1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:06,760 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. 2 00:00:11,600 --> 00:00:15,440 Speaker 2: This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along 3 00:00:15,440 --> 00:00:18,360 Speaker 2: with Lisa Bromwitz and am Marie Hortern. Join us each 4 00:00:18,480 --> 00:00:21,360 Speaker 2: day for insight from the best in markets, economics, and 5 00:00:21,400 --> 00:00:24,720 Speaker 2: geopolitics from our global headquarters in New York City. We 6 00:00:24,760 --> 00:00:27,400 Speaker 2: are live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to 7 00:00:27,480 --> 00:00:31,000 Speaker 2: nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify 8 00:00:31,200 --> 00:00:33,479 Speaker 2: or anywhere else you listen, and as always on the 9 00:00:33,479 --> 00:00:37,040 Speaker 2: Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business App. Peter Cheer of 10 00:00:37,040 --> 00:00:39,360 Speaker 2: Academy right in the following. While the market is right 11 00:00:39,440 --> 00:00:41,559 Speaker 2: not to get too concerned at the moment, there is 12 00:00:41,600 --> 00:00:44,680 Speaker 2: a risk that is being very complacent, he joins us 13 00:00:44,680 --> 00:00:46,400 Speaker 2: now for more peke Monic morning. 14 00:00:46,479 --> 00:00:47,720 Speaker 1: That risk always exists. 15 00:00:47,800 --> 00:00:50,080 Speaker 2: Let's talk about whether the base case right now is 16 00:00:50,159 --> 00:00:51,640 Speaker 2: justified or complacent. 17 00:00:52,120 --> 00:00:55,000 Speaker 1: I think it's heading towards complacent. I think the administration 18 00:00:55,040 --> 00:00:57,680 Speaker 1: seems very comfortable with tariffs. They're coming out talking with them. 19 00:00:57,960 --> 00:01:00,720 Speaker 1: Let's not forget Trump A you really like tariffs. And 20 00:01:00,760 --> 00:01:02,680 Speaker 1: I think this whole taco thing is overdone. I think 21 00:01:02,680 --> 00:01:05,200 Speaker 1: he pivoted right. It wasn't going well, stock market was 22 00:01:05,200 --> 00:01:07,120 Speaker 1: coming down, he had other things to focus on. He 23 00:01:07,200 --> 00:01:09,080 Speaker 1: pulled back. Now he's had a few big wins. I 24 00:01:09,080 --> 00:01:12,759 Speaker 1: think the success that we had in Iran very positive 25 00:01:12,760 --> 00:01:14,960 Speaker 1: for him. Getting NATO to agree to five percent except 26 00:01:15,000 --> 00:01:16,959 Speaker 1: for Spain, that was a very positive for him. Getting 27 00:01:17,000 --> 00:01:19,520 Speaker 1: the big beautiful bill turned into an actual law as positive. 28 00:01:19,680 --> 00:01:21,240 Speaker 1: I think he's going to take another cut at this 29 00:01:21,600 --> 00:01:24,120 Speaker 1: and the problem is, I think for markets, we're not 30 00:01:24,160 --> 00:01:25,720 Speaker 1: going to get a quick reaction. We might not even 31 00:01:25,760 --> 00:01:28,520 Speaker 1: get a reaction after August first, assuming the tariffs go in. 32 00:01:28,600 --> 00:01:30,600 Speaker 1: Because last time the tariffs were actually and I believe 33 00:01:30,600 --> 00:01:33,400 Speaker 1: for some number of hours before they pulled back. So 34 00:01:33,600 --> 00:01:35,160 Speaker 1: I think this could drag on. I think it's going 35 00:01:35,200 --> 00:01:37,520 Speaker 1: to be more of a slow bleed. Unfortunately, there's a 36 00:01:37,600 --> 00:01:38,760 Speaker 1: larger question here. 37 00:01:38,959 --> 00:01:41,920 Speaker 3: Is this just the market saying, look, we've been fooled before. 38 00:01:42,319 --> 00:01:44,160 Speaker 3: What are you doing We're not going to buy into 39 00:01:44,160 --> 00:01:45,440 Speaker 3: these rates actually going through. 40 00:01:45,520 --> 00:01:46,840 Speaker 4: Or is this a market saying. 41 00:01:46,840 --> 00:01:50,200 Speaker 3: We've seen how companies absorb these tariffs and it isn't 42 00:01:50,200 --> 00:01:51,720 Speaker 3: going to be as big of a hit as many 43 00:01:51,760 --> 00:01:53,200 Speaker 3: people initially thought. 44 00:01:53,480 --> 00:01:55,360 Speaker 1: I think it's the former. I think people are just like, 45 00:01:55,400 --> 00:01:57,480 Speaker 1: we got fooled by this, we all got paniced. We 46 00:01:57,560 --> 00:01:59,800 Speaker 1: all believe the Main Street versus Wall Street, the rhetoric 47 00:02:00,080 --> 00:02:01,840 Speaker 1: I was coming out of the administration that they would 48 00:02:01,880 --> 00:02:04,040 Speaker 1: go forward. I think when you start seeing this one, 49 00:02:04,120 --> 00:02:05,880 Speaker 1: it's too early to expect much of a hit onto 50 00:02:05,880 --> 00:02:08,400 Speaker 1: Wall Street. Right even at ten percent, one company's had 51 00:02:08,440 --> 00:02:10,519 Speaker 1: a lot of ability to pre order stuff that helped 52 00:02:10,560 --> 00:02:12,600 Speaker 1: take care of it. You've seen a lot of USMCA 53 00:02:12,680 --> 00:02:17,240 Speaker 1: goods get compliant approved a USMCA compliant that's where used 54 00:02:17,240 --> 00:02:19,799 Speaker 1: effective tariffs. And you look at the tariff revenue, I 55 00:02:19,800 --> 00:02:21,560 Speaker 1: think it's about eighty billion over the last three months. 56 00:02:21,560 --> 00:02:23,480 Speaker 1: That's a drop in the bucket in terms of inflation 57 00:02:23,560 --> 00:02:26,000 Speaker 1: or anything. So I think we will not start seeing 58 00:02:26,000 --> 00:02:29,280 Speaker 1: the inflation effects or the impact on corporate earnings until 59 00:02:29,360 --> 00:02:30,840 Speaker 1: a few more months down the road. 60 00:02:31,080 --> 00:02:33,040 Speaker 3: Which is the reason why we've been talking about how 61 00:02:33,080 --> 00:02:35,919 Speaker 3: pivotal this week is. How much are you concerned about 62 00:02:35,960 --> 00:02:38,119 Speaker 3: it being a headfake if we don't see the real 63 00:02:38,240 --> 00:02:42,520 Speaker 3: ramifications from tariffs, either in consumer inflation or in bank 64 00:02:42,560 --> 00:02:44,000 Speaker 3: earnings in particular. 65 00:02:43,800 --> 00:02:45,400 Speaker 1: You know, I'm not as worried about the earnings. What 66 00:02:45,440 --> 00:02:47,600 Speaker 1: I'm looking for a little bit is what are people 67 00:02:47,639 --> 00:02:50,400 Speaker 1: seeing globally, what's the global economy looking like. We talked 68 00:02:50,400 --> 00:02:52,560 Speaker 1: so much about the domestic economy. What's it like, what's 69 00:02:52,560 --> 00:02:55,080 Speaker 1: spending going on? And are any of the US brands 70 00:02:55,120 --> 00:02:57,359 Speaker 1: seeing a pullback and spending that's me is one thing 71 00:02:57,480 --> 00:03:00,360 Speaker 1: we've seen it in tourism. Is it more widespread because 72 00:03:00,360 --> 00:03:02,079 Speaker 1: that would be a bigger concern to me that you're 73 00:03:02,080 --> 00:03:04,160 Speaker 1: starting to see this kind of pulling away from the 74 00:03:04,160 --> 00:03:06,400 Speaker 1: American brands, which would be very consistent now with what 75 00:03:06,760 --> 00:03:09,160 Speaker 1: you're reporting this morning that other countries are trying to 76 00:03:09,160 --> 00:03:11,000 Speaker 1: figure out, Okay, what trade deals can we do away 77 00:03:11,000 --> 00:03:11,600 Speaker 1: from the US. 78 00:03:12,040 --> 00:03:14,160 Speaker 5: So what do you like then in this moment if 79 00:03:14,200 --> 00:03:16,680 Speaker 5: you don't think the president is just a negotiating mode 80 00:03:16,720 --> 00:03:18,359 Speaker 5: and potentially some of these rates can stay. 81 00:03:18,760 --> 00:03:22,239 Speaker 1: So I still like anything that's really involved around national security, 82 00:03:22,480 --> 00:03:24,799 Speaker 1: national production, right, And I think last week we saw 83 00:03:24,960 --> 00:03:28,840 Speaker 1: MP ticker symbol got an investment from the Department Offense. 