WEBVTT - 11/06/20 DPS-BEST OF 0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:03.600 You are listening to the Dan Patrick Show on Fox 0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:06.640 Sports Radio. Welcome to the program. We made it to 0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:09.719 a Friday. It's a meet Friday at that gang's all 0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:11.680 here ready to go. You could be part of the 0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:14.120 program and a variety of blaze. If you'd like to watch, 0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:16.759 you can do so on peacock download the app. You 0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:18.840 can watch for free. Say good morning to chat Row 0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:21.880 and also our great friends at Fox Sports Radio and 0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:24.800 the other great radio affiliates around the country, around the world. 0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.680 As a matter of fact, eight seven seven three d 0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:30.200 P Show email address DP at Dan Patrick dot com, 0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:34.479 Twitter handle at DPS show mclovin's duties. He is supposed 0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:36.120 to come up with a pull question, but he does 0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:37.960 more than that. He comes up with a couple of 0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:41.760 poll questions. Yes, mclub exciting news too. I have our man, 0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:44.920 Ethan is helping me with today's poll questions. So you're 0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:48.080 not able to handle the duties and now Ethan, who 0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:51.240 does our stats, is now helping Well, it's not like that. 0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:53.559 That's what it sounded like. No, No, we all came 0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:55.640 to a consensus on what question we wanted to ask 0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:59.840 that I turned to Ethan for some numerical supportasical. All right, 0:00:59.880 --> 0:01:02.000 I can't wait for that. Yes see he's reaching across 0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:04.600 the aisle if you will, oh, ok, sending a hand, 0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:09.360 all right, great timing, great timing to reach as across 0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:13.319 the aisle. Everybody play nice, yes, Paul. It's like a 0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:15.840 rapper and a country start collaborating on a song and 0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:19.000 trying to hit the charts. Those two so like Billy 0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:25.759 Ray Cyrus and who was the uh oh well natz 0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:28.600 X Yeah, yeah, yeah, I forgot that great song. Yes, 0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:31.080 MC club. I will guarantee all the pole results will 0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:34.240 be tallied on time. You're counting every vote. Yes, although 0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:36.200 sometimes when you call him me, I don't expect it. 0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:38.240 I might make up the result. You have made up 0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:40.880 the results before. Ahead, well, I'll go to the last 0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:42.920 time I looked, which might be forty minutes ago, in 0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:45.400 which case the results have changed. But that's an eternity. 0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:49.120 Let's not even get into that. Okay, Welcome to the program, 0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:52.120 as you can tell, already in progress here, A little feisty, 0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:54.840 a little frisky on this Friday, Packers roll over the 0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:58.960 nine Ers thirty four seventeen, Davante Adams ten catches one 0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:02.960 seventy three in the Town. The NFL finds the Raiders again, 0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:07.840 the NBA officially starting December twenty second. This weekend, you 0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:10.079 do have the Big one with Clemson and Notre Dame. 0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:14.640 Don't sleep on BYU and boise I. Don't you know? 0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:16.639 If BYU runs the table, they're not going to be 0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:19.280 in the Final four. I would love to have had 0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:22.280 a Final eight. College football can't get anything. The NC 0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:25.200 Double A can't get anything together quickly, so that's not 0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:27.560 going to happen. But I wish that they were open 0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:31.440 to it this year. Michigan and Indiana, also Florida and 0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:35.960 Georgia as well. We're told there's no excuses in football, 0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:39.520 at least in the NFL. At least there aren't supposed 0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:42.160 to be. Good teams just adjust. We hear it all 0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:45.079 the time, and they got injuries and you just try 0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:47.960 to make do with what you have. The Niners, well, 0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:51.600 the normal rules don't apply. The Niners have legitimate excuses 0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:55.120 this year, decimated by injuries. Nobody has lost more games 0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:58.400 with their players to injury than the Niners have this year. 0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:01.960 They lost four more players this week to the reserve 0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:05.320 COVID list, quarterback Jimmy Garoppolo and George Kittle. They were 0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:08.120 out last night. Most of the receiving corps was out 0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:11.160 last night. Really, they had a shell of their normal 0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:15.000 offense and they got blown out last night and defense 0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:20.079 ran into You know, Aaron Rodgers, Aaron Rodgers has performed. 