WEBVTT - 2020 NFL Divisonal Round Betting/Fantasy Preview! 

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live, all you have to do is download the

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>if you want to catch this show on video, for

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out Zoo TV channel seven nineteen and

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where you can find Sports Grids Fantasy Sports Network.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the show and thanks so much for listening and

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:25.080
<v Speaker 1>listen to me. This is the Fantasy Football Best Friends

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Forever Show. Start listening to us, or suffer the consequences.

0:00:30.320 --> 0:01:04.959
<v Speaker 1>Listen to do didn't? Yeah? Now as welcome your host

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 1>five B from No. One, your co host five ye

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>from Saint Bretza, Trik Steffa, your co host five eleven

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 1>from Why Ladies and Tentlemen yours. With that, we will

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:41.040
<v Speaker 1>get you inside of Studio thirty four. This is a

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:44.199
<v Speaker 1>b F F S. Here's Frank Stamford. I am Greg

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Sauceman and making his return for the first time in

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty e y Eric Young, who's here to puff us

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>up about the day of the Denver. About the Tennessee

0:01:57.040 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Titans still in the playoffs. I said deep for Derry

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Henry hounding their way to Baltimore. We'll see what happens

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday night. Frankie, what's happening man, Greggy? Happy Friday

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 1>to you. Lots to talk about the NFL Divisional round

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>of the playoffs. I know that you continuously say this

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>year after year, Greg that this is your favorite week

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>of the first I always remember, Baby, that's the weekend

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:26.519
<v Speaker 1>of the year. We've got the the eight best teams

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>left in the NFL this week playing, So there's a

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>lot to talk about from a betting fantasy perspective, and

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of course I talk about our Tennessee Titans, Baby, Derrick

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:38.519
<v Speaker 1>Henry going up against the Baltimore Ravens. So early in

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the week you reached out to Eric, You're like, hey,

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:41.679
<v Speaker 1>you around this week. He's like, no, man, I can't

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 1>make it. Text was like, dude, we need you on Friday.

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Like Titans, it's the playoffs. We're not here that often.

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>And he's like, I'll be there. Welcome back you w boys. Uh.

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:54.519
<v Speaker 1>It is an excellent time of year. Hockey is in

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 1>fal swing. There's some other sports that I don't talk

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>about that won't be named, and football playoffs and it's

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>awesome for me. The Titans are still in it. Uh.

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:07.079
<v Speaker 1>They're looking They're looking real, real good, real real dangerous.

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>The Ravens are unbelievable. Lamar Jackson is terrifying. But if

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna beat the Baltimore Ravens, you gotta have a

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:17.519
<v Speaker 1>solid running game. Titans are built on that. Derrick Henry

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:20.960
<v Speaker 1>is going to go off again. Uh, it is necessary.

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Tannehill is playing the best football of his entire career,

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and Uh, I can't. I couldn't be more excited for tomorrow. Man,

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm so pumped. Are you? Will you listen? It's a

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:32.919
<v Speaker 1>long way to go wherever, but it may make it

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the Super Roll. Will you be there? Uh? That uh

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 1>be an expensive endeavor I would imagine. Um, But I

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>mean I have tons of people that have tons of

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>contacts in Tampa. Tampa is uh a wrestling mecca. Um.

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Tons of the guys live there, They know people that

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>know people. So look at I will. I will do

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>everything in my power to be there if the Titans

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>make it into the Super Bowl. Uh. Not promising anything,

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's looking promising, guys. I mean, you never know

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen. Sports is crazy, Football is is madness. Um.

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>But but any team of these final eight could I

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>could see winning the Super Bowl. It could happen any

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:20.160
<v Speaker 1>which way. Tennessee was incredibly impressive last week in their

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>win against New England. Derrick Henry did what he's done

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:26.600
<v Speaker 1>all season long, what EY expected him to do all

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 1>season long. That's how good this team has been. We'll

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>get to Tennessee in a little bit only because I

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 1>want to go in game order here and I just

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 1>want to, um, just make it easy for us rather

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>than jumping around, right, just do it by the day. Interestingly,

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 1>enough is the first weekend I believe ever in the

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>divisional weekend where the Sunday games have been moved back.

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>It's three thirty, three o'clock and six thirty here, um,

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of like Championship Sunday, because well ratings, why doing

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>it one and four? We can do it at three

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and six thirty. So that's this Sunday the game started.

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I leave three or five and six four you I

0:04:57.920 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>think of the official start times, but like three thirty

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>or what we'll say, the first game of the day

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>is on Saturday night three thirty I believe four o'clock,

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>four thirties, and like that, right thirty is the game.

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>It is at four thirty five or thirty. You got

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the San Francisco forty Niners at home and they are

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 1>taken on the Minnesota Vikings. Of Vikings get by the

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans Saints last week we talked or Ey just

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>mentioned a moment ago Frank that the way that he

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>thinks you could beat Baltimore control the running game, running

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>down their throats with Derrick Henry. That's what Minnesota needs

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:33.720
<v Speaker 1>to do against San Francisco in order for them to

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>have a shot. With Dalvin Cook, he looked healthy last week,

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>played really really, really really well. I thought last week

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>they're big underdog in San Francisco. Dalvin Cook get the

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:46.599
<v Speaker 1>job done. When the Minnesota Vikings on Saturday, well, Dalvin

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Cook might be able to get the job done, but

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure the entire Minnesota Vikings team will be

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 1>able to do that against the San Francisco forty Niners,

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>who are coming off the by here under Kyle Shanahan.

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I thought the Vikings did a phenomenal job last week

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:00.840
<v Speaker 1>against the New Orleans Saints. Their game land getting after

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Drew Brees, causing lots of pressure like they have done

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>all season. I thought their secondary played much better than

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>we've seen for most of the season as well. Coming

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>into this game, Xavier Rhodes dealing with that shoulder injury.

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna play, but how healthy is he? I think

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that's a big question in this game. Obviously, you gotta

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>worry about Deebo Samuel on the outside, Emmanuel Sanders in

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the slot, who has a ton of postseason experience. I

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>haven't even named George Kittle yet, who is the number

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>one receiver for the San Francisco forty Niners team. So

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:31.280
<v Speaker 1>if you asked me, I think it's gonna be a

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:33.720
<v Speaker 1>tough task for the Minnesota Vikings here, Greg. I think

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:35.920
<v Speaker 1>that the way for them to slow down that pass

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 1>rush of San Francisco is running the ball with Dalvin

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Cook set up play action. Obviously that's what they want

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to do, but San Francisco's defense has been one of

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the best all season long, specifically against the run as well.

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:52.039
<v Speaker 1>You ask me for this game, I am. I'm willing

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to lay the points with the San Francisco forty Niners.

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I think they get it done and this is probably

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the sides that I feel most strongly about

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>this weekend. Also, really like San Francisco in this game.

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I thought Kirk Cousins got rid of a lot of

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:06.720
<v Speaker 1>demons last week in New Orleans. I thought that he

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 1>played a really safe, but really good ball game. Hit

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 1>his marks with Adam Feeland and Stefan Daves of Devin

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Cook did a really nice job. But I think giving

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the San Francisco for Ators a week off, which they

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>desperately needed, Uh, they're gonna be able to kind of

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>do what Minnesota does. I think, just do it better,

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's running the football with Rhem Boster and Tevin

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Coleman and Matt Rada and utilizing George Kittle their number

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 1>one receiver. As you mentioned, season trickery out of Deebo Samuel. Uh.

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans they got shell shocked last week. I don't

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>think San Francisco, who has a better defense than the

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans Saints, they get nearly shell shocks. I also

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 1>like San Francisco, and I will also take the points.

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Why what about you? Yeah, San Francisco for me? Love

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the forty Niners. Um Shanahanna's got these guys. I mean,

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 1>it's just his offense is so unique, so different, it's

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>hard to prepare for it. You never know where the

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>ball is going to go. So that would be my pick.

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>But happy for Kirk Cousins showing up in a playoff

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>game the last throw where he dropped it in for

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown. UM, that's solidified was a guy that can

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>get it done in the game when when it's when

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>it's important, right, San Francisco pick. We all said, we

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>come back the mein event on Saturday night TENNESSEEE. NFL

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 1>season is now upon us, so you can become the

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 1>eighth person away one million dollars in a Fandel Draft

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Kings tournament by setting their lineups using the Daily Order

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:28.679
<v Speaker 1>dot Com DFS lineup Optimizer. If you're playing Daily Fantasy

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Sports and not using Daily Order dot Com, you're doing

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:33.839
<v Speaker 1>it wrong. Sign up now for the NFL Access with

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a faster optimizer, smarter DFS projections, and better results. It's

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:40.319
<v Speaker 1>a promo code action for its ten percent discount, And

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that's promo code action for its ten percent discount. Daily

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Order dot Com where millionaires are made to reach about,

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>well well well back with Studio thirty four, getting you

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>ready for the best weekend or football of the year,

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the eight best teams in the NFL. You got four

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>games too on Saturday too, on Sunday, and now it's time.