84 00:03:28,960 --> 00:03:30,800 Speaker 1: There's a little bit of ad hoc that the Department 85 00:03:30,840 --> 00:03:33,040 Speaker 1: Defense had that money. But maybe we start seeing the 86 00:03:33,080 --> 00:03:35,680 Speaker 1: sovereign wealth funds that we talked about at the start 87 00:03:35,720 --> 00:03:38,200 Speaker 1: of the administration start turning into something where you start 88 00:03:38,200 --> 00:03:41,120 Speaker 1: seeing investment where the US public actually gets to take 89 00:03:41,120 --> 00:03:43,360 Speaker 1: advantage of the growth. We have to have rarest and 90 00:03:43,400 --> 00:03:45,840 Speaker 1: critical minerals and not just the commids, the process and 91 00:03:45,880 --> 00:03:48,400 Speaker 1: refined versions of those. We need chips, we need pharma, 92 00:03:48,880 --> 00:03:50,600 Speaker 1: all those things. I think that's where I want to 93 00:03:50,640 --> 00:03:53,839 Speaker 1: focus because the President could juggle throo things right, push 94 00:03:53,880 --> 00:03:55,960 Speaker 1: hard on tariff's on the one side, domestic growth and 95 00:03:56,000 --> 00:03:58,240 Speaker 1: those things do take away jobs from China, they bring 96 00:03:58,320 --> 00:03:59,840 Speaker 1: jobs to the US, so they fit a lot of 97 00:03:59,880 --> 00:04:02,280 Speaker 1: it genders a lot of it's deregulation, which again is 98 00:04:02,360 --> 00:04:04,160 Speaker 1: right up the President's alley. So that to me is 99 00:04:04,160 --> 00:04:07,200 Speaker 1: the positive that we last week in that investment of 100 00:04:07,280 --> 00:04:09,360 Speaker 1: the Department Fence is just the tip of the iceberg. 101 00:04:09,480 --> 00:04:11,680 Speaker 5: Do you think the fifty percent tariffs on copper is 102 00:04:11,720 --> 00:04:12,760 Speaker 5: good and it stays. 103 00:04:13,280 --> 00:04:15,600 Speaker 1: I don't know that it's good at all. Again, it's 104 00:04:15,600 --> 00:04:17,520 Speaker 1: something we import a lot of and we need to 105 00:04:17,560 --> 00:04:18,880 Speaker 1: and we're not going to be able to turn it back. 106 00:04:18,960 --> 00:04:20,600 Speaker 1: But yeah, I think he stays. I think he tries 107 00:04:20,640 --> 00:04:23,320 Speaker 1: to grow some domestic businesses around that. But it's going 108 00:04:23,400 --> 00:04:25,479 Speaker 1: to come through investments, not going to come out through handouts, 109 00:04:25,480 --> 00:04:26,560 Speaker 1: their subsidies. 110 00:04:26,200 --> 00:04:28,640 Speaker 2: Quick final word on CPI tomorrow morning. We've had a 111 00:04:28,680 --> 00:04:31,080 Speaker 2: string of softer that expected rates to we get a 112 00:04:31,080 --> 00:04:32,279 Speaker 2: fifth tomorrow morning. 113 00:04:32,480 --> 00:04:34,120 Speaker 1: I don't think so. I think we've kind of bottomed 114 00:04:34,160 --> 00:04:35,520 Speaker 1: out on it for a little while. I think there's 115 00:04:35,520 --> 00:04:37,640 Speaker 1: been some pressure on, you know, through some of what's 116 00:04:37,640 --> 00:04:39,919 Speaker 1: been going on the USMCA. I think people push some 117 00:04:40,000 --> 00:04:42,279 Speaker 1: prices through, So I don't think I'm not alarmed, but 118 00:04:42,320 --> 00:04:44,600 Speaker 1: I don't think we get a you know, a good number. 119 00:04:44,680 --> 00:04:47,039 Speaker 2: It A sure the FED has a lot to answer for. 120 00:04:47,279 --> 00:04:48,159 Speaker 2: Where's this one going? 121 00:04:48,720 --> 00:04:50,800 Speaker 1: I have no idea. It does feel politically that he's 122 00:04:50,800 --> 00:04:52,080 Speaker 1: going to be under a lot of pressure in the 123 00:04:52,120 --> 00:04:55,200 Speaker 1: coming days weeks, you know, And I do think he 124 00:04:55,200 --> 00:04:57,200 Speaker 1: probably should have cut rates or be on the pace 125 00:04:57,480 --> 00:04:59,120 Speaker 1: we should be cutting in July. I think I don't 126 00:04:59,160 --> 00:05:01,320 Speaker 1: like the jobs data, so I don't agree with all 127 00:05:01,320 --> 00:05:03,599 Speaker 1: this policy, but I think pushing them out and this 128 00:05:03,720 --> 00:05:06,240 Speaker 1: pressure markets aren't going to like it. The world's not 129 00:05:06,240 --> 00:05:08,239 Speaker 1: going to like it. So I don't love that stat 130 00:05:08,320 --> 00:05:08,640 Speaker 1: What do you. 131 00:05:08,560 --> 00:05:10,400 Speaker 2: Think the cost is? What's the price of firing the 132 00:05:10,440 --> 00:05:13,200 Speaker 2: FED chair? Not saying it will happen, if it happens, 133 00:05:13,200 --> 00:05:15,159 Speaker 2: What is the cost and is it so high that 134 00:05:15,240 --> 00:05:16,640 Speaker 2: it prevents it from happening. 135 00:05:16,760 --> 00:05:19,600 Speaker 1: You know, unfortunately or not fortunately. I don't think it's 136 00:05:19,640 --> 00:05:22,000 Speaker 1: going to be that high. Front end yields probably go down, 137 00:05:22,120 --> 00:05:23,839 Speaker 1: right because whoever's going to come and is probably going 138 00:05:23,839 --> 00:05:26,680 Speaker 1: to implement cutting. You see yields go higher maybe at 139 00:05:26,680 --> 00:05:29,000 Speaker 1: the back end, but how much can you choose tens 140 00:05:29,040 --> 00:05:30,800 Speaker 1: go out. So I think it's actually going to be 141 00:05:30,800 --> 00:05:32,840 Speaker 1: a muted reaction. I think there's a lot of fear 142 00:05:32,880 --> 00:05:34,680 Speaker 1: that we're going to blow up the treasury market. I 143 00:05:34,760 --> 00:05:36,240 Speaker 1: just don't think that happens right away. 144 00:05:36,360 --> 00:05:37,280 Speaker 4: And part of the reason. 145 00:05:37,080 --> 00:05:39,280 Speaker 3: Why is because people say there's a whole committee full 146 00:05:39,320 --> 00:05:41,400 Speaker 3: of FED members that all have a vote, and yet 147 00:05:41,480 --> 00:05:45,680 Speaker 3: Kevin Walsh, who previously was on the FED Board of Governors, 148 00:05:45,720 --> 00:05:47,800 Speaker 3: came out and said, we need regime change, we need 149 00:05:47,839 --> 00:05:50,840 Speaker 3: an overhaul, and started talking about the strategic shift that 150 00:05:50,920 --> 00:05:52,720 Speaker 3: he would like to see at the Federal Reserve. 151 00:05:53,080 --> 00:05:54,680 Speaker 4: How realistic, how feasible is that? 152 00:05:55,240 --> 00:05:57,840 Speaker 1: You know, I've often wondered for the last decade why 153 00:05:57,880 --> 00:06:00,640 Speaker 1: we don't have more behavioral economists on the FED. Right, 154 00:06:00,640 --> 00:06:03,560 Speaker 1: we have the traditional macroeconomists, and yet when you look 155 00:06:03,600 --> 00:06:05,919 Speaker 1: at the Nobel Prizes, you know, they're going out to 156 00:06:06,000 --> 00:06:08,960 Speaker 1: the behavioral So I think we shake up in kind 157 00:06:08,960 --> 00:06:11,360 Speaker 1: of some different thinking wouldn't be a bad idea. Again, 158 00:06:11,400 --> 00:06:12,839 Speaker 1: I'm not sure that it should be done in this 159 00:06:12,920 --> 00:06:16,000 Speaker 1: kind of, you know, very quick and rough way, but 160 00:06:16,279 --> 00:06:17,840 Speaker 1: I think there are things how do we think about 161 00:06:17,839 --> 00:06:19,640 Speaker 1: the world, how do people respond? I think a lot 162 00:06:19,680 --> 00:06:22,760 Speaker 1: of traditional macroeconomics has failed us, and we've kind of 163 00:06:22,760 --> 00:06:26,000 Speaker 1: missed the GFC, we miss European debt crisis. So bringing 164 00:06:26,080 --> 00:06:28,720 Speaker 1: some new types of thinking might not be a bad idea. 165 00:06:28,839 --> 00:06:31,839 Speaker 3: There are two things that you're sort of alluding to here, 166 00:06:31,920 --> 00:06:35,080 Speaker 3: and one is the fundamental economic justification for both the 167 00:06:35,160 --> 00:06:38,240 Speaker 3: rate cut, andy rethink of some of the economic modeling 168 00:06:38,279 --> 00:06:41,520 Speaker 3: on the FED. The other is the political job boning 169 00:06:41,800 --> 00:06:45,000 Speaker 3: that leaves people concerned about a Turkey situation, air dou 170 00:06:45,080 --> 00:06:48,039 Speaker 3: On like pressure, talking about what happened with Arthur Burns 171 00:06:48,279 --> 00:06:50,840 Speaker 3: that led to the highest pace of inflation that we've 172 00:06:50,839 --> 00:06:53,480 Speaker 3: seen in modern history in the United States. So how 173 00:06:53,480 --> 00:06:55,720 Speaker 3: do you distinguish between the two, And does this kind 174 00:06:55,760 --> 00:06:57,800 Speaker 3: of pressure make it less likely that they can cut 175 00:06:58,240 --> 00:06:59,680 Speaker 3: in a way that might be appropriate. 