WEBVTT - Mind Control, Part 1

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking, Taylor, and welcome to Forward Thinking, a podcast

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:17.079
<v Speaker 1>that looks at the future and says it's a long

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:22.040
<v Speaker 1>way to Tipperary. I'm Lauren Bocaba and I'm Joe McCormick,

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and today we're going to be starting the first part

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of a two part episode. Yeah, this is a topic

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:32.880
<v Speaker 1>so big it could not be contained within a single show.

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>And really we just kept finding notes, Like right before

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:37.919
<v Speaker 1>we came in here and sat down, we were like,

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 1>oh no, there's more, There's so much more. Well, it

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 1>is a somewhat mind bending topic, quite quite epic and

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>scope it turns out. But so to set the scene

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 1>for what we're going to talk about today, I want

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to have a little, a little mind experiment. All right, Okay,

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>think of yourself easy. I know it's easy for you

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>on that, but who I mean, think about what you

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 1>think When you think of yourself. There's sort of like

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:09.399
<v Speaker 1>a thing you have in your mind. It's your personality,

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>your traits, the things that the ways you would describe

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>yourself in your Okay Cupid profile. If you're being honest,

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess and if I'm no longer afraid of my wife.

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay um, But there's sort of a problem with playing

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>this game because we like to think of ourselves as

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:34.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of dependable and unchanging, like we are who we are,

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:37.399
<v Speaker 1>and we think each of our personalities is sort of

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 1>one fixed, eternal feature of the universe. There's there's Jonathan,

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and he's who Jonathan is. But deep down we sort

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 1>of all know it's not really like that, right, I mean,

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>human thought and behavior is sometimes disturbingly malleable. Yeah, So

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>to some extent, we can change what kinds of people

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>we are. You can form new habits and break old ones,

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and experiences you know, can change the way you would

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>react in any given situation. We can take steps to

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>change ourselves, and it's easy to see how since we

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>can change ourselves, we could probably also take steps to

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>change other people or have other people change us. Exactly right,

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 1>And so, like most other measurable phenomena in the world,

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:32.640
<v Speaker 1>deliberate methods of changing human thought and behavior are things

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:36.399
<v Speaker 1>that can be studied scientifically, and right now we might

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>not know a whole lot about this field, but we

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:41.919
<v Speaker 1>will probably know more and more as time goes on.

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:47.639
<v Speaker 1>So that brings me to today's topic, mind control. Yeah,

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>will it be a thing in the future? Is now

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>how reliable will the science of controlling human thought and

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>behavior become? Is this a thing that's good or bad

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>for humanity? I mean, obviously the sort of implication is

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that it's bad. But what what are all the ways

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>we could look at it? Um? And how's it going

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>to play out? Yeah? And this is something that I

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:20.639
<v Speaker 1>really enjoy reading about in science fiction because obviously, you know,

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>so many novels that warn us against this kind of stuff, right,

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of them are that really good dystopian

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of novel that's just so much fun to read. Yeah. Well, right,

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 1>because that's the ultimate type of oppression that's imagined in

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>in these dystopian futures. Right, It's not just that you

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:42.119
<v Speaker 1>are sort of physically constrained and imprisoned and threatened. It's

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>that your very sense of self is through. Yeah, it's

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the state. The state changes who you are, right, Right,

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>It's it's that you're physically constrained and you're happy about it. Yeah,

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>And you don't know not to be happy about it,

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 1>or why you would ever be unhappy about it. Yeah,

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>So says some examples as obviously anyone who has delved

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>into science fiction would be aware of these, but Orwell's

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>is a great example. Oh yeah, yeah, And this is

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>said in a society that is so steeped in propaganda

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 1>that that its citizens are trained in the art of

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:21.719
<v Speaker 1>double things, holding two contradictory thoughts at the same time,

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 1>also double belie and believing them both. And double think

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:28.720
<v Speaker 1>actually has a couple of different um um uses in

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the book. But for example, you might be told, uh that,

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>let's say that war means peace. Let's that's a simple example.

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 1>And in the classic sense of double thing, not only

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:45.719
<v Speaker 1>would you think that war means peace, but that eventually

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the concept of war would completely change, so that when

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you think the word war, you're thinking what of the

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 1>concept piece that that takes on the brand new meaning,

0:04:56.839 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and that it becomes the reality from that point for word.

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>So really it's about how this uh, this this despotic

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:12.160
<v Speaker 1>government really is defining reality and enforcing that reality among citizens.

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>And if you don't play along, you get in trouble.

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 1>And most people play along because you know, that's that's

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:21.279
<v Speaker 1>what they're told to do. They're they're kind of you know,

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>they're kind of just just cogs and a wheel at

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:27.359
<v Speaker 1>that point. And in fact there's also a UM and

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 1>a manufactured disparity between the highest of the highs and

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the lowest of the lows, where they're very small percentage

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:37.720
<v Speaker 1>of people are very very small percentage of people in

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:41.479
<v Speaker 1>the upper class, a slightly larger but still pretty small

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>percentage of people in the middle class, and then everyone

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:47.480
<v Speaker 1>else and the main characters in UM sort of the

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the the upper class in a sense like kind of

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the in the middle class slash upper class area UM.

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 1>And things do not go well for him. But then

0:05:56.880 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>we also have Anthony Burgess's clockwork R. Right, So there

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you've got this kind of sense of at least seemingly

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 1>benevolent mind control. Right. It's implemented as a crime reduction initiative. Essentially,

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>they take a young man who is by all accounts

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:19.599
<v Speaker 1>not a nice guy, so he is truly reprehensible. Yeah,

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>but they do some techniques on him. I think it's

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a combination of of drugs and then behavioral conditioning. It's

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>a version therapy to force him to have a very

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 1>visceral negative reaction to any form of violence. Yeah, Essentially,

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>all the things that he absolutely adored when he was

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 1>on his own, uh, and could be the free, willing

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:46.039
<v Speaker 1>sociopath that he was have now turned into triggers to

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:50.839
<v Speaker 1>make him feel feel violently ill, even so, going so

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>far as the music that he used to love, which

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>is actually that's kind of the breaking point for him

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:59.159
<v Speaker 1>is not so much the violence as his inability to

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 1>choose to be violent, but the music has been taken

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 1>from him as well. And Uh, what's interesting to me

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>about this book is that the American version, for the

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>longest time, left off the final chapter um chapter one,

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 1>so it into a chapter twenty where the main character,

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Alex regains his ability to make choices to be a terrible,

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>terrible person. And so it's kind of left up to

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the reader to one wonder whether or not it was

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>better to remove his ability to choose to be evil, thus,

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of removing part of his humanity. Uh.