0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:23.920 I would say Aaron Rodgers esque. I don't know if 0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:26.720 we're waiting for Aaron Rodgers. Remember we weren't quite sure. 0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:28.399 There were people who said they didn't know if Aaron 0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:32.160 Rodgers was a top ten quarterback this year in August. 0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:36.320 Didn't know if Aaron Rodgers top ten quarterback. He makes 0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:38.880 it look easy. I'll say it, and I'll say it 0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:42.480 until he retires. Nobody has ever made the position look 0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:44.600 easier when they're at the top of their game than 0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:48.240 Aaron Rodgers. For years, there seemed to be a jinx 0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:50.680 on the team that lost the Super Bowl. You know, 0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:52.760 had a lot of years where you didn't even get 0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:55.600 into the playoffs that following year. But that's the case 0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:57.760 for the Niners. They're right there against the Chiefs. That 0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:00.200 was only back in February, which seems such a long 0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:04.680 time ago. Hopefully they get healthy, the core group gets 0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:07.160 another chance to compete at that level. But right now 0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:09.560 they have to hope they can just put a competitive 0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:12.040 team on the field. And the more I was watching 0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:15.120 the game last night, and the Packers got their star 0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:17.800 running back, Aaron Jones back. Prior to the game, we 0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:19.479 weren't sure who was going to be their running back. 0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:22.760 And I started to think, Okay, the Niners don't have anybody, 0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:27.479 no one, and they're only a seven point underdog at home. 0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:31.600 And I kept thinking, Okay, there's no home field advantage 0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:36.240 for San Francisco. Start there. Packers have everybody for the 0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:41.080 most part. Rogers is playing at a high, high level, 0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:46.080 Davante Adams is playing great, and you're going out to 0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:49.320 San Francisco. And I kept thinking, what does Vegas know 0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:51.880 that I don't know, Not that I would have put 0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:55.200 money down on it, but I kept going, They're only 0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:58.480 seven point favored. And then all of a sudden, they 0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:00.560 just start to blow them out out and I go, 0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:06.039 what was Vegas thinking? And I said to PAULI, let's 0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:08.960 get Bret Musburger on. He's the Raiders play by play voice, 0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:12.240 and of course he has a gambling site that he 0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:14.560 works for in Las Vegas, and Brent will join us 0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:18.039 next hour. I'm not sure what it was, but and 0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:20.800 I don't know where the money went, but it just 0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:26.040 felt like that was a two touchdown underdog type feel 0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:30.279 to it. Maybe maybe twelve somewhere in that it felt 0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:32.839 like that. And then you start to watch the game 0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:36.360 and you go, oh, man, hold on for dear life 0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:38.560 because San Francisco is going to get blown out here. 0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:42.440 But Brent will join us coming up next hour, mclub 0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:44.440 And what's the full question we're going with today? Okay, 0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:46.920 we're still working out the choices here, but if you 0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:49.120 could sign one wide receiver in the NFL to a 0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:52.440 four year contract to build around the choices so far? 0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:58.000 DeAndre Hopkins twenty eight, Davante Adams twenty seven? Do we 0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:01.000 put Julio Jones on there? Devant Hey Adams turns twenty 0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:05.560 eight next month? Uh? Do we put Julio Jones on there? How? 0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:12.279 Julio Jones thirty one? Okay, Michael Thomas, DK metcalf do 0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:16.880 we put O'Dell on there? If you want to? Um, 0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:21.839 Mike Evans, yeah right? And Tyreek Hill all right? Let 0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:25.520 me play what Davante Adams how he responded to a 0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:28.840 question last night. Now, he was asked about this and 0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:30.760 it wasn't one of those after the games saying I'm 0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:33.160 the best receiver in the game. Here is the question 0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:35.400 and his answer. I think you're at the point where 0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:37.480 you can say you're the best wide receiver in the NFL. 0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:40.240 Do you think that's fair to say? Uh, yeah, I 0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:42.680 think that's fair to say. I think that's not that's 0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:45.240 not being conceded, that's just being confident. I think, Um, 0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:48.479 you know obviously what I've what I've done, and UM, 0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:50.160 what I'm going to continue to do is going to 0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:53.440 prove that, um to anybody who isn't on board with that. 0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:56.360 But I truly believe that just based off of the 0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:59.000 work that I put in, UM, and the connection that 0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:01.400 I have between my