1 00:00:18,120 --> 00:00:20,600 Speaker 1: Hello, Welcome to the Credit Edge, a weekly markets podcast. 2 00:00:20,720 --> 00:00:23,880 Speaker 1: My name is James Crumbie. I'm a senior editor at Bloomberg. 3 00:00:23,800 --> 00:00:27,200 Speaker 2: And I'm Phil Brendle, a senior analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence, 4 00:00:27,200 --> 00:00:30,600 Speaker 2: covering distress situations. This week, we're very pleased to welcome 5 00:00:30,640 --> 00:00:34,919 Speaker 2: Trey Parker, co founder and CIO at Sycamore Tree Capital Partners. 6 00:00:35,040 --> 00:00:35,840 Speaker 2: How are you, Trey? 7 00:00:36,120 --> 00:00:38,440 Speaker 3: I'm great, Philip and James, how are you this morning? 8 00:00:39,080 --> 00:00:43,160 Speaker 2: Sycamore Tree is a Dallas based value oriented alternative credit 9 00:00:43,200 --> 00:00:46,199 Speaker 2: asset manager. Trey has more than twenty five years of 10 00:00:46,240 --> 00:00:49,199 Speaker 2: experience investing in the loan space, much of it with 11 00:00:49,360 --> 00:00:52,479 Speaker 2: Highland Capital, which I know through personal experience, could never 12 00:00:52,520 --> 00:00:54,920 Speaker 2: be described as a passive lender in the early days 13 00:00:54,920 --> 00:00:58,920 Speaker 2: of the broadly syndicated loan space. James, how about you 14 00:00:58,960 --> 00:00:59,640 Speaker 2: start us off? 15 00:01:00,800 --> 00:01:03,440 Speaker 1: Yeah, So, Trey, you're kind of in a niche trying 16 00:01:03,480 --> 00:01:06,480 Speaker 1: to find mispriced risk right, and you'll focus on loans, 17 00:01:06,600 --> 00:01:10,880 Speaker 1: clos structure, credit and credit secondaries. You have, as Phil says, 18 00:01:10,880 --> 00:01:13,640 Speaker 1: been around for quite a long time and have a 19 00:01:13,680 --> 00:01:16,160 Speaker 1: lot of experience in distressed debt, which is very interesting 20 00:01:16,200 --> 00:01:18,640 Speaker 1: to us. Now I'm interested just to just to start 21 00:01:18,640 --> 00:01:20,880 Speaker 1: the conversation. What you're making of all the drama right 22 00:01:20,880 --> 00:01:24,720 Speaker 1: now in the private credit business development companies are seeing 23 00:01:24,720 --> 00:01:27,000 Speaker 1: a lot of redemptions they put up the gates. That 24 00:01:27,080 --> 00:01:29,120 Speaker 1: scares a lot of people. At the same time, there's 25 00:01:29,160 --> 00:01:32,600 Speaker 1: fear about software companies going bust because of AI. The 26 00:01:32,640 --> 00:01:35,720 Speaker 1: loan market and private credit are quite exposed to that sector. So, 27 00:01:36,200 --> 00:01:38,640 Speaker 1: running from your perspective, how real is the stress in 28 00:01:38,760 --> 00:01:39,959 Speaker 1: credit markets right now? 29 00:01:41,840 --> 00:01:45,720 Speaker 3: So thanks for that question. You know, it's definitely We've 30 00:01:45,720 --> 00:01:48,160 Speaker 3: been in these markets a long time and we've seen 31 00:01:48,360 --> 00:01:51,120 Speaker 3: a fairly benign credit environment for much of the last 32 00:01:51,120 --> 00:01:54,880 Speaker 3: fifteen years. We've seen some blips throughout the energy cycle 33 00:01:55,000 --> 00:01:57,880 Speaker 3: and COVID, but by and large, credit has been very, 34 00:01:57,960 --> 00:02:00,720 Speaker 3: very healthy. I would still tell you to day that 35 00:02:01,080 --> 00:02:04,240 Speaker 3: we are in the early stages of any material fundamental 36 00:02:04,240 --> 00:02:08,040 Speaker 3: correction within within credit markets. There's obviously been a lot 37 00:02:08,040 --> 00:02:11,640 Speaker 3: of noise in the marketplace around some of the you know, 38 00:02:12,200 --> 00:02:16,320 Speaker 3: idiosyncratic situations back last fall with Tricolor and First Brands, 39 00:02:16,840 --> 00:02:19,720 Speaker 3: and obviously more recently with Dynamics going on with the 40 00:02:19,800 --> 00:02:24,160 Speaker 3: structural deficiencies or challenges let me put it that way. 41 00:02:24,200 --> 00:02:27,800 Speaker 3: Within within the private credit space, I would say, largely speaking, 42 00:02:28,040 --> 00:02:32,520 Speaker 3: the fundamentals below the surface are are still relatively okay 43 00:02:33,520 --> 00:02:37,720 Speaker 3: from a credit metrics perspective, but we are certainly seeing 44 00:02:37,760 --> 00:02:41,720 Speaker 3: an elevated level of perceived risk that's being expressed pretty 45 00:02:41,720 --> 00:02:44,040 Speaker 3: directly in price levels in the loan market. But you know, 46 00:02:44,120 --> 00:02:48,040 Speaker 3: still early stages in the private credit space, Trey. 47 00:02:48,120 --> 00:02:50,720 Speaker 2: One of the questions I had, you know, maybe if 48 00:02:50,760 --> 00:02:53,079 Speaker 2: we take a step backwards, like, how would you see 49 00:02:53,440 --> 00:02:57,239 Speaker 2: you're split between private credit and the broadly syndicated loan market, 50 00:02:57,520 --> 00:02:59,720 Speaker 2: And then maybe if you could just share with me, 51 00:03:00,440 --> 00:03:04,120 Speaker 2: you know, some of the key tenants or the DNA 52 00:03:04,160 --> 00:03:05,600 Speaker 2: of Sycamore Tree. 53 00:03:07,720 --> 00:03:11,280 Speaker 3: Absolutely so, our existing business is largely focused on the 54 00:03:11,320 --> 00:03:15,320 Speaker 3: traded credit markets across clos and structured credit. We recently 55 00:03:15,400 --> 00:03:17,600 Speaker 3: announced a launch of a new business in the credit 56 00:03:17,600 --> 00:03:19,560 Speaker 3: secondary space, and we're going to be looking at that 57 00:03:19,600 --> 00:03:23,840 Speaker 3: as a logical extension of providing liquidity to a market 58 00:03:23,840 --> 00:03:26,920 Speaker 3: that historically has had not had very much liquidity. But 59 00:03:27,000 --> 00:03:29,239 Speaker 3: when we launched the business five years ago and really 60 00:03:29,280 --> 00:03:32,359 Speaker 3: really built the fundamental foundations of who we are, it's 61 00:03:32,400 --> 00:03:35,040 Speaker 3: always been looking through the lens of being a credit 62 00:03:35,080 --> 00:03:38,200 Speaker 3: investor first and foremost, which means we're always focused on 63 00:03:38,600 --> 00:03:43,160 Speaker 3: you know, capital preservation, downside risk management and you know, 64 00:03:43,280 --> 00:03:48,040 Speaker 3: understanding the complexities of credit across multiple cycles. As James mentioned, 65 00:03:48,600 --> 00:03:50,880 Speaker 3: been in and around these markets, says, have my partners 66 00:03:50,920 --> 00:03:53,400 Speaker 3: for a long time, and we've navigated through you know, 67 00:03:53,480 --> 00:03:56,880 Speaker 3: past economic and credit cycles, the likes of ninety eight 68 00:03:56,920 --> 00:04:01,280 Speaker 3: through three and eight twenty ten, and those certainly created 69 00:04:01,320 --> 00:04:04,600 Speaker 3: some interesting situations and put us in a position to 70 00:04:04,680 --> 00:04:07,200 Speaker 3: have to manage through very difficult times. We're not yet 71 00:04:07,200 --> 00:04:10,920 Speaker 3: an environment, you know, and may it may not be, 72 00:04:11,120 --> 00:04:14,240 Speaker 3: but we are certainly prepared for that should we see 73 00:04:14,240 --> 00:04:16,880 Speaker 3: that sort of disruption and credit risk and the portfolios. 74 00:04:17,040 --> 00:04:19,080 Speaker 1: You mentioned the credit secondaries, and you've just launched a 75 00:04:19,080 --> 00:04:21,000 Speaker 1: new platform for that, and I'm interested in, you know, 76 00:04:21,040 --> 00:04:23,599 Speaker 1: why now, and what the opportunity isn't and in basic terms, 77 00:04:23,640 --> 00:04:24,559 Speaker 1: how does it actually work. 78 00:04:26,120 --> 00:04:29,400 Speaker 3: Absolutely, So it's a space we've been looking at and 79 00:04:29,440 --> 00:04:31,480 Speaker 3: monitoring for a while and it's just started to come 80 00:04:31,480 --> 00:04:35,800 Speaker 3: of age. So credit secondaries is really a continuation of 81 00:04:35,839 --> 00:04:38,640 Speaker 3: a broader secondary theme that we've seen evolve over the 82 00:04:38,680 --> 00:04:41,800 Speaker 3: last couple of decades, largely in private equity, where we 83 00:04:41,920 --> 00:04:45,080 Speaker 3: have a private asset class where limited partners have limited 84 00:04:45,120 --> 00:04:49,760 Speaker 3: liquidity options other than through privately negotiated sale transactions to 85 00:04:50,200 --> 00:04:55,920 Speaker 3: monetize those stakes before they naturally evolve or monetize. That 86 00:04:56,000 --> 00:04:58,400 Speaker 3: market last year did two hundred and forty billion dollars 87 00:04:58,440 --> 00:05:02,640 Speaker 3: of total volume across private equi and credit credit has 88 00:05:02,680 --> 00:05:05,960 Speaker 3: been single digit billions until just last year, where that 89 00:05:06,000 --> 00:05:09,240 Speaker 3: market has now or did twenty billion dollars of volume 90 00:05:09,320 --> 00:05:13,800 Speaker 3: in twenty twenty five. Their expectations that that could be 91 00:05:13,880 --> 00:05:16,880 Speaker 3: upwards of thirty five billion and twenty six and you know, 92 00:05:16,880 --> 00:05:19,600 Speaker 3: doubling or tripling over the next several years. You know, 93 00:05:19,640 --> 00:05:23,160 Speaker 3: we see this as a logical liquidity extension within the 94 00:05:24,279 --> 00:05:27,839 Speaker 3: market of private credit that's gone from infancy after the 95 00:05:27,880 --> 00:05:31,240 Speaker 3: GFC to now a one seven in some definitions, to 96 00:05:31,320 --> 00:05:33,880 Speaker 3: two seven trillion dollar market of the last fifteen to 97 00:05:33,920 --> 00:05:37,080 Speaker 3: sixteen years. And we see it as a real opportunity 98 00:05:37,080 --> 00:05:40,600 Speaker 3: to be a liquidity provider for both buyers and sellers. 99 00:05:40,920 --> 00:05:44,039 Speaker 3: Sellers in the need to rebalance portfolios and change asset 100 00:05:44,040 --> 00:05:46,880 Speaker 3: allocation and buyers who are looking to provide you know, 101 00:05:46,960 --> 00:05:50,279 Speaker 3: in many cases discounted options for liquidity to set sellers. 102 00:05:50,680 --> 00:05:52,280 Speaker 1: How does it work though, in basic terms, is it 103 00:05:52,320 --> 00:05:54,480 Speaker 1: a private actually firm has a loan out to a company, 104 00:05:54,640 --> 00:05:56,760 Speaker 1: is a private direct loan, and they don't want to 105 00:05:56,800 --> 00:05:58,440 Speaker 1: refinance for whatever reason, and you'll take it on. 106 00:05:59,200 --> 00:06:02,320 Speaker 3: So as you I'm sure familiar, private credit markets have 107 00:06:02,720 --> 00:06:05,320 Speaker 3: very little to no liquidity for an underlying loan in 108 00:06:05,360 --> 00:06:08,320 Speaker 3: their portfolios, so they're typically involved from the time of 109 00:06:08,400 --> 00:06:11,880 Speaker 3: underwriting through the ultimate payoff or paydown of that facility. 