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>And no, or and that way he could not commit wrong,

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Or was it better to allow him the ability to

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>commit wrong, knowing that that was a potential outcome. Uh? Yeah,

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>that that old question of whether without the capacity to

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to do evil, anyone can ever truly be good? Yeah,

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>And so chapter one negates that question. Chapter twenty one,

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Alex grow was up and essentially Burgess at this point

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>was kind of like, you know, people grow out of it.

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, you can be a sociopathic teenager, but eventually

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>you mature and then you realize, oh, I was kind

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>of a jerk, and so I don't know if you

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>grow out of just driving around murdering people. That's what

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that's what chapter one says. Well, that's that's why I

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of prefer chapter the one that does not have

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 1>chapter twenty one in it um And because of that reason,

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and uh so then we've got Altis Huxley's Brave New World.

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>And the reason I group these three togethers all three

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>deal with a world in which the government is trying

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to impose a particular order in the world. And in

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:45.679
<v Speaker 1>this case, you've got a government that I'm actually an

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:49.080
<v Speaker 1>entire society that's evolved to the point where everything is

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>predetermined for everybody. So as soon as as you have

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:59.199
<v Speaker 1>a fertilized egg, then genetic test determined where that fertilized

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>egg is going to end up within that society, whether

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>it will be a uh in their cast system, whether

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>it will be in the upper casts or lower casts.

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Lower casts are actually genetically and chemically altered so that

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>they have a limit to the amount of intelligence that

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 1>they can have. Their their physical capabilities are limited as well,

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 1>and so it's a very restrictive world. And uh and

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>again we the the character's journey is one of discovery

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>about how the world that they didn't know was oppressive,

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:37.439
<v Speaker 1>how oppressive it actually was. Yeah. So yeah, the main

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>characters in Brave New World that they might live a

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>very sort of like placid and comfortable existence in a way,

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>but that it could be seen as without having the

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>true vitality of life. And they sort of discover the

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>romantic worldview, right right, the passion of being able to

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>completely mess yourself up. Yeah. Yeah, but of course we

0:09:57.280 --> 0:09:59.959
<v Speaker 1>don't have systems like this in the real world. I mean,

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:02.439
<v Speaker 1>you might get some people out there saying, like, no, man,

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>we're living in nineteen eight four. Come on, open your eyes, people. Well,

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>we don't really have like like full mind control methods

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:18.560
<v Speaker 1>bearing down on us, especially not ones that are deliberately

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>controlled and studied. We we have culture, and one could

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>in fact look at culture as an elaborate mind control method,

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:32.199
<v Speaker 1>but it's something that arose naturally out of you know,

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>just human behavior over hundreds of years, not not a

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 1>deliberate and scientifically informed attempt to control how people in

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:42.959
<v Speaker 1>various regions of the world would think. That's what our

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 1>vampire overlords want you to think. Well, there's also, of course,

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the the the attempts to manipulate that culture, to actually

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>leverage elements of that culture in order to get public

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 1>opinion thinking one thing or an other. So it's it's

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>while it's true that the uh, the cultural element is

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 1>is certainly more prevalent than any kind of science fiction

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 1>attempt to control people on individual basis, that cultural element

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>is something that not only are we aware of, but

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 1>we try to exploit and by we I mean various

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>various humans, not just not not just me. Now, there

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>are whole fields of study outside of Jonathan Strickland that

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:33.079
<v Speaker 1>are devoted to figuring out, you know, how to influence

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 1>actions and decisions, either to to make the stuff that

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>we have more efficient for us to use, or to

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, profit businesses that want to sell us stuff yep,

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>or profit governments that want to sell us ideas well.

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Exactly right. I think that's one of the reasons that

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:53.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking at the most old fashioned forms of

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:57.239
<v Speaker 1>mind control and sort of the science of influencing behavior

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 1>and thought and emotion and opinion, one of the first

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 1>places to look is advertising and propaganda. And really the

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>two are so hand in hand related, I mean in

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 1>many many ways. So propaganda will will start with that,

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and that's defined as usually biased or misleading information used

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:22.599
<v Speaker 1>to sway public opinion on a matter. It's not necessarily misleading,

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>like could it be propaganda if it if it doesn't

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>say any facts that aren't true, it could certainly be

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>propaganda by presenting true facts but not presenting all the facts,

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean propaganda misleading It can't You could argue it's misleading, yes,

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:40.839
<v Speaker 1>And you could argue also that biased doesn't necessarily mean nefarious,

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:43.440
<v Speaker 1>but it does mean that there is. You don't use

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>propaganda for an unbiased reason. That the bias is why

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the propaganda exists in the first place. Right, you're selling

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>an idea, and in order to do that, that means

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that you have a side already. Right, You're not like

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 1>war might or might not be good. You decide that's

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 1>not propaganda or least not effective propaganda. Wouldn't that be

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 1>great if that was like how all the campaign commercials

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:07.319
<v Speaker 1>worked as it was, like, you know, here are some candidates,

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, make up your own mind now I

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>want apparently beautiful. It could be great to have a

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:15.200
<v Speaker 1>parallel universe where everything, like everything when it comes to

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:18.079
<v Speaker 1>public relations and and propaganda and all that sort of

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:23.319
<v Speaker 1>stuff is just incredibly unbiased and mediocre. Just see how

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>far that world gets along at any rate. Uh, this,

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 1>this idea has been around for a while, guys. It's

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>not the word propaganda really got got going in the

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 1>early twentieth century, but the concept of using this means

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of communicating to a people that have a common base

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of knowledge and a common set of interests dates back

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>to ancient times. Yeah. Well, I mean, look at any

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 1>ancient Mesopotamian carving or something you know, like or depicting

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 1>like one of the rulers of ancient Egypt or something

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:01.680
<v Speaker 1>like that. It's propaganda. It's there to show you how

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>powerful and glorious this leader is, sure and not necessarily

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>there to give you an accurate recounting of the facts

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 1>of history. Well, and to be fair, also, you know

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to find this on a lot of

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>civilizations that didn't have that common set of knowledge. If

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the peoples were scattered so much, then it just the

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>communication to the people was something that was necessary for

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>propaganda to work. Right, Well, you don't need propaganda if

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't have a centralized body of government. That's that's true.

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>But you also don't need propaganda if I mean, you

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>can't have propaganda if you can't directly, in some way

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>communicate with your people. So ancient Greece is a great example.

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 1>The Athenians were subjected to propaganda and things like theatrical

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>productions or religious festivities. Also even just athletic games, the

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>things like the Olympics could become propaganda for Greece. But

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 1>beyond the ancient world, you know, we get into kind

0:14:56.680 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of a more oh, I don't know, deliberate a aproach

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 1>to propaganda then simply hey, we're great, and those other

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>guys over the hill over there, they're not so great.

