WEBVTT - Daybreak Weekend: Job Report, Earnings Season, DeepSeek

0:00:03.320 --> 0:00:05.560
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our global look at

0:00:05.600 --> 0:00:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the top stories in the coming week from our day

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Break anchors all around the world. Straight ahead on the program,

0:00:10.360 --> 0:00:12.840
<v Speaker 1>and look ahead to the January jobs report here in

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the US how that may impact FED policy moving forward.

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:19.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm Caroline Hebcker here in London, where we're looking ahead

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:21.759
<v Speaker 2>to the Bank of England great decision and what the

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Chancellor's plans for growth might mean for them.

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm Doug Chrisner looking at what lies ahead for China's

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 3>deep seek.

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 4>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:38.160
<v Speaker 4>eleven three year on New York, Bloomberg ninety nine to one, Washington, DC,

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg ninety two to nine, Boston, DAB Digital Radio, London,

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:46.479
<v Speaker 4>Sirius XM one twenty one, and around the world on

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Radio, dot Com and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Good day to you. We begin today's program with the

0:00:56.880 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>January jobs report. We get non farm pay year old

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>numbers this Friday, eight thirty am Wall Street Time, and

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>for more. We're joined by Michael McKee, Bloomberg International Economics

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and Policy correspondent. Well Michael twenty twenty four ended with

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>a blowout December jobs report two hundred and fifty six

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand added, ending the year four point one percent unemployment

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of five decade low. Did the good times continue to January?

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 5>Well, that's the question, and we aren't exactly sure. There

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 5>seems to be a division on Wall Street about how

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:32.399
<v Speaker 5>this is all going to work out. Reversion to the

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 5>mean is a sort of a well known phrase in economics,

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 5>and that's what economists surveyed by Bloomberg see for the

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:45.400
<v Speaker 5>private payrolls number itself two hundred twenty three thousand last month,

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 5>but for January, they're only at the moment thinking about

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 5>one hundred and thirty thousand, which would fit the pattern

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 5>we saw before that big December number. So that would

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 5>suggest that the economy or the labor market at least,

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:04.559
<v Speaker 5>is slowing down some. But that four point one percent

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 5>unemployment rate isn't expected to change. So what we have

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 5>seen sort of in all the ancillary data like jobless

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:15.639
<v Speaker 5>claims and things, are that people aren't losing their jobs,

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 5>but they're not getting hired. It's taking longer to find

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 5>new jobs. Business seems to be putting new employment on hold,

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 5>but they're not getting rid of people yet, And the idea,

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 5>I guess, is that this report will ratify that.

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Now seasonal holiday jobs, we always see it to a

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:36.359
<v Speaker 1>decrease in January. Correct, Well, that's the way it used

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to be.

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 5>It's a little bit less that way now, and it's

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 5>a little bit harder to figure out exactly what the

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 5>seasonal impact is going to be. We know that the

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 5>seasonal employees were hired later this year. They showed up

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:51.799
<v Speaker 5>in December instead of November. Do they stay on a

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 5>little bit longer? Do they slowly go away? I think

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 5>one of the reasons we're looking at the one hundred

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 5>and thirty thousand is that economists are anticipating those people

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 5>will have left the jobs. But it's really hard to tell.

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 5>The other impact is going to be from the Los

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:14.640
<v Speaker 5>Angeles fires because they took place during the survey week

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 5>for the January payrolls, and we don't know exactly how

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 5>many businesses were destroyed, but we know a lot from

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 5>looking at the video, and so there are probably going

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:28.079
<v Speaker 5>to be a number of job losses. Some analysts have

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 5>said as many as twenty thousand that would show up

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 5>in the report.

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 1>And for the economy, we saw Hollywood suddenly stopped some

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>production of TV shows, movies, so it really had an impact,

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>which will lessen over time. Of course, I think things

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>are now weeks later getting back to normal. Well, let's

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about the Federal Reserve. The labor market pretty solid.

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>As you said, we were looking at no change at

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>a four point one unemployment rate. Economic growth we just

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>saw this past week GDP growth fourth quarter a little

0:03:59.880 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>stronger than expected.

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 5>But inflation, that's always the kind of the butt out there.

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 5>You don't even have to say anything beyond that inflation

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 5>has sort of stalled out. The PCE numbers that the

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:17.039
<v Speaker 5>Fed released on Friday basically show that in December inflation

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 5>was unchanged on a year year basis, and that's not

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:26.919
<v Speaker 5>what they want to see. What it does suggest that

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:29.359
<v Speaker 5>as long as that continues, the Fed's going to remain

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 5>on hold. There is the reason that Jay Powell cited

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 5>for not moving at last week's meeting. So I think

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 5>at this point we're watching to see any indications of

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:44.039
<v Speaker 5>whether inflation comes down, and all of a sudden we'll

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 5>be looking at things like home prices and rents even

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:51.039
<v Speaker 5>more closely, because that's really where the stickiness is. The

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 5>Fed needs that to happen. But also we're looking at

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 5>our average early earnings in the employment report because the

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 5>FED says right now the labor market is not inflationary,

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:03.720
<v Speaker 5>so they don't want to see any changes there either.

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's talk about the rate. Two point eight percent?

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 1>Is this almost a new normal?

