33:01.180
<v Speaker 1>know borders. Yeah. We share the same enemy. We share

1:33:01.200 --> 1:33:05.300
<v Speaker 1>the same enemy and we have to coalesce and organize

1:33:06.189 --> 1:33:09.250
<v Speaker 1>worldwide in order to fight back and have a chance

1:33:09.270 --> 1:33:10.370
<v Speaker 1>of fighting back properly.

1:33:10.390 --> 1:33:11.650
<v Speaker 18>Yeah.

1:33:12.400 --> 1:33:16.750
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, organize internationally. Talk to your French folks, to

1:33:16.770 --> 1:33:18.970
<v Speaker 1>your British folks, Spanish.

1:33:18.650 --> 1:33:19.330
<v Speaker 12>Folks, etc.

1:33:19.390 --> 1:33:22.830
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, teach what you know and learn from them.

1:33:22.850 --> 1:33:25.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's the only way out of that

1:33:25.760 --> 1:33:26.679
<v Speaker 1>shit hole.

1:33:28.479 --> 1:33:28.880
<v Speaker 2>Hell yeah.

1:33:29.540 --> 1:33:31.900
<v Speaker 9>Faiza, thank you so much. Thank you so much for

1:33:31.939 --> 1:33:33.760
<v Speaker 9>coming on. Where can people find your work?

1:33:34.360 --> 1:33:36.700
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for having me, Mia. People can find me

1:33:36.970 --> 1:33:44.920
<v Speaker 1>on Twitch. at a phaser so f-a-y-z-a underscore underscore and

1:33:45.060 --> 1:33:50.420
<v Speaker 1>also on instagram and blue sky and sometimes on tiktok.

1:33:51.120 --> 1:33:53.220
<v Speaker 9>Cool yeah we will have links to that in the

1:33:53.280 --> 1:33:56.290
<v Speaker 9>show notes yeah thank you so much for coming on

1:33:56.550 --> 1:33:59.790
<v Speaker 9>and i don't know i hope i hope y'all fucking win.

1:33:59.610 --> 1:34:04.730
<v Speaker 1>Thank you i also hope that much thank you thank

1:34:04.750 --> 1:34:07.740
<v Speaker 1>you thank you and thank you again for having me Yeah,

1:34:07.939 --> 1:34:09.160
<v Speaker 1>it's been great.

1:34:21.720 --> 1:34:22.380
<v Speaker 2>Hi, everyone.

1:34:22.620 --> 1:34:25.260
<v Speaker 19>You're listening to It Could Happen Here. My name is

1:34:25.340 --> 1:34:29.189
<v Speaker 19>Carlos Berrios Polanco. And today I'm going to be talking

1:34:29.310 --> 1:34:33.769
<v Speaker 19>about breadfruit, the climate change resistant crop that also works

1:34:33.890 --> 1:34:37.480
<v Speaker 19>as a tool for emergency preparedness. But before I get

1:34:37.500 --> 1:34:40.559
<v Speaker 19>into that, let me tell you why I started thinking

1:34:40.600 --> 1:34:44.380
<v Speaker 19>about breadfruit in the first place. If you're anything like me,

1:34:44.939 --> 1:34:48.200
<v Speaker 19>the effects of human-caused climate change on the food that

1:34:48.220 --> 1:34:50.640
<v Speaker 19>we eat and grow have been on your mind lately.

1:34:51.720 --> 1:34:53.960
<v Speaker 19>Maybe you've been thinking about it because you saw a

1:34:54.140 --> 1:34:58.240
<v Speaker 19>scary-looking graph that shows the global temperature shooting up over

1:34:58.260 --> 1:35:01.559
<v Speaker 19>the last few years and only increasing over the next

1:35:01.620 --> 1:35:04.930
<v Speaker 19>couple of decades. When this type of graph comes up

1:35:04.970 --> 1:35:08.320
<v Speaker 19>in an article about food, It's usually accompanied by a

1:35:08.400 --> 1:35:12.710
<v Speaker 19>rice or cornfield so dry that the ground is cracked

1:35:13.010 --> 1:35:15.290
<v Speaker 19>to show how bad it's gotten and how much worse

1:35:15.430 --> 1:35:19.090
<v Speaker 19>it can get. Or maybe you're thinking about it because

1:35:19.130 --> 1:35:22.000
<v Speaker 19>the price of foods that have become staples in your diet,

1:35:22.400 --> 1:35:26.720
<v Speaker 19>like rice, chicken, and coffee, have gone up significantly year

1:35:26.800 --> 1:35:30.700
<v Speaker 19>over year because of a mixture of different climate-related causes

1:35:31.160 --> 1:35:34.300
<v Speaker 19>has caused crop losses all over the world, and for

1:35:34.320 --> 1:35:37.880
<v Speaker 19>the very process of planting and harvesting to become more expensive,

1:35:38.560 --> 1:35:42.599
<v Speaker 19>a process known as quote-unquote climateflation. And in the case

1:35:42.660 --> 1:35:46.650
<v Speaker 19>of more specialty foods, like Florida oranges, for example, maybe

1:35:46.670 --> 1:35:49.610
<v Speaker 19>they're not even available at the grocery store anymore because

1:35:49.650 --> 1:35:52.050
<v Speaker 19>of how hard crops have been hit by extreme weather

1:35:52.070 --> 1:35:56.530
<v Speaker 19>events and illness. To be clear, climate change isn't the

1:35:56.650 --> 1:35:59.550
<v Speaker 19>only reason that food prices have gone up lately. The

1:35:59.610 --> 1:36:01.889
<v Speaker 19>closure of the Strait of Hormuz because of the U.S.

1:36:01.890 --> 1:36:05.009
<v Speaker 19>'s war on Iran has also certainly led to prices

1:36:05.070 --> 1:36:08.389
<v Speaker 19>going up for everything across the board. But climate change

1:36:08.550 --> 1:36:12.200
<v Speaker 19>is the main thing that has been and will continue

1:36:12.240 --> 1:36:14.759
<v Speaker 19>to affect the way that we consume food into the future,

1:36:15.300 --> 1:36:19.560
<v Speaker 19>especially as resources become scarcer and we as a planet

1:36:19.580 --> 1:36:22.650
<v Speaker 19>start realizing that what once worked to feed us isn't

1:36:22.710 --> 1:36:26.290
<v Speaker 19>going to be viable forever. A study by the Climate

1:36:26.390 --> 1:36:30.630
<v Speaker 19>Impact Lab found that every additional degree Celsius of global

1:36:30.670 --> 1:36:37.770
<v Speaker 19>warming will lead to global production of six stable crops, corn, soybean, rice, wheat, cassava,

1:36:37.850 --> 1:36:43.520
<v Speaker 19>and sorghum, to decrease by 4.4%, which is roughly equivalent

1:36:43.560 --> 1:36:44.910
<v Speaker 19>to a loss of 120 calories per person per day.

1:36:47.920 --> 1:36:51.460
<v Speaker 19>As Solomon Sheehan, one of the senior authors of this

1:36:51.500 --> 1:36:55.299
<v Speaker 19>study and a professor of environmental sciences at Stanford Doerr

1:36:55.360 --> 1:37:00.590
<v Speaker 19>School of Sustainability, told the UK Telegraph, quote, if climate

1:37:00.689 --> 1:37:04.310
<v Speaker 19>warms by three degrees, that's basically like everyone on the

1:37:04.350 --> 1:37:09.640
<v Speaker 19>planet giving up breakfast, end quote. This is pretty bad already,

1:37:09.950 --> 1:37:13.080
<v Speaker 19>but it's going to affect the people already suffering from

1:37:13.160 --> 1:37:16.890
<v Speaker 19>food insecurity the worst. And that's not to say that

1:37:16.930 --> 1:37:19.870
<v Speaker 19>we're not growing enough food, just that it's not being

1:37:19.930 --> 1:37:23.820
<v Speaker 19>distributed to the people who need it most. Three degrees

1:37:23.880 --> 1:37:28.139
<v Speaker 19>of warming would also cause cataclysmic ecological effects for millions

1:37:28.180 --> 1:37:31.220
<v Speaker 19>of people around the world, to include cities submerged by

1:37:31.280 --> 1:37:35.960
<v Speaker 19>rising sea levels, months-long deadly heat waves, and turn people

1:37:36.040 --> 1:37:40.250
<v Speaker 19>into refugees by the millions. The regions most affected by

1:37:40.310 --> 1:37:43.809
<v Speaker 19>climate change right now, like Africa, Southern Asia, and the

1:37:43.850 --> 1:37:48.050
<v Speaker 19>Caribbean are would be the most affected by this. So

1:37:48.110 --> 1:37:50.890
<v Speaker 19>I've really been thinking a lot about that lately, and

1:37:50.950 --> 1:37:53.269
<v Speaker 19>I did what I always do whenever I start to

1:37:53.310 --> 1:37:56.370
<v Speaker 19>think about collapse and cataclysm like that. I look for

1:37:56.390 --> 1:37:58.550
<v Speaker 19>the ways that people around me are trying to deal

1:37:58.570 --> 1:38:01.730
<v Speaker 19>with the effects of climate change in the best way

1:38:01.770 --> 1:38:02.480
<v Speaker 19>that they can.

1:38:03.180 --> 1:38:03.700
<v Speaker 12>That's why.

1:38:04.550 --> 1:38:07.299
<v Speaker 19>On a recent Friday morning, I found myself about an

1:38:07.400 --> 1:38:10.260
<v Speaker 19>hour away from my hometown of Caguas in a tiny

1:38:10.320 --> 1:38:13.880
<v Speaker 19>little neighborhood called Mariana that's nestled into the mountains of

1:38:13.920 --> 1:38:18.600
<v Speaker 19>the municipal borderline between Yabucoa and Umacao. As I made

1:38:18.660 --> 1:38:21.100
<v Speaker 19>my way through the labyrinth-like roads up to the mountain

1:38:21.150 --> 1:38:23.830
<v Speaker 19>that definitely were not made to fit two cars side

1:38:23.870 --> 1:38:26.670
<v Speaker 19>by side, I knew that I was getting close because

1:38:26.710 --> 1:38:31.060
<v Speaker 19>I started seeing nearly 100-foot-tall breadfruit trees reach towards the heavens.

1:38:31.950 --> 1:38:34.179
<v Speaker 19>I was there in late September right at the tail

1:38:34.260 --> 1:38:37.960
<v Speaker 19>end of the breadfruit's harvest season. So the bright yellow-green

1:38:38.020 --> 1:38:40.979
<v Speaker 19>football-sized fruits weren't as plentiful as they would be if

1:38:41.040 --> 1:38:43.639
<v Speaker 19>I had come earlier in the month. If you've never

1:38:43.680 --> 1:38:46.559
<v Speaker 19>seen a breadfruit or never tasted one, you should probably

1:38:46.660 --> 1:38:48.139
<v Speaker 19>fix that as soon as you can.

1:38:48.439 --> 1:38:49.100
<v Speaker 12>It's delicious.

1:38:49.900 --> 1:38:52.780
<v Speaker 19>Breadfruit trees can grow up to 100 feet tall and

1:38:52.820 --> 1:38:56.240
<v Speaker 19>are covered in large green leaves. The fruit itself can

1:38:56.280 --> 1:38:59.509
<v Speaker 19>grow to be almost 15 pounds, but usually tops out

1:38:59.660 --> 1:39:03.059
<v Speaker 19>at about 6 to 10 pounds. Per the Breadfruit Institute

1:39:03.090 --> 1:39:06.349
<v Speaker 19>in Hawaii, it's an energy-rich food and a good source

1:39:06.410 --> 1:39:10.350
<v Speaker 19>of complex carbs, fiber, and minerals like potassium and calcium

1:39:10.430 --> 1:39:11.650
<v Speaker 19>as well as vitamin.

1:39:11.290 --> 1:39:12.090
<v Speaker 2>B and others.

1:39:12.830 --> 1:39:15.930
<v Speaker 19>Although some varieties grow with seeds, in my experience, the

1:39:15.970 --> 1:39:20.010
<v Speaker 19>majority don't. Therefore, about 90% of the time, you're more

1:39:20.050 --> 1:39:23.730
<v Speaker 19>likely to see breadfruit propagated through root cuttings or tissue

1:39:23.770 --> 1:39:28.290
<v Speaker 19>cultures or something like that, rather than from seed. Breadfruit

1:39:28.350 --> 1:39:32.290
<v Speaker 19>trees grow extremely quickly, like up to four feet per year,

1:39:32.590 --> 1:39:35.689
<v Speaker 19>and will begin producing fruit in about three years. And

1:39:35.729 --> 1:39:40.040
<v Speaker 19>it produces a lot of fruit, like between 100 or

1:39:40.040 --> 1:39:43.380
<v Speaker 19>200 individual fruits per tree, although some trees could blow

1:39:43.460 --> 1:39:47.510
<v Speaker 19>past that. Harvest season depends on where these trees are grown,

1:39:48.010 --> 1:39:51.930
<v Speaker 19>but it's generally late summer to fall, usually. The tree

1:39:51.990 --> 1:39:55.550
<v Speaker 19>itself doesn't need too much care or perfect growing conditions.

1:39:55.990 --> 1:39:58.700
<v Speaker 19>Far from it, actually. As long as you can provide

1:39:58.720 --> 1:40:01.660
<v Speaker 19>it with medium amounts of water and deep, fertile, and

1:40:01.700 --> 1:40:05.439
<v Speaker 19>well-draining soils, it'll grow for you. And even then, some

1:40:05.460 --> 1:40:09.300
<v Speaker 19>varieties grow in atolls that are shallow and sandy, according

1:40:09.320 --> 1:40:12.870
<v Speaker 19>to the Breadfruit Institute. And it'll also grow on hillsides.

1:40:13.500 --> 1:40:17.850
<v Speaker 19>That's why it's often touted as a quote-unquote climate-resilient tree,

1:40:18.020 --> 1:40:21.490
<v Speaker 19>because it'll grow in a bunch of different conditions. It's

1:40:21.910 --> 1:40:25.310
<v Speaker 19>really the goat of trees. As to what the fruit

1:40:25.350 --> 1:40:28.270
<v Speaker 19>tastes like, well, it's in the name. When cooked, it

1:40:28.310 --> 1:40:30.870
<v Speaker 19>tastes like bread, although I've read some people can describe

1:40:30.930 --> 1:40:33.060
<v Speaker 19>it as kind of like a starchy and nutty potato.

1:40:33.840 --> 1:40:36.200
<v Speaker 19>It can be used in a million different recipes and

1:40:36.320 --> 1:40:41.400
<v Speaker 19>used in all states of ripeness, from completely raw to overripe. Personally,

1:40:41.600 --> 1:40:44.080
<v Speaker 19>my favorite way to eat it is cooked into tostones,

1:40:44.220 --> 1:40:47.090
<v Speaker 19>which are these kind of twice-fried flattened fritters that are

1:40:47.160 --> 1:40:50.150
<v Speaker 19>usually made from plantain, but I prefer when they're made

1:40:50.189 --> 1:40:53.710
<v Speaker 19>out of breadfruit. I've been to Mariana before, about three

1:40:53.750 --> 1:40:56.350
<v Speaker 19>years ago, to work on a story about how communities

1:40:56.470 --> 1:41:00.070
<v Speaker 19>affected by the destruction caused by Hurricane Maria in 2017

1:41:00.070 --> 1:41:03.950
<v Speaker 19>and Hurricane Fiona in 2022 were designing their just recovery

1:41:04.030 --> 1:41:08.260
<v Speaker 19>through bottom-up methods, like a community aqueduct to help ail

1:41:08.300 --> 1:41:11.600
<v Speaker 19>the neighborhood's decades-long water issues, as well as a community

1:41:11.660 --> 1:41:14.380
<v Speaker 19>census to know who is the most vulnerable in case

1:41:14.420 --> 1:41:17.840
<v Speaker 19>of an emergency and make sure they got help first.

1:41:18.760 --> 1:41:20.960
<v Speaker 19>And in a sense, I was back there to cover

1:41:21.060 --> 1:41:24.200
<v Speaker 19>essentially the same thing, except that this time it was

1:41:24.320 --> 1:41:27.689
<v Speaker 19>community preparedness through a breadfruit farm that they've planted at

1:41:28.310 --> 1:41:31.250
<v Speaker 19>La Loma de la Niña Mariana, a kind of community

1:41:31.310 --> 1:41:36.189
<v Speaker 19>park slash rec space. It's a really serene space. especially

1:41:36.280 --> 1:41:39.450
<v Speaker 19>when it's empty. It's surrounded by breadfruit and other trees,

1:41:39.510 --> 1:41:42.090
<v Speaker 19>so there's a lot of green, and the breeze is

1:41:42.110 --> 1:41:45.670
<v Speaker 19>a welcoming reprieve from the near triple-digit temperatures we've been

1:41:45.710 --> 1:41:48.970
<v Speaker 19>having lately. Mariana is the neighborhood that grows the most

1:41:49.050 --> 1:41:53.430
<v Speaker 19>breadfruit in Humacao, Rosalina Abreu tells me. She's a community

1:41:53.470 --> 1:41:57.570
<v Speaker 19>leader who's part of the neighborhood's non-profit organization, Arecma, which

1:41:57.630 --> 1:42:01.470
<v Speaker 19>is in charge of community participation and development. As a

1:42:01.510 --> 1:42:04.650
<v Speaker 19>quick note, I interviewed Rosalina in our native Spanish, but

1:42:04.729 --> 1:42:07.650
<v Speaker 19>Mia from the Cool Zone team was gracious enough to

1:42:07.870 --> 1:42:11.330
<v Speaker 19>read a translation of that interview here and in following sections.

1:42:14.850 --> 1:42:18.380
<v Speaker 2>It's a tree with a strong root. It's resistant to

1:42:18.439 --> 1:42:22.760
<v Speaker 2>hurricanes and any environmental changes. And a mature tree can

1:42:22.800 --> 1:42:24.939
<v Speaker 2>yield a harvest of between 100 and 300 to 400 breadfruits.

1:42:25.020 --> 1:42:25.620
<v Speaker 13>Therefore....

1:42:29.060 --> 1:42:31.240
<v Speaker 2>The harvest is fruitful and abundant.

1:42:33.200 --> 1:42:36.660
<v Speaker 19>Breadfruit has a long history here. Rosalina tells me that

1:42:36.700 --> 1:42:39.390
<v Speaker 19>her family has always had a breadfruit tree or a

1:42:39.439 --> 1:42:43.849
<v Speaker 19>couple growing near them going back generations because of how

1:42:43.890 --> 1:42:46.660
<v Speaker 19>much food it produces and because when you preserve it,

1:42:46.970 --> 1:42:51.030
<v Speaker 19>it can last months with proper refrigeration. In Puerto Rico,

1:42:51.430 --> 1:42:54.800
<v Speaker 19>it was originally used as sustenance for pigs and other livestock,

1:42:54.979 --> 1:42:58.140
<v Speaker 19>but little by little, people started paying attention to how

1:42:58.220 --> 1:43:01.740
<v Speaker 19>good the fruit was, how many nutrients it provided, and

1:43:01.800 --> 1:43:05.520
<v Speaker 19>people started using it for everything. Mariana has been hosting

1:43:05.650 --> 1:43:08.570
<v Speaker 19>a breadfruit festival between the end of August and the

1:43:08.610 --> 1:43:12.930
<v Speaker 19>start of September amid the peak breadfruit harvest for 38 years.

1:43:13.689 --> 1:43:17.090
<v Speaker 19>The community has also created a breadfruit recipe book that

1:43:17.130 --> 1:43:19.990
<v Speaker 19>I'm flipping through as I read this script, and it

1:43:20.010 --> 1:43:23.070
<v Speaker 19>has dozens and dozens of different things you make with

1:43:23.110 --> 1:43:27.849
<v Speaker 19>it from fritters to flan and even juice. When Hurricane Maria,

1:43:28.010 --> 1:43:32.769
<v Speaker 19>a Category 4 hurricane, tore through Puerto Rico in 2017,

1:43:32.770 --> 1:43:37.070
<v Speaker 19>leaving thousands of people dead and causing more than $ 91

1:43:36.350 --> 1:43:41.229
<v Speaker 19>billion in damages, Mariana was left more or less incommunicated

1:43:41.290 --> 1:43:44.689
<v Speaker 19>from the rest of the world. Rosalina told me years

1:43:44.760 --> 1:43:46.719
<v Speaker 19>ago that it was like a bomb had been dropped

1:43:47.140 --> 1:43:50.679
<v Speaker 19>in their neighborhood. But knowing that the government wasn't coming

1:43:50.720 --> 1:43:53.760
<v Speaker 19>to help their small rural community, they knew that the

1:43:53.880 --> 1:43:57.610
<v Speaker 19>only people they could count on or themselves. So they

1:43:57.630 --> 1:44:00.570
<v Speaker 19>got to work and opened a food distribution center at

1:44:00.610 --> 1:44:04.150
<v Speaker 19>La Loma where they were feeding members of the community

1:44:04.189 --> 1:44:06.890
<v Speaker 19>with whatever food they had on hand and whatever food

1:44:06.910 --> 1:44:09.610
<v Speaker 19>they could gather from the hundreds of breadfruit trees and

1:44:09.689 --> 1:44:10.710
<v Speaker 19>others in the neighborhood.

1:44:16.210 --> 1:44:19.910
<v Speaker 2>We've seen that when the need arises, people come here

1:44:19.970 --> 1:44:23.440
<v Speaker 2>to look for breadfruit. And not only that, But the

1:44:23.490 --> 1:44:26.180
<v Speaker 2>environment is full of trees that keep us cool, that

1:44:26.200 --> 1:44:30.360
<v Speaker 2>provide a natural space for growth. And eventually we know

1:44:30.700 --> 1:44:32.500
<v Speaker 2>that we are going to be one of the neighborhoods

1:44:32.580 --> 1:44:35.620
<v Speaker 2>best prepared for any situation that involves a food shortage.

1:44:36.100 --> 1:44:38.320
<v Speaker 2>We're going to have breadfruit to share and to use.

1:44:39.740 --> 1:44:42.690
<v Speaker 2>In fact, we have a kitchen here, a semi-industrial kitchen

1:44:42.710 --> 1:44:46.110
<v Speaker 2>that opens to feed the neighborhood. During the time of Maria,

1:44:46.170 --> 1:44:49.710
<v Speaker 2>we served 400 people daily that came looking for food here.

1:44:50.790 --> 1:44:53.430
<v Speaker 2>We already have the kitchen, we have the trees planted.

1:44:53.450 --> 1:44:57.760
<v Speaker 2>So we're already a step ahead for the survival of

1:44:57.800 --> 1:45:02.940
<v Speaker 2>our people if an event occurs.

1:45:03.860 --> 1:45:07.600
<v Speaker 19>Neighbors in Mariana have planted about 80 breadfruit trees throughout

1:45:07.620 --> 1:45:11.590
<v Speaker 19>La Loma as a kind of disaster insurance policy. There

1:45:11.630 --> 1:45:14.670
<v Speaker 19>is probably not a fruit tree that can really withstand

1:45:14.750 --> 1:45:17.890
<v Speaker 19>a hurricane or severe flooding or something like that. But

1:45:17.930 --> 1:45:20.590
<v Speaker 19>if a breadfruit tree goes down, it'll likely start to

1:45:20.630 --> 1:45:23.689
<v Speaker 19>spring back up from the roots. Of the four people

1:45:23.729 --> 1:45:26.110
<v Speaker 19>that I interviewed for this episode, all of them told

1:45:26.170 --> 1:45:30.110
<v Speaker 19>me something similar. And if a breadfruit tree gets stripped

1:45:30.189 --> 1:45:32.680
<v Speaker 19>of its leaves and its fruits by a storm, it'll

1:45:32.720 --> 1:45:36.820
<v Speaker 19>probably start sprouting leaves a few weeks after and will

1:45:36.860 --> 1:45:41.180
<v Speaker 19>probably produce breadfruit next harvest season. Something similar, although to

1:45:41.220 --> 1:45:45.990
<v Speaker 19>a lower degree, happened when Hurricane Fiona hit in 2022.

1:45:45.990 --> 1:45:49.730
<v Speaker 19>Rosalina explained to me that in the 1920s and.

1:45:49.689 --> 1:45:50.430
<v Speaker 10>1930s, the U.S.

1:45:50.470 --> 1:45:53.590
<v Speaker 19>Government tried to take down breadfruit trees to grow potatoes,

1:45:54.330 --> 1:45:56.250
<v Speaker 19>but they didn't take away the roots, so it just

1:45:56.290 --> 1:45:59.410
<v Speaker 19>sprang back up again. She also says that Puerto Rico's

1:45:59.450 --> 1:46:03.099
<v Speaker 19>farmers took the tree up into the mountains. It usually

1:46:03.140 --> 1:46:05.700
<v Speaker 19>grows closer to the beach and other places where it

1:46:05.740 --> 1:46:07.099
<v Speaker 19>has thrived ever since.

1:46:11.460 --> 1:46:13.850
<v Speaker 2>It looks like a Christmas tree with its bulbs because

1:46:13.979 --> 1:46:17.250
<v Speaker 2>each branch has two or three bread fruits. And when

1:46:17.270 --> 1:46:19.740
<v Speaker 2>they're ripe, when it's harvest time, you look at it,

1:46:19.890 --> 1:46:26.510
<v Speaker 2>and it's really miraculous. Plus, it provides food, provides shade,

1:46:26.710 --> 1:46:29.230
<v Speaker 2>it's resistant to the soil, meaning you can plant it

1:46:29.310 --> 1:46:32.930
<v Speaker 2>in areas prone to landslides, and it will preserve the

1:46:32.970 --> 1:46:39.120
<v Speaker 2>terrain so there's no collapses or landslides. So, for many.

1:46:38.979 --> 1:46:45.230
<v Speaker 20>Reasons, it's a tree we could consider miraculous.

1:46:46.729 --> 1:46:49.230
<v Speaker 19>Breadfruit is one of the first crops to grow back

1:46:49.330 --> 1:46:52.590
<v Speaker 19>in Puerto Rico after an extreme weather event. It also

1:46:52.630 --> 1:46:55.930
<v Speaker 19>grows pretty much everywhere throughout the archipelago. And this is

1:46:56.010 --> 1:46:58.790
<v Speaker 19>super important because Puerto Rico is one of the countries

1:46:59.050 --> 1:47:02.850
<v Speaker 19>most affected by climate change, ranking sixth on German Watch's

1:47:02.950 --> 1:47:06.520
<v Speaker 19>Climate Risk Index. which looks at how countries are affected

1:47:06.610 --> 1:47:09.110
<v Speaker 19>by extreme weather events and how they cause loss of

1:47:09.170 --> 1:47:12.670
<v Speaker 19>life and how it impacts their GDP. Puerto Rico has

1:47:12.729 --> 1:47:16.550
<v Speaker 19>experienced several disasters caused by extreme weather over the years,

1:47:16.790 --> 1:47:19.770
<v Speaker 19>the biggest of which were Hurricanes Irma and Maria and Fiona.

1:47:20.380 --> 1:47:24.700
<v Speaker 19>Maria caused a loss of around 80% of the archipelago's crops,

1:47:24.880 --> 1:47:28.880
<v Speaker 19>or about $ 800 million worth of food, according to the

1:47:28.900 --> 1:47:33.730
<v Speaker 19>New York Times. Meanwhile, Fiona caused about $ 159 million in

1:47:33.770 --> 1:47:36.630
<v Speaker 19>losses for the agricultural industry per the AP.

1:47:37.310 --> 1:47:42.880
<v Speaker 21>Breadfruit has proven to be drought resistant. It's wind resistant.

1:47:42.979 --> 1:47:46.900
<v Speaker 21>After Hurricane Maria, we were eating breadfruit first than we

1:47:46.920 --> 1:47:51.630
<v Speaker 21>were eating local bananas and local plantains. Because they were

1:47:51.710 --> 1:47:54.450
<v Speaker 21>highly affected by the winds, but they would come back.

1:47:55.070 --> 1:47:59.760
<v Speaker 21>So it's very interesting how... Even if the fruits are smaller,

1:47:59.900 --> 1:48:02.730
<v Speaker 21>it will bear fruit, especially in a drought season.

1:48:03.360 --> 1:48:07.970
<v Speaker 19>That's Marisol Villalobos, a co-founder of Amazar, a company that

1:48:07.990 --> 1:48:11.230
<v Speaker 19>sells breadfruit flour that's shelf-stable and can last years with

1:48:11.270 --> 1:48:15.330
<v Speaker 19>no problems. Their farm's in Hayuya, and in 2017, her

1:48:15.350 --> 1:48:18.570
<v Speaker 19>and her husband, who's also a co-founder, had planted about

1:48:18.790 --> 1:48:21.469
<v Speaker 19>two acres of their farm worldwide. breadfruit, but the saplings

1:48:21.510 --> 1:48:25.340
<v Speaker 19>were little tiny sticks when Maria hid, and only one survived.

1:48:25.770 --> 1:48:30.720
<v Speaker 19>Marisol now calls it the quote-unquote matriarch tree. Nearly 10

1:48:30.720 --> 1:48:34.479
<v Speaker 19>years after that, their farm now has 500 breadfruit trees

1:48:34.520 --> 1:48:37.560
<v Speaker 19>that are producing hundreds and hundreds of pounds of breadfruit

1:48:37.620 --> 1:48:40.530
<v Speaker 19>that they turn into flour every year. They're one of

1:48:40.570 --> 1:48:42.990
<v Speaker 19>the first farms in Puerto Rico to grow breadfruit and

1:48:43.050 --> 1:48:46.269
<v Speaker 19>cocoa at the same time. The breadfruit trees provide the

1:48:46.330 --> 1:48:50.450
<v Speaker 19>necessary shade for cocoa to grow. They've also planted several

1:48:50.520 --> 1:48:53.640
<v Speaker 19>other native trees throughout their farms. If you wanted to

1:48:53.680 --> 1:48:57.600
<v Speaker 19>produce breadfruit at an industrial scale, this probably isn't the

1:48:57.640 --> 1:49:01.720
<v Speaker 19>best way to go. Most industrial agriculture has one singular

1:49:01.800 --> 1:49:06.070
<v Speaker 19>crop planted over large swaths of land to maximize production,

1:49:06.210 --> 1:49:11.840
<v Speaker 19>ease of gathering, and resources. This is called monoculture. However,

1:49:11.860 --> 1:49:15.780
<v Speaker 19>there's serious downsides to it, like needing to pump tons

1:49:15.850 --> 1:49:18.810
<v Speaker 19>of fertilizer and compost into the soil to keep it

1:49:18.970 --> 1:49:22.190
<v Speaker 19>growing the same thing over and over again, as well

1:49:22.229 --> 1:49:25.030
<v Speaker 19>as increasing the risk that a pest or illness will

1:49:25.110 --> 1:49:28.929
<v Speaker 19>wreak havoc throughout the crop. The way Marisol grows breadfruit

1:49:29.229 --> 1:49:32.870
<v Speaker 19>isn't ideal if they wanted to maximize production, but Marisol

1:49:33.170 --> 1:49:36.550
<v Speaker 19>isn't really bothered by it. Instead, she thinks it's better

1:49:36.810 --> 1:49:39.610
<v Speaker 19>that way because of its positive effects on the soil

1:49:39.720 --> 1:49:40.439
<v Speaker 19>and on the plants.

1:49:41.060 --> 1:49:44.519
<v Speaker 21>Some people say, no, it might not be the best synergy.

1:49:45.060 --> 1:49:47.880
<v Speaker 21>I see it in a way, you know, I'm enriching

1:49:48.020 --> 1:49:52.220
<v Speaker 21>my model of agroforestry. And what we produce is what

1:49:52.240 --> 1:49:56.160
<v Speaker 21>we produce. But if I have a more secure crop

1:49:56.240 --> 1:50:01.420
<v Speaker 21>in terms of resilience and protection from sicknesses, illnesses in place,

1:50:01.760 --> 1:50:02.800
<v Speaker 21>I'm very happy with that.

1:50:03.500 --> 1:50:07.700
<v Speaker 19>Puerto Rico grows very little of its own food, about 10-15%

1:50:08.240 --> 1:50:11.760
<v Speaker 19>depending on the source that you look at. While breadfruit

1:50:11.780 --> 1:50:15.360
<v Speaker 19>has been part of Puerto Ricans' diets for centuries, production

1:50:15.400 --> 1:50:17.820
<v Speaker 19>of it has been going down over the last few

1:50:17.900 --> 1:50:21.460
<v Speaker 19>years as Puerto Rico becomes even more reliant on imports.

1:50:22.340 --> 1:50:26.820
<v Speaker 19>Per data from the Archipelago's Department of Agriculture, production of

1:50:26.900 --> 1:50:31.190
<v Speaker 19>breadfruit has gone down from 1991 to 2019, the last

1:50:31.229 --> 1:50:34.550
<v Speaker 19>year for which public data is available, by about 771,000 pounds.

1:50:34.610 --> 1:50:36.650
<v Speaker 19>Only about 650,000 pounds of breadfruit were produced in Puerto

1:50:36.720 --> 1:50:38.840
<v Speaker 19>Rico in 2019, according to the data. Meanwhile, imports have

1:50:38.880 --> 1:50:40.320
<v Speaker 19>risen rapidly from 2015 to 2019, reaching about 830,000 pounds

1:50:40.380 --> 1:50:43.299
<v Speaker 19>of breadfruit imported in 2019. So people are still eating breadfruit.

1:50:43.320 --> 1:50:45.680
<v Speaker 19>They're eating more of it, but we just can't grow

1:50:45.820 --> 1:50:46.519
<v Speaker 19>it fast enough.

1:51:03.310 --> 1:51:06.800
<v Speaker 21>So we definitely have a great opportunity in Puerto Rico

1:51:06.860 --> 1:51:10.719
<v Speaker 21>to increase local production and local consumption with a crop

1:51:10.740 --> 1:51:16.260
<v Speaker 21>like breadfruit and especially incorporating other crops with it. Beans, vegetables,

1:51:16.520 --> 1:51:18.189
<v Speaker 21>a lot of farinacios, taro.

1:51:18.210 --> 1:51:19.470
<v Speaker 1>Plantains, all that. Yeah.

1:51:19.970 --> 1:51:24.110
<v Speaker 21>And even animals, you know, nice farms that have both things,

1:51:24.370 --> 1:51:28.610
<v Speaker 21>silver pasture with trees and with the animals. And then

1:51:28.640 --> 1:51:30.519
<v Speaker 21>we have a little bit more protein there too.

1:51:30.580 --> 1:51:30.820
<v Speaker 1>So yeah.

1:51:31.270 --> 1:51:33.270
<v Speaker 19>When we get back from the ad break, we're going

1:51:33.290 --> 1:51:36.350
<v Speaker 19>to be talking about the history of breadfruit's voyage from

1:51:36.370 --> 1:51:39.110
<v Speaker 19>the Pacific to the Caribbean and the rest of the

1:51:39.150 --> 1:51:42.710
<v Speaker 19>world and how breadfruit is being distributed to help combat

1:51:42.810 --> 1:51:57.150
<v Speaker 19>hunger crises everywhere. And we're back. You're listening to It

1:51:57.170 --> 1:52:00.030
<v Speaker 19>Could Happen Here. I'm Carlos, your host for today's episode.

