WEBVTT - Beating the Book: 2020 Presidential Election Betting Angles

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:12.399
<v Speaker 1>Check it on Man Now down Man, It's good today

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>morning in the right here at Visa in the Sports

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Betting Network Series six time channel to A four of course,

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Visa dot Com, the Visa have Boobo Slinging game plus

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:23.280
<v Speaker 1>thanks to everybody who uh it's planning on joining us

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>for the two hours today because uh I like this one. Later,

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Drew dinsick whale Caper on Twitter talk a little NFL

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>with us, not a little NFL, that was a lot

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>of NFL. We'll get his picks, will get his thoughts

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>on week seven and obviously week eight moving forward, and

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>then Joe Shan will join us talk World Series Game

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>six tonight. And I'll do what I did with both

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Sport and Winegarden yesterday. I just sort of throw out

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>my Davy Roberts theories and see if Joe wants to

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:51.199
<v Speaker 1>bat them down as well. Everybody disagrees and they're like yeah,

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>but Davy Roberts loses job, So I don't know if

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>they disagree or they agree. So we look forward to that.

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:59.279
<v Speaker 1>Football and baseball come in the second hour, but we

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>start today. As you know, on this show, we have

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:06.559
<v Speaker 1>not been shy about talking about political betting. A politically speaking,

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of course, Jason Jason conn is here as well. Everybody,

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:10.960
<v Speaker 1>how you doing, Jason? Could good morning? Go yeah we

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 1>get a political yeah yeah, well I want to get

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>a political but political betting. This is like super geeked

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 1>out stuff. Uh. And these two guests who are kind

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:23.040
<v Speaker 1>enough to join us this morning, they did a phenomenal

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>podcast video pod on the subject last week, and I

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>wanted to have them both on. Uh. She is from

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:32.040
<v Speaker 1>odd Sharks. She's a writer for add Sharks. Comes comes

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to us primarily from my poker writing background. I believe

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 1>she'll correct me if I'm wrong. Pamela Malda Nado on

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the show this morning, and uh, he is a gaming attorney.

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 1>But also and he may object to this term, so

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll have to get a definition on this. I believe

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>operative might be too strong of a word. He may

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>object to that. But registered Republican, formerly working in politics

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and the Republican Party. It's Mac for standing. So welcome, Pamela,

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome Mac, and congratulations to the both of you. And

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I thought was just a great pot cast last week.

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. There they are, look at them

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>very much. Oh no, no, it was great. It was

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>It was thorough. It was wonderful and I hope to

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>do justice here this this morning, because I think this

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:16.800
<v Speaker 1>is the content that everybody wants. We are one week away,

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 1>obviously from the presidential election, and I guess I was

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out where should I start, And let's

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 1>just start with the latest, which is yesterday. When we

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>were on the air, it looked like Joe Biden had

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:30.359
<v Speaker 1>his day cleared, he wasn't gonna go anywhere, UM, had

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>his calendar cleared. And then he showed up in Pennsylvania randomly,

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe not so randomly, but at least schedule wise, it

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>was randomly. And then the schedule came out and he's

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 1>going to Georgia and Florida. I want to start with

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Georgia and Texas specifically because I found that interesting. UM,

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:49.359
<v Speaker 1>because Georgia and Texas at least in the betting markets,

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and I can give you the numbers specifically, Republicans to

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 1>win the electoral vote electoral vote in Georgia minus one

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>seventy six to do so in Texas. Uh, it is

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:01.239
<v Speaker 1>just about the same number. I think a little higher.

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll check on the exact number right now. Mac. Let's

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>start with you on these um Texas, by the way,

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>minus three sixty for the Republicans, pardon me, much higher

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>are Georgia. In Texas and specifically Georgia, where Biden is

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>visiting today in play, George is not genuinely in play

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>on the presidential front, but George is important for two reasons. One,

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a Senate race that is weirdly in play. The

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>incumbent Senator per Due is looking oddly vulnerable against a

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>guy named John osof whose claimed to fame and I

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>could not make this up, is he lost the most

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>expensive house race in American history. But somehow he's running

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>strong in Georgia on the Senate front. And if Biden's

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>going to win in his game to the point in

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the race where he's taking for granted the idea that

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>he might win and he wants to send it to

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>back him, that puts a lot of pressure down to

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>get there too. It makes the Republicans in the last

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>week spend money in the Atlanta media mark which is

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>expensive and going to the Texas point in a bunch

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>of media Marke considers super expensive, and that takes their

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>precious resources away from Michigan, Pennsylvania and parts of Florida,

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>So it's not a it's not a Hillary mistake. I don't.

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I know. He did say he's going to go visit Wisconsin,

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>so maybe it's it's it's not a kin to that,

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>but it's not for those are saying like, hey, this

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 1>is exactly what Hillary did. She was in the wrong

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>states of the in the last week. You don't view

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 1>it that way. I don't view it that way because

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's any obvious blind spot states that

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>he's missing. Look, I'm a proud man who used to

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:36.919
<v Speaker 1>live in Wisconsin, went to school in Wisconsin. And the

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 1>fact that Hillary couldn't see that iowaism play, in ohioism play,

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 1>but somehow didn't realize Wisconsin isn't play is malpractice of

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:49.039
<v Speaker 1>highest magnitude. But I didn't seems to be doing a

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>better job covering the obvious states. So I do think

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:54.479
<v Speaker 1>it is a little arrogant to go down to Georgia,

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>to go down to Texas and to try to put

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>those in place, so to speak, when he us have

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>real concerns in other states. But he's playing like a

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:05.919
<v Speaker 1>man who's well ahead in the fourth quarter and something

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of a preventive hunt. Interesting by the way, Trump of

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>course winning Georgia and polls right now split. But the the

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 1>betting market, as we mentioned, Republicans at minus one seventy

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>six to win the electoral will vote skill Alexander. It

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 1>is a numbers game right here at Visa the Sports

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Betting Network series x M channel two O four talking

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>with both mac Verstanding and Pamela Maldonado from odd Shark

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>about the election one week from today. Let me shift

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 1>to Texas for a second, Pamela, And by the way,

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>pam or Pamela, what do you prefer either way? We're

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>exciting to me. Okay, well, uh, Texas. You live in Texas,

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you are familiar with the demographics there. Uh done deal.

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:49.359
<v Speaker 1>Republicans huge favorites minus three sixty in terms of the

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>betting market on the electoral vote in Texas. But you

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>think that might be a little high. As far as

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:58.479
<v Speaker 1>I could gather, I will would not believe that they're

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>spending advertising dollar Kamala Harris is making a trip to

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Texas if they didn't believe that there is a legitimate

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>shot at at least making this a much tighter race

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 1>than the odds and polls indicate. Now, the reason for

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>that is because we have a large number of transient

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:19.599
<v Speaker 1>people that have come from California, New York, Arizona, people

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>from all across the country have in fact moved over

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to Austin, moved over to Harris County, that's Houston, Dallas,

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>moved over to some of these big metropolitans cities within

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the state. And that has shifted our demographics. We are

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:37.919
<v Speaker 1>no longer as strongly read as we used to be.

