WEBVTT - Tech Fallout From Russia Invasion

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:06.440
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power CALLI

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:11.799
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:11.880 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I'm Caroline Hyde in New York in Family

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>chang and this is going to make technology coming up

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>in the next hour US equates rose for a second day.

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>That's his economic data and will actually some hopes surrounding

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 1>Russia's war with Ukraine started to impact investors choices. We'll

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:43.520
<v Speaker 1>bring you the latest in terms of the market moves,

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>plus the growing cyber threat out of Russia after Ukraine's

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>institutions were attacked. How big of a risk is there

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>for the West as well? More than that later, and

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the amount of misinformation spreading online in the wake of

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Russia's invasion is growing. How platforms are handling their role

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>in urgeoning wall We'll get to all of that in

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 1>but a moment, But first, the prospect of talks between

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Russia and Ukraine has been cast well hope, then doubt

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the Kremlin saying Kiev stops responding after rejecting Moscow's initial

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>offer for a meeting in Minsk, Belarus. The most amory

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:20.760
<v Speaker 1>hooden is here with more and in an odd way,

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the market seemed to grasp on to this hope that

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:27.039
<v Speaker 1>there could be talks between Ukraine and Russia. But tell

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>us about the real truth here. Well, if there were

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to be, really the timing and the location would be

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:36.399
<v Speaker 1>incredibly important. So Russia first decided that they would like

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 1>to hold these tasks in Minsk, Belarus, but that's not

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:41.639
<v Speaker 1>going to happen given the fact that Lukoshenko has allowed

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Russian troops to stay in Belarus and use that as

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>a base to then invade on Ukraine. From the northern

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>border and the Belarus border to the capital of Kiev

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>is about two and a half hours or three hours

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>spending on which side of that river you you drive upon.

0:01:57.200 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>So this is going to be incredibly interesting if these

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>talks or to happen. But of course, one thing on

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the tables that President Putumont is a veto on Ukraine

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>joining NATO basically neutralize Ukraine in terms of whether or

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>not it will join NATO or not. And Ukraine has

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>constantly said they want to maintain that path to NATO

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 1>membership and keep that door open. Meanwhile, that for next

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>steps that you're going to be paying attention to, is

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:21.959
<v Speaker 1>we head towards the weekend. We've had so much of

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a global narrative China Wang and we've looked at other

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 1>key leaders in the UK and NATO leaders, what next

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 1>in terms of next steps for you? So today was

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>really about upping the sanctions against Russia. So we saw

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that European capitals as well as the White House just

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 1>confirming about a hour ago at Press Secretary Jensaki talking

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>about the fact that they are going home with sanctioning

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>slav Roth, that Russian foreign minister, as well as President

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Putin himself. But this is largely symbolic, giving most of

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>his assets are relatively skimmed, that's official assets. But what's

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>going to happen for the weekend, I think is really

0:02:56.840 --> 0:03:00.639
<v Speaker 1>going to depend on what happens on the ground in Ukrane.

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I imagine if there's anything on the diplomacy front, it

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 1>will be a lot of phone calls, but they'll probably

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 1>wait until Monday. Caroline, is any more of this upping

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>of the risk or are the potential penalties for Russia

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:14.959
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to sanctions? And Marie Horden, one of

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the busiest women out there this week, We hope you

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>managed to get some rest. Thank you so much for that. Meanwhile,

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>of course the conflict in Ukraine has been tom of

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>mine all week, but investors maybe taking a breath ahead

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>of the weekend, maybe trying to reallocate, and men would

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:33.359
<v Speaker 1>have been a significant sell off during Thursday's trade to

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>then rally higher. Ed Ludlow bring us the Friday big

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>moves for US. Yeah, yeah, I think you're right. Position

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>This is hope rather than substance on the talks between

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine and Russia. But a lot of green on the screen.

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>You see the sp the main gage of US equities

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>up two point to is the biggest jump in a month,

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>and it almost makes you forget the volatility of the

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>week right such big declines over Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday sessions

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>because of what we saw in Ukraine. Then as that

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>one though very tech heavy and there it's kind of

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>underperforming because don't forget traders are trying to make up

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>their mind. Now where we stand with the Fed in

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the outlook for rates, and note the US tenure yield

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>there at one had been a little higher earlier and

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Friday were off by about a basis points softer by

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:18.040
<v Speaker 1>a basis point, so a lot to consider going into

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:21.359
<v Speaker 1>the weekend. But a sigh of relief, which is interesting.

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go ahead to semi conductor. Semi conductor

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>is really interesting one. A big focus on Thursday's sanctions

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>package was restricting access to technology for Russia, semi conductors

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 1>being a big part of that. You see the socks. Yes,

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>we underperform the SP five. We're still at one point

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>six percent UM. Well, those that are willing to discuss it,

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>semi conducts covering this is saying, well, if suppliesn't go

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 1>to Russia, we have a long list of customers waiting

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:50.039
<v Speaker 1>for chips, will just send it somewhere else. Demand is

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 1>so great and video also interesting. They coming out with

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>statements saying that they have had some kind of hack

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to their internal systems, not doing too much for the

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>stock actually rose and sort of late gain and Fridays

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>session up one and forward up four percent, despite idling

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>one of its most profitable lines in Kansas City for

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the one ye Caroline shortage of semi conductors. Very quickly,

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>let me talk about Dell, because twenty four hours ago

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you and I were so focused on Russia Ukraine. This

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>is Dell. Over the last six days, six straight days

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of declined we had earnings for the fourth quarter of

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night, a weak profit outlook. Why supply chain disruptions,

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 1>rising costs, they can't service demand. I'm going to be mean.

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>I know I shouldn't do this on a Friday, but

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 1>let me just read to you this long list of superlatives.

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>The biggest drop since April for the stock on Friday,

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>at one point it was facing the biggest drop on record.