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>In a moment, we'll get into Saturday night. We'll get

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>into the Titans. We'll get to the Ravens before we do. Right,

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:31.679
<v Speaker 1>he has some props you want to talk about from

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:34.440
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco in Minnesota. Yeah, I wanted to get into

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:36.959
<v Speaker 1>some props real quick for this game. I like Raheem

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Moster to score a touchdown. That you're getting that a

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 1>plus one fifteen right now. He has scored uh seven

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in the final six games for the San Francisco

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>forty nine ers since Week thirteen on leads San Francisco

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>with eight red zone carries. The next closest on the

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>team is Tevin Coleman with just two. So he only

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>gets around you know, ten to twelve maybe thirteen fourteen

0:09:57.559 --> 0:09:59.839
<v Speaker 1>carries a game, but he does get the work in

0:09:59.880 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the red zone. So I like for he most to

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>score touchdown in this game. I like Kyle Rudolph over

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:06.599
<v Speaker 1>two and a half receptions. San fran has allowed a

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>tight end to go over this in four of their

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 1>last five games. Uh. Ky Rudolph had four receptions last week.

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:15.199
<v Speaker 1>He's been a little bit more involved recently, so those

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 1>are a few props that I like, and I also

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>have some trends. Greg trying a bunch of from Gabe

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>rency Joe Rner. He's roughout the week. On the morning after.

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm down in the pit. I'm working. Also, got one

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 1>ear open. I'm listening to all the trends that these

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:29.679
<v Speaker 1>guys are throwing out here. How about this? Here you go.

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota last seventeen games on the road in January three

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and fourteen straight up, four and thirteen against the spread.

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I know Gabe has talked about a lot about wild

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:42.679
<v Speaker 1>card teams having to win back to back games on

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the road in the NFL playoffs. It's tough to do.

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it will be tough for the Minnesota Vikings

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to do just that this week as well. San Francisco

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>getting healthy at the right time. D four will be

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>back in this game. I'm laying the points with San Francisco.

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Most are to score a touchdown. Kyle Rudolf over two

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and a half receptions. Greg. Those are the props right

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>here for me. I'll commenting on them. U it seems easy.

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 1>It was too easy. I like these low props on

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>like peripheral players. You know, it just seems it just

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>seems too easy. The most are one I don't like

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>because I was doing the research on mostly going into

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs and he's just not all that involved in

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:23.199
<v Speaker 1>the passing game. It is. It's risky because again he

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:25.719
<v Speaker 1>only sees like ten to twelve carries a game, but

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 1>he dominates the red zone usage for one of the best,

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 1>definitely one of the best schemed rushing attacks in the NFL.

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:34.439
<v Speaker 1>With Kyle Shanahan and the San Francisco forty Niners, he

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:36.439
<v Speaker 1>seems to be the go to guy. Wouldn't surprise me

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 1>if he actually sees more work in this game. I

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>think he has earned that. I think he's earned the

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>respect and the trust of Kyle Shanahan and this forty

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Niners team. So wouldn't surprise me if he sees more

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>work in this game as well. Alvin Kamara got in

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:49.839
<v Speaker 1>the end zone last week for the Saints. I like

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>most of score touchdown this week. Wants to get to Tennessee.

0:11:54.480 --> 0:12:01.199
<v Speaker 1>That's Tennessee and Baltimore. Derrick Henry leading the tie against Baltimore.

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Here's my question for really why so? Last week? Obviously,

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee defeated New England. The quarterback Ryan Tande Hill through

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:11.679
<v Speaker 1>for seventy two yards. That's probably not going to get

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 1>it done against Baltimore. What do you think you need

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>from Ryan tadne Hill this week for Tennessee to win? Uh?

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>And I mean I do feel it's They're gonna be

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 1>a very similar game plan. Um. They wanted to keep

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:25.679
<v Speaker 1>the ball out of Brady's hands, even though he has

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>not even been close to the quarterback la Lamar Jackson

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 1>has been. But the reality is is this time of year,

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and I know it's cliche, but running the football is

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 1>what wins playoff games. I don't know if there's any

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 1>team better suited to run the football than the Tennessee

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Titans that has left in the playoffs. Derrick Henry Um,

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, I mean, yes, I'm a homer, Um,

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>but in my opinion, you know, just knowing, you know,

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:51.439
<v Speaker 1>listening to what the Titans were talking about and what

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to do and how this offense was was designed. Uh,

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was spending a heavy premium on good

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:02.959
<v Speaker 1>run blocking offensive lineman. Um having a bunch of tight

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>ends that are very good at run blocking. Nobody wants

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to tackle this guy. I mean, you could see it

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>in last year or last week's game. Um, he would

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:13.599
<v Speaker 1>come over the edge and and a cornerback, hundred and

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:16.719
<v Speaker 1>sixty pound cornerback would be falling away as he was

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>running into because nobody wants to get in his way.

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be very similar. It's going to be

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:24.079
<v Speaker 1>cool in Baltimore. You mean they're of an outdoor stadium.

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>It could even possibly be raining. Um and for me,

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the worst of weather, the better it is for the Titans.

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I think if Tannehill can throw a hundred and twenty

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 1>five yards and Henry cannavro over a hundred and twenty yards,

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:38.679
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a tough team to beat. I'm with

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>e Y on this one as well. I don't know

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 1>that I'm gonna call the Tennessee Titans outright win here,

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and we'll go back to my handy days. It's been

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 1>ongoing for a week, but Saturday games since two thousand

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and six, home teams are eighteen and two straight up

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 1>there fifteen and five against the spread, So that doesn't

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:03.079
<v Speaker 1>bode well for the Tennessee Titans. Home teams over the

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 1>past two years are seven and one straight up over

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the last six years. Their nineteen and five straight up.

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:10.199
<v Speaker 1>What that means to me is there's one team this

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:12.719
<v Speaker 1>weekend that can pull out the upset, and to me,

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the two most likely teams that are able to do

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>that are the Tennessee Titans and the Seattle Seahawks. And

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that what Ey said, And although it is cliche,

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry is a walking cliche right now. He gets

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 1>stronger as the game goes on, and that's something you

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>don't want to see if you're an opposing defense in

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the NFL playoffs. So I agree with what I said

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>regarding Derrick Henry. I like the over on his rushing

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 1>yards in this game as well. It's a huge number.

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>It's ninety four and a half on his rushing yardage

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 1>prop greg. But over the past, what do I have here?

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>He's averaging one hundred fifty four rushing yards per game

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>over his last seven games. I mean he is. He's

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>on a rampage right now, a hundred and eighty two

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards. Last week against the New England Patriots, who

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>were one of the best run defenses all season long,

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>he ran for two hundred and eleven yards. The final

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>game of the season in Week seventeen, Derrick Henry is

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 1>just on a different level, and you can run against Baltimore.

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>That's the biggest difference. You don't want to attack them

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>through the air since they acquired Marcus Peters and everyone

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>has got healthy in that secondary with Jimmy Smith. You

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>don't want to throw against this Baltimore Ravens secondary, but

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>you can run against them. Their nineteenth and run defense

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>DV away, they allow the tenth highest yards per carry

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>to opposing running backs four point four to all. That

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 1>to me means that Derrick Henry is gonna have success

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 1>in this game to an extent. They're going to be

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>able to keep keep away. They're gonna be able to

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 1>play keep away from Lamar Jackson and this Ravens offense,

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 1>who that is the best offense in the NFL. And

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that is a recipe to keep keep this

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>game closer. I don't think that Tennessee is gonna win

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 1>this game. I'm sorry, e Y, but I think that

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be closer than the spread reveals with

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens being nine and a half point favorites. With

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 1>all that being said, Greg, if the Ravens get off

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to a hot start, if they score on the first drive,

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 1>if they go a fourteen zip, I think that this

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>is probably one that's gonna spiral out of control. But

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>if Tennessee can run the ball early and often in

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>this game and play keep away, then they have a

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>good chance of covering. So you kind of just hit

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the nail on the head right Like, so I I

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>see nine and a half points on the surface, and

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, this is too many. It's something simply too many.

