1
00:00:03,680 --> 00:00:06,960
Speaker 1: On this episode of Newts World. The first Earth Day

2
00:00:07,040 --> 00:00:13,000
Speaker 1: was established on April twenty second, nineteen seventy. At the time,

3
00:00:13,400 --> 00:00:17,040
Speaker 1: I was still studying in Brussels for my dissertation in

4
00:00:17,239 --> 00:00:22,040
Speaker 1: modern European history. The following year, I became a professor

5
00:00:22,440 --> 00:00:25,440
Speaker 1: in the history department of West Georgia College, and I

6
00:00:25,600 --> 00:00:28,720
Speaker 1: asked to get involved in the environmental studies program, which

7
00:00:29,000 --> 00:00:32,519
Speaker 1: in fact I helped develop, and I taught in the

8
00:00:32,560 --> 00:00:35,440
Speaker 1: second earth Day and then we created an entire program

9
00:00:35,479 --> 00:00:38,839
Speaker 1: around environmental studies, which was one of the most exciting

10
00:00:38,880 --> 00:00:42,000
Speaker 1: things I did during the period when I was a teacher.

11
00:00:42,520 --> 00:00:46,199
Speaker 1: But my interest in the concept of Earth Day and

12
00:00:46,240 --> 00:00:57,680
Speaker 1: the concept of conservation goes back way before that. I

13
00:00:57,720 --> 00:01:01,080
Speaker 1: grew up in Central Pennsylvania until I was eleven, and

14
00:01:01,120 --> 00:01:03,120
Speaker 1: then I would go back in the summer when my

15
00:01:03,200 --> 00:01:05,920
Speaker 1: dad was stationed in the army at Fort Raleigh, and

16
00:01:06,560 --> 00:01:09,920
Speaker 1: I grew up going up into the mountains and really

17
00:01:10,160 --> 00:01:15,040
Speaker 1: being surrounded by nature, and I had a fascination with animals.

18
00:01:15,080 --> 00:01:17,000
Speaker 1: In fact, my relatives would all take me to the

19
00:01:17,000 --> 00:01:21,760
Speaker 1: Philadelphia Zoo, to the Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences, and

20
00:01:21,959 --> 00:01:24,000
Speaker 1: for a very long time I thought I would become

21
00:01:24,000 --> 00:01:29,559
Speaker 1: either a vertebrate paleontologist, probably studying dinosaurs, or I would

22
00:01:29,600 --> 00:01:33,160
Speaker 1: become a zoo director. My first experiences in public life

23
00:01:33,520 --> 00:01:35,920
Speaker 1: were at the age of eleven trying to help Harrisburg

24
00:01:36,240 --> 00:01:38,319
Speaker 1: get a zoo which it had lost during World War Two.

25
00:01:38,720 --> 00:01:41,480
Speaker 1: So I had a very deep interest in the natural world,

26
00:01:42,000 --> 00:01:45,400
Speaker 1: and in natural history, and in the whole concept of

27
00:01:45,880 --> 00:01:50,000
Speaker 1: the environment that surrounds us. And in that sense I

28
00:01:50,160 --> 00:01:53,880
Speaker 1: found the idea of working in the environmental studies program

29
00:01:54,360 --> 00:01:57,880
Speaker 1: just absolutely right down my alley. One of the great

30
00:01:57,960 --> 00:02:01,880
Speaker 1: driving forces in the creation of Earth Day was Rachel

31
00:02:01,920 --> 00:02:06,440
Speaker 1: Carson's New York Times bestseller Silence Spring, which came out

32
00:02:06,440 --> 00:02:10,400
Speaker 1: in nineteen sixty two. The book really described the impact

33
00:02:10,440 --> 00:02:14,680
Speaker 1: of chemicals, in particular on birds and on other parts

34
00:02:14,680 --> 00:02:18,120
Speaker 1: of nature. It sold over five hundred thousand copies in

35
00:02:18,200 --> 00:02:21,400
Speaker 1: twenty four countries, and it really had a dramatic impact

36
00:02:21,480 --> 00:02:25,400
Speaker 1: in raising public awareness and concern for living organisms and

37
00:02:25,560 --> 00:02:29,160
Speaker 1: for the environment. In some ways, it was really really important.

38
00:02:29,600 --> 00:02:33,440
Speaker 1: We had been using DDT very widely. DDT saved lots

39
00:02:33,440 --> 00:02:36,920
Speaker 1: of lives in World War Two. Is a very powerful pesticide,

40
00:02:37,280 --> 00:02:39,960
Speaker 1: but one of its side effects was that it was

41
00:02:40,000 --> 00:02:43,079
Speaker 1: preserved going up the food chain, so that if you

42
00:02:43,160 --> 00:02:47,400
Speaker 1: had enough DDT in the environment, fish would absorb it.

43
00:02:47,680 --> 00:02:49,600
Speaker 1: Then if you had an animal like for example, the

44
00:02:49,600 --> 00:02:52,519
Speaker 1: bald eagle, when they ate the fish, they were getting

45
00:02:52,680 --> 00:02:56,200
Speaker 1: very heavy doses of DDT and that was leading them

46
00:02:56,560 --> 00:02:59,160
Speaker 1: to lay eggs that would not come to term. And

47
00:02:59,280 --> 00:03:03,920
Speaker 1: so it was a real collapse, particularly among fish eating words.

48
00:03:04,440 --> 00:03:09,440
Speaker 1: And we have had vivid evidence that by banning DDT

49
00:03:09,680 --> 00:03:12,840
Speaker 1: or limiting its used in very specific cases and generally

50
00:03:12,840 --> 00:03:16,639
Speaker 1: eliminating it from the larger environment, you've had a tremendous

51
00:03:16,680 --> 00:03:20,360
Speaker 1: rebound of eagles. And remember at one point being on

52
00:03:20,440 --> 00:03:23,320
Speaker 1: a cruise in Alaska and seeing a tree that had

53
00:03:23,320 --> 00:03:26,679
Speaker 1: I think forty eagles sitting it. It was astonishing because

54
00:03:26,720 --> 00:03:30,960
Speaker 1: eagles are really big but really beautiful animals. So a

55
00:03:31,080 --> 00:03:35,680
Speaker 1: number of people were directly moved by Rachel Carson's book.