quarterback. You know, it's not just 0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:04.479 about me. I mean just running a route and uh 0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:06.440 you know, if if the line isn't protecting, or if 0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:08.719 the quarterback doesn't look your way, or the other receivers 0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:12.040 don't do they're part the poor defenders away. Um, you know, 0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:15.000 that's none of what I could do can happen. So 0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:18.320 at the end of the day, I'll tell you, yes, absolutely, 0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:20.040 i think I'm the best war receiver in the in 0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:22.240 the game. But um, there's a lot of things that 0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:25.440 go into me being able to make that statement. That's 0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:30.160 Davante Adams with mclovin also in there. It doesn't match 0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:33.200 the headline. It feels like Davontae Adam is. You know, 0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:35.560 he's saying, Hey, I'm the best receiver. I mean, he 0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:39.280 agreed with the question, and I don't have any problem 0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:43.880 with this if he thinks he is, great. I we 0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:46.600 we wanted both ways, like, oh, man, you can't be 0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:49.520 saying that too. Man. I'm glad he said it because 0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:54.560 it gives me content. He feels it great. I have 0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:59.400 no problem with that, but I wanted to have the 0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:02.239 contact of it, because if you just see the headline, 0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:04.480 then he might think, oh, who does Davante Adams think 0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:08.120 he is? And Fritzie even said that in the morning meeting, 0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:10.600 and I said, we're gonna play it for you in 0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:13.600 its context, and then you're gonna understand he agreed with 0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:16.800 the If the reporter says, who do you think the 0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:20.360 best receiver in the game is, and then if he 0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:24.080 says I think I am, that's a little different than 0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:27.320 do you think you're the best receiver in the game? Yeah. 0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:29.080 I heard fair to say yeah. When I heard him 0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:31.520 that he said that. My initial thought was that's, you know, 0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:33.920 being arrogant and brigand and it's a turn off. But 0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:36.560 the way he posed it, I see that comment in 0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:39.800 a much different layer. I love the answer. If I'm 0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:42.280 Aaron Rodgers, I love that he says that I want 0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:44.800 him to feel like he's the best receiver. I want 0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:47.160 him to feel that every single game when I go 0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:52.400 out there, I have to be great. And that's part 0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:54.720 of being the best receiver in the game is every 0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:59.880 game they're game planning for you. And I'm there's not 0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:03.400 a great player in any sport who goes I don't know. 0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:07.360 I don't know. Remember when I asked Steph Curry about 0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:10.959 who's a better offensive player? That was a couple of 0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:13.760 years ago, and I asked him, I think four years ago, 0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:16.199 did I ask him who's the best offensive player in 0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:19.840 the game? And he said that he was, And people 0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:24.040 are like, can you believe Steph Curry said that. I'm like, yeah, 0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:27.960 I mean, if he said, you know, I'm not even 0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:32.480 the best offensive guy on my own team, and I'm 0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:35.640 probably not, you know, maybe the fifth best, you know, 0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:38.120 in the West. Right now, I want my guys to 0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:42.800 feel that way every single show that I do, I 0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:45.440 want to prove that I'm the best that does this. 0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:48.800 Whether I do it or not, my mindset is you 0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:53.400 want to do that every single show. Wish the Dannets 0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:56.160 would follow suit. But now it's on me, which makes 0:09:56.160 --> 0:10:02.400 it makes it even m Sorry, are you the best 0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:05.640 booker in the business? Yes? Okay, I don't know if 0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:11.160 i'd be that confident. But how's that working out today? Oh? 0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:14.800 Oh no, come on, come on, get him on. That's 0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:16.880 an easy show. You know we do that. It's bad 0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:19.640 timing for that answer from you time. Mike Floria is 0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:22.880 joining us in the final I know it's quality now 0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:26.400 you got Florio. Yeah, that's unbelievable. You should have told 0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:28.600 me is a quality or quantity? I'm trying to how 0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:31.880 does this swear? How do I get judged? I like quality? 0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:34.400 The quality of quantity is what I like. How about 0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:40.240 more quality? Yeah? See, it's not for me to say 0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:42.959 who was a good book or not two minutes ago on. 0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:45.840 It's I don't like to get into that kind of stuff. 