1
00:00:01,800 --> 00:00:05,560
Speaker 1: For all the focus on deficits and tariffs, you might

2
00:00:05,680 --> 00:00:09,560
Speaker 1: think economic ties between the US and China are just

3
00:00:09,760 --> 00:00:12,840
Speaker 1: about how much stuff is put on a ship, how

4
00:00:12,920 --> 00:00:16,400
Speaker 1: much it costs, where it's made, and where it's going.

5
00:00:17,400 --> 00:00:22,760
Speaker 1: You would be mistaken. The future belongs to data, not merchandise,

6
00:00:23,239 --> 00:00:27,520
Speaker 1: and the world economy is a duopoly. America and China

7
00:00:27,920 --> 00:00:40,240
Speaker 1: own it. Welcome to Benjamin, a show about the global econome.

8
00:00:40,920 --> 00:00:46,199
Speaker 1: I'm Daniel Moss, columnist at Bloomberg Opinion in New York.

9
00:00:46,840 --> 00:00:50,080
Speaker 1: A few people are as familiar with both the viewers

10
00:00:50,240 --> 00:00:56,000
Speaker 1: and China as Kai Fu Lei. Born in Taiwan, Doctor

11
00:00:56,080 --> 00:01:00,560
Speaker 1: Lee has spent his career straddling Silicon Valley the tech

12
00:01:00,720 --> 00:01:06,120
Speaker 1: precincts of Beijing. He used to run Google China and

13
00:01:06,200 --> 00:01:10,720
Speaker 1: now leads sign Ovation Ventures, a firm that focuses on

14
00:01:10,840 --> 00:01:14,480
Speaker 1: developing the next big thing. Along the way, he had

15
00:01:14,520 --> 00:01:20,280
Speaker 1: a personal crisis that further sharpened his insights. Dr Lee

16
00:01:20,480 --> 00:01:26,240
Speaker 1: is the author of Ai Superpowers, China, Silicon Valley, and

17
00:01:26,319 --> 00:01:31,399
Speaker 1: the New World Order. It's probably the business book of

18
00:01:31,480 --> 00:01:35,440
Speaker 1: the moment. Dr leeh thanks for joining us, and thanks

19
00:01:35,480 --> 00:01:40,000
Speaker 1: for not putting the word disruption in the title. Thank you.

20
00:01:40,240 --> 00:01:43,440
Speaker 1: It's great to talk to you. I've heard you describe

21
00:01:43,640 --> 00:01:47,400
Speaker 1: China as the new Saudi Arabia and data as the

22
00:01:47,480 --> 00:01:50,640
Speaker 1: new oil. What did you mean by that and how

23
00:01:50,680 --> 00:01:55,600
Speaker 1: does that capture the essence of this moment? Sure? The

24
00:01:55,640 --> 00:01:59,160
Speaker 1: way are the official intelligence or AI works today is

25
00:01:59,200 --> 00:02:03,560
Speaker 1: that within this single application, when an AI algorithm is

26
00:02:03,600 --> 00:02:07,720
Speaker 1: trained down a huge amount of data with corresponding labels,

27
00:02:08,200 --> 00:02:11,720
Speaker 1: it can then make decisions in that domain at a

28
00:02:11,840 --> 00:02:16,240
Speaker 1: superhuman accuracy. So the more the data, the better. So

29
00:02:16,280 --> 00:02:20,200
Speaker 1: the system is not programmed by humans to do make decisions,

30
00:02:20,240 --> 00:02:23,840
Speaker 1: but it learns from data. And the amount of data

31
00:02:23,880 --> 00:02:28,480
Speaker 1: that's needed is is huge. So today China has the

32
00:02:28,520 --> 00:02:31,240
Speaker 1: most data in the world and that gives a certain

33
00:02:31,280 --> 00:02:37,040
Speaker 1: advantage to China. Now, technology, business, and economic literature has

34
00:02:37,080 --> 00:02:42,200
Speaker 1: been gushing about artificial intelligence for a while. What's changed.

