WEBVTT - Week 1 Is Finally Here!

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:10.039
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and advice,

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Now League dot Com. Here's your host. Welcome to our

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>first regular season edition of Fantasy Football Weekly for year

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>number twenty seven. I am Paul Churchy and my co

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:33.480
<v Speaker 1>host today are Scott Fish and Matt Harrison from Shock

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:38.159
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy footballs Back it is baby, Ah. That Thursday night

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>game was so much fun. It was. It was a

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:44.159
<v Speaker 1>ton of fun and uh for everybody except Zeke owners.

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Those are the one people that had no fun that night.

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>But you know what, those people probably didn't start him,

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and even if they did, they deserve what they got.

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>At that point. You told him last week, you told

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>him about you told you know what. Listen. I I

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>hate to start a show right off the bat, but

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>if you go back and listen to last week's show

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>in which I previewed the Monday night game, it was uncanny. Yeah.

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:15.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to prank, but I absolutely nailed this game,

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and I might not nail another game all season long.

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Probably that was it. That one we pretty much handled.

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>You lead off well though, Church. Although I gave I

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>gave Zeke a C grade, I should have just given

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>him the bench. I thought he would catch enough that

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 1>he would get he'd put together a decent PPR week.

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>He didn't. He didn't even do that. I'm gonna take

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>a one week victory lap on Antonio Brown being the

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>right receiver. You should right now. It looks very good.

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:43.119
<v Speaker 1>It does look good through one week. We've got plenty

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:44.320
<v Speaker 1>to get to over the course of the show. We're

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna break down every game fantasy style. We've got take

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me in which we give you sleep

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Some of you need sleepers already. If you're me and

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>you Rostered Gus Edwards in like every league in America,

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>or you're me and you roster J. K. Dobbins in

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>every league you're in, yea, then you probably need our

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on me players charge. It turns out

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>we don't get to have this argument at all this year.

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Here we were planning it two weeks ago. I know.

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's ridiculous which happened. And we will touch

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>on that story much more later in the show. Three

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>tough questions coming up, and the return of everybody's favorite

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>segment premature speculation, which we tell you which players you'll

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>be trying to pick up you want to pick up,

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>now what everybody else is trying to pick them up

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>next week? That's premature speculation. First we start breaking down games.

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:38.679
<v Speaker 1>Let's do it including game I think is can have

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of points, Arizona taking on Tennessee. Matt I

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of a grades in this one. Will

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>start with the Kyler Murray and DeAndre Hopkins both getting

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>an A. Tennessee was absolutely brutal last year against the

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>pass and didn't fix that much in the offseason. Only

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Drew lock and l Jack's run game and a half

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Minshew half Glennan game last season were the only three

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>where they didn't allow multi pull passing scores or at

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>least two hundred fifty yards. Do I like a J Green,

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Christian Kirk or Rondale more enough to start them in

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>this juicy matchup, not in a week with no buys.

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to see how the snap counts and the

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:15.799
<v Speaker 1>targets track for a week. James Conner and Chase Edmonds,

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I'd recommend benching both, but if I had to start

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>one for this game, it would be Connor. The Titans

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>gave up five rushing touchdowns to running backs over the

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>final three weeks of the regular season, but we've been

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 1>preaching this all season. Chase Edmonds had one rush from

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:31.959
<v Speaker 1>inside the five and only three attempts from inside the

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>ten last year. I think it's James Conner if they

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>get near the stripe. On the other side, Derrick Henry's

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>an easy A grade A J. Brown and Julio Jones

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving A grades two as well. According to Pro

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Football Focuses Wide Receiver Cornerback Matchup tool, both A. J.

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>And Julio face the top seven easiest matchups in the

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 1>league this week against Cardinals cornerbacks Byron Murphy, who allowed

0:03:57.240 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>ten touchdowns in his coverage that last season, and then

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Rob Alford, who, when I googled him, is known as

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the Ski Doo Snowmobile Ambassador. No, that's not that Rob Alfred.

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Is he the Judas Priest lead singer? No, that's Rob Halford.

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Way off, I mean, not fonetically. I really wasn't. No,

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>you weren't. Uh. A. J. Brown missed a practice on Wednesday,

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>but he was staying loose on the stationary bike and

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>he dropped off the injury report by Friday, so his

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 1>game status is not in doubt. If I like Brown

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and Julio, given Ryan Tannehill in a too. Although Tannehill

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 1>is only top twenty seven passing attempts in a game

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:39.919
<v Speaker 1>twice in his last ten games, he's very efficient. He

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 1>throws for multiple scores and half of those contests. And

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>by the way, he had six rushing touchdowns from Week

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>twelve on last year. Not something you expect with Derrick

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Henry in the backfield. Finally, a little surprised B grade

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>here for Anthony fers Er. Ferser was targeted on of

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>his routes last season. To give you an idea of

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>how good that is, Travis Kelsey was targeted on twenty

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of his routes run. I just don't think he's gonna

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:09.280
<v Speaker 1>run enough routes. The problem is Johnny was in front him.

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Last year. When Johnny wasn't there, Anthony Ferkser was pretty good.

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>He'll go up against card safety Jalen Thompson, who gave

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>up completions in se of the throws in his direction

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:21.600
<v Speaker 1>last year. I think Ferkser, if you're playing in that

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>weird tight end game where you don't know who you

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:26.279
<v Speaker 1>got the eleventh twelve tight ends in your league. Fers,

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a guy that he's kind of a bonus take

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me guy right now. Worried about A. J.

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Brown's knee, Okay, let's let's hope that he's okay on

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>that it was nagging lingering problem in miss practice wednesday.

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm just man, Let's just took him off the injury report, though.

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's hope that Philadelphia takes on Atlanta Scott. Yes, yes, yes, okay.

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>You're not even gonna faint enthusiasm here, are you. It

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>actually should be a pretty high scoring game. Actually, I

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>believe it's got the second or third highest over under

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:01.359
<v Speaker 1>four the weeks, So I do expect a little bit

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:05.159
<v Speaker 1>of a shootout here. I'm giving Jalen Hurts. I can't

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>believe I'm gonna do this, but I'm gonna stay on

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the upside side of it. I'm gonna I'm gonna give

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>him an A grade. The Eagles should be in a

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>negative game script chasing points a little bit in this game. Uh.

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>The offensive line is better than last year. The secondaries

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>very beautiful, beatable, not just very beautiful. This Uh, this

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta secondary. Man. They were eaten alive by rushing quarterbacks

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>last year, and they allowed multiple touchdowns to rushing quarterbacks

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>in two quarterbacks in all but three games, So there's

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of opportunity here. Hurts averaged over seventy

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>yards rushing. If you add all that up, he's got

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 1>a good chance for for even a QB one like

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>first overall week if he gets those rushing yards in

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:50.599
<v Speaker 1>al right onto his wide receivers. Though, because we got

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>to talk about his passing. Actually, Davanta Smith, I give

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a B grade here. PFF has Atlanta graded as the

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>worst secondary in the NFL L and last year allowed

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the most yards to wide receivers, so that tracks, uh,

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 1>nineteen times they let a receiver get over ninety yards

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and or a touchdown last year nineteen times. Smith should

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>get a decent matchup with Fabian Moreau, and no one

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>can match Smith's speeds. So I like him for a

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>B grade, but I wouldn't be shocked if he gets

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>loose a couple of times. Jalen Reagor I do have

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. He's getting He's getting a j terrell Um.

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>He's been so hit and miss over his career so far.

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 1>But A J. Terrell is an up and coming You know,

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>he was a rookie last year. We thought he'd be

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 1>last we thought he'd be better. Maybe he turns it

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>around in year two. But it's hard to trust Reagor

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 1>right now. Quez Watkins. He with that fourth three speed,

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 1>he could have a huge as a deep sleeper in

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 1>a DFS dart throw. Watkins is really intriguing. Yeah, he

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>plays from the slot and he's you know, he's gonna

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>have He's gonna be in a beatable position against a

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>below average slot corner. And for people who don't know

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Quis Watkins, you remember Travis Fulgum last year was you know,

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>fantasy startable in much of the second half of the season.

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Quays Watkins beat him out so soundly they dropped full

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>from the roster. If Quais Watkins has a great game,

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 1>will it be a pop? Quaz, thank you. I'll just

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>keep going after that. Zach Ertz and Dallas got Her

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I actually have C grades on both of them. I

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:29.119
<v Speaker 1>liked got It more when I thought Artz was gonna

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>be leaving, he didn't leave. And uh Arts is getting

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>more targets and training camp everything supposedly behind him, Urt's

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>is fine with staying there. Interesting stad that I failed

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to mention in the preseason last year when Arts and

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 1>got It played together, dust Gottard only got two red

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>zone targets in all the games together last year, so

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>it seems like it's more the guy there. Atlanta was

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>bottom five against tight ends in several categories last year.

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 1>And don't forget that Atlanti's front eleven defensive players aren't great.

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>That just the front eleven over to the over the

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:07.080
<v Speaker 1>running back side. I'm giving Sanders a B grade because

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be the he's going to be the starter,

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>and he's going to get most of the volume. He's

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 1>got well documented issues catching the ball. Barely caught over

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>fifty of his passes last year, and for a running back,

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:18.839
<v Speaker 1>that's really bad. That's really bad for a running back.

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>The Falcons allowed the second fewest rushing yards and second

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 1>fewest rushing touchdowns, but they and they did get Dion

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:29.199
<v Speaker 1>Jones back, but they are bottom twelve against passing pass

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 1>game running backs, which they're always at the near at

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>or near the bottom. They were the worst for like

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 1>five years in a row, but last year just bottom twelve.

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>So I do have a C grade on Boston Scott.

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>With the high employed implied point totals for both teams,

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:46.839
<v Speaker 1>it could be end up with a negative game script.

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:49.439
<v Speaker 1>Siriano and the O C downplayed the bell cow role

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:52.679
<v Speaker 1>they want. They want Boston Scott to play that like

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:57.079
<v Speaker 1>nahem Heinz roll that Siriano had over and with Indianapolis

0:09:57.200 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>last year. And he's been playing the two minute hurry

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 1>up drill for in practice. So that's that's a feather

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>in the cap of Boston Scott there, so see grade

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:09.679
<v Speaker 1>on him. Over the Atlanta side, I have a B

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 1>grade on Matt Ryan. I think just because potential shootout

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 1>category here. It's one of the week's highest over under.

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Eagles allowed multiple touchdowns ten times last year. Um, you

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>don't need to look for the button. I instinctively went

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:26.599
<v Speaker 1>for the button and then stop myself. I wish I

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>could have made that happen for you. Uh, Kyle Pitts,

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>next time, just lie, just lie, just just be wrong

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:36.439
<v Speaker 1>for the listeners, Like you're only off by ten percent.

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Pitts with an A grade here. Charch isn't loving that,

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>but Brian Johnson is fist pumping in right now. Listen

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't played a game yet, and you're giving it to

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a rookie tight end and A grade. I bet Scott's

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna give him the fantasy Fonzie here. Let's let's let's

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 1>do it. No, I'm not you want you want the

0:10:56.360 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>fantasy Fonzie, the Fanta. The Eagles allowed no one's benching

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>him though right like anyone who drafted him. A big

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 1>gulf between a grade and a bench. The Eagles allowed

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>over five catches per game to tight ends last year

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and nine touchdowns. And if you look at how Arthur

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Smith utilized John Smith Smith when he was healthy at

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the season last season, I think there's

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of optimism here. I could see in art.

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>You might be playing button next weekend about Kyle pit

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 1>How about name minus? Is that fine? You know that

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>that's not cool either. Calvin Ridley gets the A grade

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>going up against Darius Slagh, who is no longer the

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>sleigh ride that he used to be ranked fifty six

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 1>by PFF this last year. Ridley's averages without Julio Jones

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and he will be without Julio Jones. We're fairly started

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>this first game seven point five receptions on eleven point

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:52.439
<v Speaker 1>three targets for a hundred nine yards, and he scored

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>virtually every other game. That's what he does without Julio

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>seven for a hundred. I'll take it. Russell Gage, I'm

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 1>giving a C grade also because of the shootout potential,

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Also because he's going up against PFFS first ranked Avonte Maddox,

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 1>who allows one two point seven passer rading in his coverage.

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Gauge looked good enough last year that I'll trust him

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:19.200
<v Speaker 1>with a C grade. Here onto the running backs, Mike Davis,

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving you a B grade. It just feels like

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:24.439
<v Speaker 1>it's might be your best week to use Davis. They

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>acquired Goldman, who's still new to the team. Patterson Cordarrel

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:31.079
<v Speaker 1>Patterson that is has been working as the backup. But

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:33.199
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna see a lot of Mike Davis, who proved

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:36.680
<v Speaker 1>to be an effective pass catcher last year uh catching

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>fifty nine passes at a percent catch rate. Miles Sanders,

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>look look across the field of how you're supposed to

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>do it. It's the middle of the road, Rundy with

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 1>shootout and a volume back. I'll take that. I'm gonna

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 1>bench the other backs. All right, sounds good final matchup

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:55.319
<v Speaker 1>of this segment, Minnesota taking on Cincinnati. On the Minnesota side,

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Dalvin Cook, Adam Feeland, and Justin Jefferson are all A grades,

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and Cook for obvious reasons. I don't even need to

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 1>explain that. For Theland and Jefferson, they have deeply positive

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>matchups against replacement grade cornerbacks. Trey Waynes has been ruled

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 1>out of this game. Cast off cornerbacks Eli Apple and

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Hidobe Ewoozier and Jefferson, and I think I got it right.

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>So there it's a This is a strongly positive matchup

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 1>for all three of them. Kirk Cousins comes in with

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:28.719
<v Speaker 1>a B grade. Bengals lost their best two cornerbacks in

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:32.719
<v Speaker 1>the offseason, William Jackson to Washington, Mackenzie Alexander to Minnesota.

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Already mentioned Waynes is out, Eli Apple, Hidobe Awoozier are in,

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and even at full strength, the Bengals are badly overmatched

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 1>by Justin Jefferson and Adam Feland. So add all that

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 1>together and it's a very positive matchup for Kirk Cousins.

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:48.200
<v Speaker 1>The tight end rotation to me is when I'm going

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>to avoid Tyler Conklin is tempting, but I'm not ready

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to put him in yet. And he's not even at

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>full health yet, So that's a that's too much of

0:13:57.280 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>a concern for me, and I'm not ready to go

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>quite that far. Cincinnati side, let's start with Joe Mixon.

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Last year's Viking run defense was brutal, but they've completely

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>rebuilt their entire front four, including epic runs stuffing defensive

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>tackle Michael Pierce, who was one of the league's best

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 1>run defenders in twenty nineteen before he opted out last season.

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>The Bagel's offensive line looks like a bottom tier unit,

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>even with the additions of Riley Reefs. So I'm nervous

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>about Joe Mixon here, but through sheer volume he should

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 1>be able to get to a B. It's just revenge

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>games on both sides of the ball here. Well, it

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>is interesting enough, and Riley Reef's gonna go up against

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>as a former Viking. We'll go up against Daniel Hunter,

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>which would be a fantastic match. We are worth watching.

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>U Let's go to the passing game. Joe Burrow comes

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 1>in with a sea here. Hasn't played since last November,

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>barely participated in the preseason games looked hesitant and inaccurate.

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 1>In training camp, the Vikings defense dramatically improved over the

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 1>version you saw last year. The week seventeen Minnesota Viking

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 1>defense the last and we saw them. We'll have ten

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 1>of eleven new starters on defense, and they're all improvements.

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 1>All ten of them are better than the ten guys

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>they're replacing, including Patrick Peterson now in the secondary from Minnesota,

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Burrow was on pace to throw six hundred passes before

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 1>last year's a c L, so I think through sheer

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 1>volume he comes up with an okay day enough for

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a C grade here, but that's as high as I'm

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>willing to take him. On this first game back, Tee

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Higgins gets a B grade. I mentioned Patrick Peterson as

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the team's best cornerback now, and traditionally Zimmer had used

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Mike zimmerd used his best and biggest cornerback to shadow

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>opposing top receiver receivers, but in recent years he's more

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>anchored his best cornerback on one side of the field.

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 1>We don't know if he's if he's gonna revert back

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 1>to that or not, but assuming he doesn't, that means

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Tee Higgins can avoid Peterson anytime he plays on the

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>other side of the field. So the presumption here is

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>that Higgins will be free enough to earn his B

0:15:56.160 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 1>grade against Brish Odd Bland. Tyler Boyd gets a C

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>grade running out of the slot. McKenzie Alexander returns to

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota where he will resume his slot cornerback role, and

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 1>he could very well hold Tyler Boyd in check. McKenzie

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Alexanders yielded three touchdowns in three seasons in his coverage.

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>That's it one a season with Burrow last year Boyd

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>average day ho homes six receptions, sixty six yards, and

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>point three touchdowns per game. This is okay. That feels

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>like okay, that's a C grade. Last thing Jamar Chase

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 1>after the preseason that he had, I think there's no

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't start him here. I don't think any now.

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's just wait a week and see what develops. I

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>think you get some hand a handful of short confidence

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>building passes for Jamaar Chase, but based on what we saw,

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 1>we cannot end up starting him. When we come back

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>to Fantasy Football Weekly, take a chance on me. Nine

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>players not normally in your starting lineup will tell you

0:16:57.200 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>who you can start that maybe even is available on

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the waiver wire. Is a free agent right now, We'll

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:08.440
<v Speaker 1>identify players that might be better than your starters, and

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you what the quarterback I'm going to give

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you is probably better than your starting quarterback. Find out

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:17.439
<v Speaker 1>who it is when we come back to Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly, Paul Scharchy and from Guillotine

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 1>leagues dot com. Still time to join a Guillotine league.

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:49.439
<v Speaker 1>Full season versions of the Guillotina. This is a totally

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:51.919
<v Speaker 1>new version of taking chance on Me. No, this is

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:53.439
<v Speaker 1>the one that we used at the tail end of

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>last year. I had forgot about that. We we got

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the permission from this band. That's right. This is the

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>non stuck version of take a Dance on Me. This

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:10.160
<v Speaker 1>is awesome. Wow. Alright, Anyway, we've still got full season

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 1>live drafts happening for Guillotine Leagues. If you want to

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 1>join the most exciting new format and fantasy sports happening

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Saturday and Sunday morning before kickoff, that is available take

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>a chance, I mean nine players not normally in your

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:25.679
<v Speaker 1>starting lineup. Many of these guys are available on the

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:28.360
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire. And you can pick them up and start them.

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>This week, we begin with Scott Fish and the quarterback position.

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna start out with Ben Roethlisberger. The matchup isn't

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 1>what you would naturally think is great against the Bills,

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and he didn't do great against the Bills last year,

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 1>but that was at the tail end of the year

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 1>when his arm was starting to die off and when

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the team kind of fell apart in the run game

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:48.119
<v Speaker 1>was non existent. They had like forty yards rushing that

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:51.120
<v Speaker 1>they were forced to pass, and the Bills clamped down

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 1>on that. In this one, He's got Nag Harris's outlet,

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.200
<v Speaker 1>He's got all three of his receivers a little better.

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 1>The arms looked better in the preseason, and they're gonna

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:00.920
<v Speaker 1>be They should be behind so the game. There's seven

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 1>point dogs in this one. I feel like they'll be

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 1>chasing points that Ben. Give me Ben in this one. Okay,

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>your take a chance of me quarterback Matt This is risky,

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>but I'm going with Mac Jones, a rookie in his

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:15.119
<v Speaker 1>first start against the division rival. Not only that he

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>gets to face off against the guy who was ahead

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>of him on the death chart at Alabama. UH the

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 1>line is very sound in front of Mac Jones, and

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the reasons I like this so much.

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Cam Newton enjoyed the seventh most time in a clean

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:29.360
<v Speaker 1>pocket with a past attempt last year, and he still

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:31.920
<v Speaker 1>couldn't do anything with it. And that's why Cam Newton's

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 1>not on this team anymore. Consider that UM according to

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football focuses strength of schedule, the metrics that rate

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 1>each team defense. Based on their grades of this year's defense,

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the Miami Dolphins are the second easiest defense for quarterbacks.

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:48.919
<v Speaker 1>The Dolphins defense faltered against the past down the stretch

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>as well. They allowed over three yards or multiple scores

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>to three of the last four quarterbacks they faced, and

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the only one who didn't, Cam Newton figures might take

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a chance of quarterback is rostered in three percent of leagues. Oh,

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I wonder who that is. If there was ever a

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:13.159
<v Speaker 1>game to start Jimmy Garoppolo. Trey Lance is nursing a

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>cracked finger bone, which means the threat of him platooning

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 1>with Garoppolo is very low and Garoppolo is going to

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:23.879
<v Speaker 1>have all of his weapons healthy. That never happened once

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 1>last year. I you Kittle, Samuel all healthy, and of

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 1>course the Kuda gras. It's Detroit on the schedule. The

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Lions allowed the most passing touchdowns and the third most

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 1>passing yards, and and on paper, the defense looks worse

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 1>this year somehow. So you roll all that together and

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a great opportunity to start Jimmy Garppolo, currently ranked

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 1>my number ten quarterback for this week. I hope his

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 1>kneecaps stay intact, though against the Lions they do like

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 1>to bite him. Yeah, they'll take out kneecaps. Let's go

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>to the running back position, Scott, let's stay right there

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:59.400
<v Speaker 1>with Tray Sermon gets the Lions, who allowed the most

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:02.120
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns to running backs last year as well nearly two

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>per game, allowed over a hundred and sixty yards per

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 1>game to the position. But here's here's the better, better part.

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I like San Francisco should get ahead early in games

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>day won last year, running backs averaged thirty five touches

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>in those wins. Raheemostard has only had more than nineteen

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:22.680
<v Speaker 1>touches once in his entire career. I think we're looking

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:26.119
<v Speaker 1>at fifteen twenty touches for each back this game. At

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>least ten to fifteen for sermon minimum though, is there

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>any rookie you don't love in his first NFL game?

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Apparently not. That was Matt with the last one. Well

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 1>you gave Kyle Pitts an a. We're not gonna let

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that go quietly into the night running. But yes, against

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the Lions, I will love it. Okay, Uh, Matt, let's

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:47.160
<v Speaker 1>go to your take a chance of me running back.

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take an older running back and he's going

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:51.680
<v Speaker 1>up against the Jaguars this week. But let's review the

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:54.239
<v Speaker 1>running backs that torch the Jags down the stretch and

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 1>their measurements. Jonathan Taylor five ten to David Montgomery five

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:04.400
<v Speaker 1>of ten to two, Derrick Henry six three six, Nick

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:07.919
<v Speaker 1>Chubb five ten. You get the big, big big backs.

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>So mark Ingram is five nine to fIF that's okay.

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Philip Lindsay five eighty, David Johnson six one to four.

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>That's the guy. In his full game against the Jags

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:22.680
<v Speaker 1>last year, he told the hundred and three yards. It's

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:25.680
<v Speaker 1>also worth noting the Jags allowed the sixth most receptions

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:28.119
<v Speaker 1>to the running back position last year, and Philip Lindsay

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and mark Ingram both were not involved in their respective

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:35.199
<v Speaker 1>passing games at all last year. David Johnson, there's a

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:40.879
<v Speaker 1>starting NFL running back who is probably available in your league.

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:44.160
<v Speaker 1>There's a reason. Probably you've been poo pooing him all year.

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:47.200
<v Speaker 1>He's not all year. How about for like four years.

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 1>He's not technically good. But Tevin Coleman, rostered in just

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:59.120
<v Speaker 1>twent of Yahoo leagues, is the probable starter for the Jets,

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:03.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's a face. It's a favorable matchup against Carolina.

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>New York's offensive line sports two recent first round picks,

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and Coleman should have some running lanes against last year's

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty four ranked run defense. New defensive line editions the

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Kwon Jones and Morgan Fox might actually be downgrades from

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 1>last year's front four, and Carolina's run defense was particularly

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:22.200
<v Speaker 1>bad at the end of last year, giving up five

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and a half yards per carry over the final seven

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:28.119
<v Speaker 1>games of the year. It's go to the wide receiver position, Scott.

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's just stick with rookies. Then right here comes it's

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Dammy Brown season. Finally Brown season. It's fine, We've been

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:41.640
<v Speaker 1>waiting so long, I have I have anyway, Curtis Samuel

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 1>put on, I R Dammy Brown coming out? What he

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:47.359
<v Speaker 1>does well. What he does well is run down the

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 1>field really fast and go up for contested catches and

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 1>catch ball and us touchdown. And he is paired with

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:58.199
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Fitzpatrick. That is the perfect combo right there with

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Curtis Samuel out. He should see a fall compliment his snaps.

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Finally and he's looked good. All right, Matt, I'm going

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 1>to the tight end position and I have Hunter Henry

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:08.920
<v Speaker 1>who is not on the injury report, which if you've

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 1>ever had him on your fantasy team, you know that's significant. Obviously,

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>John Whu Smith is tight end one on this roster

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:17.479
<v Speaker 1>and everyone knows this, including the Dolphins. So what does

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Bill Belichick do? He deploys the mismatches with Henry and

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 1>John who on the field at the same time. In

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>their last nine games last season, Yeah, there is, the

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins allowed five touchdowns to the tight end position, including

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:35.119
<v Speaker 1>one two then charger Hunter Henry. Oh and by the way,

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Travis Kelsey and Darren Waller each beat them for over

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a hundred yards in the month of December. Oh, Hunter

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Henry mine Is Paris Campbell might take a chance on

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>me wide receiver going up against Seattle play Paris Campbell,

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:50.359
<v Speaker 1>while you can sure it's only a matter of time

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 1>before Campbell succumbs to some bizarre malady that will knock

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:55.640
<v Speaker 1>come out for half of the Sea. He's already gotten

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 1>achilles injury he's dealing with, but he's going to play

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 1>with it. It might be Goiterer's leprosy, inverted nipples, ibs.

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Who knows that it's something's gonna go wrong. But what's

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 1>important is that he's got a juicy matchup in the

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>season opener this week. Would they call inverted nipples just

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 1>upper body injury? That probably probably in the hockey they

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:17.959
<v Speaker 1>would for Campbell plays from the slot, and that's the

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 1>massive week point. In the Seattle secondary, He'll avoid the

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:23.880
<v Speaker 1>solid outside corners they've got Trey Flowers and DJ Read

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 1>and instead he'll see some combination of two different safeties

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:33.400
<v Speaker 1>playing cornerback, Marquis Blair and or Ugo Amadi. Blair has

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>seventy seven NFL snaps under his belt, and Amadi allowed

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>seventy the passes in his coverage last year to be caught.

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I know you haven't seen much of of Paris Campbell

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 1>throughout his career, but remember he was a freakish athlete

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 1>with crazy speed. With t Y Hilton out extra passes

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 1>coming to Paris Campbell, Let's go to one more matchup, Matt,

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and that would be Jackson Bill taking on Houston. Yeah,

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 1>let's start with James Robinson. He gets the A grade.

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Over the final five games of the Houston Texans allowed

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 1>six point three yards per carry two opposing running backs.

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 1>They also allowed two points seven yards before contact, the

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:17.440
<v Speaker 1>worst mark in the league. This might be juicy enough

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:19.880
<v Speaker 1>for Carlos Hide in the revenge game to get get

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 1>a bikey start, but I'll stick with James Robinson as

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the AH Trevor Lawrence. I'm only giving a C grade

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:27.879
<v Speaker 1>to the matchup is right for the running backs in

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 1>this game, so it seems reasonable the Jags wouldn't have

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the rookie throw forty times in his first appearance, although

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>if he does drop back that much. Houston defense had

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:39.400
<v Speaker 1>just seven percent pressure rate on pass plays last year.

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:41.760
<v Speaker 1>That was third worst in the league, and they had J. J.

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:44.159
<v Speaker 1>Watt for a little bit of that. As far as

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the wide receivers go, I don't really like any of

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>them that much. I have se grades on DJ Chark,

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:53.879
<v Speaker 1>Lavisca Chennault, and Marvin Jones Jr. The best matchup is

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>against Vernon Hargraves, the third who's playing for Houston, and

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 1>he's not very good at his job as opposed to

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:02.960
<v Speaker 1>other people in the league. In man coverage last year,

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>he allowed an abysmal pass a rating of one forty

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:09.920
<v Speaker 1>one point two. Jones and Chennault each ran a majority

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 1>of the routes from the slot last year, but in

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:14.679
<v Speaker 1>this matchup, three wide receivers will rarely be on the

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 1>field because get this, the Texans only faced a hundred

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:20.919
<v Speaker 1>and fifty four snaps last year where a slot corner

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 1>was deployed. Wow, that's bizarre. Nobody played three wide receivers

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:28.920
<v Speaker 1>against them because they sucked. I'm nervous that there's only

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty five passes thrown in this game by Lawrence, and

0:27:31.119 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 1>since I don't fully know how each will be deployed,

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather not start any of them. If I have to,

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 1>it would be Chennault first, possibly for carries, then Jones,

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:42.920
<v Speaker 1>then Chark in that order. On the other side, Brandon

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Cooks good old b C. His initials. That's what I'd

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 1>like to give him as a grade to somewhere between

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>those two letters. Um looks like he will have a

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 1>matchup against Shakil Griffin, who allowed seven touchdowns in his

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:58.120
<v Speaker 1>coverage last year down the stretch. Last year, Cooks became

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Deshaun Watson's favorite target. But he's obviously not playing in

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Houston this week. Tyrod Taylor is, and let's talk about him.

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Last year, in his single start for the Chargers, he

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 1>lit up the bengals amazing defense for yards and no scores.

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, in his career in games he started,

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 1>he's averaging two two passing yards and a whopping one

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 1>touchdown per game. We poke fun at Teddy Bridgewater's career numbers,

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 1>but he's way worse. Uh. The Jaguars did give up

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:28.880
<v Speaker 1>multiple touchdowns to nine of the last ten quarterbacks they

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 1>faced last year, but we're still keeping Tiroud on the

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 1>bench as we are with the rest of the receiver's

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Nico Collins, Anthony Miller, Danny Ammondla David Johnson. Of course,

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 1>this might take a chance on me runner and then

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Philip Lindsay. I think that he's a c start as well.

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Being is that he's tops on the depth chart right now,

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and this is a good matchup for running backs. I'm

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna leave Ingram on the bench, but I wonder if

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the Texans could trade mark Ingram back to the Ravens

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>for a late round pick. I think at this point

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 1>that that that chip has sailed for better or worse. Hey,

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to say happy birthday to my dad, who's

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 1>enjoying his seventy one birthday this weekend. Fantastic. Thank you

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 1>for having a great kid, dad. How about that? Um?

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, more matchups, including Pittsburgh taking on Buffalo.

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Now g Harris makes his debut. Scott Fish will tell

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 1>you what to expect from him. Is it an A

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 1>or is it a plus or A? He's getting the

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy ard Park he might get, he might get the

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Ardvark. Well, there's your Ardark first art park of

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the season right there coming out. That's my prediction. We'll

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 1>find out if it comes true when we come back

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to Fantasy Football Weekly. Fantasy Football Weekly continues Paul Charchi

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and Scott Fish and and Matt Harrison with you. You

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:04.800
<v Speaker 1>can follow us on Twitter. I'm at Paul Charchian, Scott

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 1>is at Scott Fish twenty four, and Matt is at

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Explosive Output. Yeah. Pittsburgh takes on Buffalo Scott and let's

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:17.719
<v Speaker 1>start with the running game, shall we. There's an intriguing

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 1>rookie named Naji Harris who will be starting for the

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh Steelers. Will he break the all time single game

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 1>rushing record in this game? No? No, I don't have

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 1>him doing that against the Buffalo Bills wrote underdogs, So

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the game script isn't great in a game that they

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 1>may fall behind, But Naji is pretty good in the

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 1>past game. Should have the volume on both of those fronts.

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 1>His match up against the linebackers is where he's gonna

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 1>make his Hey, it's mostly an a for volume because

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to see any way. He doesn't get touches. Alright,

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 1>great shocking, really really shocked. Thanks. Where do you have

0:30:57.200 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 1>him in your ranks? Top ten? I'm sure I'll tell

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:02.959
<v Speaker 1>in a minute. All right. I already talked about ben

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 1>uh In to take a chance on me segments. So

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 1>let's go to his receivers. I have to Deonte Johnson

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 1>with a B grade. The Bills were the fourth best

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 1>against fantasy wide receivers and PFF has them as a

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>top five secondary. They were top six in yards and touchdowns.

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Allowed last year. Despite that, Johnson's target hog. The game

0:31:19.840 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 1>script is going to be perfect for him trailing, and

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 1>he averaged over eleven targets per game last year when

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 1>he played over fifty of the snaps. That's a lot

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of volume. Sous White might be on him, but they

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 1>are able to move Deontay around quite a bit, and

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 1>White only shadowed his opposing receiver five times out of

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the sixteen games last year, and these are a lot

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 1>of good receivers, so they might just keep him on

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:44.920
<v Speaker 1>his on the left side where he likes to play.

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Chase Claypool I got a C grade. He had thirteen

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 1>red zone targets, was top ten in air yards last

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 1>year in a limited role. As a full starter, I

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 1>think he would get a little more work. He can

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 1>out muscle anyone for the ball. I'm going to give

0:31:57.080 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 1>him that C grade. He's the third of the receivers.

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I like this week though, because I feel like where

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>you can beat the Buffalo Bills is short. So I

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 1>like Deonte and I like Juju. I think it's a

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 1>tough matchup for overall, but Juju should see a decent

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 1>amount of work close to close to the middle of

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the field. Guys like Alan and Cup and Crowder and

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of slot receivers had really good games last

0:32:20.880 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 1>year against these Bills. So I got a B grade there.

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Over to the other side, Josh Allen, I got an

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 1>A grade. T J. Watt's gonna be back. It sounds like,

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, he got finally got that settled. But the

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Bills have a twenty seven and a half implied total there,

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be a lot of points to be had.

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:40.480
<v Speaker 1>UM no QB overhead over three hundred yards and no

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 1>QB through for more than two touchdowns against Pittsburgh last year,

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 1>but Allen was one of them that that had high

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 1>two hundreds and two touchdowns and they added a bunch

0:32:49.120 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 1>of rushing yards. Those rushing yards really helped for Alan

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 1>A grade there. Uh, Stefon Diggs, I think the A

0:32:56.000 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 1>is pretty obvious US. Yeah, he's gonna either get Hayden

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 1>who's thirty two, or Cameron Sutton, who's like in p

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:08.720
<v Speaker 1>F F Frankin's um. As for the other receivers, Davis Sanders, Beasley.

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Sanders is very questionable for this game. He popped back

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 1>up on the injury report. If he doesn't go, there

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 1>might be a dart throw for Davis, but otherwise I'm

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:20.840
<v Speaker 1>benching because it's a little too mucky. Yeah, to the

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 1>running game, it's a it's a lot more muck, a

0:33:24.120 --> 0:33:27.680
<v Speaker 1>lot more muck. Uh. Singletary based on camp talk in

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 1>preseason usage uh, and he's the explosive guy. I mean

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 1>he's he's top ten in the league and plays over

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 1>ten yards and plays over twenty yards since he entered

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the league. He's the explosive guy. But he gets no

0:33:38.480 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 1>goal line work. That's moss. So we don't know what

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 1>either of them are gonna get until I know more

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:44.800
<v Speaker 1>of the usage. I don't want any of them in

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 1>my lineup. Devin Singletary just does nothing for me when

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I watch him. He just I don't see anything that

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 1>any part of his game that pops for me. They're

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:55.480
<v Speaker 1>both pretty ordinary in my mind right now. Zach was

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 1>last year, but this is year two and we've seen Singletary.

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I got a lot more, lot more tape on Singletary

0:34:02.120 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 1>mental tape. I'm not breaking down Singletary tape. Charges take

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 1>on Washington and this might be the hardest game of

0:34:10.040 --> 0:34:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the year for justin air Bear, are you saying the

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 1>air Bear is scared. No, I'm not. Thankfully, the Charges

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 1>upgraded as offensive line in the off season. They got

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Corey Linsley and Rashawn Slater, and they will be tested

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 1>against the best front four in football, including elite rusher's

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Chase Young, Jonathan Allen, and Montes Sweat. From Week six forward,

0:34:32.120 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 1>Washington allowed just one passing touchdown per game and only

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:41.120
<v Speaker 1>one quarterback topped two hundred seventy six yards Week six

0:34:41.160 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 1>forward for Washington last year, and their secondary got better

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:47.760
<v Speaker 1>with the addition of William Jackson. So' all that together.

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I've got a B grade on on Justin air Bear

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'm I contemplated having him with It's it's I

0:34:55.640 --> 0:35:00.480
<v Speaker 1>have concern here for Keenan Allen. Washington secondary yielded second

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 1>fewest scores the fifth fewest yards to opposing receivers. I

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:06.319
<v Speaker 1>don't like that. It looks like um Washington is gonna

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:10.160
<v Speaker 1>move cornerback Kendall Fuller to the slot and he'll be

0:35:10.320 --> 0:35:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Allen's primary defender. He was pretty good last year. He

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:16.840
<v Speaker 1>held opponents scoreless in twelve or fifteen games, and he

0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 1>went a had a five game scoreless stretch to close

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the season. So B grade and Keenan Allen. Mike Williams

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 1>missed most of the preseason with a hip injury, but

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:28.320
<v Speaker 1>he's practicing and he should play here. And he's Williams

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:30.879
<v Speaker 1>entering his fifth season, Mike Williams. And if he's five

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:34.120
<v Speaker 1>seasons and he's twenty six years old, he's still just

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:37.640
<v Speaker 1>a baby. There's still room to improve, which would be nice.

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Um Williams Ligns up all over the field, but most

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 1>frequently see cornerback Darryl Roberts, who has been cast aside

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:47.920
<v Speaker 1>by the Lions the Jets over the past two years.

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:50.279
<v Speaker 1>That is a very plus matchup for Mike Williams, who

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I like in this one quite a bit. A B

0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:56.279
<v Speaker 1>grade from Mike Williams. The other receivers Jalen Guyden and

0:35:56.800 --> 0:35:59.399
<v Speaker 1>rookie Josh Palmer on the bench, they're gonna their third

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 1>receiver due tease, and you know what their roles maybe

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:02.920
<v Speaker 1>is not clear And this is a tough matchup, so

0:36:02.920 --> 0:36:04.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't want a part of it. All right, Let's

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:06.719
<v Speaker 1>talk Austin Neckla where things get thorny. He practiced on

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Friday after missing Wednesday and Thursday with with a hamstring

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:13.759
<v Speaker 1>injury and no injury is more susceptible to aggravation than

0:36:13.760 --> 0:36:16.399
<v Speaker 1>a running backs hamstring injury. I mean, this is and

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you know that's that's what sidelined him for whatever eight

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:22.800
<v Speaker 1>games last year. I love the new improved offensive line,

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 1>but Washington's run defense was good last year. They allowed

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the ninth fewest rushing yards the fourth fewest combo yards

0:36:29.320 --> 0:36:33.200
<v Speaker 1>to opposing running backs. No back caught more than five

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 1>passes against Washington all last year, and that's why we

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:40.280
<v Speaker 1>have Austin Ekeler. So I've got a C grade on Eckler,

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and I'm baking in some of the danger of him

0:36:44.520 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 1>not finishing this game, which I'm very real. Next on

0:36:48.120 --> 0:36:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the Washington side, we'll start with their running back Antonio Gibson,

0:36:51.920 --> 0:36:54.440
<v Speaker 1>with a B grade. No back top eighty two rushing

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:56.840
<v Speaker 1>yards against the Chargers in the entire second half of

0:36:56.960 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 1>last year. They weren't impenetrable. They only give up four

0:36:59.520 --> 0:37:01.399
<v Speaker 1>point They get at four point six yards per carry,

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:03.040
<v Speaker 1>which right in the in the middle of the pack.

0:37:03.480 --> 0:37:06.719
<v Speaker 1>And while we all hope that Gibson will catch more passes,

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the charges were very good there too. Over the final

0:37:09.840 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 1>ten games of last year, opposing runners over only averaged

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:15.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine receiving yards per game, and they scored one

0:37:15.600 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 1>total touchdown over that long stretch to finish the year.

0:37:19.560 --> 0:37:21.920
<v Speaker 1>So I'm nervous about Gibson and I've only got a

0:37:21.960 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 1>B grade on him. Let's go to the passing game.

0:37:24.080 --> 0:37:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Fitzpatrick has a B grade. Unlike any recent Washington quarterback,

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Fitzpatrick impressed the ball down field last year. He finished

0:37:32.920 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 1>eleventh and completed air yards and eighth and yards per attempt. That,

0:37:37.719 --> 0:37:41.240
<v Speaker 1>by the way, despite having the second shortest time to throw.

0:37:41.920 --> 0:37:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Because Fitzpatrick Fitzpatrick is, he will stand in that pocket

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:51.359
<v Speaker 1>and absorb, you know, absolute destruction to his body, which

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I love. Um. The return of elite safety Derwin James

0:37:54.920 --> 0:37:58.520
<v Speaker 1>helps an inconsistent secondary that worries me. They spent a

0:37:58.600 --> 0:38:01.279
<v Speaker 1>draft pick on a Sante Samue, which which could be

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a concern at some point, but it's just his first

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:05.799
<v Speaker 1>ever game. B grade on Ryan Fitzpatrick. Let's go to

0:38:05.880 --> 0:38:12.000
<v Speaker 1>his receivers, specifically Terry McLaurin with an A grade. He

0:38:12.080 --> 0:38:16.960
<v Speaker 1>averaged seventy yards per game with Dwayne Haskins and Alex

0:38:16.960 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Smith and case Keenum throwing him the ball the last

0:38:19.160 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 1>few years. Now he gets a gun slinger to throw

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the ball downfield, and I love the opportunity for him

0:38:26.160 --> 0:38:31.920
<v Speaker 1>to open up this offense. The Chargers defense good. I

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 1>mentioned a Sante Samuel got added to a second day

0:38:34.600 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 1>that was already giving up the seventh few yards to

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:41.399
<v Speaker 1>opposing receivers. Um McLaurin has an experienced advantage over Samuel, though,

0:38:41.440 --> 0:38:43.400
<v Speaker 1>so we'll keep him with the A grade. And the

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:45.920
<v Speaker 1>last guy I want to really talk about his Logan Thomas.

0:38:45.920 --> 0:38:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Thomas ran over six his snaps from the slot, the

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:51.719
<v Speaker 1>third highest percentage among tight ends. He was also targeted

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the third most times one five times. Last season, The

0:38:55.400 --> 0:38:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Chargers allowed the twelfth most fantasy points to tight end

0:38:58.120 --> 0:39:01.719
<v Speaker 1>and the fourth most touchdowns. Thomas's will most oftense. He

0:39:01.760 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 1>coverage from linebacker Kenneth Murray, who struggled as a rookie

0:39:05.200 --> 0:39:09.239
<v Speaker 1>last year and graded is the tenth worst rookie of

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:13.560
<v Speaker 1>tenth worst linebacker in coverage by Pro Football Focus. So

0:39:13.600 --> 0:39:16.439
<v Speaker 1>I like logan Thomas and he's gotta be grade Diamie Brown,

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:19.480
<v Speaker 1>was your take a chance on me? Wide receiver? By

0:39:19.800 --> 0:39:23.759
<v Speaker 1>the way, Thomas over a thousand snaps last year, like

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that was first among tenants. He's just always

0:39:25.800 --> 0:39:27.640
<v Speaker 1>on the field, which is what we need that, right

0:39:27.800 --> 0:39:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Who doesn't want that? We all do alright. Final matchup

0:39:29.760 --> 0:39:32.040
<v Speaker 1>of this segment is the New York Jets taking on

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:36.319
<v Speaker 1>Carolina Matt Yeah. Um, let's start with the obvious guy here,

0:39:36.400 --> 0:39:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Dan Arnold, who gets a C grade. This grade reflects

0:39:39.800 --> 0:39:42.040
<v Speaker 1>my fear of a Brian Johnson backlash if I leave

0:39:42.080 --> 0:39:44.279
<v Speaker 1>him on the bench. Not actually, but he will be

0:39:44.320 --> 0:39:47.480
<v Speaker 1>going up against the once grade C. J Moseley, who

0:39:47.520 --> 0:39:51.279
<v Speaker 1>hasn't played meaningful football since the end of so I

0:39:51.360 --> 0:39:53.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of like Dan Arnold in this little bit here,

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:55.799
<v Speaker 1>and let's let's give him a see, also giving his

0:39:56.160 --> 0:40:00.040
<v Speaker 1>passing partner Sam Donald a C. Almost every quarterback to

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 1>face the Jets last year had a good day. It's

0:40:02.120 --> 0:40:03.920
<v Speaker 1>too many of the list, but three hundred yards and

0:40:03.920 --> 0:40:06.799
<v Speaker 1>three passing scores was very common, and Donald should know.

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:09.640
<v Speaker 1>He got to dominate this defense in practice for three years.

0:40:09.880 --> 0:40:12.359
<v Speaker 1>So here's the revenge game right off the bat. It's

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:15.480
<v Speaker 1>hard to remember a lot of great Sam Donald moments,

0:40:15.480 --> 0:40:20.080
<v Speaker 1>but against bottom eight past defenses in his career, he's

0:40:20.080 --> 0:40:22.800
<v Speaker 1>fared pretty well in those seven career starts against bottom

0:40:22.880 --> 0:40:25.319
<v Speaker 1>eight pass defenses and the Jets were holding one of

0:40:25.320 --> 0:40:28.040
<v Speaker 1>those spots a lot of the time. He's averaging two

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:31.080
<v Speaker 1>seventy five yards and one point six touchdowns per game.

0:40:31.160 --> 0:40:33.680
<v Speaker 1>That's not bad. It doesn't hurt that he had now

0:40:33.719 --> 0:40:36.640
<v Speaker 1>has good wide receivers to including one of his favorites

0:40:36.680 --> 0:40:39.600
<v Speaker 1>from his old Jets days, Robbie Anderson, who had his

0:40:39.680 --> 0:40:41.800
<v Speaker 1>best years as a pro with Donald. The two connected

0:40:41.840 --> 0:40:44.919
<v Speaker 1>for eleven touchdowns in twenty five career games. I'm giving

0:40:45.000 --> 0:40:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Robbie Anderson and d J Moore a b. Anderson gets

0:40:48.840 --> 0:40:51.239
<v Speaker 1>Bryce Hall, who gave up a passer rating of one

0:40:51.280 --> 0:40:54.120
<v Speaker 1>oh three in his coverage last year, while DJ Moore

0:40:54.200 --> 0:40:59.319
<v Speaker 1>goes against undrafted free agent rookie Isaiah Donne. I'm not

0:40:59.480 --> 0:41:02.440
<v Speaker 1>going to put Terrace Marshall on the field, even though

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:05.839
<v Speaker 1>Scott Fish wants to. I'm gonna give him the weight

0:41:05.920 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and c grade um he was. He was a great

0:41:09.440 --> 0:41:12.200
<v Speaker 1>preseason player. But if you have drafted a few wide receivers,

0:41:12.280 --> 0:41:15.000
<v Speaker 1>you probably have a few ahead of terrorists the fourth

0:41:15.000 --> 0:41:18.319
<v Speaker 1>receiving option on that team. That's completely understanding. That's true.

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Christian McCaffrey, he gets an a. We're moving on to

0:41:20.640 --> 0:41:22.799
<v Speaker 1>the running game on the Jet side where charts use

0:41:22.840 --> 0:41:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Tevin coleman as to take a chance on me runner,

0:41:25.040 --> 0:41:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna sit and wait on Michael Carter or

0:41:27.400 --> 0:41:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Ty Johnson to see how that one shakes out. Zack Wilson,

0:41:30.920 --> 0:41:33.239
<v Speaker 1>he gets a C grade. This is a really a

0:41:33.360 --> 0:41:36.000
<v Speaker 1>tale of how bad the Jets defense is for me

0:41:36.480 --> 0:41:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and how I foresee a lot of garbage time coming

0:41:38.800 --> 0:41:42.040
<v Speaker 1>their way the season now. Brian Johnson submitted the names

0:41:42.160 --> 0:41:45.239
<v Speaker 1>carbage time for Derek Carr back on the day dart

0:41:45.320 --> 0:41:48.600
<v Speaker 1>board ledge time for Bartles worked for me, So I

0:41:48.640 --> 0:41:53.120
<v Speaker 1>submit for your approval. Chart scraps Wilson, Oh, I like,

0:41:54.040 --> 0:41:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and he's gonna get the scraps at the end of

0:41:55.600 --> 0:41:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the game. Scraps at the end of the game. The

0:41:58.000 --> 0:42:01.399
<v Speaker 1>Panthers only intercepted two passes in the final eight games

0:42:01.480 --> 0:42:05.359
<v Speaker 1>last year. Both were off of Dwayne Haskins. So Zack

0:42:05.400 --> 0:42:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Wilson and garbage time in Scraps Wilson time. I like his.

0:42:10.000 --> 0:42:12.120
<v Speaker 1>His top receiver of the week is gonna be Corey Davis,

0:42:12.120 --> 0:42:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and I'm giving him a solid beat. The Jets will

0:42:14.040 --> 0:42:16.439
<v Speaker 1>need to throw off in the second half, likely deep,

0:42:16.800 --> 0:42:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and Davis was a ninth in the NFL with fifteen

0:42:19.320 --> 0:42:22.000
<v Speaker 1>point one yards per catch last year, and his average

0:42:22.000 --> 0:42:26.200
<v Speaker 1>depth of target was a robust twelve point five yards. Uh.

0:42:26.280 --> 0:42:29.560
<v Speaker 1>And then finally, the last receiver that I want to

0:42:29.560 --> 0:42:32.319
<v Speaker 1>talk about, Jamison Crowder. He's gonna miss the game with

0:42:32.360 --> 0:42:35.840
<v Speaker 1>an injury. So fire up Elijah Moore with a C grade.

0:42:35.600 --> 0:42:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Scott Fish is gonna like that. There we go A

0:42:38.520 --> 0:42:40.799
<v Speaker 1>j Booyer was set to start at slot corner, but

0:42:40.800 --> 0:42:43.560
<v Speaker 1>he's serving the final two games of his pe D suspension,

0:42:43.640 --> 0:42:47.800
<v Speaker 1>leaving fifth round rookie Keith Taylor or Stanley Thomas Oliver

0:42:47.960 --> 0:42:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to cover the slot. Thomas Oliver gave up a passer

0:42:50.880 --> 0:42:53.480
<v Speaker 1>rating of one fifty three in his fifty two snaps

0:42:53.560 --> 0:42:58.800
<v Speaker 1>lest season almost snap almost. So hey, let's go with

0:42:58.960 --> 0:43:02.480
<v Speaker 1>j Elijah Moore as a C grade. Well done. You

0:43:02.520 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 1>brought actual enthusiasm to the Jets Panthers game. I like that.

