WEBVTT - Interview With Sebastian Mallaby: Masters in Business (Audio)

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Masters in Business is brought to you by the American

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Arbitration Association. Business disputes are inevitable, resolve Faster with the

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:12.240
<v Speaker 1>American Arbitration Association, the global leader in alternative dispute resolution

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>for over ninety years. Learn more at a d R

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>dot org. This is Masters in Business with Barry Ridholts

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>on Boomberg Radio. This week. On the podcast, I have

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Sebastian Mallaby, and I have to tell you I found

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:35.480
<v Speaker 1>this to be an absolutely fascinating conversation. We definitely sort

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>of go off into the weeds on some wonky um

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:45.560
<v Speaker 1>history and biography of who Alan Greenspan was and why

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>he had such an outsized uh influence. If if you're

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>a Federal Reserve watcher or econo geek, you will find

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this stuff fascinating, and we talked about

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>it extensively. I prob belie could have spent another hour

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 1>just on Alan Greenspan, but if I did that, I

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have been able to get some more money than God,

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>which is a delightful book on hedge fund managers, highly recommended.

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 1>I could babble about this stuff endlessly, but instead of

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>me doing that without any further Ado my conversation with

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Sebastian Mallaby. This is Masters in Business with Barry Ridholts

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. My special guest today is Sebastian Mallaby.

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>He is an author and the paul A. Vulgar Fellow

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>for International Economics at the Council on Foreign Relations. He

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>has contributed to The Washington Post and The Economist, and

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>he is the author of More Money Than God Hedge

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Funds in the Making of the New Elite, that won

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the two thousand and eleven Lobe Prize and was a

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>New York Times bestseller. His most recent book, The Man

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Who Knew, The Life and Times of Alan Greenspan. Uh

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Sebastian Mallaby. Welcome to Bloomberg. Great to pay with you, Parry,

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>So I'm fascinated by both your process and the topics

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>you cover. Let's start with The Man Who Knew, a

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>title I perhaps might choose to argue with you over,

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 1>but I can't argue with this quote. This sex up

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>from the book. No post war figure has loomed over

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:32.080
<v Speaker 1>global finance as imposingly as Alan Greenspan, America's FED Chairman

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>became FED Chairman the month of the crash, and no

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>figure has been more paradoxical. A man who preached the

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>virtue of the gold standard yet came to embody paper money.

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>A man who posed as a dry technocrat yet was

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:53.679
<v Speaker 1>political to his core. Let's discuss that. Well, he is

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a man of paradox this and I didn't quite understand

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>before I began writing quite how deep those paradox has went.

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:02.959
<v Speaker 1>But he was a person who had lectured in the

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixties that the creation of the Federal Reserve was

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and historic disaster. So the man who later embodied the

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve personified the central bank. He didn't believe there

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>should be a central bank, which which is which is ironic?

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I always found it fascinating that he was such a

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Fed chairman, interventionist, and yet he very much argued for

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>learning the marketplace work things out themselves. Yes, he had

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>begun in his earlier life, in his thirties and forties,

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>as a very determined libertarian. I mean this idea that

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>there shouldn't be a central bank was because he believed

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>in a goal standard. Why because he didn't want the

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>government to be in the business of making money. He

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>thought that that was too much government power. And yet

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>when he was FED chairman, of course, not only did

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>he move interest rates around quite a lot to try

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to micromanage the level of inflation, but also he was

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>willing to intervene when there was a crisis repeatedly and

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 1>bail things out. Literally within his first few weeks of

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>joining the FED, the seven Crash occurs down in a

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>single day, lots of panic, and he stepped in and

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>provided liquidity. Really that set the tone for the rest

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of his his career. It did, so you know, when

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:23.840
<v Speaker 1>there was the Mexico crisis in the beginning of nineteen five,

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the FED helped to bail out Mexico. When there was,

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, the East Asian crisis, green Span was involved

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:32.160
<v Speaker 1>long term capital management. The hedge fund goes down in

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and the FED, in my view, that's really where they

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>really go overboard and cut interest rates no fewer than

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:40.919
<v Speaker 1>three times to try to stabilize the markets. After that

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund went down. Then, of course, after the Nasdaq

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>bubble bus, you know, another round of super loose policy.