35
00:02:42,960 --> 00:02:46,359
Speaker 1: I think the biggest change was that ten years ago

36
00:02:46,919 --> 00:02:51,280
Speaker 1: a new technology called deep learning was invented and it

37
00:02:51,440 --> 00:02:56,119
Speaker 1: was applied in many many domains, and starting about six

38
00:02:56,200 --> 00:02:59,720
Speaker 1: years ago, we began to see its efficacy in face

39
00:02:59,720 --> 00:03:03,400
Speaker 1: wreck cognition, later speech recognition, later the game of Go,

40
00:03:04,240 --> 00:03:08,960
Speaker 1: and almost all subsequent technologies were built on this deep

41
00:03:09,040 --> 00:03:13,320
Speaker 1: learning or associated technologies. So that was the single big

42
00:03:13,360 --> 00:03:18,760
Speaker 1: breakthrough that became clear to the researchers about six years ago,

43
00:03:19,040 --> 00:03:21,160
Speaker 1: but to the rest of the world about two and

44
00:03:21,240 --> 00:03:25,040
Speaker 1: a half years ago when Alpha go emerged, and this

45
00:03:25,160 --> 00:03:30,400
Speaker 1: technology coincided with the rapidly increasing amount of data because

46
00:03:30,440 --> 00:03:34,400
Speaker 1: deep learning is a very deep network with potentially billions

47
00:03:34,400 --> 00:03:38,160
Speaker 1: of parameters to train, so it was hungry for data.

48
00:03:38,600 --> 00:03:43,120
Speaker 1: So the accessibility and growth of Internet data alongside with

49
00:03:43,240 --> 00:03:48,680
Speaker 1: that the development of deep learning together created never before

50
00:03:48,760 --> 00:03:52,840
Speaker 1: seeing accuracy in all kinds of tasks that deep learning

51
00:03:52,880 --> 00:03:56,800
Speaker 1: plus large data tackles. Can you put this in the

52
00:03:57,000 --> 00:04:02,240
Speaker 1: context of economic history for the past couple of centuries?

53
00:04:02,400 --> 00:04:06,560
Speaker 1: Where does this rank in the period that began with say,

54
00:04:06,640 --> 00:04:12,040
Speaker 1: the Industrial Revolution in the United Kingdom? Okay, I think

55
00:04:12,080 --> 00:04:17,760
Speaker 1: AI should definitely rank among the Industrial Revolution, in particular

56
00:04:17,920 --> 00:04:26,719
Speaker 1: with the steam engine, electricity, and perhaps the internet computer revolution.

57
00:04:27,400 --> 00:04:31,159
Speaker 1: These probably are the top three or four in my

58
00:04:31,279 --> 00:04:35,520
Speaker 1: personal opinion. It will end up proven to be number one,

59
00:04:35,880 --> 00:04:38,640
Speaker 1: but of course that remains to be seen. Does the

60
00:04:38,760 --> 00:04:43,800
Speaker 1: industrial and economic map of the world now resemble something

61
00:04:43,839 --> 00:04:48,680
Speaker 1: from the nine century but instead of European powers gobbling

62
00:04:48,760 --> 00:04:52,880
Speaker 1: up territory in Africa and Asia, China in the United

63
00:04:52,920 --> 00:04:57,799
Speaker 1: States carving up the technology world. What does that map

64
00:04:57,839 --> 00:05:01,680
Speaker 1: look like today? I think if we take a snapshot

65
00:05:01,800 --> 00:05:05,520
Speaker 1: right now, US is still has the upper hand with

66
00:05:05,720 --> 00:05:11,640
Speaker 1: American technologies penetrating developed countries and some developing countries, and

67
00:05:11,800 --> 00:05:15,320
Speaker 1: China is largely still within China, with a little bit

68
00:05:15,360 --> 00:05:19,440
Speaker 1: of penetration into other countries. But we're seeing a rapidly