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:08.720
<v Speaker 6>This?

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>It really hasn't changed much in months.

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 5>Right, That's the key question is can the FED get

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:16.280
<v Speaker 5>it down to the two percent target?

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Or is the.

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 5>Economy growing at a faster pace than it had been.

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 5>Is potential growth higher, which would mean inflation would be higher.

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>It could support a two point Does.

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 5>That mean that we need higher interest rates on a

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 5>regular basis? Not necessarily raise them from here, but don't

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 5>cut them. That's the debate within the FED, and that's

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 5>the thing that they have to figure out between now

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 5>and their next meeting on March nineteenth. And that should

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 5>be relatively easy except for Donald Trump and his tariffs

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 5>and everything else that's going to happen between now and then.

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:53.919
<v Speaker 1>Well, speaking of those tariffs, how do you think the

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>FED has prepared for the threat of those twenty five

0:05:56.600 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 1>percent tariffs? I mean, Canada, Mexico buy more American products

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and anybody else, So we know this is you know,

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:06.279
<v Speaker 1>it could be challenging.

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 5>Indeed, well I know a lot of FED officials around

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:13.040
<v Speaker 5>the country at the various FED banks and then down

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 5>in Washington at the Board of Governors have tasked their

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 5>researchers to come up with what if scenarios. The problem

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 5>is is without a lot of detail, it's been hard

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 5>for them to come up with what if scenarios, and

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.280
<v Speaker 5>so now if they get some details, it takes them

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:35.839
<v Speaker 5>time to put to work through it all because there's

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:37.839
<v Speaker 5>a lot that goes into it. It's not just what

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:40.720
<v Speaker 5>the tariff level is, it's how long it's imposed for

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 5>and how it's imposed over time or immediately, and then

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 5>what are the tariff countries do? Do they put teriffs

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 5>back on the US. So all of that has to

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 5>be accounted for. So it'll be a little while before

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 5>the PET has a clear idea of what it would mean.

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:01.799
<v Speaker 1>The January jobs are out This Friday morning, eight thirty

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:04.720
<v Speaker 1>am Wall Street Time our thanks to Michael McKee, Bloomberg

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>International Economics and Policy correspondent, we turned out to earnings

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>with two more members of the tech sector, so called

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Magnificent seven, posting fourth quarter results this coming week Alphabet

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesday and on Thursday, Amazon, and we want to

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>focus on Amazon to see about sales over the holidays

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's cash cow cloud computing, an AI services unit,

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and any impact at all from China's deep seek chat

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>pot Now for more where all of that were joined

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>by anirag Rana, Bloomberg Intelligence technology analyst anarag We'll start

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 1>with the earnings. What are you expecting to see in

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Thursday's earnings report from Amazon?

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 7>You know, my colleague Punum and I we re published

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 7>a preview for Amazon, and we think that the four

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 7>Q sales could be at the high end of their

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 7>guidance of seven to eleven percent, driven by AWS advertising

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 7>retail sales over the holiday quarter, which were very strong.

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 6>Frankly, so those are the areas. We also think advertising

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 6>revenue could be in the high teens given the addition

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 6>of Prime Video ads.

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>So sales good, the ons, signature site ad sales. What

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>about its cash cow Amazon web services and what is

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Amazon investing now in AI and infrastructure?

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 6>And that's you know, you're right, that's probably the most

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 6>important question right now. We're looking at Amazon, you know,

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 6>sales growth of somewhere around nineteen percent excluding ethics impact.

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 6>That's slight better than I would say what would have

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 6>anticipated just a year ago, and a lot of that

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 6>is driven by the improvement in workload consumption or people

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:48.559
<v Speaker 6>running more things on the platform. AI will contribute as well,

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 6>although they don't disclose contribution from AI sales similar to Microsoft,

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 6>but that's because they do not have you know, you

0:08:56.800 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 6>could say the workloads coming from conserhum apps like chat, GPT.

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 6>Most of their businesses, enterprise and enterprise and corporate clients

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:10.959
<v Speaker 6>are just starting the implementation of AI related products, so

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 6>it's not as you know, you could say, that is

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 6>not a mature market as some of the consumer apps

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:16.439
<v Speaker 6>have been.

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:18.719
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of room to grow for Amazon in.

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 6>AI, absolutely, and a lot of room for everybody to grow,

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:25.079
<v Speaker 6>including you know, Microsoft and Google. In this case, what

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 6>Amazon has done is they have a strong relationship. They've

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 6>invested in a company called Anthropic, which is one of

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 6>their you could say, preferred large language model providers. They

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 6>also have their own model. They also let people use

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 6>models from Mecca called Lama, So it's it's up to

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 6>the client what kind of model they want to use.

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 6>Amazon Web Services is just going to provide the platform

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 6>and and you know, the basically the infrastructure to run

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 6>those products.

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Now, Wall Street got a real wake up call last

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 1>week with that low cost chat from the Chinese startup

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Deep Seek. Boy did it rattle the markets and rattle

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of AI companies. How did Amazon react well in.

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:13.680
<v Speaker 6>The long run? So, first and foremost, we are not

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 6>even sure whether we should see that as in a way,

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 6>there are two scenarios whether we can continue to see

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 6>large amount of improvements in these models without the use

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 6>of expensive chips. And that's where the argument is right now.

