WEBVTT - The Bear Was Poked With Maria Konnikova

0:00:15.356 --> 0:00:22.956
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Hello everyone, I'm backed with the Visionist Histories ombusman

0:00:23.516 --> 0:00:28.036
<v Speaker 1>Mariya Kanikova. This is our third round and she's here

0:00:28.476 --> 0:00:30.396
<v Speaker 1>to grill me on the six part series we just

0:00:30.436 --> 0:00:33.556
<v Speaker 1>wrapped up on Guns in America. This is a mail

0:00:33.556 --> 0:00:37.036
<v Speaker 1>bag in the truest sense of the word. We received

0:00:37.036 --> 0:00:40.716
<v Speaker 1>an unprecedented amount of listener mail in this series, and

0:00:40.756 --> 0:00:44.356
<v Speaker 1>Maria's come prepared with a whole slew of your feedback.

0:00:45.356 --> 0:00:48.076
<v Speaker 1>Some nice, that's so nice.

0:00:48.196 --> 0:00:53.436
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, I am surprised at how much nice we got,

0:00:53.996 --> 0:00:59.156
<v Speaker 2>considering the subject of this particular season of Revisionist History.

0:00:59.396 --> 0:01:03.996
<v Speaker 2>To be perfectly honest, so let's start with something really

0:01:04.116 --> 0:01:05.156
<v Speaker 2>nice and positive.

0:01:05.316 --> 0:01:06.716
<v Speaker 1>Get the good stuff up takes.

0:01:06.556 --> 0:01:10.116
<v Speaker 2>Exactly exactly, you know the praise sound which, right, that's

0:01:10.116 --> 0:01:14.996
<v Speaker 2>the feedback sandwich. But you had a relatively light episode

0:01:14.996 --> 0:01:21.236
<v Speaker 2>in there about gun smoke, and someone wrote in being

0:01:21.316 --> 0:01:24.076
<v Speaker 2>a little bit worried that you got the murder rate

0:01:24.196 --> 0:01:29.596
<v Speaker 2>wrong when you calculated the murders, which I bring this, yes,

0:01:29.636 --> 0:01:34.596
<v Speaker 2>all right, So basically you had this episode where you

0:01:34.636 --> 0:01:37.716
<v Speaker 2>talked about the show that ran for how many years?

0:01:38.356 --> 0:01:44.836
<v Speaker 2>Twenty years, right, almost twenty years, and your producer Tali

0:01:44.876 --> 0:01:51.396
<v Speaker 2>Emlin actually went through several seasons of it and calculated

0:01:51.636 --> 0:01:54.476
<v Speaker 2>what the murder rate would be, and you found that

0:01:54.596 --> 0:01:58.516
<v Speaker 2>it would actually, even though it's insane, it is actually

0:01:58.676 --> 0:02:04.476
<v Speaker 2>eighty times higher than what it would be in any

0:02:04.796 --> 0:02:08.636
<v Speaker 2>city in the United States today. Yes, but it turns

0:02:08.676 --> 0:02:12.596
<v Speaker 2>out that you might have actually undercounted. According to this listener.

0:02:12.876 --> 0:02:16.956
<v Speaker 2>So here's the letter, the murder rate in Dodge City

0:02:17.236 --> 0:02:20.956
<v Speaker 2>was even worse than you calculated. You compared a season

0:02:20.956 --> 0:02:24.516
<v Speaker 2>of the show to an annual rate of modern day cities. However,

0:02:24.676 --> 0:02:28.116
<v Speaker 2>each episode probably takes place in a single day or

0:02:28.156 --> 0:02:32.916
<v Speaker 2>so the entire season probably only covered a couple months

0:02:32.956 --> 0:02:36.716
<v Speaker 2>of time. That would make the annual rate five to

0:02:36.916 --> 0:02:41.036
<v Speaker 2>six times worse than you already calculated. So what do

0:02:41.076 --> 0:02:41.716
<v Speaker 2>we think about that?

0:02:42.516 --> 0:02:47.356
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I get where this critique is coming from. I

0:02:47.356 --> 0:02:49.636
<v Speaker 1>think some merit to it. I would point out, though,

0:02:49.716 --> 0:02:52.236
<v Speaker 1>when I asked Ally about this, she says, if you

0:02:52.316 --> 0:02:54.796
<v Speaker 1>look at the first two seasons, so we have an

0:02:54.836 --> 0:02:57.756
<v Speaker 1>episode said in summer, we have one in winter, we

0:02:57.796 --> 0:03:01.556
<v Speaker 1>have one on Christmas, We've got a blizzard. So they

0:03:01.556 --> 0:03:05.756
<v Speaker 1>are kind of implying that what we're seeing unfolding in

0:03:05.756 --> 0:03:10.276
<v Speaker 1>the mythical Dodge City is real passage of time and

0:03:10.316 --> 0:03:13.036
<v Speaker 1>not a series of episodes. And also, by the way,

0:03:13.716 --> 0:03:18.316
<v Speaker 1>the actors get older, right, so you know when they

0:03:18.596 --> 0:03:21.356
<v Speaker 1>when this starts, Matt Dilan's a young man. When Gun

0:03:21.396 --> 0:03:23.596
<v Speaker 1>Smoke ins, Matt Dylan is no longer a young man.

0:03:24.436 --> 0:03:26.556
<v Speaker 1>So maybe the best way to say this is that,

0:03:27.996 --> 0:03:30.236
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think we should probably split the difference

0:03:30.316 --> 0:03:34.476
<v Speaker 1>and say that we were being excessively generous to the

0:03:34.476 --> 0:03:37.716
<v Speaker 1>fictional Dodge City in suggesting that their murder rate was

0:03:37.756 --> 0:03:42.836
<v Speaker 1>only eighty times higher than the next highest American city.

0:03:44.236 --> 0:03:48.956
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know, maybe it should. The accurate number

0:03:48.956 --> 0:03:50.276
<v Speaker 1>is one sixty.

0:03:51.236 --> 0:03:54.396
<v Speaker 2>That is absolutely crazy. By the way, I have never

0:03:54.436 --> 0:03:57.756
<v Speaker 2>seen gun Smoke, and I had to look it up.

0:03:58.316 --> 0:04:01.636
<v Speaker 2>The first time I heard of it was on your show.

0:04:02.196 --> 0:04:04.636
<v Speaker 1>And I act you get for growing up in Russia.

0:04:04.676 --> 0:04:08.156
<v Speaker 2>This is true. But I also had this like brain

0:04:08.276 --> 0:04:11.676
<v Speaker 2>fart moment where Matt Dylan. I was like, wait, but

0:04:11.716 --> 0:04:13.196
<v Speaker 2>Matt Dylan isn't that old.

0:04:14.036 --> 0:04:15.236
<v Speaker 1>Oh you would think of the other man.

0:04:15.596 --> 0:04:17.796
<v Speaker 2>I was thinking of the actor Matt Dylan, and so

0:04:17.996 --> 0:04:20.396
<v Speaker 2>for a second I was like, wait, how is Matt

0:04:20.476 --> 0:04:22.996
<v Speaker 2>Dylan in this show gun Smoke? And it was just

0:04:23.036 --> 0:04:26.076
<v Speaker 2>like this this total fictional universe that I created in

0:04:26.116 --> 0:04:29.276
<v Speaker 2>my head before I looked up what it actually was.