56
00:03:36,160 --> 00:03:39,200
Speaker 1: But then I think the next big breaking point was

57
00:03:39,280 --> 00:03:43,320
Speaker 1: that there was a massive oil spill in Santa Barbara, California,

58
00:03:43,400 --> 00:03:47,360
Speaker 1: and that really led Senator Gaylord Nelson, who was the

59
00:03:47,440 --> 00:03:51,520
Speaker 1: junior senator from Wisconsin, had a long interest in the environment,

60
00:03:51,960 --> 00:03:55,920
Speaker 1: and he got involved in trying to create the more

61
00:03:56,000 --> 00:03:59,880
Speaker 1: public awareness of the problems, so he took a lesson

62
00:04:00,000 --> 00:04:02,520
Speaker 1: out of the Vietnam War movement and announced the idea

63
00:04:02,560 --> 00:04:06,440
Speaker 1: for a teaching on college campuses and convinced Pete McCloskey,

64
00:04:06,840 --> 00:04:11,080
Speaker 1: a conservation minded Republican congressman, to serve as as co chair.

65
00:04:11,680 --> 00:04:14,520
Speaker 1: They recruited Dennis Hayes, a young activist, to organize the

66
00:04:14,560 --> 00:04:18,799
Speaker 1: campus teachings, and they chose April twenty second, a weekday

67
00:04:18,839 --> 00:04:23,640
Speaker 1: falling between spring break and final exams, to maximize student involvement.

68
00:04:24,360 --> 00:04:28,880
Speaker 1: This has been an ongoing, continuous recognition of the importance

69
00:04:29,279 --> 00:04:33,080
Speaker 1: of earth and the importance of environmental approaches, and the

70
00:04:33,160 --> 00:04:35,880
Speaker 1: result is by nineteen ninety For example, in the twentieth

71
00:04:35,880 --> 00:04:40,360
Speaker 1: anniversary Earth Day had two hundred million people in over

72
00:04:40,440 --> 00:04:44,760
Speaker 1: one hundred and forty nations participating. The fact is that

73
00:04:45,320 --> 00:04:49,719
Speaker 1: younger people have a very very deep commitment. For example,

74
00:04:50,120 --> 00:04:53,120
Speaker 1: a majority of gen Zers some fifty six percent and

75
00:04:53,240 --> 00:04:56,640
Speaker 1: millennials some fifty seven percent support a move to phase

76
00:04:56,680 --> 00:05:00,719
Speaker 1: out gasoline powered vehicles. There are smaller support in older

77
00:05:00,760 --> 00:05:05,000
Speaker 1: generations A generation access at forty five percent and Boomers

78
00:05:05,000 --> 00:05:08,560
Speaker 1: are older at thirty eight percent. Roughly two thirds of

79
00:05:08,640 --> 00:05:12,640
Speaker 1: gen Z adults sixty six percent and millennials sixty four percent,

80
00:05:12,960 --> 00:05:16,480
Speaker 1: a pose increasing offshore oil and gas drilling, compared with

81
00:05:16,800 --> 00:05:19,599
Speaker 1: forty six percent of baby boomers in older adults. But

82
00:05:19,720 --> 00:05:25,160
Speaker 1: notice that even among the least pro environment generation, there's

83
00:05:25,160 --> 00:05:28,360
Speaker 1: still a very large block that is deeply concerned about

84
00:05:28,360 --> 00:05:31,440
Speaker 1: the environment. So the environment has become part of the

85
00:05:31,440 --> 00:05:35,479
Speaker 1: background environment of American politics. There's a sense that we

86
00:05:35,520 --> 00:05:38,400
Speaker 1: ought to be concerned, and the truth is, we have

87
00:05:38,520 --> 00:05:43,120
Speaker 1: made enormous progress. If you look, for example, at the

88
00:05:43,160 --> 00:05:45,840
Speaker 1: impact Jerry Lewis, who I served with when he was

89
00:05:45,880 --> 00:05:50,440
Speaker 1: in California legislature offered the first Clean Air Act, And

90
00:05:50,480 --> 00:05:52,480
Speaker 1: if you look at the amount of smog in Los

91
00:05:52,560 --> 00:05:55,719
Speaker 1: Angeles to day compared to thirty five or forty years ago,

92
00:05:56,160 --> 00:05:59,760
Speaker 1: there is an astonishing difference. If you look in London

93
00:06:00,240 --> 00:06:03,440
Speaker 1: at the impact of the Great Fog which killed people

94
00:06:03,839 --> 00:06:06,600
Speaker 1: after World War Two, and then you look at how

95
00:06:06,680 --> 00:06:10,279
Speaker 1: much they have cleaned up the atmosphere over London, it's

96
00:06:10,320 --> 00:06:13,680
Speaker 1: a remarkable change. If you look at the Cuyahoga River,

97
00:06:13,760 --> 00:06:17,120
Speaker 1: which at one point was actually burning, it had chemicals

98
00:06:17,160 --> 00:06:20,760
Speaker 1: from an upstream chemical plant. The chemicals were floating on

99
00:06:20,800 --> 00:06:23,520
Speaker 1: top of the river caught fire, and in the middle

100
00:06:23,560 --> 00:06:26,760
Speaker 1: of the city of Cleveland you had a river on fire.

101
00:06:26,839 --> 00:06:29,440
Speaker 1: Now you know, it's pretty hard to argue that that

102
00:06:29,520 --> 00:06:33,160
Speaker 1: is an acceptable environmental policy. We also, at one point

103
00:06:33,160 --> 00:06:36,120
Speaker 1: we're in danger of losing Lake Erie. There have been

104
00:06:36,920 --> 00:06:43,120
Speaker 1: continuous efforts to try to change our impact on the environment,

105
00:06:43,120 --> 00:06:46,000
Speaker 1: when the US has actually been a leader in doing

106
00:06:46,040 --> 00:06:49,719
Speaker 1: that over and over again. For example, our total emissions

107
00:06:50,080 --> 00:06:54,680
Speaker 1: declined thirteen percent from two thousand and five to two nineteen.