1:52:01.100 --> 1:52:04.220
<v Speaker 19>And while breadfruit has become a staple in the Caribbean

1:52:04.280 --> 1:52:06.680
<v Speaker 19>because of how easily it grows and its ability to

1:52:06.700 --> 1:52:11.380
<v Speaker 19>be turned into a gazillion different things, it's not native here. Instead,

1:52:11.400 --> 1:52:15.440
<v Speaker 19>it's originally from the western Pacific, specifically from New Guinea

1:52:15.580 --> 1:52:19.160
<v Speaker 19>and the Indo-Malay region. Thousands of years ago, it was

1:52:19.200 --> 1:52:22.800
<v Speaker 19>spread by the indigenous Polynesians who were the literal first

1:52:22.880 --> 1:52:26.410
<v Speaker 19>people to travel across the region. They would travel on

1:52:26.470 --> 1:52:29.410
<v Speaker 19>double-hulled canoes that are nothing like what we know of

1:52:29.570 --> 1:52:32.570
<v Speaker 19>as canoes today. Instead, each hull could reach up to

1:52:32.570 --> 1:52:35.120
<v Speaker 19>100 feet in length, they had a sail, and they

1:52:35.140 --> 1:52:37.760
<v Speaker 19>could fit entire families as well as the food and

1:52:37.840 --> 1:52:41.100
<v Speaker 19>resources they needed to settle on the islands they were

1:52:41.140 --> 1:52:44.420
<v Speaker 19>traveling to. And one of the things they carried were

1:52:44.500 --> 1:52:47.820
<v Speaker 19>breadfruit saplings because of how much fruit it would produce

1:52:48.000 --> 1:52:48.720
<v Speaker 19>when planted.

1:52:49.340 --> 1:52:51.560
<v Speaker 20>In the case of breadfruit, it was usually the little

1:52:51.600 --> 1:52:53.700
<v Speaker 20>saplings that shoot up from the roots. They would cut

1:52:53.740 --> 1:52:56.180
<v Speaker 20>them and pack them in a ball of earth and

1:52:56.240 --> 1:52:59.350
<v Speaker 20>leaves and keep them moist so that they could plant

1:52:59.390 --> 1:53:01.730
<v Speaker 20>them on the new island and have the same familiar

1:53:01.790 --> 1:53:04.530
<v Speaker 20>foods that they were used to wherever they were coming from.

1:53:05.210 --> 1:53:09.590
<v Speaker 19>That's Russell Fielding, an associate professor at Coastal Carolina University

1:53:09.710 --> 1:53:14.210
<v Speaker 19>in South Carolina who researches geography and environmental justice and

1:53:14.370 --> 1:53:17.390
<v Speaker 19>who wrote the book Red Fruit, Free Global Journeys of

1:53:17.430 --> 1:53:21.040
<v Speaker 19>a Bountiful Tree. He explained, that one of the Pacific

1:53:21.080 --> 1:53:24.220
<v Speaker 19>people's earliest uses for breadfruit was roasting it in an

1:53:24.300 --> 1:53:26.720
<v Speaker 19>earth oven, which is when you create a pit, put

1:53:26.760 --> 1:53:30.009
<v Speaker 19>burning coals in there, then the fruit, then more coals

1:53:30.090 --> 1:53:32.190
<v Speaker 19>on top, and then you cover it all with stones

1:53:32.320 --> 1:53:35.310
<v Speaker 19>and soil. This type of cooking is common to a

1:53:35.350 --> 1:53:38.750
<v Speaker 19>bunch of indigenous cultures across the world, and it produces

1:53:38.970 --> 1:53:42.970
<v Speaker 19>delicious food. Another way that the people of the Pacific

1:53:43.229 --> 1:53:46.070
<v Speaker 19>used breadfruit that Russell's never seen outside of the region

1:53:46.229 --> 1:53:49.650
<v Speaker 19>is putting it into a dark pit, making sure there's

1:53:49.729 --> 1:53:53.330
<v Speaker 19>no airflow, and then letting it ferment. This turns it

1:53:53.410 --> 1:53:55.809
<v Speaker 19>into a sort of paste that can be stored for

1:53:55.850 --> 1:53:59.179
<v Speaker 19>a long time. It tastes kind of tart, almost like citrus,

1:53:59.270 --> 1:54:02.760
<v Speaker 19>Russell told me. Its name depends on which Pacific island

1:54:02.780 --> 1:54:05.839
<v Speaker 19>you're on, but the people of the Marquesas call it ma.

1:54:06.500 --> 1:54:10.300
<v Speaker 20>And so this fermented breadfruit was used as kind of

1:54:10.320 --> 1:54:14.320
<v Speaker 20>an insurance against times of scarcity, where, you know, if

1:54:14.340 --> 1:54:16.840
<v Speaker 20>you get a big crop of breadfruit, like you said,

1:54:17.520 --> 1:54:20.360
<v Speaker 20>A single tree in a single season produces lots of fruit.

1:54:20.900 --> 1:54:22.559
<v Speaker 20>So if it's more than you need for the time being,

1:54:22.620 --> 1:54:24.840
<v Speaker 20>you can ferment some of it to store it away

1:54:24.900 --> 1:54:27.580
<v Speaker 20>for later. And then maybe there's a drought or a

1:54:27.640 --> 1:54:30.240
<v Speaker 20>famine at some point and you have to dip into

1:54:30.280 --> 1:54:30.919
<v Speaker 20>your reserves.

1:54:31.780 --> 1:54:34.740
<v Speaker 19>This shows that the history of breadfruit as an emergency

1:54:34.800 --> 1:54:40.200
<v Speaker 19>preparedness tool goes back millennia. People and the breadfruit they

1:54:40.240 --> 1:54:44.760
<v Speaker 19>carried continued spreading across the Pacific. When the Europeans colonized

1:54:44.780 --> 1:54:47.820
<v Speaker 19>the region, they essentially forced the people to switch from

1:54:47.880 --> 1:54:52.980
<v Speaker 19>breadfruit to imports from the globalized market. Crops like coffee, pineapples,

1:54:53.160 --> 1:54:57.240
<v Speaker 19>and sugar overtook the breadfruit groves in taro patches, while

1:54:57.310 --> 1:55:00.530
<v Speaker 19>rice became a staple of the Pacific diet, according to

1:55:00.570 --> 1:55:05.170
<v Speaker 19>Russell's book. It's a story anyone familiar with colonization or

1:55:05.210 --> 1:55:08.290
<v Speaker 19>who's been a victim of it knows all too well. However,

1:55:08.950 --> 1:55:12.170
<v Speaker 19>breadfruit has seen a resurgence in recent times. In Hawaii,

1:55:12.830 --> 1:55:16.290
<v Speaker 19>According to an article in Civil Beat, breadfruit production is booming,

1:55:16.750 --> 1:55:20.030
<v Speaker 19>but similar to Puerto Rico, farmers can't keep up with demand.

1:55:20.930 --> 1:55:23.820
<v Speaker 19>We'll get back to the modern-day breadfruit situation in a second.

1:55:24.160 --> 1:55:27.020
<v Speaker 19>But before that, let's talk about how breadfruit made its

1:55:27.100 --> 1:55:29.640
<v Speaker 19>way all the way from the Pacific to the Caribbean.

1:55:30.220 --> 1:55:33.060
<v Speaker 20>It wasn't until the very end of the 18th century

1:55:33.620 --> 1:55:37.340
<v Speaker 20>that breadfruit made its jump to the Caribbean. And this

1:55:37.380 --> 1:55:42.690
<v Speaker 20>was intentional. This was directed by the European colonialists. It

1:55:42.710 --> 1:55:45.770
<v Speaker 20>was the British that eventually succeeded first, but they weren't

1:55:45.810 --> 1:55:48.650
<v Speaker 20>the only ones trying. The French had also made efforts

1:55:48.720 --> 1:55:52.620
<v Speaker 20>to bring breadfruit to the Caribbean. And there's some hypothesis

1:55:52.640 --> 1:55:56.160
<v Speaker 20>that the Spanish were also moving breadfruit around the same time.

1:55:56.200 --> 1:55:57.720
<v Speaker 20>But the British did it first.

1:55:58.360 --> 1:56:01.140
<v Speaker 19>You might have heard this story before. The story of

1:56:01.180 --> 1:56:04.400
<v Speaker 19>the mutiny on the bounty. Every time I mentioned to

1:56:04.980 --> 1:56:08.000
<v Speaker 19>someone that I was working on this breadfruit project, They

1:56:08.040 --> 1:56:12.050
<v Speaker 19>would mention the original 1945 movie, The Muni on the Bounty,

1:56:12.150 --> 1:56:16.090
<v Speaker 19>or the 1962 remake with Marlon Brando to me. And

1:56:16.130 --> 1:56:18.890
<v Speaker 19>I would be like, yeah, for sure. But let me

1:56:18.930 --> 1:56:21.570
<v Speaker 19>be honest with you, dear listener. I did not know

1:56:21.610 --> 1:56:24.050
<v Speaker 19>that these movies existed up until a couple of weeks

1:56:24.130 --> 1:56:25.570
<v Speaker 19>before recording this episode.

1:56:25.590 --> 1:56:28.170
<v Speaker 2>And to be honest, they're pretty good.

1:56:28.170 --> 1:56:33.990
<v Speaker 19>3.5 stars on Letterboxd. Anyway, as European colonization wrecked terror

1:56:34.090 --> 1:56:37.230
<v Speaker 19>and death throughout the Caribbean... The British came up with

1:56:37.290 --> 1:56:41.170
<v Speaker 19>a plan to transport breadfruit from their Pacific colonies to

1:56:41.210 --> 1:56:43.790
<v Speaker 19>their Caribbean colonies, all of which had more or less

1:56:43.830 --> 1:56:47.480
<v Speaker 19>the same climate, to feed the enslaved people that they

1:56:47.490 --> 1:56:52.180
<v Speaker 19>had kidnapped from Africa and forced to work on sugar plantations. So,

1:56:52.820 --> 1:56:56.720
<v Speaker 19>the British assigned William Bly to the HMS Bounty, and

1:56:56.740 --> 1:57:00.540
<v Speaker 19>they traveled to Tahiti to load upon breadfruit. Bly, as

1:57:00.620 --> 1:57:04.420
<v Speaker 19>authoritarians commonly do, was quick to anger and routinely verbally

1:57:04.460 --> 1:57:08.580
<v Speaker 19>berated and physically assaulted his crew, who eventually mutinied and

1:57:08.640 --> 1:57:13.380
<v Speaker 19>sent Bly in his loyalist packing. However, Bly eventually made

1:57:13.420 --> 1:57:15.800
<v Speaker 19>his way back to England, where he would once again

1:57:15.940 --> 1:57:18.780
<v Speaker 19>make his way back to Tahiti and eventually reach his

1:57:18.840 --> 1:57:22.920
<v Speaker 19>original goal of bringing breadfruit to the Caribbean. He first

1:57:22.980 --> 1:57:25.800
<v Speaker 19>stopped in St. Vincent in 1793, then Jamaica shortly after.

1:57:28.630 --> 1:57:31.470
<v Speaker 19>Then breadfruit was all over the Caribbean in a few

1:57:31.530 --> 1:57:34.350
<v Speaker 19>short years, even reaching the state of Florida a few

1:57:34.390 --> 1:57:37.990
<v Speaker 19>decades later, where it's still really the only place in

1:57:38.010 --> 1:57:40.990
<v Speaker 19>the continental U.S. where it can grow outside without too

1:57:41.010 --> 1:57:44.790
<v Speaker 19>much trouble. Although it really only mostly grows in the

1:57:44.890 --> 1:57:47.810
<v Speaker 19>Keys and the warmest parts of South Florida because it's

1:57:48.020 --> 1:57:50.640
<v Speaker 19>super susceptible to a cold snap.

1:57:51.800 --> 1:57:55.620
<v Speaker 20>It was specifically intended to feed people that were enslaved

1:57:56.240 --> 1:58:01.420
<v Speaker 20>on sugar plantations and or otherwise impoverished. I know that

1:58:01.460 --> 1:58:03.940
<v Speaker 20>not every island was practicing slavery at the time that

1:58:03.960 --> 1:58:08.220
<v Speaker 20>breadfruit was imported to that island, but breadfruit was never

1:58:08.340 --> 1:58:11.910
<v Speaker 20>really intended as a food for everyone. It was for

1:58:12.020 --> 1:58:15.740
<v Speaker 20>the poor and the enslaved. And unfortunately, that gave breadfruit

1:58:16.300 --> 1:58:19.560
<v Speaker 20>something of a stigma or a negative reputation in a

1:58:19.600 --> 1:58:21.540
<v Speaker 20>lot of places throughout the Caribbean. And you can even

1:58:21.580 --> 1:58:24.400
<v Speaker 20>still find traces of that today, where it's referred to

1:58:24.520 --> 1:58:28.040
<v Speaker 20>as you know, poor man's food or comida y barro,

1:58:28.260 --> 1:58:31.580
<v Speaker 20>where it's still got that association today with poverty.

1:58:32.340 --> 1:58:35.720
<v Speaker 19>Russell explained that while slavery was still going on, people

1:58:35.760 --> 1:58:39.040
<v Speaker 19>that were able to eat something else absolutely refused to

1:58:39.140 --> 1:58:42.570
<v Speaker 19>eat breadfruit. That's how hated it was, and who could

1:58:42.590 --> 1:58:46.470
<v Speaker 19>really blame them? This reputation as a food for enslaved

1:58:46.510 --> 1:58:50.300
<v Speaker 19>people or something that only people in poverty ate stuck

1:58:50.460 --> 1:58:53.360
<v Speaker 19>around for decades, and one could make the argument that

1:58:53.420 --> 1:58:58.000
<v Speaker 19>some of that sentiment still lingers today. Even if breadfruit's

1:58:58.060 --> 1:59:00.940
<v Speaker 19>reputation has started to turn around, so much of that

1:59:01.080 --> 1:59:06.130
<v Speaker 19>evil history of colonialism and slavery is inescapable. Even now,

1:59:06.390 --> 1:59:08.370
<v Speaker 19>as I read this script, I think about how the

1:59:08.410 --> 1:59:11.190
<v Speaker 19>communities where this fruit grows the most are some of

1:59:11.230 --> 1:59:15.450
<v Speaker 19>the ones most affected by human-caused climate change, which they

1:59:15.510 --> 1:59:20.340
<v Speaker 19>contribute the least to. The Caribbean historically accounts for less

1:59:20.400 --> 1:59:24.460
<v Speaker 19>than 1% of the world's global greenhouse gas emissions, according

1:59:24.480 --> 1:59:29.540
<v Speaker 19>to the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research. Theoretically, there

1:59:29.580 --> 1:59:32.380
<v Speaker 19>could come a day when breadfruit is not as bountiful

1:59:32.500 --> 1:59:34.820
<v Speaker 19>as it once was because of the heat or even

1:59:34.880 --> 1:59:39.930
<v Speaker 19>refuse to grow altogether. Even though breadfruit is certainly climate

1:59:39.970 --> 1:59:42.790
<v Speaker 19>resilient and it can take a lot, it can't survive

1:59:43.070 --> 1:59:46.370
<v Speaker 19>without soil and water. both of which are becoming harder

1:59:46.510 --> 1:59:50.850
<v Speaker 19>and harder to come by day by day. The global south,

1:59:51.090 --> 1:59:53.590
<v Speaker 19>a lot of which relies on breadfruit as part of

1:59:53.630 --> 1:59:56.610
<v Speaker 19>their diet, will no longer be able to grow this

1:59:56.690 --> 2:00:00.960
<v Speaker 19>bountiful tree if we reach certain levels of warming. As

2:00:01.000 --> 2:00:03.800
<v Speaker 19>the hottest year on record morphs into the hottest year

2:00:03.840 --> 2:00:07.220
<v Speaker 19>so far, the global north will likely get to experience

2:00:07.360 --> 2:00:09.940
<v Speaker 19>breadfruit for the first time as areas that were once

2:00:10.020 --> 2:00:13.900
<v Speaker 19>hostile to breadfruit become its new home. This seems to

2:00:14.080 --> 2:00:17.340
<v Speaker 19>already be happening in the Marshall Islands, another place that

2:00:17.400 --> 2:00:20.940
<v Speaker 19>is very, very, very affected by climate change, as in

2:00:21.080 --> 2:00:26.990
<v Speaker 19>they're literally disappearing before our eyes. Their breadfruit, which they

2:00:27.030 --> 2:00:30.470
<v Speaker 19>call ulu, similar to other places in the Pacific, has

2:00:30.530 --> 2:00:34.930
<v Speaker 19>seen better days. They're growing smaller and less bountiful, according

2:00:34.970 --> 2:00:39.100
<v Speaker 19>to one farmer the Civil Beat interviewed. He thinks it's

2:00:39.160 --> 2:00:42.870
<v Speaker 19>salt getting into the soil or the aquifer. While breadfruit

2:00:42.890 --> 2:00:47.810
<v Speaker 19>can resist some salt, the constant presence is killer. Per

2:00:47.870 --> 2:00:50.970
<v Speaker 19>a study published in PLOS Climate about how breadfruit can

2:00:51.030 --> 2:00:54.760
<v Speaker 19>contribute to climate-resilient food systems in areas near the equator,

2:00:55.770 --> 2:00:59.120
<v Speaker 19>the area suitable for breadfruit cultivation in the tropics and

2:00:59.180 --> 2:01:04.120
<v Speaker 19>subtropics is projected to decrease by 4.4% in a scenario

2:01:04.160 --> 2:01:09.080
<v Speaker 19>where we stabilize emissions. aka where emission levels go down

2:01:09.200 --> 2:01:11.900
<v Speaker 19>but do not reach net zero by the year 2100,

2:01:11.900 --> 2:01:18.020
<v Speaker 19>and they'll decrease by about 4.5% in a high-emission scenario,

2:01:18.140 --> 2:01:21.350
<v Speaker 19>which essentially means if we burn even more fossil fuels

2:01:21.550 --> 2:01:26.670
<v Speaker 19>by 2100. In these scenarios, the areas most affected will

2:01:26.690 --> 2:01:29.850
<v Speaker 19>be Latin America and the Caribbean. where a suitable range

2:01:29.900 --> 2:01:34.370
<v Speaker 19>for breadfruit growth will decrease by 10.1% if we stabilize

2:01:34.410 --> 2:01:40.970
<v Speaker 19>emissions and 11.5% in a high-emission scenario. Meanwhile, in Southeast

2:01:41.110 --> 2:01:45.890
<v Speaker 19>Asia and the Pacific, yield quality and consistency show minimal

2:01:45.930 --> 2:01:49.390
<v Speaker 19>decreases under a high-emission scenario, while the land where you

2:01:49.410 --> 2:01:52.950
<v Speaker 19>can plant breadfruit will likely go up. In all regions,

2:01:53.170 --> 2:01:57.070
<v Speaker 19>a high-emission scenario will lead to reduced consistency and quality

2:01:57.140 --> 2:02:00.550
<v Speaker 19>of breadfruit harvests. The narrative of the study ends by

2:02:00.630 --> 2:02:04.190
<v Speaker 19>saying that breadfruit may play a role in alleviating current

2:02:04.250 --> 2:02:10.160
<v Speaker 19>and future food insecurity, particularly in equatorial Africa. When instituted

2:02:10.200 --> 2:02:13.520
<v Speaker 19>with an agroforestry model, as Marisol is doing, it could

2:02:13.560 --> 2:02:18.480
<v Speaker 19>be a potent climate adaptation strategy. This study also mentions

2:02:18.540 --> 2:02:21.500
<v Speaker 19>that its role can be expanded in countries that already

2:02:21.580 --> 2:02:24.360
<v Speaker 19>produce it to become even more of a staple and

2:02:24.400 --> 2:02:27.160
<v Speaker 19>help address growing climate-related issues there.

2:02:28.110 --> 2:02:32.050
<v Speaker 13>Ironically, tropical regions are where you do find some of

2:02:32.130 --> 2:02:37.910
<v Speaker 13>the world's underserved people, people with hunger and malnutrition as

2:02:38.010 --> 2:02:41.930
<v Speaker 13>part of their risks of daily living. So the kinds

2:02:41.990 --> 2:02:45.610
<v Speaker 13>of tree that we plant and the need are very

2:02:45.890 --> 2:02:46.850
<v Speaker 13>well matched.

2:02:47.890 --> 2:02:51.650
<v Speaker 19>That was Mike McLaughlin, co-founder and secretary of the Trees

2:02:51.710 --> 2:02:56.850
<v Speaker 19>That Feed Foundation. a Chicago-based nonprofit whose mission is to

2:02:56.890 --> 2:03:00.940
<v Speaker 19>feed people, create jobs, and benefit the environment. Mike and

2:03:00.960 --> 2:03:04.040
<v Speaker 19>his wife, Mary, who's president of Trees That Feed, grew

2:03:04.100 --> 2:03:08.760
<v Speaker 19>up in Jamaica, where breadfruit is incredibly common. However, they

2:03:08.780 --> 2:03:12.020
<v Speaker 19>didn't think of planting it until years later when they

2:03:12.080 --> 2:03:15.910
<v Speaker 19>realized how badly climate change was affecting the environment as

2:03:16.010 --> 2:03:19.210
<v Speaker 19>well as the problems it was causing around the world.

2:03:19.230 --> 2:03:22.150
<v Speaker 19>And then they started thinking about what they could do

2:03:22.210 --> 2:03:22.510
<v Speaker 19>about it.

2:03:23.340 --> 2:03:26.420
<v Speaker 15>And the reason we wanted to plant fruit trees, it

2:03:26.460 --> 2:03:30.550
<v Speaker 15>was kind of an easier sell. There were, and there

2:03:30.630 --> 2:03:34.990
<v Speaker 15>still are, climate change skeptics, people that don't think anything

2:03:35.030 --> 2:03:39.590
<v Speaker 15>is happening. They're not worried about super El Nino. They're

2:03:39.630 --> 2:03:44.340
<v Speaker 15>not doing anything to reduce our fossil fuel use, our

2:03:44.420 --> 2:03:48.680
<v Speaker 15>carbon footprint. And so because of the skeptics, we said

2:03:48.720 --> 2:03:53.240
<v Speaker 15>if we lead our effort with with climate change and

2:03:54.220 --> 2:03:58.340
<v Speaker 15>solving that problem, we kind of have to do more explaining.

2:03:58.360 --> 2:04:00.880
<v Speaker 15>We're going to be more skeptics. But if we say

2:04:00.900 --> 2:04:04.830
<v Speaker 15>we're planting trees to feed people, everybody understands that.

2:04:04.910 --> 2:04:05.850
<v Speaker 13>They know that.

2:04:06.610 --> 2:04:10.390
<v Speaker 19>Trees that feed gives breadfruit and other trees to farmers

2:04:10.570 --> 2:04:13.450
<v Speaker 19>in more than 20 countries, then teaches them how to

2:04:13.490 --> 2:04:17.190
<v Speaker 19>take care of them, harvest the breadfruit and process it

2:04:17.730 --> 2:04:20.370
<v Speaker 19>so that it can be sold and used to feed

2:04:20.410 --> 2:04:23.860
<v Speaker 19>their families. Part of the reason they have this emphasis

2:04:23.920 --> 2:04:27.700
<v Speaker 19>with farmers is that it reduces reliance on imported food,

2:04:28.380 --> 2:04:31.860
<v Speaker 19>which means that more money circulates in the local economy

2:04:32.480 --> 2:04:37.570
<v Speaker 19>instead of going elsewhere. The organization also buys breadfruit flour

2:04:37.650 --> 2:04:42.530
<v Speaker 19>and other breadfruit-based products from processors and bakeries, then donates

2:04:42.590 --> 2:04:45.450
<v Speaker 19>them to schools as part of their school feeding programs.

2:04:45.840 --> 2:04:49.030
<v Speaker 19>which serves more than 20 schools and orphanages in Haiti,

2:04:49.190 --> 2:04:51.710
<v Speaker 19>which is the second country that they started working with,

2:04:51.910 --> 2:04:56.830
<v Speaker 19>Mike explained. 5.8 million Haitians, a little more than half

2:04:56.870 --> 2:05:00.480
<v Speaker 19>of the country's total population, face crisis levels of food

2:05:00.520 --> 2:05:04.820
<v Speaker 19>insecurity or worse, according to the United Nations World Food Programme.

2:05:05.520 --> 2:05:09.900
<v Speaker 19>More than 250,000 children aged 6 to 59 months are

2:05:09.970 --> 2:05:14.750
<v Speaker 19>projected to suffer from acute malnutrition between June 2026 and

2:05:14.810 --> 2:05:20.010
<v Speaker 19>May 2027, per a UN analysis. Some people in Haiti

2:05:20.110 --> 2:05:23.110
<v Speaker 19>are forced to eat mud cookies, which are exactly what

2:05:23.130 --> 2:05:25.110
<v Speaker 19>they sound like, a little bit of earth, salt, and

2:05:25.270 --> 2:05:29.110
<v Speaker 19>oil that's meant to curb hunger pangs. It's the saddest

2:05:29.150 --> 2:05:31.950
<v Speaker 19>thing Mike's ever heard of, he told me. Trees that

2:05:31.990 --> 2:05:35.280
<v Speaker 19>feed Foundation have tried to substitute that where they can,

2:05:35.950 --> 2:05:38.830
<v Speaker 19>with con pared, a type of bread that's dense like

2:05:38.890 --> 2:05:42.770
<v Speaker 19>cake or a breadfruit porridge. These recipes were co-produced with

2:05:42.810 --> 2:05:46.670
<v Speaker 19>bakers in Haiti and North America, according to the organization's website.

2:05:47.470 --> 2:05:50.570
<v Speaker 19>Part of the trouble of growing so much breadfruit is

2:05:50.640 --> 2:05:53.840
<v Speaker 19>that it ripens really quickly, like within a couple of days,

2:05:53.960 --> 2:05:56.680
<v Speaker 19>it might start rotting if you don't refrigerate it. So

2:05:56.720 --> 2:06:00.440
<v Speaker 19>to combat that, Mike helped create a solar dehydrator that

2:06:00.480 --> 2:06:03.260
<v Speaker 19>can dehydrate breadfruit so that it can be stored without

2:06:03.300 --> 2:06:08.640
<v Speaker 19>refrigeration without affecting the nutritional benefits of the food. This

2:06:08.730 --> 2:06:11.660
<v Speaker 19>means that it can be stored for up to several

2:06:11.740 --> 2:06:17.220
<v Speaker 19>years and still maintain the same nutritional value. What Trees

2:06:17.240 --> 2:06:20.100
<v Speaker 19>That Feed is doing, using breadfruit as a tool for

2:06:20.160 --> 2:06:23.580
<v Speaker 19>sustainable development, is part of its history all along, Russell,

2:06:23.640 --> 2:06:26.060
<v Speaker 19>who's also a board member of the organization, told me

2:06:26.100 --> 2:06:30.150
<v Speaker 19>during our interview. When indigenous communities were carrying it across

2:06:30.170 --> 2:06:33.510
<v Speaker 19>the Pacific, they were hoping to feed themselves wherever they settled.

2:06:34.300 --> 2:06:36.820
<v Speaker 19>Although it was a weapon in service of the evils

2:06:36.860 --> 2:06:40.220
<v Speaker 19>of slavery, the British brought breadfruit to the Caribbean to

2:06:40.260 --> 2:06:43.860
<v Speaker 19>provide food when it became scarce, in large part because

2:06:43.900 --> 2:06:48.460
<v Speaker 19>of their own actions planting monoculture sugar plantations everywhere, to

2:06:48.480 --> 2:06:53.420
<v Speaker 19>be clear. Meanwhile, in modern times, it continues spreading across

2:06:53.460 --> 2:06:56.400
<v Speaker 19>the world as an attempt to feed people suffering through

2:06:56.460 --> 2:07:01.060
<v Speaker 19>hunger because of climate change and other crises. It's time

2:07:01.090 --> 2:07:03.130
<v Speaker 19>to throw the ads, but when we come back, We'll

2:07:03.150 --> 2:07:05.530
<v Speaker 19>wrap this episode up by talking about how the real

2:07:05.610 --> 2:07:08.010
<v Speaker 19>power of breadfruit might have been the friends that we

2:07:08.050 --> 2:07:22.440
<v Speaker 19>made along the way. You're listening to It Could Happen Here.

2:07:22.460 --> 2:07:25.660
<v Speaker 19>I'm your host for today, Carlos. And one thing I

2:07:25.700 --> 2:07:29.160
<v Speaker 19>haven't mentioned yet is about what we call breadfruit in Spanish.

2:07:29.960 --> 2:07:34.620
<v Speaker 19>It has a bunch of names depending on where you are. Panapeng, frutipang, masapang, buempang.

2:07:34.860 --> 2:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>You get the idea.

2:07:35.580 --> 2:07:36.900
<v Speaker 2>They're all bread related.

2:07:37.420 --> 2:07:41.180
<v Speaker 19>However, what I and millions of other Puerto Ricans call

2:07:41.220 --> 2:07:46.180
<v Speaker 19>it is pana, which is exactly the same way that

2:07:46.220 --> 2:07:50.160
<v Speaker 19>we refer to a close friend. A direct translation would

2:07:50.180 --> 2:07:55.200
<v Speaker 19>be something like buddy or homie. So every breadfruit is

2:07:55.510 --> 2:07:59.670
<v Speaker 19>a friend. This fruit that grows quickly and produces hundreds

2:08:00.120 --> 2:08:02.760
<v Speaker 19>of pounds of food from a single tree that has

2:08:02.820 --> 2:08:06.810
<v Speaker 19>accompanied people into the unknown and been turned from a

2:08:06.890 --> 2:08:11.250
<v Speaker 19>weapon that sustained humanity's greatest evil into a food that

2:08:11.310 --> 2:08:15.370
<v Speaker 19>now helps sustain millions and millions of people every day

2:08:16.270 --> 2:08:20.440
<v Speaker 19>that has started sprouting weeks after disaster raised every other crop,

2:08:20.660 --> 2:08:23.480
<v Speaker 19>that will grow tall and wild without much help, and

2:08:23.640 --> 2:08:28.810
<v Speaker 19>almost always has something to give, is literally named Friend.

2:08:29.690 --> 2:08:32.850
<v Speaker 19>That's the kind of beautiful and surreal that only real

2:08:32.910 --> 2:08:37.550
<v Speaker 19>life could ever be? Marisol from Amazar has a theory

2:08:37.590 --> 2:08:40.140
<v Speaker 19>about why it's called Pana that I think is worth sharing.

2:08:40.800 --> 2:08:42.580
<v Speaker 21>We in Amazar have a theory that it has to

2:08:42.620 --> 2:08:48.840
<v Speaker 21>do that. We have a very strong relationship in Puerto

2:08:48.860 --> 2:08:52.960
<v Speaker 21>Rico with our godfathers. And comadre and compadre is that

2:08:53.000 --> 2:08:57.340
<v Speaker 21>relationship of the parents of the godchild with the godfather

2:08:57.400 --> 2:09:00.120
<v Speaker 21>and godmother of that child. So if I were to

2:09:00.200 --> 2:09:04.960
<v Speaker 21>visit in the 1800s, and we were very, very, very poor,

2:09:05.160 --> 2:09:08.980
<v Speaker 21>extremely poor, and a lot of malnutrition, if I were

2:09:09.020 --> 2:09:12.080
<v Speaker 21>to visit a friend, I would bring a pana. with

2:09:12.160 --> 2:09:15.100
<v Speaker 21>me and here's your pana, here's your pana, a pana.

2:09:15.120 --> 2:09:18.440
<v Speaker 21>So it was kind of like that connotation of I'm

2:09:18.500 --> 2:09:21.240
<v Speaker 21>giving you something to help nurture your family. So that's

2:09:21.260 --> 2:09:24.260
<v Speaker 21>something very special. So if you're really my pana, you're

2:09:24.300 --> 2:09:26.120
<v Speaker 21>dear to me, I will protect you. I will take

2:09:26.180 --> 2:09:28.580
<v Speaker 21>care of you and I will, I will have your back.

2:09:29.700 --> 2:09:32.360
<v Speaker 19>I want to end this episode by returning back to

2:09:32.400 --> 2:09:36.010
<v Speaker 19>La Loma de la Niña Mariana. After my interview with Rosalina,

2:09:36.290 --> 2:09:38.430
<v Speaker 19>when I was on my way out, I stopped to

2:09:38.470 --> 2:09:41.230
<v Speaker 19>take a photo of a mosaic made with hundreds of

2:09:41.290 --> 2:09:45.470
<v Speaker 19>little pieces of colorful tiles. It depicts about a dozen

2:09:45.510 --> 2:09:48.650
<v Speaker 19>hands together in a circle, like they're about to go three, two, one,

2:09:48.730 --> 2:09:49.380
<v Speaker 19>go team.

2:09:50.020 --> 2:09:51.060
<v Speaker 2>There's a breadfruit at.

2:09:51.020 --> 2:09:53.320
<v Speaker 19>The center of the circle, almost as if it's the

2:09:53.360 --> 2:09:56.900
<v Speaker 19>thing they've put their whole faith in. But the inscription

2:09:57.000 --> 2:10:01.160
<v Speaker 19>under the mosaic, glory to the hands that work, makes

2:10:01.220 --> 2:10:03.420
<v Speaker 19>it clear that even though breadfruit might be at the

2:10:03.440 --> 2:10:05.560
<v Speaker 19>center of this art and one of the most important

2:10:05.590 --> 2:10:08.590
<v Speaker 19>things in this community, The real greatest thing that this

2:10:08.630 --> 2:10:12.070
<v Speaker 19>neighborhood has are its people, the ones that are putting

2:10:12.090 --> 2:10:13.800
<v Speaker 19>in the work when it's needed, the ones that are

2:10:13.840 --> 2:10:17.140
<v Speaker 19>making sure to help their neighbors when they need help,

2:10:17.400 --> 2:10:20.040
<v Speaker 19>the ones that are using all this breadfruit and have

2:10:20.160 --> 2:10:22.860
<v Speaker 19>used it to cook for years and years whenever there's

2:10:22.880 --> 2:10:27.550
<v Speaker 19>a crisis. It can't happen without them. Breadfruit might grow

2:10:27.810 --> 2:10:31.570
<v Speaker 19>super quickly. It might be incredibly abundant as a source

2:10:31.610 --> 2:10:34.530
<v Speaker 19>of food, but it can't be used to feed people

2:10:35.240 --> 2:10:38.340
<v Speaker 19>without the community putting in the work to gather it,

2:10:38.500 --> 2:10:40.980
<v Speaker 19>cook it, store it, and then bring it back out

2:10:41.270 --> 2:10:41.860
<v Speaker 19>when it's needed.

