WEBVTT - Does anti-matter feel anti-gravity?

0:00:08.440 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Jorgey, do you have your antimatter snack yet? I

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>had a banana as usual. It's anti slip. Does that count? No?

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>But you do know that bananas give off antimatter radiation,

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>don't you wait? What that's bananas? Isn't that dangerous. It's

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>so little that it doesn't really matter. That's why you're

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>so matter of fact about it. That's why it annihilated

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>my taste for bananas. Well, the important thing is that

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>it annihilates your hunger. That's the whole point of eating food,

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>is the antimatter of hunger. Hi am or Handy, cartoonist

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and the creator of PhD comics. Hi, I'm Daniel. I'm

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a particle physicist and a professor at U C Irvine.

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>And it really has been years since I had a banana. Years.

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh, I feel sorry for you. Why are

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>you depriving yourself and one of life's simplest pleasures. Although

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I recently convinced my daughter to start eating bananas, so

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>now we have bananas around the house. Oh my goodness. Wait,

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:20.960
<v Speaker 1>why are you recommending it to your daughter but not

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>having any yourself. You know, it's a very personal question,

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:26.400
<v Speaker 1>person to person, I mean you brought it up, and

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm just asking a fallow up question. I just mean

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:32.320
<v Speaker 1>that it's subjective. You know, one person can love bananas,

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:36.119
<v Speaker 1>another person can hate them. To slippery slope, some people

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:39.199
<v Speaker 1>find them appealing. Welcome to a podcast Daniel and Jorge

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Explained the Universe, a production of Our Heart Radio in

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>which we try to explain our subjective, our personal experience

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>of the universe the way that it seems to us.

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>All this data that we gather with our eyeballs, biological

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and technological, the things that we see out there in

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the universe, we want to understand all of them. We

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>want the whole universe to be a story that makes

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>sense to the human brain. This is part of course,

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the long journey of science and trying to wrap up

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the mysteries of the cosmos into something we understand. And

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>our goal on this podcast is to take you on

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>that journey and explain all of it to you. Yeah,

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>because it is a very mysterious universe, full of amazing

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>things that are happening in it, and a lot of

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>things that we don't understand, even things that we take

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>for granted on an everyday basis. Yeah, there are so

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>many basic questions about the universe that we do not

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>have answers to, which means that for you young folks listening,

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you future scientists, there are plenty of discoveries left to

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:39.359
<v Speaker 1>be made, lots and lots of open questions for you

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to explore. These are big questions about the universe, about

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:45.640
<v Speaker 1>our very existence, of why we're here and how it

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>is that we are here because there is a lot

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>of the things in the universe that matter, and also

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things that antimatter, like bananas. I wasn't

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>joking that bananas produced antimatter. That's a real thing. Oh yeah,

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:58.919
<v Speaker 1>But is an antimatter dangerous? Like if you touch antimatter,

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you explode anti matter. When it hits real matter, it

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>will annihilate into photons. But bananas contain potassium, which is unstable.

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>It undergoes radioactive decay, emitting positrons, which are anti electrons,

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:15.119
<v Speaker 1>and when those do hit your body, they will annihilate

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and create a tiny little flash of light. But it's

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>such a tiny amount of antimatter that it doesn't really matter. Well,

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that's why I eat bananas, because you know, it makes

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>me glow, makes me feel lighter too. There isn't potassium

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>in everything. I mean, it's all around us too, right,

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:32.079
<v Speaker 1>It's not just bananas that have potassium. That's right. It's

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>not just bananas that have potassium. And it's all sorts

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of other things that also radioactively decay. So it's actually

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>anti matter sort of all around us all the time.

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>It's also showering down on us from the atmosphere because

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>of cosmic ray impacts. Yeah, there are all kinds of

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>amazing things showering us at the moment right now and

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 1>enveloping us, and and for a lot of those things,

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 1>we still have big questions about them, even big things

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>like gravity. Anti matter is fascinating. It appears in science fiction,

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 1>but it's also some thing that's real. It's one of

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>these interesting hints that the universe is more complex than

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>just the stuff that we are made out of, that

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the universe is capable of doing many more things than

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>can just be found out of the particles that we

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>are made of. There are all sorts of other weird

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:17.600
<v Speaker 1>possible particles out there, and they all give us hints

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>about what the underlying rules are governing the universe itself.

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>And you're right, because ant matter is so rare. There

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>are basic questions we have about its properties, Yeah, including

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:32.720
<v Speaker 1>something as basic as gravity, gravity, which you know we

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of depend on every day of our lives to

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>stay on planet Earth. Without gravity, we'd all be floating

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>out there in space. That's not something I ever worry about,

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:42.479
<v Speaker 1>but maybe I should start to do. We need to

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 1>like look at the gravity prediction every day as well

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 1>as the weather prediction. Well, I know it's a heavy

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 1>burden to be carrying around worrying about gravity, but it

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>seems to be pretty reliable. Right. We ever noticed any

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>change in your gravity? I mean, I don't want to

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>enquire about your weight or anything like that. That's also

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>personal information. That definitely explains it. Right, It's not that

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting heavier and heavier. It's at the gravity of

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the Earth itself is increasing. Sounds like you have an

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 1>amazing experiment in at hand here, But it does raise

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of interesting questions about gravity and antimatter, specifically

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>whether or not they are the same for everything in

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the universe. That's right, antimatter seems to be like the

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>opposite of matter in so many interesting ways, and so

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>people also wonder whether or not antimatter falls down or

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 1>whether it might possibly fall up, like does antimatter fail upwards?

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>So today on the program we'll be tackling the question

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 1>does antimatter feel anti gravity? Interesting? Now, are you saying

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:54.039
<v Speaker 1>it might feel anti gravity or it has anti feelings

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 1>against gravity? We should invite it onto the podcast to

0:05:56.760 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>ask it what its emotional response is to gravity. But

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I think today we're focusing on a more physics question,

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:06.040
<v Speaker 1>which is just like, when gravity does this thing, where

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 1>does antimatter go? Doesn't like run away from gravity? Is

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 1>that what you mean? Because antimatter is the opposite of

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>matter in so many interesting ways, Yet we also really

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 1>don't understand how gravity works for fundamental particles. We think

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 1>about gravity in terms of like boulders or basketballs, or baseballs,

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>or even little bits of sand, But once we get

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:31.479
<v Speaker 1>down to the quantum level, those particles do things that baseball's,

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:34.599
<v Speaker 1>basketballs and bits of sand can't do, and we don't

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>really know how to apply gravity to those situations, which

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:41.039
<v Speaker 1>opens up all sorts of questions like maybe it does

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 1>the opposite of what it does for normal matter. Do

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 1>you think antimatter minds that we call it antimatter? Like

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:49.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe it just has a different opinion about the universe.

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, maybe it's just pro something else. Yeah, I

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 1>think in the antimatter galaxies that might be out there

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.479
<v Speaker 1>in deep space. On their podcast, they're probably calling us

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:01.479
<v Speaker 1>the antimatter yeah. Or maybe there's a third opinion, you know,

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>why does it have to be so adversarial these politics

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:08.719
<v Speaker 1>of physics? Stop the polarization of physics exactly, it's all

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>just matter. Yeah, it's not helping our society for sure. Well,

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 1>as usual, we were wondering how many people have thought

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>about anti matter and whether it feels gravity, or whether

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 1>it feels anti gravity, or whether anti feels gravity. So

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>thanks very much to everybody who participates in this segment

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of the podcast. If you would like to try answering

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the question of the day, please feel free to write in.

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll set you up and you can hear your voice

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast. Think about it for a second. Do

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>you think antimatter falls down or up? Here's what people

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>had to say, pravity, because anti gravity might be things

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>pushing each other apart. What do you think gravity or

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>anti gravity? I feel like anti matter still has mass.

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't have like anti mass, so I don't think

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>it feels anti gravity. Do we know if there's anti gravity?

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Is their uncle gravity? I think that antimatter feel gravity

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>in the same way that normal matter feels gravity, and

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>anti gravity, I think is we don't know if that

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>even exists. Well, if I remember your lessons on anti matter,

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>it should feel gravity because any matter is just regular

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>matter with opposite chart. I know that matter feels gravity

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>because of the bending of spacetime towards something with mass.

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't really know what anti matter is and whether

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 1>it exists in another field or spatial field than mass.

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>But I suppose in the field that anti matter exists,

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's the bending of that field, which would be

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>called anti gravity, So I'd say it does feel anti gravity. Alright,

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of very pro and anti pocisitions on this question.

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>My emotions go up and down as I was listening

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 1>to those things. I like how people were anti knowing

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>an answer. What happens when knowledge collides with anti knowledge.

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:01.959
<v Speaker 1>You probably get the current state of affairs right now

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>in the world. You get a physics podcast about the

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>mysteries of the universe. But it is an interesting question

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:12.439
<v Speaker 1>whether antimatter feels anti gravity, because I guess antimatter feels

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:15.679
<v Speaker 1>natively about a lot of things. Yeah, antimatter is one

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite ideas in physics because it shows you

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>that our matter isn't the only kind of matter that

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>can be out there. There's like the opposite of our

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:27.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of matter. Though, like what exactly opposite means is

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a question philosophically, Right, Well, I guess

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe start with the basics what is matter for of all?

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Because I know there are matter particles and there are

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 1>force particles, right, I think the basic idea is that

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the universe is filled with quantum fields, and some of

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>these are matter quantum fields. Right. Yeah, what we call

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 1>matter is what you and I are made out of.