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>You get to the time of Philip the second of

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Spain and Queen Elizabeth of England. They had a little

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>propaganda war about thing called the Spanish Armada. Spain was like,

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>look how awesome our armada is, and never actually said

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 1>by the way, we were completely defeated in that totally,

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>you know they were. They never acknowledged it in Spain

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>at the time anyway, whereas in England, in fact, I

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>think it was Sir Walter Raleigh who later on wrote

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>that he was disgusted by how Spain had presented the

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Spanish Armada to the Spanish population as if the defeat

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and had never happened. Whereas I'm thinking, like, you know,

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 1>come on, Queen Elizabeth, she was pretty savvy on the

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 1>ways of communicating to the English public as well, so

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 1>gone the other way, I'm pretty sure the England would

0:15:57.000 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>be like, oh, we totally whatever, he has a little tiff,

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>would you? Would you argue that at some point like

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>like Shakespeare was a propagandist, you know, he certainly was

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>in a way because the reason he wrote the Scottish

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>play was we're not in theater you can you can say,

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>all right, all right? When he wrote the Thane of

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Cawdor's play, um, when he wrote Macbeth, he he made

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>sure to do a couple of things. First of all,

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 1>that's when James the First was now King of England.

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>He wanted to make his line look good. Yeah, So

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>in the line of King's presentation in Macbeth. The Last

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>King was thought, at least in scholarship, to have held

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>up a mirror and pointed it toward King James, to

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>suggest that James himself is the descendant on this line

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>that ends up taking over for Macbeth. Also, the play

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 1>was very short compared to most of Shakespeare's plays, partly,

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 1>at least according to scholarship, due to the fact Shakespeare

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>had heard that James the First had a short attention span,

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and also it had which isn't it which James the

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:06.439
<v Speaker 1>First was really interested in? So in many ways it

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 1>was probably or I can't tell if you're kidding, Is

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 1>this a known thing? James the First was into witches.

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>He was into which is probably the wrong way of

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 1>putting it. He was very much against them, fascinated by them.

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps you could say terrified. Perhaps it's another way. I mean,

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:26.159
<v Speaker 1>of course, this is a very early part of James

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the First reign. And he wasn't into witches like I'm into,

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:31.959
<v Speaker 1>which now he was. He wasn't watching the craft at

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 1>two am every night. Okay, it's not like you, Joe, Okay, sorry, man,

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I almost thought that James and I had something going there. Yeah. Well,

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>so when we think of propaganda these days, obviously our

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 1>our opinions are very much influenced by what that meant

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:50.160
<v Speaker 1>in the first half of the twentieth century. World War

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>one and two in Europe. Yeah, great in Britain in particular,

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>forged to the modern idea of propaganda during the early

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>months of the Great War as it was called then,

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 1>or World War One as we know, the war to

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>end all wars accepted totally didn't accept it, did not

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>at all. Yeah. The Uh, the British government first cut

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 1>off Germany's oceanic communication cables, meaning that they would lag

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:14.679
<v Speaker 1>behind in in getting news and and to press and

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:18.120
<v Speaker 1>supporters over in the United States, which was huge. Um.

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>And then in September of nineteen fourteen, remember that war

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:24.120
<v Speaker 1>had only broken out in July of that year. Uh,

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the British government set up Wellington House, which was the

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 1>secret organization that called upon journalists to write things that

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:33.479
<v Speaker 1>were sympathetic to the British cause and also published its

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:37.679
<v Speaker 1>own newspapers, eventually in eleven different languages, with a circulation

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of like five hundred thousand copies per issue. Crazy amounts

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of stuff being put out there. The Chinese language version

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:48.120
<v Speaker 1>is credited by some historians as influencing public thought enough

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>that that China was able to declare war against Germany

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and not have a revolt on its hands. And the

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 1>general idea of Wellington House was was to create publications

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 1>that seemed like they were grassroots not governmental, um Like

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:08.119
<v Speaker 1>they were published by local commercial publishers instead of government

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:11.360
<v Speaker 1>owned presses, and and the materials were circulated not by

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>government officials but by like local opinion makers. Yeah, we

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:17.920
<v Speaker 1>see this come up again and again, not just in

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>in government propaganda, but in other means of trying to

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>sway public opinion. And one of the big ones is

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 1>let's try and make sure it looks like it's coming

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 1>from quote unquote real people and not not a voice

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 1>of authority. That way, it doesn't seem authoritarian. It seems

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 1>like a genuine ups you know, upwelling support for whatever

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 1>idea it happens to be. It's like, why, you know,

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>an advertiser might want to give some of their stuff

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:47.639
<v Speaker 1>to a celebrity to where instead of like having a

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:51.440
<v Speaker 1>spokesperson say you should wear our product, Yeah, if you give,

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>if you give Michael Jordan's your shoes. Then suddenly kids

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:56.640
<v Speaker 1>like the shoes. Well, it looks like he's just authentically

0:19:56.760 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 1>enjoying these shoes, which maybe he is. Maybe he's holding

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:02.359
<v Speaker 1>the shoes up to his face and going, I really

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:06.160
<v Speaker 1>enjoy these. Yeah, you know, but that certainly is exploiting

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>something that they perceived about the way we form opinions

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 1>like that, that they picked up on the fact that

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 1>people are less likely to have their mind influenced by

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>something that they recognize as coming from a government source. Right,

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:23.120
<v Speaker 1>And and you would still get information from government sources

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:26.399
<v Speaker 1>as well, and like posters, things and songs, all this

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:29.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff that would be either uh sponsored by

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the government or promoted through the government. And that wasn't

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:35.640
<v Speaker 1>just in the u. K. Over in the United States.

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 1>On we had our own version of the Wellington House.

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>On April thirteen, nineteen seventeen, President Woodrow Wilson formed the

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Committee on Public Information. That sounds so innocuous and boring.

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Its to be like it sounds like it it almost

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>is like two steps away from one of the departments

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 1>in Yeah, it really does. The Committee on Public Information

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that would be called like the Committee for Public Truth. Yeah,

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>which I said two steps away right. Uh. So he

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:05.959
<v Speaker 1>put George Creel in charge. And Creel was a journalist.

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:09.199
<v Speaker 1>Some called him a muckreaker. Um, he was also a

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 1>proponent of free speech. He said, you know, free speech

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:17.200
<v Speaker 1>was really important, and obviously censorship from public uh sources

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>like government sources was completely wrong, and he did he

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 1>disagreed with it. However, since he was then put in

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 1>charge of this department, it became kind of his job

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>to at least filter stuff, if not outright censor it.