0:04:29.476 --> 0:04:33.556
<v Speaker 1>Years ago, maybe thirty thirty, maybe twenty five. I'm at

0:04:33.596 --> 0:04:36.796
<v Speaker 1>a party in the West Village and I realized Matt

0:04:36.796 --> 0:04:39.516
<v Speaker 1>Dillon is there when he was really at the height

0:04:39.556 --> 0:04:41.236
<v Speaker 1>of his fame. He's still famous, but he was very

0:04:41.916 --> 0:04:46.596
<v Speaker 1>I ingratiated myself with him and spent a delightful evening.

0:04:46.596 --> 0:04:49.916
<v Speaker 1>It went well past evening, I said, I spent a

0:04:49.956 --> 0:04:53.276
<v Speaker 1>delightful evening in his company, and I can testify that

0:04:53.356 --> 0:04:56.116
<v Speaker 1>he is everybody's charming in real life as he would

0:04:56.556 --> 0:04:58.196
<v Speaker 1>as the movies was jest he would be.

0:04:58.396 --> 0:05:00.396
<v Speaker 2>That's wonderful. Was he named after the show?

0:05:01.076 --> 0:05:04.196
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think it's obvious he was, right, Yeah, because

0:05:04.196 --> 0:05:09.356
<v Speaker 1>he kind of does. He looks not unlike the the

0:05:09.396 --> 0:05:12.476
<v Speaker 1>fictional Matt Dill. Maybe his parents had a notion, but

0:05:12.556 --> 0:05:14.836
<v Speaker 1>who knows either that or like just some agent gave

0:05:14.876 --> 0:05:17.356
<v Speaker 1>it to him when he was nineteen years old.

0:05:17.676 --> 0:05:20.116
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think I think that's amazing. And you know,

0:05:20.156 --> 0:05:21.876
<v Speaker 2>to my credit, I also did not have a TV

0:05:21.956 --> 0:05:24.556
<v Speaker 2>growing up, so notice, so you know, ah, we have

0:05:24.596 --> 0:05:29.436
<v Speaker 2>that in common. So we did have this one lighthearted

0:05:29.596 --> 0:05:35.716
<v Speaker 2>reader's email, but every other email, or at least the

0:05:35.796 --> 0:05:38.316
<v Speaker 2>vast majority, were about one single episode. Do you want

0:05:38.316 --> 0:05:39.636
<v Speaker 2>to care to guess which one it was?

0:05:39.716 --> 0:05:41.596
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to guess it was the assault rifle.

0:05:41.316 --> 0:05:45.836
<v Speaker 2>Episode, and you would have guessed correctly, it's that episode.

0:05:46.076 --> 0:05:48.236
<v Speaker 1>Before you go, before you get into the let me

0:05:48.276 --> 0:05:52.356
<v Speaker 1>just say that there are things you do as journalists,

0:05:52.356 --> 0:05:55.596
<v Speaker 1>and you know this well, that are deliberate provocations. You

0:05:55.596 --> 0:05:58.116
<v Speaker 1>do them precisely because you do think you are running

0:05:58.516 --> 0:06:03.436
<v Speaker 1>counter to people's expectations and preconceptions. This would be one

0:06:03.476 --> 0:06:07.596
<v Speaker 1>of those. I was poking the bear, and I guess

0:06:07.636 --> 0:06:11.796
<v Speaker 1>the bear. The bear was postfair, was duly boked.

0:06:12.476 --> 0:06:15.876
<v Speaker 2>Mission accomplished. So let's get into some of these letters,

0:06:15.916 --> 0:06:19.716
<v Speaker 2>because when you listen to excerpts from them, you start

0:06:19.756 --> 0:06:24.676
<v Speaker 2>realizing that it's as if people listened to two different episodes,

0:06:24.996 --> 0:06:28.356
<v Speaker 2>depending on where they were coming from to begin with

0:06:29.036 --> 0:06:33.516
<v Speaker 2>their own opinions about gun control colored what they heard

0:06:33.596 --> 0:06:37.596
<v Speaker 2>you say and how they experienced your interviews to a

0:06:37.636 --> 0:06:40.276
<v Speaker 2>shocking degree. I mean, actually not shocking. I'm not at

0:06:40.316 --> 0:06:44.756
<v Speaker 2>all shocked, but it's crazy reading these and seeing just

0:06:45.156 --> 0:06:50.836
<v Speaker 2>the opposite responses. So they will write things like, let's

0:06:50.876 --> 0:06:53.836
<v Speaker 2>see the gun rights guy was more genial than the

0:06:53.836 --> 0:06:58.316
<v Speaker 2>gun control guy, but he was just as misleading. All

0:06:58.356 --> 0:07:01.276
<v Speaker 2>he did was smile while he made you look left

0:07:01.636 --> 0:07:04.836
<v Speaker 2>when you should have looked to the right. And then

0:07:04.836 --> 0:07:08.196
<v Speaker 2>they have all of these figures behind that saying that, oh, well,

0:07:08.196 --> 0:07:11.636
<v Speaker 2>they're saying that, you know, he is saying that it

0:07:11.676 --> 0:07:15.636
<v Speaker 2>only takes three seconds to do this, but mass shooters

0:07:16.076 --> 0:07:18.436
<v Speaker 2>are there's going to be so much going on and

0:07:18.516 --> 0:07:20.476
<v Speaker 2>his math is wrong and this is wrong, and that

0:07:20.676 --> 0:07:26.236
<v Speaker 2>is wrong, and they say that you were led astray.

0:07:26.636 --> 0:07:30.676
<v Speaker 2>But then you have someone saying, Malcolm, you know, I'm

0:07:30.756 --> 0:07:33.516
<v Speaker 2>so proud of you for finally seeing the light now

0:07:33.556 --> 0:07:36.436
<v Speaker 2>and now I'm quoting. Now, let's remember that the problem

0:07:36.516 --> 0:07:41.556
<v Speaker 2>in America is a murder problem, not a weapon problem.

0:07:42.076 --> 0:07:46.516
<v Speaker 2>So you have two very very different points of view, right,

0:07:46.836 --> 0:07:50.996
<v Speaker 2>and let's talk about that. How can people walk away

0:07:51.836 --> 0:07:55.436
<v Speaker 2>from the same episode, listening to the same data with

0:07:55.796 --> 0:07:58.356
<v Speaker 2>just completely opposite perspectives.