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 6>If we were to take that aside, if in reality

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 6>we can come up with models at a much cheaper cost,

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 6>that's really good for somebody like an Amazon because they

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 6>don't have to spend that much in capital expenditures and

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 6>the growth curve or the adoption curve off AI goes up.

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 6>These guys benefit from that because they're providing the infrastructure.

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 6>So I think in the long run it's good for

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 6>the cloud providers like Amazon. But again I think we

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 6>still have to see whether that really is the case

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:01.199
<v Speaker 6>that you can build models that.

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Cheaply consumer spending. I want to go back to that

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>in the in the final quarter of last year up

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 1>better than expected about four percent. A lot of that

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>from Amazon dot Com. Obviously, it's like most consumers can't

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 1>live without it. But something I want to bring up

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:19.079
<v Speaker 1>ups in its earnings just said that they're going to

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>slash deliveries they do for Amazon in half by next year.

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:26.199
<v Speaker 1>That's because of the home deliveries just too costly. FedEx

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>made the same decision five years ago. FedEx doesn't even

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 1>deliver for Amazon. What do you think it could mean

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>for their e commerce unit?

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think you know, one of the most important

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 6>part of their e commerce business is really their logistics

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:41.680
<v Speaker 6>at this point. Frankly speaking, you know, when you think

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 6>about it, what they did in COVID, they've really invested

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 6>so much to improve their logistics network. So frankly speaking,

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 6>I think, you know, you could argue that these guys

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 6>really don't need anybody else. Now that's not true. They

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 6>will outsource when they need extra capacity, but you know,

0:11:56.840 --> 0:11:59.679
<v Speaker 6>their logistics are pretty impressive at this point, and in fact,

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 6>this whole promise of delivering products within a few hours

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 6>is really changing the way people buy. What used to happen,

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 6>Tom was I used to go to Amazon because it

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 6>was the low cost provider. That's no longer the case.

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 6>You can find goods outside and other websites that are cheaper,

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 6>but the reason you go to Amazon dot Com is

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 6>because as a Prime member, you can get those products

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 6>pretty quickly. It's happened to me several times that you

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 6>need something right away and they will deliver it in

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 6>four to five hours. So that level of service is

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 6>what I think is the biggest differentiator for Amazon, and

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 6>it's not price.

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Q four earnings out this coming Thursday are thanks

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 1>to anirog Rana, Bloomberg Intelligence technology analyst and coming up

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg day Break weekend, a rate decision this week

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>from the Bank of England. I'm Tom Busby and this

0:12:50.240 --> 0:13:03.079
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberger. This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend, our global look

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 1>ahead at the top stories for investors in the coming week.

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Busby in New York. Up later in our

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 1>program Deep Seek Move Markets. This past week we see

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>what's next for China's Ai startup. But first, policymakers at

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the Bank of England are preparing to make their first

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>interest rate decision of the year. A slumping currency and

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 1>stagnant growth will be on the minds of officials as

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>they make their choice. Now for more, let's go to

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 1>London and bring in Bloomberg Daybreak Europe Banker Caroline.

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 2>Hepgar Tom week Sterling is just the latest factor that

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 2>Bank of England officials will have to think about when

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:40.559
<v Speaker 2>plotting the path for interest rates in twenty twenty five.

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Investors are still expecting a quarter point cut, one of

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 2>just two fully priced in for this year, but stagnant

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 2>economic growth, alongside the threat of a global trade war,

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 2>has loomed large over the Central Bank's forecasts and could

0:13:56.360 --> 0:14:01.680
<v Speaker 2>dampen the Bank of England's inflation projections in years this

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 2>as moves in guilt yields and rate expectations since the

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 2>budget in October have tightened fiscal conditions, a real headwind

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 2>for the British economy. Enter Chancellor Rachel Reeves she's on

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 2>a mission to revitalize the nation's economic health by going

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 2>further and faster, she puts it for growth and potentially

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 2>lifting some of the pressure on Andrew Bailey's Monetary Policy Committee.

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 2>She has been speaking to Bloomberg about her proposals.

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 8>Well, look at the reaction from business to the speech

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 8>I gave two thirds of businesses and the instant reaction

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:42.119
<v Speaker 8>has said they now feel more confident about the government's

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 8>growth plans. I make no apologies for putting our country

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 8>bag on the right's path, and because of the planning

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 8>reforms that we're making alongside the big announcements yesterday, it

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 8>means what we can crack on and get these projects

0:14:57.280 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 8>delivered quicker because they won't get clogged up in courts

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 8>because we're reforming the way that you build stuff in Britain.

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 9>Do not feel, though, Chancellor, that you need to deliver

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 9>something that will deliver now that will give an uptick

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 9>to growth. Now we're looking at the labor market, data,

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 9>messages from recruiters, the purchasing managers' surveys, all of those

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 9>telling us quite negative things about the labor market, saying

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 9>that businesses are shedding jobs at the rate we haven't

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 9>seen since the financial crisis.

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 10>Well, if you.