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:32.919
<v Speaker 1>In effect, there were quite a few times where they

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:36.119
<v Speaker 1>would tell people like, you should really not publish this story.

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 1>It would look bad, and they were trying to drum

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 1>up the government was trying to drum up support from

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the American public to get involved in World War One,

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:46.879
<v Speaker 1>which was not a popular idea at the time, to

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 1>send people overseas to fight someone else's war, which would

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 1>become another issue went during World War Two. So part

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of it was this idea of let's publish the stories

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:03.120
<v Speaker 1>that are going to help support public opinion to get

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 1>involved and downplay the ones that would not support it.

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things that came out about this

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>is kind of the idea that we see over and

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>over again with propaganda, which is, if you can control

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the flow of information to a people so that they

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>only get one side of the story, then obviously it's

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be easier for you to sway a public

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:24.880
<v Speaker 1>opinion in support of that. If they're not, if not

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>getting the full story, then any decision they make is

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be based upon a limited set of information. Sure,

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 1>that's ostensibly why countries like like China don't allow full

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>access to the Internet, or North Korea, which is probably

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I would say North Korea has got this down pat

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>with with as far as propaganda goes. Yeah, But one

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>thing we can say about propaganda in this period, and

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 1>even a lot of propaganda today, is that a lot

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:55.400
<v Speaker 1>of it is still not what I would call necessarily

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 1>scientifically informed. It's in a lot of cases, I don't

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 1>think that they researched, like what would be the most

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>effective way to get people to think the way I

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 1>want them to think that they just kind of intuitively sense,

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:12.360
<v Speaker 1>like you don't want people hearing bad things about the leadership.

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:15.640
<v Speaker 1>What's funny is that a lot of research actually has

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>gone into this, although from sources that would seem unusual.

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:23.160
<v Speaker 1>For example, one of the people who was working at

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the cp I was a guy by the name of

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Edward Burnet's. Yeah he was. He was really good people

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 1>thinking what he wanted them to think. Well, I guess

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 1>we should transition then to talking a little bit about

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Edward Burnet's and maybe the the overlap between propaganda and advertising,

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 1>how how that creates this mass mind control effect. Yeah,

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 1>so he was not just someone who worked in propaganda.

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>He worked in public relations. You could argue that it's advertising,

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:56.880
<v Speaker 1>but really it was pr He his job. He saw

0:23:56.920 --> 0:23:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it as he would be hired by companies to help

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>them do whatever they did more effectively by convincing the

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>public that whatever that company did was awesome. Sure. Sure,

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 1>he was born, let us say, in Vienna, in although

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:13.479
<v Speaker 1>his family did move to the United States when he

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:15.679
<v Speaker 1>was just a baby. I think he was like one

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 1>year old. And his uncle, interestingly enough, was one Sigmund Freud. Yeah,

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 1>it's not that interesting an uncle. I saw where you

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>were going a mile away and I approved, sir. Yes.

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>So Freud obviously very influential to to Berne's. Bernice's was

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:39.439
<v Speaker 1>Depending upon whom you read, Some people say, well, he

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 1>was a genius because he was able to study psychology

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and sociology and then incorporate those ideas directly into a

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:50.639
<v Speaker 1>practical approach. When it came to pr other people said, no,

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>he was more of a guy who could just cut

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and paste cool ideas that a lot of other people

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:56.679
<v Speaker 1>would come up with and just put them together in

0:24:56.720 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>a new format that was really effective. So again, in

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 1>my mind, that's still genius either way. He was real effective. Yeah.

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:08.199
<v Speaker 1>So here's some stories about ways he was able to

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>change public opinion. And the first one is probably the

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>most famous that he's associated with, which was getting women

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to smoke uh in public, specifically Lucky Strike Cigarettes. So

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Lucky Strike Cigarettes had hired him saying, we want to

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:26.120
<v Speaker 1>sell more cigarettes, and he was looking around at the

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 1>potential markets, and one large untapped market was females. And

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 1>it's because well, a couple of reasons. One the biggest

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:37.679
<v Speaker 1>one is the social stigma that was against women smoking

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>in public. It was considered vulgar. Sure, sure, And and

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 1>this I we should put in was in the nineteen twenties. Yeah, yeah,

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 1>And uh. There's also, by the way, a series of

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:51.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff they don't want you to Know videos that explains

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:53.920
<v Speaker 1>all of the things that Bernet's got up to, which

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 1>I highly recommend you check out. But the the the

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 1>other issue, slightly more um frivolous, I would say, is

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:05.399
<v Speaker 1>that the color green, which is what the Lucky Strikes

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:09.879
<v Speaker 1>packaging was, it was the dark green color that it

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>was not seen as fashionable, and therefore women were less

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>likely to purchase them even if they did. I'll see

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:21.479
<v Speaker 1>that smoking in public Wasn't this this stigmatized activity. I

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:24.480
<v Speaker 1>don't quite get that there was a time when just

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 1>green was out. Yeah, he just was not. It was

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 1>not a thing. So he did, he did. His His

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 1>attack was multi pronged. One of those was to get

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 1>people to change their opinion about the color green, and

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 1>so he started to He started to uh chat with

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>some of his buddies who were fashion designers, people like

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 1>people who were designing fashions in France and convincing them

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:50.920
<v Speaker 1>to add green into the fashion lines for the following season.

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 1>So the Parisian fashions that were coming out were incorporating

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>this color of green. So suddenly green was seen as

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a very fashionable color. But that still doesn't he still

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't still doesn't address the other problem right about women's sing.

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 1>But luckily there was this whole women's suffragate movement. There

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>was the whole women's live thing you know that needed

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to that was picking up steam, and he thought, Hey,

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:22.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to leverage this, this movement to work to

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:27.160
<v Speaker 1>my benefit. He ended up convincing several women who were

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:31.680
<v Speaker 1>involved in the women's liberation movement to organize a march

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 1>while smoking lucky Strikes cigarettes as a way of saying

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 1>they were they were. Um, there was like kind of

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 1>an empowerment uh symbol, right, the idea that the women

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:46.399
<v Speaker 1>were the equals to men, that they could do the

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:49.200
<v Speaker 1>same things men could do, including smoking in public. Yes,

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 1>do what you want to get cancer, whatever you want.

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:56.440
<v Speaker 1>And they were even calling them torches for freedom, that's

0:27:56.480 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 1>what the cigarettes were being referred to as. And this

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:04.919
<v Speaker 1>domination really helped swing things so that women were buying

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 1>cigarettes and smoking in public. And you could argue that

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 1>in part it helped change some public perception of women.

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 1>But and it got him smoking. So it's not like

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:19.359
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not like it's a win win all around. Um.