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 1>So yes, repeated interventions to stabilize finance, and and of

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:56.040
<v Speaker 1>most famously after nine eleven there were fairly radical interest

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>rate cuts, the Greenspan FED took rates down to level

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 1>they really hadn't been on, especially for as long as

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>they were kept there right now. As I remember, they

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:08.840
<v Speaker 1>were down at one on the federal funds rate in

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the summer of two thousand three and stuck there for

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:13.839
<v Speaker 1>a whole year to two thousand four, right below two

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 1>percent for three years, at one percent for a single year,

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and subsequent to that, a number of assets that are

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>priced in either dollars or credit, housing, oil, all the commodities, gold,

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>they all took off right And I think what that

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 1>points to is the difficulty for the FED on the

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>one hand of targeting inflation. So if you're looking at

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.360
<v Speaker 1>consumer price in fashion or however, you measure that that

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 1>can be stable, while asset prices are not a tool stable.

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>They're going crazy. And the central dilemma, which still remains

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>for the FED and maybe quite relevant actually in the

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>next twelve months, is that you can be thinking, Okay,

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing a good job because inflation is low and stable,

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 1>but you're not getting a good job because all these

0:05:56.760 --> 0:06:01.679
<v Speaker 1>asset prices are bubbling away uncontrollably. The thing that stood

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:05.719
<v Speaker 1>out to me from another book that takes A similar

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>look was Roger Lonstein's Origins of the crash, and he

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>talks about the opportunity the Federal Reserve had after long

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:19.919
<v Speaker 1>term capital management to impose some discipline on market participants

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and say, hey, we don't want to engage in moral hazard.

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>You guys mess this up, you figure it out. It's

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>not systemic, it's not threatening. And maybe there's a lesson

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:32.480
<v Speaker 1>to be learned there that that might be asking a

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>little too much of the Federal Reserve to think along

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 1>those lines. But do you agree with that assessment that

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>this intervention, amongst many help set the stage for the

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>future crisis. Definitely. I mean, I think that the expression

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:51.159
<v Speaker 1>used on wall streets after the long term capital management

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>experience was Uncle Allan will take care of us. That

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>is not a good way for traders to be feeling,

0:06:57.400 --> 0:06:59.159
<v Speaker 1>because then they're gonna take too much risk. And I

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>think it was really ascerbated by the way in the

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 1>two thousand four or five period when the Fed started

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to do a forward guidance that further exacerbated this feeling

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that Uncle Allan was there. He was pretty much telling

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>you how quickly interest rates we're going to be raised,

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:18.679
<v Speaker 1>and therefore you could take a ton of risk because

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>you knew you wouldn't be ambushed by a sudden rate

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 1>hike of seventy five basis points. I'm Barry Rihults. You're

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 1>listening to Master's in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My special

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>guest today is Sebastian Mallaby. He is the author of

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the highly regarded The Man Who Knew The Life and

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Times of Alan greenspan. Uh. The reviews on this book

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>have been wonderful. I've been working my way through it.

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>You spent so at first, I have to talk a

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit about your process. You spent about five years

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>researching and writing. This is that right? Yeah? My kids

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>make fun of me that every time I write a

0:07:56.880 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>book it seems to take longer than the last one.

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 1>And this did take a bit over five years. And

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't that was my plan. But it was so

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>fascinating once I got into it. I discovered so much

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>new stuff that people didn't know about this very public figure,

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and yet there were private things to be discovered. Give

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>us an example, well, you know we remember the sort

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of bursuited sober, pinstriped fed chairman going on about trucking

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 1>capacity utilization in the Midwest. You don't remember that he

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>was the guy who bought the Buick Electra convertible automobile,

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, and drove it so fast up and down

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Manhattan that, as his girlfriend said, um, you know, it

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a moderate pace and he got he got plenty

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of speeding tickets. You know. He was not against marriage.