110 00:06:12,800 --> 00:06:15,680 Speaker 3: There are a lot of institutional investors who've gotten exposure 111 00:06:15,720 --> 00:06:18,760 Speaker 3: to these private credit deals through you know, traditional fund 112 00:06:18,760 --> 00:06:21,719 Speaker 3: structures that are draw down and you know closed in 113 00:06:21,839 --> 00:06:26,719 Speaker 3: or finite in terms being having no liquidity. Those limited 114 00:06:26,760 --> 00:06:30,400 Speaker 3: partners or investors will look for liquidity and sell their stakes, 115 00:06:30,440 --> 00:06:35,200 Speaker 3: their LP interests through to buyers like secondaries, firms like ourselves, 116 00:06:36,240 --> 00:06:39,360 Speaker 3: you know, typically at some form of liquidity driven discount. 117 00:06:39,400 --> 00:06:41,839 Speaker 1: So it's an equity stake, not not a credit, not 118 00:06:41,920 --> 00:06:42,400 Speaker 1: a loan. 119 00:06:43,320 --> 00:06:46,240 Speaker 3: It's it's a derivative credit stake, but through an LP interest. 120 00:06:46,279 --> 00:06:47,760 Speaker 1: Correct how big is the ticket? 121 00:06:49,760 --> 00:06:51,359 Speaker 3: They can come in all sizes. Like I said, the 122 00:06:51,400 --> 00:06:55,279 Speaker 3: market did twenty billion dollars of volume last year. We 123 00:06:55,360 --> 00:06:57,960 Speaker 3: expect that to move higher over the next several years. 124 00:06:58,680 --> 00:07:00,920 Speaker 3: But stakes as small as to as much as a 125 00:07:00,960 --> 00:07:03,200 Speaker 3: billion dollars have traded in the credit secondary's market in 126 00:07:03,200 --> 00:07:03,960 Speaker 3: the last seple of years. 127 00:07:04,080 --> 00:07:07,080 Speaker 1: Is that the average ticket size for you? 128 00:07:05,440 --> 00:07:09,279 Speaker 3: You know, we're we're not talking capital formation yet in 129 00:07:09,320 --> 00:07:11,760 Speaker 3: terms of our firm as we just launched, you know, 130 00:07:11,800 --> 00:07:14,880 Speaker 3: but we we will opportunistically and with flexible capital. Look 131 00:07:14,920 --> 00:07:17,280 Speaker 3: at you know, a variety of different sizes, you know, 132 00:07:17,320 --> 00:07:18,840 Speaker 3: with and without partners in the market. 133 00:07:18,880 --> 00:07:22,040 Speaker 1: And you mentioned you're buying a discount. I'm wondering what 134 00:07:22,120 --> 00:07:23,680 Speaker 1: kind of discounts are you seeing right now in the 135 00:07:23,680 --> 00:07:25,280 Speaker 1: market and how is that changing over time? 136 00:07:26,640 --> 00:07:29,000 Speaker 3: Yeah, So our particular focus is more on the opportunistic 137 00:07:29,040 --> 00:07:31,760 Speaker 3: side of things within credit secondaries, you know, funds like 138 00:07:31,800 --> 00:07:36,000 Speaker 3: mes funds, special situations and distress funds. In those circumstances, 139 00:07:36,000 --> 00:07:39,680 Speaker 3: discounts upwards of twenty to twenty five percent to navs 140 00:07:39,840 --> 00:07:44,160 Speaker 3: can can materialize. We've seen the more traditional direct lending 141 00:07:44,160 --> 00:07:46,960 Speaker 3: part of the credit secondary's market trade closure to high 142 00:07:47,080 --> 00:07:51,000 Speaker 3: nineties to par because the capital formation and the relative 143 00:07:51,160 --> 00:07:55,320 Speaker 3: you know, information is more transparent in that part of 144 00:07:55,360 --> 00:07:58,440 Speaker 3: the market. We'll look for the deeper discount opportunities in 145 00:07:58,480 --> 00:08:00,040 Speaker 3: our in our portfolio. 146 00:07:59,600 --> 00:08:03,840 Speaker 2: Try spurs a question from me, like, when you're looking 147 00:08:03,880 --> 00:08:08,400 Speaker 2: at new credits and you know, just kind of think 148 00:08:08,440 --> 00:08:12,080 Speaker 2: about process at Sycamore Tree, you guys might have to 149 00:08:12,120 --> 00:08:14,240 Speaker 2: go from zero to one hundred in terms of like 150 00:08:14,760 --> 00:08:18,560 Speaker 2: understanding of credit and all of its modes and challenges, 151 00:08:18,680 --> 00:08:22,000 Speaker 2: And I'm curious, how do you do that on the 152 00:08:22,080 --> 00:08:25,720 Speaker 2: fly like that? I mean, are you like constantly looking 153 00:08:25,720 --> 00:08:29,560 Speaker 2: at these private credit loans that may not ever trade 154 00:08:30,000 --> 00:08:32,480 Speaker 2: because that's kind of a waste of resources if that 155 00:08:32,600 --> 00:08:38,800 Speaker 2: actually never comes about. Or are you just ramping up 156 00:08:38,920 --> 00:08:42,320 Speaker 2: very quickly for situations like this and you have the 157 00:08:42,760 --> 00:08:46,160 Speaker 2: dedicated resources and maybe you can talk about the kind 158 00:08:46,200 --> 00:08:48,360 Speaker 2: of resources at your firm as well that you know 159 00:08:48,520 --> 00:08:49,600 Speaker 2: to support that effort. 160 00:08:51,200 --> 00:08:55,040 Speaker 3: Absolutely. So part of the reason this is a symbiotic 161 00:08:55,080 --> 00:08:57,120 Speaker 3: relationship with this new line of business for us is 162 00:08:57,160 --> 00:09:00,320 Speaker 3: we have an existing credit platform and team that is 163 00:09:00,320 --> 00:09:03,599 Speaker 3: the broadly syndicated loan market. And we've got an experienced 164 00:09:03,920 --> 00:09:07,000 Speaker 3: the twenty ter experienced analyst team that covers in the 165 00:09:07,040 --> 00:09:09,400 Speaker 3: broadly syndicated loan market, which is north of a thousand 166 00:09:09,520 --> 00:09:12,400 Speaker 3: names with over three hundred active names in our portfolio. 167 00:09:12,800 --> 00:09:14,800 Speaker 3: And while those aren't the exact names, that are in 168 00:09:14,840 --> 00:09:18,160 Speaker 3: these private credit portfolios. We have the value and benefit 169 00:09:18,200 --> 00:09:21,920 Speaker 3: of understanding industries who the key players are able to 170 00:09:21,920 --> 00:09:25,559 Speaker 3: benchmark competitive sets across different sectors, so that when we're 171 00:09:25,600 --> 00:09:28,880 Speaker 3: looking at the top or the largest positions within some 172 00:09:28,920 --> 00:09:32,240 Speaker 3: of these secondary situations, we can leverage that team's knowledge, 173 00:09:32,280 --> 00:09:36,640 Speaker 3: background and expertise to do a deeper dive underwriting of 174 00:09:36,679 --> 00:09:39,319 Speaker 3: those private credit portfolios. The other thing I would say 175 00:09:39,360 --> 00:09:41,079 Speaker 3: is that we've been in and around these markets for 176 00:09:41,440 --> 00:09:44,880 Speaker 3: several decades, and most of the borrowers are they've been 177 00:09:44,920 --> 00:09:47,120 Speaker 3: around for a long time, and so it's rare that 178 00:09:47,200 --> 00:09:49,280 Speaker 3: we'll find a company or a borrower that we don't 179 00:09:49,280 --> 00:09:52,520 Speaker 3: have some level of familiarity with, given the collective experience 180 00:09:52,600 --> 00:09:55,600 Speaker 3: we bring to the bear here in this business. 181 00:09:55,760 --> 00:09:59,240 Speaker 2: I'm curious in those situations when you do ramp up 182 00:09:59,280 --> 00:10:02,480 Speaker 2: and are take can look at, you know, perhaps a 183 00:10:02,640 --> 00:10:05,760 Speaker 2: private credit name that was part of a club. Are 184 00:10:05,800 --> 00:10:09,760 Speaker 2: the price differences between where you guys would be interested 185 00:10:09,840 --> 00:10:13,640 Speaker 2: and where they're actually marking. Could they be quite stark 186 00:10:13,760 --> 00:10:18,240 Speaker 2: or especially in this environment, And you know, maybe just 187 00:10:18,760 --> 00:10:21,360 Speaker 2: if you can just describe where it was maybe a 188 00:10:21,400 --> 00:10:23,320 Speaker 2: couple of years ago versus today. 189 00:10:24,640 --> 00:10:28,880 Speaker 3: We've already seen some headlines around some differentials within marks 190 00:10:29,000 --> 00:10:31,720 Speaker 3: around club deals in the private credit space, and so 191 00:10:31,760 --> 00:10:34,319 Speaker 3: I think that that's something that you know, we'll always 192 00:10:34,360 --> 00:10:36,400 Speaker 3: have an eye for. You know, at the end of 193 00:10:36,440 --> 00:10:38,880 Speaker 3: the day, private credit is marked based on appraisal or 194 00:10:39,000 --> 00:10:42,120 Speaker 3: fair valuation by the underlying manager, and that's within their 195 00:10:42,200 --> 00:10:44,600 Speaker 3: rights to be able to make that determination. You know, 196 00:10:44,640 --> 00:10:46,720 Speaker 3: we will always be looking at this as a fundamental 197 00:10:46,800 --> 00:10:49,480 Speaker 3: underwriting where if we look at the business, we look 198 00:10:49,480 --> 00:10:52,040 Speaker 3: at the cash flow characteristics have said business, we'll look 199 00:10:52,040 --> 00:10:55,320 Speaker 3: at the loan value based on a view today of 200 00:10:55,360 --> 00:10:59,320 Speaker 3: what valuations in that sector or space look like. And 201 00:10:59,360 --> 00:11:02,360 Speaker 3: so regardless what the general partner of that particular fund 202 00:11:02,360 --> 00:11:04,760 Speaker 3: may view that credit to be marked at, you know, 203 00:11:04,800 --> 00:11:07,440 Speaker 3: we'll have our own independent view and will stress test 204 00:11:07,480 --> 00:11:09,040 Speaker 3: that like any good credit investor would. 205 00:11:09,400 --> 00:11:12,240 Speaker 1: And the opportunity you're seeing trailing more along the lines 206 00:11:12,280 --> 00:11:14,840 Speaker 1: of a company that borrowed, you know, very cheap when 207 00:11:15,000 --> 00:11:16,920 Speaker 1: rates were near zero five years ago, and now they're 208 00:11:16,960 --> 00:11:19,720 Speaker 1: hitting the wall trying to refinance and they can't refinance, 209 00:11:19,720 --> 00:11:22,680 Speaker 1: so they're coming to more opportunistic and dislike yourself, or 210 00:11:22,760 --> 00:11:24,680 Speaker 1: is it the fact that the private acity holder is 211 00:11:24,760 --> 00:11:28,120 Speaker 1: just fatigued and needs cash for something else or sees 212 00:11:28,160 --> 00:11:30,960 Speaker 1: better returns elsewhere. And what's the mix and how much 213 00:11:31,320 --> 00:11:34,000 Speaker 1: real stress are you seeing at the company level. 214 00:11:35,160 --> 00:11:39,240 Speaker 3: It's all the above. There's certainly a lot of you know, 215 00:11:39,480 --> 00:11:42,839 Speaker 3: private credit issuance and credit in general issuance activity that 216 00:11:42,880 --> 00:11:47,000 Speaker 3: happened in a zero interest rate environment. Those companies struggle 217 00:11:47,080 --> 00:11:51,200 Speaker 3: today in some cases to you know, meet the interest 218 00:11:51,440 --> 00:11:54,480 Speaker 3: burdens first and foremost, but really continue to invest in 219 00:11:54,520 --> 00:11:57,960 Speaker 3: their businesses, you know, invest for growth, invest for optimization. 