WEBVTT - Surveillance: Negative Rates with Mohamed El-Erian

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:12.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah. Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom

0:00:12.720 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Keane Jailey. We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg Michael

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:34.159
<v Speaker 1>Holland with us as well. Many of you will know

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>him for the courage to be in the markets as well. Michael,

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:41.480
<v Speaker 1>what happens after a bang up double digit here? What

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>what's the history of what happens next? The history, Tom

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>is pretty clear that if you look at the last

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:52.840
<v Speaker 1>quarter of a century, there's been six years of performance

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 1>like we just had in the US. In over three

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>quarters of those years, the following year you had double

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 1>digit rates of return. There was Newton law of motion.

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Things in motions stay in motion. That's what's happened, by

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the way, in the other years you lost money. So

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>historians would all be millionaires of history simply repeated itself

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:17.960
<v Speaker 1>perfect exactly. So, Michael, it's interesting, you know, we hear

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of folks coming here and they look back

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>at ten they had this huge run. But it's interesting

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>if you take a look at it from the peak

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 1>of eighteen and September, it's maybe it's still a double

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>digit return, but there's no reason to maybe say, oh

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>my god, I can't possibly follow up twenty percent year.

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:36.760
<v Speaker 1>It's more like a ten or eleven or twelve percent

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>year relative to Barry d Barry Ridholtz made it and

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:44.199
<v Speaker 1>thanks for listening exactly, and we have to give Barty

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 1>Barry credit. How do you think about so nineteen? Do

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I need to think about certain sectors that I want

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to be in? Do I want to be more aggressive

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>than I want to be defensive? How do you think

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>about it after even a double digit year? I think, Paul,

0:01:56.640 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>when when you whenever including this period we just went

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>through and are going into right now, I think you

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>always have to look for the individual. If you're buying

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:09.359
<v Speaker 1>individual companies, you simply have to look at number one management.

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>For example, we talked about Boeing earlier too. Uh, you

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>have a new management that it probably is a major

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>plus for the company. Um. You look at companies like Microsoft,

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>what they've done versus IBM and the cloud you go

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:22.920
<v Speaker 1>on it, so then you look at the valuation. So

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's as simple as fundamentals. Basic blocking and

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>tackling Um, there's still companies out there, they're trading at

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>reasonable prices given their prospects. How do you factor in

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>all these I guess exogenous issues that have really whip

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:39.959
<v Speaker 1>solved this market around almost on a daily basis. Let's

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>just take trade for example. Do you just try to

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>just take the trade out of the discussion and focus

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>again on the fundamentals of the companies or you can

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 1>have to say, g I have to think about a

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>stock that's gonna weather maybe a prolonged trade disagreements skirmish

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:56.400
<v Speaker 1>with China. Yeah, the crazy trade stuff for the past year, Paul,

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>actually provides opportunities if you identify a company really like

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>and because someone says we're not gonna have a deal

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>with the China, the Chinese uh, and the market goes down,

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>you can you have an opportunity to buy it. I

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>think at the end end of the process, would would

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you end up with with with the trade thing is

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get something, the Chinese will get something, but

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>not very much and it doesn't really matter. Far more

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 1>important actually for me over the decades and full of

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>markets and market is the Federal Reserve. A year ago,

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the ugly December we had the worse since was caused

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 1>in large part by the worry about the Fed hiking

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 1>interest rates. Made no The market said, this is nuts.

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>We may be going into a recession. We don't know,

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and the feed is talking about hiking rates. This is

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>crazy in the market. Tank. Now you have opposite day,

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>which is massive amounts of liquidity, probably a record balance

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>sheet for the Federal Reserve at the end of the year. Okay,

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>we're doing We're channel in Wall Street week. Uh this

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 1>day with Danna Telsea later and Elf and Michael Holland

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>with us is well in honor of Marty's wife. Don't

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>fight the Fed. How do you not fight the Fed? Forward?

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>You don't fight him? Marty wonderful friend, do him for years?

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>A brilliant investors, really really good investor. Uh, there's gonna

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>be a crash, the famous line, and uh, right before

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the crash of the market back anyhow, he he got

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>it right. The Federal Reserve, if they were going to

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:25.919
<v Speaker 1>hike a year ago, you wanted to be out of

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the market. If they can, they don't have a they

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>don't have a choice the Fed. Sometimes it's very the

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>play card is pretty easy it's easy right now because

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:39.160
<v Speaker 1>for the time being, the Federal Reserve is really concerned

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>about the liquidity in the markets. They looks it looks

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 1>like they've addressed it through the end of the year,

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:46.919
<v Speaker 1>but there was major concern back in going to rebuild

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:49.719
<v Speaker 1>the balance sheet and keep yield slow in the next year.