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 1>He did it twice, but he was single between twenty

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:44.439
<v Speaker 1>seven and seventy one. You describe him as a ladies man.

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Is that an exaggeration or is that a fair description. Well,

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>he had a succession of remarkably beautiful girlfriends in this

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 1>as he said, you know, there was this little interim

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>between twenty seven and seventy one, and in this period

0:08:57.640 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and these are his words, not mine, you know, he

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>dated news anchors, beauty queens and much in between. So

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:08.319
<v Speaker 1>there was quite a list there. That's quite that's quite fascinating. Look,

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>we were referencing earlier, um, the forward guidance that the

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 1>FED began in two thousand and four. So this was

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>with green Spans still as FED chairman, but the new

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>kid in town coming in as vice chairman, Ben Bernanke,

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and you argue more or less in the book that

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>forward guidance helped set the stage for the financial crisis.

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk a little bit about this. Why was

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 1>this such a break from past policy and how did

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 1>it impact um the future crisis. Well, in terms of

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the difference from past policy, if you go back to

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen eighties and you look at the big moments

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 1>in monetary policy, they were remarkably untelegraphed. So Paul volca

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>in two gave up monetary targets, big change in the

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Fed's policy. He didn't even announce it when he did that,

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and then he showed up a bit later at a

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>conference of bankers and said something like him, well, we

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:10.679
<v Speaker 1>made a little adjustment and how we approached this stuff,

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>but we might go back, and we're not sure if

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 1>we're going to stick with it. I mean, the level

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>of communication was very, very low, to the point where

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 1>people didn't know that the Fed wouldn't come out and announced, hey,

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 1>we raised interest rates. It would show up in in

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 1>their actual open market activity, not from a missive And

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:33.199
<v Speaker 1>that all changed under Greenspan, didn't it exactly? So bit

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>by bit there was more openness, and the Fed did

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>announce the policy change once it decided it. And then

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>in the two thousands you get to this period where

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>not only does the Fed announce what it's just decided,

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>it also guides the markets about what it's going to

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>be doing in the future. And that's the crucial change.

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 1>And to me, what that did to Wall Street was

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that Wall Street suddenly felt it wouldn't be ambushed by

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:59.679
<v Speaker 1>a sudden jump in the short term interest rate. So

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>this change took normally conservative bond managers and traders and

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>gave them a little more carde blanche to take more

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 1>risk and embrace a trade that was fraught with the

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 1>potential of the Fed suddenly and unexpectedly raising rates. If

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 1>you compare the two thousand four kind of period to

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>four when the FED was in a tightening cycle, and

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:27.559
<v Speaker 1>at one point it did twenty five basis points, sometimes

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>fifty basis points. There was one meeting where they raised

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:34.320
<v Speaker 1>by seventy five basis points. That cause what one bond

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:38.319
<v Speaker 1>trader at the time called Hurricane Greenspan. Right, people got

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:40.559
<v Speaker 1>blown up if they were leveraged. You know, there was

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>real market discipline being imposed. Market discipline meaning people weren't

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 1>leveraging up. The carry trades because you never knew when

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>a sudden rate increase would come along, and the guys

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>who were leveraged, like Michael Steinhardt, the hedge fund trader,

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>for example, blew up. You know, he was done enormously

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>in punished by the FED for taking too much risk.

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 1>And you've got to do that in markets a bit

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to to remind people that it's risky. So removing that

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>potential of the unexpected increase pretty much allowed allowed traders

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 1>to embrace more risk, embrace more leverage, get much further

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>out over their skis than they previously had been doing. Yeah,

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's worth just trying to encapsulate this

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:22.439
<v Speaker 1>for your listeners in the following way, because it's it's

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a misunderstanding and a disagreement that persists even today

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>in the debates that I have with policy makers. So

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 1>sometimes there people say to me, look, if you raise

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the short term industrates the FED was raising rates in

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 1>two thousand five, then you know the short term rate

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 1>is more expensive to borrow, so you're gonna have less

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:42.319
<v Speaker 1>carry trade. And I say, yeah, you have to think

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 1>about the risk adjusted return, not just the return. If

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the sharp ratio, the risk adjusted return on a carry

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 1>trade improves, then Wall Street will do more. One of

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the things that I was aware of and and you

0:12:56.960 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>reference was in the early nineties is when a few

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>days before an f O m C meeting, green Span

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:10.199
<v Speaker 1>on his own decides to cut rates and the governors

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>went berserk and subsequently remove the ability of the Federal

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Reserve to act that independently outside of a real emergency.