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>But that's not the only thing he's responsible for. Like

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:27.640
<v Speaker 1>there are other big, big things, like big cultural level things.

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Are you saying Berne's is the reason that bacon isn't

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:34.360
<v Speaker 1>a sometimes food. Berne's is the reason that He's I'm

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 1>not saying he's the reason that bacon has now become

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 1>an all the time's food. That really has to do

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 1>with Brooklyn, New York. No, it has to do with

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 1>bumper stickers and stupidity. It started with hipsters and ended

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>up kind of boiling out from there, So I'm going

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to the source there. But yeah, no, Bernie's. Bernie's was

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>he was hired by a company that, among other things,

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 1>produced bacon, and they wanted to be able to sell

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>more bacon, so he ended up writing as as the

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff they don't want you to know, episode says a

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 1>carefully worded letter to about five thousand doctors asking what

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 1>would be more healthy for people, a hearty breakfast or

0:29:14.560 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 1>a light breakfast. As far as I know, he didn't

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 1>actually use the word bacon in either of those. Then

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 1>then he said, um where he launched a public relations

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 1>campaigns in four thousand five posicians agree that a breakfast

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 1>hearty breakfast of bacon and eggs is best for you,

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and ended up and creating this market for bacon to

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 1>become a breakfast food in the United States. The reason

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that we eat bacon for breakfast here in the US

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 1>is Edward Berney's. That's it. So the things he was

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 1>that he started to do have become essentially the the

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 1>like to do list for PR firms these days. So

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 1>he actually sort of had a something approaching a more

0:29:55.760 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 1>scientific methodology for figuring out how to change people's minds

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:01.760
<v Speaker 1>about I don't know what you eat for breakfast or

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 1>when you should smoke cigarette. He was he was looking

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 1>at things that tended that would tend to influence people

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and then try to leverage those so for things like

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>an expert opinion that would be something that could end

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 1>up influencing someone. So he would look for experts or

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 1>spokespeople who would end up lending legitimates legitimacy to whatever

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 1>claims he was making. Right, I'm sure you've seen those

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 1>old commercials that some of them are on YouTube now

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 1>with more doctors smoke camels Healthier for your Love. It

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 1>just makes me think that that Burnet's would have like

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 1>run circles around Don Draper. I mean, it's just like

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 1>there was there would be no hope for Draper against Burns. Yeah, yeah,

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and it was. It was really so brilliant because he

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 1>wasn't really marketing particular branded products or even particular brands.

0:30:48.280 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 1>He was marketing opinions and feelings and urges and concepts. Yeah,

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and he was creating word of mouth campaigns, which again

0:30:56.840 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 1>goes back to what we were saying before with governments

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 1>about the legitimacy seems to come from the fact that

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a grassroots approach as opposed to something that's

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 1>top down. If it looks like it's bottom up, people

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 1>tend to think, oh, well this, uh, this, this is

0:31:11.680 --> 0:31:14.160
<v Speaker 1>something that people really do care about, something I should

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 1>care about one way or the other. It's I think

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the same reason you see so many companies today trying

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 1>to get like hashtags going on Twitter like get people

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to participate, and why that's so often is just a miserable,

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:31.120
<v Speaker 1>embarrassing failure. Yeah, it's so crude. Uh if if you're

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 1>lifting it up next to next to what Bernese was doing,

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 1>because if you say to someone, hey, be interested in

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 1>our product with this keyword, then you're you're ruining the

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 1>entire experiment. Yeah, yeah, you're showing your hands. It's it's

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 1>very rare when a brand can go out there and

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and start using a hashtag effectively, it does happen, but

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 1>it's far more common that we see these things rise

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 1>up because maybe there are a couple of notable personalities

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 1>who use it and then it spreads from there. Occasionally,

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>it's an event that happens and then something that is

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>uh directly tied to that event becomes like the zeitgeist

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:11.440
<v Speaker 1>for whatever that is. Um. Anyway, getting back to Burne's

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 1>he actually wrote a book about his methodology. He called

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 1>it Crystallizing Public Opinion, and um, it was reprinted back

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:22.720
<v Speaker 1>in I think, but he comes across as a little

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 1>uh condescending, essentially saying that the public are dumb and

0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 1>they need to be led. I mean, really, it is

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 1>very much in that are pretty dumb. What do we

0:32:33.720 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 1>need to? Yeah, And I feel like if I were

0:32:37.200 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 1>standing next to Edward Burnet's I would be like, man,

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm a more on crap. I don't know that i'd

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 1>feel dumb, but I would certainly be like, I'm not

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even baking anymore. I haven't even baken in

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 1>a long time anyway, But that's not the point. So uh,

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Apart from that one day. But that was a slip.

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 1>So then there was also the the another book he

0:32:57.200 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 1>wrote called Propaganda, in which he made the case for

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the manipulation of public opinion as a necessary component of democracy.

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Of democracy, but you can't have democracy unless you first

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 1>tell the people what they need to vote on and

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 1>why they need to vote that way, I'm oversimplifying. No, no no, no,

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>but I mean, but I totally believe that that's okay,

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a thing. Well, you can look at it in

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a certain kind of way by saying, uh, a democracy,

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 1>if it is working properly, is only as good as

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:31.720
<v Speaker 1>its people. And if you have people in a properly

0:33:31.760 --> 0:33:37.040
<v Speaker 1>functioning democracy who widely hold very bad opinions, then you're

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:41.240
<v Speaker 1>going to end up with very bad government. Yeah, it's

0:33:41.400 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely a tricksy subject. Yes, but Bernet's was not

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the only person who is working in in this kind

0:33:51.880 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 1>of sticky ideological matter around those times. Um, I wanted

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 1>to talk for a moment about Diamond. I know, because

0:34:01.640 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 1>you love talking about I do. I do. If you

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:07.600
<v Speaker 1>have either watched brain stuff or listened to stuff they

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 1>don't want you to Nose podcast, then you may have

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:14.080
<v Speaker 1>heard me talk about diamonds before. But but basically so

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:17.480
<v Speaker 1>diamonds are the engagement ring stone of choice because of

0:34:17.520 --> 0:34:21.759
<v Speaker 1>a marketing campaign created by de Beers, which is that cartel.

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 1>If you so choose, you could say vertical diamond mining,

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 1>slash accrediting slash distribution corporation. You can say monopoly, you

0:34:29.520 --> 0:34:33.400
<v Speaker 1>could say monopoly. Any of those words are probably valid. Uh.

0:34:33.480 --> 0:34:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Around around the nineteen thirties, the demand for diamonds was falling.