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee could hang in there with Derrick Henry doing his things,

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, you could run on the Baltimore Ravens.

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Problem is when you need Ryan Tannehill to be superhero

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>because Lamar Jackson's crowd is gonna be roucous in Baltimore.

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Larr Jackson's gonna run down the field and seeming like

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>he always does love the over on Lamar Jackson's rushing

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to correct. How can you He's going to run this

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>team down the field and probably get in They stopped

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee on that first drive, and you get quickly get

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>up fourteen nothing, then that pressure you're going to fall

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>on Ryan Tannell and you can't just quickly play keep

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 1>keep away as he want to mentioned like this, Tom Brady,

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>you weren't afraid this year him beating you. He wasn't.

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he's good enough, but that team was not good enough.

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Offense wasn't good enough. That's what it comes to. The

0:16:56.840 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>offense was not good enough. This is a different offense.

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>It's different and best offense in the NFL. If they

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 1>get behind, it makes me a little bit nervous, like

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Seattle getting behind. We'll get to that in a few moments,

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:09.439
<v Speaker 1>because if Seattle gets behind, this is something we were

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 1>concerned about last year and this year. Can they come back?

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know that they can. And I don't

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 1>know that Tennessee can. I don't know that they can

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:19.120
<v Speaker 1>make it a game. But seen nine and a half,

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:23.479
<v Speaker 1>which you're down two touchdowns late. Everyone's gonna relaxing here

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 1>in that zone defense. The bat is gonna be so

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:31.120
<v Speaker 1>many points. It's too many points. I can't I can't

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 1>lay that with Baltimore. I'm going to take Tennessee in

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:35.160
<v Speaker 1>this game plus nine and a half. And it's more

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:37.400
<v Speaker 1>so it's not that you can't lay it with Baltimore,

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:41.719
<v Speaker 1>it's you don't want to lay that against Tennis right now, Ben,

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 1>But don't break defense They're not an amazing against any means,

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:48.400
<v Speaker 1>as we're gonna get to shortly. That's why I don't

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:51.199
<v Speaker 1>want to say, uh, it's you know, it's it's crazy

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to lay this many points this time of year because

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:55.679
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get to the Kansas City game very shortly.

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:58.119
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's the way that the Tennessee Titans

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:00.880
<v Speaker 1>are playing right now. And yes, you don't want Ryan

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Tannehill to you don't want to have to rely on

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Tannehill, but he can make plays. We saw that

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:08.399
<v Speaker 1>down the stretch. He finished first in the NFL this

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>year in passer rating first and yards per attempt. A. J.

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Brown I think bounces back to an extent this week.

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's just gonna be limited to one

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:19.920
<v Speaker 1>catch in this game. I like the Titans with the

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 1>points in this game plus nine and a half. I

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>think you can use the Ravens as part of a

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 1>teaser teasis down to minus two and a half. I

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 1>like the over in this game as well. Back to

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the handy Dandy trends from Dame Marnzi, Ryan Tannehill nine

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:34.680
<v Speaker 1>and two to the over with Tennessee over. His last

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 1>eleven games were probably like will hit the regular you

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 1>want to stall us after that. I like a J.

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Brown over twenty four and a half yards as his

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:42.880
<v Speaker 1>longest reception. I think I think it's a good bet.

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 1>He's a catch and run guy. I like that. One

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>NFL season is an alpanas, so you can be going

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the eighth person awain one million dollars in a FanDuel

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Draft Kings tournament. My setinger lineup using the Daily Roder

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>dot Com DFS lot of optimizer. If you're playing daily

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports and not using Daily Order dot Com, you're

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 1>doing it wrong. Sign it down for the NFL Access

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 1>with a faster optimizer, smarter DFS projections, and better results

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>into promo code action for its end percent discount. And

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 1>that's promo code action for its head percent discount. Tailor

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 1>order dot com where millionaires are made. Get in the

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 1>game of the Draft Kings sports book where listeners of

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 1>this show can get deposit bonus of five dollars. He's

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 1>works created a Draftkicking sports book account. Take a deposit.

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Please your first bet Draft Kings on matchup bonus five

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:43.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred bucks all for is eligible all users, new users

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>getting risk free bet on. It's two undrellar is gonna

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>sportscred dot com slash DK to play sports scrid dot

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>com slash DK to play gambling promic one hundred gamblers

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty one over New Jersey only. Eligibility restrictions apply to

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>website for DTL. We get out the props we like.

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 1>We've taken the side that we like one quicker side. Greg.

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:03.160
<v Speaker 1>As soon as you came in talking about the promo,

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>you came in at the spot in that song, I

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:08.639
<v Speaker 1>thought you were going with it. Right before the promo.

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>La la la, la la la. You guys told me

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:16.919
<v Speaker 1>don't sing anymore. We actually have sang this song together.

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Harry Yok. He's he's singing very quietly to himself because

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>he's not allowed to sing on the show it and

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to follow the rules. All right, anyway, Mr su

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 1>send me. But I'm really you're seeing another song about

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Man in the Mirror. I stay want to review that.

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't singing it. I heard some crazy guy and

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Bread and Butter over here singing his own version in

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 1>Man of the Mirror. Uh had that had to do

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:47.639
<v Speaker 1>with accusations regarding Michael Jackson in his lifetime. Let's just

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 1>leave it there. He was crazy for sure. Yes, he

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 1>was one of those guys. Just one look at the

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:54.640
<v Speaker 1>guy you just knew, like, stay away from that dude.

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>He's just like picking away at the buffet to stay yeah,

0:20:58.200 --> 0:20:59.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of the way you look at e Y right

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>when he's like in the wrestling ring. To stay away

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>from that guy. You do not want to be around

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>that guy. All right, Eric, we talked a lot about

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:08.399
<v Speaker 1>what we think we've all you know the Titans or

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:10.479
<v Speaker 1>all on the Titans. You're obviously taking them out right,

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>anything else you want to hit on this game before

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>we move on your comments on what we had said

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:19.119
<v Speaker 1>when we opined, what do you think? No, I mean

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I think what you guys are saying, Like, look at

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I like the Baltimore Ravens. They were one of my

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:27.439
<v Speaker 1>favorite teams to watch this year. Lamar Jackson is changing

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback position, and I think changing it for the better. Um,

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:33.959
<v Speaker 1>people are going to look at running quarterbacks and quarterbacks

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 1>that they're their primary their primary offensive weapon is to

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:41.640
<v Speaker 1>run the ball. They're gonna look at those quarterbacks very differently. UM.

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:45.400
<v Speaker 1>It was really cool how they scheme the offense around that. UM.

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>This is is different than Michael Vick. This is different

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:51.400
<v Speaker 1>than any quarterback that has been a you know, considered

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:53.920
<v Speaker 1>a running quarterback before. It's really cool to be a

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 1>fan and uh and to see that happen like we

0:21:57.240 --> 0:21:59.880
<v Speaker 1>were part of history. Like the quarterback position going forward

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to change. In my opinion, it's because of

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:06.680
<v Speaker 1>because of Lamar Jackson. UM. He's terrifying, absolutely terrifying. Every

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 1>time he touches the ball, it could go for fifty yards,

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 1>he could go for a touchdown, and you know, it

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:13.479
<v Speaker 1>could be a run, it could be a pass. UM

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 1>running is his primary weapon. But he can't throw the

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:19.360
<v Speaker 1>ball and he's proven that UM all year. They throw

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:21.880
<v Speaker 1>it when they need to. UM. But but I think

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that Tannehill is a better traditional quarterback. I believe the

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Titans are specifically designed UM, especially their their linebacking corps

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:34.360
<v Speaker 1>is very quick. UM. They'll be able to spy him

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and contain him. No one's gonna be able to stop

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson. He's proven that all year and I think

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:41.440
<v Speaker 1>he'll prove it again this week. It'll just be limiting

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 1>him and like I said, running the ball and limiting

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the amount of times that Lamar Jackson touches the ball. Well,

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>you'll have to limit the amount of times Lamar Jackson

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 1>touches the ball. That's the only way that Tennessee is

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 1>gonna be able to ultimately win this game, not to

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 1>stay a win this game by limiting the amount of

0:22:57.800 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>touches or that offensive ball to what do you think

0:22:59.880 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>more can play this week? I do think that mark

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Ingram is gonna play. I wouldn't touch any of his props.