220 00:11:58,880 --> 00:12:02,760 Speaker 3: In a easy money or low interest rate environment, you know, 221 00:12:02,880 --> 00:12:06,000 Speaker 3: sponsors or borrowers were willing and able to stretch to 222 00:12:06,559 --> 00:12:09,720 Speaker 3: finance their businesses at levels historically there would have been 223 00:12:09,960 --> 00:12:14,480 Speaker 3: unprecedented six times firstly eight times you know, total leverage. 224 00:12:15,160 --> 00:12:18,880 Speaker 3: Those levels are difficult to sustain in a market environment 225 00:12:18,920 --> 00:12:20,480 Speaker 3: or base rates are at three and a half to 226 00:12:20,520 --> 00:12:24,360 Speaker 3: four percent, and so I think that constraining of cash 227 00:12:24,360 --> 00:12:27,240 Speaker 3: flow has really impacted businesses. The other part of the 228 00:12:27,320 --> 00:12:30,839 Speaker 3: question you asked was around the sponsors. Sponsors were very, 229 00:12:30,920 --> 00:12:34,439 Speaker 3: very active in twenty twenty twenty one, twenty twenty two, 230 00:12:34,520 --> 00:12:38,360 Speaker 3: coming out of COVID. They put on those those capital 231 00:12:38,360 --> 00:12:41,000 Speaker 3: structures that were built for a different interest rate environment. 232 00:12:41,200 --> 00:12:44,880 Speaker 3: But they also put those investments on when they believe 233 00:12:44,960 --> 00:12:47,720 Speaker 3: that growth was on a certain trajectory. And you know, 234 00:12:47,760 --> 00:12:50,599 Speaker 3: there has been a slowdown in the growth trajectory of 235 00:12:50,640 --> 00:12:53,800 Speaker 3: a lot of these companies. And I think private equity 236 00:12:53,840 --> 00:12:57,440 Speaker 3: firms are being more portfolio managers than they are sort 237 00:12:57,480 --> 00:13:00,960 Speaker 3: of focused on each and every individual deal. And if 238 00:13:01,040 --> 00:13:04,280 Speaker 3: something that you bought at fifteen or eighteen times based 239 00:13:04,320 --> 00:13:07,360 Speaker 3: on public carpet multiples, there's now worth ten or twelve 240 00:13:07,679 --> 00:13:11,040 Speaker 3: and your equity checks sort of value is materially lower, 241 00:13:11,320 --> 00:13:13,800 Speaker 3: you're less likely to focus on that particular situation or 242 00:13:13,840 --> 00:13:16,480 Speaker 3: opportunity versus something else in your book for your portfolio. 243 00:13:16,640 --> 00:13:19,480 Speaker 3: So I think you've got some portfolio management dynamics going 244 00:13:19,480 --> 00:13:22,360 Speaker 3: home within the sponsored community. And you certainly have companies 245 00:13:22,360 --> 00:13:25,200 Speaker 3: that are starved for you know, leverage free cash flow 246 00:13:25,240 --> 00:13:25,800 Speaker 3: to invest in them. 247 00:13:26,040 --> 00:13:29,080 Speaker 1: The businesses themselves aren't impaired, they're not in trouble or 248 00:13:29,280 --> 00:13:32,120 Speaker 1: about to disappear. You just just got the wrong capital 249 00:13:32,120 --> 00:13:34,360 Speaker 1: structure and you're coming into sort of rework. 250 00:13:34,440 --> 00:13:38,720 Speaker 3: That's a bit in some cases, Yes, that that absolutely 251 00:13:38,800 --> 00:13:41,880 Speaker 3: has has been the case, where the businesses themselves are 252 00:13:41,880 --> 00:13:47,160 Speaker 3: not fundamentally broken. They've been maybe underinvested in, they may 253 00:13:47,200 --> 00:13:50,439 Speaker 3: be starved for capital, but they're not fundamentally broken. Now, 254 00:13:50,440 --> 00:13:52,560 Speaker 3: I would say, and then not to take the conversation 255 00:13:52,640 --> 00:13:55,640 Speaker 3: in an entirely different direction, but given the recent dynamics 256 00:13:55,640 --> 00:13:58,319 Speaker 3: around AI and the innovation that's going on within the 257 00:13:58,400 --> 00:14:02,600 Speaker 3: broader economy, the risk of obsolescence, the risk of you know, 258 00:14:02,760 --> 00:14:07,120 Speaker 3: further deterioration in businesses is evolving much work uckly. The 259 00:14:07,200 --> 00:14:11,960 Speaker 3: moats for companies is shrinking, and I think things like 260 00:14:12,200 --> 00:14:14,079 Speaker 3: AR are speeding up that process. And so I think 261 00:14:14,120 --> 00:14:17,040 Speaker 3: we have to be very careful about betting on you know, 262 00:14:17,160 --> 00:14:21,000 Speaker 3: good company bad balance sheet as being easy answer because 263 00:14:21,520 --> 00:14:23,400 Speaker 3: lore is changing a lot quickly right now. 264 00:14:23,960 --> 00:14:27,680 Speaker 2: Trey, you hit on something that I've seen. I follow 265 00:14:27,760 --> 00:14:31,360 Speaker 2: the distress markets, and you know, every month I publish something, 266 00:14:31,400 --> 00:14:33,680 Speaker 2: it's it's focused more on the high yeld bond market. 267 00:14:33,760 --> 00:14:36,520 Speaker 2: But what we saw recently is that the most distressed 268 00:14:36,560 --> 00:14:39,480 Speaker 2: sector now is technology, at least in the middle of 269 00:14:39,560 --> 00:14:44,080 Speaker 2: the month of April, versus communications, which was the most distressed. 270 00:14:44,120 --> 00:14:48,040 Speaker 2: And you know, these software companies are unique animals, and 271 00:14:48,080 --> 00:14:51,440 Speaker 2: I know, honestly, in the HIL bond market you're not 272 00:14:51,480 --> 00:14:54,440 Speaker 2: seeing too many of at least is not as much 273 00:14:54,440 --> 00:14:59,760 Speaker 2: as private credit is seeing. And my question really is 274 00:14:59,760 --> 00:15:03,160 Speaker 2: is the work when they go distressed? What are some 275 00:15:03,200 --> 00:15:07,920 Speaker 2: of the unique aspects of software companies running into trouble 276 00:15:08,240 --> 00:15:12,239 Speaker 2: That like makes it different than you know what we've traditionally. 277 00:15:12,280 --> 00:15:15,480 Speaker 2: You know, your roots are in Highland, like my roots 278 00:15:15,520 --> 00:15:19,760 Speaker 2: for merlinch investment managers. It's like, you know, you invested 279 00:15:19,800 --> 00:15:25,280 Speaker 2: against real assets. Software's definitely picked up the debt game 280 00:15:25,920 --> 00:15:29,720 Speaker 2: in spades, But you know, how much how do you 281 00:15:29,840 --> 00:15:30,680 Speaker 2: view it as different? 282 00:15:32,640 --> 00:15:36,240 Speaker 3: Sure? Well, first of all, I think software has levered 283 00:15:36,320 --> 00:15:38,360 Speaker 3: up largely because the evaluations got so high. It was 284 00:15:38,400 --> 00:15:40,400 Speaker 3: the only way that many of the sponsors could make 285 00:15:40,440 --> 00:15:43,840 Speaker 3: the math work to generate the text of returns they needed. 286 00:15:44,080 --> 00:15:46,760 Speaker 3: I would tell you that we've while Price would tell 287 00:15:46,800 --> 00:15:49,840 Speaker 3: you that there's a significant called forty billion dollars plus 288 00:15:49,640 --> 00:15:53,880 Speaker 3: of stressed or distressed software loans in the market, the 289 00:15:53,880 --> 00:15:56,280 Speaker 3: fundamentals are not yet proving that out. You still have 290 00:15:56,480 --> 00:15:58,920 Speaker 3: you know, net and gross retention rates within the software 291 00:15:58,960 --> 00:16:03,120 Speaker 3: space at real, relatively healthy levels. You know, revenue growth 292 00:16:03,160 --> 00:16:04,920 Speaker 3: in a lot of these situations is probably not as 293 00:16:04,960 --> 00:16:06,920 Speaker 3: fast as the sponsors would have hoped they would be, 294 00:16:08,160 --> 00:16:11,120 Speaker 3: but many of them are still you know, leverage free, 295 00:16:11,120 --> 00:16:15,560 Speaker 3: cash flow neutral and and still putting up decent fundamentals. 296 00:16:16,000 --> 00:16:19,200 Speaker 3: The recent drawdown in the software space has been more 297 00:16:19,240 --> 00:16:22,440 Speaker 3: on the prospective concerns that AI is going to materially 298 00:16:22,480 --> 00:16:25,760 Speaker 3: disrupt that sector. And there will be players in the 299 00:16:25,800 --> 00:16:29,520 Speaker 3: software space for that absolutely is the case, you know, 300 00:16:29,600 --> 00:16:32,000 Speaker 3: And and there will obviously be be winners that that 301 00:16:32,160 --> 00:16:34,240 Speaker 3: won't necessarily see that, and they'll see it as as 302 00:16:34,240 --> 00:16:36,800 Speaker 3: an advantage, as a way to play offense. And so 303 00:16:36,880 --> 00:16:39,680 Speaker 3: again it comes down to you know, good old fashioned 304 00:16:39,720 --> 00:16:43,920 Speaker 3: credit selection, you know, focused on on the survivors, focused 305 00:16:43,960 --> 00:16:46,680 Speaker 3: on the companies that actually have you know, real staying 306 00:16:46,720 --> 00:16:50,080 Speaker 3: power at their customers. A lot of the disruption risk 307 00:16:50,240 --> 00:16:53,240 Speaker 3: in in software will be a function of how easily 308 00:16:53,320 --> 00:16:57,960 Speaker 3: replaceable or sort of how easy particular software out of 309 00:16:58,120 --> 00:17:00,920 Speaker 3: out of a company. You focus on arger, more enterprise 310 00:17:00,960 --> 00:17:05,240 Speaker 3: focused software businesses that are vertically integrated, maybe in sectors 311 00:17:05,240 --> 00:17:07,920 Speaker 3: like financials or healthcare, where the sensitivity of the information 312 00:17:07,960 --> 00:17:11,360 Speaker 3: they're processing is far higher. We believe that there's far 313 00:17:11,440 --> 00:17:15,040 Speaker 3: less risk to ultimate disruption. You focus on pricing models 314 00:17:15,080 --> 00:17:17,639 Speaker 3: that are more usage based or SUCCEIT based where the 315 00:17:17,720 --> 00:17:21,280 Speaker 3: utilization isn't just a headcount and an employee based driven factor. 316 00:17:21,880 --> 00:17:23,600 Speaker 3: I think again you're going to have greater levels of 317 00:17:23,640 --> 00:17:29,000 Speaker 3: prosiliency software is based. When software does get distressed and 318 00:17:29,040 --> 00:17:31,639 Speaker 3: it's not just a capital structure issue, you know, I 319 00:17:31,680 --> 00:17:34,920 Speaker 3: do think customers will have greater concerns and therefore the 320 00:17:35,720 --> 00:17:39,399 Speaker 3: potential deterioration of those companies will be more more dire 321 00:17:39,440 --> 00:17:43,200 Speaker 3: and more risky per se as an investor. So we're 322 00:17:43,200 --> 00:17:46,320 Speaker 3: not there yet, short answer to your question in software distressed, 323 00:17:46,800 --> 00:17:48,119 Speaker 3: but when we do, I think a lots to be 324 00:17:48,200 --> 00:17:49,800 Speaker 3: very careful about about exposure. 