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Tell us a little bit about that moment. Well, you know,

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Greenspan was always known as the Imperial Fed Chairman. He

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>massed massive power unto himself, and if you know, all

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 1>through this period he really dominated the system. And in

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the early period he had this particular device that you're

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about, where basically they would have a meeting, they

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't quite come to a decision about what they should do,

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and so they would end the meeting saying that the

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Fed Chairman had the authority to move into straits in

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>between meeting, just on his own authority. And Greenspan of

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>course like that because it gave him the power, and

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 1>he used to do that a lot in the first

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 1>few years, until finally his committee had enough of that

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and stopped him. I mean, it was just days before

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a meeting. It seemed like he was snubbing his nose

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 1>at them and they weren't happy with it. Let's let's

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about some of the other things. Ben BERNANKEI gave

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you a wonderful He said, it wasn't a review, but

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 1>it was a write up of the book. He disagrees

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>with you about green SPAN's role uh in leading up

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 1>to the crisis. Um, let's let's discuss that. What do

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>you think about the former Fair chairman's discussion of the book. Well,

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm very grateful to Ben Bernankey because he

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>did write a very gracious, long response. He said, it's

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 1>highly recommended, So how can I complain. Um. At the

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>same time, we we do have a disagreement, and you're right.

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Part of the disagreement is about the interpretation of Greenspan's

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>motivation for not raising interest rates more aggressively. I say

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 1>in my book that some of it had to do

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 1>with personality, that green Span didn't like to confront people

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>directly and aggressively. I'm Barry Ridholts. You're listening to Master's

0:14:56.760 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My special guest today is

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Sebastian Mallaby. He is the author of More Money Than

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 1>God Hedge Funds and the Making of the New Elite,

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>as well as, most recently The Man Who Knew the

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Life and Times of Alan Greenspan. Let's talk a little

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>bit about your writing process. You you referenced that it

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>took you five years to write this. Is that the

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>research that's so time consuming or is it physically the

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 1>process of getting words on paper, um, and then editing

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and re editing that that's so time consuming. It's mostly

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the research. I mean, this was a huge project of

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>going to presidential archives and you know, going through what

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the Nixon Library might have about Nixon's involvements with green Span, etcetera, etcetera,

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>And and the big I think what really makes this

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of book worth doing is you've got to put

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>on the table information that people didn't have before. And

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that's not easy with a guy who is literally in

0:15:57.040 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the public eye and financial television is showing the thickness

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>of his briefcase on the way to one f M

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 1>f m C meeting as indication of what might happen.

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 1>He's that closely watched. Yeah, but so you really have

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 1>to go down every moss hole and really hope you

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>find something, and sometimes you just get lucky. So, for example,

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I went to see the guy who operated green Spans

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>computers when you know, like the technician who was working

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 1>for green Spans consulting company in the nine sixties. And

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I went there on the theory that this is a

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 1>person who would have some color about the culture of

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>green SPAN's little company. And so I show up and um,

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>it's in the middle of nowhere in the woods in Virginia.

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>There's a clearing in the words, a cabin, this guy

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>living by himself, and I start talking with him, and

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 1>it turns out he's an Iron Rand follower, and he

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>was the person who in his basement had this store

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>of green Spans speeches when he was close to Iron

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Rand come on three page transcript on it was called

0:16:57.080 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the Economics of a Free Society, green SPAN's worldview when

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 1>he was thirty eight years old. So you know, I

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't go there expecting to find it there, but I did.