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe if you want to go under them, but again,

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 1>this is such a great rushing team even that is

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 1>dicey to do. So I wouldn't use him in DFS either,

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>because I don't think that he is one. They've been

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:19.159
<v Speaker 1>so hush hush about marketing room situation all week long. No,

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't do that either. Like that. Yeah, I mean

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 1>it's sneaky you're playing a GDP again for super cheap,

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:29.199
<v Speaker 1>But overall, I wouldn't mess around with the marketing room

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 1>situation I mentioned. I do like Lamar Jackson's prop over

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:35.200
<v Speaker 1>seventy seven and a half rushing yards. He did that

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 1>in eight of fifteen games this year. He did that

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:40.119
<v Speaker 1>in five of his final six games as well. And

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:42.439
<v Speaker 1>I think that if Baltimore is gonna win this game.

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna because Lamar Jackson had a lot to say

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>about it. He had a lot to do with it,

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 1>especially with mark Ingram being banged up. So Lamar over

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:51.439
<v Speaker 1>seventy seven and a half, Derrick Henry over ninety four

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 1>and a half. I like Tennessee plus two points. I

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:57.359
<v Speaker 1>like the over forty seven points as well. Greg, And

0:23:57.440 --> 0:24:00.200
<v Speaker 1>shout out to the Pick six podcast. I was sending

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to this on my way in today. Dean P's is

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 1>a defensive coordinator of the Tennessee Titans. He was also

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the as a coordinator of the Ravens when they faced

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Greg Roman and the San Francisco Super Bowl forty Niners

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:18.679
<v Speaker 1>conference in the Super Bowl where he limited Colin Kaepernick

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:22.119
<v Speaker 1>and that you know, uh similar obviously not the same,

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson is better. But their ability to run that

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>readoption play with a Russian quarterback and they, you know,

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 1>dominated in that game. So I think that that is

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>another feather in the calf for the Tennessee Titans in

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 1>this game. Yeah, absolutely, I I think it's a really

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>great point. It's a really great nugget. It's a coaching nugget,

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:38.680
<v Speaker 1>you know how. I'm into those. I am uh, and

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll see a j. Brown though it's twenty four and

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 1>a half yards for as long as cash I don't

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:44.440
<v Speaker 1>hate his over three and a half receptions as well. Yeah,

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 1>totally fair. Okay, should we move on? We're all good here,

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:50.120
<v Speaker 1>all right, let's do it. The early game on Sunday

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>features the Kanda City Chiefs hosting Houston Texas. We talked

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:58.120
<v Speaker 1>about how it's a really big spread for the Baltimore

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Ravens over the Titans, and we both one nine and

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 1>a half. Those games also nine and a half, and

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:06.119
<v Speaker 1>yet it's what doesn't feel as big, No, it doesn't.

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Not all nine and a halfs are created equal in

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. I think the Chiefs are going to demolish this.

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I think they win this game by fourteen to seventeen points.

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I like laying the points with the Kansas City Chiefs.

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:21.399
<v Speaker 1>They lost this game earlier in Arrowhead this season against

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the Houston Texas. They lost thirty one to twenty four.

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Last week watching that game, Yes, Deshaun Watson led this

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>team back against a good Buffalo Bill's defense. They almost

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:34.199
<v Speaker 1>want in spite of Bill O'Brien. It's just what were

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 1>they doing in the first half. The game plan seemed terrible,

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the offensive line was not good. Now you're going up

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>against the Kansas City Chiefs defense that is clicking at

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the right time. Steve Spagnolo has done a great job

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:46.239
<v Speaker 1>with his Chief's defense all year. Their secondary has been

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 1>a strength all season long. For this Kansas City Chiefs defense,

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the only way that Houston's gonna hang around

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 1>in this game is if they can run, and that's

0:25:56.760 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>not really a strength of their team. Yes, DeShawn Watson

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:01.920
<v Speaker 1>can make plays himself rushing, but they don't want to

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>rely on Carlos Hide, they don't want to rely on

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:07.959
<v Speaker 1>Duke Johnson all because of that. Again, I don't think

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I think Bill O'Brien is not a great coach. I

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 1>think that again they want in spite of him. Understatement

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 1>against the Buffalo Bills, I think you know and you

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 1>read off the buy and you read again. Back to

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 1>my nuggets here from Gabe four and one against the

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:24.879
<v Speaker 1>spread in the divisional round in his career. Uh. I

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:27.199
<v Speaker 1>think the Chiefs win this game. I think they win handily.

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 1>With all that being said, Greg, I kind of like

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the under in this game. I think it's too many points.

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I think the fifty one is high. I think we

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 1>get a thirty one seventeen that gets you around forty

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 1>eight or fourteen type seventeen. Uh And I know a

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of you know sharp betters are on the under

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>this week. I think that the Chiefs win this one handily,

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:49.239
<v Speaker 1>but I think it goes under the number as well.

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Give me the KNC City Chiefs. I like the Chiefs

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 1>in the under two man the Chiefs. Stefens has played

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:55.159
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot better in the second half of the year.

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Steve Stagnol has his play team playing really really good

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:01.200
<v Speaker 1>football at the moment. And if he's down sixteen nothing

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 1>at halftime away from Houston, I don't think they get

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:06.639
<v Speaker 1>back into it. And I don't think the Kansas. The

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs will not let up like the Buffalo Bills. They

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 1>will just they will put the gas and they will

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:13.920
<v Speaker 1>just keep pounding. They will just keep chucking it deep

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 1>to Tyreek Hill. I expect the big Tyree Hill game. Uh.

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:19.399
<v Speaker 1>Here for two touchdowns in the first meeting they had

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:21.440
<v Speaker 1>earlier this year went for five E D and two.

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I believe him and Kelsey had good games the first

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 1>time they played this year. Um and I believe, Frank,

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and I could be wrong. That game that you mentioned

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:31.399
<v Speaker 1>against the Texans, the first tyre killing game, it was

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that his first game back from injury. I can look

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that up for you. I was just pulling up the

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 1>game lock to see if Travis Kelsey had a big

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:42.680
<v Speaker 1>game as well. Uh so that game against the Houston

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Texans was his first game back, right, He went five

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:48.159
<v Speaker 1>for eight and two on tent. He popped two huge

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:50.639
<v Speaker 1>ones in that game. And I remember we took him

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:53.199
<v Speaker 1>in a pool and Kelsey only four for fifty eight

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 1>in that game. It's alright, so that's not a Travis

0:27:56.560 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Kelsey game of terrible. It's not. It's not he adin't

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:01.400
<v Speaker 1>go nuts by any means. But Tyree Hill, it's that's hilarious.

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I just had a really big game out of seventy

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 1>four and a half yards a lot. Though it's a

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 1>bet on. I don't think I could do that, probably

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 1>for Tyree Hill. I mean you could do that in

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 1>two receptions. I understand that, but like also not the

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>total reception and alf I like the over yards more

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 1>than I do the over receptions. Tyree Hill is not

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:25.919
<v Speaker 1>a big recept Probably love what Damian Williams over eleven

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 1>and a half rush attempts. I'll give you one better

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 1>than that. I like that one a lot. To Damie

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Williams over twenty three and a half receiving yards linus

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 1>one thirty. You gotta lace m. What's the Texans got

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 1>beat by receiving running backs all season? Whatever? I do?

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 1>You know what? I don't have it in front of me.

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 1>What the total yard and Damilliams is here? I got

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>it seven seventy nine and a half. I like that too.

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I like him. Like you're talking about value versus what

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>they can do from a DFS perspective this weekend, I

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 1>think Damian Williams offers the most value and total based

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>on his question per dollar this weekend going up again.

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I told him didn't single Terry just did when we

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>did the FanDuel Show yesterday. The Hurry Up Jamie wa

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 1>is my favorite DFS play on the slate in total?

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 1>What do you think of this Casey Houston, Gamie Way.

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that Kansas City UH is going to smash him.

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I believe that the Buffalo Bills got beat

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 1>by themselves. Um, there are several times where they could

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>have put the game away. Um, really erratic play from Alan.

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:25.240
<v Speaker 1>You know what, one down he could be dropping back

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and and and throw a pass or Ronnie like, oh,

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 1>this guy is gonna be such a huge star in

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. And then the next down he drops back

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and literally throws it to the other team, or the

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 1>crazy like throw when luckily went out of bound. But um, yeah,

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I think Houston is gonna get worked over by Kansas City.

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City offensively is absolutely terrifying. I would rather play

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson than Patrick Mahomes. So that's obviously the question.

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 1>You want to face Lamar Jackson. Do you want to

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 1>face Patrick Homes? Do you want to play Lamar Jackson?