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>We call it matter because it's the first thing we discovered,

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and so we sort of named it the normal stuff.

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>And you and I are made of these particles electrons

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and protons and neutrons, which are of course made up

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of core works inside them. And as you say, they

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>are all bound together by forces, the electromagnetic force, the

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 1>weak nuclear force, the strong force, which all use particles

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to communicate with each other. So there's like the photon

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>for the electromagnetic force and the gluon for the strong

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 1>nuclear force. And so you and I are like this

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>big complicated mesh of particles all weaving themselves together to

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 1>make me and you. Right, and we are made out

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 1>of the basic three kinds of matter particles, right, electrons,

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and one type of forks, and another type of cork.

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:36.439
<v Speaker 1>And wait, a third type of cork. Right, three courts?

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>How many quarks are there? There are six quarks that

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>we have discovered, the up cork and the down cork.

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Those two are the ones that we find mostly in

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the proton and the neutron, although there is a little

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>bit of other kinds of quirks sometimes appearing in the

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:52.679
<v Speaker 1>proton and neutron, but for the most part, it's up

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>quarks and down corks make protons and neutrons, and you

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>add electrons to complete the atom. Right, So we're made

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 1>out of those kinds of icles, and most of most

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 1>of the stuff in the universe is made out of

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>those three particles, right, Like the planets, the stars, the

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>comments out there, the asteroids, the whole galaxies are basically

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>those three kinds of particles. Right. Yeah, we think that

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>our entire solar system, our entire galaxy, our cluster of

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>galaxy is all made out of this same kind of

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>basic stuff that these basic building blocks can be put

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:23.960
<v Speaker 1>together in lots of different ways to make stars and

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>lava and weasels and peanut butter and all the stuff

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:29.440
<v Speaker 1>that we know in the universe. And that's why we

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 1>call it matter. And on a semantic note, I would

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>include also the force particles, you know, the gluons and

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:37.199
<v Speaker 1>the photons and things that tie them together to really

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 1>make them who we are. So we're not just like

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a loose pile of particles as constituting matter in this case.

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I know, sometimes particle physicists distinguished between matter particles and

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>force particles, but when we're talking about matter and versus antimatter,

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it makes more sense to just lump it

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>all together as matter. Okay, shifting definitions here of basic

0:11:57.000 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>things like matter and force. I guess we're all a

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:02.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit das to that. But also that's the stuff

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>that we're made out of. But there's also other stuff

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 1>in the universe in this category of matter, right, there's

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 1>like heavier electrons and heavier courts. Yes, there are other

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 1>versions of these particles. This is one of the really

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 1>fascinating things about particle physics is that the particles we know,

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the electron, the upcork, and the down cork have these reflections.

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>That's what I meant earlier about the sort of philosophical

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>definition of opposite. Because with the particles we know, there

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>are several versions of them. So even before we talk

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 1>about antimatter, as you said, there are heavier versions of

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>these particles, so they're sort of reflected in this one

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>dimension along mass. So there's like a heavier version of

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the electron it's called a muon, and a heavier version

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of the up cork it's called a charm cork. And

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:47.440
<v Speaker 1>then there's a second reflection, right, So there's the muan

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and then the towel is the upcork, the charm cork,

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and then the top cork. So each of these basic

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 1>particles of matter that we know, there's two more versions

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 1>of each of them. So it's this weird reflection of

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the kinds of matter that we're familiar with along the

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:04.960
<v Speaker 1>mass access they're heavier versions of each of these. Well,

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>not all the particles, right, the force particles don't have

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>heavier cousins, do they. Yeah, that's right. Only the fermions

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>have these heavier cousins. We're not aware of any heavier

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 1>version of the photon or the z boson. Okay, but

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 1>there is something called antimatter particles, which is like if

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you take all of those particles you mentioned, the ones

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>we're made out of their heavier cousins. And also in

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>some ways, if you also take the force particles and

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:33.199
<v Speaker 1>numpit amount in, there's a whole other version of all

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>of those particles that are called antimatter. That's exactly right.

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:38.959
<v Speaker 1>So all these particles that were aware of, there's another

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:41.839
<v Speaker 1>way they're reflected, not just like there's a heavier version

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of them, but now there's like this opposite version of

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>them where we take all the charges, for example, and

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 1>we flip them, so the electron has charged minus one.

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>There's another version of the electron, which we call the

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>antimatter version of the electron. Sometimes we call it a positron,

0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>which has charged plus one. So it's reflected in this

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 1>like different direction. And that's true also for the muan

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and for the up cork, and for the down cork

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and the top cork. All these particles have their antimatter versions.

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 1>So the antimatter versions are when you flip their charges,

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:17.959
<v Speaker 1>which is related to the kind of force they feel, right,

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Like electrons feel the electromagnetic force, which means they have

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>a charge, and that's what you flip to get the

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>anti electron exactly. And we're talking here just about the

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>electric charge, which is a label that we put on

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>particles that feel the electromagnetic force. And a minus charge

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>means one thing, and a positive charge means something else.

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>And we know, for example that like positive negative charges

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>will pull on each other and similar charges will repel

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 1>each other. So that's a label we put on particles

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to describe how they react to electromagnetic fields. And so

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>an electron an apostitron are the same, except they react

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>oppositely to these fields. The same electromagnetic field which pushes

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>an electron up will push a positron down, so it

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:02.479
<v Speaker 1>has the same mass as an electron, but the opposite

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 1>electric charge. Right. And then other particles like the corks,

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>they don't feel the electromagnetic force, right, so they don't

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>have electrical charge. Right. Corks do have electromagnetic charge, but

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>they're really weird. They're like plus two thirds or minus

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>one third, so they definitely feel electromagnetic fields. You just

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>don't typically think of them as doing so because they

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>also have a charge for a much more powerful force,

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>a strong nuclear force. So they have the electric charge

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and they also have this color charge for the strong

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>nuclear force. Okay, so of course feel the color charge

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and also the electric charge. Now, then is an anti

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>cork something that has both of those things flipped or

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>just one of those things flipped. Both of those things

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>get flipped for an antiquark exactly. And I guess that's

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>true for all the other particles. But what about the

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>force particles. That's also true for their antimatter versions, So

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that's really interesting. It actually depends on the force particle.

0:15:56.320 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>So for example, the W boson that actually carries electric charge,

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>it's like there's a positive version and a negative version,

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and one is the anti particle of the other. So

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the antiparticle of the W plus is the W minus. Okay. Yeah.

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>And then there's some interesting things about certain particles that

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>are their own antiparticle, like photons, right, that's right. For photons,

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>there is no other particle to serve as the antiparticle.

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>They are their own antiparticle, which is sort of weird.

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>But the way we think about in particle physics is

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>like you take a particle, you apply the antiparticle operator

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to it, and say, what do you get? If you

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>start with an electron and you apply the antimatter particle

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>operator to it, you get a positron. You start with

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the photon and you apply this operator to it, you

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>just get the photon back and sort of like symmetric.

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 1>So the photon serves as its own antiparticle. Because I guess,

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 1>does the photon have a charge. Photon does not have

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>an electric charge, right, the photon does not feel electromagnetic fields.

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>If a photon is flying through space and this electric

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>field there does not bend the path of the photon.

0:16:57.000 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>If you don't have anything to flip, then you can't

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 1>have an antimatter because is that kind of generally the rule.

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:04.640
<v Speaker 1>That's generally the rule, and that holds also for example,

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>for gluons. Luonto the particle that transmit the strong nuclear force,

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and they do carry color, they carry this charge, and

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 1>so you can't have anti gluons. You can take a

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:17.239
<v Speaker 1>gluon and make the anti version of it as the

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 1>opposite color. All right, So that's matter and antimatter. But

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:24.119
<v Speaker 1>one thing, I guess all matters seems to have in common,

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 1>whether or not it feels certain forces or not. Is

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 1>that everybody seems to feel gravity? Right, Well, we're not

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 1>exactly sure about what happens with antimatter and gravity, but

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:35.919
<v Speaker 1>there is something we think that isn't flipped, which is

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 1>the mass. Like an electron we think has the same

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:42.120
<v Speaker 1>mass as a positron, it's not like that mass then

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:45.399
<v Speaker 1>goes negative. That suggests they probably have a similar relationship

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to gravity as the original particle, but we just aren't sure. Well, yeah,

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's what I was trying to get at,

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>which is that a lot of most of these particles,

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:56.919
<v Speaker 1>the matter particles, have mass, right, that's one thing we

0:17:56.960 --> 0:17:58.880
<v Speaker 1>know about them, and almost in a way, that's kind

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of what makes the matter part Yeah, all the fermions

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>definitely do have mass. Even the new trinos have mass,

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:07.159
<v Speaker 1>even though they have a really tiny little bit of it,

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 1>and all of them get mass, we think from the

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 1>same process, which is interacting with the Higgs boson, And

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>to interact with the Higgs boson you have to have

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:18.159
<v Speaker 1>an antimatter particle. Also, the Higgs boson requires particles to

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>interact like in pairs. It couldn't give the electron mass

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:24.919
<v Speaker 1>if the positron didn't exist, for example, right, All right,

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>well then, I guess you know, we know that all

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:31.400
<v Speaker 1>of these matter particles feel gravity, right because we feel gravity,

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and all of the things on Earth feel gravity. And

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>we know that the stars and the planets out there,

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 1>and the galaxies and the galaxy clusters all feel gravity

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and they're mostly made out of matter stuff. And so

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the question that is, does antimatter also feel gravity or

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 1>does it feel something else, maybe the opposite of gravity.