69
00:05:19,600 --> 00:05:25,800
Speaker 1: increasing pace that Chinese technology companies, and that's primarily mobile

70
00:05:26,200 --> 00:05:32,760
Speaker 1: apps and AI companies going from China to Southeast Asia,

71
00:05:33,120 --> 00:05:37,760
Speaker 1: Middle East, and Africa. They're just at the beginning, so

72
00:05:37,800 --> 00:05:41,720
Speaker 1: it's too early to tell the final results. But given

73
00:05:41,800 --> 00:05:46,800
Speaker 1: that the American giants have largely ignored those regions. Um

74
00:05:46,880 --> 00:05:50,360
Speaker 1: as you add India also, since that's generally separate from

75
00:05:50,440 --> 00:05:54,520
Speaker 1: the Southeast Asia, US is generally not paid too much

76
00:05:54,560 --> 00:05:58,280
Speaker 1: attention to those four regions. I think it gives China

77
00:05:58,440 --> 00:06:03,520
Speaker 1: an opportunity to go into these four regions. And in addition,

78
00:06:03,760 --> 00:06:08,440
Speaker 1: the Chinese demographics may match those regions better than the US,

79
00:06:08,480 --> 00:06:13,479
Speaker 1: so the products may be more attractive. And coincidentally, it

80
00:06:13,560 --> 00:06:19,080
Speaker 1: also matches the Belt Road initiative from China. So I

81
00:06:19,120 --> 00:06:22,479
Speaker 1: think the developed countries will end up continuing to be

82
00:06:23,279 --> 00:06:29,279
Speaker 1: a stronghold of American dominance in technology. But I think

83
00:06:29,720 --> 00:06:34,039
Speaker 1: most of the rest of our world would potentially have

84
00:06:34,240 --> 00:06:38,320
Speaker 1: a high degree of Chinese penetration, probably not as strong

85
00:06:38,400 --> 00:06:41,719
Speaker 1: as US in the developed countries, but let's say a

86
00:06:42,279 --> 00:06:47,560
Speaker 1: more than fifty percent penetration or dependency on Chinese technologies.

87
00:06:47,720 --> 00:06:51,160
Speaker 1: Over let's say the next five to ten years. So

88
00:06:51,600 --> 00:06:57,479
Speaker 1: broadly speaking, the US would have Western Europe, Canada, and Japan,

89
00:06:58,680 --> 00:07:05,720
Speaker 1: and China would have the rest, probably not quite I

90
00:07:05,760 --> 00:07:09,920
Speaker 1: think um. I think the US would have nearly total

91
00:07:10,000 --> 00:07:16,480
Speaker 1: penetration of most of, if not all, of Europe, Canada, Australia,

92
00:07:17,160 --> 00:07:23,400
Speaker 1: and Japan, and possibly some of South America and a

93
00:07:23,440 --> 00:07:26,000
Speaker 1: little bit at the rest of the world. And China

94
00:07:26,120 --> 00:07:31,640
Speaker 1: would have all of China and more than fifty of India,

95
00:07:31,760 --> 00:07:37,200
Speaker 1: Southeast Asia, Middle East, and Africa. The trade disputes between

96
00:07:37,320 --> 00:07:40,880
Speaker 1: the United States and China, which dominate much of the

97
00:07:40,960 --> 00:07:47,880
Speaker 1: public discourse in America these days, that principally about merchandise trade,

98
00:07:48,320 --> 00:07:53,200
Speaker 1: about deficits, about the cost of production. That seems to

99
00:07:53,240 --> 00:07:58,400
Speaker 1: be a completely different conversation from that of the world

100
00:07:58,480 --> 00:08:02,640
Speaker 1: that you're inhabiting. Well to be fair. There's also intellectual property,

101
00:08:02,920 --> 00:08:07,280
Speaker 1: which I think is crosses both. I do agree that

102
00:08:07,320 --> 00:08:11,880
Speaker 1: the trade disputes are include the intellectual property don't affect

103
00:08:12,480 --> 00:08:17,800
Speaker 1: um our area, which is AI mobile software. But some