0:07:58.436 --> 0:08:00.676
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, it shouldn't come as a surprise that

0:08:02.356 --> 0:08:07.476
<v Speaker 1>people's when people listen to something that they feel strongly about,

0:08:07.556 --> 0:08:12.916
<v Speaker 1>they have a subjective reading, nor, you know, nor does

0:08:12.956 --> 0:08:16.076
<v Speaker 1>it surprise me now after thirty years of writing books,

0:08:16.476 --> 0:08:21.116
<v Speaker 1>that people don't read or listen to the end. You know,

0:08:21.156 --> 0:08:24.956
<v Speaker 1>I wrote a book called my second book, Blink, was

0:08:25.276 --> 0:08:29.716
<v Speaker 1>a book that looked critically at When I say critically,

0:08:29.796 --> 0:08:32.756
<v Speaker 1>the examine wrote the pros and cons of snap judgments,

0:08:33.356 --> 0:08:36.236
<v Speaker 1>But you had to keep reading. It started out on

0:08:36.276 --> 0:08:39.996
<v Speaker 1>the pros and then as I dug deeper got interested

0:08:39.996 --> 0:08:44.316
<v Speaker 1>in the cons. The number of people who either supported

0:08:44.796 --> 0:08:47.036
<v Speaker 1>or loved that book or hated that book because they

0:08:47.116 --> 0:08:51.796
<v Speaker 1>perceived it as being a book about celebrating snap judgments

0:08:52.156 --> 0:08:54.596
<v Speaker 1>was limitless. You know, anytime you tell a story that

0:08:54.596 --> 0:08:57.196
<v Speaker 1>has a twist, you're going to leave some portion of

0:08:57.276 --> 0:09:00.076
<v Speaker 1>people along the way. And I think this episode is

0:09:00.076 --> 0:09:03.076
<v Speaker 1>a proof of that. Like basically where I end up

0:09:03.116 --> 0:09:05.716
<v Speaker 1>remember is you know, is a gun is a gun

0:09:05.756 --> 0:09:09.396
<v Speaker 1>as a gun. Parsing these these distinctions between gun is

0:09:09.436 --> 0:09:13.596
<v Speaker 1>a pointless exercise that leads you away from the central issue,

0:09:13.636 --> 0:09:17.476
<v Speaker 1>which is that having lots of lethal weapons floating around

0:09:17.716 --> 0:09:20.636
<v Speaker 1>in a society is not the best idea.

0:09:21.276 --> 0:09:24.876
<v Speaker 2>Right. Obviously, when you were doing these interviews, you you

0:09:24.916 --> 0:09:26.436
<v Speaker 2>know you want to do the interview, and you never

0:09:26.516 --> 0:09:30.116
<v Speaker 2>want to You don't want to antagonize a person you're interviewing.

0:09:30.156 --> 0:09:32.396
<v Speaker 2>In the middle of the interview, especially when they're holding

0:09:32.396 --> 0:09:36.036
<v Speaker 2>a gun. But I'm actually just curious from a personal perspective,

0:09:36.116 --> 0:09:39.676
<v Speaker 2>if if you care to comment, were you kind of

0:09:39.716 --> 0:09:44.556
<v Speaker 2>were you persuaded by by these arguments so that it

0:09:44.716 --> 0:09:49.796
<v Speaker 2>actually doesn't make that much of a difference, and that

0:09:49.876 --> 0:09:54.676
<v Speaker 2>you you know that that we should that were barking

0:09:54.756 --> 0:09:57.076
<v Speaker 2>up the wrong tree when we're looking at this guy legislation.

0:09:57.236 --> 0:10:02.236
<v Speaker 1>I was there two persuasive things in the reporting a persuision.

0:10:02.596 --> 0:10:06.596
<v Speaker 1>One was with my gun expert, the guy I've shot

0:10:06.596 --> 0:10:10.916
<v Speaker 1>within North Carolina, Gregg Wallace. And what's persuasive about his

0:10:11.116 --> 0:10:14.996
<v Speaker 1>discussion is not how fast you can shoot a semi

0:10:15.036 --> 0:10:17.436
<v Speaker 1>automatic weapon versus an automatic weapon, although that is the

0:10:17.436 --> 0:10:19.956
<v Speaker 1>thing is relevant. The real core issue he was getting

0:10:19.996 --> 0:10:24.596
<v Speaker 1>at is said assault rifle bands don't ban assault rifles.

0:10:25.276 --> 0:10:29.516
<v Speaker 1>They ban a subcategory of assault rifles which qualify for

0:10:29.556 --> 0:10:32.196
<v Speaker 1>the ban not because they are more lethal, but because

0:10:32.236 --> 0:10:35.996
<v Speaker 1>they have certain cosmetic features that make them unattractive or

0:10:36.116 --> 0:10:40.516
<v Speaker 1>mean looking. Right, Really, what you're getting so's his function

0:10:40.716 --> 0:10:43.476
<v Speaker 1>in the story is to remind us that, look, this

0:10:43.516 --> 0:10:46.476
<v Speaker 1>is a bullshit exercise. You may think that an assault

0:10:46.516 --> 0:10:49.876
<v Speaker 1>rifle ban bands assault rifles it does not. Right, the

0:10:49.916 --> 0:10:56.756
<v Speaker 1>fundamental platform of the AR fifteen remains untouched by these bands, right.

0:10:56.796 --> 0:10:58.956
<v Speaker 1>You can still use the basic weapon, you just can't

0:10:59.036 --> 0:11:02.516
<v Speaker 1>use some of these accessories. That's pointing with the number

0:11:02.516 --> 0:11:06.156
<v Speaker 1>two is it is not a distinction without a difference

0:11:06.236 --> 0:11:09.836
<v Speaker 1>to point out that a semi automatic weapon is not

0:11:09.876 --> 0:11:13.436
<v Speaker 1>the same as an automatic weapon. They are fundamentally different.

0:11:13.476 --> 0:11:17.956
<v Speaker 1>And if people are under the illusion that an assault

0:11:18.476 --> 0:11:23.996
<v Speaker 1>weapon is basically like a machine gun, they're wrong, right, Yeah,

0:11:24.036 --> 0:11:25.636
<v Speaker 1>And that's not a trivial mistake.

0:11:26.036 --> 0:11:26.236
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:11:27.196 --> 0:11:29.476
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of these as I'm reading through on

0:11:29.516 --> 0:11:31.876
<v Speaker 1>this one in this one letter, a lot of them,

0:11:32.036 --> 0:11:36.636
<v Speaker 1>you know, are fussing around in the kind of minor

0:11:36.716 --> 0:11:39.396
<v Speaker 1>details of these distinctions, and it's just like, it's not

0:11:39.476 --> 0:11:42.516
<v Speaker 1>the point. The point is like, what we're setting out

0:11:42.556 --> 0:11:44.356
<v Speaker 1>to do here is not actually what we're doing A

0:11:44.836 --> 0:11:47.756
<v Speaker 1>and B. This brings us to the second persuasive character

0:11:47.796 --> 0:11:50.916
<v Speaker 1>in that the most persuasive character in that episode was

0:11:50.956 --> 0:11:54.156
<v Speaker 1>the er doctor. Yeah, the guy in DC who had

0:11:54.196 --> 0:11:59.956
<v Speaker 1>studied mass shootings and points out that the truly lethal

0:11:59.996 --> 0:12:02.116
<v Speaker 1>weapon in the hands of a mass shooter is a

0:12:02.156 --> 0:12:06.396
<v Speaker 1>handgun and not an assault rifle. And that's because what

0:12:06.476 --> 0:12:10.556
<v Speaker 1>makes a gun lethal is not just a matter of

0:12:10.596 --> 0:12:14.436
<v Speaker 1>its ballistic properties. It's a question of how it's used.

