1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:02,920 Speaker 1: Brought you by Bank of America Mary Lynch. Investing in 2 00:00:03,000 --> 00:00:07,840 Speaker 1: local communities, economies and a sustainable future. That's the power 3 00:00:08,080 --> 00:00:12,360 Speaker 1: of global connections. Mary Lynch, Pierce Fenner and Smith Incorporated 4 00:00:12,760 --> 00:00:27,400 Speaker 1: Member s I p C. Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. 5 00:00:27,840 --> 00:00:31,520 Speaker 1: I'm Tom Keene with David Gura. Daily we bring you 6 00:00:31,560 --> 00:00:36,600 Speaker 1: insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations. 7 00:00:37,000 --> 00:00:41,600 Speaker 1: Find Bloomberg Surveillance on iTunes, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot Com, and 8 00:00:41,680 --> 00:00:49,120 Speaker 1: of course on the Bloomberg fur Badholds, who joins is 9 00:00:49,159 --> 00:00:51,360 Speaker 1: now in our Bloomberg eleven three oh studios. He's the 10 00:00:51,400 --> 00:00:53,760 Speaker 1: chief US economist at the Undo Credit Group. Great to 11 00:00:53,800 --> 00:00:56,040 Speaker 1: have you here with us. Let's start with what I 12 00:00:56,080 --> 00:00:59,200 Speaker 1: just mentioned there. There had been such optimism, enthusiasm for 13 00:00:59,200 --> 00:01:01,320 Speaker 1: stuff getting done in Washington, d C. It seems like 14 00:01:01,320 --> 00:01:04,600 Speaker 1: we've reached a pivot point here where there's some realism, 15 00:01:04,640 --> 00:01:07,120 Speaker 1: some skepticism, perhaps that this isn't going to happen, at 16 00:01:07,160 --> 00:01:09,679 Speaker 1: least not as fast as many thoughts. Yeah, maybe it's 17 00:01:09,680 --> 00:01:13,040 Speaker 1: more it's more realism right now. I mean, I still 18 00:01:13,040 --> 00:01:14,920 Speaker 1: think that what the market is really waiting for is 19 00:01:14,920 --> 00:01:16,600 Speaker 1: a big text card so I mean, to be honest, 20 00:01:16,600 --> 00:01:18,560 Speaker 1: the market does not care so much about the healthcare 21 00:01:18,600 --> 00:01:21,680 Speaker 1: bill as many many Americans, you know, for global financial 22 00:01:21,680 --> 00:01:24,720 Speaker 1: markets that if it's Obamacare or any other healthcare system, 23 00:01:24,880 --> 00:01:27,400 Speaker 1: they couldn't care less. But they know that the new 24 00:01:27,440 --> 00:01:30,360 Speaker 1: administration basically set up the sequencing. They first want to 25 00:01:30,760 --> 00:01:34,160 Speaker 1: repeal or replace Obamacare and then continue with the tax cuts. 26 00:01:34,319 --> 00:01:36,440 Speaker 1: So of course there's a ripple effect. If the healthcare 27 00:01:36,560 --> 00:01:39,960 Speaker 1: bill does not pass Congress, then that may have negative 28 00:01:40,680 --> 00:01:43,520 Speaker 1: negative consequences as well for the timeline of the tax cuts. 29 00:01:43,600 --> 00:01:46,560 Speaker 1: And so from that perspective there is more realism. They 30 00:01:46,560 --> 00:01:49,360 Speaker 1: are looking at it more and a bit more skeptic 31 00:01:49,400 --> 00:01:53,440 Speaker 1: away and and wonder I don't think whether we do 32 00:01:53,520 --> 00:01:56,120 Speaker 1: get a text cut at all. But when Yeah, there's 33 00:01:56,160 --> 00:01:59,320 Speaker 1: a fascinating piece on the Bloomberg yesterday about the order 34 00:01:59,360 --> 00:02:02,960 Speaker 1: of operation here. Uh, you know, they're their political motivations 35 00:02:02,960 --> 00:02:06,080 Speaker 1: for doing the Affordable Care Actor repeal first, but it 36 00:02:06,160 --> 00:02:08,760 Speaker 1: sort of laces the groundwork for tax reform. There are 37 00:02:08,760 --> 00:02:10,799 Speaker 1: elements their tax cuts in this particular bill, and I 38 00:02:10,800 --> 00:02:12,520 Speaker 1: think there's a lot of political concerned that if this 39 00:02:12,560 --> 00:02:15,240 Speaker 1: couldn't get through, that would mean the rest of the 40 00:02:15,240 --> 00:02:18,919 Speaker 1: presence agenda would have trouble as well. As you look 41 00:02:18,960 --> 00:02:20,880 Speaker 1: at this process, player, what does it tell you about 42 00:02:20,880 --> 00:02:24,720 Speaker 1: the prospects for a tax reform. Well, first of all, 43 00:02:25,240 --> 00:02:27,760 Speaker 1: it shows the disc the disconnect, and I think I 44 00:02:27,840 --> 00:02:32,679 Speaker 1: think globally investors have to understand the the different dynamics 45 00:02:32,720 --> 00:02:36,160 Speaker 1: of US politics compared to to to what global investors 46 00:02:36,200 --> 00:02:38,040 Speaker 1: look at. I mean, we we have seen during the 47 00:02:38,040 --> 00:02:40,639 Speaker 1: election that there are topics much more important for US 48 00:02:40,720 --> 00:02:43,200 Speaker 1: voters than they may be for for international investors. And 49 00:02:43,240 --> 00:02:46,720 Speaker 1: as I said, UM, for many Republican voters, for almost 50 00:02:46,760 --> 00:02:51,280 Speaker 1: all Republican voters, UM, this Obamacare has been really a 51 00:02:51,360 --> 00:02:52,840 Speaker 1: red flag and they want to get rid of it. 52 00:02:52,880 --> 00:02:54,960 Speaker 1: And that's why it's politically important, I think for the 53 00:02:55,000 --> 00:02:57,720 Speaker 1: Republican Party to deliver, because I mean they have been 54 00:02:57,919 --> 00:02:59,960 Speaker 1: they have been if you want, benefiting over the lad 55 00:03:00,040 --> 00:03:02,120 Speaker 1: us now six years. I think since the two thousand 56 00:03:02,120 --> 00:03:06,400 Speaker 1: ten mid term election from Obamacare, UM and I have 57 00:03:06,480 --> 00:03:09,920 Speaker 1: been able to to really against this gain gain voters. 58 00:03:09,960 --> 00:03:11,960 Speaker 1: So that's that's why it's so important for them to 59 00:03:11,960 --> 00:03:15,040 Speaker 1: to do it first, to fulfill the pledge to their voters. Plus, 60 00:03:15,040 --> 00:03:18,200 Speaker 1: as you correctly pointed out, Obamacare has some text relevant provisions. 61 00:03:18,560 --> 00:03:20,840 Speaker 1: So in other words, if if they, if the Republican 62 00:03:21,160 --> 00:03:24,280 Speaker 1: administration would get the text reforms through, simplify the text code, 63 00:03:24,280 --> 00:03:25,720 Speaker 1: and then a couple of months later, all of a 64 00:03:25,800 --> 00:03:28,440 Speaker 1: sudden the Catillec text and other things kick in. You 65 00:03:28,680 --> 00:03:31,720 Speaker 1: all of a sudden make it more complicated. Um, I think. 