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>And now you said my Republican was minus three sixty.

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I've been tracking these odds since about March April UM

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>when everyone else was focusing on Korean baseball. I got

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 1>into politics. The number for a Republican was minus six hundred.

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>That number is now anywhere between minus three hundred. I

0:06:56.839 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 1>see it on bet online minus three. You see it

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a minus three sixty. Democrat went from plus one thousand,

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:05.719
<v Speaker 1>it is now plus two forty. Now it's interesting about

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Texas is we have nearly seven point four million early

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>votes as a Sunday. Why is that number so important

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>because that is of the state's total in two thousand

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and sixteen and we still have a week away. It

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>really is a present. But how about that Douson team

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>in Korea. That's what I really wanted to bring on it.

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Very very curious about that. Um so then, but just

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>from a betting perspective, then, while all of that so,

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>both in Georgia and Texas, while we're trending in one way,

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and listen, we're all about value. We always say it,

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>no matter the bed, value is value, whether it's a

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>favorite or an underdog. Mac do I do? Do you still?

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Do you recommend a bet on the Democrats in either

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>of those states? Are we are we jumping ahead of ourselves?

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I would take the bet on the Democrats in Texas.

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I think Texas at least for this election cycle is

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>lucy and the football to the Democrats there gonna get close,

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>They're going to make some progress, but the last man's

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna get pulled away. Georgia with the right odds, and

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>it seems that we're getting there may actually have good

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>value if you're looking to make a wager if Joe

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Biden wins big, if this is a historic election, somewhere

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>in the nature of Ronnie Reagan and eight four about

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>out the forty nine states sweep, Georgia is one of

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>those surprising states. That's gonna flip his way. I don't

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>think it's gonna happen. I don't think it's more probable

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 1>than not. But if you're getting the right odds and

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>it looks like the markets are just about there, it

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>may be a good value bet Okay, let's talk about

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the rust belt states because as I'm as I understand

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 1>and I think how the conventional wisdom is going right now,

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and most people seem to get it, is if Biden

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>can win, uh, the trifecta, if you will, of Michigan, Wisconsin,

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:51.839
<v Speaker 1>and Pennsylvania, this thing is over. Katie bar the doors.

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 1>They say back down south that this is done ze.

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with these one by one. You guys did

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>a great job on your pot about this. Let's start

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 1>with Michigan. Um, how do you see that one? As

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 1>we look at the real clear politics board here up

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>at Visa dot com and the Visa app, that's the

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the three Michigan that looks like it is

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>definitely not definitely, but at least it has a light

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>shade of blue Michigan right now. The electoral vote, the

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>electoral vote rather in terms of the betting market, Democrats

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>minus to sixty Republicans plus two oh nine mac Michigan.

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Michigan probably does Democratic. I certainly don't like the action

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>of minus to six D. I don't think it is

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:36.959
<v Speaker 1>that safe from the Democratic cold. But I don't think

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>there's enough value of plus two or nine either. It's

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>a race. I wind to be wagering at those odds

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>one way or another. If Trump's going to hold on

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to Michigan, it's going to be a hidden vote that

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 1>comes out from Again, it's also going to be reverse

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 1>coachail and was a Senate race with a really lovable

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>guy named John James's an Iraqi War veteran running on

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:59.679
<v Speaker 1>the Republican ticket, If he can draw out enough of

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the true additional GOP base that's been otherwise repulsed by Trump,

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and let's just say there's really bad weather in Detroit

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>that day or something that sort of tamps down the vote,

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>it's possible. But I see Michigan going back in the

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Democratic column, and I would say relatively safely. So light

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 1>blue does seem like the right shape. Pennsylvania, where the

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Democrats are minus two hundred, another state that Trump won

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>in has come down from minus to fifty. Biden not

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 1>quite the polling advantage that he has in Michigan. Do

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you think Pennsylvania is in play and and is it really,

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is it one of these that if Trump

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>can win, I mean, that's his only path, right mac, Yes,

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 1>his only path is to pick up two of the

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>three rest spelt states. Trump is an incumbent who's not

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 1>going to add a single state he lost last time

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>with the possible looks of human the vata, and that's

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of exasperatmant to itself if you're looking at the

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>big odds, the idea. They have an incumbent who is

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:03.079
<v Speaker 1>not likely to be territory. Pennsylvania's Joe Biden's home state,

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:05.839
<v Speaker 1>US the senator from Delaware. But he is at least

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>supposedly a proud son of screen to Pennsylvania, and he's

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>been pointing that out a lot on the campaign trail.

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>The problem for him is Philadelphia has been not showing

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 1>these sort of robust enthusiasm you would want from a

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Democratic perspective. Trump has been smart. He's been campaigning hard

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 1>in Pennsylvania, not just recently. I mean, remember Donald Trump

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>started campaigning for re election roughly ten seconds after the

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:34.959
<v Speaker 1>oath of office. So I'm looking to see what we've

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 1>got at the moment, Democrats Republicans plus one fifty three,

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I think there's value on the Republican mind there. I

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't take it even money, but at plus one fifty three,

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I think Donald Trump could pull this out of his

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 1>back pocket. Again. It's a state that's not getting any

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>more liberal. It's it's a it's a market that has

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>really come down to like every day, Yeah, go ahead,

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>go ahead. Did I go ahead and interject here? I

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>think another thing that you have to get cosider is

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:03.839
<v Speaker 1>that it's not just a Biden that's making his rounds

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:06.680
<v Speaker 1>over in Pennsylvania, it's also Obama. And who's gonna who

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 1>has a lot more name recognition at this point, It's

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be Obama. But something that did help that

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 1>is a big blow for Republicans that would have me

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>leaning more towards Democrat, is that the Supreme Court ruled

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>just yesterday that mail in ballots can't be rejected over

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>mismatched signatures. So what that means it's different looking signatures

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:28.959
<v Speaker 1>from your ballot than your registration form are no longer disqualifying.