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>They because they quick answer yes, yeah, I mean I

0:04:56.440 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>think it's absolutely extraordinary. Michael. How we look at as

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:03.160
<v Speaker 1>we said earlier Graham, Dodd and Coddle, we've thrown it

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>out the window. So what are we left with? What

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>is the theory of owning companies like Amazon right now

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:13.039
<v Speaker 1>or even an elevated Microsoft. What's the underlying theory that

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>allows you to own them? Uh? You do human stuff,

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and that is you look at companies where the managements

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>have figured it out. They perpetuate themselves Johnson and Johnson, Uh, Microsoft,

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>You go on and on through through the great companies

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and you figure out where their price go ahead. No, no,

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 1>don't please continue. No. So so that hasn't changed in

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>any way. I think at the end, at the end

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of the day, once once you find very high quality

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I think professional sports to the top athlete and get

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>it at the right price, you realize that the only

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>reason Holland's here he said, I'd only show up if

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the Bruins beat the capitalist You know that's the truth. Um,

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 1>this is important, folks. You got a couple of minutes

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to go here, and we have where this Paul Sweeney,

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>who's done more to develop security analysis at Bloomberg than anyone,

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and a guy named Holland who began with Morgan Guarantee

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and then first Boston. Right, this is a few years ago.

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:11.279
<v Speaker 1>What are cf A is gonna do ten years from

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>now or five years now? We're where Michael Holland, where

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>is the security analysis five years from now? Well, I

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's it's interesting, Tom. I think the cells, it's

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily the cell side, which is one of the

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:26.840
<v Speaker 1>historic landing points for the CFAs. Um, it's going to

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>be at the bye side. I think there's taking more

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 1>research in house on the by side. But then it's

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna be alternative research platforms, for example Bloomberg Intelligence here

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:37.599
<v Speaker 1>where we have three analysts covering two thousand stocks. It's

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>just a different model kind of reacting to the changes

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>in the cell side. And I think there's gonna be

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 1>other models out there. As well. Dana Telsey is a

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:48.840
<v Speaker 1>great example Tom for some of the independiques, the independent boties.

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:50.919
<v Speaker 1>But you have to be somebody like what do you

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>read every day? Michael Holland. I mean, you know, we

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 1>used to. I used to go up the elevator with

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Phil Kray Pioneer, and he had piles of stuff, you know,

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>on the dolly. What do you reading? In his nineties,

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>he was still reading stuff. I knew him. He was

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>one of my heroes in the business. I'm almost as

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>old as he right now. I actually this is not

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>a commercial. I don't belong to Bloomberg. I don't get

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:14.559
<v Speaker 1>paid by Bloomberg. I actually start with Bloomberg in the morning.

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>And Paul Sweeney has helped to develop the model of

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the future, the business model of the future. The model

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that I grew up with in the business is dead. Uh.

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>The model of the future is what you have at Bloomberg.

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>People who have an objective reason to be right about

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Then who who decides by hold self for you? If

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Paul Sweeney doesn't, oh, well, I have to do that myself.

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>To do it's a surveillance bre exclusive investors by hold Cell.

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Michael Holland. Thank you so much for joining us here

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>as well. We got through that without him talking, Abo.

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Can we hold him for another block? I'd like to

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>speak about the upcoming presidential election? What should I disclaimer

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>here before we do the three? Michael Holland with us

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>getting us into trouble, We're thrilled to bring you know

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>uh an original healf on Wall Street Week. Dana Telsey

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>joins us now with bear Stearings for years in a

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 1>hugely successful retail research shop, Telsey Advisory. Dana, thank you

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Let's just sum up here.

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>How is this holiday season? Ben? I think the holiday

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 1>season has basically been okay. I think there's a have

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>and to have, not value and convenience is winning And basically,

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>if you are not having something innovative, you're not going

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>to drive the traffic. I saw the other day the

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:45.959
<v Speaker 1>Steam luxury BRANDI off five days before Christmas or whatever.

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>What do they do on the and forward into about

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:54.079
<v Speaker 1>January five? If they're sixty off, now, how much do

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 1>they go off in the next ten days? I mean

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 1>off typically is the most it's gonna go. They'll move

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the merchandise or else it'll get sold to some of

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the off pricers. But the other key thing is what

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>some of the retailers do that is a smart thing.

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 1>They bring in new merchandise. You have to bring in

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 1>fresh goods in order to attract the consumer. It can't

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>be a deal a day every day in order to

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>generate your profitable margins. So, Dana, what are people buying

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>this shopping season? I mean Tom just has got I

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>think he bought twelve air pods or something to for

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>his lisp. What are most people buying? That's what they're buying.

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Those AirPods are some of the most popular items out there.

0:09:31.440 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Some TVs are very popular also, and everything active. Check

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 1>out those sneakers. And this is a boot season also

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>where boots are doing very well too, like the Selene

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:45.079
<v Speaker 1>Folco over the knee boot and calf skin one thousand ninety.

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Some saline must have and it's a musty, haven't I

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 1>believe me? Someone was watching you, Dana with me earlier

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and she emailed in and said, deer on the way home,

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>pick up those salines. How do these brands still do? What?