104
00:08:17,920 --> 00:08:23,920
Speaker 1: of those issues certainly do affect semiconductor PC UM mobile

105
00:08:23,960 --> 00:08:26,840
Speaker 1: phones and so on, which are very much related to

106
00:08:26,960 --> 00:08:30,480
Speaker 1: the area as we invest in now. You were born

107
00:08:30,480 --> 00:08:33,400
Speaker 1: in Taiwan, you came to the United States as a

108
00:08:33,440 --> 00:08:37,800
Speaker 1: small boy to Tennessee. You've worked in the Valley, You've

109
00:08:37,800 --> 00:08:40,680
Speaker 1: worked for an American company in China, you have your

110
00:08:40,679 --> 00:08:45,480
Speaker 1: own venture capital firm. As a student of the United

111
00:08:45,520 --> 00:08:51,160
Speaker 1: States and the economic and technological currents, what from your perspective,

112
00:08:51,200 --> 00:08:53,280
Speaker 1: is going on in this country right now? How would

113
00:08:53,320 --> 00:08:58,199
Speaker 1: you define this moment? Do you mean the technology development

114
00:08:58,400 --> 00:09:02,680
Speaker 1: or the trade disputes? If you've wrapped up the overall

115
00:09:02,840 --> 00:09:07,800
Speaker 1: vibe in America right now compared with previous visits, from

116
00:09:07,800 --> 00:09:09,480
Speaker 1: the time you were growing up, from the time you

117
00:09:09,520 --> 00:09:14,120
Speaker 1: were a student at university, here, what's changed in this

118
00:09:14,280 --> 00:09:20,720
Speaker 1: country and why? I think in Silicon Valley not much

119
00:09:20,760 --> 00:09:25,440
Speaker 1: has changed. There has been and still is a very

120
00:09:25,480 --> 00:09:28,960
Speaker 1: strong self confidence that it is the center of the world.

121
00:09:29,679 --> 00:09:33,800
Speaker 1: The rest of America is beginning to realize that there

122
00:09:34,000 --> 00:09:40,680
Speaker 1: is an alternate technological force emerging that's called China. And

123
00:09:41,880 --> 00:09:47,640
Speaker 1: I think the Silicon Valley centric view is potentially dangerous

124
00:09:48,320 --> 00:09:50,680
Speaker 1: because it is a great view. It is a great

125
00:09:50,920 --> 00:09:54,680
Speaker 1: way to develop products, but China has proven that it

126
00:09:54,800 --> 00:09:57,720
Speaker 1: is not the only way. So it would be wise

127
00:09:57,800 --> 00:10:02,600
Speaker 1: to consider at least the two alternate ways that great

128
00:10:02,640 --> 00:10:09,160
Speaker 1: innovative products can be developed. And in terms of overall sentiment,

129
00:10:09,960 --> 00:10:16,959
Speaker 1: I think I sense more divisiveness in America. I think

130
00:10:17,360 --> 00:10:22,600
Speaker 1: before there was a much greater unity, and I think

131
00:10:22,640 --> 00:10:28,600
Speaker 1: there is um more disagreements today, and I think there

132
00:10:28,640 --> 00:10:33,080
Speaker 1: are it feels like they're more uncertainty, but the economy

133
00:10:33,200 --> 00:10:39,959
Speaker 1: is good and the people feel confident about the American technologies. Yeah,

134
00:10:40,080 --> 00:11:14,840
Speaker 1: that's basically what I see. How profoundly did your brush

135
00:11:15,200 --> 00:11:21,440
Speaker 1: with cancer effect your perspective? Very very profoundly. In my

136
00:11:21,559 --> 00:11:25,640
Speaker 1: first fifty plus years of my life, I've I've really

137
00:11:25,880 --> 00:11:29,840
Speaker 1: was a workaholic, and I felt work was the center

138
00:11:29,880 --> 00:11:34,800
Speaker 1: of my life. And family was UM a set of

