WEBVTT - Coinbase in the UAE and Meta May End News in Canada

0:00:01.560 --> 0:00:02.280
<v Speaker 1>From Mahard.

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:06.840
<v Speaker 2>We're Innovations Money and Power Collie in Silicon Vallet NBN.

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:11.240
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Hyde of bloomgg's world headquarters in New York,

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 3>and I'm Ed.

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:32.279
<v Speaker 4>Lovelow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Technology coming up.

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:34.159
<v Speaker 3>We have got the latest on the held of the

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 3>banking system and of course the state of fundraising, which

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:40.840
<v Speaker 3>are in by some kvcs from viet Ventures and Costanoa Ventures.

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 4>Plus Coinbase weighing the United Arab Emirates for its international hub.

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 4>We hear from Coinbased CEO Brian Armstrong on what's driving

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:50.199
<v Speaker 4>that decision, and we'll have.

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 3>The latest on meta as of the social media giant

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 3>may end Facebook and Instagram news content in Canada and

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 3>as the company vows to fight back against the ftc.

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 5>Of children's data.

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 3>Now, as we dwell on that story around a publicly

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 3>traded company, let's go more broadly across the indices right

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 3>now because.

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 5>Some caution in today's trading.

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 3>Even though we've got to lift in European trading and

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 3>Asian trading, today we just pull back a little bit.

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 3>The nastack off six points. We're basically flat on the day,

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 3>coming off of our lows. We're really though, seeing some

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:21.759
<v Speaker 3>pressure on the bond market. This is we not more

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:24.680
<v Speaker 3>focus on the FED, but we actually focus on supply,

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 3>on corporate bonds being sold ultimately and a whole hef

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 3>to them. We're expecting some thirty five billion dollars towards

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 3>the rest of the week. So we're up by five

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 3>basis points as we see a supply pressure coming. Two

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 3>year yields currently creeping up to three point ninety six percent,

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 3>and I'm looking at the vics.

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 5>Just starling back a little bit.

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:42.679
<v Speaker 3>So even though we see this cautious trading volatility is low,

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 3>we're still well below that twenty handle at seventeen. Moving on,

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 3>that's not what's happening in the world of crypto because

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 3>we have seen volatility there no surprise in many ways,

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 3>not by three and a half percent.

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 5>We're going to dig in ed to the stories.

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 3>Around finance around some of the ability to be able

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 3>to trade the og in the crypto space. Interestingly, some

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 3>new means coming onto that particular well ecosystem basically, and

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 3>it's clogging up.

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, two holts in the twenty four hour period or

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:09.920
<v Speaker 4>twelve hour period on Binance. The operational update is that

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 4>Binance says those pending Bitcoin Tracs transactions were process bottom

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 4>of this board, you see crypto related stocks in the

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:18.519
<v Speaker 4>equity space also.

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:19.639
<v Speaker 6>Moving to the downside.

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 4>Very closely link to that story up here as the

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 4>scaler twenty one percent gain biggest jumps at September, at

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 4>one point on track for its biggest jump since the

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 4>end of December twenty twenty. There's a lot of feel

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 4>good in the cyber space after its prelim results came

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 4>in far above expectations. If you see energy in the

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 4>cybersecurity space, that is why regional banks again a story.

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 4>We're seeing a rebound, particularly in pac West, following on

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 4>from what we saw on Friday. You know, we were

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 4>also asking ourselves again, Caroline, what is the rationale here?

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:50.919
<v Speaker 4>There's been a lot of fighting talk from PacWest about

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:54.800
<v Speaker 4>its operational health. I remind myself for this program Bloomberg

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 4>Technology that when it was founded in nineteen ninety nine,

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:00.920
<v Speaker 4>it was with a remit to serve Venture act companies.

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 4>Really important for our audience because many of them have

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 4>some sort of banking service, even with these regional banks.

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it is important to think about.

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:11.679
<v Speaker 3>Also the more broad risks taking that people do and

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 3>don't want to do, is we're still slightly cautious around

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 3>the ultimate safety of the banking system. Let's talk about

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 3>pack Uess and so much more with our one and

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 3>only Sali bus second Sally. It feels as though anxiety

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 3>levels dialed back a little bit today, but through any

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 3>fundamental reason.

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Here Westen these stocks have sold off pretty dramatically, and

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 1>if you look through Friday evening, we had a lot

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>of tenuous news, for example Fitch placing pack West on

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a negative ratings watch. But to the point that you're

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>making fundamental reasons, it's not because of the deposit base

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>they did that, and it's not because of the holdings

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the bond holdings that have hurt many of these banks.

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>The reason they put them on a negative watch is

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>because they're worried about the strategic direction moving forward. There

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>are stories last week about potential strategic asset sales. What

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>is a business model of pack Wes moving forward? I

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>would also to Ed's point here that a few of

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>these banks that are still under pressure, not beyond First Republic,

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>pack West, Western, Alliance has been the worst performer on

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the KBW Bank Index. Here a lot of banks that

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>are based out West, and what is it about these

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>firms that really bring these deposit base and the risks

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>tied to the lending altogether that have investors spooked at

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 1>this moment?

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 4>So notally, if there's anything that the market's cheering, it

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 4>seems to be a dividend cut. Why is that such

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 4>a significant factor with this stock.

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting because typically when you see a dividend cut,

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't see investors reacting positively. But in this instance,

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the reason that there might be a little bit of

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>relief is because investors are looking to pack West to

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>do everything it can to keep its capital based strong,

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>and that means some tough decisions in the meantime. It

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:49.839
<v Speaker 1>doesn't need to be the case that these banks fall

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>into deeper and deeper concern after we've seen such big

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 1>issues already. But again, there are longer term worries here

0:04:58.080 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>ed and you really see it reflected in the bond

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>prices of Western Alliance and pack West which have their

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>bonds trading the ones maturing in twenty thirty one trading

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 1>at sixty or forty cents on the dollar. Still, when

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:11.599
<v Speaker 1>I talk to investors on the sidelines as well, there's

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>a hesitancy to get in until some of these existential

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:15.919
<v Speaker 1>questions are cleared.

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 4>Up in Invectionali Bassekat in New York, thank you. Let's

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 4>stick with a story and bring in FIAT ventures Managing

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 4>partners Marcos Fernandez, Marcos, what is uniquely relevant to the

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 4>VC community that you're a part of and venture bank

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 4>startups in this scenario with the regional banks? Why are

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 4>you paying such close attention?

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely so, banks like First Republic, like Silicon Valley Bank

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 7>and pac West. As was mentioned, they cater towards the

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 7>venture community, both venture capital funds and the founders that

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 7>we back the startup community as a whole, And it's

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 7>not just the deposits that they hold, but it's venture

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 7>debt solutions that help them expand out their runways. For

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 7>those founders in particular, it's loans that help them be

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 7>able to do things like purchase homes when a lot

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:00.919
<v Speaker 7>of their values tied up in private equity. So we

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 7>pay a big attention to it, certainly, and work very

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 7>closely with our founders to help them seek alternatives, especially

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 7>as markets continue to be more violatle.