0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:49.280 It's not your place to say that today. Other people 0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:52.920 make those decide on a you know, maybe a four 0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:55.640 guest day. But I did I did drive in this 0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:59.440 morning with the attitude that I am. Okay, okay have 0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:02.000 that attitude. No, no, it doesn't always work out. Look, 0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:07.439 you work hard, you do that's for meat Friday. No, No, 0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:10.760 it's you're good, you work hard, you care. Yes, mc 0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:13.320 cle That sounds a little bit like Mike Zimmer saying 0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:15.760 Everson Griffin is a good player? Did you see that headline? 0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:19.080 And Everson Griffin was an upset that he wants to 0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:22.400 get back at Mike Zimmer called him a good player? Right, 0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:25.840 That's like Todd working hard is the good player? Meaning yeah, 0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:28.560 that's one of those stories where the Lions defensive end 0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:31.960 Everson Griffin upset. Mike Zimmer called him, quote a good player. 0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:34.200 This is the best I felt in a long time. 0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:36.560 I got a little frustrated when I read that comment 0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:40.440 what Zimmer said, Oh, Everson was a good player, Griffin 0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:44.160 said Thursday, like coach Zimmer just wasn't a good coach. 0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:46.160 He was a great coach to me, So for him 0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:48.160 to call me a good player that kind of hurts 0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:54.360 my feelings. On Sunday, I'm really looking forward to playing 0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:57.160 the Vikings and showing them that I'm a great player. 0:11:57.440 --> 0:12:01.080 I'm excited. I'm ready to execute. Mental health is strong, 0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:04.280 my physical health is strong, my mind is strong, and 0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:06.720 I'm ready to go out there and dominate. I'm ready 0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:09.600 to create, adapt and go out there and win. Who's 0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:14.000 with me? Oh that's right, we're the Lions. Maybe nobody. 0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:19.599 Everson Griffin got called a good player. That's going to 0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:22.360 motivate him? So he wasn't going to be motivated going 0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:25.439 against his former team? Is Mike zimmer plan? By the way? 0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:27.400 I don't think he's gonna play in the game, is he? 0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:28.800 But he's gonna go out there and he's gonna prove 0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:32.360 it to somebody. Yes, and coach speak is saying someone's good. 0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:35.679 But is that a negative? Like? Is Everson Griffin? Right? 0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:37.680 Was Zimmer taking a little shot there? Did you know 0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:39.280 how coaches are always like the guy who were playing 0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:41.000 this week is the best player I've ever seen? Yes, 0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:44.439 you're right that that's normally the case. Even Belichick has 0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:48.800 been known to hyperbole, you know, fall prey to hyperbole. Uh, 0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:52.520 George Kodle, He's the best tut in that I've seen 0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:55.079 a long time. Yeah, mclu did you see this week 0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:58.920 Bruce Arian said that Alvin Kamara is better than Marshall Fault. Yeah, 0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:01.800 that's a classic example of hyping up your opponent. Yes, 0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:06.920 I I don't think he's better than Marshall Falk, but 0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:11.200 this week, Bruce Aries, it's better than going. He's not 0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:14.560 quite Marshall Falk, but he's a good player. Then, Alvin 0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:17.160 Kamaron going. Did you hear what, Bruce Arians? He called 0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:19.760 me a good player? Yeah, you know you want to 0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:21.640 do the good player thing. Take it into your home life. 0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:23.720 Imagine your wife just got back from the store and 0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:25.760 she had a dress and she's tried on. Hey, what 0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:27.160 do you think of my new dress? You said that 0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:31.720 looks good? You're over man, You're cooked. Your weekend is shot. 0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:37.199 If you don't say that that dress looks awesome, hot, great, beautiful, 0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:42.280 you have to it's much safer to overcompliment than to undercompliment. Somebody. Well, 0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:45.439 that's your wife. Though a coach and a player is 0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:49.760 a relationship. But it's a former player former coach, then 0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.400 he must not have been that helpful to his cause. You. Okay, 0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:56.360 how about a former girlfriend of yours and you saw 0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:59.120 her and you were telling somebody you saw her. Would 0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:02.440 you say she looked good? What would you say she 0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:08.400 looked great? What am I talking to? Not your wife? Okay, 0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:11.000 not your wife. Yes, when Paul brought up his wife, 0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:13.120 I thought he was talking about another area where you 0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:16.800 don't want to hear you were good, not great, It's Friday, 0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:21.760 was good? Where are we going? What happened? That's great? Yes, time, 0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:24.480 But you could also overstate or overcompliment. If you look 0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:26.520 like the coach that screams all the time, you tune 0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:29.080 them out. If every time you're a wife or a 0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:31.600 girlfriend who's looking for a compliment and everything is amazing, 0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:34.800 or you're you're incredible looking, or that's work looks perfect 0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:39.000 on you, And when is it like legitimate? If anybody 0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:44.600 should overcompliment their wife, it's you. Yes, you should be crawling. 