0:12:14.956 --> 0:12:17.916
<v Speaker 1>And there are so many quote unquote advantages to a

0:12:17.956 --> 0:12:21.396
<v Speaker 1>handgun in the way it's used that it makes it,

0:12:21.476 --> 0:12:22.996
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, a more dangerous weapon

0:12:23.036 --> 0:12:25.836
<v Speaker 1>in a mass shooting. There is a whole kind of

0:12:25.956 --> 0:12:32.356
<v Speaker 1>really weird academic subculture devoted to the analysis of mass shootings,

0:12:32.436 --> 0:12:35.796
<v Speaker 1>and you would be surprised how divergent those findings are

0:12:35.876 --> 0:12:40.156
<v Speaker 1>from a lot of our preconceptions about what happens in

0:12:40.196 --> 0:12:40.836
<v Speaker 1>a mass shooting.

0:12:41.596 --> 0:12:44.556
<v Speaker 2>That's really interesting, and I actually saw that as a

0:12:44.596 --> 0:12:50.036
<v Speaker 2>thread throughout this entire season of Revisionist History, just how

0:12:50.276 --> 0:12:55.076
<v Speaker 2>strong identity politics and our sense of who we are

0:12:55.116 --> 0:12:58.196
<v Speaker 2>and how we define ourselves is when it comes to

0:12:59.036 --> 0:13:02.076
<v Speaker 2>parsing the world and those definitional issues.

0:13:02.556 --> 0:13:07.236
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the other moment, you know, in the assault Rifle episode,

0:13:07.316 --> 0:13:12.916
<v Speaker 1>you know, it ends with me confronting this this anti

0:13:12.996 --> 0:13:19.076
<v Speaker 1>gun lobbyist, big time opponent of the Second Amendment in Washington,

0:13:19.596 --> 0:13:22.476
<v Speaker 1>and I think the reason he gets very upset, and

0:13:22.596 --> 0:13:24.796
<v Speaker 1>actually we didn't even use the parts of the of

0:13:24.836 --> 0:13:27.476
<v Speaker 1>the conversation where he was most upset, And I think

0:13:27.516 --> 0:13:29.076
<v Speaker 1>One of the reasons he was so upset is that

0:13:30.036 --> 0:13:35.236
<v Speaker 1>I was out flanking him on the left, and I

0:13:35.276 --> 0:13:37.436
<v Speaker 1>was taking a more anti gun position than he was.

0:13:37.876 --> 0:13:39.796
<v Speaker 1>And not only that, in order to outflank him on

0:13:39.836 --> 0:13:43.036
<v Speaker 1>the left, I was using right wing arguments or right

0:13:43.036 --> 0:13:46.556
<v Speaker 1>wing facts. You know that that episode is if you

0:13:46.556 --> 0:13:49.796
<v Speaker 1>think about it structurally, that's what it is. It's taking

0:13:50.036 --> 0:13:53.916
<v Speaker 1>arguments most commonly used on the right to draw a

0:13:53.996 --> 0:13:56.996
<v Speaker 1>highly liberal conclusion. It's just confused. It's just confusing to

0:13:57.036 --> 0:13:57.316
<v Speaker 1>do that.

0:13:57.836 --> 0:14:01.516
<v Speaker 2>Malcolm, you have come a long way from your debating fiasco.

0:14:04.116 --> 0:14:09.116
<v Speaker 1>Don't even get me started. We will be right back

0:14:09.196 --> 0:14:11.356
<v Speaker 1>back more from the mailbag.

0:14:27.156 --> 0:14:31.076
<v Speaker 2>All right, well, let's go back to guns, because I

0:14:31.156 --> 0:14:33.716
<v Speaker 2>do want to talk about some of the other episodes.

0:14:34.236 --> 0:14:37.356
<v Speaker 2>I think that one theme that we haven't touched on,

0:14:37.516 --> 0:14:42.156
<v Speaker 2>but that is, you know, deeply connected to all of everything.

0:14:42.236 --> 0:14:46.356
<v Speaker 2>We have been discussing, the racial and the socioeconomic underpinnings

0:14:46.396 --> 0:14:49.916
<v Speaker 2>of all of this, and the fact that it's kind

0:14:49.916 --> 0:14:55.276
<v Speaker 2>of woven into the fabric of the country. And you know,

0:14:55.476 --> 0:15:00.156
<v Speaker 2>you you talk about in these are different episodes. There's Chicago,

0:15:00.316 --> 0:15:03.996
<v Speaker 2>you know, there's there's DC, There's and you have you

0:15:04.076 --> 0:15:09.436
<v Speaker 2>have Alabama. You have these very different geographically arts of

0:15:09.436 --> 0:15:15.156
<v Speaker 2>the country, urban rural, and yet you have some of

0:15:15.196 --> 0:15:21.756
<v Speaker 2>the exact same reasons why we have still despite all

0:15:21.836 --> 0:15:27.996
<v Speaker 2>of the incredible medical stuff that's happened, and despite how

0:15:27.996 --> 0:15:30.356
<v Speaker 2>many lives are saved now that wouldn't have been saved

0:15:30.356 --> 0:15:33.636
<v Speaker 2>in the past, we still have these huge disparities, and

0:15:33.796 --> 0:15:36.836
<v Speaker 2>we still have people dying who shouldn't be dying because

0:15:37.556 --> 0:15:40.156
<v Speaker 2>either they're the wrong color, or they're in a place

0:15:40.156 --> 0:15:43.636
<v Speaker 2>where they seem like they're the wrong color, or they're

0:15:43.676 --> 0:15:48.196
<v Speaker 2>in a place that's so economically marginalized that you know,

0:15:48.236 --> 0:15:52.236
<v Speaker 2>they can't get to a trauma center, probably because that

0:15:52.356 --> 0:15:55.796
<v Speaker 2>area was the wrong color at some point, and it's

0:15:55.916 --> 0:15:59.556
<v Speaker 2>just it's heartbreaking, but it's still the reality.

0:15:59.916 --> 0:16:03.876
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this reminds me of I think I'm getting this right.

0:16:04.276 --> 0:16:07.076
<v Speaker 1>Something I read years ago about what is the effact

0:16:07.196 --> 0:16:11.876
<v Speaker 1>What is the effect of reading enrichment programs on test

0:16:11.876 --> 0:16:16.516
<v Speaker 1>score gaps between black and white kids? And reading the

0:16:16.596 --> 0:16:20.916
<v Speaker 1>ritual programs increase the testcore gap. They don't decrease it,

0:16:20.956 --> 0:16:23.796
<v Speaker 1>even though they're intended to decrease it. But what they

0:16:23.836 --> 0:16:26.716
<v Speaker 1>do is if you give reading enrichment to someone who

0:16:26.756 --> 0:16:30.476
<v Speaker 1>reads a lot, they're going to reap the most of

0:16:30.556 --> 0:16:33.356
<v Speaker 1>that boost. If you give a reading enrichment to someone

0:16:33.436 --> 0:16:35.756
<v Speaker 1>doesn't read much, they're not going to get much out

0:16:35.756 --> 0:16:38.116
<v Speaker 1>of it because they're not reading to begin with. So

0:16:38.756 --> 0:16:41.836
<v Speaker 1>something that we introduced as a way to narrow the

0:16:41.836 --> 0:16:44.316
<v Speaker 1>gap ends up widening the gap, which is a reminder

0:16:44.356 --> 0:16:47.716
<v Speaker 1>that not all innovations do what we have an assumption.

