WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: Big Questions Through 8 Games

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:03.880
<v Speaker 1>The following is a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:03.880 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Are you ready for

0:00:07.120 --> 0:00:10.799
<v Speaker 1>a break? Yes? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely?

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Ready for a break? Yeah? And so much for that.

0:00:15.360 --> 0:00:19.480
<v Speaker 1>It's time for The Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Wait Well with Nick Eatman, David Hellman, and bar Garcia

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and Derek Eagleton. It is Tuesday, November seven, twenty seventeen,

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Season thirteen, episode number seventy. Welcome to another edition of

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>The Break, live from the s WBC Mortgage Studios at

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:38.879
<v Speaker 1>the Star. It's gonna be a good day today. We're

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:41.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a big picture look at the NFL. It's

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the mid season Cowboys that finished half their games, and

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna give you guys an idea of what we

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:48.199
<v Speaker 1>think across the board, just looking at the team in

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>a big picture way, what we think about different players,

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>different parts of the team, and hopefully set you guys

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>up for what will be an entertaining I'm sure second

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>half of the season. How's everybody doing good? Awesome, awesome?

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:05.320
<v Speaker 1>It's getting ready for tonight? Just getting ready for tonight. Oh,

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I know I know where you're going with that. You're

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna watch it live or I don't know, no, no,

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>not live, not live. He's talking about you know, two

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>years ago. On a year and a half ago, Kent

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Garrison actually said, do you know they're coming out with

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>a Rick Flair thirty for thirty And I was like, no,

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:20.759
<v Speaker 1>they're not. It's like, yeah, they are, and they've been

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the hell out of it. Oh my god. I mean

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>when you do that, when you gotta promote it, because

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 1>it's it's almost like ESPN screaming like we we cover

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>wrestling too, Like you know, you don't have to watch

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Monday Night Raw, you can watch us. That's gonna be awesome.

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>The amazing part about it is that people that have

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 1>been watching wrestling for a long time, they're watching this

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>thing because Rick Flair. I mean, like that's wrestling. Yeah,

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>we were kids, definitely that was wrestling. You know, I

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>have three of those little wrestling figures up on my

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>desk up in my office. He's one of them or

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the other two, uh sting, which you know he's a

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>fan of of the Dallas Cowboys. Yeah show yeah. And

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>then of course the all time greatest Randy matchamat Savage

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>for a minute, am I cooking. Let me take a

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>look at this. Huh, very coy. A lot of charisma,

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the most well knowing, the best looking, the best dress,

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:13.679
<v Speaker 1>custom made, the longest drop of all time. Role I

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>watch ramas. Can you tell kens excited? He's excited, But

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 1>he cannot be the most excited on our staff about this.

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I would think it has to be Rob, right. Rob's

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 1>probably the biggest wrestling fan in our group. Right, Rob's

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the biggest. No, He's one of the biggest wrestling fans

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I've ever met in my life. Yeah, right, like not

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>our group. I mean you just be like in the world. Yeah,

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>WrestleMania nineteen, he'd be like Toronto Triple H against the

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:46.639
<v Speaker 1>Rock loser leaves Town match or something whatever. Yeah, all

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 1>of us today, Okay, all right, let's get back barrass anyone.

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:57.399
<v Speaker 1>But does everyone know Rick Flair? No? I never would

0:02:57.440 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 1>have guessed that we would start this show off with

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:02.959
<v Speaker 1>with Rick Flair. Pro wrestling. Yeah, but hey works, Hey,

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>most pro wrestlers used to be football players. So they're

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:08.359
<v Speaker 1>talking a lot talking. Actually had sting on last year.

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's oh yeah, when he was here, he was on

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>talking Cowboys. Look that up? Yeah, look that up? Yeah,

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>all right, all right, let's get into let's talk some

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys we've got. You look at the NFC East right now,

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys are sitting in second place. They are at the

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 1>moment a wildcard team. You got the Philadelphia Eagles in

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 1>first place at eight and one. They'll have a bye

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>this week. Cowboys are at five and three, will go

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to Atlanta. Washington at four and four plays Minnesota. That'll

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>be a tough game. Minnesota now at six and two

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>and leading their division. And then of course the Giants,

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>they're one and seven and they'll be facing the OE

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>nine San Francisco forty nine. Is that should be fun?

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>That's my steam. Somebody will be watching that, I'm sure.

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>All right. So here's the interesting part though, when you

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>start looking at the wildcard race and some of the

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>teams that are involved there. Right now, Carolina is the

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>other wild card team at six and three. But listen

0:03:58.200 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>to these other teams that are kind of in that

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>mixed with the Cowboys and the and the Panthers. You

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 1>got Seattle at five and three, got Atlanta at four

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and four, Washington and Arizona at four and four, Detroit

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>at four and four, and Green Bay at four and four.

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>And the best part about that for the Cowboys is

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>there's only one team in that mix that has a

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>head to head tie break over them, and it's the

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 1>one that's going the opposite way, which is Green Bay

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:23.599
<v Speaker 1>at four and four. The rest of these teams either

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys have already beaten them or the Cowboys play

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 1>them at some point this season. So everything sits right

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>in front of the Cowboys. Here's the question for you guys.

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Who scares you? You You look around the NFC right now.

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers is obviously out of the mix. Who scares

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>you in the NFC at this point? That's second circuit

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 1>cord or something like that. Yeah, that's that's the scariest

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>thing you gotta face. Three judge three judge panel in

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>New York is pretty scary. Yeah, that that right there.

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not trying to funny. That's it's true. That

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:53.559
<v Speaker 1>is true. I mean because we feel like with Zeke

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and they can they can compete with it. I mean

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:01.480
<v Speaker 1>they can beat anyone handily. Really, um Dick can compete

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>with anyone for sure on any place. And and we

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>know that this league now is and I said to

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 1>the other day, it's it's becoming a sixty forty league

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:12.280
<v Speaker 1>for fans. So you got to go on the road

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and win, but you'll have fans there at home. You

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>got to deal with it, you know. I mean Dak's

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to like quiet the crowd and like that only

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>down in that chief's end zone. Like that didn't help,

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>you know. So I'm just saying this team has a

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:29.359
<v Speaker 1>chance to win with Zeke, but with who scares you?

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I'll let Dave answer that. Who's who

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:35.599
<v Speaker 1>scares this team? Well, our listeners have let me know

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 1>how much they don't appreciate how much I respect Aaron Rodgers,

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>which so he's not an option. So if teams that

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:47.040
<v Speaker 1>have just like next level Hall of Fame caliber quarterback

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 1>player are always going to worry me, Like that's the

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 1>great equalizer, which so gods are one in seven day,

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I know that there's another team though there's another team,

0:05:56.160 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 1>which honestly I don't. Oh, I don't so this point

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:03.360
<v Speaker 1>believe that they're as good as that six game winning

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>streak indicates. But the Saints are rolling, and when they are,

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>that Superdome is a tough place to play. Is he

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the only quarterback that's that's in the NFC, that's kind

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:16.600
<v Speaker 1>of in the hunt right now, that is better than

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Dack definitively, Yes, I mean, I mean there are other guys.

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:23.599
<v Speaker 1>You would say it's right there with Zak, and you

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>can kind of Carson Carson Wentz is playing better than

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Dak because he's doing it there. Their success is a

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of because of him. Cowboy success is a lot

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:36.479
<v Speaker 1>of him and Zeke. But this, this goes back to

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:38.559
<v Speaker 1>the conversation we had two or three weeks ago, which

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Breeze is probably the only guy in the NFC that

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>is inarguably a better quarterback than Dak. I think Russell

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Wilson probably deserves getting there. He deserves some credit there.

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:52.840
<v Speaker 1>And if you just want to talk resume, then you

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 1>gotta throw Eli in there. And but he's not in

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:58.119
<v Speaker 1>the mixing right No, Yeah, but I mean he's about

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:00.280
<v Speaker 1>his out of it as Rogers Breeze. Bree he's in

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>RUSS I think, or unless I'm just really forgetting that.

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's a guy that's taking his team to

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the super Bowl. We had this conversation though, like he's

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Jekyl and mister High. Yes he can be now

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>old song, Oh, But who's who says that though? Is

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>it Teddy Riley? I think it's Teddy Riley. Matt Matt Ryan,

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and Matt Stafford are probably on that list too, honestly.

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're just talking about playing the quarterback position.

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>What they've done and what they can do. You can

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>say that they're better than Dak right now, but I

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>mean Dak is trending that way, and I'm certainly I'm

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 1>not willing to concede on the Dak Wentz argument anytime soon.

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's gonna be fascinating but also annoying for

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>like the next decade. It's that debate quarterbacks. It's kind

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of funny when you when you have one that you

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>really like, you might argue, Okay, this guy's better, his

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>resume is better, or he's playing better, but you're not

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>trading anyone for him like you wouldn't. There's no one

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>that's the end exactly. That's a trade for Dak talking

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>about for a game a season, for a season. That's

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's kind of my I mean, the only thing,

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the only one that came to my mind was Stafford

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>because I think he's in the prime of his career.

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think he is right now, of all those

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>guys you mentioned, I think he's probably he's right up

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>there with the way he plays and how much has

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>heaped on him to be able to get his team

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>to win. Yeah, I think he's up there with those

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>those Yeah, you're right. I probably would trade for Stafford

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 1>two for one. And I'm not saying I would. That

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>just gave me pause, Like that's the guy I think

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>about it. You're right, he does a lot with less

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, it's like, oh, there's up doing

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>it back there fumbling the ball in my fantasy game

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 1>away and umtually one lesson the guy that was I

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>was playing against was ahead of me and then he fumbled.

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>You're talking about your fantasy game right now. Absolutely am

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and awful. Radio. I don't care what you have to

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 1>say about that, Mara. Yes, I would ask y'all to

0:08:57.520 --> 0:08:59.319
<v Speaker 1>do that. I didn't ask y'all to do either. We

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about her lives day, We do talk about our

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>lives fantasy football and can be. I don't think they do.

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>They absolutely do. You know, it's it's a big deal

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 1>for them mud hounds and mad dogs. What the mudhounds?

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:15.559
<v Speaker 1>What a mad dog about your awful fantasy team, the

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>mad Dogs, mad Hounds dog whatever they are, what is

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:22.439
<v Speaker 1>it mad hounds? Excuse me, the mud hounds, the mud

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>mad Dogs. We were right there. We were close. The

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>winning is team in all football. That's your fantasy team

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>doing that's a thing. This morning is just gonna responsible today,

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>one and done. She played last year, Yeah, last year.