66 00:03:32,360 --> 00:03:34,000 Speaker 1: And and now they have said they want to do 67 00:03:34,040 --> 00:03:35,840 Speaker 1: it first, they need to deliver because they can say, 68 00:03:35,880 --> 00:03:37,520 Speaker 1: you know, we we we changed the plan. Right now 69 00:03:37,760 --> 00:03:39,640 Speaker 1: they can't do so they have to come up with 70 00:03:39,640 --> 00:03:42,960 Speaker 1: with healthcare. And you just wrote a great piece I'm manufacturing, 71 00:03:43,040 --> 00:03:45,080 Speaker 1: really really smart, with a lot of theory to it. 72 00:03:45,520 --> 00:03:48,200 Speaker 1: Let me cut to the chase. Is it finally time 73 00:03:48,280 --> 00:03:51,920 Speaker 1: for a national policy and manufacturing? If we're going to 74 00:03:52,000 --> 00:03:55,839 Speaker 1: develop a little Switzerland or a big Switzerland with all 75 00:03:55,840 --> 00:03:58,880 Speaker 1: the politics and Mr Trump going out and saying I'm 76 00:03:58,920 --> 00:04:04,200 Speaker 1: creating jobs Bologni, Do we finally need a labor policy 77 00:04:04,320 --> 00:04:08,000 Speaker 1: to boost manufacturing jobs? Do you mean big Switzerland as 78 00:04:08,000 --> 00:04:14,120 Speaker 1: at Germany? Yeah? That would be Sorry why you're helping 79 00:04:13,800 --> 00:04:16,560 Speaker 1: get out of this? No, I completely agree, but I 80 00:04:16,560 --> 00:04:19,680 Speaker 1: wouldn't not necessarily call it manufacturing policy because you know, 81 00:04:20,480 --> 00:04:22,920 Speaker 1: I think, what what the US really needs is a 82 00:04:22,960 --> 00:04:25,920 Speaker 1: system of getting the education, house and order. We always 83 00:04:26,040 --> 00:04:28,800 Speaker 1: I always come back to that. Um. There's of course 84 00:04:28,920 --> 00:04:32,080 Speaker 1: a group, a relative small group of the population being 85 00:04:32,160 --> 00:04:35,080 Speaker 1: extremely well educated. But if you look at the broad masses, 86 00:04:35,120 --> 00:04:37,640 Speaker 1: there is some room for improvement, to say politely, so 87 00:04:37,680 --> 00:04:39,880 Speaker 1: I think that is where the government needs to step in. 88 00:04:40,080 --> 00:04:42,240 Speaker 1: And then you can also think about the the system 89 00:04:42,279 --> 00:04:45,360 Speaker 1: of people may leave after middle school that is very 90 00:04:45,360 --> 00:04:48,200 Speaker 1: often happens in Germany, and then you go to a company, 91 00:04:48,279 --> 00:04:51,039 Speaker 1: do an apprenticeship, and then you just you continue going 92 00:04:51,080 --> 00:04:52,839 Speaker 1: to school, but you learn only the stuff that you 93 00:04:52,880 --> 00:04:56,760 Speaker 1: need for your job. You get specialized experts for your field. 94 00:04:56,760 --> 00:04:59,920 Speaker 1: And I think that's an important reason why countries like 95 00:05:00,040 --> 00:05:03,280 Speaker 1: Switzerland or Germany or some other countries are doing so 96 00:05:03,400 --> 00:05:07,560 Speaker 1: extremely well. They produce high quality stuff and that justifies 97 00:05:08,360 --> 00:05:11,360 Speaker 1: them too, um to get relatively high priced in the 98 00:05:11,400 --> 00:05:13,840 Speaker 1: global market. Because let's face it, the US is an 99 00:05:13,880 --> 00:05:16,680 Speaker 1: expensive country with a high GDP per capita, so the 100 00:05:16,760 --> 00:05:19,480 Speaker 1: uys will never compete on a price basis whereas many 101 00:05:19,520 --> 00:05:21,760 Speaker 1: of the other global players, and it has to produce 102 00:05:21,880 --> 00:05:23,960 Speaker 1: high quality stuff and that for that you need a 103 00:05:24,040 --> 00:05:26,680 Speaker 1: very well educated workforce. Why haven't we seen the apprenticeship 104 00:05:26,720 --> 00:05:28,640 Speaker 1: model here. That was certainly something that was discussed at 105 00:05:28,640 --> 00:05:31,680 Speaker 1: the White House and Chancellor we sat where the President 106 00:05:31,760 --> 00:05:37,600 Speaker 1: excuse me, I spoke with. I spoke with Mark belly 107 00:05:37,600 --> 00:05:39,040 Speaker 1: Off of Salesforce, who was at a meeting at the 108 00:05:39,040 --> 00:05:41,360 Speaker 1: White House before that, that joint press conference with those 109 00:05:41,400 --> 00:05:44,160 Speaker 1: two leaders. It's something that he champions. He thinks he's 110 00:05:44,160 --> 00:05:46,480 Speaker 1: happening within his company and should happen more. Why why 111 00:05:46,640 --> 00:05:48,120 Speaker 1: is it not a phenomenon that's caught on here in 112 00:05:48,120 --> 00:05:49,800 Speaker 1: the US. Yeah, I really don't know. I mean I 113 00:05:49,960 --> 00:05:51,560 Speaker 1: I read a little bit about it as well. Some 114 00:05:51,600 --> 00:05:54,320 Speaker 1: people say, well, that's because the labor market is not 115 00:05:54,400 --> 00:05:56,520 Speaker 1: as strict as in in Germany. And German you basically 116 00:05:56,520 --> 00:05:58,680 Speaker 1: have the system if you do an apprenticeship in the company, 117 00:05:58,880 --> 00:06:01,160 Speaker 1: you stay there until you're higher, so kind of it's 118 00:06:01,160 --> 00:06:03,640 Speaker 1: an investment from the company side initially and it pays off, 119 00:06:03,839 --> 00:06:06,560 Speaker 1: pays back for the company over the next three or 120 00:06:06,600 --> 00:06:09,520 Speaker 1: four decades. In the US, obviously, the system is very different. 