0:16:47.836 --> 0:16:50.956
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes I think that the purpose of an innovation is

0:16:50.996 --> 0:16:53.476
<v Speaker 1>to shrink the gap between the haves and have nots.

0:16:54.036 --> 0:16:57.036
<v Speaker 1>This is so often violated that it's time we shelve

0:16:57.076 --> 0:17:01.836
<v Speaker 1>that notion and understand that innovations are just energy. You know,

0:17:02.076 --> 0:17:04.236
<v Speaker 1>they can be put to whatever use we want, and

0:17:04.276 --> 0:17:07.756
<v Speaker 1>sometimes what they do is just turbocharge existing inequities. And

0:17:07.796 --> 0:17:11.796
<v Speaker 1>I think Caare is an example of this exact thing.

0:17:12.476 --> 0:17:16.676
<v Speaker 1>That you can't put trauma centers everywhere too expensive. You

0:17:16.676 --> 0:17:19.116
<v Speaker 1>can only put them in places where you can justify

0:17:19.116 --> 0:17:22.796
<v Speaker 1>them economically. And what are those places, Well, those are

0:17:22.836 --> 0:17:25.116
<v Speaker 1>wealthy places. Yeah, So you put them in wealthy places,

0:17:25.116 --> 0:17:26.916
<v Speaker 1>and they have the effect of making the quality of

0:17:27.676 --> 0:17:30.356
<v Speaker 1>healthcare provided in wealthy places, which was already better than

0:17:30.356 --> 0:17:35.516
<v Speaker 1>everyone else everywhere else, even better. Right, So when everyone

0:17:35.596 --> 0:17:37.356
<v Speaker 1>who goes to a hospital gets you to for a

0:17:37.396 --> 0:17:41.636
<v Speaker 1>gun shot dies. We don't notice the difference between good

0:17:41.676 --> 0:17:44.556
<v Speaker 1>hospitals and bad hospitals. But when you put a trauma

0:17:44.556 --> 0:17:46.276
<v Speaker 1>center in one of those places and you don't have

0:17:46.276 --> 0:17:48.516
<v Speaker 1>another one, then you begin to notice it's a huge difference.

0:17:48.596 --> 0:17:48.836
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:17:49.276 --> 0:17:51.596
<v Speaker 1>I was just at something when we were talking about AI,

0:17:52.516 --> 0:17:55.996
<v Speaker 1>and everyone's you know, we're obviously very excited about the

0:17:56.036 --> 0:18:00.356
<v Speaker 1>possibility that AI will transform all manner of things. It's

0:18:00.396 --> 0:18:05.116
<v Speaker 1>really unclear whether AI lifts all boats equally, closes the

0:18:05.156 --> 0:18:07.436
<v Speaker 1>gap between haves and have nots, or widens the gap.

0:18:07.476 --> 0:18:10.716
<v Speaker 1>Pato halves no idea. Anyone who tells you that they

0:18:10.756 --> 0:18:13.156
<v Speaker 1>know which way it'll go, doesn't you know it was

0:18:13.196 --> 0:18:13.636
<v Speaker 1>fooling you.

0:18:14.316 --> 0:18:17.276
<v Speaker 2>That's that's a very good point. And I mean, if

0:18:17.316 --> 0:18:19.236
<v Speaker 2>I had to bet on one outcome or the other,

0:18:19.316 --> 0:18:21.276
<v Speaker 2>I would say probably it's not going to lift all

0:18:21.316 --> 0:18:25.316
<v Speaker 2>boats equally, just because also who's going to have access

0:18:25.396 --> 0:18:28.636
<v Speaker 2>to AI, right, and who's going to have access to

0:18:28.756 --> 0:18:30.956
<v Speaker 2>the technologies, and who's going to have the time to

0:18:31.036 --> 0:18:34.876
<v Speaker 2>learn how to use them? Yeah, so who knows? Who knows?

0:18:35.076 --> 0:18:39.036
<v Speaker 1>On that one? I'm actually an optimist, good I'm glad. Well,

0:18:39.076 --> 0:18:43.316
<v Speaker 1>at least I'll say this that over time, I would

0:18:43.316 --> 0:18:49.476
<v Speaker 1>expect it to close the gap. Not even so quite explicitly.

0:18:49.876 --> 0:18:52.556
<v Speaker 1>It's obvious to me it lifts all boats. It's obviously

0:18:52.556 --> 0:18:55.436
<v Speaker 1>in the short term, people with access to the technology

0:18:55.476 --> 0:18:58.116
<v Speaker 1>will benefit the most. So I'm interested in making a

0:18:58.156 --> 0:19:00.516
<v Speaker 1>medium to long term I think in medium to long

0:19:00.596 --> 0:19:03.356
<v Speaker 1>term it does not merely lift all boats. If I

0:19:03.396 --> 0:19:06.996
<v Speaker 1>had to put my money on something, I would say

0:19:07.076 --> 0:19:12.796
<v Speaker 1>it would close the gap that the farmer in Bangladesh

0:19:13.636 --> 0:19:19.076
<v Speaker 1>benefits more from AI than the than the factory farmer

0:19:19.156 --> 0:19:21.996
<v Speaker 1>with fifty million dollars in equipment in Iowa.

0:19:22.716 --> 0:19:23.436
<v Speaker 2>I hope you're right.

0:19:23.676 --> 0:19:25.756
<v Speaker 1>These days, I'm only really optimistic about one thing, and

0:19:25.796 --> 0:19:28.076
<v Speaker 1>that's it. Everything else is bad.

0:19:28.356 --> 0:19:30.476
<v Speaker 2>All right, All right, well, well let's cling to that.

0:19:31.476 --> 0:19:35.476
<v Speaker 2>So now back to the optimistic news of the trauma centers.

0:19:36.756 --> 0:19:39.516
<v Speaker 2>But I was one of the things that I am

0:19:39.556 --> 0:19:43.276
<v Speaker 2>curious about is how strongly do you actually agree with

0:19:43.316 --> 0:19:47.836
<v Speaker 2>this idea of moral hazard that you raise in relation

0:19:47.996 --> 0:19:53.156
<v Speaker 2>to the improvements and care, because I don't know if

0:19:53.196 --> 0:19:54.196
<v Speaker 2>I actually buy that.

0:19:54.356 --> 0:19:56.876
<v Speaker 1>You don't buy that. No, So the argument was that

0:19:57.436 --> 0:20:01.036
<v Speaker 1>doctors have become so good at saving lives that it's

0:20:01.116 --> 0:20:04.356
<v Speaker 1>relieve the pressure on the rest of society to do

0:20:04.436 --> 0:20:10.676
<v Speaker 1>something real about the gunman. Exactly that if doctors had

0:20:10.716 --> 0:20:15.316
<v Speaker 1>done nothing over the last fifty years, this is the counterfactual,

0:20:15.796 --> 0:20:19.596
<v Speaker 1>the murder rate would be. We probably have four or

0:20:19.636 --> 0:20:21.756
<v Speaker 1>five times of spending homicides in a given year. Let's

0:20:21.756 --> 0:20:23.836
<v Speaker 1>say we we'd have one hundred thousand homicides as opposed

0:20:23.836 --> 0:20:28.156
<v Speaker 1>to twenty thousand homicides, and at one hundred thousand, the

0:20:28.236 --> 0:20:31.636
<v Speaker 1>current American policy set up, policy positions would be untenable.