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>The stock is at its lowest level since September of

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:45.599
<v Speaker 1>six September, and this run of six days of declines

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 1>is the worst streak of declines since October twenties, so

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>something clearly not going right. For del of course, such

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>a legacy name in the world of technology, you might

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>have missed that one. For everything that's going on the

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>world in the last twenty four hours, well for shining

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a light on it, because there's plenty where sing amid well,

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:04.359
<v Speaker 1>what is a turbulent time in geopolitics, And indeed the

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:06.840
<v Speaker 1>market said loudly, we thank you, let's get even more

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>insight on the tech sector. Is slightly remarkable moves don

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:13.159
<v Speaker 1>ives a web Bush, who, of course, at the beginning

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>this week, had said that really the situation you were

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 1>playing couldn't have come at a worse time for tech.

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>And then the bounce back, what is this? Is this

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that you know we've seen so many bear respects put on,

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen so many shorts already that we sort

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 1>of see the bounce back. Now. Look, I think it's

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 1>the most oversold. It's the most oversold that I've seen

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>tech stocks in the last six years. And I think

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that's essentially what's what's really playing out here. I think

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>it was oversold in terms of tech, and now you're

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 1>really starting to see a bounce, like especially with the

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:48.159
<v Speaker 1>tap wind defend, it's gonna be a slower fed hike

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 1>that's starting to get factored in fifty bits off the table,

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's oversold in terms of tech. That's where we

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>show the bounce back. Therefore, if we start to reassess

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>what happens mark six, because we don't think we're going

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to get a double hiker fifty basis point move, but

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>we start to tamper down our expectations for six seven

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 1>right hikes over the course of the year, who wins

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>them in the tech sector. I think it's a combat.

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I think you've got to look at this two large

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>traps are gonna be safe. The names like Microsoft, Apple, Intel,

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Cisco safety blanket names, and you see more and more

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>rotation towards tech. I think you're starting to see a

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>little more of a risk on dipping the toe in

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the water. And then you look at cybersecurity. I think

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>some of these cybersecurity names, I in my opinion it's

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be the sector of tech that PIOUP performs

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the most, not just because I think valuations to go

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>overall growth. And then you look at the Ukraine situation,

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be a potentially two to three tellent names

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>like pow out or CrowdStrike, z scale or ACT among others.

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 1>And then then that's why this is one you go

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>into the weekend, despite the horrific situation in Ukraine, at

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>least from a style market perspective, TEX feels like that

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 1>over sold and I think we we're starting to put

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>at some sort of bottom in here at with some untech. Okay, interesting,

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 1>And I'm your perspective in terms of you know, the

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 1>allocation to big tech has a haven or not. Do

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>you think that it rides that wave in some way

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>or is this really about trying to understand the valuation

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>element to it all. I think part of it valuations

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>are way over sold, you know, relative obviously, from the

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the year, we've seen most techdown twenty percent.

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh out of these down relative to growth, I think

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>it's some of the most attractive valuations we've seen going

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:43.839
<v Speaker 1>back two thousand sixteen. But I think when you look

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>at overall growth, which is important, that's not changing because

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 1>of the situation here. And I think when you look

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 1>at overall tech that's really really what I think resoning

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>with investors in terms of some of these levels. And lastly,

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>it will sort of been over perhaps there's also some

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 1>of the A is syncratic news, some of the M

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and A news, you know, zendesque and terminating deals. Are

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>we expecting fewer combinations here? Consolidation here is there's still

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>plenty of opportunity to be had when we're thinking of

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 1>those sorts of eventualities to make us want to get

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>into certain tech names. Oh, I think there's going to

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 1>be actually an acceleration M and A because of what

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing on some of the oversawled names. From evaluation perspective,

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I think names like Microsoft are going to be aggressive

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to specifically areas like cybersecurity, I think

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 1>you'll see strategic eminate as well as financial And this

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:39.839
<v Speaker 1>is something I think behind the scenes you have a

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of investors really focused on which are some of

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>these oversawled names you'd be looking at. I think a

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of PE names like cybersecurity and some of the

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 1>cloud names in particular, just way oversold. Don I's on

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the technicals as well as some of the fundamentals at play.

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 1>We thank you so much of web Bush. He has

0:09:57.840 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 1>just been a fun of knowledge when it comes to

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:02.320
<v Speaker 1>check out. Was on the Bloomberg terminal as well. Amid

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:13.719
<v Speaker 1>these dramatic days, you don't have to move tanks, you

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 1>don't have to move armories. You can just use your

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>keyboard to get across, which you think as an active

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:23.439
<v Speaker 1>art of war in an asymmetric manner. So it's also

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 1>something very difficult to move back against. So, for example,

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and Fresher strikes us with a cyber blow, what is

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the US going to do? And so that's definitely what

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:38.079
<v Speaker 1>he conceives as an excellent use of his arsenal. That

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 1>was forming US Assistant Secretary for Homeland Security, Matt Hayden.

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>They're talking about the threat of cyber attacks from Russia,

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>not just on Ukraine but also here in the West.

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's begin Mandian's head of Global Intelligence, Sundra Joyce, to

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit more about that. The most phenomenal

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 1>resume in terms of the amount of well Master's degrees

0:10:56.720 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 1>that you hold in cyber policy and international affairs. Just

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>talk to us in here and now, Sandra. What you

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:05.839
<v Speaker 1>are telling your clients, how would they need to be well,

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 1>what we're telling them is that they need to be prepared,

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>but not to panic. The fact of the matter is

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:14.680
<v Speaker 1>that Russian cyber aggression has been going on for many years,

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of the preparations that organizations are making

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 1>for ransomware and other attacks that are the same preparations

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>that we're asking them to make today. Any industry groups

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 1>that are more vulnerable than others, or indeed that you

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 1>feel could be undergreater threat than others, well, the risk

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>of of reciprocal action against or cyber action against US businesses.

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:38.680
<v Speaker 1>The risk of that does go up with the application

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of sanctions, and when we're looking at reciprocity, a lot

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of the sanctions are based on financial effects. We might

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>expect to see some action against the financial sector, but

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't be just limited to the financial sector if

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>it were to happen. And that's because cyber attacks can

0:11:56.080 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 1>create effects across all industries, um and and that is

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>really what I believe the Russian aggression is about. It's

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>about creating fear, doubt, uncertainty, um and that's going to

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 1>be very powerful if they can actually get that done.