121 00:06:09,720 --> 00:06:11,800 Speaker 1: You were very often employed at will. So if you 122 00:06:11,880 --> 00:06:15,279 Speaker 1: do that apprenticeship, the company invests in you and then 123 00:06:15,400 --> 00:06:17,279 Speaker 1: you get then you get a better offer from somebody 124 00:06:17,279 --> 00:06:20,200 Speaker 1: else you leave. So maybe the the incentive for companies 125 00:06:20,200 --> 00:06:22,880 Speaker 1: to offer something like that on an individual basis if 126 00:06:22,880 --> 00:06:25,440 Speaker 1: you want is very limited. For that reason, we would 127 00:06:25,480 --> 00:06:29,760 Speaker 1: need something institutionalized so that everybody participates. So then you know, 128 00:06:29,839 --> 00:06:33,320 Speaker 1: then the incentive for one company it's as big as 129 00:06:33,360 --> 00:06:36,039 Speaker 1: for the other one because you have fluctuations. But maybe 130 00:06:36,080 --> 00:06:37,360 Speaker 1: at the end of the day you still end up 131 00:06:37,360 --> 00:06:39,240 Speaker 1: with well trained people. So it has to come from 132 00:06:39,240 --> 00:06:42,440 Speaker 1: the top tom asks about policy. We hear so little 133 00:06:42,440 --> 00:06:45,360 Speaker 1: about automation, and you have a startling chart in your 134 00:06:45,400 --> 00:06:49,960 Speaker 1: most recent chart book looking at UH divided by education 135 00:06:50,040 --> 00:06:52,400 Speaker 1: level of education, if you're at a lower level of education, 136 00:06:52,440 --> 00:06:54,560 Speaker 1: if you've been in secondary school, saying that's it. It 137 00:06:54,640 --> 00:06:56,479 Speaker 1: sort of like a forty nine percent chance that your 138 00:06:56,560 --> 00:06:59,120 Speaker 1: job could be automated. Why are we not hearing more 139 00:06:59,160 --> 00:07:01,120 Speaker 1: about that and how real is that threat? I think 140 00:07:01,120 --> 00:07:03,880 Speaker 1: we are hearing indirectly because that I so I wrote 141 00:07:03,960 --> 00:07:06,159 Speaker 1: last year a piece about robots because I wanted to 142 00:07:06,240 --> 00:07:08,920 Speaker 1: educate myself. So that's what's part of the results. And 143 00:07:08,960 --> 00:07:12,520 Speaker 1: I think I think we are hearing about the people 144 00:07:12,520 --> 00:07:15,120 Speaker 1: losing the jobs to the losers of technological progress. By 145 00:07:15,120 --> 00:07:18,280 Speaker 1: looking at the polls, I think Mr Trump, Brexit, all 146 00:07:18,320 --> 00:07:20,680 Speaker 1: the polls that we see in Europe is is the 147 00:07:20,760 --> 00:07:24,480 Speaker 1: result of some of these losers of globalization and technological 148 00:07:24,520 --> 00:07:27,480 Speaker 1: progress having been left on their own for too long. 149 00:07:27,560 --> 00:07:29,880 Speaker 1: I think we're seeing it. And the chart that that 150 00:07:29,960 --> 00:07:31,840 Speaker 1: you quoted is actually from an O C. D study, 151 00:07:31,840 --> 00:07:34,320 Speaker 1: and I was just happy to use the numbers. We 152 00:07:34,440 --> 00:07:36,120 Speaker 1: do that here. Yes, of course, No, I mean it's 153 00:07:36,280 --> 00:07:39,640 Speaker 1: and and and and that suggests that that it will continue. 154 00:07:39,760 --> 00:07:43,480 Speaker 1: So so established parties or politicians have to find a 155 00:07:43,520 --> 00:07:46,080 Speaker 1: way to deal with that because it is getting worse 156 00:07:46,160 --> 00:07:48,480 Speaker 1: if you want before it gets better in terms of inequality. 157 00:07:48,760 --> 00:07:51,600 Speaker 1: So technological progress is a good thing, but it produces 158 00:07:51,600 --> 00:07:53,160 Speaker 1: winners and losers, and we have to take care of 159 00:07:53,200 --> 00:07:54,880 Speaker 1: the losers. Help me here, and this is the way 160 00:07:54,880 --> 00:07:57,520 Speaker 1: of script, but I'll go with it. Harm help me 161 00:07:57,560 --> 00:08:01,360 Speaker 1: here with big Switzerland. What did you detect within the 162 00:08:01,440 --> 00:08:05,480 Speaker 1: body language Chancellor Miracles visit to President Trump? I mean 163 00:08:05,800 --> 00:08:09,920 Speaker 1: there was I'm sorry for Americans, it was lost in translation, 164 00:08:10,120 --> 00:08:13,320 Speaker 1: were a little subtly is in nuances. We didn't pick 165 00:08:13,400 --> 00:08:16,880 Speaker 1: up what did you pick up? No, I mean I 166 00:08:16,920 --> 00:08:19,320 Speaker 1: think it is very hard and I think that that's 167 00:08:19,480 --> 00:08:25,200 Speaker 1: that's Chancellor Market's big strengths too. To have that, how 168 00:08:25,200 --> 00:08:27,520 Speaker 1: can I call it poker face? Maybe all the time 169 00:08:27,720 --> 00:08:31,920 Speaker 1: she does not or barely signal anything if she is 170 00:08:31,960 --> 00:08:34,520 Speaker 1: in these meetings. I think her strength is she's very 171 00:08:34,520 --> 00:08:38,680 Speaker 1: well prepared, extremely well prepared. Um. She knows exactly where 172 00:08:38,720 --> 00:08:41,559 Speaker 1: she can give something and where she doesn't want to move. Um. 173 00:08:41,760 --> 00:08:44,440 Speaker 1: I was it was interesting that she did. I mean, 174 00:08:44,480 --> 00:08:48,440 Speaker 1: for her, given that was mercle her initial statement that 175 00:08:48,480 --> 00:08:51,000 Speaker 1: it is better to talk to each other than about 176 00:08:51,040 --> 00:08:54,160 Speaker 1: each other. I mean that was more clear than anything 177 00:08:54,160 --> 00:08:56,640 Speaker 1: I heard from Meracle. If you're used to other rhetoric, 178 00:08:57,200 --> 00:08:59,680 Speaker 1: then you may not notice that. But for Mercle, that 179 00:08:59,760 --> 00:09:02,319 Speaker 1: was very strong statement and letting out at Trump honestly. 180 00:09:02,840 --> 00:09:05,160 Speaker 1: But thereafter she gave something back, saying, yeah, we have 181 00:09:05,200 --> 00:09:07,480 Speaker 1: to increase our defense spending and all that stuff. So 182 00:09:07,520 --> 00:09:10,160 Speaker 1: she was willing to give that to the president. But 183 00:09:10,320 --> 00:09:12,679 Speaker 1: I'm pretty sure you know, the big criticism we've heard 184 00:09:12,720 --> 00:09:15,199 Speaker 1: from Petter Navarro and others that Germany has to move 185 00:09:15,280 --> 00:09:17,600 Speaker 1: to change the trade to plus. That's not going to happen. 