325 00:17:49,840 --> 00:17:53,160 Speaker 2: So I guess that you really look for mode in 326 00:17:53,320 --> 00:17:56,200 Speaker 2: picking your credits. You want really big modes where it's 327 00:17:56,240 --> 00:18:00,880 Speaker 2: difficult to transition out of those software platforms. Very interesting. 328 00:18:01,240 --> 00:18:05,360 Speaker 3: And when they're using AI or technology as an asset 329 00:18:05,560 --> 00:18:08,240 Speaker 3: offensively as opposed to just playing defense and trying to 330 00:18:08,240 --> 00:18:09,639 Speaker 3: sustain their business model. 331 00:18:09,440 --> 00:18:14,200 Speaker 2: Right, very interesting. One of the questions that I had, 332 00:18:14,480 --> 00:18:17,119 Speaker 2: and it kind of is pulling on a thread from 333 00:18:17,640 --> 00:18:20,400 Speaker 2: the comment you made before, is about how the private 334 00:18:20,520 --> 00:18:23,520 Speaker 2: equity folks are looking at their investments more on a 335 00:18:23,560 --> 00:18:27,000 Speaker 2: portfolio basis as opposed to you. I think in the 336 00:18:27,040 --> 00:18:29,720 Speaker 2: past we've seen them very concentrated and very married to 337 00:18:29,760 --> 00:18:33,520 Speaker 2: their investments. Do you see that as a manifestation of 338 00:18:33,560 --> 00:18:37,719 Speaker 2: their entry into private credit and you know, becoming bigger 339 00:18:37,760 --> 00:18:41,040 Speaker 2: credit players that are they able to be the same 340 00:18:41,160 --> 00:18:44,880 Speaker 2: kind of sponsor that they were in the past. I'm 341 00:18:44,960 --> 00:18:49,440 Speaker 2: curious at how you view the migration of the traditional 342 00:18:49,440 --> 00:18:52,360 Speaker 2: pe sponsor over the past ten years. 343 00:18:53,800 --> 00:18:55,480 Speaker 3: Look, I think a large part of it is just 344 00:18:55,560 --> 00:18:59,000 Speaker 3: the growth and breadth of these platforms. They've gotten so large, 345 00:18:59,040 --> 00:19:02,640 Speaker 3: the fun sizes often you know equally as large that 346 00:19:02,800 --> 00:19:04,399 Speaker 3: you know they're not going to bat a thousand as 347 00:19:04,440 --> 00:19:07,200 Speaker 3: it relates to your portfolio companies and their portfolio, and 348 00:19:07,400 --> 00:19:10,240 Speaker 3: they've got to be rational about allocating you know, financial 349 00:19:10,280 --> 00:19:13,840 Speaker 3: and strategic resources to the companies that are working. You 350 00:19:13,880 --> 00:19:16,879 Speaker 3: know that they're not you know, migrating to a venture 351 00:19:16,920 --> 00:19:19,360 Speaker 3: model where they're just sticking to the handful that really 352 00:19:19,400 --> 00:19:23,040 Speaker 3: really work. But they're also you know, going to to 353 00:19:23,080 --> 00:19:26,160 Speaker 3: focus the resources on on portfolio companies that actually see 354 00:19:26,320 --> 00:19:28,920 Speaker 3: they see real, real value in I think the other 355 00:19:28,960 --> 00:19:31,040 Speaker 3: thing that you've seen is for the companies that are 356 00:19:31,440 --> 00:19:34,240 Speaker 3: you know, not performing well with in priv equity portfolios. 357 00:19:34,240 --> 00:19:37,800 Speaker 3: They're using creative liability management solutions and concert with their 358 00:19:37,880 --> 00:19:41,360 Speaker 3: lenders to extend runway, and that's obviously something that's having 359 00:19:41,359 --> 00:19:45,240 Speaker 3: a broader implication on the syndicated loan market. But those 360 00:19:45,280 --> 00:19:48,360 Speaker 3: are situations where you're actually not fixing the balance sheet, 361 00:19:48,440 --> 00:19:51,560 Speaker 3: you're actually not doing something to net net improve the 362 00:19:51,600 --> 00:19:54,720 Speaker 3: company is performance and sustainability of its capital structure, and 363 00:19:54,760 --> 00:19:57,080 Speaker 3: that's something that I think is sowing the seeds of 364 00:19:57,480 --> 00:20:00,760 Speaker 3: more potential stress to stress situations over the next three 365 00:20:00,760 --> 00:20:01,520 Speaker 3: to five years. 366 00:20:01,840 --> 00:20:03,639 Speaker 1: On ll ME since you mentioned it, Tray, I mean, 367 00:20:03,640 --> 00:20:07,280 Speaker 1: they seem to become becoming less frequent. Maybe the lawyers 368 00:20:07,280 --> 00:20:08,840 Speaker 1: are up to something else and we can't see it yet, 369 00:20:08,840 --> 00:20:13,280 Speaker 1: but there is a sense that they're diminishing, you know, 370 00:20:13,280 --> 00:20:15,960 Speaker 1: and that's that's going to be good for investors, But 371 00:20:16,680 --> 00:20:19,080 Speaker 1: for a smaller shop like yourself, I mean, how do 372 00:20:19,119 --> 00:20:21,600 Speaker 1: you navigate these things because it tends to be that 373 00:20:21,680 --> 00:20:24,199 Speaker 1: the bigger players win out in the end, and I'm 374 00:20:24,240 --> 00:20:26,000 Speaker 1: wondering how you're positioning around those. 375 00:20:27,800 --> 00:20:29,480 Speaker 3: You're right, we have seen a slow down in the 376 00:20:29,600 --> 00:20:33,560 Speaker 3: LM transaction activity. I think part of it is sponsors 377 00:20:33,800 --> 00:20:36,520 Speaker 3: are coming to the appreciation as our other lenders that 378 00:20:36,640 --> 00:20:39,639 Speaker 3: you know, it's a small relative world and you have 379 00:20:39,680 --> 00:20:41,840 Speaker 3: to come back to the same markets for refinancings down 380 00:20:41,880 --> 00:20:45,639 Speaker 3: the road, and you can't afford to you know, create 381 00:20:45,680 --> 00:20:47,679 Speaker 3: that many enemies in the market, and so I think 382 00:20:47,720 --> 00:20:49,840 Speaker 3: people are starting to act a bit more rationally and 383 00:20:49,880 --> 00:20:53,240 Speaker 3: deals are starting to become more product So I think 384 00:20:53,240 --> 00:20:55,720 Speaker 3: that's a good thing for the entire market from a 385 00:20:55,760 --> 00:20:59,160 Speaker 3: long term recovery rate perspective, which leads to the sustainability 386 00:20:59,200 --> 00:21:04,400 Speaker 3: of slow market and instructure markets. In leverage lending. You're 387 00:21:04,440 --> 00:21:08,080 Speaker 3: also you know, seeing an uptick in the number of 388 00:21:08,160 --> 00:21:11,919 Speaker 3: repeat defaulters folks that have been through LEM transactions that 389 00:21:11,960 --> 00:21:14,800 Speaker 3: are now coming back to the market and going through 390 00:21:15,040 --> 00:21:18,280 Speaker 3: you know, distressed and instructuring situations again, which obviously is 391 00:21:18,320 --> 00:21:20,359 Speaker 3: emblematic of the fact that they didn't fix the balance 392 00:21:20,400 --> 00:21:22,680 Speaker 3: at the first time around. They just sort of extended runway. 393 00:21:23,440 --> 00:21:26,120 Speaker 3: How are folks like us, which are on the smaller 394 00:21:26,160 --> 00:21:28,960 Speaker 3: scale of of you know, managers or investors in the 395 00:21:29,000 --> 00:21:32,800 Speaker 3: law market, you know, overcoming these LME dynamics. There are 396 00:21:32,800 --> 00:21:35,480 Speaker 3: two things I would say is really really proactive risk 397 00:21:35,520 --> 00:21:38,479 Speaker 3: management looking at a variety of factors that allow us 398 00:21:38,520 --> 00:21:42,240 Speaker 3: to you know, in those structures a boy or get 399 00:21:42,240 --> 00:21:45,080 Speaker 3: out of risky situations in advance of there being a 400 00:21:45,160 --> 00:21:47,800 Speaker 3: you know, more aggressive you know LM transaction, which could 401 00:21:47,840 --> 00:21:51,159 Speaker 3: be punitive to our positioning. Is the first and foremost 402 00:21:51,200 --> 00:21:54,679 Speaker 3: strategy you know, for slo luck structures. It really is 403 00:21:54,720 --> 00:21:59,240 Speaker 3: about avoiding losses, avoiding defaults. You know. Secondarily, it's using 404 00:21:59,240 --> 00:22:02,320 Speaker 3: the ecosystem knowledge and relationships that we built over our 405 00:22:02,359 --> 00:22:04,520 Speaker 3: decades in this business to make sure that we're well 406 00:22:04,560 --> 00:22:07,600 Speaker 3: aligned with other like minded lenders to make sure that 407 00:22:07,680 --> 00:22:10,679 Speaker 3: what we're doing is rational, not just for the company 408 00:22:10,720 --> 00:22:13,119 Speaker 3: and the capital structure, but rational for our own investors. 409 00:22:13,880 --> 00:22:15,639 Speaker 3: You know. One of the things based on our DNA, 410 00:22:15,680 --> 00:22:19,200 Speaker 3: our heritage is we've always been principled in the recovery 411 00:22:19,280 --> 00:22:23,359 Speaker 3: value for our investors. We view ourselves as fiduciaries and 412 00:22:23,400 --> 00:22:26,479 Speaker 3: stewards for the capital we're investing in in credit, and 413 00:22:26,480 --> 00:22:28,680 Speaker 3: that means we have abs so priority and we should 414 00:22:28,720 --> 00:22:31,880 Speaker 3: get paid back, you know, as as situations play out, 415 00:22:31,960 --> 00:22:34,560 Speaker 3: and you know, we're going to do our best within 416 00:22:34,600 --> 00:22:38,480 Speaker 3: the context of commercial situations to uphold that, and and 417 00:22:38,520 --> 00:22:40,879 Speaker 3: that means you know, sort of you know, aligning ourselves 418 00:22:40,920 --> 00:22:44,240 Speaker 3: with other like minded lenders to try to attain that outcome. 419 00:22:44,760 --> 00:22:48,080 Speaker 2: It's it's interesting because I just traveling and distress. We 420 00:22:48,119 --> 00:22:51,520 Speaker 2: always see all these that's like the the first play 421 00:22:51,520 --> 00:22:55,520 Speaker 2: of the playbook. And you know, even a byside guy 422 00:22:55,640 --> 00:22:58,120 Speaker 2: said to me recently, he's like LM stands for lets 423 00:22:58,160 --> 00:23:02,359 Speaker 2: meet eternally for the restructuring professionals, because it's just it 424 00:23:02,600 --> 00:23:06,919 Speaker 2: just seems like they meet once, get successfully, and so 425 00:23:07,040 --> 00:23:10,679 Speaker 2: you have increasing professional class that could be frustrating. And 426 00:23:10,760 --> 00:23:14,679 Speaker 2: I'm curious, you know, like, and we've also seen finally 427 00:23:14,760 --> 00:23:18,440 Speaker 2: the co ops seems to have been an effective defense mechanism. 