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 8>Look at the IMF forecast for the UK, they've revised

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 8>up the UK's growth prospects for this year. The PwC

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 8>survey released at the beginning of last week of global

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 8>CEOs who see Britain as the second best place in

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 8>the world to invest outside of the United States. The

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 8>first time in twenty eight years have been at that

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 8>position in the League table, and yesterday business is coming

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 8>out and backing Labour's plans to grow the economy and

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 8>making them feel more confident about the future.

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 10>Can you give me a growth number by the end

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 10>of the year, then, if you are more positive about

0:15:57.320 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 10>what growth is going to deliver in the UK, what

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 10>growth numbers we can expect. Do you have a number

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 10>in mind, do you have a target for this year

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 10>and can you share it with us.

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 8>I'm not going to do growth forecasts. That's up to

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 8>the Independent Office, the Budget Responsibility, the IMF and others

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 8>to forecast the UK's growth prospects. But what I did

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 8>was to set out some ambitious plans and to get

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 8>our economy growing, to get spades in the ground, to

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 8>deliver these infrastructure projects that in many cases have been

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 8>available for years now but the previous government balked at.

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 8>So whether it's the Oxcam Growth Corridor to create Europe's

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 8>Silicon Valley here in the UK, or the third Runway

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 8>at Heathrow, a new stadium at Old Trafford, the TransPennine routes,

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 8>upgrade a new airport at Doncaster. All of these things

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 8>are about a confidence in Britain, saying to investors, look

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 8>again at Britain. This is a great place to invest,

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 8>to start and grow a business, and this government has

0:16:59.280 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 8>your back.

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 10>When does the first spade go in the ground and

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 10>any of those projects, Well, let's.

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 8>Take Heathrow with our key throw to come forward with

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:14.640
<v Speaker 8>plans by this summer and we hope to be able

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 8>to grant a development consent order in this parliament. So

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 8>spades in the ground in this parliament. But other projects

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 8>can get going sooner. We've committed to build one and

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:27.880
<v Speaker 8>a half million homes in this Parliament and we've made

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:32.119
<v Speaker 8>it easier to build, for example, around commuter railway stations,

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 8>with the default answer for planning applications now being yes.

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 8>So spades in the ground this parliament. One and a

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 8>half million homes in this parliament, because we want to

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 8>go further and faster to kickstart economic growth and to

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 8>make our economy more competitive, to be a more attractive

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 8>place for businesses to invest, and ultimately to make working

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:55.440
<v Speaker 8>people better off.

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 9>Chancellor, we've heard a lot about growth over reseas and

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 9>that do you think to be still some divisions amongst

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 9>your team around what all of these will mean for

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 9>the environment. Of course, businesses might be a little bit

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.359
<v Speaker 9>confused about what kind of reaction function we can expect

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:13.400
<v Speaker 9>you to have around green issues. Do you think that

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 9>the green policies of this government, or the push towards

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:20.159
<v Speaker 9>electrification for example, all of these things are they a

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 9>little harder to predict for business now than they were?

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.439
<v Speaker 8>Well, look at the record of this government. We've ended

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:33.200
<v Speaker 8>the moratorium on onshore wind and indeed have signed off

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 8>planning applications in just six months for new onshore wind farms,

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 8>has signed off planning applications for solar farms that the

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 8>previous governments blocked. But we've invested alongside with BP and

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 8>Equanal in carbon capture and storage in te Side and Merseyside,

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 8>so we know that there are huge industrial and investment

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 8>opportunities for the private sector in these jobs and industries

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 8>of the and has unique strengths in this area because

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 8>of our industrial heritage and because of our geography to

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 8>reap the benefits of that investment.

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 9>Okay, Chancellor, can I ask you just about the US

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 9>Treasury Secretary Besant, who is now going to be your

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:19.440
<v Speaker 9>counterparty in the United States. I wonder what you plan

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 9>to discuss with him, and do you have plans for

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 9>a conversation soon.

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:26.399
<v Speaker 8>I'm really pleased that Scott Bessont was confirmed earlier this

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 8>week as the next to the US Treasury's Secretary. I

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:34.639
<v Speaker 8>have written to him and I look forward to talking

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 8>to him soon about how our two countries can work

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:42.160
<v Speaker 8>together and to grow our respective economies. And I look

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 8>forward to having a close relationship with Scott Bessant and

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 8>his team at the US Treasury.

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 2>That was the Chancellor Rachel Reeves speaking to Bloomberg's Anna Edwards,

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Christy Gupta and Guy Johnson. So the government is going

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 2>for growth, but our businesses coming along for the ride.

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:00.879
<v Speaker 2>We've been getting reaction from the back to General of

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 2>the British Chambers of Commerce, Chevron Haviland, who was one

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:07.159
<v Speaker 2>of the first to turn critical in the wake of

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 2>the budget last year as growth flatlined and we saw

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:14.639
<v Speaker 2>a dip in both consumer and business confidence. We spoke

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 2>to her just after Rachel Reeves's big announcement.

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 11>It will deliver it in the short term and lots

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 11>of different places. Remember this is a really difficult time

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 11>for business. Natal insurance increases are going, you know, coming

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 11>in place in just a few weeks, so tax rises

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 11>for all businesses. So it was really good to see

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 11>the Chancellor focus on economic growth, Airport expansion, Heathrow, Doncaster, Sheffield,

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 11>new road, rail low attempts crossing East West rail and

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 11>rebalancing the planning system as you were outlined. So those

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 11>things will have not just a there are a great

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 11>signifier global signify far of confidence and the direction we're

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 11>traveling in. You know, big infrastructure projects, as you say,

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 11>take a long time, so you need to start now.