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 1>And you just have to go everywhere and hope you

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 1>find stuff that that's amazing. So did this guy ever

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:12.439
<v Speaker 1>publish that or did he allow you full access to it?

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 1>He gave me a full three page print out of

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing a photocopy, and it would have taken

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:20.920
<v Speaker 1>me five years to read three hundred pages of Queen

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:24.119
<v Speaker 1>spans ran speeches. Now you get a feeling of why

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>it does take a while to do this this work.

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 1>You know. I went to see Pat buchannan on the

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 1>theory that Bricannon was a Nixon speech writer and green

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Span had been involved in the same Nixon campaign. So

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I thought Pat mcannon would tell me if his stories.

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:40.880
<v Speaker 1>It turns out he didn't just tell me stories. He

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:43.159
<v Speaker 1>also said, now in my basement, you should come down

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and have a look. And in Pat mcanna's basement there's

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>two things, right, there's a fantastic collection of antique firearms,

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:52.159
<v Speaker 1>and there are all the memos that people wrote to

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Nixon in the sixties seven sixty eight campaign, including green

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Spans memos. So that doesn't go to a presidential library.

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:00.439
<v Speaker 1>I would assume the law was that has to be archived,

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:03.679
<v Speaker 1>or maybe that's a ladder piece of legislation. Well, I

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>think that the campaign stuff. Yeah, right, So this is

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 1>when green Span was in the war room during Nixon's campaign.

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:15.119
<v Speaker 1>He begins by writing pure economic advice, then he starts

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:17.679
<v Speaker 1>to do political advice. He starts to analyze polls for

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Nixon and then he does spin. I mean literally is

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>telling Nixon, you know you believe this, but you shouldn't

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>emphasize it too much because it won't go over well

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>with the with the public um. So you know, how

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>about phrasing it this way? That's fascinating. It reveals the

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:35.399
<v Speaker 1>political side of Alan Greenspan. I need to get some

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>more stuff in my basement. So in the description of

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:42.679
<v Speaker 1>the book, it says you have unlimited You had unlimited

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>access to Alan Greenspan. Define unlimited access? Did you really

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:51.639
<v Speaker 1>spend that much time with him? And how forthcoming was

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>he about the writing you were doing. When I would

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 1>go over to his office every week or two, I'd

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>spent a couple of hours talking to him. After doing

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 1>this for seventy hours, I stopped counting. I think for

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 1>me it was research and for him it was therapy.

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 1>So it was very open access. And for example, one

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>other document that nobody had been able to find before

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 1>was Alan Greenspan's PhD thesis, and I heard about that.

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>He gave it to me. Now he gave it to

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:24.680
<v Speaker 1>me partly because I think, you know, I was asking

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:27.679
<v Speaker 1>him so many questions about his early intellectual development. And

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 1>after a while he kept on glancing up at a

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:31.239
<v Speaker 1>shelf and I looked up there and I saw this

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:33.880
<v Speaker 1>big binder, and I kind of I figured he had

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>it there, so he gave it to me. And you know,

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that was fascinating because it was really about how the

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 1>central bank must fight bubbles. So it's one of these

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:47.119
<v Speaker 1>enormous ironies. Wow, that's amazing. Now. The also famously he

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>never got his PhD in economics. What why did he

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:55.919
<v Speaker 1>not complete his PhD? THEASI, Well, what happened was actually

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that he began the PhD when he was young, in

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen fift and never completed it. Then he went

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:04.679
<v Speaker 1>into business. He was a guy who grew up with

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:07.119
<v Speaker 1>not much money. He wanted to start making money, and

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>so he did very well as a paid consultant and

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>economics and that was more attractive. But then way later,

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 1>in fact, when he was in his early fifties, he'd

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:20.879
<v Speaker 1>by this time being President Ford's chairman of the Council

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:23.880
<v Speaker 1>of Economic Advices, and his old friends at New York

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:26.399
<v Speaker 1>University said, um, you know, you should really get a

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 1>PhD since you're an economist, and why don't you come

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>back and take some classes. So he went back, took

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the classes, did the coursework, and they assembled a collection

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>of papers that he'd written over the years, and then

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 1>he did get a PhD. Then I'm Barry Ridholtz. You're

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:43.400
<v Speaker 1>listening to Master's in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My guest

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:47.959
<v Speaker 1>today is Sebastian Mallaby. He is the author, amongst other things,

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 1>More Money than God, which won the Lobe Award in

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:55.360
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eleven. It was a New York Times best seller.