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:32.959
<v Speaker 1>That's a big blow for the Republicans. Did you find

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>since you got into this, Pam earlier this year, have

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you found that the that the betting interest in this

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>has grown far wider than you could have imagined. I

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 1>listen every single day. I go about an hour walk

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 1>every single morning, and it's why I need to listen

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>to podcasts. I am listening to every single political podcast

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that I can. I have absorbed this like it has

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:59.440
<v Speaker 1>become my limb. I'm astonished with myself, to be frank,

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's just it's it's just so it's thrilling to

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>see the developments from where we were in March to

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:08.679
<v Speaker 1>where we are now, and it's a week away. You're

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>seeing the progression from either side, Republicans Democrats, You're getting

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>viewpoints from Republicans Democrats, and it's just it's it's fascinating

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>to me, it is and it's it's what. What's what

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:20.319
<v Speaker 1>me and my friends have talked about the most. Obviously

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>we talked about football and baseball and standard as well,

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>but this has been the running sort of sidebar the

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 1>whole way through. I want to get your thoughts Pam

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>on on Florida momentarily, but let's finish the Rust belt

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>because I know Mac that you were in Wisconsin for

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a good period of time. This to me, of all

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the things you guys talked about, well, there was a

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of states, Wisconsin and Nevada were particularly interesting, but Wisconsin,

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 1>which is part of that Rust Belt trio. Uh Democrats

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>minus two right now Republicans plus two thirty five. These

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 1>are consensus numbers in betting markets globally. Trump wanted in

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:56.679
<v Speaker 1>polling has been really really interesting because you see some

0:13:56.720 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>polls where Biden is double digits ahead in Wisconsin. You've

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 1>lived there, You've worked in politics there. You see this

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 1>completely differently from a poll like that I do. I

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 1>think it is much closer, and I think it was

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>value on the Republican side. Trump was the first Republican

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 1>to pull Wisconsin out in some time. But the fact

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that it's got in the stake close is not coincidence.

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 1>With auto layoffs. The number of unionized employees over the

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>past several years has dropped dramatically. That means the number

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>of both Democratic voters period has dropped, and the number

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of Democratic voters who are going to be told by

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>his or her respective union boss to help and vote

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>has dropped. There's another issue with Wisconsin. This is not

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a good thing, but from a betting point of view,

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>we've got to take everything into account. Milwaukee is a

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>city that contains almost the entire Democratic base of the

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Wisconsin vote outside of Madison, and Milwaukee is a place

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>where voter suppression occurs on just an enormous and deeply

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 1>unfortunate scale. By no means my condone in this this

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>is a terrible thing, but it's baked into the cake.

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>The reality is there is year and a year out

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>in effort to suppress the African American vote in Milwaukee.

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>The African American vote in Milwaukee is a heavily Democratic vote.

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>The polling obviously isn't suppressed. No one's being turned away

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 1>from answering the phone over dinner. So there tends to

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 1>be a divide between what the polls show in advance

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and what actually happens on election day. Added the fact

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the places like Jamesville don't have the auto workers that

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>they once did. Add in the fact the parts of

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the state have actually done pretty well under Trump, and

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a very close state. I think there's

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of value in the Republican wager at the moment,

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that it makes sense. And an even

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>money point, I think Joe Biden is going to win

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the state, but it's much much closer. And add on

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>to that you have I was just talking about Pennsylvania

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and how the Supreme Court was a big blow for

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans. Well, it's the reverse. It's the Supreme Court

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 1>ruled in something that's in favor of the Publicans. The

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court will not and this was also something that

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>just happened over the weekend. They will not extend the

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>deadline for absentee ballots, meaning absentee ballots will be counted

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 1>only if they are in the hands I mean musical

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>clerks by the time the polls closed on November three.

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>So that's a big win for Republicans. Speaking of speaking

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>of the allegations of voter suppression, or maybe not just allegations,

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe the reality of voter suppression. We talked about

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Milwaukee here moments ago. Uh. Florida pam uh again, another

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 1>state that went to Trump in it was read in

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 1>this market very tight Republicans minus one forty four Democrats

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>plus one twenty. There is a path where Florida or

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>there is a scenario, I should say where Florida doesn't

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>matter in the end. If Biden wins those rust belt states,

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe even Trump winning Florida will not shift this election

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 1>to Donald J. Trump. But Latino's obviously an interesting demographic

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>in the state of Florida and very hard to sort

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of wrangle. Explain that to us if you would. I

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>think I'm going to let Mac do this one, because

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I kind of do believe that. I think, yes, it's

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 1>a toss up, but I am agreement with him that

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 1>it is probably going to go towards Trump and Republican

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 1>minus too minus the odds are the voter turnout is

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:23.120
<v Speaker 1>not doing as superb as other states. The voter turnout

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:25.880
<v Speaker 1>is kind of whether it is depression, but it's only

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the votes have cast their ballots. They are expecting turnout.

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 1>But I myself, I'm I'm not. I don't feel strong,

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and I would believe that Mac perhaps would be a

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 1>better one to answer on this one when it comes

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to the state back so far, that is where I

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>went to law school. I don't know that gives a

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:47.159
<v Speaker 1>much way of bona fides, but I've lived in Miami

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and I've voted in Miami. One of the really inexplicable

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:53.919
<v Speaker 1>things is the ratio of Republican voters to Democratic voters

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:57.640
<v Speaker 1>in Florida has actually gone up over the past four

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 1>years during Trump's first start, meaning there are more registered

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Republicans today as a percentage than there were four days ago.

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:08.159
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't jibe with any national arment, doesn't jibe with

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 1>anything you expect against a relatively unpopular incumbent president. There's

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 1>also a lot of things in Florida that would ordinarily

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:20.159
<v Speaker 1>suggest Biden should be comfortable to heavily minority state, but

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:24.479
<v Speaker 1>and Hamela is much more qualified on this part than me. Uh.

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>The Latino and Latino vote is not a singular block.

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:32.879
<v Speaker 1>It's an enormously complicated voting block. But it's a huge

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>part of Miami Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach Counties, which

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>are the three counties in southern Florida that account for

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>almost all of the state's Democratic votes, and where they

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>meaningfully differ from the Latino and Latino votes in places

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>like Texas and Arizona is there's a heavily Cuban influence.

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Younger generations of Cubans are supposed to be getting more

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 1>and more liberal because they did not personally flee the

0:18:57.200 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 1>terrors of Fidel Castro, but somehow that has a planned out.

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>The Cuban vote has been reliably Republican over the years,

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>mostly just because of the de facto reaction to anything

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that even vaguely sounds like communism or liberalism, which again

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 1>put in the side of Merrite from the other day,

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's held Florida as a relatively conservative state. So

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it is growing to hold for Trump. It

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>is now officially his residence. He somehow shut up and

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>voted in person the other day, got a good photo op.

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:29.719
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, there's some guys on the public and ticket there. Okay.

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 1>So Florida is just Sorda. Is just really hard because

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you're having to guess who is going to turn out

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>for the vote. You have the older white demographic who

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:42.439
<v Speaker 1>is very upset at them is handling of coronavirus. And

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 1>like Max said, you have the Latino population, which we've

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 1>had this discussion. It is very hard to break down

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the Latino Hispanic population because we have thirty subsidies within

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>our culture. So somebody who is like he said, you

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:58.639
<v Speaker 1>have the Cubans, and then you have the Mexicans who

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:00.199
<v Speaker 1>are vote well part of Mexico. Are you've from the

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 1>southern Mexico, from the west coast Mexico, Like, it's just

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:05.679
<v Speaker 1>so many So you're trying to have why Florida is

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 1>a toss up is because you're trying to guess which

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 1>demographic is going to turn out. Okay, So then to

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>both of you here, because we have a pesky commercial

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>here in a minute, of the states we've talked about Michigan, Wisconsin,

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and Pennsylvania, the rust belt states, uh, Florida, and then

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:22.880
<v Speaker 1>let's throw in Georgia and Texas, which is where we started.