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 1>And so let's get into that weighty question. But first

0:18:55.960 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>let's take a quick break. All right, we're anti talking

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 1>about not feeling anti gravity or is this a pro

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:18.159
<v Speaker 1>gravity podcast? I'm definitely pro gravity. I don't want it

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:19.879
<v Speaker 1>to pick up and move somewhere else, like I'd like

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 1>for it to stay pretty much where it is. I'm

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:24.640
<v Speaker 1>relying on it every day. Oh really, I guess I'm

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>more morally flexible when it comes to gravity. I mean,

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 1>if I could, like, you know, ignore it for a

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:32.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit, that'd be pretty cool to fly around, wouldn't

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that be great? It would be nice to be able

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:36.920
<v Speaker 1>to manipulate gravity, right If we had ways to create

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:40.400
<v Speaker 1>like anti gravity somehow, it'd be easier to move your

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:42.920
<v Speaker 1>bed across the room, or to ship stuff across the world,

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 1>or to launch stuff into outer space. That would be

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty awesome. We forget other stuff. How about ourselves, we

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 1>could all be flying around. Finally, you get that flying

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:58.400
<v Speaker 1>car exactly right. It could be an anti car. Well,

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the exciting things about all of these

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>open questions is that once you understand the way the

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 1>universe works, you might discover something really surprising that's could

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>give you a handle for creating all sorts of new

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>crazy technologies. Yeah. I mean, we've been waiting for these

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:15.639
<v Speaker 1>anti gravity flying cars for for years. We're still waiting, Daniel,

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>what's the hold? Well, you know, antime matter is not

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>easy to study. It's sort of all around us in

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 1>very very tiny amounts. It's made when cosmic rays hit

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the atmosphere. Part of the shower of particles that comes

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:33.199
<v Speaker 1>down to the surface is antimatter. There's like muans and

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 1>anti muans as well, but it doesn't last very long

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:39.159
<v Speaker 1>because it smashes into stuff and annihilates, and it just

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem to be very much of it in the universe,

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 1>which is one of the big mysteries. Right. We talked

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot about how matter and antimatter are symmetric. It's

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:49.879
<v Speaker 1>all the same, just with the flipped number. You might

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>wonder like, well, why isn't there more antimatter in the universe.

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Why is the universe matter and not anti matter? What's

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the difference in the end. Yeah, we have a whole

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 1>episode on that, and I think we also have a

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 1>whole episode on the annihilation of matter and antimatter. Right.

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>When a matter particle like an electron hits it's antimatter

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>version a positron, they like disappear and turn into pure energy, right, Yeah,

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:13.720
<v Speaker 1>they can turn into a photon, they can turn into

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:16.439
<v Speaker 1>a z boson, And you're right, they do disappear, right.

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 1>It's not like what comes out as a rearrangement of

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:22.679
<v Speaker 1>the bits inside the electron and the positron. This really

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>is alchemy that we're talking about. You're transforming the energy

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 1>from one quantum field the electron of depositron field, then

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>into a photon field, and then into something else. That

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 1>photon can turn into corks or into w's or into

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:39.199
<v Speaker 1>something else entirely. It really is pretty awesome. This annihilation

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 1>is like a conduit for transforming matter into something else.

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 1>And it's funny that you mentioned that it's all around us, right,

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, well, technically it is all around us, because

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>if there's an electron quantum field all around this, there's

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>also an anti electron quantum field all around this too. Right.

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Is it a separate field or is it the same

0:21:56.960 --> 0:21:59.360
<v Speaker 1>field as the electron? Oh, good question, It is its

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:03.359
<v Speaker 1>own field. There's another field there for the anti electron.

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>We tend to comple them together sometimes in the calculations,

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>although it gets complicated because there's like left handed versions

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:11.679
<v Speaker 1>of them and right handed versions of them, and the

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:14.879
<v Speaker 1>weak force treats those differently. Dig into our episode about

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the weak force and symmetry to understand that more in detail.

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>But the short answer is, yes, we are surrounded by

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 1>quantum fields for antiparticles. Even if there aren't actually antiparticles

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 1>around us. Their fields are there, like parking spots are

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>there even if no cars are in them. Yeah, there's

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 1>negativity all around us these days, it seems. But as

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>we're saying, what's interesting about antimatter is that it's like

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>regular matter, but it has certain of its properties flipped,

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>like the charge of the electromagnetic force and charge and

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:46.199
<v Speaker 1>also it's a color and things like that. And so

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 1>one thing that regular matter particles we know have is

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 1>something called mass, Like it's a little it's a property

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:55.879
<v Speaker 1>of regular matter particles, and that's the thing that gives it,

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, inertia, and it makes it feel gravity. Right,

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of a measure of how much it feels

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>gravity or how hard it is to push or pull. Yeah,

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 1>mass is one of these amazing things that seems so simple.

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:08.400
<v Speaker 1>We think we understand it. You have an intuitive stance

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>of what mass is, but when you dig into it theoretically,

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 1>it turns out to be kind of complicated. As you

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:17.199
<v Speaker 1>say this, two different ideas of mass there. One is

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>inertial mass, which is like, when you push on something,

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 1>how much does it move? And that's the mass that

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>appears in Newton's equation F equals M A. Basically, it

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 1>relates F how hard you're pushing on something to A

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>how fast it accelerates when you push on it. And

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Newton tells us that the relationship between those two quantities

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>is mass. That's sort of what inertial mass is. Something

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 1>with more inertial mass takes a larger force to get

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the same acceleration. Something with almost no inertial mass. You

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 1>can accelerate pretty easily with a very small force. That's

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:54.159
<v Speaker 1>conceptionally different from this other concept of mass, gravitational mass.

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 1>That's the mass that appears, and like the gravitational force

0:23:56.760 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 1>equation g mm over are squared that tells you, like

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 1>how strong gravitational forces between two objects, right, and so,

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 1>regular particles have this property that we call mass. I

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 1>mean we've called it before in this podcast. Like it's

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 1>almost like a label or it's almost like a charge

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:16.160
<v Speaker 1>for the force of gravity, right, Like the electric charge

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 1>is kind of like it's a measure how much it

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 1>feels electromagnetic force. Mass is kind of like the measure

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:24.919
<v Speaker 1>of how much it feels gravity and inertiap Right, It's

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 1>almost like it's like a little property of matter. Yeah,

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 1>it's like a little property of matter and you shouldn't

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:32.880
<v Speaker 1>think of it. It's like how much stuff the electron has,

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 1>or how much stuff the top cork has. In our theory,

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>these are all point particles. I have no volume. This

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:40.880
<v Speaker 1>is just like a property of the particle. If you're

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:44.640
<v Speaker 1>comfortable assigning like quantum labels to things, like this thing

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:47.159
<v Speaker 1>has a positive charge, and you don't have to like

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 1>figure out a physical place for that charge to live.

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>You should try to do the same thing with the

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>mass of the particle. Like the particle just has this mass.

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to like have room to put enough

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff into the top cork to make heavy. It just

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:04.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of is that massive. There's another interesting level to

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 1>dig into there, which is like, is this mass actually

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:10.119
<v Speaker 1>a property of the particle itself or is it a

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:14.639
<v Speaker 1>property of the interaction of that particle with fields, Because

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>we think that like in a universe without a Higgs field,

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:19.879
<v Speaker 1>all these matter particles, the top cork, the electron, they

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 1>would be massless, they would fly around like photons. It's

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>only because the Higgs field is there that these particles

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:28.119
<v Speaker 1>have a mass. So sort of like a cloud of

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Higgs bosons surrounding every particle changing the way it moves

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 1>so that it looks like as if it had mass.

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>So if you want to zoom out, you can just think,

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna put a label on these particles. You

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 1>want to zoom in, you could think about, like, well,

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 1>this particle is sort of like a virtual cloud of

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Higgs bosons around it that are changing it, and I'm

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:49.119
<v Speaker 1>just going to label the whole cloud is having this mass.

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Do you think of it as a kind of a

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>label like you said that particles just have just like

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 1>electric charge, And so the question is if antimatter is

0:25:57.119 --> 0:26:00.400
<v Speaker 1>just regular matter with some of the charges flipped, does

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 1>it also flip the label of mass, like does it

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>also flip how it feels gravity or how it feels inertia? Right,

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:09.679
<v Speaker 1>that's the main question we're asking today. Yeah, and it

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>really comes down to this basic question about what is

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>gravity anyway? Is gravity a force the way the other

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:20.119
<v Speaker 1>forces are, you know, the electromagnetic force and the strong force,

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>who have all their charges flipped for antimatter. If you

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:25.639
<v Speaker 1>think about it that way, then gravity is just another

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 1>force and the charge for it is mass, as you say,

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 1>And then it would make sense. It would be like

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:33.679
<v Speaker 1>sementric It would follow the pattern if also mass was

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>flipped for antimatter. Or is gravity not a force? If

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:40.679
<v Speaker 1>gravity is something else? And we've been thinking about it

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 1>as a force because we just don't see the curvature

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of space and time, and so we've created this fictitious

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:49.639
<v Speaker 1>force to explain the effect of the bending of space

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:52.400
<v Speaker 1>time on the motion of particles and If that's the case,

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>it would make sense for space time to treat everything

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:58.440
<v Speaker 1>inside of it the same way. Antimatter and matter particles

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 1>are both just little bundles of energy and his energy

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that bends that space, and so then it would make

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:05.920
<v Speaker 1>sense for matter and antimatter to all have the same

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:09.680
<v Speaker 1>relationship with gravity instead of the opposite relationship. So this

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 1>question about whether antimatter feels gravity or anti gravity is

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:16.400
<v Speaker 1>also kind of a question about like what is gravity anyway?