176 00:07:00,480 --> 00:07:02,520 Speaker 1: So I would have said before this weekend I felt 177 00:07:02,560 --> 00:07:04,479 Speaker 1: they would be pressured not to cut because they didn't 178 00:07:04,520 --> 00:07:06,680 Speaker 1: want to be bowing to this. But it does seem 179 00:07:06,720 --> 00:07:08,320 Speaker 1: like this is a whole new line of attack. They're 180 00:07:08,400 --> 00:07:11,120 Speaker 1: kind of going down different avenues to get that sort 181 00:07:11,120 --> 00:07:13,760 Speaker 1: of change, and if that happens, then I think we 182 00:07:13,800 --> 00:07:16,160 Speaker 1: do get cuts very quickly, because whoever comes in, we'll 183 00:07:16,200 --> 00:07:18,000 Speaker 1: try and say, well, this has to be our mandate. 184 00:07:18,640 --> 00:07:21,040 Speaker 1: It's probably the most confusing I've ever had because we've 185 00:07:21,040 --> 00:07:23,960 Speaker 1: never i think, had to figure out the political ramifications 186 00:07:23,960 --> 00:07:25,240 Speaker 1: of the FED in such a way. 187 00:07:25,400 --> 00:07:27,800 Speaker 5: Kevin Hassett was asked about this over the weekend. He says, 188 00:07:28,080 --> 00:07:30,640 Speaker 5: they're being looked into whether or not if there's cause, 189 00:07:30,720 --> 00:07:32,920 Speaker 5: he could be fired, but this would be about issues 190 00:07:32,920 --> 00:07:36,520 Speaker 5: regarding renovations at the FED. Does it matter to the 191 00:07:36,560 --> 00:07:40,400 Speaker 5: markets what the potential issue is that they think they 192 00:07:40,400 --> 00:07:42,560 Speaker 5: have a legal standing to fire the FED share? 193 00:07:43,200 --> 00:07:44,600 Speaker 1: I think it does make a difference. And I do 194 00:07:44,640 --> 00:07:47,320 Speaker 1: think one thing. Powell was very successful independently before he 195 00:07:47,400 --> 00:07:49,000 Speaker 1: joining the FED, so I think he probably has a 196 00:07:49,000 --> 00:07:51,920 Speaker 1: lot more stomach to fight this than someone who didn't have, 197 00:07:52,000 --> 00:07:54,080 Speaker 1: you know, his own personal wealth isn't coming into this 198 00:07:54,200 --> 00:07:56,000 Speaker 1: job very strong. I think he is very committed to 199 00:07:56,040 --> 00:07:58,960 Speaker 1: what he's doing, So you know, I find you will 200 00:07:59,040 --> 00:07:59,960 Speaker 1: not go down easily. 201 00:08:00,280 --> 00:08:02,160 Speaker 5: If he's not going to go down easily, then do 202 00:08:02,160 --> 00:08:04,840 Speaker 5: you think he sticks around to finish out his governorship 203 00:08:04,880 --> 00:08:05,760 Speaker 5: to twenty twenty eight? 204 00:08:07,120 --> 00:08:08,720 Speaker 1: I think that's such a long way away in this 205 00:08:08,840 --> 00:08:11,400 Speaker 1: environment right now. It's like we have trouble living week 206 00:08:11,440 --> 00:08:12,040 Speaker 1: to week. 207 00:08:12,240 --> 00:08:14,920 Speaker 5: Right But he won't tell Trump administration officials, he won't 208 00:08:14,920 --> 00:08:17,920 Speaker 5: tell reporters. He's repeatedly asked about this and doesn't give 209 00:08:17,920 --> 00:08:18,440 Speaker 5: an answer. 210 00:08:18,760 --> 00:08:20,440 Speaker 1: I think there's no reason for him to give an answer. 211 00:08:20,480 --> 00:08:22,280 Speaker 1: Why I make it easy on anyone. It says kind 212 00:08:22,280 --> 00:08:23,600 Speaker 1: of a little bit of leverage. Maybe it is what 213 00:08:23,680 --> 00:08:26,880 Speaker 1: makes him happy when he's fighting with this. So I 214 00:08:26,920 --> 00:08:28,760 Speaker 1: feel it's all a bit of a side show to 215 00:08:28,800 --> 00:08:31,120 Speaker 1: what we should be looking at, and that's not good. 216 00:08:31,720 --> 00:08:33,839 Speaker 2: The price of this now, you said it wouldn't be 217 00:08:33,880 --> 00:08:36,320 Speaker 2: that high, Joe Somervellos said, it's thirty to forty basis 218 00:08:36,320 --> 00:08:37,760 Speaker 2: points and a fixed thing comes sell off in the 219 00:08:37,760 --> 00:08:40,760 Speaker 2: following twenty four hours for the FX market, it could 220 00:08:40,760 --> 00:08:42,880 Speaker 2: mean a three to four percent move in the trade 221 00:08:42,880 --> 00:08:45,480 Speaker 2: weighted dollar at least support up the experience in Turkey. 222 00:08:45,720 --> 00:08:47,960 Speaker 2: If you go back to spring of twenty twenty one 223 00:08:48,160 --> 00:08:51,199 Speaker 2: when Erdehan fired is then central bank governor. I think 224 00:08:51,200 --> 00:08:53,520 Speaker 2: the following day we have an eight percent move on 225 00:08:53,559 --> 00:08:56,040 Speaker 2: the Turkish LERA. Are you not expecting anything like that 226 00:08:56,040 --> 00:08:57,520 Speaker 2: in the following twenty four hours? 227 00:08:57,880 --> 00:09:00,120 Speaker 1: I think it'll be hard like you want to sell off. 228 00:09:00,000 --> 00:09:01,719 Speaker 1: I think that I agree on the FX. I think 229 00:09:01,760 --> 00:09:04,200 Speaker 1: it's going to push people away from the dollar. I 230 00:09:04,200 --> 00:09:07,280 Speaker 1: think that makes sense to me. But why would Tebow 231 00:09:07,360 --> 00:09:09,040 Speaker 1: sell off a lot? Right? Clearly you're going to get 232 00:09:09,040 --> 00:09:11,320 Speaker 1: someone coming in and I think that will anchor the 233 00:09:11,320 --> 00:09:12,720 Speaker 1: curve a little bit. I think maybe you get this 234 00:09:12,760 --> 00:09:13,240 Speaker 1: and make. 235 00:09:13,160 --> 00:09:15,080 Speaker 2: At the front end. Tell me what happens further along 236 00:09:15,120 --> 00:09:16,880 Speaker 2: the curve. I'm not interested in the front end. I 237 00:09:16,880 --> 00:09:18,760 Speaker 2: don't know what happens to tens and thirties. 238 00:09:19,080 --> 00:09:21,040 Speaker 1: Maybe it widens a little bit. I don't see a 239 00:09:21,040 --> 00:09:22,880 Speaker 1: thirty to forty BIB. I would not be surprised to 240 00:09:22,920 --> 00:09:26,400 Speaker 1: see markets actually remain more calm than all the hype. Unfortunately, 241 00:09:26,559 --> 00:09:29,200 Speaker 1: I think that gives the whole ammunition. But I think 242 00:09:29,200 --> 00:09:32,280 Speaker 1: there's just so much more going on than the FED share. Now, 243 00:09:32,320 --> 00:09:33,720 Speaker 1: if we believe that someone's going to come in and 244 00:09:33,720 --> 00:09:35,560 Speaker 1: cut one hundred BIPs immediately and get us down to 245 00:09:35,600 --> 00:09:37,600 Speaker 1: two percent, that's a different story. But I think if 246 00:09:37,640 --> 00:09:39,200 Speaker 1: you think someone's going to cut fifty and try and 247 00:09:39,200 --> 00:09:42,560 Speaker 1: get down one hundred bits by September, do we really 248 00:09:42,600 --> 00:09:44,439 Speaker 1: sell off that much? Like that's kind of more in 249 00:09:44,480 --> 00:09:46,320 Speaker 1: the ballpark what I think the FED should be doing anyway. 250 00:09:46,360 --> 00:09:47,920 Speaker 1: So I'm not going to react that negatively. 251 00:09:47,960 --> 00:09:50,319 Speaker 3: I was setting though, a precedent that becomes dangerous for 252 00:09:50,360 --> 00:09:52,360 Speaker 3: the bond market going forward. And I say this not 253 00:09:52,440 --> 00:09:54,560 Speaker 3: just from the US perspective, but globally at a time 254 00:09:54,559 --> 00:09:56,720 Speaker 3: when you see all the long bonds around the world 255 00:09:56,800 --> 00:09:59,679 Speaker 3: and develop market selling off in the prospect of more 256 00:10:00,040 --> 00:10:02,120 Speaker 3: end and politicians that don't want to have to raise 257 00:10:02,160 --> 00:10:06,120 Speaker 3: taxes or cut spending in order to reduce the deficit. 258 00:10:06,559 --> 00:10:09,800 Speaker 3: Isn't this a fundamental problem that increasingly politicians will just 259 00:10:09,880 --> 00:10:12,600 Speaker 3: job own their central banks as opposed to actually taking 260 00:10:12,600 --> 00:10:12,960 Speaker 3: the pain. 261 00:10:13,360 --> 00:10:14,920 Speaker 1: Yeah, And I think it's like a lot of things. 262 00:10:14,960 --> 00:10:17,440 Speaker 1: We've had executive orders skyrocket over the last twenty years. 