139
00:11:34,840 --> 00:11:38,880
Speaker 1: people I depended on, but I gave them time as

140
00:11:38,920 --> 00:11:42,520
Speaker 1: I could afford from my work. UM gave enough times

141
00:11:42,520 --> 00:11:48,600
Speaker 1: so that they tolerate my lack of attention. But as

142
00:11:48,640 --> 00:11:52,880
Speaker 1: I found out that I had cancer, I realized that

143
00:11:52,920 --> 00:11:57,880
Speaker 1: all the accomplishment really meant nothing, and that, like most

144
00:11:57,920 --> 00:12:01,920
Speaker 1: people facing the possibility of death, I realized that what

145
00:12:02,160 --> 00:12:08,120
Speaker 1: was important in life was first and foremost to love

146
00:12:08,200 --> 00:12:10,400
Speaker 1: and give love back to the people who love me,

147
00:12:11,120 --> 00:12:14,960
Speaker 1: and secondly, to follow the things and do things that

148
00:12:15,080 --> 00:12:19,720
Speaker 1: I am passionate about. And that's very consistent across thousands

149
00:12:19,760 --> 00:12:22,439
Speaker 1: of people facing death, and I think there's a lot

150
00:12:22,480 --> 00:12:27,200
Speaker 1: of wisdom in people facing death. So fortunately, I'm now

151
00:12:27,360 --> 00:12:32,280
Speaker 1: in remission and when I now come back to work,

152
00:12:32,880 --> 00:12:36,800
Speaker 1: I no longer put work as my only priority, and

153
00:12:36,960 --> 00:12:40,560
Speaker 1: when my kids come home, I actually just don't work,

154
00:12:41,040 --> 00:12:43,240
Speaker 1: and it's a reversal of what I used to do.

155
00:12:43,679 --> 00:12:46,760
Speaker 1: I still spend a lot of hours working less than before,

156
00:12:47,240 --> 00:12:50,160
Speaker 1: but it's a matter of priorities. It's a matter of

157
00:12:50,200 --> 00:12:53,600
Speaker 1: finally realizing what was important. And it also made me

158
00:12:53,640 --> 00:12:59,679
Speaker 1: realize that workaholism is something that haunts both the Americans

159
00:12:59,760 --> 00:13:03,959
Speaker 1: and the Chinese, and that there really is more to

160
00:13:04,200 --> 00:13:09,080
Speaker 1: life than work. So in some sense, uh, as we

161
00:13:09,240 --> 00:13:12,880
Speaker 1: enter the era of AI, I think AI is here

162
00:13:12,920 --> 00:13:17,359
Speaker 1: to relieve us from a lot of redundant or repetitive

163
00:13:17,480 --> 00:13:20,800
Speaker 1: or routine work that we're doing, giving us a lot

164
00:13:20,800 --> 00:13:25,040
Speaker 1: more time back to us so that we can give

165
00:13:25,280 --> 00:13:29,199
Speaker 1: time to the people who love us, We can do

166
00:13:29,240 --> 00:13:33,440
Speaker 1: the things that we are passionate about, and and we

167
00:13:33,480 --> 00:13:36,520
Speaker 1: can have time to think about the real meaning of life,

168
00:13:36,559 --> 00:13:40,600
Speaker 1: which is definitely not work. In keeping with that, what

169
00:13:40,640 --> 00:13:46,199
Speaker 1: does this new technological world order main for the future

170
00:13:46,240 --> 00:13:52,920
Speaker 1: of work? Because AI is capable of doing single, distinct

171
00:13:53,000 --> 00:13:57,079
Speaker 1: tasks much better than people, that means we don't have

172
00:13:57,160 --> 00:14:02,000
Speaker 1: to be threatened that AI will become robot overlords ruling

173
00:14:02,040 --> 00:14:05,720
Speaker 1: over us because there are tools that we control. On

174
00:14:05,760 --> 00:14:09,000
Speaker 1: the other hand, if they can do single tasks better