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:18.160
<v Speaker 1>But I guess the main picture of trying to pain

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:20.919
<v Speaker 1>is that you know, like if an electron has a

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 1>negative charge, the negative electric charge, and it weighs, you know,

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>point zero zero zero zero zero something kilograms, doesn't anti

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 1>electron not just have positive electric charge, but does it

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>also maybe way negative through a point zero zeros there

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 1>zero something kilograms? And what would that mean for the

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 1>anti electron? Yeah, that would be super fascinating, right, And

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:47.359
<v Speaker 1>because we have two different concepts of mass, we have

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 1>to think about them sort of individually. Like if a

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:54.879
<v Speaker 1>positron had negative inertial mass, what would that mean? It

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 1>would mean that if you push on it in one direction,

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 1>it would accelerate the other direction, right, Remember force equals

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 1>mass times acceleration. These are vectors, So if mass is negative,

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 1>that means that acceleration of force are pointing in different directions.

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>So you like give it a shove to the left

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 1>and it moves to the right. That's what having negative

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>inertial mass would mean. That's like really counterintuitive. Negative gravitational

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 1>mass would be different. It would allow for gravitational repulsion.

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Gravity attracts things that both have positive mass. But if

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>two particles, one with positive gravitational mass and one with

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:35.680
<v Speaker 1>negative gravitational mass meat, they might repel each other, which

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 1>would be really interesting because that's not something we've ever seen.

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Gravitational repulsion. Yeah, super fascinating. And so let's maybe talk

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 1>more about each of these scenarios one at a time.

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 1>And so, first of all, let's say that antimatter doesn't

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>just flip the charges electrical charges of the forces in

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>regular matter particles, but let's say it also flips its

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>inertial mass, so it has anti inertia. I guess is

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the idea, And like you said, it's kind of kind

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>of intuitive where you try to push something but it

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>actually moves towards you. That would be weird, right, That

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 1>would be very weird instead of counter through everything we've

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>understood and everything we've experienced in the universe, that would

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:16.479
<v Speaker 1>be a very strange experience for us to shove somebody

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and then have them slam into you. But I guess

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe it does make sense if you just think about

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:25.240
<v Speaker 1>it as it being antimatter, and where you think you're

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>pushing it, you're actually pulling it because it feels you're

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 1>pushing force the opposite way, So it's almost like you're

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 1>just pulling on something, right, Like an electron attracts a

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>positively charged particle, right, so it doesn't push it when

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 1>it gets near it, it actually pulls it. So couldn't

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:43.959
<v Speaker 1>that just be the same for anti mass? It could be,

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 1>although it's a bit more general than that. We're talking about.

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Any force applied to a positron would then move it

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 1>in the opposite direction of that force, whether it's a

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>gravitational force or electromagnetic force, or the weak force, which

0:29:57.000 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 1>positrons also feel. It's a little bit deeper than just

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 1>saying electromagnetism can attract and repel, so what's the big deal.

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Now it's applied to every force on this positron, it

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>would be pretty strange. Yeah, but I mean if you

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>think about it, like an electron repels another electron, right,

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 1>because they have both have negative charge. Now, if you

0:30:16.080 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 1>have an electron and a positron, they would normally attract

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>each other because they have opposite charges. But then if

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>it has negative inertial mass, then it actually maybe flips

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 1>that force and it does repel. Yeah. I think what

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:32.480
<v Speaker 1>happens there is even weirder because the positron is repelled

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 1>from the electron, but the electron is still attracted to

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the positron, right, It's still attracted to that positive charge,

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and so they sort of like chase each other. Like

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the positron gets pushed away from the electron, but the

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 1>electron gets pulled along with the positron, So you get

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 1>this sort of like weird runaway effect. Yeah. I guess

0:30:50.640 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 1>when that is kind of a way to prove that

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 1>antimatter doesn't have anti inertial mass is that, you know,

0:30:57.480 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 1>if you have an electron, it gets attracted to an

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 1>anti electron, which means that it doesn't have anti inertia. Yeah,

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:08.720
<v Speaker 1>anti inertia would be really weird. Negative inertial mass particles

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 1>would behave very strangely, and this is something we would

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 1>have seen because we do see positrons in the world.

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>We see them in cosmic rays, we can bend them

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 1>with magnets. We don't see them doing this sort of

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:23.239
<v Speaker 1>weird behavior of being pushed in the opposite direction of

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the force. So negative inertial mass is not something anybody

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 1>really considers seriously. When it comes to antimatter. It would

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:30.720
<v Speaker 1>be really bizarre. We haven't seen it, but I wonder

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 1>if it's possible, Like could you have maybe a third

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 1>version of an electron, not just a positron, with something

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that has its opposite charge, but also has negative inertia,

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 1>which would act just like another electron to an electron,

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Like you would think it was an electron, but really

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 1>it's an antimatter electron with a flip inertial mass. Yeah,

0:31:56.080 --> 0:31:59.480
<v Speaker 1>negative mass electron. It's certainly possible that there are other

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 1>reflect actions of the particles that we're not aware of.

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Our we're not limited to just matter and antimatter or

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 1>heavier versions. You know, there are theories about like supersymmetric

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 1>versions of each of these particles, and so it's totally

0:32:11.520 --> 0:32:13.959
<v Speaker 1>possible to come up with another idea like a particle

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 1>that it's just like the electron, but with negative inertial mass,

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and say maybe it could exist in the universe. Then

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:21.720
<v Speaker 1>you have to answer questions like, well, why was made

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:24.960
<v Speaker 1>in the Big Bang? Where are these? If they do exist,

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 1>why haven't we seen them? And if you haven't seen them,

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:29.600
<v Speaker 1>they have to come up with an explanation for why

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 1>they don't seem to appear in our universe. But it

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that it couldn't possibly exist in the universe.

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 1>But I guess you're saying that the antimatter that we

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 1>have seen so far, like the anti electrons that we've seen,

0:32:41.800 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>seem to have regular inertial mass. Yeah, and this is

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 1>not so challenging to observe because we can apply pretty

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:51.720
<v Speaker 1>powerful forces like electromagnetic forces to antimatter particles, which are

0:32:51.840 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 1>rare but not impossible to make into manipulated and we

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 1>can see their behavior. So, for example, the discovery of

0:32:57.960 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 1>antimatter was seeing a positron moved through a magnetic field

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and bending in a way that an electron doesn't. So

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 1>we're pretty sure that antimatter has inertial mass the same

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 1>way that normal matter does. All right, Well, now let's

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 1>tackle this idea of having anti gravitational mass. Now, is

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 1>there such a thing as gravitational mass? I thought gravity

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:20.560
<v Speaker 1>wasn't really a force, It was really kind of a

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 1>bending of space. This idea has some interesting history. Newton

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 1>considered these things separate. He said, things have inertial mass

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and they have gravitational mass. These are different ideas. If

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you're on an empty space where there's no gravity, and

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:35.480
<v Speaker 1>objects still had inertia, right, and the force of gravity,

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the mass that appears in there didn't necessarily have to

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 1>be the same as the mass in F equals m A.

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 1>People measured it, and they always found these two things

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:45.240
<v Speaker 1>to be the same. The mass that appears in those

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 1>equations were the same, and so people thought, well, that's weird,

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 1>what a crazy coincidence of these things really are separate

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:53.760
<v Speaker 1>concepts and yet always managed to be exactly the same.

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:55.840
<v Speaker 1>So that was sort of an unexplained mystery for a

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:59.480
<v Speaker 1>long time. Einstein, when he developed his theory of relativity,

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 1>he said, well, let's just assume that these things are

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the same. He baked that in to his theory of relativity.

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 1>That's not a proof that they are, that's just an

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:11.799
<v Speaker 1>assumption of the foundation of general relativity. He said that

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 1>gravity and inertia are basically the same thing. Okay, and

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 1>so then what does that mean for having negative gravitational

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 1>mass or anti gravitational mass. Well, it means that general

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 1>relativity makes a very strong prediction that anything with energy

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 1>bends space the same way. And so we think that

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 1>antimatter probably feels gravity the same way that matter does.