0:43:05.680 --> 0:43:08.480
<v Speaker 1>You know it's gonna be that is that is that

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:10.279
<v Speaker 1>is fun? All right? I want I want to We've

0:43:10.280 --> 0:43:13.360
<v Speaker 1>got about a minute left in in this segment. What

0:43:13.640 --> 0:43:18.080
<v Speaker 1>is the appropriate level of concern for Ezekiel Elliott owners

0:43:18.320 --> 0:43:22.439
<v Speaker 1>coming off the dismal Thursday night game. Some I think

0:43:22.440 --> 0:43:25.520
<v Speaker 1>it's some yeah, yeah, I think there's going to be

0:43:25.560 --> 0:43:28.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of panicked owners in your league's are trying

0:43:28.560 --> 0:43:30.399
<v Speaker 1>to wanting to trade him, or you might be able

0:43:30.400 --> 0:43:33.480
<v Speaker 1>to get a good deal off of him. But honestly,

0:43:33.600 --> 0:43:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I thought Paulard looked a little better than Zeke blocking

0:43:36.400 --> 0:43:40.319
<v Speaker 1>a bunch is blocking was great in that game. It

0:43:40.440 --> 0:43:43.600
<v Speaker 1>was that does not help fantasy owners at all, paular did.

0:43:43.719 --> 0:43:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I thought he ran harder. Tampa is a legendarily good

0:43:48.160 --> 0:43:51.399
<v Speaker 1>that is the run defense, and so we gotta take

0:43:51.400 --> 0:43:55.200
<v Speaker 1>this with a grain assault like running back twenty four.

0:43:55.239 --> 0:43:57.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, I was very nervous. Here's that

0:43:57.440 --> 0:44:00.400
<v Speaker 1>everybody going against Tampa. I think it should be compared

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:02.120
<v Speaker 1>to where you drafted him because I felt like he

0:44:02.200 --> 0:44:04.640
<v Speaker 1>was overdrafted. I didn't have him in my top five

0:44:04.719 --> 0:44:08.160
<v Speaker 1>running backs where most people did this This show, this

0:44:08.160 --> 0:44:11.600
<v Speaker 1>show has figured that out many times in the past.

0:44:11.920 --> 0:44:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Our number two coming up, including three tough questions. You

0:44:15.120 --> 0:44:17.759
<v Speaker 1>can play along as we try as my co host

0:44:17.760 --> 0:44:21.120
<v Speaker 1>try to go three and oh Stay tuned Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:44:45.320 --> 0:44:48.359
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back our number two Fantasy Football Weekly. I am

0:44:48.360 --> 0:44:50.759
<v Speaker 1>Paul Charchi and from Guillotine Leagues dot com, my co

0:44:50.880 --> 0:44:57.759
<v Speaker 1>host Scott Fish and Matt Harrison from shock Fantasy dot com. Right, uh,

0:44:57.960 --> 0:45:00.120
<v Speaker 1>there's still time to get into a full season a

0:45:00.200 --> 0:45:05.080
<v Speaker 1>teen league drafts happening Saturday and Sunday morning. You can

0:45:05.120 --> 0:45:06.840
<v Speaker 1>still get into a guillotine league if you'd like to

0:45:06.880 --> 0:45:09.080
<v Speaker 1>go to Guillotine leagues dot com. We also have private

0:45:09.120 --> 0:45:11.920
<v Speaker 1>leagues for between eight and eighteen owners. If you've got

0:45:11.960 --> 0:45:14.120
<v Speaker 1>friends that have always wanted to try the guillotine league format,

0:45:14.200 --> 0:45:15.759
<v Speaker 1>this is this is your chance. And if you have

0:45:15.760 --> 0:45:18.439
<v Speaker 1>a strange amount of owners, like you have nine people

0:45:18.440 --> 0:45:20.400
<v Speaker 1>who want to play a fantasy league, you don't have

0:45:20.480 --> 0:45:23.359
<v Speaker 1>to about getting the even number. You just head to head.

0:45:23.360 --> 0:45:26.040
<v Speaker 1>You know. Yeah, if you got an odd number you

0:45:26.040 --> 0:45:27.800
<v Speaker 1>don't have, you can you can actually get away with

0:45:27.800 --> 0:45:30.200
<v Speaker 1>it in a guillotine like. Good job of fleshing out

0:45:30.200 --> 0:45:33.560
<v Speaker 1>what an odd number was. Well, you're pretty good at

0:45:33.560 --> 0:45:35.560
<v Speaker 1>dividing by two, so let's see if you can do

0:45:35.680 --> 0:45:40.279
<v Speaker 1>nine divided by two. I can't too hard. There's a

0:45:40.280 --> 0:45:42.719
<v Speaker 1>game we call three tough questions. I will pepper my

0:45:42.760 --> 0:45:45.320
<v Speaker 1>co host with three tough questions. They will try to

0:45:45.360 --> 0:45:46.960
<v Speaker 1>go three and oh, we encourage you to play a lot.

0:45:47.120 --> 0:45:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Tough question number one which Ravens running back will score

0:45:50.840 --> 0:45:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the most Fantasy points this year? Scott, I'm just gonna

0:45:54.200 --> 0:45:56.439
<v Speaker 1>stick with Tyson Williams. This is the guy that Matt

0:45:56.480 --> 0:45:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Waldman and football guys in the RSP profile said give

0:45:59.520 --> 0:46:01.360
<v Speaker 1>him one to two years and he has the talent

0:46:01.400 --> 0:46:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to outplay a lot of draft picks. He he liked

0:46:04.640 --> 0:46:06.759
<v Speaker 1>him a lot. The team seems to like him a lot.

0:46:06.760 --> 0:46:09.319
<v Speaker 1>They did bring in Lottavius Murray, who feels like a

0:46:09.480 --> 0:46:12.839
<v Speaker 1>really good fit for that Ravens offense. The quotes coming

0:46:12.840 --> 0:46:15.040
<v Speaker 1>out of there this week seemed to indicate that they

0:46:15.120 --> 0:46:17.480
<v Speaker 1>want Levian Bell to be involved. He's just doesn't have

0:46:17.520 --> 0:46:19.879
<v Speaker 1>his legs under him yet, so it's gonna be kind

0:46:19.880 --> 0:46:21.960
<v Speaker 1>of gross. But they run the ball a ton, and

0:46:22.120 --> 0:46:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna give it to the young guy because

0:46:24.080 --> 0:46:26.200
<v Speaker 1>he's the one that's been there all through camp and

0:46:26.320 --> 0:46:28.279
<v Speaker 1>on the practice squad last year as well. All Right, Matt,

0:46:28.280 --> 0:46:30.840
<v Speaker 1>which Ravens running back will score the most Fantasy points

0:46:30.840 --> 0:46:32.200
<v Speaker 1>this year? I just want to know if you're a

0:46:32.200 --> 0:46:35.320
<v Speaker 1>fan of eighth year running backs, because that's what Levian

0:46:35.440 --> 0:46:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Bell is in his eighth year, Lottavius Murray eighth year.

0:46:39.000 --> 0:46:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Even if you go to Davante Freeman. He's in his

0:46:41.080 --> 0:46:44.319
<v Speaker 1>eighth year. Tyson Williams is a twenty five year old,

0:46:44.360 --> 0:46:49.360
<v Speaker 1>which is old for a rookie. Second, but big dude,

0:46:49.440 --> 0:46:52.560
<v Speaker 1>six ft zero, I'm not gonna go with an eighth

0:46:52.640 --> 0:46:56.680
<v Speaker 1>year alright, Greece, Scott Fish Tyson Williams. Correct answer is

0:46:57.080 --> 0:47:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Tyson Williams. And by the way I've learned watching went

0:47:00.200 --> 0:47:02.400
<v Speaker 1>back and watched a lot of Tyson Williams to you know,

0:47:02.440 --> 0:47:04.319
<v Speaker 1>get all prepped up on this and and that's how

0:47:04.360 --> 0:47:08.160
<v Speaker 1>they were pronouncing his name, Tyson, not Tyson, so just

0:47:09.719 --> 0:47:12.919
<v Speaker 1>the apost Tyson. You never know. But and that's that's

0:47:12.960 --> 0:47:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the case here. Um. As of three days ago, he

0:47:17.560 --> 0:47:21.000
<v Speaker 1>was the only Ravens runner on the team. Right, that's

0:47:21.000 --> 0:47:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a well, a massive institutional advantage was there until I'm

0:47:26.000 --> 0:47:29.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about guys who do not have blown out um,

0:47:29.080 --> 0:47:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and that gives him the chance to establish himself as

0:47:32.120 --> 0:47:34.480
<v Speaker 1>a viable lead back in the first month of the

0:47:34.520 --> 0:47:38.160
<v Speaker 1>season by being good and listen to the defenses that

0:47:38.160 --> 0:47:41.520
<v Speaker 1>are coming up. The Raiders on Monday Night ranked twenty

0:47:41.560 --> 0:47:44.160
<v Speaker 1>five and rushing yards allowed last year, then the Chiefs

0:47:44.160 --> 0:47:47.640
<v Speaker 1>they ranked three, then the Lions and then the Broncos

0:47:47.680 --> 0:47:51.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty two last year in rushing yards allowed that easy

0:47:51.440 --> 0:47:55.640
<v Speaker 1>runway in is going to establish Tyson Williams as the

0:47:55.719 --> 0:47:58.600
<v Speaker 1>go to back. And if you're worried about the pass

0:47:58.640 --> 0:48:01.640
<v Speaker 1>catching side with be On Bell, they threw a running

0:48:01.640 --> 0:48:05.279
<v Speaker 1>backs fifty times last year total. I thought maybe that's

0:48:05.280 --> 0:48:09.319
<v Speaker 1>a fluke fifty one the year before. They just don't

0:48:09.360 --> 0:48:12.319
<v Speaker 1>do that. Um Lottavias Murray has been a relief back

0:48:12.360 --> 0:48:15.400
<v Speaker 1>since seen and even that year he was supposed to

0:48:15.480 --> 0:48:17.239
<v Speaker 1>be a backup. He just he is what he is,

0:48:17.280 --> 0:48:19.239
<v Speaker 1>which is a role player backup back, and that's what

0:48:19.280 --> 0:48:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Ottavias Murray's is going to remain tough. Question Number two

0:48:24.920 --> 0:48:28.200
<v Speaker 1>forty Niners starting quarterback Jimmy Garoppolos rostered in three percent

0:48:28.239 --> 0:48:31.359
<v Speaker 1>of fantasy leagues. Is that appropriate or is that a mistake? Man,

0:48:31.800 --> 0:48:33.920
<v Speaker 1>At least for the first few weeks. It's a mistake

0:48:33.960 --> 0:48:36.680
<v Speaker 1>because he should be on rosters. The Niners get the

0:48:36.719 --> 0:48:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Lions this week, he should put up nice points in

0:48:38.520 --> 0:48:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that game. The Eagles next week, same thing. After that,

0:48:41.320 --> 0:48:44.319
<v Speaker 1>home games against the Packers and Seahawks both have very

0:48:44.400 --> 0:48:47.080
<v Speaker 1>burnable secondaries and should be more of a shootout. And

0:48:47.080 --> 0:48:49.520
<v Speaker 1>then at Arizona the next week. That should be more

0:48:49.560 --> 0:48:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of the same. Their secondaries not great either. Then they

0:48:52.040 --> 0:48:54.000
<v Speaker 1>go into a by and come out of the bye

0:48:54.200 --> 0:48:56.760
<v Speaker 1>in Week seven against the Colts on Sunday Night football.

0:48:56.760 --> 0:48:59.200
<v Speaker 1>So if they're gonna make a switch, it would make

0:48:59.280 --> 0:49:01.799
<v Speaker 1>sense in the week six by. But they're gonna be

0:49:01.920 --> 0:49:05.120
<v Speaker 1>five and oh after the first five weeks, so it's

0:49:05.120 --> 0:49:08.160
<v Speaker 1>a mistake. He belongs on rosters until they name Trey

0:49:08.239 --> 0:49:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Lance the starter. The green Bay game could be a loss. Yeah,

0:49:11.520 --> 0:49:14.239
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say, I think I disagree with the

0:49:14.280 --> 0:49:18.759
<v Speaker 1>green Bay part um. Uh my. My instinct is to say,

0:49:19.040 --> 0:49:23.279
<v Speaker 1>now they're they're twelve fourteen quarterbacks that everybody's gonna have

0:49:23.360 --> 0:49:26.480
<v Speaker 1>on rosters and be starting because they drafted them as starters.

0:49:26.719 --> 0:49:28.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's why he's at three percent. You can pick

0:49:28.760 --> 0:49:31.200
<v Speaker 1>him up off waivers for the next few weeks. But

0:49:31.440 --> 0:49:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I think Matt kind of convinced me on the fly there,

0:49:36.320 --> 0:49:39.760
<v Speaker 1>given that schedule, I would want him on my roster,

0:49:39.960 --> 0:49:42.160
<v Speaker 1>So I can, you know, make the matchup play for

0:49:42.200 --> 0:49:44.920
<v Speaker 1>a few of those correct, That is the correct answer.

0:49:45.000 --> 0:49:47.799
<v Speaker 1>He should be on right, it should be he should

0:49:47.840 --> 0:49:50.680
<v Speaker 1>be rostered. You get the here's the advantages that come

0:49:50.719 --> 0:49:54.160
<v Speaker 1>with Jimmy Garoppolo, the best offensive coach in the NFL,

0:49:54.560 --> 0:49:59.759
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Shanahan. He is throwing to three receivers everybody loves

0:50:00.120 --> 0:50:03.880
<v Speaker 1>universally Kittle. Are you can, Samuel? And you mentioned the schedule,

0:50:03.920 --> 0:50:06.279
<v Speaker 1>which was which is a no brainer. Four of the

0:50:06.320 --> 0:50:10.600
<v Speaker 1>first five games are easy for him. All those reasons

0:50:10.640 --> 0:50:15.000
<v Speaker 1>together and Jimmy Garoppolo should be rostered. He was might

0:50:15.040 --> 0:50:18.000
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on the quarterback. He was a really

0:50:18.200 --> 0:50:21.800
<v Speaker 1>tough question. Number three. I told you the answer earlier.

0:50:21.880 --> 0:50:25.520
<v Speaker 1>You did, uh, Scott, Yeah, we're one year removed from

0:50:25.600 --> 0:50:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Jamis Winson being the second highest scoring fantasy quarterback this year.

0:50:30.920 --> 0:50:35.120
<v Speaker 1>What grade will he most commonly get from Fantasy Football

0:50:35.160 --> 0:50:39.640
<v Speaker 1>weekly hosts and A, A, B, A C or a

0:50:39.719 --> 0:50:44.399
<v Speaker 1>bench grade? Ah See, I wanted to say his most

0:50:44.440 --> 0:50:48.760
<v Speaker 1>common grade will be ungraded take a chance on me players, Winston,

0:50:50.320 --> 0:50:52.680
<v Speaker 1>but take a chance of me. Players can still get grade, Yes,

0:50:52.719 --> 0:50:55.040
<v Speaker 1>they still can. Uh. He has the field that take

0:50:55.040 --> 0:50:56.759
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me. Guy, he's got He's got a

0:50:56.760 --> 0:51:00.960
<v Speaker 1>schedule that's uh supposedly tenth easiest for quarterbacks according to

0:51:01.000 --> 0:51:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Points and second to easiest schedule for quarterbacks according

0:51:04.840 --> 0:51:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to pro FO Pro Football Focus, however, the front five

0:51:09.239 --> 0:51:12.239
<v Speaker 1>is one of the worst in the league so early on,

0:51:12.360 --> 0:51:13.799
<v Speaker 1>not a whole lot of them. But I'm gonna say

0:51:13.800 --> 0:51:15.400
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna get a lot of B grades come the

0:51:15.520 --> 0:51:18.600
<v Speaker 1>end of the come the second half, B is your aunt. Alright,

0:51:18.840 --> 0:51:22.919
<v Speaker 1>Matt should what grade will Jamis Winston most commonly get

0:51:23.320 --> 0:51:26.840
<v Speaker 1>from Fantasy Football Weekly hosts, A, B, C or bench.

0:51:27.200 --> 0:51:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I went through the schedule. I gave him three a's,

0:51:30.160 --> 0:51:33.640
<v Speaker 1>nine B s, and five c's. However, so be is

0:51:33.680 --> 0:51:36.920
<v Speaker 1>my answer right now. But there's caveat here. If Taysom

0:51:37.040 --> 0:51:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Hill gets meaningful snaps in these first couple of weeks

0:51:39.600 --> 0:51:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and and Jamis Winston's not on the field, fully, we're

0:51:43.000 --> 0:51:45.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna move him down a full letter grade on each

0:51:45.120 --> 0:51:48.200
<v Speaker 1>of those. So if if Taysom Hill is getting work,

0:51:48.400 --> 0:51:53.719
<v Speaker 1>he's probably a C grade player. I also estimated all

0:51:53.760 --> 0:51:57.000
<v Speaker 1>seventeen games and had good for you and almost dead

0:51:57.040 --> 0:51:59.600
<v Speaker 1>even distribution four four four four, But one of them

0:51:59.640 --> 0:52:01.880
<v Speaker 1>had a five five and that was the B grade.