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 11>But remember that indicator for the small and medium sized

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:14.639
<v Speaker 11>businesses in those supply chains will already give them confidence

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 11>to think about investing now and growing their businesses now

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 11>so they can supply those into those infrastructure projects.

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 1>But Trevon, is it going to be enough.

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 12>Those businesses are worried about how they're going to pay

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:29.239
<v Speaker 12>for the national insurance rise coming in a couple of

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 12>months time. The budget has been very difficult and we've

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:35.200
<v Speaker 12>seen that reflected in both business and consumer confidence figures.

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:39.920
<v Speaker 11>The budget has been very difficult. It has, and especially

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 11>if you have a business with a large employee base.

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 11>It is going to be very hard. Our businesses are

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 11>telling us they're going to have to put up prices

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 11>if they can. A lot of them have already put

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:53.239
<v Speaker 11>up their prices. That's going to be tricky. They're going

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 11>to take it in their margin, which means lower investment,

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:59.919
<v Speaker 11>or they're going to slow down recruitment. And all of

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 11>that is good. But you remember, at the same time

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 11>in the budget, the Chancellor also said to mitigate against

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 11>those issues, we need more opportunity for business, and she

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:16.200
<v Speaker 11>talked about getting britten back to building homes, hospitals, energy, infrastructure,

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 11>and so you know, the announcements yesterday are a really

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 11>good step in that direction. They're a really good indicator

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:26.879
<v Speaker 11>for that. Okay, things that infrastructure projects. It's not just

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 11>local supply chains and local economic development. Often supply chains

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 11>run all over the country. Connectivity, airport expansion. That's fantastic

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 11>for trade, you know, moving our goods around the world,

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 11>and it also global competitiveness.

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:45.199
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but she did not reverse the tax increases on

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:48.119
<v Speaker 2>business from the October budget. I mean, okay, you can

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 2>understand why she might not do that, but she will

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 2>be under pressure to do something in the spring statement. Potentially,

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 2>if her fiscal head doom disappears, that's either going to

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 2>be cuts to government or it's going to be more

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:02.400
<v Speaker 2>tax increases. Are you expecting more tax increases to come?

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Do you want her to do, let's say something that

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:08.640
<v Speaker 2>would be much more business positive, lower corporation tax in Britain.

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 11>We well, I don't know what she's going to do

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 11>in the spring, and we're definitely not expecting any tax

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:20.199
<v Speaker 11>increases for business. She's been pretty clear that that was

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 11>a what did you call it yesterday?

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 6>Once in a.

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 11>Generation tax increase. However, there are other places where she

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:33.360
<v Speaker 11>can help business, so we've asked her to accelerate her

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 11>review of business rates. Business rates are the tax that

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:40.399
<v Speaker 11>you pay on property, so really hard if you're on

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 11>the high Street, you know, before you've even sold a

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 11>single product, you're paying tens of thousands in tax. So

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 11>how she can review business rates and change those more

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:54.160
<v Speaker 11>quickly to help our high streets? And actually, you know

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 11>the other thing is the quickest way to grow our

0:23:56.720 --> 0:24:01.199
<v Speaker 11>economy is through trade. Our biggest training partner, the EU,

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 11>is still really hard to move goods over the border.

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:04.880
<v Speaker 6>There.

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:09.120
<v Speaker 11>What is the government doing more quickly to help businesses

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 11>who are trading around the world.

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 2>That was chevallne Havilan from the British Chambers of Commerce.

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 2>She was sharing her reaction to chants of Rachel Reeves's

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 2>proposals that came out in the past few days. Speaking

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 2>to me and to Bloomberg's Stephen Carroll. Judging by her

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:28.640
<v Speaker 2>media blitz over the past couple of days, Reeves has

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 2>a plan and she wants us to know about it.

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 2>But just how long will it take for the results

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 2>to materialize? And when can institutions like the Bank of

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 2>England expect to see those improvements in real life. These

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 2>are all questions that remain up in the air, some

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 2>of which will likely be put to Bank of England

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:52.159
<v Speaker 2>Governor Andrew Bailey during his post Monetary Policy Committee press

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 2>conference in the next few days, and of course we

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 2>will have full coverage of the press conference and the

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 2>interest rate decision on Bloomberg. I'm Caroline HEPCUN London. You

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:05.959
<v Speaker 2>can catch us every week day morning for Bloomberg Daybreak

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 2>here at beginning at six am in London, that's one

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 2>am on Wall Street.

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:09.879
<v Speaker 4>Tom.

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:13.199
<v Speaker 1>Thank you Caroline, and coming up on Bloomberg day Break weekend,

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>we head to China to see how AI startup Deep

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:20.360
<v Speaker 1>seek as plans to take on US artificial intelligence giants.

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Busby and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>day Break weekend, our global look ahead at the top

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 1>stories for investors in the coming week. I'm Tom Busby

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>in New York. It was a story that sent shock

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 1>waves through global markets last week, a Chinese startup releasing

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:48.360
<v Speaker 1>an AI model set to rival open ais chat GPT

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:52.159
<v Speaker 1>and allegedly at just a fraction of the cost. For

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 1>more on what's ahead for China's Deep Seek, let's get

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to the host of the Daybreak Asia podcast, Doug Krisner.