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>It's too stressful. Yeah, it's because we did an auction league.

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll never do that again. That ever, that sucks. Ever.

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, here's what we're gonna do. I want to

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>because it's the midway point of the season. I have

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 1>some questions for you guys. We're gonna do like a

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 1>mid season recap, and these questions again, are gonna be

0:09:57.080 --> 0:09:59.839
<v Speaker 1>big picture questions about this team. And I want each

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>you guys are going to go around the table. You guys,

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>each give me an answer. Feel free. I'm gonna give

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 1>you options, but feel free to throw in another option

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 1>if you choose, if you think there's a better option

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:10.439
<v Speaker 1>out there that I missed. All right, so' gonna start

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the first question. Defensive player who has had the biggest

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>impact de Marcus Lawrence shan Lee or David Irvy you

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 1>want me to say de Marcus Lawrence, No, I don't

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the answer. The answer Sean there you go. Yeah, the

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>answer is Shaun, which is on this side of the table. Yeah,

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>am Er, what do you think you agree with that? Well?

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I think Sean Lee, Yeah, you've it's been super noticeable

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:37.199
<v Speaker 1>the impact that he can make in this defense, especially

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 1>you know when he's not there, you see how much

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that affects the team. But at the same time, I

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>would say de Marcus Lawrence, he came this season, he

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>came in doing so well that I think it just

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>feeds off everyone else on the line and it helps

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>everyone everyone, you know, play better. And I think he

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:56.839
<v Speaker 1>was a great impact. He's been great as well, No

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>doubt you can make an impact for all three because

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>David this defense is now take it to the next level.

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Since he's gotten here, he's got what six sacks in

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>what three four d four four games? Yeah, he's on

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>pace for like eighteen or something like that. I mean,

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>it's that's amazing. And then you know DeMarcus has done

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and he's I don't think he's leading the league anymore

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>in sacks, but I mean he's right there. He's only

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 1>half off Yeah, he's he's right there. He's played outstanding.

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe he couldn't get eight straight to start

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the season. At his first game with no sacks came

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>after Halloween like that. Just it's remarkable when you put

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 1>it in that perspective. But I really am at the

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 1>point they would have won at least one of those games,

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Rams or Packers. They would have won at least one

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>if Shanley had been on the field. I really do

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 1>believe that. Definitely agree with you, I really do. I

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>mean just probably probably the Rams game. Probably the Rams,

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 1>but one way or the other, I really think that

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:51.719
<v Speaker 1>would have made I mean, you're talking about razor thin

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>margin of error. Like if he makes three plays, I

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:58.080
<v Speaker 1>mean he sniffs out a screen to Kareem Hunt that

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>might have gone for a seventy yard touchdown, and he

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 1>had at least one tackle for loss on Tyreek Hill

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>two on one of those care I mean, those players

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 1>make difference. That's the difference between Todd Gurley splitting the

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>defense going fifty three yards for a touchdown. Aaron Jones

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 1>is his name, Aaron Jones the Packers. I just don't

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 1>see one hundred and fifteen yards out of him. With

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Sean Lee out there, I mean, I just don't. I

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>just think he'll stop the drive earlier, they'll sniff that

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff out. And but yeah, so to me, the answer

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 1>is Sean Lee. But those other two guys are really good.

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 1>It really illuminates how much injuries just matters so much

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>just one guy. Because even think about this, like you

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:36.839
<v Speaker 1>take you take right now, Aaron Rodgers obviously out that

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>team would have been right up there at the top

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:41.079
<v Speaker 1>of the NFC in my opinion, and right now they

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>are going the other way, and they're the way they

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>look last night. It's hard for me to fathom them

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 1>even making the playoffs. There I'm I'm stealing. I'm stealing

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>this line from r. J o'choa, who's one of the

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 1>you know cowboys. He covers the Cowboys. He does really

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>good job of it, for whatever that's worth, but he

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the twenty seventeen Packers are the twenty fifteen Cowboys. Like

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>watching that team last and just trying to make it

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:05.439
<v Speaker 1>work with less than great quarterback play. You've got some

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:07.679
<v Speaker 1>playmakers on defense who are trying to make it work.

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, it's not like they got their doors

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>blown off in that game last night. But you just

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:13.719
<v Speaker 1>you gotta have quarterback play in this league. You have

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to ye, all right. Next question, who was or will

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>be missed more David Irving during the first four games

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 1>of the season or Brian Price during the rest of

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the season. I think it. I think Brian Price has

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 1>been playing well and they are thin at one tech,

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know, depending on what they do here, that

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 1>could be something that matters. But I'm not I'm not

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>ready to give him that kind of status just yet

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to where you know, I don't know that it's going

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to drastically change what the defense looks like without him.

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>They signed Nick Haden yet, Is Nick Hayden still around?

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Is he available? I do wonder about that though, I mean,

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>logic I don't know if he's around. I don't know.

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Logic says you would sign Lewis Neil because he's not

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:58.679
<v Speaker 1>a one time I know that's but you carried him

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>on your practice squad, you liked him enough to keep

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:02.959
<v Speaker 1>him around. You almost put him on your fifty three.

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>And these guys always tend to favor their guys more

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>than somebody else's guy. But he really doesn't fit what

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 1>they need right right, and That's exactly why I asked

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>this question the way that I did. I think conventional

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:16.319
<v Speaker 1>wisdom would say it's David Irving. But I think when

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 1>you look at the way this team is constructed, and

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you look at what they have on their practice squad,

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Brian Price really was their big body. They don't have

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>other big bodies. I actually have Ash now, Yeah, but

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's the same Like I don't. I

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>don't see him as like you look at Brian Price.

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 1>He is just a mean, he's a just a massive

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>dude can full of dirt. Yeah, and they don't have

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't seem like even Ash. I don't think it's

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>that kind of guy, Like he's not that big. And

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and I just I was actually hoping before this game,

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I was saying I really wanted them to do more

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>with keeping Brian Price in there and rotating Malie Collins

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>at three technique with David Irving because I thought you

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>would get more out of Malie Collins, you know. But

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I think right now, I just I don't like what

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>they have left at at the one technique. I don't

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>think they have a guy that really these just a

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, basically suck up two blockers and consistently be

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 1>able to hold a point of attack like that. Well,

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>let me throw this out. Let me rephrase what I

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>was trying to say. It's Tuesday morning, and we haven't

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>heard anything about workouts, which we probably would have if

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that was normally happen. Yeah, like tuesdays, that off day

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>they get into practice tomorrow, this would be the day

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>that they'd be working guys out if they were planning

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>on signing somebody from outside. And maybe they will, but

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>typically we hear about those types of things late Monday night,

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>early Tuesday morning, and I haven't heard anything. No, I

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>haven't heard anything about a workout. But don't forget that

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>they have worked out guys on a regular basis. And

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm sure they're keeping track on these, you know,

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>defensive tackle or if there was one in the last

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 1>few weeks. So, okay, this guy's good or not. I

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>just wonder, and again I could be wrong. Maybe they'll

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 1>work a guy out, maybe they'll just bring a guy in.

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>But you've got Irving who can play tackle, You've got

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Tyrone who can move inside. You've still got Malik and

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Ash there. You could call up Neil and I'll say

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>it for the million of time, even though they don't

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>want to do it. You could also play Taco at

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 1>tackle if you wanted to. So they got the options.

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 1>They don't have that big body. I agree with you,

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>But well, they'll keep they'll keep having. The assumption will

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>be they'll keep Malik at one technique. He'll still be

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 1>your one technique. Ash will be a guy that rotates

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>there with him at one technic. Right, and then you

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>can Neil probably gonna if he gets thirty one teams

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>out there with the practice squad of ten guys, I

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 1>guarantee there's a big body out there. I would take him.

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Just just just go grab a big body. Yeah, he's

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 1>got to be on your roster for three weeks, but

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that's okay because Brian Price is going to be you know,

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>on ir. Yeah, I'd be interested. I mean, Malik has

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>been playing one and Ash can play one. Maybe call

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>up call up my guy, the LSU guy, and see

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>if he dish the past. I mean, I mean Jay

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Ratliffe was an undersized guy too. And I mean I'm

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 1>not to sound, you know, like Lou Holtz here, but

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying, you know, you can't underestimate the guy's heart.

0:16:56.800 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he this guy's here. You got it this far,

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and I know that. You can just see him in

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the locker room talking. This is talking about Lewis Neil.

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 1>He's chopping at the bit to get out there. I

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:09.640
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't mean, who's to say that he won't

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 1>do something? And I get well, and I guess my

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>point is you don't have to call him up to

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>play one because that's where the injury was. You can

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 1>play him at three and have some other guys. It's

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of massage it a little bit, but he can

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>do something. All right. We're gonna take our first break.

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, we'll continue this game. We want

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the best win, the worst loss, best rookie,

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>most disappointing rookie, and of course who's been the MVP.

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 1>We'll do out that when we come right back. This

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 1>is Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio. We the entertainment loving

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:38.399
<v Speaker 1>people want a smartphone build for us. With AT and

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>T and Direct TV, you can get the Samsung Galaxy

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:43.359
<v Speaker 1>Saight with an Infinity edge to edge screen. It's perfect

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 1>for entertainment. We want exactly what you just said, Buy

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>a Samsung Galaxy SA and and get one free after

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>bill credits when you buy both on AT and T

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 1>next and a direct TV. Visit your local AT and

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>T store today by each seven hundred fifty dollars on installment.

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Agree with eligible service new line is three to seven

0:17:57.560 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred fifty thousand credits over thirty months credit starting two

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>to three bill if service canceled by spanlans two taxes,

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>fees and restricts and complied liney time offices, drawfity towns.

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Star Sports Tours is the only official fan travel partner

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:11.400
<v Speaker 1>of the Dallas Cowboys, offering exclusive game weekend travel packages

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 1>with sideline access and photo ops with current players, alumni

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and cheerleaders. That's not all, though, You'll get to talk

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 1>XS and os with Senior Director of Player Personnel Will

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>McClay and of course with yours truly, me, Brian broad Us.

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:26.159
<v Speaker 1>You can trust the official fan travel partner of the

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys, and with us you'll travel like a pro.

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Visit Cowboys travel dot com to book your travel package today.

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys fans know that the second best of anything simply

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 1>won't cut it, and your skincare should be no different.