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:15.839
<v Speaker 1>Feared doubt, uncertainty was certainly increased in Ukraine amid that

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>were not one but two cyber attacks. It seemed to

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 1>be more d d OS distributed denial of service attacks

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and an inability to communicate, particularly with their front lines.

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:27.679
<v Speaker 1>But I'm interested in what types of attacks you might

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>see in Ukraine would also perhaps close to home. Isn't

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that sort of attack or is it more ransomware that

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>we need to fear? Well, what we should be thinking

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 1>about is what is the effect that the Russian government

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>would be trying to to get. So they could use

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>a very low sophistication technique like a DIDOS attack, but

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:49.440
<v Speaker 1>what is accompanying with that or things like text messages.

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>We saw this in Ukraine, text messages going out to

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>banking customers telling them that the banks were down, that

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't be able to get their money. That is

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 1>an effect that's really cognitive, it's psychology iCal. I think

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>that what we're going to be seeing from that Russian

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>playbook is as psychological attachment to any of the cyber

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>actions that they're taking trying to drive down the resolve

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the people. The application of sanctions and their effectiveness is

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>really driven by the willingness of the people to support them.

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>And if Russia can get uh, you know, their target population,

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>whether it's in Ukraine or elsewhere, to start doubting their

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>government to weaken their resolve, then they will have achieved

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:30.719
<v Speaker 1>the effect that they're looking for. Okay, so give us

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 1>as a consumer, but also the clients that you speak

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>to as sort of quick one. I one of what

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 1>we should be looking for how we should be acting

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 1>in this carent environment. Well, really what we need to

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 1>be doing is looking for anomalies in our networks. We

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:50.599
<v Speaker 1>should already be practicing cyber hygiene. Um, what run that playbook?

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:52.679
<v Speaker 1>If you know that you're going to be taking actions

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:57.719
<v Speaker 1>separating networks or segmenting them, who's responsible for that is

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 1>your general counsel part of your tabletop exercises. If not,

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>they should be. And a lot of this will also

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>require a connection to your your PR or media relations team,

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>because if you are a target of significance, there certainly

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a lot of messaging around that.

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 1>In fact, you can expect things like defacements or a

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 1>narrative come out that could be completely fabricated. So really

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>what organizations need to be doing is to prepare in

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the way that they would have been preparing for any

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>ransomware attack or any type of other breach of their network.

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Get the playbook in place, and then remediate and press

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 1>on because our resilience is very important here. It's essential

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>not to panic. Companies get breached every day and they

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 1>do continue once the remediation is complete. We of course

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>talk a lot about defense, but we started for I

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>feel at the first time to hear from the potentially

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the administration to talk about offense when it comes to

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 1>cyber well attack to ascent degree, what do you think

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>could be deployed to be a will to, you know,

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>take it back upon Russia in some way. Well, the U.

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>S Military of course has every option available to them,

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't need to be a cyber response. In fact,

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>if military action UM were to come, they would there

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 1>will be quite a few different options. But one thing

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>to remember here is there are multiple instruments of national power.

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>If the United States decides that it's going to go

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 1>on offense, it can go on offense in many ways, diplomatically, economically, UM.

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Even in within the breadth of military tools. There are

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 1>low level UM you know, things that can be done

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>all the way to some of the more sophisticated UM

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>attacks that could happen. But really it's not about the

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>mode and mean of it what it is. It's about

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the effect. What effect do you want to reach and

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 1>how is the most efficient application UM that you can

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 1>put out there to gain that effect? And quickly, Sandra,

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the people, Well, the places these attacks coming from is

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 1>becoming easier and easier to identify very quickly, because that

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>seemed to have been one of the case, was to

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>ensure that we knew that these are coming from Russia,

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>even if it wasn't exactly from the government itself. Well,

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>we do know quite a bit about the Russian threat

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>is cyber threat apparatus over this several years that they

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>have been conducting attacks UM. Not only the governments, but

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>also commercial companies like my own have enumerated a lot

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>of their capabilities, and so we know quite a bit

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>about them. They've been operating in safe harbor in Russia

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>or in adjacent areas for quite a number of years,

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>so a lot is known about them. Uh. The the

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>thing that gets tricky is that it is they've been

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>operating in an area where we have thus far not

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>had jurisdiction or a lot of options in order to

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>stop the activity. Really great to get your expertise amid

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 1>this current environment. Sandra Joyous many and executive vice president

0:16:57.120 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and had a global intelligence Pretty busy women, I think.

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Meanwhile coming up, YouTube massively popular in Russia, and now

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Google is facing pressure to cut back on ties to

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:10.400
<v Speaker 1>pro Russian channels sase countries continue to sanction Russia. Will

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:13.400
<v Speaker 1>discuss the knock on effect for some US based businesses.

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:41.439
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. So with sanctions on Russia ramping up

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>following its invasion of Ukraine, certain companies like well Google's

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>YouTube are under pressure to remove or cut commercial ties

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>with some of its most prolific pro Russian channels. For

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:55.359
<v Speaker 1>more on this story, I'm joined by Bloomberg's Mark Bergen,

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 1>who covers Google of course Alphabet the parent company, and

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 1>done a great deep dive on this just how deep

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 1>do these relationships run? Mark, You know, that's that's hard

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to say. It's kind of a repeat of seventeen. If

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:09.919
<v Speaker 1>you remember, there was a lot of criticism around Russia

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Today and Russian influence after the sixteen election that clearly

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:15.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that was around some of the bought

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 1>networks that hit Facebook and Twitter. But on YouTube, you know,

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Russia Today advertiser itself. You can go look at their

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>English page as the world's most popular news channel on YouTube.