0:52:02.280 --> 0:52:05.080
<v Speaker 1>So the correct answer is b um. Many people are

0:52:05.120 --> 0:52:07.680
<v Speaker 1>really down on Winston right now. You're going undrafted in

0:52:07.719 --> 0:52:11.000
<v Speaker 1>most leagues are very late drafted. In most leagues. But

0:52:11.120 --> 0:52:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, as the season progresses and we're gonna have

0:52:14.560 --> 0:52:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the return to health of Trey Kwon Smith, who's on

0:52:17.480 --> 0:52:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I R now but can come back. Adam Troutman is

0:52:19.960 --> 0:52:22.759
<v Speaker 1>gonna come back, Michael Thomas is gonna come back. As

0:52:22.800 --> 0:52:24.719
<v Speaker 1>the season goes on, I get the feeling I'm gonna

0:52:24.719 --> 0:52:29.920
<v Speaker 1>be increasingly wishing I had more shares of Jameis Winston.

0:52:30.000 --> 0:52:33.960
<v Speaker 1>It's like a pre premature special people remember the thirty interception.

0:52:33.960 --> 0:52:36.440
<v Speaker 1>You're he'd never had a team before that, more than

0:52:36.440 --> 0:52:38.360
<v Speaker 1>any team before that. He got lace sick. He's with

0:52:38.360 --> 0:52:40.319
<v Speaker 1>Sean Payton, who I trust to keep him locked down

0:52:40.320 --> 0:52:43.279
<v Speaker 1>on that. He eats w's yeah, he eats. Nope, you

0:52:43.320 --> 0:52:45.960
<v Speaker 1>know sometimes he does. But maybe Sean Payton will get

0:52:45.960 --> 0:52:47.840
<v Speaker 1>that out of him. Let's work in one more matchup

0:52:47.840 --> 0:52:51.319
<v Speaker 1>into this segment, San Francisco taking on Detroit Scott. Yes,

0:52:51.480 --> 0:52:54.600
<v Speaker 1>so you had Jimmy Garoppolo as your take a chance

0:52:54.600 --> 0:52:56.600
<v Speaker 1>on me player. Well, at letter grade would you give him?

0:52:57.040 --> 0:52:59.319
<v Speaker 1>I would have given him a B possibly like I

0:52:59.360 --> 0:53:03.520
<v Speaker 1>have him at the leave tenth in my UM. And

0:53:03.600 --> 0:53:05.480
<v Speaker 1>here I'm going to go through the players and tell

0:53:05.520 --> 0:53:08.719
<v Speaker 1>you why you were right why you charged, were right

0:53:08.800 --> 0:53:14.560
<v Speaker 1>with you? Yes, okay. I'm gonna start with George Kittle.

0:53:14.640 --> 0:53:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Last year, Kittle, Deebo and a yuk Uh, Deebo Samuel

0:53:18.000 --> 0:53:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and Brandon Aiyuke. We're all healthy together for four games.

0:53:21.040 --> 0:53:24.920
<v Speaker 1>In those four games, Kittle had forty targets when they

0:53:24.920 --> 0:53:27.919
<v Speaker 1>were all playing together. That's a lot, and he led

0:53:27.960 --> 0:53:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the team in targets or tied for the lead in

0:53:30.280 --> 0:53:33.320
<v Speaker 1>all four games. Three of those were Jimmy G starts.

0:53:33.480 --> 0:53:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Lions were top five against tight ends, but they did

0:53:35.600 --> 0:53:39.280
<v Speaker 1>allow a bunch of touchdowns nine times to be exact

0:53:40.000 --> 0:53:45.480
<v Speaker 1>um and ended the season. And they ended the season

0:53:45.520 --> 0:53:48.440
<v Speaker 1>allowing seventy plus yards and or a score in each

0:53:48.480 --> 0:53:50.920
<v Speaker 1>of the last five games to tight ends. So I

0:53:50.920 --> 0:53:53.239
<v Speaker 1>have an A grade on Kittle. I'm gonna go down

0:53:53.280 --> 0:53:55.520
<v Speaker 1>to a B grade for Deebo Samuel, who I think

0:53:55.520 --> 0:53:57.080
<v Speaker 1>will be a little bit of an extension to the

0:53:57.160 --> 0:54:00.960
<v Speaker 1>run game. He's got a juicy matchup against drafted free

0:54:01.000 --> 0:54:05.239
<v Speaker 1>agent rookie cornerback A J. Parker. Uh. Expect a run

0:54:05.280 --> 0:54:07.440
<v Speaker 1>heavy game script, but like I said, he's you know,

0:54:07.520 --> 0:54:09.600
<v Speaker 1>he'll they'll be ahead, run ahead of the game script.

0:54:10.080 --> 0:54:12.200
<v Speaker 1>But I think he's an extension of the run game.

0:54:12.239 --> 0:54:14.719
<v Speaker 1>So I'm giving him a B got auke with a C.

0:54:15.320 --> 0:54:18.160
<v Speaker 1>He's going up against a manio who is ranked a

0:54:18.239 --> 0:54:21.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred by PFF. But is that his first hand last

0:54:21.120 --> 0:54:24.920
<v Speaker 1>name is his first name? Oh, that's just what he's

0:54:25.560 --> 0:54:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I thought he had act. He was just like, his

0:54:30.080 --> 0:54:32.320
<v Speaker 1>last name is the name that you would try to pronounce,

0:54:32.400 --> 0:54:37.000
<v Speaker 1>but I did not give it. But a big size

0:54:37.040 --> 0:54:40.040
<v Speaker 1>guy able to be press coverage, I like you, but

0:54:40.120 --> 0:54:42.040
<v Speaker 1>he's got a hamstring injury. I'm only giving the C

0:54:42.200 --> 0:54:46.640
<v Speaker 1>grade here. Over to the run game, I already talked about.

0:54:47.239 --> 0:54:49.479
<v Speaker 1>Sermon In might take a chance on me. I'm given

0:54:49.520 --> 0:54:52.160
<v Speaker 1>mostard an A. This is a Lions team, Like we said,

0:54:52.640 --> 0:54:57.120
<v Speaker 1>this is a Lions team that allowed nearly two touchdowns

0:54:57.160 --> 0:54:59.080
<v Speaker 1>per game to running backs last year, over a hundred

0:54:59.120 --> 0:55:02.280
<v Speaker 1>six yards per game when when the four Niners are ahead,

0:55:02.480 --> 0:55:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the running backs touched the ball thirty five plus times.

0:55:06.680 --> 0:55:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Even if you get most or twenty of those against

0:55:09.320 --> 0:55:11.799
<v Speaker 1>this Lions team, he's gonna come up with a grade.

0:55:11.800 --> 0:55:14.080
<v Speaker 1>He's my number six rank running back. I've got an

0:55:14.080 --> 0:55:16.839
<v Speaker 1>A grade on him as well. Yes, over onto the

0:55:16.920 --> 0:55:20.319
<v Speaker 1>rams side, or excuse me, the ram side because Jared

0:55:20.360 --> 0:55:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Goff the Lions side. I have a grade on t J. Hockenson.

0:55:26.920 --> 0:55:28.719
<v Speaker 1>I have a B grade there. I have a grade

0:55:28.760 --> 0:55:30.360
<v Speaker 1>on him. Yeah, I will tell you what it is.

0:55:31.000 --> 0:55:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I have a grade on two players. T J. Hawkinson

0:55:33.680 --> 0:55:36.319
<v Speaker 1>should be a target hog established himself and as golf

0:55:36.400 --> 0:55:39.640
<v Speaker 1>security blanket. Uh. That said, the four Niners allowed the

0:55:39.680 --> 0:55:42.919
<v Speaker 1>fewest yards and second fewest touchdowns the tight ends last year.

0:55:43.160 --> 0:55:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Their their defense should be healthier than last year. But

0:55:45.920 --> 0:55:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I just think Golf is gonna target him a ton. Uh.

0:55:49.120 --> 0:55:51.920
<v Speaker 1>The reason I don't have any grade on any of

0:55:51.960 --> 0:55:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the other receivers for this team is Golf is facing

0:55:55.680 --> 0:55:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a four NS defense that was top ten in several

0:55:58.239 --> 0:56:02.640
<v Speaker 1>categories last year, and and Golf downgraded he had a

0:56:02.640 --> 0:56:05.360
<v Speaker 1>bad year last year, and he downgraded his offensive coach

0:56:05.640 --> 0:56:08.640
<v Speaker 1>his receiving options. It's a bad matchup everything. So all

0:56:08.680 --> 0:56:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the receivers except for Hawkinson due to volume, is going

0:56:13.160 --> 0:56:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to be on the bunch in the running game. I'm

0:56:16.680 --> 0:56:19.279
<v Speaker 1>giving DeAndre Swift a B grade because I think they'll

0:56:19.320 --> 0:56:21.800
<v Speaker 1>be in a negative game. Script have to pass a bunch.

0:56:22.160 --> 0:56:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Dan Campbell and Anthony Lynn's team's last year passed to

0:56:24.880 --> 0:56:27.359
<v Speaker 1>the running back over twenty five percent of the time,

0:56:27.719 --> 0:56:30.040
<v Speaker 1>which is a lot of passes to running back and

0:56:30.080 --> 0:56:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Swift is that role they've mentioned, He's that role. So

0:56:33.400 --> 0:56:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to give him the volume and enough passwork

0:56:35.840 --> 0:56:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to get a B grade, but I'm leaving Williams on

0:56:38.000 --> 0:56:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the bench for this week at least. Yeah, I'm interested

0:56:40.320 --> 0:56:42.640
<v Speaker 1>to see what Williams role ends up being in this

0:56:42.760 --> 0:56:45.319
<v Speaker 1>offense and is it meaningful or not. You know, they

0:56:45.440 --> 0:56:47.280
<v Speaker 1>were what they're paying him, They're paying a meaningful amount

0:56:47.280 --> 0:56:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of money. We'll see if they use them in a

0:56:49.040 --> 0:56:52.799
<v Speaker 1>meaningful role. Beginning on Sunday, the Lions played. Can we

0:56:52.840 --> 0:56:57.360
<v Speaker 1>just say because Lions from now on for yeah, probably

0:56:58.040 --> 0:57:02.080
<v Speaker 1>when we come back, more matchups, including green Bay traveling

0:57:02.120 --> 0:57:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to Jacksonville to play the Saints. Funny how these things

0:57:07.120 --> 0:57:09.520
<v Speaker 1>break just right for for green Bay. I think the

0:57:09.600 --> 0:57:11.520
<v Speaker 1>officials had anything to do with the weather. I think

0:57:11.600 --> 0:57:14.279
<v Speaker 1>that's how this all ended up happening. We'll tell you

0:57:14.280 --> 0:57:17.439
<v Speaker 1>what to expect it in a possible shootout between Green

0:57:17.480 --> 0:57:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Bay and the Saints when we come back to Fantasy

0:57:19.720 --> 0:57:40.439
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. Welcome back to Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Church

0:57:40.520 --> 0:57:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and Scott Fish and Matt Harrison with you working through

0:57:43.600 --> 0:57:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the matchups around the NFL fantasy style. Next up, the

0:57:50.360 --> 0:57:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay Packers taking on New Orleans would have been

0:57:53.760 --> 0:57:57.560
<v Speaker 1>in New Orleans. Instead, we've been relocated to a Jacksonville.

0:57:58.080 --> 0:58:00.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a neutral site. Can usually call and mccockney does.

0:58:00.960 --> 0:58:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Those not this week. Aaron Rodgerson, Davante Adams are obvious

0:58:06.240 --> 0:58:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and compelling A grades that do not need any elaboration.

0:58:09.080 --> 0:58:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to some other players, including Randall Cobb. Now

0:58:13.240 --> 0:58:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving Randall Cobb a C grade for intangible reasons.

0:58:17.120 --> 0:58:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers put his ass on the line by demanding

0:58:20.000 --> 0:58:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that the team trade for Randall Cobb. Do you think

0:58:22.760 --> 0:58:26.240
<v Speaker 1>he won't feature Cob here? Of course he will. Cob

0:58:26.240 --> 0:58:30.640
<v Speaker 1>lines up against Chauncey Gardner Johnson Profo Ball Focus is

0:58:30.760 --> 0:58:34.720
<v Speaker 1>sixty four ranked cornerback in the slot. It's a plus

0:58:34.760 --> 0:58:38.720
<v Speaker 1>matchup for Cobb and and I told you so a

0:58:38.800 --> 0:58:42.959
<v Speaker 1>moment for his quarterback se grade on Randall Cobb. Let's

0:58:42.960 --> 0:58:47.240
<v Speaker 1>talk Robert Tunyon a grade. He led all tight ends

0:58:47.240 --> 0:58:50.440
<v Speaker 1>with eleven touchdowns last year, and he posted an catch

0:58:50.560 --> 0:58:53.520
<v Speaker 1>rate which was the best among tight ends and second

0:58:53.560 --> 0:58:57.640
<v Speaker 1>best across the entire NFL. The Saints allowed the fifth

0:58:57.640 --> 0:59:00.360
<v Speaker 1>most touchdowns to tight ends, nine of them a year.

0:59:00.800 --> 0:59:03.720
<v Speaker 1>And safety Malcolm Jenkins should be the primary matchup for

0:59:03.760 --> 0:59:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Tony and he was graded as a bottom ten covered

0:59:06.640 --> 0:59:10.200
<v Speaker 1>safety last year by Pro Football Focus. Big green light

0:59:10.480 --> 0:59:14.520
<v Speaker 1>for Robert Tonyan in this matchup. As for the other receivers,

0:59:14.640 --> 0:59:17.880
<v Speaker 1>mvs and Alan Robinson, way to scattershot for my taste.

0:59:18.080 --> 0:59:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Both were completely undependable even in Aaron Rodgers m v

0:59:21.520 --> 0:59:25.240
<v Speaker 1>P last season and in a plus matchup. Uh not

0:59:25.320 --> 0:59:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Allen Robinson, Allen Lazard, even in a very plus matchup.

0:59:30.160 --> 0:59:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Their total dart throws I would show caution here. Let's

0:59:32.640 --> 0:59:35.240
<v Speaker 1>go to Aaron Jones, who gets a B grade. The

0:59:35.320 --> 0:59:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Saints have been brutalizing opposing running backs for three years,

0:59:40.080 --> 0:59:43.840
<v Speaker 1>allowing just one runner to top one hundred rushing yards

0:59:43.920 --> 0:59:48.440
<v Speaker 1>in those three seasons. That's crazy. The Packers offense will

0:59:48.480 --> 0:59:51.320
<v Speaker 1>move through the air in this game against a bad secondary,

0:59:51.360 --> 0:59:53.880
<v Speaker 1>not on the ground against the great front four. Jones

0:59:53.920 --> 0:59:56.480
<v Speaker 1>put up seventy six scoreless combo yards and just two

0:59:56.480 --> 0:59:58.640
<v Speaker 1>catches in New Orleans last year, and that's why he

0:59:58.680 --> 1:00:00.960
<v Speaker 1>dips down to a B grade here for a J.

1:00:01.160 --> 1:00:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Dillon again elite Saints run defense, and we really don't

1:00:04.840 --> 1:00:06.960
<v Speaker 1>know what his usage is gonna be. And they never

1:00:07.000 --> 1:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>threw to him last year. He had three targets all

1:00:09.200 --> 1:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of last year. Roll all that together, we're leaving A. J.

1:00:11.760 --> 1:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Dillon on the bench. Let's go over to the Saint side.

1:00:14.800 --> 1:00:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Alvin Camara gets an A grade. He is the entire

1:00:18.280 --> 1:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Saints offense in this game. I believe the Packers know it.

1:00:21.920 --> 1:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>But can they stop him? Last year he hammered the Packers,

1:00:25.560 --> 1:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>putting up an absurd one nineties seven combo yards to

1:00:29.680 --> 1:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>go with thirteen catches and two touchdowns. Camara averaged seven

1:00:34.320 --> 1:00:37.919
<v Speaker 1>receptions per game without Michael Thomas last season, and that's

1:00:37.920 --> 1:00:40.600
<v Speaker 1>when the Saints actually had other wide receivers. Now you

1:00:40.640 --> 1:00:43.840
<v Speaker 1>know short at least two, Camara's seven receptions could go

1:00:43.960 --> 1:00:46.560
<v Speaker 1>up from there. Meanwhile, the Packers returned the majority of

1:00:46.560 --> 1:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>a defense that was bottom ten and every meaningful category

1:00:50.400 --> 1:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>against opposing receiving backs. So a good all purpose game

1:00:53.920 --> 1:00:56.640
<v Speaker 1>coming for Camara, who gets an A. Let's go to

1:00:56.680 --> 1:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the passing game. I've got a bench grade on all

1:00:59.440 --> 1:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of them in looting, Marquez Callaway, let's pray. I hope

1:01:03.800 --> 1:01:06.919
<v Speaker 1>it's another season of just like bombs Away. No, look

1:01:07.040 --> 1:01:11.960
<v Speaker 1>yolo heaves from Jameis. Winston's all year long, just like

1:01:13.280 --> 1:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>terrible for his career, but great for my fantasy team.

1:01:16.240 --> 1:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I love those. Wait, we have to stop the show now,

1:01:22.400 --> 1:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>those high risk throws were fantastic. Winston's first problem though,

1:01:28.600 --> 1:01:31.400
<v Speaker 1>here is a lack of receiving talent with Michael Thomas,

1:01:31.440 --> 1:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Adam Troutman, and Trey Kwan Smith out. And then for whatever,

1:01:35.920 --> 1:01:38.200
<v Speaker 1>defend whatever re siies he's got left, he's got to

1:01:38.200 --> 1:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>go up. There's number one receiver, presumably Callaway has to

1:01:40.920 --> 1:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>go up against Jay R Alexander profile focuses top ranked cornerback.

1:01:45.040 --> 1:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>There's just not a good It's just not enough targets

1:01:47.840 --> 1:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>left on the board for Winston in this matchup. So

1:01:50.480 --> 1:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>he gets a bench grade. You know, Tony Jones is

1:01:52.760 --> 1:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of interesting. How about a C grade on Tony Jones.

1:01:56.680 --> 1:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna talk more about Tony Jones later in this show.

1:01:59.160 --> 1:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>But you know, Alvin Camaratt never workhorseback won't be in

1:02:02.840 --> 1:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>this game either. And Tony Jones, right, he said, and

1:02:08.400 --> 1:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>reasonably so. I went back through and watched all the

1:02:10.320 --> 1:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>preseason Carry's Dude's good, especially that first game against the

1:02:13.360 --> 1:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Ravens really good. So I'm going to be a SEE

1:02:15.400 --> 1:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>grade to Tony Jones of this matchup. Next, let's go

1:02:18.480 --> 1:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>to Cleveland taking on Kansas City in a very possible

1:02:21.960 --> 1:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>preview of the a f C Championship game next January. Well, yeah,

1:02:25.240 --> 1:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and if you remember last season's playoff game, I think

1:02:27.920 --> 1:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty safe to fire up Chad Henny at quarterback

1:02:30.480 --> 1:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>with solid B grade. What if they send out Henny

1:02:33.600 --> 1:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>for the first snap of the game. Just just a

1:02:35.920 --> 1:02:40.360
<v Speaker 1>mass with the Browns, Patrick Mahomes, Tyreek Killed, Travis Kelsey,

1:02:40.400 --> 1:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>all A grades. They're good at TOSSI toss uh Nicole Hardman,

1:02:45.640 --> 1:02:48.959
<v Speaker 1>DeMarcus Robinson, Byron Pringle. They're all on the bench. Which

1:02:48.960 --> 1:02:51.320
<v Speaker 1>one of these guys is far and away the number

1:02:51.320 --> 1:02:54.800
<v Speaker 1>two wide receiver Hardman. Maybe he's being drafted like it.

1:02:55.360 --> 1:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>The wide receiver on the Chiefs can disappear at any

1:02:58.240 --> 1:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>time they want to, anytime they feel you. In the

1:03:01.600 --> 1:03:04.640
<v Speaker 1>sixteen wide receiver two games the Chiefs played last year,

1:03:04.960 --> 1:03:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I took the games that Sammy Watkins played, and in

1:03:07.360 --> 1:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the games he was absent, I inserted me Cole Hardman.

1:03:10.560 --> 1:03:12.920
<v Speaker 1>The average game for the Kansas City Wide receiver two

1:03:13.040 --> 1:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>was four targets, three receptions, forty one yards and one

1:03:16.680 --> 1:03:20.400
<v Speaker 1>sixth of a touchdown. It's just there is no wide

1:03:20.400 --> 1:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>receiver too. It's okay, we get to know who the

1:03:23.480 --> 1:03:26.920
<v Speaker 1>good players on the Chiefs. You can't argue they're very bankable,

1:03:27.320 --> 1:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>except for Clyde Edwards Hilaire, who's not very bankable. Uh,

1:03:30.480 --> 1:03:32.960
<v Speaker 1>this one's just a bad matchup. Down the stretch. Cleveland

1:03:33.000 --> 1:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>was one of the best run defenses in the league,

1:03:35.320 --> 1:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>allowing only seventy rushing yards per game over the final

1:03:38.240 --> 1:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>six games of the year. Clyde did not play in

1:03:40.520 --> 1:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the playoff game last year, so maybe he's their secret weapon.

1:03:43.400 --> 1:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>They've never seen him before. Nick Chubb he gets a

1:03:46.760 --> 1:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>B grade, and Kareem Hunt he gets to see. The

1:03:49.080 --> 1:03:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs were bottom twelve in the league against running back

1:03:52.480 --> 1:03:56.919
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards, receptions, receiving yards, and receiving touchdowns. So one

1:03:56.960 --> 1:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>place they exceeded expectations is the only allowed seven running

1:04:01.160 --> 1:04:04.840
<v Speaker 1>back rushing touchdowns last year. Still, I don't know. Nick

1:04:04.880 --> 1:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Chubb's really really good. He's really really good and not

1:04:07.680 --> 1:04:10.120
<v Speaker 1>everything else sounded like it was game on. It's kind

1:04:10.120 --> 1:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>of I'd like you to reconsider a possible a right here,

1:04:12.400 --> 1:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>oh no uh in the Battle of the trenches, though

1:04:14.960 --> 1:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football Focus has this as the third most positive

1:04:17.960 --> 1:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>run game for Cleveland's offensive line versus Kansas City's defensive line. Okay,

1:04:22.040 --> 1:04:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll give Nick chubb an a thank you very much

1:04:26.280 --> 1:04:27.840
<v Speaker 1>to my ranking. Here. I've got Hi, I've got him

1:04:27.840 --> 1:04:31.280
<v Speaker 1>a running back for Okay, that's good. Baker Mayfield, he

1:04:31.360 --> 1:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>gets a C grade. The Browns are a running team.

1:04:33.560 --> 1:04:35.919
<v Speaker 1>They had the fourth lowest passing rate in the league

1:04:36.000 --> 1:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>last year, and they saw Tampa unlock the key to

1:04:38.600 --> 1:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>beat the Chiefs. Good defense and ball control offense. That's

1:04:41.680 --> 1:04:44.160
<v Speaker 1>why I only have se grades on Odell Beckham and

1:04:44.440 --> 1:04:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Jarvis Landry. The chief should deploy Legarious Snead against Beckham. Yeah,

1:04:50.880 --> 1:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>he had a top three passer rating and balls thrown

1:04:53.240 --> 1:04:56.480
<v Speaker 1>into his coverage last year at fifty three point four.

1:04:56.800 --> 1:05:00.280
<v Speaker 1>And Landry often runs from the slot and three wide receivers,

1:05:00.280 --> 1:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>but the Browns run a ton of twelve personnel, which

1:05:03.360 --> 1:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>means two tight ends on the field in those scenarios,

1:05:06.280 --> 1:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>he's likely running against former Viking Mike Hughes, who allowed

1:05:10.720 --> 1:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>completed catches on his throws in his coverage last season.

1:05:14.320 --> 1:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>So I actually like Landry better than Beckham in this game,

1:05:17.480 --> 1:05:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and the tick and the tight ends are on the bench. Yeah,

1:05:21.320 --> 1:05:24.480
<v Speaker 1>well that's I'm that's safe to say. Yeah, in part

1:05:24.520 --> 1:05:27.480
<v Speaker 1>because there's three three deep tight end you know, you

1:05:27.520 --> 1:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>never know who's coming up next. Seattle takes on Indianapolis,

1:05:31.080 --> 1:05:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and injuries will play a potentially a big part of

1:05:34.040 --> 1:05:37.360
<v Speaker 1>this game. Um, particularly in the Indianapolis side. But yeah,

1:05:37.720 --> 1:05:39.959
<v Speaker 1>I'll let you I'll let you address that, Scott. Yeah,

1:05:40.040 --> 1:05:44.360
<v Speaker 1>well let's sure. Let's start on the wayside, the Indianapolis side.

1:05:44.400 --> 1:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Carson Wentz I have on the bench despite the second

1:05:47.280 --> 1:05:49.720
<v Speaker 1>highest Vegas over under of the week, He's going to

1:05:49.760 --> 1:05:52.720
<v Speaker 1>be missing Eric Fisher, which they'll be down to their

1:05:52.760 --> 1:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>third left tackle. I believe on that side they our

1:05:54.880 --> 1:05:59.840
<v Speaker 1>third left tackle Julian something and something Julia Gulia, Julian

1:06:00.040 --> 1:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>child friend chef, and Quentin Nelson is still questionable. I

1:06:04.920 --> 1:06:07.040
<v Speaker 1>mean it sounds like he'll go, but he's still questionable.

1:06:07.120 --> 1:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Last uh, let's go to his receivers though. Do I

1:06:12.960 --> 1:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>think that any of his receivers are startable? Do I

1:06:15.800 --> 1:06:20.920
<v Speaker 1>gave you a Paris to Paris Paris Hilton? Yeah, you know,

1:06:21.080 --> 1:06:23.160
<v Speaker 1>how did how do I get to this point and

1:06:23.200 --> 1:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>not realize that the Indianapolis receivers had a Paris and

1:06:25.680 --> 1:06:28.160
<v Speaker 1>a Hilton. I don't know. How did I not know

1:06:28.240 --> 1:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that until now? I don't know. I'd never drop it anyway,

1:06:31.800 --> 1:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>you know why. Here's why I don't care about Paris

1:06:34.520 --> 1:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Hilton at all. I don't care about her. That's why

1:06:40.800 --> 1:06:45.360
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about Michael Pittman. I now I got a

1:06:45.440 --> 1:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>C grade on Michael Pittman. Remains to be seen if

1:06:49.400 --> 1:06:51.040
<v Speaker 1>he can be the top dog and take on to

1:06:51.120 --> 1:06:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the top coverages. But he is six ft four and

1:06:54.000 --> 1:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>he might be facing up against five ft nine DJ Reid.

1:06:57.680 --> 1:07:00.120
<v Speaker 1>If you're doing the math at home, that is seven

1:07:00.120 --> 1:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>inches difference, which I really like that matchup for him. Uh,

1:07:05.640 --> 1:07:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Paris Campbell was charged to take a chance on me

1:07:07.920 --> 1:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>player dealing with a little bit of an achilles injury.

1:07:10.240 --> 1:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>But he's gonna play through it, and he looks fine.

1:07:12.760 --> 1:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>He does play from the slot though. So on the

1:07:16.240 --> 1:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>other side is gonna be Michael Strown. I love Michael Stron. Uh,

1:07:22.520 --> 1:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna I'm gonna make a prespect in the middle

1:07:25.160 --> 1:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of my thing here. Michael Stron is gonna play mostly

1:07:28.240 --> 1:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>on the outside for this, he's six ft five pounds

1:07:32.800 --> 1:07:37.240
<v Speaker 1>ten inch hands in winks ban four point four sixty

1:07:37.560 --> 1:07:41.280
<v Speaker 1>at that size. Um, he's gonna go over Zach Pascal,

1:07:41.680 --> 1:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and Zach Pascal plays six from the slot. But Michael

1:07:46.920 --> 1:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>stron uh lad the team in targets, catches, and receiving yards.

1:07:50.720 --> 1:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>In the preseason, they said he was just unstoppable in camp.

1:07:54.600 --> 1:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he gets some work here, not enough to start.

1:07:57.560 --> 1:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>But if you're on a deeper roster, go get Michael Strong.

1:08:00.640 --> 1:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>It's it's spelled like straight chin or whatever. Go get

1:08:03.560 --> 1:08:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Michael Strong. Uh. To the running game, let's go with

1:08:08.240 --> 1:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Taylor. I got a C grade on Jonathan Taylor, honestly,

1:08:11.400 --> 1:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>behind that line with Fisher out with if he especially

1:08:13.800 --> 1:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>if Quint Nelson also misses. Seattle was top five against

1:08:17.200 --> 1:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>running backs last year. It's just a bad matchup. He

1:08:20.200 --> 1:08:22.720
<v Speaker 1>just might get enough ten to fifteen touches to to

1:08:22.800 --> 1:08:26.439
<v Speaker 1>make that C volume play there. Uh and easier second

1:08:26.520 --> 1:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>round probably second round pick. You're probably playing him anyway.

1:08:29.200 --> 1:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Naheim Hines I got a C grade on because he's

1:08:32.000 --> 1:08:34.200
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be as well as Taylor h c gred

1:08:34.200 --> 1:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>because they're gonna be chasing points. He's gonna be an

1:08:36.160 --> 1:08:37.880
<v Speaker 1>outlet for wins. He's gonna want to get the ball

1:08:37.880 --> 1:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>out quickly. Hines was the top three receiving back last

1:08:40.880 --> 1:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>year and Seattle allowed the fourth most receptions to running

1:08:43.439 --> 1:08:45.479
<v Speaker 1>back slack here by the way, it congrats on your

1:08:45.520 --> 1:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>new contract, Nahim Hines will be three more years over

1:08:50.240 --> 1:08:53.519
<v Speaker 1>to the Seattle side. Russell Wilson got a B grade

1:08:53.560 --> 1:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>on uh Indie end of the final quarter last season,

1:08:56.320 --> 1:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>allowing over three five yards and two point five touch

1:08:59.400 --> 1:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>John's per game two quarterbacks. It's got the second highest

1:09:02.240 --> 1:09:04.920
<v Speaker 1>vegas over under. As I mentioned before that it's just

1:09:04.920 --> 1:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a shootout. So I like Wilson there. I

1:09:07.400 --> 1:09:10.960
<v Speaker 1>like his receivers a lot too. I got metcalf with

1:09:11.000 --> 1:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>an A grade DK Metcalf Um, he'll get Rock your

1:09:14.360 --> 1:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Sin probably seventh ranked by PF and if he doesn't,

1:09:18.280 --> 1:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>he gets thirty two year old t J. Kerry. So

1:09:22.040 --> 1:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>so that's gonna be. That's gonna be his matchup with

1:09:25.880 --> 1:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Xavier Rhodes out uh. Let's see here. I got lock

1:09:30.080 --> 1:09:33.080
<v Speaker 1>It with a B grade. His inconsistency is one that

1:09:33.280 --> 1:09:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't love. And also he's going to be He's

1:09:36.840 --> 1:09:39.960
<v Speaker 1>got a match up against Kenny Moore, but Kenny Moore

1:09:40.000 --> 1:09:42.759
<v Speaker 1>is raring sixteen by p F. It's a pretty pretty

1:09:42.760 --> 1:09:45.800
<v Speaker 1>tough matchup for lock It. But when he explodes, he explodes,

1:09:45.840 --> 1:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think this is going to be a shootout

1:09:47.240 --> 1:09:50.479
<v Speaker 1>where lock It might get a play. So I have

1:09:50.520 --> 1:09:53.679
<v Speaker 1>a B grade unlock It. Chris Carson tough Jobs last

1:09:53.680 --> 1:09:57.519
<v Speaker 1>season's second best run defense. He I I have a

1:09:57.600 --> 1:10:00.960
<v Speaker 1>B grade on him, but it's because he gets all

1:10:01.000 --> 1:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the running back work, like all of it, So I

1:10:03.400 --> 1:10:05.960
<v Speaker 1>have a B grade on him. I have every I

1:10:06.000 --> 1:10:07.639
<v Speaker 1>have the tight ends on the bench. I'm not gonna

1:10:07.680 --> 1:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>trust Gerald Everet until I see his usage in that offense. Yeah,

1:10:11.240 --> 1:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of people kind of depending on that

1:10:13.920 --> 1:10:16.680
<v Speaker 1>usage to be pretty high. Yeah, but I don't know.

1:10:17.240 --> 1:10:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Daryl wall Uh Waller is the only tight end the

1:10:20.240 --> 1:10:23.680
<v Speaker 1>top sixty yards against them last year. That's another good

1:10:23.680 --> 1:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>reason they show a lot of caution right there. When

1:10:26.200 --> 1:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>we came back, final segment of Fantasy Football Weekly Premature Speculation,

1:10:30.479 --> 1:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>these are the guys you want to pick up this

1:10:32.479 --> 1:10:35.639
<v Speaker 1>week that everybody else will be trying to pick up

1:10:36.000 --> 1:10:39.320
<v Speaker 1>next week. That's the return of our compensation, right there

1:10:39.439 --> 1:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>like Michael Strod, like Michael Strode everything, Who's Michael Strode?

1:10:43.120 --> 1:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Who's Quaz Watkins? These maybe these are the guys that

1:10:46.600 --> 1:10:49.519
<v Speaker 1>are gonna show up in premature by Stay tuned to

1:10:49.520 --> 1:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>find out. Welcome back, Fantasy Football Weekly final segment. We've

1:11:10.320 --> 1:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>got four games to break down and premature speculation a

1:11:16.840 --> 1:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>favorite segment for listeners, going on, why did we dream

1:11:19.800 --> 1:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>this up about six years ago? Something like that? Yeah,

1:11:23.160 --> 1:11:25.679
<v Speaker 1>it feels like it's been about that long. It's my favorite.

1:11:26.120 --> 1:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's begin there. Let's uh the premise of premature speculations.

1:11:29.400 --> 1:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna give you guys to pick up now that

1:11:31.160 --> 1:11:32.559
<v Speaker 1>we think everybody else is gonna be trying to pick

1:11:32.640 --> 1:11:34.519
<v Speaker 1>up next week. And when they go to the waiver

1:11:34.600 --> 1:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>wire and they see they're already on your team, to

1:11:37.400 --> 1:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>be like that guy is brilliant, Scott. Let's begin with you.

1:11:41.160 --> 1:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Who is your premature speculation player? I'm going beta here,

1:11:44.439 --> 1:11:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna premature speculate a premature speculation. Bradley Roby just

1:11:49.960 --> 1:11:52.439
<v Speaker 1>got traded from the Houston away from the Houston Texas.

1:11:52.479 --> 1:11:54.639
<v Speaker 1>They've said that they are going to trade all their vets.

1:11:55.080 --> 1:11:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I think Brandon Cooks gets traded and you should pick

1:11:57.920 --> 1:12:01.679
<v Speaker 1>up Nico Collins. Now, okay, all right, he might already

1:12:01.680 --> 1:12:03.960
<v Speaker 1>get volume this week and become a thing, but once

1:12:04.040 --> 1:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Cooks has gone, he'll be the only thing in town.

1:12:06.520 --> 1:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Makes sense, Okay, I like Nico Collins. I think I

1:12:09.040 --> 1:12:11.679
<v Speaker 1>think you could start Week one, I know for Houston. Yeah,

1:12:11.760 --> 1:12:13.320
<v Speaker 1>go get him. Every reason to believe they'll be behind

1:12:13.320 --> 1:12:16.280
<v Speaker 1>by a lot. Matt, who's your premature speculation player? Scott

1:12:16.320 --> 1:12:18.439
<v Speaker 1>covered this guy a little bit before, but it's thirty

1:12:18.479 --> 1:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>seven percent owned zach Ertz, whose death has been greatly exaggerated.

1:12:23.200 --> 1:12:25.799
<v Speaker 1>First off, he's got some fresh new golden locks. Second,

1:12:25.840 --> 1:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>he led the Eagles tight ends last season and targets

1:12:28.360 --> 1:12:31.519
<v Speaker 1>even while missing five games due to injury, including seven,

1:12:31.640 --> 1:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>seven and six targets in the final three games. Third,

1:12:34.840 --> 1:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>this week he gets the Falcons defense, who gave up

1:12:36.960 --> 1:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the fourth most touchdowns the position. And then he's got

1:12:39.920 --> 1:12:43.680
<v Speaker 1>matchups against Dallas, Kansas City, and Carolina in weeks three, four,

1:12:43.720 --> 1:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and five, all of which are bottom ten against the

1:12:46.640 --> 1:12:49.280
<v Speaker 1>tight end position. Zach Ertz can be yours and he's

1:12:49.400 --> 1:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>very startable for the next five weeks. I'm going with

1:12:51.880 --> 1:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Tony Jones, the new number two running back for the Saints.

1:12:55.040 --> 1:12:57.960
<v Speaker 1>We alluded to this earlier. Alvin Comariz is not a

1:12:57.960 --> 1:13:00.879
<v Speaker 1>workhorse back, never has been. He isn't now. His average

1:13:00.960 --> 1:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>number of carries since becoming the starter is twelve and

1:13:04.280 --> 1:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>a couple of shows ago. Matt, I believe it was

1:13:06.400 --> 1:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>you who mentioned Alvin Kamara has topped nineteen carries once. Yeah,

1:13:12.840 --> 1:13:15.679
<v Speaker 1>one time. Uh. Tony Jones will have a non trivial

1:13:15.760 --> 1:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>role in this offense, and he's better than Latavius Murray

1:13:18.160 --> 1:13:20.479
<v Speaker 1>and can out perform what Murray has been giving. Fantasy

1:13:20.479 --> 1:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>owners went back and watch his preseason kid look good,

1:13:23.600 --> 1:13:25.679
<v Speaker 1>Tony Jones got a little juice. Make sure you've picked

1:13:25.720 --> 1:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>him up. Go get that kid, Yeah, go get go,

1:13:28.160 --> 1:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>get that guy. Let's go to Chicago taking on the

1:13:32.120 --> 1:13:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Rams and what's going to be a one sided game. First,

1:13:35.520 --> 1:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Andy Dalton. The Andy Dalton led passing attack against last

1:13:38.520 --> 1:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>year's best past defense means there there are bench grades

1:13:41.920 --> 1:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty much everywhere except Allen Robinson, who's only comes in

1:13:45.280 --> 1:13:48.200
<v Speaker 1>here with a C grade. Last season, these teams met

1:13:48.360 --> 1:13:51.719
<v Speaker 1>and Robinson posted four catches for seventies scoreless yards against

1:13:51.800 --> 1:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Ramsey, and that was that was with Nick Foles

1:13:54.520 --> 1:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>at quarterback. It's kind of a lateral move here to Dalton,

1:13:57.400 --> 1:14:00.680
<v Speaker 1>So I'm expecting something close to seventies scoreless again with

1:14:00.720 --> 1:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the terrible offensive line. If Andy Dalton gets hurt in

1:14:04.120 --> 1:14:07.200
<v Speaker 1>this game and Justin Fields comes in, does all of

1:14:07.200 --> 1:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>a sudden Allen Robinson's in game grade move up a letter?

1:14:10.479 --> 1:14:12.559
<v Speaker 1>Probably would? I want to know who's gonna be bold

1:14:12.640 --> 1:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>enough to start Justin Fields now? It's premature speculus, very

1:14:18.320 --> 1:14:23.559
<v Speaker 1>premature speculation. Uh. The Rams return their outside cornerbacks who

1:14:23.640 --> 1:14:27.280
<v Speaker 1>allowed the fewest yards per game and just seven touchdowns

1:14:27.280 --> 1:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to opposing receivers last year. It's a disaster scenario here.

1:14:31.200 --> 1:14:34.240
<v Speaker 1>But Allen Robinson's great, so just to see grade on him,

1:14:34.360 --> 1:14:37.759
<v Speaker 1>David Montgomery gets a C grade you're figuring and Dalton's

1:14:37.800 --> 1:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna be completely overmatched, And so they'll try to run

1:14:41.160 --> 1:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>David Montgomery in this game, but they're not gonna be

1:14:43.320 --> 1:14:46.920
<v Speaker 1>very effective. The bears tattered offensive line look horrendous in

1:14:46.960 --> 1:14:50.519
<v Speaker 1>the preseason, and Montgomery just isn't elusive enough to make

1:14:50.560 --> 1:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>his own running lanes. And unlike last year, the Bells

1:14:54.280 --> 1:14:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Bears have other solid runners are going to contribute, like

1:14:56.920 --> 1:14:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Damien Williams and Khalil Herbert, so you don't get the

1:15:00.040 --> 1:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>volume that mcgomery was giving you last year when he

1:15:02.360 --> 1:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>was startable. Los Angeles finished fifth in yards allowed per

1:15:06.320 --> 1:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>carry and sixth and fantasy points allowed to the running

1:15:08.920 --> 1:15:13.799
<v Speaker 1>back position. And we know Aaron Donald elite pass rushing tackle.

1:15:14.720 --> 1:15:18.639
<v Speaker 1>He was also the number one ranked run tackle by

1:15:18.640 --> 1:15:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football Focus last year. He's just really good. He's

1:15:21.040 --> 1:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>just really good at football. Let's go to the ramside.

1:15:23.880 --> 1:15:28.639
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Stafford and the rest of his meaningful receivers, Cooper

1:15:28.640 --> 1:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Cup and Robert Woods all a grades. Stafford delivered the

1:15:32.240 --> 1:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>lions most recent victory. It was Week thirteen against these Bears,

1:15:38.439 --> 1:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and he threw for four hundred yards and three touchdowns.

1:15:41.120 --> 1:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>As a member of the Lion is not afraid of

1:15:42.960 --> 1:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the Bears. He's not afraid of the Bears, and you

1:15:45.000 --> 1:15:48.479
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be either, because they have a rebuilt secondary featuring

1:15:48.479 --> 1:15:55.200
<v Speaker 1>two very green cornerbacks something called Kindle Vildor and Duke Shelley.

1:15:55.760 --> 1:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>As a rookie, Vildor was garbage last year, allowing a

1:15:59.040 --> 1:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>passer rating of a twenty four in his coverage, and

1:16:02.000 --> 1:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Shelley is the presumptive starting slot corner. He's got ninety

1:16:06.080 --> 1:16:09.479
<v Speaker 1>two career snaps to his name. Cups and cup and

1:16:09.520 --> 1:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Wood's elite starts this week. And I'll even go one

1:16:12.920 --> 1:16:18.639
<v Speaker 1>step further. You want a deep dark DFS playshaun DeShawn Jackson.

1:16:18.720 --> 1:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>That's right. DeShawn Jackson does it in week one a

1:16:20.720 --> 1:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>lot too, and he does he You're right, week one

1:16:23.040 --> 1:16:25.519
<v Speaker 1>his guts because he's healthy. It's like Sammy Watkins in

1:16:25.520 --> 1:16:28.200
<v Speaker 1>week one. That's right. Let's talk Darryl Henderson, who gets

1:16:28.200 --> 1:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a B grade here uh career rushing average of four

1:16:31.000 --> 1:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>point four, which lines up almost exactly with Chicago that

1:16:33.880 --> 1:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>gave up just over four yards per carry last year.

1:16:37.400 --> 1:16:39.839
<v Speaker 1>Sony Michelle's there, but I still think the vast majority

1:16:39.840 --> 1:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>of the workload here goes to Henderson. The Rams rushed

1:16:42.840 --> 1:16:46.879
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine times per game last year. That's enough workload

1:16:46.880 --> 1:16:49.719
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that Henderson gets the ball plenty. Bears

1:16:49.720 --> 1:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>maintained most of their key run defenders from last year.

1:16:53.040 --> 1:16:56.519
<v Speaker 1>They were ranked fifth overall by Pro Football Focus. Chicago

1:16:56.560 --> 1:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>faced Henderson last year when he was still the lead

1:16:58.800 --> 1:17:01.599
<v Speaker 1>back before he gave up that job to cam Acres,

1:17:02.080 --> 1:17:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and they held him to seventeen touches for seventy six

1:17:04.360 --> 1:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>yards and that sounds about right here, Sony Michelle. I'm

1:17:06.840 --> 1:17:08.680
<v Speaker 1>keeping on the bench until we have a better understanding

1:17:08.680 --> 1:17:11.519
<v Speaker 1>of what his role might look like. And let's spend

1:17:11.560 --> 1:17:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a second on a great matchup for Tyler Higgby. The

1:17:14.880 --> 1:17:17.439
<v Speaker 1>tight end situation in Los Angeles. We've been waiting for

1:17:17.520 --> 1:17:20.639
<v Speaker 1>clarity for years. We finally have it. If you would

1:17:20.640 --> 1:17:24.200
<v Speaker 1>have rolled together Everett and Higby stats into one guy

1:17:24.320 --> 1:17:28.120
<v Speaker 1>last year, you'd have had tight end five. And now

1:17:28.240 --> 1:17:31.559
<v Speaker 1>that's maybe what we're gonna get here. In Tyler Higby's

1:17:31.600 --> 1:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>three career games without Gerald Everett, He's averaged eleven targets

1:17:36.240 --> 1:17:40.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred eleven yards per game. Those are gigantic numbers, and

1:17:40.160 --> 1:17:42.719
<v Speaker 1>the Bear struggled against the tight end position last season,

1:17:42.720 --> 1:17:47.920
<v Speaker 1>finishing bottom six in receptions, yards, and touchdowns allowed to

1:17:48.000 --> 1:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the tight end position, A grade for Tyler Higbe. Our

1:17:54.320 --> 1:17:57.519
<v Speaker 1>next matchup is Miami taking on New England. Math I'm

1:17:57.560 --> 1:18:00.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna start with Jalen Waddle and Davante Parker, who are

1:18:00.800 --> 1:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>both on your bench this week. Even with Will Fuller

1:18:04.040 --> 1:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>being out serving the rest of his suspension this week,

1:18:07.200 --> 1:18:10.559
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots are without top corner Stephan Gilmour. That's actually

1:18:10.560 --> 1:18:13.519
<v Speaker 1>a good thing for the Finns wide receivers. However, J C.

1:18:13.720 --> 1:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Jackson and Jonathan Jones are not members of instinct. They

1:18:16.800 --> 1:18:19.880
<v Speaker 1>are the pats other starting corners, and both were rated

1:18:19.960 --> 1:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>rather highly by Pro Football Focus last season. I'm a

1:18:23.040 --> 1:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit nervous that Parker and Ta just don't mix well. Overall.

1:18:26.479 --> 1:18:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Through seven career games together, Parker is averaging three point

1:18:30.000 --> 1:18:33.200
<v Speaker 1>seven catches and forty four yards per game with TWA.

1:18:33.479 --> 1:18:36.280
<v Speaker 1>He's only caught two career touchdowns from to as well.

1:18:36.360 --> 1:18:39.200
<v Speaker 1>So they're on the bench, as is Mike Gasicki. In

1:18:39.320 --> 1:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>five prior meetings with the Patriots, Gisicki has been held

1:18:41.800 --> 1:18:45.080
<v Speaker 1>under thirty five yards in every game and scored only once.

1:18:45.560 --> 1:18:47.519
<v Speaker 1>If I've got all the receivers on the bench, I've

1:18:47.560 --> 1:18:50.120
<v Speaker 1>got two on the bench too, So I'm gonna go

1:18:50.200 --> 1:18:52.640
<v Speaker 1>over to Miles Gaskin, who I think a lot of

1:18:52.640 --> 1:18:55.040
<v Speaker 1>people are kind of relying on maybe to play this week.

1:18:55.040 --> 1:18:57.879
<v Speaker 1>I got him on the bench. Last year, New England's

1:18:57.880 --> 1:19:01.479
<v Speaker 1>defense was stout against the run every only zero point

1:19:01.600 --> 1:19:05.400
<v Speaker 1>for three yards allowed before first contact. That's the best

1:19:05.439 --> 1:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>mark in the league by a wide margin. And Gaskin

1:19:08.520 --> 1:19:12.479
<v Speaker 1>was in the league in yards after contact with only

1:19:12.560 --> 1:19:15.360
<v Speaker 1>two point five yards. This leads me to believe that

1:19:15.439 --> 1:19:18.479
<v Speaker 1>Gaskins should run for about three yards per carry, and

1:19:18.560 --> 1:19:21.519
<v Speaker 1>that's not good. He only managed forty rushing yards in

1:19:21.520 --> 1:19:23.400
<v Speaker 1>his one meeting with the Pats last year as well.

1:19:23.960 --> 1:19:25.599
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the running back on the other side

1:19:25.600 --> 1:19:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that we want to talk about. That's Damien Harris. He

1:19:28.240 --> 1:19:31.720
<v Speaker 1>gets a B. Last year, the Pats deployed four or

1:19:31.760 --> 1:19:35.640
<v Speaker 1>five backs against the Dolphins in both meetings. In the

1:19:35.680 --> 1:19:39.840
<v Speaker 1>first meeting, four backs each top twenty yards and they

1:19:39.880 --> 1:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>total the hundred on the ground with a touchdown. In

1:19:42.760 --> 1:19:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the second game, Sony Michelle went for seven point four

1:19:45.960 --> 1:19:49.880
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry. Rolls are clearer and more defined this year.

1:19:49.880 --> 1:19:52.880
<v Speaker 1>It seems Damien Harris is the lead dog, James White

1:19:52.920 --> 1:19:54.680
<v Speaker 1>is the pass catcher, and it's a coin flip if

1:19:54.760 --> 1:19:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Ramondre Stevenson is even active in this game. White and

1:19:59.000 --> 1:20:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Stevenson around my engine. Harris gets the B. Mac Jones

1:20:02.320 --> 1:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and Hunter Henry where my take a chance on me

1:20:05.240 --> 1:20:08.760
<v Speaker 1>TOSSI tossers and John U Johnu. He gets a B

1:20:08.880 --> 1:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>grade as well. I like Henry enough to give him

1:20:10.720 --> 1:20:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the starting grade he gets. He got the C by

1:20:13.240 --> 1:20:15.479
<v Speaker 1>the way, and for the same reasons, John who gets

1:20:15.479 --> 1:20:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the B grade here. But finally, I got two more

1:20:18.080 --> 1:20:20.679
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers and I'm giving them both B grades. Wide

1:20:20.680 --> 1:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>receivers getting a B grades on the Patriots. You say

1:20:23.720 --> 1:20:27.639
<v Speaker 1>there's one glaring weakness in the Dolphins defensive backfield, that's

1:20:27.680 --> 1:20:31.679
<v Speaker 1>Miami corner Byron Jones, who allowed seventeen point one yards

1:20:31.680 --> 1:20:34.280
<v Speaker 1>per catch last year. That was the third worst in

1:20:34.320 --> 1:20:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. If he's going to get beat, it's deep.