0:09:57.520 --> 0:09:59.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean? Some brands are sinking. I'm you know, the

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:03.079
<v Speaker 1>Bank Group seeds to come. Uh, Dana and that. How

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 1>does someone like Selena of such a good year. I

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>think some of the things they do, it's coming out

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>with new designs, new styles on a regular basis, and

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 1>basically being in the press and bring on social media

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>that people want to be part of that club. Instagram media.

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Instagrams changed everything. How do the department stores adapt to

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the reality of Instagram. They need to offer service. You

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>need to be able to have service to marry the

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>activity of buying with the activity of doing. It's interesting, Dana,

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:36.679
<v Speaker 1>what I've noticed, you know, just following the earnings of

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:39.319
<v Speaker 1>some of the big retailer, big box retailers, whether it's

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a wal Mart, Target is every quarter I look at

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 1>their digital sales numbers and their eye popping, you know,

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of growth in e commerce from some of these

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>big companies. To me, I'm just a lay person looking

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 1>at the retail space, but it seems like they figured

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:57.719
<v Speaker 1>out how to compete against Amazon. I think that is

0:10:57.760 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>what's happening. I think when you think about some of

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:02.839
<v Speaker 1>these do aital numbers and you're marrying it with retail stores. Also,

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the themes of holiday season two

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand nine is going to be buy online pickup in

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 1>store worked. That's ONNI channel tongue. Oh that's um, that's like,

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that's okay, I'm learning, Dana. You wrote a piece two

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 1>days ago. I'll say that was absolutely exquisite on what

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:24.079
<v Speaker 1>I know everyone is talking about, which is the piles

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and piles of cardboard boxes. Can Amazon, first of all,

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 1>can Amazon be successful with one day shipping? I think

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be. I think Amazon continues to push

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the needle on speed, and speed basically means everything because

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:42.439
<v Speaker 1>I can allow you to gaine care. And I think

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:46.079
<v Speaker 1>we're going to continue to see retailers enhance their speed models.

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 1>What do they do about the expense I believe you

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>have in your lead paragraph shipping up eight to that

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 1>crushes retail margins. Do they pass that on to the customer?

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:58.079
<v Speaker 1>How does that work? I think some of it does

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>come in the form of the of cost. I think

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>some of it comes in the form of service, and

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I think some of it is just lower margins. It

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 1>is expensive to offer all of these services. It doesn't

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>come for free. Yeah, that's kind of where I wanted

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 1>to go, Dana. I mean, if if I'm not a Walmart,

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:16.679
<v Speaker 1>if I'm not a Target, how do I compete against

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:21.079
<v Speaker 1>the digital aspect of it all? I can't invest, can I? Well,

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I think there are some elements where you can. I

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 1>think some of these companies overall, if you're not a Walmart,

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:27.439
<v Speaker 1>you're not a target. Take a look at the off

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>pricers that treasure hunt experience. There's a reason why their

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>traffic is up all the time. Take a look at

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:36.439
<v Speaker 1>country brands. You can only get them at those luxury stores.

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Or take a look at Lulu Lemon. Basically the identify

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>of that brand, if it's unique and differentiated, the consumer

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>will come well, we're unique and differentiated. And then we're

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>just two guys talking retail with Dana Telsey sort of

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>fix that joining us saw the star of Bloomberg Business Week,

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Carol Masser. Women who can talk about stop. No, I'm

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:00.439
<v Speaker 1>out of questions. What do you think of all the

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:04.199
<v Speaker 1>more enlightened No, I am. We've been talking to Selene

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>boot for two thousand dollars. Mrs Keane has noted that

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 1>in my dream question, please for data, Telsey, Data Telsey,

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the retailers. You know, it's funny. I was looking at

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:17.079
<v Speaker 1>some of the best performing and worst performing stocks of

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the S and P five hundred for the year last year,

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Target is near the top and at the bottles, So like,

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>how do you reconcile the retailers who figured it out

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and those who haven't. I think one of the things

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen Target and Brian Cornell do a Target

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 1>that's been pretty amazing and basically has worked the service aspect.

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Look at the look at the look of the stores

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>they've gotten cleaner. Look at the exclusive brands that's come

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 1>in where basically he's changing up the brands on a

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 1>regular basis. And look at the categories to it goes

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 1>from electronics to cosmetics, to apparel to food. He really

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:58.319
<v Speaker 1>has taken that whole business model and turned it upside

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>down and came out with something that's and exciting. Dana

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and Carol and also and Danny, you mentioned this earlier

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:07.679
<v Speaker 1>on my other property, the whole makeup thing. I mean, Carol,

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>you're living this in real time with various you know

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:13.319
<v Speaker 1>Tom King. Literally I just came down the escalator, Dana.

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm like here with my bags and he's like coming

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>into the studio, coming to the studio. But I have

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>to say the makeup category that like creams and lotions.

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Look at Sepphora, look at look at Alta. Alta is

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 1>constantly I'm the most accurate. Who's the target, Dana Telsey,

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>who is the targ of the makeup category. It's Alta

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and Sepphora that are doing it. Alta out of the mall,

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Sepphora in the mall, and basically the reason why they

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>have they have makeup applications there and it's a community.

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 1>People basically get excited when they say that looks good

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 1>on you or no, this is the color for you.

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 1>It's it's interacting. That's what's driving the bus. Yeah, I

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>like Paul Color one oh six, Tasty Hazel. This is

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the Gucci Ruga Levra Matt lipstick forty two dollars after

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>after thought, Dana, save us, because can you believe these

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>two guys are talking lipstick? You know what? You never know?

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Right map Everyone wants to carry their skin with your

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>heritage with Bergdorf? Do they make money in the basement?

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 1>You go down there to the most dangerous basement in

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the world. What per square foot do they make in

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the basement of Bergdorf? I makeup cosmetics is very high margin.

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:26.479
<v Speaker 1>There's a reason why there's always called the lipstick indicator.

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>When recessions come, women will always buy lipstick. It's profitable

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and it adds a Dasha newness where there's a boom. Now,

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 1>what's the newness now from miss mass or is she

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 1>considers getting to the holidays? I mean, is it the

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>is it the facelift? The face mask? No, the face

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>mask thing you're doing by looking at me and saying

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>you wear one of my favorite everybody's walking around the

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>house with face mask on? Is that like the next thing, Dana?

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Don't you know? The new look is all about natural

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and it takes a lot of work to look natural,

0:15:57.040 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 1>but naturals wears that right now, telling Dana to tell us,

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being with us. Thrilled that

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you're with us. We are thrilled to bringing a gentleman

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 1>who put a book out a few years ago there

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 1>was a must must read when markets collide, and when

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>then his work for the industry, his work at Pimco

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 1>and Alians, and of course his service to Cambridge which

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>comes up in late two thousand and twenty. It is

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 1>rare that you not only deliver when markets collide, but

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a second book as well. The Only Game in Town,

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Dr Larry and joins us Samohama, And I know you're

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>working on a new edition of the Only Game in Town?

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>What will be new in the in the game in

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>this town? I'm good morning, Tom, and thanks for having in.

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Happy holidays to you and and all our listeners. Um,

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>what's gonna be new is that since I published a

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>book in January two accounting and sixteen people have understood

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the issue. They have understood that there are costs and

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>risks of excessive reliance on central banks. And now we

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 1>have a list of things that have become clear, but

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 1>we have a list of other things that have become

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 1>even more murky. And the conversation is starting to lose

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>sight of the fact that we can get out of

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>this mess, but we need to do it quickly. One

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>of my conversations of the year was with great courage,

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>David folk arts Landau of Deutsche Bank took a stand

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 1>against negative interest rates with all the complexities of his

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>executive abilities at Deutsche Bank. And that do you agree

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 1>with folk its land out that the experiment is done?

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 1>So I think the experiment is done. I think the

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>experiment was done. Um. A few years ago that's why

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:46.399
<v Speaker 1>I wrote the book. But getting out of the experiment

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>is not in the hands of central banks. That's what

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:52.360
<v Speaker 1>people lose sight of. In order to normalize monetary policy,

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you need a policy handoff from excessive reliance on central

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 1>banks to a comprehensive poke growth approach. And that means

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the governments. It means politics, and we're simply not saying it,

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>which is why No, I don't mean to interrupt Dr Lambe,

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:11.439
<v Speaker 1>but this is so important. Under the Hicksie and I

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:14.880
<v Speaker 1>s l l M framework, you're saying, move it over

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 1>from the monetary game to the real economy game. Does

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:21.639
<v Speaker 1>that include fiscal policy? Are you suggesting it's strictly a

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 1>policy opportunity. So for a very small handful of countries,

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:31.679
<v Speaker 1>very small um, it means physical opportunity. For the rest,

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>it means focusing on the drivers of productivity, on structure reforms,

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 1>on infrastructure, on labor retraining, on labor retooling. There is

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 1>so much to do, and if you look for the

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>last twenty years, with the exception of Germany, nothing has

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 1>been done. In the advanced world. We've relied on finance,

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 1>first on private finance, and then on central banks and

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 1>we've lost sight of what tribes productivity and growth. So

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>we need a pivot back. But I'm not too optimistic

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>because that means a lot politicians, and it means that

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 1>they have to get their act together. And Mohammed talking

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:08.399
<v Speaker 1>about getting the act together, I'm thinking about Germany and

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of you know, think about negative interest rates

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 1>in the industrial world, certainly think about Germany. They have

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 1>shown no signs. I guess from a political point to

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:21.159
<v Speaker 1>go to your point of thinking about fiscal steamless, what

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:25.479
<v Speaker 1>has to change? What do you think realistically can happen

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to push it out. So if you are in Germany

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and everybody is lecturing you for fiscal stimulus, you really

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:36.920
<v Speaker 1>are baffled because, on the one hand, your service industry

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:40.679
<v Speaker 1>is doing fine. Second, yes, your manufacturing sector is not

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:43.120
<v Speaker 1>doing great, but that has little to do with demand.

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:45.200
<v Speaker 1>It has to do with trade, and it has to

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>do with the auto sector. So you keep on scrashing

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 1>your head and saying, wait a minute, why is everybody

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>asking me to sacrifice my physical side if they're not

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>doing more? So I you know this notion we fell

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:00.400
<v Speaker 1>in love at one stage with them. Are your place

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 1>with this notion that Germany was gonna implement. It's not

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen. They may do something small. So the answer

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to that is unfortunately more complicated, is that Germany has

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>to be part of a regional effort to get fiscal

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 1>integration going. That's that's the answer. That is what the

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:20.400
<v Speaker 1>engineers would tell you, But the politicians will say, hey, no,

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 1>not now. If you're just joining us worldwide in coast

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to coast Muhammad a'll aian with us of course writing

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Opinion, uh and with alliance and of course

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>moving to Queen's College at Cambridge? Are you going to

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>be a tough grader at Queen's Scott What are you

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:34.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna do at Cambridge? I mean, are you going to

0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>teach a course? But what you've missed, Tom is I've

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:41.400
<v Speaker 1>been teaching a course this semester at Wharton and it's

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 1>been the most enjoyable thing. You want to learn something,

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 1>go go talk to seventy secure year old and you

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 1>will learn so much from them. It's been an incredible

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>joy in various What are you telling them about the

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>new actual assumption? I mean the reality here And this

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:58.879
<v Speaker 1>is NBA speak, folks, But the bottom line is the

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>actual assumption come screaming down. Bill Gross talks about financial repression.

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 1>It's here for retirees. What do you tell them about

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 1>what your new normal is? I mean, is it three

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>actual real assumption? Is that where we're heading? So I

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:18.119
<v Speaker 1>take that as an example of you people sitting in

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the room are going to have to make decisions on

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 1>their radical uncertainty, on the unusual uncertainty. There's lots of

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 1>things that were unthinkable that have become reality, and they

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>are changing the way the system works, and that is

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:33.919
<v Speaker 1>the biggest challenge you're going to face in your business career.

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:36.119
<v Speaker 1>And then what I do is I give them tools.

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't give them the answer because I don't know

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:40.159
<v Speaker 1>what the answer is, but I give them tools to

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 1>help them figure out how to get to an answer

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>in their particular circumstances. Interesting, Mohammed, if I were, you know,

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:49.360
<v Speaker 1>thinking about that. Tom talks about the actual assumptions. It's

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 1>it's what I tell my kids. Max out on your

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 1>four one K from day one. But Mohammed, so as

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>we think about the world going forward, are you in

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the camp that is essentially you know, I can go

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 1>to time assumption issue kind of lower growth for longer.

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I am lower growth for longer if and it's a

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 1>big if. Okay, capital I capital if if if policymakers

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>don't step up to their policy responsibilities. Um, I worry.

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 1>There's two really big unknown unknowns. Thomas was talking about this.

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the answer is, and the marketplace

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>has to deal with short term constructive outlook with the

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:32.120
<v Speaker 1>longer term uncertainty. I don't know how much damage we've

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>created to the market based system with negative rates. I

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know whether we are going to deglobalize for a

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>number of years or not. And I don't think anybody knows.

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:47.440
<v Speaker 1>These are big unknowns and the key issues to build resilience.

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll go with resilience in Mohammed, if we could speak

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 1>of your time at Harvard and you know the pluses

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and the minuses of actually managing real money, how should

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 1>our listeners position shan there forty thou three hundred dollars

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:07.640
<v Speaker 1>or their forty two million, three hundred thousand dollars. How

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:12.440
<v Speaker 1>should they position that after this great ball market if

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:16.120
<v Speaker 1>they don't know the amplitudes of some of these sharks

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 1>to come, And that is the challenge. So sort of

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:24.359
<v Speaker 1>proposition that you're trying to implement is to keep a

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>claim on the upside while having more protection against the downside.

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>If you if you're a professional investor, and that's what

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:34.440
<v Speaker 1>we did at Harvard when I was there, you can

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 1>do some tail hedging, you can do various things that

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>are very low costs. In this environment because of volatility

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>has collapsed. If, however, your retail investor, it gets trickier. Um,

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>a retail investor doesn't have as many options as a

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 1>professional investor does. So you've got to focus on things

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>that matter. Balance sheet matter, cash generations matter, being higher

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>up in quality in credit terms matter. And you've just

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:02.639
<v Speaker 1>got to got to remember you want to maintain a

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>claim on the upside, but increasingly protect against the downside.

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:08.160
<v Speaker 1>And the time we've got left to Dr Hilaria. And

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 1>I was cornered this weekend by a wonderful listener who

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a claim to me of his latest trip to Egypt,

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 1>and he just said it was a complete success and

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the tourism that is so vital to your Egypt as well.

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Give us an update on what Egypt needs to do forward,

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Mr ELCC and the others. All the controversy, how does

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 1>Egypt find a better decade. So economically they need to

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:41.640
<v Speaker 1>build on this success of the last few years to

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 1>produce more inclusive and higher growth. They having higher growth,

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 1>it needs to be more inclusive. The success is reserves

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:51.639
<v Speaker 1>are no longer an issue there at record levels, Inflation

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>has come down dramatically, and as you said, tourism has

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>come back and has come back in size. So now

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you need to pivot it in order to make sure

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 1>that the growth that is produced is more inclusive. And

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>that's about second generation reforms. Um, it's not you know

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 1>something we don't know about. It just requires a lot

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 1>of hard work at the micro level. How alone do

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you perceive Egypt to be? Given the challenges that Mr

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Radjuan in Turkey, he had a vision of foreign policy,

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:25.360
<v Speaker 1>of foreign projection, a Middle East projection of seven eight,

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:28.879
<v Speaker 1>nine years ago that was to be to take ownership

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:32.719
<v Speaker 1>in the future of the Eastern Mediterranean. That's evaporated, hasn't it?

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:35.919
<v Speaker 1>How alone is Egypt and it's it's destiny here and

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 1>how can the United States help? So Egypt has been

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>focusing much more on its own issues, exactly a regional

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 1>view that Turkey took and others have Um, you know,

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>it has good allies in the region, has a very

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>good relationship with the US, and I think what Egypt

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:54.920
<v Speaker 1>is trying to do is to get its house in order,

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and it has been doing so. Dr Larian, Thank you

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 1>so much, Muhammadhlarian, folks, and when you await the new

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:02.919
<v Speaker 1>edition of the Only Game in Town, greatly appreciate it.

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 1>We're thrilled to continue with Michael Darta of MKM Partners. Michael,

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:46.639
<v Speaker 1>I've been in all cash that worked out. There was

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:49.399
<v Speaker 1>a photo out in the social space today. Have you

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 1>with the Darta rocket ship with your three Bloomberg log

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 1>ins and your various dogs assembled and and all that.

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Are you long the market now? And how do you

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:03.119
<v Speaker 1>position yourself in the next year? Hi Tom, thanks for

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>having me on. Um. You know, I think the investor

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:10.919
<v Speaker 1>should be diversified and maybe tactically cautious. Here if we

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:15.400
<v Speaker 1>just re rhind the clock exactly one year ago, we

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 1>were in a situation where the S and P five

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:21.120
<v Speaker 1>dred had dropped almost twenty at the end of last year.

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:24.919
<v Speaker 1>And even though it was uncomfortable, uh, the view was

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:27.640
<v Speaker 1>you really want to be long risk here? Our opinion

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 1>was recession probably unlikely, yet the market has almost priced

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 1>in such a scenario. So today, you know, with these

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 1>huge games that we've had this year, it's just the opposite.

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:42.399
<v Speaker 1>You know, Valuations have have moved up a lot, the

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:46.199
<v Speaker 1>markets had a phenomenal year, and markets do not go

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:50.360
<v Speaker 1>straight up. Um, So you know, probably we're looking at

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>some kind of a pullbacker dislocation in the not too

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:57.399
<v Speaker 1>distant future. A lot of optimism out there right now

0:27:57.440 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 1>about a second half acceleration in two thousand money about

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 1>this trade deal essentially being sign sealed and delivered, but

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you know that may not turn out to be the case.

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:12.200
<v Speaker 1>So from a shorter term slash tactical perspective, I think

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of caution is probably justified here. So Michael,

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:17.960
<v Speaker 1>earlier in a programmed time when I were talking about

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:21.639
<v Speaker 1>whether we sense fear or greed in the marketplace, and

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:24.240
<v Speaker 1>my suggestion was I I kind of felt like it

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:27.840
<v Speaker 1>was cautiously optimistic, no real sense of greed in the

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>marketplace that we've sensed in other parts of this bull market.

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:34.200
<v Speaker 1>As you talk to your clients as they enter fear

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 1>or greed, what are you hearing most are feeling most? Well,

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I'd say I'd replace agreed with optimism. Um. You know,

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I think most of the institutional money managers we interact

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 1>with are pretty optimistic that we've soft landed. You know,

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>that growth isn't going to be booming, but it'll be

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 1>positive next year that the trade deal is done, and

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 1>so they see further upside, but you know, maybe not

0:28:56.160 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 1>at the same pace that we enjoyed this year. So

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 1>given where we are, Michael, uh, you know, in the

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 1>economic cycle, in this bull market, given a price performance

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen in as you go into there sectors

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>of the market you like more than the others. Yeah,

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:16.720
<v Speaker 1>thanks for that question. Absolutely. So if we just break

0:29:16.720 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>it down in terms of the ten major sectors of

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the S and P five hundred and look at the

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>valuations relative to their own history, very interesting. So we

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>had an underperformance by the healthcare sector this year for

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 1>various reasons, obviously, some of which attributed to fears of um,

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, policy changes with the rise of Elizabeth Warren

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and concerns that Medicare for All and other changes might

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 1>hurt the sector's profitability. So healthcare underperformed this year. The

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 1>valuations on a forward basis running about thirteen four percent

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 1>um below you know where healthcare tends to trade historically.

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 1>On the other end of the spectrum, consumer discretionary very

0:29:56.240 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 1>strong this year, but the valuations almost cent above um

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 1>its own history. So our view for next year would be, um,

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 1>why not take a look at a sector that's not

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 1>so tied to the economy that's all that also offers

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 1>attractive valuations. Healthcare would also fit uh into a bucket

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 1>that you know that's shaping up better technically. J C. O'Hara,

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 1>who's our technical strategist that you guys have on a lot,

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 1>likes healthcare from a technical perspective. I like it from

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a fundamental perspective, and I like it from a business

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 1>cycle risk perspective. If there is a downturn next year,

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 1>then these high flying cyclical equity sectors are probably not

0:30:36.360 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be the place to be. Is that is

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 1>energy a value tub? It might be, Tom, It's interesting.

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean it screens quite well, not quite as well

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 1>as healthcare on evaluation basis. I mean the valuations are

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 1>below um, you know, their own history, But in an

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 1>environment where the global economy doesn't turn, then you know

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna still have headwinds there I'd be more comfortable

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 1>with energy perhaps than some of the other cyclical sectors,

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 1>just simply because the valuations are are lower. But it's

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>a very relevant question. How much does this will go

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 1>to our next section with Michael Darda, but how much

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 1>of this, Michael, do you link into Fed policy. The

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 1>zeitgeist right now is this is the power bull market?

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Is it? Yeah? I think so, because you know what

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 1>tends to happen when growth is accelerating and you move

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 1>into a decelerating pattern as you get an equity market correction.

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 1>We had you know, two big ones last year, and

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 1>if you're soft landing, you know, if it looks like goldilocks,

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 1>then valuations go back up. And that's exactly what's happened

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 1>so so far. So far, it looks like the FED

0:31:39.600 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 1>is pulled a rabbit out of the hat, if you will,

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 1>with monetary policy, and they've done just enough to keep

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the economy going at a steady keel, and then you'd

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>be justified in you know, in stock prices going back

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 1>up to record highs. But just keep in mind that

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>we had a four month yield curb in version this year.

0:31:55.800 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 1>It's reversed now, but we had the yield curb inverted

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:03.239
<v Speaker 1>tends to builds for or consecutive months. Historically, that's been

0:32:03.280 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 1>a twelve month forward recession indicators. So the consensus seems

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to believe we're out of the woods on recession risk.

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:13.720
<v Speaker 1>But the last three times we had yield curve inversions,

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 1>recessions hit between eight and sixteen months later. We're only

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 1>six months out of the initial inversion at this moment

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 1>in time, So maybe we're getting a bit over our

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:27.240
<v Speaker 1>skis here in terms of optimism on the business cycle. Hey, Michael,

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 1>this is obviously is presidential election year. Historically, how have

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 1>markets reacted during an election period? You know, I don't

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 1>put a ton of stock into that. Others have seen

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 1>certain patterns, but I think it really comes down to,

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, the fundamentals, how much tightening did the FED

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 1>doe in the past. You know, did you move into

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 1>an inverted yield curve environment? You know how our credit

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:53.719
<v Speaker 1>markets responding? And so as of now, you know, a

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of the indicators look like they're telling a soft

0:32:56.360 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 1>landing story. Um, but I really think the first half

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 1>of next is going to be critical in terms of

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 1>how some of these shorter term leading indicators hold up

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 1>like jobless claims and temporary help employment. Confidently, you know,

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 1>if they hold up through the first half, then I

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 1>think it's you know, looks it's looking much better for

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 1>a soft land, but it's too soon at this point

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to make that judgment. This has been great, Michael Darda,

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:20.760
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, greatly appreciate it. With m Camp

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Partners this morning, very generous with his time. We're thrilled

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 1>they have David Kotuk with this Cumberland Advisers. David, I

0:33:38.800 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 1>just randomly picked off the map the twenty year piece

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 1>of Sarah Soda. This is a small city in Florida,

0:33:47.480 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 1>enjoying a four percent coupon. The yield at the moment

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 1>is two point four percent. Priced at one eleven. I'm

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 1>up eleven on this dog this year, so I got

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:02.440
<v Speaker 1>eleven plus four. I got a fifteen percent total return

0:34:03.080 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 1>on a Muni bond. You live, eating, breathe. Muni bonds.

0:34:07.080 --> 0:34:12.239
<v Speaker 1>Are they priced to perfection? Hi? Tom, Merry Christmas and

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to you into Paul and May I add Rich Truman

0:34:15.640 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and Tanya Chin who are such a player to work

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and all four of you can come down to the

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 1>old dog Sarah Sota on a fifteen percent total return

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:30.279
<v Speaker 1>on the Muni bond, and we would be happy to

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 1>entertain you. It's remarkable. It's remarkable. I mean, it's been

0:34:34.040 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 1>a story is Michael Holland said earlier. Six of the

0:34:36.360 --> 0:34:39.839
<v Speaker 1>last twenty five years have been like this. What do

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:44.759
<v Speaker 1>you do if you're clipping triple text free coupons and

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 1>you're up fifteen percent in one year, Well, the first

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:52.360
<v Speaker 1>thing you do is uncorked the bottle of champagne. But

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 1>when you finish it and come back to your sentence,

0:34:56.280 --> 0:35:02.640
<v Speaker 1>you say, this cannot repeat itself. And in our portfolio strategies,

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:06.640
<v Speaker 1>we have a barbel. A barbell means you have some

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:10.080
<v Speaker 1>of the kinds of bonds you've described, and you have

0:35:10.320 --> 0:35:13.799
<v Speaker 1>shorter maturities, which is where you have the safety net.

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:18.360
<v Speaker 1>And as the bond market goes through this terrific increase,

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:23.759
<v Speaker 1>you move from the successful piece and add to the

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 1>barbell defensive piece, because that's the only way you'll have

0:35:28.200 --> 0:35:33.040
<v Speaker 1>money available to redeploy sometime in the future. Yeah, I apologize,

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:34.640
<v Speaker 1>my years are going here at the end of year.

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I thought, he said, Barbill, we sometimes they go together together.

0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:43.759
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes they do Tom. I'd tell you. When I read

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 1>David co talks research, I always always always learned something new.

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Here's my nugget from today's UH Sweden's ricks bank. Did

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you know that this was the world's first central banquet

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:58.760
<v Speaker 1>opened its doors in six David was there? David was there? David.

0:35:58.800 --> 0:36:00.279
<v Speaker 1>That brings me to my point here. I mean, we

0:36:00.320 --> 0:36:02.359
<v Speaker 1>don't have to talk about negative interest rates per se,

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 1>because I'm not really sure how to figure that one out.

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:06.200
<v Speaker 1>But are you in the camp that says we are

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:11.040
<v Speaker 1>in a lower for longer rate environment. I'm not there.

0:36:11.080 --> 0:36:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I think negative interest rates our peak, and the peak

0:36:17.160 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 1>was at about seventeen trillion total worldwide debt specified in

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 1>a negative interest rate by market based prices, and that

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:30.360
<v Speaker 1>was in the summer. That number is down to twelve.

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for the compliment about the research on Sweden.

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Sweden is back up to zero and the rest of

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Europe is under discussion. Christine legarde Um has has phrased

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:53.000
<v Speaker 1>in a nuanced way, we're going to do a full

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 1>review this year and the reason has to be negative

0:36:57.560 --> 0:37:00.960
<v Speaker 1>interest rates have been so damaging. What the review is

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:03.239
<v Speaker 1>going to say when it will be completed, how they're

0:37:03.239 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 1>going to move to it and how they do it

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:09.359
<v Speaker 1>when the staff of the e c B is part

0:37:09.440 --> 0:37:12.640
<v Speaker 1>of the review process and they're the folks that created

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the myth. David, to get to our to our next block,

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:18.719
<v Speaker 1>which I really want to focus on equity market and

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:22.800
<v Speaker 1>stock ownership. We we we have such a narrow market

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:26.439
<v Speaker 1>six eight, ten, twelve stocks. Everybody owns them, everybody loves them,

0:37:26.560 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 1>or they're not in the market. Can you acquire shares

0:37:31.320 --> 0:37:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of something like Apple today? And I'm just picking that, folks,

0:37:34.040 --> 0:37:37.719
<v Speaker 1>as one of the representative stocks. And what do you

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:41.319
<v Speaker 1>do with these one story blue chips that have gone up,

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:45.360
<v Speaker 1>up and up. It's remarkable. Um, we use E T

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:49.000
<v Speaker 1>s as you know, and in the E T F strategies.

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:52.920
<v Speaker 1>In the last few days, we've had three rounds of

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 1>selling and we have raised cash. And as we sit

0:37:57.080 --> 0:38:02.520
<v Speaker 1>here today in our US Exchange Traded funds portfolio today

0:38:02.680 --> 0:38:07.360
<v Speaker 1>we are in case. So you only got to go

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to get to where I am. Well, I the rest

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:14.840
<v Speaker 1>is in a mix, and that mix has overweight characteristics

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 1>in healthcare and in defense, and for good reasons justified

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:25.640
<v Speaker 1>by the defense budget, by the complexities of the world

0:38:25.960 --> 0:38:31.440
<v Speaker 1>geopolitical risk, and healthcare is the insulated sector eight percent

0:38:31.520 --> 0:38:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of the US GDP. We own three TS to get

0:38:35.040 --> 0:38:38.839
<v Speaker 1>to the space, and that is domestic US. It has

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:43.000
<v Speaker 1>insular qualities against trade war effects, and the rest of

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:48.799
<v Speaker 1>the world wants to buy American healthcare results, whether it's

0:38:48.880 --> 0:38:51.920
<v Speaker 1>in biotech, it's a cure, whatever it happens to be.

0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 1>So that's how we've repositioned here. David Kotak for US

0:38:56.520 --> 0:38:59.600
<v Speaker 1>A couple of advices. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:38:59.640 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Savel podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:39:06.000 --> 0:39:10.200
<v Speaker 1>or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at

0:39:10.280 --> 0:39:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keane Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide.

0:39:15.000 --> 0:39:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio