1 00:00:02,160 --> 00:00:05,560 Speaker 1: Welcome to the solid verbal. Holl that for me. 2 00:00:06,680 --> 00:00:08,119 Speaker 2: I'm a man, I'm forty. 3 00:00:08,240 --> 00:00:10,119 Speaker 1: I've heard so many players say, well, I want to 4 00:00:10,119 --> 00:00:12,080 Speaker 1: be happy. You want to be happy for a day 5 00:00:12,360 --> 00:00:13,000 Speaker 1: at the steak? 6 00:00:13,320 --> 00:00:14,440 Speaker 2: Is that woo woof? 7 00:00:14,920 --> 00:00:17,080 Speaker 1: And them and tie. 8 00:00:18,760 --> 00:00:21,200 Speaker 2: Welcome back to the solid verbal boys and girls. My 9 00:00:21,280 --> 00:00:23,520 Speaker 2: name is Ty hilden Brad. That fine gentleman over there, 10 00:00:24,120 --> 00:00:29,080 Speaker 2: one of the only still the incomparable Dan Rubinstein in Chicago, Illinois, Sir, 11 00:00:29,120 --> 00:00:29,600 Speaker 2: how are you? 12 00:00:30,080 --> 00:00:32,240 Speaker 1: I'm great, Ty. I am shot out of a cannon. 13 00:00:32,400 --> 00:00:34,920 Speaker 1: And I don't know if it's because of the caffeine 14 00:00:34,920 --> 00:00:38,560 Speaker 1: intake this morning. But I tried something new. I tried 15 00:00:38,920 --> 00:00:42,560 Speaker 1: ending my morning shower with a couple minutes of freezing 16 00:00:42,800 --> 00:00:43,600 Speaker 1: cold water. 17 00:00:44,280 --> 00:00:46,400 Speaker 2: Is this a new thing? Supported by science or no? 18 00:00:47,040 --> 00:00:50,680 Speaker 1: I'm vaguely probably supported by Google, supported by I've seen 19 00:00:50,840 --> 00:00:53,239 Speaker 1: enough people, and I have a friend who recommended it, 20 00:00:53,600 --> 00:00:56,120 Speaker 1: And honestly, I've been sort of shot out of a 21 00:00:56,160 --> 00:00:58,760 Speaker 1: cannon today. I honestly I don't know if that's the reason. 22 00:00:58,760 --> 00:01:01,000 Speaker 1: Maybe a good night's sleep, maybe a good breakfast. I 23 00:01:01,000 --> 00:01:03,800 Speaker 1: don't know what it is. But if you're looking to 24 00:01:03,960 --> 00:01:08,280 Speaker 1: change things up, throw that curveball to your day, maybe 25 00:01:08,280 --> 00:01:09,679 Speaker 1: a cold shower. I don't know. 26 00:01:10,520 --> 00:01:12,520 Speaker 2: The reason I'm shot out of a canon is because 27 00:01:12,520 --> 00:01:15,839 Speaker 2: we got football this weekend, Dan Buddy, Yeah, buddy. Football 28 00:01:15,880 --> 00:01:18,839 Speaker 2: week zero is what they call it, but football nonetheless 29 00:01:19,440 --> 00:01:22,559 Speaker 2: is upon us. We're going to do a very quick 30 00:01:22,959 --> 00:01:26,720 Speaker 2: Week zero preview. I've also got a bet. I'm excited 31 00:01:26,760 --> 00:01:31,640 Speaker 2: to get this thing up and running. Also excited to 32 00:01:31,720 --> 00:01:35,280 Speaker 2: get our Extra credit weekend up. And oh tell me more, 33 00:01:36,000 --> 00:01:39,160 Speaker 2: playerunthboard dot com run the Board is our pick them game. 34 00:01:39,200 --> 00:01:42,080 Speaker 2: It runs throughout the college football calendar, so for the 35 00:01:42,160 --> 00:01:46,040 Speaker 2: next couple months, ten games per week against the spread. 36 00:01:46,520 --> 00:01:49,560 Speaker 2: You pick them, we drop your lows two weeks. Whoever 37 00:01:49,600 --> 00:01:53,640 Speaker 2: finishes in the top five gets immediately elected to our 38 00:01:53,680 --> 00:01:56,560 Speaker 2: board of trustees, the Steam Board of Trustees here in 39 00:01:56,600 --> 00:02:01,360 Speaker 2: solid Verbleville. But Extra Credit weekend is new. There are 40 00:02:01,360 --> 00:02:04,000 Speaker 2: five games to pick in Week zero. Each game counts 41 00:02:04,000 --> 00:02:07,880 Speaker 2: as two points. I should add that in looking at 42 00:02:07,920 --> 00:02:12,000 Speaker 2: the standings from last season, these extra points extra ten 43 00:02:12,040 --> 00:02:14,880 Speaker 2: points would have brought an additional one hundred and twenty 44 00:02:15,040 --> 00:02:18,880 Speaker 2: people whoa into the running for fifth place. 45 00:02:20,560 --> 00:02:22,160 Speaker 1: You gotta get on it. This is the only week 46 00:02:22,160 --> 00:02:23,799 Speaker 1: we're doing bonus point extra credits. 47 00:02:23,840 --> 00:02:25,720 Speaker 2: This is the last time, the last time we're we're 48 00:02:25,720 --> 00:02:27,120 Speaker 2: gonna talk about I'm never gonna talk about on the 49 00:02:27,120 --> 00:02:30,119 Speaker 2: show again ever that's true. Never get that's true, never again. 50 00:02:30,240 --> 00:02:31,720 Speaker 2: And they're gonna talk about it ever again. 51 00:02:32,120 --> 00:02:35,440 Speaker 1: Play run the Board dot com or verbalers dot com 52 00:02:35,440 --> 00:02:38,200 Speaker 1: to learn more. Of course, and extra credit ends what 53 00:02:38,440 --> 00:02:41,560 Speaker 1: Saturday at eleven fifty nine. I don't know what time 54 00:02:41,639 --> 00:02:43,280 Speaker 1: kickoff whatever kicks off game? 55 00:02:44,120 --> 00:02:44,400 Speaker 2: No more? 56 00:02:44,520 --> 00:02:48,320 Speaker 1: Can you te on by Friday night? Play runtheboard dot com. 57 00:02:48,720 --> 00:02:51,840 Speaker 1: It is the most important and prestigious college football pick 58 00:02:51,880 --> 00:02:53,840 Speaker 1: them pool in the universe. And I don't even know 59 00:02:53,880 --> 00:02:54,919 Speaker 1: if there's a second place. 60 00:02:55,080 --> 00:02:59,120 Speaker 2: And I'm gonna give you one at least one winning pick. Oh. 61 00:02:59,160 --> 00:03:01,840 Speaker 2: As we go through the show today, I'm very confident. Okay, 62 00:03:02,000 --> 00:03:03,960 Speaker 2: this episode, all of our episodes driven by our good 63 00:03:03,960 --> 00:03:09,960 Speaker 2: friends over at Geico. Don't forget college football Thursdays also tonight. 64 00:03:10,639 --> 00:03:13,840 Speaker 2: Oh so much going on right now in the build 65 00:03:13,880 --> 00:03:17,200 Speaker 2: up to college football. College Football Thursdays are Spotify Thing 66 00:03:17,560 --> 00:03:21,440 Speaker 2: Tonight Live five pm Eastern. Go to Solidverbo dot com 67 00:03:21,480 --> 00:03:24,840 Speaker 2: slash Spotify if you have ever so inclined to join 68 00:03:24,919 --> 00:03:27,280 Speaker 2: in on the live experience. Because that's what it is 69 00:03:28,240 --> 00:03:30,120 Speaker 2: with Dan and I playing games. We're gonna play the 70 00:03:30,160 --> 00:03:33,480 Speaker 2: name game. This was briefly iconic tight Ends who did 71 00:03:33,480 --> 00:03:34,960 Speaker 2: not make it to the NFL. Right, that's what we're 72 00:03:34,960 --> 00:03:38,000 Speaker 2: going We're gonna play that game like it's war. We've 73 00:03:38,040 --> 00:03:39,560 Speaker 2: got a bunch of other stuff. We're gonna go through news, 74 00:03:39,560 --> 00:03:40,880 Speaker 2: We're gonna go through some of these picks, and I'm 75 00:03:40,880 --> 00:03:43,200 Speaker 2: going to discuss here in a little bit. A whole 76 00:03:43,200 --> 00:03:46,200 Speaker 2: bunch of the new starters are coming out like clockwork. 77 00:03:46,840 --> 00:03:50,600 Speaker 2: All sorts of stuff going on here. You can participate. 78 00:03:51,080 --> 00:03:54,560 Speaker 2: Hop up on stage, join the chat. College football Thursdays 79 00:03:54,560 --> 00:03:57,360 Speaker 2: live on Spotify five pm Eastern, soliverble dot com, slash 80 00:03:57,400 --> 00:04:01,360 Speaker 2: Spotify as u r L and well it's solivablelive dot com. 81 00:04:01,360 --> 00:04:06,200 Speaker 2: We've got a Chicago show this weekend, Saturday evening. Be kitchen. 82 00:04:07,000 --> 00:04:09,200 Speaker 2: If you are going to be in the vicinity of Chicago, 83 00:04:09,280 --> 00:04:12,000 Speaker 2: if you've got nothing to do, grab a buddy, grab 84 00:04:12,040 --> 00:04:16,240 Speaker 2: a friend, grab your unwitting spouse. Come on out to 85 00:04:16,240 --> 00:04:18,159 Speaker 2: be Kitchen. Solivable live dot com as where you can 86 00:04:18,160 --> 00:04:21,279 Speaker 2: buy tickets, Come and see our Fantasy Things draft Live. 87 00:04:22,600 --> 00:04:23,760 Speaker 1: Bring an illicit lover. 88 00:04:24,000 --> 00:04:26,640 Speaker 2: I don't know, Yeah, let me enjoy it. Yeah, whatever 89 00:04:26,640 --> 00:04:33,839 Speaker 2: floats your boat. Yeah, time. It is a tradition, unlike 90 00:04:33,880 --> 00:04:36,840 Speaker 2: any other of the very first playing of that sound 91 00:04:37,440 --> 00:04:40,760 Speaker 2: every season. I'm excited last year, I think we waited 92 00:04:40,839 --> 00:04:43,679 Speaker 2: until week one. But what's the point you're doing it early. 93 00:04:43,800 --> 00:04:46,279 Speaker 2: It's extra credit weekend. Man, Let's just get off to 94 00:04:46,360 --> 00:04:49,520 Speaker 2: a hot start here. Okay, it says picks of the week, right, 95 00:04:49,720 --> 00:04:51,160 Speaker 2: it does say picks of the week. 96 00:04:51,200 --> 00:04:53,120 Speaker 1: I think we're only doing one. Are you doing multiple? 97 00:04:53,400 --> 00:04:57,839 Speaker 2: I'm gonna do one. I'm only gonna do one pick. 98 00:04:57,880 --> 00:04:59,760 Speaker 2: But there are a couple of games, a couple notable 99 00:04:59,800 --> 00:05:03,760 Speaker 2: games we need to discuss. There's Wyoming against Illinois. There 100 00:05:03,800 --> 00:05:06,479 Speaker 2: is Duquine against Florida State. There is Florida A and 101 00:05:06,680 --> 00:05:10,200 Speaker 2: M at North Carolina, and there's Vandy at Hawaii. Those 102 00:05:10,240 --> 00:05:12,400 Speaker 2: are four of the five games that are going to 103 00:05:12,440 --> 00:05:14,920 Speaker 2: be on an extra credit weekend slate you can pick from, 104 00:05:15,040 --> 00:05:16,839 Speaker 2: and it's against the bread. I think Illinois is favored 105 00:05:16,839 --> 00:05:19,680 Speaker 2: by about ten. I haven't seen lines yet for Florida 106 00:05:19,760 --> 00:05:23,400 Speaker 2: State and North Carolina. Those lines will drop a little 107 00:05:23,440 --> 00:05:25,760 Speaker 2: bit closer to kickoff. But the one that I did 108 00:05:25,800 --> 00:05:30,520 Speaker 2: want to talk about is the so called headliner this week. 109 00:05:31,080 --> 00:05:34,240 Speaker 2: Of all the games that are featuring FBS teams, eleven 110 00:05:34,320 --> 00:05:36,800 Speaker 2: in total, I could read through all of them, But 111 00:05:37,160 --> 00:05:40,520 Speaker 2: the big one is the Nebraska Northwestern game, which kicks 112 00:05:40,560 --> 00:05:44,240 Speaker 2: off at twelve pm Eastern on Fox. They are playing 113 00:05:44,320 --> 00:05:51,159 Speaker 2: in Ireland. Correct, Nebraska is a thirteen point favorite against Northwestern. 114 00:05:51,960 --> 00:05:55,880 Speaker 2: Just for some clarity on what this matchup looked like. 115 00:05:55,960 --> 00:06:00,560 Speaker 2: Last year, Nebraska won fifty six to seven, and as 116 00:06:00,560 --> 00:06:03,479 Speaker 2: some Nebraska fans pointed out to me in our discord 117 00:06:03,520 --> 00:06:05,919 Speaker 2: over at for bowlers dot Com, it was one of 118 00:06:05,960 --> 00:06:09,920 Speaker 2: those games that gave him hope. It is the hope 119 00:06:09,960 --> 00:06:14,320 Speaker 2: that kills you in this college football universe. But Nebraska 120 00:06:14,360 --> 00:06:16,480 Speaker 2: looked pretty good. They scored in their first three drive. 121 00:06:16,520 --> 00:06:18,200 Speaker 2: They were only held down I think on three of 122 00:06:18,200 --> 00:06:21,400 Speaker 2: their eleven drives if you count the final game or 123 00:06:21,480 --> 00:06:23,160 Speaker 2: the final drive excuse me, where they just sort of 124 00:06:23,240 --> 00:06:26,160 Speaker 2: killed the clock and won the game. So going into 125 00:06:26,240 --> 00:06:29,640 Speaker 2: this game, we've heard a lot in the offseason about 126 00:06:29,640 --> 00:06:32,120 Speaker 2: how Scott Frost has to put it together. They retained 127 00:06:32,160 --> 00:06:37,080 Speaker 2: his services going into twenty twenty two, perhaps rightfully, perhaps wrongfully, 128 00:06:37,320 --> 00:06:39,680 Speaker 2: A lot of folks, a lot of folks will will 129 00:06:39,800 --> 00:06:42,600 Speaker 2: argue back and forth about that, but nonetheless he is back. 130 00:06:43,000 --> 00:06:45,560 Speaker 2: He made some changes, not the least of which was 131 00:06:45,600 --> 00:06:48,640 Speaker 2: Mark Whipple as his new offensive coordinator, not the least 132 00:06:48,640 --> 00:06:51,520 Speaker 2: of which was Casey Thompson, his new transfer quarterback who 133 00:06:51,560 --> 00:06:56,480 Speaker 2: comes over from Texas. Scott Frost clearly knows, clearly knows 134 00:06:56,520 --> 00:06:59,560 Speaker 2: that it's make or break this season for the Huskers. 135 00:07:00,279 --> 00:07:03,240 Speaker 2: Surely luck must turn around for him, because they lost 136 00:07:03,320 --> 00:07:06,360 Speaker 2: nine games by single digits last season. 137 00:07:07,480 --> 00:07:09,600 Speaker 1: I don't think it was unlucky that they went three 138 00:07:09,680 --> 00:07:13,000 Speaker 1: and nine. I understand that they produced, and production was 139 00:07:13,120 --> 00:07:15,080 Speaker 1: to a certain point where you would expect them to 140 00:07:15,120 --> 00:07:17,480 Speaker 1: be more of a six and six type team. But 141 00:07:17,600 --> 00:07:20,160 Speaker 1: they also did things that three and nine teams do, 142 00:07:20,280 --> 00:07:23,440 Speaker 1: as I've liked to point out, and that was a 143 00:07:23,480 --> 00:07:26,040 Speaker 1: major reason why they ended up doing that. Big moments, 144 00:07:26,120 --> 00:07:30,080 Speaker 1: high leverage moments. I think Nebraska should comfortably win this game. 145 00:07:31,960 --> 00:07:35,880 Speaker 1: Nebraska is in a pretty good place. I just have 146 00:07:36,040 --> 00:07:39,240 Speaker 1: no concept for the number of things that they can 147 00:07:39,320 --> 00:07:41,480 Speaker 1: do to win games, like there are a couple of 148 00:07:41,520 --> 00:07:43,600 Speaker 1: things that seem obvious. The defense has gotten to a 149 00:07:43,640 --> 00:07:46,240 Speaker 1: good point. We know when Casey Thompson is healthy, he 150 00:07:46,320 --> 00:07:48,720 Speaker 1: can be pretty dangerous. He was beat up last year 151 00:07:48,960 --> 00:07:51,720 Speaker 1: for Texas, and his results sort of waxed and waned. 152 00:07:51,720 --> 00:07:55,440 Speaker 1: His abilities sort of were part of the reason Texas's 153 00:07:55,480 --> 00:07:58,760 Speaker 1: offense seemed to be all over the place during certain matchups. 154 00:08:00,840 --> 00:08:03,440 Speaker 1: Neither one of these teams trend wise against the spread 155 00:08:03,520 --> 00:08:05,960 Speaker 1: or over unders. There's nothing. There's not a lot there. 156 00:08:06,840 --> 00:08:08,640 Speaker 1: If you want to look at last year's results as 157 00:08:08,720 --> 00:08:11,640 Speaker 1: being indicative of something that Nebraska should comfortably win. What'd 158 00:08:11,640 --> 00:08:13,240 Speaker 1: you say? It was twelve and a half points. 159 00:08:13,080 --> 00:08:16,720 Speaker 2: Yeah, twelve and a half thirteen depends where and when. Uh. 160 00:08:16,760 --> 00:08:20,760 Speaker 1: Northwestern hasn't officially named Ryan Holinsky the starter, but I 161 00:08:20,800 --> 00:08:23,920 Speaker 1: saw that there was some some chatter about something he 162 00:08:24,000 --> 00:08:27,280 Speaker 1: posted on Instagram being sort of indicative that he's again 163 00:08:27,400 --> 00:08:31,080 Speaker 1: leading Northwestern's offense for whatever it will be this year. 164 00:08:32,200 --> 00:08:34,079 Speaker 1: I am of the mind to just take the points. 165 00:08:34,400 --> 00:08:37,840 Speaker 1: I'm of the mind that in a weird setting across 166 00:08:37,880 --> 00:08:43,000 Speaker 1: the pond, weird time changes, we think Northwestern's defense should 167 00:08:43,000 --> 00:08:47,680 Speaker 1: improve from a pretty bad place weirdly last year. Nebraska's 168 00:08:47,720 --> 00:08:49,440 Speaker 1: defense should be fine, but probably not as good as 169 00:08:49,480 --> 00:08:51,600 Speaker 1: where they were last year. I think Nebraska's offense will 170 00:08:51,640 --> 00:08:54,040 Speaker 1: probably be a little bit more consistent, although I think 171 00:08:54,040 --> 00:08:56,200 Speaker 1: the ceiling might be a little bit lower because Adrian 172 00:08:56,240 --> 00:08:59,720 Speaker 1: Martinez was, when healthy, capable of some pretty incredible plays 173 00:08:59,720 --> 00:09:02,319 Speaker 1: with his arm and his feet. So I'm going to 174 00:09:02,440 --> 00:09:05,560 Speaker 1: take the points in this game because of the situation, 175 00:09:05,960 --> 00:09:08,760 Speaker 1: because of it being week one, because of it being overseas, 176 00:09:09,520 --> 00:09:13,720 Speaker 1: and because we of the changes involved with these teams. 177 00:09:14,200 --> 00:09:16,160 Speaker 1: I mean, we don't have a great concept for anybody, 178 00:09:16,320 --> 00:09:19,200 Speaker 1: so I'm just of the mind, when in doubt, take 179 00:09:19,240 --> 00:09:23,079 Speaker 1: the points. I hate it with Northwestern because I don't 180 00:09:23,080 --> 00:09:25,560 Speaker 1: think their offense is capable of a ton, but I 181 00:09:25,559 --> 00:09:27,240 Speaker 1: think over the course of the season they should be 182 00:09:27,240 --> 00:09:29,319 Speaker 1: able to run some at least, and there are a 183 00:09:29,320 --> 00:09:31,840 Speaker 1: couple of pieces, especially upfront and on the edge, that 184 00:09:31,920 --> 00:09:34,120 Speaker 1: I like a good deal actually, but. 185 00:09:35,640 --> 00:09:36,000 Speaker 2: I don't know. 186 00:09:36,040 --> 00:09:37,920 Speaker 1: We saw how Nebraska came out of the shoot. That's 187 00:09:37,960 --> 00:09:42,440 Speaker 1: your favorite phrase, right last year Illinois ran away from 188 00:09:42,480 --> 00:09:47,040 Speaker 1: Lincoln against a disappointing team from Illinois. You can believe 189 00:09:47,040 --> 00:09:50,199 Speaker 1: in that trend. I just I don't have a good concept, 190 00:09:50,240 --> 00:09:52,000 Speaker 1: so I'm just going to air on the side of points. 191 00:09:52,080 --> 00:09:53,559 Speaker 1: In Europe. 192 00:09:55,000 --> 00:10:01,840 Speaker 2: Blunk of the week, let's get this already started, mister Rubinstein, 193 00:10:03,080 --> 00:10:07,640 Speaker 2: lock me up, Nebraska, minus two and a half minus thirteen. 194 00:10:08,120 --> 00:10:10,439 Speaker 2: I will say the cause for pause our favorite pet 195 00:10:10,520 --> 00:10:13,560 Speaker 2: charity is definitely the fact that they were playing this 196 00:10:13,559 --> 00:10:19,000 Speaker 2: one in a foreign country. Yeah that you know, if 197 00:10:19,000 --> 00:10:21,240 Speaker 2: I had a little bit more time before we hit record, 198 00:10:21,840 --> 00:10:24,679 Speaker 2: I probably would have gone back to look at the 199 00:10:24,760 --> 00:10:27,559 Speaker 2: history of teams traveling to Europe. 200 00:10:27,720 --> 00:10:30,720 Speaker 1: Buddy, I did. Some of them are close, and then 201 00:10:30,800 --> 00:10:36,079 Speaker 1: Notre Dame also blew out Navy, Like there are varying results. 202 00:10:37,240 --> 00:10:40,400 Speaker 1: What PLU did cal play in Australia Hawaii way back 203 00:10:40,440 --> 00:10:43,839 Speaker 1: when there were some closer games. UCF was involved in 204 00:10:43,880 --> 00:10:46,600 Speaker 1: a game or two. Boston College I think was involved 205 00:10:46,640 --> 00:10:50,400 Speaker 1: in an Ireland game. Something's off to me. Something's just off. 206 00:10:50,520 --> 00:10:54,199 Speaker 2: If that, if that's the reason that you're going to 207 00:10:54,240 --> 00:10:56,600 Speaker 2: go with Northwestern in the points, which I know for 208 00:10:56,679 --> 00:10:59,400 Speaker 2: you it isn't. But I'm saying in my own head, 209 00:10:59,440 --> 00:11:02,800 Speaker 2: I'm thinking myself, if that's the only reason I have 210 00:11:02,920 --> 00:11:05,800 Speaker 2: for going Northwestern plus the points because they're playing this 211 00:11:05,840 --> 00:11:07,839 Speaker 2: one on a different field, in a different land and 212 00:11:07,920 --> 00:11:11,040 Speaker 2: a different time zone at a weird time, that's not 213 00:11:11,200 --> 00:11:14,760 Speaker 2: good enough of a reason for me to go with Northwestern. 214 00:11:15,240 --> 00:11:22,319 Speaker 2: Nebraska annihilated Northwestern last season, Northwestern didn't stop them at all. 215 00:11:22,440 --> 00:11:24,800 Speaker 2: What is changed in the off season to make us 216 00:11:24,800 --> 00:11:28,079 Speaker 2: feel differently? The only team that seems like they're really 217 00:11:28,120 --> 00:11:29,440 Speaker 2: trying to get better is Nebraska. 218 00:11:30,480 --> 00:11:33,720 Speaker 1: So oh, I don't think that's fair. I think Northwestern's trying. 219 00:11:34,080 --> 00:11:37,680 Speaker 1: Oh they stink. I'm hitching my wag into Nebraska here. 220 00:11:38,280 --> 00:11:41,920 Speaker 1: Week one, MINEUS thirteen is when I grabbed it. Lock 221 00:11:42,640 --> 00:11:43,520 Speaker 1: it up. 222 00:11:43,400 --> 00:11:47,760 Speaker 2: Now, maybe a little bit of a backdoor cover. 223 00:11:47,880 --> 00:11:49,920 Speaker 1: See, I don't think that a backdoor cover is possible 224 00:11:49,960 --> 00:11:53,239 Speaker 1: at all, because that involves Northwestern winging it around, probably 225 00:11:53,440 --> 00:11:55,760 Speaker 1: to try and crawl back into respectability. And I don't 226 00:11:55,760 --> 00:11:58,360 Speaker 1: think they're a quick scoring team. I think they're gonna 227 00:11:58,360 --> 00:12:01,880 Speaker 1: win games if they win games methodically to serve the 228 00:12:01,920 --> 00:12:04,800 Speaker 1: defense and hopefully a better defense that can get off 229 00:12:04,800 --> 00:12:06,600 Speaker 1: the field a little bit better than they could last year. 230 00:12:06,640 --> 00:12:08,120 Speaker 1: They showed a little bit of fight early, didn't they 231 00:12:08,200 --> 00:12:11,520 Speaker 1: Michigan State early last year? Yep, they scored more than 232 00:12:11,920 --> 00:12:13,120 Speaker 1: fourteen points. I believe. 233 00:12:15,760 --> 00:12:16,160 Speaker 2: Yeah. 234 00:12:16,240 --> 00:12:20,240 Speaker 1: I just think it's one of those things where Nebraska 235 00:12:20,320 --> 00:12:22,520 Speaker 1: may be okay this year, but I think it's going 236 00:12:22,559 --> 00:12:24,040 Speaker 1: to take a minute for everybody to get on the 237 00:12:24,080 --> 00:12:27,800 Speaker 1: same page with Scott Frost with his background offensively, Mark Whipple, 238 00:12:28,200 --> 00:12:31,280 Speaker 1: Casey Thompson finding out who's who in the offensive skill 239 00:12:31,360 --> 00:12:35,160 Speaker 1: position groupings. I think it's gonna take. Like the offensive 240 00:12:35,160 --> 00:12:39,360 Speaker 1: line is still yet to fully prove that they can gel. Obviously, 241 00:12:39,440 --> 00:12:41,800 Speaker 1: the game season hasn't even started yet, but they struggle 242 00:12:41,800 --> 00:12:44,400 Speaker 1: at times last year. I just there are too many 243 00:12:44,480 --> 00:12:48,040 Speaker 1: questions and too much improvement that always happens for everybody 244 00:12:48,160 --> 00:12:51,720 Speaker 1: between week one and week two, and that's domestically. So 245 00:12:51,960 --> 00:12:56,160 Speaker 1: I'm gonna take the points alrighty Uh, what's the number two? 246 00:12:56,200 --> 00:12:56,320 Speaker 2: Like? 247 00:12:56,559 --> 00:12:58,200 Speaker 1: Do you have Vandy Hawaii takes? 248 00:12:58,920 --> 00:13:02,120 Speaker 2: I don't have Vandy Hawaii. Hawaii getting eight at home 249 00:13:02,200 --> 00:13:05,600 Speaker 2: after Vandy travels a great long distance to get there 250 00:13:05,679 --> 00:13:09,440 Speaker 2: is appealing to me. Perhaps they'll play hard for Timmy Chang, 251 00:13:09,559 --> 00:13:12,679 Speaker 2: but ultimately Vandy being favored there I think is probably 252 00:13:12,679 --> 00:13:18,040 Speaker 2: the right call. Nevada only minus nine at New Mexico State. 253 00:13:18,760 --> 00:13:23,400 Speaker 2: Nevada new coach had a bunch of guys transfer over 254 00:13:23,440 --> 00:13:27,560 Speaker 2: to Colorado State, so I'm not crazy about the wolf 255 00:13:27,559 --> 00:13:29,959 Speaker 2: Pack there. I don't really have a lean one way 256 00:13:30,000 --> 00:13:33,439 Speaker 2: or the other. North Texas against utep No Lean Charlotte 257 00:13:33,440 --> 00:13:36,920 Speaker 2: against Florida Atlantic is kind of interesting to me. Charlotte 258 00:13:36,960 --> 00:13:40,960 Speaker 2: geting about seven points I think is appealing, just given 259 00:13:40,960 --> 00:13:42,960 Speaker 2: the fact that they should have a pretty good offense 260 00:13:43,000 --> 00:13:46,360 Speaker 2: but no real strong leaning there. And then Utah State 261 00:13:46,400 --> 00:13:50,840 Speaker 2: against Yukon. I already mentioned Wyoming Illinois. Only other one 262 00:13:50,840 --> 00:13:54,040 Speaker 2: here that I've really got a note is Nebraska Northwestern. 263 00:13:54,080 --> 00:13:57,559 Speaker 2: There are other teams involved as well. Western Kentucky plays 264 00:13:57,600 --> 00:14:01,520 Speaker 2: Austin p unl V against Idaho State, Florida State Duquine. 265 00:14:01,640 --> 00:14:04,640 Speaker 2: We mentioned on the show yesterday, North Carolina, Florida A 266 00:14:04,640 --> 00:14:07,000 Speaker 2: and M So. There are some other games, Dan, but 267 00:14:07,679 --> 00:14:09,439 Speaker 2: the big one I think, for all intents and purposes, 268 00:14:09,520 --> 00:14:11,120 Speaker 2: is going to be that Nebraska Northwestern game. 269 00:14:11,440 --> 00:14:13,800 Speaker 1: You ready for the Mic Wright era for the doors 270 00:14:13,920 --> 00:14:17,120 Speaker 1: of Vanderbilt. Ken Seals doesn't win the job, Ken Seals 271 00:14:17,120 --> 00:14:20,960 Speaker 1: Honda fired up. Yeah, OHI is gonna be a little 272 00:14:20,960 --> 00:14:23,400 Speaker 1: bit thin. I'll watch a little bit of Wyoming Illinois. 273 00:14:23,600 --> 00:14:26,320 Speaker 1: Of course I will drive to six tie. It doesn't 274 00:14:26,320 --> 00:14:30,040 Speaker 1: take a week off. We're not skipping over anything. You know. 275 00:14:30,080 --> 00:14:33,520 Speaker 1: I'm a big believer and what Illinois may be able 276 00:14:33,560 --> 00:14:37,240 Speaker 1: to do sometimes occasionally to get Bowl eligible this year, Come. 277 00:14:37,120 --> 00:14:44,480 Speaker 2: On, it's not really breaking news, okay, I just wanted 278 00:14:44,520 --> 00:14:47,240 Speaker 2: to play it. I wanted to drum up some excitement 279 00:14:47,320 --> 00:14:50,200 Speaker 2: here because there have been some quarterbacks who have been 280 00:14:50,280 --> 00:14:53,160 Speaker 2: named quin Yours, Yeah, what do you have? Was named 281 00:14:53,160 --> 00:14:55,640 Speaker 2: as the starting quarterback at Texas. I guess no big 282 00:14:55,680 --> 00:14:57,120 Speaker 2: surprise there, right. 283 00:14:56,960 --> 00:14:59,200 Speaker 1: Well, it depends on how much of the message board 284 00:14:59,240 --> 00:15:03,080 Speaker 1: community believe. For the anonymous message board posters who seemed 285 00:15:03,080 --> 00:15:06,840 Speaker 1: confident that Hudson Card was getting the snaps with the ones, 286 00:15:07,000 --> 00:15:10,040 Speaker 1: and then shortly thereafter quin Yours was named the starter. 287 00:15:10,120 --> 00:15:13,840 Speaker 1: So either the trusted people on various Texas message boards 288 00:15:13,840 --> 00:15:15,680 Speaker 1: are not to be believed. 289 00:15:15,720 --> 00:15:18,120 Speaker 2: Or I find that a bit of a stretch. 290 00:15:19,120 --> 00:15:22,080 Speaker 1: It'll be very obvious pretty early on with Texas's schedule. 291 00:15:22,560 --> 00:15:25,640 Speaker 1: If Quinn Yours is clearly better, we'll see how much 292 00:15:25,680 --> 00:15:30,359 Speaker 1: he's trusted. With a pretty large Week two looming. 293 00:15:30,320 --> 00:15:32,640 Speaker 2: Pretty large Week two. We also had a bit of 294 00:15:32,640 --> 00:15:35,680 Speaker 2: a surprise at UCF with John Reese Plumbley. I'll remember 295 00:15:35,760 --> 00:15:39,400 Speaker 2: him of course the transfer in he wins the job 296 00:15:40,120 --> 00:15:43,440 Speaker 2: at UCF for Gus Malazan, Tyler Shuck is going to 297 00:15:43,440 --> 00:15:48,000 Speaker 2: be the quarterback of my beloved Texas Tech Red Raiders. 298 00:15:48,440 --> 00:15:51,880 Speaker 2: I saw Drake May has officially been starting quarterback at 299 00:15:51,920 --> 00:15:54,800 Speaker 2: North Carolina. It was a bit of a contest down 300 00:15:54,800 --> 00:15:57,720 Speaker 2: there as well. There are many others that are yet 301 00:15:57,760 --> 00:15:59,880 Speaker 2: to come. We talked a little bit about Tyler Buckner 302 00:16:00,400 --> 00:16:03,400 Speaker 2: on the last episode of the show, but I guess 303 00:16:03,400 --> 00:16:06,840 Speaker 2: two episodes ago now. But yep, this is definitely going 304 00:16:06,840 --> 00:16:09,680 Speaker 2: to be a very fluid news type of situation as 305 00:16:09,680 --> 00:16:14,360 Speaker 2: it relates to starting quarterbacks. I know Elisu is predicting 306 00:16:14,400 --> 00:16:17,120 Speaker 2: that they will be naming their quarterback relatively soon. They're 307 00:16:17,160 --> 00:16:18,840 Speaker 2: going to have to. The season starts up for them 308 00:16:18,840 --> 00:16:21,600 Speaker 2: in about a week and a half, So do stay 309 00:16:21,640 --> 00:16:24,520 Speaker 2: tuned right here as we get closer to week one. 310 00:16:24,960 --> 00:16:26,760 Speaker 2: We'll do our best to keep you abreast of all 311 00:16:26,800 --> 00:16:28,040 Speaker 2: of the quarterback announcements. 312 00:16:28,880 --> 00:16:31,520 Speaker 1: Yeah, there's not that many huge ones left and there's 313 00:16:31,520 --> 00:16:33,400 Speaker 1: a lot of assumptions, and yeah you would. When we 314 00:16:33,440 --> 00:16:36,480 Speaker 1: previewed UCF, you talked about mikey Keene and the upside 315 00:16:36,480 --> 00:16:38,920 Speaker 1: that he showed last year. John rees Plumbley from an 316 00:16:38,960 --> 00:16:41,520 Speaker 1: athletic standpoint, what he was able to do when he 317 00:16:41,600 --> 00:16:43,720 Speaker 1: was sharing time with Matt Crow at Ole Miss was 318 00:16:43,760 --> 00:16:47,320 Speaker 1: somewhat impressive and seems like he could be a Nick 319 00:16:47,360 --> 00:16:51,760 Speaker 1: Marshall light maybe yep, for a Gusmuson offense now at UCF. 320 00:16:52,200 --> 00:16:56,960 Speaker 1: So I'm intrigued by that with UCF's hopes understandably raised 321 00:16:57,080 --> 00:17:00,720 Speaker 1: after some promising moments even without their starting quarterback last year. 322 00:17:00,800 --> 00:17:04,199 Speaker 1: So yeah, I'm intrigued to see what they can do. 323 00:17:04,280 --> 00:17:06,760 Speaker 1: John Responeley also, I think played baseball at Ole Miss, 324 00:17:06,800 --> 00:17:10,000 Speaker 1: so certainly an intriguing athlete running the offense there for 325 00:17:10,040 --> 00:17:13,200 Speaker 1: the Knights. Yeah. Drake May is fascinating. He was I 326 00:17:13,240 --> 00:17:19,080 Speaker 1: think a Bama de commitment before fulfilling his destiny as 327 00:17:19,200 --> 00:17:21,639 Speaker 1: a North Carolina athlete given his older brother and I 328 00:17:21,640 --> 00:17:25,679 Speaker 1: think father also a North Carolina athlete. Yeah, I mean 329 00:17:25,720 --> 00:17:28,280 Speaker 1: he North Carolina plays this weekend. Yes, you mentioned them 330 00:17:28,400 --> 00:17:29,480 Speaker 1: against Florida A and M. 331 00:17:29,600 --> 00:17:30,720 Speaker 2: Yes, yes, So. 332 00:17:30,680 --> 00:17:32,120 Speaker 1: We'll get to see a little bit of Drake May 333 00:17:32,320 --> 00:17:34,640 Speaker 1: if he struggles against Florida A and M. That's concerning. 334 00:17:34,680 --> 00:17:37,399 Speaker 1: It's like an NBA summer league thing. If he shows out, great, 335 00:17:37,440 --> 00:17:39,760 Speaker 1: he should probably show out with North Carolina with the 336 00:17:39,800 --> 00:17:43,000 Speaker 1: research return at receiver, so cool to see. Hope it 337 00:17:43,000 --> 00:17:45,960 Speaker 1: works out for the Heels and Gus smells On excuse me, sorry, 338 00:17:46,040 --> 00:17:49,600 Speaker 1: gene Chiswick. I'm confusing former Auburn guys. Gene Chiwick gives 339 00:17:49,640 --> 00:17:51,879 Speaker 1: them a little bit more of a fighting chance taking 340 00:17:51,880 --> 00:17:52,720 Speaker 1: over their defense. 341 00:17:53,200 --> 00:17:56,399 Speaker 2: Yeah. And last, but certainly not least, Chas Brewer still around, 342 00:17:56,680 --> 00:17:59,960 Speaker 2: still playing back, this time for Liberty. Yeah, Charlie Brewer 343 00:18:00,080 --> 00:18:04,840 Speaker 2: name starting quarterback at Liberty. For now, For now, let's 344 00:18:04,880 --> 00:18:10,680 Speaker 2: get to part two of your questions. Congratulations, Skippy, you've 345 00:18:10,720 --> 00:18:14,600 Speaker 2: got mail. You've got mail on the solid ruble Dan. 346 00:18:14,640 --> 00:18:18,439 Speaker 2: As often as we can, we pay homage to the 347 00:18:18,440 --> 00:18:21,040 Speaker 2: fine for ballers who write into the show. Yesterday we 348 00:18:21,080 --> 00:18:24,120 Speaker 2: did part one. We have a lengthy list of questions 349 00:18:24,119 --> 00:18:27,000 Speaker 2: that are still in front of us on this document, 350 00:18:27,680 --> 00:18:31,800 Speaker 2: and today we start with Kevin. Hello, Kevin, Hey, keV, 351 00:18:32,960 --> 00:18:39,280 Speaker 2: which team's season outlook is most dependent on Game one? 352 00:18:39,560 --> 00:18:43,920 Speaker 2: I feel very different about Perdue based on the result 353 00:18:44,000 --> 00:18:47,720 Speaker 2: of Penn State. Kevin is sort of speaking my language here. 354 00:18:48,359 --> 00:18:48,879 Speaker 1: You love this. 355 00:18:49,440 --> 00:18:52,160 Speaker 2: I love this, not just this question, but his answer. 356 00:18:52,680 --> 00:18:58,960 Speaker 2: I feel similarly about Penn State. My answer is Penn State. OK. Question, 357 00:18:59,600 --> 00:19:02,720 Speaker 2: Penn State. It's over under if I recall correctly, was 358 00:19:02,760 --> 00:19:05,840 Speaker 2: eight and a half. And when I did the preview, 359 00:19:05,840 --> 00:19:07,760 Speaker 2: I went on to say that, I think Penn State 360 00:19:07,840 --> 00:19:09,960 Speaker 2: is interesting for non penn Stators out there, people who 361 00:19:09,960 --> 00:19:12,480 Speaker 2: wouldn't otherwise care about the Nidney Lions, because I don't 362 00:19:12,520 --> 00:19:15,520 Speaker 2: think Vegas is a damn clue about this team. This 363 00:19:15,600 --> 00:19:18,960 Speaker 2: season lost a fair amount on defense. Going to be 364 00:19:19,000 --> 00:19:23,919 Speaker 2: another year for Sean Clifford the second Now under the 365 00:19:23,920 --> 00:19:27,240 Speaker 2: Mike usage system, they've got what I think is a 366 00:19:27,280 --> 00:19:30,879 Speaker 2: decent enough line. Who knows for sure. They've got a 367 00:19:30,960 --> 00:19:32,920 Speaker 2: stable of running backs that should be pretty good. I 368 00:19:32,920 --> 00:19:36,159 Speaker 2: think they'll be talented out wide. I feel very optimistic 369 00:19:36,200 --> 00:19:40,040 Speaker 2: about this team, but perhaps I am biased. That being said, 370 00:19:40,440 --> 00:19:43,080 Speaker 2: you look at this Penn State schedule. You keep in 371 00:19:43,119 --> 00:19:44,679 Speaker 2: the back of your mind eight and a half is 372 00:19:44,720 --> 00:19:48,679 Speaker 2: that over under you start checking off games here that 373 00:19:48,760 --> 00:19:51,879 Speaker 2: you could see as wins, you can only get to 374 00:19:52,000 --> 00:19:58,000 Speaker 2: about seven if you're not counting Perdue. It starts getting 375 00:19:58,040 --> 00:20:01,199 Speaker 2: interesting in a hurry. If Pennce eight loses Week one 376 00:20:01,280 --> 00:20:04,000 Speaker 2: at Perdue, the point spread I would add is only 377 00:20:04,040 --> 00:20:06,679 Speaker 2: three and a half. Only three and a half in 378 00:20:06,720 --> 00:20:10,080 Speaker 2: favor of the Nitney Lions. On the road rass Aids Stadium, 379 00:20:10,680 --> 00:20:16,400 Speaker 2: West Lafayette, Louisiana, Thursday, September first, I think that game 380 00:20:16,640 --> 00:20:20,119 Speaker 2: is huge, not just for Penn State, but as Kevin 381 00:20:20,160 --> 00:20:23,639 Speaker 2: pointed out, for both teams. Lose that game against Perdue, 382 00:20:23,720 --> 00:20:26,679 Speaker 2: who knows what happens two weeks later you go to Auburn. 383 00:20:26,760 --> 00:20:29,680 Speaker 2: What could happen there? There's a real chance this team 384 00:20:29,680 --> 00:20:32,000 Speaker 2: could start off three and two as opposed to five 385 00:20:32,040 --> 00:20:35,080 Speaker 2: to zero. And those are two drastically different seasons. 386 00:20:35,160 --> 00:20:37,520 Speaker 1: So a couple teams stand out, A few teams stand 387 00:20:37,560 --> 00:20:39,840 Speaker 1: out to me. You already talked about the potential of 388 00:20:39,880 --> 00:20:43,160 Speaker 1: Colorado going to twelve. They've got a retooled TCU team 389 00:20:43,160 --> 00:20:46,360 Speaker 1: in Week one, so winning one right off the bat 390 00:20:46,680 --> 00:20:49,760 Speaker 1: throws a theory of yours away. I can't wait number 391 00:20:49,800 --> 00:20:53,000 Speaker 1: two or two and three, both of the Pac twelve 392 00:20:53,000 --> 00:20:55,479 Speaker 1: teams playing huge games in Week one. I'm sorry. If 393 00:20:55,480 --> 00:20:58,560 Speaker 1: Oregon goes to Atlanta and beats Georgia, that changes my 394 00:20:58,680 --> 00:21:02,520 Speaker 1: mind about orc and is this fall? And it doesn't 395 00:21:02,520 --> 00:21:04,600 Speaker 1: fully change my mind that Utah is really good if 396 00:21:04,640 --> 00:21:06,679 Speaker 1: they go to the Swamp and win, But as a 397 00:21:06,720 --> 00:21:08,560 Speaker 1: top ten team to go to the Swamp to open 398 00:21:08,600 --> 00:21:11,199 Speaker 1: the season when they are now the hunted instead of 399 00:21:11,280 --> 00:21:15,080 Speaker 1: the team that's perennially slept on that says to me, 400 00:21:15,240 --> 00:21:17,199 Speaker 1: Utah is ready to compete for a playoff spot. Ye, 401 00:21:17,359 --> 00:21:21,400 Speaker 1: if Utah goes to Florida and emphatic is a little 402 00:21:21,480 --> 00:21:25,919 Speaker 1: much to ask, but comfortably or leaves no doubt that 403 00:21:25,920 --> 00:21:28,880 Speaker 1: they're better than Florida in the swamp. When it's gonna 404 00:21:28,880 --> 00:21:32,160 Speaker 1: be hot, I assume it's going to be unlike Salt 405 00:21:32,240 --> 00:21:35,560 Speaker 1: Lake City in Gainesville that afternoon or night, whenever, whatever 406 00:21:35,600 --> 00:21:38,359 Speaker 1: time that game is being played. That would change the 407 00:21:38,480 --> 00:21:42,200 Speaker 1: complexion to me of their season. How about West Virginia, 408 00:21:42,640 --> 00:21:45,080 Speaker 1: a team that is looking to make changes on offense, 409 00:21:45,160 --> 00:21:49,639 Speaker 1: brings in JT. Daniels and opens with the reignition of 410 00:21:49,680 --> 00:21:52,480 Speaker 1: the backyard brawl going to pitt as some I think 411 00:21:52,520 --> 00:21:54,440 Speaker 1: like a touchdown. I don't know what the spread is 412 00:21:54,480 --> 00:21:56,600 Speaker 1: for that, but that would change to me like, oh, 413 00:21:56,680 --> 00:21:59,240 Speaker 1: West Virginia is a threat in the Big twelve, not 414 00:21:59,680 --> 00:22:03,680 Speaker 1: a a leader, not a favorite, whatever, but more of 415 00:22:03,720 --> 00:22:05,880 Speaker 1: a threat than we've come to expect these last couple 416 00:22:05,920 --> 00:22:08,639 Speaker 1: of years. That would change what I expect from West Virginia. 417 00:22:08,640 --> 00:22:11,000 Speaker 1: If they're able to win that monumental of an opening 418 00:22:11,119 --> 00:22:13,680 Speaker 1: night game or opening what I don't get, I don't 419 00:22:13,800 --> 00:22:18,119 Speaker 1: schedule kickoff times in front of me. There was another 420 00:22:18,160 --> 00:22:20,399 Speaker 1: one that stood out to me that there's just so 421 00:22:20,480 --> 00:22:22,480 Speaker 1: much up in the air that I don't fully know. 422 00:22:22,640 --> 00:22:26,639 Speaker 1: But Cincinnati beating Arkansas in Fayetteville. They I don't believe 423 00:22:26,640 --> 00:22:28,680 Speaker 1: at the time of recording, they've named whether it was 424 00:22:28,720 --> 00:22:30,800 Speaker 1: Prada or Bryant, a starting quarterback. I think they close 425 00:22:30,880 --> 00:22:34,320 Speaker 1: camp without naming a quarterback. So Cincinnati in the way 426 00:22:34,359 --> 00:22:37,240 Speaker 1: that they're retooling, if they're able to come away, I 427 00:22:37,280 --> 00:22:40,280 Speaker 1: think they're about a touchdown dog in that game. I 428 00:22:40,280 --> 00:22:42,800 Speaker 1: think the expectation is Cincinnati will be good, but they're 429 00:22:42,800 --> 00:22:44,600 Speaker 1: not going to be where they were last year. Beating 430 00:22:44,720 --> 00:22:46,520 Speaker 1: Arkans on the road, that would be That would up 431 00:22:46,560 --> 00:22:49,800 Speaker 1: my expectations, absolutely up my expectations of the Bearcats. 432 00:22:49,880 --> 00:22:51,640 Speaker 2: That would be a really big deal. By the way, 433 00:22:52,040 --> 00:22:54,119 Speaker 2: Pitt favored by about six and a half in that 434 00:22:54,200 --> 00:22:58,200 Speaker 2: backyard brawl game. Okay, taking place on Thursday, September the first. 435 00:22:58,240 --> 00:23:00,399 Speaker 2: We will absolutely preview that when we do Week one 436 00:23:00,440 --> 00:23:03,520 Speaker 2: preview next week. And to your point of the weather 437 00:23:03,600 --> 00:23:06,239 Speaker 2: in Florida being different than Salt Lake City, it's going 438 00:23:06,280 --> 00:23:09,760 Speaker 2: to be mid to upper nineties in Salt Lake all week. 439 00:23:10,320 --> 00:23:15,040 Speaker 2: Oh but the humidity Tye, you're talking altitude altitude. Yeah, 440 00:23:15,080 --> 00:23:19,120 Speaker 2: still hot, I have no idea. Still hot, still absolutely hot. 441 00:23:20,400 --> 00:23:23,640 Speaker 2: There's other interesting matchups that I don't like. If Army 442 00:23:23,640 --> 00:23:28,320 Speaker 2: beats Coastal Carolina and Conway, you're already high on Army, right, 443 00:23:28,440 --> 00:23:29,120 Speaker 2: I love Army. 444 00:23:29,200 --> 00:23:31,320 Speaker 1: Oh yeah, that upsit though, right, that has to up 445 00:23:31,359 --> 00:23:35,480 Speaker 1: what you expect from our yes here absolutely yeah. I 446 00:23:35,560 --> 00:23:38,360 Speaker 1: mean you have to consider Notre Dame at least playoff 447 00:23:38,359 --> 00:23:40,640 Speaker 1: worth if they beat Ohio State in the shoe. 448 00:23:41,640 --> 00:23:43,280 Speaker 2: They're not going to beat Ohio State in the shoe, 449 00:23:43,280 --> 00:23:46,160 Speaker 2: but yeah, for sure, if they do, we're talking about 450 00:23:46,160 --> 00:23:48,880 Speaker 2: a much different Notreed Aame team. We're talking about Heisman 451 00:23:49,040 --> 00:23:53,560 Speaker 2: contender Tyler Buckner if they beat Oile State in the shoe. 452 00:23:53,600 --> 00:23:55,120 Speaker 2: By the way, let me bring up that question because 453 00:23:55,160 --> 00:23:58,440 Speaker 2: we did get a question about that. Enrique says, which 454 00:23:58,560 --> 00:24:02,960 Speaker 2: team is in the best position if they're new quarterback? 455 00:24:03,040 --> 00:24:07,680 Speaker 2: Has that it factor? Now? New quarterback? The word new 456 00:24:07,800 --> 00:24:10,520 Speaker 2: is doing some heavy lifting. We need to define what 457 00:24:10,560 --> 00:24:13,879 Speaker 2: that means before I answer this question. Is it new 458 00:24:14,440 --> 00:24:17,840 Speaker 2: in terms of this is a brand new kid who 459 00:24:17,920 --> 00:24:21,640 Speaker 2: has never played quarterback? Is it a Tyler Buckner situation 460 00:24:21,760 --> 00:24:24,879 Speaker 2: where we saw flashes. Is it somebody who's been on 461 00:24:24,920 --> 00:24:28,280 Speaker 2: the roster, Like, what do you define as new full 462 00:24:28,320 --> 00:24:30,200 Speaker 2: time starter? New full time starter? 463 00:24:30,560 --> 00:24:31,000 Speaker 1: Yeah? 464 00:24:31,080 --> 00:24:34,600 Speaker 2: I think Tyler Buckner is my answer here. And you know, 465 00:24:34,680 --> 00:24:38,600 Speaker 2: I hate to answer this question with a Penn State 466 00:24:38,680 --> 00:24:40,679 Speaker 2: and Notre Dame on back to back because people are 467 00:24:40,680 --> 00:24:44,360 Speaker 2: gonna call me a homer, But I really think it's 468 00:24:44,680 --> 00:24:49,400 Speaker 2: if it's not Notre Dame and Buckner, it is Texas 469 00:24:49,400 --> 00:24:52,320 Speaker 2: A and M and whoever they pick. Okay, I think 470 00:24:52,320 --> 00:24:55,000 Speaker 2: both those teams are in really good shape if their 471 00:24:55,080 --> 00:24:59,240 Speaker 2: quarterback has the IT factor. I have not seen A 472 00:24:59,320 --> 00:25:01,400 Speaker 2: and M yet. I don't know who they're gonna pick. 473 00:25:01,800 --> 00:25:04,240 Speaker 2: My suspicion is that they like Haynes King a lot. 474 00:25:04,560 --> 00:25:07,040 Speaker 2: That Haines King gives them a lot of athleticism. That's 475 00:25:07,040 --> 00:25:09,720 Speaker 2: why they picked them last year. So if he goes 476 00:25:09,760 --> 00:25:11,840 Speaker 2: out there, if he brings that IT factor, if he 477 00:25:11,920 --> 00:25:15,040 Speaker 2: can make it all the more difficult to defend that offense. 478 00:25:15,720 --> 00:25:19,159 Speaker 2: A and M's a strong answer. Buckner isn't working with 479 00:25:19,240 --> 00:25:22,160 Speaker 2: as much offensively as what they've got at A and M. 480 00:25:22,160 --> 00:25:25,240 Speaker 2: But he does remain a pretty big unknown because we 481 00:25:25,280 --> 00:25:27,200 Speaker 2: only saw him in limited doses last season. 482 00:25:27,840 --> 00:25:31,320 Speaker 1: I'm gonna go off the beaten path. Sir Cameron Ward 483 00:25:31,760 --> 00:25:35,199 Speaker 1: was it? Oh my god, so long shot. To me, 484 00:25:35,240 --> 00:25:36,720 Speaker 1: it's a long shot. As good as he was and 485 00:25:36,720 --> 00:25:40,040 Speaker 1: as good as he has been, there are if you 486 00:25:40,080 --> 00:25:42,600 Speaker 1: look at where Washington State should be pretty good upfronts, 487 00:25:42,640 --> 00:25:45,960 Speaker 1: you're basically looking at teams that have defenses that you 488 00:25:46,080 --> 00:25:50,760 Speaker 1: think are pretty dependable, that need a significant upgrade in 489 00:25:50,840 --> 00:25:54,000 Speaker 1: terms of offensive output, especially from quarterback. So yeah, your 490 00:25:54,000 --> 00:25:57,080 Speaker 1: Notre Dame answer is not bad, though I would argue 491 00:25:57,320 --> 00:25:59,760 Speaker 1: a good chunk of where Notre Dame struggled last year 492 00:25:59,840 --> 00:26:03,520 Speaker 1: was because of Jack Cohne or Drew Pye or Tyler 493 00:26:03,560 --> 00:26:05,919 Speaker 1: Buckner and the rotation. They were just so beat up 494 00:26:05,920 --> 00:26:08,120 Speaker 1: along the offensive line they couldn't run the ball at all. 495 00:26:08,600 --> 00:26:12,400 Speaker 1: So basically they were just starting from way behind last year. 496 00:26:12,520 --> 00:26:18,760 Speaker 1: So it's we'll see new quarterback wise, Dylan Gabriel is 497 00:26:18,760 --> 00:26:19,840 Speaker 1: an interesting answer to me. 498 00:26:20,119 --> 00:26:23,040 Speaker 2: I thought about him, but he see he doesn't feel 499 00:26:23,080 --> 00:26:26,520 Speaker 2: like a new quarterback. Yeah to me, I mean, I 500 00:26:26,560 --> 00:26:29,160 Speaker 2: guess he is for Oklahoma, and it obviously got hurt 501 00:26:29,240 --> 00:26:31,920 Speaker 2: last year, so it's been a while for him. New 502 00:26:32,000 --> 00:26:33,360 Speaker 2: quarterback for Oklahoma. 503 00:26:33,560 --> 00:26:36,320 Speaker 1: This is a new quarterback for Oklahoma. So we know 504 00:26:36,400 --> 00:26:38,520 Speaker 1: that Dylan Gabriel has the adfactor, which is why I 505 00:26:38,520 --> 00:26:42,280 Speaker 1: don't necessarily feel like it's a worthy answer. Where there's 506 00:26:42,280 --> 00:26:44,800 Speaker 1: more of a mystery with Cameron Ward and Wazoo and 507 00:26:44,880 --> 00:26:47,639 Speaker 1: just that he hasn't played at the the FBS level. 508 00:26:49,680 --> 00:26:52,760 Speaker 1: Otherwise there's there's not a lot of teams. Here's I'll 509 00:26:52,840 --> 00:26:54,520 Speaker 1: scratch you where you witch ty? You ready? 510 00:26:54,560 --> 00:26:55,119 Speaker 2: I'm ready? 511 00:26:55,560 --> 00:26:59,480 Speaker 1: Kate club Nick, Oh my god, what is whisper you 512 00:26:59,520 --> 00:27:01,160 Speaker 1: of a comp You've grown a cuss? 513 00:27:01,280 --> 00:27:04,160 Speaker 2: We talk about the club level and Cameron Ward around 514 00:27:04,200 --> 00:27:06,159 Speaker 2: here in hushed revered tones. You know that. 515 00:27:06,640 --> 00:27:13,640 Speaker 1: Yeah, So, just excellent defenses that are hopeful that whoever 516 00:27:13,720 --> 00:27:17,320 Speaker 1: is stepping into the full time quarterback job now is 517 00:27:17,400 --> 00:27:18,000 Speaker 1: the answer. 518 00:27:18,560 --> 00:27:22,119 Speaker 2: I noticed that you didn't mention the uh Alex Padilla flotilla? 519 00:27:22,359 --> 00:27:23,200 Speaker 1: Was he named the starter? 520 00:27:23,320 --> 00:27:25,040 Speaker 2: I don't know he should be Okay, he's got to 521 00:27:25,040 --> 00:27:25,360 Speaker 2: be right. 522 00:27:25,359 --> 00:27:27,680 Speaker 1: Those are not he but see neither one of them. 523 00:27:27,720 --> 00:27:30,560 Speaker 1: I guess Spencer Petris was the full time starter, but 524 00:27:30,760 --> 00:27:32,280 Speaker 1: I don't know. I don't know if that counts. But 525 00:27:32,320 --> 00:27:34,520 Speaker 1: even still, that's just a ridiculous answer. Time you could 526 00:27:34,560 --> 00:27:35,520 Speaker 1: be ashamed of yourself. 527 00:27:35,840 --> 00:27:39,280 Speaker 2: I know it's Padilla too. I apologize. Okay, here we 528 00:27:39,320 --> 00:27:45,399 Speaker 2: go from Chuck the rebuilding Baltimore Orioles and their surprising 529 00:27:45,440 --> 00:27:48,960 Speaker 2: performance is the best sports story of the summer, at 530 00:27:49,000 --> 00:27:51,720 Speaker 2: least at my house. Okay, who is a chance to 531 00:27:51,760 --> 00:27:54,520 Speaker 2: be the college football equivalent. So the feel good story. 532 00:27:55,000 --> 00:27:58,159 Speaker 2: Maybe some success you didn't see coming, and everybody just 533 00:27:58,200 --> 00:27:59,240 Speaker 2: feels good about it. 534 00:27:59,320 --> 00:28:05,359 Speaker 1: Somebody likes likable to you or to somebody, somebody likable who, 535 00:28:05,400 --> 00:28:10,159 Speaker 1: against all odds, keeps stringing together wins. And perhaps I 536 00:28:10,160 --> 00:28:11,840 Speaker 1: don't know if it's a schedule thing. I don't know 537 00:28:11,840 --> 00:28:14,159 Speaker 1: if it's a weird winning fifty to fifty games, but 538 00:28:14,240 --> 00:28:16,840 Speaker 1: they were projected to win four or five and suddenly 539 00:28:16,880 --> 00:28:19,240 Speaker 1: we are we're swimming in an eight to nine win 540 00:28:19,320 --> 00:28:21,280 Speaker 1: pool something like that. 541 00:28:21,480 --> 00:28:23,359 Speaker 2: Well I'm not talking an eight to nine win pool, 542 00:28:23,359 --> 00:28:25,640 Speaker 2: but I'm talking about the Arizona Wildcats here. 543 00:28:26,400 --> 00:28:30,560 Speaker 1: That would be likable ish, Yeah, that would be likable ish. 544 00:28:32,320 --> 00:28:38,480 Speaker 2: I feel really good about this team, Okay, not necessarily 545 00:28:38,600 --> 00:28:41,360 Speaker 2: getting to a bowl game, certainly not getting eight to 546 00:28:41,440 --> 00:28:44,640 Speaker 2: nine wins. My god, people would laugh me off the 547 00:28:44,680 --> 00:28:49,160 Speaker 2: stage here. Uh, but I like what Jed Fish is 548 00:28:49,200 --> 00:28:51,960 Speaker 2: doing and I think they played hard last season. I 549 00:28:51,960 --> 00:28:54,680 Speaker 2: think they've got more support this year. I think they'll 550 00:28:54,680 --> 00:28:57,400 Speaker 2: be better. And so if they pull an upset, even 551 00:28:57,400 --> 00:28:59,440 Speaker 2: if they win four games, and it feels like they've 552 00:28:59,440 --> 00:29:02,280 Speaker 2: got things going in a good direction, that's a feel 553 00:29:02,280 --> 00:29:04,959 Speaker 2: good story, you know. That's something that Arizona people can 554 00:29:04,960 --> 00:29:07,200 Speaker 2: feel good about and build towards. I don't know if 555 00:29:07,200 --> 00:29:10,000 Speaker 2: it gets national significance. I don't know if the Orioles 556 00:29:10,040 --> 00:29:13,320 Speaker 2: have national significance. Frankly, at last check, I believe they're 557 00:29:13,320 --> 00:29:19,040 Speaker 2: still trading all their players. But who for you outside 558 00:29:19,080 --> 00:29:26,160 Speaker 2: of maybe the bottom rung of eligibility for this answer, right, 559 00:29:26,200 --> 00:29:26,880 Speaker 2: would you go with. 560 00:29:28,440 --> 00:29:30,200 Speaker 1: The fighting lion I of Illinois tie? 561 00:29:30,800 --> 00:29:31,160 Speaker 2: Okay? 562 00:29:32,280 --> 00:29:35,320 Speaker 1: I feel as if and maybe this is me misreading 563 00:29:35,360 --> 00:29:37,440 Speaker 1: the room, and I'm sure there are some fans who 564 00:29:37,480 --> 00:29:43,560 Speaker 1: would disagree. But if Illinois is surprisingly decent, that means 565 00:29:43,600 --> 00:29:48,840 Speaker 1: they're beating PJ. Fleck. They're beating Scott Frost, they're beating 566 00:29:48,880 --> 00:29:53,840 Speaker 1: Michigan State, they're beating Jim Harbaugh, they're beating Kirk Farns, 567 00:29:54,160 --> 00:30:00,800 Speaker 1: they're beating Shark Tank's own Paul Chris. Number of either 568 00:30:00,880 --> 00:30:04,480 Speaker 1: good or unlikable teams at least within the Midwestern footprint. 569 00:30:05,160 --> 00:30:07,840 Speaker 1: And again I don't think I misreading the room, like 570 00:30:07,880 --> 00:30:11,160 Speaker 1: I think Brett Bielam is somewhat likable, just like playing 571 00:30:11,200 --> 00:30:14,360 Speaker 1: the big dumb style that Illinois and Brett Bieloma teams 572 00:30:14,400 --> 00:30:18,200 Speaker 1: tend to play. I think that would be considering the 573 00:30:18,240 --> 00:30:22,400 Speaker 1: depths to which Illinois dropped to these past few years, 574 00:30:22,440 --> 00:30:29,080 Speaker 1: these past couple coaches, and how sick people can grow 575 00:30:29,560 --> 00:30:33,480 Speaker 1: around certain powers always being the best. Illinois coming up 576 00:30:33,480 --> 00:30:36,040 Speaker 1: and spanking two or three of them are surprising two 577 00:30:36,120 --> 00:30:39,360 Speaker 1: or three of them on their way to winning seven games. Yeah, 578 00:30:39,400 --> 00:30:41,120 Speaker 1: I think that would be a pretty likable story. 579 00:30:41,560 --> 00:30:44,320 Speaker 2: We also could include Texas beating Kansas here ending the 580 00:30:44,360 --> 00:30:47,640 Speaker 2: losing streak. I thought, how dare you a feel good story? Right? 581 00:30:49,080 --> 00:30:52,240 Speaker 1: I think Kansas would be a good story. Maybe TCU 582 00:30:53,480 --> 00:30:57,000 Speaker 1: given Sunny Dykes's ties to the state and college football 583 00:30:57,040 --> 00:31:00,800 Speaker 1: success within his family and the depth to win TCU 584 00:31:00,920 --> 00:31:04,080 Speaker 1: fell and they were ready to move forward, and the 585 00:31:04,560 --> 00:31:08,680 Speaker 1: uncertainty and hatred that people feel in the Big Twelve 586 00:31:08,760 --> 00:31:12,960 Speaker 1: toward Texas and Oklahoma. That if like the phoenix rising 587 00:31:13,080 --> 00:31:16,840 Speaker 1: from the ashes of where TCU was last year, that 588 00:31:16,880 --> 00:31:19,600 Speaker 1: the Frogs are pretty good Virginia Tech. 589 00:31:19,480 --> 00:31:22,400 Speaker 2: Winning six games would be a feel good story. And 590 00:31:22,840 --> 00:31:25,320 Speaker 2: I view Virginia Tech a little bit like their rich 591 00:31:25,360 --> 00:31:28,520 Speaker 2: Man's South Carolina from twenty twenty one, okay, in that 592 00:31:28,640 --> 00:31:31,960 Speaker 2: they just don't have the guys. They don't have the 593 00:31:32,040 --> 00:31:36,200 Speaker 2: people to build this thing in a great direction in 594 00:31:36,240 --> 00:31:39,640 Speaker 2: twenty twenty two. But they're trying, you know, they're moving 595 00:31:39,640 --> 00:31:42,040 Speaker 2: guys around, they're they're doing their best. And I believe 596 00:31:42,600 --> 00:31:44,800 Speaker 2: in Brent Priye. I think he's a good coach. I 597 00:31:44,800 --> 00:31:47,680 Speaker 2: think they're at least a year away from being, you know, 598 00:31:47,960 --> 00:31:50,240 Speaker 2: a respect year away team. Yeah, you're away from a 599 00:31:50,280 --> 00:31:53,080 Speaker 2: year away. But if they can find a way to 600 00:31:53,120 --> 00:31:56,320 Speaker 2: cobble together six that'd be a great story. Yeah you can. 601 00:31:56,360 --> 00:31:58,040 Speaker 2: You don't have to look too hard to find these. 602 00:31:58,360 --> 00:32:01,160 Speaker 1: Yeah, Virginia Tech is. I think they're pretty likable nationally. 603 00:32:01,240 --> 00:32:04,160 Speaker 1: I think people like the idea of a giant Turkey 604 00:32:04,400 --> 00:32:07,360 Speaker 1: and Metallica and jumping up and down in a loud 605 00:32:07,400 --> 00:32:09,760 Speaker 1: stadium in the middle of nowhere. Sure. Yeah, I think 606 00:32:09,800 --> 00:32:12,720 Speaker 1: people are on board with enjoying a Virginia Tech run 607 00:32:12,800 --> 00:32:16,600 Speaker 1: back to you know, competing just with the best of 608 00:32:16,640 --> 00:32:20,160 Speaker 1: the acc not necessarily winning every week, but being a 609 00:32:20,200 --> 00:32:21,920 Speaker 1: hard out. I'd think people would be on board with that. 610 00:32:22,080 --> 00:32:29,040 Speaker 2: Yeah, longtime SEC fan, right, sin h, long time, first time. 611 00:32:29,920 --> 00:32:36,120 Speaker 2: I've listened to you guys now for at least thirteen years. Welcome, Wow, welcome, Welcome. 612 00:32:36,680 --> 00:32:38,840 Speaker 2: From the beginning, I've noticed that you two generally have 613 00:32:39,040 --> 00:32:43,400 Speaker 2: positive takes on everybody. Was that intentional as part of 614 00:32:43,440 --> 00:32:45,120 Speaker 2: your approach to the show and football? 615 00:32:45,200 --> 00:32:51,240 Speaker 1: Dan? Not intentional per se, especially in the off season. 616 00:32:52,080 --> 00:32:56,600 Speaker 1: I'm a big fan of the thought exercise of let's 617 00:32:56,640 --> 00:33:00,840 Speaker 1: piece together a road in which this team is good 618 00:33:01,360 --> 00:33:05,240 Speaker 1: or improved or pretty good, because that's the currency we 619 00:33:05,360 --> 00:33:08,320 Speaker 1: trade in as college football fans. It's all hope, it's 620 00:33:08,360 --> 00:33:11,959 Speaker 1: all positivity and reasons to find positivity about our own teams, 621 00:33:12,280 --> 00:33:15,400 Speaker 1: and reasons to hate the teams we don't like and 622 00:33:15,440 --> 00:33:19,760 Speaker 1: want to beat into the ground. And so every year 623 00:33:19,800 --> 00:33:22,840 Speaker 1: there are teams that surprise us by being good, or 624 00:33:23,080 --> 00:33:26,120 Speaker 1: our own teams surprise us by being better than we expected, 625 00:33:27,040 --> 00:33:31,400 Speaker 1: and so who unless we feel certain that a team 626 00:33:31,480 --> 00:33:34,880 Speaker 1: is not going to be all that good, it's just 627 00:33:35,200 --> 00:33:37,840 Speaker 1: it makes more sense to sort of not paint a 628 00:33:37,920 --> 00:33:42,880 Speaker 1: rosier picture but look for silver linings, because I think 629 00:33:42,880 --> 00:33:47,360 Speaker 1: we can both agree that different. Success for different teams 630 00:33:47,800 --> 00:33:51,480 Speaker 1: is very different. And so by me saying, like for 631 00:33:51,560 --> 00:33:54,520 Speaker 1: Illinois and how when we preview them, I said, look, 632 00:33:54,560 --> 00:33:57,280 Speaker 1: if you if you don't take the Ali and I seriously, 633 00:33:57,280 --> 00:33:59,960 Speaker 1: they'll come up and beat you. If Illinois catches you 634 00:34:00,200 --> 00:34:02,040 Speaker 1: with a beat up quarterback, they might come up and 635 00:34:02,080 --> 00:34:06,160 Speaker 1: beat you. And so Illinois winning six or seven games, 636 00:34:07,320 --> 00:34:11,399 Speaker 1: it's not crazy positive. But for an ALIONI fan who 637 00:34:11,480 --> 00:34:13,880 Speaker 1: just wants to watch his or her team be pretty 638 00:34:13,880 --> 00:34:18,080 Speaker 1: good going to a bowl game, beating probably a couple 639 00:34:18,120 --> 00:34:21,080 Speaker 1: teams that they're looked at as not being ready to beat, 640 00:34:21,800 --> 00:34:24,480 Speaker 1: that's a huge deal. So I try to enter that 641 00:34:24,600 --> 00:34:27,680 Speaker 1: mind space when talking about different teams in the offseason, 642 00:34:27,719 --> 00:34:31,120 Speaker 1: because I don't know, it feels more natural to me 643 00:34:31,239 --> 00:34:33,479 Speaker 1: to try and paint that picture, to try to pave 644 00:34:33,600 --> 00:34:36,040 Speaker 1: that road when looking at these teams. 645 00:34:37,080 --> 00:34:40,640 Speaker 2: Here's the reality. You're listening to a podcast now for enjoyment. 646 00:34:41,280 --> 00:34:43,600 Speaker 2: You don't want to come on here and hear somebody 647 00:34:43,640 --> 00:34:46,520 Speaker 2: just tell you that your team sucks. If your team sucks, 648 00:34:46,520 --> 00:34:48,839 Speaker 2: you already know they suck. You know you do know that. Yeah, 649 00:34:49,320 --> 00:34:51,439 Speaker 2: you don't need me to tell you that, or Dan, 650 00:34:52,120 --> 00:34:55,239 Speaker 2: you already know your team sucks. So I think we've 651 00:34:55,280 --> 00:34:57,880 Speaker 2: made it at least somewhat of a point here to 652 00:34:57,960 --> 00:35:01,000 Speaker 2: try and highlight the fun stuff. If your team is bad, 653 00:35:01,120 --> 00:35:04,080 Speaker 2: let's give you things to latch onto, things that we 654 00:35:04,120 --> 00:35:07,359 Speaker 2: can latch onto. Right, this isn't necessarily just a show 655 00:35:07,400 --> 00:35:09,719 Speaker 2: for the other folks. It's also a show for us. 656 00:35:09,719 --> 00:35:11,759 Speaker 2: Because we do it all the time, we have to 657 00:35:11,840 --> 00:35:14,200 Speaker 2: enjoy it, and so we try to find those points 658 00:35:14,200 --> 00:35:19,480 Speaker 2: of intersect between reality and amusement that we can use 659 00:35:19,480 --> 00:35:22,960 Speaker 2: to keep people engaged here with the show. Sometimes it's 660 00:35:23,040 --> 00:35:25,799 Speaker 2: easier than others. Sometimes we just have to say this 661 00:35:25,840 --> 00:35:28,640 Speaker 2: team's really bad. Well, also another that we can say 662 00:35:28,640 --> 00:35:30,759 Speaker 2: here other than the obvious that this team's bad. But 663 00:35:30,920 --> 00:35:33,880 Speaker 2: I think we are not necessarily looking at the glass 664 00:35:34,480 --> 00:35:37,520 Speaker 2: half empty all the time. We are doing our best 665 00:35:37,560 --> 00:35:41,240 Speaker 2: to try and find just those little points that people 666 00:35:41,239 --> 00:35:42,200 Speaker 2: can feel good about. 667 00:35:42,440 --> 00:35:45,799 Speaker 1: We're in the business, though, of selling the sport. So 668 00:35:46,080 --> 00:35:49,840 Speaker 1: if Tie comes on here and tells you that Virginia 669 00:35:49,920 --> 00:35:53,440 Speaker 1: is garbage and you shouldn't watch them, and Minnesota is 670 00:35:54,040 --> 00:35:58,160 Speaker 1: horrible and to avoid them at all costs, your enthusiasm 671 00:35:58,200 --> 00:36:02,960 Speaker 1: for college football could be affected by Tye the influencer 672 00:36:03,640 --> 00:36:06,839 Speaker 1: being negative about teams that are playing in the sport, like, 673 00:36:06,920 --> 00:36:08,640 Speaker 1: oh I was thinking about watching that game, but Ty 674 00:36:08,760 --> 00:36:11,600 Speaker 1: the influencer said, damn, they're really bad. 675 00:36:11,719 --> 00:36:12,400 Speaker 2: I appreciate that. 676 00:36:12,520 --> 00:36:15,839 Speaker 1: And so if we are selling excitement and enthusiasm about 677 00:36:15,840 --> 00:36:20,680 Speaker 1: college football, which is authentically something we feel, then maybe 678 00:36:20,840 --> 00:36:24,440 Speaker 1: you'll be more interested in listening to this show more often. 679 00:36:24,560 --> 00:36:29,040 Speaker 1: It's not intentional, but people like listening to people who 680 00:36:29,120 --> 00:36:32,120 Speaker 1: are into their subject matter. And so if we go 681 00:36:32,239 --> 00:36:34,680 Speaker 1: down the road like this team sucks, this offense sucks, 682 00:36:34,680 --> 00:36:38,680 Speaker 1: this defense sucks, without giving you a chunk of like look, yes, 683 00:36:38,800 --> 00:36:43,000 Speaker 1: of course Northwestern struggled mightily on offense and their defense 684 00:36:43,040 --> 00:36:46,279 Speaker 1: took a step back. But here is the picture I 685 00:36:46,320 --> 00:36:49,240 Speaker 1: can paint in which they can actually surprise a couple teams. 686 00:36:49,280 --> 00:36:51,239 Speaker 1: They ran the ball well, this guy's going to be 687 00:36:51,239 --> 00:36:53,319 Speaker 1: an NFL player on the edge. And so there are 688 00:36:53,360 --> 00:36:56,640 Speaker 1: reasons to still care about games on the fringe outside 689 00:36:56,680 --> 00:36:58,719 Speaker 1: of a Bama game, outside of an Ohio State game, 690 00:36:59,080 --> 00:37:01,640 Speaker 1: because that's how we take in the sport. We're looking 691 00:37:01,719 --> 00:37:05,879 Speaker 1: for that meaty flank of a team that otherwise does 692 00:37:05,920 --> 00:37:09,000 Speaker 1: not have a winning body. That's what we're looking for. 693 00:37:10,440 --> 00:37:13,880 Speaker 2: Brian wants to know, will the valuable TV market in 694 00:37:14,080 --> 00:37:18,000 Speaker 2: LA just turn into a mid tier Big Ten program? 695 00:37:19,560 --> 00:37:24,600 Speaker 2: Speaking of which, speaking yeah of Pump in the Sunshine 696 00:37:24,600 --> 00:37:30,440 Speaker 2: here Brian going the exact opposite direction USC DAN. What 697 00:37:30,480 --> 00:37:35,480 Speaker 2: does usc look like within the Big ten college football landscape? 698 00:37:36,320 --> 00:37:40,080 Speaker 1: It's fascinating. In the short term, they should be the 699 00:37:40,280 --> 00:37:44,600 Speaker 1: valuable LATV market, should be a team who can put 700 00:37:44,680 --> 00:37:48,440 Speaker 1: up points in the Pac twelve next year or two 701 00:37:48,600 --> 00:37:52,160 Speaker 1: if they are as one note, as they look right now, 702 00:37:52,160 --> 00:37:53,799 Speaker 1: as they appear to be right now, and as they 703 00:37:53,840 --> 00:37:56,960 Speaker 1: appeared as Oklahoma appeared to be under Lincoln Riley at 704 00:37:57,000 --> 00:37:58,640 Speaker 1: times where they had to win a bunch of shootouts 705 00:37:58,680 --> 00:38:01,080 Speaker 1: and really struggle to catch on defense. Maybe other than 706 00:38:01,080 --> 00:38:04,480 Speaker 1: the back half of the twenty twenty season, it actually 707 00:38:04,520 --> 00:38:08,040 Speaker 1: provides for a unique program within the Big Ten. Who 708 00:38:08,120 --> 00:38:11,239 Speaker 1: was the last Big Ten team to be sort of 709 00:38:12,200 --> 00:38:15,040 Speaker 1: all gas on offense and all breaks on defense, to 710 00:38:15,120 --> 00:38:18,560 Speaker 1: be like a pseudo half team in the direction of offense. 711 00:38:19,880 --> 00:38:22,120 Speaker 1: Like all of those Penn State teams under Joe Morehead. 712 00:38:22,160 --> 00:38:24,560 Speaker 1: They had pretty good defenses. They won the Big Ten. 713 00:38:25,880 --> 00:38:28,520 Speaker 1: Ohio State has had good last year wasn't great, but 714 00:38:28,560 --> 00:38:32,040 Speaker 1: it was okay. That defense so Who was that last 715 00:38:32,040 --> 00:38:35,000 Speaker 1: team to have like a number four offense and a 716 00:38:35,080 --> 00:38:38,239 Speaker 1: number ninety seven defense in the Big Ten? Has that 717 00:38:38,280 --> 00:38:43,520 Speaker 1: team existed ever? We We sort of had bouts of it, 718 00:38:43,600 --> 00:38:45,319 Speaker 1: maybe with Minnesota a couple of years ago, and they 719 00:38:45,320 --> 00:38:46,680 Speaker 1: want a bunch of games. They still have a pretty 720 00:38:46,680 --> 00:38:50,759 Speaker 1: good defense. Who is that team that was capable of 721 00:38:50,800 --> 00:38:53,400 Speaker 1: scoring forty five but also capable of giving up forty 722 00:38:53,440 --> 00:38:56,680 Speaker 1: five any given week in the Big Ten? That could 723 00:38:56,680 --> 00:39:01,200 Speaker 1: spell mid tier Big Ten for USC because that style 724 00:39:01,360 --> 00:39:07,279 Speaker 1: just doesn't seem like it works within the conference. But that, yeah, 725 00:39:07,520 --> 00:39:10,400 Speaker 1: that got me to thinking, who was that team that 726 00:39:10,800 --> 00:39:13,680 Speaker 1: couldn't get it figured out on defense but locked in 727 00:39:13,760 --> 00:39:15,319 Speaker 1: on offense within the Big Ten? 728 00:39:15,800 --> 00:39:21,720 Speaker 2: I mean, are we counting Maryland here among those Maryland? 729 00:39:21,880 --> 00:39:24,120 Speaker 1: I guess Maryland is not. 730 00:39:24,080 --> 00:39:28,000 Speaker 2: As high level as what I think we assume USC 731 00:39:28,080 --> 00:39:30,759 Speaker 2: will be by the time they make it over. But 732 00:39:31,040 --> 00:39:35,400 Speaker 2: Maryland's maybe the closest go by right now team that 733 00:39:35,400 --> 00:39:37,799 Speaker 2: should have a good offense did not play a lick 734 00:39:37,880 --> 00:39:41,759 Speaker 2: of defense last season. Ohio State to a much much 735 00:39:41,880 --> 00:39:46,400 Speaker 2: lesser degree. The defense had its moments against physical opponents, 736 00:39:46,920 --> 00:39:51,040 Speaker 2: but it wasn't like it was an overall bad defense. 737 00:39:51,080 --> 00:39:54,560 Speaker 2: This wasn't a half team type of scenario. They certainly 738 00:39:54,640 --> 00:39:57,200 Speaker 2: needed to get better if they wanted to contend for 739 00:39:57,200 --> 00:40:00,600 Speaker 2: a national championship, but they were still like second in 740 00:40:00,640 --> 00:40:04,320 Speaker 2: the conference, so clearly they don't really rise to the 741 00:40:04,400 --> 00:40:05,480 Speaker 2: level of what you're describing. 742 00:40:06,719 --> 00:40:09,320 Speaker 1: No, not necessarily so mid tier. Who would you define 743 00:40:09,320 --> 00:40:11,520 Speaker 1: as mid tier? And does that fit to you with 744 00:40:11,560 --> 00:40:14,640 Speaker 1: what you expect from Lincoln Riley USC if they're not 745 00:40:14,800 --> 00:40:18,239 Speaker 1: quite as good as what we assume his and their 746 00:40:18,280 --> 00:40:22,760 Speaker 1: ceiling is together, I don't think with mid tier mid Minnesota, Yeah. 747 00:40:22,640 --> 00:40:26,239 Speaker 2: I was gonna say Minnesota, I guess kind of is 748 00:40:26,280 --> 00:40:32,520 Speaker 2: in that meaty middle. I just don't see them falling 749 00:40:32,560 --> 00:40:34,440 Speaker 2: that far. I think by the time they get into 750 00:40:34,440 --> 00:40:37,360 Speaker 2: the Big Ten, it could be a scenario in which 751 00:40:38,120 --> 00:40:42,480 Speaker 2: Lincoln Riley has the offense cranked up enough, USC starts 752 00:40:42,480 --> 00:40:45,560 Speaker 2: playing more Big Ten opponents, and suddenly the Big Ten 753 00:40:45,640 --> 00:40:48,439 Speaker 2: maybe has to change a little bit. Maybe the Big 754 00:40:48,480 --> 00:40:52,680 Speaker 2: Ten has to revolutionize its own offenses or the way 755 00:40:52,680 --> 00:40:56,879 Speaker 2: that it plays in order to accommodate USC. I kind 756 00:40:56,880 --> 00:41:00,000 Speaker 2: of view the USC thing, at least from an offensive standpoint, 757 00:41:00,520 --> 00:41:03,480 Speaker 2: as a positive agent of change for the way the 758 00:41:03,480 --> 00:41:05,920 Speaker 2: Big Ten plays football, Right now because it is a 759 00:41:05,920 --> 00:41:07,680 Speaker 2: lot of defense and let's see what we can get 760 00:41:07,680 --> 00:41:11,359 Speaker 2: out of the offense. I'm hoping that USC, or maybe 761 00:41:11,360 --> 00:41:15,279 Speaker 2: Ohio State Michigan's been good on offense, maybe Penn State 762 00:41:15,280 --> 00:41:17,480 Speaker 2: can get there this year. I'm hoping that we can 763 00:41:17,520 --> 00:41:19,680 Speaker 2: have something of an offensive revolution, that we get a 764 00:41:19,680 --> 00:41:20,400 Speaker 2: little bit more. 765 00:41:20,280 --> 00:41:24,000 Speaker 1: Scoring in five years if both head coaches are still there, 766 00:41:24,080 --> 00:41:26,480 Speaker 1: do you expect USC to be ahead of Penn State 767 00:41:26,840 --> 00:41:29,440 Speaker 1: in terms of Big ten hierarchy and program health? 768 00:41:32,719 --> 00:41:38,919 Speaker 2: Probably? Okay, probably because for as high on Penn State 769 00:41:38,960 --> 00:41:42,000 Speaker 2: as I am this year, there's definitely a sense in 770 00:41:42,040 --> 00:41:47,319 Speaker 2: State College like if James Franklin leaves, we'll find somebody else, right, 771 00:41:47,719 --> 00:41:51,320 Speaker 2: you know, there is a sense of right, Kay, when's 772 00:41:51,320 --> 00:41:52,839 Speaker 2: this thing gonna happen? When are we going to go 773 00:41:52,880 --> 00:41:55,000 Speaker 2: to the next level with this thing? It's been a 774 00:41:55,000 --> 00:41:58,479 Speaker 2: minute since the Joe moorehead and Saquon Barkley and Trace 775 00:41:58,560 --> 00:42:04,160 Speaker 2: mcsworley era, So maybe just because they're the flavor of 776 00:42:04,200 --> 00:42:07,640 Speaker 2: the week here and the USC is probably my answer there. 777 00:42:09,000 --> 00:42:13,200 Speaker 1: Interesting, I'm worried. I'm worried about line play. I'm worried 778 00:42:13,200 --> 00:42:17,920 Speaker 1: about defensive star power with USC moving forward when the 779 00:42:17,960 --> 00:42:20,239 Speaker 1: top of the conference seems to be a little bit 780 00:42:20,280 --> 00:42:23,320 Speaker 1: more robust than what USC has been dealing with lately, 781 00:42:23,880 --> 00:42:27,400 Speaker 1: in that Michigan State has gotten better. Michigan obviously went 782 00:42:27,440 --> 00:42:29,960 Speaker 1: to the playoff. Ohio State should continue to be lethal. 783 00:42:30,320 --> 00:42:33,080 Speaker 1: Penn State, while not a team and a program with 784 00:42:33,120 --> 00:42:36,759 Speaker 1: its act fully together, should field good defenses for the 785 00:42:36,800 --> 00:42:39,319 Speaker 1: foreseeable future. Given how they've recruited and at least has 786 00:42:39,360 --> 00:42:44,319 Speaker 1: interesting offensive skill talent, Wisconsin is just going to be 787 00:42:44,480 --> 00:42:49,080 Speaker 1: very difficult to deal with in perpetuity. Like USC would 788 00:42:49,120 --> 00:42:51,600 Speaker 1: need to build a program on the level of where 789 00:42:51,640 --> 00:42:55,080 Speaker 1: Michigan and Ohio State currently are for me to truly 790 00:42:55,120 --> 00:42:56,919 Speaker 1: believe that they'd be above Penn State, and I don't 791 00:42:56,920 --> 00:42:58,399 Speaker 1: know if I'm there, I really don't. 792 00:42:58,920 --> 00:43:02,759 Speaker 2: Okay, Well, speaking of this question, here's a related one 793 00:43:02,800 --> 00:43:07,400 Speaker 2: from Allen fill in the blank. Power five school A 794 00:43:08,040 --> 00:43:10,839 Speaker 2: is the Power five school B of the Power five 795 00:43:10,960 --> 00:43:15,000 Speaker 2: school a's conference. That's a lot to get through your head. 796 00:43:15,680 --> 00:43:18,759 Speaker 2: The example here is that Texas is the Virginia Tech 797 00:43:18,760 --> 00:43:21,239 Speaker 2: of the Big twelve. Is what he's listed out, which 798 00:43:21,239 --> 00:43:24,560 Speaker 2: I don't agree with. But the reason that I thought 799 00:43:24,560 --> 00:43:28,719 Speaker 2: of this question is because we're talking about USC is 800 00:43:28,800 --> 00:43:31,960 Speaker 2: Miami not the USC of the ACC? 801 00:43:34,080 --> 00:43:36,960 Speaker 1: Man, at least I would say Miami is the Texas 802 00:43:36,960 --> 00:43:41,520 Speaker 1: of the ACC, because at least USC has won their conference. 803 00:43:42,840 --> 00:43:46,239 Speaker 1: Least USC has been to and won a major bowl 804 00:43:46,280 --> 00:43:50,320 Speaker 1: game in the last decade, right beating Penn State in 805 00:43:50,360 --> 00:43:50,959 Speaker 1: the Rose Bowl. 806 00:43:51,400 --> 00:43:51,600 Speaker 2: Yep. 807 00:43:53,120 --> 00:43:57,480 Speaker 1: So yeah, I think there are similarities big flashy cities 808 00:43:57,520 --> 00:44:01,040 Speaker 1: looking back twenty years, fifteen to twenty years for when 809 00:44:01,280 --> 00:44:03,040 Speaker 1: it was truly the glory days that they need to 810 00:44:03,040 --> 00:44:06,680 Speaker 1: get back to. Blah blah blah. I think it's a 811 00:44:06,719 --> 00:44:09,640 Speaker 1: little bit of Texas that and both can be compared 812 00:44:09,640 --> 00:44:15,200 Speaker 1: to Texas in that the glory years were probably more 813 00:44:15,280 --> 00:44:20,279 Speaker 1: isolated than we'd like to think. Yeah, but Miami has 814 00:44:20,360 --> 00:44:22,839 Speaker 1: much has at least a more pronounced you go back 815 00:44:22,880 --> 00:44:27,920 Speaker 1: twenty thirty years than USC and Texas at least. Who 816 00:44:27,960 --> 00:44:31,359 Speaker 1: are the other similar teams like Nebraska Tennessee A little bit? 817 00:44:31,840 --> 00:44:32,319 Speaker 1: A little bit? 818 00:44:32,360 --> 00:44:34,399 Speaker 2: I mean the I think the low hanging fruit here 819 00:44:34,440 --> 00:44:38,480 Speaker 2: is Stanford and Vandy, that sort of academic connection Stanford 820 00:44:38,480 --> 00:44:41,839 Speaker 2: as the Vandy of the PAC twelve or vice versa, 821 00:44:41,880 --> 00:44:42,120 Speaker 2: of the. 822 00:44:42,160 --> 00:44:44,280 Speaker 1: Scene the Rose bowls. Man. 823 00:44:45,320 --> 00:44:48,080 Speaker 2: Yeah, not recently, though it's been a while. 824 00:44:48,200 --> 00:44:49,759 Speaker 1: It's been a minute, It's been a little bit, but 825 00:44:49,880 --> 00:44:53,319 Speaker 1: like I don't know, I understand the academic thing and 826 00:44:53,360 --> 00:44:57,760 Speaker 1: why they're close. Duke is the Georgia Tech of the ACC. 827 00:44:58,120 --> 00:45:04,080 Speaker 1: Georgia Tech is Duke of the ACC. Who is living 828 00:45:04,200 --> 00:45:07,440 Speaker 1: like I think they're playing this year Michigan State and Washington, Yeah, 829 00:45:08,040 --> 00:45:12,160 Speaker 1: living in the shadow, but also both went to the 830 00:45:12,160 --> 00:45:16,279 Speaker 1: playoff and couldn't accomplish anything on offense, but both went 831 00:45:16,320 --> 00:45:20,440 Speaker 1: to the playoff just as many times as their rival. 832 00:45:20,480 --> 00:45:22,120 Speaker 1: Who has received far more attention. 833 00:45:22,920 --> 00:45:28,879 Speaker 2: Yeah? Is Colorado the Vandy of the PAC twelve? Wow? 834 00:45:28,880 --> 00:45:30,360 Speaker 1: They were right there for the playoff a couple of 835 00:45:30,440 --> 00:45:32,080 Speaker 1: years ago, and they started four and oho and packed 836 00:45:32,120 --> 00:45:35,600 Speaker 1: twelve for losing to Utah and just getting drilled by 837 00:45:35,640 --> 00:45:36,360 Speaker 1: Casey Thompson. 838 00:45:36,440 --> 00:45:38,080 Speaker 2: I guess it depends how this season goes. 839 00:45:39,719 --> 00:45:44,719 Speaker 1: Yeah, you would have to look like so Colorado, a 840 00:45:44,800 --> 00:45:52,480 Speaker 1: once semi mighty power, is now an afterthought in their conference. Yeah, 841 00:45:52,360 --> 00:45:56,319 Speaker 1: who is that comparison in? I mean, it's weirdly enough. 842 00:45:56,400 --> 00:46:02,919 Speaker 1: Maybe Nebraska right rivals Nebraska obviously on a higher level 843 00:46:02,960 --> 00:46:08,120 Speaker 1: than Colorado. I'm trying to think of there any other teams. 844 00:46:08,160 --> 00:46:10,160 Speaker 1: Is there a UCLA in another conference? 845 00:46:10,560 --> 00:46:14,360 Speaker 2: UCLA is an interesting answer or an interesting thought experiment. 846 00:46:14,440 --> 00:46:19,560 Speaker 1: Yeah, you'd think they'd be better, but for whatever reason, 847 00:46:19,640 --> 00:46:23,319 Speaker 1: for a number of reasons, they just can't seem to. 848 00:46:23,320 --> 00:46:26,839 Speaker 2: Break through that ceiling. My first thought was Florida State. 849 00:46:26,960 --> 00:46:31,240 Speaker 2: Florida State's got a lot more success in its history totally, 850 00:46:32,000 --> 00:46:34,560 Speaker 2: but at least at present, there's a similarity there. 851 00:46:34,920 --> 00:46:39,360 Speaker 1: Yeah, UCLA, who is the team that you feel like 852 00:46:40,320 --> 00:46:44,839 Speaker 1: should have had a more interesting successful Golden era and 853 00:46:44,960 --> 00:46:50,040 Speaker 1: never quite got there? Peaked a while ago, recruits pretty well, 854 00:46:50,719 --> 00:46:53,520 Speaker 1: but never really gets to that like nine to ten 855 00:46:53,600 --> 00:46:54,560 Speaker 1: win territory. 856 00:46:56,080 --> 00:46:57,719 Speaker 2: I mean, it could also be Texas. 