0:20:31.996 --> 0:20:34.676
<v Speaker 1>We would jump up and down and say enough stuff. Now,

0:20:35.476 --> 0:20:39.396
<v Speaker 1>do I think that there is some truth in that? Yes. However,

0:20:40.636 --> 0:20:43.436
<v Speaker 1>then I thought, after I'd finished the episode and I

0:20:43.476 --> 0:20:46.476
<v Speaker 1>was writing this next book, I'm working on doing something

0:20:46.476 --> 0:20:49.956
<v Speaker 1>on the opioid crisis, and I realized, Oh, we're at

0:20:49.956 --> 0:20:53.916
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and twenty thousand opioid whatever it is, one

0:20:53.996 --> 0:20:57.556
<v Speaker 1>hundred and ten thousand opioid deaths a year and hasn't

0:20:58.836 --> 0:21:00.676
<v Speaker 1>really moved the needle. We don't even talk about it.

0:21:00.756 --> 0:21:00.996
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:21:01.756 --> 0:21:09.716
<v Speaker 1>So, and also, opioid deaths are not dissimilar to homicide

0:21:09.716 --> 0:21:12.876
<v Speaker 1>deaths in a sense that it's clustered in various parts

0:21:12.876 --> 0:21:17.876
<v Speaker 1>of the country, various slightly younger age groups. You know,

0:21:18.036 --> 0:21:19.996
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we spend an enormous amount of time

0:21:20.636 --> 0:21:23.636
<v Speaker 1>arguing about mass shootings when mass shootings are what, less

0:21:23.636 --> 0:21:26.476
<v Speaker 1>than one percent of total homicide deaths in a given year,

0:21:26.796 --> 0:21:29.356
<v Speaker 1>and very little time on the remaining ninety nine percent,

0:21:29.796 --> 0:21:32.756
<v Speaker 1>suggests to me that maybe it wouldn't make a difference.

0:21:32.836 --> 0:21:34.476
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the moral hazard thing is just a kind of

0:21:34.476 --> 0:21:40.596
<v Speaker 1>intellectual nicety. The opioid thing would suggest that if it's

0:21:40.596 --> 0:21:43.636
<v Speaker 1>the wrong people dying, really hard to get people upset.

0:21:44.236 --> 0:21:47.156
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, that's to be perfectly honest, that's exactly

0:21:47.156 --> 0:21:49.036
<v Speaker 2>what I was thinking when I was listening to this.

0:21:49.156 --> 0:21:51.516
<v Speaker 2>I was saying, I actually think the moral hazard argument

0:21:51.556 --> 0:21:55.636
<v Speaker 2>is bullshit, and that we wouldn't care, and that it's

0:21:55.756 --> 0:21:59.916
<v Speaker 2>just these days, we also are so immune to a

0:21:59.916 --> 0:22:02.516
<v Speaker 2>lot of this stuff where you're just like, oh, yeah,

0:22:02.716 --> 0:22:06.116
<v Speaker 2>you know, I guess more people are dying, and.

0:22:07.356 --> 0:22:10.036
<v Speaker 1>Here's the so here's the let me make a let

0:22:10.076 --> 0:22:13.396
<v Speaker 1>me return, let me do another backflip and say, okay,

0:22:13.436 --> 0:22:17.916
<v Speaker 1>here's here's here's a here's a moral hazard argument, and

0:22:18.116 --> 0:22:22.196
<v Speaker 1>maybe that it's a it's a mechanism argument. So moral

0:22:22.196 --> 0:22:25.876
<v Speaker 1>hazard is as a term is used most frequently in.

0:22:25.836 --> 0:22:26.996
<v Speaker 2>The insurance industry.

0:22:27.356 --> 0:22:30.196
<v Speaker 1>If I ensure you against a risk, I make your

0:22:31.596 --> 0:22:36.156
<v Speaker 1>motivation to avoid that risk, I diminish your class. Example

0:22:36.156 --> 0:22:40.236
<v Speaker 1>would be you live in a flood zone and I

0:22:40.276 --> 0:22:43.196
<v Speaker 1>give you flood insurance, or the federal government you know,

0:22:43.716 --> 0:22:48.036
<v Speaker 1>provides flood insurance. Nobody moves from South Beach. Yep, logically

0:22:48.036 --> 0:22:50.156
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't live in South Peach. In fact, they're building.

0:22:50.436 --> 0:22:53.556
<v Speaker 1>They built billions of dollars in luxury house against South

0:22:53.596 --> 0:22:57.196
<v Speaker 1>Beach in the last ten years, precisely because the builders

0:22:57.236 --> 0:23:00.756
<v Speaker 1>are and the not not just builders, the purchasers of

0:23:00.796 --> 0:23:03.236
<v Speaker 1>those apartments are reasonably sure that in the event of

0:23:03.236 --> 0:23:06.116
<v Speaker 1>an environmental catastrophe, they will be bailed out by the government.

0:23:06.276 --> 0:23:08.236
<v Speaker 1>So why not why not live in paradise until you

0:23:08.316 --> 0:23:12.716
<v Speaker 1>get there? The answer to that is that just because

0:23:13.396 --> 0:23:17.956
<v Speaker 1>one institution or body insures against risk and provides a

0:23:17.996 --> 0:23:21.876
<v Speaker 1>mechanism for moral hazard doesn't mean everybody does. So what's

0:23:21.876 --> 0:23:26.436
<v Speaker 1>happening in Miami is that, sure, if the hurricane wipes

0:23:26.476 --> 0:23:28.996
<v Speaker 1>out your house, the Feds may bail you out, or

0:23:28.996 --> 0:23:32.116
<v Speaker 1>the statement bail you out, But in the meantime, no

0:23:32.556 --> 0:23:36.676
<v Speaker 1>private insurer is writing you up policy, right, So you're

0:23:36.716 --> 0:23:40.316
<v Speaker 1>other self assuring or you're naked. The cycling that's happening

0:23:40.836 --> 0:23:43.036
<v Speaker 1>that I suspect may soon happen, and there are people

0:23:43.436 --> 0:23:46.996
<v Speaker 1>talking about this now, is maybe when you buy a

0:23:47.036 --> 0:23:54.556
<v Speaker 1>house in South Beach, the mortgage rate is three points higher,

0:23:54.956 --> 0:23:57.356
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's ten percent. Maybe the bank just says, you

0:23:57.396 --> 0:24:01.636
<v Speaker 1>know what, why am I writing a mortgage for an

0:24:01.676 --> 0:24:05.196
<v Speaker 1>apartment in South Beach that's the same as an apartment

0:24:05.236 --> 0:24:08.796
<v Speaker 1>on a mountaintop in Maine when the odds that one

0:24:08.836 --> 0:24:12.076
<v Speaker 1>will be swept away in a hurricane are a thousand

0:24:12.116 --> 0:24:14.596
<v Speaker 1>times higher than the other. But really, by a quirk

0:24:14.676 --> 0:24:18.516
<v Speaker 1>of history, we have national mortgage rates. Why are mortgage

0:24:18.596 --> 0:24:22.716
<v Speaker 1>rates national if risks are not equal across what happens

0:24:22.756 --> 0:24:25.356
<v Speaker 1>when we start localizing mortgage rates. That is a way

0:24:25.396 --> 0:24:31.076
<v Speaker 1>in which moral hazard problems can be corrected by the market, right.