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 1>What's the best bet state by state among them as

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:28.640
<v Speaker 1>you see it value wise, either of you could take

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 1>that best value is Wisconsin. Safest bet is Florida. Gop

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:36.680
<v Speaker 1>on both of them, gop on both of you agree

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 1>with that, Pam, I was Wisconsin is going to be

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 1>my first response as well, so the value on the

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 1>GOP in the state of Wisconsin, which is again one

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of those three that Biden is trying to get to

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:51.640
<v Speaker 1>clinch it and make it an early night a week

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 1>from today, election night, November three, one week from today.

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, we'll come back. It's mac verstanding it's Panela

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Maldonado from Odds Shark talking a election here all hour long.

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk to Dreu Densic on the NFL and Joe

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Sheen on MLB. In the second hour. I want to

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>get into the state of Nevada, which most people sort

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:12.959
<v Speaker 1>of think is a done deal. Mac doesn't see it

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that way. We want to get into the interesting demographics

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:17.479
<v Speaker 1>of the state of Nevada, which is a very twenty

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty discussion that and of course the broader discussion. Finally,

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the big market. Who will win this ultimately UH in

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the presidential race, Biden or Trump, and how you should

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>bet that? Coming back on a numbers game at Visa

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>these Sports Betting Network one week from today with Mac

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Verstanding and Pamela mal Donado. The Twitter machine loves these two.

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I knew they would. Um, we'll get intoll those tweets

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>here momentarily, but we have a we have a short

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:46.640
<v Speaker 1>little segment here, and I want to talk Nevada because

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that you two talked about on

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:51.879
<v Speaker 1>your video pod shut I called a video pod a

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 1>video I don't know what it was, but it was

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 1>beautiful the way you guys did it. But Nevada was

0:21:56.280 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>fascinating because here we are. Mac. I know you're are

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 1>located in Nevada, Pam, You're in Texas. UM. Nevada is

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a very unique situation, isn't it. Mac Nevada is the

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:15.119
<v Speaker 1>ultimate and but for the storylines of it would not

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and should not be implayed. So that is a state

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>that was getting more and more reliably democratic and showing

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 1>no signs of turning back about four to seven points

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:29.359
<v Speaker 1>in the blue margin. Hillary Clinton wanted. Donald Trump didn't

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:32.359
<v Speaker 1>really compete there. He tried to adend happen and that

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 1>should have held. But here's the thing about Nevada. Nevada

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:38.439
<v Speaker 1>is Las Vegas and the rest of the state, and

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the state has been very conservative. Las

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Vegas is full of casino employees, that is our local industry,

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and casino employees are unionized and thus tend to the Democratic.

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:54.919
<v Speaker 1>But because of COVID nineteen, a large swap of the

0:22:54.960 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 1>casino employees are gone. Not all the casinos are fully

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:03.160
<v Speaker 1>up and reopened at all, and the ones that are

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 1>not really running a full capacity at the moment. So

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:10.439
<v Speaker 1>there's these huge quantities of unionized employees who were told

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>earlier this year that they've been laid off, they've been

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>let go, and a large number of them have packed

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:18.880
<v Speaker 1>up and they've gone to California, they've gone to Florida,

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 1>they've gone to any number of other states. But they're

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:24.919
<v Speaker 1>not hanging back in Nevada where the short term future

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>prospects of employment are not great. That means there's a

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:32.120
<v Speaker 1>large part of this reliable Democratic vote that's gone. Now

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Here's what makes us even screw here. When we take

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 1>polls in politics, when we sample what's going on in

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>front of election day, we assume a Republican Democratic and

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:44.399
<v Speaker 1>voters split, but either in accord with what's on the

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:47.640
<v Speaker 1>books or that roughly resembles what turned out four years ago.

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:53.160
<v Speaker 1>So the polling is not going to show this massive

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:57.440
<v Speaker 1>drop in Democratic voters in southern Nevada. Interesting, but I

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 1>think the campaigns note they've been showing up in great

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:04.399
<v Speaker 1>frequency lately. Donald Trump has been running all over southern

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the data and I don't think you'd see that investment

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of resources unless someone in the campaign had the same

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>until we do. That's that's totally it, right, That's totally

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the reason why it keeps coming back here. It's got

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>to be drum a betting perspective, you always talk about

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 1>fishy lines, and maybe the line certainly correly. I think

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>what's interesting about him and why I would also lean

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 1>towards the Republican side of getting value is because if

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 1>you look at five thirty eight, I look at this ideally.

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>By the way, if you look at five thirty eight,

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:39.880
<v Speaker 1>they have Biden clearly favored to win Nevada nine two

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:44.959
<v Speaker 1>in one hundred, Yet the betting nods have continuously dropped Republican.

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 1>And so if it was clearly favored, in my opinion,

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:51.959
<v Speaker 1>that democratic juice would be a little bit higher than

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 1>what it is at minus anywhere between minus two fifty

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 1>minus two eighty than what you're getting. Yeah, in fact,

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:58.719
<v Speaker 1>pan to your point, I mean this yesterday I saw

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:00.959
<v Speaker 1>Democrats minus three four already here we look this more

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:02.680
<v Speaker 1>when we flash up on the screen is minus three

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:05.639
<v Speaker 1>you're quoting it to tick below that. Even so it

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>is you know, every day, obviously the general election market

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:12.879
<v Speaker 1>changes every day back and forth, but even these states

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 1>now are starting to move at a very rapid pace,

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:17.399
<v Speaker 1>in Nevada being perhaps chief among them. You agree with

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 1>that Mac that that that's a that's a value bet,

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and maybe more than a value bet. Maybe, you know,

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:24.240
<v Speaker 1>because it's one thing to talk value, it's another thing too, Okay,

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>value schmalue. Is this gonna win or not? As people?

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, people want to know, is it gonna catch it?

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Would you bet this Republican? I would bet a Republican.

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about a lot of value opportunities in the

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Rust Belt, and those are things where at the right number,

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the odds are there, but I suspect they're

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>going to go to Joe Biden. I think Donald Trump

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:42.679
<v Speaker 1>is gonna win the state of Nevada. It is going

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:47.679
<v Speaker 1>to be the ultimate aberration and will be fascinating to

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>see four years from now whether or not the parties

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:53.360
<v Speaker 1>realized this is what happened, because this is a singular,

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 1>non reoccurring event that just falls right in his favor.

0:25:56.920 --> 0:25:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I only have twenty seconds here before the next break.