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 1>A long time locker room favorite of the players and

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 1>the official men's skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys. Dallas

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>based Jack Black is the number one best selling men's

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 1>skincare brand in the country because we make products that

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>help guys look, smell, and feel better. Visit get Jack

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Black dot com slash Cowboys to get ten dollars off

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:58.160
<v Speaker 1>your first order of fifty dollars or more. Jack Black

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Look Good, Smell good, feel good, official men skincare brand

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of the Dallas Cowboys. I hear all this talk about

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 1>what it takes to be a cowboy. Everyone's got their ideas,

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>but I just say to myself, it's what's up top

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that matters. Sure, you need men with the muscle and

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>heart to get her done. But if your scouts and

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:18.160
<v Speaker 1>coaches are listening out there a word of advice. Pick

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the man with the most well worn stetson. That's the

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>one most cut out to be a cowboy. Stetson hats

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>are handmade right here in Texas and have been on

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>cowboys heads for over one hundred and fifty years. The

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>rest of you can visit stetson dot com slash Cowboy

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 1>to find a retailer nearest you. Back to the Break

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back. It's the second segment of the Break lot

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 1>from the s WBC Mortgage Studios at the Star. We

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 1>are going through our midseason review and I'm asking these

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 1>guys questions about the team. Let's get to the questions

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 1>we got. The next question is which was the best win?

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>When at Washington with a one thirty three nineteen Week

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>eight or the Week nine victory against Kansas City where

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 1>they won twenty eight to seventeen. That's those are the

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>only options. You feel free to throw in others if

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:06.640
<v Speaker 1>you like. Now that's I mean the Chiefs, the chief skin,

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 1>It's it's got to be the Chiefs, you think. I

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 1>think it was the best game they played as a team, offense, defense,

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and special teams. I think it was the best team

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>they've beaten to this point, the only one with a

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>record above five hundred right now, if I recall correctly,

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Arizona Arizon's four four. Arizona and Washington are both best team,

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.879
<v Speaker 1>they played, best performance just all. I mean, they dominated

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a team that I expect to be in the playoffs.

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:35.640
<v Speaker 1>So that's yeah, that's the one. Yeah, it's the most

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>impressive win. It's probably not the most important, but it

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>is the most impressive win. But I'll switch it up,

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>but I'll say that the one two weeks ago was

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>was a better win. Um not from a surprising standpoint,

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 1>because obviously it picked the Chiefs to win the game,

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and I am surprised. But at the end of the day,

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 1>beating the Redskins was probably a better win because not

0:20:57.359 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>only is it a division win, it's a conference win

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to the Chiefs. That doesn't really affect you as much

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 1>other than win lost records. So I'll just I guess

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:07.120
<v Speaker 1>would just be different. I mean, I mean more impressed

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 1>with the Chiefs win, but that one going they're winning

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:11.919
<v Speaker 1>in the rain like that, doing it the way they did,

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:15.399
<v Speaker 1>the defense, shutting them down like that, playing limiting their

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 1>mistakes in that monsoon, and getting that win, getting a

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>defensive touchdown, getting Byron Jones to make play. That's big win.

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 1>And the most important part about that is they went

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>on the road to get that means they still got

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to play watching it, but they get them at home

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 1>for the second game. Amber which way do you go?

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>They were both great, But I would have to say

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>against the Chiefs, I thought they would have a good

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 1>battle against the Redskins, but I still had in mind

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that they would be able to beat them. So I'll

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>just go with the Chiefs because I definitely didn't expect

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 1>that outcome. Okay, here's a little tougher question. Which was

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the worst loss at Denver where they lost forty two

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to seventeen in week two, playing versus the Rams where

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 1>they won thirty five, I mean they lost thirty five

0:21:57.000 --> 0:21:59.640
<v Speaker 1>to thirty in week four, or playing Green Bay where

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:02.879
<v Speaker 1>they lost thirty five thirty one in week five. You

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 1>want me to say Denver, I do not want you

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 1>to say Rams, it's the Rams or I mean you

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>can throw green Bay in there too, because you have to.

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 1>We're all painful. Has to be the Rams. They they

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 1>lost because of themselves. Yeah, when you lose because of that,

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>then that just so. Are you guys not buying into

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the Rams because it does. I get the impression listening

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to you guys talk about the Rams those things where

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys should have won. I don't care anything about

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:33.920
<v Speaker 1>what the Rams have done after that. I'm just talking

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>about the sixty minutes that we watched. They were better

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:39.160
<v Speaker 1>football team. They shouldn't have lost that game. They really

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:40.959
<v Speaker 1>how Boys were better football to Cowboys were better. They

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:43.720
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't have lost. They made a mistake there. They let

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Here's here's the difference of how they've grown. They let

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a horrible mistake just kind of change the whole game

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>and they couldn't recover from. I'm talking about Switzer's fumble

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>this time against the Chiefs, worst mistake. They were able

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>to overcome that and not let it snowball, so that

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 1>there's some signs of growth there. But I think there's

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 1>really no excuse for I mean that excuse. The Rams

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 1>are playing well, they're better than we thought, but they

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>should have won that particular game. In my opinion, it's

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>got Yeah, it's got nothing to do with whether or

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>not the Rams are for real. It's got everything to

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:19.360
<v Speaker 1>do with holding an eleven point lead at home against

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:22.879
<v Speaker 1>a I mean, going back to that conversation, like, is

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Jared Goff that Aaron Rodgers type of quarterback that you're

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:27.680
<v Speaker 1>just kind of have to tip your cap. I don't

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>think so, at least not yet. They're talented team. Obviously,

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 1>they're they're in the front running to maybe even get

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a buy in the playoffs. But you got a team

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 1>down by multiple possessions at home. You need to win that.

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, going to Denver, one of the toughest home

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:45.399
<v Speaker 1>field advantages in football, playing against that defense on a

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 1>rainy day. Okay, stuff happens. You lose to Aaron Rodgers

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>with a minute to go. Okay, he's a Hall of Famer.

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:54.120
<v Speaker 1>But the Rams, that's even if they win the Super

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Bowl this year, I still won't think that will be,

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, a justifiable loss. And I'll say this too,

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I would like now Aaron Donald is going to be

0:24:01.560 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 1>a beast regardless, but I would like to see Jonathan

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Cooper now against him. Um, I think it's gonna be different. Yeah,

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I think Jonathan Cooper is playing much better. I think

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the offensive line is more a cohesive unit. And I

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>think I think you would see a better showing there

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:21.399
<v Speaker 1>than than you saw there. They still score thirty points,

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:23.719
<v Speaker 1>but I think they would be better there. I mean,

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Sean Lee there. All I know is is they could

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>have to might have to play at the Superdome, might

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.239
<v Speaker 1>have to play at all these you know Seattle, they

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>have to go to play at the Coliseum against the

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Rams in the playoffs. Like okay, okay, that's fine. Whether

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:41.440
<v Speaker 1>it'll be great, it'll be half Cowboy fans there. That

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:44.440
<v Speaker 1>would be of all the destinations they could have in

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, that sounds like the most attractive. Yeah, And

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 1>that's not disrespect toward the Ring now, it's just that

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:54.160
<v Speaker 1>everything he just said as opposed to Minnesota as loud

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:56.680
<v Speaker 1>as hell. Oh man, the Saints are loud as hell

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and have a Hall of Fame quarterback and there. I mean,

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I know that Cowboys fans travel and it's close, but

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 1>super Dome off game. No other outdoor stadiums left in

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the NFC that are at the top, like Philly is

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the only one. Philly. Yeah, because I'm thinking this is

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:14.399
<v Speaker 1>the team what I love about the Cowboys what they

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>did against Washington where I think this team, better than

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:19.879
<v Speaker 1>any of those teams were mentioning, has the ability to

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 1>go into inclement weather and really be able to play

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:24.399
<v Speaker 1>well much better than their opponent can. And I just

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you're gonna have a lot of those

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:29.399
<v Speaker 1>opportunities most seasons. But I don't remember exactly what we

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:31.159
<v Speaker 1>were just talking about, but it was something about home

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>field advantage and whatnot. I like this team on the

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:36.359
<v Speaker 1>road way better than I like. Yeah, just for whatever

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>that's worth even though you mumbled it. I agree with you. Yeah, yeah,

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:43.119
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you whenever it's like a side whenever,

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>whenever I feel like I'm saying something that might not

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>be popular with management and owner. You think you say

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 1>lower into the microphone. Yeah, exactly, awesome, Yeah, eventually you

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 1>think you can have all No, I don't think when

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the Chromos are playing it at home, they're good. But

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:03.639
<v Speaker 1>they're a lot better on the road than they are

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 1>at home, in my opinion. Like it all right? Next question,

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:10.679
<v Speaker 1>who's been the best? Rooca the son? Jordan Lewis, Xavier Woods,

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Xavier Woods, Xavier whatever, Xavier, Xavier whatever. I noticed that

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 1>you say that, But the basketball team that wins games

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 1>is x The word is Xavier, that's how you should

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>pronounce it. But Xavier Woods pronounces it xavier and it's

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 1>his name, So I'm gonna, I mean, is that technically

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the correct way to pronounce the word. Probably not, but

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that's what he wants. So okay, feel free? Yeah, wow, Xavier. Okay,

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 1>there you go. Who's been Who's been better? No? No, no,

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>that was the question. The question was best rookie shouts

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I'd say Jordan. I'm a big fan. I think we're

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>forgetting someone can't no, who no, forgetting one of the rookies.

0:26:56.800 --> 0:26:59.640
<v Speaker 1>He's coming, you'll be in the next question. So let's

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>just say with this Woods or Jordan Lewis, big fan

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:10.199
<v Speaker 1>of Xavier Woods. Jordan Lewis got no training camp, no preseason,

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 1>came in on a moment's notice in week two, and

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>he's probably not gonna make the Pro Bowl. But he

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 1>has been solid. He has been really good. I mean,

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I can't think I know, he got beat by Josh

0:27:22.680 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Doxon pretty bad in DC on a but a dropped pass.

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 1>It didn't wind up coming back to bite him. I

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 1>can't think of a lot of other players where he's

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:32.639
<v Speaker 1>been like noticeably beaten up. And at this point his career,

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:36.680
<v Speaker 1>did you say the touchdown which one oh Adams? Yeah,

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, but at one point you see those

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of plays, that play doesn't bother me. Yeah, I

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 1>don't think of that as like, oh, this rookie that

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers. They should have run the ball, perfect play ball,

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 1>a great catch and he had good coverage. That that happens,

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>that's the NFL. He shouldn't have been in that position

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 1>in the first place, and he broke up the first one.

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like you, that's a fifty fifty kind of situation.