186 00:09:17,880 --> 00:09:20,040 Speaker 1: I would kill for you to write again on oil. 187 00:09:20,559 --> 00:09:21,920 Speaker 1: I don't know, I don't want to tell, I don't 188 00:09:21,920 --> 00:09:23,679 Speaker 1: want to be erk Nielsen and tell you what to do, 189 00:09:23,800 --> 00:09:26,240 Speaker 1: but I would kill to get her bundles from Oil. 190 00:09:26,640 --> 00:09:28,760 Speaker 1: In the next six weeks he is with Unit Credit 191 00:09:29,240 --> 00:09:32,320 Speaker 1: terrific research. Again, we protect the copyright of all our guests, 192 00:09:32,360 --> 00:09:35,240 Speaker 1: even Michael Barr. We do not send out Michael Barr's 193 00:09:35,280 --> 00:09:40,800 Speaker 1: news reports as those Batte Those are highly highly protected 194 00:09:40,880 --> 00:09:56,760 Speaker 1: her bundles. Thank you so much. I've been waiting for 195 00:09:56,800 --> 00:10:03,080 Speaker 1: this interview because April six seven, mark your calendars. What 196 00:10:03,160 --> 00:10:06,280 Speaker 1: are we calling Mara Lago the golf house. I don't 197 00:10:06,320 --> 00:10:12,360 Speaker 1: think they can golf. I think in the president don 198 00:10:12,480 --> 00:10:14,800 Speaker 1: stairs and will you be there at Mara Lago golfing 199 00:10:14,840 --> 00:10:18,600 Speaker 1: when the President and a teachership of China. I won't 200 00:10:18,640 --> 00:10:21,120 Speaker 1: be there. President she is not a golfer, So I 201 00:10:21,160 --> 00:10:26,000 Speaker 1: think I'll do I don't know. They're They're going to 202 00:10:26,080 --> 00:10:31,120 Speaker 1: have a cordial time. Um pleasant, but no no progress 203 00:10:31,600 --> 00:10:35,240 Speaker 1: and quite frankly, the problem is that President she has 204 00:10:35,280 --> 00:10:40,839 Speaker 1: no idea what the President Trump thinks of anybody else 205 00:10:41,120 --> 00:10:43,959 Speaker 1: one of my young troops. Why you again, just set 206 00:10:44,000 --> 00:10:46,320 Speaker 1: me a gift, a jif whatever you call it, a 207 00:10:46,360 --> 00:10:49,400 Speaker 1: little video of chance or miracle. Looking at the President 208 00:10:49,480 --> 00:10:52,719 Speaker 1: during the press conference and it was suitably hilarious. We're 209 00:10:52,760 --> 00:10:55,360 Speaker 1: not getting the same look from the leadership of China. 210 00:10:55,440 --> 00:10:58,600 Speaker 1: Let me properly introduce you Donald stas folks with decades 211 00:10:58,640 --> 00:11:03,120 Speaker 1: ever core, I s I on his China. What do 212 00:11:03,200 --> 00:11:10,559 Speaker 1: they think of this president? Um, they are. I'm pretty confident, astonished, 213 00:11:11,280 --> 00:11:14,520 Speaker 1: as I think many people are. We have a president 214 00:11:14,600 --> 00:11:19,000 Speaker 1: now who is behaving differently than any president that I 215 00:11:19,080 --> 00:11:22,920 Speaker 1: can I can remember. I think, quite frankly, he has 216 00:11:23,000 --> 00:11:27,600 Speaker 1: some sound bites in mind and but not uh, not 217 00:11:27,760 --> 00:11:33,160 Speaker 1: many principled views. And without an anchor of that sort, 218 00:11:33,760 --> 00:11:38,600 Speaker 1: you get this flopping around, this distraction, lack of focus. 219 00:11:39,400 --> 00:11:42,000 Speaker 1: And I think the healthcare thing is just one simple 220 00:11:42,559 --> 00:11:45,120 Speaker 1: symptom of that. We have the Secretary State Rex Deelers 221 00:11:45,160 --> 00:11:46,960 Speaker 1: and in Beijing and the Hall of the People meeting 222 00:11:46,960 --> 00:11:48,680 Speaker 1: with it with the President a couple of days ago, 223 00:11:48,800 --> 00:11:51,760 Speaker 1: laying the groundwork I gather for that visit to Florida. 224 00:11:51,800 --> 00:11:54,240 Speaker 1: What did you hear from him? Uh? It might give 225 00:11:54,280 --> 00:11:56,120 Speaker 1: you some sense of what's going to be discussed. What 226 00:11:56,200 --> 00:11:57,920 Speaker 1: might come out of that meeting in Florida. Well, I 227 00:11:57,960 --> 00:12:03,600 Speaker 1: think um he folk Uh primarily on areas that excuse me, 228 00:12:05,400 --> 00:12:08,640 Speaker 1: areas of agreement UH, and that's what that's what you 229 00:12:08,679 --> 00:12:11,479 Speaker 1: would expect. We know there are a variety of conflicts 230 00:12:11,520 --> 00:12:16,160 Speaker 1: on the trade side, on the investment side, UH, North 231 00:12:16,240 --> 00:12:21,280 Speaker 1: Korea and UH on and on. So focus on what 232 00:12:21,360 --> 00:12:24,240 Speaker 1: the two of you can agree to and kind of 233 00:12:24,320 --> 00:12:27,600 Speaker 1: kick the can down the road and talk more later 234 00:12:28,240 --> 00:12:30,640 Speaker 1: about what they don't agree on. I kind of asking 235 00:12:30,640 --> 00:12:33,000 Speaker 1: about what's happening with the PBOC the third day here 236 00:12:33,160 --> 00:12:36,480 Speaker 1: of the PBOC injecting more money into the financial space 237 00:12:36,559 --> 00:12:39,400 Speaker 1: in China. What's going on there? How noimalous is it? 238 00:12:39,480 --> 00:12:42,559 Speaker 1: And how concerns investors be by what's happening. You shouldn't 239 00:12:42,559 --> 00:12:48,160 Speaker 1: be concerned at all. This is UH. PBOC has UM 240 00:12:48,480 --> 00:12:53,600 Speaker 1: more difficulty than many central banks UM gauging liquidity demands. 241 00:12:53,600 --> 00:12:56,600 Speaker 1: In the very short run, these episodes come and go, 242 00:12:57,080 --> 00:13:01,600 Speaker 1: as this one will. China is in UH dragging mode 243 00:13:01,679 --> 00:13:04,840 Speaker 1: whatever it takes for a good economy in two thousand seventeen. 244 00:13:04,920 --> 00:13:08,040 Speaker 1: This is their selection year after last year was our 245 00:13:08,120 --> 00:13:11,840 Speaker 1: election year. So things will be fine. You know. We 246 00:13:11,880 --> 00:13:14,280 Speaker 1: watched as a Treasury sectary Steve Manuchen went to Berlin 247 00:13:14,320 --> 00:13:16,720 Speaker 1: and then to boden Botten and he was asked about 248 00:13:17,200 --> 00:13:19,559 Speaker 1: labeling China currency manipulator. He said, that's something that will 249 00:13:19,559 --> 00:13:21,520 Speaker 1: be discussed at these sort of semiennial reviews within the 250 00:13:21,559 --> 00:13:25,360 Speaker 1: Treasury department. Give us your sense of the timetable for 251 00:13:25,720 --> 00:13:27,679 Speaker 1: looking at the Chinese currency, what you expect to hear 252 00:13:27,679 --> 00:13:31,240 Speaker 1: from the Treasury Department. A Treasury seemingly is going to 253 00:13:31,280 --> 00:13:35,880 Speaker 1: go back to the typical schedule of April and October 254 00:13:36,120 --> 00:13:41,360 Speaker 1: reviews in which they look at various countries and decide 255 00:13:41,400 --> 00:13:44,840 Speaker 1: if that country is or is not a currency manipulator 256 00:13:44,840 --> 00:13:47,560 Speaker 1: in their view. I think they will again conclude that 