263 00:10:17,480 --> 00:10:20,160 Speaker 1: Everything's kind of being done a little bit backdoor, maybe 264 00:10:20,200 --> 00:10:22,480 Speaker 1: not quite by the official channels. So I think those 265 00:10:22,520 --> 00:10:24,800 Speaker 1: are all risks. One thing I keep. You know, we've 266 00:10:24,800 --> 00:10:26,880 Speaker 1: been arguing to our customers probably for three years now. 267 00:10:27,000 --> 00:10:29,120 Speaker 1: You're supposed to be if you're investing in one year 268 00:10:29,240 --> 00:10:32,840 Speaker 1: end paper heavily, heavily, heavily overweighted towards corporate debt commercial 269 00:10:32,840 --> 00:10:36,280 Speaker 1: paper because corporations actually have good governance, right, corporations that 270 00:10:36,360 --> 00:10:38,520 Speaker 1: are there to make sure their bills are paid on time. 271 00:10:38,880 --> 00:10:40,680 Speaker 1: So I would be overweight. I think you're getting that 272 00:10:40,679 --> 00:10:42,520 Speaker 1: extra spread, and I think there's going to be more 273 00:10:42,559 --> 00:10:45,240 Speaker 1: and more conversation about what should one of these top 274 00:10:45,280 --> 00:10:48,680 Speaker 1: companies trade versus the US dollar, or sorry, versus T bills. 275 00:10:48,679 --> 00:10:50,719 Speaker 1: I don't think we're right through. I don't think we're 276 00:10:50,760 --> 00:10:53,040 Speaker 1: there at this point, but I could see us approaching 277 00:10:53,080 --> 00:10:55,839 Speaker 1: that right. It's happened in some third world or em 278 00:10:55,880 --> 00:10:58,360 Speaker 1: countries in the past for a variety of reasons. We're 279 00:10:58,400 --> 00:11:00,600 Speaker 1: not there, But I think you're getting free spread almost 280 00:11:00,640 --> 00:11:02,240 Speaker 1: when you look at some of these double A, triple A, 281 00:11:02,280 --> 00:11:05,160 Speaker 1: even single A companies orrising commercial paper. I would own 282 00:11:05,200 --> 00:11:07,240 Speaker 1: that all day long instead of tea bills. I think 283 00:11:07,240 --> 00:11:08,000 Speaker 1: it's less hassle. 284 00:11:08,080 --> 00:11:09,439 Speaker 5: Peter, if you don't think there's going to be a 285 00:11:09,440 --> 00:11:12,160 Speaker 5: massive implication to the market, if they fire fed Chair J. 286 00:11:12,280 --> 00:11:14,600 Speaker 5: Powell's what's holding them back then from doing it. 287 00:11:15,559 --> 00:11:17,800 Speaker 1: I assume there's legalities and how to do it, whether 288 00:11:17,800 --> 00:11:19,360 Speaker 1: they're allowed to do it, and I'm sure that's being 289 00:11:19,480 --> 00:11:19,959 Speaker 1: worked on it. 290 00:11:20,400 --> 00:11:22,760 Speaker 2: Pete, it's going to say, as always, thanks for dropping 291 00:11:22,760 --> 00:11:35,559 Speaker 2: by a pity share there of Academy. The former senior 292 00:11:35,600 --> 00:11:38,079 Speaker 2: White House Trade advisor Kelly and Shaw, writing the President 293 00:11:38,160 --> 00:11:40,080 Speaker 2: believes he still has a long leash when it comes 294 00:11:40,080 --> 00:11:43,040 Speaker 2: to tariffs for countries that don't have deals by August first, 295 00:11:43,080 --> 00:11:45,880 Speaker 2: I do expect tariffs to go up. Kelly and joins 296 00:11:45,920 --> 00:11:47,880 Speaker 2: us now for more Kelly, and welcome back to the program. 297 00:11:47,920 --> 00:11:49,200 Speaker 2: I think you told us all to get a beer 298 00:11:49,240 --> 00:11:51,440 Speaker 2: and take a break last time, and then everyone gets 299 00:11:51,440 --> 00:11:54,080 Speaker 2: fired up after the announcements over the weekend. How seriously 300 00:11:54,080 --> 00:11:56,720 Speaker 2: are you taking some of the threats this past weekend. 301 00:11:57,920 --> 00:12:00,000 Speaker 6: Yeah, good morning, And I think I have the same 302 00:12:00,120 --> 00:12:03,640 Speaker 6: advice today that I had last week, and that this 303 00:12:03,800 --> 00:12:05,760 Speaker 6: is not for us, This is not for business. 304 00:12:05,840 --> 00:12:08,120 Speaker 4: These tactics are really for other governments. 305 00:12:08,160 --> 00:12:10,199 Speaker 6: And I think that director has it said it well 306 00:12:10,240 --> 00:12:12,240 Speaker 6: on Sunday when he said the President was trying to 307 00:12:12,280 --> 00:12:15,280 Speaker 6: squeeze every last drop out of some of these deals. 308 00:12:15,640 --> 00:12:17,920 Speaker 4: So that to me is really what these letters are about. 309 00:12:18,240 --> 00:12:22,240 Speaker 6: I'm still relatively optimistic will land somewhere with the European Union. 310 00:12:22,960 --> 00:12:25,040 Speaker 6: The Mexico letter was a bit of a surprise to me, 311 00:12:25,120 --> 00:12:28,520 Speaker 6: given that they weren't negotiating one of these full reciprocal deals. 312 00:12:28,559 --> 00:12:30,400 Speaker 4: It was really about steel and aluminum. 313 00:12:30,720 --> 00:12:32,480 Speaker 6: But that said, we've got two and a half weeks 314 00:12:32,480 --> 00:12:34,560 Speaker 6: to go and I expect to see a bunch of deals, 315 00:12:34,600 --> 00:12:36,560 Speaker 6: and for those countries that don't have them, I expect 316 00:12:36,559 --> 00:12:37,520 Speaker 6: to see those terif. 317 00:12:37,320 --> 00:12:37,920 Speaker 4: Rates go up. 318 00:12:38,040 --> 00:12:40,240 Speaker 5: When you say you do think this is the President 319 00:12:40,320 --> 00:12:44,679 Speaker 5: trying to squeeze every lens ounce out of these trade negotiations, 320 00:12:44,679 --> 00:12:46,080 Speaker 5: say what comes to the European Union? 321 00:12:46,200 --> 00:12:46,959 Speaker 1: What is he after? 322 00:12:48,280 --> 00:12:50,560 Speaker 6: Well, with the European Union, there are a number of 323 00:12:50,720 --> 00:12:54,360 Speaker 6: sticking points, and I think everyone's expectation is that if 324 00:12:54,400 --> 00:12:56,839 Speaker 6: the US and EU were able were going to be 325 00:12:56,880 --> 00:12:58,640 Speaker 6: in a position to agree, that it would be too 326 00:12:58,679 --> 00:13:02,440 Speaker 6: basically a subset of issues, and not every irritant. But 327 00:13:02,520 --> 00:13:05,880 Speaker 6: I had been hearing some consternation about agriculture in particular, 328 00:13:05,920 --> 00:13:08,440 Speaker 6: and some frustration on the US side that the EU 329 00:13:08,559 --> 00:13:11,240 Speaker 6: wasn't willing to cut some of the more sensitive teriff rates, 330 00:13:11,640 --> 00:13:14,760 Speaker 6: and then a lot of disagreement over those Section two 331 00:13:14,800 --> 00:13:17,360 Speaker 6: thirty two carve outs and what those might look like 332 00:13:17,400 --> 00:13:19,920 Speaker 6: on auto steel, pharma, semiconductors. 333 00:13:19,960 --> 00:13:22,600 Speaker 4: And then of course, the President has long talked about 334 00:13:23,120 --> 00:13:24,920 Speaker 4: Europe's treatment of US tech. 335 00:13:24,720 --> 00:13:27,600 Speaker 6: Firms and from state aid to the DMA and DSA, 336 00:13:28,000 --> 00:13:30,880 Speaker 6: and so those are going to continue to be difficult 337 00:13:30,880 --> 00:13:32,920 Speaker 6: points between the US and the European Union. 338 00:13:33,120 --> 00:13:35,480 Speaker 5: The European Union, we have this story, is preparing to 339 00:13:35,480 --> 00:13:38,560 Speaker 5: step up engagement with other countries, potentially pros the United 340 00:13:38,559 --> 00:13:41,559 Speaker 5: States with other allies. Do you think that tactic could 341 00:13:41,640 --> 00:13:42,760 Speaker 5: work with this administration? 342 00:13:44,320 --> 00:13:47,600 Speaker 6: I mean, I think it is a unique administration who 343 00:13:47,679 --> 00:13:50,720 Speaker 6: negotiates in ways that are not typical in terms of 344 00:13:50,720 --> 00:13:54,600 Speaker 6: diplomatic relations. So why not come to the United States 345 00:13:54,640 --> 00:13:57,959 Speaker 6: as a block and say here is a potential solution 346 00:13:58,040 --> 00:14:00,840 Speaker 6: and a potential way forward. Because is what is clear 347 00:14:00,920 --> 00:14:04,320 Speaker 6: from Presidents Trump's tactic in terms of taking the sledgehammer 348 00:14:04,360 --> 00:14:08,160 Speaker 6: to the global trading system and negotiating bilaterally with every 349 00:14:08,160 --> 00:14:11,440 Speaker 6: government on Earth, is that the current global trading system, 350 00:14:11,559 --> 00:14:14,880 Speaker 6: the World Trade Organization that is one hundred and sixty. 