0:29:56.800 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to play pack? Your Titans might have

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:04.080
<v Speaker 1>to face both of them. That's true. In the FS,

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 1>you to choose one quarterback. This week's choosing Lamar, Patrick Mahomes,

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson. I don't know that Patrick Mahomes will have

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to do as much. I think he can have a

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 1>very good game to seventy five and two touchdowns. I

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 1>think Damian Williams has a big game as well, But

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I think Lamar Jackson will be relied on to do

0:30:18.920 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 1>more for his respective team. Especially from a rushing perspective.

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of rushing, one more prop for you, Greg, Deshaun

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Watson over thirty one and a half rushing yards. I

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 1>love the over for most of the rushing quarterbacks. I'm

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 1>not going to touch Holmes in this game, but I

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 1>think the Texans playing from behind, DeShawn Watson again gonna

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>have to make plays like he did last week where

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>he rushed for fifty five yards. In that earlier meeting

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 1>against the Kansas City Chiefs, he ran ten times for

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 1>forty two yards and two rushing touchdowns in that game.

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Give me the over thirty one and a half rushing

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 1>for Deshaun Watson. Do you think we see will Fuller

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>in this game? I think he will play. Uh in

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 1>terms of how much will he be on the field,

0:30:56.720 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>do you get a full compliment? I don't think anybody

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 1>knows that I wouldn't touch him from a DF We

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 1>talk a lot about it last week. This Houston team

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 1>is a very very different team and will Faci they

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 1>need him on the field. We'll see if that happens

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:09.720
<v Speaker 1>when we come back. We're in a preview the Seahawks

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and Green Baby closest game we expect we'll see we'll

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:18.240
<v Speaker 1>break it down. Next. NFL season is now upon us,

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 1>so you can becoming the eighth person away in one

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 1>million dollars in a Fandel Draft Kings tournament. My settinger

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 1>lineups using the Daily Order dot Com DFS line of optimizer.

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 1>If you're playing Dailey Fantasy Sports and not using Daily

0:31:29.800 --> 0:31:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Order dot Com, you're doing it wrong. Sign up now

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 1>for the NFL Access with a faster optimizer, smarter DFS projections,

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and better results. Enter promo code action for a ten

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 1>percent discount. And that's promo code Action for a ten

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 1>percent discount. Daily Order dot Com where millionaires are made. Okay,

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 1>back here on the BFFs, we got about fifteen minutes

0:31:57.240 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 1>left to go with E Y Frank and I will

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 1>take you to the top weed your talk. Those us

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:02.959
<v Speaker 1>year watching us live on the Sports Creed Network all

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the grid. What are you waiting for? One more game

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 1>to get to you? And it's the Green Bay Packers

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and the Seattle Seahawks. This is the smallest spread on

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the on the card this weekend indivisional playoff play. It

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:16.520
<v Speaker 1>is four and a half. The Seahawks are dogs in

0:32:16.600 --> 0:32:19.440
<v Speaker 1>green Bay. The total sits at forty six and a half.

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 1>All of this according to the FanDuel Sports Book. Now

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 1>this whole narrative rank, I get it. Nobody thinks green

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Bay is good. They think that. They don't think they

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 1>watched these games. They get by the bed skin of

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 1>their teeth. Seattle coming off a good victory over Philly,

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 1>despite Philly being without their quarterback in Carson Wentz, Josh

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>McCown playing, it was an okay victory. It was a victory.

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Josh McCown playing with a torn hamstring the entire game.

0:32:42.760 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I really want to see Greg Ward with the quarterback.

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:47.960
<v Speaker 1>It would have been amazing. Um. But Seattle goes to

0:32:48.040 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay, a place they have one before. They have

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:53.560
<v Speaker 1>beaten green Bay. In Green Bay, Russell Wilson has gotten

0:32:53.600 --> 0:32:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the job done. I think it's a really good matchup

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 1>for Seattle. I think it's a style that they can

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>win against. But Brian Schottenheimer and we say this every week,

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 1>has to put the ball in the hands of Russell

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Wilson to do it. We know how good the green

0:33:13.160 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 1>that Hacker's defense can be. Russell Wilson needs the ball,

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:20.240
<v Speaker 1>not aending this stupid conservative crap. The Schottenheimer likes to

0:33:20.280 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 1>play in order to be successful. Do you think that

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 1>will happen? Well, let's go back to what they did

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:28.960
<v Speaker 1>last week. They threw the ball thirty times and Russell

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Wilson ends up going for three five yards ten point

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 1>eight yards per attempt throws for a touchdown as well,

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 1>So they let him throw the ball a little bit.

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 1>In this game, the running backs combined for just seventeen

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 1>carries versus thirty passing attempts for Russell Wilson. Nine rushing

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 1>attempts for Russell Wilson, So they did give him a

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit more freedom than we have seen the past

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 1>couple of years under Brian Schottenheimer. Here with Russell Wilson.

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 1>The difference for me is the green Bay Packers have

0:33:57.240 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 1>been really good at home this year, as you know this,

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Seattle Seahawks have been great on the road to I

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 1>mean this, these are two immovable forces here, uh the

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Seattle Seahawks seven and one on the road straight up,

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:09.759
<v Speaker 1>green Bay Packers seven and one at home straight up

0:34:09.800 --> 0:34:12.440
<v Speaker 1>this year. But I think green Bay their style in

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 1>terms of their secondary, I think they have a solid secondary.

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:17.880
<v Speaker 1>They have a really good pass rush with the two

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Smiths there Zadarius Smith and Preston Smith getting after the quarterback,

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:24.319
<v Speaker 1>and that has been a problem for the Seahawks all

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 1>season long. Their offensive line has been beat up. It's

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:30.560
<v Speaker 1>not great to begin with, and once again this year,

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson was one of the most pressure quarterbacks all

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:35.440
<v Speaker 1>season long. So I think green Bay will have some

0:34:35.520 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>success in that regard. The way to beat green Bay

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:40.840
<v Speaker 1>is by running the football. Now, are Travis Homer and

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Marshawn Lynch going to be able to do that? You know?

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Are the green Bay Packer is going to be scared

0:34:45.360 --> 0:34:47.719
<v Speaker 1>of Marshawn Lynch and Travis Hommer running all over them.

0:34:48.239 --> 0:34:49.759
<v Speaker 1>I think that the answer is note to that. And

0:34:49.840 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that the way green Bay played uh down

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the stretch as well with Aaron Jones on the back

0:34:55.600 --> 0:34:58.080
<v Speaker 1>of Aaron Jones and Aaron Rodgers has proved he could

0:34:58.080 --> 0:35:00.200
<v Speaker 1>still make all the plays when he needs to. But

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 1>this is a different green Bay Packers team. Greg This

0:35:02.560 --> 0:35:04.880
<v Speaker 1>reminds me a lot of the New Orleans Saints. Over

0:35:04.920 --> 0:35:07.239
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of years. As the Saints defense has

0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:09.879
<v Speaker 1>gotten better, they have asked Drew Brees to do less

0:35:09.960 --> 0:35:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and less. That is the same thing with Aaron Rodgers.

0:35:12.280 --> 0:35:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Just because he is doing less doesn't mean that he

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:17.160
<v Speaker 1>can't still make the plays. He can make the plays.

0:35:17.440 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 1>They're just not asking the duty. He's thirty five years old.

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Why would they. They have a great running back in

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones, and the Seattle Seahawks defense is not very

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:26.319
<v Speaker 1>good there twenty six and run defense div a way.

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I think the Green Bay Packers win this game by

0:35:29.800 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 1>six to ten points. I don't like it. The spread

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:33.759
<v Speaker 1>is in a no man's land. It's four and a

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:35.879
<v Speaker 1>half points in this game. But I do like Aaron

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Jones in this spot. I think Aaron Rodgers will make

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:40.200
<v Speaker 1>plays when he needs to. I think Devanta Adams can

0:35:40.239 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 1>dominate the secondary of the Seattle Seahawks. Uh. And I

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:44.960
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to be just a little bit too

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:47.200
<v Speaker 1>much for Russell Wilson and the Seattle Seahawks team. Give

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:49.360
<v Speaker 1>me the Green Bay Packers um laying the points and

0:35:49.800 --> 0:35:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the most confident total that I am in. Total play

0:35:52.640 --> 0:35:55.919
<v Speaker 1>that I'm in uh this entire weekend is the under

0:35:56.280 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 1>in this game between the Packers and the Seattle Seahawks. Now,

0:35:59.600 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned Eric, they everybody believes seemingly I'm gonna

0:36:04.080 --> 0:36:06.320
<v Speaker 1>rebut you in a moment. But everybody seemingly thinks that

0:36:06.360 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Green May stinks and they wanted to say the same

0:36:08.600 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 1>thing about Seattle too though all season long, that's been

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a storyline that Seattle is not good. Their defense is good,

0:36:14.160 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 1>but they do just enough because Russell Wilson at the

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 1>end of the games can win them games. He said

0:36:18.040 --> 0:36:19.920
<v Speaker 1>it against a friend one of these you talked. You

0:36:20.000 --> 0:36:22.520
<v Speaker 1>talked about how they're gonna rely on Aaron Jones and

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:25.960
<v Speaker 1>they just like New Orleans and Drew Brees, they hand

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the ball off more every doing it all season and

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:30.279
<v Speaker 1>for fantasy owners is very very clear it's Aaron the

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones show, not the Aaron Rodgers show. Unless they

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 1>get into desperation. They maybe they make it desperate, and

0:36:35.440 --> 0:36:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's what they want to do. Get

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:38.480
<v Speaker 1>do it. In a second, Eric, what do you think

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:43.239
<v Speaker 1>about this game? I got a real sneaky feeling about Seattle. Um.