257 00:13:47,600 --> 00:13:51,520 Speaker 1: they are not. I think Washington is is coming to 258 00:13:51,640 --> 00:13:57,800 Speaker 1: the view that they have precious little leverage over China 259 00:13:58,720 --> 00:14:03,920 Speaker 1: on trade and on the currency, and so the surprise 260 00:14:04,000 --> 00:14:06,160 Speaker 1: will be how little they do this year, not how much. 261 00:14:06,400 --> 00:14:09,360 Speaker 1: I saw a article yesterday on the cost to live 262 00:14:09,360 --> 00:14:13,719 Speaker 1: in Asia were leading away for idiocy. Is China pricing 263 00:14:13,760 --> 00:14:17,800 Speaker 1: their cities out of competition with how much it costs 264 00:14:17,840 --> 00:14:21,360 Speaker 1: to live there? No, I don't think so. Um and 265 00:14:21,400 --> 00:14:25,000 Speaker 1: it has become a lot more pricey, But the people 266 00:14:25,080 --> 00:14:28,480 Speaker 1: still want to live in the Tier one cities, and 267 00:14:28,640 --> 00:14:31,520 Speaker 1: just like they do in this uh in this country, 268 00:14:31,760 --> 00:14:34,240 Speaker 1: Boston and New York and l A and San Francisco. 269 00:14:34,560 --> 00:14:38,440 Speaker 1: Extraordinarily a pricy but that's not killing at Houston in Chicago. 270 00:14:38,840 --> 00:14:44,120 Speaker 1: If I'm playing golf in Florida, dun Strass, iimers whatever, Core, 271 00:14:44,800 --> 00:14:48,680 Speaker 1: good luck with the bracket as well. Perdue. As we're in, 272 00:14:49,000 --> 00:14:54,520 Speaker 1: we're there. Boiler up, Boiler up with Don Strass, I'm perdue, 273 00:14:54,720 --> 00:15:06,640 Speaker 1: North Carolina. Brought you by Bank of America, Mary Lynch. 274 00:15:06,720 --> 00:15:11,000 Speaker 1: Dedicated to bringing our clients insights and solutions to meet 275 00:15:11,000 --> 00:15:14,520 Speaker 1: the challenges of a transforming world. That's the power of 276 00:15:14,560 --> 00:15:19,640 Speaker 1: global connections. Mary Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith Incorporated Member 277 00:15:20,280 --> 00:15:26,240 Speaker 1: s I PC, David Garrow with Tom Keene in New York. 278 00:15:26,240 --> 00:15:29,040 Speaker 1: This is Bloomberg Surveillance on Bloomberg Radio. If j Alfred 279 00:15:29,080 --> 00:15:32,000 Speaker 1: Prufrock measured his life with coffee spoons, we increasingly measure 280 00:15:32,040 --> 00:15:35,760 Speaker 1: hours with presidential tweets. Donald Trump tweeting moments ago, big 281 00:15:35,840 --> 00:15:38,560 Speaker 1: day for healthcare, working hard, and we'll use that as 282 00:15:38,600 --> 00:15:40,800 Speaker 1: a peg for our next conversation. Here with Zeke Emmanuel, 283 00:15:41,400 --> 00:15:43,200 Speaker 1: chair the Medical Ethics and Health Policy Department at the 284 00:15:43,280 --> 00:15:45,440 Speaker 1: University of Pennsylvania, who had an audience with the President 285 00:15:45,480 --> 00:15:47,600 Speaker 1: just a couple of days ago at the White House. 286 00:15:47,600 --> 00:15:49,120 Speaker 1: Great of you to join us, Thanks very much for 287 00:15:49,160 --> 00:15:51,840 Speaker 1: being here. And without divulging too much detail of your 288 00:15:51,840 --> 00:15:53,960 Speaker 1: conversation with the President, what did you want to convey 289 00:15:53,960 --> 00:15:58,080 Speaker 1: to him about health reform generally, what's working and what's not. Oh. 290 00:15:58,240 --> 00:16:01,320 Speaker 1: I wanted to convey to him, as I've said in 291 00:16:01,640 --> 00:16:04,320 Speaker 1: lots of other public venues, including The New York Times 292 00:16:04,320 --> 00:16:09,200 Speaker 1: and Fox, that I think the uh Paul Ryan bill 293 00:16:09,760 --> 00:16:13,320 Speaker 1: in the House is not a good bill and he 294 00:16:13,360 --> 00:16:16,320 Speaker 1: should not support it. It It does not realize his goals. 295 00:16:16,480 --> 00:16:20,520 Speaker 1: His goals are, as he has said many times, he 296 00:16:20,600 --> 00:16:24,680 Speaker 1: wants to uh, um, you know, get coverage for all 297 00:16:24,760 --> 00:16:27,840 Speaker 1: Americans uh. And he has not said access, he has 298 00:16:27,880 --> 00:16:30,840 Speaker 1: said coverage. And second of all, he wants uh to 299 00:16:30,880 --> 00:16:34,880 Speaker 1: bring healthcare costs down so that healthcare is affordable to 300 00:16:34,960 --> 00:16:37,480 Speaker 1: more Americans. He also says that he would like to 301 00:16:37,520 --> 00:16:41,280 Speaker 1: negotiate drug prices because drug prices are too high. This 302 00:16:41,320 --> 00:16:43,960 Speaker 1: bill does none of those things, as we all know. 303 00:16:44,000 --> 00:16:47,840 Speaker 1: According to the CBO, it will dramatically increase the number 304 00:16:47,840 --> 00:16:50,680 Speaker 1: of uninsured. Maybe twenty four million isn't exactly the right number, 305 00:16:50,680 --> 00:16:52,800 Speaker 1: but it's certainly gonna be tens of millions of people 306 00:16:52,840 --> 00:16:55,760 Speaker 1: are gonna lose insurance. And we've already heard from a 307 00:16:55,840 --> 00:16:58,840 Speaker 1: number of insurers that if this bill passes, they are 308 00:16:58,920 --> 00:17:01,680 Speaker 1: jacking up their premium uh and even the CBO said 309 00:17:01,720 --> 00:17:05,800 Speaker 1: that by premiums ago up, then they'll decline only for 310 00:17:05,840 --> 00:17:08,639 Speaker 1: young people and increase for older people. This is not 311 00:17:08,760 --> 00:17:11,720 Speaker 1: a bill that realizes the president's objectives or the objectives 312 00:17:11,760 --> 00:17:13,600 Speaker 1: that all of us should have the healthcare system. Let 313 00:17:13,640 --> 00:17:15,280 Speaker 1: me talk about those objectives a little bit more here. 314 00:17:15,320 --> 00:17:17,840 Speaker 1: I'm curious why when we talk about healthcare policy it 315 00:17:17,880 --> 00:17:21,440 Speaker 1: happens to happen in these very time limited portions. In 316 00:17:21,520 --> 00:17:24,240 Speaker 1: other words, it's so important, Yet we see this court 317 00:17:24,280 --> 00:17:26,600 Speaker 1: of being moved through Congress rather quickly. We saw the 318 00:17:26,600 --> 00:17:28,719 Speaker 1: same thing with the affordable character. Wait wait wait wait 319 00:17:28,720 --> 00:17:32,399 Speaker 1: wait wait wait a sec Okay, no, you're misrepresenting history, 320 00:17:32,520 --> 00:17:34,639 Speaker 1: and I cannot let that go on. Well, it was 321 00:17:34,680 --> 00:17:37,879 Speaker 1: a nine month process. It was excuse me, we started 322 00:17:37,880 --> 00:17:41,159 Speaker 1: on January and we passed it on Marche. That's a 323 00:17:41,200 --> 00:17:45,159 Speaker 1: fourteen month process. And this is less than sixty days 324 00:17:45,440 --> 00:17:48,080 Speaker 1: that it was not equivalent. When we introduced the bill 325 00:17:48,119 --> 00:17:50,560 Speaker 1: in the House, matcy Posy introduced the bill in the House, 326 00:17:50,560 --> 00:17:53,520 Speaker 1: there was a hundred and sixteen days before it was 327 00:17:53,600 --> 00:17:56,600 Speaker 1: voted on. Here they're sixteen days. These are not equivalent. 