351 00:14:14,559 --> 00:14:16,520 Speaker 4: Six member countries just doesn't work. 352 00:14:16,840 --> 00:14:19,000 Speaker 6: And so if there are a subset of countries who 353 00:14:19,040 --> 00:14:22,440 Speaker 6: want to join together and approach the United States, I 354 00:14:22,440 --> 00:14:24,280 Speaker 6: think the administration could be open to that. 355 00:14:24,480 --> 00:14:26,720 Speaker 3: Kelly, and you said a keyword there, tactic. And this 356 00:14:26,840 --> 00:14:29,560 Speaker 3: is what the market is viewing all of this as, 357 00:14:29,640 --> 00:14:31,680 Speaker 3: at least in terms of the muted reaction that we're 358 00:14:31,680 --> 00:14:35,040 Speaker 3: seeing this morning, a tactic to negotiate a better deal. 359 00:14:35,440 --> 00:14:37,640 Speaker 3: Is this negotiating with the trade partners or is this 360 00:14:37,720 --> 00:14:39,600 Speaker 3: negotiating with the market. 361 00:14:40,840 --> 00:14:44,280 Speaker 6: I think it's predominantly negotiating with the trading partners. 362 00:14:44,320 --> 00:14:46,960 Speaker 4: But I do think that the market is playing a role. 363 00:14:47,440 --> 00:14:50,640 Speaker 6: And right now, the fact that the market hasn't reacted 364 00:14:50,800 --> 00:14:53,680 Speaker 6: as significantly as it did in the aftermath of April second, 365 00:14:53,880 --> 00:14:58,080 Speaker 6: coupled with low inflation, positive job reports, and overall good 366 00:14:58,120 --> 00:15:01,720 Speaker 6: economic indicators, I think doesen bolden the president and gives 367 00:15:01,760 --> 00:15:04,800 Speaker 6: him a longer leash on his tariff strategy. 368 00:15:04,840 --> 00:15:07,200 Speaker 4: Now, if the markets were to. 369 00:15:06,520 --> 00:15:09,600 Speaker 6: Totally go the other way, I do think that that 370 00:15:09,760 --> 00:15:12,240 Speaker 6: might have a bit of a mitigating impact on some 371 00:15:12,280 --> 00:15:15,240 Speaker 6: of these tariffs. But I think the market is reading 372 00:15:15,240 --> 00:15:18,160 Speaker 6: the situation exactly right, which is the President is sending 373 00:15:18,160 --> 00:15:21,200 Speaker 6: these letters out the announcing these high tariff rates in 374 00:15:21,240 --> 00:15:23,680 Speaker 6: the hopes of actually getting deals so that he won't 375 00:15:23,720 --> 00:15:25,280 Speaker 6: have to impose those tariffs. 376 00:15:25,320 --> 00:15:26,720 Speaker 4: So Kelly, And that's where. 377 00:15:26,480 --> 00:15:29,760 Speaker 3: I think there is some confusion. What is the tariff strategy? 378 00:15:29,840 --> 00:15:32,880 Speaker 3: Is it to get deals that are specific and have 379 00:15:32,960 --> 00:15:35,880 Speaker 3: certain parameters, or is it just to see how far 380 00:15:36,240 --> 00:15:39,640 Speaker 3: someone can push before you get revenues on the tariff's 381 00:15:39,640 --> 00:15:41,440 Speaker 3: side and markets don't freak out. 382 00:15:42,680 --> 00:15:42,920 Speaker 1: Yeah. 383 00:15:43,160 --> 00:15:44,800 Speaker 4: I think it can be a little bit of both. 384 00:15:44,920 --> 00:15:47,760 Speaker 6: I mean, certainly the pressing task right now is to 385 00:15:47,800 --> 00:15:51,360 Speaker 6: create this action forcing event that by August first, these 386 00:15:51,360 --> 00:15:54,800 Speaker 6: tariff rates will be exceptionally high unless countries are able 387 00:15:54,800 --> 00:15:56,640 Speaker 6: to get a deal. I think that's really first and 388 00:15:56,680 --> 00:15:59,800 Speaker 6: foremost on the president's mind. But the second line of 389 00:16:00,040 --> 00:16:03,040 Speaker 6: messaging that we're hearing is about this revenue and the 390 00:16:03,080 --> 00:16:05,560 Speaker 6: fact that the tariffs have been good for the US economy, 391 00:16:05,600 --> 00:16:07,840 Speaker 6: that prices haven't gone up, and we're going to use 392 00:16:07,880 --> 00:16:08,840 Speaker 6: it to pay for some of. 393 00:16:08,800 --> 00:16:09,640 Speaker 4: These tax cuts. 394 00:16:10,000 --> 00:16:12,840 Speaker 6: I think that's about softening the message on tariff so 395 00:16:12,840 --> 00:16:16,480 Speaker 6: that for countries that don't get deals, it's not viewed. 396 00:16:16,160 --> 00:16:18,280 Speaker 4: As catastrophic the sky is falling. 397 00:16:18,280 --> 00:16:21,000 Speaker 6: That there might be some positive benefit there, But I 398 00:16:21,040 --> 00:16:23,640 Speaker 6: do think at the end of the day, it would 399 00:16:23,680 --> 00:16:27,120 Speaker 6: be best case scenario for everyone involved to find some 400 00:16:27,160 --> 00:16:30,160 Speaker 6: sort of landing zone in terms of these bilateral negotiations 401 00:16:30,160 --> 00:16:32,560 Speaker 6: with countries and to see a bunch of deals get 402 00:16:32,600 --> 00:16:35,440 Speaker 6: inked and see those tariff and non tariff barriers come down. 403 00:16:35,800 --> 00:16:37,920 Speaker 2: Kelly on I appreciate the update, the catch up. Thank 404 00:16:37,960 --> 00:16:40,280 Speaker 2: you the former senior White House trying advise that Kelly 405 00:16:40,320 --> 00:16:51,880 Speaker 2: on Shore that on the leak system. Vito s Perduto 406 00:16:51,920 --> 00:16:56,400 Speaker 2: of BC Capital Markets saying EMINI activity is delayed, not derailed, 407 00:16:56,720 --> 00:17:00,240 Speaker 2: writing the backlog of Vemini opportunities continues to build. Itals 408 00:17:00,280 --> 00:17:03,120 Speaker 2: what happen that're just not happening as quickly as many 409 00:17:03,200 --> 00:17:04,879 Speaker 2: had expected. Vita, it's going to see it. 410 00:17:04,920 --> 00:17:06,479 Speaker 1: Good morning. Thank you for having me. 411 00:17:06,560 --> 00:17:09,840 Speaker 2: The difference between those two words delayed and derailed what 412 00:17:09,960 --> 00:17:13,040 Speaker 2: inspires confidence this is just a delay and not a derailment. 413 00:17:13,200 --> 00:17:16,320 Speaker 7: Well, I think the fundamental conditions have continued to be 414 00:17:16,440 --> 00:17:19,760 Speaker 7: very solid. I think the corporates are sitting flush with 415 00:17:19,920 --> 00:17:24,480 Speaker 7: cash more so than they have historically. I think for clients, 416 00:17:24,640 --> 00:17:27,199 Speaker 7: for instance, we're open to lend the clients to support 417 00:17:27,240 --> 00:17:30,320 Speaker 7: their transactions much like we were earlier in the year. 418 00:17:30,640 --> 00:17:33,720 Speaker 7: I think people have gotten comfortable with the current environment. 419 00:17:33,920 --> 00:17:37,199 Speaker 7: They are operating in an environment of constant uncertainty, and 420 00:17:37,240 --> 00:17:40,040 Speaker 7: so when you talk about whether it's tariffs or other 421 00:17:40,080 --> 00:17:42,800 Speaker 7: policy coming out of EC, you have to plan for 422 00:17:42,880 --> 00:17:46,200 Speaker 7: multiple scenarios. And so what we're finding with our clients 423 00:17:46,240 --> 00:17:50,359 Speaker 7: is that they're preparing for transactions. There's a fair amount 424 00:17:50,359 --> 00:17:53,160 Speaker 7: that they'd like to do. They're continuing their plans. It's 425 00:17:53,240 --> 00:17:55,320 Speaker 7: just a question of when do you make the decision 426 00:17:55,359 --> 00:17:57,920 Speaker 7: to do it, and so it's delayed to the right, 427 00:17:58,240 --> 00:18:01,399 Speaker 7: it's not being taken off the t and so I 428 00:18:01,400 --> 00:18:03,240 Speaker 7: think there's a fair amount of activity when the window 429 00:18:03,280 --> 00:18:03,800 Speaker 7: does open. 430 00:18:03,880 --> 00:18:05,480 Speaker 2: A lot of people said it was a wait and 431 00:18:05,560 --> 00:18:09,560 Speaker 2: see economy, and then doutsa airlines happened and Ed Bastion 432 00:18:09,720 --> 00:18:12,360 Speaker 2: came out and said that things are stable. Businesses have Clarency, 433 00:18:12,440 --> 00:18:14,600 Speaker 2: they're investing again. Have we broken out of that weight 434 00:18:14,640 --> 00:18:15,600 Speaker 2: and see economy. 