108
00:06:55,240 --> 00:06:58,040
Speaker 1: At the same time, there are other countries that are

109
00:06:58,080 --> 00:07:01,240
Speaker 1: doing a terrible job. In two thousand nineteen, for the

110
00:07:01,279 --> 00:07:06,000
Speaker 1: first time since we began measuring greenhouse gas emissions, China's

111
00:07:06,080 --> 00:07:10,560
Speaker 1: annual emissions by itself exceeded those of all the developed

112
00:07:10,600 --> 00:07:15,000
Speaker 1: countries combined. China's emissions were less than a quarter of

113
00:07:15,040 --> 00:07:19,120
Speaker 1: developed country emissions in nineteen ninety, but as the Chinese

114
00:07:19,120 --> 00:07:22,480
Speaker 1: have developed economically over the past three decades, they have

115
00:07:22,600 --> 00:07:27,680
Speaker 1: more than tripled their emissions, reaching over fourteen billion tons

116
00:07:27,680 --> 00:07:31,560
Speaker 1: of CO two equivalent in twenty nineteen. And I might

117
00:07:31,600 --> 00:07:34,360
Speaker 1: point out that this is one of the reasons virtually

118
00:07:34,400 --> 00:07:38,440
Speaker 1: all current strategies are childish. If you don't deal with

119
00:07:38,560 --> 00:07:42,120
Speaker 1: India and you don't deal with China. Everything else you

120
00:07:42,240 --> 00:07:45,600
Speaker 1: do to try to change the environment is very tiny

121
00:07:45,680 --> 00:07:48,880
Speaker 1: if you're talking about global warming, because these two countries

122
00:07:48,880 --> 00:07:52,160
Speaker 1: are huge. Between them, they're almost half of the entire

123
00:07:52,240 --> 00:07:56,000
Speaker 1: human race. They are building more and more call plants,

124
00:07:56,120 --> 00:07:59,720
Speaker 1: and in fact, you would have a bigger impact on

125
00:08:00,360 --> 00:08:03,960
Speaker 1: the carbon loading of the atmosphere by replacing Chinese and

126
00:08:04,040 --> 00:08:07,720
Speaker 1: Indian coal plants with natural gas than any other single

127
00:08:07,880 --> 00:08:11,880
Speaker 1: practical thing you could do. And yet almost nobody advocates

128
00:08:12,200 --> 00:08:15,040
Speaker 1: thinking globally about how you deal with it, so we

129
00:08:15,200 --> 00:08:18,480
Speaker 1: bend over backwards spend huge amounts of money. Meanwhile, the

130
00:08:18,600 --> 00:08:22,480
Speaker 1: Chinese are rapidly increasing the amount of carbon they're putting

131
00:08:22,480 --> 00:08:25,560
Speaker 1: in the atmosphere because it's the least expensive way for

132
00:08:25,600 --> 00:08:30,000
Speaker 1: them to develop. The fact is that every ton of

133
00:08:30,080 --> 00:08:34,080
Speaker 1: carbon reduced by the United States is offset because China

134
00:08:34,200 --> 00:08:37,920
Speaker 1: increases its emission by many tons. At the same time,

135
00:08:54,520 --> 00:08:58,319
Speaker 1: we also have a reality about the nature of the

136
00:08:58,360 --> 00:09:03,440
Speaker 1: production of food. The US has increased productivity by over

137
00:09:03,520 --> 00:09:08,480
Speaker 1: two hundred and fifty percent while reducing emissions from farmland.

138
00:09:09,200 --> 00:09:12,520
Speaker 1: We've cut the total emissions required to provide each of

139
00:09:12,559 --> 00:09:17,640
Speaker 1: your meals by twenty four percent since nineteen ninety. So

140
00:09:18,240 --> 00:09:22,400
Speaker 1: the fact is the United States produces more food with

141
00:09:22,559 --> 00:09:26,440
Speaker 1: less environmental damage than virtually any other country in the world.

142
00:09:27,160 --> 00:09:29,800
Speaker 1: We also have some of the most pristine federal lands

143
00:09:29,840 --> 00:09:33,719
Speaker 1: in the world with conservation programs that are funded by

144
00:09:33,720 --> 00:09:37,240
Speaker 1: our energy production and by the sportsmen and ranchers who

145
00:09:37,360 --> 00:09:40,760
Speaker 1: utilize those lands for hunting, fishing, and livestock. The US

146
00:09:40,800 --> 00:09:45,160
Speaker 1: Department of Agriculture's Conservation Reserve Program pays a yearly rental

147
00:09:45,200 --> 00:09:49,400
Speaker 1: payment in exchange for farmers who remove environmentally sensitive land

148
00:09:49,400 --> 00:09:53,480
Speaker 1: from agricultural production and who plant species that will improve

149
00:09:53,600 --> 00:09:56,800
Speaker 1: environmental quality. What this has done is it's meant that

150
00:09:56,800 --> 00:09:59,720
Speaker 1: the farmers are focused on the best land for growing

151
00:10:00,000 --> 00:10:04,199
Speaker 1: ops are taking out of production the least useful land.

152
00:10:04,640 --> 00:10:07,640
Speaker 1: They get paid by you, the taxpayer, and the result

153
00:10:07,760 --> 00:10:10,720
Speaker 1: is you have a great deal more land that is

154
00:10:10,760 --> 00:10:14,720
Speaker 1: being in reserve and that helps the environment. It's just

155
00:10:14,840 --> 00:10:17,440
Speaker 1: remarkable how much time and energy we have gone into

156
00:10:17,480 --> 00:10:19,760
Speaker 1: this whole program. And in fact, the US Department of

157
00:10:19,800 --> 00:10:25,240
Speaker 1: Agriculture has an entire Farmable Wetlands program designed to restore

158
00:10:25,320 --> 00:10:28,480
Speaker 1: wet lands and wetland buffer zones that have been farmed

159
00:10:28,960 --> 00:10:31,240
Speaker 1: and the result is that they give farmers and wrenchers

160
00:10:31,559 --> 00:10:35,960
Speaker 1: rental payments in return for restoring the wetlands and establishing

161
00:10:35,960 --> 00:10:38,840
Speaker 1: the plant cover. And you really see this when you

162
00:10:38,880 --> 00:10:41,800
Speaker 1: look at the number of birds who are now once

163
00:10:41,840 --> 00:10:45,800
Speaker 1: again flying over, many of them in a migratory pattern,