1:20:37.280 --> 1:20:39.679
<v Speaker 1>And of the players that had at least eighty targets

1:20:39.760 --> 1:20:41.720
<v Speaker 1>last year, do you know who led the league in

1:20:41.840 --> 1:20:46.519
<v Speaker 1>yards per reception? Nelson Agar at eighteen point seven. And

1:20:46.680 --> 1:20:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I never would have guessed that are torched. This Dolphins

1:20:50.240 --> 1:20:52.080
<v Speaker 1>defense is a member of the Raiders last year for

1:20:52.320 --> 1:20:55.160
<v Speaker 1>five catches a hundred and fifty five yards and score.

1:20:55.840 --> 1:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I love it. This is a great angle. Why was

1:20:57.840 --> 1:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>he not your your take a chance? I mean, why

1:20:59.680 --> 1:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>did you? Well, you use Hunter Henry. That's why I

1:21:01.960 --> 1:21:04.160
<v Speaker 1>love mac Jones so much. Aglar's nursing a little bit

1:21:04.160 --> 1:21:06.200
<v Speaker 1>of an ankle injury, but he's gonna go. And by

1:21:06.240 --> 1:21:08.519
<v Speaker 1>the way, Jacoby Myers is a bit of a forgotten

1:21:08.520 --> 1:21:11.200
<v Speaker 1>guy in fantasy. Here In's a B grade. He earned

1:21:11.240 --> 1:21:13.360
<v Speaker 1>his keep in the second half last season. Over the

1:21:13.400 --> 1:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>final ten games, the average seven targets, five catches, and

1:21:16.120 --> 1:21:18.559
<v Speaker 1>sixty five yards per game. Those are pre solid numbers

1:21:18.680 --> 1:21:22.360
<v Speaker 1>with Cam Newton as your quarterback. However, in two full seasons,

1:21:22.400 --> 1:21:27.400
<v Speaker 1>he's never scored an NFL touchdown. That changes this week

1:21:27.680 --> 1:21:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to Kobeyers. Okay, there it is. By the way, TOSSI

1:21:32.240 --> 1:21:35.160
<v Speaker 1>toss is a hail Mary. No, no, no, it's it's

1:21:35.200 --> 1:21:39.519
<v Speaker 1>just TOSSI to It's Denver takes on the Giant Scott.

1:21:39.520 --> 1:21:42.720
<v Speaker 1>And what I'm hoping you tell me is that Javonte

1:21:42.800 --> 1:21:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Williams can be a starter in Week one. Yeah, I

1:21:45.240 --> 1:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know about that. I don't know. I need him.

1:21:50.000 --> 1:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a rookie, he's a right. What happened on the

1:21:52.840 --> 1:21:56.679
<v Speaker 1>automatic A grade all the rookie? What happened to that? Okay,

1:21:56.720 --> 1:21:58.439
<v Speaker 1>I'll give him a C grade if I can also

1:21:58.479 --> 1:22:03.800
<v Speaker 1>give Gordon to see grade. They do have the middle

1:22:03.840 --> 1:22:06.439
<v Speaker 1>of the pack matchup, and they're gonna they're gonna be

1:22:06.520 --> 1:22:09.040
<v Speaker 1>in a a positive game. Script for that to run

1:22:09.120 --> 1:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>down the clock, Javonte Williams might actually be a better

1:22:11.880 --> 1:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>rundown the clock guy. So there you go. There you go,

1:22:14.960 --> 1:22:20.080
<v Speaker 1>charge alright onto the passing game now, I guess. Uh,

1:22:20.160 --> 1:22:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Teddy Bridgewater I do have a C grade on somehow.

1:22:23.240 --> 1:22:25.439
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna have to get ahead of the Giants somehow,

1:22:25.439 --> 1:22:27.479
<v Speaker 1>and I think Teddy's got just enough to do it

1:22:27.720 --> 1:22:30.200
<v Speaker 1>against the Giant's team that allowed the fifth most yards

1:22:30.400 --> 1:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and the fifth most touchdowns last year. Uh, Teddy Bridgewater

1:22:35.280 --> 1:22:39.000
<v Speaker 1>seventy passer last year, that's gonna be coming in way

1:22:39.040 --> 1:22:42.360
<v Speaker 1>more handy for Jerry Judy, who had the highest percentage

1:22:42.360 --> 1:22:48.360
<v Speaker 1>of NFL passes last year. Yes, so gain that seventy

1:22:48.400 --> 1:22:51.879
<v Speaker 1>passer and going up against Darnay Holmes ranked a hundred

1:22:51.920 --> 1:22:55.719
<v Speaker 1>and seventh by Profotball Focus. I'm giving Judy a B grade,

1:22:55.960 --> 1:22:58.680
<v Speaker 1>giving Courtland Sutton a C grade here. He's gonna get

1:22:59.000 --> 1:23:02.920
<v Speaker 1>a much tougher match up in James Bradberry seventh ranked. Uh,

1:23:02.960 --> 1:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>but he's a good contexted catch guy. He's got some

1:23:06.120 --> 1:23:09.120
<v Speaker 1>inches on Bradberry. Um. Hopefully you can use that size

1:23:09.160 --> 1:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to his advantage and that confidence is back. Uh. No

1:23:11.960 --> 1:23:15.680
<v Speaker 1>offense leg injury seems to be fine. Now he's practicing

1:23:15.720 --> 1:23:18.599
<v Speaker 1>without limits. Now he's gonna play. You know that he's

1:23:18.600 --> 1:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna play. I got a C grade on him. The

1:23:21.360 --> 1:23:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Giants only allowed four touchdowns to tight ends last year,

1:23:23.760 --> 1:23:25.680
<v Speaker 1>but they allowed some yards, so I think he I

1:23:25.680 --> 1:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>think he might get just enough in this one. Over

1:23:29.040 --> 1:23:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to the Broncos side. Over to the Giant side. Excuse me,

1:23:32.640 --> 1:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm only starting ste Kwon Barkley. That's it. On the

1:23:36.000 --> 1:23:38.559
<v Speaker 1>passing side. Look what the Giants are trying to overcome.

1:23:38.560 --> 1:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>They're implied point totals nineteen points. The Broncos the top

1:23:42.000 --> 1:23:44.800
<v Speaker 1>ten against quarterbacks, top ten against wide receivers. The only

1:23:44.840 --> 1:23:47.920
<v Speaker 1>allowed three touchdowns to tight ends last year, and Waller

1:23:47.960 --> 1:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and Kelsey were the only two that had good games.

1:23:50.120 --> 1:23:52.160
<v Speaker 1>And that was a Denver defense that was beat up

1:23:53.080 --> 1:23:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the years. They're so smart to keep it Vangio. He's

1:23:56.479 --> 1:23:59.360
<v Speaker 1>such a good defensive come that von Miller back, Bradley

1:23:59.400 --> 1:24:01.759
<v Speaker 1>Chup's question and bull but likely to go their defensive

1:24:01.760 --> 1:24:05.439
<v Speaker 1>backs Ronald Darby, Kyle Fuller. They drafted Patrick certain over

1:24:06.280 --> 1:24:09.519
<v Speaker 1>Um justin fields, I guess controversially, and they have the

1:24:09.560 --> 1:24:12.839
<v Speaker 1>top rank slot corner according to PF and Bryce Callahan.

1:24:13.160 --> 1:24:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Who's gonna be covering Sterling Shepherd. So I got him

1:24:16.160 --> 1:24:18.160
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. Why do I have Kenny Golladay on

1:24:18.200 --> 1:24:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the bench. Well, this broncos d I mentioned top ten

1:24:22.200 --> 1:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>against wide receivers. But also he's had no time to

1:24:25.280 --> 1:24:28.960
<v Speaker 1>gain some chemistry with Daniel Jones. This this offseason, he's

1:24:28.960 --> 1:24:31.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna he's gonna be up with Ronald Darby. In fairness,

1:24:32.240 --> 1:24:36.519
<v Speaker 1>has any player ever had chemistry with That's fair, that's fair.

1:24:36.600 --> 1:24:38.960
<v Speaker 1>But he also gets a tough match up against Ronald Darby.

1:24:39.320 --> 1:24:41.360
<v Speaker 1>So I I have everyone on the bench and I'm

1:24:41.400 --> 1:24:44.439
<v Speaker 1>barely giving Barkley a C grade. I have issues though,

1:24:44.479 --> 1:24:46.920
<v Speaker 1>because they want to limit him. I think he might

1:24:47.080 --> 1:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>get just enough volume. But remember he's coming off that

1:24:49.640 --> 1:24:52.240
<v Speaker 1>A cl Andrey and he's they have to play Thursday night.

1:24:52.280 --> 1:24:55.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a short turnaround, so they might want to limit.

1:24:55.280 --> 1:24:58.080
<v Speaker 1>They might actually legitimately wanted in him, but they'll be Yeah,

1:24:58.120 --> 1:25:00.559
<v Speaker 1>I can't start Barkley. They'll be plankings ten. I think

1:25:00.600 --> 1:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>he's ten total touches. I have a C grade on

1:25:02.640 --> 1:25:04.599
<v Speaker 1>him because they'll be playing from behind. Maybe he gets

1:25:04.680 --> 1:25:07.360
<v Speaker 1>enough passing game work that maybe he gets that C grade.

1:25:07.720 --> 1:25:12.479
<v Speaker 1>I'll bet Booker produces him. I am fine benching him. Yeah. Absolutely.

1:25:12.760 --> 1:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he's in that Ezekiel Elliott from last week

1:25:15.120 --> 1:25:17.280
<v Speaker 1>category where you're like, you kind of feel like you

1:25:17.320 --> 1:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>should start him, but you can see the path through

1:25:19.280 --> 1:25:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a terrible game. I do. All right, Let's go to

1:25:22.520 --> 1:25:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore taking on Las Vegas on Monday night. The running

1:25:26.200 --> 1:25:29.280
<v Speaker 1>back situations a disaster. Of course, Tyson Williams should get

1:25:29.320 --> 1:25:31.519
<v Speaker 1>most of the work. You know, he's really built in

1:25:31.560 --> 1:25:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens mold for their runners that they like to have.

1:25:34.479 --> 1:25:37.479
<v Speaker 1>He's taller, sturdy runner with some burst and good balance,

1:25:37.800 --> 1:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>likely to get most of the workload, maybe like all

1:25:40.360 --> 1:25:42.759
<v Speaker 1>of the workload, or virtually all of it. He scored

1:25:42.800 --> 1:25:45.519
<v Speaker 1>a goal line touchdown in the preseason. Actually, no, I

1:25:45.520 --> 1:25:47.120
<v Speaker 1>take that back. It was a twenty yard touchdown in

1:25:47.160 --> 1:25:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the preseason. Last season, the Raiders allowed the eighth most

1:25:50.479 --> 1:25:54.400
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards hunter ten per game and almost five yards

1:25:54.400 --> 1:25:57.080
<v Speaker 1>per carry, and the off season did not provide any

1:25:57.080 --> 1:26:00.160
<v Speaker 1>personnel help. I think Tyson Williams a sneaky, good hard

1:26:00.200 --> 1:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I've gotta be grade on him as a workhorse back

1:26:02.240 --> 1:26:06.400
<v Speaker 1>in this game. Good a grade for Lamar Jackson writers.

1:26:06.479 --> 1:26:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Secondary remains a complete mess. One season after finishing his

1:26:09.640 --> 1:26:13.160
<v Speaker 1>pro football focus is twenty ninth ranked coverage unit. They

1:26:13.200 --> 1:26:17.600
<v Speaker 1>made epic draft blunders in by drafting Jonathan Abram and

1:26:17.640 --> 1:26:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Trayvon Mullen into their secondary, and those guys continue to start,

1:26:21.160 --> 1:26:24.479
<v Speaker 1>and that's just sunk cost right there. A couple of

1:26:24.560 --> 1:26:27.559
<v Speaker 1>rookies will being key roles in the secondary, Trayvon Mooring

1:26:27.680 --> 1:26:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and Nate Hobbs, both starting their first NFL games. And

1:26:31.280 --> 1:26:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders didn't give up a lot of rushing yards

1:26:33.920 --> 1:26:35.920
<v Speaker 1>last year, just thirteen per game, but they also didn't

1:26:35.920 --> 1:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>see very many rushing quarterbacks. And Lamar Jackson's a special

1:26:39.080 --> 1:26:41.840
<v Speaker 1>rusher and probably gets a few extra carries here with

1:26:41.880 --> 1:26:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the running back situation being what it is, So a

1:26:44.479 --> 1:26:47.200
<v Speaker 1>grade on Lamar Jackson um warmed up a lot in

1:26:47.240 --> 1:26:49.479
<v Speaker 1>the past few days to Mark's Brown because he got

1:26:49.520 --> 1:26:52.200
<v Speaker 1>through a whole week of practice with no issues after

1:26:52.280 --> 1:26:55.519
<v Speaker 1>missing a month of practice with a preseason hamstring injury.

1:26:55.720 --> 1:26:59.360
<v Speaker 1>And as I mentioned, the secondary here is a complete disaster.

1:26:59.600 --> 1:27:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I really really like Marquis Brown, and you know, for

1:27:01.760 --> 1:27:04.519
<v Speaker 1>a boom er bust guy who's got boomrit all over it.

1:27:04.680 --> 1:27:06.559
<v Speaker 1>For Marquise Brown, go ahead and start him here with

1:27:06.560 --> 1:27:10.559
<v Speaker 1>a B grade. See grade on Sammy Watkins, a legendary

1:27:10.640 --> 1:27:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Week one performer, if only week one, And like I said,

1:27:14.800 --> 1:27:17.839
<v Speaker 1>if not now when this is the secondary is terrible.

1:27:17.920 --> 1:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>So if you're ever gonna start Sammy Watkins for some

1:27:20.280 --> 1:27:23.880
<v Speaker 1>reason you drafted him, this is your one chance right here. Um,

1:27:24.360 --> 1:27:28.960
<v Speaker 1>all the terrible reason, let's start. Let's let's secondary. I

1:27:28.960 --> 1:27:33.320
<v Speaker 1>forget hallucinated all the problems in the secondary already and

1:27:33.439 --> 1:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>they just don't have a lot of options. They don't

1:27:35.320 --> 1:27:37.680
<v Speaker 1>have a lot, got nothing left. Watkins is gonna have

1:27:37.720 --> 1:27:41.639
<v Speaker 1>a great week. Not great. How about a grade for

1:27:41.800 --> 1:27:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Mark Andrews, who was Jackson's healthiest and most most reliable

1:27:46.200 --> 1:27:48.840
<v Speaker 1>target last year. The Raiders were middle of the packing

1:27:48.920 --> 1:27:53.160
<v Speaker 1>tight end defense, but they somehow skirted every upper tier

1:27:53.800 --> 1:27:57.519
<v Speaker 1>every upper tier tight end except Travis Kelsey, and Kelsey

1:27:57.560 --> 1:28:01.599
<v Speaker 1>destroyed them. So in a grade on him for the Raiders,

1:28:01.680 --> 1:28:04.719
<v Speaker 1>there's only one guy to start, and it's Darren Waller.

1:28:04.960 --> 1:28:07.760
<v Speaker 1>He won't catch anybody by surprise, especially not the team

1:28:07.760 --> 1:28:10.559
<v Speaker 1>that drafted him. He's sitting on a very good game here.

1:28:10.600 --> 1:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Aguilar's departure leaves eight touchdowns behind, and that's an opportunity

1:28:15.120 --> 1:28:18.960
<v Speaker 1>for him. Josh Jacobs. I've got just a C grade

1:28:19.000 --> 1:28:21.280
<v Speaker 1>on him. His yards per carry dropped by a full

1:28:21.360 --> 1:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>yard last year. He's got to contend with Kenyan Drake

1:28:24.120 --> 1:28:26.280
<v Speaker 1>for carries. I almost had a bench grade on him.

1:28:26.320 --> 1:28:29.200
<v Speaker 1>And it's Baltimore's defense, and it's Baltimore's defense. But just

1:28:29.240 --> 1:28:32.559
<v Speaker 1>through sheer volume, hopefully Josh Jacobs will get enough done

1:28:32.600 --> 1:28:35.200
<v Speaker 1>for your team. And that is it for the starters

1:28:35.240 --> 1:28:38.040
<v Speaker 1>for the race. It's all, it's all bad. Thanks for listening.

1:28:38.040 --> 1:28:39.599
<v Speaker 1>If you missed any part of the show, check out

1:28:39.600 --> 1:28:42.479
<v Speaker 1>our podcast of Fantasy Football Weekly. You can certainly do

1:28:42.520 --> 1:28:44.680
<v Speaker 1>that and catch up on everything that you missed. We'll

1:28:44.720 --> 1:28:47.000
<v Speaker 1>be back next week. Best of luck. In the opener, everybody,

1:28:47.200 --> 1:28:59.519
<v Speaker 1>Bye bye. Fantasy Football Weekly is a production of i

1:28:59.680 --> 1:29:02.439
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio. For more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit

1:29:02.439 --> 1:29:05.479
<v Speaker 1>the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

1:29:05.520 --> 1:29:06.840
<v Speaker 1>listen to your favorite shows.