2:10:44.770 --> 2:10:48.910
<v Speaker 9>Because to us, if we've done anything, it's that we've

2:10:48.950 --> 2:10:53.690
<v Speaker 9>seeded solidarity. I mean, whenever a situation happens here, people

2:10:53.730 --> 2:10:57.250
<v Speaker 9>show up and immediately ask, how can I help? What

2:10:57.290 --> 2:11:00.470
<v Speaker 9>can I do? Where can I pitch in? People get

2:11:00.530 --> 2:11:03.910
<v Speaker 9>here hauling water with whatever they have at home. Cans

2:11:03.950 --> 2:11:07.990
<v Speaker 9>of beans, rice. Look, I have this, you can start cooking.

2:11:08.630 --> 2:11:11.130
<v Speaker 9>People say, I can get to such and such place

2:11:11.190 --> 2:11:13.130
<v Speaker 9>because I have the right equipment. What can I do?

2:11:13.630 --> 2:11:17.510
<v Speaker 9>We have that in abundance. This community's greatest resource is

2:11:17.570 --> 2:11:21.410
<v Speaker 9>its people. We've always said so. We might not have

2:11:21.450 --> 2:11:24.300
<v Speaker 9>the vast financial resources, but we do have the people.

2:11:24.310 --> 2:11:26.000
<v Speaker 2>And that is.

2:11:25.980 --> 2:11:28.880
<v Speaker 9>The primary resource we work with, and the people to

2:11:28.920 --> 2:11:30.360
<v Speaker 9>whom we owe everything we have here.

2:11:34.290 --> 2:11:37.490
<v Speaker 19>I've been thinking about that mosaic pretty much every day

2:11:37.880 --> 2:11:41.160
<v Speaker 19>since I was at La Loma. While breadfruit is at

2:11:41.200 --> 2:11:44.080
<v Speaker 19>the center, it's the people that are putting in the

2:11:44.120 --> 2:11:47.420
<v Speaker 19>work who are actually able to help one another by

2:11:47.760 --> 2:11:51.490
<v Speaker 19>using breadfruit. It's a powerful reminder that the only way

2:11:51.690 --> 2:11:54.730
<v Speaker 19>out of a crisis is through, that the only way

2:11:54.790 --> 2:11:57.630
<v Speaker 19>through is together. Thanks for listening.

2:12:09.160 --> 2:12:11.380
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to It Could Happen Here, a show about

2:12:11.420 --> 2:12:16.080
<v Speaker 3>things falling apart. I'm Robert Evans. We all know what

2:12:16.120 --> 2:12:19.570
<v Speaker 3>happened at the U.S. Capitol on January 6th, 2021. Those

2:12:19.590 --> 2:12:23.250
<v Speaker 3>events were so consequential and infamous that I fear people

2:12:23.270 --> 2:12:26.150
<v Speaker 3>have forgotten how they felt about the possibility of an

2:12:26.210 --> 2:12:29.520
<v Speaker 3>attack on the Capitol by a mob of citizens on

2:12:29.580 --> 2:12:32.900
<v Speaker 3>January 5th. That's not something I can forget. as I

2:12:32.940 --> 2:12:35.660
<v Speaker 3>spent my first days of January that year digging through

2:12:35.720 --> 2:12:39.060
<v Speaker 3>thousands of comments on social media and MAGA-focused message boards.

2:12:39.620 --> 2:12:41.760
<v Speaker 3>I came away from my research convinced an attack on

2:12:41.800 --> 2:12:44.460
<v Speaker 3>the Capitol was possible, and I tried to warn people.

2:12:45.160 --> 2:12:47.120
<v Speaker 3>I was not the only researcher who wrote about the

2:12:47.160 --> 2:12:50.260
<v Speaker 3>possibility of an attack on the Capitol before January 6th.

2:12:50.920 --> 2:12:53.740
<v Speaker 3>None of our warnings were heeded, in part because the authorities,

2:12:53.900 --> 2:12:57.390
<v Speaker 3>like most people, considered the odds of a mob successfully

2:12:57.570 --> 2:13:01.580
<v Speaker 3>occupying the Capitol to be right around 0%. The United

2:13:01.640 --> 2:13:04.660
<v Speaker 3>States is the most powerful nation in history, the argument went,

2:13:05.060 --> 2:13:07.710
<v Speaker 3>and the Capitol building and nearby government facilities are some

2:13:07.730 --> 2:13:10.410
<v Speaker 3>of the most hardened targets on Earth. There's no way

2:13:10.470 --> 2:13:13.830
<v Speaker 3>a mob of mostly unarmed protesters could just storm them

2:13:13.990 --> 2:13:17.220
<v Speaker 3>like the Winter Palace and put lawmakers' lives at risk.

2:13:17.640 --> 2:13:18.900
<v Speaker 2>Your fears are a fantasy.

2:13:18.980 --> 2:13:20.440
<v Speaker 3>You're just trying to scare people.

2:13:20.840 --> 2:13:21.250
<v Speaker 1>Shut up.

2:13:21.780 --> 2:13:25.220
<v Speaker 3>Well, we were correct about January 6th, and over the

2:13:25.260 --> 2:13:27.770
<v Speaker 3>last few years, I've begun to worry about something new.

2:13:28.430 --> 2:13:32.370
<v Speaker 3>The name I've given this fear is Nuclear January 6th. Now,

2:13:32.710 --> 2:13:35.410
<v Speaker 3>I'm not talking about an all-out nuclear war here, and

2:13:35.430 --> 2:13:38.030
<v Speaker 3>I'm certainly not talking about a nuclear strike on the U.S. Capitol,

2:13:38.050 --> 2:13:40.950
<v Speaker 3>although that's one possible way this could occur. You're all

2:13:41.230 --> 2:13:45.510
<v Speaker 3>readily familiar with the possibility and consequences of Atomic Holocaust,

2:13:45.950 --> 2:13:47.840
<v Speaker 3>and I'm not using that term for the possibility of

2:13:47.880 --> 2:13:51.460
<v Speaker 3>a terrorist organization or their non-state actor acquiring a nuke

2:13:51.540 --> 2:13:55.620
<v Speaker 3>or dirty bomb, which remains possible, but let's say unlikely.

2:13:56.430 --> 2:13:59.810
<v Speaker 3>A nuclear January 6th would be a lot like its namesake,

2:14:00.070 --> 2:14:03.980
<v Speaker 3>a catastrophic event that would have seemed impossible, even laughably so,

2:14:04.100 --> 2:14:07.320
<v Speaker 3>before it occurred and involves the use of a nuclear weapon.

2:14:08.100 --> 2:14:11.540
<v Speaker 3>A nuclear January 6th, then, would be a fuck-up, either

2:14:11.600 --> 2:14:15.260
<v Speaker 3>a disastrous nuclear error caused by incompetence or a limited

2:14:15.340 --> 2:14:20.450
<v Speaker 3>nuclear deployment inspired by incompetence. Either way, the scenario I'm

2:14:20.490 --> 2:14:23.490
<v Speaker 3>envisioning doesn't mean the end of the world, It means

2:14:23.710 --> 2:14:25.850
<v Speaker 3>one or at most a small number of warheads are

2:14:25.950 --> 2:14:29.300
<v Speaker 3>detonated for a very stupid reason, and we're all left

2:14:29.360 --> 2:14:31.940
<v Speaker 3>to move forward in a world that is now permanently

2:14:32.020 --> 2:14:37.580
<v Speaker 3>less safe. In 1989, American political scientist Robert Jervis published

2:14:37.600 --> 2:14:41.010
<v Speaker 3>a book titled The Meaning of the Nuclear Revolution, Statecraft

2:14:41.070 --> 2:14:44.310
<v Speaker 3>and the Prospect of Armageddon. Looking out at the international

2:14:44.350 --> 2:14:47.190
<v Speaker 3>situation at the tail end of the Cold War, Jervis

2:14:47.310 --> 2:14:51.520
<v Speaker 3>argued that war between nuclear powers was now unthinkable. Within

2:14:51.540 --> 2:14:54.040
<v Speaker 3>the context of that conflict, he was correct.

2:14:54.480 --> 2:14:55.160
<v Speaker 2>Both the U.S.

2:14:55.200 --> 2:14:58.340
<v Speaker 3>And the USSR, despite their separate battalions of war hawks

2:14:58.400 --> 2:15:02.970
<v Speaker 3>and substantial doses of paranoia, avoided stepping over the nuclear brink.

2:15:03.590 --> 2:15:07.750
<v Speaker 3>The men who ran both nations clearly considered nuclear war unthinkable.

2:15:08.550 --> 2:15:10.970
<v Speaker 3>In the decades since the Cold War's end, the nations

2:15:11.010 --> 2:15:13.510
<v Speaker 3>of the world have continued to avoid nuking us all

2:15:13.550 --> 2:15:16.990
<v Speaker 3>into Cormac McCarthy's The Road. But there is an unfortunate

2:15:17.040 --> 2:15:19.200
<v Speaker 3>amount of evidence that some of the people in charge

2:15:19.240 --> 2:15:22.000
<v Speaker 3>of the great powers of our time no longer find

2:15:22.080 --> 2:15:25.820
<v Speaker 3>deploying a nuke to be unthinkable, even against other nuclear powers.

2:15:26.640 --> 2:15:29.420
<v Speaker 3>The clearest example of this comes from the Russian Federation

2:15:29.480 --> 2:15:33.020
<v Speaker 3>and its activities in Ukraine. Back in January, The Bell,

2:15:33.150 --> 2:15:36.510
<v Speaker 3>an independent Russian news site, reported on building support in

2:15:36.550 --> 2:15:39.850
<v Speaker 3>the Kremlin for the battlefield use of a tactical nuclear weapon.

2:15:40.410 --> 2:15:43.190
<v Speaker 3>This was thought to most likely occur over Crimea.

2:15:43.550 --> 2:15:43.890
<v Speaker 5>A 2022 U.S.

2:15:44.010 --> 2:15:49.190
<v Speaker 3>Intel assessment independently estimated 50% odds that Putin would order

2:15:49.210 --> 2:15:52.470
<v Speaker 3>a nuclear strike if the defenses around Crimea began to fail.

2:15:53.170 --> 2:15:56.510
<v Speaker 3>Russian nuclear doctrine today supports the use of atomic weapons

2:15:56.570 --> 2:15:59.930
<v Speaker 3>against an existential threat. And as Kieran Monks writes in

2:15:59.970 --> 2:16:04.040
<v Speaker 3>a piece for iNews, Russia's Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Rybakov

2:16:04.120 --> 2:16:06.860
<v Speaker 3>said this morning this meant encroachments on Russia or its

2:16:06.900 --> 2:16:10.720
<v Speaker 3>territorial integrity by aggressors, including those who may possess such weapons,

2:16:11.100 --> 2:16:14.140
<v Speaker 3>could prompt us to use these weapons in the worst-case scenario.

2:16:14.980 --> 2:16:17.820
<v Speaker 3>The loss of Crimea, which Putin calls an inseparable part

2:16:17.860 --> 2:16:22.370
<v Speaker 3>of Russia, could technically reach that threshold, said Dr. Pavel Podvig,

2:16:22.470 --> 2:16:25.310
<v Speaker 3>a senior researcher and specialist on Russia's nuclear forces at

2:16:25.350 --> 2:16:29.850
<v Speaker 3>the UN Institute for Disarmament Research. Now, my understanding of

2:16:29.890 --> 2:16:32.670
<v Speaker 3>the situation in Ukraine is that Crimea is not under

2:16:32.730 --> 2:16:37.500
<v Speaker 3>imminent danger of being retaken by Ukrainian forces, somewhat unfortunately. However,

2:16:37.580 --> 2:16:41.020
<v Speaker 3>the vagueness of Russia's nuclear line being an existential threat

2:16:41.550 --> 2:16:43.789
<v Speaker 3>means that they might well decide one day that diesel

2:16:43.830 --> 2:16:47.110
<v Speaker 3>refining facilities count, given the centrality of oil exports to

2:16:47.129 --> 2:16:51.300
<v Speaker 3>their economy. Sergei Karaganov, head of a defense industry think

2:16:51.340 --> 2:16:54.180
<v Speaker 3>tank in Moscow and former advisor to Putin, is among

2:16:54.240 --> 2:16:57.820
<v Speaker 3>Russia's largest nuclear hawks. He has recently argued for limited

2:16:57.879 --> 2:17:01.300
<v Speaker 3>nuclear strikes on Ukraine's European allies. I bring this up

2:17:01.340 --> 2:17:04.199
<v Speaker 3>not because that's a scenario I'm discussing today. If Russia

2:17:04.250 --> 2:17:06.430
<v Speaker 3>nuked a NATO country, that would be a de facto

2:17:06.450 --> 2:17:08.490
<v Speaker 3>strike on a nuclear power and would likely end up

2:17:08.530 --> 2:17:12.019
<v Speaker 3>being much worse than my nuclear January 6th theory. I

2:17:12.060 --> 2:17:14.560
<v Speaker 3>bring this up because comments like this from Russia have

2:17:14.580 --> 2:17:17.100
<v Speaker 3>contributed to an unfortunate trend in U.S.

2:17:17.120 --> 2:17:17.900
<v Speaker 2>Defense circles.

2:17:18.459 --> 2:17:23.250
<v Speaker 3>Serious discussion about the need for expanded low-yield tactical nuclear options.

2:17:23.370 --> 2:17:27.110
<v Speaker 3>And folks, remember, when we're saying low-yield nuclear weapons, we're

2:17:27.150 --> 2:17:29.869
<v Speaker 3>still often talking about stuff at least on par with

2:17:29.890 --> 2:17:33.920
<v Speaker 3>the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs, if not still considerably more powerful.

2:17:33.980 --> 2:17:38.480
<v Speaker 3>Those count as low-yield weapons today. For most of our lifetimes,

2:17:38.890 --> 2:17:41.550
<v Speaker 3>The U.S. has focused its nuclear research and buildup on

2:17:41.590 --> 2:17:45.580
<v Speaker 3>what we might call big civilization-ending doomsday nukes. I'm using

2:17:45.620 --> 2:17:48.050
<v Speaker 3>a little hyperbole there, but not much. Most of our

2:17:48.129 --> 2:17:49.970
<v Speaker 3>standing nuclear weapons are strategic.

2:17:50.340 --> 2:17:50.820
<v Speaker 2>In nature.

2:17:51.240 --> 2:17:53.539
<v Speaker 3>That means they're very big, and they're meant to deter

2:17:53.620 --> 2:17:56.400
<v Speaker 3>an enemy from launching a full-scale nuclear attack on us.

2:17:57.120 --> 2:18:00.939
<v Speaker 3>The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists estimates that about 94% of

2:18:01.140 --> 2:18:05.690
<v Speaker 3>all actively deployed U.S. warheads are long-range strategic weapons. As

2:18:05.750 --> 2:18:08.650
<v Speaker 3>Gabriel Honrada noted in an article for Asia Times, this

2:18:08.709 --> 2:18:12.910
<v Speaker 3>makes tactical nukes a, quote, small, specialized component of overall U.S.

2:18:12.950 --> 2:18:13.769
<v Speaker 2>Nuclear posture.

2:18:14.490 --> 2:18:16.769
<v Speaker 3>You and I might consider that a good thing because

2:18:16.890 --> 2:18:19.230
<v Speaker 3>any nuke small enough to use safely is likelier to

2:18:19.350 --> 2:18:23.080
<v Speaker 3>get used. However, when defense planners hear the U.S. has

2:18:23.140 --> 2:18:27.039
<v Speaker 3>very few tactical nukes alongside news articles about Russia threatening

2:18:27.080 --> 2:18:30.580
<v Speaker 3>to use small tactical nukes, a funny thing happens. They

2:18:30.600 --> 2:18:33.620
<v Speaker 3>begin to worry about a gap between our capability and

2:18:33.660 --> 2:18:36.470
<v Speaker 3>that of an adversary. Fears of that gap have been

2:18:36.550 --> 2:18:40.830
<v Speaker 3>further exacerbated by recent significant modernization of China's nuclear arsenal.

2:18:41.530 --> 2:18:44.370
<v Speaker 3>In the last few years, the Chinese military has massively

2:18:44.430 --> 2:18:47.770
<v Speaker 3>increased the quality of their nuclear weapons and the related equipment,

2:18:47.810 --> 2:18:50.660
<v Speaker 3>the delivery devices and such. I'm not going to go

2:18:50.740 --> 2:18:53.860
<v Speaker 3>into a nerdy, fear-mongery deep dive about the exact capabilities

2:18:53.900 --> 2:18:56.950
<v Speaker 3>of these new tools. That doesn't really matter today. What

2:18:57.030 --> 2:19:00.920
<v Speaker 3>does matter is that in August of 2026, U.S. Undersecretary

2:19:00.950 --> 2:19:04.759
<v Speaker 3>of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby initiated a policy review

2:19:04.980 --> 2:19:08.340
<v Speaker 3>of the nation's nuclear posture. The stated goal of this

2:19:08.420 --> 2:19:11.990
<v Speaker 3>review is, per coverage by Breaking Defense, quote, focused on

2:19:12.020 --> 2:19:16.430
<v Speaker 3>providing more options for the White House. Undersecretary Colby expressed

2:19:16.470 --> 2:19:19.930
<v Speaker 3>the need for what he called rational nuclear options to

2:19:19.970 --> 2:19:22.810
<v Speaker 3>deal with the changing threats from China and Russia. And,

2:19:22.970 --> 2:19:26.179
<v Speaker 3>as Honrada wrote in his article, The policy review comes

2:19:26.240 --> 2:19:30.560
<v Speaker 3>amid longstanding U.S. DOD concerns over foreign deployments in low-yield warheads,

2:19:30.640 --> 2:19:35.039
<v Speaker 3>which risk leaving the U.S. without proportional non-strategic responses. An

2:19:35.080 --> 2:19:38.630
<v Speaker 3>expansion in the number of, and potentially the in-theater deployment of,

2:19:38.830 --> 2:19:43.070
<v Speaker 3>low-yield nuclear weapons does not guarantee their use. Low-yield nukes

2:19:43.090 --> 2:19:45.929
<v Speaker 3>have been deployed to hot zones or potential hot zones before,

2:19:46.190 --> 2:19:48.490
<v Speaker 3>albeit decades ago during the height of the Cold War.

2:19:49.180 --> 2:19:51.920
<v Speaker 3>But I have trouble looking at this current administration in

2:19:51.959 --> 2:19:55.260
<v Speaker 3>the U.S. and so much of the bombastic, kill-obsessed rhetoric

2:19:55.300 --> 2:19:57.930
<v Speaker 3>that comes out of the Department of War these days

2:19:58.490 --> 2:20:01.490
<v Speaker 3>and believing that the terms low-yield and tactical won't be

2:20:01.530 --> 2:20:05.810
<v Speaker 3>interpreted as safe to use. In fact, there's a real

2:20:05.910 --> 2:20:08.100
<v Speaker 3>chance that just by accepting the need for more of

2:20:08.110 --> 2:20:11.600
<v Speaker 3>these weapons and deploying some near-conflict regions, we'll start a

2:20:11.660 --> 2:20:14.940
<v Speaker 3>countdown whereby some of our current defense thinkers convince themselves

2:20:14.980 --> 2:20:17.120
<v Speaker 3>there's a ticking clock. and they need to find a

2:20:17.220 --> 2:20:20.280
<v Speaker 3>target for a low-yield nuclear strike to prove we've got

2:20:20.340 --> 2:20:23.730
<v Speaker 3>the guts to use this thing. If that sounds far-fetched,

2:20:23.940 --> 2:20:25.340
<v Speaker 3>I want you to think back to April of 2017,

2:20:25.330 --> 2:20:28.990
<v Speaker 3>when the U.S. conducted an airstrike in Afghanistan using the

2:20:29.030 --> 2:20:32.790
<v Speaker 3>largest non-nuclear weapon we've got, the MOAB. There were some

2:20:32.870 --> 2:20:35.810
<v Speaker 3>logical reasons for such a strike. ISIS fighters were using

2:20:35.870 --> 2:20:38.110
<v Speaker 3>a tunnel network, and the MOAB is meant to penetrate

2:20:38.150 --> 2:20:41.310
<v Speaker 3>and take out such underground targets. That said, there's no

2:20:41.390 --> 2:20:44.849
<v Speaker 3>evidence this facility or the 36-ish ISIS fighters killed in

2:20:44.879 --> 2:20:48.090
<v Speaker 3>the blasts represented a threat to U.S. interests in the region,

2:20:48.150 --> 2:20:52.730
<v Speaker 3>necessitating such a dramatic response. Many pundits suspected the real

2:20:52.810 --> 2:20:54.950
<v Speaker 3>reason we dropped this big bomb had more to do

2:20:54.990 --> 2:20:58.230
<v Speaker 3>with Trump's campaign promise to bomb the shit out of ISIS.

2:20:58.950 --> 2:21:02.750
<v Speaker 3>Faisal Pervez, an analyst for the military intelligence forum Stratfor,

2:21:03.129 --> 2:21:06.879
<v Speaker 3>told Vice his suspicions. We drop a bomb that weighs

2:21:06.879 --> 2:21:07.240
<v Speaker 3>21,000 pounds.

2:21:07.330 --> 2:21:08.240
<v Speaker 2>That's so big.

2:21:08.610 --> 2:21:10.209
<v Speaker 3>I think a part of it, or some part of it,

2:21:10.280 --> 2:21:12.860
<v Speaker 3>is the messaging and the symbolic significance that the U.S.

2:21:12.900 --> 2:21:15.180
<v Speaker 3>is sending out to countries such as Russia. that we

2:21:15.220 --> 2:21:17.520
<v Speaker 3>are the premier military in the world. We are the

2:21:17.540 --> 2:21:19.890
<v Speaker 3>biggest power. We have the tools and weapons to show

2:21:19.910 --> 2:21:23.029
<v Speaker 3>you that this is the case. Well, the same man

2:21:23.070 --> 2:21:25.450
<v Speaker 3>who dropped that bomb is back in power now. We

2:21:25.490 --> 2:21:27.930
<v Speaker 3>are fighting a losing war with Iran that has endangered

2:21:27.970 --> 2:21:32.150
<v Speaker 3>his power. Back in April of 2026, President Trump threatened

2:21:32.190 --> 2:21:35.629
<v Speaker 3>Iran by saying, a whole civilization will die tonight if

2:21:35.670 --> 2:21:39.010
<v Speaker 3>the Strait of Hormuz was not reopened. More recently, he's

2:21:39.050 --> 2:21:41.730
<v Speaker 3>mused that Iran might take out Los Angeles or San

2:21:41.750 --> 2:21:44.620
<v Speaker 3>Diego with a nuclear weapon someday. which he viewed as

2:21:44.650 --> 2:21:46.910
<v Speaker 3>a small price to pay for the permission that would

2:21:46.950 --> 2:21:50.670
<v Speaker 3>give the U.S. to annihilate Iran in return. We'll keep

2:21:50.709 --> 2:21:53.290
<v Speaker 3>talking about this, but first, here's some ads.

2:22:04.720 --> 2:22:05.140
<v Speaker 2>We're back.

2:22:06.720 --> 2:22:10.480
<v Speaker 3>If more low-yield nuclear weapons are built and deployed, they

2:22:10.520 --> 2:22:14.250
<v Speaker 3>will become in startlingly short time just another option on

2:22:14.270 --> 2:22:18.820
<v Speaker 3>the menu for military planners. We might expect decade-standing traditions

2:22:18.959 --> 2:22:21.800
<v Speaker 3>against using such weapons to count for something, but as

2:22:21.820 --> 2:22:24.500
<v Speaker 3>you're aware, Pete Hegseth has purged a huge number of

2:22:24.560 --> 2:22:27.860
<v Speaker 3>veteran leaders from the Department of Defense. Similar brain drains

2:22:27.900 --> 2:22:31.210
<v Speaker 3>have occurred across all of our primary national security institutions.

2:22:31.670 --> 2:22:33.810
<v Speaker 2>There are fewer cooler heads to prevail.

2:22:33.830 --> 2:22:37.410
<v Speaker 3>Hegseth has also made lethality and kill count into our

2:22:37.450 --> 2:22:41.710
<v Speaker 3>military's primary measure of operational success. More to my point, today,

2:22:41.750 --> 2:22:45.860
<v Speaker 3>the entire Trump administration runs on social media. Truth social, Twitter,

2:22:45.879 --> 2:22:49.260
<v Speaker 3>and TikTok aren't just organs the regime uses to disseminate propaganda.

2:22:49.300 --> 2:22:51.619
<v Speaker 3>They are where Donald Trump and his advisors go for

2:22:51.680 --> 2:22:55.300
<v Speaker 3>information and to take the pulse of the nation. Let's

2:22:55.340 --> 2:22:58.700
<v Speaker 3>consider one possible chain of events. Some months from now,

2:22:58.940 --> 2:23:02.000
<v Speaker 3>Trump orders a tactical nuke deployed with our forces attacking Iran.

2:23:02.379 --> 2:23:04.550
<v Speaker 3>The plan isn't to use it, but to threaten the

2:23:04.620 --> 2:23:08.070
<v Speaker 3>enemy and generate a groundswell of rage among Trump's domestic enemies,

2:23:08.110 --> 2:23:11.070
<v Speaker 3>which is always something he thinks about. Soon after the

2:23:11.110 --> 2:23:14.750
<v Speaker 3>weapon arrives, Iranian forces score a major hit. Maybe one

2:23:14.770 --> 2:23:17.429
<v Speaker 3>of their ballistic missile strikes and damages a naval vessel

2:23:17.490 --> 2:23:20.129
<v Speaker 3>killing soldiers. Maybe they hit a base and cause an

2:23:20.190 --> 2:23:23.640
<v Speaker 3>unprecedented loss of lives and materiel. Such a strike is

2:23:23.750 --> 2:23:26.820
<v Speaker 3>not impossible. It could happen tomorrow, and it would not

2:23:26.900 --> 2:23:30.140
<v Speaker 3>need to debilitate or cripple our military forces long term

2:23:30.440 --> 2:23:33.620
<v Speaker 3>to provoke Donald Trump into a nuclear response. All it

2:23:33.660 --> 2:23:36.600
<v Speaker 3>would need to do is embarrass him. At his footage

2:23:36.680 --> 2:23:39.720
<v Speaker 3>spreads of fire raging atop an aircraft carrier or a

2:23:39.800 --> 2:23:42.840
<v Speaker 3>burning frigate listing at sea or wounded and dying U.S.

2:23:42.900 --> 2:23:46.730
<v Speaker 3>soldiers near a base, Trump's followers begin howling for blood

2:23:46.780 --> 2:23:50.090
<v Speaker 3>on social media. One cry sounds out louder than all

2:23:50.110 --> 2:23:50.550
<v Speaker 3>the others.

2:23:51.129 --> 2:23:53.830
<v Speaker 2>Nuke the bastards. Trump might.

2:23:54.590 --> 2:23:56.949
<v Speaker 3>Such a strike would be unlikely to cause an immediate

2:23:56.990 --> 2:24:01.330
<v Speaker 3>apocalyptic cascade into nuclear war. There would be international outrage,

2:24:01.370 --> 2:24:05.209
<v Speaker 3>but not outright retaliation. Even so, in a stroke, Trump

2:24:05.230 --> 2:24:08.150
<v Speaker 3>would have dissolved any remaining stigma against the use of

2:24:08.209 --> 2:24:12.160
<v Speaker 3>nuclear weapons in war. This would make Russia much likelier

2:24:12.220 --> 2:24:15.640
<v Speaker 3>to use a tactical nuke in Ukraine. It might change

2:24:15.720 --> 2:24:19.800
<v Speaker 3>Chinese calculations, RE Taiwan, but what it would inarguably do

2:24:20.220 --> 2:24:24.689
<v Speaker 3>is make nuclear weapons a normal, conceivable, usable tool of

2:24:24.790 --> 2:24:28.170
<v Speaker 3>conventional war. I don't know how long it would take

2:24:28.250 --> 2:24:31.070
<v Speaker 3>the breaking of that taboo to generate a larger nuclear war,

2:24:31.550 --> 2:24:33.910
<v Speaker 3>But I believe after this point, such a future would

2:24:33.930 --> 2:24:38.089
<v Speaker 3>become almost inevitable. It is still quite possible, even likelier,

2:24:38.290 --> 2:24:40.709
<v Speaker 3>that Russia would be the first nation-state to break the

2:24:40.750 --> 2:24:43.209
<v Speaker 3>taboo and use a tactical nuke for the reasons I've

2:24:43.230 --> 2:24:46.699
<v Speaker 3>just outlined. This might lead to a similar outcome worldwide,

2:24:46.720 --> 2:24:49.280
<v Speaker 3>although I'm less certain of that. Russia is considered an

2:24:49.300 --> 2:24:52.140
<v Speaker 3>international pariah to many in ways that the United States

2:24:52.220 --> 2:24:55.660
<v Speaker 3>still isn't quite. That said, I have no doubt that

2:24:55.680 --> 2:24:58.080
<v Speaker 3>the ultimate chain of events leading to such a deployment

2:24:58.120 --> 2:24:59.820
<v Speaker 3>would be just as stupid as they would be in

2:24:59.860 --> 2:25:03.610
<v Speaker 3>the United States. China feels less likely to be the

2:25:03.629 --> 2:25:07.350
<v Speaker 3>direct cause of such a deployment. Their nuclear policy originated

2:25:07.410 --> 2:25:10.830
<v Speaker 3>from Mao Zedong. He did not love nuclear weapons, calling

2:25:10.850 --> 2:25:13.400
<v Speaker 3>them a paper tiger and talking shit on the US

2:25:13.440 --> 2:25:15.959
<v Speaker 3>and the USSR for building so many of the damn things.

2:25:16.420 --> 2:25:19.660
<v Speaker 3>When China became a nuclear state in 1964, Mao stated

2:25:19.680 --> 2:25:22.599
<v Speaker 3>the only use for this thing, his term for the bomb,

2:25:23.020 --> 2:25:27.080
<v Speaker 3>was to deter other nuclear-armed countries. As a result, China

2:25:27.100 --> 2:25:30.990
<v Speaker 3>has always had an official no-first-use policy with their nuclear arsenal.

2:25:31.470 --> 2:25:33.849
<v Speaker 3>This differs from the U.S. and Russia, who operate by

2:25:33.930 --> 2:25:36.450
<v Speaker 3>launch on warn. In other words, if we think you're

2:25:36.490 --> 2:25:40.000
<v Speaker 3>going to nuke us, we will nuke you. China's official

2:25:40.040 --> 2:25:44.580
<v Speaker 3>policy is minimum deterrence. That's generally translated to mean we

2:25:44.620 --> 2:25:47.620
<v Speaker 3>keep our arsenal at the minimum level necessary to deter

2:25:47.700 --> 2:25:50.900
<v Speaker 3>our adversaries. However, in an article on the evolution of

2:25:50.959 --> 2:25:55.260
<v Speaker 3>China's nuclear posture, the website DEFCON Warning System notes, This

2:25:55.320 --> 2:26:00.020
<v Speaker 3>declaratory posture also embodies China's strategic ambiguity. For one, minimum

2:26:00.060 --> 2:26:03.980
<v Speaker 3>deterrence remains undefined. Chinese officials have never quantified what a

2:26:04.060 --> 2:26:07.180
<v Speaker 3>minimum nuclear capability means in practice. Is it a few

2:26:07.240 --> 2:26:08.820
<v Speaker 3>dozen warheads able to strike back?

2:26:09.120 --> 2:26:09.760
<v Speaker 2>A few hundred?

2:26:10.340 --> 2:26:13.970
<v Speaker 3>As China's arsenal grows, the goalposts appear to shift. Similarly,

2:26:14.050 --> 2:26:17.690
<v Speaker 3>what constitutes an arms race is left vague. Beijing's current buildup,

2:26:17.790 --> 2:26:20.830
<v Speaker 3>by far its largest and fastest ever, ostensibly does not

2:26:20.870 --> 2:26:23.510
<v Speaker 3>violate its pledge to avoid arms racing, at least in

2:26:23.570 --> 2:26:27.090
<v Speaker 3>its own view. Crucially, China's nuclear doctrine has begun to

2:26:27.140 --> 2:26:31.660
<v Speaker 3>stress achieving strategic counterbalance with other powers. Though not officially defined,

2:26:31.720 --> 2:26:34.800
<v Speaker 3>this phrase suggests Beijing sees its nuclear forces as vital

2:26:34.840 --> 2:26:37.859
<v Speaker 3>to shaping the global power equilibrium. It implies a more

2:26:37.920 --> 2:26:40.740
<v Speaker 3>assertive role for nukes, not merely to deter an attack

2:26:40.820 --> 2:26:43.859
<v Speaker 3>on China, but to offset the overall military might of rivals,

2:26:43.959 --> 2:26:48.210
<v Speaker 3>particularly the United States. This nuanced shift in language contributes

2:26:48.250 --> 2:26:52.170
<v Speaker 3>to uncertainty. Does counterbalance mean China seeks nuclear parity with

2:26:52.190 --> 2:26:55.430
<v Speaker 3>the U.S. or simply a survivable second strike? The lack

2:26:55.470 --> 2:26:59.350
<v Speaker 3>of clarity keeps observers guessing. Now, I don't bring any

2:26:59.370 --> 2:27:02.189
<v Speaker 3>of this up with the interest of fear-mongering over China,

2:27:02.230 --> 2:27:05.390
<v Speaker 3>but because the questions and ambiguities outlined in that segment

2:27:05.470 --> 2:27:08.400
<v Speaker 3>are a real cause for concern to the defense analysts

2:27:08.450 --> 2:27:10.619
<v Speaker 3>who study China, not just for the U.S.

2:27:10.680 --> 2:27:12.000
<v Speaker 2>Government, but over in New Delhi.

2:27:12.540 --> 2:27:15.420
<v Speaker 3>The Indian state is locked in a continuous low-level border

2:27:15.480 --> 2:27:19.620
<v Speaker 3>conflict with China, alongside their border conflict with Pakistan, also

2:27:19.660 --> 2:27:23.520
<v Speaker 3>a nuclear-armed state. Both China and India have been extremely

2:27:23.580 --> 2:27:27.030
<v Speaker 3>careful to avoid bringing nuclear threats to the table. But

2:27:27.050 --> 2:27:30.250
<v Speaker 3>that only underlines how much leaders in both nations fear

2:27:30.290 --> 2:27:34.010
<v Speaker 3>the possibility. And over on their border with Pakistan, nuclear

2:27:34.030 --> 2:27:37.810
<v Speaker 3>threats have come up recently. 2025 saw a large skirmish

2:27:37.850 --> 2:27:39.930
<v Speaker 3>between India and Pakistan that included crossfire.

2:27:40.600 --> 2:27:41.300
<v Speaker 2>Aerial raids.

2:27:41.820 --> 2:27:44.780
<v Speaker 3>After several days of this, Pakistan's foreign secretary issued a

2:27:44.820 --> 2:27:47.860
<v Speaker 3>statement on May 28th. We will not hesitate to use

2:27:48.060 --> 2:27:51.200
<v Speaker 3>any weapon in our arsenal to defend our territorial integrity.