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 1>But is it consequentially even if it does go to

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans for the national election? No, No, that is

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 1>a diminimous number of electoral votes, and I do not

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 1>see the selection being that squeaky of the margin. All Right,

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll come back, mac verstanding Pamela mal Donado talking election

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 1>one week away and we'll talk football and baseball. Promise

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:19.199
<v Speaker 1>you that it's a numbers game at Visa and the

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>sports betting Network geeking out. Uh we get tweets at

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 1>beating the book. Always appreciate all the feedback and as

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:29.880
<v Speaker 1>you can imagine, on a show like this, it's all

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>over the place. Let's see this is from Let's see

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:36.680
<v Speaker 1>this is from Nick is talking about Pam. Listening to

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 1>your appearances directed at Pam. Sound awesome. Gil should have

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 1>you on the show morow he should guilt, should guilt?

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:45.159
<v Speaker 1>Should beam? Martin bands Hey, Gil, mom Nada one of

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:47.199
<v Speaker 1>my favorite newly discovered cappers plus gives the show a

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 1>lot better look than wishing of the disheveled intellectual. Great

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>call on putting her on the show. He got thrown

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>out under the bush. Let's see here? Uh okay. James

0:26:57.320 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 1>McIvor a politically speaking, that was one of my favorite

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:04.120
<v Speaker 1>interviews ever. Still happening, James um analytics. Where do people

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>bet these presidential props? Globally? Bradley Poris Biden is not

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 1>winning Texas minus three sixties, Free money, l O L.

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Mike Jang and the words of public idemy. Don't believe

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the hype on Biden Harrison Texas. We're talking about value

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and uh, let's say Phil wis excellent pair of election experts,

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 1>really good info, and then he goes on to throw

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Speaker 1>one of our other guests under the bus. It's it's

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 1>just not cool either. Come on, people, come on, Uh

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:32.640
<v Speaker 1>skill Alexander, it's mac ver stand again as Pamela Maldonado

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:34.679
<v Speaker 1>from odsh are kind enough to join us talk election

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 1>this morning before we get into the broader presidential market.

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:41.160
<v Speaker 1>And what I'm really curious about is if you would,

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:44.440
<v Speaker 1>uh hate, if you would venture a wager on by

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:47.480
<v Speaker 1>how much either the GOP or the Democrats are gonna

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 1>win in the electoral college. We'll get into that next segment,

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 1>but let's go through a few of these senate races

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of consequence. Uh, if you will, guys, and let's start

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:57.719
<v Speaker 1>in Arizona. I guess Arizona. We can talk both electoral

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 1>college and the Senate race. Martha mcsal lee the Republican,

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Mark Kelly the Democrat, Mark Kelly a huge minus three

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:08.399
<v Speaker 1>three favorite. Properly priced throw it out to either of you,

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 1>So yes, properly price Martha mc sally is an incompan

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:17.440
<v Speaker 1>who has never been elected. There's a lot of unpopularity there.

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a state that's leaning towards going towards Biden to

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 1>begin with. Plus, Mark Kelly is a lovable former astronaut.

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 1>He's married to Gabby Gifford's who's the former congressman congresswoman

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>who had the tragic shooting. He is a figure who

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Arizona is easily rallied around. This is an almost impossible

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Senate race on the GOP side. Uh. From a legal

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 1>point of view, Amy Coney Barrett was sworn in as

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 1>an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court really a short

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 1>time ago. I think it's as we've been on air

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 1>this morning, and one of the questions is why did

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the GPE rusher through prior to election day? Why not

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 1>tease it out there as reelect us and we'll get

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 1>it done, or at least we'll get done in the

0:28:57.160 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>lane up session. And I think Arizona is actually a

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 1>big reason. Because this is a special election. Whoever wins

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 1>this race is gonna be sworn in very quickly. They

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 1>don't wait till January. And there is zero confidence in

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the Republican party that Martha McSally can hold onto this seat.

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 1>What about the state itself? The state itself from an

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>electoral college perspective, red or blue, because this is a

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 1>real tight market with the Democrats only a slight favorite. Well,

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Trump won here four years ago. If he's going to

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 1>lose outside of the rust belt, this would seem to

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 1>be part of what walks away from him. But there's

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 1>been this odd issue with again the Latino Latino vote,

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 1>which we talked about. It's not a singular vote. It's

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 1>a hard vote to understand, but it doesn't seem to

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 1>be as copacetic to him as it was to Barack

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Obama or even to Hillary Clinton. That is a massive

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 1>part of the vote in Arizona. Arizona is really just

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a couple of metropolitan areas, the rest of its rural.

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 1>So Trump seems to have a chance of holding on

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 1>here is a reason the markets going back and forth.

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 1>But if you're getting anything close to even money on Biden,

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I would take it. If you're you know, anywhere close

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 1>that march and I would take it. What is it

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 1>at then maybe that's small, But take the Democratic side,

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Pam your thoughts, I would agree with him. It's mean

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 1>to quote our interview that he had. He said, no

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 1>one believes Nick Sally is going to win, and there

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 1>are going to be situations like this where you have them, uh,

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the incumbent Republican going to get pushed out, but it

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a split diic a vote where

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 1>it goes towards the Democratic side. And I agree the

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:37.959
<v Speaker 1>voter turnout in Arizona. I mean, it's record breaking numbers

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>across the country and Arizona is no exception to that.

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Trying to get to as many states as possible here

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 1>within the air. If your state is not mentioned, please

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 1>don't don't be offended. We're trying to get to some

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of the more swingy ones Iowa. Let's start with the

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Senate race. Jody Earns the Republican, slight favorite minus one six,

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Theresa Greenfield the Democrat plus one oh six. You were

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:01.440
<v Speaker 1>mentioning on the on the pods you did with Pam

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 1>over there at odd Shark, which was wonderfully done. Once again,

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I urged people to go listen to it and watch it.

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 1>That Earnest at one point was sort of a darling

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 1>in the Republican Party actually delivering a state of the

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Union response not really the case anymore, huh. You know

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Johnny Earnest, So I'm quick and hard. Johnny Earnest, when

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 1>she first ran, had this advertisement she put on TV

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 1>where she talked about growing up castrating hogs, and it

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 1>became this metaphor for getting you know what out of Washington,

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 1>d C. That hit the Iowa populist perfectly. I was

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 1>a really politically savvy state because of the Iowa CAUCUSUS.

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:46.760
<v Speaker 1>They take absurd pride in being the presidential wine tasters

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 1>of the United States and the people who shall sample

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:52.480
<v Speaker 1>our presidential candidates first every four years, so they pay

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of attention. And the problem was promising to

0:31:55.760 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>go to d C and clean up the swamp is

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 1>a singular senator from Iowa. We can't do it, and

0:32:01.560 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think even Mr Smith could do it these days.

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 1>So John Earns is taken a hit because of that.