435 00:18:16,160 --> 00:18:17,080 Speaker 1: I think some have. 436 00:18:17,680 --> 00:18:20,360 Speaker 7: I think we're seeing it certainly. I take a look 437 00:18:20,480 --> 00:18:24,000 Speaker 7: very closely, for example, at the CEO Confidence Index out 438 00:18:24,000 --> 00:18:27,119 Speaker 7: of the Conference Board. So the median there is fifty 439 00:18:27,119 --> 00:18:28,680 Speaker 7: on a scale of zero to one hundred, in terms 440 00:18:28,680 --> 00:18:31,199 Speaker 7: of the inflection point. In the first quarter, which was 441 00:18:31,200 --> 00:18:35,159 Speaker 7: taken in February, CEOs were at a sixty, meaning that 442 00:18:35,200 --> 00:18:37,720 Speaker 7: they were confident in the forward outlook. They felt positive 443 00:18:37,760 --> 00:18:40,600 Speaker 7: about it. The survey that was taken in mid May 444 00:18:41,119 --> 00:18:43,720 Speaker 7: dropped to thirty four. It's the biggest quarterly drop that 445 00:18:43,760 --> 00:18:47,200 Speaker 7: you've seen. So what's happened between February and May Liberation Day? 446 00:18:47,760 --> 00:18:53,280 Speaker 7: So that tariff and policy uncertainty, concerns about geopolitical instability, 447 00:18:53,480 --> 00:18:56,680 Speaker 7: and then also an uncertain regulatory environment in some cases 448 00:18:57,520 --> 00:19:00,560 Speaker 7: has driven them to not make decisions. And so when 449 00:19:00,560 --> 00:19:03,280 Speaker 7: they looked at that, a very high number of them 450 00:19:03,680 --> 00:19:06,520 Speaker 7: felt that we were in a worse position versus six 451 00:19:06,600 --> 00:19:10,000 Speaker 7: months ago, back in May. But what we are seeing 452 00:19:10,040 --> 00:19:12,880 Speaker 7: is that, Look, I think you look to Trump one 453 00:19:12,880 --> 00:19:15,720 Speaker 7: point zero versus this. It took a full year of 454 00:19:15,760 --> 00:19:19,359 Speaker 7: the first administration for people to get their arms around 455 00:19:19,359 --> 00:19:22,800 Speaker 7: what it meant. I think it's happening quicker now, and 456 00:19:22,840 --> 00:19:26,400 Speaker 7: I think the better companies are prepared and they're going 457 00:19:26,440 --> 00:19:27,480 Speaker 7: to enact policy. 458 00:19:27,680 --> 00:19:30,560 Speaker 3: The pipeline is rich, the pipeline is there. Look, I 459 00:19:30,640 --> 00:19:32,480 Speaker 3: think one reason why a lot of people are looking 460 00:19:32,480 --> 00:19:33,800 Speaker 3: at this is because we are going to get the 461 00:19:33,880 --> 00:19:37,000 Speaker 3: earnings from JP Morgan and City tomorrow and Wells Fargo 462 00:19:37,200 --> 00:19:39,600 Speaker 3: and then from Morgan Stanley and Goldbin Sachs on Wednesday. 463 00:19:39,640 --> 00:19:42,320 Speaker 3: And people are wondering how much of a boom this 464 00:19:42,440 --> 00:19:44,320 Speaker 3: is going to be to them, considering that heading into 465 00:19:44,320 --> 00:19:45,600 Speaker 3: this year it was supposed to be the year of 466 00:19:45,680 --> 00:19:49,679 Speaker 3: M and A didn't happen. How much has that been derailed? 467 00:19:50,640 --> 00:19:52,200 Speaker 7: Well, I think you're seeing if you look at M 468 00:19:52,240 --> 00:19:55,120 Speaker 7: and A volumes this year announced volumes, it's actually up 469 00:19:55,240 --> 00:19:57,399 Speaker 7: versus last year, but a lot of those transactions in 470 00:19:57,440 --> 00:19:59,640 Speaker 7: the first quarter were things that were already on. 471 00:19:59,600 --> 00:20:00,920 Speaker 1: The books about to happen. 472 00:20:00,920 --> 00:20:03,520 Speaker 7: And so you have USM and announced volumes are up 473 00:20:03,560 --> 00:20:07,320 Speaker 7: sixteen percent this year. Globally it's up twenty six percent. 474 00:20:07,800 --> 00:20:11,479 Speaker 7: But it's really larger deals billion dollar plus are driving that, 475 00:20:11,600 --> 00:20:14,440 Speaker 7: and the smaller deals sub a billion are actually slightly 476 00:20:14,520 --> 00:20:17,320 Speaker 7: down in value. So what's happened is a lot of 477 00:20:17,359 --> 00:20:19,840 Speaker 7: it's just been, like we talked about, pushed to the right. 478 00:20:20,640 --> 00:20:23,200 Speaker 7: People should not be surprised by this, Like I said 479 00:20:23,359 --> 00:20:28,600 Speaker 7: just now, this is what happened back in twenty seventeen 480 00:20:28,880 --> 00:20:33,199 Speaker 7: during the first administration. But what we are seeing is 481 00:20:33,240 --> 00:20:36,400 Speaker 7: that where we sit today versus the beginning of the year, 482 00:20:36,880 --> 00:20:38,960 Speaker 7: is that there has been a tightening of the bid 483 00:20:39,000 --> 00:20:43,320 Speaker 7: ask spread. I think parties that are prepared and feel 484 00:20:43,320 --> 00:20:46,640 Speaker 7: confident are out there doing transactions. I think sellers that 485 00:20:46,800 --> 00:20:49,520 Speaker 7: need capital and need to For instance, if you're a 486 00:20:49,520 --> 00:20:51,840 Speaker 7: private equity firm and you need to return capital to 487 00:20:52,280 --> 00:20:55,800 Speaker 7: your LPs, you're looking at various alternatives. It might not 488 00:20:55,840 --> 00:20:57,960 Speaker 7: be a traditional sale, but maybe you look at a 489 00:20:58,000 --> 00:21:01,920 Speaker 7: continuation vehicle, maybe you're looking at some structured equity. 490 00:21:02,040 --> 00:21:02,919 Speaker 1: Maybe you're looking at a. 491 00:21:02,960 --> 00:21:06,760 Speaker 7: Minority sale or taking a loan on your net asset value, 492 00:21:07,280 --> 00:21:10,399 Speaker 7: and you're finding ways to return capital because that's the 493 00:21:10,440 --> 00:21:11,760 Speaker 7: lifeblood of what they need to do. 494 00:21:11,920 --> 00:21:15,080 Speaker 3: I wonder how much the scenario for how people are 495 00:21:15,160 --> 00:21:18,640 Speaker 3: financing these purchases has changed with yields where they are. 496 00:21:18,760 --> 00:21:22,040 Speaker 3: Have you seen people less willing or companies not people, 497 00:21:22,240 --> 00:21:25,600 Speaker 3: companies less willing to incur debt to make those purchases 498 00:21:25,680 --> 00:21:27,960 Speaker 3: and want you at all stock or crash or whatever 499 00:21:28,080 --> 00:21:29,119 Speaker 3: just lucas of the fees. 500 00:21:29,680 --> 00:21:32,439 Speaker 7: I think if you go back two years ago, a 501 00:21:32,520 --> 00:21:36,160 Speaker 7: year ago, certainly I think people had not accepted this 502 00:21:36,200 --> 00:21:39,200 Speaker 7: new level yet. I think they've accepted it now, so 503 00:21:39,200 --> 00:21:43,159 Speaker 7: they understand rates higher for longer. I think if you 504 00:21:43,200 --> 00:21:46,080 Speaker 7: look at where where the calls are. For instance, our 505 00:21:46,160 --> 00:21:49,960 Speaker 7: rate desk just pushed out their call last week that 506 00:21:50,080 --> 00:21:52,560 Speaker 7: instead of a first cut happening in September, it's now 507 00:21:52,600 --> 00:21:55,000 Speaker 7: going to be December, just because it's too short of 508 00:21:55,000 --> 00:21:58,960 Speaker 7: a window to August first or the September meeting to 509 00:21:59,040 --> 00:22:02,840 Speaker 7: really see any the statistics that will allow the FED 510 00:22:02,880 --> 00:22:04,879 Speaker 7: to cut. And so as a result, I think companies 511 00:22:04,880 --> 00:22:07,040 Speaker 7: are saying, I'm going to be in this environment longer. 512 00:22:07,400 --> 00:22:09,600 Speaker 7: I need to make the right decisions for my business. 513 00:22:10,800 --> 00:22:13,760 Speaker 7: It's too soon to just focus on twenty six and beyond. 514 00:22:14,080 --> 00:22:15,480 Speaker 7: But I think a lot of folks are looking at 515 00:22:15,480 --> 00:22:18,080 Speaker 7: they're more longer term plans, and as a result, you're 516 00:22:18,080 --> 00:22:21,439 Speaker 7: seeing them make decisions that are strategic. I always like 517 00:22:21,480 --> 00:22:25,720 Speaker 7: to say good strategic transactions will happen and we can 518 00:22:25,760 --> 00:22:27,679 Speaker 7: find a way to support them and finance them. And 519 00:22:27,720 --> 00:22:29,159 Speaker 7: we're seeing that with our best clients. 520 00:22:29,200 --> 00:22:31,120 Speaker 5: But what's the risks in delaying. 521 00:22:32,680 --> 00:22:35,359 Speaker 7: The risk in delaying is that someone else takes advantage 522 00:22:35,600 --> 00:22:39,280 Speaker 7: and you're sitting on the sideline and left behind. And 523 00:22:39,359 --> 00:22:41,520 Speaker 7: so we're seeing a lot of activity in some sectors 524 00:22:41,840 --> 00:22:45,280 Speaker 7: where folks are feeling that. For example, if you look 525 00:22:45,280 --> 00:22:48,280 Speaker 7: at the technology sector, I think folks are trying to 526 00:22:48,320 --> 00:22:51,520 Speaker 7: build their pipelines from an AI perspective, and they're looking 527 00:22:51,560 --> 00:22:53,600 Speaker 7: and saying, I need to be in here quickly. 