328 00:17:56,640 --> 00:17:59,399 Speaker 1: The Republicans are not doing what the Democrats did. We 329 00:17:59,440 --> 00:18:01,720 Speaker 1: tried to ogociate. We had the Gang of Four, the 330 00:18:01,760 --> 00:18:03,200 Speaker 1: Gang of six, the Gang of eight to try to 331 00:18:03,240 --> 00:18:06,880 Speaker 1: negotiate with Republicans. They haven't even called a single Democrat 332 00:18:06,960 --> 00:18:09,959 Speaker 1: to the best of anyone's knowledge, to talk. Okay, so 333 00:18:10,000 --> 00:18:13,400 Speaker 1: this is not equivalent. This is much worse. Alright, I'm 334 00:18:13,400 --> 00:18:15,840 Speaker 1: not going to have the equivalency. It's just like the Democrats. 335 00:18:15,880 --> 00:18:20,159 Speaker 1: That's false. You hear from the House speaker, however, uh 336 00:18:20,280 --> 00:18:21,960 Speaker 1: that this has been something on which this party has 337 00:18:22,040 --> 00:18:24,639 Speaker 1: run for cycle after cycle after cycle. He's rejecting the 338 00:18:24,640 --> 00:18:26,359 Speaker 1: comment that you just made there, that this is something 339 00:18:26,400 --> 00:18:29,600 Speaker 1: big force through now. He's run on repeal and replace, 340 00:18:29,720 --> 00:18:32,800 Speaker 1: and as many of us have noted multiple times, he's 341 00:18:32,800 --> 00:18:35,720 Speaker 1: never had a replacement bill. He's never articulated something until 342 00:18:35,840 --> 00:18:38,760 Speaker 1: now when he had to go out there. The reason 343 00:18:38,800 --> 00:18:42,320 Speaker 1: he never articulated something is because he got a terrible 344 00:18:42,320 --> 00:18:45,960 Speaker 1: CBO score. If he had to put in a bill before, uh, 345 00:18:45,960 --> 00:18:50,320 Speaker 1: he would never I mean the score is devastatingly bad. 346 00:18:50,040 --> 00:18:52,480 Speaker 1: I didn't mean for the question to be offensive. What 347 00:18:52,520 --> 00:18:54,520 Speaker 1: I intended to to get to here is it doesn't 348 00:18:54,520 --> 00:18:57,159 Speaker 1: seem like it's very diological. It's hard for politicians to 349 00:18:57,760 --> 00:18:59,840 Speaker 1: talk about what in fact is wrong without their care 350 00:18:59,840 --> 00:19:01,480 Speaker 1: in this country and to work it out. Why is 351 00:19:01,560 --> 00:19:03,080 Speaker 1: that the case in other ways? Why does it have 352 00:19:03,119 --> 00:19:04,719 Speaker 1: to come to sort of a crisis point like this? 353 00:19:04,880 --> 00:19:07,440 Speaker 1: Wait a second. I'm the policy brother. I'm the guy 354 00:19:07,480 --> 00:19:09,560 Speaker 1: who thinks of what is the best policy for the 355 00:19:09,560 --> 00:19:12,240 Speaker 1: health care system? And as I have said multiple times, 356 00:19:12,520 --> 00:19:15,800 Speaker 1: I do believe there's a bipartisan approach. I don't think 357 00:19:15,800 --> 00:19:18,960 Speaker 1: the alternative is keep the a C A uh do 358 00:19:19,560 --> 00:19:23,360 Speaker 1: Representative Rand Paul's approach of uh, you know, just repeal 359 00:19:23,520 --> 00:19:28,080 Speaker 1: and no replacement, or uh your only other approaches Paul Ryan, 360 00:19:28,119 --> 00:19:32,040 Speaker 1: there's other approaches, including a bipartisan approach that begins where 361 00:19:32,040 --> 00:19:37,040 Speaker 1: there's overlap. And I don't know why politicians can't seem 362 00:19:37,080 --> 00:19:40,800 Speaker 1: to come to rational reasonable agreement. You know, you'd have 363 00:19:40,840 --> 00:19:43,800 Speaker 1: to ask my political brother. He understands those things better 364 00:19:43,800 --> 00:19:47,119 Speaker 1: than these A little occupied, Zeke, We're going to continue that. 365 00:19:47,240 --> 00:19:48,760 Speaker 1: I want to do the next block. He's well, but 366 00:19:48,880 --> 00:19:53,000 Speaker 1: let me ask you this Mark Meadows got jawed uh 367 00:19:53,080 --> 00:19:55,880 Speaker 1: chewed out yesterday by the President United States. He from 368 00:19:55,880 --> 00:19:59,000 Speaker 1: western North Carolina. If I go down to the former St. 369 00:19:59,080 --> 00:20:02,800 Speaker 1: Joseph's Hospital in Asheville, North Carolina, or I go to 370 00:20:02,880 --> 00:20:06,240 Speaker 1: your Beth Israel Hospital in Boston, let me ask the 371 00:20:06,640 --> 00:20:10,080 Speaker 1: question of the same doctors at St. Joseph's and the 372 00:20:10,200 --> 00:20:13,560 Speaker 1: doctors at Beth Israel. What's in this for the doctors. 373 00:20:13,600 --> 00:20:16,800 Speaker 1: You're a doctor, You're like a real doctor. What do 374 00:20:16,920 --> 00:20:21,760 Speaker 1: the doctors want out of this? Donnybrook in Washington, let 375 00:20:21,760 --> 00:20:24,399 Speaker 1: me let me emphasize three points. First, the A M 376 00:20:24,480 --> 00:20:27,280 Speaker 1: A has come out against this bill. Doctors are are, 377 00:20:27,520 --> 00:20:30,600 Speaker 1: I think, very strongly against this bill. UM in the 378 00:20:30,600 --> 00:20:33,560 Speaker 1: American public ought to notice doctors were very nervous about 379 00:20:33,560 --> 00:20:36,840 Speaker 1: the Affordable Care Actors. They didn't understand it. Initially it 380 00:20:36,920 --> 00:20:40,960 Speaker 1: was complicated. UM. I run a panel every year at 381 00:20:41,040 --> 00:20:45,040 Speaker 1: Wharton where I teach UM for my students of I 382 00:20:45,119 --> 00:20:47,520 Speaker 1: bring in doctors, and you know, the first few years 383 00:20:47,560 --> 00:20:49,679 Speaker 1: after the passage of the Affordable Character doctors were like 384 00:20:49,760 --> 00:20:52,320 Speaker 1: kind of negative. I've got to do this electronic health records. 