0:36:43.520 --> 0:36:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I think when the chips are down, and like, I

0:36:45.520 --> 0:36:47.719
<v Speaker 1>mean what you just said, it is both people have

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:50.719
<v Speaker 1>thought that neither of these teams are good. Um, But

0:36:50.920 --> 0:36:53.480
<v Speaker 1>for the reality is is Russell Wilson is the guy

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:56.240
<v Speaker 1>this year that I believe in more than Aaron Jones.

0:36:56.320 --> 0:37:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I think, uh, mechanically and skills wise, Aaron or Um,

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers is still one of, if not the best

0:37:04.200 --> 0:37:07.800
<v Speaker 1>technical quarterback in the league. Huh, but when he's needed

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to do it, he really hasn't been able to do

0:37:09.400 --> 0:37:11.920
<v Speaker 1>it this year. Russell Wilson is the guy that, like,

0:37:12.360 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 1>when something happened needs to happen, he wills it to happen.

0:37:15.960 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 1>DK Metcalf is terrifying, Tyler Lackett is having a very

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:23.439
<v Speaker 1>good year. Um, and I just want to see Marshawn Lynch.

0:37:23.600 --> 0:37:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know that's crazy, but it's such a

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 1>cool story. Uh. He's one of my favorite players of

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:32.560
<v Speaker 1>all time. And I just believe that neither team has

0:37:32.600 --> 0:37:35.480
<v Speaker 1>been great, neither defense is great, and they're going to

0:37:35.560 --> 0:37:36.960
<v Speaker 1>need to play one way or the other at the

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:38.480
<v Speaker 1>end of the game, and Russell Wilson is going to

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 1>make it and Aaron Rodgers is not. I agree, very

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:46.239
<v Speaker 1>young in this regard that Aaron Rodgers all season long

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:49.960
<v Speaker 1>has not been able to make super underwhelming. Yeah, it's

0:37:50.000 --> 0:37:52.360
<v Speaker 1>a really good word for it, underwhelming. He hasn't been

0:37:52.360 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 1>able to make the biggest place right trust, without question,

0:37:56.440 --> 0:37:58.759
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson in this spot more than a Rodger. And

0:37:58.840 --> 0:38:01.120
<v Speaker 1>that's why when I pleaded the game, where I kind

0:38:01.160 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 1>of got up to the preview rankie. If Ryan SHAWNA.

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:07.319
<v Speaker 1>Himer puts the ball in Russell Wilson's hands, he's going

0:38:07.400 --> 0:38:10.759
<v Speaker 1>to make magic. And we didn't think necessarily that he'd

0:38:10.760 --> 0:38:11.840
<v Speaker 1>be able to do that this year, or that he

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:16.439
<v Speaker 1>would do that more. Shawn Lynch and Travis Homer, Yeah,

0:38:16.760 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 1>they might get you down there. I don't want the

0:38:19.160 --> 0:38:21.160
<v Speaker 1>ball in Russell Wilson's hands. And I know how good

0:38:21.200 --> 0:38:23.360
<v Speaker 1>that secondary has been for green Bay, and I know

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:26.560
<v Speaker 1>how open down Tyler Lockett DK Metcalf have been. But

0:38:27.080 --> 0:38:28.920
<v Speaker 1>give me the team with the better quarterback, that is

0:38:29.040 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson. Give me the team that I think, in

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:35.399
<v Speaker 1>all honesty, they could be. Then they could have been

0:38:35.760 --> 0:38:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a team with a bye bye. They could have been

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:41.440
<v Speaker 1>playing at home this week. It fell short on the

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:43.480
<v Speaker 1>goal line when all, when it was all said and done,

0:38:45.160 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I think Seattle is better than green Bay. So maybe

0:38:47.239 --> 0:38:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm buying into that narrative the green Bay stinks. I

0:38:50.360 --> 0:38:51.839
<v Speaker 1>think Seattle is a better football team, and I think

0:38:51.840 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 1>they win this team out right, Were you impressed by

0:38:53.560 --> 0:38:55.719
<v Speaker 1>what Seattle did last week against the Philadelphia Eagles. I

0:38:55.719 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think you can I get that right, like I

0:38:58.640 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think you can make going into a Green Bay.

0:39:01.200 --> 0:39:03.400
<v Speaker 1>It's not easy to play in Philly either, but I

0:39:03.440 --> 0:39:06.120
<v Speaker 1>think going into Green Bay is even harder, especially considering

0:39:06.160 --> 0:39:08.839
<v Speaker 1>the weather persons as well. Russell Wilson has never won

0:39:08.960 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 1>in his career in Lambeau. He's owing three in his

0:39:11.160 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 1>career Lambeau. Russell Wilson has faced off against Aaron Rodgers

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:17.080
<v Speaker 1>seven times. Russell Wilson is four and oh at home,

0:39:17.400 --> 0:39:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and he is oh and three in Lambeau. So give

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:23.360
<v Speaker 1>me the edge of the home team here. It's different

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:28.960
<v Speaker 1>playing in Lambeau. I I believe it's a field advantage men.

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:31.319
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson, You're right, Russell Wilson's better than Aaron Rodgers

0:39:31.360 --> 0:39:32.920
<v Speaker 1>at this point. There's no way I'm gonna dispute that.

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I think Aaron Jones is head and shoulders better than

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:39.480
<v Speaker 1>what they're going to get from the Seattle backfield in

0:39:39.560 --> 0:39:43.759
<v Speaker 1>this game, especially if Ryan Schottenheimer tries to go back

0:39:43.840 --> 0:39:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to running the football in this game, because based on

0:39:46.560 --> 0:39:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the matchup, he actually should because the way to beat

0:39:49.239 --> 0:39:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the Packers is on the ground. It has been all

0:39:51.200 --> 0:39:53.640
<v Speaker 1>season long. They allow four point eight six yards per

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:55.880
<v Speaker 1>carry to opposing running backs. So if you want to

0:39:55.880 --> 0:39:57.640
<v Speaker 1>look at some Marshall Lynch props in this game from

0:39:57.640 --> 0:40:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Travis Homer props, I can't blame you for that. From

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:02.880
<v Speaker 1>a DFS perspective, they're obviously much cheaper than the other

0:40:02.960 --> 0:40:07.719
<v Speaker 1>running backs on the slate. But Aaron Jones, his head

0:40:07.760 --> 0:40:10.239
<v Speaker 1>and shoulders, I think the combination of Aaron Jones is

0:40:10.320 --> 0:40:12.799
<v Speaker 1>that much better than Seattle Seahawks backfield. I don't think

0:40:12.840 --> 0:40:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that disparity is as big between Russell Wilson and Aaron Rodgers.

0:40:15.760 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess. I sure, I think that's fair. When the

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:20.759
<v Speaker 1>game is on the line, can Aaron Rodgers make the play?

0:40:21.239 --> 0:40:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. Especially

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:28.480
<v Speaker 1>against Seattle, they have no pass for us whatsoever. Cowny

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:31.400
<v Speaker 1>another week. He Conny was there all year. They were

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:33.680
<v Speaker 1>amongst them. He was injured a lot of the second

0:40:33.680 --> 0:40:35.719
<v Speaker 1>half of the year, but I mean he was there

0:40:35.760 --> 0:40:37.000
<v Speaker 1>for the first half of the years. Well, even the

0:40:37.040 --> 0:40:39.360
<v Speaker 1>first half of the year. The Seahawks were amongst the

0:40:39.480 --> 0:40:41.920
<v Speaker 1>lowest in the league, and pressures per game, so they

0:40:41.960 --> 0:40:43.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't get pressure all year long. And you're asking one

0:40:45.760 --> 0:40:48.640
<v Speaker 1>for the Seahawks left tackle. That's yeah, But how healthy

0:40:48.719 --> 0:40:50.480
<v Speaker 1>is he? He he just had knee surgery, like what

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 1>a month ago. I don't think he's gonna be on again.