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 1>He got fifty. I mean, I for a guy that

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:05.879
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a training camp. I don't know how you

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 1>could want more from a third round pick who's starting

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:11.360
<v Speaker 1>in his rookie season. Yeah, he's been he's been good.

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 1>So Jordan, Jordan, Jordan, everybody, Yeah, all right now most

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>disappointing rookie UM Taco Charlton, Ryan Switzer, Chidobe Ewoozia. I'm

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna cop right out of this and just say Cheeto

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 1>because he's he's not playing, and I mean it's not

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:34.160
<v Speaker 1>his fault, but he has He hasn't played since Green

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 1>Bay and he's only played in three out of eight games.

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys are optimistic he might finally start practicing this week.

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he can play against Atlanta. But he just I mean,

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 1>he was a top sixty pick. He's the guy. He

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he was. You thought he would, you know,

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 1>have a prominent role in this defense right away, and

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 1>he just hasn't happened for him. This is a good one.

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 1>You can make a case for all of them. You can, Um,

0:28:56.200 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm gonna Gowitzer hasn't done anything. He hasn't

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 1>done anything positive for the Cowboys. He's he's affected games,

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 1>but he hasn't really affected them in the right way.

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 1>And let me clarify the question when I'm saying disappointment disappointing.

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Disappointing has a lot to do with expectations. So with

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 1>that being sid, who is who's been the most? Like

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 1>when we when training camp started, even the rookie minicamp,

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 1>there was so much hype around Ryan Switzer that you

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 1>expected it to turn out pretty good, you know, once

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>he got out there on the field. Now on Taco,

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 1>speaking of Taco, I would give him the advantage of

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 1>just being like, okay, the position, it takes a while

0:29:40.160 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 1>to learn and to the point she's trying to make.

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 1>The day one talk on Taco was this is gonna

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 1>take some time. He's raw. He's probably not gonna do

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>that much. The day one talk on Switzer was like

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 1>dunbar punt returner going to the house seven times, like

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 1>all that. I mean, he was the leading returner in

0:29:57.480 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>college football. I get yeah. I mean I'm going with

0:29:59.440 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different voices a day. I mean, this

0:30:01.360 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 1>is like in a world where Lance dunbar Is at

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles ran. The Cowboys needed a new punt returner.

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 1>His name, Ryan Switzer is the newest here you go,

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 1>So I get what ambers I mean, there was a

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of hype on Ryan Switzer and not much of

0:30:22.440 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 1>it has materialized to this point. But he is also

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 1>a fourth round pick. And let's not forget he missed

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 1>what two or three weeks ye siderable time, He magnificant time.

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 1>He missed a junk of training camp. No, no, I

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 1>don't want to clarify those words. I'm just saying it was.

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 1>It was a good amount. I mean, for me, the

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 1>thing about Switzer is my expectation was that I didn't

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 1>expect much from the receiver him at receiver. I did

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 1>expect him to immediately come in and give something with

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 1>punt returns. And not only has he not really been

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the guy expected there, he's actually made mistakes there that

0:30:56.840 --> 0:30:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I thought were a little bit and seemingly uncharacteristic of

0:30:59.880 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 1>a guy who is who is so proficient at returning

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:08.239
<v Speaker 1>punt and quietly benched quietly, yeah, he was benched. I mean,

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 1>his job is to be the punt returner, and that's

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 1>really what he does. And they're saying that when it

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 1>gets down to the ten yard line, they're gonna put

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a guy that doesn't practice as much as him, that

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 1>had a concussion the week before, and he's gonna make

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 1>him the safe punt returner. That's a problem. So, I

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 1>mean they're basically saying that when it comes to making

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 1>decisions down there, that Beasley is better than Switzer. He

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 1>probably just doesn't do it all the time because Beasley

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 1>actually runs route and play I mean, and it's more

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of a part of the offense switchers out there, but

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't do it as much. So I still I

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 1>agree with everything y'all just said him. But Cheeto not playing.

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Chito was supposed to be one of the

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 1>four or five, like, I mean, he was going to

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 1>be a real member of this secondary and it just

0:31:57.160 --> 0:32:00.600
<v Speaker 1>hasn't happened for him. You know. That's the epitome of disappointed,

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 1>but very injuries versus performance. No, sure, but I mean

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 1>he just he just disappointed that you haven't. Yeah, he

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 1>hasn't made an impact on this season whatsoever, which again,

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, I'm not it's not his fault. It's

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 1>just a statement of fact and one of the things

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 1>that I think that disappoints me there it with Cheeto specifically,

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 1>is that he actually was out there during training camp

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 1>more than Jordan Lewis. And so if you would have

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 1>told me, okay, by mid season, one of these players

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:28.880
<v Speaker 1>will still be battling a hamstring injury and the other

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:32.320
<v Speaker 1>will be out there playing and playing pretty well, it

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:33.680
<v Speaker 1>would not It would have been the flip, and I

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>probably would have been a little less disappointed that Jordan

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Lewis wasn't doing it because he was battling this hamstring thing.

0:32:38.840 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Going back that far, it just kind of flipped. I

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:44.480
<v Speaker 1>have never been really down on Taco. I really haven't

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>either because the expectations right, hey, yeah, I'm okay with

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 1>it with him, I'm in I'm in a weird place.

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I think I said it a couple weeks ago, where

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 1>like I said, the expectations were never high. He was

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 1>always going to be a project. I think it's fair

0:32:58.040 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to expect a little bit more like when you're talking

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 1>about your first round pick getting seven snaps a game

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and not showing up on the stat sheet, that's problematic.

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 1>But if he I think since he started playing a

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 1>bigger role, since de Monterrey Moore was released. I mean,

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 1>he's got a sack, he's he had some pressures in

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. His performance since the bye week has been

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 1>on par with about what I wanted. But the first

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 1>five weeks, I would say not so much. And it

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 1>helps that you've got the guy leading the league or

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:30.960
<v Speaker 1>right up there in sacks and Crawford on the other side.

0:33:31.200 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 1>If Benson Mayowa was having you know, had one sack

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and was ahead of him, and Ebony's or Ecuban was

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 1>ahead of him, then that's one thing. And I was

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:40.560
<v Speaker 1>just about to ask you that question, is the success

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 1>of the defensive line? The reason why you're not so

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:46.719
<v Speaker 1>because you feel like, hey, Taco has time because these

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 1>other guys are playing so well. If they were getting

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:51.040
<v Speaker 1>very little pressure in very few sacks, I think there'd

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 1>probably be a lot more pressure, like why is this

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:55.080
<v Speaker 1>rookie that's a first round pick not doing more? And

0:33:55.160 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll say that there's a I don't know what category

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 1>he would go in, but a rookie to be somewhat

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 1>excited about. And I know you don't have to say

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 1>sell this to Dave, but Noah Brown, from from a

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 1>standpoint of he you know, young guy does his job.

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 1>He's already got that NFL body. He's gonna he's gonna

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:20.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of keep getting better and improving. And I think

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:23.799
<v Speaker 1>that when you're talking about free agency and next year

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and all that decisions that they've got to make, I

0:34:26.239 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 1>think they're gonna be really happy with Noah Brown and

0:34:29.239 --> 0:34:31.880
<v Speaker 1>getting the playing time that he's getting right now. I mean,

0:34:31.920 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I know he was an active this last week, but

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 1>they try to get him active. I mean, if if,

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 1>if they have a chance they make him active and

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:39.719
<v Speaker 1>he has a little bit of a role by going

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:42.360
<v Speaker 1>in there and blocking, he'll be Okay. This may be

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:44.359
<v Speaker 1>a really tough question to ask, but I'm gonna ask

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:47.279
<v Speaker 1>you guys, anyway, is his upside as good as say,

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 1>an undrafted guy like a Miles Austin is. Does he

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:51.400
<v Speaker 1>have that kind of potential or is he just one

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of those guys that his ceiling is kind of He

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:57.320
<v Speaker 1>can be a you know, he can be a thirty

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 1>catch a year type guy that really blocks well and

0:35:00.960 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 1>makes a few big catches for you here and there. Like,

0:35:03.080 --> 0:35:05.120
<v Speaker 1>what is his upside? What what do you think is

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the max for for where he can go? I'm I

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 1>mean I'm not trying to cop out, but I don't

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 1>even know how you answer that. Well. I think Miles Austin,

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:18.960
<v Speaker 1>though it was a phenomenal athlete like now, it took

0:35:19.040 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 1>him a while. You know, he had to run a

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:23.799
<v Speaker 1>lot of you know, routes in the backyard to really

0:35:23.880 --> 0:35:26.520
<v Speaker 1>get to the point where where he is. But but

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I just had to go out to the

0:35:29.280 --> 0:35:32.440
<v Speaker 1>house run some routes. It is true. I wish we had, uh,

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:34.400
<v Speaker 1>mister Garrett on the talk a little bit about that.

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 1>That'd be nice. He's watching tape. But I think that

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:43.840
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to compare that to Miles, because Miles it

0:35:43.960 --> 0:35:45.800
<v Speaker 1>took him at while. He didn't he just kind of

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:47.840
<v Speaker 1>blew up there in Kansas City that day. And that

0:35:47.960 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 1>was and I don't did you see that coming now?

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:52.800
<v Speaker 1>That to me will go down as one of the

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 1>top five games of all time. No, did you see

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Miles Austin coming out the years before that? Did you

0:35:57.600 --> 0:35:59.239
<v Speaker 1>see anything in him that said, man, I think this

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 1>guy really had no if he can ever get over

0:36:01.680 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the this. A week before that, I was like, this guy,

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 1>get him out of here. The week before it was Denver.