164
00:10:46,160 --> 00:10:50,760
Speaker 1: and the impact of having enough wetland for the various

165
00:10:50,960 --> 00:10:55,440
Speaker 1: birds to use is just astonishing, and re establishing very

166
00:10:55,600 --> 00:10:58,520
Speaker 1: very large flocks of a species that at one time

167
00:10:58,559 --> 00:11:03,040
Speaker 1: were in danger, frankly, of disappearing. We've also worked to

168
00:11:03,160 --> 00:11:06,560
Speaker 1: prove in America that you don't have to choose between

169
00:11:06,559 --> 00:11:11,000
Speaker 1: a cleaner planet and a better economy. Between nineteen seventy

170
00:11:11,000 --> 00:11:16,120
Speaker 1: and twenty nineteen, the combined emissions of pollutants dropped by

171
00:11:16,200 --> 00:11:20,000
Speaker 1: seventy seven percent in the US, while the US economy

172
00:11:20,160 --> 00:11:24,000
Speaker 1: grew by two hundred and eighty five because of the

173
00:11:24,040 --> 00:11:28,200
Speaker 1: application of science and technology, and because of the right incentives,

174
00:11:28,600 --> 00:11:32,200
Speaker 1: and because of a commitment to educating people about how

175
00:11:32,240 --> 00:11:35,240
Speaker 1: they could be more effective. And in fact, in the

176
00:11:35,280 --> 00:11:38,160
Speaker 1: recent past, from two thousand and five to twenty eighteen,

177
00:11:38,600 --> 00:11:43,679
Speaker 1: total US energy related carbon dioxide emissions fell by twelve percent.

178
00:11:44,160 --> 00:11:49,640
Speaker 1: So we're busy investing heavily bringing our systems into line,

179
00:11:50,200 --> 00:11:54,160
Speaker 1: having less and less carbon dioxide emissions. At the same time,

180
00:11:54,200 --> 00:11:57,400
Speaker 1: the China and India, with half the world's population, are

181
00:11:57,520 --> 00:12:01,320
Speaker 1: dramatically ramping up. And you understand it. These are very

182
00:12:01,360 --> 00:12:04,960
Speaker 1: poor countries. They are desperate to provide a better standard

183
00:12:04,960 --> 00:12:08,000
Speaker 1: of living for their people, and the least expensive way

184
00:12:08,040 --> 00:12:11,079
Speaker 1: to do that is to invest in coal plants on

185
00:12:11,120 --> 00:12:15,160
Speaker 1: a huge, huge scale. The fact is that the United

186
00:12:15,200 --> 00:12:18,040
Speaker 1: States has continued to be the leader in the world,

187
00:12:18,320 --> 00:12:21,440
Speaker 1: which is part of why it's ironic when environmentalist attacked

188
00:12:21,720 --> 00:12:25,439
Speaker 1: the Trump administration for withdrawing from the Paris Accord, because

189
00:12:25,440 --> 00:12:28,760
Speaker 1: the fact is the policies we were following were better

190
00:12:28,880 --> 00:12:34,320
Speaker 1: than the Paris Agreement, produced better results, produced a better

191
00:12:34,640 --> 00:12:37,600
Speaker 1: production of the economy, or at the same time, producing

192
00:12:37,880 --> 00:12:41,960
Speaker 1: a more dramatic decline and energy In twenty nineteen alone,

193
00:12:42,440 --> 00:12:46,280
Speaker 1: the US saw a decline and energy related carbon dioxide

194
00:12:46,280 --> 00:12:50,199
Speaker 1: emissions by two point nine percent in one year. For

195
00:12:50,360 --> 00:12:54,960
Speaker 1: twenty seventeen and twenty nineteen, the combined critical air polluting

196
00:12:55,040 --> 00:12:58,880
Speaker 1: emissions dropped seven percent. So here you have a growing

197
00:12:58,920 --> 00:13:04,800
Speaker 1: economy using better technology, using better approaches, actually reducing its

198
00:13:04,880 --> 00:13:09,360
Speaker 1: burden on the environment while people live better lifestyles. In

199
00:13:09,559 --> 00:13:15,520
Speaker 1: twenty nineteen, the Environmental Protection Agency actually completed twenty seven

200
00:13:15,720 --> 00:13:20,120
Speaker 1: Superfund sites, the largest number from the National Priorities List

201
00:13:20,360 --> 00:13:23,360
Speaker 1: since two thousand and one. So it was possible to

202
00:13:23,440 --> 00:13:28,840
Speaker 1: have a practical, common sense approach. Now, by contrast, what

203
00:13:29,080 --> 00:13:32,200
Speaker 1: the woke left ones to do and what the big

204
00:13:32,240 --> 00:13:35,280
Speaker 1: government socialists want to do kills the economy and doesn't

205
00:13:35,280 --> 00:13:38,080
Speaker 1: get you very much on the environment. There's an American

206
00:13:38,080 --> 00:13:41,280
Speaker 1: Action Forum report that the Green New Deal would cost

207
00:13:41,760 --> 00:13:47,080
Speaker 1: somewhere around fifty two trillion dollars over the next ten years,

208
00:13:47,120 --> 00:13:50,640
Speaker 1: but could be as high as ninety three trillion dollars

209
00:13:50,640 --> 00:13:53,600
Speaker 1: over the next ten years. The Biden illinistration has already

210
00:13:53,679 --> 00:13:58,280
Speaker 1: rolled out five billion dollars to fund adding electric vehicle

211
00:13:58,360 --> 00:14:01,120
Speaker 1: chargers across the nation over the next five years. And

212
00:14:01,160 --> 00:14:05,760
Speaker 1: by the way, nobody who talks about electric vehicles talks

213
00:14:05,800 --> 00:14:08,640
Speaker 1: about where the electricity is going to come from. I mean,

214
00:14:08,679 --> 00:14:10,920
Speaker 1: if we had every electric vehicle on the road that

215
00:14:11,080 --> 00:14:14,120
Speaker 1: people would like to have, thought, California would see the

216
00:14:14,280 --> 00:14:18,319
Speaker 1: entire grid breakdown and you wouldn't have any electric lights.