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 1>So Einstein and general relativity say antimatterer should feel gravity,

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:40.480
<v Speaker 1>it shouldn't feel anti gravity, and that's a strong prediction

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:43.640
<v Speaker 1>from general relativity. Well, that's a strong you're saying assumption

0:34:43.719 --> 0:34:46.840
<v Speaker 1>about general relativity, right, But it is it possible for

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:49.960
<v Speaker 1>something to have negative gravitational mass, so that if I

0:34:50.000 --> 0:34:51.719
<v Speaker 1>throw it at a black hole, it's actually going to

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:53.840
<v Speaker 1>run away from the black hole and not towards the

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 1>black hole. I mean, it's possible in the sense that

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:58.560
<v Speaker 1>like anything is possible in the universe, and we don't

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:02.880
<v Speaker 1>know if general relativity accurately describes everything in the universe,

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and specifically, we don't know how to apply general relativity

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to particles. So it's possible that antimatter breaks general relativity

0:35:10.200 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and that quantum gravity allows for other weird forces on

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:17.760
<v Speaker 1>antimatter particles like anti gravity. But if you just say

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:21.480
<v Speaker 1>we believe in general relativity, then it's not possible for

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:25.880
<v Speaker 1>antimatter to have anti gravity. I see, So if something

0:35:25.920 --> 0:35:29.840
<v Speaker 1>could have negative gravitational mass, it would mean Einstein was wrong,

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:33.760
<v Speaker 1>or that general grotivity needs to be maybe expanded. Doesn't

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 1>necessarily mean it's wrong, or would you just need to

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:38.760
<v Speaker 1>like add something to Einstein's theory. Well, that's an interesting

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:42.560
<v Speaker 1>philosophical question. I mean, we're pretty sure that Einstein is wrong,

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:44.920
<v Speaker 1>not in the sense that any of his predictions have

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:47.200
<v Speaker 1>been proven wrong, but we don't know how to extend

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 1>his theory to quantum particles. It definitely needs some sort

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 1>of adaptation, and that might mean that it needs to

0:35:53.080 --> 0:35:55.560
<v Speaker 1>be like tossed out and completely replaced with the theory

0:35:55.560 --> 0:35:58.319
<v Speaker 1>of quantum gravity. That's a completely different picture of how

0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:02.399
<v Speaker 1>space gets bent using like quantum gravitons. Or it might

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 1>be that we take Einstein's theory and we quantize it

0:36:05.440 --> 0:36:08.280
<v Speaker 1>that we like say, space itself is made of quantum

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:11.560
<v Speaker 1>bits that are woven together, and general relativity emerges from that.

0:36:11.719 --> 0:36:13.239
<v Speaker 1>We really don't know whether we need to build on

0:36:13.320 --> 0:36:15.840
<v Speaker 1>top of Einstein's theory or whether we need to like

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 1>re examine the very foundations of it. But we do

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:21.200
<v Speaker 1>know that can't work in the quantum realm, so it

0:36:21.239 --> 0:36:23.759
<v Speaker 1>needs some sort of update. It might be that we

0:36:23.800 --> 0:36:26.560
<v Speaker 1>discovered failing only when we see inside black holes, or

0:36:26.600 --> 0:36:29.400
<v Speaker 1>it might be that we discovered failing when we examine

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the gravitational properties of antimatter. Well, I guess I'm not

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 1>quite sure what you're saying. Are you saying that? Okay?

0:36:34.680 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 1>So eince science theory assumes that gravitational mass and inertial

0:36:38.680 --> 0:36:42.080
<v Speaker 1>mass are the same, which means that you can't have

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:45.920
<v Speaker 1>negative rotational mass anti gravitational mass, or that you still

0:36:46.000 --> 0:36:49.400
<v Speaker 1>could or like, if you have negative inertial math anti

0:36:49.400 --> 0:36:52.360
<v Speaker 1>inertial mass, then that would also mean you have anti

0:36:52.400 --> 0:36:56.760
<v Speaker 1>gravity irrotational mass. Einstein's theory says you can't have negative

0:36:56.760 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 1>gravitational mass, that that just can't happen because of the

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 1>equip into principle. But we don't know that that's true, right,

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:05.719
<v Speaker 1>We don't know what the universe actually does. So if

0:37:05.760 --> 0:37:09.960
<v Speaker 1>we discover antimatter with negative gravitational mass, that means general

0:37:10.000 --> 0:37:13.160
<v Speaker 1>relativity is wrong in some important way. But maybe wouldn't

0:37:13.200 --> 0:37:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that just mean that it has negative inertial mass. Like,

0:37:16.239 --> 0:37:18.560
<v Speaker 1>if something has a negative inertial in them mass, then

0:37:18.680 --> 0:37:23.239
<v Speaker 1>in in Einstein's formulation, they would also have negative gravitational mass. Yeah,

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a really cool thought. You're right that general relativity

0:37:25.719 --> 0:37:29.840
<v Speaker 1>just requires that they have the same inertial and gravitational mass,

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:33.040
<v Speaker 1>which I suppose would allow for them to both be negative.

0:37:33.320 --> 0:37:36.840
<v Speaker 1>But again, we haven't seen particles with negative inertial mass.

0:37:36.880 --> 0:37:39.359
<v Speaker 1>So the antimatter we know and we are familiar with

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have negative inertial mass, so then general relativity would

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 1>predict that it also has positive gravitational mass M. So

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:49.879
<v Speaker 1>it's then it is possible to have a particle out

0:37:49.880 --> 0:37:51.960
<v Speaker 1>there that if you throw at a black hole, it's

0:37:51.960 --> 0:37:53.719
<v Speaker 1>going to run away from the black hole. But if

0:37:53.760 --> 0:37:57.239
<v Speaker 1>it has both negative and gravitational mass, it would have

0:37:57.400 --> 0:38:00.479
<v Speaker 1>the opposite force on it, and then that worse would

0:38:00.480 --> 0:38:03.880
<v Speaker 1>push it in the opposite direction, and two opposites resulted

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:08.440
<v Speaker 1>in going the same way. WHOA, So it would still

0:38:08.480 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 1>go towards the black hole. It would still go towards

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the black hole, Yes, because they would cancel each other out. Yeah, exactly.

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Black hole's force would technically be away from it, and

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:20.279
<v Speaker 1>that would result in a particle moving towards it. So

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:25.600
<v Speaker 1>double bonkers unless um, somehow Einstein's theory is wrong and

0:38:25.640 --> 0:38:27.920
<v Speaker 1>they're sort of not the same thing, right exactly, the

0:38:27.920 --> 0:38:31.000
<v Speaker 1>possibility that Einstein is wrong and that antimatter particles have

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:35.480
<v Speaker 1>positive inertial mass and negative gravitational mass. All right, well,

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:38.160
<v Speaker 1>it seems like, um, it is possible maybe to have

0:38:38.360 --> 0:38:42.600
<v Speaker 1>anti gravity from being an antimatter particle, to have an

0:38:42.719 --> 0:38:47.080
<v Speaker 1>anti inertial or anti gravitational mass seems possible. But I

0:38:47.120 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 1>guess then the question is does it actually happen? What

0:38:50.600 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 1>are some experiments we've done to try to find the

0:38:53.719 --> 0:38:55.840
<v Speaker 1>answer to this question. So let's get into that, But

0:38:55.880 --> 0:39:10.920
<v Speaker 1>first let's take another quick break. All right, we are

0:39:11.200 --> 0:39:15.520
<v Speaker 1>feeling a lot of anti emotions here talking about antimatter,

0:39:15.680 --> 0:39:21.160
<v Speaker 1>anti gravity, anti mass, anti everything. It's a very contrary episode.

0:39:22.120 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 1>We're going up, we're going down. We're going anti up

0:39:24.719 --> 0:39:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and anti down all at the same time. Can you

0:39:26.920 --> 0:39:32.400
<v Speaker 1>go anti anti? Those would be your double negative mass particles, right,

0:39:32.880 --> 0:39:36.120
<v Speaker 1>be anti anti attracted to a black hole? What would

0:39:36.160 --> 0:39:39.600
<v Speaker 1>you call the antimatter version of your parents, sister, your

0:39:39.680 --> 0:39:44.000
<v Speaker 1>anti anti These are tough questions we're asking today, assuming

0:39:44.040 --> 0:39:47.879
<v Speaker 1>people are still listening or the left in an anti huff.

0:39:48.239 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're talking about whether or not antimatter feels

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:54.960
<v Speaker 1>anti gravity, which is kind of turned out to be

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a pretty complicated question because, first of all, you have

0:39:57.239 --> 0:40:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to think about whether antimatter has anti inertia mass or

0:40:00.520 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 1>anti gravitational mass, and whether or not if they're the

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:05.920
<v Speaker 1>same thing according to Einstein, or maybe they're not. I

0:40:05.920 --> 0:40:07.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I don't know. I feel like from all

0:40:07.600 --> 0:40:11.040
<v Speaker 1>this theoretical discussion, it seems like you're saying that it's

0:40:11.560 --> 0:40:14.359
<v Speaker 1>not possible to have anti gravity. I think it's very

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:19.880
<v Speaker 1>unlikely that antimatter has anti gravity just because general relativity

0:40:19.960 --> 0:40:22.479
<v Speaker 1>is so successful. The YadA YadA YadA, dot dot dot.

0:40:22.520 --> 0:40:25.360
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, why do we do experiments. We

0:40:25.400 --> 0:40:27.840
<v Speaker 1>don't do experiments just to like yawn and check the

0:40:27.840 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 1>boxes off of theoretical predictions. We do experiments because we

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:35.040
<v Speaker 1>want to explore the universe. We want to find crazy,

0:40:35.080 --> 0:40:38.680
<v Speaker 1>shocking things that we can't explain that let us pull

0:40:38.719 --> 0:40:40.759
<v Speaker 1>the rug out of everything we thought we knew and

0:40:40.880 --> 0:40:43.440
<v Speaker 1>build up new ideas about the universe. So this is

0:40:43.440 --> 0:40:45.520
<v Speaker 1>definitely something we should check. We should go and see

0:40:45.520 --> 0:40:50.360
<v Speaker 1>whether antimatter follows our expectations or anti follows them. I

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:52.280
<v Speaker 1>think I see what you're saying. You're saying you're anti

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:56.160
<v Speaker 1>anti gravity, but you're pro the government giving you more

0:40:56.160 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 1>money to run experiments. Is that kind of what I'm

0:40:58.560 --> 0:41:03.120
<v Speaker 1>sensing here. I it's a little um contradictory position here.