0:34:38.120 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 1>They were seen as a luxury that the average person

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:44.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't need, and they were no longer a true rarity

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 1>since the discovery of really huge deposits of them in

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 1>South Africa. UH. Only about ten percent of engagement rings

0:34:51.719 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>around that time. Moore Diamonds and so Beers, which had

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:58.840
<v Speaker 1>all of these diamonds, was like, hey, n w A

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:02.400
<v Speaker 1>or ad agency, can you launch us a multimedia campaign

0:35:02.400 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 1>that will push diamonds onto the fingers of some of

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:07.719
<v Speaker 1>brides in the United States By the two thousand's, that's

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:10.080
<v Speaker 1>actually probably not what they said, but that's what ended

0:35:10.200 --> 0:35:14.799
<v Speaker 1>up happening. Um the uh uh. And we are not

0:35:14.840 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the only country where that occurred. You know. Back in

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the early days, there were fashion columns that were written

0:35:22.239 --> 0:35:26.799
<v Speaker 1>by an agency representative that we're not reported as being

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:29.600
<v Speaker 1>written by an agency representative, that we're pushing diamonds. They

0:35:29.920 --> 0:35:34.680
<v Speaker 1>had these these loner programs to get jewelry onto the

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:37.879
<v Speaker 1>rich and the famous for big socialite events where these

0:35:37.920 --> 0:35:40.960
<v Speaker 1>photographs would be published in newspapers or uh, you know,

0:35:41.000 --> 0:35:43.800
<v Speaker 1>whenever Marilyn and Row was wearing diamonds in a movie,

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:48.920
<v Speaker 1>they were probably loaned to her from de Beers. M Simultaneously,

0:35:49.120 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 1>they started educating the public to increase the demand for

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 1>more expensive diamonds. Those four cs are completely a de

0:35:57.000 --> 0:36:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Beers and w Air collaboration. Um. Simultaneously, they were also

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:06.640
<v Speaker 1>propagating the idea that diamonds should never be resold. Thus

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:10.839
<v Speaker 1>they were maintaining the demand for new diamonds. Um. It's

0:36:10.840 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 1>completely insidious. And if you would like to hear a

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:16.279
<v Speaker 1>very long history on that, well done, very long. I

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:18.800
<v Speaker 1>mean it's long enough, it's long enough to cover the territory.

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 1>It's you can check out stuff they don't want you

0:36:24.239 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to to nose. A podcast episode from February seventeen of

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:35.880
<v Speaker 1>this year being it's a good podcast, uh looking ahead

0:36:35.960 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 1>because now we've you know, obviously World War two propaganda

0:36:39.280 --> 0:36:41.600
<v Speaker 1>was huge. And obviously we live in an era of

0:36:41.640 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 1>advertising today where we are constantly surrounded by ads, whether

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:50.719
<v Speaker 1>it's in billboards or in video or an audio, or

0:36:50.840 --> 0:36:54.400
<v Speaker 1>on our clothing or yeah, there's it's it's everywhere, to

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the point where actually their entire people whose whose jobs

0:36:57.640 --> 0:37:01.120
<v Speaker 1>depend upon How can we get over advertising blindness where

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:05.279
<v Speaker 1>people have developed an immunity to certain types of advertising

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:09.279
<v Speaker 1>They just don't even it doesn't even register with them anymore. Uh,

0:37:09.560 --> 0:37:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Looking ahead, like what's the future of propaganda? I found

0:37:14.360 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 1>an interesting interview with a guy named Sean Gorley who

0:37:17.640 --> 0:37:19.520
<v Speaker 1>did a TED talk back in two thousand nine, and

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:23.200
<v Speaker 1>his sense talked about this couple of times. Um, he's

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:26.360
<v Speaker 1>a data analysis expert, and it was talking about in

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the future, we'll see governments participate in propaganda through social

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:33.040
<v Speaker 1>media conversations, which makes perfect sense. We're just talking about

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:36.080
<v Speaker 1>how the approach of you know, making this a grassroots

0:37:36.120 --> 0:37:40.839
<v Speaker 1>kind of approach benefits the adoption of certain ideas and

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:43.600
<v Speaker 1>whether you're trying to sell, you know, a line of

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:48.759
<v Speaker 1>clothing or sell the idea of a big political policy.

0:37:49.160 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh well, it totally makes sense. I mean you will

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 1>see politicians that, for example, have a Twitter account or

0:37:56.000 --> 0:37:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a Facebook account. I mean pretty much all of them

0:37:58.040 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 1>do now, at least in the United States that I'm

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:02.640
<v Speaker 1>whereof it. It's rare that you encounter a politician who

0:38:02.680 --> 0:38:05.759
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have those things, um. And then they have followers,

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:08.279
<v Speaker 1>of course, who are people who they can count on

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to be ideologically and perhaps even just culturally or socially

0:38:14.200 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 1>uh in line with them, and then they can selectively

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:20.680
<v Speaker 1>report the things they want to report on their feed

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:23.960
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook and say like, hey, here's a news item

0:38:24.040 --> 0:38:26.759
<v Speaker 1>that's flattering to me and the things I support, and

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:29.759
<v Speaker 1>then they know that their followers will share that with

0:38:29.800 --> 0:38:33.279
<v Speaker 1>their friends and comment on it positively. It's a very uh,

0:38:33.360 --> 0:38:36.799
<v Speaker 1>it's a very productive venue, we might say, right. And

0:38:36.840 --> 0:38:40.399
<v Speaker 1>it gets even creepier than that, because gord Lee's point

0:38:40.480 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 1>was that we can use data analysis to identify trends

0:38:45.080 --> 0:38:47.880
<v Speaker 1>before they really take off. So let's say, for example

0:38:48.480 --> 0:38:52.279
<v Speaker 1>that Lauren, you're a politician, and let's say that the

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:56.040
<v Speaker 1>data analysis has shown that there is an uh a

0:38:56.200 --> 0:38:59.840
<v Speaker 1>growing but not huge public opinion that is counter to

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:04.640
<v Speaker 1>your strategies, it's counter to your philosophy. What am I

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:06.680
<v Speaker 1>going to do about it? And through it that analysis

0:39:06.680 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 1>you discover the best ways to create counter stories, to

0:39:10.120 --> 0:39:13.880
<v Speaker 1>insert them into the conversation and thus head this off

0:39:13.920 --> 0:39:17.399
<v Speaker 1>before it becomes a big trend. So it's the same

0:39:17.440 --> 0:39:22.040
<v Speaker 1>idea as creating counterintelligence or counterpropaganda that has dated back

0:39:22.120 --> 0:39:26.239
<v Speaker 1>ever since we started talking about propaganda, but doing so

0:39:26.320 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 1>on a on a scale that's much more um precise

0:39:30.680 --> 0:39:33.920
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that you are you're detecting these things

0:39:33.960 --> 0:39:37.960
<v Speaker 1>before they even become noticeable on a wide scale basis.