2:27:52.050 --> 2:27:54.609
<v Speaker 3>This was interpreted as a nuclear threat and caused a

2:27:54.790 --> 2:27:58.619
<v Speaker 3>massive international ruckus. which prompted a spokesman for Pakistan's government

2:27:58.640 --> 2:28:02.039
<v Speaker 3>to clarify that that was not the intent. We all

2:28:02.120 --> 2:28:05.180
<v Speaker 3>lucked out that the May 2025 conflict did not occur

2:28:05.240 --> 2:28:07.760
<v Speaker 3>at the same time as another uptick in hostility between

2:28:07.800 --> 2:28:10.820
<v Speaker 3>Beijing and New Delhi, but it's easy to imagine something

2:28:10.840 --> 2:28:13.720
<v Speaker 3>like that might occur. In the event of such a conflict,

2:28:13.900 --> 2:28:17.250
<v Speaker 3>Pakistan would rely heavily on their naval forces, armed with

2:28:17.280 --> 2:28:20.730
<v Speaker 3>nuclear weapons, to complete the third leg of their nuclear triad.

2:28:21.530 --> 2:28:25.129
<v Speaker 3>Having a nuclear triad, which means having separate land, sea,

2:28:25.190 --> 2:28:28.720
<v Speaker 3>and air-based weapon systems that can deploy nuclear weapons, is

2:28:28.750 --> 2:28:32.900
<v Speaker 3>considered the gold standard for nuclear deterrence. Most nations that

2:28:33.040 --> 2:28:35.580
<v Speaker 3>have one fulfill the third leg of the triad with

2:28:35.640 --> 2:28:39.740
<v Speaker 3>nuclear-armed attack submarines. The most advanced of these are, inarguably,

2:28:40.000 --> 2:28:44.120
<v Speaker 3>the deadliest weapon systems ever devised by man. Pakistan is

2:28:44.200 --> 2:28:46.600
<v Speaker 3>generally considered to be the nuclear power with the least

2:28:46.670 --> 2:28:50.590
<v Speaker 3>reliable protections for their arsenal. These have long inspired fear

2:28:50.610 --> 2:28:53.000
<v Speaker 3>that Pakistan might lose control of a weapon or that

2:28:53.060 --> 2:28:55.600
<v Speaker 3>rogue elements of their security services might give one to

2:28:55.640 --> 2:28:58.900
<v Speaker 3>a terrorist group. That's not my concern here. One of

2:28:58.940 --> 2:29:01.340
<v Speaker 3>my sources for these episodes was an article in the

2:29:01.379 --> 2:29:04.550
<v Speaker 3>Defense and Security Analysis Journal. Its authors point out that

2:29:04.580 --> 2:29:07.129
<v Speaker 3>in recent years, Pakistan has done a decent job of

2:29:07.209 --> 2:29:09.670
<v Speaker 3>sealing some of the former security holes in their nuclear

2:29:09.709 --> 2:29:14.269
<v Speaker 3>weapons systems. However, as one researcher noted in 2014, Parts

2:29:14.310 --> 2:29:17.350
<v Speaker 3>of Pakistan's nuclear management system, like its command element, have

2:29:17.370 --> 2:29:20.600
<v Speaker 3>been reasonably transparent. Other parts, like the physical security and

2:29:20.680 --> 2:29:23.900
<v Speaker 3>surety human reliability elements, have been at best translucent.

2:29:24.300 --> 2:29:25.720
<v Speaker 2>In many areas, there are only.

2:29:25.580 --> 2:29:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Bald assertions that programs and methods have been put into

2:29:28.040 --> 2:29:31.480
<v Speaker 3>place with very few details provided. One of the parts

2:29:31.560 --> 2:29:34.200
<v Speaker 3>of their management system we know least about is the

2:29:34.280 --> 2:29:39.050
<v Speaker 3>rules under which shipboard nuclear weapons operate. In theory, any

2:29:39.129 --> 2:29:42.390
<v Speaker 3>nuclear weapons used by Pakistani forces would have to be

2:29:42.629 --> 2:29:46.900
<v Speaker 3>authorized by a special 10-man committee. It's believed, but not known,

2:29:47.180 --> 2:29:50.600
<v Speaker 3>that some systems require both a civilian and military key

2:29:50.640 --> 2:29:53.340
<v Speaker 3>to be provided in order for the weapons to become operable.

2:29:54.000 --> 2:29:56.570
<v Speaker 3>This is because Pakistan's military has a long history of

2:29:56.620 --> 2:29:59.990
<v Speaker 3>outright running the shop. Today, civilian leadership is meant to

2:30:00.030 --> 2:30:02.730
<v Speaker 3>have much more oversight. One example of this is the

2:30:02.770 --> 2:30:05.730
<v Speaker 3>fact that all air and land-based nuclear weapons in Pakistan

2:30:05.830 --> 2:30:09.290
<v Speaker 3>are stored separate from their delivery systems. This makes them

2:30:09.370 --> 2:30:11.910
<v Speaker 3>harder to steal and makes it more complex for, say,

2:30:12.050 --> 2:30:14.190
<v Speaker 3>rogue military leaders to get a hold of a piece

2:30:14.230 --> 2:30:17.699
<v Speaker 3>of the arsenal. But we already know that Pakistan's naval

2:30:17.740 --> 2:30:20.959
<v Speaker 3>nukes do not work exactly the same way. Per that

2:30:21.000 --> 2:30:24.580
<v Speaker 3>journal article, quote, Little information is available for the naval

2:30:24.620 --> 2:30:27.600
<v Speaker 3>leg of Pakistan's deterrent, currently based on the Babur III

2:30:27.680 --> 2:30:31.940
<v Speaker 3>submarine-launched cruise missile. First test-fired in 2017 and described by

2:30:32.000 --> 2:30:36.240
<v Speaker 3>Pakistan's Inter-Services Public Relations as a second-strike capability because of

2:30:36.280 --> 2:30:38.660
<v Speaker 3>its naval requirements, the Babur III is assumed to be

2:30:38.760 --> 2:30:42.300
<v Speaker 3>pre-mated and contained within a vertical launch system or similar

2:30:42.360 --> 2:30:46.760
<v Speaker 3>canisterized device. Procedures meant to inhibit the use of nuclear

2:30:46.800 --> 2:30:51.330
<v Speaker 3>weapons outside authorized uses are called negative controls. We do

2:30:51.390 --> 2:30:55.090
<v Speaker 3>not know what negative controls Pakistan has for their naval weapons.

2:30:55.540 --> 2:30:59.310
<v Speaker 3>it is entirely possible the military remains in total control

2:30:59.350 --> 2:31:03.050
<v Speaker 3>here and justifies that as necessary for guaranteeing their ability

2:31:03.090 --> 2:31:06.750
<v Speaker 3>to launch retaliatory strikes against India. I want you to

2:31:06.870 --> 2:31:10.150
<v Speaker 3>think right now about a fun new development in technology

2:31:10.190 --> 2:31:13.360
<v Speaker 3>that we've all witnessed, the growth of generative AI tools

2:31:13.420 --> 2:31:16.560
<v Speaker 3>that can convincingly mimic both human posters on social media

2:31:16.940 --> 2:31:21.280
<v Speaker 3>and create believable fake videos, including fake news videos. These

2:31:21.340 --> 2:31:24.039
<v Speaker 3>and similar tools make it possible to flood any region

2:31:24.070 --> 2:31:27.510
<v Speaker 3>with targeted disinformation and make it seem legitimate, at least

2:31:27.550 --> 2:31:30.950
<v Speaker 3>for a short span of time. Earlier this year, in

2:31:30.990 --> 2:31:34.930
<v Speaker 3>March of 2026, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists published

2:31:34.950 --> 2:31:38.320
<v Speaker 3>a theoretical article by Herbert Lin. He's a Stanford fellow

2:31:38.379 --> 2:31:41.460
<v Speaker 3>and expert on cyber warfare operations who in 2016 worked

2:31:41.480 --> 2:31:44.740
<v Speaker 3>for the Obama administration. Back in the 1980s, he was

2:31:44.780 --> 2:31:47.520
<v Speaker 3>a staff scientist for the House Armed Services Committee, so

2:31:47.540 --> 2:31:49.949
<v Speaker 3>he's a guy with some knowledge of this area. The

2:31:50.000 --> 2:31:53.280
<v Speaker 3>article he put together envisions several scenarios in which AI

2:31:53.340 --> 2:31:57.340
<v Speaker 3>tools might help cause or exacerbate a nuclear conflict. None

2:31:57.360 --> 2:32:00.720
<v Speaker 3>of his scenarios involved anything like Skynet. The dangers he

2:32:00.780 --> 2:32:03.490
<v Speaker 3>foresees from AI come not from its intelligence so much

2:32:03.550 --> 2:32:06.550
<v Speaker 3>as its ability to automate the production of targeted bullshit

2:32:06.870 --> 2:32:10.789
<v Speaker 3>and influence the decisions of political leaders. And speaking of

2:32:10.850 --> 2:32:13.000
<v Speaker 3>targeted bullshit, here's some ads.

2:32:24.590 --> 2:32:25.070
<v Speaker 2>We're back.

2:32:25.290 --> 2:32:27.490
<v Speaker 3>And I was talking about an article for the Bulletin

2:32:27.629 --> 2:32:31.670
<v Speaker 3>of the Atomic Scientists written by Herbert Lin. One of

2:32:31.709 --> 2:32:35.090
<v Speaker 3>his scenarios envisioned a blockade of Taiwan in which the

2:32:35.129 --> 2:32:38.470
<v Speaker 3>Chinese military deployed an army of AI chatbots to lie

2:32:38.510 --> 2:32:41.160
<v Speaker 3>about military maneuvers in order to create the impression of

2:32:41.240 --> 2:32:45.500
<v Speaker 3>high military readiness to deter U.S. intervention. I don't consider

2:32:45.540 --> 2:32:48.220
<v Speaker 3>this specific scenario very likely, but I do think he's

2:32:48.379 --> 2:32:51.430
<v Speaker 3>on to something with passages like this. The accounts adopt

2:32:51.490 --> 2:32:54.500
<v Speaker 3>personas of professionals or students isolated by the crisis and

2:32:54.540 --> 2:32:57.360
<v Speaker 3>connect with foreigners through the full suite of channels described above.

2:32:57.860 --> 2:33:01.650
<v Speaker 3>These spaces attract not only their regular users, but also journalists, analysts,

2:33:01.680 --> 2:33:05.310
<v Speaker 3>and even mid-level Pentagon staffers looking for unfiltered intelligence. In

2:33:05.410 --> 2:33:08.430
<v Speaker 3>one instance, a bot mimicking a 28-year-old engineer named Li

2:33:08.470 --> 2:33:12.640
<v Speaker 3>Wei claims, I saw convoys with TELs heading east. DF-26

2:33:12.760 --> 2:33:16.490
<v Speaker 3>is probably, referring to mobile transporter erector launches used to

2:33:16.530 --> 2:33:21.349
<v Speaker 3>launch ballistic missiles and land-based dual-capable DF-26 intermediate-range ballistic missiles.

2:33:21.810 --> 2:33:26.490
<v Speaker 3>Before adding, sirens everywhere, evacuation starting. Then screenshots start flooding

2:33:26.510 --> 2:33:29.570
<v Speaker 3>the social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter, amplified

2:33:29.610 --> 2:33:33.269
<v Speaker 3>by coordinated sock puppets. The bots adapt seamlessly to queries,

2:33:33.629 --> 2:33:37.910
<v Speaker 3>cross-referencing real-time U.S. open-source chatter for added plausibility. A user

2:33:37.950 --> 2:33:40.500
<v Speaker 3>of Tinder, a dating app in Washington, D.C., matched with

2:33:40.560 --> 2:33:44.490
<v Speaker 3>Wang Mei, a fabricated nurse in Ximen, who relays her

2:33:44.530 --> 2:33:47.510
<v Speaker 3>alleged eyewitness panic about explosions near the port and prepping

2:33:47.550 --> 2:33:50.830
<v Speaker 3>of hypersonic weapons, which aligns with the partial satellite imagery

2:33:50.870 --> 2:33:53.970
<v Speaker 3>glitches caused by Chinese jamming and begins to see doubt

2:33:54.070 --> 2:33:58.029
<v Speaker 3>in U.S. intelligence assessments. State media subtly echoes these stories,

2:33:58.170 --> 2:34:00.120
<v Speaker 3>framing them as grassroots outrage at U.S.

2:34:00.160 --> 2:34:00.760
<v Speaker 2>Provocation.

2:34:01.320 --> 2:34:03.820
<v Speaker 3>In the United States, some of this material migrates into

2:34:03.879 --> 2:34:07.900
<v Speaker 3>expert discourse. Open-source intelligence analysts, journalists, and think tank experts

2:34:07.940 --> 2:34:12.039
<v Speaker 3>incorporate screenshots and chat logs into maps, timelines, and situation reports,

2:34:12.540 --> 2:34:14.740
<v Speaker 3>and present them on cable news and in policy briefs

2:34:14.800 --> 2:34:18.840
<v Speaker 3>as independent confirmations of missile movements. Congressional staffers and allied

2:34:18.879 --> 2:34:21.720
<v Speaker 3>governments cite these products in their own assessments, generating a

2:34:21.780 --> 2:34:26.100
<v Speaker 3>feedback loop in which fabricated chats appear as triangulated, multi-source evidence.

2:34:27.620 --> 2:34:29.920
<v Speaker 3>I think the only weakness of Lin's article is his

2:34:30.020 --> 2:34:33.730
<v Speaker 3>focus on scenarios that lead to mass nuclear exchange and

2:34:33.770 --> 2:34:36.670
<v Speaker 3>in his insistence on considering nation states as the only

2:34:36.750 --> 2:34:40.110
<v Speaker 3>relevant actors in most of these escalation cycles. But the

2:34:40.129 --> 2:34:43.709
<v Speaker 3>basic process he outlined there, a bad actor flooding regional

2:34:43.770 --> 2:34:46.949
<v Speaker 3>social media with disinformation designed to look like OSINT that

2:34:47.010 --> 2:34:51.580
<v Speaker 3>suggests an imminent attack, that's entirely possible and you wouldn't

2:34:51.640 --> 2:34:54.010
<v Speaker 3>need a nation state level actor to pull it off.

2:34:54.790 --> 2:34:59.070
<v Speaker 3>Let's say you have a well-funded non-state group of ideological hardliners.

2:34:59.129 --> 2:35:02.530
<v Speaker 3>Let's imagine them as partisans of India or Pakistan, right?

2:35:02.970 --> 2:35:05.349
<v Speaker 3>You could also imagine they're just trolls, eager to add

2:35:05.420 --> 2:35:09.260
<v Speaker 3>confusion for the lulz. Or more insidiously, you could imagine

2:35:09.280 --> 2:35:12.180
<v Speaker 3>them as motivated to pull off a massive score gambling

2:35:12.220 --> 2:35:15.180
<v Speaker 3>on world events by betting on a limited nuclear attack

2:35:15.379 --> 2:35:19.199
<v Speaker 3>and then making one happen. Returning to our hypothetical border

2:35:19.240 --> 2:35:23.220
<v Speaker 3>conflict between India and Pakistan, let's imagine another outbreak of

2:35:23.320 --> 2:35:27.380
<v Speaker 3>actual shooting like May of 2025. Imagine whichever of those

2:35:27.440 --> 2:35:31.240
<v Speaker 3>hypothetical non-state groups you like to pick floods the region

2:35:31.340 --> 2:35:35.510
<v Speaker 3>with reports of Indian nuclear forces mobilizing or even weapons inbound.

2:35:36.070 --> 2:35:39.730
<v Speaker 3>This would occur alongside the already nightmarish disruption of communication

2:35:39.790 --> 2:35:42.250
<v Speaker 3>and command and control that will occur during such times

2:35:42.290 --> 2:35:45.940
<v Speaker 3>of conflict. Is it so crazy to imagine that one

2:35:45.980 --> 2:35:50.140
<v Speaker 3>of those Pakistani ships chooses to fire its payload? There's

2:35:50.180 --> 2:35:52.980
<v Speaker 3>a very good reason why most nuclear-armed nations do not

2:35:53.080 --> 2:35:55.640
<v Speaker 3>give military leaders direct control over how and when to

2:35:55.680 --> 2:35:59.000
<v Speaker 3>fire these weapons. We don't know how Pakistan governs the

2:35:59.140 --> 2:36:01.780
<v Speaker 3>use of their naval nukes, not really, and that means

2:36:01.820 --> 2:36:05.420
<v Speaker 3>we cannot discount such a possibility. The kind of decisions

2:36:05.520 --> 2:36:07.610
<v Speaker 3>made in nuclear war planning tend to come with a

2:36:07.670 --> 2:36:10.630
<v Speaker 3>timer of less than a half hour. New weapon systems

2:36:10.670 --> 2:36:14.000
<v Speaker 3>like hypersonic missiles have shortened that even further. This means

2:36:14.070 --> 2:36:16.970
<v Speaker 3>any decision about when to deploy nuclear weapons is likely

2:36:17.010 --> 2:36:19.390
<v Speaker 3>going to be made on a very short time frame

2:36:19.430 --> 2:36:23.610
<v Speaker 3>by frightened people. Another equally terrifying vision of that scenario

2:36:23.650 --> 2:36:26.690
<v Speaker 3>could lead China, Pakistan, and India to each conclude, based

2:36:26.750 --> 2:36:29.510
<v Speaker 3>on a mix of real movements by neighboring forces and

2:36:29.550 --> 2:36:33.030
<v Speaker 3>a flood of AI disinformation, to activate and position their

2:36:33.070 --> 2:36:39.580
<v Speaker 3>nuclear arsenals just in case. Once you have nuclear weapons assembled, deployed,

2:36:39.740 --> 2:36:43.629
<v Speaker 3>and aimed properly, the odds rise exponentially that something might

2:36:43.690 --> 2:36:46.350
<v Speaker 3>go wrong, even if no one chooses to fire them.

2:36:46.930 --> 2:36:50.470
<v Speaker 3>And the same sort of concerted digital disinformation attack, executed

2:36:50.510 --> 2:36:53.730
<v Speaker 3>by a state or non-state actor, could happen today, during

2:36:53.850 --> 2:36:58.300
<v Speaker 3>literally any tense international situation with a potential for nuclear escalation.

2:36:59.140 --> 2:37:01.440
<v Speaker 3>As I said, my interest here is not in an

2:37:01.520 --> 2:37:05.480
<v Speaker 3>apocalypse narrative, but in the possibility of a limited nuclear fuck-up.

2:37:06.459 --> 2:37:09.660
<v Speaker 3>Let me propose another that might occur in this situation.

2:37:10.280 --> 2:37:12.720
<v Speaker 3>In the U.S., all nuclear weapons are built to be

2:37:12.760 --> 2:37:16.060
<v Speaker 3>what's called one-point safe. This means the weapon has a

2:37:16.160 --> 2:37:18.660
<v Speaker 3>probability of less than one in a million of causing

2:37:18.720 --> 2:37:23.110
<v Speaker 3>a nuclear detonation if the weapon explodes unintentionally. We have

2:37:23.150 --> 2:37:26.530
<v Speaker 3>had nuclear weapons destroyed in plane crashes, and so far

2:37:26.570 --> 2:37:29.949
<v Speaker 3>they have never detonated in a proper nuclear explosion on accident.

2:37:30.060 --> 2:37:34.740
<v Speaker 3>Because they're one point safe Other nations do not necessarily

2:37:34.840 --> 2:37:37.830
<v Speaker 3>abide by the same safety rules in their nuclear weapons

2:37:38.200 --> 2:37:41.210
<v Speaker 3>And we simply do not know if Pakistan's nukes are

2:37:41.250 --> 2:37:44.590
<v Speaker 3>safe in the same way Imagine then, as the border

2:37:44.629 --> 2:37:48.250
<v Speaker 3>conflict heats up Pakistan's military assembles their arsenal and begins

2:37:48.330 --> 2:37:52.070
<v Speaker 3>flying it in theater A plane crashes or gets shot down,

2:37:52.410 --> 2:37:56.050
<v Speaker 3>and the weapon inside detonates in a proper nuclear fireball.

2:37:57.010 --> 2:38:01.190
<v Speaker 3>Every one of my nuclear fuck-up scenarios relies on terrible decision-making.

2:38:01.670 --> 2:38:04.830
<v Speaker 3>Clear-thinking civilian and military leaders do not take the kind

2:38:04.870 --> 2:38:08.530
<v Speaker 3>of risks that would lead to a nuclear January 6th. Alas,

2:38:08.870 --> 2:38:11.750
<v Speaker 3>clear-thinking civilian and military leaders are thin on the ground

2:38:11.800 --> 2:38:15.390
<v Speaker 3>these days, especially where I live. As I noted earlier,

2:38:15.590 --> 2:38:18.390
<v Speaker 3>the decision makers in any of these situations, regardless of

2:38:18.430 --> 2:38:21.480
<v Speaker 3>national identity, might have only minutes to make their decisions.

2:38:21.879 --> 2:38:25.120
<v Speaker 3>They'll be frightened and probably sleep-deprived. And what do frightened,

2:38:25.160 --> 2:38:27.720
<v Speaker 3>sleep-deprived people turn to these days when they need to

2:38:27.760 --> 2:38:28.340
<v Speaker 3>get work done?

2:38:28.900 --> 2:38:30.400
<v Speaker 2>That's right, AI.

2:38:31.280 --> 2:38:33.920
<v Speaker 3>In a CNN article from earlier this year, Katie Lillis

2:38:33.980 --> 2:38:36.820
<v Speaker 3>and Zachary Cohen write, Across the US military and the

2:38:36.860 --> 2:38:39.810
<v Speaker 3>intelligence community, officials are pushing to weave AI into nearly

2:38:39.840 --> 2:38:42.410
<v Speaker 3>every facet of their work, from analyzing the huge volumes

2:38:42.450 --> 2:38:45.470
<v Speaker 3>of raw intelligence the US collects and selecting targets for strikes,

2:38:45.890 --> 2:38:49.550
<v Speaker 3>to more mundane applications like managing budgeting, logistics, and supply chains.

2:38:50.170 --> 2:38:53.580
<v Speaker 3>Just a few months ago, back in the spring of 2026,

2:38:53.580 --> 2:38:56.520
<v Speaker 3>one member of the intel community, an analyst, asked one

2:38:56.540 --> 2:38:59.619
<v Speaker 3>of these chatbots to analyze intelligence around a Chinese vessel

2:38:59.740 --> 2:39:02.289
<v Speaker 3>sailing to the Middle East. The bot was likely an

2:39:02.350 --> 2:39:05.390
<v Speaker 3>internal tool, but as one senior U.S. official told CNN,

2:39:05.709 --> 2:39:08.170
<v Speaker 3>the internal tools are mostly just copies of the commercial

2:39:08.209 --> 2:39:11.890
<v Speaker 3>stuff wearing lipstick. Said bot did what bots do best.

2:39:12.150 --> 2:39:14.360
<v Speaker 3>It mixed a bunch of different sources together to create

2:39:14.379 --> 2:39:17.200
<v Speaker 3>a product for its user. This analysis, based on a

2:39:17.220 --> 2:39:20.560
<v Speaker 3>mix of OSINT and secret intel, concluded that the Chinese

2:39:20.600 --> 2:39:23.560
<v Speaker 3>ship was carrying components used in the production of nuclear weaponry.

2:39:24.120 --> 2:39:26.859
<v Speaker 3>The analyst asked his AI tool to take its finding

2:39:26.920 --> 2:39:29.360
<v Speaker 3>and produce an intelligence report, which was sent up the

2:39:29.390 --> 2:39:32.180
<v Speaker 3>chain of command. Since the vessel was headed in the

2:39:32.280 --> 2:39:35.810
<v Speaker 3>general direction of Iran, and since China does sell conventional

2:39:35.850 --> 2:39:39.570
<v Speaker 3>weapons to Iran, this sparked a panic. Heard that CNN article?

2:39:39.990 --> 2:39:40.290
<v Speaker 2>The U.S.

2:39:40.310 --> 2:39:43.230
<v Speaker 3>Military swung into action with plans to intercept the vessel,

2:39:43.290 --> 2:39:45.010
<v Speaker 3>according to four sources familiar.

2:39:44.750 --> 2:39:45.430
<v Speaker 2>With the episode.

2:39:45.730 --> 2:39:48.070
<v Speaker 3>According to two of the sources, armed members of the U.S.

2:39:48.110 --> 2:39:51.470
<v Speaker 3>military were preparing to board the ship. Military planes were

2:39:51.570 --> 2:39:53.709
<v Speaker 3>in the air, one of these sources and another source

2:39:53.730 --> 2:39:56.590
<v Speaker 3>familiar with the incident said. There was only one issue.

2:39:57.110 --> 2:40:00.690
<v Speaker 3>The AI chatbot that Analyst used had hallucinated. Every piece

2:40:00.730 --> 2:40:03.530
<v Speaker 3>of that report was wrong. China was not sending nuclear

2:40:03.570 --> 2:40:06.250
<v Speaker 3>weapons equipment to Iran or anywhere else because of fucking

2:40:06.330 --> 2:40:09.920
<v Speaker 3>course they weren't. But we came calamitously close to attacking

2:40:09.980 --> 2:40:13.280
<v Speaker 3>a Chinese ship with military force due to that hallucination.

2:40:14.140 --> 2:40:17.140
<v Speaker 3>In January, Pete Hegseth gave a speech outlining our Department

2:40:17.160 --> 2:40:21.960
<v Speaker 3>of Defense's new AI strategy. He insisted, we will unleash experimentation,

2:40:22.040 --> 2:40:25.860
<v Speaker 3>eliminate bureaucratic barriers, focus our investments, and demonstrate the execution

2:40:25.879 --> 2:40:29.350
<v Speaker 3>approach needed to ensure we lead in military AI. All

2:40:29.370 --> 2:40:31.610
<v Speaker 3>that says to me is that these tools will only

2:40:31.650 --> 2:40:34.720
<v Speaker 3>become more critical to the production of intelligence products than

2:40:34.750 --> 2:40:37.609
<v Speaker 3>ever before, and we know they'll continue to hallucinate too.

2:40:38.480 --> 2:40:40.840
<v Speaker 3>This change isn't just happening in the United States. It's

2:40:40.879 --> 2:40:43.780
<v Speaker 3>occurring in governments and militaries all across the world, and

2:40:43.800 --> 2:40:46.300
<v Speaker 3>it's happening at the same time as some nuclear-armed nations

2:40:46.340 --> 2:40:50.720
<v Speaker 3>seek to expand their low-yield stockpiles. Simultaneously, the U.S. war

2:40:50.760 --> 2:40:53.000
<v Speaker 3>against Iran and the ongoing war in Ukraine have made

2:40:53.020 --> 2:40:55.460
<v Speaker 3>it clear to every nation-state actor that the only real

2:40:55.520 --> 2:40:59.790
<v Speaker 3>guarantee of national sovereignty is a nuclear arsenal. More nations

2:40:59.830 --> 2:41:02.170
<v Speaker 3>will work to acquire nukes in the near future. This

2:41:02.209 --> 2:41:04.750
<v Speaker 3>means more nuclear weapons and more conflicts where they might

2:41:04.790 --> 2:41:08.170
<v Speaker 3>get used, alongside an even wider proliferation of tools like

2:41:08.200 --> 2:41:09.480
<v Speaker 3>the ones I just described.

2:41:10.400 --> 2:41:11.580
<v Speaker 2>I'm not trying to be.

2:41:11.540 --> 2:41:14.160
<v Speaker 3>Apocalyptic here, because again, that's.

2:41:13.720 --> 2:41:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Not really the immediate worry.

2:41:15.720 --> 2:41:18.120
<v Speaker 3>The worry is that a mix of increasing acceptance that

2:41:18.140 --> 2:41:21.920
<v Speaker 3>it's okay to use small nukes, and increasing reliance on

2:41:21.940 --> 2:41:25.730
<v Speaker 3>these AI tools, alongside the conflicts that we have always

2:41:25.790 --> 2:41:29.030
<v Speaker 3>had between nations, will lead to a situation in which

2:41:29.070 --> 2:41:32.390
<v Speaker 3>a very limited nuclear fuck-up not only is disastrous to

2:41:32.410 --> 2:41:35.379
<v Speaker 3>people on the ground or wherever it occurs, but changes

2:41:35.450 --> 2:41:37.959
<v Speaker 3>the very nature and all of the decision-making calculus in

2:41:37.980 --> 2:41:40.400
<v Speaker 3>the world that we live in. I hope it doesn't happen,

2:41:40.500 --> 2:41:42.500
<v Speaker 3>but that's what I'm thinking about these days.

2:41:43.879 --> 2:42:00.100
<v Speaker 2>That's everything for today. We'll be back tomorrow. This is

2:42:00.240 --> 2:42:04.129
<v Speaker 2>It Could Happen Here, Executive Disorder, our weekly newscast covering

2:42:04.170 --> 2:42:06.789
<v Speaker 2>what's happening in the White House, the crumbling world, and

2:42:06.830 --> 2:42:09.210
<v Speaker 2>what this means for you. I'm Garrison Davis. Today I'm

2:42:09.250 --> 2:42:15.170
<v Speaker 2>joined by Mia Wong, Robert Evans, and Sophie Lichterman. Not allegedly. Yeah, no,

2:42:15.190 --> 2:42:17.760
<v Speaker 2>that's definitely Sophie, but you can't prove it's me. I

2:42:17.820 --> 2:42:18.900
<v Speaker 2>can prove it's you.

2:42:18.940 --> 2:42:23.260
<v Speaker 3>Sophie, you have no idea where I am, Sophie, or

2:42:23.320 --> 2:42:23.940
<v Speaker 3>what I'm doing.

2:42:24.080 --> 2:42:28.240
<v Speaker 5>I know exactly where you are, and I know exactly.

2:42:27.430 --> 2:42:29.730
<v Speaker 2>What you're doing. This is the first episode where we're

2:42:29.750 --> 2:42:31.210
<v Speaker 2>testing AI Robert.

2:42:31.950 --> 2:42:32.590
<v Speaker 1>Oh, no.

2:42:32.610 --> 2:42:36.690
<v Speaker 2>We're not testing, there's no AI Robert. Don't yell at me,

2:42:36.709 --> 2:42:37.670
<v Speaker 2>I'm Blue Sky.

2:42:38.660 --> 2:42:43.619
<v Speaker 3>It'd be shit. You'll know there's no AI Robert because

2:42:43.640 --> 2:42:45.810
<v Speaker 3>they would have trained an AI Robert on like the

2:42:46.070 --> 2:42:48.070
<v Speaker 3>subreddit and all of the different jokes that I can

2:42:48.129 --> 2:42:50.910
<v Speaker 3>no longer do because people have taken it too seriously.

2:42:51.209 --> 2:42:53.650
<v Speaker 3>Like if I start talking about a child hunting island,

2:42:54.030 --> 2:42:56.030
<v Speaker 3>like you'll know it's the AI me.

2:42:56.190 --> 2:42:58.830
<v Speaker 2>It'll pull like a bagel throwing reference from like nine

2:42:58.870 --> 2:42:59.370
<v Speaker 2>years ago.

2:42:59.390 --> 2:43:03.250
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, all of a sudden you start talking about Doritos

2:43:03.320 --> 2:43:04.740
<v Speaker 5>like you did 10 years ago.

2:43:05.590 --> 2:43:08.110
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, talking about Doritos like 10 years ago or talking

2:43:08.129 --> 2:43:10.110
<v Speaker 3>about the Jamie Loftus murder thing, which I don't do

2:43:10.170 --> 2:43:12.630
<v Speaker 3>anymore because now there's a real serial killer in the

2:43:12.770 --> 2:43:14.750
<v Speaker 3>area that people were making comments about.

2:43:15.190 --> 2:43:16.550
<v Speaker 2>And being like, what is it, Jamie? I'm like, guys,

2:43:16.590 --> 2:43:19.350
<v Speaker 2>there's really people dead. We don't keep the bit up

2:43:19.450 --> 2:43:20.730
<v Speaker 2>at this point. All right.

2:43:21.050 --> 2:43:21.470
<v Speaker 1>Here.

2:43:22.110 --> 2:43:25.510
<v Speaker 2>This episode, we're covering the week of October 7th to

2:43:25.590 --> 2:43:30.030
<v Speaker 2>October 14th. And we're actually going to jump straight to

2:43:30.090 --> 2:43:35.690
<v Speaker 2>our first main story. Last Thursday afternoon, October 8th, ICE

2:43:35.870 --> 2:43:39.570
<v Speaker 2>shot a 28-year-old man named Oscar Belgal in the New

2:43:39.590 --> 2:43:43.400
<v Speaker 2>York City neighborhood of Marble Hill, which is physically located

2:43:43.459 --> 2:43:46.040
<v Speaker 2>in the Bronx, but technically in the borough of Manhattan.

2:43:47.080 --> 2:43:51.160
<v Speaker 2>Oscar was in a car with his five-year-old son. Per

2:43:51.600 --> 2:43:55.580
<v Speaker 2>video released by the NYPD, around 4 p.m., just in

2:43:55.600 --> 2:43:59.410
<v Speaker 2>the middle of the day, masked plainclothes agents, some wearing

2:43:59.550 --> 2:44:02.650
<v Speaker 2>yellow construction vests, ran up to a parked car with

2:44:02.730 --> 2:44:07.850
<v Speaker 2>guns already drawn. The driver, Oscar, started backing away, and

2:44:07.870 --> 2:44:10.369
<v Speaker 2>then an agent began hitting the car windows with the

2:44:10.390 --> 2:44:13.550
<v Speaker 2>butt of his gun. Oscar then pulls into the street

2:44:13.670 --> 2:44:17.920
<v Speaker 2>and drives off screen, as agents point their guns at

2:44:18.030 --> 2:44:22.600
<v Speaker 2>the windshield. The actual shooting itself is not captured on

2:44:22.780 --> 2:44:26.180
<v Speaker 2>this video, but I'll play it here for us to reference.

2:44:26.720 --> 2:44:28.800
<v Speaker 2>This is security camera footage.

2:44:29.660 --> 2:44:33.020
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, one of the things that was, like, noticeably unsettling

2:44:33.280 --> 2:44:36.020
<v Speaker 5>besides all of it was the fact that, like, these

2:44:36.060 --> 2:44:39.320
<v Speaker 5>guys were dressed like crossing guards.

2:44:40.400 --> 2:44:42.060
<v Speaker 2>Construction workers, crossing guards.

2:44:42.080 --> 2:44:44.480
<v Speaker 12>They had, like, on normal clothes and then.

2:44:44.390 --> 2:44:44.930
<v Speaker 10>Just, like, a.

2:44:45.390 --> 2:44:46.310
<v Speaker 2>High-vis vest.

2:44:46.370 --> 2:44:51.539
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, which, you know, somebody in a high-vis vest and a...