857 00:46:58,000 --> 00:47:01,360 Speaker 1: I generally think Penn State should be better. I agree, 858 00:47:01,719 --> 00:47:04,759 Speaker 1: And maybe there's like a Penn State Jimora era UCLA 859 00:47:04,880 --> 00:47:08,000 Speaker 1: comparison where the recruiting is there where you think like 860 00:47:08,040 --> 00:47:10,000 Speaker 1: they're going to break through more often. Penn State did 861 00:47:10,040 --> 00:47:13,280 Speaker 1: it more and went to more big games than UCLA. 862 00:47:13,560 --> 00:47:15,600 Speaker 1: Who is that team? Who is that team that you 863 00:47:15,840 --> 00:47:19,080 Speaker 1: would think would put together that stretch of nine to 864 00:47:19,080 --> 00:47:22,480 Speaker 1: ten win seasons and just is in there at seven 865 00:47:22,480 --> 00:47:25,480 Speaker 1: and eight, just comes up one and a half to 866 00:47:25,520 --> 00:47:29,640 Speaker 1: two games short every year. I guess Oklahoma State, right 867 00:47:29,760 --> 00:47:34,080 Speaker 1: is Oklahoma State in there? What about them? Oklahoma State 868 00:47:35,400 --> 00:47:38,160 Speaker 1: can't get over the hump of the Sooners with any 869 00:47:38,160 --> 00:47:40,680 Speaker 1: sort of consistency. They're always going to be second place 870 00:47:40,719 --> 00:47:44,680 Speaker 1: in their own state, and they win pretty often, but 871 00:47:45,080 --> 00:47:47,959 Speaker 1: just I don't know, eight nine to ten somewhere in there, 872 00:47:48,160 --> 00:47:50,040 Speaker 1: or maybe like eight or eight or nine wins but 873 00:47:50,080 --> 00:47:53,440 Speaker 1: not ten wins with any consistency, can't fully seem to 874 00:47:53,480 --> 00:47:57,200 Speaker 1: break through. Yeah, all right, that's all. Okay. Next question, 875 00:47:58,000 --> 00:47:58,600 Speaker 1: why don't. 876 00:47:58,440 --> 00:48:03,600 Speaker 2: You pick one or two non college football or semi 877 00:48:03,640 --> 00:48:06,759 Speaker 2: college football questions off the tree here before we let 878 00:48:06,760 --> 00:48:10,280 Speaker 2: the fine people go off into the sunset. 879 00:48:10,480 --> 00:48:13,680 Speaker 1: Let's see. Next question, are you staying hydrated? 880 00:48:13,840 --> 00:48:16,120 Speaker 2: Ty drigging right now? Baby? 881 00:48:16,239 --> 00:48:21,480 Speaker 1: Would you pass the Tom Herman Texas color charts? No? 882 00:48:22,440 --> 00:48:24,280 Speaker 2: No, what is it? You got to be perfectly clear? 883 00:48:24,600 --> 00:48:24,920 Speaker 1: Clear? 884 00:48:25,080 --> 00:48:25,480 Speaker 2: Yeah? 885 00:48:25,520 --> 00:48:27,480 Speaker 1: Clear means you care about your teammates? 886 00:48:27,600 --> 00:48:28,480 Speaker 2: No, no, No. 887 00:48:29,400 --> 00:48:34,320 Speaker 1: Are you close? I could do better? I could always 888 00:48:34,360 --> 00:48:34,759 Speaker 1: do better. 889 00:48:35,160 --> 00:48:38,680 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean it. It's close enough, I think for 890 00:48:38,719 --> 00:48:45,239 Speaker 2: a podcaster. I think I'm in good shape here doing okay, podcaster? Yeah? 891 00:48:45,280 --> 00:48:45,600 Speaker 1: All right? 892 00:48:45,640 --> 00:48:51,759 Speaker 2: Another question two, Dan, what's the process for your new 893 00:48:51,760 --> 00:48:55,440 Speaker 2: audio setup for people watching at home? Ryan One Studio 894 00:48:56,200 --> 00:48:59,880 Speaker 2: a new studio setup. Excuse me, you've got a new studio, 895 00:49:00,280 --> 00:49:02,240 Speaker 2: you moved into a new place. You've got a new studio. 896 00:49:02,280 --> 00:49:07,480 Speaker 2: You've got some hexagons behind you. What's going on back there? 897 00:49:07,480 --> 00:49:09,880 Speaker 1: Man, I don't know right now. I'm just trying to 898 00:49:09,920 --> 00:49:11,960 Speaker 1: quiet this room down. I'm just trying to tame this 899 00:49:12,440 --> 00:49:16,200 Speaker 1: bucking bronco of a reverberating room. So I've softened it 900 00:49:16,280 --> 00:49:18,520 Speaker 1: up a little. I have some audio panels on the wall. 901 00:49:18,560 --> 00:49:20,520 Speaker 1: I've got stuff in here, and that softens things up 902 00:49:20,560 --> 00:49:23,520 Speaker 1: and you get less echo and less reverb. I'd like 903 00:49:23,640 --> 00:49:25,880 Speaker 1: to figure out some shelving in the background. I got 904 00:49:25,920 --> 00:49:27,880 Speaker 1: my lights in here, I've got all my audio stuff. 905 00:49:28,920 --> 00:49:31,640 Speaker 1: I put a TV on the wall. Finally, like making 906 00:49:31,840 --> 00:49:36,600 Speaker 1: a permanent home of this studio. I don't know it's 907 00:49:36,680 --> 00:49:39,720 Speaker 1: coming along. If I sound all right, that's an early 908 00:49:39,760 --> 00:49:41,040 Speaker 1: win for me, But I got to figure it out. 909 00:49:41,080 --> 00:49:44,400 Speaker 1: I get some lights behind me to sort of jazz 910 00:49:44,520 --> 00:49:47,759 Speaker 1: up the bookshelf and everything right there. But no, for 911 00:49:47,760 --> 00:49:51,360 Speaker 1: anybody who podcasts or would like to podcast, my only 912 00:49:51,400 --> 00:49:55,960 Speaker 1: real advice, aside from my only real production advice, it's 913 00:49:56,040 --> 00:49:57,719 Speaker 1: just soften up that room. You don't need to spend 914 00:49:57,719 --> 00:49:59,560 Speaker 1: a lot of money out of microphone. You don't need 915 00:49:59,600 --> 00:50:02,080 Speaker 1: to do vide right away anything like that. Be consistent 916 00:50:02,520 --> 00:50:04,399 Speaker 1: and soften up the room. You don't need to spend 917 00:50:04,440 --> 00:50:06,680 Speaker 1: a ton just have stuff in your room. Have soft 918 00:50:06,719 --> 00:50:09,960 Speaker 1: stuff in your room. No bare walls fully and no 919 00:50:10,080 --> 00:50:13,600 Speaker 1: bare floors. Fully, cover up glass with a curtain, cheap 920 00:50:13,600 --> 00:50:14,240 Speaker 1: ass curtain. 921 00:50:14,360 --> 00:50:16,200 Speaker 2: See this is something that you and I disagree on. 922 00:50:16,719 --> 00:50:18,720 Speaker 1: Oh what you don't care about the room. 923 00:50:18,920 --> 00:50:19,839 Speaker 2: I don't care about the room. 924 00:50:19,920 --> 00:50:19,960 Speaker 1: No. 925 00:50:20,200 --> 00:50:22,160 Speaker 2: Oh I can't get spend all your money on a 926 00:50:22,160 --> 00:50:24,080 Speaker 2: good mic and then go into a closet. 927 00:50:24,719 --> 00:50:27,640 Speaker 1: Oh well that's a room. Ty, that's a quiet ass room. 928 00:50:28,840 --> 00:50:30,920 Speaker 2: Phil need a room, but get a good mic. You 929 00:50:30,920 --> 00:50:32,840 Speaker 2: don't want to sound like you're talking into a tin can. 930 00:50:33,880 --> 00:50:35,480 Speaker 1: Oh yeah, I wouldn't spend a lot of money on 931 00:50:35,560 --> 00:50:36,960 Speaker 1: a mic right away. I don't care about that. 932 00:50:37,200 --> 00:50:41,840 Speaker 2: So look again, college football Thursdays is tonight, Boom, it 933 00:50:41,880 --> 00:50:45,560 Speaker 2: is tonight. If you are listening on Thursdays tonight five 934 00:50:45,600 --> 00:50:50,680 Speaker 2: pm Eastern, two pm Pacific. Solid verbal dot com slash Spotify. 935 00:50:51,160 --> 00:50:52,960 Speaker 2: That is where you go. It is a live show. 936 00:50:53,440 --> 00:50:56,600 Speaker 2: You can participate in the chat if you have something 937 00:50:56,640 --> 00:50:58,160 Speaker 2: to get off your chest. If you would like to 938 00:50:58,239 --> 00:51:02,800 Speaker 2: speak to us physically, actually speak to us, not just virtually. 939 00:51:02,840 --> 00:51:05,200 Speaker 2: I mean, I guess it is kind of virtually. But yeah, 940 00:51:05,360 --> 00:51:07,839 Speaker 2: if you want to use your voice to communicate with 941 00:51:07,920 --> 00:51:10,399 Speaker 2: us in real time, you can do so on College 942 00:51:10,400 --> 00:51:13,319 Speaker 2: Football Thursdays. You just send us a speaker request. Towards 943 00:51:13,320 --> 00:51:14,879 Speaker 2: the end of the show. We're bringing people up on stage. 944 00:51:14,960 --> 00:51:16,840 Speaker 2: Did it last week? Brought a bunch of people up 945 00:51:16,880 --> 00:51:20,080 Speaker 2: on stage. We are excited about this. We're playing games. 946 00:51:20,560 --> 00:51:23,800 Speaker 2: We're going to talk through college football news with starters. 947 00:51:23,840 --> 00:51:26,600 Speaker 2: We're going to talk through the week ahead in week zero, 948 00:51:27,320 --> 00:51:29,120 Speaker 2: all sorts of fun stuff. Come on out to College 949 00:51:29,120 --> 00:51:33,600 Speaker 2: Football Thursdays live on Spotify again five pm Eastern. Also, 950 00:51:34,440 --> 00:51:39,799 Speaker 2: it is extra credit weekend. It is week zero Playerundboard 951 00:51:39,840 --> 00:51:42,239 Speaker 2: dot Com. Player on the Board dot Com. It's our 952 00:51:42,239 --> 00:51:45,680 Speaker 2: big pick them contest. It runs the whole year through. 953 00:51:47,160 --> 00:51:49,080 Speaker 2: We've never gotten never talking about it ever again. 954 00:51:49,840 --> 00:51:50,360 Speaker 1: That's true. 955 00:51:50,480 --> 00:51:53,040 Speaker 2: The extra credit bit. You know, I'll bug you guys 956 00:51:53,080 --> 00:51:55,239 Speaker 2: about player on the Board for a while at least 957 00:51:55,239 --> 00:51:58,200 Speaker 2: another week. But the extra credit bit of this is new, 958 00:51:58,280 --> 00:52:00,960 Speaker 2: it's novel, it's exciting. You can help you win. Get 959 00:52:01,000 --> 00:52:05,320 Speaker 2: on the board, man playerundboard dot com is where you 960 00:52:05,360 --> 00:52:07,680 Speaker 2: can go to find out more information about that. We 961 00:52:07,760 --> 00:52:09,840 Speaker 2: detail the whole thing there. We did not mention the 962 00:52:09,880 --> 00:52:12,719 Speaker 2: extra credit bit though. No. The only way you know 963 00:52:12,760 --> 00:52:15,000 Speaker 2: about that is if you're listening to the show part 964 00:52:15,040 --> 00:52:16,600 Speaker 2: of a secret society. 965 00:52:17,480 --> 00:52:19,160 Speaker 1: If your voice is going to a weird place, I 966 00:52:19,280 --> 00:52:19,520 Speaker 1: like it. 967 00:52:19,680 --> 00:52:21,520 Speaker 2: Play run the board dot com. It's how you get 968 00:52:21,560 --> 00:52:24,239 Speaker 2: in on the fun and last, but certainly not least, 969 00:52:24,360 --> 00:52:28,520 Speaker 2: live show, live show, Blinking red Light. We have yet 970 00:52:28,520 --> 00:52:29,520 Speaker 2: to plan our content. 971 00:52:30,320 --> 00:52:32,360 Speaker 1: Worry we out. We've done a little We've not only. 972 00:52:32,280 --> 00:52:34,200 Speaker 2: Done a little bit. Okay, we've done a little bit, 973 00:52:34,640 --> 00:52:36,520 Speaker 2: probably not as much as we should, but that's pretty 974 00:52:36,600 --> 00:52:38,879 Speaker 2: much part of the course for you and me. We'll 975 00:52:38,880 --> 00:52:41,280 Speaker 2: get it sorted out. I've got all sorts of audio 976 00:52:41,320 --> 00:52:45,560 Speaker 2: gear strewn about the studio here. I am waiting for 977 00:52:45,640 --> 00:52:48,720 Speaker 2: a big backpack that I can hopefully use to carry 978 00:52:48,719 --> 00:52:51,399 Speaker 2: all this stuff with me on the plane to get 979 00:52:51,440 --> 00:52:55,000 Speaker 2: out there to do the live fantasy things draft before 980 00:52:55,560 --> 00:52:59,000 Speaker 2: a live audience. If you want to be there in attendance, 981 00:52:59,680 --> 00:53:02,400 Speaker 2: we would encourage you to do so. At solid verballive 982 00:53:02,960 --> 00:53:05,360 Speaker 2: dot com. That is the one that is the only 983 00:53:05,480 --> 00:53:09,399 Speaker 2: u URL where you can find said tickets solid verballive 984 00:53:10,040 --> 00:53:12,160 Speaker 2: dot com. Please come on out and see us. 985 00:53:12,560 --> 00:53:16,400 Speaker 1: What about smell tieshir dot solid verballive dot com. Okay, 986 00:53:16,560 --> 00:53:19,719 Speaker 1: just making sure and so I'll giveaway dot com if 987 00:53:19,719 --> 00:53:20,080 Speaker 1: you want to win. 988 00:53:20,120 --> 00:53:21,319 Speaker 2: The Michael Maherh helmet behind me. 989 00:53:21,920 --> 00:53:22,520 Speaker 1: It's all I have. 990 00:53:23,800 --> 00:53:26,080 Speaker 2: For that guy over there, my good friend Dan Rubinstein, 991 00:53:26,120 --> 00:53:29,520 Speaker 2: for myself, Tie Hildenbrandt, thank you for downloading, listening, playing 992 00:53:29,520 --> 00:53:32,640 Speaker 2: along at home. We hope to have you on stage tonight. 993 00:53:32,680 --> 00:53:35,799 Speaker 2: College Football Thursdays Live on Spotify. For that guy over there, 994 00:53:35,920 --> 00:53:38,000 Speaker 2: my good friend Dan Rubinstein, for my self, Tie hilbrand 995 00:53:38,000 --> 00:53:40,560 Speaker 2: Talk to y'all soon. Stay solid, peace