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk a little bit about this book, um, which

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>is really quite fast. And first I have to ask

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>explain from whence the title comes. Well, it's a bit

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 1>of a funny one. But the U nickname for JP Morgan,

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the famous banker, was Jupiter. And I looked up how

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:21.399
<v Speaker 1>much money JP Morgan had when he died um in

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 1>an inflation adjusted dollars, and it came to something like,

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I think one point three billion is a piker exactly.

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I realized that modern hedge fund managers in a single

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>year occasionally make more money than Jupiter. Jim sound Simon's

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Ray Dalio. They have two and three billion dollar years

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:41.159
<v Speaker 1>on a regular basis, right, So I went for the title.

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:42.959
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people hate the title. They say, oh,

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:47.159
<v Speaker 1>I love the title it because you know, you're describing

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 1>a very very distinct class of of asset managers who

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>have been there's no other way to describe it, wildly compensated.

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:03.439
<v Speaker 1>And you know, nothing is more expressive than than their phrase.

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:06.640
<v Speaker 1>So so let's let's discuss this group a little bit.

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Explaining the most secretive subculture of our economy posed an

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:16.200
<v Speaker 1>irresistible investigative challenge. Uh. You also say the common view

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:19.880
<v Speaker 1>of hedge funds seemed ripe for correction. So let's let's

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 1>talk about both of those. What was the investigative challenge

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>here reviewing a variety of different hedge fund managers. Well,

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, a lot of aspects of the U S

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 1>economy are very transparent. You can look stuff up on

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 1>the Internet and so forth. Hedge fund managers are typically

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>quite secretive, and they didn't want to talk about their

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>methods because some of it is proprietary, and they just

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:44.719
<v Speaker 1>want to be discreet because they figured most public attention

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 1>they get is negative, and so persuading people to talk

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:52.159
<v Speaker 1>to me was quite a challenge, and it took me

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 1>four years but in the end I did get a

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 1>huge amount of access. So, and let's talk about the

0:22:56.880 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 1>second part of that statement. Common view of hedge funds

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>seemed right for a correction. What do you think people misunderstands?

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:09.479
<v Speaker 1>What is the public perception that's that's erroneous. Well, I

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:14.200
<v Speaker 1>think people view hedge funds as the wild West of finance,

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the people to take the most leverage, the most risk,

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 1>and they're the craziest and therefore, in some ways the

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>scariest and and the opposite is true, isn't I think

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:25.120
<v Speaker 1>that what you can definitely say all the hedge funds

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 1>do blow up. They do take a risk, of course

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:30.120
<v Speaker 1>they do. Whereas a lot of banks are too big

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to fail and taxpayers on the hook, hedge funds is

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>small enough to fail, and they can fail without getting

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:38.439
<v Speaker 1>any taxpayer help. And I think that's way more healthy

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 1>for the system. And in fact, hedge funds had nothing

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:43.920
<v Speaker 1>to do with the financial crisis of oh eight or nine.

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:48.479
<v Speaker 1>They were a participant, they were an actor, but they

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:51.679
<v Speaker 1>weren't the players who had completely leveraged up. And and

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the few that crashed, namely the bear Sterns one, the

0:23:55.080 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>losses were limited to their own investors. It didn't become systemic, right.