2:44:52.430 --> 2:44:55.250
<v Speaker 12>Machine gun comes towards me. That's scary.

2:44:55.550 --> 2:44:57.349
<v Speaker 2>They look like, like, especially the guy with the long gun.

2:44:57.390 --> 2:44:59.020
<v Speaker 2>He looks like a mass shooter. They look like.

2:44:58.930 --> 2:45:02.160
<v Speaker 3>Fucking mass shooters. Like, I would not assume those were

2:45:02.220 --> 2:45:04.939
<v Speaker 3>police officers. And I might take steps to defend myself

2:45:05.020 --> 2:45:08.320
<v Speaker 3>in that situation because they just look like fucking mass shooters.

2:45:08.420 --> 2:45:08.840
<v Speaker 12>Correct.

2:45:09.180 --> 2:45:12.400
<v Speaker 2>Mayor Zora Mamdani said, quote, There was no reasonable way

2:45:12.459 --> 2:45:16.039
<v Speaker 2>to identify them as ICE agents. School had just gotten out.

2:45:16.780 --> 2:45:19.330
<v Speaker 2>The street was crowded with families and children.

2:45:19.620 --> 2:45:20.020
<v Speaker 7>Unquote.

2:45:21.810 --> 2:45:25.390
<v Speaker 2>According to the NYPD, at least one agent fired seven shots.

2:45:25.930 --> 2:45:29.080
<v Speaker 2>We do not have footage of the actual shooting. As

2:45:29.140 --> 2:45:32.540
<v Speaker 2>I said, Oscar's five-year-old son was in the backseat of

2:45:32.600 --> 2:45:37.459
<v Speaker 2>the car. Thank God he is physically unharmed. But, of course,

2:45:37.500 --> 2:45:40.980
<v Speaker 2>he still had to watch masked men with guns run up,

2:45:41.459 --> 2:45:45.120
<v Speaker 2>shoot his dad in the neck, and drag his body away.

2:45:45.400 --> 2:45:50.289
<v Speaker 2>Jesus Christ. DHS Secretary Mullen said that agents were not

2:45:50.379 --> 2:45:53.240
<v Speaker 2>aware a kid was in the car. Uh-huh, because they

2:45:53.260 --> 2:45:55.160
<v Speaker 2>didn't care. Air check.

2:45:55.959 --> 2:45:58.020
<v Speaker 12>Shoot first, ask questions later.

2:45:58.040 --> 2:46:01.940
<v Speaker 2>The child's mother told Governor Hochul that her son is

2:46:02.000 --> 2:46:06.680
<v Speaker 2>traumatized and won't talk. Quote, the child is not speaking.

2:46:07.310 --> 2:46:08.170
<v Speaker 12>That's terrible.

2:46:08.330 --> 2:46:09.189
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean.

2:46:09.600 --> 2:46:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Sure, of course.

2:46:11.180 --> 2:46:11.550
<v Speaker 4>Jesus.

2:46:11.570 --> 2:46:12.910
<v Speaker 12>That's horrible, you guys.

2:46:13.190 --> 2:46:15.189
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I can't really think of anything worse that

2:46:15.209 --> 2:46:18.410
<v Speaker 3>could happen to a child than to watch their parent

2:46:18.550 --> 2:46:20.830
<v Speaker 3>shot in the neck at random when, like, in a

2:46:21.190 --> 2:46:23.349
<v Speaker 3>normally safe situation like that.

2:46:23.879 --> 2:46:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Jesus Christ. ICE has still not released body cam footage

2:46:29.100 --> 2:46:32.660
<v Speaker 2>of the shooting. DHS has said that they were conducting a, quote,

2:46:32.820 --> 2:46:37.650
<v Speaker 2>targeted enforcement operation and that Oscar, quote, weaponized his vehicle.

2:46:38.560 --> 2:46:40.760
<v Speaker 2>This is the thing they always say when something like

2:46:40.780 --> 2:46:41.280
<v Speaker 2>this happens.

2:46:41.640 --> 2:46:43.340
<v Speaker 12>Spoiler plate ass statement.

2:46:44.080 --> 2:46:48.370
<v Speaker 2>DHS also claimed that after Ice shot and arrested Oscar, agents, quote,

2:46:48.770 --> 2:46:51.410
<v Speaker 2>rendered first aid and then took him to the hospital.

2:46:52.570 --> 2:46:55.789
<v Speaker 2>This is a lie. This did not happen. This is

2:46:56.050 --> 2:47:00.890
<v Speaker 2>a plain-faced lie from DHS. Body camera footage released by

2:47:01.070 --> 2:47:04.110
<v Speaker 2>NYPD from when they first got to the scene, when

2:47:04.140 --> 2:47:07.260
<v Speaker 2>the cops got to the scene, Show Oscar just sitting

2:47:07.300 --> 2:47:10.380
<v Speaker 2>in the street, bleeding out, with his hands handcuffed behind

2:47:10.420 --> 2:47:13.100
<v Speaker 2>his back, surrounded by ICE agents who are just standing

2:47:13.150 --> 2:47:15.310
<v Speaker 2>in a circle around him, offering no assistance.

2:47:15.750 --> 2:47:17.410
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, and they do this all the fucking time when

2:47:17.430 --> 2:47:17.949
<v Speaker 9>they shoot someone.

2:47:17.950 --> 2:47:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Because they just, like, stand there and handcuff them. The

2:47:20.300 --> 2:47:24.360
<v Speaker 2>NYPD rushes over in this footage, picks up and carries Oscar,

2:47:24.760 --> 2:47:28.360
<v Speaker 2>who now appears to be going unconscious. They take Oscar

2:47:28.459 --> 2:47:30.640
<v Speaker 2>into a squad car, they render aid, put pressure on

2:47:30.660 --> 2:47:33.080
<v Speaker 2>the wound, and drive him to the hospital down the street.

2:47:33.379 --> 2:47:35.020
<v Speaker 9>Do you know how hard it is to have less

2:47:35.060 --> 2:47:37.440
<v Speaker 9>concern for human life than the New York Police Department?

2:47:38.280 --> 2:47:42.580
<v Speaker 3>My God, that's astonishing. That's that's that takes some work.

2:47:42.840 --> 2:47:47.520
<v Speaker 3>Jesus Christ. We're reaching average Los Angeles sheriff's deputy levels

2:47:47.580 --> 2:47:48.270
<v Speaker 3>of empathy here.

2:47:48.510 --> 2:47:49.430
<v Speaker 2>Like it's shocking.

2:47:49.870 --> 2:47:51.890
<v Speaker 9>It's like it's like the CPD detectives they brought in

2:47:51.930 --> 2:47:53.770
<v Speaker 9>to do torture after 9-11.

2:47:54.190 --> 2:47:59.470
<v Speaker 2>Like that kind of shit. We don't really know what

2:47:59.490 --> 2:48:01.450
<v Speaker 2>would have happened if NYPD did not get to the

2:48:01.490 --> 2:48:05.220
<v Speaker 2>scene as quick as they did. In the body camera

2:48:05.240 --> 2:48:10.119
<v Speaker 2>footage of them carrying Oscar, his body is fully limp.

2:48:10.440 --> 2:48:11.100
<v Speaker 2>He's out of it.

2:48:11.180 --> 2:48:13.170
<v Speaker 3>He looks like he's been shot in the neck.

2:48:13.790 --> 2:48:18.010
<v Speaker 2>NYPD had no involvement in the federal operation prior to

2:48:18.050 --> 2:48:19.490
<v Speaker 2>this point, prior to the shooting.

2:48:19.510 --> 2:48:21.990
<v Speaker 3>Quite frankly, this kind of shit isn't what they do.

2:48:22.050 --> 2:48:23.890
<v Speaker 3>They do other bad things, but they don't just like,

2:48:24.870 --> 2:48:28.570
<v Speaker 3>shoot and like charge people's cars with guns when they're

2:48:28.610 --> 2:48:30.570
<v Speaker 3>like driving away from school with it. Like that's just

2:48:30.709 --> 2:48:33.430
<v Speaker 3>that that's this is so much of an escalation of

2:48:33.450 --> 2:48:35.950
<v Speaker 3>like our normal police bullshit is what I'm saying.

2:48:37.370 --> 2:48:40.690
<v Speaker 2>DHS has tried to justify their targeting of Oscar, calling

2:48:40.720 --> 2:48:44.000
<v Speaker 2>him a, quote, criminal illegal alien from the Dominican Republic.

2:48:44.530 --> 2:48:44.900
<v Speaker 5>Great.

2:48:45.240 --> 2:48:48.800
<v Speaker 2>And pointed to prior arrests and a criminal conviction for

2:48:48.920 --> 2:48:54.800
<v Speaker 2>grand larceny and claim Oscar's, quote, associated crimes. With a gang.

2:48:55.280 --> 2:48:58.760
<v Speaker 2>That's the word they keep using. Associated or association. They

2:48:58.800 --> 2:49:01.840
<v Speaker 2>won't even say he's like a member. They'll say he's

2:49:01.890 --> 2:49:03.110
<v Speaker 2>associated with a gang.

2:49:03.790 --> 2:49:04.090
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

2:49:04.990 --> 2:49:07.530
<v Speaker 2>I'll play a short clip here from the mayor's press

2:49:07.570 --> 2:49:11.450
<v Speaker 2>conference later that evening, just down the street from this

2:49:11.470 --> 2:49:12.170
<v Speaker 2>side of the shooting.

2:49:12.930 --> 2:49:17.580
<v Speaker 10>There is no explanation for federal officers firing this many

2:49:17.640 --> 2:49:21.039
<v Speaker 10>rounds into a car that has a five-year-old in the car.

2:49:21.780 --> 2:49:25.830
<v Speaker 10>there is no explanation we are standing here so close

2:49:25.890 --> 2:49:28.930
<v Speaker 10>to the site of where this actually took place and

2:49:29.010 --> 2:49:31.240
<v Speaker 10>look at how many people live right here this is

2:49:31.300 --> 2:49:34.140
<v Speaker 10>a residential neighborhood we are right here by a subway

2:49:34.720 --> 2:49:37.940
<v Speaker 10>And the pretext of ICE is, in their words, to

2:49:38.020 --> 2:49:41.540
<v Speaker 10>keep this country safe. How is it keeping anyone safe

2:49:42.080 --> 2:49:44.260
<v Speaker 10>to have, as you just heard from the police commissioner,

2:49:44.720 --> 2:49:49.060
<v Speaker 10>individuals wearing construction vests and masks with long guns?

2:49:49.420 --> 2:49:53.230
<v Speaker 16>Residents have no idea if these are law enforcement agents

2:49:53.580 --> 2:49:56.280
<v Speaker 16>or if they are simply attacking someone on the street.

2:49:56.580 --> 2:49:58.410
<v Speaker 16>And when it comes to ICE, it begs the question,

2:49:58.790 --> 2:50:01.430
<v Speaker 16>what's the difference? There is no explanation for this.

2:50:02.379 --> 2:50:07.940
<v Speaker 2>After the shooting, soon-to-be DSA Congresswoman Daria-Liza Avila-Chavier quickly went

2:50:07.980 --> 2:50:10.140
<v Speaker 2>up to the Bronx and saw that federal agents were

2:50:10.180 --> 2:50:14.360
<v Speaker 2>going door-to-door, quote-unquote, collecting evidence and trying to question residents

2:50:14.379 --> 2:50:17.800
<v Speaker 2>about the shooting, writing down people's names and numbers. So

2:50:18.020 --> 2:50:22.600
<v Speaker 2>Daria-Liza followed behind these HSI agents, informing residents that they

2:50:22.640 --> 2:50:25.840
<v Speaker 2>did not need to speak to or answer questions from

2:50:26.220 --> 2:50:32.129
<v Speaker 2>these federal agents. Meanwhile, soon-to-be former congressman Adriano Espaillat And

2:50:32.150 --> 2:50:36.250
<v Speaker 2>Oscar's own family weren't allowed to see Oscar at the hospital.

2:50:36.270 --> 2:50:37.590
<v Speaker 1>Jesus.

2:50:38.110 --> 2:50:40.430
<v Speaker 2>Now, outside the hospital where Oscar is being treated, a

2:50:40.470 --> 2:50:43.310
<v Speaker 2>few hundred New Yorkers gathered to protest ICE and the

2:50:43.350 --> 2:50:46.270
<v Speaker 2>shooting of one of their neighbors. Earlier in the evening,

2:50:46.560 --> 2:50:51.880
<v Speaker 2>ICE vehicles were driving through protesters. But pretty quickly, NYPD

2:50:52.140 --> 2:50:54.620
<v Speaker 2>arrived to do crowd control and clear the street for

2:50:54.660 --> 2:50:57.800
<v Speaker 2>vehicles to enter and exit the hospital. This led to

2:50:58.020 --> 2:51:01.700
<v Speaker 2>violent shoving matches over metal fence barricades that NYPD was

2:51:01.720 --> 2:51:05.440
<v Speaker 2>trying to set up around the street. Daria Liza moved

2:51:05.459 --> 2:51:08.580
<v Speaker 2>to this protest, and she was trying to de-escalate conflict.

2:51:09.320 --> 2:51:12.520
<v Speaker 2>But NYPD got very aggressive, and Daria Liza was shoved

2:51:12.540 --> 2:51:15.859
<v Speaker 2>to the ground by a community affairs officer. The NYPD

2:51:15.910 --> 2:51:19.970
<v Speaker 2>blue shirts. The ones that are, you know, supposed to

2:51:20.470 --> 2:51:22.250
<v Speaker 2>de-escalate conflict at protests.

2:51:22.330 --> 2:51:27.070
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, average example of community affairs is shoving a congressperson.

2:51:26.430 --> 2:51:31.000
<v Speaker 2>To the ground. I arrived at the hospital just after

2:51:31.060 --> 2:51:35.850
<v Speaker 2>this first big clash over police barricades, during which NYPD

2:51:35.870 --> 2:51:40.330
<v Speaker 2>arrested five protesters. After that, things seemed to settle down

2:51:40.470 --> 2:51:44.430
<v Speaker 2>for a little bit. The crowd got smaller. And about

2:51:44.530 --> 2:51:47.250
<v Speaker 2>like a little over an hour later, just before 11 p.m.,

2:51:47.910 --> 2:51:51.230
<v Speaker 2>police rapidly cleared the street again, pushing protesters onto the

2:51:51.270 --> 2:51:55.330
<v Speaker 2>sidewalk as a small caravan of feds departed the hospital

2:51:55.480 --> 2:51:59.020
<v Speaker 2>at dangerously high speeds. They were zooming by.

2:51:59.040 --> 2:52:12.310
<v Speaker 14>Ice just pulled away.

2:52:12.330 --> 2:52:19.070
<v Speaker 7>The crowd chased him a little bit. It's 10.40 p.m.

2:52:20.350 --> 2:52:24.650
<v Speaker 7>We've got a group of NYPD now leaving the area

2:52:24.950 --> 2:52:28.150
<v Speaker 7>and the crowd is falling behind, yelling.

2:52:27.970 --> 2:52:31.530
<v Speaker 2>At them as well. Again, NYPD is putting off into

2:52:32.760 --> 2:52:38.300
<v Speaker 2>two directions. Oscar was in one of these vehicles leaving

2:52:38.340 --> 2:52:41.180
<v Speaker 2>the hospital. After the feds left the hospital, the crowd

2:52:41.260 --> 2:52:45.179
<v Speaker 2>continued to dwindle to about 40 people who then marched forward.

2:52:45.570 --> 2:52:48.270
<v Speaker 2>up over the bridge to protest in front of Zoran's

2:52:48.470 --> 2:52:52.470
<v Speaker 2>press conference. At the press conference, Zoran said that for

2:52:52.510 --> 2:52:54.400
<v Speaker 2>the past two hours, he had been on the phone

2:52:54.590 --> 2:52:59.099
<v Speaker 2>negotiating with President Trump and Secretary Mullen for Oscar's release,

2:52:59.720 --> 2:53:03.900
<v Speaker 2>but that those negotiations were unsuccessful. I think it is

2:53:03.940 --> 2:53:06.820
<v Speaker 2>worth noting here that earlier this year, Trump did release

2:53:06.860 --> 2:53:10.959
<v Speaker 2>someone from ICE custody following a request by Mayor Mamdani.

2:53:11.840 --> 2:53:15.510
<v Speaker 2>With the cries of protesters heard in the background, The

2:53:15.530 --> 2:53:18.850
<v Speaker 2>mayor reiterated calls for ICE to be abolished, saying, quote,

2:53:19.430 --> 2:53:23.080
<v Speaker 2>ICE is rotten to its core, operates with impunity, sows

2:53:23.120 --> 2:53:27.060
<v Speaker 2>chaos and terror across our country, and they have killed

2:53:27.160 --> 2:53:29.539
<v Speaker 2>far more of our neighbors than they could have ever

2:53:29.820 --> 2:53:30.760
<v Speaker 2>claimed to save.

2:53:31.600 --> 2:53:33.670
<v Speaker 16>I stand here not just as the mayor of our city,

2:53:34.110 --> 2:53:35.890
<v Speaker 16>but as someone who is proud to be an immigrant

2:53:35.930 --> 2:53:38.850
<v Speaker 16>in our city. And I know that these kinds of raids,

2:53:38.890 --> 2:53:42.590
<v Speaker 16>this kind of terrorizing of this city, leaves the three

2:53:42.629 --> 2:53:45.410
<v Speaker 16>million immigrants of this city asking if they are safe here,

2:53:45.810 --> 2:53:48.270
<v Speaker 16>if they belong here, if this too can be their

2:53:48.310 --> 2:53:53.030
<v Speaker 16>home here. We will not normalize ICE's viciousness. We will

2:53:53.070 --> 2:53:57.520
<v Speaker 16>not accept its cruelty. We know, and I have said

2:53:57.560 --> 2:54:00.859
<v Speaker 16>this directly, whether to the president or to the public,

2:54:01.720 --> 2:54:03.720
<v Speaker 16>ICE undermines public safety.

2:54:04.560 --> 2:54:06.199
<v Speaker 2>It makes us less safe.

2:54:07.200 --> 2:54:10.400
<v Speaker 16>New York City will not stand by while ICE agents

2:54:10.459 --> 2:54:13.880
<v Speaker 16>shoot New Yorkers. And we will not back down from

2:54:13.920 --> 2:54:16.900
<v Speaker 16>the demand that so many, including myself, have put forward

2:54:17.240 --> 2:54:21.080
<v Speaker 16>time and again. This is an agency that must be abolished.

2:54:21.920 --> 2:54:25.859
<v Speaker 2>Commissioner Jessica Tisch then gave some more details about the shooting,

2:54:25.879 --> 2:54:29.420
<v Speaker 2>some of which I've already echoed, but also read off

2:54:29.520 --> 2:54:34.400
<v Speaker 2>Oscar's NYPD rap sheet. Average Commissioner Tisch move. Including two

2:54:34.500 --> 2:54:38.279
<v Speaker 2>prior arrests. one for robbery, which he pleaded guilty to

2:54:38.920 --> 2:54:43.140
<v Speaker 2>and received probation, and another for drug possession. When Zoran

2:54:43.160 --> 2:54:46.700
<v Speaker 2>got the microphone back, he again undermined ICE's legitimacy and

2:54:46.750 --> 2:54:49.390
<v Speaker 2>said that while negotiating with the president and Secretary Mullen,

2:54:49.730 --> 2:54:52.510
<v Speaker 2>he requested ICE agents leave the scene entirely and demanded

2:54:52.570 --> 2:54:56.330
<v Speaker 2>that ICE stop its enforcement actions in the city.

2:54:56.650 --> 2:54:59.710
<v Speaker 16>There is no justification for what we have seen today

2:54:59.810 --> 2:55:02.580
<v Speaker 16>and we know. That what we have seen today is

2:55:02.620 --> 2:55:05.780
<v Speaker 16>but a microcosm of what ICE does on a daily

2:55:05.860 --> 2:55:09.290
<v Speaker 16>basis across this country. How can that be how we

2:55:09.330 --> 2:55:10.369
<v Speaker 16>describe public safety?

2:55:10.650 --> 2:55:11.289
<v Speaker 8>It can't be.

2:55:11.530 --> 2:55:13.710
<v Speaker 16>And I've shared that with the president. I've shared that

2:55:13.730 --> 2:55:18.080
<v Speaker 16>with the secretary. This city wants ICE out. We want

2:55:18.200 --> 2:55:20.600
<v Speaker 16>ICE out of our city, ICE out of our schools,

2:55:20.760 --> 2:55:22.759
<v Speaker 16>ICE out of our hospitals, ICE out of our streets,

2:55:23.160 --> 2:55:25.930
<v Speaker 16>ICE away from our kids. We want that because we

2:55:25.990 --> 2:55:28.510
<v Speaker 16>want to keep the city safe. We do not need

2:55:28.550 --> 2:55:31.330
<v Speaker 16>them to do so. All they do is terrorize the city.

2:55:32.310 --> 2:55:36.150
<v Speaker 2>Now, the people chanting outside the press conference weren't just

2:55:36.270 --> 2:55:41.360
<v Speaker 2>protesting ICE, but also the NYPD and Zoran himself, with

2:55:41.420 --> 2:55:46.480
<v Speaker 2>chants of, quote, Mamdani is complicit. most of the ire

2:55:46.520 --> 2:55:50.940
<v Speaker 2>directed at Mayor Mamdani was due to NYPD facilitating ICE's

2:55:51.120 --> 2:55:54.710
<v Speaker 2>exit by clearing protesters in front of the hospital off

2:55:54.730 --> 2:55:58.970
<v Speaker 2>the street before the agents sped off. After leaving the hospital,

2:55:59.010 --> 2:56:02.290
<v Speaker 2>DHS moved Oscar to New Jersey and then back to

2:56:02.350 --> 2:56:05.289
<v Speaker 2>New York, where he's currently in federal custody at the

2:56:05.330 --> 2:56:11.370
<v Speaker 2>Metropolitan Detention Center. On Monday, Oscar's lawyers released a statement, quote, Mr.

2:56:11.410 --> 2:56:16.010
<v Speaker 2>Belgal is living through an unimaginable nightmare. While he is

2:56:16.080 --> 2:56:20.940
<v Speaker 2>currently in solitary confinement, a bullet remains lodged in his neck.

2:56:21.640 --> 2:56:24.200
<v Speaker 2>The left side of his face is numb and he

2:56:24.240 --> 2:56:27.879
<v Speaker 2>can barely hear out of his left ear. Doctors have

2:56:27.940 --> 2:56:32.600
<v Speaker 2>told him he urgently needs surgery, unquote. Awful. A federal

2:56:32.640 --> 2:56:36.920
<v Speaker 2>judge has also temporarily blocked Oscar's deportation. The day after

2:56:36.940 --> 2:56:40.560
<v Speaker 2>the shooting, Daria Liza called for NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch

2:56:40.620 --> 2:56:44.200
<v Speaker 2>to step down in a statement, quote, Last night, the

2:56:44.300 --> 2:56:48.160
<v Speaker 2>NYPD and Commissioner Tisch violated the spirit, if not the letter,

2:56:48.660 --> 2:56:52.519
<v Speaker 2>of our sanctuary city policies and fueled the Trump administration's

2:56:52.640 --> 2:56:56.900
<v Speaker 2>attempts to demonize our communities. The NYPD's Strategic Response Group,

2:56:56.980 --> 2:57:00.590
<v Speaker 2>or the SRG, must be disbanded as quickly as possible,

2:57:01.209 --> 2:57:04.890
<v Speaker 2>and Commissioner Tisch must step down. New York City DSA

2:57:05.050 --> 2:57:07.470
<v Speaker 2>also released a statement, of which I'll quote a small

2:57:07.510 --> 2:57:10.550
<v Speaker 2>portion of. ICE's devastating shooting of a New Yorker in

2:57:10.610 --> 2:57:14.410
<v Speaker 2>front of his child cannot stand. Neither can the NYPD's

2:57:14.470 --> 2:57:17.000
<v Speaker 2>attack on New Yorkers who stood up for their neighbors.

2:57:17.560 --> 2:57:20.250
<v Speaker 2>ICE is a terrorist agency that must be expelled from

2:57:20.270 --> 2:57:23.660
<v Speaker 2>New York City and abolished. Jessica Tisch must get ICE

2:57:23.720 --> 2:57:27.580
<v Speaker 2>out of New York and end NYPD complicity with these terrorists.

2:57:28.320 --> 2:57:30.540
<v Speaker 2>If the commissioner can't put a stop to these injustices,

2:57:30.920 --> 2:57:36.730
<v Speaker 2>she must be fired. Unquote. Now, initial reports claim that SRG,

2:57:36.760 --> 2:57:40.390
<v Speaker 2>the strategic response group, was deployed to handle this protest

2:57:40.610 --> 2:57:43.990
<v Speaker 2>at the hospital. And this is notable because Zoran ran

2:57:44.050 --> 2:57:48.470
<v Speaker 2>on disbanding the SRG. And right now, any SRG deployment

2:57:48.550 --> 2:57:52.050
<v Speaker 2>must get approval from City Hall, according to reporting from Politico.

2:57:52.680 --> 2:57:56.320
<v Speaker 2>So the idea that Mamdani personally sent the SRG to

2:57:56.360 --> 2:58:00.080
<v Speaker 2>crack skulls of anti-ice protesters fueled a lot of the

2:58:00.270 --> 2:58:04.530
<v Speaker 2>anger coming from protesters that night. The SRG, or the

2:58:04.570 --> 2:58:08.330
<v Speaker 2>Strategic Response Group, is a specialized unit within the NYPD,

2:58:09.030 --> 2:58:14.850
<v Speaker 2>which focuses on counterterrorism, but also policing protests. They're sort

2:58:14.870 --> 2:58:18.300
<v Speaker 2>of the city's de facto riot cops. The unit has

2:58:18.340 --> 2:58:23.810
<v Speaker 2>been long criticized for violently suppressing political protest. The SRG

2:58:23.850 --> 2:58:28.710
<v Speaker 2>did not respond to that protest, though. Instead, NYPD sent

2:58:28.810 --> 2:58:34.190
<v Speaker 2>officers from community affairs, as mentioned, and the transit bureau's, quote,

2:58:34.410 --> 2:58:39.770
<v Speaker 2>anti-terrorism unit, which doesn't need City Hall's direct sign-off. So

2:58:39.820 --> 2:58:43.500
<v Speaker 2>while Zoran did not personally send the SRG to crack

2:58:43.540 --> 2:58:48.800
<v Speaker 2>down on this protest, the violence from NYPD demonstrates that

2:58:49.360 --> 2:58:53.840
<v Speaker 2>this issue is bigger than just one specific unit. But

2:58:54.420 --> 2:58:57.480
<v Speaker 2>there is this larger question of like crowd control at

2:58:57.500 --> 2:59:01.260
<v Speaker 2>these protests. And I think this question demonstrates the diverging

2:59:01.320 --> 2:59:05.490
<v Speaker 2>interests on the part of protesters and city hall. Some

2:59:05.750 --> 2:59:10.310
<v Speaker 2>protesters want no NYPD crowd control. People want to directly

2:59:10.410 --> 2:59:12.650
<v Speaker 2>fight ICE and they're willing to put their body on

2:59:12.670 --> 2:59:15.330
<v Speaker 2>the line. Yeah. Even if that means they might get hurt.

2:59:15.910 --> 2:59:18.440
<v Speaker 2>As we've seen in other cities, physical confrontations against ICE

2:59:19.060 --> 2:59:21.760
<v Speaker 2>could result in DHS sending more troops to New York

2:59:21.780 --> 2:59:26.070
<v Speaker 2>and possibly triggering a political crisis, which some on the

2:59:26.090 --> 2:59:28.400
<v Speaker 2>left also desire. There is a sort of like accelerationist

2:59:28.440 --> 2:59:30.340
<v Speaker 2>bent towards some of these protests. They kind of want

2:59:30.360 --> 2:59:33.060
<v Speaker 2>this political crisis and they want to directly fight and

2:59:33.100 --> 2:59:36.660
<v Speaker 2>oppose ICE. On the other hand, for someone in Zoran's position,

2:59:37.100 --> 2:59:39.830
<v Speaker 2>there's a desire to prevent ICE agents from hurting more people,

2:59:39.870 --> 2:59:43.570
<v Speaker 2>whether by running people over or shooting more New Yorkers.

2:59:44.209 --> 2:59:46.170
<v Speaker 2>I think all of these questions definitely exist in the

2:59:46.209 --> 2:59:50.410
<v Speaker 2>shadow of Minneapolis. And furthermore, the mayor wants to limit

2:59:50.440 --> 2:59:53.030
<v Speaker 2>the amount of DHS and ICE agents deployed to the city.

2:59:53.730 --> 2:59:57.070
<v Speaker 2>So to that end, NYPD may end up doing some

2:59:57.090 --> 3:00:00.010
<v Speaker 2>level of crowd control to limit protesters' interactions with ICE

3:00:00.730 --> 3:00:05.720
<v Speaker 2>to avoid provoking a larger deployment. So even if protesters

3:00:05.800 --> 3:00:10.459
<v Speaker 2>and Zoran have similar ultimate goals vis-a-vis ICE, their respective

3:00:10.500 --> 3:00:15.970
<v Speaker 2>positions lead them to contradictory impulses. Zorn has said that

3:00:16.000 --> 3:00:18.550
<v Speaker 2>he will not justify the use of force against protesters

3:00:18.629 --> 3:00:21.810
<v Speaker 2>on Thursday night and told MSNOW he'll be conducting a

3:00:21.810 --> 3:00:25.050
<v Speaker 2>review of the entire 24-hour period, quote, from the ICE

3:00:25.110 --> 3:00:28.070
<v Speaker 2>shooting to the NYPD response to the incident and the

3:00:28.110 --> 3:00:31.869
<v Speaker 2>ensuing protests to ICE's use of a privately owned parking

3:00:31.890 --> 3:00:34.849
<v Speaker 2>lot as a staging location to every tool that we

3:00:34.910 --> 3:00:39.010
<v Speaker 2>have at our disposal to keep New Yorkers safe, unquote.

3:00:39.129 --> 3:00:42.170
<v Speaker 2>And on one of those last parts, AOC has also

3:00:42.209 --> 3:00:45.760
<v Speaker 2>mentioned this, that ICE has been using the rooftop parking

3:00:45.780 --> 3:00:48.720
<v Speaker 2>lot of a Target in the Bronx to stage before

3:00:48.780 --> 3:00:51.920
<v Speaker 2>going out to do arrests. And that's something that electeds

3:00:52.120 --> 3:00:56.180
<v Speaker 2>are looking to crack down on if they can. But

3:00:56.620 --> 3:00:59.500
<v Speaker 2>Zoran has said that there are no plans to replace

3:00:59.600 --> 3:01:03.050
<v Speaker 2>Commissioner Tisch, pointing to her history of uprooting NYPD corruption

3:01:03.100 --> 3:01:07.869
<v Speaker 2>and the later Adams administration and the record low number

3:01:07.890 --> 3:01:12.230
<v Speaker 2>of murders, shootings and shooting victims. But Zoran has reiterated

3:01:12.270 --> 3:01:15.150
<v Speaker 2>multiple times this week his intention to disband the SRG

3:01:15.590 --> 3:01:17.750
<v Speaker 2>and said he will provide an update on that timeline

3:01:17.850 --> 3:01:21.010
<v Speaker 2>in the coming months. Also to the dismay of the

3:01:21.050 --> 3:01:23.980
<v Speaker 2>police union, the mayor announced this week that his administration

3:01:24.000 --> 3:01:27.160
<v Speaker 2>will be conducting the first comprehensive review of NYPD use

3:01:27.200 --> 3:01:30.120
<v Speaker 2>of force policies and practices for the first time in

3:01:30.160 --> 3:01:33.539
<v Speaker 2>a decade and will crack down on officers getting out

3:01:33.600 --> 3:01:37.770
<v Speaker 2>of misconduct proceedings by retiring before disciplinary action can take

3:01:37.810 --> 3:01:40.940
<v Speaker 2>place after this was announced yesterday. There was a very

3:01:41.040 --> 3:01:45.420
<v Speaker 2>angry statement from the police union about this. And because

3:01:45.459 --> 3:01:49.370
<v Speaker 2>New York has already ended qualified immunity, the biggest thing

3:01:49.410 --> 3:01:52.790
<v Speaker 2>City Hall could do to undermine police power is to

3:01:52.830 --> 3:01:56.390
<v Speaker 2>move certain public safety and administrative roles outside of the NYPD,

3:01:56.670 --> 3:01:59.490
<v Speaker 2>which Zorn wants to do with the Department of Community Safety,

3:01:59.550 --> 3:02:03.590
<v Speaker 2>but that has faced budgetary constraints, especially following the discovery

3:02:03.670 --> 3:02:07.730
<v Speaker 2>of the $ 12 billion deficit left over by Mayor Adams. Now,

3:02:07.730 --> 3:02:11.110
<v Speaker 2>10 months into his administration, Zoran has not been eager

3:02:11.370 --> 3:02:14.990
<v Speaker 2>to spend political capital taking on the NYPD. Where he

3:02:15.030 --> 3:02:18.140
<v Speaker 2>has been spending political capital, it's mostly been to strengthen labor,

3:02:18.820 --> 3:02:21.820
<v Speaker 2>investing in the Department of Consumer and Worker Protection, creating

3:02:21.840 --> 3:02:24.700
<v Speaker 2>and enforcing a new click-to-cancel rule to crack down on

3:02:25.000 --> 3:02:29.960
<v Speaker 2>impossible-to-end subscriptions, winning hundreds of millions of dollars for delivery workers,

3:02:30.379 --> 3:02:33.600
<v Speaker 2>fighting to pass the Delivery Protection Act to strengthen Amazon workers'

3:02:34.080 --> 3:02:37.560
<v Speaker 2>right to unionize, and partnering with labor unions to modernize

3:02:37.580 --> 3:02:39.980
<v Speaker 2>the process of applying for city jobs and launching the

3:02:40.000 --> 3:02:43.480
<v Speaker 2>mayor's office of worker power. And this is in addition

3:02:43.520 --> 3:02:46.760
<v Speaker 2>to universal child care and the rent freeze, which just

3:02:46.800 --> 3:02:51.260
<v Speaker 2>went into effect earlier this month. But after attending protests

3:02:51.379 --> 3:02:54.510
<v Speaker 2>this week, my general sense is that when it comes

3:02:54.550 --> 3:02:59.410
<v Speaker 2>to NYPD and ICE, protesters want more than just well-worded

3:02:59.470 --> 3:03:04.090
<v Speaker 2>statements and these reviews. They want to see more actionable change.

3:03:04.720 --> 3:03:07.740
<v Speaker 2>whether that's using his position as mayor as a sort

3:03:07.760 --> 3:03:12.519
<v Speaker 2>of bully pulpit to rally the masses against ICE, or

3:03:12.620 --> 3:03:15.890
<v Speaker 2>employ more direct measures to protect New Yorkers from ICE.