0:40:53.680 --> 0:40:55.320
<v Speaker 1>And you're talking about the Packers, who have one of

0:40:55.360 --> 0:40:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the best pass rushing duos in the league right now.

0:40:58.640 --> 0:41:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's close. I don't know. I'm not gonna

0:41:02.040 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna kill you for taking the Seahawks again

0:41:04.000 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 1>because I was on the Seahawks last week. This is

0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:08.160
<v Speaker 1>a week two week thing when it kind of NFL playoffs.

0:41:08.760 --> 0:41:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I was on Russell Wilson last week, and you know,

0:41:10.960 --> 0:41:13.239
<v Speaker 1>if Carson Wentz plays that game, we're likely looking at

0:41:13.280 --> 0:41:17.359
<v Speaker 1>a different game because Josh McCown almost led this team back.

0:41:17.719 --> 0:41:21.280
<v Speaker 1>He had that game to score a game time touchdown

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and go for the two point conversion to tie that game.

0:41:24.080 --> 0:41:27.040
<v Speaker 1>So again, I wasn't impressed by what I saw the Seattle.

0:41:27.120 --> 0:41:29.160
<v Speaker 1>They did enough, they won the game, they covered the spread,

0:41:29.200 --> 0:41:31.040
<v Speaker 1>they did what they had to do. I think going

0:41:31.080 --> 0:41:33.640
<v Speaker 1>into Lambeau, the weather is going to be super cold there.

0:41:33.640 --> 0:41:36.560
<v Speaker 1>It's like twenty degrees in Green Bay, this weekend as well.

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:40.520
<v Speaker 1>This is obviously the closest game to figure out. It's

0:41:40.520 --> 0:41:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the lowest spread of the weekend. I think Green Bay

0:41:42.719 --> 0:41:44.279
<v Speaker 1>gets it done. I like them to lay the points.

0:41:44.320 --> 0:41:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I like the under in this game as what. I

0:41:47.160 --> 0:41:51.080
<v Speaker 1>haven't really dove into the props extensively in this game. Um,

0:41:51.560 --> 0:41:56.480
<v Speaker 1>but I think looking at Aaron Jones against the Seattle

0:41:56.520 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks in this game, and imagine Aaron Jones Russia Temps

0:41:59.040 --> 0:42:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Vandal doesn't have player pops up for this game. Oh okay,

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:05.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at I'm on the popular tab right now,

0:42:07.080 --> 0:42:12.720
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half. I love that attempts fourteen carries,

0:42:13.000 --> 0:42:16.400
<v Speaker 1>especially if so when you're deciding what player props to do.

0:42:16.520 --> 0:42:18.440
<v Speaker 1>This is what's always going through my mind because I

0:42:18.440 --> 0:42:20.360
<v Speaker 1>actually like player props more than betting the sides and

0:42:20.400 --> 0:42:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the totals in these games, just from I think a

0:42:22.600 --> 0:42:26.520
<v Speaker 1>fantasy perspective, fantasy background, we know more about specific we're

0:42:26.560 --> 0:42:29.239
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. E y he's currently read tweeting videos Eddie Jordan,

0:42:31.840 --> 0:42:36.000
<v Speaker 1>oh Man, we gotta get anyway involved in this game. Uh.

0:42:36.239 --> 0:42:39.480
<v Speaker 1>When you're trying to figure out player props, to me,

0:42:39.680 --> 0:42:41.680
<v Speaker 1>you have to figure out what the game flow is

0:42:41.719 --> 0:42:43.839
<v Speaker 1>going to be. And I think for most of this game,

0:42:43.920 --> 0:42:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay is playing from ahead, and because of that,

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I like Aaron Rodgers props in this game. I think

0:42:49.600 --> 0:42:50.800
<v Speaker 1>for most of this game they were playing with like

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:52.760
<v Speaker 1>a seven to ten point lead. Maybe it gets closer

0:42:52.880 --> 0:42:55.600
<v Speaker 1>later on in the game, but I like Green Baby

0:42:55.800 --> 0:42:57.839
<v Speaker 1>playing with a positive game script here, and that will

0:42:57.920 --> 0:43:00.680
<v Speaker 1>lean to more rushing attempts and rushing yard for Aaron Jones.

0:43:00.760 --> 0:43:02.759
<v Speaker 1>So I agree with you on that regard, Greg, Yeah,

0:43:02.920 --> 0:43:06.920
<v Speaker 1>so Aaron Jones certainly somebody with those uh those Russia

0:43:06.960 --> 0:43:09.239
<v Speaker 1>tamis for sure. Like it's interesting for me how you

0:43:09.840 --> 0:43:13.400
<v Speaker 1>described your player prop strategy right, because other people that

0:43:13.480 --> 0:43:15.760
<v Speaker 1>bet the sides and the props kind of the opposite

0:43:16.000 --> 0:43:18.400
<v Speaker 1>where it's like, all right, so unless they're hedging right

0:43:18.600 --> 0:43:20.800
<v Speaker 1>in a way hedging exactly, Well, why don't you just

0:43:20.840 --> 0:43:23.160
<v Speaker 1>try to hit everything right? Then you could lose everything.

0:43:24.960 --> 0:43:28.960
<v Speaker 1>You should have confidence in, you know, handicapping games and

0:43:29.080 --> 0:43:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and trying to I kind of have more confidence like

0:43:31.040 --> 0:43:34.400
<v Speaker 1>knowing the players, like you, we know the players exactly,

0:43:34.520 --> 0:43:36.080
<v Speaker 1>but I think you want to know the players and

0:43:36.160 --> 0:43:38.879
<v Speaker 1>also have that play into how you think the game

0:43:39.040 --> 0:43:41.759
<v Speaker 1>is going to ultimately play out with the game. Plow

0:43:41.880 --> 0:43:43.560
<v Speaker 1>is going to be so um, you know you're not

0:43:43.600 --> 0:43:45.919
<v Speaker 1>gonna bet a ton of passing attempts or passing yards

0:43:45.960 --> 0:43:48.279
<v Speaker 1>from a quarterback if you think they're playing with the lead.

0:43:48.320 --> 0:43:51.080
<v Speaker 1>It just doesn't get it. So correlate your props with

0:43:51.120 --> 0:43:52.600
<v Speaker 1>how you think the game's gonna So the reason I'm

0:43:52.600 --> 0:43:55.600
<v Speaker 1>making these picks, Frankie, it's because I felt like the

0:43:55.760 --> 0:43:57.560
<v Speaker 1>NFC in the a f C, we were bound for

0:43:57.680 --> 0:44:00.440
<v Speaker 1>two matchups in the a f C Casey in Baltimore

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:02.200
<v Speaker 1>on this collision course. If it doesn't work out like that,

0:44:02.239 --> 0:44:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, Eric, it doesn't work out like that like

0:44:04.560 --> 0:44:06.759
<v Speaker 1>that kind of sucks. Those two teams should be playing

0:44:06.800 --> 0:44:09.080
<v Speaker 1>each other. In my opinion in the NFC, I want

0:44:09.120 --> 0:44:11.080
<v Speaker 1>to see Seattle as a Francisco one more time, Like

0:44:11.200 --> 0:44:14.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the matchup. I want to say that would be awesome,

0:44:15.080 --> 0:44:16.719
<v Speaker 1>but I think most people had the Saints in their

0:44:16.760 --> 0:44:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowls, so it doesn't matter. Now it's not possible ideal.

0:44:21.239 --> 0:44:23.880
<v Speaker 1>What do people want for? Like before the playoffs started,

0:44:23.880 --> 0:44:25.880
<v Speaker 1>what did people want as the NFC playoff matchup? And

0:44:25.960 --> 0:44:27.440
<v Speaker 1>do you think that's what they wanted? Was the Seahawks

0:44:27.480 --> 0:44:31.799
<v Speaker 1>and the that's what they wanted, because that was an

0:44:31.840 --> 0:44:38.120
<v Speaker 1>awesome game too in the dome. He doesn't game when

0:44:38.160 --> 0:44:41.319
<v Speaker 1>you feel at the end. Um So I think now

0:44:41.480 --> 0:44:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I want the storyline. I want the rubber match Seattle

0:44:43.600 --> 0:44:45.839
<v Speaker 1>and San Francisco. Well, you can't bet on what you want, Greg,

0:44:45.840 --> 0:44:48.200
<v Speaker 1>you got a bet on what number tad. I certainly

0:44:48.239 --> 0:44:50.520
<v Speaker 1>can bet on what I want. That's literally what betting is.