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:01.640
<v Speaker 3>Tom. The model is now own as R one, and

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 3>the claim made by deep Seek was that R one

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 3>rivaled or even outperformed leading Western chatbots on a range

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:13.119
<v Speaker 3>of AI industry benchmarks. I think the most shocking claim

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 3>was R one was built for just a small fraction

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 3>of the cost of its Western rivals. Well, this immediately

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 3>sparked skepticism on the high valuation of US and Europe

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:26.199
<v Speaker 3>and AI related companies, but I think the eye of

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:29.119
<v Speaker 3>the storm was clearly in Nvidia. In the Monday session,

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 3>it shares tumbled seventeen percent, and that drop erased five

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:37.399
<v Speaker 3>hundred eighty nine billion dollars from Nvidia's market cap in

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:41.159
<v Speaker 3>one single trading day. For more on the deep Seek story,

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:44.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm joined by Robert Lee He a senior software analyst

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:47.639
<v Speaker 3>for Bloomberg Intelligence. Robert joining us from our studios in

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:50.160
<v Speaker 3>Hong Kong. Robert, thank you for making time to chat

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 3>with me about what's happening at the deep Seek. This

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 3>Chinese artificial intelligence startup and the AI model that the

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 3>company has apparently been working on for a while are one.

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:04.440
<v Speaker 3>What do we know about it exactly? Can you fill

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 3>me in sure?

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:07.440
<v Speaker 13>Thanks very much for having me on. First of all,

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 13>as you would expect, Bluemberg Intelligence likes to lead the way,

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:13.359
<v Speaker 13>this is actually Deep Seeker is a company we've been

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 13>writing on for the best part of seven or eight months.

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 13>I would say it's relatively well known to Asian investors

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 13>at this point, or has been for some time, but

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 13>obviously it's only its international profile has only risen more recently.

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 13>So the main reason why, or which helps you understand

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 13>why deep Seek is doing so well at the moment,

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:38.119
<v Speaker 13>really goes back to the earlier export controls on the

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:41.119
<v Speaker 13>semiconductor or chip side that we're put in place via

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:45.119
<v Speaker 13>the US. And one point I've consistently made over the

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 13>last year or so is that, again not to trivialize

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 13>software development, but the technological barriers to entry on software

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 13>are significantly lower than on the chip side. It's far

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 13>easier to develop these algorithms than it is to design

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:00.639
<v Speaker 13>a cutting edge tip at the atomic scale. So with

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 13>these export controls put in place by the US, obviously

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 13>any good engineer is going to try and work their

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 13>way around the problem. Go round it, go under it,

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:09.199
<v Speaker 13>go over it.

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:09.639
<v Speaker 1>Whatever.

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 13>So what the Chinese companies as a whole have done,

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:16.679
<v Speaker 13>with deep Seek being the leading one, is moved to

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 13>more computationally efficient, smaller models that are more adept at

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 13>utilizing and running on locally developed chips from the likes

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 13>of Huawei, and that ultimately leads to models which are

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 13>faster to develop and more importantly, lower cost to both

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 13>develop and to train or inference, and that gives companies

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 13>like deep Seek a significant cost and efficiency advantage over

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 13>their domestic competitors in China. And also, as we've seen

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:49.720
<v Speaker 13>in recent headlines, some of the big US tech platforms,

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 13>So it's really been a wake up call to the

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 13>entire industry.

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 3>How long have software programmers in China been working on this?

0:28:57.760 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 13>So give you a metric to work with. I guess

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 13>you know how many of us had heard of large

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 13>language models in China when Chat GPT first launched, and

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 13>they were next to none, So to quite a stat

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 13>at you. In October twenty twenty three, so you know,

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 13>roughly eighteen months ago or so, there were fourteen sanctioned

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 13>officially sanctioned models available in China from the regulator, and

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 13>then rolling forward to where we were at the end

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 13>of last year, they were close to three hundred. So

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 13>that highlights the very rapid progress that Chinese companies have made,

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 13>and as I said, with increasing focus on smaller, more

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 13>computationally efficient models in order to work their wear around

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:42.239
<v Speaker 13>this problem caused by the US chip controls. Consequence of

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 13>that is their developments have remained on track and relatively unhindered,

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 13>but that has given them some potential cost advantage versus

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 13>the let me call it a more brute force approach

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 13>taken by companies in other parts of the world, not

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:01.760
<v Speaker 13>just by the US. But again this is going back

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 13>to basic principles and engineering. You know, you may have

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:08.760
<v Speaker 13>seen headlines at the end of last year given the

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 13>very high energy costs of these very large models. There

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 13>was even talk about restarting nuclear reactors, etc. I think,

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 13>you know, just Gutville, It just doesn't make sense. There

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 13>has to be an easier way to go about things.

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 13>And I think, you know, prompted by these external restrictions

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 13>placed on them, Like any good engineer, you know, the

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 13>Chinese have focused gone back to their code and try

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 13>to work around the problem, and that has developed them

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 13>some you know, highly competitive models as a result.