3:03:16.570 --> 3:03:20.730
<v Speaker 2>What those measures may be is not entirely clear. And

3:03:21.270 --> 3:03:23.630
<v Speaker 2>if the left wants to be effective in agitating for

3:03:23.690 --> 3:03:27.610
<v Speaker 2>larger social change, beyond making just general demands of electeds,

3:03:27.770 --> 3:03:31.250
<v Speaker 2>it may be worth closely considering why an elected is

3:03:31.330 --> 3:03:34.230
<v Speaker 2>taking certain actions, the constraints of their power and the

3:03:34.290 --> 3:03:38.450
<v Speaker 2>contradictions inherent to holding office, so that those not in

3:03:38.510 --> 3:03:41.990
<v Speaker 2>office can apply targeted outside pressure to counteract the pressure

3:03:42.110 --> 3:03:44.890
<v Speaker 2>coming from the federal and state level, and just the

3:03:44.930 --> 3:03:50.060
<v Speaker 2>pressures of governing itself. Though firing Tisch may please some

3:03:50.090 --> 3:03:54.099
<v Speaker 2>of Zoran's left-wing base, more broadly it is politically risky

3:03:54.280 --> 3:03:56.600
<v Speaker 2>and could damage Zoran as he tries to enact his

3:03:56.660 --> 3:04:00.470
<v Speaker 2>economic agenda while contending with a centrist governor and a

3:04:00.810 --> 3:04:04.970
<v Speaker 2>very hostile federal administration. From City Hall's perspective, choosing to

3:04:05.010 --> 3:04:07.929
<v Speaker 2>go to war with the NYPD right now could undermine

3:04:08.129 --> 3:04:11.880
<v Speaker 2>Zoran's ability to protect New York from ICE, whether by limiting...

3:04:11.970 --> 3:04:15.510
<v Speaker 2>the scale of ICE operations, or ideally keeping ICE out

3:04:15.550 --> 3:04:17.910
<v Speaker 2>of the city entirely. Of course, none of this means

3:04:17.930 --> 3:04:22.300
<v Speaker 2>that people should stop protesting. Protesting is the crucial thing

3:04:22.320 --> 3:04:24.580
<v Speaker 2>that could apply pressure here. But it's also going to

3:04:24.600 --> 3:04:27.619
<v Speaker 2>have to be more than 400 of New York's most

3:04:27.740 --> 3:04:31.140
<v Speaker 2>left-wing protesters. It's going to have to require mass engagement.

3:04:31.780 --> 3:04:33.860
<v Speaker 2>But the thing I wanted to emphasize here at the

3:04:33.920 --> 3:04:37.990
<v Speaker 2>end is that a socialist elected to an executive position

3:04:38.410 --> 3:04:42.090
<v Speaker 2>and a protester and an organizer outside of government are

3:04:42.150 --> 3:04:46.269
<v Speaker 2>very different kinds of political actors whose positions strongly influence

3:04:46.290 --> 3:04:49.039
<v Speaker 2>the actions they take or may be inclined to take.

3:04:49.580 --> 3:04:53.020
<v Speaker 2>Protests supply an important pressure on city leaders to pursue

3:04:53.080 --> 3:04:56.580
<v Speaker 2>certain aims, but our political analysis must take account of

3:04:56.660 --> 3:04:59.960
<v Speaker 2>the balance of forces within the state. Does anyone else

3:04:59.980 --> 3:05:02.789
<v Speaker 2>have any thoughts on this? I'm sure Mia does.

3:05:03.470 --> 3:05:07.490
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, well, I think part of what's happening here on

3:05:07.510 --> 3:05:11.590
<v Speaker 9>a broader scale is that, like, One of the reasons

3:05:11.610 --> 3:05:15.590
<v Speaker 9>that ICE has been successful over the last, call it

3:05:15.640 --> 3:05:22.019
<v Speaker 9>like three or four months, in significant escalations of raids,

3:05:22.320 --> 3:05:24.080
<v Speaker 9>and we've talked about this a little bit on this show,

3:05:24.120 --> 3:05:26.539
<v Speaker 9>but there have been huge escalations in raids in Texas

3:05:26.700 --> 3:05:30.240
<v Speaker 9>and raids in Florida. And there's also been kind of

3:05:30.340 --> 3:05:34.650
<v Speaker 9>beneath the notice of people who aren't there, a really

3:05:34.670 --> 3:05:39.570
<v Speaker 9>significant escalation in places like Minneapolis and But they're doing

3:05:39.610 --> 3:05:40.190
<v Speaker 9>it quietly.

3:05:40.410 --> 3:05:40.610
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

3:05:40.629 --> 3:05:43.090
<v Speaker 9>Like, they're not fighting with protesters. They're going in, they're

3:05:43.110 --> 3:05:45.950
<v Speaker 9>grabbing people, and they're leaving. And I think this is

3:05:45.990 --> 3:05:48.650
<v Speaker 9>one of the things the protesters are thinking about to

3:05:48.670 --> 3:05:51.449
<v Speaker 9>some extent, which is part of why their calculus is

3:05:51.470 --> 3:05:54.529
<v Speaker 9>different in the mayor's office, because, you know, one of

3:05:54.580 --> 3:05:57.300
<v Speaker 9>the things that's been allowing all of this to happen

3:05:57.500 --> 3:05:59.600
<v Speaker 9>is that ICE has been able to do this smoothly.

3:05:59.800 --> 3:06:00.039
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

3:06:00.560 --> 3:06:04.220
<v Speaker 9>The fact that they'll do it smoothly, quietly, and without disturbing, like,

3:06:04.400 --> 3:06:05.540
<v Speaker 9>the broader public order.

3:06:05.560 --> 3:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

3:06:06.690 --> 3:06:08.760
<v Speaker 9>Is a big part of how they've been able to

3:06:09.459 --> 3:06:12.560
<v Speaker 9>really ramp up rates without the kind of mass resistance

3:06:12.640 --> 3:06:14.340
<v Speaker 9>that we saw.

3:06:14.160 --> 3:06:15.020
<v Speaker 13>Earlier in the year.

3:06:15.040 --> 3:06:21.830
<v Speaker 9>But this leads you to a structural problem with the

3:06:21.850 --> 3:06:26.070
<v Speaker 9>position of someone holding office, which is that, A, holding

3:06:26.110 --> 3:06:28.410
<v Speaker 9>office in the U.S. does not give you a monopoly

3:06:28.470 --> 3:06:32.220
<v Speaker 9>on violence because the police are effectively a semi-independent force.

3:06:33.290 --> 3:06:37.420
<v Speaker 9>And you can do oversight on them to some extent,

3:06:38.110 --> 3:06:41.020
<v Speaker 9>but as long as you're sending them there, even if

3:06:41.060 --> 3:06:43.600
<v Speaker 9>you tell them, hey, don't beat up protesters, they're going

3:06:43.640 --> 3:06:46.500
<v Speaker 9>to go beat up Congress people. And then you have

3:06:46.520 --> 3:06:49.400
<v Speaker 9>a secondary problem, which is that if you're running the

3:06:49.440 --> 3:06:52.380
<v Speaker 9>government of New York, your job is to maintain public order.

3:06:53.160 --> 3:06:55.859
<v Speaker 9>And the way that you defeat ICE is through breaking

3:06:56.040 --> 3:07:00.340
<v Speaker 9>public order. And this puts you inherently in tension. with

3:07:00.760 --> 3:07:04.100
<v Speaker 9>the state itself in a position where Mondani ends up

3:07:04.120 --> 3:07:09.860
<v Speaker 9>being aligned structurally with the police trying to do protest control.

3:07:10.920 --> 3:07:14.209
<v Speaker 9>And this is just sort of like the structural limits

3:07:14.530 --> 3:07:17.430
<v Speaker 9>of what kind of power you actually hold in the

3:07:17.470 --> 3:07:21.010
<v Speaker 9>United States when you are elected. Because, yeah, I was like, no,

3:07:21.030 --> 3:07:27.580
<v Speaker 9>we're keeping on fucking Adams-era police commissioner because if you

3:07:27.610 --> 3:07:31.080
<v Speaker 9>want to try to have the body that's nominally enforcing

3:07:31.120 --> 3:07:35.240
<v Speaker 9>your legitimacy on violence, you have to go to war

3:07:35.280 --> 3:07:40.200
<v Speaker 9>with people who can fight you. And that's just a

3:07:40.220 --> 3:07:44.280
<v Speaker 9>huge structural problem with power in the American government. Yeah,

3:07:44.320 --> 3:07:49.709
<v Speaker 9>and Tisch was also retained. essentially following requests from hokal

3:07:49.890 --> 3:07:52.230
<v Speaker 9>as a sort of like yeah sign to hokal that

3:07:52.270 --> 3:07:55.919
<v Speaker 9>like zorn will still be like a competent administrator essentially

3:07:55.980 --> 3:07:57.279
<v Speaker 9>it was it was it was it was assigned to

3:07:57.320 --> 3:08:00.180
<v Speaker 9>her to kind of get her on board during the

3:08:00.220 --> 3:08:03.539
<v Speaker 9>general election yeah and then also you know extract economic

3:08:04.080 --> 3:08:07.000
<v Speaker 9>wins and revenue from the state so that mom donnie

3:08:07.020 --> 3:08:09.650
<v Speaker 9>can have the funding for things like universal child care

3:08:09.670 --> 3:08:11.350
<v Speaker 9>and it's that was one of the calculations that was

3:08:11.390 --> 3:08:14.120
<v Speaker 9>made and and he did like announce his intention to

3:08:14.180 --> 3:08:16.439
<v Speaker 9>retain her during, during the campaign. So this wasn't, is it,

3:08:16.440 --> 3:08:19.320
<v Speaker 9>this isn't necessarily one of his campaign promises, the way

3:08:19.820 --> 3:08:21.180
<v Speaker 9>abolishing SRG is.

3:08:21.730 --> 3:08:24.990
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And which he seems to be still trying to

3:08:25.050 --> 3:08:27.390
<v Speaker 2>work on and you can apply, but as we see from,

3:08:27.690 --> 3:08:30.750
<v Speaker 2>you know, NYC DSA, Zoran's political home, a pressure can

3:08:30.770 --> 3:08:33.209
<v Speaker 2>still be applied on both of these things. Yeah. And, and,

3:08:33.270 --> 3:08:35.230
<v Speaker 2>and should be in that pressure is necessary. Even if

3:08:35.270 --> 3:08:38.350
<v Speaker 2>that means you're going to be going against someone who

3:08:38.410 --> 3:08:41.330
<v Speaker 2>is like, you know, an economic ally, right. In terms of,

3:08:41.500 --> 3:08:43.629
<v Speaker 2>in terms of, yeah. how he's trying to run the city.

3:08:44.129 --> 3:08:47.190
<v Speaker 2>But there are going to be these contradictions that part

3:08:47.230 --> 3:08:49.930
<v Speaker 2>of the left winning power in these places means we

3:08:49.970 --> 3:08:52.110
<v Speaker 2>have to deal with those contradictions. You have to go

3:08:52.150 --> 3:08:54.490
<v Speaker 2>through them, not just avoid them. You can't just avoid

3:08:54.570 --> 3:08:58.050
<v Speaker 2>conflict here. You have to pursue it with focus and determination.

3:08:58.790 --> 3:09:02.770
<v Speaker 2>I think sometimes, at least in conversations in New York

3:09:03.050 --> 3:09:05.470
<v Speaker 2>over the NYPD aspect, I definitely do not want to

3:09:05.850 --> 3:09:09.270
<v Speaker 2>distract from the ice angle here as there is a

3:09:09.290 --> 3:09:11.849
<v Speaker 2>man With a bullet still literally in his neck.

3:09:12.110 --> 3:09:12.330
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

3:09:12.570 --> 3:09:15.350
<v Speaker 2>And I hope that that gets some more focus in

3:09:15.400 --> 3:09:19.959
<v Speaker 2>these next few days. Yeah. Because that situation has not

3:09:20.000 --> 3:09:37.990
<v Speaker 2>resolved itself. In the episode description, I will link New

3:09:38.010 --> 3:09:43.070
<v Speaker 2>York City's immigration resources, the Immigration Legal Support Hotline, the

3:09:43.230 --> 3:09:46.970
<v Speaker 2>intake form for the Rapid Response Legal Collaborative for people

3:09:47.050 --> 3:09:50.920
<v Speaker 2>facing the threat of detention or deportation, as well as

3:09:51.000 --> 3:09:53.640
<v Speaker 2>the Know Your Rights booklets that the city offers in

3:09:53.720 --> 3:09:57.800
<v Speaker 2>multiple languages. It's time for us to go on an

3:09:57.900 --> 3:10:00.300
<v Speaker 2>ad break, and then we will return for more news,

3:10:00.320 --> 3:10:13.859
<v Speaker 2>because it has been a busy week. We are back.

3:10:15.560 --> 3:10:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Let's now go through some of our small things here. Mia,

3:10:19.240 --> 3:10:20.340
<v Speaker 2>do you want to start us off?

3:10:21.320 --> 3:10:21.680
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

3:10:21.800 --> 3:10:26.310
<v Speaker 9>So speaking of the filmed shooting of people in America,

3:10:26.330 --> 3:10:31.530
<v Speaker 9>Pete Hegseth has announced that he is planning to live

3:10:31.550 --> 3:10:35.220
<v Speaker 9>stream the execution by firing squad of the 2009 Fort

3:10:35.250 --> 3:10:39.660
<v Speaker 9>Hood shooter. He announced this by email. Quote tweeting a

3:10:39.860 --> 3:10:44.849
<v Speaker 9>CBS News tweet about the Pentagon's plan with a quote

3:10:44.890 --> 3:10:49.369
<v Speaker 9>tweet that says, quote, correct. And that's that's how it

3:10:49.410 --> 3:10:52.330
<v Speaker 9>was announced by the U.S. government that we were going

3:10:52.390 --> 3:10:56.070
<v Speaker 9>to execute a man by firing squad. A thing that

3:10:56.330 --> 3:11:00.140
<v Speaker 9>the military hasn't executed someone in 65 years. And live streamed.

3:11:00.300 --> 3:11:04.180
<v Speaker 9>The live streaming part specifically is that is 30s lynching shit.

3:11:04.420 --> 3:11:05.240
<v Speaker 9>That's crazy.

3:11:05.930 --> 3:11:08.550
<v Speaker 3>Like, to be honest, I don't support the death penalty

3:11:08.590 --> 3:11:10.869
<v Speaker 3>for the military. Like, the state shouldn't be doing that,

3:11:10.910 --> 3:11:13.480
<v Speaker 3>in my opinion. But among death penalty options, I don't

3:11:13.520 --> 3:11:16.060
<v Speaker 3>care about, like, a firing squad. Like, I actually think

3:11:16.080 --> 3:11:18.900
<v Speaker 3>that's more ethical than the fucking lethal injections they're doing.

3:11:19.379 --> 3:11:23.140
<v Speaker 2>But live streaming? It's depraved. It's sick shit.

3:11:23.240 --> 3:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

3:11:23.780 --> 3:11:25.930
<v Speaker 2>That also just more so points to the brutality of

3:11:25.950 --> 3:11:27.789
<v Speaker 2>lethal injection, despite it being this.

3:11:27.890 --> 3:11:28.029
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

3:11:28.550 --> 3:11:32.170
<v Speaker 2>Thing that's marketed as peaceful and civil. Yes, I'm not

3:11:32.230 --> 3:11:35.000
<v Speaker 2>saying it's nice to shoot people. Yeah, it's also horrible.

3:11:35.040 --> 3:11:38.480
<v Speaker 2>It's much worse than shooting them. Yeah, the fact that

3:11:38.520 --> 3:11:41.060
<v Speaker 2>lethal injection is by all accounts actually a more horrific

3:11:41.080 --> 3:11:46.289
<v Speaker 2>way to die than a literal firing squad is itself crazy.

3:11:47.090 --> 3:11:50.010
<v Speaker 2>If you know what you're doing, a bullet's quick. But

3:11:50.030 --> 3:11:51.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the live streaming thing is insane.

3:11:51.750 --> 3:11:56.160
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, it's horrible. Like, obviously, there's been widespread condemnation of this.

3:11:56.440 --> 3:11:58.859
<v Speaker 9>The people who have been really in support of this

3:11:59.100 --> 3:12:01.840
<v Speaker 9>have been a bunch of the worst Silicon Valley fascists.

3:12:02.580 --> 3:12:05.930
<v Speaker 9>There was a quote from Palmer Luckey, who is one

3:12:05.950 --> 3:12:09.609
<v Speaker 9>of the founders of Andriel, which is a Silicon Valley

3:12:09.670 --> 3:12:11.090
<v Speaker 9>weapons manufacturer we've talked about.

3:12:11.110 --> 3:12:13.250
<v Speaker 2>They make drones. They make a bunch of other shit.

3:12:14.110 --> 3:12:17.550
<v Speaker 9>Who said, quote, and then there are those who suggest

3:12:17.750 --> 3:12:21.300
<v Speaker 9>any revel in the death of those who truly deserve

3:12:21.340 --> 3:12:23.860
<v Speaker 9>it is an indicator of a broken or diseased mind.

3:12:24.020 --> 3:12:27.000
<v Speaker 9>To the contrary, it is normal, good, and aligned with

3:12:27.060 --> 3:12:29.920
<v Speaker 9>our natural order that it has not been done here

3:12:29.980 --> 3:12:32.340
<v Speaker 9>in 60 years as an indictment in and of itself.

3:12:33.080 --> 3:12:35.210
<v Speaker 9>And the thing I would say about this is to

3:12:35.290 --> 3:12:38.610
<v Speaker 9>everyone who wants to do this, like, are you sure

3:12:38.709 --> 3:12:41.010
<v Speaker 9>you want to live in the world where you've opened

3:12:41.050 --> 3:12:41.369
<v Speaker 9>this door?

3:12:42.410 --> 3:12:42.730
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

3:12:42.850 --> 3:12:44.930
<v Speaker 2>Like, are you sure you want what follows?

3:12:45.450 --> 3:12:49.520
<v Speaker 3>Do you want us to talk about live streaming executions?

3:12:49.560 --> 3:12:51.740
<v Speaker 3>Because I will tell you, I don't think a lot

3:12:51.780 --> 3:12:54.560
<v Speaker 3>of Americans want to watch this execution live stream, but

3:12:54.600 --> 3:12:56.980
<v Speaker 3>there are some executions I can imagine a lot of

3:12:57.040 --> 3:12:59.310
<v Speaker 3>Americans would want to watch on a live stream.

3:12:59.340 --> 3:13:02.670
<v Speaker 9>Read up on your Chochescu is all I'm saying about this.

3:13:02.690 --> 3:13:05.750
<v Speaker 3>Look at your poll numbers and read about Chochescu.

3:13:05.770 --> 3:13:09.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. You can't help but think of like, When our

3:13:09.379 --> 3:13:12.359
<v Speaker 2>term comes, we shall make no excuse for the terror. Like,

3:13:13.440 --> 3:13:18.890
<v Speaker 2>I'm there, baby. I've never understood those words so much

3:13:18.950 --> 3:13:19.869
<v Speaker 2>as I do now.

3:13:19.930 --> 3:13:21.910
<v Speaker 9>I would prefer that that door remained shut because I

3:13:21.950 --> 3:13:23.890
<v Speaker 9>don't think you should be publicly executing people. I don't

3:13:23.910 --> 3:13:26.230
<v Speaker 9>think you should be publicly executing people on livestream. But like,

3:13:27.350 --> 3:13:29.820
<v Speaker 9>you're opening this fucking door. If that's what we're doing,

3:13:29.879 --> 3:13:30.620
<v Speaker 9>it's like.

3:13:32.230 --> 3:13:34.870
<v Speaker 3>I can I can agree. Perhaps the country would be

3:13:34.910 --> 3:13:38.289
<v Speaker 3>better if everyone couldn't buy an AR-15. But you opened

3:13:38.310 --> 3:13:41.250
<v Speaker 3>the door. So I have like six. Right.

3:13:42.140 --> 3:13:45.560
<v Speaker 2>It's also it has been reported that Trump is debating

3:13:45.820 --> 3:13:49.360
<v Speaker 2>canceling the live stream only after he learned that the

3:13:49.400 --> 3:13:52.760
<v Speaker 2>shooter was paralyzed, which is very interesting.

3:13:54.000 --> 3:13:56.959
<v Speaker 3>Every now and then, you get a little insight into

3:13:56.980 --> 3:14:00.160
<v Speaker 3>the fact that Trump does have some kind of moral

3:14:00.240 --> 3:14:03.900
<v Speaker 3>schema in his head, and it's always baffling when you

3:14:03.940 --> 3:14:05.750
<v Speaker 3>get a hint of how it really looks.

3:14:06.200 --> 3:14:09.410
<v Speaker 2>It's always just completely unhinged. I mean, that just might

3:14:09.430 --> 3:14:12.390
<v Speaker 2>be an optics thing, too. Yeah, that is an optics thing,

3:14:12.410 --> 3:14:14.130
<v Speaker 2>but it's showing his awareness of the moral component and

3:14:14.150 --> 3:14:14.390
<v Speaker 2>the optics.

3:14:14.410 --> 3:14:14.510
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

3:14:21.160 --> 3:14:23.620
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly. It's just nuts. It's just like, that was

3:14:23.640 --> 3:14:28.260
<v Speaker 2>your line, huh? Maybe. Like, okay. Oh, God.

3:14:28.340 --> 3:14:28.680
<v Speaker 8>All right.

3:14:30.600 --> 3:14:34.980
<v Speaker 2>Quick update here. On Thursday, President Trump did, in fact,

3:14:35.080 --> 3:14:39.840
<v Speaker 2>cancel the planned live stream of the Fort Hood shooter's execution.

3:14:41.250 --> 3:14:46.209
<v Speaker 2>Moving on. On Monday, DHS and HSI Homeland Security Investigations

3:14:46.450 --> 3:14:50.900
<v Speaker 2>raided the D.C. home of Minnesota Representative Ilhan Omar. This

3:14:50.959 --> 3:14:56.679
<v Speaker 2>follows confirmation at the midterm RNC from Secretary Mullen that

3:14:57.080 --> 3:15:01.170
<v Speaker 2>there is an investigation into the allegations of immigration fraud

3:15:01.350 --> 3:15:05.510
<v Speaker 2>made against Omar based on a years old racist conspiracy theory.

3:15:06.110 --> 3:15:09.010
<v Speaker 2>After the raid on Monday, Ilhan made a statement, quote,

3:15:09.890 --> 3:15:13.300
<v Speaker 2>I'm OK. Make no mistake. This is an attempt to

3:15:13.350 --> 3:15:17.610
<v Speaker 2>target political enemies and weaponize federal law enforcement. 10 years,

3:15:17.730 --> 3:15:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Trump has targeted me with baseless lies and smear campaigns.

3:15:21.770 --> 3:15:24.879
<v Speaker 2>This is just the latest escalation in his campaign of

3:15:24.940 --> 3:15:28.900
<v Speaker 2>political intimidation. I will not be silenced, unquote.

3:15:28.920 --> 3:15:31.459
<v Speaker 9>It's also worth noting, like, we're coming up on the elections,

3:15:31.620 --> 3:15:33.320
<v Speaker 9>and this is the shit that's happening right now.

3:15:34.000 --> 3:15:38.060
<v Speaker 2>Quick update here. Shortly after recording, the Wall Street Journal

3:15:38.200 --> 3:15:44.020
<v Speaker 2>reported that the Trump administration's investigations into Representative Omar's is

3:15:44.240 --> 3:15:47.120
<v Speaker 2>specifically aimed at building a case to strip her of

3:15:47.180 --> 3:15:51.720
<v Speaker 2>her U.S. citizenship and ultimately deport her. We will likely

3:15:51.820 --> 3:15:53.320
<v Speaker 2>talk about this more next week.

3:15:54.420 --> 3:15:56.720
<v Speaker 3>I do want to take us a little bit further

3:15:57.060 --> 3:16:01.420
<v Speaker 3>from the United States to the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

3:16:01.440 --> 3:16:06.070
<v Speaker 3>There's a long ongoing conflict there between the Congolese government

3:16:06.350 --> 3:16:09.170
<v Speaker 3>and the rebel group M23, which is backed by the

3:16:09.209 --> 3:16:14.310
<v Speaker 3>Rwandan state. Eric Prince and his mercenary corporation, Vectus, have

3:16:14.330 --> 3:16:17.600
<v Speaker 3>been contracted by the Congolese government to fight against M23.

3:16:17.680 --> 3:16:20.900
<v Speaker 3>What I'm talking about actually happened on September 17th, but

3:16:20.920 --> 3:16:22.879
<v Speaker 3>we just found out about it within the last couple

3:16:22.920 --> 3:16:26.580
<v Speaker 3>of days. During intense fighting in the Menemwe highlands, a

3:16:26.660 --> 3:16:31.450
<v Speaker 3>group of Prince's mercenaries were ambushed and roughly 20 of

3:16:31.510 --> 3:16:34.730
<v Speaker 3>them were killed or injured. This came after a clash

3:16:34.750 --> 3:16:37.650
<v Speaker 3>earlier in September in which several Colombian contractors were killed.

3:16:38.160 --> 3:16:42.280
<v Speaker 3>During this most recent ambush, a New Zealand military veteran

3:16:42.490 --> 3:16:46.130
<v Speaker 3>was killed and an American named Tim Kennedy, who was

3:16:46.150 --> 3:16:48.949
<v Speaker 3>a former Green Beret, and then after being a Green Beret,

3:16:48.970 --> 3:16:52.420
<v Speaker 3>a former UFC fighter. fighter, was badly injured. I think

3:16:52.440 --> 3:16:54.000
<v Speaker 3>he got shot three times in the leg. Sounds like

3:16:54.020 --> 3:16:55.660
<v Speaker 3>there's a good chance he'll lose a leg, but I

3:16:55.680 --> 3:16:59.180
<v Speaker 3>don't really know for certain. And was evac'd and wound

3:16:59.240 --> 3:17:02.340
<v Speaker 3>up eventually at a U.S. military hospital in Germany. So

3:17:03.620 --> 3:17:04.900
<v Speaker 3>there's a couple of things about this. First off, I've

3:17:04.920 --> 3:17:06.250
<v Speaker 3>seen people being like, why is the U.S.

3:17:06.280 --> 3:17:06.750
<v Speaker 2>Military.

3:17:07.300 --> 3:17:08.860
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, paying for the health care of a mercenary because

3:17:08.900 --> 3:17:11.180
<v Speaker 3>he's a veteran. It's not weird that he went to

3:17:11.200 --> 3:17:14.130
<v Speaker 3>a military hospital, right? He's entitled to that, to health

3:17:14.150 --> 3:17:16.590
<v Speaker 3>care of that kind. The bigger issue is that Eric

3:17:16.610 --> 3:17:19.170
<v Speaker 3>Prince has a mercenary corporation that's active in the Congo.

3:17:19.709 --> 3:17:22.450
<v Speaker 3>Things do not seem to be going well for Prince

3:17:22.650 --> 3:17:25.670
<v Speaker 3>or for Vectis in the Congo. Although, again, we don't

3:17:25.709 --> 3:17:27.460
<v Speaker 3>know that. We just know 20 injured and killed. I

3:17:27.450 --> 3:17:28.800
<v Speaker 3>don't know how many killed. I don't know what their

3:17:28.820 --> 3:17:31.220
<v Speaker 3>nationalities were. They're not a real military, so they don't

3:17:31.240 --> 3:17:32.920
<v Speaker 3>have to tell anybody that shit, right?

3:17:33.300 --> 3:17:33.859
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

3:17:33.920 --> 3:17:36.699
<v Speaker 3>Once James is back, I'm sure we'll put together an episode.

3:17:37.200 --> 3:17:39.560
<v Speaker 3>covering in more detail, like what's happening in the Congo,

3:17:39.580 --> 3:17:41.750
<v Speaker 3>because that's important. And it's not really a topic we've

3:17:41.830 --> 3:17:44.230
<v Speaker 3>covered a lot on this show. As a little bit

3:17:44.270 --> 3:17:47.050
<v Speaker 3>of a fun note, because this really pissed off a

3:17:47.090 --> 3:17:49.890
<v Speaker 3>lot of people on X, the everything app, like a

3:17:49.930 --> 3:17:52.250
<v Speaker 3>lot of right wingers who are angry that turns out

3:17:52.350 --> 3:17:54.970
<v Speaker 3>US Special Forces guys aren't nearly as badass without air support.

3:17:55.110 --> 3:17:56.810
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they can just get killed in the jungle like

3:17:56.910 --> 3:17:57.510
<v Speaker 2>anybody else.

3:17:58.030 --> 3:18:00.610
<v Speaker 3>Bullets don't discriminate on how much training or whatever you have,

3:18:00.660 --> 3:18:03.440
<v Speaker 3>how cool you look in pictures. So this started a

3:18:03.480 --> 3:18:06.439
<v Speaker 3>discourse that ended ultimately with a poll and a week

3:18:06.500 --> 3:18:09.620
<v Speaker 3>long discussion as to whether or not all of Europe

3:18:10.140 --> 3:18:12.200
<v Speaker 3>in 1939 could conquer modern 2026 Africa. 78% of X

3:18:12.250 --> 3:18:17.550
<v Speaker 3>voted they believe 1939 Europe. Let me tell you something, folks.

3:18:17.910 --> 3:18:20.750
<v Speaker 3>This is objectively true. Anyone who knows anything about modern

3:18:20.910 --> 3:18:23.490
<v Speaker 3>20th century warfare will tell you it wouldn't take all

3:18:23.530 --> 3:18:28.650
<v Speaker 3>of Africa. Egypt alone could wipe out 1939 Europe. to

3:18:28.680 --> 3:18:32.689
<v Speaker 3>the man militarily without a single soldier landing in Africa.

3:18:33.090 --> 3:18:38.050
<v Speaker 3>They have Rafale fighters. They have 1,100 Abrams tanks. Even

3:18:38.070 --> 3:18:40.760
<v Speaker 3>if you were to take somehow and magically transport all

3:18:40.780 --> 3:18:44.020
<v Speaker 3>of the tanks in Europe in 1939. And remember, in 1939,

3:18:44.020 --> 3:18:46.439
<v Speaker 3>none of the cool shit from World War II existed yet,

3:18:46.560 --> 3:18:48.940
<v Speaker 3>by the way. The German army, I mean, it ended

3:18:48.980 --> 3:18:51.699
<v Speaker 3>the war horse-based, but it was really horse-based in 1939, right?

3:18:52.490 --> 3:18:54.650
<v Speaker 3>If you were to take all of the tanks, every

3:18:54.750 --> 3:18:58.430
<v Speaker 3>armored vehicle, and put them against just Egypt's Abrams tanks,

3:18:58.510 --> 3:19:01.530
<v Speaker 3>and by the way, there's 600 T-90 tanks or something

3:19:01.570 --> 3:19:04.070
<v Speaker 3>like that in Algeria. I don't know how many Abrams

3:19:04.090 --> 3:19:06.590
<v Speaker 3>tanks fucking Morocco has, but it's a lot. But if

3:19:06.610 --> 3:19:09.550
<v Speaker 3>you take just Egypt's Abrams tanks, there was not a

3:19:09.709 --> 3:19:12.830
<v Speaker 3>single man or vehicle portable weapon on the planet that

3:19:12.850 --> 3:19:17.610
<v Speaker 3>could pierce Chobham armor in 1939. The battle would be

3:19:17.670 --> 3:19:18.369
<v Speaker 3>over in seconds.

3:19:18.610 --> 3:19:18.850
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

3:19:19.330 --> 3:19:24.810
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, one of the more amusing pieces of derangement online lately. Oh, God,

3:19:24.850 --> 3:19:26.670
<v Speaker 3>I just love it when people are crazy. That's what

3:19:26.690 --> 3:19:26.990
<v Speaker 3>I got.

3:19:28.450 --> 3:19:31.780
<v Speaker 2>One of the other things that James, I assume James

3:19:31.800 --> 3:19:34.480
<v Speaker 2>will want to talk more once he gets back, is

3:19:34.500 --> 3:19:37.720
<v Speaker 2>early this week, J.D. Vance, as part of his fraud

3:19:37.840 --> 3:19:42.920
<v Speaker 2>task force, announced big crackdowns on H-1B visas at Microsoft

3:19:43.020 --> 3:19:47.070
<v Speaker 2>and J-1 visas at universities. Hmm. So this is something

3:19:47.090 --> 3:19:50.910
<v Speaker 2>that does deserve more dedicated focus in a future episode.

3:19:50.930 --> 3:19:56.090
<v Speaker 2>Netflix this week has laid off about 1,000 employees. That's

3:19:56.140 --> 3:19:58.360
<v Speaker 2>roughly 6% of their workforce.

3:19:59.000 --> 3:19:59.620
<v Speaker 20>Oh, it sucks.

3:20:00.220 --> 3:20:05.240
<v Speaker 2>Before Paramount acquired Warner Brothers, Netflix was trying to acquire

3:20:05.280 --> 3:20:10.420
<v Speaker 2>Warner Brothers. In election news, but an even cooler kind,

3:20:10.800 --> 3:20:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Sean Fain and his left-wing slate at United UAW Just

3:20:15.260 --> 3:20:19.199
<v Speaker 2>swept the United Auto Worker elections. We are the incumbents now.

3:20:19.780 --> 3:20:20.820
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes, yes.

3:20:20.860 --> 3:20:22.280
<v Speaker 2>Just totally demolished.

3:20:22.740 --> 3:20:26.179
<v Speaker 3>And look, do some of us find it entertaining that

3:20:26.230 --> 3:20:28.970
<v Speaker 3>his name sounds a lot like the Irish political party

3:20:29.010 --> 3:20:29.510
<v Speaker 3>Sinn Féin?

3:20:29.810 --> 3:20:33.030
<v Speaker 2>Of course. That's all I have to say.

3:20:33.050 --> 3:20:35.930
<v Speaker 12>How much did he win by, Ger?

3:20:36.290 --> 3:20:44.780
<v Speaker 2>Sion Féin won with 67.98%. To runner up Rich Boyer's 14%.

3:20:44.780 --> 3:20:51.250
<v Speaker 2>Nice work, Rich. I'll glitter it. Nailed it. You really

3:20:51.280 --> 3:20:52.650
<v Speaker 2>hit the zeitgeist there, my man.

3:20:52.670 --> 3:20:56.070
<v Speaker 9>You think that like regular politicians have incumbency advantage? You

3:20:56.110 --> 3:20:57.890
<v Speaker 9>have never seen a union election.

3:20:57.910 --> 3:21:01.470
<v Speaker 2>Oh, my God. Especially a union election for a guy

3:21:01.490 --> 3:21:05.040
<v Speaker 2>who like made things better in the union. Like, damn. Yeah, yeah.

3:21:05.629 --> 3:21:08.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there's just a Catholic school in Oregon that fired

3:21:08.090 --> 3:21:09.920
<v Speaker 3>their football coach because he won by too much.

3:21:10.020 --> 3:21:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh, yeah.