528 00:22:53,680 --> 00:22:55,560 Speaker 1: I can't wait to develop this on my own. 529 00:22:55,680 --> 00:22:58,159 Speaker 7: I'm going to acquire it. If you think about some 530 00:22:58,240 --> 00:23:02,919 Speaker 7: other sectors like industrials, they're looking to diversify their supply 531 00:23:03,040 --> 00:23:06,199 Speaker 7: chains and think about making sure they've got ample supply 532 00:23:06,280 --> 00:23:10,959 Speaker 7: and various geographies and so that they're teriff resistant, and 533 00:23:11,000 --> 00:23:12,800 Speaker 7: they know they have to operate in this environment. We 534 00:23:12,880 --> 00:23:15,960 Speaker 7: know it's going to not necessarily be what's out there 535 00:23:15,960 --> 00:23:18,399 Speaker 7: in terms of a headline today, but we don't know 536 00:23:18,440 --> 00:23:20,159 Speaker 7: what that's going to be, and I think they're planning 537 00:23:20,160 --> 00:23:21,040 Speaker 7: for various scenarios. 538 00:23:21,040 --> 00:23:22,919 Speaker 2: It just finally they support up the price of money 539 00:23:23,160 --> 00:23:25,640 Speaker 2: to right. Cuts make a difference, so they move the dial. 540 00:23:26,320 --> 00:23:30,240 Speaker 7: I think, as I started before, I said, we're looking 541 00:23:30,280 --> 00:23:33,000 Speaker 7: for a signal for the for sort of people to 542 00:23:33,320 --> 00:23:37,760 Speaker 7: make decisions. I think certainly rate cuts would be a 543 00:23:37,800 --> 00:23:41,640 Speaker 7: good signal to the market and to buyers and sellers 544 00:23:41,680 --> 00:23:44,720 Speaker 7: that this is an environment where we're ready to transact 545 00:23:45,000 --> 00:23:47,679 Speaker 7: and there's a level of confidence there. M and A 546 00:23:47,800 --> 00:23:52,320 Speaker 7: is about aligning many different factors, and so you need 547 00:23:52,359 --> 00:23:54,720 Speaker 7: your management teams, you need your boards, you need them 548 00:23:54,760 --> 00:23:57,320 Speaker 7: all to have confidence in the forward outlook. If they 549 00:23:57,359 --> 00:23:59,720 Speaker 7: feel that the Fed's giving a strong signal like that, 550 00:24:00,119 --> 00:24:02,320 Speaker 7: I think that's a positive. But at the same time, 551 00:24:02,359 --> 00:24:05,560 Speaker 7: I think the better companies are prepared to act in 552 00:24:05,560 --> 00:24:09,920 Speaker 7: this environment. And so again I jokingly say, we always 553 00:24:09,920 --> 00:24:11,240 Speaker 7: have a pretty full pipeline. 554 00:24:11,400 --> 00:24:12,720 Speaker 1: It's pretty full right now. 555 00:24:13,080 --> 00:24:14,840 Speaker 7: But again i'd love to see a lot of that 556 00:24:15,560 --> 00:24:17,320 Speaker 7: transition to announce transactions. 557 00:24:17,400 --> 00:24:19,119 Speaker 2: You're certainly not alone. It's going to see you, sir. 558 00:24:19,160 --> 00:24:21,600 Speaker 2: Thanks for dropping by, Thank you for having me. Vita Spaduta. 559 00:24:21,640 --> 00:24:34,720 Speaker 2: There of abc DA of rough capital rights in this 560 00:24:34,880 --> 00:24:38,080 Speaker 2: given the FEDS wait and see approach, prospective CPI readings 561 00:24:38,119 --> 00:24:40,760 Speaker 2: may take on greater importance for risk assets in the 562 00:24:40,760 --> 00:24:42,960 Speaker 2: months ahead. Mike joins us now for more, Mike, welcome 563 00:24:43,000 --> 00:24:45,320 Speaker 2: to the program, sir, what are you expected tomorrow morning? 564 00:24:45,960 --> 00:24:49,639 Speaker 8: Thank you for having me back on SO consensus is 565 00:24:49,720 --> 00:24:53,480 Speaker 8: expecting a three tenths rise, both headlined in Core. So 566 00:24:53,560 --> 00:24:55,760 Speaker 8: I don't really think that is going to change the 567 00:24:55,880 --> 00:24:59,320 Speaker 8: mood on the FED. It's a very divided committee, as 568 00:24:59,480 --> 00:25:03,800 Speaker 8: you guys just discussing. I'm not super worried about a 569 00:25:03,800 --> 00:25:06,520 Speaker 8: big inflation spike here, and the reason I say that 570 00:25:06,760 --> 00:25:10,880 Speaker 8: is bond market inflation expectations are very low and steady. 571 00:25:11,280 --> 00:25:14,520 Speaker 8: Some of the higher frequency data actually looks pretty good. 572 00:25:15,160 --> 00:25:18,879 Speaker 8: There's a gauge called trueflation, which is based on eighty 573 00:25:18,920 --> 00:25:23,800 Speaker 8: million prices in blockchain technology, super high frequency. So we 574 00:25:23,920 --> 00:25:28,040 Speaker 8: have year over year readings extending into almost mid July 575 00:25:28,240 --> 00:25:32,040 Speaker 8: here one point seven percent. So I don't think we 576 00:25:32,119 --> 00:25:34,840 Speaker 8: need to worry about a repeat of that three year 577 00:25:34,840 --> 00:25:39,880 Speaker 8: inflation overshoot, which was really an aggregate demand monetary policy story. 578 00:25:40,160 --> 00:25:44,239 Speaker 8: The tariffs could definitely create some inflationary headwinds, but I 579 00:25:44,240 --> 00:25:46,760 Speaker 8: think they are temporary in the FED probably is best 580 00:25:46,760 --> 00:25:47,880 Speaker 8: to just look through them. 581 00:25:48,200 --> 00:25:50,520 Speaker 3: If that's the case, Mike, do you see this as 582 00:25:50,560 --> 00:25:52,960 Speaker 3: a time for the FED to be cutting especially if 583 00:25:53,000 --> 00:25:56,360 Speaker 3: this CPI print that we get tomorrow shows that ongoing 584 00:25:56,359 --> 00:25:58,560 Speaker 3: disinflation at least not an inflationary trend. 585 00:26:00,200 --> 00:26:02,280 Speaker 8: Yeah, I think so. I think they're getting much closer 586 00:26:02,280 --> 00:26:05,280 Speaker 8: to that point, probably September. That's what markets are priced 587 00:26:05,320 --> 00:26:08,840 Speaker 8: for FED funds futures are priced for just under one 588 00:26:08,880 --> 00:26:11,920 Speaker 8: hundred basis points of rate cuts over the next year. 589 00:26:13,119 --> 00:26:15,160 Speaker 8: That sounds like a lot, but it's really not over 590 00:26:15,200 --> 00:26:18,439 Speaker 8: a twelve month period. If the economy is softening a 591 00:26:18,440 --> 00:26:20,520 Speaker 8: bit at the margin, and I think, you know, some 592 00:26:20,640 --> 00:26:23,160 Speaker 8: of the data suggests that's the case, not falling off 593 00:26:23,200 --> 00:26:25,880 Speaker 8: a cliff, for sure, but we are seeing a little 594 00:26:25,880 --> 00:26:29,080 Speaker 8: bit of softness at the margin with the most recent 595 00:26:29,160 --> 00:26:35,680 Speaker 8: job numbers. And also it looks like GDP underlying growth. 596 00:26:36,119 --> 00:26:39,240 Speaker 8: Real final sales to the private sector probably ran around 597 00:26:39,320 --> 00:26:43,439 Speaker 8: one percent or so in Q two, So that's, you know, 598 00:26:43,480 --> 00:26:46,160 Speaker 8: that's much that's much softer than what we've seen over 599 00:26:46,160 --> 00:26:49,280 Speaker 8: the course of the last you know, two plus years. 600 00:26:49,320 --> 00:26:51,760 Speaker 8: So I don't think it's inappropriate for the FED to 601 00:26:51,840 --> 00:26:55,560 Speaker 8: be starting to consider lowering policy rates here. But I 602 00:26:55,600 --> 00:26:58,919 Speaker 8: will say this, the hectoring from the White House is 603 00:26:59,119 --> 00:27:03,480 Speaker 8: wholly on helpful. I mean, even if the administration were 604 00:27:03,480 --> 00:27:06,320 Speaker 8: to convince Paul to step away from the FED and 605 00:27:06,359 --> 00:27:09,399 Speaker 8: you know, this stuff about the construction project is just 606 00:27:09,440 --> 00:27:12,960 Speaker 8: a fig leaf. It's pretty obviously obvious what's going on here. 607 00:27:14,119 --> 00:27:16,400 Speaker 8: It's completely out of line in my view. But even 608 00:27:16,400 --> 00:27:19,120 Speaker 8: if you were able to convince Paul to step down 609 00:27:19,200 --> 00:27:23,000 Speaker 8: and someone else takes over. It's a committee, they operate 610 00:27:23,080 --> 00:27:27,800 Speaker 8: by consensus, so it's really very unlikely to dramatically change 611 00:27:27,840 --> 00:27:30,000 Speaker 8: the rate path in any event. 