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:29.479
<v Speaker 1>They're tremendously successful for formula subscribers. They've built up UH

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>in part with the very aggressive digital strategy, and they're

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>part of a network. There's some analysts that estimate close

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to a hundred channels that have commercial ties to entities

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:43.719
<v Speaker 1>that are under the under lesser sanctions prior to this

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 1>past week UH, and now there are you know, the

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 1>EU and the UK and the US are introducing new

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:54.639
<v Speaker 1>section sanctions that impact individuals either prominent TV journalists that

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 1>have YouTube channels or members of the close to the

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Kremlin that have connections with media, and a lot of

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Russian media is very popular on YouTube. Interesting, So how

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:08.119
<v Speaker 1>does one go about cutting it? I mean before we

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 1>see them label indeed sort of some of these sorts

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:14.719
<v Speaker 1>of state funded videos and channels. But do you just

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 1>cut it off in tally? How how do you control it? Uh? So,

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, at this point, YouTube has only kind of

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:21.639
<v Speaker 1>come out and said that they're looking, they're paying a

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:24.159
<v Speaker 1>lot of attention to misinformation, and that's been something we

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 1>saw Senator Warner kind of call it out his his

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:30.959
<v Speaker 1>turn with propaganda. The clearer I think commercial ties with

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>with YouTube is they run ads, right, they have a

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 1>revenue split with all their YouTube channels, and so every

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:37.679
<v Speaker 1>ad you go and see, you know, I was just

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>looking earlier this morning. You know a lot of these,

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 1>at least in the US there they had they run commercials.

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:46.159
<v Speaker 1>That's a split with with YouTube. YouTube could decide to

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 1>demonetize and no longer run ads on those channels which

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 1>they have on in some cases. Uh, they're clear list

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 1>even some former Google lawyers that are sort of calling

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 1>for them to make more drastic measures and actually cut

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>those channels off Entirely interesting. Once again, very difficult conversations

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure being having at an executive level. Marked is

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the response. Also, though, if it's not on Alphabet's own YouTube,

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:13.440
<v Speaker 1>it's being forced elsewhere. How much are we seeing still

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 1>YouTube being used by such news organizations or indeed state

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:23.159
<v Speaker 1>funded organizations, or are they going on to other parts

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of the internet. It's a YouTube and prominent What the

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing about YouTube is that it's both popular in

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:32.199
<v Speaker 1>Russia for a lot of the state backed media and

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of pro Kremlin media. It's also been a huge

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>asset for the opposition. Uh naval one whose opposist and

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:42.120
<v Speaker 1>leader has a massively popular YouTube channel. YouTube Boston likes

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 1>to point out that in a country with take controls

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:50.400
<v Speaker 1>of state media and broadcast, YouTube does offer avenues for criticism,

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's a fair and valid point. What's

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:56.399
<v Speaker 1>also happening is that they are under incredible amount of pressure,

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 1>even prior to this past week from the Russian government

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:03.439
<v Speaker 1>around there's been this contention around a particular YouTube channel

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:06.159
<v Speaker 1>that that YouTube blocked. That was and then there was

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 1>a court fine, and now they're paying a regular daily fine.

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Google is um they're under increasing pressure along with Facebook

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and Twitter to take down accounts that the Russian government

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>has has told them or either extremist or or using

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 1>the guys of misinformation Mark Bergen, It's a great story,

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Go and read it. Google faces sanctions dilemma with pro

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Russia YouTube channels. We thank you so much breaking all

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>down for us. Stay well, this is technology. I'm Caroline

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Hyde in New York. Now, as we headed into the

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>end of what was a pretty tense week, to say

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the least, investors still making sense of how to navigate

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the situation of course between Russia and Ukraine, and Ludlow

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 1>is here with what has been a remarkable rally actually

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 1>into the end of the week. Yeah, has and you're

0:21:57.800 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to work out what your exposure is in

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:02.120
<v Speaker 1>financial markets. You're also trying to work out which companies

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and stocks are going to be impacted in the short

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:06.239
<v Speaker 1>and long term. And this is a discussion we've got

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 1>to have around social media, Meta, parent company of Facebook

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and also Twitter, of course, you know Meta coming out

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>saying that Russian authorities ordered them to stop fact checking

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and labeling posts on the Facebook platform by state run media,

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to which Facebook declined to do so. An interesting and

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 1>list at Bloomberg Intelligence jumped on this really quickly, saying

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>that in the case of Meta, you could see one

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:31.679
<v Speaker 1>or two percentage points of a hit to daily active users.

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>But which company might benefit here? Twitter really interesting? We

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 1>know this from the Olympics, right, we know this from

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:40.159
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl. Twitter is an event driven platform and

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence estimating they could actually get a short term

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>boost for their active users from what's going on on

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 1>the ground in the Russian Ukraine. No matter how tense

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:50.639
<v Speaker 1>and difficult it is to see for a far, it's

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 1>also interesting to see where capital is flowing. We look

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:53.879
<v Speaker 1>at some of the e t F, so I love

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to take a look at the ETS space on a Friday.

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:58.679
<v Speaker 1>Caroline arcis a name so familiar to us, right, this

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>is the big fund, Kathy word and Arc money has

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 1>been going into this fund the last couple of days.

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Big gains over a two day based I think ten

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent over the last for the eight

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 1>hours or so. But if you compare that to the

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Van Eck Russia ETF, which also saw a big rebound

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:16.480
<v Speaker 1>on Friday and saw influence, you have to ask about

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 1>what the psychology of investors is here, because this was

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 1>a big rebound right in the van k ETF that

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 1>was a massive drop Wednesday Thursday. This is an e

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:27.399
<v Speaker 1>t F that tracks Russian equities. Now you have people

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:30.200
<v Speaker 1>coming in. Are these bottom feeders? Are these guys coming

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 1>in trying to buy the bottom or are they looking

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.679
<v Speaker 1>at shorting Russian equity? Short interest in that et F

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>gaining as well. But what's the rationale is going into

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:40.360
<v Speaker 1>arc if you look at the performance of these ets

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 1>relative to their fifty two week highs all over the

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 1>last twelve months. In other words, we bring up the

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>next board. There's a real difference in what's going on here.

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:52.400
<v Speaker 1>These are two very different e t s tracking very

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:55.640
<v Speaker 1>different basket of stocks, but on a fifty two week

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>basis or a draw down from a fifty two week high,

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 1>we are in pretty much the same place. So the

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 1>point I'm making his investors seemed to take stock on

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Friday and say, I'm going to go back into technology stocks.