217
00:14:18,320 --> 00:14:20,480
Speaker 1: Because we're not talking about how are you going to

218
00:14:20,560 --> 00:14:24,200
Speaker 1: invest both in the production of electricity, Where's it going

219
00:14:24,240 --> 00:14:26,840
Speaker 1: to come from? I would argue that if you're willing

220
00:14:26,840 --> 00:14:32,280
Speaker 1: to talk about a next generation modular small nuclear power system,

221
00:14:32,440 --> 00:14:36,080
Speaker 1: that makes some sense and that could actually work. But

222
00:14:36,160 --> 00:14:39,320
Speaker 1: if you're going to talk about providing the electricity for

223
00:14:39,800 --> 00:14:43,520
Speaker 1: fifty or one hundred million electric cars through purely green

224
00:14:43,720 --> 00:14:47,560
Speaker 1: wind and solar, it's not going to happen. And in fact,

225
00:14:47,600 --> 00:14:50,920
Speaker 1: Great Britain just discovered recently that when the wind stops,

226
00:14:51,200 --> 00:14:54,040
Speaker 1: it turns out the windmill stops. This came as a

227
00:14:54,120 --> 00:14:57,840
Speaker 1: huge shock because they had relied so heavily on wind

228
00:14:57,840 --> 00:14:59,800
Speaker 1: power and nobody had said what are we going to

229
00:14:59,840 --> 00:15:04,040
Speaker 1: do if the windpower disappears? So, you know, the Biden administration,

230
00:15:04,200 --> 00:15:07,560
Speaker 1: faced with a dramatic rise in gasoline prices, once to

231
00:15:07,560 --> 00:15:10,880
Speaker 1: have a fifty percent increase of new vehicle sales that

232
00:15:10,920 --> 00:15:15,280
Speaker 1: are electric by two thirty. They claim that would reduce

233
00:15:15,360 --> 00:15:18,800
Speaker 1: the transportation related emissions and help put the US on

234
00:15:18,840 --> 00:15:21,680
Speaker 1: a path to net zero emissions by new lead in

235
00:15:21,680 --> 00:15:25,880
Speaker 1: twenty and fifty. My question is where's the electricity coming from?

236
00:15:25,920 --> 00:15:28,480
Speaker 1: What kind of system are you going to use? What

237
00:15:28,560 --> 00:15:30,920
Speaker 1: does it take to build the grid? Remember, building an

238
00:15:30,920 --> 00:15:35,680
Speaker 1: electric grid takes energy building a windmill takes energy. A

239
00:15:35,720 --> 00:15:37,760
Speaker 1: lot of these things also, by the way, require the

240
00:15:37,880 --> 00:15:41,760
Speaker 1: use of exotic minerals and are much more complicated than

241
00:15:42,360 --> 00:16:05,080
Speaker 1: people think. On the Republican side, Leader Kevin McCarthy and

242
00:16:05,200 --> 00:16:09,920
Speaker 1: the House Republicans created an Energy Innovation Agenda or they

243
00:16:09,960 --> 00:16:15,080
Speaker 1: introduced nearly three dozen bills and energy innovation, clean energy, infrastructure,

244
00:16:15,520 --> 00:16:20,480
Speaker 1: natural solutions, and conservation. According to the Energy Innovation Agenda

245
00:16:20,520 --> 00:16:25,800
Speaker 1: website quote, Unlike expensive, haphazard proposals like the Green New Deal,

246
00:16:26,280 --> 00:16:29,720
Speaker 1: this legislation will have an immediate, lasting impact on Earth's

247
00:16:29,800 --> 00:16:35,800
Speaker 1: changing climate without sacrificing American jobs or our competitiveness. They

248
00:16:35,800 --> 00:16:39,520
Speaker 1: introduced several bills focusing on nuclear power and nuclear energy,

249
00:16:39,560 --> 00:16:43,120
Speaker 1: which I think is the absolute key to breaking out

250
00:16:43,160 --> 00:16:47,760
Speaker 1: on carbon production. If you're really serious about minimizing carbon production,

251
00:16:48,240 --> 00:16:50,520
Speaker 1: not just for the US, but for China and India,

252
00:16:50,880 --> 00:16:54,160
Speaker 1: you want to have first of all, the maximum use

253
00:16:54,160 --> 00:16:58,320
Speaker 1: of natural gas and second the maximum use of modular

254
00:16:58,880 --> 00:17:05,200
Speaker 1: new resafe by electric generating nuclear power systems. These technologies exist,

255
00:17:05,359 --> 00:17:09,440
Speaker 1: it's very clear, they work. They are extraordinarily stable, they're

256
00:17:09,520 --> 00:17:13,680
Speaker 1: much simpler than the old gigantic systems of the past,

257
00:17:13,720 --> 00:17:16,399
Speaker 1: and they are clearly a major part of the future. So,

258
00:17:16,640 --> 00:17:21,440
Speaker 1: for example, representing Patrick McHenry introduced the International Nuclear Energy

259
00:17:21,520 --> 00:17:28,920
Speaker 1: Financing Act. This bill would established forest conservation practices through management, reforestation,

260
00:17:29,320 --> 00:17:33,480
Speaker 1: and utilization to lead to the sequestration of greenhouse gases

261
00:17:33,680 --> 00:17:38,040
Speaker 1: and for other purposes. Representing Richard Hudson introduced the Advanced

262
00:17:38,119 --> 00:17:41,639
Speaker 1: Nuclear Deployment Act. The SPILL would set forth requirements to

263
00:17:41,760 --> 00:17:47,000
Speaker 1: provide for the rapid deployment of these new modular nuclear reactors.

264
00:17:47,440 --> 00:17:51,840
Speaker 1: Representing Bill Johnson introduced the Strengthening American Nuclear Competitiveness Act.

265
00:17:52,080 --> 00:17:57,200
Speaker 1: This bill would require expediting consideration of certain nuclear technology exports.

266
00:17:57,920 --> 00:18:02,399
Speaker 1: Representing Robert Latta introduced Nuclear Prosperity and Security Act. This

267
00:18:02,560 --> 00:18:05,879
Speaker 1: build establish and operate a uranium reserve to ensure the

268
00:18:05,880 --> 00:18:09,879
Speaker 1: availability of uranium mind in the United States. You know,

269
00:18:10,280 --> 00:18:13,119
Speaker 1: I believe when you look around the world, as of

270
00:18:13,760 --> 00:18:18,359
Speaker 1: twenty twenty two, there were fifty five nuclear reactors under construction,

271
00:18:19,080 --> 00:18:22,560
Speaker 1: fifteen of them in China, six in India, four in

272
00:18:22,640 --> 00:18:25,879
Speaker 1: South Korea, four in Russia, and only two in the

273
00:18:25,960 --> 00:18:30,200
Speaker 1: United States. And yet we created the nuclear power industry.