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 4>This is the biggest two day jump in pack weest

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 4>on record. But from your perspective, I guess you're not

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 4>lying awake at night thinking about that. I mean, what

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:21.280
<v Speaker 4>is the ongoing consideration for vcs like you and your

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 4>portfolio companies.

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:25.799
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so, unlike Silicon Valley Bank, which sprung about really quickly,

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 7>you know, the news broke on a Thursday, and even

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 7>going into the weekend, we didn't have certainty. The FED

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 7>did a great job this time by coming out first

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 7>thing Monday morning making sure that there is both certainty around.

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 8>The deposits as well as a suitor. So it really

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:39.479
<v Speaker 8>did help us sleep a little bit better at night.

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 7>And also for a lot of the startups that we've

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 7>been working with, we've been helping them seek alternatives over

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:46.599
<v Speaker 7>the last several weeks.

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 6>As this continues to unfold.

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 8>So the short answer is, no, we haven't lost too

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 8>much sleep behind it. What I will say is there's.

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 7>Phenomenal people at the PacWest Banks of the world, as

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 7>First Republic and Silicon Valley Banks, and so I think

0:06:57.800 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 7>mostly we want to make sure that we're good to

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:01.559
<v Speaker 7>our partners those institutions.

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 4>As well, you know, Caroline, the reason I ask those

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 4>questions is that if you're a startup founder or a VC,

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 4>you're kind of uniquely not liquid, right. Think about all

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 4>of your net worth that's tied up in the equity

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 4>valuation of your private company. The other thing we've learned

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 4>is that now you're if you're a founder, you've got

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 4>to find options. You've got to diversify, you've got to

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 4>modernize your banking.

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 3>And maybe start tapping FinTechs, other solutions, ones that don't

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 3>actually have a banking license but certainly have an offering.

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 5>And this is.

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 3>Where Marcus, your experience comes so into play.

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 5>You've backed the likes of Brex personally over the years.

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 3>You're someone who's worked at other FinTechs so far as

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 3>well as well in the crypto ecosystem.

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 5>Tell us about fintech whether this is a moment for.

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 3>It to outperform or whether actually there's more worry around

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 3>more newer entrants.

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely, Caroline, I hate to say that my glass is

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 7>always half full, but in this case, one.

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 8>Of the early winners is certainly FinTechs.

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 7>So you mentioned Brex, others like Mercury Bank, they've seen

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 7>a lot of influx of deposits for two big reasons.

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 8>First as they built tech stacts.

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 7>On top of legacy infrastructure, which helps them onboard and

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 7>open up more accounts more easily. And then second is

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 7>they work with multiple financial institutions and banking partners, So

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:14.120
<v Speaker 7>not only does that allow for them to see more

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 7>diversity behind those deposits, it allows them to extend out

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 7>the federal protections that fall within that for their consumers. Now,

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 7>while a lot of companies and individuals have gone back

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 7>towards these pillarbanks the Wells Fargo, b of A's JP

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 7>Morgans during these uncertain times, it's also exposed a lot

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 7>of the inefficiencies behind these institutions that rely on a

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 7>lot of individuals, time and processes to be able to

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 7>open up accounts.

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 8>So again, this is just another issue, an instance.

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 7>Of why fintech and a lot of digitization behind traditional

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 7>financial services is so important.

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 3>What do you want to see built this moment, when

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 3>you are so uniquely focused on fintech, on the future

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 3>of fintech, on backing new startups and founders and visionaries,

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:58.199
<v Speaker 3>what is the problem you want most salted at the moment?

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:02.440
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely so, I think the first wave of financial technology

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 7>innovation people focused on direct to consumer businesses. We think

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:07.719
<v Speaker 7>of the sofar as the chimes the money lions of

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 7>the world. But the next wave is certainly much more embedded,

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 7>so in some cases you actually won't know that there's

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 7>a fintech at play behind these traditional institutions that you're

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 7>bringing your money to and your deposits to. And that's

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 7>really important because over time, every company under the sun

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 7>has some sort of financial aspect with their business, and

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 7>so that next wave is really going to be led

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 7>by those that are building the picks and shovels in

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 7>infrastructure that allow both large traditional financial service firms to

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 7>become more efficient, but also those in adjacent industries like healthcare, mobility, climate,

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 7>future of work.

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 8>And that's what gets us really excited.

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 3>When I hear picks and shovels, I immediately start to

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 3>think of those who are saying talking about the mining

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 3>ed of crypto in particular, and just fold in. I

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 3>suppose that on a day where we really keep an

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 3>eye on what's happening in crypto, there's a read across

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 3>with Cosmarkos having worked at Ripple for a while.

0:09:57.760 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think if you're going to draw some commonality

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:01.719
<v Speaker 4>what we're talking about. I guess it's the want for

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 4>decentralized systems. That also the same cycle we went through

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 4>in crypto, we saw play out in banking to a

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 4>certain extent. I mean, Marcos threat those two together for

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 4>us when you are looking at what's happened in the

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 4>banking sector, the hype and boom cycle as well around

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 4>what happened with crypto, do you sort of have the

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.679
<v Speaker 4>same systemic concerns that apply to both.

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 7>In some cases you see a lot of correlation between

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 7>the two.

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 8>Right, it's individuals get really.

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 7>Excited about the potentials of a technology, but it takes

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 7>time for that to become something that we can adopt

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:38.840
<v Speaker 7>over a large scale. Fintech for example, a lot of

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:41.599
<v Speaker 7>neobanks came in and got people excited, but during this

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:44.559
<v Speaker 7>market volatility, we're seeing them go back to these traditional

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 7>pillar banks.

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:46.600
<v Speaker 8>Same thing with crypto.

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 7>Right, the idea of decentralized systems is still really exciting,

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 7>has a ton of use cases and applications, but it

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 7>takes time to build that underlying infrastructure at a scale

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 7>where millions and hundreds of millions of global individuals can

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 7>actually take it advantage of that. So certainly there's correlations

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 7>behind the two. But what I'd say is it's not

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 7>to use a sports metaform. But we're not just in

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 7>the early innings, like I don't even know if we

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 7>started the game yet for both fintech and for cryptocurrencies,

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 7>because there's so much potential to be had here and

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:16.839
<v Speaker 7>we're finally seeing a market where people can go back

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:19.839
<v Speaker 7>to building the fundamentals behind it, so building out the

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 7>businesses that will help us scale to those hundreds of

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 7>millions of consumers, both in the US and on global markets.

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 3>That leads us very smoothly onto our next conversation.