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:07.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go back a little bit into this

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 1>e t F that's tracking Russian equities and see what

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 1>my exposure is going forward. And Ludlowe, great way to

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 1>wrap up an extraordinary We thank you so much. Now

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 1>we want to turn our attention to the role of

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 1>social media and what's currently occurring in Ukraine. Russia, of

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>course no stranger to peddling this and disinformation, especially now

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:28.960
<v Speaker 1>as it tries to shape the narrative of the war

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>it created, announced that it was restricting use of Facebook

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:35.920
<v Speaker 1>due to the company fact checking content posted by state

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 1>run media. In a statement Metters, Nick Clegg wrote in part,

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>ordinary Russians are using Matters apps to express themselves and

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>organize for action. We want them to continue to make

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 1>their voices heard, share what's happening, and organize for more

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>on all of this, and very pleased to be joined

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>by Margherita Kniev, which is the Associate director for the

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Center of Security and Emerging Technology, along with Brett Schaffers,

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 1>a senior fellow at the Allie and the Securing Democracy Waits.

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 1>The first and foremost, what's the playbook we're currently seeing

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>out of Russia at the moment. I think it's been

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>a standard combination of things that we've seen before with

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 1>an influx of some new messaging. It is a reiteration

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:23.359
<v Speaker 1>of the narrative that NATO expansion has driven Russia to

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:28.199
<v Speaker 1>defend itself, which is obviously a disinformation taxing designed to

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>justify the current attacks and a lot of the probably

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:37.879
<v Speaker 1>atrocities that will be seeing increasingly. So another emphasis is

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>being put at dissuading raordinary Russians from taking a stand

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 1>against the conflict and against the war. And I think

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:49.640
<v Speaker 1>we're soon are also going to be seeing an argument

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>that those domestic protests are being driven by external uh

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:59.439
<v Speaker 1>CI A fermented uh those points that we've seen before,

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 1>So in combination of targeting domestic audiences as well as

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 1>looking externally, it's tools that Russia as honed in its

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 1>previous disc information and disupervision compans in Ukraine and then

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:17.439
<v Speaker 1>in Sey area, and now we're seeing it repeated again

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 1>in a way that it's been difficult to tackle for

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:23.640
<v Speaker 1>those media companies that you discussed Everlire, Yeah, Brett, difficult

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to tackle, and particularly when Russia's sort of saying no

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>longer wants to be using the metal platform in that respect.

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>How do you see social media companies such as YouTube

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 1>by Google, Alphabet Matters, Facebook and Instagram, how do you

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 1>how do you see them being able to respond to

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>this in the real time? Yeah, I think it's going

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to be a real moment of reckoning for the US

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>social media companies. I mean, for years they have tried

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 1>to be neutral platforms where they have allowed different perspectives

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to exist. Yes, they have labeled Russian state media outlets

0:26:56.640 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 1>as being Russian state media outlets, but they've also labeled

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:02.160
<v Speaker 1>US government the state media outlets. I think at some

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>point they may be forced into taking sides here, and frankly,

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 1>that choice may not be theirs, because I think the

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:10.639
<v Speaker 1>Russian government is going to continue to crack down on

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Western social media companies. Of course we saw that today,

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:16.160
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's it's possible, if not likely, at

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>some point that the Russian government, if this content, if

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>this conflict continues to escalate, that they will just cut

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Speaker 1>off access to Twitter, Facebook, Google for their own domestic population.

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 1>And to that end we to how effective would that be.

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Of course, we will know a VPN when we want

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to use one, But I'm interested is to what outlets

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 1>already people are using. How much perhaps Ukraine Russian people

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:41.239
<v Speaker 1>have preempted the fact that it might be hard to

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:45.400
<v Speaker 1>to access set in Western providers. Absolutely, and I think

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 1>in modern society you can never really hermetically seal a

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:52.680
<v Speaker 1>country anymore, especially a country that has already been integrated

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:56.360
<v Speaker 1>into um the outside world, We're not talking about North

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Korea here or even China. We're talking about a country

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:04.199
<v Speaker 1>has been Ukraine itself has been fully integrated into Europe,

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and even the great parts of Russia are been European facing.

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 1>So the apps that even if we're seeing, you know,

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 1>reduced access to Facebook, we just talked about YouTube being

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:22.680
<v Speaker 1>a meaningful platform that regular Russians follow. They're also use

0:28:22.880 --> 0:28:27.360
<v Speaker 1>WhatsApp and Telegram, and those are apps that will continue

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:29.679
<v Speaker 1>to be a way for people to communicate. In the

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:33.440
<v Speaker 1>same time imlently, we're also seeing the spread of disinformation there.

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think Russia will be able to gramatically

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>seal um the internet as we know here, but there's

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 1>no argument that they will try to control the information

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that is reaching Russian citizens much more tightly. And Brett

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>to that point, you know, how, how is it a

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>good way of layman terms to be ensuring that you're

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:58.239
<v Speaker 1>not being targeted by misinformation that we're not. I mean,

0:28:58.280 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>we just heard of the cyber attacks that could have

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the ways in which they're sending text messages to people

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and there like, how do you feel that from a

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:07.479
<v Speaker 1>social media despite if people couldn't really try to with

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 1>rigor understand what's true what's not. Russia has significant information capabilities,

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and that starts, of course, with their state media outlets

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 1>that are very active. They're very successful across multiple social

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 1>media platforms. Those are the easy ones to deal with

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 1>because we know what they are. They're attributable, so they

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 1>can be labeled. UH information consumers understand where the information

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 1>is coming from and the intent behind it. What gets

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit trickier is Russia also has significant capabilities

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:37.960
<v Speaker 1>in the covert space. So we know that they've run

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 1>troll farms, They've run pages presenting themselves as being sort

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of genuine American political opinion of pages, but of course

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 1>have been connected back to Russia, so they have ways

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 1>of messaging and capability that doesn't make it entirely clear

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>where the information is coming from. This is even very

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 1>difficult for the social media companies to ferret out, so

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 1>it's information can humors. I think we just have to

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>remain vigilant and very skeptical because Russia has ways of

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 1>reaching us that don't necessarily come through outlets that identify

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 1>themselves as having a connection to the Russian government and

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 1>reached it very briefly. The amount that's been spent by

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 1>certain companies to beef up the AI to ensure they

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 1>can take down volts too, you know, to be a

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 1>fact checker of choice. Do you think that's enough? Is

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 1>there still so much work to be done? Or have

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 1>they manage done on they can to a stain extent.