0:39:38.480 --> 0:39:43.200
<v Speaker 1>So you're actually talking about using big data to examine

0:39:43.239 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 1>things like public opinion and be able to try and

0:39:46.000 --> 0:39:49.839
<v Speaker 1>influence it before it becomes like a conscious part of

0:39:49.880 --> 0:39:54.759
<v Speaker 1>the public conversation. Yeah, and because so much of our

0:39:54.800 --> 0:40:00.120
<v Speaker 1>activity takes place on platforms that are largely public, not

0:40:00.200 --> 0:40:02.759
<v Speaker 1>all of us do obviously, but if you happen to

0:40:02.800 --> 0:40:07.200
<v Speaker 1>have a publicly readable Twitter feed or a publicly readable

0:40:07.280 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Facebook page or some other social platform, then that information

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:17.880
<v Speaker 1>can be gleaned by a device that really like a

0:40:17.920 --> 0:40:21.439
<v Speaker 1>web crawler that's looking for keywords to start doing things

0:40:21.440 --> 0:40:24.279
<v Speaker 1>like data analysis to see what kind of opinions are

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 1>coming up and how best to either either encourage those

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:31.640
<v Speaker 1>opinions or suppress them. You know, another thing, I can

0:40:31.680 --> 0:40:37.160
<v Speaker 1>see very much is personalized propaganda like so like personalized

0:40:37.360 --> 0:40:41.919
<v Speaker 1>advertising exactly. Yeah, I mean yeah, much the same way

0:40:41.920 --> 0:40:45.359
<v Speaker 1>that the ads you get on Facebook or determined by

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:48.120
<v Speaker 1>what some kind of algorithm has figured out you might

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:51.839
<v Speaker 1>be interested in. Boy, are they way off too. They

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:57.080
<v Speaker 1>can probably also figure I've gotten some really I've gotten

0:40:57.080 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 1>some bizarre ones that I've gotten some very sharp ones

0:40:59.120 --> 0:41:02.160
<v Speaker 1>as well. Yeah, but I'm sure that they will be

0:41:02.200 --> 0:41:04.440
<v Speaker 1>able to also figure out, Hey, you know, we can

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:06.640
<v Speaker 1>do some tests and figure out that people who have

0:41:06.840 --> 0:41:10.879
<v Speaker 1>these same seven interests that you do are much more

0:41:10.920 --> 0:41:16.320
<v Speaker 1>strongly affected by X type of propaganda than by Y approach. Sure, yeah,

0:41:16.360 --> 0:41:19.400
<v Speaker 1>it can be, you know, especially like they look at activity.

0:41:19.640 --> 0:41:22.719
<v Speaker 1>Let's take Facebook, for example, the things that you've hit

0:41:22.840 --> 0:41:25.359
<v Speaker 1>like versus the things that you you know, you might

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:30.160
<v Speaker 1>have looked at but you didn't really Then that could

0:41:30.239 --> 0:41:32.920
<v Speaker 1>end up giving more information. I mean, there's a lot

0:41:32.960 --> 0:41:36.759
<v Speaker 1>of data there. I mean, just assuming that someone Let's

0:41:36.800 --> 0:41:40.280
<v Speaker 1>just take Facebook itself for example. Let's say that Facebook

0:41:40.280 --> 0:41:44.279
<v Speaker 1>actually looks at how long things typically stay in your

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:47.520
<v Speaker 1>view when you are active on Facebook, which they do

0:41:47.560 --> 0:41:50.280
<v Speaker 1>They know which which stories you are looking at versus

0:41:50.280 --> 0:41:52.799
<v Speaker 1>which ones you're just scrolling past. They know how to

0:41:52.880 --> 0:41:55.800
<v Speaker 1>serve that stuff up to you, and they know how

0:41:55.840 --> 0:41:59.560
<v Speaker 1>long you're looking at your ex's profile they do. They

0:41:59.600 --> 0:42:02.919
<v Speaker 1>know what there you've clicked through news articles, clicked through

0:42:02.960 --> 0:42:05.440
<v Speaker 1>to news articles, I should say, And so this kind

0:42:05.440 --> 0:42:08.480
<v Speaker 1>of stuff can shape how they present information to you.

0:42:08.560 --> 0:42:12.319
<v Speaker 1>Everything from just making Facebook more effective, which you could

0:42:12.400 --> 0:42:15.360
<v Speaker 1>argue is, oh, well, that's okay, because we want whatever

0:42:15.400 --> 0:42:19.440
<v Speaker 1>we're using to be the best experience possible to presenting

0:42:19.480 --> 0:42:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the kinds of stuff you are most likely to act

0:42:21.680 --> 0:42:24.920
<v Speaker 1>upon in an advertising capacity. So the ways that Facebook

0:42:24.960 --> 0:42:26.920
<v Speaker 1>would make money, you know, the the fact that you

0:42:26.920 --> 0:42:30.160
<v Speaker 1>would be more likely to click on this stuff that, which,

0:42:30.680 --> 0:42:33.319
<v Speaker 1>depending on your point of view, either benefits everyone or

0:42:33.520 --> 0:42:36.360
<v Speaker 1>is super creepy, right, because it either means that you

0:42:36.440 --> 0:42:39.200
<v Speaker 1>are going to not waste your time on stuff that

0:42:39.280 --> 0:42:42.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter to you and maybe you'll discover things that

0:42:42.120 --> 0:42:44.680
<v Speaker 1>actually do matter to you. But on the other hand,

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:49.680
<v Speaker 1>it's like, well, Facebook's telling me what I should like. Now. Ideally,

0:42:50.320 --> 0:42:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I know that I'm always going to be encountering propaganda, advertising, etcetera.

0:42:55.080 --> 0:42:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm never going to avoid that, and it's not like

0:42:57.200 --> 0:43:00.200
<v Speaker 1>that's going to go away. I don't think we're going

0:43:00.239 --> 0:43:03.120
<v Speaker 1>to have a future where magically everyone says, you know what,

0:43:03.200 --> 0:43:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to try to get people to do

0:43:05.000 --> 0:43:06.759
<v Speaker 1>the things I would like them to do. That's just

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:08.960
<v Speaker 1>that's not going to happen. So not unless you go,

0:43:09.160 --> 0:43:11.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, totally off the grid, right yeah, yeah, if

0:43:11.960 --> 0:43:14.239
<v Speaker 1>I end up getting a log cabin someplace and just

0:43:14.320 --> 0:43:17.880
<v Speaker 1>cut ties with everybody, which I don't think I could do.