0:41:03.280 --> 0:41:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just exciting to go out and ask

0:41:05.280 --> 0:41:08.319
<v Speaker 1>basic questions, like, hey, does antimatter of f all up

0:41:08.480 --> 0:41:11.080
<v Speaker 1>or down? And it's incredible to me that almost a

0:41:11.160 --> 0:41:14.439
<v Speaker 1>hundred years after we've discovered anti matter, we still don't

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:17.640
<v Speaker 1>really know the answer to that. Like, experimentally, it turned

0:41:17.680 --> 0:41:22.359
<v Speaker 1>out to be surprisingly tricky to do experiments with antimatter, right,

0:41:22.440 --> 0:41:25.560
<v Speaker 1>And specifically, you're talking about measuring I guess, the gravity

0:41:25.640 --> 0:41:27.319
<v Speaker 1>of a particle, right, I mean, you can measure the

0:41:27.320 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 1>gravity of a planet, of a person, of a banana,

0:41:29.760 --> 0:41:32.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's hard to kind of talk about the gravity

0:41:32.040 --> 0:41:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of tiny little particles because they feel very little gravity.

0:41:35.719 --> 0:41:38.200
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to even measure the gravity of a banana.

0:41:38.600 --> 0:41:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Like you can measure the weight of a banana, you

0:41:40.560 --> 0:41:42.440
<v Speaker 1>put it on a scale, but there you're measuring the

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:45.120
<v Speaker 1>gravity of the Earth. Right. The Earth is pulling on

0:41:45.160 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the banana. If you have two bananas in the room

0:41:47.200 --> 0:41:49.680
<v Speaker 1>next to you, it's pretty hard to measure their attraction

0:41:49.760 --> 0:41:54.439
<v Speaker 1>between themselves because gravity is so weak. It's like ten

0:41:54.600 --> 0:41:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to the thirty times as weak as electromagnetism, So it's

0:41:58.640 --> 0:42:01.200
<v Speaker 1>something we typically ignore. Right, you have two bananas on

0:42:01.200 --> 0:42:03.360
<v Speaker 1>your table, you don't expect to see them like creep

0:42:03.440 --> 0:42:05.960
<v Speaker 1>towards each other if you leave them alone. But they

0:42:06.000 --> 0:42:08.160
<v Speaker 1>would in space, Right, that's the idea. If you were

0:42:08.280 --> 0:42:10.120
<v Speaker 1>floating out there in space and you have two bananas,

0:42:10.760 --> 0:42:14.960
<v Speaker 1>eventually they would become a bi banana. Banana na na. Yeah.

0:42:15.000 --> 0:42:17.360
<v Speaker 1>But even doing that experiment in space would be hard

0:42:17.480 --> 0:42:19.879
<v Speaker 1>because the gravity is so weak that it might get

0:42:19.880 --> 0:42:23.000
<v Speaker 1>swamped by other stuff like the solar wind would probably

0:42:23.000 --> 0:42:26.040
<v Speaker 1>blow on those bananas, pushing on them harder than the

0:42:26.080 --> 0:42:29.360
<v Speaker 1>force of gravity between the bananas. Or if the bananas

0:42:29.360 --> 0:42:32.560
<v Speaker 1>have like a little bit of residual positive and negative charge,

0:42:32.560 --> 0:42:34.839
<v Speaker 1>like you rubbed one on your pants accidentally and giving

0:42:34.880 --> 0:42:38.080
<v Speaker 1>it some static electricity, then those forces, even a few

0:42:38.160 --> 0:42:40.840
<v Speaker 1>electrons on the surface of each one, would be more

0:42:40.880 --> 0:42:44.120
<v Speaker 1>powerful than gravity. So gravity is super hard to measure

0:42:44.160 --> 0:42:47.399
<v Speaker 1>for small things because it's so weak, it's swamped by

0:42:47.440 --> 0:42:49.880
<v Speaker 1>everything else. It's like trying to listen to a whisper

0:42:50.160 --> 0:42:53.480
<v Speaker 1>during a really loud concert. But I guess if you

0:42:53.480 --> 0:42:56.240
<v Speaker 1>said the experiment the right way and make sure everything

0:42:56.320 --> 0:42:59.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have a charge, the two bananas would come together eventually,

0:43:00.239 --> 0:43:01.960
<v Speaker 1>because that is what happens out there in space, right,

0:43:02.000 --> 0:43:05.839
<v Speaker 1>That's how planets get formed and asteroids and the sun. Right. Yeah,

0:43:05.880 --> 0:43:08.200
<v Speaker 1>we think that's the basic process for forming all of

0:43:08.200 --> 0:43:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the structure in the universe. And we've done some really

0:43:11.080 --> 0:43:16.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty awesome virtuoso experiments measuring the gravity of like little things,

0:43:16.080 --> 0:43:19.120
<v Speaker 1>things about the size of a centimeter and involves isolating

0:43:19.120 --> 0:43:22.360
<v Speaker 1>them from everything else and seeing very very small motion,

0:43:22.480 --> 0:43:24.880
<v Speaker 1>which people observe by like attaching a mirror to the

0:43:24.920 --> 0:43:27.520
<v Speaker 1>object and shining a laser on the mirror and seeing

0:43:27.520 --> 0:43:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the laser spot like move a tiny little bit so

0:43:30.680 --> 0:43:33.000
<v Speaker 1>that you see that the object has moved. These are

0:43:33.080 --> 0:43:36.400
<v Speaker 1>really super precise experiments, very very difficult to do, but

0:43:36.520 --> 0:43:39.200
<v Speaker 1>still there. With macroscopic objects, we're talking about like things

0:43:39.200 --> 0:43:42.360
<v Speaker 1>the size of a millimeter or centimeter, not individual particles,

0:43:42.920 --> 0:43:47.200
<v Speaker 1>so we can measure the mass of tiny, regular matter

0:43:47.239 --> 0:43:49.440
<v Speaker 1>of things. But I guess it's hard to do it

0:43:49.600 --> 0:43:52.360
<v Speaker 1>with antimatter, right, because that's really the question we're asking

0:43:52.400 --> 0:43:54.520
<v Speaker 1>today is like, if you have something made out of

0:43:54.680 --> 0:43:56.919
<v Speaker 1>or a whole bunch of antimatter in one spot, would

0:43:56.920 --> 0:43:59.759
<v Speaker 1>it feel anti gravity? That's the experiment. That's also hard

0:43:59.800 --> 0:44:01.680
<v Speaker 1>to do it because it's hard to put together a

0:44:01.680 --> 0:44:04.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of antimatter. It is. We can make antimatter at CERN,

0:44:04.719 --> 0:44:07.479
<v Speaker 1>for example, we smash matter into targets and the whole

0:44:07.520 --> 0:44:10.759
<v Speaker 1>spray of stuff comes out, including some antimatter, and we

0:44:10.760 --> 0:44:13.080
<v Speaker 1>can filter it out and do experiments with it, and

0:44:13.120 --> 0:44:14.920
<v Speaker 1>we do that kind of thing. But we make like

0:44:15.120 --> 0:44:18.600
<v Speaker 1>pico grams of antimatter every year it's CERN. So you

0:44:18.600 --> 0:44:21.360
<v Speaker 1>want to make like a bananas amount of antimatter, it

0:44:21.360 --> 0:44:24.160
<v Speaker 1>would cost zillions of dollars and take years and years

0:44:24.160 --> 0:44:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and years. So instead of making really big objects out

0:44:27.000 --> 0:44:30.480
<v Speaker 1>of antimatter, we try to do really precision experiments with

0:44:30.560 --> 0:44:34.400
<v Speaker 1>much smaller amounts of antimatter. Also, would be super dangerous

0:44:34.400 --> 0:44:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to come to make like a even a piece size

0:44:36.880 --> 0:44:40.120
<v Speaker 1>or raisin size amount of antimatter, because then if it

0:44:40.160 --> 0:44:44.160
<v Speaker 1>touches regular matter, it's it's going to destroy the Earth basically, right,

0:44:44.400 --> 0:44:46.360
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the most efficient ways to release the

0:44:46.520 --> 0:44:49.840
<v Speaker 1>energy inside matter, which is a huge amount, right equals

0:44:49.960 --> 0:44:53.160
<v Speaker 1>mc squared. C is a really big number. The speed

0:44:53.200 --> 0:44:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of light C squared is a really big number. Is squared.

0:44:56.719 --> 0:44:59.440
<v Speaker 1>So as you say, like a raisin's worth of antimatter

0:44:59.480 --> 0:45:02.320
<v Speaker 1>combined with the reason but have as much energy is

0:45:02.400 --> 0:45:05.560
<v Speaker 1>like a nuclear detonation. So yes, if you are making

0:45:05.600 --> 0:45:08.799
<v Speaker 1>antimatter in your kitchen, be very careful. Yeah, we're very

0:45:08.840 --> 0:45:12.759
<v Speaker 1>anti that kitchen. A recipe there, But I think what

0:45:12.800 --> 0:45:15.399
<v Speaker 1>you're saying is that you can make antimatter in your

0:45:15.440 --> 0:45:18.640
<v Speaker 1>colliders and certain, but you haven't made enough to really

0:45:18.680 --> 0:45:22.840
<v Speaker 1>do gravitational experiments to see whether antimatter feels anti gravity.