274
00:18:30,720 --> 00:18:36,440
Speaker 1: We know that you can build extraordinarily safe nuclear power facilities,

275
00:18:36,760 --> 00:18:41,440
Speaker 1: and you can in fact generate energy for electric cars

276
00:18:41,560 --> 00:18:44,600
Speaker 1: or for your air conditioning or whatever you want with

277
00:18:44,800 --> 00:18:48,680
Speaker 1: virtually no carbon. And so it is in the long run,

278
00:18:48,760 --> 00:18:53,240
Speaker 1: a major breakthrough according to the US Energy Information Administration quote,

279
00:18:53,680 --> 00:18:57,800
Speaker 1: Unlike fossil fuel fired power plants, nuclear reactors do not

280
00:18:58,000 --> 00:19:02,200
Speaker 1: produce air pollution or carbon dioxide. According to the Nuclear

281
00:19:02,280 --> 00:19:07,840
Speaker 1: Energy Institute quote, every year, nuclear generated electricity saves our

282
00:19:07,880 --> 00:19:12,880
Speaker 1: atmosphere from more than four hundred and seventy million metric

283
00:19:12,920 --> 00:19:15,960
Speaker 1: tons of carbon dioxide emissions that would otherwise come from

284
00:19:16,000 --> 00:19:21,800
Speaker 1: fossil fuers. So if you're serious about reducing the carbon imprint,

285
00:19:21,840 --> 00:19:25,960
Speaker 1: and if you're serious about having electric cars in the

286
00:19:26,040 --> 00:19:28,680
Speaker 1: long one, you will be forced to look at modular

287
00:19:29,000 --> 00:19:32,439
Speaker 1: nuclear energy plants and these new models. Now, there are

288
00:19:32,440 --> 00:19:36,720
Speaker 1: several other steps towards energy innovation. Representive Kathey mc morris

289
00:19:36,800 --> 00:19:41,600
Speaker 1: Rodgers introduced the Hydropower Clean Energy Future Act to modernize

290
00:19:41,880 --> 00:19:46,399
Speaker 1: the hydropower licensing process and promote the next generation of

291
00:19:46,520 --> 00:19:51,320
Speaker 1: hydropower projects. Representive Gregg Pence introduced the Clean Energy Hydrogen

292
00:19:51,320 --> 00:19:54,919
Speaker 1: Innovation Act to expand the types of hydrogen projects that

293
00:19:55,000 --> 00:19:58,200
Speaker 1: are eligible for loan guarantees from the Department of Energy.

294
00:19:58,680 --> 00:20:02,840
Speaker 1: Representative Dave McKinley introduced the Innovation Act, which would amend

295
00:20:02,920 --> 00:20:06,399
Speaker 1: Title seventeen of the Energy Policy Act of two thousand

296
00:20:06,440 --> 00:20:10,040
Speaker 1: and five relating to the eligibility for loan guarantees for

297
00:20:10,200 --> 00:20:14,920
Speaker 1: carbon capture, utilization and storage projects. In other words, there's

298
00:20:14,960 --> 00:20:18,600
Speaker 1: a whole philosophy that says, one technique is to put

299
00:20:18,680 --> 00:20:21,919
Speaker 1: less carbon in the atmosphere. Another technique is to figure

300
00:20:21,920 --> 00:20:25,879
Speaker 1: out technologies that take carbon out of the atmosphere and

301
00:20:26,040 --> 00:20:28,919
Speaker 1: store them or use them for other purposes. Iceland has

302
00:20:28,960 --> 00:20:32,200
Speaker 1: been a real leader and for example taking carbon out

303
00:20:32,200 --> 00:20:36,440
Speaker 1: of the atmosphere and turning it into building the materials previsidy.

304
00:20:36,520 --> 00:20:41,439
Speaker 1: Michael Waltz introduce the American Critical Mineral Independence Act of

305
00:20:41,480 --> 00:20:45,000
Speaker 1: twenty twenty one to provide support for a domestic supply

306
00:20:45,080 --> 00:20:49,200
Speaker 1: of critical minerals. Established deadlines to complete the environmental review

307
00:20:49,200 --> 00:20:52,480
Speaker 1: of critical mineral projects on federal land. And by the way,

308
00:20:52,480 --> 00:20:55,480
Speaker 1: critical minerals become a very big deal if you're worried

309
00:20:55,480 --> 00:20:58,560
Speaker 1: about China, because far too many of them today are

310
00:20:58,600 --> 00:21:01,720
Speaker 1: being produced only in China, or primarily in China, or

311
00:21:01,760 --> 00:21:04,880
Speaker 1: in China and Russia. And so there's a real vulnerability

312
00:21:04,920 --> 00:21:08,920
Speaker 1: for the US in that area. Representative Frank Lucas introduced

313
00:21:08,960 --> 00:21:12,720
Speaker 1: the Securing American Leadership and Science and Technology Act, which

314
00:21:12,720 --> 00:21:18,960
Speaker 1: would authorize programs, projects, and activities focused on energy science research. Now,

315
00:21:19,000 --> 00:21:21,320
Speaker 1: I think the point of all this is that you

316
00:21:21,440 --> 00:21:25,560
Speaker 1: can develop new technologies, new approaches. That's what we've been

317
00:21:25,600 --> 00:21:29,280
Speaker 1: doing for several centuries now, and the result is that

318
00:21:29,440 --> 00:21:33,680
Speaker 1: we produce more food with fewer farmers with less impact

319
00:21:33,720 --> 00:21:38,240
Speaker 1: on the environment. We produce more manufactured products with fewer

320
00:21:38,280 --> 00:21:41,520
Speaker 1: people with less impact on the environment. And we have

321
00:21:41,600 --> 00:21:47,760
Speaker 1: historically used science and technology powered by entrepreneurship within a

322
00:21:48,160 --> 00:21:52,280
Speaker 1: free market framework to enable us to invent over and