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot more to be done, and

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 1>not just in the that automatic uh false actor bot space.

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot to be done in an area that

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 1>we're uncomfortable to deal with. And it is the fact

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 1>that you know, like Bread mentioned, there are what appears

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 1>to be legitimate Western political obinionformers that are then later

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:55.080
<v Speaker 1>discovered to be Russian boats or Russian influencers masquerading somebody else.

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, we are also dealing with actual,

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 1>real people in the West who are of political influence

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 1>one way or another, who are, whether intentionally or unintentionally,

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 1>end up amplifying a lot of the Russian messaging. And

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 1>there is something that I think Americans and people throughout

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Europe should be much more cargnizant of hold ourselves to

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 1>account to Margarita, can I if we thank you so much,

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Brett Shaefer, We expertise from you both. We thank you

0:31:27.600 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 1>for it. Have a good weekend. Meanwhile, coming up the

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 1>fight of a control for information in the conflict between

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Russia and Ukraine, we're talking with are We've, decentralized storage

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 1>network built on a blockchain like data structure, and it's

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 1>designed to provide permanent data storage saved from state censorship.

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>We'll discuss this is bring back now. Of course, crypto

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 1>has been a focus throughout the Ukraine Russia attention, in

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 1>large part because of the price moves, but also because

0:31:57.800 --> 0:32:00.240
<v Speaker 1>of the ways in which maybe some oligarchs could or

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>could not be using the technology. But also let's talk

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about how we could use the technology

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 1>underlying technology, not in nearly ideally blockchain per se, but

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 1>this time block We've is something that we could be

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 1>looking at. Are Weave as a Berlin based blockchain startup

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 1>that built an archival platform for permanent data storage as

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:23.440
<v Speaker 1>a means to actually counter state censorship of online information sources.

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Are we founder Sam Williams joins us now and very

0:32:25.560 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 1>pleased to say so do does our lead in our

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>crypto discussions. But mentionality back second, Galie, I want you

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to take it away first with Sam yes, Sam, you know,

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I think this situation Ukraine is such an interesting example

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 1>of where storage decentralized could be applicable. Or can you

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 1>explain what's happening when it comes to Ukraine and the

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 1>types of information you're able to store in a decentralized way. Yes, well,

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 1>we think that in order to learn from the past effectively,

0:32:54.400 --> 0:32:56.440
<v Speaker 1>we need to store the past in such a way

0:32:56.480 --> 0:32:58.320
<v Speaker 1>that it's not going to be altered over time. So

0:32:58.360 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 1>we've built a ledger. It is decentralized in natures throws

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 1>this information in hundreds, if not thousands of places across

0:33:04.440 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the world um and then back to that storage where

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the sustainable endowment UM And essentially what our community has

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>done has created archiving box that are putting approximately a

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 1>million pieces of data a day into this system and

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 1>replicating it around the world such they can't be altered

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:24.479
<v Speaker 1>in essentially forever. Can you tell us a little bit

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 1>about whether or not we're already seeing your technology being used.

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 1>How are you deploying effectively an ability to ensure that

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 1>what is currently being written in history remains so well,

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 1>we use cryptography to back the system in to make

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 1>sure that information can be changed once is put inside

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the network and then we have a system similar to

0:33:46.080 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 1>proof of work with bitcoin, except we use storage essentially

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 1>story and the data set as the work in the system,

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:55.720
<v Speaker 1>and that proves that the data has not changed over

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a large period of time. I'm wondering how people use

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the data after its stored. You have this instance, for example,

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 1>where Senator pat to Me had talked about are weaves

0:34:05.800 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 1>use of the technology in order to store work when

0:34:10.080 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Apple Daily in China and the inability

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 1>for the government to erase the information that surrounded Apple Daily.

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:22.360
<v Speaker 1>So how then does the US or other people and

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:24.800
<v Speaker 1>actors and governments start to take a look at the

0:34:24.880 --> 0:34:28.319
<v Speaker 1>data that is being stored. Well, I think the key

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:31.080
<v Speaker 1>thing is that that information is available all across the

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>not just from the US. So when a piece of

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:35.279
<v Speaker 1>data is stored inside are we, you can collect that

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:38.399
<v Speaker 1>data from hundreds, if not thousands, of different places. So

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:43.479
<v Speaker 1>while China may have successfully unfortunately removed the stand or

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:47.440
<v Speaker 1>or Apple Daily from the Internet, they really can't remove

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 1>access to are we even any serious fashion. And that

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:53.200
<v Speaker 1>means that information is still available to local populists if

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:56.280
<v Speaker 1>they want to access. Just remind us of of course,

0:34:56.280 --> 0:34:59.040
<v Speaker 1>with every of the protocol tends to come and token

0:34:59.040 --> 0:35:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and the all we've token And in particular, how's it

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:05.080
<v Speaker 1>as incentivizing people to be using your your particular provision.

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 1>How many people are using it on the UH story

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:15.080
<v Speaker 1>side or on the posting side? If so? Well, either

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:17.400
<v Speaker 1>way it's it's about hundreds of thousands, if not millions

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:20.120
<v Speaker 1>of people on the story side, UM, and then there's

0:35:20.440 --> 0:35:23.120
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of two thousands depending on the time, about nine

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:26.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred right now, I think data stories that are replicating

0:35:26.560 --> 0:35:30.399
<v Speaker 1>their information around the world. Well, speaking of funds, and

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:34.319
<v Speaker 1>you're announcing fundraise, right, so what will you do with

0:35:34.360 --> 0:35:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the funds? You know, you have some really interesting large

0:35:36.760 --> 0:35:41.239
<v Speaker 1>backers and recent Heroitz blockchain capital coin based ventures. To

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:45.160
<v Speaker 1>what degree can you grow using the new funds? Well,

0:35:45.160 --> 0:35:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean we've we've taken the destent from many a

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:49.799
<v Speaker 1>few people over over the years, and also many of

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:52.240
<v Speaker 1>those people that you just mentioned will support the tokens

0:35:52.320 --> 0:35:55.359
<v Speaker 1>just from the open market. But UM, the key thing