0:32:06.080 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 1>But I think she's minus one or so. It should

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 1>hold Republican. I live gotten margin land more Republican over

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the years. I haven't seen a huge Democratic investment in

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the state. I don't think Joe Biden has much of

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 1>a chance of winning the state upily enough, so johny

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Arns should pull it out. But this is not the upstart,

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 1>enthusiastic promising candidates she was just a few years ago.

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 1>So Jody Earn should pull it out. Am, I to understand,

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 1>you also said Republicans to win the electoral college. Their

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 1>minus one eighty three on the Republicans. What I'm seeing

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:39.959
<v Speaker 1>right now, Yeah, I don't love the line, but anything

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 1>under minus two hundred, I think there's value on the

0:32:42.320 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Republicans to hold the electoral college in Iowa, which again

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:49.080
<v Speaker 1>not terrifically consequential to hold for Trump. And it's not

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that any electoral another red state, as you said, Pam,

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Iowa anything well from a voting from a voter turnout perspective,

0:32:56.720 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at Iowa, which has hit six eight thousand ballots,

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 1>received that number in two thousand and sixteen forty two.

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:10.120
<v Speaker 1>It is you take it for what you will. We

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 1>there's no it's too early have right now obviously to

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 1>know are those Republicans or those Democrats. But those are

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the numbers that are being thrown out. So that's something

0:33:17.920 --> 0:33:20.959
<v Speaker 1>to consider. Yeah, because that's obviously the obvious follow up

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 1>is do we know what that means? Right? I think

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people will assume, oh, that must be

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Democratic voters primarily, but we don't necessarily know that from

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a static state perspective. Last commercial, I promise, uh, and

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:34.960
<v Speaker 1>we will get to the general market here on the

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 1>h the presidential race itself, Biden right around two dollar favorite.

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Will update it here momentarily, and the notion of just

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 1>how much might either Republicans or Democrats win this Trump

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 1>or Biden? Coming back in numbers game at Visa the

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:52.000
<v Speaker 1>sports betting network. Uh, it is Gil Alexander. It is

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:54.479
<v Speaker 1>a numbers game right here at Visa. We get tweets. Uh.

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:56.880
<v Speaker 1>And as always you gotta love you gotta love the

0:33:56.960 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 1>numbers games listeners. This one Gil. That guy is really

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Coleandro and disguise right, he sounds just like gets you.

0:34:05.240 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 1>We dressed of Jeff Coleandro and called him mc versanting.

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:10.279
<v Speaker 1>That's not true. That's that's what's happening, not at all.

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Great analysis from Drawn Cup, great analysis of Cuban and

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Latinos in Florida have many friends and now relatives in

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the community that fled Cuba. Uh, their kids hold the

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:21.840
<v Speaker 1>same values. One thing you did not mention is they

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:25.440
<v Speaker 1>also lean conservative because they feel liberals persecute Christians over

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:28.560
<v Speaker 1>other religions. Thank you Drawing Cup for that. Uh, John

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:31.320
<v Speaker 1>j just awesome two of my three favorite follows. Just

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:34.759
<v Speaker 1>missing Paul Stone. Um, let's see here on and on

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and beating the book always always, Uh appreciate the tweets.

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:43.359
<v Speaker 1>Mark B. Clinically figuring systematic voter suppression into betting value

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:45.480
<v Speaker 1>analysis is the most depressing thing I've ever heard on

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 1>your show. Appropriate but depressing. Um, let's see and there's

0:34:51.120 --> 0:34:53.800
<v Speaker 1>always you know, there's always different viewpoints. De shock wave

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:55.960
<v Speaker 1>like that, he says, love the show, but listen to

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you do not have to hear about politics. Keep up

0:34:58.120 --> 0:34:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the good work. But let's not spend all day on

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of madness. Okay, we'll talk football top of the air.

0:35:02.400 --> 0:35:05.239
<v Speaker 1>You'll be happy to show uh deshak de hawk when

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 1>de shock Wave. Sorry about that, um, Gil MITCHI here

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 1>miss most of the conversation, but I love the political

0:35:11.200 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 1>betting market talk. Looking forward to summary of the best

0:35:13.640 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 1>bets in the visa email. You can we throw those

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:17.920
<v Speaker 1>in the visa and email? Are we allowed to do that? Jason?

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Jason looking at me terrified. I will find out Jason's

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:23.879
<v Speaker 1>like oh no, this is the worst moment of my life.

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Do I have to include all these in the email?

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Hank deal, great interview, thank you, it's all. It's all

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 1>pam and uh and Mac Barton bands one more time

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:34.279
<v Speaker 1>Presidential wine Tasters. Oh my god, what a great line

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:36.160
<v Speaker 1>word smithing at its fines, on and on and all.

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:38.600
<v Speaker 1>We could read these all day. We appreciate all the

0:35:39.000 --> 0:35:43.279
<v Speaker 1>response to Pamela and Mac. I lied, guys one last

0:35:43.320 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 1>state because I feel like I gave short shrift here

0:35:45.560 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to Ohio, where the electrical the electoral vote rather is

0:35:49.120 --> 0:35:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Republicans minus two fifty five at Democrats plus two oh six.

0:35:52.760 --> 0:35:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Any thoughts there? No Republican has won the president too

0:35:58.040 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 1>without winning the state of Ohio, as best I can tell.

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:04.239
<v Speaker 1>I think since like the invention of the cotton gin

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:08.160
<v Speaker 1>or something among those lines. Uh, if it's going to flip,

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 1>this is the election, right, There is this scenario where

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Biden just runs the board huge in which gets Ohio

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:18.600
<v Speaker 1>will be a domino that falls with the rust belt. Uh.

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Looking at the line, you know, if you're getting plus

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:25.279
<v Speaker 1>two something close to plus three something, there might be

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:29.040
<v Speaker 1>some thing value there in the Democratic bet. But I

0:36:29.080 --> 0:36:31.479
<v Speaker 1>would say that it's small. Tun get too excited. Eli

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Whitney reference cases at plus Jason marked that down as well.

0:36:35.960 --> 0:36:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Pam anything there, Uh No, I actually had Ohio was

0:36:40.800 --> 0:36:42.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the early videos that I had done in

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was like June July before people were

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:48.160
<v Speaker 1>pegging this as a potential flip. So I just want

0:36:48.160 --> 0:36:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to toot my own horn that hey, I did. I

0:36:50.160 --> 0:36:54.719
<v Speaker 1>was out there first, Orange too did. Well. Let me

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:56.920
<v Speaker 1>let me start with you, Pamela on the general then

0:36:57.360 --> 0:37:00.800
<v Speaker 1>all right, Joe Biden, Donald Trump right now? And you

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:04.920
<v Speaker 1>know better than anybody this changes daily, if not hourly.

0:37:05.000 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 1>At this point, this has been all over the place.

