1 00:00:02,320 --> 00:00:08,880 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio News. You were surprisingly close 2 00:00:09,039 --> 00:00:12,000 Speaker 1: to a Holt. Can you explain that? 3 00:00:13,280 --> 00:00:17,079 Speaker 2: Well, I wouldn't say Holt, I would say I was 4 00:00:17,239 --> 00:00:23,040 Speaker 2: much more balanced. Well, I was balanced going into it 5 00:00:23,079 --> 00:00:25,360 Speaker 2: from at the end of the last meeting, thinking well, 6 00:00:25,880 --> 00:00:28,080 Speaker 2: I'm really open minded for the next round and we'll 7 00:00:28,080 --> 00:00:32,200 Speaker 2: see what happens. So I think, you know, my mind 8 00:00:32,320 --> 00:00:34,479 Speaker 2: was certainly open at that point as to where we 9 00:00:34,479 --> 00:00:35,360 Speaker 2: would go next. 10 00:00:36,600 --> 00:00:39,200 Speaker 1: But the decision could have gone to a hold this time. 11 00:00:39,479 --> 00:00:40,920 Speaker 1: So how should markets interpret that? 12 00:00:42,560 --> 00:00:45,440 Speaker 2: Well, I think market shinterpted is we're in a situation 13 00:00:45,479 --> 00:00:48,680 Speaker 2: where there are risks on both sides of this situation. 14 00:00:50,680 --> 00:00:55,040 Speaker 2: There are a risk that demand could be considerably weaker 15 00:00:55,080 --> 00:00:58,000 Speaker 2: than we expect it to be. That could pull down 16 00:00:58,000 --> 00:01:03,280 Speaker 2: on inflation. We would then need to put lower interest 17 00:01:03,360 --> 00:01:07,119 Speaker 2: rates than we're predicting. There's the risk on the other 18 00:01:07,200 --> 00:01:10,560 Speaker 2: side that this process of adjustment was removal of the 19 00:01:10,560 --> 00:01:13,320 Speaker 2: sort of persistence of the fects from the inflation we 20 00:01:13,400 --> 00:01:17,400 Speaker 2: had for years ago isn't going to materialize in the 21 00:01:17,440 --> 00:01:21,039 Speaker 2: way we think it is, And also that the supply 22 00:01:21,120 --> 00:01:23,920 Speaker 2: capacity of the economy remains more limited. We don't get 23 00:01:24,080 --> 00:01:26,520 Speaker 2: the sort of supply growth that even that we're thinking 24 00:01:26,520 --> 00:01:28,320 Speaker 2: we're going to get and that will cause inflation to 25 00:01:28,360 --> 00:01:33,000 Speaker 2: be higher. Now, I we did it in two parts. 26 00:01:33,000 --> 00:01:35,520 Speaker 2: We started with the sort of domestic situation and then 27 00:01:35,600 --> 00:01:37,480 Speaker 2: sort of in the sense, brought the tariff and trade 28 00:01:37,520 --> 00:01:41,880 Speaker 2: news into it. On the domestic situation, this is sort 29 00:01:41,880 --> 00:01:43,720 Speaker 2: of crucial to your question about sort of you know, 30 00:01:44,640 --> 00:01:48,720 Speaker 2: how near or how far were you from action. An 31 00:01:48,720 --> 00:01:53,040 Speaker 2: important part of the story is actually where particularly where 32 00:01:53,040 --> 00:01:56,840 Speaker 2: the pay story is going in this country. Is it 33 00:01:56,880 --> 00:01:59,920 Speaker 2: going to you know, it's it's higher clearly than consistent 34 00:02:00,080 --> 00:02:02,840 Speaker 2: at the target. Is it going to come down during 35 00:02:02,840 --> 00:02:05,600 Speaker 2: the course of this year? Are we starting to see 36 00:02:05,600 --> 00:02:08,240 Speaker 2: the sort of the signals And my conclusion sort of 37 00:02:08,280 --> 00:02:11,799 Speaker 2: pouring over the evidence and the last few weeks as 38 00:02:11,800 --> 00:02:14,560 Speaker 2: we went into this decision, is I can see enough 39 00:02:14,639 --> 00:02:16,679 Speaker 2: in there. Yeah, that I think we are begining to 40 00:02:16,720 --> 00:02:18,720 Speaker 2: see in the sort of higher frequency data that we 41 00:02:18,760 --> 00:02:20,799 Speaker 2: are seeing some scientific coming off, even though in the 42 00:02:20,840 --> 00:02:25,000 Speaker 2: official slower frequency data, actually you don't really see so 43 00:02:25,080 --> 00:02:25,760 Speaker 2: much of that at the. 44 00:02:25,720 --> 00:02:28,919 Speaker 1: Moment, Governor, I mean, Murgis are now almost ruling out 45 00:02:28,919 --> 00:02:31,000 Speaker 1: to move in June. Is that the right interpretation? 