3:21:10.480 --> 3:21:13.619
<v Speaker 3>He was scoring points when it was just kind of mean.

3:21:13.900 --> 3:21:15.930
<v Speaker 3>I feel that way about Sean. It's like, okay, man,

3:21:16.300 --> 3:21:18.120
<v Speaker 3>did you really need 67% of the vote?

3:21:18.940 --> 3:21:21.940
<v Speaker 9>For details, by the way, that guy ran an onside

3:21:22.020 --> 3:21:24.350
<v Speaker 9>kick before halftime up 57.

3:21:24.350 --> 3:21:28.690
<v Speaker 2>So that's some sicko shit. But also, I did not

3:21:28.750 --> 3:21:29.990
<v Speaker 2>know Sean had game like that.

3:21:30.010 --> 3:21:30.890
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

3:21:33.379 --> 3:21:37.060
<v Speaker 2>Starting this week, the White House has a new press secretary,

3:21:37.580 --> 3:21:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Katie Zachariah. And I'll be the first to say she's

3:21:41.440 --> 3:21:44.840
<v Speaker 2>doing great. She's amazing work. You know, no notes. I

3:21:45.080 --> 3:21:46.240
<v Speaker 2>think we can move on, right?

3:21:47.340 --> 3:21:48.840
<v Speaker 17>I adore my family.

3:21:49.080 --> 3:21:49.840
<v Speaker 2>I love them.

3:21:49.879 --> 3:21:53.500
<v Speaker 17>They are my priority. I love being with my kids.

3:21:53.879 --> 3:21:57.200
<v Speaker 17>The idea of not spending evenings with my kids is

3:21:57.440 --> 3:22:03.930
<v Speaker 17>completely unacceptable. So my president, excuse me, my husband, that's

3:22:03.950 --> 3:22:06.250
<v Speaker 17>a good one. My husband is out here.

3:22:07.140 --> 3:22:12.430
<v Speaker 2>Incredible. Oh, my God. Incredible slip. Oh, my God. Incredible slip. Oh,

3:22:12.510 --> 3:22:15.090
<v Speaker 2>my God. Is she the one that was, like, claiming

3:22:15.110 --> 3:22:15.810
<v Speaker 2>to be a lawyer?

3:22:16.030 --> 3:22:16.330
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

3:22:17.270 --> 3:22:20.880
<v Speaker 2>Yes, in China. In China. She passed the bar in China?

3:22:20.940 --> 3:22:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Let me be clear. No, she didn't.

3:22:24.080 --> 3:22:29.910
<v Speaker 9>Like, I would bet my life she did not pass

3:22:29.940 --> 3:22:30.750
<v Speaker 9>the bar in China.

3:22:31.410 --> 3:22:32.629
<v Speaker 2>Like, I am that certain.

3:22:32.650 --> 3:22:32.990
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

3:22:33.090 --> 3:22:35.190
<v Speaker 9>Like, I am as certain of that as I am

3:22:35.250 --> 3:22:37.990
<v Speaker 9>certain that 90% of people who write about Taiwanese politics

3:22:38.070 --> 3:22:39.390
<v Speaker 9>can't name three Taiwanese cities.

3:22:40.090 --> 3:22:42.710
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, Mia. She seems to have a pretty

3:22:42.790 --> 3:22:46.970
<v Speaker 2>solid grasp of foreign policy. Let's see her Mandarin. Here's

3:22:47.010 --> 3:22:49.070
<v Speaker 2>her talking about Venezuela.

3:22:49.840 --> 3:22:53.250
<v Speaker 17>He had a historic one-day war, and now we have

3:22:53.270 --> 3:22:58.359
<v Speaker 17>a booming economy and a great relationship with Venezuela.

3:22:59.230 --> 3:22:59.890
<v Speaker 2>Incredible.

3:23:00.070 --> 3:23:02.670
<v Speaker 5>I'm looking forward to covering her. I don't know what

3:23:02.690 --> 3:23:04.330
<v Speaker 5>you're talking about. This is going to be great.

3:23:04.570 --> 3:23:06.879
<v Speaker 9>By the way, for people who can't see this clip,

3:23:07.280 --> 3:23:10.500
<v Speaker 9>the amazing part is she, when she stops before she

3:23:10.540 --> 3:23:13.460
<v Speaker 9>says Venezuela, she is looking down at the page.

3:23:13.580 --> 3:23:15.359
<v Speaker 2>She looks down at her notes.

3:23:15.760 --> 3:23:20.380
<v Speaker 9>To remember what country she's talking about. Incredible stuff.

3:23:20.620 --> 3:23:23.810
<v Speaker 2>We could do a whole episode about this first press conference.

3:23:23.850 --> 3:23:26.550
<v Speaker 2>There's some great clips going around if you want to

3:23:26.590 --> 3:23:27.050
<v Speaker 2>have fun.

3:23:27.070 --> 3:23:27.570
<v Speaker 1>God.

3:23:28.450 --> 3:23:32.830
<v Speaker 2>Less fun, on the afternoon of October 7th in Sacramento,

3:23:33.520 --> 3:23:36.620
<v Speaker 2>a day after the county began mailing out ballots, an

3:23:36.660 --> 3:23:39.500
<v Speaker 2>SUV pulled up to a USPS mail truck. A masked

3:23:39.540 --> 3:23:42.120
<v Speaker 2>man got out of the SUV and stole trays of

3:23:42.200 --> 3:23:46.440
<v Speaker 2>mail from the truck. Residents have reported their mail-in ballots

3:23:46.550 --> 3:23:50.170
<v Speaker 2>are now missing. Great stuff happening here. Love this country.

3:23:50.490 --> 3:23:55.610
<v Speaker 2>A few days later, the National Guard were videoed standing

3:23:56.070 --> 3:24:01.550
<v Speaker 2>in front of... Ballot drop boxes in D.C. They claimed

3:24:01.570 --> 3:24:05.450
<v Speaker 2>that they were not legally guarding the boxes because that's illegal.

3:24:05.470 --> 3:24:11.310
<v Speaker 2>But they were meandering in front of ballot drop boxes.

3:24:11.830 --> 3:24:12.129
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

3:24:13.090 --> 3:24:20.240
<v Speaker 2>God. Not great stuff just a few weeks before the election. Lastly,

3:24:20.959 --> 3:24:26.070
<v Speaker 2>while addressing a MAGA crowd in Tennessee... Trump made this

3:24:26.390 --> 3:24:29.120
<v Speaker 2>very accurate comment. No, it's true.

3:24:29.600 --> 3:24:38.820
<v Speaker 6>No, there's such love. It's like, like, I mean, it's amazing.

3:24:39.280 --> 3:24:41.360
<v Speaker 6>When you stand up here, it's just like the love.

3:24:41.780 --> 3:24:44.170
<v Speaker 6>I could say the stupidest things and you're clapping, oh,

3:24:44.200 --> 3:24:44.810
<v Speaker 6>I love you so much.

3:24:45.330 --> 3:24:45.830
<v Speaker 2>That's true.

3:24:47.490 --> 3:24:49.850
<v Speaker 6>But we don't say the stupidest things. We say things

3:24:49.910 --> 3:24:50.830
<v Speaker 6>of common sense.

3:24:50.850 --> 3:24:53.310
<v Speaker 5>There's so much clapping to that.

3:24:57.140 --> 3:24:58.620
<v Speaker 2>He knows his fans. What can you say?

3:24:58.640 --> 3:25:00.960
<v Speaker 12>He certainly does.

3:25:00.980 --> 3:25:04.940
<v Speaker 5>And speaking of fans, I have a segment here for us.

3:25:05.240 --> 3:25:06.580
<v Speaker 12>It is sports season for me.

3:25:07.480 --> 3:25:10.970
<v Speaker 5>With the WNBA and MLB playoffs going on and the

3:25:11.090 --> 3:25:12.930
<v Speaker 5>NBA season starting, it's exciting.

3:25:12.950 --> 3:25:15.050
<v Speaker 2>I have not approved this message. Fuck off.

3:25:15.490 --> 3:25:16.650
<v Speaker 12>It's exciting for.

3:25:16.550 --> 3:25:20.250
<v Speaker 5>Me, but it also means I'm exposed to television commercial advertisements.

3:25:20.290 --> 3:25:20.490
<v Speaker 9>Oh, my God.

3:25:20.610 --> 3:25:22.040
<v Speaker 12>It's so bad.

3:25:22.140 --> 3:25:24.800
<v Speaker 5>Besides the alarming number of sports betting ads, a new

3:25:24.820 --> 3:25:28.310
<v Speaker 5>trend I'm upset about is AI ads targeting seniors.

3:25:28.370 --> 3:25:29.370
<v Speaker 12>Let's take a listen.

3:25:30.660 --> 3:25:32.640
<v Speaker 21>Can you go to my calendar and find me a

3:25:32.700 --> 3:25:35.000
<v Speaker 21>half an hour tomorrow so I can mail some of

3:25:35.040 --> 3:25:36.780
<v Speaker 21>these cookies to my grandson?

3:25:37.060 --> 3:25:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I've added a post office trip at town.

3:25:38.700 --> 3:25:39.820
<v Speaker 13>All right, Esther, we're ready.

3:25:40.040 --> 3:25:42.449
<v Speaker 17>ChatGPT boys.

3:25:42.890 --> 3:25:45.870
<v Speaker 9>ChatGPT boys got a whole lot more useful.

3:25:46.150 --> 3:25:50.070
<v Speaker 1>It's no longer just answering questions. It's better at getting

3:25:50.190 --> 3:25:50.949
<v Speaker 1>things done.

3:25:51.629 --> 3:25:52.510
<v Speaker 5>Don't do me.

3:25:54.100 --> 3:25:54.920
<v Speaker 8>Oh, honey.

3:25:54.940 --> 3:25:56.220
<v Speaker 2>Let me show you an example.

3:25:56.459 --> 3:25:58.459
<v Speaker 9>Can you go into my finances and let me know

3:25:58.520 --> 3:26:00.119
<v Speaker 9>if you see any duplicate charges?

3:26:00.160 --> 3:26:00.820
<v Speaker 2>Jesus. Sure.

3:26:00.900 --> 3:26:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Checking your accounts.

3:26:02.040 --> 3:26:02.260
<v Speaker 7>Okay.

3:26:02.480 --> 3:26:05.000
<v Speaker 9>It looks like you're paying twice for a magazine called

3:26:05.060 --> 3:26:05.970
<v Speaker 9>Sound and Stereo.

3:26:06.100 --> 3:26:09.050
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's odd. Can you cancel the duplicate and send

3:26:09.090 --> 3:26:09.850
<v Speaker 2>an e-refund?

3:26:10.110 --> 3:26:10.429
<v Speaker 18>Of course.

3:26:11.490 --> 3:26:13.830
<v Speaker 3>So you're just giving it access to your bank details

3:26:13.990 --> 3:26:15.970
<v Speaker 3>as an old person. That doesn't seem like it'll lead

3:26:16.010 --> 3:26:17.470
<v Speaker 3>you to getting scammed anymore.

3:26:17.550 --> 3:26:19.850
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I was pretty angry when I first saw that.

3:26:19.870 --> 3:26:21.720
<v Speaker 5>I thought I was being irrationally angry, but now I

3:26:21.740 --> 3:26:23.420
<v Speaker 5>think I'm just rational and that it sucks.

3:26:23.840 --> 3:26:26.820
<v Speaker 3>I can't think of any way in which a chatbot

3:26:26.860 --> 3:26:30.120
<v Speaker 3>that pulls for its answers from places like Reddit and

3:26:30.120 --> 3:26:33.310
<v Speaker 3>the social Internet would spread like bad advice on what

3:26:33.310 --> 3:26:36.020
<v Speaker 3>old people should do with their money once it has

3:26:36.020 --> 3:26:39.269
<v Speaker 3>access to their bank accounts. I can't imagine that causing

3:26:39.270 --> 3:26:41.689
<v Speaker 3>a problem. So I don't see what your issue is, Sophie.

3:26:42.450 --> 3:26:45.709
<v Speaker 12>From the New York Post quote, it's very concerning, says Dr.

3:26:45.730 --> 3:26:49.580
<v Speaker 5>Stacey Wood, clinical neuropsychologist and professor at Scripps College. Older

3:26:49.610 --> 3:26:53.160
<v Speaker 5>people are maybe less aware of the algorithm's power, like

3:26:53.200 --> 3:26:55.660
<v Speaker 5>how they work. It's really hard for them to discern

3:26:55.680 --> 3:26:59.000
<v Speaker 5>what's credible and what's not. Older people are also taking

3:26:59.070 --> 3:27:02.160
<v Speaker 5>up AI en masse. Hugh Data from February found that

3:27:02.200 --> 3:27:06.520
<v Speaker 5>a full 23% of senior citizens use chatbots and 42%

3:27:06.520 --> 3:27:09.360
<v Speaker 5>of those aged 50 to 64 are the same. And,

3:27:09.420 --> 3:27:11.400
<v Speaker 5>you know, like keeping up with tech is not necessarily

3:27:11.440 --> 3:27:12.220
<v Speaker 5>a bad thing.

3:27:12.840 --> 3:27:15.080
<v Speaker 12>But Dr. Stacey Wood says it's a slippery slope.

3:27:15.180 --> 3:27:17.500
<v Speaker 5>As people age, Wood noted, they also tend to be

3:27:17.540 --> 3:27:20.060
<v Speaker 5>more likely to believe something is true because it is

3:27:20.080 --> 3:27:22.840
<v Speaker 5>simply repeated to them over and over. And they're generally

3:27:22.890 --> 3:27:26.670
<v Speaker 5>more susceptible to sensationalized and highly partisan content.

3:27:26.970 --> 3:27:29.390
<v Speaker 2>I can say the dumbest things and you people would

3:27:29.410 --> 3:27:29.970
<v Speaker 2>clap for me.

3:27:30.410 --> 3:27:31.010
<v Speaker 12>Yeah.

3:27:31.510 --> 3:27:33.550
<v Speaker 3>One of the issues, as you stated, Sophie, is that

3:27:33.590 --> 3:27:36.629
<v Speaker 3>like it's actually more important, I think, for the elderly

3:27:36.730 --> 3:27:39.550
<v Speaker 3>to be aware of what AI is capable of than

3:27:39.570 --> 3:27:41.709
<v Speaker 3>a lot of other groups because they're being targeted so

3:27:41.770 --> 3:27:45.750
<v Speaker 3>relentlessly by different kind of AI based scams. Unfortunately, that

3:27:45.900 --> 3:27:48.820
<v Speaker 3>usually gets translated into you should be using AI, which

3:27:48.879 --> 3:27:50.080
<v Speaker 3>is going to make a lot of these people more

3:27:50.120 --> 3:27:51.080
<v Speaker 3>vulnerable to scams.

3:27:51.730 --> 3:27:54.009
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, like, I don't like that there's this

3:27:54.030 --> 3:27:57.300
<v Speaker 5>like trend that AI can can replace like human to

3:27:57.320 --> 3:28:01.260
<v Speaker 5>human contact for our seniors. You guys, Garen, Robert, you

3:28:01.280 --> 3:28:04.330
<v Speaker 5>saw a number of products at this year's CES that

3:28:04.370 --> 3:28:06.209
<v Speaker 5>were targeting seniors in that way.

3:28:06.870 --> 3:28:09.410
<v Speaker 3>We saw one or two reasonable ones and a lot

3:28:09.430 --> 3:28:10.010
<v Speaker 3>of bad ones.

3:28:10.400 --> 3:28:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah.

3:28:11.560 --> 3:28:14.240
<v Speaker 12>And, you know, I guess slippery slope.

3:28:14.360 --> 3:28:17.900
<v Speaker 5>But this commercial comes on a lot with different versions

3:28:18.140 --> 3:28:21.830
<v Speaker 5>of seniors, almost always seniors that are women doing things and,

3:28:21.970 --> 3:28:26.320
<v Speaker 5>you know. the chat GPT or whatever AI helping them.

3:28:27.000 --> 3:28:29.340
<v Speaker 5>I just don't see a reason why chat GPT should

3:28:29.360 --> 3:28:33.500
<v Speaker 5>have access to these people's calendars, finances, that kind of

3:28:33.520 --> 3:28:36.460
<v Speaker 5>a thing. I don't see this ending well for so

3:28:36.500 --> 3:28:40.240
<v Speaker 5>many folks. It lacks security and I'm angry about it

3:28:40.600 --> 3:28:43.750
<v Speaker 5>and I wish it wasn't a trend that I see increasing,

3:28:43.810 --> 3:28:45.670
<v Speaker 5>but that seems to be the path we're going on.

3:28:45.690 --> 3:28:46.210
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

3:28:46.290 --> 3:28:48.030
<v Speaker 5>That's all I had on that. I just felt it

3:28:48.070 --> 3:28:51.070
<v Speaker 5>was worth mentioning because it was On my mind.

3:28:51.350 --> 3:28:52.090
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, yeah.

3:28:52.209 --> 3:28:54.070
<v Speaker 3>Another story that's come out this week is that a

3:28:54.090 --> 3:28:56.879
<v Speaker 3>bunch of anthropic researchers are now, or at least there's

3:28:56.900 --> 3:29:00.600
<v Speaker 3>been stories in San Francisco. And you should always take

3:29:00.640 --> 3:29:01.920
<v Speaker 3>this stuff with a grain of salt, but this is

3:29:01.940 --> 3:29:04.280
<v Speaker 3>consistent with a lot of internal conversations that a lot

3:29:04.300 --> 3:29:06.300
<v Speaker 3>of them have been taking up smoking because they're like,

3:29:06.379 --> 3:29:10.320
<v Speaker 3>AI will cure cancer, right? And this has been occurring alongside,

3:29:10.379 --> 3:29:12.560
<v Speaker 3>like there was just an interview with an AI researcher

3:29:12.860 --> 3:29:16.320
<v Speaker 3>on the Delphi podcast for Anthropic who said he's enjoying

3:29:16.360 --> 3:29:18.970
<v Speaker 3>his last six months. Part of the issue here is

3:29:20.120 --> 3:29:22.140
<v Speaker 3>that if you try to engage with what these people

3:29:22.200 --> 3:29:24.910
<v Speaker 3>are saying, then you wind up sounding to a lot

3:29:24.950 --> 3:29:28.340
<v Speaker 3>of folks like you're just like ignoring the potential of

3:29:28.420 --> 3:29:30.860
<v Speaker 3>AI and the things that it is actually capable of doing.

3:29:31.690 --> 3:29:34.030
<v Speaker 3>But you have to engage with what the people making

3:29:34.050 --> 3:29:36.369
<v Speaker 3>it are saying. And everything that the company is making

3:29:36.410 --> 3:29:38.390
<v Speaker 3>this stuff is saying it's nuts.

3:29:38.810 --> 3:29:41.510
<v Speaker 2>It's bullshit. It's lies. And it's insane.

3:29:41.930 --> 3:29:44.190
<v Speaker 3>And that doesn't mean that these are not incredibly powerful

3:29:44.250 --> 3:29:45.449
<v Speaker 3>and very dangerous tools.

3:29:45.470 --> 3:29:45.730
<v Speaker 9>They are.

3:29:45.770 --> 3:29:49.110
<v Speaker 3>They are extraordinarily dangerous because, among other things, they have

3:29:49.330 --> 3:29:52.900
<v Speaker 3>automated the ability of small groups of nation states of

3:29:52.980 --> 3:29:57.560
<v Speaker 3>non-state actors. to carry out massive digital attacks with a

3:29:57.580 --> 3:30:00.460
<v Speaker 3>level of penetration and speed that was not possible before.

3:30:00.879 --> 3:30:04.660
<v Speaker 3>And that's a huge problem. These things are very capable tools.

3:30:05.150 --> 3:30:07.890
<v Speaker 3>It's just that everything being said by the people making

3:30:07.930 --> 3:30:11.050
<v Speaker 3>them is insane bullshit, and it makes it very hard

3:30:11.150 --> 3:30:13.610
<v Speaker 3>to have reasonable conversations about what should be done.

3:30:14.250 --> 3:30:18.380
<v Speaker 2>Anyway. That's a really good point. Fuck these guys. Yeah.

3:30:18.400 --> 3:30:22.879
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to ads real quick. Enjoy these hopefully non-AI products.

3:30:23.200 --> 3:30:23.540
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

3:30:34.650 --> 3:30:36.109
<v Speaker 2>And we're back.

3:30:37.550 --> 3:30:41.000
<v Speaker 3>And I think it's time for us to head south

3:30:41.280 --> 3:30:44.080
<v Speaker 3>of the border that is south of the Polish border

3:30:44.480 --> 3:30:47.330
<v Speaker 3>to talk about Ukraine. I don't know why I decided

3:30:47.370 --> 3:30:48.550
<v Speaker 3>to lead in that way, but I did.

3:30:48.610 --> 3:30:49.030
<v Speaker 5>Baffling.

3:30:49.520 --> 3:30:52.290
<v Speaker 3>Things have unfortunately been very spicy in Ukraine over this

3:30:52.310 --> 3:30:55.410
<v Speaker 3>last week. Last Friday, President Donald Trump announced that his

3:30:55.470 --> 3:30:58.359
<v Speaker 3>Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, and he had made a deal

3:30:58.459 --> 3:31:02.119
<v Speaker 3>to release 300,000 tons of Russian diesel fuel to, quote,

3:31:02.220 --> 3:31:05.680
<v Speaker 3>the American and global marketplace immediately. This came as a

3:31:05.720 --> 3:31:08.350
<v Speaker 3>massive surprise to everyone because last month, Trump signed a

3:31:08.360 --> 3:31:11.289
<v Speaker 3>massive sanctions law to stop Russia from making money selling

3:31:11.370 --> 3:31:13.330
<v Speaker 3>oil and gas to fuel their war against Ukraine.

3:31:13.730 --> 3:31:15.470
<v Speaker 2>The midterms crunch is really hurting.

3:31:16.590 --> 3:31:20.770
<v Speaker 3>It's really making strange, not strange, but I guess normal bedfellows.

3:31:21.370 --> 3:31:23.290
<v Speaker 3>All of this seems to be in response to continuing

3:31:23.330 --> 3:31:27.640
<v Speaker 3>disastrous polling numbers of Republicans in the midterms. An APNORC

3:31:27.690 --> 3:31:31.200
<v Speaker 3>poll published on October 1st showed that most Americans disapprove

3:31:31.240 --> 3:31:34.020
<v Speaker 3>of Trump's war with Iran and blame him personally for

3:31:34.080 --> 3:31:38.230
<v Speaker 3>higher gas prices because he's why we have higher gas prices.

3:31:39.150 --> 3:31:42.840
<v Speaker 9>He has destroyed a generation of work. So trying to

3:31:42.860 --> 3:31:45.100
<v Speaker 9>tell people the president does not control gas prices by

3:31:45.160 --> 3:31:47.260
<v Speaker 9>finding the only possible way to actually.

3:31:47.100 --> 3:31:47.939
<v Speaker 2>Increase gas prices. He really did.

3:31:47.959 --> 3:31:51.199
<v Speaker 3>He definitely did. This is the first time that's been true.

3:31:51.730 --> 3:31:53.949
<v Speaker 3>This is like the first time we've been in what

3:31:53.990 --> 3:31:56.190
<v Speaker 3>is effectively a recession. You can say, no, it's directly

3:31:56.230 --> 3:31:59.209
<v Speaker 3>as responsive to current policies, like literally direct. Like, I mean,

3:31:59.250 --> 3:32:01.670
<v Speaker 3>obviously the 2008 crash, a lot, Bush did a lot

3:32:01.709 --> 3:32:02.980
<v Speaker 3>to do with it, but most of that didn't hit

3:32:03.000 --> 3:32:03.580
<v Speaker 3>until anyway.

3:32:03.900 --> 3:32:05.740
<v Speaker 2>You know what I'm saying, right? Yeah. I did that.

3:32:06.120 --> 3:32:06.380
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

3:32:06.580 --> 3:32:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly.

3:32:07.820 --> 3:32:10.660
<v Speaker 3>So Trump's goal was to make a deal with Putin

3:32:10.720 --> 3:32:13.960
<v Speaker 3>to lower diesel prices in particular, as diesel prices have

3:32:13.980 --> 3:32:17.670
<v Speaker 3>been debilitating to American farmers who tend to support Trump.

3:32:17.810 --> 3:32:19.470
<v Speaker 3>And I think also just a lot of the ads

3:32:19.490 --> 3:32:21.250
<v Speaker 3>that have been running with farmers being like Trump fucked

3:32:21.290 --> 3:32:24.830
<v Speaker 3>me are really bad for Donald and for MAGA. in

3:32:24.890 --> 3:32:27.850
<v Speaker 3>addition to the immediate 300,000 tons of diesel promised to

3:32:27.890 --> 3:32:31.130
<v Speaker 3>be released, another 500,000 tons of Russian diesel were to

3:32:31.170 --> 3:32:33.710
<v Speaker 3>be released by Russia in November, and 1 million more

3:32:33.750 --> 3:32:37.320
<v Speaker 3>tons were to be released immediately hereafter. It's not actually

3:32:37.360 --> 3:32:39.140
<v Speaker 3>clear if this is any kind of formal deal or

3:32:39.180 --> 3:32:42.200
<v Speaker 3>if any of this is actually promised anywhere, what these

3:32:42.240 --> 3:32:44.180
<v Speaker 3>numbers are based on. A lot of what Trump says

3:32:44.220 --> 3:32:47.600
<v Speaker 3>is just nonsensical. So he says that in November, we'll

3:32:47.620 --> 3:32:50.470
<v Speaker 3>get another half million, and then another million immediately hereafter,

3:32:50.770 --> 3:32:53.430
<v Speaker 3>and then 3 million more tons within a short period

3:32:53.450 --> 3:32:57.430
<v Speaker 3>of time. That's not what we what are you at?

3:32:57.530 --> 3:32:59.920
<v Speaker 3>How much fuel is supposed to be released? This might

3:33:00.030 --> 3:33:03.820
<v Speaker 3>be market manipulation. Genuinely, this might just be market manipulation.

3:33:03.879 --> 3:33:07.480
<v Speaker 3>It's entirely possible as that probably leads you to believe

3:33:07.500 --> 3:33:09.820
<v Speaker 3>there are serious doubts as to whether anything like what

3:33:09.860 --> 3:33:12.369
<v Speaker 3>Trump has promised is possible to get out of Russia

3:33:12.410 --> 3:33:14.330
<v Speaker 3>right now. And I will talk about the ethical and

3:33:14.350 --> 3:33:16.570
<v Speaker 3>like Ukraine stuff. But I'm just talking about like, can

3:33:16.590 --> 3:33:18.490
<v Speaker 3>they do this right? Like, do they even have the

3:33:18.530 --> 3:33:20.670
<v Speaker 3>ability to get this fuel on the marketplace?

3:33:20.690 --> 3:33:20.890
<v Speaker 2>Right.

3:33:21.209 --> 3:33:23.260
<v Speaker 3>Per an article in the LA Times, quote, Now, while

3:33:23.280 --> 3:33:24.779
<v Speaker 3>he says half of Russia's refining capacity has been damaged,

3:33:24.820 --> 3:33:26.540
<v Speaker 3>that doesn't necessarily mean that, like, they're down by 50%.

3:33:26.540 --> 3:33:49.900
<v Speaker 3>The IEA, the International Energy Association, said, Estimates that Ukrainian

3:33:49.920 --> 3:33:52.940
<v Speaker 3>strikes on Russian refineries have cut Russia's diesel output by

3:33:52.940 --> 3:33:55.510
<v Speaker 3>30 percent or so. That also could mean that they're

3:33:55.550 --> 3:33:58.580
<v Speaker 3>like gas fuel output is by more than averages to 50.

3:33:58.570 --> 3:34:00.910
<v Speaker 3>I don't fully know. I don't know anyone has other

3:34:00.930 --> 3:34:03.850
<v Speaker 3>than the Russian government exact numbers on how much Russia's

3:34:04.270 --> 3:34:08.500
<v Speaker 3>refining capacity has been damaged. Russia's deputy prime minister has

3:34:08.540 --> 3:34:12.800
<v Speaker 3>tried to repost claims like what the Polish deputy minister

3:34:12.840 --> 3:34:15.820
<v Speaker 3>said yesterday. Our foreign minister said, arguing that Russian exports

3:34:15.860 --> 3:34:19.580
<v Speaker 3>would rise in November and December as previously damaged refineries

3:34:19.640 --> 3:34:22.270
<v Speaker 3>return from maintenance. And obviously, I don't doubt that the

3:34:22.290 --> 3:34:25.450
<v Speaker 3>Russian state is actively repairing and refurbishing damaged facilities and

3:34:25.470 --> 3:34:28.230
<v Speaker 3>that some of them will come back online periodically. But

3:34:28.250 --> 3:34:31.369
<v Speaker 3>they also will continue to face targeting from Ukrainian drone strikes.

3:34:31.470 --> 3:34:31.609
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

3:34:32.270 --> 3:34:34.610
<v Speaker 3>This current phase of the war is largely focused on

3:34:34.720 --> 3:34:38.359
<v Speaker 3>deep ranging drone strikes into Russian territory with retaliatory drone

3:34:38.400 --> 3:34:41.060
<v Speaker 3>swarms and missile attacks from Russia into Ukraine as the

3:34:41.080 --> 3:34:44.220
<v Speaker 3>front remains locked in a relatively stable position. Ukraine's hitting

3:34:44.220 --> 3:34:47.700
<v Speaker 3>1500 miles beyond the line of contact now with drones,

3:34:47.780 --> 3:34:50.429
<v Speaker 3>which is nuts. Like that's air power levels, right?

3:34:50.510 --> 3:34:50.770
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

3:34:50.830 --> 3:34:52.690
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of kvetching about like, oh, it's going

3:34:52.709 --> 3:34:55.170
<v Speaker 3>to change warfare. We've already seen the biggest change in

3:34:55.230 --> 3:34:57.350
<v Speaker 3>warfare that I think will occur in my lifetime. lifetime,

3:34:57.709 --> 3:35:02.370
<v Speaker 3>maybe I'm wrong, but it's drones. Careful what you wish for. Yeah,

3:35:03.350 --> 3:35:05.310
<v Speaker 3>I may be biased because a drone tried to kill

3:35:05.350 --> 3:35:08.080
<v Speaker 3>me once, but I have trouble imagining something altering the

3:35:08.140 --> 3:35:10.900
<v Speaker 3>experience of the regular soldier on the ground more than

3:35:10.940 --> 3:35:11.500
<v Speaker 3>drones have.

3:35:11.860 --> 3:35:15.580
<v Speaker 2>Robert, I'm so excited for the plague weapons. We'll see.

3:35:16.100 --> 3:35:19.720
<v Speaker 3>Obviously, I'm not counting the possibility of currently illegal weapons

3:35:19.760 --> 3:35:23.160
<v Speaker 3>like biologicals or nuclear weapons becoming.

3:35:22.700 --> 3:35:23.760
<v Speaker 2>Regularly deployed, right?

3:35:24.820 --> 3:35:29.440
<v Speaker 3>Immediately after Trump announced this deal, Ukrainian President Zelensky issued

3:35:29.520 --> 3:35:33.010
<v Speaker 3>a furious statement on his nation's behalf. In Kiev, a

3:35:33.050 --> 3:35:35.590
<v Speaker 3>protest gathered at the Memorial to Fallen Soldiers in the

3:35:35.629 --> 3:35:38.629
<v Speaker 3>Maidan to express their anger. Within a matter of hours

3:35:38.709 --> 3:35:41.949
<v Speaker 3>after Trump's announcement, Ukraine hit the loading terminal to Russia's

3:35:42.370 --> 3:35:47.509
<v Speaker 3>Novoshakhtynsk oil refinery, causing a massive fire. For weeks prior,

3:35:47.629 --> 3:35:51.090
<v Speaker 3>Trump had begged Zelensky to halt strikes on Russian energy infrastructure,

3:35:51.250 --> 3:35:54.209
<v Speaker 3>even as Russia has continued to hit Ukraine's energy infrastructure.

3:35:54.629 --> 3:35:57.880
<v Speaker 3>When news broke of this new Ukrainian strike, Trump reacted

3:35:57.900 --> 3:36:00.480
<v Speaker 3>with fury, telling Ukraine that it needed a new president

3:36:00.580 --> 3:36:03.410
<v Speaker 3>and blaming Zelensky for losing 30 percent of your country.

3:36:04.810 --> 3:36:06.890
<v Speaker 3>people had been killed in a war that never should

3:36:06.910 --> 3:36:07.670
<v Speaker 3>have been started.

3:36:07.690 --> 3:36:10.010
<v Speaker 2>I agree. Putin shouldn't have started the war.

3:36:10.410 --> 3:36:12.570
<v Speaker 3>Trump has repeatedly stated his belief that it wouldn't have

3:36:12.590 --> 3:36:14.870
<v Speaker 3>occurred if he'd been president when Biden was.

3:36:15.470 --> 3:36:17.630
<v Speaker 2>I think that's nonsense. By the way, his number is

3:36:17.690 --> 3:36:18.170
<v Speaker 2>also wrong.

3:36:18.209 --> 3:36:22.310
<v Speaker 3>Russia currently controls about 20% of Ukraine's territory, not 30%.

3:36:22.310 --> 3:36:24.770
<v Speaker 3>We don't have official death tolls for this war. We

3:36:24.830 --> 3:36:28.490
<v Speaker 3>know Russia has lost at least about 500,000 soldiers killed.

3:36:28.850 --> 3:36:32.120
<v Speaker 3>So it's reasonable to assume Ukrainian civilian and military fatalities

3:36:32.140 --> 3:36:35.400
<v Speaker 3>would be somewhere in that ballpark. I should also note

3:36:35.420 --> 3:36:38.340
<v Speaker 3>that Trump made this announcement, you know, complaining about Ukraine

3:36:38.360 --> 3:36:41.820
<v Speaker 3>hitting Russian energy infrastructure and promising to buy Russian diesel

3:36:41.980 --> 3:36:45.700
<v Speaker 3>directly after 20 civilians in Ukraine were killed by Russian strikes,

3:36:45.780 --> 3:36:49.890
<v Speaker 3>including three children. Russia has continued to devote significant effort

3:36:49.910 --> 3:36:53.920
<v Speaker 3>to striking Ukrainian civilian property and infrastructure. On October 13th

3:36:53.930 --> 3:36:57.420
<v Speaker 3>and 14th, Russian strikes cut power to more than 600,000 Ukrainians.