0:45:22.880 --> 0:45:25.560
<v Speaker 1>We actually have done a few experiments with antimatter that

0:45:25.680 --> 0:45:28.799
<v Speaker 1>do ask this question about the effects of gravity on

0:45:28.840 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 1>these particles, but they're very, very difficult to do and

0:45:31.280 --> 0:45:33.279
<v Speaker 1>not as sensitive as we'd like yet. What I mean,

0:45:33.320 --> 0:45:35.800
<v Speaker 1>so you did the experiments but didn't reach a conclusion

0:45:35.920 --> 0:45:38.320
<v Speaker 1>or what couldn't get the data. So they've done the experiments.

0:45:38.360 --> 0:45:41.720
<v Speaker 1>They take anti protons and they combine them with anti

0:45:41.800 --> 0:45:45.239
<v Speaker 1>electrons to make anti hydrogen. And the reason they do

0:45:45.280 --> 0:45:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that is you need neutral antimatter. You don't want any

0:45:48.120 --> 0:45:51.080
<v Speaker 1>electric or magnetic fields affecting your antimatter. You want to

0:45:51.120 --> 0:45:55.000
<v Speaker 1>measure only the gravitational force on these objects. So they

0:45:55.000 --> 0:45:59.040
<v Speaker 1>make neutral anti hydrogen, which is super awesome anyway, because

0:45:59.080 --> 0:46:01.840
<v Speaker 1>then they can do things like study the spectral properties

0:46:01.840 --> 0:46:04.239
<v Speaker 1>of it and see if anti hydrogen behaves the same

0:46:04.239 --> 0:46:07.760
<v Speaker 1>way as hydrogen, which this whole other really fascinating field

0:46:07.800 --> 0:46:09.360
<v Speaker 1>of science to try to figure out what is the

0:46:09.400 --> 0:46:12.560
<v Speaker 1>difference between matter and antimatter. But because they have a

0:46:12.560 --> 0:46:16.239
<v Speaker 1>collection of these anti hydrogen atoms, they can also see

0:46:16.280 --> 0:46:18.799
<v Speaker 1>like what happens when they float there, Like do they

0:46:18.880 --> 0:46:21.520
<v Speaker 1>drift down or do they drift up? Well, I guess,

0:46:21.560 --> 0:46:23.279
<v Speaker 1>first of all, how do you hold a bunch of

0:46:23.320 --> 0:46:27.280
<v Speaker 1>anti hydrogen? So you create this I guess by bringing

0:46:27.320 --> 0:46:30.160
<v Speaker 1>together anti electrons and anti protons, and then they make

0:46:30.200 --> 0:46:32.040
<v Speaker 1>answer hydrogen and then you get a little cloud of

0:46:32.080 --> 0:46:34.000
<v Speaker 1>anti hygen. What do you do with that? Do you

0:46:34.120 --> 0:46:36.640
<v Speaker 1>keep it inside of a bottle? It's really challenging to contain.

0:46:36.680 --> 0:46:38.480
<v Speaker 1>You're absolutely right. What we do is we keep it

0:46:38.520 --> 0:46:41.360
<v Speaker 1>in a magnetic bottle. It doesn't work very well. A

0:46:41.400 --> 0:46:44.760
<v Speaker 1>magnetic bottle is good at holding charged particles. Because magnetic

0:46:44.800 --> 0:46:48.000
<v Speaker 1>fields bend the path of charged particles. So, for example,

0:46:48.040 --> 0:46:50.279
<v Speaker 1>the beams and the large hadron collider are kept moving

0:46:50.320 --> 0:46:53.360
<v Speaker 1>in a circle because of very powerful magnets or plasma,

0:46:53.400 --> 0:46:55.880
<v Speaker 1>and a fusion reactor is kept in a magnetic bottle

0:46:55.920 --> 0:46:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to keep it from escaping because it's filled with charge particles.

0:46:59.040 --> 0:47:01.600
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't work very well all on neutral particles, but

0:47:01.960 --> 0:47:05.840
<v Speaker 1>even anti hydrogen has a magnetic moment because the spins

0:47:05.880 --> 0:47:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the particles, they do feel magnetic fields a little bit,

0:47:09.120 --> 0:47:11.000
<v Speaker 1>so we can keep them in like a very very

0:47:11.080 --> 0:47:14.640
<v Speaker 1>bad magnetic bottle, and it works best if those anti

0:47:14.719 --> 0:47:17.719
<v Speaker 1>hydrogen atoms are slow, if they're cold, they're not like

0:47:17.760 --> 0:47:21.240
<v Speaker 1>flying around with high velocity, then this very weak bottle

0:47:21.320 --> 0:47:24.720
<v Speaker 1>tends to contain them. But that's a challenge because making

0:47:24.760 --> 0:47:28.160
<v Speaker 1>anti hydrogen that's moving slowly is hard because you have

0:47:28.200 --> 0:47:32.359
<v Speaker 1>to combine the positrons and the anti protons which come

0:47:32.360 --> 0:47:35.440
<v Speaker 1>in in beams, so you have to have like slow beams,

0:47:35.480 --> 0:47:38.759
<v Speaker 1>like gases of these things like merge together. The whole

0:47:38.800 --> 0:47:42.000
<v Speaker 1>thing is experimentally very tricky. Yeah, it sounds pretty hard,

0:47:42.040 --> 0:47:44.239
<v Speaker 1>but they have done this kind of and what did

0:47:44.239 --> 0:47:46.120
<v Speaker 1>they find. Did they find that it falls at the

0:47:46.120 --> 0:47:48.120
<v Speaker 1>bottom of this bad bottle, or does it flow it

0:47:48.200 --> 0:47:50.319
<v Speaker 1>up to the top of the bad bottle. So there's

0:47:50.320 --> 0:47:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a very cool experiment at CERN. It's called the Alpha experiment,

0:47:53.560 --> 0:47:58.520
<v Speaker 1>which stands for anti hydrogen laser physics apparatus. Is a

0:47:58.719 --> 0:48:02.239
<v Speaker 1>terrible acronym or really awesome experiment. And they do not

0:48:02.280 --> 0:48:04.839
<v Speaker 1>see anti matter falling upwards very fast. I mean, some

0:48:04.880 --> 0:48:07.319
<v Speaker 1>of these hydrogen atoms do float up and some of

0:48:07.320 --> 0:48:11.040
<v Speaker 1>them do float down. And because the difficulty of measuring gravity,

0:48:11.280 --> 0:48:14.279
<v Speaker 1>it's not a very precise measurement. What they can do

0:48:14.400 --> 0:48:18.319
<v Speaker 1>is they can say that anti hydrogen doesn't have a

0:48:18.480 --> 0:48:23.320
<v Speaker 1>negative gravitational mass of sixty five times the inertial mass.

0:48:23.320 --> 0:48:26.799
<v Speaker 1>So if anti hydrogen had a negative gravitational mass of

0:48:26.840 --> 0:48:29.680
<v Speaker 1>like a hundred or a million times the inertial mass,

0:48:29.960 --> 0:48:31.720
<v Speaker 1>they would have seen it because they would have flown

0:48:31.760 --> 0:48:34.920
<v Speaker 1>upwards really fast. They don't see them flying upwards really fast,

0:48:34.920 --> 0:48:37.240
<v Speaker 1>so they can say if it does have a negative

0:48:37.280 --> 0:48:41.600
<v Speaker 1>gravitational mass, it's not that big. So it's like very imprecise.

0:48:41.760 --> 0:48:44.160
<v Speaker 1>So far, if they had a lot more anti hydrogen

0:48:44.280 --> 0:48:47.040
<v Speaker 1>or more time, they can make more precise measurements. They

0:48:47.040 --> 0:48:50.200
<v Speaker 1>could sort of narrow this down statistically, all they can

0:48:50.200 --> 0:48:52.880
<v Speaker 1>do right now is like rule out a really crazy

0:48:52.960 --> 0:48:57.000
<v Speaker 1>result where anti hydrogen has a negative gravitational mass that's

0:48:57.080 --> 0:49:01.120
<v Speaker 1>also much bigger in magnitude in the inertial mass. But

0:49:01.400 --> 0:49:05.279
<v Speaker 1>could it have a varying different gravitational mass in magnitude

0:49:05.320 --> 0:49:07.799
<v Speaker 1>than than it's inertial mass. I mean, we're exploring the

0:49:07.840 --> 0:49:11.359
<v Speaker 1>bonkers universe theory out here, so maybe right. And this

0:49:11.440 --> 0:49:13.279
<v Speaker 1>is also sort of like just the way that they

0:49:13.280 --> 0:49:16.200
<v Speaker 1>can express their results. Even if the theoretical options are well,

0:49:16.200 --> 0:49:20.040
<v Speaker 1>it either has a positive gravitational mass or negative one

0:49:20.239 --> 0:49:23.160
<v Speaker 1>times the inertial mass. We can't tell the difference between

0:49:23.160 --> 0:49:25.120
<v Speaker 1>those two. Experimentally, all we can do is tell the

0:49:25.120 --> 0:49:29.799
<v Speaker 1>difference between negative sixty five and positive one. So we