428 00:23:18,480 --> 00:23:20,920 Speaker 2: Do you think that that might be behind the actual 429 00:23:21,000 --> 00:23:27,199 Speaker 2: slowdown in enemies because that's fairly new to me that 430 00:23:27,480 --> 00:23:28,399 Speaker 2: like that's the case. 431 00:23:30,960 --> 00:23:34,000 Speaker 3: Okay, I think a greater level of organization and seeing 432 00:23:34,000 --> 00:23:36,439 Speaker 3: the world similarly when and we all should be of 433 00:23:36,480 --> 00:23:38,880 Speaker 3: the mindset that we want to sort of maximize recoveries 434 00:23:38,920 --> 00:23:41,760 Speaker 3: and difficult situations. And the credits were involved in I 435 00:23:41,800 --> 00:23:44,480 Speaker 3: think is certainly a component of that. You know, even 436 00:23:44,520 --> 00:23:46,840 Speaker 3: with the co ops, you're still seeing you know, advantage 437 00:23:46,880 --> 00:23:49,800 Speaker 3: economics for steercow lenders where they get some sort of 438 00:23:49,800 --> 00:23:53,400 Speaker 3: backstop fee or economic incentive to provide you know, sort 439 00:23:53,400 --> 00:23:56,520 Speaker 3: of capital commitments or other things to you know, sort 440 00:23:56,520 --> 00:24:00,320 Speaker 3: of lemy situations and transactions. I think that's at least 441 00:24:00,320 --> 00:24:05,080 Speaker 3: more commercially rational than what we were seeing previously. The 442 00:24:05,200 --> 00:24:07,760 Speaker 3: co ops are helping, but you know, it still comes 443 00:24:07,840 --> 00:24:10,679 Speaker 3: down to I think lenders acting rationally with with regards 444 00:24:10,720 --> 00:24:12,120 Speaker 3: to credit orders. Yeah. 445 00:24:12,119 --> 00:24:14,960 Speaker 2: One of the things that I always wondered if there 446 00:24:15,080 --> 00:24:17,600 Speaker 2: was going to be a tipping point where it's first 447 00:24:17,680 --> 00:24:22,200 Speaker 2: lean lenders are typically you know, I remember as a lender, 448 00:24:22,520 --> 00:24:25,119 Speaker 2: I'd always have the mindset, well, if this company has 449 00:24:25,320 --> 00:24:29,159 Speaker 2: value and I have to like take ownership, I prefer 450 00:24:29,200 --> 00:24:31,560 Speaker 2: to own the equity because at least then I'm not 451 00:24:31,640 --> 00:24:35,600 Speaker 2: capping my upside versus debt. But like we've seen that change, 452 00:24:36,200 --> 00:24:38,399 Speaker 2: you know in the lenders mindset that a lot of 453 00:24:38,440 --> 00:24:41,359 Speaker 2: these companies are coming out with more debt. We're even 454 00:24:41,400 --> 00:24:44,879 Speaker 2: seeing in some of these deals multi multicolor. I think 455 00:24:45,040 --> 00:24:49,720 Speaker 2: they're the existing lenders are letting the sponsor continue to 456 00:24:49,720 --> 00:24:53,560 Speaker 2: own the company and they're taking back preferred stock. You know, 457 00:24:53,920 --> 00:24:58,720 Speaker 2: I'm curious what's the appetite for equity in restructuring these days? 458 00:24:58,760 --> 00:25:03,800 Speaker 2: From lending vehicles are they tolerant of taking back equity 459 00:25:03,920 --> 00:25:10,119 Speaker 2: or is debt still the preferred course even in workouts. 460 00:25:10,680 --> 00:25:13,280 Speaker 3: And with much of the loan market, and we'll talk 461 00:25:13,280 --> 00:25:15,720 Speaker 3: about that for a second. That I think that's distinct 462 00:25:15,720 --> 00:25:17,640 Speaker 3: from the private credit market for much of the loan 463 00:25:17,680 --> 00:25:21,480 Speaker 3: market being focused on the COLO structures. I think take 464 00:25:21,560 --> 00:25:25,000 Speaker 3: back paper in a way of debt is makes more sense, 465 00:25:25,440 --> 00:25:29,879 Speaker 3: you know, for the structural benefits of recovery. That being said, 466 00:25:30,080 --> 00:25:32,120 Speaker 3: you know, if you take back a lot more debt 467 00:25:32,119 --> 00:25:34,520 Speaker 3: but the capital structure is not sustainable, you're delaying the 468 00:25:34,560 --> 00:25:39,320 Speaker 3: inevitable you know, re restructuring or eventual default of the situation. 469 00:25:39,560 --> 00:25:42,440 Speaker 3: So structure can only take you so far in terms 470 00:25:42,480 --> 00:25:46,920 Speaker 3: of you know, inherently preferring debt versus equity in take back. 471 00:25:47,600 --> 00:25:49,200 Speaker 3: I think in the private credit world you're going to 472 00:25:49,240 --> 00:25:52,919 Speaker 3: see I think a more rational economics split. You know, 473 00:25:53,000 --> 00:25:55,120 Speaker 3: if if something if there's a full from security that's 474 00:25:55,160 --> 00:25:57,520 Speaker 3: actually the debt. In a private debt situation, I think 475 00:25:57,520 --> 00:26:00,560 Speaker 3: you're going to see more handovers or you know, tossing 476 00:26:00,560 --> 00:26:04,439 Speaker 3: the keys from sponsor to private lender, where that you know, 477 00:26:05,359 --> 00:26:09,080 Speaker 3: leads to a more traditional waterfall type structuring situation. 478 00:26:10,200 --> 00:26:12,360 Speaker 1: So where else are you seeing opportunity train in terms 479 00:26:12,359 --> 00:26:15,520 Speaker 1: of sectors. I mean, we've all obviously become overnight experts 480 00:26:15,560 --> 00:26:19,920 Speaker 1: in AI, but we're rapidly gettingfa with Middle East and 481 00:26:20,000 --> 00:26:23,120 Speaker 1: shipping routes and all that stuff, So you know, that's 482 00:26:23,160 --> 00:26:25,560 Speaker 1: throwing everything for a loop over here. Maybe we haven't 483 00:26:25,600 --> 00:26:28,080 Speaker 1: seen the full impact yet in terms of you know, 484 00:26:28,160 --> 00:26:30,480 Speaker 1: gas prices and supply chains and all that stuff. But 485 00:26:30,760 --> 00:26:34,280 Speaker 1: I'm wondering if you're kind of preemptively seeing opportunity in 486 00:26:34,320 --> 00:26:37,200 Speaker 1: credit markets because of you know, geopolitics. 487 00:26:38,680 --> 00:26:41,320 Speaker 3: It so as we think about geopolitics, I think the 488 00:26:41,359 --> 00:26:44,399 Speaker 3: real lens that we need to look at is the 489 00:26:44,400 --> 00:26:47,720 Speaker 3: second and third derivative impulse of what the geopolitics means. 490 00:26:47,800 --> 00:26:51,320 Speaker 3: It's you know, certainly created inflation impulses. It relates to 491 00:26:51,440 --> 00:26:53,960 Speaker 3: oil prices and gas prices at the pump, whether it 492 00:26:54,080 --> 00:26:56,520 Speaker 3: have an impact on consumers or it has an impact 493 00:26:56,560 --> 00:27:00,639 Speaker 3: on the cost of peatstock and supply chains through chemicals, 494 00:27:00,840 --> 00:27:03,359 Speaker 3: paper and packaging, some of the chemical those some of 495 00:27:03,359 --> 00:27:06,200 Speaker 3: the sectors that have been directly impacted by bioil prices. 496 00:27:06,920 --> 00:27:09,600 Speaker 3: I think the other dynamic is is you know, even 497 00:27:09,680 --> 00:27:12,920 Speaker 3: even a further derivative, which is it's having an impact 498 00:27:13,080 --> 00:27:16,119 Speaker 3: on the way production in different and markets is happening 499 00:27:16,119 --> 00:27:19,040 Speaker 3: around the globe. For example, you know, if you think 500 00:27:19,080 --> 00:27:21,680 Speaker 3: about something like the chemical space, where there's a fair 501 00:27:21,720 --> 00:27:25,720 Speaker 3: amount of feedstock that feeds the ethylene supply chain in 502 00:27:25,760 --> 00:27:28,960 Speaker 3: Asia coming out of the straight up ormuz UH, it 503 00:27:29,040 --> 00:27:31,760 Speaker 3: really slows down the ability for some of those UH 504 00:27:32,440 --> 00:27:36,439 Speaker 3: based chemical companies produce, which provides an inherent advantage to 505 00:27:36,480 --> 00:27:38,639 Speaker 3: other parts of the globe, like the US market. For 506 00:27:39,600 --> 00:27:42,840 Speaker 3: US based chemical producers, that isn't a you know, a 507 00:27:42,880 --> 00:27:46,760 Speaker 3: boon forever, but it is a short term opportunity set 508 00:27:46,800 --> 00:27:49,720 Speaker 3: that's advantaging some of those some of those companies. You know, 509 00:27:49,760 --> 00:27:52,680 Speaker 3: I think if you look at our broader sector views, 510 00:27:53,280 --> 00:27:56,680 Speaker 3: you know, we certainly like what's going on in oil 511 00:27:56,720 --> 00:28:00,440 Speaker 3: and gas right now from an overall profitability and performance perspective. 512 00:28:00,920 --> 00:28:03,399 Speaker 3: We like the healthcare space a fair amount. You know, 513 00:28:03,440 --> 00:28:06,720 Speaker 3: we think that healthcare continues to be demand wise rearely defensive. 514 00:28:07,880 --> 00:28:10,199 Speaker 3: You know, AI there has been viewed as more of 515 00:28:10,240 --> 00:28:15,320 Speaker 3: an opportunity for you know, cost enhancement and productivity and 516 00:28:15,440 --> 00:28:19,760 Speaker 3: UH friction cost reduction UH in terms of forms of 517 00:28:19,800 --> 00:28:23,360 Speaker 3: the healthcare space, you know, on on the flip side, 518 00:28:23,960 --> 00:28:27,480 Speaker 3: you have areas like you know, technology, which which obviously 519 00:28:27,560 --> 00:28:29,679 Speaker 3: we've talked a fair amount in terms of the software space, 520 00:28:30,040 --> 00:28:33,480 Speaker 3: lodging and gaming. Inflation is having an adverse impact potentially 521 00:28:33,520 --> 00:28:37,080 Speaker 3: on consumer discretionary income levels, and so we're being a 522 00:28:37,160 --> 00:28:40,160 Speaker 3: bit more cautious as it relates to discretionary based you know, 523 00:28:40,680 --> 00:28:42,960 Speaker 3: and markets and products in to. 524 00:28:43,200 --> 00:28:45,200 Speaker 1: The chemicals one is interesting because there's not many people 525 00:28:45,320 --> 00:28:48,120 Speaker 1: are saying that, but I'm wondering if it's something's investible 526 00:28:48,160 --> 00:28:51,480 Speaker 1: in terms of your business, because you know, you're you're 527 00:28:51,520 --> 00:28:53,560 Speaker 1: definitely taking a longer view and this seems like it's 528 00:28:53,640 --> 00:28:55,880 Speaker 1: maybe a short term phenomenon. 529 00:28:57,160 --> 00:29:01,080 Speaker 3: Yeah, Look, the chemical disruption has really played out of 530 00:29:01,080 --> 00:29:03,480 Speaker 3: the last couple of years because of the substantial capacity 531 00:29:03,640 --> 00:29:06,960 Speaker 3: edition that came online in China where they were looking 532 00:29:07,000 --> 00:29:09,680 Speaker 3: to take market share within within the chemist space, and 533 00:29:09,720 --> 00:29:12,080 Speaker 3: I think we're willing to produce in a marginal, you know, 534 00:29:12,200 --> 00:29:14,880 Speaker 3: level of profitability, which made much of the rest of 535 00:29:14,880 --> 00:29:18,880 Speaker 3: the world less competitive. I think as you have a 536 00:29:19,040 --> 00:29:23,760 Speaker 3: deglobalization within supply Chaine in general, which has been a broad, 537 00:29:23,960 --> 00:29:27,240 Speaker 3: you know, sort of secular trend, particularly given current politics, 538 00:29:27,280 --> 00:29:30,360 Speaker 3: I think you're going to have more US and European 539 00:29:30,440 --> 00:29:35,240 Speaker 3: based chemical companies have an inherent advantage, especially post this disruption, 540 00:29:35,560 --> 00:29:38,040 Speaker 3: you know, from from what's going on here politically. 