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 1>for us, they think is backing the new founders UM

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:02.520
<v Speaker 1>in the ecosystem. They using the technology that we've created

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:07.040
<v Speaker 1>two new use cases. So for example, our drive producing

0:36:07.040 --> 0:36:09.799
<v Speaker 1>the rub Ecosystem just raates eighteen million dollars in order

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:14.320
<v Speaker 1>to create enterprise solutions on top of the system that

0:36:14.360 --> 0:36:17.879
<v Speaker 1>allow businesses to store their data into vacuity as well,

0:36:17.880 --> 0:36:20.680
<v Speaker 1>which of course it's very important for compliance reasons. Sometimes

0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:24.920
<v Speaker 1>we want to be thanking you for your time. Sam Williams,

0:36:24.960 --> 0:36:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of course are we founder, and we want to thank

0:36:27.120 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Shanelli Bassa for bringing having us bring that interview. And

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:33.399
<v Speaker 1>clearly some use cases currently being evolved as we look

0:36:33.480 --> 0:36:46.760
<v Speaker 1>between the Russia and Ukraine invasion. With Russia's invasion of Ukraine,

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:49.799
<v Speaker 1>it's been of course accompanied by cyber attacks actually pre

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:52.920
<v Speaker 1>emptying it to a certain extent, and now the question arises,

0:36:52.960 --> 0:36:55.760
<v Speaker 1>how do you prepare for cyber conflict? Can you glean

0:36:55.880 --> 0:36:59.279
<v Speaker 1>hints from history? Our next guest has some insights into

0:36:59.360 --> 0:37:03.839
<v Speaker 1>just that. Znowski is a threat hunter of sorts as

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:07.200
<v Speaker 1>security software companies so farce it's great to have some

0:37:07.360 --> 0:37:10.879
<v Speaker 1>time with you and talk to us about what we've

0:37:10.960 --> 0:37:13.719
<v Speaker 1>learned in previous years and previous I mean we've learned

0:37:13.760 --> 0:37:17.799
<v Speaker 1>what perhaps sanctions due to Russia in their response, what

0:37:17.960 --> 0:37:22.960
<v Speaker 1>has their response been in terms of cyber well, it's

0:37:22.960 --> 0:37:26.479
<v Speaker 1>been quite a history, you know, most nation states haven't

0:37:26.480 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 1>really been caught doing too much, but with Russia there

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:31.480
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of information to mine. There were you know,

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:34.439
<v Speaker 1>they started doing cyber attacks against Estonia back in two

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:38.239
<v Speaker 1>thousand seven and followed that with attacks against Georgia a

0:37:38.280 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 1>little after that. Of course, there were attacks during the

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:46.279
<v Speaker 1>Crimean invasion U we've even seen them mess with Kurzakhstan

0:37:46.320 --> 0:37:49.799
<v Speaker 1>and other countries as well, and so we were kind

0:37:49.800 --> 0:37:51.239
<v Speaker 1>of able to kind of put together a bit of

0:37:51.280 --> 0:37:53.800
<v Speaker 1>a map of things as you see there on the screen,

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:57.160
<v Speaker 1>and depending on the types of attacks, there's always a

0:37:57.160 --> 0:37:59.040
<v Speaker 1>bit of a pattern to it, which is what we

0:37:59.080 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 1>call denial of certain risk, but in essence taking down

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, news and government websites, that kind of thing

0:38:04.000 --> 0:38:06.879
<v Speaker 1>to create confusion, followed by a lot of other types

0:38:06.880 --> 0:38:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of attacks told to us about the other types because

0:38:09.520 --> 0:38:14.320
<v Speaker 1>we've seen the DIDs attacks so far, in particular affecting Ukraine.

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:18.080
<v Speaker 1>But what next, Well, you know, we we saw a

0:38:18.120 --> 0:38:20.239
<v Speaker 1>little bit of activity earlier this week, just before the

0:38:20.320 --> 0:38:22.759
<v Speaker 1>land invasion, which is again something we've seen before in

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:26.879
<v Speaker 1>Russian operations, which are not attributed to Russia yet by

0:38:26.920 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 1>any government agency, but it's suspected these white so called

0:38:30.520 --> 0:38:33.640
<v Speaker 1>wiper attacks, which in essence is a computer virus that

0:38:33.680 --> 0:38:36.920
<v Speaker 1>gets on your computer and instead of stealing information or

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:39.560
<v Speaker 1>things like that, it simply wipes the hard disks so

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the computer is inoperable to sort of disrupt things. Uh,

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:45.239
<v Speaker 1>and we did see some of that on Wednesday this week,

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:47.919
<v Speaker 1>right before the land invasion. Interesting and we're just talking

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to Sam Williams. Well, we've about how to be protecting

0:38:50.000 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 1>your data and enshowing it can be stored for longer

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:57.400
<v Speaker 1>periods of time, and what about people in terms of

0:38:57.640 --> 0:38:59.719
<v Speaker 1>how stress the systems already are by the fact that

0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:01.400
<v Speaker 1>many of it are working from home at the moment.

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Is that I haven't got the level of cybersecurity that

0:39:04.320 --> 0:39:07.200
<v Speaker 1>we should have. Have we learned the lessons of past.

0:39:08.440 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately we're our cybersecurity is not in good shape anywhere globally,

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and particularly in Ukraine where resources were more limited than

0:39:16.680 --> 0:39:20.000
<v Speaker 1>perhaps we have in the West as financially. But the

0:39:20.000 --> 0:39:22.760
<v Speaker 1>pandemic has not helped this either. Right, We've we've opened

0:39:22.800 --> 0:39:26.000
<v Speaker 1>more remote doors to provide access to our networks and

0:39:26.000 --> 0:39:29.880
<v Speaker 1>our information then we normally would have, say publicly facing

0:39:30.040 --> 0:39:32.799
<v Speaker 1>and as a result that is that many more opportunities

0:39:32.840 --> 0:39:36.120
<v Speaker 1>for criminals or nation states to exploit that that openness.

0:39:36.680 --> 0:39:40.360
<v Speaker 1>And in past we've of course talked about the vulnerability

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:42.880
<v Speaker 1>of infrastructure, in particular power of structure and the like.