0:37:07.719 --> 0:37:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I got Biden at plus money earlier this year. That

0:37:12.520 --> 0:37:16.279
<v Speaker 1>is obviously long gone. Uh it's at minus two oh two,

0:37:16.440 --> 0:37:18.319
<v Speaker 1>is what I'm seeing right at the moment. Trump coming

0:37:18.360 --> 0:37:23.000
<v Speaker 1>back at plus one seventy value on Trump, we usually

0:37:23.280 --> 0:37:26.840
<v Speaker 1>gravitate towards the dog when talking value, or conversely, is

0:37:27.160 --> 0:37:29.399
<v Speaker 1>there value instead on Joe Biden? Is that too low?

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:34.279
<v Speaker 1>In my opinion, I'm going to stick with without giving

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:37.240
<v Speaker 1>my politics, this is purely from what I see in numbers.

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm very much a numbers person, and what I can

0:37:39.760 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 1>go off of is that there have been sixty two

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:47.719
<v Speaker 1>million votes that is already record breaking, on track for

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:53.239
<v Speaker 1>historic levels, that is fifteen million more at this time.

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 1>In my opinion, people are not showing out if it

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:05.000
<v Speaker 1>was for the incumbent, it's potentially wanting change. And the

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 1>reason one of the largest, the biggest issue is the

0:38:10.200 --> 0:38:12.720
<v Speaker 1>handling of the pandemic. Now, no one is blaming Trump

0:38:13.000 --> 0:38:16.160
<v Speaker 1>for the pandemic. Of course, his handling of it, I

0:38:16.280 --> 0:38:20.000
<v Speaker 1>think is believe. He once said in February, this is

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:21.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be gone by April. It's gonna be gone

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 1>by easter. Here we are in November. I heard a

0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:27.280
<v Speaker 1>fascinating podcast that really opened up my eyes to seeing

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Biden as Valium. And it was a woman's coalition who

0:38:30.760 --> 0:38:34.160
<v Speaker 1>was talking about how they've gone and this this is

0:38:34.200 --> 0:38:36.440
<v Speaker 1>a group of women who either voted Republican and are

0:38:36.480 --> 0:38:39.960
<v Speaker 1>now voting for Biden, or they voted for I'm sorry

0:38:40.000 --> 0:38:41.880
<v Speaker 1>they voted for Trump and are now voting for Biden.

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:45.080
<v Speaker 1>But one of the things that they're saying was after

0:38:45.600 --> 0:38:49.399
<v Speaker 1>Trump himself got coronavirus, they had their seven year old

0:38:50.400 --> 0:38:54.719
<v Speaker 1>children tell them, mommy, why is the president not wearing

0:38:54.800 --> 0:38:57.000
<v Speaker 1>a mask? I have to wear a mask every day

0:38:57.040 --> 0:38:59.480
<v Speaker 1>at school. Why doesn't the president have to wear one?

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:02.200
<v Speaker 1>So it's just like that was eye opening to me

0:39:02.360 --> 0:39:06.320
<v Speaker 1>because there's just a large demographic that we're not necessarily

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:11.239
<v Speaker 1>thinking of in terms of of money and value. It

0:39:11.400 --> 0:39:13.880
<v Speaker 1>is it, it really is. I believe the key issue

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:17.360
<v Speaker 1>is the coronavirus, this pandemic, and I think if it

0:39:17.560 --> 0:39:20.239
<v Speaker 1>wasn't in any other election year, I think Trump can

0:39:20.280 --> 0:39:24.200
<v Speaker 1>definitely reading his spot. But because of the pandemic, in

0:39:24.239 --> 0:39:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the situation that the country is still in, the cases

0:39:27.200 --> 0:39:30.359
<v Speaker 1>are just increasing state by state across the country. We're

0:39:30.400 --> 0:39:33.440
<v Speaker 1>going back to June July numbers. I really think that's

0:39:33.520 --> 0:39:36.640
<v Speaker 1>just been the thorn in his behind that he wasn't

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 1>wanting to. Uh, you can't predict. So I really do

0:39:40.320 --> 0:39:43.279
<v Speaker 1>think that that minus two should actually be closer to

0:39:43.320 --> 0:39:48.520
<v Speaker 1>minus two. Fifty mm hmm mac same smartest four words

0:39:48.560 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll say today. Pamela Muldonado is correct. Uh, there is

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:56.799
<v Speaker 1>an enthusiasm. Gamp I drove across America in the middle

0:39:56.800 --> 0:39:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of the pandemic, actually drew from Vegas up to Main

0:39:59.760 --> 0:40:03.279
<v Speaker 1>two to take airson business. There's a big spread in

0:40:03.360 --> 0:40:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the yard signs, there's a big spread in flags, and

0:40:06.280 --> 0:40:08.959
<v Speaker 1>that I think gives some false optimism on the Trump front,

0:40:09.239 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>because the people who backed Trump love Donald Trump, but

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the numbers just aren't there. Trump is this guy holding

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:19.160
<v Speaker 1>an eight or nine card parlay or an eight or

0:40:19.239 --> 0:40:22.400
<v Speaker 1>nine card round robin, who needs to pull out almost

0:40:22.560 --> 0:40:25.959
<v Speaker 1>everyone with possibly one exception. And when we talk about

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:28.200
<v Speaker 1>them in a vacuum, we say, Okay, there's a path

0:40:28.320 --> 0:40:31.520
<v Speaker 1>in Wisconsin, there's a path in Pennsylvania, there's a path

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:36.799
<v Speaker 1>in Arizona. But for those all to fall rapidly, it's

0:40:36.920 --> 0:40:41.120
<v Speaker 1>just statistically improbable to a spectacular degree. Minus two or

0:40:41.239 --> 0:40:44.160
<v Speaker 1>two is a steel. Pam said she sees value that

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:46.319
<v Speaker 1>up to minus two fifty. I see value it up

0:40:46.360 --> 0:40:49.360
<v Speaker 1>to minus three fifty. I think the odds of Joseph

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Robinant Biden being sworn in our January are much better

0:40:53.000 --> 0:40:56.279
<v Speaker 1>than four to one. And to the people then who

0:40:56.360 --> 0:41:00.120
<v Speaker 1>would say, whoa wait a minute, everybody, Hillary was up

0:41:00.120 --> 0:41:02.800
<v Speaker 1>in the polls four years ago, and look what happened.

0:41:03.400 --> 0:41:05.200
<v Speaker 1>And even though it's a you know, let's let's be honest.

0:41:05.239 --> 0:41:07.080
<v Speaker 1>The polls are are a little more in favor of

0:41:07.200 --> 0:41:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Biden seven days out than they were in favor of Hillary.