3:36:57.860 --> 3:37:00.619
<v Speaker 3>This came just four days after Trump licensed imports of

3:37:00.660 --> 3:37:04.220
<v Speaker 3>Russian diesel. It also came after an energy ceasefire that

3:37:04.240 --> 3:37:07.720
<v Speaker 3>Trump unilaterally announced during the weekend in response to Ukraine's

3:37:07.740 --> 3:37:09.820
<v Speaker 3>strike on that binary. Trump was like, there's an energy

3:37:09.860 --> 3:37:13.030
<v Speaker 3>ceasefire now. Nobody's striking. And then there were strikes. He

3:37:13.050 --> 3:37:15.550
<v Speaker 3>was like, well, nobody's striking diesel. And then there were

3:37:15.590 --> 3:37:18.850
<v Speaker 3>more strikes, right? And Zelensky pointed out on Monday that

3:37:18.910 --> 3:37:22.230
<v Speaker 3>Russia had already violated the ceasefire. Since his announcement, Trump

3:37:22.270 --> 3:37:24.879
<v Speaker 3>has escalated his efforts to defray blame for the high

3:37:24.940 --> 3:37:27.720
<v Speaker 3>cost of gas. And his current strategy is blaming high

3:37:27.740 --> 3:37:30.660
<v Speaker 3>diesel prices in the states on Ukrainian resistance.

3:37:30.680 --> 3:37:31.699
<v Speaker 2>He is in speeches.

3:37:31.740 --> 3:37:33.560
<v Speaker 3>He is saying, like, Ukraine is why your diesel is

3:37:33.580 --> 3:37:37.490
<v Speaker 3>so expensive, which it's not. And again, they've been fighting

3:37:37.510 --> 3:37:41.970
<v Speaker 3>in Ukraine for years. Diesel prices didn't skyrocket until Trump

3:37:41.990 --> 3:37:46.030
<v Speaker 3>decided to fuck with Iran. On October 11th, Ukraine also

3:37:46.070 --> 3:37:48.990
<v Speaker 3>struck a facility belonging to Yandex, which I would casually

3:37:49.030 --> 3:37:52.890
<v Speaker 3>describe as Russian Google. This facility hosted a massive supercomputer,

3:37:52.930 --> 3:37:56.310
<v Speaker 3>two massive supercomputers actually, used to train neural networks. It

3:37:56.350 --> 3:37:58.830
<v Speaker 3>also part of like the Yandex facility there was like

3:37:58.890 --> 3:38:01.760
<v Speaker 3>a military research facility. By any term, this is a

3:38:01.770 --> 3:38:03.950
<v Speaker 3>valid target in war, by the way, just I wanted

3:38:04.000 --> 3:38:07.140
<v Speaker 3>to make that clear. The strikes caused massive disruption to

3:38:07.200 --> 3:38:11.360
<v Speaker 3>Yandex services across Russia. Yandex is an interesting company. The founder,

3:38:11.480 --> 3:38:14.340
<v Speaker 3>Arkady Voloz, was not willing to fall in line and

3:38:14.360 --> 3:38:17.140
<v Speaker 3>support Putin after the expanded invasion of Ukraine. He went

3:38:17.180 --> 3:38:19.330
<v Speaker 3>so far as to condemn the war. This forced his

3:38:19.390 --> 3:38:21.490
<v Speaker 3>exit from working in Russia, and a deal was arranged

3:38:21.530 --> 3:38:24.550
<v Speaker 3>in 2024 to put Yandex under Kremlin control. This is

3:38:24.570 --> 3:38:28.630
<v Speaker 3>why Arkady wins my least problematic Russian billionaire award. The

3:38:28.670 --> 3:38:31.629
<v Speaker 3>strike on that Yandex hub was Ukraine's third major hit

3:38:31.730 --> 3:38:35.150
<v Speaker 3>on Russian tech infrastructure in four days. It cut access

3:38:35.190 --> 3:38:38.550
<v Speaker 3>to huge numbers of services for Russians and people, not

3:38:38.570 --> 3:38:40.720
<v Speaker 3>just Russians, right? A number of countries that border Russia,

3:38:40.740 --> 3:38:42.879
<v Speaker 3>including countries that are worried about getting invaded by Russia.

3:38:43.350 --> 3:38:46.080
<v Speaker 3>Yandex is still like an important service for them. And

3:38:46.100 --> 3:38:48.160
<v Speaker 3>this was not just like they lost access to Google.

3:38:48.220 --> 3:38:51.420
<v Speaker 3>They lost access to like ride sharing apps and like AI,

3:38:51.700 --> 3:38:53.720
<v Speaker 3>like all their AI apps. Like it did a bunch

3:38:53.760 --> 3:38:56.640
<v Speaker 3>of damage to just like people being able to use

3:38:56.700 --> 3:38:58.560
<v Speaker 3>the Internet the way that most people do. people are

3:38:58.600 --> 3:39:00.800
<v Speaker 3>used to in the 21st century, not just in Russia,

3:39:00.840 --> 3:39:04.800
<v Speaker 3>but in bordering countries. This has caused confusion online. In

3:39:04.820 --> 3:39:07.280
<v Speaker 3>the immediate wake of the strikes, reports began to spread

3:39:07.340 --> 3:39:10.180
<v Speaker 3>that Yandex going down had cut bot traffic to huge

3:39:10.260 --> 3:39:13.640
<v Speaker 3>portions of the Internet. That is objectively true. What bot

3:39:13.680 --> 3:39:17.980
<v Speaker 3>traffic means is often misinterpreted. Specific claims were made that

3:39:18.040 --> 3:39:21.070
<v Speaker 3>traffic had plunged for off day, the German far right

3:39:21.100 --> 3:39:24.650
<v Speaker 3>party that like their people commenting and like pro off

3:39:24.670 --> 3:39:27.029
<v Speaker 3>day boards and stuff had like fallen off a cliff.

3:39:27.370 --> 3:39:30.670
<v Speaker 3>and that the conservative subreddit was also down, that there

3:39:30.690 --> 3:39:34.800
<v Speaker 3>were no more Magabots online, that the Russian bots had declined.

3:39:35.240 --> 3:39:37.220
<v Speaker 3>And evidence for these claims was posted in the form

3:39:37.260 --> 3:39:40.730
<v Speaker 3>of cloud flare graphs that purported to show plunging bot activity.

3:39:41.190 --> 3:39:41.510
<v Speaker 2>And again.

3:39:42.270 --> 3:39:43.850
<v Speaker 3>some of those graphs were real, some of them weren't.

3:39:43.890 --> 3:39:47.330
<v Speaker 3>There is plunging bot activity. The problem is that, and

3:39:47.370 --> 3:39:49.390
<v Speaker 3>I made a joking comment about like, this is why

3:39:49.410 --> 3:39:52.709
<v Speaker 3>we should keep airstriking data centers and then tried to

3:39:52.750 --> 3:39:55.740
<v Speaker 3>follow it up by claiming like, look guys, no one

3:39:55.760 --> 3:39:58.779
<v Speaker 3>has to abide by the truth in politics anymore.

3:39:58.820 --> 3:40:00.039
<v Speaker 2>Like, why should we, right?

3:40:00.320 --> 3:40:02.940
<v Speaker 3>But the reality of the situation is that bot traffic

3:40:03.060 --> 3:40:07.080
<v Speaker 3>did drop precipitously as a result of this attack. Cloudflare

3:40:07.120 --> 3:40:10.530
<v Speaker 3>reported that Yandex bot traffic is like 0.4% of the

3:40:10.570 --> 3:40:13.490
<v Speaker 3>max number of HTTP requests that had been reported over

3:40:13.530 --> 3:40:15.840
<v Speaker 3>the prior two weeks. But that doesn't mean there are

3:40:15.940 --> 3:40:19.910
<v Speaker 3>fewer Russian bot accounts on the internet, right? I'll refer

3:40:19.970 --> 3:40:22.590
<v Speaker 3>to an analysis by Brandon Beeb that he put together

3:40:22.629 --> 3:40:24.610
<v Speaker 3>on his Substack that does a good job of explaining

3:40:24.660 --> 3:40:27.760
<v Speaker 3>the disconnect in many people's understandings. The bots that dropped

3:40:27.800 --> 3:40:31.360
<v Speaker 3>are mostly Yandex's own search engine crawler. They aren't troll accounts.

3:40:31.500 --> 3:40:35.000
<v Speaker 3>No primary data shows that Russian social media bots went offline.

3:40:35.360 --> 3:40:38.240
<v Speaker 3>None shows that Engagement Reform UK, The Off Day, or

3:40:38.280 --> 3:40:40.080
<v Speaker 3>MAGA accounts fell because of the strikes.

3:40:40.520 --> 3:40:41.280
<v Speaker 2>Here's what matters.

3:40:41.400 --> 3:40:44.680
<v Speaker 3>In Cloudflare's language, a bot is any automated web request.

3:40:44.860 --> 3:40:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Nearly all automated traffic from Yandex's network is Yandex bot.

3:40:48.140 --> 3:40:50.779
<v Speaker 3>It's search crawler, which is Russia's version of Google bot.

3:40:51.060 --> 3:40:51.240
<v Speaker 7>Right.

3:40:51.560 --> 3:40:55.080
<v Speaker 3>So that's what has declined. Now, while the people who

3:40:55.120 --> 3:40:57.459
<v Speaker 3>are saying like, no, it's wrong that like Russian bot.

3:40:58.120 --> 3:41:01.020
<v Speaker 3>you know, influence operations collapse as a result of these strikes.

3:41:01.420 --> 3:41:03.000
<v Speaker 3>That's also led some people to say, like, there's been

3:41:03.060 --> 3:41:05.700
<v Speaker 3>no impact in Russia's influence operations as a result of

3:41:05.720 --> 3:41:08.250
<v Speaker 3>these strikes. I can't imagine that's true. It's just not

3:41:08.290 --> 3:41:11.030
<v Speaker 3>true in the way people online assumed it is, right? Like,

3:41:11.350 --> 3:41:14.970
<v Speaker 3>they lost a massive access to a massive supercomputer center

3:41:15.010 --> 3:41:18.180
<v Speaker 3>that the military used, right? This has certainly done some

3:41:18.200 --> 3:41:22.620
<v Speaker 3>damage of damage. It certainly frustrated some to some degree,

3:41:22.720 --> 3:41:25.039
<v Speaker 3>some of the shit that the Russian government does online.

3:41:25.420 --> 3:41:28.030
<v Speaker 3>It just hasn't gotten rid of all of the bot

3:41:28.110 --> 3:41:30.930
<v Speaker 3>accounts because that's just like not how any of this works.

3:41:31.190 --> 3:41:32.870
<v Speaker 9>No, like there's not like a Death Star you can

3:41:32.890 --> 3:41:35.640
<v Speaker 9>blow up that like make Russian influence operation go away.

3:41:35.760 --> 3:41:36.519
<v Speaker 8>Like, no, no.

3:41:37.400 --> 3:41:40.160
<v Speaker 2>It's bad for Russia that these got struck, right? They

3:41:40.200 --> 3:41:41.210
<v Speaker 2>prefer that not happen.

3:41:41.629 --> 3:41:45.270
<v Speaker 3>And that will presumably have impacts that are broader ranging

3:41:45.310 --> 3:41:47.650
<v Speaker 3>and that are probably kind of obscure to us on

3:41:47.950 --> 3:41:50.160
<v Speaker 3>a number of their operations. But it's not as simple

3:41:50.180 --> 3:41:52.019
<v Speaker 3>as all of the bots went away. That's just not

3:41:52.060 --> 3:41:52.519
<v Speaker 3>what happened.

3:41:53.100 --> 3:41:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Interesting. Interesting and informative.

3:41:56.300 --> 3:41:59.920
<v Speaker 9>So let's close with a segment I am calling Dispatches

3:41:59.959 --> 3:42:03.619
<v Speaker 9>from a World in Revolt with the starting claim that, yeah,

3:42:03.660 --> 3:42:06.460
<v Speaker 9>we're kind of back, by which I mean we're kind

3:42:06.500 --> 3:42:09.230
<v Speaker 9>of back in what appears to be at least the

3:42:09.260 --> 3:42:12.690
<v Speaker 9>beginning of another global era of mass protests along the

3:42:12.730 --> 3:42:17.379
<v Speaker 9>lines of sort of 2011 or 2019, 2020. We have

3:42:17.420 --> 3:42:19.160
<v Speaker 9>talked about some of these protests on the show. We're

3:42:19.200 --> 3:42:22.360
<v Speaker 9>going to be going through a few areas that have

3:42:22.379 --> 3:42:25.620
<v Speaker 9>seen large protests here. Today, we are mostly going to

3:42:25.640 --> 3:42:29.300
<v Speaker 9>be focusing on India. Now, previously on the show, we've

3:42:29.340 --> 3:42:32.280
<v Speaker 9>talked about the massive wave of student protests in India

3:42:32.340 --> 3:42:35.359
<v Speaker 9>under the banner of the meme Cockroach Janta Party, which

3:42:35.420 --> 3:42:38.880
<v Speaker 9>is named after a Supreme Court justice calling unemployed youths

3:42:38.920 --> 3:42:41.810
<v Speaker 9>their cockroaches. So it's a play on the BJP. It's

3:42:41.840 --> 3:42:45.230
<v Speaker 9>like the BJP, but it's the CJP because it's cockroaches. Okay,

3:42:45.410 --> 3:42:48.720
<v Speaker 9>with that out of the way, Those original protests from

3:42:48.740 --> 3:42:51.340
<v Speaker 9>a few months ago have sort of won. The CJP

3:42:51.459 --> 3:42:54.610
<v Speaker 9>declared victory recently after forcing the resignation of the Minister

3:42:54.629 --> 3:43:01.480
<v Speaker 9>of Education, after government officials leaked the answers to standardized tests. But, comma,

3:43:02.620 --> 3:43:06.129
<v Speaker 9>Protests in India have continued, and they have continued over

3:43:06.190 --> 3:43:10.750
<v Speaker 9>the BJP's attempt to remove 130 million people from the

3:43:10.810 --> 3:43:11.410
<v Speaker 9>voting rolls.

3:43:12.030 --> 3:43:15.530
<v Speaker 3>Now, Mia, I've never done a number before. Is that

3:43:15.650 --> 3:43:16.510
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people?

3:43:17.459 --> 3:43:19.320
<v Speaker 9>That would be the 12th largest country on Earth. That

3:43:19.379 --> 3:43:22.560
<v Speaker 9>is larger than the population of Japan. It is slightly,

3:43:23.020 --> 3:43:26.459
<v Speaker 9>slightly less than the population of Mexico that they are

3:43:26.480 --> 3:43:29.650
<v Speaker 9>trying to strip from the voting rolls. The rhetoric coming

3:43:29.670 --> 3:43:31.530
<v Speaker 9>out of the BJP is in a lot of ways,

3:43:31.570 --> 3:43:34.290
<v Speaker 9>very similar to the rhetoric you see from fascist parties

3:43:34.330 --> 3:43:38.629
<v Speaker 9>around the world. They're screaming about like illegal Muslim aliens

3:43:38.670 --> 3:43:42.590
<v Speaker 9>casting fake votes. And so like, basically they're doing on

3:43:42.629 --> 3:43:45.580
<v Speaker 9>the scale of 130 million people, a thing that like

3:43:46.100 --> 3:43:47.400
<v Speaker 9>you see in the U S where they go through

3:43:47.420 --> 3:43:49.740
<v Speaker 9>the voting rolls and like purge everyone with a nonwhite name.

3:43:49.800 --> 3:43:51.680
<v Speaker 9>And here it's like, yeah, they're purging people with Muslim

3:43:51.720 --> 3:43:55.660
<v Speaker 9>names at the scale of the 12th largest country on earth.

3:43:56.280 --> 3:44:00.260
<v Speaker 9>So yeah, In response to this, India's, I would call

3:44:00.280 --> 3:44:05.690
<v Speaker 9>them largely feckless opposition parties, actually finally did something and

3:44:05.810 --> 3:44:09.189
<v Speaker 9>they deployed their... So Congress, which is like the main INC,

3:44:09.930 --> 3:44:13.880
<v Speaker 9>are India's main opposition party. They are the party that

3:44:14.180 --> 3:44:17.880
<v Speaker 9>is like the party that did Indian independence. And they

3:44:17.900 --> 3:44:20.680
<v Speaker 9>have connected their legacy to Gandhi. And so they deployed

3:44:20.720 --> 3:44:23.320
<v Speaker 9>their one strategy, which is throwing Gandhi's at the problem.

3:44:24.379 --> 3:44:27.540
<v Speaker 9>So they staged a protest outside of the Electoral Commission.

3:44:27.560 --> 3:44:30.900
<v Speaker 3>That's not honestly an enjoyable mental image. I'm just savoring that.

3:44:30.820 --> 3:44:33.679
<v Speaker 2>For a second. Literally, physically, it is what they're doing.

3:44:33.720 --> 3:44:38.450
<v Speaker 2>They threw Raul Gandhi. How many Gandhis we got? A lot.

3:44:38.750 --> 3:44:41.230
<v Speaker 2>They have a lot of Gandhi descendants. They got a

3:44:41.350 --> 3:44:43.170
<v Speaker 2>lot of his family tree down there. Pick on the

3:44:43.190 --> 3:44:45.570
<v Speaker 2>ground the Gandhis are these days. That's good to know.

3:44:46.110 --> 3:44:49.930
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so Rahul Gandhi and his sister, who's also in

3:44:49.950 --> 3:44:51.450
<v Speaker 9>the party and is like a high ranking party official,

3:44:51.510 --> 3:44:54.600
<v Speaker 9>Rahul Gandhi is like the opposition leader. They went and

3:44:54.640 --> 3:44:57.060
<v Speaker 9>were nominally they were trying to like they went to

3:44:57.080 --> 3:44:58.920
<v Speaker 9>the Electoral Commission. We're trying to talk to the guy

3:44:58.940 --> 3:45:01.640
<v Speaker 9>who's in charge of the Electoral Commission. And they got

3:45:01.680 --> 3:45:04.310
<v Speaker 9>arrested like multiple times. There's a bunch of scenes of

3:45:04.390 --> 3:45:06.850
<v Speaker 9>like Rahul Gandhi trying to like crawl out of a

3:45:07.050 --> 3:45:09.890
<v Speaker 9>bus that he was being held. This is like this

3:45:09.910 --> 3:45:11.990
<v Speaker 9>was like a week ago Wednesday.

3:45:12.010 --> 3:45:12.090
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

3:45:12.709 --> 3:45:16.090
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, on October 7th, or maybe it was October 6th

3:45:16.110 --> 3:45:18.490
<v Speaker 9>or 7th. Basically, it was last week from when we

3:45:18.530 --> 3:45:22.420
<v Speaker 9>were recording this. And this has led to a bunch

3:45:22.700 --> 3:45:26.620
<v Speaker 9>more protests, including the CJP, like the cockroach party, like

3:45:26.680 --> 3:45:30.820
<v Speaker 9>going out against these electoral purges. But it's also led

3:45:30.920 --> 3:45:33.680
<v Speaker 9>to a sort of astonishing level of repression in India,

3:45:34.459 --> 3:45:37.900
<v Speaker 9>and particularly in the capital of New Delhi. that has

3:45:37.980 --> 3:45:42.220
<v Speaker 9>turned it over over the last weekend into effectively a

3:45:42.959 --> 3:45:47.550
<v Speaker 9>fairly overt police state. On Saturday, Indian police arrested the

3:45:47.590 --> 3:45:50.510
<v Speaker 9>founder of the cockroach party as an attempt to try

3:45:50.530 --> 3:45:53.150
<v Speaker 9>to stop the protest. There was a huge militarized police

3:45:53.170 --> 3:45:56.570
<v Speaker 9>deployment in New Delhi itself trying to stop anyone from

3:45:56.590 --> 3:45:58.670
<v Speaker 9>being able to assemble and form protests in the first place.

3:45:58.690 --> 3:46:02.210
<v Speaker 9>They've also shut down the mile long road to Junter Munter,

3:46:02.230 --> 3:46:06.840
<v Speaker 9>which is basically there's a road there that has been

3:46:06.860 --> 3:46:09.320
<v Speaker 9>a massive site of protests since like the 90s. Basically,

3:46:09.340 --> 3:46:12.140
<v Speaker 9>whenever someone's doing a protest in the Capitol, you show

3:46:12.140 --> 3:46:14.590
<v Speaker 9>up here and you do a protest on the street

3:46:14.590 --> 3:46:17.330
<v Speaker 9>and you like occupy the street for a while. And

3:46:17.330 --> 3:46:19.250
<v Speaker 9>this was also a huge hub of of the car

3:46:19.270 --> 3:46:22.810
<v Speaker 9>crash movement was a giant sit in here. And like

3:46:22.850 --> 3:46:25.270
<v Speaker 9>the entire street has been declared like not a valid

3:46:25.330 --> 3:46:28.320
<v Speaker 9>site of protest by the police and the police have

3:46:28.330 --> 3:46:30.560
<v Speaker 9>been trying to funnel protesters into other sites around the

3:46:30.590 --> 3:46:32.600
<v Speaker 9>city that are like significantly further from the center of

3:46:32.640 --> 3:46:33.500
<v Speaker 9>the city, man.

3:46:34.330 --> 3:46:39.429
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes the just international like reflexive solidarity between police officers

3:46:39.550 --> 3:46:40.510
<v Speaker 3>is just really beautiful.

3:46:40.690 --> 3:46:43.610
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's always the same the same move. No, no, no.

3:46:43.629 --> 3:46:45.850
<v Speaker 2>You can't do it there, though. Can't do it there. Sorry.

3:46:45.910 --> 3:46:49.030
<v Speaker 2>This is just free speech zones. Sorry.

3:46:49.080 --> 3:46:49.300
<v Speaker 8>Sorry.

3:46:49.320 --> 3:46:51.140
<v Speaker 2>This is not a free speech zone. Yeah, it's a

3:46:51.160 --> 3:46:53.060
<v Speaker 2>free speech zone. Yeah, they always do this like, oh,

3:46:53.080 --> 3:46:55.500
<v Speaker 2>but there. No, it's fine what you're doing, but not there.

3:46:55.520 --> 3:46:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

3:46:56.040 --> 3:46:56.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

3:46:57.990 --> 3:47:00.109
<v Speaker 9>Like over the weekend, there were these massive attempts to

3:47:00.129 --> 3:47:02.410
<v Speaker 9>stop the protests, and that did kind of cut down

3:47:02.470 --> 3:47:05.880
<v Speaker 9>on numbers. But on Monday the 12th, the Congress party,

3:47:06.190 --> 3:47:09.260
<v Speaker 9>the terminology is mildly confusing to Americans. But yeah, like

3:47:09.560 --> 3:47:13.500
<v Speaker 9>a lot of like Congress political leaders and a bunch

3:47:13.520 --> 3:47:15.519
<v Speaker 9>of protesters were able to take the streets again on Monday.

3:47:16.020 --> 3:47:19.220
<v Speaker 9>On Tuesday, cockroach protest leaders like tried to retake that

3:47:19.260 --> 3:47:21.960
<v Speaker 9>street and a bunch of their leaders got arrested after

3:47:22.020 --> 3:47:25.379
<v Speaker 9>trying to take the main square again. The protests do

3:47:25.440 --> 3:47:28.060
<v Speaker 9>not seem to be slowing down as of now. Congress

3:47:28.080 --> 3:47:29.879
<v Speaker 9>has been trying to turn this into a sort of

3:47:29.920 --> 3:47:34.150
<v Speaker 9>sustained attempt to challenge Modi's rule. I think even as

3:47:34.200 --> 3:47:37.269
<v Speaker 9>he's trying to purge 130 million people from the voting rolls,

3:47:37.310 --> 3:47:40.769
<v Speaker 9>which would be the end of anything even remotely democratic

3:47:40.790 --> 3:47:44.010
<v Speaker 9>in the Indian system, this is a real moment of

3:47:44.030 --> 3:47:47.190
<v Speaker 9>weakness for him. And the escalation of these protests has

3:47:47.250 --> 3:47:50.260
<v Speaker 9>been very damaging for the regime, even after they were

3:47:50.360 --> 3:47:54.480
<v Speaker 9>kind of able to like slow down and stop the

3:47:54.540 --> 3:47:59.570
<v Speaker 9>original cockroach protests. Now that's been reignited and Congress has

3:47:59.610 --> 3:48:01.690
<v Speaker 9>been throwing their base into it. So we're going to

3:48:01.709 --> 3:48:05.800
<v Speaker 9>continue to fill you in on what's going on there.

3:48:06.590 --> 3:48:10.070
<v Speaker 2>Do they have any specific demands when it comes to

3:48:10.350 --> 3:48:11.770
<v Speaker 2>the voter roll purchase?

3:48:12.150 --> 3:48:16.160
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, the main one, obviously, they want everyone put back

3:48:16.280 --> 3:48:18.500
<v Speaker 9>in and they want the chief of the electoral commission

3:48:18.520 --> 3:48:18.940
<v Speaker 9>to resign.

3:48:19.340 --> 3:48:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Okay. Those are the demands that everyone seems to agree to, basically.

3:48:23.360 --> 3:48:30.310
<v Speaker 9>Congress and the cockroach protesters aren't... one-to-one overlapping political bases, right? So,

3:48:30.410 --> 3:48:33.910
<v Speaker 9>you know, it's a bit complicated there. But yeah, those

3:48:33.950 --> 3:48:37.150
<v Speaker 9>are the main demands that we've seen so far. I

3:48:37.170 --> 3:48:42.510
<v Speaker 9>want to turn to Europe, where we've also seen continuations of, well,

3:48:42.530 --> 3:48:45.629
<v Speaker 9>both the protests in France and Spain, there were large

3:48:45.930 --> 3:48:49.750
<v Speaker 9>French student protests over the weekend. I've seen numbers that

3:48:49.770 --> 3:48:51.310
<v Speaker 9>suggest it was down to about 160,000, down from like

3:48:51.310 --> 3:48:56.780
<v Speaker 9>300,000 the week before. You know, and obviously the police

3:48:56.800 --> 3:49:00.180
<v Speaker 9>have continued to attack student protesters. Things are still really bleak.

3:49:00.200 --> 3:49:03.679
<v Speaker 9>There's like a horrifying picture of like a kid getting

3:49:03.820 --> 3:49:05.780
<v Speaker 9>crushed by a gate that a bunch of like a

3:49:05.920 --> 3:49:08.600
<v Speaker 9>giant metal gate that a bunch of cops are pushing. Yeah,

3:49:08.620 --> 3:49:11.420
<v Speaker 9>so they're still doing absolutely horrific stuff there. We did

3:49:11.480 --> 3:49:16.020
<v Speaker 9>a larger episode about this earlier this week. Now, the

3:49:16.040 --> 3:49:19.440
<v Speaker 9>student protests have also begun to spread, although kind of

3:49:19.480 --> 3:49:22.700
<v Speaker 9>in small forms as of this week. We've seen versions

3:49:22.760 --> 3:49:26.920
<v Speaker 9>of them break out in Greece, Albania and Belgium. Greek protesters,

3:49:26.940 --> 3:49:29.870
<v Speaker 9>student protesters put up tents in Stigmata Square, which is

3:49:29.890 --> 3:49:32.230
<v Speaker 9>another historic protest site that was, I mean, it's been

3:49:32.250 --> 3:49:36.070
<v Speaker 9>the core of a hundred million protests, but it's notably

3:49:36.130 --> 3:49:37.710
<v Speaker 9>was one of the places that was the core of

3:49:37.730 --> 3:49:40.890
<v Speaker 9>the protest in 2011, which, you know, I think links

3:49:40.950 --> 3:49:43.320
<v Speaker 9>back in a lot of ways to the ways that

3:49:43.330 --> 3:49:45.920
<v Speaker 9>the protests in Spain have been reoccupying a lot of

3:49:46.460 --> 3:49:51.780
<v Speaker 9>the like 2011 historic protest sites. The Albanian ones, I think,

3:49:51.840 --> 3:49:58.320
<v Speaker 9>have been pretty small so far. of multiple fairly large

3:49:58.350 --> 3:50:00.980
<v Speaker 9>protests going on. There was a student protest on Monday,

3:50:01.020 --> 3:50:03.720
<v Speaker 9>but then also earlier in like last week, there was

3:50:03.760 --> 3:50:06.500
<v Speaker 9>a giant anti-austerity protest. There's about like 10,000, well, it's

3:50:06.520 --> 3:50:09.800
<v Speaker 9>about like 10,000 people. Pretty large, much smaller than the

3:50:10.600 --> 3:50:15.370
<v Speaker 9>sort of full-scale stuff in France and Spain, but also, yeah,

3:50:15.470 --> 3:50:19.160
<v Speaker 9>similar cops have been attacking them fairly significantly. The cops

3:50:19.200 --> 3:50:22.150
<v Speaker 9>arrested 10 people, like nine of whom are minors. So

3:50:22.360 --> 3:50:25.350
<v Speaker 9>the student protests have a very similar sort of composition

3:50:25.410 --> 3:50:27.030
<v Speaker 9>of like, it's like these high school students going into

3:50:27.070 --> 3:50:31.290
<v Speaker 9>revolt that you see in France. Meanwhile, in Spain, there

3:50:31.310 --> 3:50:35.070
<v Speaker 9>was like another massive round of the giant protest they've

3:50:35.090 --> 3:50:36.950
<v Speaker 9>been having. A bunch of the occupations are still going.

3:50:36.990 --> 3:50:39.490
<v Speaker 9>We're probably going to talk to James next week a

3:50:39.530 --> 3:50:41.680
<v Speaker 9>bit more in detail about what's been happening there. I

3:50:42.500 --> 3:50:45.040
<v Speaker 9>think it's also fairly notable that there's been a pretty

3:50:45.060 --> 3:50:49.960
<v Speaker 9>significant attempt to by the... Okay, so this is where

3:50:49.980 --> 3:50:53.540
<v Speaker 9>we have to make a distinction between socialist party and socialist.

3:50:54.220 --> 3:50:58.310
<v Speaker 9>The socialist party government of Pedro Sanchez, with the caveat

3:50:58.350 --> 3:51:01.630
<v Speaker 9>that in Spain, the socialist party has been kind of

3:51:01.670 --> 3:51:07.510
<v Speaker 9>the equivalent of the Democrats for many, many, many years now.

3:51:07.530 --> 3:51:09.090
<v Speaker 9>The socialist party was one of the two parties that

3:51:09.690 --> 3:51:12.260
<v Speaker 9>the protests in 2011 were against, which led to the

3:51:12.280 --> 3:51:13.140
<v Speaker 9>formation of Podemos.

3:51:13.180 --> 3:51:14.180
<v Speaker 2>That's a whole other story.

3:51:15.360 --> 3:51:17.900
<v Speaker 9>But Pedro Sanchez has been trying to use these protests

3:51:17.940 --> 3:51:20.360
<v Speaker 9>to save his government, even though it has also been

3:51:20.420 --> 3:51:26.170
<v Speaker 9>his government that has been presiding over the housing crisis

3:51:26.190 --> 3:51:30.070
<v Speaker 9>and these evictions. He's been attempting to co-opt the protests

3:51:30.110 --> 3:51:34.910
<v Speaker 9>in order to save his flagging electoral things, which obviously, yeah,

3:51:34.930 --> 3:51:36.530
<v Speaker 9>it would be worse if the far right took power,

3:51:36.570 --> 3:51:39.900
<v Speaker 9>and that's kind of what things have been looking towards. Yeah,

3:51:39.920 --> 3:51:44.840
<v Speaker 9>because the far right killed two pro-tenant bills in parliament

3:51:45.180 --> 3:51:47.380
<v Speaker 9>like earlier this month yeah and then he's kind of

3:51:47.460 --> 3:51:50.100
<v Speaker 9>used that and the protests yep to call for an

3:51:50.140 --> 3:51:52.840
<v Speaker 9>election yeah and but this has also been paired with

3:51:52.880 --> 3:51:55.720
<v Speaker 9>attempts to sort of like directly co-opt the protests themselves

3:51:55.820 --> 3:51:58.380
<v Speaker 9>which there's been a whole bunch of stuff around that

3:51:58.400 --> 3:51:59.940
<v Speaker 9>there that we can get into more detail with later

3:52:00.040 --> 3:52:03.640
<v Speaker 9>but that's a dynamic that we're going to see frequently

3:52:03.720 --> 3:52:08.890
<v Speaker 9>here i mean you don't often get one as blatant

3:52:09.150 --> 3:52:11.030
<v Speaker 9>as the like hey this is the government that did

3:52:11.050 --> 3:52:12.790
<v Speaker 9>this that's like now trying to use your movement to

3:52:12.810 --> 3:52:16.480
<v Speaker 9>do something but Yeah, this is a very common dynamic

3:52:16.800 --> 3:52:19.780
<v Speaker 9>in protests like this. And yeah, we're going to be

3:52:19.820 --> 3:52:22.600
<v Speaker 9>seeing it more and more as protests continue. And we

3:52:22.620 --> 3:52:26.500
<v Speaker 9>will let you know what other places start having mass protests.

3:52:26.680 --> 3:52:29.220
<v Speaker 9>I'm just going to briefly note there were some also

3:52:29.260 --> 3:52:32.340
<v Speaker 9>education protests a little bit before this in Chile. There's

3:52:32.360 --> 3:52:35.900
<v Speaker 9>been anti-Bolsonaro protests happening all over Brazil. But yeah, we

3:52:35.920 --> 3:52:39.300
<v Speaker 9>will keep you updated as we get more really large

3:52:39.680 --> 3:52:40.320
<v Speaker 9>protest waves.

3:52:41.560 --> 3:52:44.220
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. All right. That does it for us here at

3:52:44.360 --> 3:52:47.400
<v Speaker 2>It Could Happen Here. If you want to send James

3:52:47.440 --> 3:52:51.520
<v Speaker 2>a marketing email, you can do so at coolzontips at proton.me.

3:52:51.540 --> 3:52:52.700
<v Speaker 2>He will kill you.

3:52:52.720 --> 3:52:56.560
<v Speaker 9>He will hunt you down with predator vision. Do not

3:52:56.580 --> 3:52:58.200
<v Speaker 9>send marketing emails to him.

3:52:58.220 --> 3:53:02.780
<v Speaker 2>That email is actually for news-related tips and information. Put

3:53:02.800 --> 3:53:05.640
<v Speaker 2>a trans girl on your couch. We reported the news.

3:53:07.240 --> 3:53:08.020
<v Speaker 13>We reported the news.

3:53:13.670 --> 3:53:16.790
<v Speaker 3>Hey, we'll be back Monday with more episodes every week

3:53:16.870 --> 3:53:18.710
<v Speaker 3>from now until the heat death of the universe.

3:53:19.570 --> 3:53:21.990
<v Speaker 18>It Could Happen Here is a production of Cool Zone Media.

3:53:22.230 --> 3:53:26.580
<v Speaker 18>For more podcasts from Cool Zone Media, visit our website, coolzonemedia.com,

3:53:27.020 --> 3:53:29.820
<v Speaker 18>or check us out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

3:53:30.200 --> 3:53:31.020
<v Speaker 18>or wherever.

3:53:30.680 --> 3:53:31.740
<v Speaker 12>You listen to podcasts.

3:53:31.760 --> 3:53:34.200
<v Speaker 18>You can now find sources for It Could Happen Here

3:53:34.280 --> 3:53:35.980
<v Speaker 18>listed directly in episode descriptions.

3:53:36.480 --> 3:53:37.160
<v Speaker 12>Thanks for listening.