0:39:43.000 --> 0:39:44.719
<v Speaker 1>Is that what we should be suspecting this time? What

0:39:44.760 --> 0:39:47.399
<v Speaker 1>does history tell us about where we should look vulnerabilities

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 1>going forward? It's really hard to say. I mean, I'm

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:52.840
<v Speaker 1>not a political scientist, so I don't want to comment

0:39:52.880 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 1>too much on the politics of it, but it would

0:39:55.719 --> 0:39:59.160
<v Speaker 1>certainly seem at this point we've moved into a phase

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:02.359
<v Speaker 1>where sort of nonstate actors are taking over as sort

0:40:02.400 --> 0:40:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of patriotic hackers, if you will. Um, the Ukrainian president

0:40:06.200 --> 0:40:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Zelinsky called on Ukrainian patriots to try to hack back

0:40:10.080 --> 0:40:13.319
<v Speaker 1>at Russia. UM, we've already throughout the day today, it's

0:40:13.320 --> 0:40:16.720
<v Speaker 1>been evolving. We've seen several criminal groups that are largely

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:20.640
<v Speaker 1>believed to be based in Russia make probably public proclamations

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:23.160
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to come after US and Western assets

0:40:23.160 --> 0:40:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and retribution uh for the sanctions or whatever other penalties

0:40:27.680 --> 0:40:31.160
<v Speaker 1>were imposing on Russia. And so that's ransomware? Is it

0:40:31.160 --> 0:40:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that they'll be coming off? Do do do you think certainly

0:40:34.520 --> 0:40:36.719
<v Speaker 1>ransomware groups of the ones that have been chattering, that's

0:40:36.760 --> 0:40:40.319
<v Speaker 1>for sure. They're not limited to ransomware necessarily. The one

0:40:40.360 --> 0:40:44.600
<v Speaker 1>particular ransomware group known as Kanti has, in our experience

0:40:44.800 --> 0:40:47.800
<v Speaker 1>uh performed some of these wiping attacks when they weren't

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:51.160
<v Speaker 1>paid the ransom in a previous ransom attempts. So they

0:40:51.200 --> 0:40:53.759
<v Speaker 1>could certainly get even nastier than taking our data and

0:40:53.800 --> 0:40:57.239
<v Speaker 1>simply abuse access. They may have already footholds that they

0:40:57.239 --> 0:41:00.279
<v Speaker 1>have inside of Western assets and just delete things to

0:41:00.320 --> 0:41:03.000
<v Speaker 1>be disruptive. Chat. How many cools are you getting at

0:41:03.040 --> 0:41:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the moment? So what are you doing to help your clients? Uh, Well,

0:41:07.520 --> 0:41:09.759
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a busy time, and you know, the the

0:41:09.840 --> 0:41:14.600
<v Speaker 1>challenge for each individual organization is identifying what their weaknesses

0:41:14.640 --> 0:41:17.239
<v Speaker 1>are and on short notice, what they may be able

0:41:17.280 --> 0:41:19.440
<v Speaker 1>to do to try to mitigate some of the risk

0:41:19.520 --> 0:41:23.000
<v Speaker 1>of being victimized. And so there's been a lot of long,

0:41:23.120 --> 0:41:25.680
<v Speaker 1>well thought conversations with some of the larger clients, just

0:41:25.760 --> 0:41:29.080
<v Speaker 1>having conversations about what can you do right now to

0:41:29.160 --> 0:41:31.680
<v Speaker 1>make the best of the situation. What do you watch

0:41:31.719 --> 0:41:33.799
<v Speaker 1>for to know that something may be underway where you

0:41:33.800 --> 0:41:35.960
<v Speaker 1>may want to batten down the hatches. One thing that

0:41:36.000 --> 0:41:40.960
<v Speaker 1>we should look for. Well, certainly, um, we've seen a

0:41:41.000 --> 0:41:43.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of abuse of unpatched networking equipment. So back to

0:41:43.960 --> 0:41:46.399
<v Speaker 1>that COVID pandemic question. All of us working from home

0:41:46.440 --> 0:41:51.840
<v Speaker 1>with VPNs and things, the Russians have persistently abused those

0:41:51.880 --> 0:41:54.480
<v Speaker 1>flaws when they're not fixed, and so certainly making sure

0:41:54.480 --> 0:41:57.840
<v Speaker 1>those fixes are applied, and monitoring the network very careful

0:41:57.880 --> 0:42:01.640
<v Speaker 1>for unusual activity, especially things that may involve the you know,

0:42:01.719 --> 0:42:05.359
<v Speaker 1>large quantities of data being transported at off hours are

0:42:05.400 --> 0:42:09.000
<v Speaker 1>often signs of an extortion or ransomware attack. Chat. Really

0:42:09.000 --> 0:42:11.680
<v Speaker 1>good to speak with you, Thank you so much, checks

0:42:12.200 --> 0:42:16.480
<v Speaker 1>very much, principal research scientist at so Fast. Meanwhile, that

0:42:16.640 --> 0:42:18.759
<v Speaker 1>does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology. You want

0:42:18.760 --> 0:42:20.680
<v Speaker 1>to stick around though all Street Week. It's up next

0:42:20.960 --> 0:42:24.000
<v Speaker 1>my colleague David Weston of course leading that as always

0:42:24.080 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Larry Summers there to discuss and a real deep dive

0:42:27.160 --> 0:42:30.120
<v Speaker 1>into an extraordinary week and when we actually saw us

0:42:30.200 --> 0:42:33.960
<v Speaker 1>benchmarks closed them week higher. He's going to be joined

0:42:34.000 --> 0:42:37.160
<v Speaker 1>by Jane Harmon, president of the Wilson Center, alongside Kate Morricy,

0:42:37.280 --> 0:42:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a black Rock Global Allocation team and former Trasury sectary.

0:42:40.360 --> 0:42:44.360
<v Speaker 1>As I mentioned, Larry Summers stay with him From a

0:42:44.480 --> 0:42:47.799
<v Speaker 1>clearer New York, wishing you all a well weekend. This

0:42:47.920 --> 0:42:48.560
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg