WEBVTT - P&L: Former Acting Director of the CIA Discusses Russian Hack

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p L Podcast on iTunes,

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>SoundCloud and at Bloomberg dot com. Let's turn our attention

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>now to geopolitical events. Jack Divine joins us. He is

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>a founding partner and president of the ark And Group,

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.239
<v Speaker 1>also a member the Council and Foreign Relations. Also the

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>author of the book entitled Good Hunting, A Spy Master's Story,

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>and he's a spy hunter. I was going to let

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:50.559
<v Speaker 1>him tell us my masters. Yes please, Mr Divine, thank

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>you very much for being with us. I wanted to

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>let you describe a little bit of your thirty two

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>year career for the Central Intelligence Agency. No one's ever

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>done that. Asked me to sum up my career in

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>a minute, but I will. At the top of my career,

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>was responsible for all the what we would call spies

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>around the world. People in the business never referred them

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>as spies or agents, but I was the chief spymaster

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 1>at the highest point, I've served in seven foreign countries.

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't in charge of the program to drive the

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Russians out of Afghanistan with UH famous Congressman Charlie Wilson.

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 1>On the downside, I was drawn into reluctantly into the

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:32.639
<v Speaker 1>Iran country affair. I was in Chilly when I Yendi

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>was overthrown, and I was ahead to the counter narcotics

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 1>program with escobar bit the dust. So I've spent a

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:42.960
<v Speaker 1>long time. I've written to it, and UH, I'm passionate

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>about the intelligence business and the CIA. So you've got

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>a strong stomach for risk and for for potential of problems.

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering what you think about President elect Trump's recent

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:01.919
<v Speaker 1>stance on the c i A and on intelligence briefings.

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>He was quoted as saying, you know, I'm like a

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>smart person. I don't have to be told the same

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 1>thing in the same words every single day for the

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 1>next eight years. Do you think this poses a problem?

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's important to understand the really the breath

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>of CIA. It's not just producing analysis, it's it's collecting

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>information around the world, and it's an instrument of the

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:26.919
<v Speaker 1>president when he wants to get things done, um below

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the radar, and every president has used the CIA in

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that capacity up Dwight Eisenhower had three hundred covert action

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>operations and give you the sense of it. So I think, uh,

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a terrible mistake to disdain the CIA

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>as an institution and its people. It's very dangerous. Most

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>most presidents, at least UM find a way, uh not

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>to go head to head with the agency's people. We're

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>not talking about the elites, the senior people. We're talking

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 1>about people that grew up in institution. You have to

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:05.799
<v Speaker 1>be very careful. They're very professional, they're dedicated, and disdain

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>is about the worst thing that they tolerate. You have

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to watch the people don't head for the doors. They

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>do in business the best ones. So I think it's

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>ill timed. I understand why, um, the President elect Trump

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>may be dissatisfied with the intelligence he's getting. UM, there's

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>ways to fix that, make clear your your own your

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>own interests and priorities. But I think to walk away

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>from it or to disdain it, and this is really extraordinary,

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think it will turn out to be a

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>huge mistake, hopefully will be reset quickly. I mean, um,

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of professional people that I'm sure

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll will try to make some sense of this, but

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>this was, um, from my perspective, the biggest mistake on

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the national security arena, which doesn't bode well I think

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>for the the next couple of years this needs to

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>be straightened and quickly. Can you make sense or give

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>us some sense of your thoughts having to do with

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Russia and cyber attacks in the U S election and

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>so on. I mean, I think the first, I think

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the verse. First of all, we should say

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>that Putin is a product of the intelligence system, and

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>he was a KGB officer for over fifteen years. He

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>worked in the Eastern Germany when the great spy masters

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the East German Marcus Wolfe, he headed up the their

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:34.040
<v Speaker 1>version of the FBI. He has a mindset that understands

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:38.359
<v Speaker 1>intelligence and may understand some of the darker side, because

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the experience with Marcus wolf is really pretty black. So

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Russians would be hacking in to our

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>areas of policy and uh and of foreign and domestic

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>interest should be of no surprise. I mean, this is

0:04:57.160 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 1>what not only big powers do around the world, medium

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>and now small and even individuals do this. So the

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>fact that hacking is not the issue, and I I'm

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>surprised that we spend so much time on that question.

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>It's really whether you take that information and use it domestically.

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Now that is a shocker. Uh in the business. For

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>all the years I was in it, there were unwritten rules.

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>If yes, someone will give you different, different variations of

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>it's called the Moscow rules, in which we basically operated

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:32.160
<v Speaker 1>where we would not beat up their officers and they

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:34.839
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't beat up hours I put it in those youth,

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and we wouldn't counterfeit money, they wouldn't count there. There

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:40.479
<v Speaker 1>were rules of the game, and one of the rules

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of the game was not to interfere in the internal

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>politics of either country. And again you're not going to

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>find a treaty, no lawyers are attached to it um

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think this is a violation to that. If

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>in fact it turns out that the Russians not only hacked,

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>but more importantly use that inform trying to influence this

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 1>is a change in the game and we need to

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>We need to, I think, sit down privately in public

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>with the Russians and decide whether we're going to have

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>this new arrangement where we go after and try to

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:20.040
<v Speaker 1>influence internal affairs, big story, huge story, seismic shift and intelligence.

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>If indeed this has been done. The way that you're

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:27.719
<v Speaker 1>talking makes me think that the CIA and the KGB

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 1>have direct contact and discussions about the manners with which

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 1>they go about their business. Is that is that really

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the case? I think it evolves over over years. You

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>don't sit down and demarcate the the issues. But in

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>my own case, I not only random or the drive

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the Russians out of Afghanistan. Years later, I was the

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>guest of the KGB in Moscow in June of ninety one.

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 1>The government fell in August of ninety one. That had

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>to do with my presence there. But the point that

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I would make is, of course we've have relations to

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>deal with them. It's part of you know, how do

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>you have a a safety net so that you can

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>pick up the phone and call each other and uh

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and back off of something that mayby misinterpreted. So I

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>think that if there aren't communications today, they better reset

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>just real quick. Are you optimistic about the year ahead?

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Well you have to wait. I'm going to put out

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 1>my forecast and I would say I'm bullish on all right.

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Jack Divine, founding partner and president of the Arkin Group,

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>also UH the author of Good Hunting, a Spymasters Story.

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Jack is a thirty two year veteran of the Central

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence Agency, used to be the head of all the Spies.

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring in Hugh Johnson, chairman and c

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 1>i O of Hugh Johnson Advisors, who oversees more than

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>a billions of dollars. I want to get your view, Hugh,

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 1>on how exactly you're pricing in so many uncertainties that

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>are supposed to come together with some clarity perhaps next year. Uh.

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:32.439
<v Speaker 1>Most people are expecting it to be bigger growth expectations.

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Are you convinced are you all in on this narrative

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>that growth will just be on gangbusters run in the

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 1>US and that it's up from here for stocks and

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>down from here for government bonds? Can you can you

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 1>just tell that that Lisa covers the bond market very well?

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>She does, she does, And no, I think gangbusters is

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the word, that's the strong word, and that's a little

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>bit too strong. And when you take a look at

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:01.559
<v Speaker 1>the forecast for the economy, forecast for earnings, yeah, sure,

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>we might get something from the Trump bump. You're right,

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:08.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of uncertainty. There's uncertainty is to the magnitude.

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>There's uncertainty is to the timing. That makes it very

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>difficult to put together a sensible forecast for what's going

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 1>to happen in stock prices. But nevertheless, we're going to

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>get something in the order of a Trump bump, and

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't see that in a lot of forecasts right now.

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 1>That consensus is something like two point three percent growth

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>in the US economy two thousand and seventeen with a

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Trump bump or something I think is a reasonable expectation

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>of what's going to happen next year in the form

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>of obviously tax cuts and spending increases. And again the

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>timing is important, but what I think it's going to

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe move us up towards the at best two point seven.

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>You might get as high as two point nine. That's

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 1>going to make a difference for what earnings do in

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:54.679
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and seventeen. They might be a little bit

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>higher than You put it all together, and you say,

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 1>what's the case for stocks in the end, there is

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>you can make the case for stocks being where they

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 1>are and maybe being a little bit higher, but it's

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 1>very hard to do. Valuation is really an issue, even

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>if you include some forecast or some expectation of the

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump bump. We hold on a second, h Am, I

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:20.559
<v Speaker 1>hearing you correctly that you're basically bearished on stocks right now. No,

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 1>that's that's not correct, because that what I'm saying is

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 1>that it's all within the context of an ongoing bull market.

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>If you ask yourself, as the current stock market, economic

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 1>interest rate cycle alive and well, the answer is yes.

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump has essentially postponed the end of it, is given

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit new life to the economy. I think

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:43.959
<v Speaker 1>that we still have a ball market. It's going to

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 1>go through two thousand seventeen. The case through two thousand

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>eighteen becomes a little more difficult, but nevertheless positive bull

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 1>market environment. But within the context of that ball market environment,

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying we've gotten a little ahead of ourselves. I

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 1>guess is the way to say it a little bit pricey.

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.680
<v Speaker 1>So on a short intermediate term basis, you've got to

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>be really careful, careful because of valuation, and you've got

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:12.599
<v Speaker 1>to be really quite frankly tough on prices that you

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>pay to buy stocks. You're picking of entry points has

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 1>got to be extraordinarily good. At this point in the

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:21.679
<v Speaker 1>second we've had a big move on the upside, we're

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit pricey. You've got to be good at

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 1>picking entry points, and you have to be patient in

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 1>order to be good at entry points. Hugh Johnson SMP

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>is up nearly eleven so far during the year. Dal

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Jones Industrial Average up more than fourteen percent. Tell us

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 1>about financial stocks, do you think that is an area

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>that's going to do well in Yeah? You know him.

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>When you take a look at all of this, it

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>really looks really good. This has been one heck of

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 1>a year, surprisingly good, much better than any of us,

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>most of us anyway, had expected. So I think, you know,

0:11:57.400 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you're probably not going to get that big a year

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and two thousand and seventeen it might be positive, but

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to be in the order of ten

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>to twelve percent that we're seeing this year. We're not

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 1>going to see anything like that. And again, I think

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the reason I'm saying that, are concluding that is valuation.

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I can't put together enough earnings growth, uh in order

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:21.320
<v Speaker 1>to make the case for a real big move up

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:24.439
<v Speaker 1>in stock prices from current levels. Another way of getting

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>at that same thing and saying it is that you've

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:29.319
<v Speaker 1>got to be a really good stock picker, and you've

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>got to pick good entry points when you pick, if

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 1>you pick the right stock. So be a good stock picker,

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>be a good uh, be a good spector picker. Financials

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:40.199
<v Speaker 1>are going to do well, but you and I both

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 1>know they've had a big move to the upside. So

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>you've got to be a lot more careful now than

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you had to be, say, around election time. You know,

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>one thing that I'm innterested in is industrials. Industrials have

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:54.199
<v Speaker 1>done really well since Trump's election, and um in your

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>notes you said that that's one area that you're actually

0:12:56.520 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>bullish on going forward. What's the risk, especially at trade

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:04.960
<v Speaker 1>negotiations hit a heat up with China among other nations.

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 1>What's the risk that perhaps the industrial rally has gotten

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit ahead of itself, especially with companies like Caterpillar,

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>for example, which export quite a bit of goods to

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>China and could potentially suffer from trade a trade board there. Yeah,

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a big risk. So if there's a

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:26.840
<v Speaker 1>big risk that we're not it's very difficult to quantify

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that that faces us in two thousand seventeen, and I

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 1>might add two thousand eighteen, is is a whole risk

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>of trade. And anytime you're talking about a large multinational company,

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:40.200
<v Speaker 1>you're really talking about trade. You ask yourself the question,

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:43.440
<v Speaker 1>will geez you? Small and mid sized stock stocks that

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:47.560
<v Speaker 1>are not big multinationals have done really well performance wise

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>since the election. Large cap stocks is to some extent

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:53.440
<v Speaker 1>lagged a little bit. A lot of that is because

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>of the concern about what the direction that trade is

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:58.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna go. So you've really got to be careful based

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>on a couple of things. A big move up that

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>we've seen since the election, So we've got a couple

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>of valuation problems, some rhetoric coming out of a Trump

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>campaign saying that to look at the costs are too

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 1>high by a lot of defense companies, for example, and

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 1>so that that's a little bit of a problem, that's

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 1>a policy problem, and then the trade issue is is

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>could be a problem to all of this. When you're

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 1>looking at financials, when you're looking at healthcare, when you're

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 1>looking at technology, when you're looking at industrials, especially industrial infrastructure,

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>play be a little bit careful because we've had a

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 1>big move on the upside and we've got valuation problems

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>in my mind right now, and unless we see a

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>big outbreak in speculation, and that could that could occur.

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Uh in my judgment, you've got to be a little

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 1>bit if you're gonna be sensible, you've got to be

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit careful here and again be a good

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>stock picker and a good entry point picker. Well, I

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>guess if everyone could do that, everyone would have your job.

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>You Wouldn't that be great? I'd be great if I

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 1>could do it that. Well, Well, I think trying to

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>match a ten eleven present per and a challenge for anyone.

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Thanks very much. Hugh Johnson. He is the chairman and

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the chief investment officer of Hugh Johnson Advisers. They're based

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>in Albany, New York, and he helps to manage over

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>one point two billion dollars of customer assets. We've heard

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot about some big businesses that are having some

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>direct contact President elect Donald Trump, But what about the

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>smaller companies out there? To get a sense of what

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the landscape is for smaller businesses under a Trump presidency,

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring in Karen Mills, Senior Fellow at

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Harvard Business School and former Small Business Administrator Administration Administrator.

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Karen Mills, thank you for joining us. So what is

0:15:54.840 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>your base case outlook for small businesses under a Trump president? Well,

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>President elect Trump really has to step up his game

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>on small businesses because, as you said, there's been a

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of big business personalities coming in and out of

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>his um realm right now, and he is appointing a

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of folks that really have the big business sensibility.