0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:47.040 But but then what am I Then I'm basically calling 0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:49.200 my wife insecure. She needs me like to tell her 0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:54.080 how amazing you should follow her dropping rose petals everywhere. 0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:55.760 I think you gotta mix it up a little bit. Yeah, 0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:57.840 that's what. It looks nice. The other thing, Wow, look 0:14:57.840 --> 0:14:59.120 at it, look like you're ready to go out of 0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:01.200 the town. But if everything, I don't know if a 0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:05.200 woman ever gets tired of hearing you look great. That 0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:07.520 looks great no matter what she's wearing about it, what 0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:10.320 she's doing. I don't know if a woman ever gets 0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:14.520 tired of that. And that's it insecuted and you have 0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:18.960 your okay if someone's just always telling you how wonderful 0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:21.320 you are, like it changes your person out and then 0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:23.400 you think you know your your mystery. Do you ever 0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:28.240 hear yourself? Yes, when you see Fritzie's wife, it's like 0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:32.680 watching a Kevin James CBS sitcom. You could fill in 0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:35.720 the blank on the rest of it. Every one of 0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:39.120 those CBS sitcoms, Leah Remedy is hanging out with the 0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:42.200 ups driver. Yeah it is confused. Yes, it doesn't seem 0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:44.640 to crazy hot and she's hanging out with the ups 0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:46.680 to suspend a lot of disbelief on some of those 0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:53.000 how did they get there? Yeah, so we gotta pull question. Yeah, 0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:54.800 we're gonna go with the wide receiver. Yeah, well, we're 0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:57.040 gonna start with the wide receiver. You could tide one 0:15:57.080 --> 0:15:59.200 for four years. I have a front runner. That's that's 0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:02.160 a lot of why receivers. Dude, Yeah, I have a 0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:04.440 front rower. I could save it. No, no, you can 0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:07.080 tell me for we go to break because of maybe 0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:08.640 it's just the hype, but I'm in on the DK 0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:12.160 Metcalf training young. I feel like that clip of him 0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:16.720 chasing down Buddha Baker is everywhere. He's that's the hot 0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:19.800 new wide receiver here, and I think because of that, 0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:22.960 and because of how young he is, you know, the 0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:25.160 DK Metcalf's going to get a lot of oats and 0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:28.680 rightfully so, and he might win it just because there's 0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:33.560 newness to that. Davante Adams is a great wide receiver, 0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:37.560 but wide receivers in Green Bay get overshadowed by Aaron Rodgers, 0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:40.920 Like does do the quarterbacks make them better than what 0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.280 they really are? In Green Bay? Did Brett Farve make 0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:46.080 them better than what they really were? Does Aaron Rodgers 0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:49.080 make you better than what you really are? And we're 0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:52.560 always going to fall back with praise on those quarterbacks, 0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:55.960 then we are probably with those wide receivers. If Sterling 0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:59.760 Sharp doesn't get injured, he's a Hall of Famer. But 0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:06.920 Donald Driver, Antonio Freeman, you know, Randall Cobb, like you're 0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:11.040 just they're good receivers. But Davante Adams, it feels like 0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:13.960 it is a little more special. Yes, but none of 0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:16.359 them are first round receivers. I think that label of 0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:18.560 being a second or third rounder sticks with those guys, 0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:21.399 even Adams, because he wasn't a first rounder, So we 0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:23.480 don't we Oh, he wasn't a first rounder, he can't 0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:26.840 be that good, which he is. So if I was 0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:32.919 going to take somebody for the next five years, all right, 0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:34.560 I don't give that thought. I'll have an answer here 0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:39.320 coming up. Yeah, And then I got to ask Brent 0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:42.000 Musburger what was up here with Vegas with the seven 0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:46.080 point spread. I'm just curious because when when the Niners 0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:49.040 took the field and you looked at it, it it looked 0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:52.840 like you had a junior college football team, like maybe 0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:56.280 not even a major college football team. We'll take a break. 