323
00:21:52,320 --> 00:21:55,800
Speaker 1: over and over again new and better approaches. And I

324
00:21:55,840 --> 00:21:59,240
Speaker 1: think that these bills are steps in that direction. But

325
00:21:59,320 --> 00:22:03,879
Speaker 1: in addition, there are several really exciting bills about conservation

326
00:22:04,000 --> 00:22:09,040
Speaker 1: solutions that involve the natural world. Representing Bruce Westerman introduce

327
00:22:09,119 --> 00:22:12,040
Speaker 1: the Trillion Trees Act, which has one hundred and two

328
00:22:12,040 --> 00:22:14,679
Speaker 1: co sponsors, both Democrats and Republicans. This is one of

329
00:22:14,680 --> 00:22:17,720
Speaker 1: my favorites. If you look at a map of North

330
00:22:17,720 --> 00:22:21,600
Speaker 1: and South Korea, South Korea is filled with forests. North

331
00:22:21,680 --> 00:22:23,960
Speaker 1: Korea isn't because it's so poor, they've been cutting down

332
00:22:24,000 --> 00:22:26,080
Speaker 1: the trees. If you look at a map of the

333
00:22:26,119 --> 00:22:29,960
Speaker 1: Middle East, Israel is filled with forest because they have,

334
00:22:30,080 --> 00:22:33,359
Speaker 1: in fact had a program to go out and create forests. Now,

335
00:22:33,640 --> 00:22:38,879
Speaker 1: if you plant enough trees, they absorb carbon. They also

336
00:22:38,920 --> 00:22:43,200
Speaker 1: produce actually better environment for rain and so as a result,

337
00:22:43,280 --> 00:22:46,240
Speaker 1: you can reclaim large parts of the desert by the

338
00:22:46,320 --> 00:22:50,240
Speaker 1: gradual process of introducing more and more trees. And that's

339
00:22:50,240 --> 00:22:54,160
Speaker 1: where a Representative Westerman's program on planting a trillion trees,

340
00:22:54,200 --> 00:22:56,960
Speaker 1: which is a lot of trees, really would have a

341
00:22:57,119 --> 00:23:02,760
Speaker 1: huge change impact. Representative Cliff introduced the SOS for Seedling Act,

342
00:23:02,960 --> 00:23:06,160
Speaker 1: which would address the nationwide shortage of tree seedlings. I'll

343
00:23:06,160 --> 00:23:08,840
Speaker 1: bet you didn't know that we have a shortage of seedlings,

344
00:23:08,840 --> 00:23:10,919
Speaker 1: but we do, and this is a step in the

345
00:23:10,960 --> 00:23:15,480
Speaker 1: direction of solving them. Representative Doug Lamalpha introduced the Restore Act,

346
00:23:15,800 --> 00:23:18,880
Speaker 1: which would require the US Department of Agriculture to select

347
00:23:18,880 --> 00:23:22,200
Speaker 1: a forest landscape in the state to conduct a forest

348
00:23:22,359 --> 00:23:26,720
Speaker 1: landscaping project. And Representive dust Say Johnson introduced the Fire Act,

349
00:23:26,960 --> 00:23:30,119
Speaker 1: which will provide for salvage activities after a wildfire is

350
00:23:30,160 --> 00:23:34,480
Speaker 1: contained to certain National forest system lands. If you look

351
00:23:34,480 --> 00:23:37,040
Speaker 1: at the great forest fires, they're almost all caused by

352
00:23:37,040 --> 00:23:41,840
Speaker 1: really stupid policies. Historically, we had lots of relatively small fires,

353
00:23:42,200 --> 00:23:45,960
Speaker 1: and those small fires cleaned out the underbrush, and as

354
00:23:46,040 --> 00:23:50,160
Speaker 1: a result, they were almost never really giant, extremely hot fires.

355
00:23:50,480 --> 00:23:52,960
Speaker 1: I first encountered this when I was a speaker and

356
00:23:53,080 --> 00:23:56,080
Speaker 1: I went on a field trip in Idaho, and they

357
00:23:56,119 --> 00:23:59,080
Speaker 1: were showing me an area where these giant Douglas fir

358
00:23:59,160 --> 00:24:03,199
Speaker 1: trees had been damaged by fire, which they said historically

359
00:24:03,240 --> 00:24:06,639
Speaker 1: would never have happened, but it required a really dumb

360
00:24:06,800 --> 00:24:10,800
Speaker 1: environmentalist policy of not clearing out the underbrush, and the

361
00:24:10,880 --> 00:24:14,560
Speaker 1: result was that the fires grew so hot that even

362
00:24:14,600 --> 00:24:19,840
Speaker 1: these giant trees that had historically survived mild wildfires found

363
00:24:19,840 --> 00:24:23,080
Speaker 1: themselves being damaged because the heat was so much greater

364
00:24:23,119 --> 00:24:25,399
Speaker 1: than it should have been. I also happened to be

365
00:24:25,520 --> 00:24:29,840
Speaker 1: in Arizona looking at a huge stand hundreds and hundreds

366
00:24:29,840 --> 00:24:33,600
Speaker 1: of square miles of trees which had been killed by

367
00:24:33,640 --> 00:24:38,920
Speaker 1: a particular beetle. And again the fallicies don't take down

368
00:24:38,920 --> 00:24:42,119
Speaker 1: the trees, don't try to stop the beetles. The result

369
00:24:42,240 --> 00:24:45,199
Speaker 1: is you end up with huge number of dead trees,

370
00:24:45,320 --> 00:24:48,800
Speaker 1: all of whom become part of an enormous fire and

371
00:24:49,000 --> 00:24:51,960
Speaker 1: caused tremendous damage. So if you were to look around

372
00:24:52,000 --> 00:24:54,679
Speaker 1: the country, you'd be shocked how many of the worst

373
00:24:54,760 --> 00:24:58,960
Speaker 1: forest fires are in fact caused by really bad environmental

374
00:24:59,000 --> 00:25:03,720
Speaker 1: policies fundamentally violate everything we've learned about conservation in the

375
00:25:03,800 --> 00:25:07,400
Speaker 1: last one hundred and fifty years. So I look at

376
00:25:07,720 --> 00:25:11,080
Speaker 1: Earth Day and I think to myself that in the

377
00:25:11,160 --> 00:25:14,639
Speaker 1: period that we've had over the last fifty two years,

378
00:25:15,160 --> 00:25:17,680
Speaker 1: the truth is, in many ways we're much better off.