46 00:02:31,720 --> 00:02:33,680 Speaker 2: I suppose The only thing we can say in confidences 47 00:02:33,760 --> 00:02:35,000 Speaker 2: in the world we're in at the moment is that 48 00:02:35,080 --> 00:02:37,160 Speaker 2: a lot's going to happen in the next whatever it 49 00:02:37,240 --> 00:02:39,600 Speaker 2: is six weeks or so. I mean, it really is 50 00:02:39,639 --> 00:02:41,240 Speaker 2: going to happen. I mean a lot really is going 51 00:02:41,280 --> 00:02:43,200 Speaker 2: to happen. I suspect, So I have to be honest 52 00:02:43,240 --> 00:02:45,240 Speaker 2: with you again. You know, I'm very open minded about 53 00:02:45,720 --> 00:02:48,200 Speaker 2: every meeting is by the way, every meetings live for us. 54 00:02:48,720 --> 00:02:52,680 Speaker 2: That's our philosophy. It's it's not a shifting philosophy, that's 55 00:02:52,680 --> 00:02:56,280 Speaker 2: a permanent philosophy. So I'm very open minded about it, 56 00:02:56,320 --> 00:02:58,240 Speaker 2: frankly because I think we'll know a lot. We'll know 57 00:02:58,280 --> 00:03:00,440 Speaker 2: a lot both domestically and internationally. Well, there are a 58 00:03:00,440 --> 00:03:02,520 Speaker 2: lot more about pay actually, because there's a peak of 59 00:03:02,560 --> 00:03:05,080 Speaker 2: pay settlements that we will know more about because we're 60 00:03:05,120 --> 00:03:07,600 Speaker 2: sort of just going through that, and I think we 61 00:03:07,600 --> 00:03:11,239 Speaker 2: can probably guarantee we're going to know more internationally. Stuff 62 00:03:11,280 --> 00:03:11,840 Speaker 2: will happen. 63 00:03:12,480 --> 00:03:15,800 Speaker 1: How much uncertainty does the UK US trade deal actually 64 00:03:15,880 --> 00:03:16,639 Speaker 1: take off the table? 65 00:03:17,000 --> 00:03:23,840 Speaker 2: Well, I think it's obviously good news now. However, the 66 00:03:23,960 --> 00:03:27,200 Speaker 2: UK is the very open economy, so when we formed 67 00:03:27,240 --> 00:03:30,959 Speaker 2: our view, it's not just about the UK US bilateral 68 00:03:31,000 --> 00:03:33,680 Speaker 2: trade relationship. It's about how all the other relationships with 69 00:03:33,760 --> 00:03:36,840 Speaker 2: the world come back to the UK as it were 70 00:03:36,840 --> 00:03:39,440 Speaker 2: in terms of the openness of the UK. So I 71 00:03:39,480 --> 00:03:41,160 Speaker 2: really hope, because I do think this is very good 72 00:03:41,240 --> 00:03:43,800 Speaker 2: news on the UK US front. I hope it's the 73 00:03:43,800 --> 00:03:47,280 Speaker 2: first of many, because that's really what we need to see. 74 00:03:47,440 --> 00:03:50,040 Speaker 1: It is a trade deal with the EU. The bigger prize. 75 00:03:50,840 --> 00:03:54,480 Speaker 2: Well, it's important. I think China's very important as well, frankly, 76 00:03:54,760 --> 00:03:55,960 Speaker 2: but those are important. 77 00:03:55,600 --> 00:03:59,520 Speaker 1: Ones, Yes, which ones are more important US, China or UK? 78 00:04:00,120 --> 00:04:01,960 Speaker 1: You for the UN, I don't. 79 00:04:01,760 --> 00:04:04,240 Speaker 2: Actually have a rank, order to be honest with you. 80 00:04:05,240 --> 00:04:07,240 Speaker 2: I think it's it's because of the sort of the 81 00:04:07,640 --> 00:04:11,880 Speaker 2: sort of other fluctuation nature of the situation. We do 82 00:04:11,960 --> 00:04:14,600 Speaker 2: not have a sort of you know, a league table 83 00:04:14,640 --> 00:04:16,200 Speaker 2: of importance in that sense. 84 00:04:17,800 --> 00:04:21,320 Speaker 1: How big would the growth downgrade had been if not 85 00:04:21,480 --> 00:04:24,400 Speaker 1: for the looser financial conditions? 86 00:04:26,200 --> 00:04:29,159 Speaker 2: Well, yeah, okay, it's a slightly hypopoctical question obviously, because 87 00:04:29,240 --> 00:04:33,200 Speaker 2: they did move. Obviously, our sort of taking a part 88 00:04:33,200 --> 00:04:37,000 Speaker 2: of the of the components would have suggested that the 89 00:04:37,040 --> 00:04:40,440 Speaker 2: impact of the world on growth next year and actually 90 00:04:40,520 --> 00:04:42,880 Speaker 2: is not a bad place to lock Actually would have 91 00:04:42,920 --> 00:04:47,440 Speaker 2: been about point three. I think something like that without 92 00:04:47,560 --> 00:04:51,720 Speaker 2: then and of offsetting effects of financial markets, and so. 93 00:04:51,680 --> 00:04:55,800 Speaker 1: Again going forward, given all the uncertainty, do you you know, 94 00:04:55,960 --> 00:04:59,480 Speaker 1: what does it mean for cuts? How should market interpret 95 00:05:00,480 --> 00:05:03,640 Speaker 1: what we're seeing in you know, longer term? 96 00:05:04,120 --> 00:05:07,840 Speaker 2: So I think the path is still gradually and carefully downwards. 