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>So what we want to make sure is that there's

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>somebody at the table to represent small business. And he

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 1>has appointed a new s b A Administrator, but the

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>real trick is going to be to make sure that

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 1>that person has a voice in all the White House

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>economic discussions. Well, you're talking about Linda McMahon, right, and

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Lynda McMahon, co founder former chief executive of the professional

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>wrestling franchise w w E. I mean she doesn't seem

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>like a lightweight. Uh is that? Well done to second?

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>But but the s b A, right, I mean, it

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>has an office in just about like every state. I

0:16:57.080 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 1>think it's at least in more than one. UM. Do

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 1>you think that Linda McMahon and her business background will

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Speaker 1>be an asset to the people that depend on the

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:10.679
<v Speaker 1>s b A. Well. The good news is that the

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:15.160
<v Speaker 1>President elect kept the s b A in the cabinet

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and having a seat at the table is a really

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 1>important um role for the Small Business Administration. Every single

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:28.639
<v Speaker 1>new piece of legislation that's going to come up in

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 1>this administration has an impact on small business. Whether it's

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:39.120
<v Speaker 1>taxes or healthcare, or infrastructure or anything to do with trade.

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Those things are really part of the life blood of

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>small business. And financial reform, you have to make sure

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 1>that they still have access to loans. Karen, what's the difference?

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is a very basic question, but can

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 1>you give us a specific example of one area where

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:00.680
<v Speaker 1>a policy for small business would be different than a

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 1>policy that would benefit big business. Well, it's actually true

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:08.640
<v Speaker 1>all the way across the board. So let's start with healthcare.

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 1>In fact, there are a bunch of things in the

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 1>healthcare law that small businesses want. They actually want to

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:19.439
<v Speaker 1>provide healthcare for their employees, but the problem was that

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 1>they can't really even get a quote. If you have

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>five people and somebody gets sick, that's a big risk

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>for an insurance company. So they put new exchanges. You

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>can actually go to a shop exchange and get a

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>quote where your risk is pooled with everybody else's small business.

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's not five people, it's many thousands, millions of people,

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:45.639
<v Speaker 1>and that should give you a cheaper price. We don't

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:49.159
<v Speaker 1>want to throw that out in healthcare reform. In fact,

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that was put in by I think Olympius Snow was

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 1>put in by the Republicans. So we want to make

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:58.919
<v Speaker 1>sure that somebody's got that I on what small businesses

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:02.439
<v Speaker 1>need as things get done in this next congressional session.

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:05.639
<v Speaker 1>Right the Olympius know the Republican senator from from the

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:10.479
<v Speaker 1>state of Maine. It's s b A also a big lender. Right,

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 1>You've got the general small business loans, Uh, you've got

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>disaster loans, the micro loan project, and you've also got

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 1>real estate and equipment loans. You've got a big package.

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:25.159
<v Speaker 1>There is that something that the administrator directly oversees or

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>what role would they have in some kind of program

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 1>that oversees the loan program. The sp A has a

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:36.120
<v Speaker 1>portfolio of over a hundred billion dollars of loan guarantees.

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>They're not loans. The banks make the loans. It's actually

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of the perfect public private partnership Fannie Man Freddy

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Mac a little bit a little bit, and the guarantees

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 1>are made by the s b A in a case

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 1>where the bank can't quite make that loan. So this

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 1>means lots of people have access to credit who wouldn't

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:58.920
<v Speaker 1>otherwise in the banking system. Well, this is absolutely critical

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>for small businesses. And the gap and access to credit

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 1>right now is in the smaller dollar loans under a

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand. So when they go and look at Dodd Frank,

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 1>let's make sure to also keep the small business hat

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 1>on and make sure that whatever is done benefits those

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 1>who are going to make loans to the people who

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 1>need something under a hundred thousand dollars, because that's where

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the credit squeeze is real quick. Do you think that

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:29.639
<v Speaker 1>the rate hike that we're expecting tomorrow is going to

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:33.919
<v Speaker 1>have any specific effect on small businesses? Well, it's going

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to be more expensive tomorrow, and that's always a cost

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 1>for small businesses. Um. I know they're all looking for

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 1>now tax reductions coming what which might offset it? And

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the real important thing for small businesses is that the

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>economy keep going. So if they're spending an infrastructure, that's

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 1>good for small business and construction. But if the economy

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>UH doesn't do well in this next administration, that people

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 1>who get or the small business owners. Thank you for

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>being with us and coming in. Karen Mills is the

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:08.160
<v Speaker 1>former administrator of the SPA of the Small Business Administration

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 1>and also a senior fellow at the Harvard Business School.

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much for giving us your time. Thanks

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:26.440
<v Speaker 1>can subscribe and listen to interviews at iTunes, SoundCloud, or

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 1>whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm out

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:33.439
<v Speaker 1>there on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm out there on

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast. You

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:39.399
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.