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 3>So it creates a big question mark over the bleeding

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 3>edge market for that hardware that you're talking about, obviously

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 3>on the GPU side, on the memory side as well,

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:51.120
<v Speaker 3>right with those high bandwidth memory chips.

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 13>That remains in question. And in no way am I

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 13>trying to evade that question, because if the cost of

0:30:57.520 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 13>developing these models is decreasing, and on one hand, would

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:05.320
<v Speaker 13>that lead to a proliferation in the number of models,

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 13>a proliferation more importantly in the number of applications out there,

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 13>and in some way, you know, actually accelerate the uptake

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 13>of these products within the wider market because of their

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 13>increased availability. That's one way that things could get and

0:31:21.560 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 13>I guess that would be a more positive way, you know.

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 13>On the negative side, and again I think it really

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 13>is up the debate and remains to be seen, you know,

0:31:29.240 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 13>is a potential negative for the hardware suppliers and the

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 13>likes of Nvideo, etc. Because again, this brute force approach

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 13>that's been taken so far. You know, I don't think

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 13>it's sustainable in the long run, both from a capital

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 13>point of view and you know, an environmental point of

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:46.760
<v Speaker 13>view and an energy point of view. So I think

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 13>that it genuinely is uncertain at the moment, but should

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 13>become clearer in the coming months.

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 3>So what do you expect the impact to be of

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 3>the fact that are one, this AI model from deep

0:31:59.760 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 3>Ceas is open source. How is that going to impact

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:03.480
<v Speaker 3>the industry?

0:32:03.720 --> 0:32:05.840
<v Speaker 13>Well, again, you know, my job is to take a

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 13>critical eye to thinks. But I think potentially there could

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 13>be a positive from that because in open source and

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 13>allowing external developers to really understand the nuts and bolts

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 13>of how they've put this model together. It's potentially a

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 13>positive for the industry and will help the industry as

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 13>a whole move towards you know, more efficient, lower cost

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:34.240
<v Speaker 13>models overall. So again that is one potential direction of

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 13>travel that the industry could go in as a result

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 13>of this. Because, and again this may surprise some people

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 13>out there, this innovative Chinese company has been pretty transparent

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 13>about what it's done, so I think, you know, ultimately

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 13>that could be to the benefit of the entire industry.

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 13>But again its early days. It remains to be seen.

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 3>What do we know about the way in which this

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 3>R one model has been trained. When you hear stories

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 3>of how US AI chat parts have been trained, I

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 3>mean they're accumulating vast sums of data from the intranet

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 3>and that is helping to train these models. It's a

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:12.720
<v Speaker 3>very different story in China though, where data is concerned,

0:33:12.760 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 3>is it not and is there anything to read into

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:20.240
<v Speaker 3>kind of the context of a Chinese AI app being

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 3>developed on the mainland.

0:33:22.680 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 13>That's a very important point. And again when we've raised

0:33:25.440 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 13>in our research one issue that the Chinese companies do have.

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 13>First of all, there's the censorship rules, the Great Firewall,

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 13>et cetera. So obviously their availability to data in Chinese

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:41.720
<v Speaker 13>language is relatively unrestricted within the confines of these censorship rules,

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 13>so as being commented widely. Yeah, sure, if you're asking

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 13>more sensitive, politically sensitive questions, for example, the model sort

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:55.240
<v Speaker 13>of clam up and unwilling to answer that. But I

0:33:55.280 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 13>think the reality is the World Wide Web is dominated

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 13>by the English language. Forget the exact stat off the

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 13>top of my head, but you know it's like eighty

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:06.720
<v Speaker 13>to ninety percent of all information on the world Wide

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:11.800
<v Speaker 13>where globally is in English. And again, the Chinese aility

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 13>or the ability of Chinese companies to access that training

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 13>data is more limited versus companies in the US or Europe.

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:19.759
<v Speaker 13>So again I think that's another issue they need to

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:24.880
<v Speaker 13>work around in the long run. But you know, their models,

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:29.239
<v Speaker 13>as have said, are highly efficient, highly cost competitive. The

0:34:29.239 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 13>fact that they're open sourcing this technology and making it

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 13>effectively available to everybody should ultimately help the developments and models,

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:38.920
<v Speaker 13>you know, globally.

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:42.279
<v Speaker 3>So if the efficiency of the technology, which seems to

0:34:42.320 --> 0:34:45.840
<v Speaker 3>have been demonstrated, is there, that will likely then I

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:49.759
<v Speaker 3>would imagine, lead to increased demand for the resource. Is

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:53.240
<v Speaker 3>this a pivotal moment for the adoption of chat bards

0:34:53.239 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 3>because of what this company is doing?

0:34:56.160 --> 0:35:00.040
<v Speaker 13>Right, One thing I have done repeatedly when I I

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 13>meet new people, when I talk to my friends and

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:06.719
<v Speaker 13>family and colleagues, I normally will drop into conversation a

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:10.800
<v Speaker 13>question just asking about their AI usage to see whether

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 13>they're using these spots, whether they're paying for bots. More importantly,

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:18.280
<v Speaker 13>and although this is completely anecdotal, I think the reality

0:35:18.360 --> 0:35:20.680
<v Speaker 13>is the vast majority of us at the moment are

0:35:20.719 --> 0:35:21.880
<v Speaker 13>not paying for these things.

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 1>So why is that?

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:25.799
<v Speaker 13>Particularly in this part of the world. In China, many

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:28.200
<v Speaker 13>of these apps are free to use, and that's the

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:31.280
<v Speaker 13>culture of Chinese apps in general. They tend to monetize

0:35:31.320 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 13>through advertising, But I think it reflects the level of

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:39.400
<v Speaker 13>value add that the average consumer currently sees in the

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 13>current generation of bots and other AI tools. Whilst they're

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:46.359
<v Speaker 13>interesting to play around with and maybe there are applications

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:49.560
<v Speaker 13>in some areas, the vast majority of consumers are not

0:35:49.600 --> 0:35:51.760
<v Speaker 13>putting their hands in the pocket and paying for these things.

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 13>So the biggest challenge this industry faces at the moment

0:35:54.680 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 13>is monetization and tying back to the US tech platform.

0:35:58.160 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 13>Spending ten billion dollars plus per quarter in CAPEX, I

0:36:03.040 --> 0:36:06.640
<v Speaker 13>would say largely driven by fear of missing out, you know,

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:09.319
<v Speaker 13>at some point we are going to hit a day

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 13>of reckoning if these companies are not monetizing fast enough

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 13>or in a in a more meaningful way. So whilst

0:36:17.280 --> 0:36:19.080
<v Speaker 13>Deepseeker is a bit of a wake up call to

0:36:19.120 --> 0:36:21.200
<v Speaker 13>show that, you know, Chinese obviously narrowing the gap and

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:24.040
<v Speaker 13>the technology front, the big challenge for all these companies,

0:36:24.440 --> 0:36:27.959
<v Speaker 13>whatever region they operate in is monetization. In our view,

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:31.960
<v Speaker 13>and we've published as repeatedly this is not happening fast enough,

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 13>and I think that is the major challenge this industry

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 13>still faces.

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 3>So what is the risk there? When I hear that,

0:36:39.239 --> 0:36:41.840
<v Speaker 3>it seems to suggest a lot of caution.

0:36:42.320 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 13>Well, there been so many bubbles and hype cycles in tech,

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:49.840
<v Speaker 13>not just in recent years, whether it's crypto or metaverse,

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:52.200
<v Speaker 13>and you know, going back to the year two thousand

0:36:52.440 --> 0:36:55.279
<v Speaker 13>and the Internet bubble, and I think there are some

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:59.279
<v Speaker 13>parallels in all honesty with the Internet bubble. Ultimately, you know,

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:02.759
<v Speaker 13>we internet is an essential part of everybody's life these days.

0:37:02.760 --> 0:37:04.920
<v Speaker 13>So I'm not in any way suggesting AI won't be

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:08.399
<v Speaker 13>or isn't a useful tool, but I you know, whether

0:37:08.400 --> 0:37:12.279
<v Speaker 13>it goes back to the human psychology, human nature, there

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:15.240
<v Speaker 13>tends to be an overreaction either way. So, whilst AI

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 13>is a very interesting and innovative technique that can drive

0:37:22.320 --> 0:37:26.840
<v Speaker 13>efficiency and cost savings across many applications, I think the reality,

0:37:26.840 --> 0:37:29.920
<v Speaker 13>as I've said, is the technology still at relatively immature phase,

0:37:30.440 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 13>and therefore the companies are struggling to monetize at anywhere

0:37:35.760 --> 0:37:40.080
<v Speaker 13>fast enough rate given the huge amounts, humongous amounts they're

0:37:40.120 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 13>spending on CAPEX at the moment. So I think obviously

0:37:43.920 --> 0:37:46.400
<v Speaker 13>it isn't such an issue for the very large tech platforms,

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:49.719
<v Speaker 13>given their very healthy balance sheets in free cash flow generations.

0:37:49.760 --> 0:37:52.440
<v Speaker 13>But I think the more marginal players out there, you know,

0:37:52.480 --> 0:37:54.400
<v Speaker 13>at some point we'll have to make a decision. Can

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:58.439
<v Speaker 13>they continue plowering such high amounts into CAPEX when there's

0:37:58.480 --> 0:38:01.560
<v Speaker 13>no or very limited chance of making a near term

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:02.160
<v Speaker 13>return on this.

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:05.240
<v Speaker 3>Robert, great stuff, Thank you so much. Robert Lee, Senior

0:38:05.280 --> 0:38:08.960
<v Speaker 3>analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence, joining us from Hong Kong. I'm

0:38:08.960 --> 0:38:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Doug Prisner. You can catch us weekdays for the Daybreak

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:16.480
<v Speaker 3>Asia podcast. It's available wherever you get your podcast, Tom.

0:38:16.200 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 1>And that does it for this edition of Bloomberg day

0:38:18.160 --> 0:38:20.759
<v Speaker 1>Break Weekend. Join us again Monday morning at five am

0:38:20.840 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Time for the latest on markets overseas, in

0:38:23.239 --> 0:38:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the news you need to start your day. I'm Tom Buzzby.

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:29.359
<v Speaker 1>Stay with us. Top stories and global business headlines are

0:38:29.400 --> 0:38:30.920
<v Speaker 1>coming up right now.