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess he didn't play. Well, it's like, what are

0:36:10.480 --> 0:36:13.080
<v Speaker 1>they still doing with this guy? And then he had

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 1>to start a game and then he just had two

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 1>fifty and another dumb we've been and then he was

0:36:17.680 --> 0:36:20.560
<v Speaker 1>off and running off and running for two or three years. Literally,

0:36:20.800 --> 0:36:22.320
<v Speaker 1>we've been I mean, we've been saying that since the

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 1>draft really and it's a good comparison though it's well,

0:36:25.840 --> 0:36:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the well he has that body, right, he's he's got

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 1>He's baby Deaz, That's what I'm trying to say. And

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:33.920
<v Speaker 1>it's ridiculous for me to say that his ceiling is

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:37.560
<v Speaker 1>eighty nine catches, eleven hundred yards and sixteen touchdowns, which

0:36:37.960 --> 0:36:39.759
<v Speaker 1>for three or four years there, that's what Dez was

0:36:39.840 --> 0:36:42.520
<v Speaker 1>reeling off. But he's that type of receiver, like he's

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:45.920
<v Speaker 1>he's not the eighty yard Antonio Brown guy. He's the

0:36:46.040 --> 0:36:48.239
<v Speaker 1>red zone mismatch. And we saw him make some plays

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:49.880
<v Speaker 1>like that in training camp. We saw him make some

0:36:49.960 --> 0:36:52.640
<v Speaker 1>plays like that in the preseason where I think it

0:36:52.719 --> 0:36:54.399
<v Speaker 1>was the rams where he just shook off a bunch

0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:56.279
<v Speaker 1>of tacklers probably would have gone to the house if

0:36:56.320 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 1>he hadn't just had a case of the whoopsies fumble. Yeah,

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:02.959
<v Speaker 1>just randomly fumbled it. But he is a big body

0:37:03.120 --> 0:37:05.400
<v Speaker 1>like he can box defensive backs out, he can go

0:37:05.560 --> 0:37:07.759
<v Speaker 1>up and high point the ball. He's a good blocker like.

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:11.359
<v Speaker 1>I think he could be a receiver in that des mold.

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Whether he'll ever reach All Pro status, who the hell knows,

0:37:14.680 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 1>but he has that type of potential to be that

0:37:17.200 --> 0:37:19.600
<v Speaker 1>type of player. We'll take our final break and come back.

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:23.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about who has been the MVP for this

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:25.120
<v Speaker 1>team during the first half of the season. I got

0:37:25.160 --> 0:37:27.600
<v Speaker 1>two offensive guys for you, and I got two defensive guys.

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:29.160
<v Speaker 1>We'll do that when we come right back. This is

0:37:29.239 --> 0:37:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio. To work this big land,

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you need equipment with values rooted as deep in Texas

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:38.600
<v Speaker 1>soil as you are. Like John Deer compact tractors with

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:41.440
<v Speaker 1>a six year power train warrant to him. Big features

0:37:41.520 --> 0:37:43.759
<v Speaker 1>that help you work less so you have more time

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to do what you love. John Deer was first in

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the Texas fields, and we're proud to be on the

0:37:48.320 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 1>field as the official agg and turf equipment of the

0:37:50.800 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys. Find Texas sized deals and my John Deer

0:37:54.080 --> 0:37:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Dealer dot com slash football terms, conditions, exclusions, and warranty

0:37:57.920 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 1>limitations apply so he can be love for details. We

0:38:00.560 --> 0:38:03.759
<v Speaker 1>the entertainment loving people, want a smartphone built for us.

0:38:04.040 --> 0:38:05.839
<v Speaker 1>With AT and T and Direct TV, you can get

0:38:05.880 --> 0:38:08.919
<v Speaker 1>the Samsung Galaxy Saight with an Infinity edge to edge screen.

0:38:09.000 --> 0:38:12.960
<v Speaker 1>It's perfect for entertainment. We want exactly what you just said.

0:38:13.200 --> 0:38:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Buy a Samsung Galaxy sa and then get one free

0:38:15.239 --> 0:38:17.440
<v Speaker 1>after bill credits when you buy both on ATNT next

0:38:17.480 --> 0:38:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and a Direct TV. Visit your local AT and T

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:21.840
<v Speaker 1>store today by each seven hundred fifty dollars on installment

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:23.600
<v Speaker 1>agreement with eligible service new line is threef to seven

0:38:23.640 --> 0:38:25.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred fifty thousan credits over thirty months, credits starting in

0:38:25.600 --> 0:38:27.360
<v Speaker 1>two to three bills. If service cancel with vice falls

0:38:27.360 --> 0:38:29.600
<v Speaker 1>two taxes, fees and restrictions apply. Limited time offices, draw

0:38:29.640 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 1>free details, Ice Cold, Doctor Pepper and the Dallas Cowboys

0:38:32.760 --> 0:38:36.280
<v Speaker 1>go way back. They belong together, like Texas and football,

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Silver and Blue shotgun formations and Hail Mary's. Having a

0:38:40.400 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys football party without Doctor Pepper is like having Thanksgiving

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 1>without the Cowboys. Basically, we wouldn't recommend it. So next

0:38:48.239 --> 0:38:51.120
<v Speaker 1>time you have a tailgate, homegate, or whatever else kind

0:38:51.200 --> 0:38:53.759
<v Speaker 1>of gate grab some ice cold doctor Pepper for you

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and your friends to enjoy. It's a Dallas Cowboys tradition.

0:38:57.360 --> 0:39:00.359
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Pepper the one you crave. It can be hard

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to find the right resource for learning about important financial matters.

0:39:04.040 --> 0:39:06.200
<v Speaker 1>You search how to build savings, you end up reading

0:39:06.239 --> 0:39:09.239
<v Speaker 1>about the one weird ingredient from supermarkets that can make

0:39:09.280 --> 0:39:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you taller. That's why Bank of America build Better Money

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Habits dot Com, a safe little corner of the Internet

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:18.480
<v Speaker 1>for answering your financial questions. Full of simple videos and tips,

0:39:18.600 --> 0:39:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Better Money Habits can show you how to make the

0:39:20.440 --> 0:39:23.320
<v Speaker 1>most of your money without resorting to random searches that

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:26.400
<v Speaker 1>always seem to lead to unbelievable photos of childhood stars

0:39:26.480 --> 0:39:29.439
<v Speaker 1>grown up. To learn more, visit Better Money habits dot Com.

0:39:31.480 --> 0:39:34.839
<v Speaker 1>Back to the Break, Welcome back. It's the final segment

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:37.280
<v Speaker 1>of The Break live from the s WBC Mortgage studios

0:39:37.280 --> 0:39:39.520
<v Speaker 1>at the Star. Nick take it away. Well, let's find

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:42.840
<v Speaker 1>a good one here, all right. Tommy John gives you.

0:39:43.560 --> 0:39:46.239
<v Speaker 1>Tommy John gives you the feed feeling of freedom ware

0:39:46.239 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 1>It accounts. It's got a contour of pounds that nestles

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the boys. What boys are we talking about here? With

0:39:52.880 --> 0:39:54.759
<v Speaker 1>over three million pair of sold. We've put in the

0:39:54.880 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 1>hustle to make sure you're nestled. This one is probably

0:39:58.320 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the worst reading that Tommy John ask but you can

0:40:01.120 --> 0:40:04.480
<v Speaker 1>still shop exclusive Cowboys underwear at Tommy John dot com

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:09.400
<v Speaker 1>for Slash Cowboys Live read seven has to go. I

0:40:09.560 --> 0:40:12.200
<v Speaker 1>really don't like referring to them as the boys. I

0:40:12.280 --> 0:40:21.880
<v Speaker 1>don't like that. No, I didn't work weeding boys a nuts. Okay,

0:40:23.640 --> 0:40:27.040
<v Speaker 1>all right, um yeah, so um let's get back to

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the game. Here the midseason review. Here's our final question

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:34.200
<v Speaker 1>of the game. Uh, it is the question of who

0:40:34.440 --> 0:40:36.799
<v Speaker 1>has been the MVP for the Cowboys during the first

0:40:36.840 --> 0:40:40.520
<v Speaker 1>half of the season. Here your candidates, Zeke Elliott, Dak

0:40:40.560 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Prescott to Marcus Lawrence and Sean Lee. Try to think

0:40:46.239 --> 0:40:48.719
<v Speaker 1>about this and don't take the obvious answer. Well, to

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:52.920
<v Speaker 1>go with Dak. He's the most valuable player. I mean

0:40:53.680 --> 0:40:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about this earlier this morning. Aaron Rodgers

0:40:56.280 --> 0:40:58.840
<v Speaker 1>is the NFL's MVP. There's no doubt about it. You

0:40:58.880 --> 0:41:00.839
<v Speaker 1>can't see what's going on here. He is the MV

0:41:01.040 --> 0:41:03.600
<v Speaker 1>as we saw with Manning years ago when this team

0:41:03.680 --> 0:41:05.960
<v Speaker 1>just fell apart. But they don't. They don't. That's not

0:41:06.120 --> 0:41:08.319
<v Speaker 1>what they want to give it to. It's like who's

0:41:08.320 --> 0:41:10.759
<v Speaker 1>having the best year? I get it, But so thinking

0:41:10.760 --> 0:41:15.000
<v Speaker 1>about that from that standpoint, though, MVP most your bull player, man,

0:41:15.320 --> 0:41:17.840
<v Speaker 1>who's provided the most of this team in the first

0:41:18.000 --> 0:41:20.040
<v Speaker 1>half of us Oh, that's a different question, is it,

0:41:20.640 --> 0:41:22.759
<v Speaker 1>Because if you're talking about who's been most valuable, then

0:41:22.800 --> 0:41:25.440
<v Speaker 1>it's probably the guy that if he's provided the most.

0:41:25.600 --> 0:41:27.759
<v Speaker 1>Take him away and you probably don't win the five

0:41:27.800 --> 0:41:30.480
<v Speaker 1>games you've I would say I'm going with Dad just

0:41:30.680 --> 0:41:34.480
<v Speaker 1>based on the circumstances, like the things he's been able

0:41:34.560 --> 0:41:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to do given the scenario that he's been put in.

0:41:38.800 --> 0:41:41.600
<v Speaker 1>That's the only reason I'm not saying, like I wouldn't

0:41:41.600 --> 0:41:44.719
<v Speaker 1>call it MVP necessarily. But but but you know what,

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:47.839
<v Speaker 1>you make a good point, and the Cowboys are lucky

0:41:47.920 --> 0:41:49.719
<v Speaker 1>that they haven't had to see that, because when you

0:41:49.840 --> 0:41:53.719
<v Speaker 1>talk about drop off from Morris, I mean from Zeke

0:41:53.760 --> 0:41:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to Morris. We haven't seen it yet, but you know,

0:41:56.840 --> 0:41:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I think they could. They could manage it, and I

0:41:59.520 --> 0:42:01.640
<v Speaker 1>think that I'll be able to manage it. You know,

0:42:01.719 --> 0:42:05.000
<v Speaker 1>with Shawn Lee, they really couldn't manage it. But Cooper

0:42:05.080 --> 0:42:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Rush is one play away, So I think actually the

0:42:07.920 --> 0:42:11.719
<v Speaker 1>answer is Dak. I want to say Zeke, And my

0:42:12.000 --> 0:42:14.440
<v Speaker 1>logic here is like, okay, well, Zeke can be the

0:42:14.520 --> 0:42:17.440
<v Speaker 1>first half MVP, and Dak is about to have a

0:42:17.560 --> 0:42:20.719
<v Speaker 1>chance to make his case probably if Zeke is suspended

0:42:20.840 --> 0:42:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and the Cowboys keep role, and then Dak is going

0:42:23.080 --> 0:42:25.000
<v Speaker 1>to get all of the credit in the world and

0:42:25.120 --> 0:42:27.960
<v Speaker 1>justifiably so m he could in the league if he

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:30.560
<v Speaker 1>keeps playing this way without Zeke and gets the Cowboys

0:42:30.600 --> 0:42:34.280
<v Speaker 1>into the playoffs. If he's not in consideration, that's a travesty.