0:44:50.600 --> 0:44:53.759
<v Speaker 1>Probably not going to be what you want. Of course

0:44:53.800 --> 0:44:55.160
<v Speaker 1>you do. You bet on what the numbers tell you

0:44:55.239 --> 0:44:57.440
<v Speaker 1>to bet on. You can. You can make the numbers

0:44:57.480 --> 0:44:59.680
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want. You can see I could give you

0:44:59.680 --> 0:45:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a try. It's for days and we can kind of

0:45:01.200 --> 0:45:02.920
<v Speaker 1>spin them with you know what you want to follow me?

0:45:03.000 --> 0:45:04.080
<v Speaker 1>This is what I think of your tries. Let me

0:45:04.080 --> 0:45:05.480
<v Speaker 1>see this all right? No, no, no, come on, you

0:45:05.520 --> 0:45:07.840
<v Speaker 1>can't rip this up, Craig, don't rip up my trends.

0:45:08.320 --> 0:45:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Don't rip up my trends. This is really trend You

0:45:12.719 --> 0:45:17.759
<v Speaker 1>didn't have to come to my side to read it. Well,

0:45:17.920 --> 0:45:19.719
<v Speaker 1>that's what I think. We don't want to get e

0:45:19.920 --> 0:45:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Y back involved. That was Greg Susman's heel turn. There

0:45:22.680 --> 0:45:25.880
<v Speaker 1>you go long live? Can I believe it was a

0:45:25.960 --> 0:45:31.399
<v Speaker 1>face turn? There? You go Derrick Henery, Tennessee Titans. Ey,

0:45:31.440 --> 0:45:33.120
<v Speaker 1>good luck this week, buddy. We'll talk to you next week.

0:45:35.480 --> 0:45:37.640
<v Speaker 1>He's not even listening. He's too excited. All right, we'll

0:45:37.640 --> 0:45:39.279
<v Speaker 1>be back with the final three minutes right after. This

0:45:45.120 --> 0:45:47.439
<v Speaker 1>NFL season is now upon us and you can become

0:45:47.520 --> 0:45:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the eighth person awayen one million dollars in a Fandel

0:45:50.640 --> 0:45:53.359
<v Speaker 1>Draft Kings tournament my sator lineups using the Daily Order

0:45:53.440 --> 0:45:56.000
<v Speaker 1>dot Com DFS lot of optimizer. If you were playing

0:45:56.080 --> 0:45:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Daily Fantasy Sports and not using Daily Order dot Com,

0:45:59.120 --> 0:46:01.360
<v Speaker 1>you're doing it all. Sign him now for the NFL

0:46:01.440 --> 0:46:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Access with a faster optimizer, smarter DFS projections, and better

0:46:05.239 --> 0:46:08.320
<v Speaker 1>results into promo code action for at ten percent discount.

0:46:08.400 --> 0:46:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Is that's promo Code Action first ten per cent discount

0:46:11.239 --> 0:46:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Order dot Com where millionaires are made. So everybody

0:46:25.160 --> 0:46:32.759
<v Speaker 1>knows it's me. What a movie? Huh um? Oh my god?

0:46:33.120 --> 0:46:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, oh what a movie? I don't even know

0:46:34.840 --> 0:46:38.759
<v Speaker 1>what movie. It's from Frank French Jr. And what's her name.

0:46:40.120 --> 0:46:42.120
<v Speaker 1>It's not it's the it's not Summer Catch It's not.

0:46:42.200 --> 0:46:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh I got yes, thank you, I just looked it up.

0:46:46.640 --> 0:46:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I googled it. Thank you. Danny, that was it. She's

0:46:49.120 --> 0:46:53.439
<v Speaker 1>all that one a movie any bogs. So the don

0:46:53.760 --> 0:46:57.080
<v Speaker 1>my father during the before we do this, during the break, uh,

0:46:57.320 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Frank was on his hands and knees trying to put

0:46:59.040 --> 0:47:02.399
<v Speaker 1>his pieces back together. Put the puzzle, We'll try. I'm

0:47:02.400 --> 0:47:03.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna try my best. I'm gonna try and take this.

0:47:04.160 --> 0:47:08.399
<v Speaker 1>He picks up all the together and trying to put

0:47:08.480 --> 0:47:11.279
<v Speaker 1>it back together. So my dad is thoroughly watching the

0:47:11.320 --> 0:47:14.960
<v Speaker 1>show here, Greg, because he is part of a confidence pool. Yes,

0:47:15.040 --> 0:47:17.200
<v Speaker 1>he's enjoying it. He needs help with his picks this week.

0:47:17.719 --> 0:47:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Like the rip, he has the numbers he has left.

0:47:20.200 --> 0:47:26.239
<v Speaker 1>Are you ready for this? One? Three, five, seven, nine, ten, eleven, one, three, five,

0:47:26.400 --> 0:47:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the remaining playoffs. Basically, he has all the odd lumbers

0:47:30.480 --> 0:47:37.360
<v Speaker 1>numbers left except for ten. Yes that nine have nine nine, three, five, seven, nine, ten, eleven.

0:47:37.840 --> 0:47:41.360
<v Speaker 1>He's all even numbers. Week What is your what is

0:47:41.360 --> 0:47:44.600
<v Speaker 1>your most confident pick this weekend? Is it with the spread?

0:47:44.920 --> 0:47:47.000
<v Speaker 1>It's with the spread with spread, so you have to

0:47:47.719 --> 0:47:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and obviously the strategy involved because you don't know what

0:47:49.960 --> 0:47:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the spread is gonna be in the next round, and

0:47:51.920 --> 0:47:53.880
<v Speaker 1>it just is it totals or is it just just

0:47:54.239 --> 0:47:58.480
<v Speaker 1>just spread sides. Would you use your eleven this week?

0:48:01.360 --> 0:48:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Is there anything you feel bad strongly about? He wants to,

0:48:03.800 --> 0:48:06.640
<v Speaker 1>He wants, he wants to say the case Casey put

0:48:06.680 --> 0:48:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the eleven on case? My two favors of case I

0:48:08.680 --> 0:48:12.120
<v Speaker 1>feel most confident matters or Casey is fan Francisco. Would

0:48:12.120 --> 0:48:14.759
<v Speaker 1>you used the eleven now? Probably not? Maybe used nine

0:48:14.800 --> 0:48:17.520
<v Speaker 1>in tent on it. I probably used nine tent on it. Yeah,

0:48:17.719 --> 0:48:20.719
<v Speaker 1>I would do that agree. He also had this to say,

0:48:21.200 --> 0:48:23.360
<v Speaker 1>speaking of it's a big jeopardy week? What are the

0:48:23.400 --> 0:48:26.719
<v Speaker 1>other two? You're human number? Oh? There you go? Would

0:48:26.719 --> 0:48:28.800
<v Speaker 1>you would you go seven on? What? Would you go seven? On? Tennessee?

0:48:28.840 --> 0:48:32.399
<v Speaker 1>Now I go five? So we have won three, seven

0:48:32.440 --> 0:48:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and eleven left for green Bay. He is a Packers fan.

0:48:39.040 --> 0:48:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Is that my factor into the three? I guess take

0:48:43.080 --> 0:48:47.839
<v Speaker 1>the three on green Bay? His jeopardy question is who

0:48:47.920 --> 0:48:53.120
<v Speaker 1>dresses and looks older than they are? Who is break sauce?

0:48:55.640 --> 0:48:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Division of Laylve week? Is here? What the coverage? All

0:48:58.000 --> 0:48:59.719
<v Speaker 1>we get along on the Sports Good Network? Wage your

0:48:59.760 --> 0:49:02.400
<v Speaker 1>dog is next? Thanks to Danny Chris downstairs, Frank Stampe,

0:49:02.440 --> 0:49:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm Gregg Sousman. We'll do it all. Get on Monday,

0:49:05.239 --> 0:49:09.360
<v Speaker 1>we will sports grid dot com betting insights and entertainment

0:49:09.480 --> 0:49:13.759
<v Speaker 1>at your fingertips, real time odds, predictive betting models, expert picks,

0:49:13.800 --> 0:49:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and more. Get on the grid sports grid dot com