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 5>We thank you for that.

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 3>Fat Ventures managing partner Marcus Fernandez great to has some time.

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 9>In the.

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 6>Crypto exchange.

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 4>Coinbase is weighing the United Arab Emirates for its international hub.

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 4>CEO Brian Armstrong says the UAE is leading the way

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 4>regionally in crypto. He spoke to Bloomberg at the Dubai

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 4>Fintech Summit earlier.

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 6>Have listened.

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 10>Coinbase our mission is to increase second our freedom in

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 10>the world, so that means we really need to do

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 10>that in many many countries. Obviously, We started in the

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 10>US and took a very compliance focused approach and became

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 10>a listed company there and that's been a big piece

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 10>of our revenue still, but we've increasingly expanded into other

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 10>major markets around the world. Now what we're doing is

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 10>we're looking for a home to set up an international

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 10>hub that could serve the long tail of countries in

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 10>the world, you know, the Middle East, Africa, maybe parts

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 10>of Asia as well. And from that point of view,

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 10>the UA is very attractive. I mean, the UA deserves

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:29.199
<v Speaker 10>a ton of credit. They're the first country in the

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 10>world I'm aware of that created a dedicated new regulator

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 10>to crypto and they've published a clear rule book and

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 10>it's very business forward and protecting of consumers.

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 2>So they head by a country mod here relative to

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 2>the UK and relative to the.

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 10>US, well, I would say they are ahead of where

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 10>the US is. You know, the EU has actually published

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 10>comprehensive crypto legislation already. The UK is on their way there.

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 10>But I would say the UAE is their approach has

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 10>been more forward thinking than the US so far.

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 2>So we spoke to your CFO, you're the CEO the

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 2>West Notes everybody, you know, we sort of digging around

0:12:58.320 --> 0:12:59.839
<v Speaker 2>for news here and I sat down and what is

0:12:59.880 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 2>the as well as noticed, is it an armageddon moment

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 2>potentially for coinbase in the United States of America.

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 8>I think this.

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 10>Moment is really an opportunity for us to finally get

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 10>some regulatory clarity in the United States, and we're happy

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 10>to do that. By the way, it's I think it's

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:16.200
<v Speaker 10>a great role for us to play in the industry

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 10>and for America.

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 6>You going head to head with the SEC.

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 8>Well, that's true.

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 10>I mean, look, we don't relish the opportunity to be

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 10>in litigation with one of our primary lob regulators. We've

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 10>sought out regulation all over the world and tried to

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 10>be proactive when there wasn't clarity. But if there's no

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 10>clear rule book in the US, we created our own

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 10>best practices to evaluate you know, over one thousand assets

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 10>and we rejected eighty percent of them the two hundred

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:40.839
<v Speaker 10>and twenty percent that we list. We believe our commodities

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 10>and there's been no clear rule book, and so if

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 10>we receive it well, as notice, I feel like we

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 10>have a duty to take a push back and go

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 10>see a case law that will help bring this clarity

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 10>to the US.

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean I fitted a rhyme with this question for

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 2>about two hours. Sec CFTC. What is the question you

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 2>asked the CEO, And here's the question. Are these regulators

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 2>fit for purpose?

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think there's certainly a role, yes, because crypto

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 10>is many things. Crypto is has commodities. Crypto has some

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 10>bitter securities. We don't list them, but there are some

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:13.199
<v Speaker 10>out there. We think there should be a robust, healthy

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 10>market for that. There's also stable coins, which are more

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:18.680
<v Speaker 10>like currencies. There's artwork, you know, with NFTs, and so

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 10>crypto is going to have a number of different regulators.

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 10>It probably is going to need new legislation to be

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 10>passed in the US. And the good news isn't there's

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 10>broad BIPARTI isn't supporting Congress for that exactly to happen.

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Could you see a day of a troop side I'm

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 2>gone from the US.

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 6>We're not going to leave the US.

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 10>You know, we do have a choice of where to

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 10>invest our dollars around the world in any given moment,

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 10>but we're not going to leave the US. It's an

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 10>important market. And the good thing about the US is

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 10>there's rule of law, and so we do reach the

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 10>right outcome eventually.

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 4>Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong with her own menace Cranny, Caroline one.

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 5>And any manus.

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, let's stick with crypto a little bit more. You

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 3>reference the earlier ed the finance situation. How it's we

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 3>started the drawals of bitcoin itself a slighting congestion on

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 3>the tokens book chain. After two holts in less than

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 3>twelve hours, the suspensions had weighed in the cryptocurrency markets.

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 3>More broadly, it seems like we can go to our

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 3>own Katie Lines out there in Washington to just discuss

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 3>what are these new mean coins that are getting on.

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 3>What is the original of the cryptosphere. Before we sort

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 3>of associate NFTs meme coins with ethereum, But.

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 5>Why are we now associating it with Bitcoin.

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 11>Well, you can trace it back to the new Ordinals

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 11>protocol that was introduced earlier this year, Caroline, which as

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 11>you are alluding to, allowed now non vegeible tokens meme

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 11>coins to be minted on the Bitcoin network, which primarily

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 11>they usually were just based on ethereum. The fact that

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 11>they have now come to be part of this network,

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 11>this ecosystem, has meant that it is more congested, congested,

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 11>and as result, fees have gone higher as well, and

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 11>Finance says that is really what the problem was here,

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 11>that this wasn't as was speculated earlier about people pulling

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 11>money from their exchange, that this really was just a

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 11>congestion problem.

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 8>And as a.

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 11>Result, to address this, to make sure that it doesn't

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 11>happen again, they have raised fees to make sure all

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 11>of those pending transactions actually will be mined by bitcoin miners.

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 11>But that's ultimately what it comes down to here' Stz,

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 11>the CEO of Byance, saying that some of those fees

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 11>are up eighteen times over just the last month that

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 11>we've seen more and more activity taking place on this blockchain.

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 4>I think that the data point to call my eye

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 4>from the Bloomberg reporting is that five billion dollars worth

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 4>of transactions happened in that twenty four hour period. From

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 4>a volume perspective, makes you realize that bitcoin is kind

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 4>of everything from a volume perspective, right, that it was

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 4>the volume of transaction is trying to ram through that caused.

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 6>All of this.

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, that's exactly right.

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 11>Again, a congestion problem, but you are speaking to the

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 11>kind of volume that binance is seen here. This is

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 11>also why this exchange in particular is so critical in

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 11>terms of driving sentiment for the broader ecosystem, because it

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 11>is by far the largest in the world, especially after

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 11>the collapse of FTX. So really people look to binance

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:04.679
<v Speaker 11>as kind of a bell weather for what is happening

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 11>in the wider system. So the amount of activity there

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 11>when they do see disruptions like this is reason why

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 11>you start to see some market participants getting concerned. But yeah,

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 11>it's a great point ed. When we are talking about

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 11>the broader crypto ecosystem of coorse, bitcoin really is the

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 11>not monolith, but really just the dominant cryptocurrency in this ecosystem.