0:24:31.156 --> 0:24:33.276
<v Speaker 2>But it's a very different kind of moral hazard. Right.

0:24:33.316 --> 0:24:37.596
<v Speaker 2>It's actually you can't draw this then equivalence there because

0:24:37.676 --> 0:24:41.076
<v Speaker 2>one is a personal choice you're making, right, You're you're

0:24:41.156 --> 0:24:43.636
<v Speaker 2>choosing to buy a house knowing that it'll be fine

0:24:43.836 --> 0:24:46.516
<v Speaker 2>or not. The other one is the way that you're

0:24:46.556 --> 0:24:49.876
<v Speaker 2>looking at policy legislation where you don't think it applies

0:24:49.916 --> 0:24:54.716
<v Speaker 2>to you where oh, well, you know, I'm not the

0:24:54.756 --> 0:24:58.596
<v Speaker 2>one dying, or you know, I think I think it's

0:24:58.596 --> 0:25:02.476
<v Speaker 2>a it's a slightly different decision making calculus. And in

0:25:02.516 --> 0:25:07.116
<v Speaker 2>one case, you're talking about kind of discretionary spending. I

0:25:07.156 --> 0:25:10.276
<v Speaker 2>mean obviously having housing as at discretionary, but you know

0:25:10.276 --> 0:25:12.436
<v Speaker 2>what I mean buying, But buying a condown in South

0:25:12.476 --> 0:25:17.796
<v Speaker 2>Beach certainly is versus you know, life and death and

0:25:18.436 --> 0:25:21.436
<v Speaker 2>policies that are on a more.

0:25:22.836 --> 0:25:27.236
<v Speaker 1>Fundamental global basic Yes, but here my point was I

0:25:27.236 --> 0:25:32.556
<v Speaker 1>should restate my point. My point is that moral hazard

0:25:32.636 --> 0:25:36.916
<v Speaker 1>is a term that applies to any kind of policy

0:25:36.996 --> 0:25:42.476
<v Speaker 1>that removes the kind of necessary pressure for behavioral change. Sure,

0:25:43.276 --> 0:25:46.156
<v Speaker 1>my point is, using the mortgage example, was that just

0:25:46.196 --> 0:25:51.076
<v Speaker 1>because one mechanism removes pressure doesn't mean there are other

0:25:51.156 --> 0:25:53.636
<v Speaker 1>mechanisms that can't exert it. So and you can see

0:25:53.636 --> 0:25:56.636
<v Speaker 1>that with housing. What I'm wondering is, in the case

0:25:56.676 --> 0:26:00.276
<v Speaker 1>of if we had one hundred thousand homicide deaths every year,

0:26:00.876 --> 0:26:04.276
<v Speaker 1>or if we continue to have these one hundred and

0:26:04.316 --> 0:26:11.796
<v Speaker 1>whatever plus, is there another mechanism by which on a

0:26:12.156 --> 0:26:18.276
<v Speaker 1>non effected populations might be affected. So you can imagine

0:26:19.436 --> 0:26:24.996
<v Speaker 1>if you live in downtown San Francisco and you see

0:26:25.556 --> 0:26:27.996
<v Speaker 1>the results on a day to day basis of what

0:26:28.316 --> 0:26:32.676
<v Speaker 1>the opioid crisis is doing to vulnerable communities, that's the

0:26:32.756 --> 0:26:36.916
<v Speaker 1>kind of pressure. Sure, So what if what if I

0:26:36.916 --> 0:26:39.476
<v Speaker 1>imagine that you're the way you think about the opioid

0:26:39.516 --> 0:26:42.156
<v Speaker 1>crisis if you live in downtown San Francisco, it's very

0:26:42.156 --> 0:26:45.156
<v Speaker 1>different than if you lived in Marine County. So what

0:26:45.316 --> 0:26:49.316
<v Speaker 1>happens if Marine County starts to look like downtown San Francisco.

0:26:49.436 --> 0:26:52.636
<v Speaker 1>In other words, there is not it's not absolutely clear

0:26:52.676 --> 0:26:56.916
<v Speaker 1>to me that the kinds of pressures that would change

0:26:56.916 --> 0:27:00.236
<v Speaker 1>people's thinking in a place are always going to be

0:27:00.436 --> 0:27:04.396
<v Speaker 1>confined to downtown San Francisco and downtown LA And right,

0:27:04.836 --> 0:27:07.276
<v Speaker 1>there's a there could be there's a scenario where people

0:27:07.316 --> 0:27:12.156
<v Speaker 1>living in suburban enclaves begin to be confronted with the

0:27:12.196 --> 0:27:14.356
<v Speaker 1>consequences of social policies in a way that they're not

0:27:14.476 --> 0:27:15.396
<v Speaker 1>now right.

0:27:16.476 --> 0:27:19.676
<v Speaker 2>Sure, Sure, I mean I get that argument, and I

0:27:19.676 --> 0:27:21.916
<v Speaker 2>think and I think that that's actually that that's a

0:27:21.996 --> 0:27:24.516
<v Speaker 2>valid argument. But I just don't see, you know, how

0:27:24.516 --> 0:27:28.836
<v Speaker 2>we're going to get without massive horrible things happening to

0:27:28.916 --> 0:27:30.996
<v Speaker 2>the world. How we're going to get Marin County looking

0:27:31.036 --> 0:27:34.716
<v Speaker 2>like downtown San Francisco. It's just a you know, it's

0:27:34.756 --> 0:27:37.396
<v Speaker 2>a it's a nice what if exercise, but but it

0:27:37.436 --> 0:27:39.316
<v Speaker 2>doesn't seem like an actual solution.

0:27:42.236 --> 0:27:43.796
<v Speaker 1>We are going to take a little break and be

0:27:43.916 --> 0:27:45.396
<v Speaker 1>back with some final thoughts.

0:27:57.676 --> 0:28:00.196
<v Speaker 2>So so we had you know, we've talked about a

0:28:00.276 --> 0:28:04.196
<v Speaker 2>lot of problems, and so we had one letter that

0:28:04.436 --> 0:28:06.916
<v Speaker 2>finally turns to the question of okay, so what do

0:28:06.996 --> 0:28:10.076
<v Speaker 2>we do? But here's here's what this letter from South

0:28:10.116 --> 0:28:14.316
<v Speaker 2>Carolina asks. My request is this, I need help with

0:28:14.396 --> 0:28:17.556
<v Speaker 2>the So now, what if Malcolm were in charge of

0:28:17.556 --> 0:28:21.556
<v Speaker 2>this topic, what would he do? Copy Canada's rules, build

0:28:21.556 --> 0:28:24.076
<v Speaker 2>a new hospital in Chicago in a certain gun violence

0:28:24.116 --> 0:28:28.476
<v Speaker 2>prone area. Force all cities to report bullet contact injuries

0:28:28.476 --> 0:28:32.636
<v Speaker 2>and not just fatalities. So Malcolm, you're now in charge

0:28:32.676 --> 0:28:32.916
<v Speaker 2>of this.

0:28:33.996 --> 0:28:38.356
<v Speaker 1>Well all of those things. I mean, I think we

0:28:38.436 --> 0:28:41.316
<v Speaker 1>have to accept rist fall that there's no one there

0:28:41.396 --> 0:28:44.356
<v Speaker 1>is no one thing we can do here. Probably have

0:28:44.356 --> 0:28:49.716
<v Speaker 1>to do twenty things. The big my big of takeaway

0:28:49.716 --> 0:28:53.796
<v Speaker 1>from doing that series was I came away fundamentally disillusioned

0:28:53.876 --> 0:28:59.596
<v Speaker 1>in the power of conventional government approaches to solve the problem.

0:28:59.916 --> 0:29:02.236
<v Speaker 1>I don't. Actually, I was struck in talking to people

0:29:02.236 --> 0:29:05.476
<v Speaker 1>who are on the front lines of this epidemic how

0:29:05.636 --> 0:29:08.276
<v Speaker 1>infrequently people talked about gun control. I mean, I talked

0:29:08.276 --> 0:29:11.956
<v Speaker 1>about in passing, but it is just not The majority

0:29:11.996 --> 0:29:16.076
<v Speaker 1>of gun violence in this country is people to people

0:29:16.076 --> 0:29:18.636
<v Speaker 1>with the legal guns. You can change, you can pass

0:29:18.636 --> 0:29:21.556
<v Speaker 1>all the laws you want. They're not being touched by that.

0:29:21.836 --> 0:29:23.756
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are little things Washington could do around

0:29:23.796 --> 0:29:28.916
<v Speaker 1>the margin, but just changing the conversation so that we're

0:29:28.916 --> 0:29:32.956
<v Speaker 1>not arguing in the abstract about which law does this

0:29:32.996 --> 0:29:35.356
<v Speaker 1>and which law does that. A couple of seasons ago,

0:29:35.436 --> 0:29:38.556
<v Speaker 1>I did this episode on homelessness and they spent a

0:29:38.596 --> 0:29:42.356
<v Speaker 1>lot of time in Jacksonville, Florida, which has an exemplary

0:29:42.356 --> 0:29:46.596
<v Speaker 1>homelessness program by the way, and someone involved that program said,

0:29:47.036 --> 0:29:49.236
<v Speaker 1>we had this conversation which I didn't use in the episode.

0:29:49.556 --> 0:29:52.916
<v Speaker 1>I've thought about all the time, long time since. She said,

0:29:52.956 --> 0:29:55.476
<v Speaker 1>you know, they do account of their homeless populationship, so

0:29:55.516 --> 0:29:57.836
<v Speaker 1>they have a really really accurate picture going back for years,

0:29:58.156 --> 0:30:01.476
<v Speaker 1>how their population has fluctuated over time. And she said,

0:30:01.516 --> 0:30:06.036
<v Speaker 1>you know, there aren't more homeless in Jacksonville today than

0:30:06.036 --> 0:30:09.636
<v Speaker 1>there were five years ago, in fact is less, but

0:30:09.716 --> 0:30:12.876
<v Speaker 1>they're more visible. And then she went into the long

0:30:12.916 --> 0:30:15.436
<v Speaker 1>discussion of why all the reasons why they might be

0:30:15.436 --> 0:30:18.996
<v Speaker 1>more visible, and it was really interesting to me because

0:30:20.076 --> 0:30:23.596
<v Speaker 1>we do make this mistake where we confuse the severity

0:30:23.636 --> 0:30:26.676
<v Speaker 1>of a problem with the visibility of a problem. And

0:30:27.556 --> 0:30:31.396
<v Speaker 1>the thing that causes pressure is not severity, it's visibility.

0:30:32.276 --> 0:30:35.516
<v Speaker 1>And so when the homeless are visible in Jacksonville, you

0:30:35.596 --> 0:30:39.356
<v Speaker 1>get movement behind it. So now when the problem is

0:30:39.516 --> 0:30:41.516
<v Speaker 1>it's actually small than it used to be in the past,

0:30:41.556 --> 0:30:44.436
<v Speaker 1>but there's urgency now because they're visible, and when it

0:30:44.436 --> 0:30:47.316
<v Speaker 1>was this huge problem that was hidden, there wasn't the

0:30:47.356 --> 0:30:51.676
<v Speaker 1>same kind of So like that distinction so often I

0:30:51.716 --> 0:30:57.036
<v Speaker 1>think allied that distinction between urgency and visibility. So I

0:30:57.076 --> 0:30:58.956
<v Speaker 1>think that what I hope to get from the series

0:30:59.076 --> 0:31:01.756
<v Speaker 1>is not that it pass a law or ban ar

0:31:01.836 --> 0:31:04.356
<v Speaker 1>fifteens or whatever. I think I just wanted to make

0:31:04.356 --> 0:31:07.756
<v Speaker 1>the problem more visible. The last episode is called sin

0:31:07.916 --> 0:31:10.276
<v Speaker 1>is the Failure to Bother to Kill. I'm not so

0:31:10.556 --> 0:31:13.356
<v Speaker 1>interested in what people decide to do to solve the problem,

0:31:13.556 --> 0:31:15.436
<v Speaker 1>because there's a million ways to get it. The problem.

0:31:15.836 --> 0:31:18.796
<v Speaker 1>It's not even just one problem. I'm mainly interested in

0:31:18.836 --> 0:31:21.876
<v Speaker 1>trying to get people to care and to think clearly

0:31:21.916 --> 0:31:23.596
<v Speaker 1>about what they're caring about.

0:31:25.516 --> 0:31:28.556
<v Speaker 2>On that really really happy note, thank you for an

0:31:28.596 --> 0:31:33.436
<v Speaker 2>inspiring and optimistic conversation. By the way, we're probably you know,

0:31:33.476 --> 0:31:36.516
<v Speaker 2>we don't have time. But I loved the Shockley episode.

0:31:36.916 --> 0:31:39.716
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was so much fun and I would

0:31:39.796 --> 0:31:42.796
<v Speaker 2>I hope people listen to the end that last sentence.

0:31:43.156 --> 0:31:48.196
<v Speaker 2>That just what an amazing, amazing reveal. I mean, Freud

0:31:48.236 --> 0:31:53.276
<v Speaker 2>would have just like been been there. Oh Freud's back

0:31:53.316 --> 0:31:55.996
<v Speaker 2>in a big way. Yea, but it was. It was

0:31:56.036 --> 0:31:58.756
<v Speaker 2>such a great episode. I love it. Thank you Ray,

0:31:59.116 --> 0:32:02.796
<v Speaker 2>all right, Thanks Melcom.

0:32:02.836 --> 0:32:06.356
<v Speaker 1>This episode of Revisionist History was produced by Ben A. DAPFH. Haffrey,

0:32:06.676 --> 0:32:10.716
<v Speaker 1>Tali Amlin, and Jacob Smith, editing by seraen Nix, original

0:32:10.716 --> 0:32:14.676
<v Speaker 1>scoring by Luis Kira, mastering by Jake Gorsky, and engineering

0:32:15.316 --> 0:32:18.396
<v Speaker 1>by Nina Lawrence. I'm Malcolm Claudma