379
00:25:18,320 --> 00:25:21,119
Speaker 1: We have saved a number of endangered species that you

380
00:25:21,200 --> 00:25:23,080
Speaker 1: may have seen the picture on Fox of the seven

381
00:25:23,080 --> 00:25:26,320
Speaker 1: foot alligator that was running around at a taco bell,

382
00:25:26,840 --> 00:25:31,040
Speaker 1: and alligators were almost endangered, and now they've come back

383
00:25:31,040 --> 00:25:33,480
Speaker 1: so much that they're kind of a nuisance. You see

384
00:25:33,520 --> 00:25:37,200
Speaker 1: this happening again and again. We've had an intelligent approach

385
00:25:37,600 --> 00:25:41,919
Speaker 1: to dealing with the environment, to save endangered species, to

386
00:25:42,040 --> 00:25:45,800
Speaker 1: save beautiful areas of wildlife and wilderness, and to try

387
00:25:45,840 --> 00:25:49,640
Speaker 1: to find ways that we can have human beings cohabiting

388
00:25:49,720 --> 00:25:54,480
Speaker 1: with nature in a way that makes our lives dramatically better.

389
00:25:54,560 --> 00:25:57,840
Speaker 1: I've written recently about the work along the Chattahoochie that

390
00:25:58,000 --> 00:26:01,440
Speaker 1: my daughter Jackie has been involved with fifteen years. I've

391
00:26:01,440 --> 00:26:04,800
Speaker 1: been involved with the Chattahoochee since the early nineteen seventies.

392
00:26:05,200 --> 00:26:08,879
Speaker 1: The river is now cleaner, it has parks all along

393
00:26:08,880 --> 00:26:11,159
Speaker 1: the river. In fact, they'll eventually have over one hundred

394
00:26:11,200 --> 00:26:14,880
Speaker 1: miles of parks. It's one of the most heavily visited

395
00:26:14,960 --> 00:26:18,600
Speaker 1: rivers in the United States. And it's a great quality

396
00:26:18,600 --> 00:26:20,760
Speaker 1: of life, and it's a great area where people can

397
00:26:20,800 --> 00:26:25,239
Speaker 1: swim and fish and canoe, and it's the way we

398
00:26:25,280 --> 00:26:28,360
Speaker 1: can find a way to live together. We are a

399
00:26:28,400 --> 00:26:32,280
Speaker 1: part of our environment, and if we are good stewards

400
00:26:32,280 --> 00:26:34,800
Speaker 1: of that environment, we're going to have a much better

401
00:26:34,880 --> 00:26:38,080
Speaker 1: life living in a much better environment. And I would

402
00:26:38,119 --> 00:26:40,159
Speaker 1: like to think that that's what Earth Day tries us

403
00:26:40,200 --> 00:26:44,240
Speaker 1: to get across to people, that it is worthwhile to

404
00:26:44,280 --> 00:26:47,200
Speaker 1: think through how we can improve what we're doing. It

405
00:26:47,280 --> 00:26:50,000
Speaker 1: is worthwhile to find ways not just to have a

406
00:26:50,040 --> 00:26:53,640
Speaker 1: good environment with a bad economy or a good economy

407
00:26:53,680 --> 00:26:56,200
Speaker 1: with a bad environment, but how do we develop a

408
00:26:56,200 --> 00:26:59,159
Speaker 1: win win so that we have a great economy and

409
00:26:59,280 --> 00:27:02,080
Speaker 1: a great environment and have a quality of life that

410
00:27:02,240 --> 00:27:04,359
Speaker 1: is truly what we want to give to our children

411
00:27:04,400 --> 00:27:07,800
Speaker 1: and grandchildren. Thank you for listening. I hope that this

412
00:27:07,840 --> 00:27:10,240
Speaker 1: podcast is giving you a little bit of insight into

413
00:27:10,280 --> 00:27:12,760
Speaker 1: the environmental movement and into what we've been doing over

414
00:27:12,800 --> 00:27:17,520
Speaker 1: the years. I am deeply committed to a balanced, scientifically

415
00:27:17,520 --> 00:27:21,199
Speaker 1: based approach, and I really do believe that we have

416
00:27:21,320 --> 00:27:27,080
Speaker 1: the capacity to both solve our problems and to have

417
00:27:27,200 --> 00:27:30,320
Speaker 1: a great economy and a great environment, and I think

418
00:27:30,359 --> 00:27:39,560
Speaker 1: that's what we should be striving for. Thank you for listening.

419
00:27:39,960 --> 00:27:43,040
Speaker 1: You can read more about Earth Day and current Republican

420
00:27:43,119 --> 00:27:47,680
Speaker 1: environmental proposals on our show page at newtsworld dot com.

421
00:27:47,880 --> 00:27:51,800
Speaker 1: Newtsworld is produced by Gingwich three sixty and iHeartMedia. Our

422
00:27:51,840 --> 00:27:56,600
Speaker 1: executive producer is Garnsey Slump, our producer is Rebecca Howell,

423
00:27:56,880 --> 00:28:00,680
Speaker 1: and our researcher is Rachel Peterson. Work for the show

424
00:28:00,800 --> 00:28:04,040
Speaker 1: was created by Steve Penley. Special thanks to the team

425
00:28:04,040 --> 00:28:07,240
Speaker 1: at Gingwide three sixty. If you've been enjoying news World,

426
00:28:07,480 --> 00:28:10,400
Speaker 1: I hope you'll go to Apple Podcast and both rate

427
00:28:10,440 --> 00:28:13,520
Speaker 1: us with five stars and give us a review so

428
00:28:13,680 --> 00:28:17,240
Speaker 1: others can learn what it's all about. Right now, listeners

429
00:28:17,240 --> 00:28:20,640
Speaker 1: of news World can sign up for my three free

430
00:28:20,640 --> 00:28:24,840
Speaker 1: weekly columns at Gingwich three sixty dot com slash newsletter.

431
00:28:25,400 --> 00:28:27,800
Speaker 1: I'm Newt Gingrich. This is news world,