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 11>Maybe all of these mean coins that are now clogging

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:29.199
<v Speaker 11>things up are really just kind of a distraction at

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 11>the end.

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 5>Of the day.

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:32.159
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, before we dive into the world of

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 3>Pepe and some of the other exuberant rising coins that

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:39.879
<v Speaker 3>are basically like what a couple of cents or dollars

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 3>and suddenly rise ever higher. Talk to us a little

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 3>bit more about the international focus we had had anxiety

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:50.920
<v Speaker 3>around finance, what more about just more broadly global interaction

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:53.119
<v Speaker 3>with crypto at the moment, we're still seeing desire to

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:55.160
<v Speaker 3>be training here in the US, whether it's over there

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:57.679
<v Speaker 3>in certain parts of Asia, what happens in China at

0:17:57.680 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 3>the moment, because I mean, what is it still was

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 3>thinking about how China is interacting with cryptom worldly well.

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 11>Especially as China it seems likes looking to kind of

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 11>build up Hong Kong as another center for this activity.

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 11>And it really comes down to the differences in the

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 11>regulatory environment, right Caroline. I mean when you're looking at

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 11>Finance in particular, in theory binance US is supposed to

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 11>operate independently and it's kind of owned silo. But we

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 11>know that the CFTC earlier this spring sued Finance for

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 11>violating US derivatives rules. It's been under a lot of

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 11>regulatory scrutiny here in the US, and the same ghost

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:29.959
<v Speaker 11>for other players as well. We were just hearing how

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:33.439
<v Speaker 11>coinbase wants to have a wider footprint internationally because at

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 11>the end of the day, these regulations what activities people

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 11>can actually engage on do differ country by country, So

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 11>that is a huge factor in here. And I would

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 11>note as well, and part of this regulatory landscape, what

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 11>has happened with the bankings here in the US is

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 11>when the liquidity picture comes into the conversation. I've had

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 11>a lot of guests on Bloomberg Crypto in recent weeks

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:55.199
<v Speaker 11>and months talking about how liquidity really is just so

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:58.360
<v Speaker 11>thin and that exacerbates the price moves to the upside, sure,

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 11>which is what God is north the thirty thous, but

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:03.160
<v Speaker 11>also to the downside, which we're obviously seeing play out

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:06.400
<v Speaker 11>and really broad based selling in crypto today.

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:10.160
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's Katie Lines adding Washington d C. Thank you very much.

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 4>Now coming up, China's bay Doo, known for its line

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 4>with smart home devices, is adding a new product to

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:20.920
<v Speaker 4>its AI operated roster and entering of an already crowded arena.

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 6>Talking tech coming up, Carot.

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:26.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, another key story we're going to keep covering is

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 3>we'll see ed shares of the company over in Asia

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 3>trading had absolutely rocketed more than seven percent.

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:35.680
<v Speaker 5>We'll talk about why perhaps.

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 3>We're seeing some more optimism coming from the leader of

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:38.919
<v Speaker 3>that business from New York.

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 5>The a's a Bloomberg.

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 6>Time for talking tech.

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 4>First up, China limiting access by foreign entities to its

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 4>after a series of reports published by US researcher firms

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 4>spooked government officials. This according to The Wall Street Journal,

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:11.360
<v Speaker 4>the mover's expected to make it harder to analyze.

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 6>What's going on inside China.

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 4>There's tensions between Beijing and Washington mount Speaking of China,

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:19.919
<v Speaker 4>Chinese tech firm Baidu is entering the mobile phone market,

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 4>adding a smartphone to its portfolio of gadget similar to

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 4>the likes of Amazon's Alexa division. The device will be

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 4>unveiled next week and will utilize its artificial intelligence software

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 4>plus C. The ten Cent bank self East Asia internet

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 4>company boosting pay for most of its workers this summer.

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:40.120
<v Speaker 4>Workers who joined on or before March thirty first will

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 4>get a five percent salary bump. CEO Forest Lee says

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 4>the company has reached quote self sufficiency after taking dramatic

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:49.120
<v Speaker 4>measures to slash costs Caroline.

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:51.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, what a different tack from a few months ago

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 3>for that particular company. Meanwhile, well, coming up, we've got

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:57.199
<v Speaker 3>to dive into what's happening to meta today. International stories

0:20:57.200 --> 0:21:00.040
<v Speaker 3>are bound a vow to fight back against here in

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 3>the US the FTC as it faces some pretty stiff

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 3>reviews of its privacy policies. We'll also be discussing what

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 3>it's doing about Canada too. Let's just check in on

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:10.400
<v Speaker 3>how the shares are moving. Let's check in on how

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 3>more broadly the tech market is moving. Meta actually managing

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 3>to hold up about We're down in tenth of a percent.

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:17.680
<v Speaker 5>That's in line with the rest of the market.

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:19.959
<v Speaker 3>There's caution out there at some big tech heavyweights are

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:21.920
<v Speaker 3>just dragging some of the industries a little bit lower

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 3>today after what had been a lot of exuberance following

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 3>a few of their earnings from New York and San Francisco.

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg. Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. I'm Canon

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 3>Hide in New.

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:41.720
<v Speaker 4>York and our med love Loo in San Francisco. Carey,

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 4>let's go to check on the market. That has to

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 4>be honest, there's not a huge amount of energy in

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:47.160
<v Speaker 4>financial markets this Sunday morning. You look at the NAS

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 4>that one hundred, we are completely flat. Although some slight

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 4>wood downward pressure across the majority of names outperformance slightly

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:55.360
<v Speaker 4>in the SOXSORL although.

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:56.480
<v Speaker 6>Modest up to tens to one percent.

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:58.679
<v Speaker 4>It's interesting to note that a lot of the AI

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 4>related chip names, your AMDs and videos actually as well

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 4>as Alphabet are moving to the upside during Monday's session,

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 4>some movement in bonds are up five basis points on

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:09.880
<v Speaker 4>the US ten year three point four to nine one

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 4>point three point five percent, and then kind of risk

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:14.679
<v Speaker 4>off when it comes to crypto. We talked about that

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:17.400
<v Speaker 4>story all throughout the show, the pause on the finance

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:20.400
<v Speaker 4>platform in terms of bitcoin transaction, but that has had

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:23.880
<v Speaker 4>an impact with below twenty eight thousand US dollars per token.

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 6>Some individual movers.

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:28.360
<v Speaker 4>That are interesting z Scale are really outperforming and actually

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 4>carrying a number of cybersecurity stocks with it. It posted

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 4>prelium results far ahead of expectations. Kind of puts to

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 4>rest this idea that spending on cybersecurity was under question.