0:42:35.040 --> 0:42:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to say Zeke in the first half, but

0:42:37.120 --> 0:42:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I even believe that, because I'm sitting

0:42:39.239 --> 0:42:43.600
<v Speaker 1>here all right. They've won five games, and every single

0:42:43.719 --> 0:42:46.640
<v Speaker 1>one when Zeke had a good game, it also was

0:42:46.719 --> 0:42:49.919
<v Speaker 1>dependent on Dak playing pretty damn well. And I'm even thinking,

0:42:49.920 --> 0:42:52.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, Arizona, did they win that game because of

0:42:52.840 --> 0:42:55.839
<v Speaker 1>Zeke or was it was it Dak? It was Dak, Bryce, well,

0:42:56.000 --> 0:42:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Bryce too, but somebody had to throw those passes exact

0:42:59.480 --> 0:43:01.400
<v Speaker 1>But how much does how much? Does? I know what

0:43:01.480 --> 0:43:03.320
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, and I agree with it, but just to

0:43:04.080 --> 0:43:06.640
<v Speaker 1>play Devil's advocate here, how much of that is, though,

0:43:06.680 --> 0:43:09.520
<v Speaker 1>dependent on the fact that the defense. The opposing defense

0:43:10.000 --> 0:43:13.560
<v Speaker 1>really creates their opportunities created because of Zeke being in

0:43:13.600 --> 0:43:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the backfield. Yeah, but remember how the Cowboys offensive line

0:43:18.800 --> 0:43:22.120
<v Speaker 1>was struggling. Even with those struggles, we've seen Dak being

0:43:22.200 --> 0:43:26.320
<v Speaker 1>able to still keep the game going and get away

0:43:26.400 --> 0:43:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and run and make the right moves that he should

0:43:29.000 --> 0:43:31.800
<v Speaker 1>be making in order to keep the offense going. So

0:43:32.160 --> 0:43:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that's why I'm saying like in that case, because again, Zeke,

0:43:35.480 --> 0:43:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you expect him to be great. You expect him he

0:43:38.120 --> 0:43:40.799
<v Speaker 1>goes up against the wall and he's gonna get those

0:43:40.880 --> 0:43:44.719
<v Speaker 1>extra yards and he's great little yards, but they all

0:43:44.760 --> 0:43:47.000
<v Speaker 1>add up at the end of the day. Again, Dad,

0:43:47.120 --> 0:43:51.000
<v Speaker 1>we talked about his sophomore year, let's call it that way.

0:43:51.160 --> 0:43:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Whether he was gonna have a slump, is that what

0:43:53.280 --> 0:43:55.920
<v Speaker 1>you guys call it slump or not? And he hasn't.

0:43:56.080 --> 0:43:59.640
<v Speaker 1>He's been great given the what has been happening to

0:43:59.760 --> 0:44:02.600
<v Speaker 1>this team so far. Yeah, they really do go hand

0:44:02.640 --> 0:44:04.320
<v Speaker 1>in hand. And I get what you're saying, and I

0:44:05.160 --> 0:44:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I say it all the time like that. My analogy

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:09.359
<v Speaker 1>is that like Zeke is the engine of the car.

0:44:09.719 --> 0:44:12.440
<v Speaker 1>He I mean, everything runs through him. He's the horsepower.

0:44:12.840 --> 0:44:15.279
<v Speaker 1>But you still need a driver to drive the car

0:44:15.400 --> 0:44:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and have it make the right decisions and go in

0:44:17.560 --> 0:44:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the right places. And Dak has been so amazing at that.

0:44:20.160 --> 0:44:23.200
<v Speaker 1>And this is such a quarterback dependent league, I'm just

0:44:23.360 --> 0:44:26.480
<v Speaker 1>always inclined to give the nod toward the quarterback if

0:44:26.480 --> 0:44:28.120
<v Speaker 1>you just had to right now, you have to give

0:44:28.160 --> 0:44:30.000
<v Speaker 1>a six game suspension to one of them? Who are

0:44:30.000 --> 0:44:33.160
<v Speaker 1>you giving it to? There? You go, yeah, I mean,

0:44:33.239 --> 0:44:35.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a no question, all right. But but I also

0:44:35.719 --> 0:44:37.799
<v Speaker 1>but but but wait, but let's take it back one step.

0:44:37.920 --> 0:44:40.319
<v Speaker 1>We started this conversation talking about Sean Lee and how

0:44:40.360 --> 0:44:43.080
<v Speaker 1>important he was to this defense. Does this thing continue

0:44:43.120 --> 0:44:45.359
<v Speaker 1>to go, Well, if he's not a part of give

0:44:45.400 --> 0:44:48.319
<v Speaker 1>it you give your suspension to him, then you gotta

0:44:48.360 --> 0:44:50.360
<v Speaker 1>give one out to somebody that no, it's not you,

0:44:50.640 --> 0:44:53.000
<v Speaker 1>not me. You gotta give you a suspension out to somebody.

0:44:53.360 --> 0:44:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, And then maybe that's not fair because the

0:44:57.200 --> 0:45:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys have padded this running back position with a full

0:45:00.239 --> 0:45:03.680
<v Speaker 1>of really good expectation and they haven't done that at

0:45:03.760 --> 0:45:07.840
<v Speaker 1>quarterback obviously, So you know that might be the drop off.

0:45:07.960 --> 0:45:10.840
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we could be one growing injury away

0:45:10.880 --> 0:45:13.200
<v Speaker 1>from having a different person in here. If chas Green

0:45:13.320 --> 0:45:17.319
<v Speaker 1>can't block on Sunday. Good point if Tyren Smith is out,

0:45:17.400 --> 0:45:21.600
<v Speaker 1>so we might have some complete different answer there. Yeah,

0:45:22.080 --> 0:45:23.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. No, I'm just gonna say I do think

0:45:23.880 --> 0:45:25.359
<v Speaker 1>that there needs to be a little bit more thought

0:45:25.400 --> 0:45:28.040
<v Speaker 1>they're given to Shan Lee, just because I do believe.

0:45:28.120 --> 0:45:30.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that they win that game against Kansas City.

0:45:30.280 --> 0:45:33.160
<v Speaker 1>You guys just said they probably win the games against

0:45:33.280 --> 0:45:35.879
<v Speaker 1>maybe Green Bay or the Rams if they have him

0:45:35.880 --> 0:45:38.479
<v Speaker 1>out there. I don't think they necessarily win against Kansas City.

0:45:38.600 --> 0:45:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they stopped that offense the way they

0:45:40.520 --> 0:45:43.200
<v Speaker 1>did without Sean Lee. Everything you said is true, But

0:45:44.719 --> 0:45:48.319
<v Speaker 1>this is a this is a middling team without Sean Lee.

0:45:48.520 --> 0:45:50.600
<v Speaker 1>But their offense is still good enough to give them

0:45:50.680 --> 0:45:54.160
<v Speaker 1>an edge in a solid chunk of their games until

0:45:54.200 --> 0:45:57.240
<v Speaker 1>they face better offenses. Yeah, this team is hopelessly lost

0:45:57.320 --> 0:45:59.560
<v Speaker 1>without Like they're only as good as their offense is

0:45:59.600 --> 0:46:02.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be. That's all that. That's that, that's just

0:46:02.320 --> 0:46:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that's it. That's the bottom line, and so you go,

0:46:05.520 --> 0:46:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm always going to give deference to and we're talking

0:46:08.000 --> 0:46:10.799
<v Speaker 1>about something that we haven't seen. Thankfully we haven't seen

0:46:11.040 --> 0:46:13.759
<v Speaker 1>dak Be you know, out of the game. But I

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:17.799
<v Speaker 1>will say, in a weird way, this sounds counterintuitive and bad,

0:46:17.880 --> 0:46:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and I get that, like kind of intrigued to see

0:46:20.719 --> 0:46:22.920
<v Speaker 1>what this will look like If Zeke isn't there, I

0:46:22.920 --> 0:46:24.960
<v Speaker 1>would prefer to not have to deal with that. But

0:46:25.160 --> 0:46:28.680
<v Speaker 1>with that, like that's just something that's on the docket,

0:46:28.920 --> 0:46:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and we all think there's a pretty good chance he's

0:46:31.040 --> 0:46:33.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna be going away. Let's talk about with that in mind,

0:46:33.960 --> 0:46:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of intrigued to see, you know, put even

0:46:36.680 --> 0:46:38.440
<v Speaker 1>more on dak shoulders. I want to see what it

0:46:38.480 --> 0:46:41.120
<v Speaker 1>looks like. I wish I could see it without accounting. Yeah, yeah,

0:46:41.160 --> 0:46:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that would be run out there and run it through

0:46:43.040 --> 0:46:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and then afterwards the game doesn't well you know this,

0:46:45.600 --> 0:46:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh this past game against the Chiefs, I was thinking,

0:46:48.680 --> 0:46:52.319
<v Speaker 1>and why aren't they running the ball more? I would

0:46:52.360 --> 0:46:54.680
<v Speaker 1>expect him to have tried to run the ball more.

0:46:55.120 --> 0:46:58.080
<v Speaker 1>But then I was really happy they didn't because we

0:46:58.239 --> 0:47:00.880
<v Speaker 1>got a chance to see what it would be like

0:47:01.840 --> 0:47:05.279
<v Speaker 1>with Dak kind of having the receivers more involved, and

0:47:05.960 --> 0:47:08.480
<v Speaker 1>they were able to do so with having Zeke kind

0:47:08.520 --> 0:47:11.400
<v Speaker 1>of like as a cushion in the back and as

0:47:11.440 --> 0:47:16.759
<v Speaker 1>a support. Now, maybe with Zeke away, they're able to

0:47:17.000 --> 0:47:19.640
<v Speaker 1>still keep that going what No, I was gonna ask

0:47:19.680 --> 0:47:21.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm asking you a follow up question that go ahead. No,

0:47:21.880 --> 0:47:24.080
<v Speaker 1>do you think that that was because the game plan?