385 00:20:52,320 --> 00:20:54,600 Speaker 1: I don't know what the system is gonna be now. 386 00:20:54,920 --> 00:20:57,080 Speaker 1: They love it. The last few years I've been doing it. 387 00:20:57,200 --> 00:21:00,960 Speaker 1: Doctors so much better. Let's do the Zeke, We're gonna 388 00:21:00,960 --> 00:21:03,280 Speaker 1: come back. Zeke Emmanuel with is fired up about what 389 00:21:03,320 --> 00:21:05,760 Speaker 1: we're seeing and of course the drama that will see 390 00:21:05,800 --> 00:21:09,640 Speaker 1: today and in Joe tomorrow in Washington. Stay in touch 391 00:21:09,680 --> 00:21:14,040 Speaker 1: with Bloomberg News Washington. Are good, Kevin surreally as well 392 00:21:14,080 --> 00:21:19,040 Speaker 1: about what we'll see forward um on healthcare. Zeke Emmanuel University, 393 00:21:19,040 --> 00:21:21,919 Speaker 1: Professor at Penn, Senior Fellow at the Center of American Progress, 394 00:21:21,920 --> 00:21:25,080 Speaker 1: an expert on health policy. We're having a spirited discussion 395 00:21:25,119 --> 00:21:27,560 Speaker 1: about what's going on on Capitol Hill this week. Let 396 00:21:27,560 --> 00:21:29,920 Speaker 1: me ask you about what the insurance companies are saying. 397 00:21:29,960 --> 00:21:32,800 Speaker 1: We've watched in these weeks and months leading up to today, 398 00:21:33,200 --> 00:21:35,280 Speaker 1: a number of insurers pulling out of markets. We saw 399 00:21:35,280 --> 00:21:38,000 Speaker 1: that with Etna and others. They say it's not competitive 400 00:21:38,040 --> 00:21:40,080 Speaker 1: for them to be there. Certainly, this is something that 401 00:21:40,160 --> 00:21:43,520 Speaker 1: at face is worrisome to consumers. What's the solution here? 402 00:21:43,560 --> 00:21:46,560 Speaker 1: How do you get insurers to get back into those markets? Right? 403 00:21:46,600 --> 00:21:49,000 Speaker 1: You have to have consumers in the markets who have 404 00:21:49,160 --> 00:21:53,600 Speaker 1: to have UH protect them against the uncertainties of this market. 405 00:21:53,760 --> 00:21:56,280 Speaker 1: You know, any to any new health insurance market is 406 00:21:56,280 --> 00:21:57,919 Speaker 1: a problem because you don't know who's gonna come in, 407 00:21:58,000 --> 00:22:00,320 Speaker 1: you don't know what their health utilization is. To be 408 00:22:00,640 --> 00:22:04,480 Speaker 1: pricing a the product in that situation is uncertain. That's 409 00:22:04,520 --> 00:22:08,680 Speaker 1: why we've built in risk corders reinsurance in case people 410 00:22:08,720 --> 00:22:12,720 Speaker 1: are more expensive than they anticipated. Those were part of 411 00:22:12,760 --> 00:22:15,600 Speaker 1: the the rules of the game going forward. We adopted 412 00:22:15,640 --> 00:22:18,880 Speaker 1: them from the Republicans who introduced it in Medicare Part 413 00:22:18,960 --> 00:22:21,960 Speaker 1: d UM and we need and then Marco Rubio changed 414 00:22:21,960 --> 00:22:24,520 Speaker 1: the rules. He pulled those things out and upset the 415 00:22:24,520 --> 00:22:27,159 Speaker 1: insurance marketplace. We need to put them back in. And 416 00:22:27,200 --> 00:22:31,360 Speaker 1: by the way, Representative Speaker Ryan's bill has a hundred 417 00:22:31,640 --> 00:22:35,440 Speaker 1: billion dollars and a stability fund for exactly this kind 418 00:22:35,440 --> 00:22:38,520 Speaker 1: of thing, reinsurance making sure that people are high costs 419 00:22:38,640 --> 00:22:41,560 Speaker 1: do not affect the insurance bottom line. That will definitely 420 00:22:41,680 --> 00:22:44,239 Speaker 1: that kind of thing would definitely stabilize the market, and 421 00:22:44,280 --> 00:22:46,399 Speaker 1: we believe in that. We also think you need to 422 00:22:46,920 --> 00:22:51,520 Speaker 1: probably adjust the subsidies. Uh and uh, you know my 423 00:22:51,560 --> 00:22:55,240 Speaker 1: favorite approaches. Forget the mandate, forget the penalty if you're 424 00:22:55,280 --> 00:22:58,439 Speaker 1: not continuously insured. Let's go to auto enrollment for people 425 00:22:59,000 --> 00:23:01,480 Speaker 1: like we have in medicare apart a. I think there 426 00:23:01,480 --> 00:23:03,880 Speaker 1: are those kind of changes that will you know, could 427 00:23:03,880 --> 00:23:08,400 Speaker 1: substantially UH get them stabilized the market. But we should 428 00:23:08,440 --> 00:23:11,760 Speaker 1: also note that the CBO, when they scored the bill said, look, 429 00:23:12,080 --> 00:23:15,840 Speaker 1: the marketplaces are stable, They're going to continue, they're not 430 00:23:15,920 --> 00:23:20,960 Speaker 1: going under, they're not collapsing. That claim by Representative Ryan 431 00:23:21,119 --> 00:23:25,880 Speaker 1: and others that the marketplaces are collapsing simply false. Okay, 432 00:23:25,880 --> 00:23:28,639 Speaker 1: fake news again. Last question here, we heard from the 433 00:23:28,640 --> 00:23:30,959 Speaker 1: President in that speech before a joint session of Congress 434 00:23:30,960 --> 00:23:33,800 Speaker 1: he wants to have insurance available across state lines. I 435 00:23:33,800 --> 00:23:35,320 Speaker 1: imagine that might be something he brought up with you 436 00:23:35,359 --> 00:23:37,480 Speaker 1: when you visit with him at the White House. What's 437 00:23:37,480 --> 00:23:39,639 Speaker 1: the rationale for that, How likely is that to happen, 438 00:23:39,640 --> 00:23:44,719 Speaker 1: and what difference could that make? Well, let's inform your listeners. 439 00:23:45,160 --> 00:23:49,119 Speaker 1: Three states already have UH allow insurers to come across 440 00:23:49,119 --> 00:23:52,840 Speaker 1: state lines, Maine and Georgia, and I forget the third one. Okay, 441 00:23:53,000 --> 00:23:56,040 Speaker 1: not one single insur has taken it up, even though 442 00:23:56,119 --> 00:23:59,760 Speaker 1: it's legal in those states. And the reason is it's complex. 