0:49:29.800 --> 0:49:32.120
<v Speaker 1>can rule out negative sixty five, we can't yet rule

0:49:32.160 --> 0:49:35.279
<v Speaker 1>out negative one. M I see. So they done the

0:49:35.320 --> 0:49:38.640
<v Speaker 1>experiment and they don't have a clear result, but it's

0:49:38.640 --> 0:49:41.759
<v Speaker 1>not an anti result either. It's not. And they're just

0:49:41.760 --> 0:49:43.759
<v Speaker 1>getting started, right, and so they're going to make more

0:49:43.800 --> 0:49:46.680
<v Speaker 1>anti hydrogen and they're gonna do more precise experiments. There

0:49:46.719 --> 0:49:49.560
<v Speaker 1>are other experiments coming online at CERN to measure this

0:49:49.640 --> 0:49:51.799
<v Speaker 1>in other ways and so in the next few years

0:49:51.800 --> 0:49:55.080
<v Speaker 1>we hope to get more precise measurements of the gravitational

0:49:55.160 --> 0:49:59.520
<v Speaker 1>properties of antimatter. All right, Besides cern are there other

0:49:59.560 --> 0:50:02.279
<v Speaker 1>experiment is that we've done or are going to do

0:50:02.400 --> 0:50:05.120
<v Speaker 1>to measure the gravity of antimatter. These kind of particle

0:50:05.160 --> 0:50:08.000
<v Speaker 1>physics experiments are really the most direct way to probe this.

0:50:08.640 --> 0:50:11.040
<v Speaker 1>You can also do other sort of thought experiments to

0:50:11.160 --> 0:50:14.719
<v Speaker 1>think about the effects of antimatter. For example, like the

0:50:14.760 --> 0:50:18.360
<v Speaker 1>protons that are inside me and you, we talked earlier

0:50:18.400 --> 0:50:20.920
<v Speaker 1>about how they have quarks inside them, Well, they also

0:50:21.120 --> 0:50:25.480
<v Speaker 1>have antimatter inside them. Like the gluons that are inside

0:50:25.520 --> 0:50:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the protons, they sometimes turn into cork anti cork pairs

0:50:29.360 --> 0:50:32.080
<v Speaker 1>like very briefly before going back to being a gluon

0:50:32.520 --> 0:50:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the way like a photon will turn into a particle

0:50:34.680 --> 0:50:38.000
<v Speaker 1>antiparticle pair briefly and go back to being a photon.

0:50:38.160 --> 0:50:40.320
<v Speaker 1>So that means that like you and I are partially

0:50:40.360 --> 0:50:44.680
<v Speaker 1>made of anti matter. If antimatter had anti gravity in

0:50:44.719 --> 0:50:47.799
<v Speaker 1>some weird way, then we would see the effect of

0:50:47.840 --> 0:50:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that on protons. And we don't see any weird behavior

0:50:51.040 --> 0:50:52.719
<v Speaker 1>of protons. They don't seem to have any sort of

0:50:52.760 --> 0:50:56.319
<v Speaker 1>like deviation between their inertial and gravitational mass. So that's

0:50:56.360 --> 0:51:00.920
<v Speaker 1>a strong hint that antimatter probably has normal. Yeah, we

0:51:00.960 --> 0:51:03.640
<v Speaker 1>all have a little bit of negativity inside of us,

0:51:03.640 --> 0:51:05.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a contrarian inside of us. But

0:51:05.840 --> 0:51:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you're saying that we all are made a

0:51:08.040 --> 0:51:10.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit of antimatter and it doesn't seem to be

0:51:10.480 --> 0:51:12.759
<v Speaker 1>affecting the regular matter. But at the same time, it's

0:51:12.760 --> 0:51:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a very tiny amount, isn't Isn't it like super duper

0:51:15.520 --> 0:51:18.319
<v Speaker 1>negligible the amount of antimatter inside of us? Yeah, so

0:51:18.400 --> 0:51:21.200
<v Speaker 1>it would be pretty negligible. All right. Well, maybe to

0:51:21.280 --> 0:51:23.560
<v Speaker 1>wrap up here, I think we've sort of maybe a

0:51:23.560 --> 0:51:27.719
<v Speaker 1>little bit debunked the idea of anti gravity for antimatter particles.

0:51:27.800 --> 0:51:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, theoretically, it seems like it's not really possible,

0:51:30.800 --> 0:51:33.800
<v Speaker 1>or I mean it's possible, but we would mean we

0:51:33.840 --> 0:51:36.520
<v Speaker 1>would see a very different universe. And also these experiments

0:51:36.520 --> 0:51:39.160
<v Speaker 1>that you describe kind of rule it out as well.

0:51:39.280 --> 0:51:44.359
<v Speaker 1>So if that's true, then if you can't have anti gravity,

0:51:44.360 --> 0:51:47.320
<v Speaker 1>what does that mean about our theories of the universe.

0:51:47.480 --> 0:51:49.239
<v Speaker 1>I think I agree mostly with what you say, but

0:51:49.280 --> 0:51:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I always hold out a little bit of hope for

0:51:51.680 --> 0:51:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the crazy result. You know, even if the theory very

0:51:54.160 --> 0:51:57.120
<v Speaker 1>strongly says that can't happen, that just makes me more

0:51:57.200 --> 0:51:59.640
<v Speaker 1>excited to go and discover it that way, because it

0:51:59.680 --> 0:52:03.120
<v Speaker 1>means undermining that whole theory and starting from scratch, and

0:52:03.160 --> 0:52:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to me, those are the most exciting moments in science.

0:52:06.000 --> 0:52:08.440
<v Speaker 1>So I think you're right that the theory very strongly

0:52:08.480 --> 0:52:11.680
<v Speaker 1>suggests that antimatter doesn't have anti gravity, But that still

0:52:11.680 --> 0:52:14.240
<v Speaker 1>makes me hopeful. Wait, what makes you hopeful that maybe

0:52:14.239 --> 0:52:16.560
<v Speaker 1>one of these experiments will get a shocking result and

0:52:16.600 --> 0:52:20.120
<v Speaker 1>discover antimatter fluting up in a gravitational field and give

0:52:20.200 --> 0:52:22.560
<v Speaker 1>us a clue about the next direction we should take

0:52:22.600 --> 0:52:26.040
<v Speaker 1>for gravity, for understanding whether it is a quantum field

0:52:26.120 --> 0:52:28.600
<v Speaker 1>or whether space itself is quantized, and how to get

0:52:28.640 --> 0:52:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to quantum gravity. All right, well, I think what you're

0:52:32.080 --> 0:52:34.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to say is keep giving you money to run

0:52:34.040 --> 0:52:37.800
<v Speaker 1>these experiments just to make sure that the universe is

0:52:37.840 --> 0:52:40.319
<v Speaker 1>not actually crazy. I'd say, we never know where the

0:52:40.360 --> 0:52:43.760
<v Speaker 1>next surprise, where the great big learning moment about the universe,

0:52:43.760 --> 0:52:45.720
<v Speaker 1>will come, and so it makes a lot of sense

0:52:45.760 --> 0:52:47.680
<v Speaker 1>to go out there and do careful experiments and see

0:52:47.680 --> 0:52:49.879
<v Speaker 1>if the universe is the way we expect or not?

0:52:50.120 --> 0:52:52.719
<v Speaker 1>Where is to the anti way we expect? All right,

0:52:52.760 --> 0:52:56.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll stay tuned, as I guess we keep exploring this

0:52:56.200 --> 0:53:00.000
<v Speaker 1>idea of antimatter and what gravity actually is. I guess

0:53:00.040 --> 0:53:01.960
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to prove that there's such a thing as

0:53:02.000 --> 0:53:04.080
<v Speaker 1>anti gravity if we don't actually kind of know what

0:53:04.160 --> 0:53:08.560
<v Speaker 1>gravity is. That's a good point. We anti know gravity,

0:53:08.719 --> 0:53:10.560
<v Speaker 1>right like, It's still kind of up for the babe

0:53:10.560 --> 0:53:14.319
<v Speaker 1>whether general relativity, which is Einstein's theory, is right or not,

0:53:15.320 --> 0:53:18.200
<v Speaker 1>and how it matches up with quantum mechanics. It's one

0:53:18.239 --> 0:53:20.839
<v Speaker 1>of the deepest questions at the heart of modern physics,

0:53:20.840 --> 0:53:24.040
<v Speaker 1>how to unify these two pillars of our understanding of

0:53:24.040 --> 0:53:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the universe. All right, well, I guess we'll keep waiting

0:53:27.040 --> 0:53:30.720
<v Speaker 1>for news from the fringes of physics. We'll keep funding

0:53:30.760 --> 0:53:33.560
<v Speaker 1>those experiments. You mean it's above my pay grade? All right? Well,

0:53:33.560 --> 0:53:36.520
<v Speaker 1>we hope you enjoyed that or anti enjoyed that. Thanks

0:53:36.560 --> 0:53:47.160
<v Speaker 1>for joining us, See you next time. Thanks for listening,

0:53:47.160 --> 0:53:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and remember that. Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe is

0:53:49.920 --> 0:53:53.440
<v Speaker 1>a production of I Heart Radio. For more podcast from

0:53:53.440 --> 0:53:56.520
<v Speaker 1>My Heart Radio, visit the I Heart Radio app Apple

0:53:56.600 --> 0:54:05.239
<v Speaker 1>podcasts or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. No.