175
00:14:09,080 --> 00:14:12,760
Speaker 1: than us, there are many people who do jobs that

176
00:14:12,880 --> 00:14:17,880
Speaker 1: are composed of a number of single tasks. That means

177
00:14:17,960 --> 00:14:22,120
Speaker 1: those jobs will be displaced by AI, either one on

178
00:14:22,240 --> 00:14:26,800
Speaker 1: one or through industry disruption. So in terms of the

179
00:14:26,840 --> 00:14:31,000
Speaker 1: future of work, I'm quite concerned that a certain percentage

180
00:14:31,000 --> 00:14:36,400
Speaker 1: of jobs that are not requiring the most creativity and

181
00:14:36,480 --> 00:14:40,960
Speaker 1: not requiring the greatest human touch and interaction, those kinds

182
00:14:40,960 --> 00:14:44,560
Speaker 1: of routine jobs will be replaced by AI, and that

183
00:14:45,160 --> 00:14:49,000
Speaker 1: the time has come for us to plan to real

184
00:14:49,520 --> 00:14:53,760
Speaker 1: to reskill the people in those jobs, and while we

185
00:14:53,800 --> 00:14:57,960
Speaker 1: still have time to create jobs that can be both

186
00:14:58,000 --> 00:15:03,160
Speaker 1: satisfying and reasonably play paying, so that people can move

187
00:15:03,200 --> 00:15:06,200
Speaker 1: on to the next steps in their lives rather than

188
00:15:06,360 --> 00:15:09,840
Speaker 1: just to see AI take over one type of job

189
00:15:09,920 --> 00:15:14,040
Speaker 1: after another, Doctor Lee. You're probably familiar with some of

190
00:15:14,080 --> 00:15:18,240
Speaker 1: the criticism that's made of Northern California and in some

191
00:15:18,280 --> 00:15:22,760
Speaker 1: ways the state in general, that the scene is to uniform,

192
00:15:22,840 --> 00:15:26,200
Speaker 1: there's too much group think, it's a one party state,

193
00:15:27,040 --> 00:15:30,280
Speaker 1: and it's lost its age. What's your perspective on that

194
00:15:31,000 --> 00:15:36,720
Speaker 1: about California, about Silicon Valley California in general, versus what

195
00:15:36,760 --> 00:15:39,520
Speaker 1: you're seeing when you hang out in the tech precincts

196
00:15:39,520 --> 00:15:44,560
Speaker 1: of Beijing. Well, I am very conflicted because at the

197
00:15:44,600 --> 00:15:49,120
Speaker 1: same time, I have tremendous respect of the vision that's

198
00:15:49,160 --> 00:15:51,720
Speaker 1: come out of Silicon Valley, that has led the world

199
00:15:51,800 --> 00:15:55,600
Speaker 1: for the last thirty years, and that still has many

200
00:15:55,640 --> 00:15:59,880
Speaker 1: of the world's most amazing companies and startups. But I

201
00:16:00,000 --> 00:16:04,280
Speaker 1: I'm also at the same time concerned that the success

202
00:16:04,400 --> 00:16:10,000
Speaker 1: has created some degree of self entitlement and maybe even

203
00:16:10,040 --> 00:16:13,080
Speaker 1: a little bit of hubris, the feeling that the world

204
00:16:13,200 --> 00:16:17,920
Speaker 1: revolves around Silicon Valley. They belief that um only the

205
00:16:17,960 --> 00:16:22,960
Speaker 1: companies there matter, the belief that only Silicon Valley innovates,

206
00:16:23,160 --> 00:16:27,320
Speaker 1: and only the method of Silicon Valley that matters when

207
00:16:27,320 --> 00:16:31,600
Speaker 1: it comes to innovation. And I think that is myopic.