443 00:24:00,080 --> 00:24:02,560 Speaker 1: Setting up a network is complex unless you have enough 444 00:24:03,000 --> 00:24:06,320 Speaker 1: UH people willing to buy it's too expensive to set 445 00:24:06,359 --> 00:24:09,200 Speaker 1: up a network and other things, so it's and even 446 00:24:09,240 --> 00:24:11,560 Speaker 1: if it got set up, most economists estimated it would 447 00:24:11,600 --> 00:24:15,680 Speaker 1: hardly affect premiums at the wall. So unless you're gonna 448 00:24:15,680 --> 00:24:17,600 Speaker 1: have a race to the bottom where insurers can come 449 00:24:17,640 --> 00:24:21,040 Speaker 1: in and basically offer these horrible medical insurance plans that 450 00:24:21,080 --> 00:24:24,440 Speaker 1: are very skinny, it's not really going to do a big, 451 00:24:24,600 --> 00:24:26,840 Speaker 1: big job. And then if it does a big job, 452 00:24:26,880 --> 00:24:28,680 Speaker 1: it would do a big job by depriving people of 453 00:24:28,960 --> 00:24:33,640 Speaker 1: coverage for basic uh items. So it's not a solution. 454 00:24:33,720 --> 00:24:35,919 Speaker 1: I mean, I'm not opposed to it, but it's hardly 455 00:24:35,960 --> 00:24:38,639 Speaker 1: the of a solution. Ze, thank you so much for 456 00:24:38,680 --> 00:24:40,640 Speaker 1: being this. We look forward to speaking to you again 457 00:24:53,000 --> 00:24:56,240 Speaker 1: because he is a laurier from Yale. Robert Schiller, Bob, 458 00:24:56,400 --> 00:24:59,000 Speaker 1: good morning. We'll make it quick today. You wrote a 459 00:24:59,040 --> 00:25:02,440 Speaker 1: book called Finding in the Good Society. Where did the 460 00:25:02,480 --> 00:25:08,400 Speaker 1: good Society go? Well, we've got the tough business man 461 00:25:08,480 --> 00:25:11,960 Speaker 1: that we wanted. I guess people want someone who can 462 00:25:12,000 --> 00:25:16,280 Speaker 1: say no, who can say you're fired. They got him. Uh, 463 00:25:16,320 --> 00:25:18,520 Speaker 1: that's it's a whole different view. But it isn't a 464 00:25:18,520 --> 00:25:21,160 Speaker 1: whole different my book, Tin and send the good society 465 00:25:21,600 --> 00:25:25,160 Speaker 1: was about the business world and what it can do 466 00:25:26,200 --> 00:25:30,840 Speaker 1: for society. Ultimately, we owe much or most of our 467 00:25:30,960 --> 00:25:34,639 Speaker 1: well being to business. And uh so Trump is on 468 00:25:34,720 --> 00:25:39,400 Speaker 1: that wavelength, on the wavelengths in that book. What's your 469 00:25:39,400 --> 00:25:42,359 Speaker 1: sense of what's happening in Washington today? Uh there was 470 00:25:42,400 --> 00:25:44,639 Speaker 1: such enthusiasm, such optimism that so much was going to 471 00:25:44,680 --> 00:25:46,800 Speaker 1: get done so quickly. We're not. We're seeing that not happen. 472 00:25:47,600 --> 00:25:49,199 Speaker 1: Give us your your take on what's going on there? 473 00:25:49,240 --> 00:25:51,240 Speaker 1: Is this anything different? Are we seeing anything new out 474 00:25:51,240 --> 00:25:56,879 Speaker 1: of Washington, d C? Today? Well? Unfortunately, one of my 475 00:25:57,000 --> 00:26:00,680 Speaker 1: grapes about Donald Trump is that he over implifies or 476 00:26:00,720 --> 00:26:05,399 Speaker 1: implies it's easy to fix these problems. We have a 477 00:26:05,400 --> 00:26:09,320 Speaker 1: health care system that I applaud. It has some chinks 478 00:26:09,359 --> 00:26:11,879 Speaker 1: in it. We can work on improving it. But the 479 00:26:11,960 --> 00:26:15,080 Speaker 1: rhetoric is as if the people who framed it were 480 00:26:15,560 --> 00:26:21,360 Speaker 1: We're just stupid or incompetent or biased. That isn't what happened. 481 00:26:21,400 --> 00:26:26,520 Speaker 1: We have a system that could be improved, but you know, 482 00:26:26,640 --> 00:26:28,919 Speaker 1: it's just not going to be so easy to fix it. 483 00:26:29,520 --> 00:26:31,800 Speaker 1: Let me ask you lastly, you're just about growth and 484 00:26:31,840 --> 00:26:33,680 Speaker 1: the degree to which all of this could affect growth. 485 00:26:33,680 --> 00:26:36,960 Speaker 1: That being a healthcare reform or tax reform, or indeed 486 00:26:37,000 --> 00:26:39,040 Speaker 1: an infrastructure package if we were to get that. How 487 00:26:39,040 --> 00:26:41,120 Speaker 1: optimistic are you that we can see the growth trajectory 488 00:26:41,200 --> 00:26:44,639 Speaker 1: change in this country. Well, you know, we measure growth 489 00:26:44,760 --> 00:26:49,080 Speaker 1: by something called gross domestic product. I I do feel 490 00:26:49,119 --> 00:26:53,439 Speaker 1: that loosening regulations will tend to boost that. But the 491 00:26:53,480 --> 00:26:58,480 Speaker 1: problem is that gross domestic product isn't the best possible 492 00:26:58,560 --> 00:27:01,560 Speaker 1: measure of well being for the nation. So things like 493 00:27:01,640 --> 00:27:06,080 Speaker 1: the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which were created by Dodd 494 00:27:06,160 --> 00:27:13,160 Speaker 1: Frank might be eliminated or handicapps that would actually help 495 00:27:13,280 --> 00:27:15,960 Speaker 1: d DP, but I think it would hurt the overall welfare. 496 00:27:16,520 --> 00:27:19,160 Speaker 1: Professor Schuler, thank you so much. Too short of visit today, 497 00:27:19,200 --> 00:27:20,919 Speaker 1: We'll do it again for a much longer time. He 498 00:27:21,000 --> 00:27:24,240 Speaker 1: is with Yale University, and of course a classic book 499 00:27:24,320 --> 00:27:35,639 Speaker 1: on the exuberance of our markets. Thanks for listening to 500 00:27:35,680 --> 00:27:41,760 Speaker 1: the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on iTunes, SoundCloud, 501 00:27:42,160 --> 00:27:46,399 Speaker 1: or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm out on Twitter 502 00:27:46,480 --> 00:27:50,280 Speaker 1: at Tom Keene. David Gura is at David Gura. Before 503 00:27:50,320 --> 00:27:54,320 Speaker 1: the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg 504 00:27:54,400 --> 00:28:09,560 Speaker 1: radio Ye brought you by Bank of America. Mary Lynch 505 00:28:09,640 --> 00:28:13,920 Speaker 1: dedicated to bringing our clients insights and solutions to meet 506 00:28:13,920 --> 00:28:17,439 Speaker 1: the challenges of a transforming world. That's the power of 507 00:28:17,480 --> 00:28:22,560 Speaker 1: global connections. Mary Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Incorporated, Member 508 00:28:23,200 --> 00:28:23,840 Speaker 1: s I p C