612 00:27:30,119 --> 00:27:32,640 Speaker 3: So it's just like Michael, because this is actually one 613 00:27:32,680 --> 00:27:35,359 Speaker 3: key question that the market has right that the people 614 00:27:35,600 --> 00:27:39,119 Speaker 3: are questioning whether the market is pricing in some sort 615 00:27:39,200 --> 00:27:42,439 Speaker 3: of firing of fed Shair J. Powell and wouldn't have 616 00:27:42,520 --> 00:27:45,800 Speaker 3: that big of a reaction at all. Peter Shecheer was saying, no, 617 00:27:45,920 --> 00:27:47,800 Speaker 3: that it is a committee and that people would look 618 00:27:47,880 --> 00:27:51,439 Speaker 3: through that. How much does it complicate a message that 619 00:27:51,560 --> 00:27:55,240 Speaker 3: actually would go the president's way if you've followed the 620 00:27:55,240 --> 00:27:57,639 Speaker 3: economic data at least in your opinion, how much does 621 00:27:57,680 --> 00:28:00,560 Speaker 3: it complicate that kind of messaging from a that wants 622 00:28:00,600 --> 00:28:01,719 Speaker 3: to appear independent. 623 00:28:03,359 --> 00:28:04,240 Speaker 4: That's a great point. 624 00:28:04,320 --> 00:28:07,680 Speaker 8: I think, if anything, this hectoring in the political pressure 625 00:28:08,600 --> 00:28:11,840 Speaker 8: probably makes it more difficult for the committee to move 626 00:28:11,920 --> 00:28:15,760 Speaker 8: forward with rate cuts, and because they don't want to 627 00:28:15,800 --> 00:28:19,320 Speaker 8: be viewed as, you know, a bending to political pressure. 628 00:28:19,480 --> 00:28:23,439 Speaker 8: So I think, if anything, these kinds of shenanigans are 629 00:28:23,560 --> 00:28:28,240 Speaker 8: likely a backfire and it sets a terrible precedent going forward. 630 00:28:28,280 --> 00:28:31,399 Speaker 8: I mean, you know, the FED should be an independent institution. 631 00:28:32,040 --> 00:28:34,880 Speaker 8: We can look back at what happened with President Nixon 632 00:28:35,840 --> 00:28:39,960 Speaker 8: when he pressured FED Chair Burns to inappropriately run easy 633 00:28:40,000 --> 00:28:43,960 Speaker 8: monetary policy, setting off a decade of inflation which eventually 634 00:28:43,960 --> 00:28:47,360 Speaker 8: culminated in double digit interest rates. We saw a situation 635 00:28:47,480 --> 00:28:51,720 Speaker 8: in Turkey where President Erdawan tampered with the central bank, 636 00:28:51,840 --> 00:28:55,560 Speaker 8: wanted low rates, easy money policy, a currency collapse and 637 00:28:55,640 --> 00:28:59,080 Speaker 8: hyperinflation followed. So let's get back to basics. If you 638 00:28:59,120 --> 00:29:01,400 Speaker 8: want low mark at interest rates, what do you need? 639 00:29:01,480 --> 00:29:03,560 Speaker 8: You need price stability, and I think the FED is 640 00:29:03,760 --> 00:29:06,520 Speaker 8: well on their way to achieving that in terms of 641 00:29:06,560 --> 00:29:10,040 Speaker 8: on target inflation. And you need budget integrity, and the 642 00:29:10,080 --> 00:29:12,680 Speaker 8: FED has nothing to do with that in the administration, 643 00:29:13,320 --> 00:29:17,120 Speaker 8: and my judgment and Congress are certainly not on that 644 00:29:17,240 --> 00:29:20,520 Speaker 8: path with the so called big beautiful Bill that was 645 00:29:20,880 --> 00:29:23,880 Speaker 8: miles and miles away from an optimal outcome. 646 00:29:24,280 --> 00:29:26,600 Speaker 5: Jonathan's been talking about this Deutsche Bank note about the 647 00:29:26,720 --> 00:29:30,880 Speaker 5: risks of if Powell was to be ousted are underpriced. 648 00:29:30,920 --> 00:29:33,800 Speaker 5: What kind of market reaction could we see if we've 649 00:29:33,840 --> 00:29:35,000 Speaker 5: come to that point. 650 00:29:36,200 --> 00:29:39,200 Speaker 8: Well, it's very uncertain. I think it's just a matter 651 00:29:39,280 --> 00:29:44,360 Speaker 8: of setting a very bad precedent of political tampering or 652 00:29:44,400 --> 00:29:48,760 Speaker 8: the attempt to tamper with an independent federal reserve. And 653 00:29:48,800 --> 00:29:52,960 Speaker 8: you really look back at history and policized central banks 654 00:29:53,400 --> 00:29:57,280 Speaker 8: don't achieve optimal outcomes. They might do something that helps 655 00:29:57,280 --> 00:30:00,280 Speaker 8: the sitting administration in the short run. In the long 656 00:30:00,400 --> 00:30:03,480 Speaker 8: term price is paid by the public in terms of 657 00:30:03,560 --> 00:30:07,160 Speaker 8: higher inflation and lower real income. So it's really not 658 00:30:07,280 --> 00:30:09,560 Speaker 8: the path you want to be going down. Very hard 659 00:30:09,560 --> 00:30:11,480 Speaker 8: to say in terms of the very short term. I mean, 660 00:30:11,480 --> 00:30:14,480 Speaker 8: what happens even if were to step down, I don't 661 00:30:14,480 --> 00:30:17,760 Speaker 8: think it really changes things dramatically in terms of you 662 00:30:17,760 --> 00:30:19,960 Speaker 8: know where the FED is headed here, given that it's 663 00:30:20,000 --> 00:30:22,959 Speaker 8: a committee, and you know, the administration is not going 664 00:30:23,000 --> 00:30:26,760 Speaker 8: to be able to completely politicize the majority on the 665 00:30:26,800 --> 00:30:32,240 Speaker 8: committee anytime soon. That said, it's really a move in 666 00:30:32,280 --> 00:30:35,280 Speaker 8: the wrong direction. It's totally inappropriate, and they should just. 667 00:30:35,240 --> 00:30:37,400 Speaker 2: Stop it, just a bit of bow on it, given 668 00:30:37,440 --> 00:30:39,760 Speaker 2: all the risks we've talked about. Why are market based 669 00:30:39,760 --> 00:30:41,640 Speaker 2: inflation and expectations so well anchored? 670 00:30:42,880 --> 00:30:45,640 Speaker 8: Well, I think they're well anchored because the FED has 671 00:30:45,680 --> 00:30:48,240 Speaker 8: achieved quite a bit of credibility here, right. I mean, 672 00:30:48,280 --> 00:30:52,520 Speaker 8: they obviously had a big goof in twenty one twenty 673 00:30:52,520 --> 00:30:55,160 Speaker 8: two where we had inflation shoot up to forty year highs. 674 00:30:55,680 --> 00:30:59,240 Speaker 8: But you know, they ended up correcting that with five 675 00:30:59,320 --> 00:31:01,960 Speaker 8: hundred and fifty basis points of rate hikes and we're 676 00:31:02,000 --> 00:31:05,320 Speaker 8: somehow able to achieve a soft landing avoid a recession. 677 00:31:05,760 --> 00:31:09,080 Speaker 8: And now inflation has come down to much lower levels historically, 678 00:31:09,600 --> 00:31:12,560 Speaker 8: So the bond market is giving the Fed the benefit 679 00:31:12,600 --> 00:31:16,280 Speaker 8: of the doubt. The institution has really regained and re 680 00:31:16,400 --> 00:31:20,960 Speaker 8: anchored its credibility, and that's another reason not to tamper 681 00:31:21,840 --> 00:31:24,200 Speaker 8: with the Federal Reserve in a political way, because if 682 00:31:24,200 --> 00:31:28,480 Speaker 8: that credibility is lost, it could be very difficult to reachieve. 683 00:31:28,560 --> 00:31:32,960 Speaker 8: They certainly got very fortunate with this episode a few 684 00:31:33,000 --> 00:31:36,360 Speaker 8: years ago. You know why keep playing Russian roulette with 685 00:31:36,440 --> 00:31:39,040 Speaker 8: credibility doesn't make any sense whatsoever. 686 00:31:39,400 --> 00:31:41,280 Speaker 2: Mikeel, appreciate your time. It's been too long. Let's do 687 00:31:41,360 --> 00:31:45,160 Speaker 2: it against so micro daanave of rough capital. This is 688 00:31:45,200 --> 00:31:50,520 Speaker 2: the Bloomberg Seventants podcast, bringing you the best in markets, economics, angiopolitics. 689 00:31:50,840 --> 00:31:53,320 Speaker 2: You can watch the show live on Bloomberg TV weekday 690 00:31:53,360 --> 00:31:56,560 Speaker 2: mornings from six am to nine am Eastern. Subscribe to 691 00:31:56,600 --> 00:31:59,760 Speaker 2: the podcast on Apple Spotify or anywhere else you listen, 692 00:32:00,120 --> 00:32:02,200 Speaker 2: and as always on the bloom Blog, Terminal and the 693 00:32:02,200 --> 00:32:03,120 Speaker 2: Bloomberg Business 694 00:32:03,120 --> 00:32:07,760 Speaker 1: Out Mm hmm