208
00:16:32,160 --> 00:16:36,360
Speaker 1: And if if we, if Americans all really believe that,

209
00:16:37,000 --> 00:16:40,120
Speaker 1: then it would be missing all the exciting things happening

210
00:16:40,120 --> 00:16:45,280
Speaker 1: in China. Chinese model of innovation is different. It's heavier,

211
00:16:45,720 --> 00:16:50,120
Speaker 1: it's building impregnable business models that actually are more built

212
00:16:50,160 --> 00:16:55,800
Speaker 1: to last, but maybe less visionary and technically exciting. I

213
00:16:55,840 --> 00:16:59,480
Speaker 1: think as citizens of this world, we should all be

214
00:16:59,720 --> 00:17:04,119
Speaker 1: hum ball and study different types of innovation and be

215
00:17:04,240 --> 00:17:09,320
Speaker 1: open to different models. And if Silicon Valley continues to

216
00:17:09,560 --> 00:17:15,080
Speaker 1: only look within and not accept external innovation, then it

217
00:17:15,160 --> 00:17:18,399
Speaker 1: will be missing half of the teaching materials for the

218
00:17:18,480 --> 00:17:21,840
Speaker 1: young people in Silicon Valley. That I can assure you

219
00:17:21,920 --> 00:17:26,840
Speaker 1: that the young people in China are studying humbly both

220
00:17:27,240 --> 00:17:30,560
Speaker 1: the successes in the US, the Googles and facebooks and

221
00:17:30,640 --> 00:17:33,919
Speaker 1: the successes from China the Ali Baba's and made Twins

222
00:17:33,960 --> 00:17:38,320
Speaker 1: and ten cents, and that gives a more robust set

223
00:17:38,680 --> 00:17:42,800
Speaker 1: of instructions, if you will, for the Chinese entrepreneurs that

224
00:17:42,920 --> 00:17:47,639
Speaker 1: there's no reason American entrepreneurs should um keep the blinders

225
00:17:47,680 --> 00:17:51,639
Speaker 1: on and throw away half of the instructions that could

226
00:17:51,640 --> 00:17:56,320
Speaker 1: be so helpful to their growth as entrepreneurs. What role

227
00:17:56,480 --> 00:18:00,400
Speaker 1: should the state play in this? I was fortunate enough

228
00:18:00,440 --> 00:18:04,120
Speaker 1: to be at an event last month with Audrey Tongue,

229
00:18:05,040 --> 00:18:09,119
Speaker 1: Taiwan's Digital minister, whom you probably know. Uh. That was

230
00:18:09,160 --> 00:18:14,600
Speaker 1: a very special experience. It should China and the United

231
00:18:14,640 --> 00:18:18,639
Speaker 1: States each have a digital affairs minister like Audrey Tongue.

232
00:18:20,040 --> 00:18:23,879
Speaker 1: I'm not sure. I think UM, whatever role is called

233
00:18:24,359 --> 00:18:29,720
Speaker 1: chief technical officer, chief Digital officer, chief AI officer, that

234
00:18:29,960 --> 00:18:34,280
Speaker 1: role has to be empowered in order to be impactful

235
00:18:34,680 --> 00:18:39,600
Speaker 1: for any country. I think what's perhaps more important is

236
00:18:39,760 --> 00:18:44,520
Speaker 1: to let private enterprises do what they do best. That is,

237
00:18:44,720 --> 00:18:49,840
Speaker 1: let private capital invest in private companies to build companies,

238
00:18:50,280 --> 00:18:53,360
Speaker 1: and to the extent that they're successful in getting users,

239
00:18:53,359 --> 00:18:56,600
Speaker 1: in generating revenues and profits, they will get more money

240
00:18:56,640 --> 00:19:01,399
Speaker 1: and then potentially be listed publicly under to success. But

241
00:19:01,520 --> 00:19:05,919
Speaker 1: the role of governments is really to provide the types

242
00:19:05,960 --> 00:19:11,639
Speaker 1: of infrastructure that private companies cannot do, and to have

243
00:19:12,600 --> 00:19:17,480
Speaker 1: really as open as possible technical policies that let new

244
00:19:17,520 --> 00:19:23,480
Speaker 1: technologies have a chance to perhaps grow faster and potentially

245
00:19:23,520 --> 00:19:29,600
Speaker 1: even disrupt traditional UM technologies. I think it is that's

246
00:19:29,760 --> 00:19:34,200
Speaker 1: openness and infrastructure building UH that will ensure the country

247
00:19:34,400 --> 00:19:39,239
Speaker 1: moves forward. China does a reasonably good job on both UH.