0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:58.480 Phone calls are always welcome. We'll settle on our poll 0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:01.880 question here. I'm curious if anybody suffered a bad beat 0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:05.040 last night because there was a touchdown with four seconds 0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:08.679 to go. That's where you watch and you you know, 0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:12.640 you feel like you got that under. I got the under. 0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:18.520 I'm good. I probably shut off the TV and wake 0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:21.800 up in a bed full of money, and all of 0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:24.280 a sudden you look and like I've done that before, 0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:26.600 where you wake up at like two in the morning, 0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:29.800 and then because you didn't stay up for the whole game, 0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:33.760 and you go, oh my god, that's a bad beat. Yeah. 0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:36.320 That's why I think betting the over, you're grinding the 0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:40.000 entire game. But once it's over, it can't go back under. 0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:41.960 That's the one thing you can. You could be sitting 0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:43.920 there in the fourth part of thinking I got the under, 0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:46.159 Oh it's gonna oh no, oh no, oh no no, 0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:48.320 why would he score there? Once you get the over, 0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:51.160 that's it. I would probably, if I was betting, would 0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:53.959 bet over unders more than I would the point spread. 0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:57.760 Oh that's I know. But I did point spreads forever 0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:03.840 and the over under. You root for both teams. I'm 0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:06.560 a weather guy. With over unders, I will look at 0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:09.160 it in all seriousness. If you can, you can beat 0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:12.719 Vegas a little bit if you get weather, look at 0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:15.199 weather a little bit. You don't think Vegas looks at 0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:18.600 they do. But I'm telling you you can anticipate a 0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:19.920 little bit. If you would have said, I don't know 0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:22.840 what the over under was with raiders in Browns. But 0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:27.080 when my nephew who lives in Cleveland, and he was 0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:29.240 talking about how windy it was and how bad the 0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:32.520 weather was. That's when I would have gone, what's the 0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:35.560 number here? Just curiosity, not betting. All right, you're right, 0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:37.560 Vegas does watch the weather, but if you're a local, 0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:39.960 you may hear about five days from now we have 0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:43.600 something possibly coming. Yeah, that's what I would I would 0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:46.920 have like, Buffalo is playing Seattle in Buffalo this week 0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:50.760 and it's supposed to be sixty and sunny. Now, if 0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:53.080 it had been different, then maybe we would look at 0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:55.960 that game and the result, the end result differently. Yeah, mclovin, 0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:57.520 is there any doubt that's going to come down to 0:19:57.560 --> 0:19:59.520 a Russell Wilson drive in the fourth quarter of that game? 0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:02.440 It's so set up for and I was wondering who 0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:06.520 needs the game more? Because Seattle's got games coming up 0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:09.600 with the Rams and the Cardinals and they're they're playing 0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:11.840 for the number one seed. You know, Buffalo is not 0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:15.119 going to be the number one seed, but you know, 0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:17.280 and they don't have to be great to win that division. 0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:23.560 Seattle has it. It feels like there's different potential expectations 0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:25.800 with them to be the best team in the NFC. 0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:29.280 Buffalo is just trying to win that division, but they're not. 0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:32.720 I don't think they're close to be in better than 0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:35.879 Pittsburgh or certainly not better than Kansas City, maybe not 0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:38.280 better than the Ravens. Yeah, the club. What about national 0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:40.560 reputation wires? Not that they care, but I feel like 0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:42.359 the Bills need a big win to get back in 0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:45.760 everybody's good graces because they were hot early. Even if 0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:47.920 they do get a win, it feels like we're still 0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:51.960 the jury's out on them because we saw them in 0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:54.439 National on National TV a couple of games and they 0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:57.560 didn't look good at all. And if they do win 0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:00.639 this game, it's not on National TV. This isn't a 0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:03.639 standalone game. I don't think. Is this a one o'clock 0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:09.320 game in Buffalo? Probably, so check on that. Mclovin. Thanks 0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:11.720 for listening to The Dan Patrick Show podcast. Be sure 0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:14.640 to catch us live every weekday morning nine to noon 0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:17.760 Eastern or six to nine Pacific on Fox Sports Radio. 0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:20.399