541 00:29:37,720 --> 00:29:39,920 Speaker 1: And so there is debt that you can invest in 542 00:29:40,120 --> 00:29:41,680 Speaker 1: a long as you know, to take and take a 543 00:29:41,720 --> 00:29:44,480 Speaker 1: long view with that kind of information right now. 544 00:29:44,360 --> 00:29:47,120 Speaker 3: You think there is so long as the company has 545 00:29:47,160 --> 00:29:51,480 Speaker 3: that quate liquidity to continue to withstand some level of volatility. Uh, 546 00:29:51,760 --> 00:29:54,120 Speaker 3: we absolutely think there is across different parts of the 547 00:29:54,160 --> 00:29:54,800 Speaker 3: chemical space. 548 00:29:56,200 --> 00:30:01,080 Speaker 2: So as we have you know, the environment is probably 549 00:30:01,080 --> 00:30:05,640 Speaker 2: going to be stickier than previously thought. There's going to 550 00:30:05,680 --> 00:30:10,040 Speaker 2: be a longer horizon of you know, we're not going 551 00:30:10,080 --> 00:30:13,760 Speaker 2: back to zero interest rates anytime soon. We can safely 552 00:30:13,800 --> 00:30:18,120 Speaker 2: say that, how does that? Are there any other sectors 553 00:30:18,240 --> 00:30:20,920 Speaker 2: with the kind of environment that we have, and you know, 554 00:30:21,000 --> 00:30:25,600 Speaker 2: we've constantly seen these companies looking to refinance what was 555 00:30:25,720 --> 00:30:29,000 Speaker 2: cheap debt and they get sticker shot at, you know, 556 00:30:29,040 --> 00:30:32,560 Speaker 2: where they have to refinance. Are there other sectors that 557 00:30:32,640 --> 00:30:37,400 Speaker 2: you see as like maybe presenting a distressed opportunity or 558 00:30:38,240 --> 00:30:41,400 Speaker 2: you know, and it also looks like North America Energy 559 00:30:41,480 --> 00:30:44,120 Speaker 2: is a pretty safe place to be in terms of 560 00:30:44,520 --> 00:30:48,320 Speaker 2: you know, going back to the high bond index that 561 00:30:48,400 --> 00:30:51,920 Speaker 2: I look at. It's like energy and financials had almost 562 00:30:52,200 --> 00:30:57,000 Speaker 2: no distressed bonds in them, which was, you know, kind 563 00:30:57,040 --> 00:31:01,840 Speaker 2: of mind blowing. It's there's a real dichotomy between you 564 00:31:01,880 --> 00:31:07,200 Speaker 2: know what, communications and technologies struggling with versus you know, 565 00:31:07,400 --> 00:31:12,920 Speaker 2: energy and financials. Any any thoughts on sectors anything else. 566 00:31:14,200 --> 00:31:16,400 Speaker 3: You know, it's interesting when you have past cycles is 567 00:31:16,440 --> 00:31:18,840 Speaker 3: to refer to some of our long standing history that 568 00:31:18,920 --> 00:31:23,440 Speaker 3: go through you know, significant de leveraging, you know cycles. 569 00:31:23,520 --> 00:31:26,880 Speaker 3: You know. Obviously eight was the GFC and it delivered 570 00:31:26,880 --> 00:31:29,360 Speaker 3: the financial simment system, and I think even the condition 571 00:31:29,440 --> 00:31:32,720 Speaker 3: of banks and financial companies in general are you know, 572 00:31:32,800 --> 00:31:35,440 Speaker 3: far healthier than they have been historically. And then in 573 00:31:35,480 --> 00:31:38,680 Speaker 3: fifteen and sixteen we went through the OPEC energy crisis. 574 00:31:38,760 --> 00:31:42,320 Speaker 3: I think it brought some rationality to the energy sector 575 00:31:42,360 --> 00:31:46,760 Speaker 3: from a level of debt and exposure perspective. Unfortunately, a 576 00:31:46,800 --> 00:31:50,320 Speaker 3: lot of the telecom and telecom services companies didn't learn 577 00:31:50,320 --> 00:31:53,680 Speaker 3: that lesson from twenty five years ago, which is, you know, 578 00:31:53,920 --> 00:31:56,520 Speaker 3: those are really high cost of capital businesses because they're 579 00:31:56,640 --> 00:32:00,000 Speaker 3: very capital intensive. And we saw a lot of stress 580 00:31:59,720 --> 00:32:03,440 Speaker 3: in the telecom telecom services space because of rising interest rates, 581 00:32:04,200 --> 00:32:07,200 Speaker 3: and so I think the memories of our markets are 582 00:32:07,240 --> 00:32:09,440 Speaker 3: too short most of the time. But they were they 583 00:32:09,720 --> 00:32:12,240 Speaker 3: didn't even arken back to to that that past cycle 584 00:32:12,320 --> 00:32:14,080 Speaker 3: that you know, they should have learned some lessons on. 585 00:32:14,160 --> 00:32:17,360 Speaker 3: So we're seeing some stress within you know, telecom and 586 00:32:17,480 --> 00:32:20,800 Speaker 3: and telecom related services businesses that I think have really 587 00:32:20,800 --> 00:32:24,000 Speaker 3: struggled because of the interest rate environment. You know, I 588 00:32:24,040 --> 00:32:27,640 Speaker 3: think in some of the industrial names, which you know, 589 00:32:28,360 --> 00:32:31,040 Speaker 3: we should be in somewhat of an industrial tailwind from 590 00:32:31,040 --> 00:32:34,920 Speaker 3: a domestic perspective, have also struggled. You know, I think 591 00:32:34,960 --> 00:32:38,400 Speaker 3: with some cyclicality and you know, start for capex and 592 00:32:38,400 --> 00:32:40,000 Speaker 3: not have enough free cash flow to be able to 593 00:32:40,040 --> 00:32:42,000 Speaker 3: invest in their businesses. And I think that's another sector 594 00:32:42,040 --> 00:32:44,520 Speaker 3: that we could see some strain and stress in, especially 595 00:32:44,520 --> 00:32:46,280 Speaker 3: at the higher levers levels that those are for the 596 00:32:46,280 --> 00:32:47,000 Speaker 3: instant right now. 597 00:32:47,080 --> 00:32:50,000 Speaker 2: So maybe maybe twenty six years is about the right 598 00:32:50,120 --> 00:32:55,719 Speaker 2: time frame before that they repeat becoming the spotlight player 599 00:32:56,040 --> 00:32:59,480 Speaker 2: for distress. So so one last question, because I you know, 600 00:32:59,520 --> 00:33:02,560 Speaker 2: I get I think it hits back to underwriting standards. 601 00:33:03,080 --> 00:33:03,320 Speaker 3: You know. 602 00:33:04,760 --> 00:33:06,840 Speaker 2: I think it was on the last episode of The 603 00:33:06,920 --> 00:33:11,680 Speaker 2: Credit Edge that I heard that adjustments have like roughly 604 00:33:11,720 --> 00:33:15,200 Speaker 2: doubled in the last I forget the period five to 605 00:33:15,280 --> 00:33:20,120 Speaker 2: ten years, and I'm curious where you see us being 606 00:33:20,160 --> 00:33:23,440 Speaker 2: on the pendulum are you know, are are we at 607 00:33:23,440 --> 00:33:27,640 Speaker 2: one end where ebitdad adjustments are a pe firms fantasy, 608 00:33:27,800 --> 00:33:30,840 Speaker 2: or are we at the other end where like the 609 00:33:30,840 --> 00:33:34,880 Speaker 2: people with the cash, lenders with the cash basically dictate 610 00:33:34,920 --> 00:33:35,440 Speaker 2: the terms. 611 00:33:36,160 --> 00:33:40,120 Speaker 3: I think increasingly the lack of follow through on on 612 00:33:40,240 --> 00:33:45,080 Speaker 3: ebadah and adjustments, you know, perspective ebadah adjustments and improvements, 613 00:33:45,480 --> 00:33:48,320 Speaker 3: I think lenders are going to, through a more a 614 00:33:48,320 --> 00:33:50,440 Speaker 3: softening of the cycle and a softening of the easy 615 00:33:50,440 --> 00:33:52,680 Speaker 3: money environment, get more power to be able to dictate 616 00:33:52,720 --> 00:33:56,800 Speaker 3: the definition of ebadah and how optimistic you know, ebada 617 00:33:56,880 --> 00:33:59,520 Speaker 3: can be defined as you know, going forward. On the 618 00:33:59,520 --> 00:34:03,080 Speaker 3: flip side, for the sponsors, I think we've you know, 619 00:34:03,160 --> 00:34:06,280 Speaker 3: we've come out of the period of multiple accretion and 620 00:34:06,640 --> 00:34:09,320 Speaker 3: you know, really really cheap financing. So unless they actually 621 00:34:09,360 --> 00:34:12,200 Speaker 3: do start producing some of that ebadad improvement through cost 622 00:34:12,200 --> 00:34:15,320 Speaker 3: savings and productivity improvement, they're not going to generate the 623 00:34:15,360 --> 00:34:17,520 Speaker 3: types of returns that they've been able to for the 624 00:34:17,600 --> 00:34:19,960 Speaker 3: last fifteen or twenty years. So I think it's a 625 00:34:19,960 --> 00:34:22,040 Speaker 3: little bit of a push pull. I think, you know, 626 00:34:22,160 --> 00:34:24,879 Speaker 3: your willingness as a lender to believe it, I think 627 00:34:25,040 --> 00:34:28,000 Speaker 3: is more you know, sort of suspect, and quite frankly, 628 00:34:28,040 --> 00:34:30,719 Speaker 3: in the public markets, we discount most of the adjustments 629 00:34:30,719 --> 00:34:34,960 Speaker 3: and add backs anyway, and on on. On the sponsor side, 630 00:34:34,960 --> 00:34:36,839 Speaker 3: I think it's their ability to produce it that's actually 631 00:34:36,880 --> 00:34:39,560 Speaker 3: going to allow them to put forth sort of private 632 00:34:39,560 --> 00:34:41,360 Speaker 3: dec we like returns on go forward basis. 633 00:34:42,360 --> 00:34:45,040 Speaker 1: So as Phil says, you know, rates aren't high, they 634 00:34:45,040 --> 00:34:47,640 Speaker 1: probably probably will stay high for quite a bit longer 635 00:34:47,680 --> 00:34:50,920 Speaker 1: than everyone was expecting, you know, unless the President has 636 00:34:50,920 --> 00:34:55,000 Speaker 1: his way and washed us something that's particularly political to 637 00:34:55,440 --> 00:34:59,160 Speaker 1: bring down rates. But let's assume they stay where they are. 638 00:35:00,040 --> 00:35:03,560 Speaker 1: But the bulk of the borrowers out there have gotten 639 00:35:03,640 --> 00:35:08,919 Speaker 1: used to this, they've managed through, and that must play 640 00:35:09,000 --> 00:35:12,359 Speaker 1: to the advantage. Therefore floating rate assets, which we are 641 00:35:12,400 --> 00:35:17,560 Speaker 1: hearing people talk about more so loans obviously clos you know, 642 00:35:18,000 --> 00:35:21,080 Speaker 1: going back the entire time I've been covering credit for decades, 643 00:35:21,320 --> 00:35:23,600 Speaker 1: people have been scared of clos and they still seem 644 00:35:23,640 --> 00:35:26,840 Speaker 1: to be. But you are, you have a clo business. 645 00:35:27,840 --> 00:35:30,240 Speaker 1: People seem to like them. They seem to be doing well, 646 00:35:31,239 --> 00:35:34,560 Speaker 1: yet there are concerns about higher default rates in leverage 647 00:35:34,600 --> 00:35:37,759 Speaker 1: loans and lower recoveries as you pointed out. So I'm 648 00:35:37,760 --> 00:35:40,840 Speaker 1: wondering from your perspective, you know, what's what's the current 649 00:35:41,000 --> 00:35:43,360 Speaker 1: take on on clos? How how do you what's the 650 00:35:43,400 --> 00:35:47,600 Speaker 1: reception from investors to those Yeah. 651 00:35:47,440 --> 00:35:51,120 Speaker 3: So celos have have definitely become less esoteric and more 652 00:35:51,600 --> 00:35:55,080 Speaker 3: you know, to use a different terminology, democratized in terms 653 00:35:55,080 --> 00:35:58,719 Speaker 3: of accessibility, both from an institutional investor point of view 654 00:35:58,719 --> 00:36:01,800 Speaker 3: and quite frankly also for certain liability parts of the 655 00:36:01,840 --> 00:36:05,080 Speaker 3: capital structure from a retail investor point of view. We 656 00:36:05,200 --> 00:36:08,319 Speaker 3: view them as highly resilient structures that have actually shown 657 00:36:08,360 --> 00:36:13,600 Speaker 3: an ability to withstand severe points of market stress. Clos 658 00:36:13,640 --> 00:36:16,320 Speaker 3: survive the ninety eight through or three crisis, dolos survived 659 00:36:16,600 --> 00:36:19,160 Speaker 3: eight crisis, they survive the COVID crisis, and I think 660 00:36:19,200 --> 00:36:22,440 Speaker 3: what they've evolved to, number one, the structures have gotten safer. 661 00:36:22,520 --> 00:36:26,520 Speaker 3: And number two, you've seen, you know, instead of of 662 00:36:26,680 --> 00:36:29,960 Speaker 3: markets shutting off and turning back on, you've seen parallel 663 00:36:30,000 --> 00:36:33,520 Speaker 3: shifts and spreads between assets and liabilities and still a 664 00:36:33,560 --> 00:36:37,880 Speaker 3: functioning market, which I think goes to the further resiliency 665 00:36:38,000 --> 00:36:40,960 Speaker 3: and survivability of colos. Now, the other point you hit on, 666 00:36:41,000 --> 00:36:44,360 Speaker 3: which is defaults and recovery rates, is always going to 667 00:36:44,400 --> 00:36:48,680 Speaker 3: be an important fundamental dynamic within clos. Clos are about, 668 00:36:48,840 --> 00:36:52,400 Speaker 3: you know, pricing liabilities reasonably well in line with assets spreads, 669 00:36:52,440 --> 00:36:55,839 Speaker 3: and it's about managing losses. And so as we get 670 00:36:55,960 --> 00:37:00,160 Speaker 3: rising dispersion, which I mean right now we're seeing will 671 00:37:00,320 --> 00:37:03,520 Speaker 3: excuse me, single bee to triple C dispersion two x 672 00:37:03,600 --> 00:37:05,360 Speaker 3: what it's been for the last ten years, where it 673 00:37:05,600 --> 00:37:08,920 Speaker 3: caught fourteen hundred basis points between single b's and triple c's. 674 00:37:10,280 --> 00:37:13,240 Speaker 3: That type of dispersion is going to create more winners 675 00:37:13,239 --> 00:37:16,000 Speaker 3: and losers. It's going to you know, really highlight and 676 00:37:16,040 --> 00:37:19,640 Speaker 3: identify people who are able to proactively identify and risk 677 00:37:19,680 --> 00:37:22,480 Speaker 3: and avoid loss in their portfolios. And so I think 678 00:37:22,520 --> 00:37:25,440 Speaker 3: that's a healthy thing. When a market persists in a 679 00:37:25,480 --> 00:37:28,000 Speaker 3: really easy money environment for too long, it gets crowded, 680 00:37:28,440 --> 00:37:31,200 Speaker 3: and you know, a difficult market credit cycle will actually 681 00:37:31,239 --> 00:37:34,839 Speaker 3: differentiate performance. And I think that's that's a healthy part 682 00:37:34,840 --> 00:37:36,760 Speaker 3: of what's going to happen in the SELO market. 683 00:37:37,000 --> 00:37:39,560 Speaker 1: Going back to your sort of em to find miss 684 00:37:39,560 --> 00:37:41,920 Speaker 1: priced risk this must be a great time to do it, 685 00:37:42,040 --> 00:37:44,200 Speaker 1: given the dispersion that you're talking. 686 00:37:44,040 --> 00:37:49,160 Speaker 3: About carefully, Yes, it's saloes are great because they're long 687 00:37:49,239 --> 00:37:52,240 Speaker 3: term locked up, you know, capital that aren't marked to market, 688 00:37:53,200 --> 00:37:56,600 Speaker 3: you know, in structure, which does allow you to take 689 00:37:56,640 --> 00:38:00,920 Speaker 3: advantage of periods of volatility and dislocation, but it doesn't 690 00:38:00,920 --> 00:38:05,160 Speaker 3: allow you to avoid loss or meaning like you have 691 00:38:05,200 --> 00:38:07,960 Speaker 3: to still make good credit selections and good credit decisions. 692 00:38:08,080 --> 00:38:11,680 Speaker 3: So yes, it does create opportunity, but it still means 693 00:38:11,719 --> 00:38:14,239 Speaker 3: you have to be very focused, especially given really are 694 00:38:14,239 --> 00:38:15,040 Speaker 3: in a potential cycle. 695 00:38:15,040 --> 00:38:17,680 Speaker 1: Well, the dispersion is it? Is it based on ill liquidity? 696 00:38:17,760 --> 00:38:17,960 Speaker 3: Is it? 697 00:38:18,000 --> 00:38:21,319 Speaker 1: Inefficiency? Is what's driving it? Because we've been tearing about 698 00:38:21,320 --> 00:38:22,520 Speaker 1: dispersion for a long time now. 699 00:38:23,680 --> 00:38:28,840 Speaker 3: Yeah, I think it's more pronounced because of the sector dynamics. 700 00:38:28,840 --> 00:38:32,040 Speaker 3: You've seen software, as an example, widened to two hundred 701 00:38:32,040 --> 00:38:34,960 Speaker 3: and fifty basis points over the broader loan market year 702 00:38:35,000 --> 00:38:37,680 Speaker 3: to day, largely because of the fears of AI. That 703 00:38:37,719 --> 00:38:39,759 Speaker 3: hasn't played through in the fundamentals. But that's what the 704 00:38:39,760 --> 00:38:43,480 Speaker 3: perception of risk is within the marketplace. I think you've seen, 705 00:38:43,760 --> 00:38:46,920 Speaker 3: you know, other sector dynamics that have caused you more 706 00:38:47,000 --> 00:38:49,959 Speaker 3: dislocation like that. It's a part of the service space. 707 00:38:50,040 --> 00:38:52,080 Speaker 3: Because of the fears of ai I have also played out. 708 00:38:53,200 --> 00:38:56,040 Speaker 3: You know, autos because of tariffs last year were particularly 709 00:38:56,040 --> 00:38:58,319 Speaker 3: wide relative to the rest of the market. So I 710 00:38:58,360 --> 00:39:00,480 Speaker 3: think that's a part of it. The other part I 711 00:39:00,560 --> 00:39:04,960 Speaker 3: would say is lmes have created negative technicals in the market. 712 00:39:05,640 --> 00:39:08,200 Speaker 3: When a situation gets into one of these you know, 713 00:39:08,280 --> 00:39:12,719 Speaker 3: sort of non default restructuring situations, the bid for that 714 00:39:12,760 --> 00:39:15,520 Speaker 3: paper goes away very quickly, and it causes a dramatic 715 00:39:15,600 --> 00:39:19,200 Speaker 3: widening of those acid prices and the spread levels that 716 00:39:19,239 --> 00:39:22,920 Speaker 3: can cause a perversion in you know, and a dispersion 717 00:39:23,080 --> 00:39:24,279 Speaker 3: in incredibrity. Yes. 718 00:39:24,480 --> 00:39:28,080 Speaker 1: Yeah, we've been hearing clos dropping out at ninety very 719 00:39:28,120 --> 00:39:30,040 Speaker 1: quickly because they think that it's going to get into 720 00:39:30,040 --> 00:39:32,680 Speaker 1: a situation that they cannot you know, litigate through. But 721 00:39:33,440 --> 00:39:35,800 Speaker 1: I'm interested when you talk about the early stages of 722 00:39:35,840 --> 00:39:38,200 Speaker 1: the cycle. We've heard people talk about late cycle. You've 723 00:39:38,200 --> 00:39:41,560 Speaker 1: been doing this long enough to have a bigger perspective maybe, 724 00:39:42,320 --> 00:39:44,719 Speaker 1: but we seem to have. You know, no cycle just 725 00:39:44,760 --> 00:39:46,920 Speaker 1: goes on and on. We talk all the time about 726 00:39:46,920 --> 00:39:48,160 Speaker 1: you know, when's it going to end, how's it going 727 00:39:48,200 --> 00:39:50,839 Speaker 1: to end, and it never ends. So's what's keeping us 728 00:39:51,080 --> 00:39:52,320 Speaker 1: limping along endlessly. 729 00:39:53,080 --> 00:39:57,880 Speaker 3: Look, I think the stat I mentioned earlier, which is 730 00:39:57,920 --> 00:40:01,040 Speaker 3: the number of repeat offenders that you know, tried to 731 00:40:01,040 --> 00:40:03,200 Speaker 3: fix their balance sheet once through some sort of kick 732 00:40:03,239 --> 00:40:05,799 Speaker 3: the can exercise, are coming back to the market again, 733 00:40:05,880 --> 00:40:09,520 Speaker 3: and in many cases ultimately going through a full scale restructuring, 734 00:40:10,160 --> 00:40:12,759 Speaker 3: is a sign that you know, the gig is up 735 00:40:12,800 --> 00:40:16,080 Speaker 3: and we're running out of runway to you know, pretend 736 00:40:16,239 --> 00:40:19,400 Speaker 3: our way into a sort of a quick recovery. I 737 00:40:19,400 --> 00:40:21,720 Speaker 3: think that's part of it. I think the other pieces. 738 00:40:22,040 --> 00:40:25,759 Speaker 3: You know, a lot of this sort of capital structure 739 00:40:26,200 --> 00:40:29,120 Speaker 3: you know is built in zero interest rate environments, is 740 00:40:29,160 --> 00:40:31,480 Speaker 3: really you know, plaguing you know a lot of borrowers. 741 00:40:31,840 --> 00:40:34,160 Speaker 3: I think that you know, they need to invest in 742 00:40:34,200 --> 00:40:37,239 Speaker 3: their business to stay competitive, to grow, to innovate, to 743 00:40:37,719 --> 00:40:40,240 Speaker 3: do M and A, and a lot of these companies 744 00:40:40,239 --> 00:40:42,319 Speaker 3: can't afford to do that because they're doing their best 745 00:40:42,360 --> 00:40:45,239 Speaker 3: to meet their interest coverage charges. And I think that 746 00:40:45,320 --> 00:40:48,160 Speaker 3: really will start to bear out and we're going to 747 00:40:48,239 --> 00:40:50,359 Speaker 3: have Look, I don't think this is an O eight 748 00:40:50,760 --> 00:40:54,120 Speaker 3: style crisis where you have massive spikes and defaults, but 749 00:40:54,200 --> 00:40:56,719 Speaker 3: even at three to five percent default rates, which with 750 00:40:56,719 --> 00:40:59,400 Speaker 3: what we've been experiencing on a soft and hard basis 751 00:40:59,400 --> 00:41:01,719 Speaker 3: for the last two or three years, that over the 752 00:41:01,719 --> 00:41:04,880 Speaker 3: next two or three years is going to be painful. Cumulatively, 753 00:41:04,920 --> 00:41:07,279 Speaker 3: that's a lot of bounce sheets that need to be restructured, 754 00:41:07,719 --> 00:41:09,239 Speaker 3: and I think that's what we're going to see. We're 755 00:41:09,280 --> 00:41:12,880 Speaker 3: going to see more proliferation of bounce sheets that are 756 00:41:12,920 --> 00:41:13,640 Speaker 3: redone next. 757 00:41:13,480 --> 00:41:15,399 Speaker 1: All right, I mean I'll last guests, as Phil said, 758 00:41:15,440 --> 00:41:18,400 Speaker 1: mentioned seven hundred and seventy billion in US loans directs 759 00:41:18,440 --> 00:41:22,000 Speaker 1: and broadly syndicated that are stress based on interest coverage 760 00:41:22,080 --> 00:41:25,040 Speaker 1: ratios below one and a half and leverage above seven times, 761 00:41:25,800 --> 00:41:28,960 Speaker 1: which seems like a big worrying number with all the 762 00:41:29,000 --> 00:41:30,640 Speaker 1: other things going on in the world, and yet every 763 00:41:30,640 --> 00:41:32,799 Speaker 1: time there's a dip, people just pile in and buy it. 764 00:41:34,520 --> 00:41:36,920 Speaker 3: There's a lot of capital on sidelines. I think equity 765 00:41:36,920 --> 00:41:39,680 Speaker 3: market participants certainly have some fomo with everything that's going 766 00:41:39,719 --> 00:41:43,920 Speaker 3: on in AI, but at some point credit investors will 767 00:41:43,920 --> 00:41:46,600 Speaker 3: have to come to market and seek some sort of refinancing. 768 00:41:47,600 --> 00:41:50,200 Speaker 3: And unless you believe in a greater fools theory, those 769 00:41:50,239 --> 00:41:52,200 Speaker 3: businesses that have some one and a half times interest 770 00:41:52,239 --> 00:41:54,440 Speaker 3: coverage north of seven times leverage are going to really 771 00:41:54,440 --> 00:41:58,200 Speaker 3: struggle to get refinanced and that will become an issue, 772 00:41:58,280 --> 00:41:58,759 Speaker 3: you know, at. 773 00:41:58,680 --> 00:42:01,720 Speaker 1: The and the fear around private credit which just seems 774 00:42:01,719 --> 00:42:04,480 Speaker 1: to be feeding on itself because no one knows a 775 00:42:04,520 --> 00:42:07,200 Speaker 1: lot of that is based on the idea that you know, 776 00:42:07,680 --> 00:42:10,200 Speaker 1: there was a lot of fund raised, funds raised, and 777 00:42:10,239 --> 00:42:13,800 Speaker 1: they needed to be deployed, and not everyone was deploying 778 00:42:13,800 --> 00:42:17,040 Speaker 1: them quote responsibly. But when we talk to people about that, 779 00:42:17,080 --> 00:42:18,919 Speaker 1: they would always say, well, it's obviously not us, it's 780 00:42:18,920 --> 00:42:21,560 Speaker 1: the tourists. You've been doing this a long time, tray 781 00:42:21,600 --> 00:42:23,759 Speaker 1: you're not a tourist, And wondering are you seeing any 782 00:42:23,840 --> 00:42:26,360 Speaker 1: kinds of you know, signs of frath or did you 783 00:42:26,400 --> 00:42:28,000 Speaker 1: see any deals that you just shook your head out 784 00:42:28,000 --> 00:42:29,960 Speaker 1: and so that that shouldn't be getting done right now? 785 00:42:31,280 --> 00:42:34,080 Speaker 3: There absolutely have been, and we've we've been very disciplined 786 00:42:34,120 --> 00:42:37,680 Speaker 3: in our credit underwriting process and remains so today. There's 787 00:42:37,680 --> 00:42:40,000 Speaker 3: always deals that you scratch your head at when you 788 00:42:40,040 --> 00:42:43,520 Speaker 3: see get done. And and I do think there's been 789 00:42:43,960 --> 00:42:48,400 Speaker 3: a massive breath widening in the participation in credit markets 790 00:42:48,440 --> 00:42:51,880 Speaker 3: in general, and private credits markets more specifically. Many of 791 00:42:51,920 --> 00:42:55,279 Speaker 3: those platforms haven't actually ever navigated a cycle, and so 792 00:42:55,680 --> 00:42:57,840 Speaker 3: it will be interesting to see how they react and 793 00:42:57,840 --> 00:43:00,960 Speaker 3: behave in the circumstances. Like just to kind of circle back, 794 00:43:01,040 --> 00:43:04,760 Speaker 3: I don't think the broader credit markets, both private and public, 795 00:43:04,840 --> 00:43:07,839 Speaker 3: are fundamentally broken. I think they just need to go 796 00:43:07,880 --> 00:43:10,640 Speaker 3: through a bit of a cathartic credit cycle process. I 797 00:43:10,640 --> 00:43:13,399 Speaker 3: think that's going to you know, separate the real week 798 00:43:13,440 --> 00:43:13,920 Speaker 3: from the shaft. 799 00:43:14,080 --> 00:43:17,640 Speaker 1: But it's more of a repricing, not a big collapse. 800 00:43:19,600 --> 00:43:24,439 Speaker 3: A repricing and a culling of of of the weaker herd. 801 00:43:24,560 --> 00:43:27,439 Speaker 3: I guess you would say credit credit markets or credit cycles, 802 00:43:27,480 --> 00:43:30,480 Speaker 3: I should say, and economic cycles are intentional in that 803 00:43:30,560 --> 00:43:35,520 Speaker 3: they tend to, you know, filter out companies, borrowers, you know, 804 00:43:35,560 --> 00:43:38,279 Speaker 3: people that really shouldn't be competitive, shouldn't have gotten the 805 00:43:38,360 --> 00:43:40,759 Speaker 3: breath of fresh air to continue to get financed or 806 00:43:40,760 --> 00:43:43,000 Speaker 3: to move forward. And we need a little that, we 807 00:43:43,000 --> 00:43:45,840 Speaker 3: need a little health on the local arsist in market. 808 00:43:45,960 --> 00:43:48,560 Speaker 1: You still trade seem to think that is pretty far off, 809 00:43:48,680 --> 00:43:53,800 Speaker 1: this this reckoning, and I'm wondering what might trigger it. 810 00:43:53,800 --> 00:43:55,480 Speaker 3: It's not so much that it's far off, that it's 811 00:43:55,560 --> 00:43:59,280 Speaker 3: early and that there's still a fair amount of credit 812 00:43:59,480 --> 00:44:02,640 Speaker 3: that needs to work through, you know, a balance sheet 813 00:44:02,680 --> 00:44:07,440 Speaker 3: right sizing or some sort of restructuring your organization, and 814 00:44:07,480 --> 00:44:09,680 Speaker 3: that could continue for multiple years. I mean, if you 815 00:44:09,880 --> 00:44:12,840 Speaker 3: just look at what historically has happened, it's typically not 816 00:44:13,040 --> 00:44:17,000 Speaker 3: until three or four years after you know, a bullish 817 00:44:17,080 --> 00:44:19,560 Speaker 3: credit issuing cycle. Do you see the stress and the 818 00:44:19,600 --> 00:44:22,319 Speaker 3: stress that comes out of that. And you know, we 819 00:44:22,320 --> 00:44:25,160 Speaker 3: were still in a very very rosy, very healthy environment 820 00:44:25,400 --> 00:44:27,919 Speaker 3: through twenty twenty four and even you know the first 821 00:44:27,920 --> 00:44:30,360 Speaker 3: part of twenty twenty five, and so you've got to 822 00:44:30,400 --> 00:44:32,640 Speaker 3: fast forward that tape two three four years down the 823 00:44:32,680 --> 00:44:36,560 Speaker 3: road to see, you know what those you know, situations 824 00:44:36,719 --> 00:44:39,960 Speaker 3: really what would become of them. And that's why I mean, 825 00:44:40,000 --> 00:44:41,520 Speaker 3: it's going to go on for a while. 826 00:44:41,360 --> 00:44:43,719 Speaker 1: So it's not going to happen over so to be clear, 827 00:44:43,719 --> 00:44:46,239 Speaker 1: then we're already in the default cycle. It's it's that 828 00:44:46,680 --> 00:44:49,560 Speaker 1: let's say, let's say five percent, and it's not going 829 00:44:49,600 --> 00:44:51,800 Speaker 1: to increase dramatically from there. It's just going to continue 830 00:44:51,800 --> 00:44:55,279 Speaker 1: at this fairly high rate. Yes, that's our view, and 831 00:44:55,320 --> 00:44:59,720 Speaker 1: that's across public and private. You think I believe so, yes, 832 00:45:00,719 --> 00:45:02,239 Speaker 1: I'm going to obviously put you on spot and say 833 00:45:02,239 --> 00:45:03,879 Speaker 1: how many years does it go on trade? 834 00:45:03,920 --> 00:45:06,880 Speaker 3: So yeah, look, I think we have at least a 835 00:45:06,920 --> 00:45:10,360 Speaker 3: couple more years of this to work through some of 836 00:45:10,400 --> 00:45:14,000 Speaker 3: the excesses. Where could we be wrong? You know, some 837 00:45:14,040 --> 00:45:18,040 Speaker 3: of this sort of fiscal stimulus bullus AI could be 838 00:45:18,160 --> 00:45:21,840 Speaker 3: a productivity boon that doesn't you know, sort of damage 839 00:45:21,840 --> 00:45:25,719 Speaker 3: employment and creates massive upside growth to the economy. And 840 00:45:25,760 --> 00:45:28,719 Speaker 3: that's somehow filters through the consumer and in that side 841 00:45:28,719 --> 00:45:32,560 Speaker 3: of circumstance, you know, could we be wrong and default rates, 842 00:45:32,640 --> 00:45:34,680 Speaker 3: you know, crash back down to one or two percent 843 00:45:34,800 --> 00:45:38,279 Speaker 3: and we're off to the races. Absolutely, But where we're 844 00:45:38,320 --> 00:45:41,200 Speaker 3: focused in the way that we're positioned for that it 845 00:45:41,560 --> 00:45:43,600 Speaker 3: may not be quite as juicy, but it's still not 846 00:45:43,840 --> 00:45:46,520 Speaker 3: a horrible thing. It certainly wouldn't be as healthy as 847 00:45:46,560 --> 00:45:48,759 Speaker 3: we're talking about. But that's I guess, how we could 848 00:45:48,800 --> 00:45:49,680 Speaker 3: be wrong with the situation. 849 00:45:50,440 --> 00:45:53,080 Speaker 1: Great stuff, Trey Parker with Sycamore Tree Capital Partners. It's 850 00:45:53,080 --> 00:45:55,000 Speaker 1: been a pleasure having you on the Credit Edge. Many thanks. 851 00:45:55,160 --> 00:45:56,799 Speaker 3: Thank you for having me. I appreciate it. 852 00:45:56,880 --> 00:45:59,000 Speaker 1: And to Phil Brendle of Bloomberg Intelligence, thank you very 853 00:45:59,080 --> 00:46:02,480 Speaker 1: much for joining us today. Thanks guys for even more analysis. 854 00:46:02,480 --> 00:46:04,759 Speaker 1: Read all of Phil's work on the Bloomberg Terminal. It's 855 00:46:04,800 --> 00:46:07,800 Speaker 1: great stuff. I've been reading it for years. Bloomberg Intelligence 856 00:46:07,840 --> 00:46:10,120 Speaker 1: is part of our research department, with five hundred analysts 857 00:46:10,120 --> 00:46:13,120 Speaker 1: and strategists working across all markets. Coverage includes over two 858 00:46:13,160 --> 00:46:15,479 Speaker 1: thousand equities and credits and outlooks on more than ninety 859 00:46:15,560 --> 00:46:20,280 Speaker 1: industries and one hundred market industries, currencies, and commodities. Please 860 00:46:20,320 --> 00:46:22,720 Speaker 1: who subscribe to the Credit Edge wherever you get your podcasts. 861 00:46:22,760 --> 00:46:25,680 Speaker 1: We're on Apple, Spotify and all other good podcast providers, 862 00:46:25,680 --> 00:46:29,280 Speaker 1: including the Bloomberg Terminal at the podco. Give us a review, 863 00:46:29,400 --> 00:46:32,359 Speaker 1: tell your friends, or email me directly at jcromb eight 864 00:46:32,480 --> 00:46:33,719 Speaker 1: at Bloomberg dot net. 865 00:46:34,560 --> 00:46:35,320 Speaker 3: I'm James Crombie. 866 00:46:35,320 --> 00:46:37,120 Speaker 1: It's been a pleasure having you join us again next 867 00:46:37,160 --> 00:46:54,560 Speaker 1: week on the Credit Edge.