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 4>Alphabet as I pointed out, an AI related name up

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:43.360
<v Speaker 4>one and a half percent, and then to the downside.

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 4>You see Microsoft and Meta actually has paired some of

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 4>its losses. But those were two big point drags on

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 4>the major indices.

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 3>Let's dig into one of them, I mean point drags lower.

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 3>We've got volume sin, but there is a lot of

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 3>news to digest when it comes to Meta at the moment,

0:22:57.680 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 3>in particular, let's talk about it here in the United States.

0:22:59.880 --> 0:23:02.160
<v Speaker 3>The company really fights back saying it's going to oppose

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 3>an FTC plan to look at banning it from profiting

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 3>off of children's data. For more, we want to bring

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:11.719
<v Speaker 3>in Blie Meg's Emny Burnbound and the backstory to this

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 3>is what the FDC is really analyzing some mistakes made

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 3>in the messenger part of the offering to children, but

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 3>trying to sort of read that across to a broader

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 3>implication for how they make money from children more broadly.

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, So the FTC is looking back to an agreement

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:32.639
<v Speaker 12>that they came to with Meta in twenty twenty. So

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 12>alongside a five billion dollar civil penalty, which is record

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:40.919
<v Speaker 12>breaking in the agency's history, they had Meta agreed to

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 12>a series of privacy pledges, and they say that Facebook

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:49.399
<v Speaker 12>has not adhered to the promises that it made, and

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 12>that gives them the right to go back, revise that

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:54.959
<v Speaker 12>agreement that they came to with Facebook in twenty twenty

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 12>and put all these new standards and these new processes

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 12>in place for ensuring that they are actually protecting the

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:04.880
<v Speaker 12>privacy of US users.

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 6>Emily, what's Meta's arguments in all of this?

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:14.160
<v Speaker 12>Meta says that the agency is vastly overstepping on its authorities.

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 12>That they are trying to take a mechanism that the

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 12>agency does have, which is revising old agreements, and they

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:28.960
<v Speaker 12>are going too far in you know, banning them from

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 12>monetizing children's data, putting all these new restrictions that would

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 12>force them to submit to privacy reviews before they launch

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 12>any new products. They say this is too sweeping. They

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 12>intend to fight it in court, and that it shows

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 12>the FTC is biased against Meta.

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:50.439
<v Speaker 4>All right, Bloomberg's Emily Burnbaum at in DC, thank you.

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 4>Let's stick with this story for more META and bring

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:58.640
<v Speaker 4>in Diana Moss, President and CEO of the American Antitrust Institute. Dan,

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 4>how much does this test the boundaries of the FTC's

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 4>ability to shape privacy policy but through enforcement?

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 13>I think that's a great question. I think we're seeing

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 13>right now a real tension between the FDCs mandate to

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 13>promote consumer protection but also to promote competition. They've had

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 13>a bit of a rough go and some of the

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 13>competition cases involving big tech, and of course now we

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 13>see the moves on privacy.

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:30.640
<v Speaker 6>But I think the.

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:34.159
<v Speaker 13>Important thing to remember here is that user data is

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:38.440
<v Speaker 13>the fuel, the gasoline that powers the digital platforms and

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:42.159
<v Speaker 13>collecting that data, harnessing the value of it through AI

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:45.639
<v Speaker 13>and machine learning is really core to the value proposition

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 13>of attracting users and locking them into a particular platform.

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:55.120
<v Speaker 4>Diana, you heard what Emily had to say about Meta's

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:59.880
<v Speaker 4>arguments in this dispute. Do you think that Meta fighting

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:03.199
<v Speaker 4>FTC on this will bring them success, that this is

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 4>an example we're actually pushing back will fall in metas favor.

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:11.439
<v Speaker 13>I actually don't you know. I think what we're seeing

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:15.440
<v Speaker 13>here is a natural evolution, sort of a growing recognition

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 13>that the FTC alone cannot, through its authorities, address both

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:24.440
<v Speaker 13>the competition and the privacy issues, and as I just said,

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 13>they're both integrally related. Using data, potentially abusing data is

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 13>the way to recognize or realize that value proposition. I

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 13>think what we're seeing is going to be a series

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 13>of violations and pushback because that is the value proposition.

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 13>You're talking about, very strong incentives for the digital platforms

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 13>to use and potentially abuse data to realize that value proposition.

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 13>And I think where we might be going is the

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:58.159
<v Speaker 13>need for a broader system of regulation in the United States,

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 13>much like in the UK, both on competition issues but

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 13>on privacy issues as.

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, and you reference the UK the what about more

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 3>broad regulation, just more globally and more joined up approach.

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 13>Well, I think that's where it's going. The problem is

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:16.639
<v Speaker 13>we have a lot of jurisdictions and we don't have

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 13>any sort of international authorities, but there is a tremendous

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 13>amount of cross fertilization and collaboration on international regulatory approaches.

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 13>And I think the other thing to realize here is

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 13>what's going on with META and the data in this

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 13>particular case is going to be no different than other

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:41.159
<v Speaker 13>platforms use of data to power the e commerce and

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 13>the social media platforms and advertising on their platforms. So

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:50.120
<v Speaker 13>a regulatory infrastructure would address not only these concerns with Meta,

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 13>but also other digital platforms that are very powerful.

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:57.160
<v Speaker 3>And to be fair, I mean metas already limited kind

0:27:57.200 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 3>of information that informs certain ads, particularly when it relates

0:27:59.880 --> 0:28:02.639
<v Speaker 3>to teens on its apps. They withdrew the ability for

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:06.239
<v Speaker 3>advertisers in particular to sort of target teams and their

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:09.399
<v Speaker 3>interest in their activities. You basically only know location data

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 3>in an age, but they're going to have quite a

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 3>pr feet on their hands because anything saying no, no, no,

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:17.119
<v Speaker 3>we need to be able to make money by advertising

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 3>directly to children. How do they manage to make that nuance?

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:24.160
<v Speaker 3>With your years and decades of experience in this, can

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:26.640
<v Speaker 3>companies make a case for themselves that this is in

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 3>line with you know, ultimately what's good for the company,

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:33.160
<v Speaker 3>but also not detrimental to society More broadly.

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 13>I think that's a hard line to walk, given how

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 13>integral data collection and data processing and harnessing the value.

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 8>That data is for the digitals.

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 6>And I think the.

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 13>US is getting to a point where the comfort level

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 13>in accepting promises and reassurances from the companies about how

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 13>they will not misused data, it's beginning to where it's thin.

0:28:57.560 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 13>And what we see here with the FTC, to their credit,

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 13>is a strong enforcement action, but it's really this case

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 13>by case approach when this problem is so systemic amongst

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 13>the digital platforms use and potential abuse of data that

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:18.959
<v Speaker 13>that warrants a broader regulatory system like we see elsewhere

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 13>elsewhere in the world.

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, Meta called the FTC's latest preceding a political stunt.

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 3>Diana Moss, we thank you so much, President and CEO

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 3>of the American Anti Trust Institute. And in fact, it's

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 3>another focus under the day, with Meta the company saying well,

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 3>it might end news content on Facebook and Instagram. Over

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 3>in Canada, then as if lawmakers pass a bill requiring

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 3>social networking platforms to pay media publishers to feature their work.

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:47.360
<v Speaker 3>Meant to describe the bill as fundamentally flawed, but supporters

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 3>say it addresses a marketing balance. Is that more people

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 3>turn to digital platforms for newsed something that we think

0:29:53.280 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 3>about on the daily.

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 4>YEP coming up, how startups can keep up with big

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 4>tech in the Aii.

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 6>That's next.

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 4>We've cost No Adventures partner Martina Lauchenko, who gives us.

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:08.600
<v Speaker 6>Her view of the landscape. This is Bloomberg.

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 4>This is a global story that caught my eye. Japanese

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 4>firm MUFG planning to start two debt funds alongside tech

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 4>lender Liquidity Capital.

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 6>The funds will be established.

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 4>Under a joint venture MARS Growth Capital, and provide as

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:43.720
<v Speaker 4>much as four hundred million dollars in financing for middle

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 4>and later stage startups in Japan and Europe. The move

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 4>is the latest by Japan's biggest banks to ramp up

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 4>startup finance, where they increasingly see potential for new business.

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 3>Caroline fascinating giving the timing aird and look at all

0:30:56.680 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 3>us big tech companies like Microsoft, like Google dominate the

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 3>conversation surrounding investments in artificial intelligence, but that VC's there too.

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 3>They're flagging house startups can perhaps so get lost on

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 3>the battlefield. Here's on what some of our recent guests

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 3>are saying about the AI ecosystem.

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 8>We are in the middle of an incredible revolution in AI.

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 14>I would say there's many more bad AI startups than

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 14>good startups, and it's very hard to differentiate if you're

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 14>not experienced with AI.

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 15>If you're a company today and you're not embracing the

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 15>changes that are taking place with AI, you're going to

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 15>be behind.

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 4>Let's take actions to help form it safely.

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 14>I think it's too early to regulate the AI. We

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 14>don't know enough about it.

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 15>I think the companies that are building this recognize that

0:31:46.920 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 15>regulation is needed.

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 3>There's so much to get into with our next guest,

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 3>Martina Lachenko, of course as Christinoa Ventures, and I'm interested

0:31:56.040 --> 0:32:00.120
<v Speaker 3>Martina in well, the view points there around regulation a

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 3>thick and fast, but ultimately about how you sought the

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 3>wheat from the chaff. You heard that from Vanokoza saying

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 3>there's far more bad AI startups outla then they're all good.

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 3>How do you discern which one's are good on the

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 3>marketplace right now?

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 9>Well, at Costanoa, we invest in really early stage startups

0:32:17.160 --> 0:32:19.200
<v Speaker 9>and so at that point you really have to assess

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 9>the founder and the fundamentals of their idea. And we

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 9>are absolutely seeing this wave of companies that we call

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 9>generative AI native where they are clearly built on top

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 9>of generative AI from the start, and you recognize it immediately.

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:34.480
<v Speaker 5>So just in the last two weeks, I.

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 9>Saw two startups same category. One was more like the

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 9>AI remodel or it was glamped on, and the other

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:43.800
<v Speaker 9>was clearly built on top of the large language models

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 9>and the generative AI that everybody was talking about on

0:32:46.440 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 9>your show, And you immediately notice the difference just in

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:51.960
<v Speaker 9>how they're built, what the interface is like, and how

0:32:51.960 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 9>they talk about what their product vision is.

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 5>So there is a distinction and.

0:32:55.440 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 9>That's absolutely what early stage venture capitalists are looking to

0:32:58.640 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 9>invest in now.

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 3>It was interesting last week suddenly the open source versus

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:07.440
<v Speaker 3>wall garden conversation came in to bear, particularly.

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 5>Around artificial intelligence.

0:33:09.320 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 3>What are you seeing in terms of who's going to

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 3>eat who's lunch, Because it felt as though certain over

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 3>at Google are saying, look.

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 5>Really, it's open source.

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 3>It's no one owning a particular large language model that's

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:20.760
<v Speaker 3>going to ultimatenyone out here.

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:24.640
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think you need both. I think both feed

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 5>each other.

0:33:25.200 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 9>The vibrancy of the ecosystem requires the open source side

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 9>of the house where everyone can contribute.

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:33.200
<v Speaker 5>But the wild garden aspect is.

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 9>The thing about generative AI is you have to be

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 9>an expert to recognize when it's going off of the

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:41.240
<v Speaker 9>rails and how to put in place the guardrails to

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 9>make it safe so that when it's used anywhere else

0:33:43.840 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 9>it makes sense. And it tends to need to be

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 9>more purpose built for a company or for what is

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 9>being used for for it to do its job well.

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 9>And that's where you might need a combination of built

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 9>on top of the open source foundation but the world garden,

0:33:57.320 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 9>making it more purpose built and intentional for whatever it's purpose.

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:04.520
<v Speaker 4>Let's take an example from your portfolio. Quizlet how long

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:05.800
<v Speaker 4>has that been in your portfolio?

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 9>It's been our portfolio for almost eight years.

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 6>Almost eight years.

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:13.480
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So to Caroline's point, you know, Vinocosa's point everyone

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 4>is now trying to discern what is it, what is

0:34:15.719 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 4>a viable AI related or AI adjacent company, and what

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 4>is not? How has your thinking changed from when you

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:26.799
<v Speaker 4>first made that Quizler investment almost eight years ago to

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:28.880
<v Speaker 4>when you're confronted with a deck right now.

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 9>So Kosteno has been around for about ten years, and

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:34.400
<v Speaker 9>the way we have always looked at AIAI has been

0:34:34.400 --> 0:34:36.880
<v Speaker 9>around for quite some time, and it's really about what

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:41.160
<v Speaker 9>is the infrastructure that enables AI. And you need large

0:34:41.160 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 9>sums of data, and you also need great machine learning.

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:47.760
<v Speaker 9>You need great machine learning algorithms, and so it's companies

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 9>that have been around for some time that have the

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:52.840
<v Speaker 9>data set that let them build and train those models

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:55.200
<v Speaker 9>so that at this point in time they can actually

0:34:55.239 --> 0:34:57.880
<v Speaker 9>provide that level of AI that everyone's experiencing. So a

0:34:57.880 --> 0:35:00.560
<v Speaker 9>company like quiz it's a great example. We have a

0:35:00.600 --> 0:35:04.239
<v Speaker 9>monstrous data set, the largest user generated data set of

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:07.880
<v Speaker 9>learning tools in the world, and they've been training this

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:11.960
<v Speaker 9>data for years and so now they're able to use

0:35:12.000 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 9>that on behalf of users and creating this generative AI

0:35:15.120 --> 0:35:16.399
<v Speaker 9>approach To how what people are.

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 6>Expecting in this environment?

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 4>Where does the balance of power lie with the vcs

0:35:22.120 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 4>or the AI driven founders.

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:27.960
<v Speaker 9>I think it's always a partnership. I think with the

0:35:27.960 --> 0:35:30.640
<v Speaker 9>best VC firms that's always going to be. The founders

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:34.919
<v Speaker 9>have great ideas, they have wonderful talents that they're bringing

0:35:34.920 --> 0:35:37.800
<v Speaker 9>to bear. But when the VC is really genuinely additive

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 9>and a great partner, it only makes them better. So

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 9>our startups, our founders tend to be technical, either product

0:35:44.640 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 9>or engineering based, and so they need more of that

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 9>go to market partner.

0:35:47.760 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 5>That's what we spend time with them on.

0:35:49.520 --> 0:35:52.640
<v Speaker 9>Because you need the Steve jobs to the Steve WOSNEYAC combination.

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:55.319
<v Speaker 9>And if they don't bring it, then who backs them

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:56.400
<v Speaker 9>actually needs to help them with that.

0:35:56.480 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 5>So that's what we focus.

0:35:57.360 --> 0:35:58.920
<v Speaker 6>On, Caroline.

0:35:59.000 --> 0:36:04.240
<v Speaker 4>Irrespective of the application or where in the data preer,

0:36:04.360 --> 0:36:06.880
<v Speaker 4>deep learning inference part of the cycle you lay, I

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 4>think everyone agrees on one thing, which is we need

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:12.319
<v Speaker 4>to have some parameters and some regulation in place, and

0:36:12.320 --> 0:36:12.799
<v Speaker 4>whether it's.

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:16.360
<v Speaker 3>Self regulation or whether it's coming from the government. Martina,

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:19.359
<v Speaker 3>to that point, are you on the optimistic front and

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:24.240
<v Speaker 3>are you nervous about how quickly we're advancing without formal

0:36:24.239 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 3>guardrails in place?

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:27.760
<v Speaker 5>Well, I'm both.

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:31.319
<v Speaker 9>I'm super optimistic, and I'm also nervous. I don't think

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:34.799
<v Speaker 9>the government has a good idea of what they can

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:36.560
<v Speaker 9>do to help regulate this, and so I really think

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:39.359
<v Speaker 9>it's going to be incumbent on companies themselves to be

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:42.920
<v Speaker 9>responsible in how they're taking advantage of this technology and

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:46.239
<v Speaker 9>putting in place those guardrails I mentioned before. We're going

0:36:46.280 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 9>to have sort of a before times and then after

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:51.879
<v Speaker 9>times of those generative AI native companies, or at least

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:54.480
<v Speaker 9>in how they think and that they are putting in

0:36:54.520 --> 0:36:57.040
<v Speaker 9>place those guardrails that you don't have to be an

0:36:57.080 --> 0:36:58.960
<v Speaker 9>expert to recognize that it's going off the rails, and

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:01.120
<v Speaker 9>that's going to have to come from the companies themselves.

0:37:01.480 --> 0:37:03.200
<v Speaker 9>The government's not going to be able to regulate that.

0:37:04.320 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 4>Thanks to Martina Laschenko partner of course, with costs and

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:09.520
<v Speaker 4>no Adventures, the thing they call my Eye Caroline. Over

0:37:09.560 --> 0:37:13.520
<v Speaker 4>the weekend, Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger hold court during

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:17.719
<v Speaker 4>the Berkshire halfway and your meeting on Saturday. Of course,

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:20.360
<v Speaker 4>they talked about things you'd expect like Apple and Elon

0:37:20.520 --> 0:37:24.719
<v Speaker 4>musk and guess what else Ai and Charlie Mungers like, well,

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:28.120
<v Speaker 4>I'm skeptical, and Warren Buffett comes out with what was

0:37:28.160 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 4>a pretty profound statement of the parallels of what we're

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 4>seeing in AI and human history.

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:35.239
<v Speaker 5>What was it? An atom? Mom?

0:37:35.560 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 3>He referenced, I mean extraordinary language amazement. He also seemed

0:37:41.040 --> 0:37:44.360
<v Speaker 3>to demonstrate when it came to chatchipt other AI tools,

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:47.480
<v Speaker 3>what they're already doing, how they're already upending things. But

0:37:47.560 --> 0:37:49.759
<v Speaker 3>ultimately it feels as though he said, what was it?

0:37:49.760 --> 0:37:52.080
<v Speaker 3>He compared it to splitting of the atom as potentially

0:37:52.160 --> 0:37:55.000
<v Speaker 3>dangerous advance and technology. And that's It's interesting the way

0:37:55.040 --> 0:37:58.279
<v Speaker 3>we just had Martina articulate that, yes, I'm optimistic, but

0:37:58.360 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm also nervous about really the advance is the swift

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:03.760
<v Speaker 3>nature of it and how it's going to upend basically

0:38:03.840 --> 0:38:06.960
<v Speaker 3>every industry, particularly when you know there is Charlie Munger

0:38:07.040 --> 0:38:09.600
<v Speaker 3>and Warren Buffett salt in the middle of energy industry,

0:38:09.640 --> 0:38:10.920
<v Speaker 3>of banking industry.

0:38:10.560 --> 0:38:12.400
<v Speaker 5>Of all sorts that are going to be upended by AI.

0:38:12.920 --> 0:38:13.160
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:38:13.520 --> 0:38:14.920
<v Speaker 4>One thing I point out is that, you know, is

0:38:14.960 --> 0:38:17.280
<v Speaker 4>it relates to Elon Musk. Is very praising of Elon

0:38:17.400 --> 0:38:20.799
<v Speaker 4>Musk and Tesla and entrepreneurial ism, but he said, you know,

0:38:20.880 --> 0:38:24.399
<v Speaker 4>for them but have away. They need certainty and visibility

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 4>on returns, and in the field of AI or whatever

0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:30.560
<v Speaker 4>Elon's doing with Tesla and Twitter, that's not the sort

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:42.240
<v Speaker 4>of certainty and visibility that they're going to get. Apple

0:38:42.320 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 4>selling debt in the US blue chip bomb market, borrowers

0:38:45.560 --> 0:38:48.560
<v Speaker 4>flooding in looking to raise cash before two key pieces

0:38:48.560 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 4>of data later in the week, Caroline CPI, PPI. But

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 4>this is something that Apple does annually, right, and you

0:38:54.640 --> 0:38:58.920
<v Speaker 4>think for me shareholder returns. They use those funds for

0:38:59.000 --> 0:39:00.160
<v Speaker 4>buybacks and dividends.

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is all often what happens after earnings. We

0:39:03.120 --> 0:39:05.279
<v Speaker 3>saw it with Meta already tapping the bond market. They

0:39:05.320 --> 0:39:07.200
<v Speaker 3>come out, they decide that they're going to be raising

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:09.440
<v Speaker 3>funds and look diversify the way in which that they

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:12.880
<v Speaker 3>have money to hand. But it does feel though that

0:39:13.000 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 3>maybe we're gravitating towards the safer areas the credit markets.

0:39:16.160 --> 0:39:18.319
<v Speaker 3>I was just looking at how the Dish chairman, of course,

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:20.480
<v Speaker 3>the company that's slightly under more pressure at the moment,

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:22.279
<v Speaker 3>is saying that the debt market really isn't open to

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:25.040
<v Speaker 3>us at the moment with these financial worries, with the

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:28.120
<v Speaker 3>macro headwind that is upon us, no wonder the big

0:39:28.200 --> 0:39:30.680
<v Speaker 3>juggernauts like Apple, like Matter, with a lot of cash

0:39:30.719 --> 0:39:33.480
<v Speaker 3>on their hands, are able to sell and sell easily,

0:39:33.560 --> 0:39:34.560
<v Speaker 3>but not for everyone.

0:39:34.560 --> 0:39:35.279
<v Speaker 5>It would feel like.

0:39:35.719 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, look, five billion dollars in up to five parts.

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:41.000
<v Speaker 4>According to a Bloomberg sauce, at the long end, thirty

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:43.360
<v Speaker 4>year bond could yield one hundred and thirty five basis

0:39:43.400 --> 0:39:46.239
<v Speaker 4>points over comparable treasuries. So that's what we're waiting on.

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:47.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, why we saw a bit of a sell off

0:39:47.880 --> 0:39:49.719
<v Speaker 3>in the bond market more generally today in terms of

0:39:49.800 --> 0:39:52.239
<v Speaker 3>US treasuries. But let's focus in on the Apple part

0:39:52.320 --> 0:39:55.360
<v Speaker 3>of all of this right now, because after its earnings

0:39:55.400 --> 0:39:57.319
<v Speaker 3>we did hear it's turning its attention really to what

0:39:57.400 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 3>feels like emerging markets right now to get their growth.

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:02.799
<v Speaker 3>Montgam and please to say that after the calm of

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:06.120
<v Speaker 3>the earning storm, you join us to really digest from LA.

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:10.920
<v Speaker 3>It seems like Indias front and centered is all about international.

0:40:10.320 --> 0:40:11.080
<v Speaker 5>Growth right now.

0:40:12.239 --> 0:40:16.280
<v Speaker 16>I've never heard Apple talk about emerging markets in India, Indonesia,

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:19.160
<v Speaker 16>the UAE more than they did on the earnings call

0:40:19.239 --> 0:40:22.360
<v Speaker 16>last week. And it's pretty clear why these messages that

0:40:22.400 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 16>they talk about on these earnings calls. They're very carefully crafted,

0:40:26.080 --> 0:40:28.319
<v Speaker 16>they're very deliberate in what they say, and they don't

0:40:28.360 --> 0:40:31.759
<v Speaker 16>say we're about to enter our third quarter, or I

0:40:31.760 --> 0:40:34.239
<v Speaker 16>should say, we're in our third quarter where Apple is

0:40:34.360 --> 0:40:38.600
<v Speaker 16>likely to announce its third annual revenue decline in a row.

0:40:38.920 --> 0:40:41.960
<v Speaker 16>It's very clear that they've plateaued, at least for now

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:48.080
<v Speaker 16>in the US, the larger Americas, Europe, Asia, China specifically,

0:40:48.360 --> 0:40:50.440
<v Speaker 16>and so investors in Wall Street they want to see

0:40:50.440 --> 0:40:52.959
<v Speaker 16>where's the future growth. So Apple has a new pitch

0:40:53.000 --> 0:40:54.800
<v Speaker 16>for them, Like you said, it's emerging markets.

0:40:54.880 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:40:55.360 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 16>They talked about how this was one of the best

0:40:57.200 --> 0:41:00.319
<v Speaker 16>quarters ever for emerging markets. They talked about how they

0:41:00.360 --> 0:41:02.879
<v Speaker 16>have very low market share in India and other low

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:07.200
<v Speaker 16>emerging markets like Mexico, like Brazil, like Indonesia, And that

0:41:07.400 --> 0:41:09.719
<v Speaker 16>might be bad on the surface, but the reality is

0:41:09.719 --> 0:41:13.799
<v Speaker 16>that means there's big untapped markets for Apple to grow into.

0:41:14.320 --> 0:41:14.440
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:41:14.800 --> 0:41:18.520
<v Speaker 16>They make you know, between fifteen and twenty billion dollars

0:41:18.520 --> 0:41:22.439
<v Speaker 16>per quarter in China. Right, Imagine if Apple could find

0:41:22.440 --> 0:41:25.400
<v Speaker 16>another market, maybe it's India, where they can add another

0:41:25.520 --> 0:41:29.120
<v Speaker 16>five ten billion dollars per quarter just in that one country. Right,

0:41:29.440 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 16>that's a massive opportunity, and over time, if they are

0:41:33.040 --> 0:41:36.120
<v Speaker 16>able to tap into these emerging markets properly, if people

0:41:36.120 --> 0:41:38.879
<v Speaker 16>decide to buy their products, if they make key new

0:41:39.040 --> 0:41:42.840
<v Speaker 16>devices and services geared towards those markets, it's very possible

0:41:42.880 --> 0:41:47.040
<v Speaker 16>that Apple revenue could grow exponentially just from those new regions.

0:41:47.360 --> 0:41:49.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, while some exponential growth of your own writing.

0:41:49.880 --> 0:41:52.760
<v Speaker 3>The Power On is on the discord now I understand

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:54.920
<v Speaker 3>markam and brilliant to have you on to discuss all

0:41:54.960 --> 0:41:56.640
<v Speaker 3>things Apple. It's a great story. You've got to go

0:41:56.680 --> 0:41:59.480
<v Speaker 3>and read it on his daily weekly Power On. Meanwhile,

0:42:00.000 --> 0:42:02.000
<v Speaker 3>we look at that does it with this edition of Bloomberg.

0:42:01.680 --> 0:42:05.879
<v Speaker 4>Technology Today recap. Don't forget the podcast. Wherever you get

0:42:05.880 --> 0:42:10.200
<v Speaker 4>your podcast, Apple, Spotify, iHeart, and of course Bloomberg platforms.

0:42:10.280 --> 0:42:11.560
<v Speaker 6>This is Bloomberg