0:41:09.680 --> 0:41:12.279
<v Speaker 1>Let's make that clear as well. But to the people

0:41:12.280 --> 0:41:15.520
<v Speaker 1>who say, hey, polls, schmolls, as my mother used to say,

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:19.680
<v Speaker 1>what would you say to them in regard to the polls,

0:41:19.719 --> 0:41:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Here's what I would One thing that I would say

0:41:21.880 --> 0:41:24.239
<v Speaker 1>is that there's one key difference in regards to the

0:41:24.320 --> 0:41:31.919
<v Speaker 1>polls from now is that one, Hillary never once reach

0:41:32.040 --> 0:41:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the threshold during the entire election period. Biden has not

0:41:36.280 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 1>only hit that, he has maintained that for months number two. Hillary,

0:41:41.800 --> 0:41:45.080
<v Speaker 1>right around this time, all of the sentiment was actually

0:41:45.160 --> 0:41:50.839
<v Speaker 1>shifting against her. Biden he has kept he is favorable

0:41:51.200 --> 0:41:54.279
<v Speaker 1>in his personality, he is favorable in the economy, he

0:41:54.400 --> 0:41:58.600
<v Speaker 1>is favorable in whatever poll imaginable. He has held his

0:41:58.680 --> 0:42:03.759
<v Speaker 1>favorability something he not once hasn't shown a decline. So

0:42:03.920 --> 0:42:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that would be two stark differences in my opinion, threshold

0:42:08.640 --> 0:42:16.560
<v Speaker 1>maintained throughout the entire election process. Interesting, Mac, I think

0:42:16.640 --> 0:42:21.440
<v Speaker 1>that's accurate. Um. Donald Trump ran four years ago campaigning

0:42:21.520 --> 0:42:24.080
<v Speaker 1>on what he can do for the United States. This

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:26.759
<v Speaker 1>has largely been a campaign about the wrongs that have

0:42:26.840 --> 0:42:29.239
<v Speaker 1>been done to him and why he deserves to be

0:42:29.360 --> 0:42:32.160
<v Speaker 1>reelected for his own personal purposes. I don't think that's

0:42:32.160 --> 0:42:35.239
<v Speaker 1>a convincing message. He also won four years ago because

0:42:35.280 --> 0:42:38.640
<v Speaker 1>people lied to bolsters, which is not uncommon. Right, people

0:42:38.680 --> 0:42:40.520
<v Speaker 1>will say one thing on the phone because it sounds

0:42:40.560 --> 0:42:43.320
<v Speaker 1>like the correct thing. They will then go standing and

0:42:43.400 --> 0:42:47.359
<v Speaker 1>voting booth and notwithstanding a terrible access Hollywood tape, vote

0:42:47.400 --> 0:42:49.719
<v Speaker 1>for Donald Trump. It's a little harder to do that

0:42:49.800 --> 0:42:52.400
<v Speaker 1>when you're voting at the kitchen counter, with your spousing,

0:42:52.440 --> 0:42:55.080
<v Speaker 1>your children hanging around. I think that's a small factor,

0:42:55.480 --> 0:42:57.879
<v Speaker 1>But when it goes toward Biden, I just don't see

0:42:57.920 --> 0:43:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Trump being able to string together in those states. Guys,

0:43:00.320 --> 0:43:01.640
<v Speaker 1>for real. I could talk to you about this for

0:43:01.680 --> 0:43:03.839
<v Speaker 1>another hour, but sadly we only have a minute left.

0:43:03.840 --> 0:43:05.520
<v Speaker 1>So I want to ask you this following question. If

0:43:05.600 --> 0:43:07.960
<v Speaker 1>you then are following what you just said, you both

0:43:08.040 --> 0:43:11.040
<v Speaker 1>believe that the value is on Biden. Uh. There are

0:43:11.160 --> 0:43:14.760
<v Speaker 1>some markets by how much then will either the GOP

0:43:14.920 --> 0:43:16.840
<v Speaker 1>win in the electoral College? If you believe that, by

0:43:16.920 --> 0:43:19.760
<v Speaker 1>how much will the Democrats? Uh? And there are ranges

0:43:19.800 --> 0:43:21.359
<v Speaker 1>on this and we could flash those up at Visa

0:43:21.440 --> 0:43:24.520
<v Speaker 1>dot com and the Visa app. Um, what is your

0:43:24.640 --> 0:43:26.680
<v Speaker 1>best And obviously this is where you really get into

0:43:26.680 --> 0:43:28.799
<v Speaker 1>the weeds of electoral math. This state goes this way,

0:43:28.840 --> 0:43:31.240
<v Speaker 1>if that state goes the other way. What's the range

0:43:31.360 --> 0:43:33.760
<v Speaker 1>by which you think And you guys both said Biden

0:43:34.160 --> 0:43:36.879
<v Speaker 1>that you think specifically Biden will win by and it's

0:43:37.239 --> 0:43:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a there's a one to nine, ten

0:43:39.160 --> 0:43:42.439
<v Speaker 1>to ninety to fifty nine six nine, there's all kinds

0:43:42.440 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of ranges. Give be your best guess on that, pam Um.

0:43:46.040 --> 0:43:47.839
<v Speaker 1>Without having to do all that math in my head,

0:43:47.880 --> 0:43:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to go with a landslide. Landslide, Wow, Mac,

0:43:54.520 --> 0:43:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I see the electoral vote being somewhere in the neighborhood

0:43:59.520 --> 0:44:02.440
<v Speaker 1>of three hundred to three twenty for the Democrats. I

0:44:02.520 --> 0:44:04.560
<v Speaker 1>think there are enough states to get picked up that

0:44:04.760 --> 0:44:06.680
<v Speaker 1>we land in there. You've got to look at some

0:44:06.800 --> 0:44:09.200
<v Speaker 1>weird things to come out with the precise count, including

0:44:09.280 --> 0:44:12.759
<v Speaker 1>what happens to the one weird congressional district in Maine

0:44:13.080 --> 0:44:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that roots on the town. So that sounds like a

0:44:15.120 --> 0:44:17.880
<v Speaker 1>triple digit electoral win or just shy of that is

0:44:17.920 --> 0:44:21.839
<v Speaker 1>what I'm getting with three twenty. Well be the total

0:44:21.880 --> 0:44:25.080
<v Speaker 1>electoral count, so that would be yeah, triple digit or

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:27.799
<v Speaker 1>just about their hundred or so or just shy yeah,

0:44:28.160 --> 0:44:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Mac For standing Pamela mal Donado can't thank you too enough.

0:44:31.560 --> 0:44:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for spending the hour. I appreciate it so much.

0:44:34.520 --> 0:44:36.520
<v Speaker 1>And again, congratulations to both of you on a great

0:44:36.640 --> 0:44:39.560
<v Speaker 1>video pod that you did together which completely inspired this.

0:44:39.640 --> 0:44:43.319
<v Speaker 1>So thank you to you both. Appreciate Pamela and Mack

0:44:43.680 --> 0:44:45.480
<v Speaker 1>right here on the Numbers Game Advisa. We will talk

0:44:45.520 --> 0:44:45.560
<v Speaker 1>for