0:47:24.400 --> 0:47:26.839
<v Speaker 1>Does that represent the game plan before they knew about

0:47:26.920 --> 0:47:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Zeke that they were gonna say, Hey, we're going in

0:47:29.200 --> 0:47:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna put this more on Dak, then we

0:47:31.480 --> 0:47:33.520
<v Speaker 1>will on the running game. And they just didn't change

0:47:33.560 --> 0:47:35.759
<v Speaker 1>it once Zeke was back. It probably did, and we

0:47:35.840 --> 0:47:41.960
<v Speaker 1>talked about that before going into the face. I'm just like,

0:47:42.080 --> 0:47:44.480
<v Speaker 1>y'all are making it sound like Zeke had ten carries. No,

0:47:44.600 --> 0:47:46.840
<v Speaker 1>but they threw the ball more than they ran the

0:47:46.880 --> 0:47:48.640
<v Speaker 1>ball this game. It was thirty three to thirty one,

0:47:49.120 --> 0:47:52.200
<v Speaker 1>So he carried the ball twenty seven times. I understand that.

0:47:52.320 --> 0:47:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying when you talk about the disparity of

0:47:55.080 --> 0:47:58.799
<v Speaker 1>running versus passing, usually in most games the Cowboys are

0:47:58.840 --> 0:48:00.919
<v Speaker 1>a run heavy team. They were not a run heavy

0:48:00.920 --> 0:48:03.719
<v Speaker 1>team this week. I get what you're saying, but I don't.

0:48:03.760 --> 0:48:06.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, ze Zeke carried the ball twenty seven times

0:48:06.400 --> 0:48:10.040
<v Speaker 1>like he was still I didn't. I it's it's it's okay,

0:48:10.120 --> 0:48:12.600
<v Speaker 1>it's fifty two forty eight, Like, yeah, that's outside of

0:48:12.680 --> 0:48:15.239
<v Speaker 1>their that's outside of their tendency, but it's not so

0:48:15.480 --> 0:48:17.640
<v Speaker 1>weird that it's like this crazy out no, no, no.

0:48:17.760 --> 0:48:20.000
<v Speaker 1>But but I do think just that one play in

0:48:20.120 --> 0:48:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the second drive when it was third and one, or

0:48:22.760 --> 0:48:24.320
<v Speaker 1>was it maybe the first drive of the game was

0:48:24.400 --> 0:48:27.400
<v Speaker 1>third and one, and he just goes back to throw it,

0:48:27.480 --> 0:48:29.359
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, why aren't we giving the ball

0:48:29.360 --> 0:48:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to Zeke here? Like I mean that play I remember,

0:48:31.719 --> 0:48:33.520
<v Speaker 1>but I don't remember a lot others of like why

0:48:33.560 --> 0:48:36.200
<v Speaker 1>aren't they running it? But when we talked about yesterday,

0:48:36.239 --> 0:48:38.520
<v Speaker 1>both those two touchdown drives that they had, the first

0:48:38.560 --> 0:48:41.040
<v Speaker 1>two touchdown drives, they had six passes to one run. Now,

0:48:41.080 --> 0:48:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of course, the last one that was in a one

0:48:43.320 --> 0:48:46.680
<v Speaker 1>minute fifty one minute thirty something seconds left in a half,

0:48:46.840 --> 0:48:48.439
<v Speaker 1>so of course they're gonna be throwing more than they're

0:48:48.440 --> 0:48:51.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna be running. But that first one that happened earlier

0:48:51.239 --> 0:48:53.920
<v Speaker 1>in the game, there was not a time situation, and

0:48:54.080 --> 0:48:56.439
<v Speaker 1>they threw the ball six times and ran it once.

0:48:56.800 --> 0:48:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Like that's not typical of the Cowboys offense. And that's

0:48:59.680 --> 0:49:01.680
<v Speaker 1>my point is there were moments in that game that

0:49:01.760 --> 0:49:03.759
<v Speaker 1>didn't seem typical, and it does make me wonder, I

0:49:03.880 --> 0:49:07.000
<v Speaker 1>know what you're saying, yes, they ran Zeke a ton

0:49:07.080 --> 0:49:09.239
<v Speaker 1>of times, and that more importantly, like they didn't pull

0:49:09.320 --> 0:49:12.080
<v Speaker 1>him out, which they usually do, especially in that third

0:49:12.160 --> 0:49:14.160
<v Speaker 1>series of the game. They did not do that. But

0:49:14.280 --> 0:49:15.880
<v Speaker 1>all that being said, I do think there was a

0:49:16.000 --> 0:49:18.160
<v Speaker 1>difference in how they call that game than they typically

0:49:18.200 --> 0:49:21.680
<v Speaker 1>call games. In my opinion, I think, man, you might

0:49:21.719 --> 0:49:24.120
<v Speaker 1>be right. I can't say that you're definitively wrong, but

0:49:24.360 --> 0:49:27.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not enough to where I'm convinced. I think Garrett

0:49:27.120 --> 0:49:29.560
<v Speaker 1>would probably say something like WHOA, each game is different

0:49:29.600 --> 0:49:32.000
<v Speaker 1>in the situation You've already told us that process. He

0:49:32.080 --> 0:49:34.680
<v Speaker 1>will say things that you don't necessarily believe every day

0:49:35.400 --> 0:49:37.919
<v Speaker 1>that really doesn't matter. But I don't know I would.

0:49:38.160 --> 0:49:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't. That's not enough of a discrepancy that I'm

0:49:41.040 --> 0:49:43.280
<v Speaker 1>jumping onto this thought. Probably, So let me ask that question,

0:49:43.360 --> 0:49:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and I'll just ask you the question in this coming week.

0:49:46.200 --> 0:49:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's assume for a second we get to the week

0:49:48.120 --> 0:49:50.480
<v Speaker 1>end and Zeke is not available to the Cowboys. Do

0:49:50.560 --> 0:49:53.360
<v Speaker 1>you expect this to be a team where they become

0:49:53.560 --> 0:49:58.320
<v Speaker 1>now more dependent on the past than the run. No? No,

0:49:58.760 --> 0:50:02.279
<v Speaker 1>I honestly, I okay, You're right. I don't always believe

0:50:02.320 --> 0:50:04.440
<v Speaker 1>everything Jason Garrett says, but I do believe him when

0:50:04.480 --> 0:50:06.319
<v Speaker 1>he says that they're not going to change a whole

0:50:06.360 --> 0:50:08.480
<v Speaker 1>lot about what they do just because Zeke's not there

0:50:08.680 --> 0:50:11.719
<v Speaker 1>until it has proven that they have to, Like they're

0:50:11.719 --> 0:50:14.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna make these teams prove that Rod Smith, Alfred Morris

0:50:14.880 --> 0:50:17.400
<v Speaker 1>and Darren McFadden can't hurt him. Before that, they just

0:50:17.640 --> 0:50:20.600
<v Speaker 1>drastically like, all right, we're it's twenty twelve. That order

0:50:20.680 --> 0:50:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Dack's throwing sixty times. No, not at but maybe I

0:50:26.080 --> 0:50:29.359
<v Speaker 1>mean it'll it'll be come down to who's who's doing

0:50:29.440 --> 0:50:32.319
<v Speaker 1>the best in the you know, the second half. Maybe

0:50:32.360 --> 0:50:35.600
<v Speaker 1>it is Rod Smith. Alfred Morris looked like he really

0:50:35.640 --> 0:50:38.440
<v Speaker 1>wanted to keep running after that one. Yeah, yeah, he

0:50:39.040 --> 0:50:41.920
<v Speaker 1>just took that Linebacker's like, what's we're going. We're getting

0:50:41.960 --> 0:50:44.200
<v Speaker 1>a first down either you can grab me all you want,

0:50:44.280 --> 0:50:46.359
<v Speaker 1>but we're gonna get eleven yards. It don't really care

0:50:46.440 --> 0:50:49.040
<v Speaker 1>what you do. Like he looked that looked like a

0:50:49.160 --> 0:50:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Zeke type of run. I'm so fascinated, Like all three

0:50:52.600 --> 0:50:54.839
<v Speaker 1>of those guys, like you know, you know, they love

0:50:55.040 --> 0:50:57.160
<v Speaker 1>their teammate, you know that they want what's best for

0:50:57.239 --> 0:50:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the team. But like they want to play and and

0:50:59.400 --> 0:51:02.160
<v Speaker 1>like I'm not saying they're like mad at Zeke or

0:51:02.280 --> 0:51:04.279
<v Speaker 1>but mad at the situation, but like that's gotta be

0:51:04.400 --> 0:51:06.560
<v Speaker 1>tough on them too, that like, you know, you think

0:51:06.560 --> 0:51:08.920
<v Speaker 1>you're getting your chance. You're like it's like and this

0:51:09.080 --> 0:51:11.239
<v Speaker 1>offensive line, it's like you're trying to get into a

0:51:11.320 --> 0:51:13.879
<v Speaker 1>Cadillac and they're like, wait a second, hang on, we're

0:51:13.920 --> 0:51:16.120
<v Speaker 1>not done with the paperwork yet. Like they want to

0:51:16.200 --> 0:51:18.160
<v Speaker 1>run behind this line just as much as anybody else. Yeah,

0:51:18.160 --> 0:51:20.080
<v Speaker 1>poor mcfad and he was gonna get a game, we

0:51:20.160 --> 0:51:22.880
<v Speaker 1>actually could play football, right, and then all of a sudden,

0:51:22.920 --> 0:51:24.680
<v Speaker 1>it's like, nah, you're going to be an active again.

0:51:24.800 --> 0:51:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I think if they get a chance to do their stuff,

0:51:28.920 --> 0:51:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying they're gonna, you know, redefine the running

0:51:31.440 --> 0:51:33.759
<v Speaker 1>back position, but I think they're like pissed off and

0:51:34.280 --> 0:51:37.239
<v Speaker 1>want to show people that they they're talented to I'll

0:51:37.239 --> 0:51:40.439
<v Speaker 1>say this, after watching last game, I feel a little

0:51:40.520 --> 0:51:45.160
<v Speaker 1>bit more I guess less worried to see the Cowboys

0:51:45.200 --> 0:51:49.160
<v Speaker 1>play without Zeke, like what they can possibly do without

0:51:49.280 --> 0:51:52.520
<v Speaker 1>having him. I'm I'm feeling a little more confident about

0:51:52.600 --> 0:51:55.920
<v Speaker 1>this team with you know, doing his app because it

0:51:56.000 --> 0:51:58.800
<v Speaker 1>was solid balance. And let me go back to this

0:51:58.920 --> 0:52:02.520
<v Speaker 1>thing I wanted to talk about. Actually what I oh?

