Speaker 1: So get this from the Los Angeles Times. Some kids
Speaker 1: are thriving, doing better than anybody expected because the schools
Speaker 1: are closed. That's right, my friends. These schruel children are
Speaker 1: feeling less stress, they're getting better grades, they're happy, they're
Speaker 1: productive now that they don't have to go to school.
Speaker 1: Some of these kids say that they aren't tired anymore.
Speaker 1: They don't have bouts of hunger during the day, they
Speaker 1: don't worry about being bullied. They're well fed, their energetic,
Speaker 1: their loving life. Ever since, they have been able to
Speaker 1: attend their classes online, which they don't really do, rather
Speaker 1: than at their oppressive schools. Now not all students feel
Speaker 1: that way. The kids who live in noisy homes or
Speaker 1: whose families are suffering hardships or illness because of the
Speaker 1: virus pandemic, well they're not doing so well. But for
Speaker 1: the kids the l A Times reported on man oh Man,
Speaker 1: life is good. So maybe it's time to reevaluate everything, folks.
Speaker 1: What are we doing to our children? Why should America's precious, fragile,
Speaker 1: sensitive kids ever be forced to go back to school.
Speaker 1: It's too stressful. They're grades suffer, they're tired, they're hungry,
Speaker 1: they're bullied, they're miserable, they never win. We should close them.
Speaker 1: That's what we should do. We should close the schools
Speaker 1: most of any way, forever. We should do it. We
Speaker 1: must do it in order to save the children. Think
Speaker 1: of the billions of taxpayer dollars. Actually know they would
Speaker 1: still charge of the tax revenue. So but we still
Speaker 1: should close the schools. Makes all the sense of the world, right,