WEBVTT - Here's Why Trump's Tariff Plan Has Global Consequences

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. I'm Stephen Carroll, and

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>this is Here's Why, where we take one news story

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:15.240
<v Speaker 1>and explain it in just a few minutes with our

0:00:15.280 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>experts here at Bloomberg. If we know one thing about

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump's foreign policy, he likes to tax trade.

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 2>Most beautiful word in the dictionary is tariff, and it's

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 2>my favorite word. It needs a public relations firm.

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 1>We're going to have thousands of companies coming into this country.

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>We're going to grow it like it's never grown before,

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to protect them when they come in

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>because we're not going to have somebody undercut him. That

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>was what the now president elect told Bloomberg in October.

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>During his first term, the self proclaimed tariff man enacted

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>duties on about three hundred and eighty billion dollars worth

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of imports. Now he's promising to go further with a

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:06.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty percent levy on all imported goods and sixty percent

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>on Chinese products. Trump says the import taxes can help

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>raise revenue as well as reduce US trade deficits and

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>drive manufacturers to make more in America. They have the

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>potential to completely upend global trade. Flows. So here's why

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Trump's tariff plan has global consequences. Bloomberok's trades are Brendan.

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Murray joins me now for more Brendan. From a historical

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>point of view, how dramatic would the tariffs that Trump

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>is promising be.

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Economics crunched these numbers and came up with an

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 2>estimate that we haven't seen tariffs like this in the

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 2>US for more than eighty years. So the sheer scale

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 2>of them, twenty percent tariffs on all US imports would

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 2>be a big shock to the sticker price of everything

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 2>from cars to toys.

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>How easily can Donald Trump actually impose these tariffs?

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 2>So the power to imposed tariffs exists in the US Constitution.

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 2>It's granted to Congress, but over the many years decades,

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Congress has essentially delegated a lot of that authority to

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 2>the executive branch, to the president. President Trump exercised that

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:18.520
<v Speaker 2>authority pretty loudly during his first four year term. President

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:21.919
<v Speaker 2>Biden followed him with maintaining many of those tariffs and

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 2>adding to some of them. And now Trump, being reelected

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 2>coming back in is saying, if you thought that the

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 2>first term tariffs were interesting, just wait till I get

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 2>in office again. The first term seems like, you know,

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:35.799
<v Speaker 2>just kind of a test for what's something much bigger

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 2>that's going to come.

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:39.920
<v Speaker 1>What would this mean in particular for China's economy because

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump has particularly singled out China for heavy tariffs.

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 2>That's right, he said, We're going to apply a sixty

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 2>percent tariff on everything from China, which Bloomberg Economics has

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 2>estimated that by twenty twenty eight that would reduce the

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 2>US's imports of Chinese good by about fifty percent, so

0:02:57.120 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 2>an absolutely huge number as the US would look to

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 2>from other places. But as Trump has said, all these

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 2>other countries, all these alternatives in China are going to

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 2>have a tariff on them as well, a twenty percent tariff.

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 2>So you can see how quickly this can turn into

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 2>something where prices and an inflationary environment could cause some

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 2>damage to the economy.

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>What should we be thinking about in terms of the

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:22.239
<v Speaker 1>sectors that could be particularly hard hit by this, because

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:24.519
<v Speaker 1>it's something that you know, as you say, we're talking

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>about big steps on a global scale, But are there

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>particular sectors that stand to be punished by this?

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, if you listen to Trump's advisors. A big part

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 2>of these campaign promises are meant to apply leverage on

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 2>other countries, other economies, the European Union, for example, after China,

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 2>the US administration under Donald Trump is going to go

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 2>after the European Union and say, hey, look, we have

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 2>some good trading relationships between us, but there's some imbalances

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 2>that we need to address. So let's talk about cars.

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Electric vehicles are a big issue right now. China's producing

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot of them, a lot of very good cars

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 2>by all accounts, and the US has blocked those from

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 2>coming into to the US market. Europe just recently imposed

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 2>tariffs on Chinese made electric vehicles. So from there the

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 2>debate will broaden out to other products, from agricultural goods

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 2>to industrial machinery, you know, highly engineered manufactured goods.

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Could the EU, for example, hope to perhaps negotiate with

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration and avoid a trade war, perhaps manage

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to carve out some exemptions. Is there room for diplomacy?

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:29.679
<v Speaker 1>And what we've heard from Donald Trump in the past

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and what he's done in the past.

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, this is the central question really as we shift

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 2>from a rules based trading system, one where low tariffs

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:40.479
<v Speaker 2>are the guiding principle. If Donald Trump comes in and

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 2>says to the European Union, look, we don't think our

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:46.479
<v Speaker 2>trading relationship is fair, then we will put twenty percent

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 2>tariffs on every European product. That's where the negotiation starts.

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:52.919
<v Speaker 2>And you know, we could see lots of reciprocal action

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:55.720
<v Speaker 2>by Europe. You know, you can see how quickly this

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 2>can cascade into a trade war.

0:04:57.440 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, indeed, I think we can all sort of imagine

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>this would have a negative impact on all the firms

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that export goods to the US. But what would we

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>expect this to mean for the US economy.

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, the goal, if you listen to Trump and his advisors,

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:14.479
<v Speaker 2>is to bring production back to the US. A lot

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 2>of manufactured items are made elsewhere now, and the goal

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:22.479
<v Speaker 2>is to turn the US from a consumption based economy

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 2>back to a production based economy. Now, that would mean

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:30.160
<v Speaker 2>bringing factories that otherwise would go to Southeast Asia or

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Latin America, Mexico. Even so, the goal would be bring

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 2>your production to the US, Otherwise we're going to put

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 2>a tariff on whatever you make. That ultimately is the goal,

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:42.600
<v Speaker 2>and good jobs would be the dividend that would come

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 2>from that, but it's a long way down the road

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 2>to accomplishing that, certainly longer than a four year president.

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:51.280
<v Speaker 1>And in the meantime, of course, then there's the inflationary

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>impact of it as well for consumers to deal with.

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly. I mean, tariffs themselves are not inflationary, but

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 2>they can add inflationary pressure. Now there's a distinction to

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 2>be made. And every time the Trump administration talks about

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:06.479
<v Speaker 2>their tariffs on their first term, they say, look, they

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 2>weren't inflationary. We didn't have inflation during Donald Trump's first term. Well,

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 2>if you look back at at some FED research, you

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 2>can see signs that businesses were feeling price pressure from

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 2>those tariffs. They were saying, we don't have any pricing pressure,

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 2>we can't raise our prices. But then the pandemic came along,

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 2>and the demand spike and the supply shock from the

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:30.720
<v Speaker 2>pandemic added fuel to what was already the embers of

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 2>inflation starting to heat up.

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:34.599
<v Speaker 1>What I'm hearing is it's not simple, which I think

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 1>is a good lesson for us to watch and see

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 1>what happens next. Brendon Murray, our trades are here at Bloomberg.

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:41.479
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much for joining us and talking us

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 1>through some of the potential consequences of Donald Trump's tariff plant,

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:47.599
<v Speaker 1>and for more explanations like this from our team of

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven hundred journalists and analysts around the world. Search

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:53.600
<v Speaker 1>for Quick Take on the Bloomberg website or the Bloomberg

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Business app. I'll be back next week with more. Thanks

0:06:57.000 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>for listening.