0:52:02.960 --> 0:52:07.840
<v Speaker 1>And another thing, No, I guess defensive sometimes, but I

0:52:08.120 --> 0:52:12.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know exactly how I worded it yesterday, but I

0:52:12.080 --> 0:52:15.440
<v Speaker 1>started getting some messages from people, Oh, I'm so negative,

0:52:15.520 --> 0:52:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and do you even watch the games? Yes? I watch

0:52:18.080 --> 0:52:21.640
<v Speaker 1>every single game. I'm at every single game. Yes, My

0:52:21.840 --> 0:52:25.800
<v Speaker 1>point yesterday was I don't think the Cowboys offense suck

0:52:26.200 --> 0:52:29.719
<v Speaker 1>at all. They've been what it's fair to say average,

0:52:30.120 --> 0:52:34.120
<v Speaker 1>averaging like thirty points a game or so something like that,

0:52:34.280 --> 0:52:37.919
<v Speaker 1>but they've been very, very good at scoring points. They've

0:52:37.960 --> 0:52:41.320
<v Speaker 1>been good at the running game. Again, my point yesterday

0:52:41.600 --> 0:52:44.640
<v Speaker 1>was saying that it was to me, at least the

0:52:44.719 --> 0:52:49.000
<v Speaker 1>first time I saw them be successful as successful successful

0:52:49.480 --> 0:52:52.600
<v Speaker 1>at the passing game as they were compared to every

0:52:52.680 --> 0:52:55.359
<v Speaker 1>other game that we've seen. Yes, they've thrown the ball,

0:52:55.520 --> 0:52:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Yes they made some good catches here and there, but

0:52:58.680 --> 0:53:01.120
<v Speaker 1>they weren't very consistent at it. And this was the

0:53:01.200 --> 0:53:03.279
<v Speaker 1>one time that I thought they were actually able to

0:53:03.920 --> 0:53:07.000
<v Speaker 1>have it more consistent. And the interesting part about that point,

0:53:07.040 --> 0:53:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Amber is that it's not just Dak, it's the receivers

0:53:10.600 --> 0:53:13.359
<v Speaker 1>like until this last game, have you seen a game

0:53:13.440 --> 0:53:15.760
<v Speaker 1>this year where you had the full compliment of receivers

0:53:15.840 --> 0:53:18.360
<v Speaker 1>being a part of the game and really making plays

0:53:18.400 --> 0:53:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that made a difference. Terrence Williams obviously in what he did,

0:53:21.920 --> 0:53:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Cole Beasley with two touchdowns, Dez catching some balls across

0:53:25.040 --> 0:53:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the middle, which I think he's probably best at, and

0:53:27.280 --> 0:53:29.360
<v Speaker 1>they don't seem to find him all the time in

0:53:29.440 --> 0:53:32.640
<v Speaker 1>those situations. You know, I just think that it goes

0:53:32.680 --> 0:53:34.239
<v Speaker 1>back to what you were saying. I don't think they've

0:53:34.320 --> 0:53:36.440
<v Speaker 1>really gotten into a game this year where all those

0:53:36.560 --> 0:53:38.920
<v Speaker 1>things clicked like they should have, certainly like they did

0:53:39.040 --> 0:53:40.640
<v Speaker 1>last year, because I think they had several games last

0:53:40.680 --> 0:53:43.200
<v Speaker 1>year where they had a compliment of guys all clicking

0:53:43.280 --> 0:53:45.680
<v Speaker 1>in the passing game with the running game. How about

0:53:45.719 --> 0:53:49.120
<v Speaker 1>this that I told you right before, And you're right,

0:53:49.200 --> 0:53:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the passing game has not been there. I don't believe

0:53:52.040 --> 0:53:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Dak has a three hundred yard game yet. And the

0:53:54.600 --> 0:53:57.279
<v Speaker 1>first one hundred yard receiving game was Terrence Williams, who

0:53:57.280 --> 0:54:00.560
<v Speaker 1>would have won that bet. But the Cowboys have tied

0:54:01.600 --> 0:54:05.360
<v Speaker 1>this team's This offense has tied the franchise record for

0:54:05.480 --> 0:54:09.239
<v Speaker 1>most consecutive games of twenty eight points or more was six.

0:54:09.560 --> 0:54:12.880
<v Speaker 1>It happened in two thousand and seven. It's pretty good

0:54:12.920 --> 0:54:16.040
<v Speaker 1>offense right there, with Romo, Tarrell Owens and those guys

0:54:16.120 --> 0:54:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Marion Barber so set they had six games of twenty

0:54:19.680 --> 0:54:21.640
<v Speaker 1>eight points or more. This one's already there and has

0:54:21.680 --> 0:54:24.279
<v Speaker 1>a chance this week to pass that and might need,

0:54:24.680 --> 0:54:28.239
<v Speaker 1>might need to get there against Atlanta to get seven straight.

0:54:28.320 --> 0:54:30.640
<v Speaker 1>So that just goes to show that this offense, and

0:54:31.040 --> 0:54:33.759
<v Speaker 1>some of its been defense and turnovers, but how this

0:54:33.880 --> 0:54:36.359
<v Speaker 1>offense has turned in around and you can't just take

0:54:36.400 --> 0:54:38.960
<v Speaker 1>it away. I get that. But outside of one just

0:54:39.280 --> 0:54:42.839
<v Speaker 1>abysmally horrific day in Denver for everybody involved. I mean,

0:54:43.640 --> 0:54:45.640
<v Speaker 1>they've been on a role all year and they read

0:54:45.760 --> 0:54:47.919
<v Speaker 1>zone problems against the Giants, but they put up twenty

0:54:47.960 --> 0:54:50.960
<v Speaker 1>eight against the Cardinals, put up thirty against the Rams,

0:54:51.000 --> 0:54:54.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty one against the Pack. I mean they Denver is

0:54:54.440 --> 0:54:56.759
<v Speaker 1>really the only team that just completely stopped him from

0:54:56.800 --> 0:54:58.719
<v Speaker 1>doing what they wanted to do. It's amazing that they

0:54:58.800 --> 0:55:00.680
<v Speaker 1>did that, and now they are the team that they are.

0:55:01.719 --> 0:55:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Paul's weird like that man, like they have just completely

0:55:04.239 --> 0:55:07.200
<v Speaker 1>fallen off the map after a start like they had

0:55:07.280 --> 0:55:09.359
<v Speaker 1>where the two Batman back wins, including the big win

0:55:09.400 --> 0:55:12.239
<v Speaker 1>of the counts. You know it all those first four

0:55:12.320 --> 0:55:15.520
<v Speaker 1>or five games, Um, you know, Packers was the fifth game,

0:55:15.560 --> 0:55:17.800
<v Speaker 1>But when you think about it, two of those games

0:55:18.000 --> 0:55:20.840
<v Speaker 1>they had they got to play against the team missing

0:55:20.920 --> 0:55:23.960
<v Speaker 1>their best offensive player in Odell Beckham and David Johnson.

0:55:24.400 --> 0:55:27.160
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, but they have to face a

0:55:27.239 --> 0:55:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Denver team now that's not playing like that now Green

0:55:30.480 --> 0:55:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Bays certainly not playing like they are now, and we

0:55:32.719 --> 0:55:35.160
<v Speaker 1>know why. So just kind of works out that way

0:55:35.200 --> 0:55:37.279
<v Speaker 1>as a schedule of the NFL, right yea. And that's

0:55:37.320 --> 0:55:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the other thing that makes you feel pretty good about

0:55:39.200 --> 0:55:41.080
<v Speaker 1>where the Cowboys are at this moment. Now that can

0:55:41.120 --> 0:55:44.000
<v Speaker 1>all change, but at this moment, they've been one of

0:55:44.080 --> 0:55:46.839
<v Speaker 1>the healthier teams in the NFL, and so that they

0:55:46.920 --> 0:55:50.120
<v Speaker 1>have not had that major injury that somebody's gonna miss

0:55:50.160 --> 0:55:53.839
<v Speaker 1>the play somebody's gonna miss the playoffs by a game,

0:55:54.480 --> 0:55:56.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, and I can't think who would be, but

0:55:56.880 --> 0:56:00.160
<v Speaker 1>but somebody's gonna have to face Zeke and lose. And

0:56:00.440 --> 0:56:02.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, he was supposed supposed to be suspended for

0:56:02.640 --> 0:56:04.880
<v Speaker 1>these six, but then it's gonna be the six and

0:56:05.000 --> 0:56:08.240
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna it's gonna work out, probably bad for somebody,

0:56:08.520 --> 0:56:10.839
<v Speaker 1>maybe for the Cowboys. You know, maybe it was Kansas City.

0:56:10.880 --> 0:56:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's like Kansas City, if right. If he

0:56:15.200 --> 0:56:17.759
<v Speaker 1>gets suspended at this point, basically you said it last week,

0:56:17.920 --> 0:56:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Oakland becomes the benefactor because now he got to play

0:56:20.960 --> 0:56:22.960
<v Speaker 1>against Kansas City, and then he would miss the game

0:56:23.080 --> 0:56:25.680
<v Speaker 1>versus Oakland, so and that affects their division on that

0:56:25.840 --> 0:56:28.359
<v Speaker 1>timeline as well. Then he comes back just in time

0:56:28.400 --> 0:56:31.120
<v Speaker 1>to play the Seahawks, who you would imagine or scrapping

0:56:31.200 --> 0:56:33.480
<v Speaker 1>for a playoff spot as well. Right, So, I mean

0:56:33.600 --> 0:56:36.440
<v Speaker 1>it fascinating little jigsaw puzzle. All right, we appreciate you

0:56:36.480 --> 0:56:38.480
<v Speaker 1>guys joining us back tomorrow nine thirty am. Told then

0:56:38.480 --> 0:56:41.240
<v Speaker 1>for Nick Even, Dave Helm and Amber Garcia. I'm Derek Eagleton.

0:56:41.280 --> 0:56:43.680
<v Speaker 1>This has been The Break live on Dallas Cowboys dot

0:56:43.719 --> 0:56:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Com Radio. This has been a production of Dallas Cowboys

0:56:49.040 --> 0:56:51.680
<v Speaker 1>dot Com and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club