0:43:18.040 --> 0:43:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not good at chopping wood. So the the key

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:25.040
<v Speaker 1>here is that you want to get as much access

0:43:25.080 --> 0:43:28.760
<v Speaker 1>to as many different sources of information as possible, knowing

0:43:28.800 --> 0:43:32.120
<v Speaker 1>that everyone has their agenda, even if it's something like

0:43:32.160 --> 0:43:35.880
<v Speaker 1>their agenda is to try and create an unbiased objective approach.

0:43:36.239 --> 0:43:39.239
<v Speaker 1>We're humans, so sometimes that just doesn't happen, and not

0:43:39.360 --> 0:43:43.200
<v Speaker 1>even on a conscious basis, But our ability to access

0:43:43.600 --> 0:43:46.279
<v Speaker 1>as many different sources of information as possible at least

0:43:46.320 --> 0:43:50.279
<v Speaker 1>gives us the opportunity to have as close to an

0:43:50.320 --> 0:43:54.759
<v Speaker 1>objective view as possible. So that that's something that some

0:43:54.880 --> 0:43:57.440
<v Speaker 1>of us have the luxury of because we live in

0:43:57.480 --> 0:44:00.400
<v Speaker 1>a place where we can have understricted access to formation,

0:44:00.600 --> 0:44:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and we furthermore have the type of lifestyle that allows

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:06.640
<v Speaker 1>us to spend time perusing that sort of information exactly.

0:44:06.640 --> 0:44:09.359
<v Speaker 1>So we're doubly privileged in that sense. But then you

0:44:09.440 --> 0:44:11.520
<v Speaker 1>also have to take into account that human beings can

0:44:11.560 --> 0:44:15.439
<v Speaker 1>be really lazy, and since we're lazy, then it means

0:44:15.480 --> 0:44:19.279
<v Speaker 1>that we also have a responsibility to overcome that laziness

0:44:19.280 --> 0:44:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and seek this stuff out because it's it's it's just

0:44:22.600 --> 0:44:26.160
<v Speaker 1>as possible to have a society a culture that has

0:44:26.360 --> 0:44:30.319
<v Speaker 1>free access to all this stuff at least on you know,

0:44:30.400 --> 0:44:34.239
<v Speaker 1>on one level, like a hypothetical level, but through practice,

0:44:34.520 --> 0:44:37.200
<v Speaker 1>no one bothers to do it, and so you end

0:44:37.280 --> 0:44:39.920
<v Speaker 1>up you don't have to worry about them accessing multiple

0:44:40.080 --> 0:44:44.240
<v Speaker 1>sources of information. You can send out whatever messages you want. So, um,

0:44:44.280 --> 0:44:46.120
<v Speaker 1>just something to keep in mind. I think I think

0:44:46.160 --> 0:44:48.640
<v Speaker 1>most of our listeners are probably the type who goes

0:44:48.640 --> 0:44:51.440
<v Speaker 1>seeking information from as many sources as possible just to

0:44:51.719 --> 0:44:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, get a really good view of what's happening.

0:44:54.600 --> 0:44:56.600
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't mean that you agree with all of them

0:44:56.680 --> 0:44:59.920
<v Speaker 1>or any of them. Even I would be disturbed if

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:02.839
<v Speaker 1>you agreed with information from all of your sources. Yeah,

0:45:03.280 --> 0:45:07.000
<v Speaker 1>that would be back to double think again. Yeah, but

0:45:07.080 --> 0:45:09.279
<v Speaker 1>I think we're we're pretty much wrapping it up for

0:45:09.320 --> 0:45:13.080
<v Speaker 1>this first part here, but you should definitely tune in

0:45:13.200 --> 0:45:15.319
<v Speaker 1>next time because next time we're going to get into

0:45:15.320 --> 0:45:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the crazy territory of persuasive technology, moral enhancement. When is

0:45:20.920 --> 0:45:25.160
<v Speaker 1>it maybe right to use mind control? What color makes

0:45:25.200 --> 0:45:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you do things? Yes, all of that and more in

0:45:29.080 --> 0:45:32.240
<v Speaker 1>our next episode. And yeah, it's some really interesting stuff

0:45:32.280 --> 0:45:34.600
<v Speaker 1>that I did not know before I started researching for

0:45:34.600 --> 0:45:38.400
<v Speaker 1>for these episodes about what specifically people are doing to

0:45:39.040 --> 0:45:44.640
<v Speaker 1>use these are modern technologies to propagate propaganda. Yeah, and

0:45:44.719 --> 0:45:47.719
<v Speaker 1>to just in some cases just try to make the

0:45:47.719 --> 0:45:50.040
<v Speaker 1>world a better place, but that kind of that kind

0:45:50.040 --> 0:45:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of approaches. Who's idea of better? Yeah? Yeah, you know

0:45:54.360 --> 0:45:59.080
<v Speaker 1>not all not all pigs are equal? Wait what I

0:45:59.160 --> 0:46:00.919
<v Speaker 1>guess all pigs are cool, but some are more equal

0:46:00.960 --> 0:46:06.600
<v Speaker 1>than others. Which there you know, different orwell same idea? Sure? Yeah,

0:46:07.160 --> 0:46:11.280
<v Speaker 1>why that wasn't What about bacon? Okay I'm getting confused?

0:46:11.480 --> 0:46:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Or well, if you want to get in touch with this,

0:46:15.520 --> 0:46:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you can s where I was gonna go. Yeah, you

0:46:17.680 --> 0:46:19.320
<v Speaker 1>can let us know. You can say us an email.

0:46:19.320 --> 0:46:22.239
<v Speaker 1>Our address is fw thinking at how Stuff Works dot com,

0:46:22.400 --> 0:46:25.400
<v Speaker 1>or drop us a line on Facebook, on Twitter, or

0:46:25.480 --> 0:46:27.759
<v Speaker 1>on Google Plus. A Twitter and Google Plus. We are

0:46:27.880 --> 0:46:30.759
<v Speaker 1>f w Thinking. Just search fw thinking on Facebook we'll

0:46:30.760 --> 0:46:33.240
<v Speaker 1>pop up. Do you have any suggestions for future episodes?

0:46:33.280 --> 0:46:35.840
<v Speaker 1>You've got comments, you get questions, send those to us.

0:46:35.920 --> 0:46:37.680
<v Speaker 1>We look forward to hearing from you, and you'll hear

0:46:37.719 --> 0:46:45.759
<v Speaker 1>from us again. For more on this topic in the

0:46:45.840 --> 0:46:58.920
<v Speaker 1>future of technology, visit forward thinking dot Com, brought to

0:46:59.000 --> 0:47:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you by Toyota. Let's Go Places,