97 00:05:08,440 --> 00:05:12,000 Speaker 2: I don't think that that path is done. A lot 98 00:05:12,040 --> 00:05:14,719 Speaker 2: will depend also, of course, on the say, on these 99 00:05:14,760 --> 00:05:20,720 Speaker 2: important domestic developments. But I'm not going to make predictions 100 00:05:20,760 --> 00:05:25,479 Speaker 2: about you know, how quickly how much, because there is say, 101 00:05:25,560 --> 00:05:27,760 Speaker 2: there is so much now in a sense that we're 102 00:05:27,800 --> 00:05:29,840 Speaker 2: going to learn in the next in the coming in 103 00:05:29,920 --> 00:05:33,200 Speaker 2: the coming time. But I do think the underlying path 104 00:05:33,279 --> 00:05:34,480 Speaker 2: is down as we are going to get a bit 105 00:05:34,480 --> 00:05:36,200 Speaker 2: of a bit of a bump up in inflation. I'm 106 00:05:36,200 --> 00:05:37,680 Speaker 2: afraid we know that it's going to be in the 107 00:05:37,720 --> 00:05:39,800 Speaker 2: next release because it's it's in these sort of so 108 00:05:39,920 --> 00:05:44,880 Speaker 2: called administered prices, which we already know. But our view 109 00:05:45,000 --> 00:05:47,480 Speaker 2: is it's not it's nothing like what we what we 110 00:05:47,480 --> 00:05:50,040 Speaker 2: saw a few years ago. And we do think in 111 00:05:50,080 --> 00:05:54,240 Speaker 2: the current situation, you know, it's reasonable to look through 112 00:05:54,279 --> 00:05:55,400 Speaker 2: that does. 113 00:05:55,279 --> 00:05:58,120 Speaker 1: A terminal rate at three and a half percent sound reasonable. 114 00:05:59,240 --> 00:06:02,800 Speaker 2: Well, again, I think judgments on the terminal rate and 115 00:06:02,880 --> 00:06:08,200 Speaker 2: conditions of uncertainty like this are frankly, you know, quite 116 00:06:08,560 --> 00:06:11,560 Speaker 2: quite heroic at times. Obviously the market makes those judgments. 117 00:06:11,600 --> 00:06:15,159 Speaker 2: Market has to make those judgments. Uh, you've seen the 118 00:06:15,200 --> 00:06:19,200 Speaker 2: profile that we've published today with inflation based on that 119 00:06:19,279 --> 00:06:21,760 Speaker 2: market profile, and it doesn't look an unreasonable one. 120 00:06:22,960 --> 00:06:25,720 Speaker 1: Going forward to how concerned are you about the surgeon pound? 121 00:06:26,520 --> 00:06:28,280 Speaker 1: Does that have any impact on. 122 00:06:29,279 --> 00:06:32,880 Speaker 2: How much the word surging is is quite dramatic because 123 00:06:33,320 --> 00:06:36,360 Speaker 2: Stirling has been a little bit sort of in the middle. Actually, 124 00:06:36,440 --> 00:06:39,760 Speaker 2: so you've had obviously we've obviously we've appreciated against the dollar, 125 00:06:39,839 --> 00:06:44,040 Speaker 2: but we've depreciated against some other currencies, so we've relative 126 00:06:44,080 --> 00:06:47,400 Speaker 2: to some others, we've been somewhat in the middle. Actually again, yeah, 127 00:06:47,400 --> 00:06:51,200 Speaker 2: we factor it into our our forecast. I think we 128 00:06:51,240 --> 00:06:53,039 Speaker 2: also have to look at it quite carefully as to 129 00:06:53,120 --> 00:06:56,520 Speaker 2: why is it searching? Because I'm not sure that just 130 00:06:56,560 --> 00:07:01,239 Speaker 2: apploying the usual theory of interest parity you know, tells 131 00:07:01,240 --> 00:07:02,880 Speaker 2: you all the story. In fact, it doesn't touch it 132 00:07:02,880 --> 00:07:04,560 Speaker 2: because our staff do a lot of work to sort 133 00:07:04,560 --> 00:07:07,200 Speaker 2: of pick the bones apart, and they'll tell you actually 134 00:07:07,240 --> 00:07:09,280 Speaker 2: that's not really, that's not really the story. So I 135 00:07:09,320 --> 00:07:12,840 Speaker 2: think it's more going on than just that story. So 136 00:07:12,840 --> 00:07:14,720 Speaker 2: again we have to look at you, what degree I 137 00:07:14,800 --> 00:07:17,280 Speaker 2: sort of risk Premiu coming into the into the market 138 00:07:17,320 --> 00:07:17,880 Speaker 2: in that sense,