248
00:19:39,359 --> 00:19:43,720
Speaker 1: Infrastructure building would be examples like building a new highway

249
00:19:43,840 --> 00:19:47,119
Speaker 1: for autonomous driving or even a new city the size

250
00:19:47,119 --> 00:19:52,320
Speaker 1: of Chicago for autonomous driving. And as far as open

251
00:19:52,359 --> 00:19:56,480
Speaker 1: policies would be the example of letting the Chinese software

252
00:19:56,480 --> 00:20:02,240
Speaker 1: companies develop payment so much so that these up mobile

253
00:20:02,280 --> 00:20:07,439
Speaker 1: payments have squeezed out cash as well as credit cards

254
00:20:07,800 --> 00:20:12,960
Speaker 1: from almost into obsolescence. So these are the kinds of

255
00:20:13,000 --> 00:20:17,120
Speaker 1: examples that has pushed China ahead to the extent possible.

256
00:20:17,359 --> 00:20:21,720
Speaker 1: I think other countries can try to build similar infrastructures

257
00:20:21,760 --> 00:20:27,000
Speaker 1: and have such open mindedness about technology, otherwise there would

258
00:20:27,040 --> 00:20:32,639
Speaker 1: be risks of falling behind. I attended your Asia Society

259
00:20:32,680 --> 00:20:36,199
Speaker 1: event in New York October one, and I have to

260
00:20:36,240 --> 00:20:40,040
Speaker 1: admit to being surprised to see you in an extremely smart,

261
00:20:40,560 --> 00:20:45,000
Speaker 1: well tailed three piece suit with an immaculate tie. I

262
00:20:45,080 --> 00:20:47,800
Speaker 1: don't think it was many people's vision of what a

263
00:20:47,880 --> 00:20:50,920
Speaker 1: tech guru would look like. Where had you just been

264
00:20:52,680 --> 00:20:55,320
Speaker 1: I knew I was going to the Asia Society. I

265
00:20:55,359 --> 00:21:00,199
Speaker 1: was going to greet many people who wear suits and tie. Um,

266
00:21:00,440 --> 00:21:03,720
Speaker 1: but to be fair, I do wear a certain tie

267
00:21:04,200 --> 00:21:08,400
Speaker 1: quite often and that's my prefer attire. Dr Lee, thank

268
00:21:08,440 --> 00:21:12,520
Speaker 1: you so much for joining us, and congratulations on the book. Okay,

269
00:21:12,520 --> 00:21:25,280
Speaker 1: thanks so much. Benchmark will be back next week. Until then,

270
00:21:25,320 --> 00:21:29,360
Speaker 1: you can find us on the Bloomberg terminal, Bloomberg dot com,

271
00:21:29,359 --> 00:21:33,480
Speaker 1: our Bloomberg app, as well as podcast destinations such as

272
00:21:33,520 --> 00:21:38,439
Speaker 1: Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen. We'd love it

273
00:21:38,720 --> 00:21:40,720
Speaker 1: if he took the time to rate and review the

274
00:21:40,760 --> 00:21:44,520
Speaker 1: show so more people can find us. You can follow

275
00:21:44,600 --> 00:21:50,160
Speaker 1: me on Twitter at moss underscore E. Benchmark is produced

276
00:21:50,160 --> 00:21:55,000
Speaker 1: by tofa Foreheirs. The head of Bloomberg Podcasts is Francesco Leaving.

277
00:21:55,560 --> 00:22:00,760
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening. See you next time. It was not

278
00:22:01,200 --> 00:22:03,720
Speaker 1: the Boy