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:03.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, as we were discussing earlier, this Greenspan put

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>existed and that encouraged too much risk. But I think

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>that encouragement applied especially to the big banks that felt

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:14.359
<v Speaker 1>they were kind of inviolable. They felt they were so big,

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>so powerful, that they could take all this risk and

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:20.160
<v Speaker 1>be okay. Hedge funds always knew that they were driving

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>along rapidly in a rickety car that could just fall

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>apart in him, and so they were more careful. I

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:28.680
<v Speaker 1>love that description. So you have access so not just

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>like you had a wonderful access to Alan Greenspan, you

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you received access to a number of legendary hedge fund

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 1>managers who who do you wish you could have gotten

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>a conversation with that either was unavailable or unwilling to

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>chat with you. Well, you know, the first character in

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>my book is Alfred Winslow Jones, who started the hedged Fund,

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:56.680
<v Speaker 1>as he called it, And you know, he was a

0:24:56.720 --> 0:25:00.679
<v Speaker 1>fascinating guy who in his early life had fallen in

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:05.440
<v Speaker 1>love with a Marxist beauty in Berlin, and he himself

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>enrolled in the Marxist Workers School, which is a funny

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 1>place for the you know, father of hyper capitalist hedge funds,

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>or all the best hedge fund managers go through the

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:18.679
<v Speaker 1>Marxist point. Anyway, he was dead by the time that

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I read the book, so I had to go speak

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 1>to his portfolio managers who told me stories. But I

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 1>never met him in my office. There's an internal debate

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:30.920
<v Speaker 1>as to whether Winslow or ed Thorpe was the first

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:36.199
<v Speaker 1>true quant we we've been we've been arguing that, um internally.

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:39.879
<v Speaker 1>So we know hedge funds have been under performing the

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 1>past decade or so, UM, what what's your your take

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:46.919
<v Speaker 1>on that? Why do why do we see hedge funds

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>as a group under performance? You know? I think one

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 1>point is that yields have been compressed, so risky bonds

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 1>are not paying you much more in interest than unrisky bonds.

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 1>And that's a general point that if the expertise of

0:26:04.400 --> 0:26:08.120
<v Speaker 1>a hedge fund is to finally manage risk and figure out,

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, which risk is mispriced. If all of these

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>risks are priced very low, you're just not being compensated

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 1>very much for that expertise anymore. So I think that's

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:19.360
<v Speaker 1>one point. And now the point is that in an

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:23.440
<v Speaker 1>environment of low returns overall, in in at least in

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>fixed income low yields UM. You know, the two and

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:32.120
<v Speaker 1>two and twenty fee structure is taking a big nut,

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:35.199
<v Speaker 1>an insane bite right out of the return to the

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>final investor. And I think that's the second reason we've

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 1>seen that compressed. We've seen you know, one point five

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and fifteen or one in ten that's coming wrong. You know,

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm reminded of UM Jim Chainos's comment. He said thirty

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>years ago when when he launched his hedge funds, can

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>A Coach Partners, can Coast Associates, there were a few

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred hedge funds and they all created alpha. Now there's

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:01.400
<v Speaker 1>eleven thousand hedge funds and those same two hundred edge

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:04.959
<v Speaker 1>ones or the alpha generators. How much do we suspect

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the lack of performance is a function of a ton

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>of entrance into the space, some of which probably shouldn't

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>be in there. I think there's some truth in that UM,

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>but I also think that you know, the notion that

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a finite amount of alpha maybe understates the way

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 1>that you know, financial markets are being globalized, that there's

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 1>new opportunities of trade, frontier markets that didn't exist before.

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 1>It may understate the way that there are new financial

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 1>instruments being created and you can trade those. There's also

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 1>a new kinds of data and all the kind of

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>world of big data and online intelligence that we're getting.

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 1>So I think the world is constantly changing creating new opportunities.

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 1>So I didn't put so much emphasis on the idea

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that there's a natural limit to how many hedge funds

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 1>there ought to be that that that's quite quite interesting.

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:59.120
<v Speaker 1>And the other data point that I find so fascinating

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>since hedge fund assets are up twenty five fold and

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 1>recently crossed the three trillion dollar mark for the first time.

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 1>So what does that tell us about this form of investment. Well,

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it shows you that allocators in other ways,

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:21.399
<v Speaker 1>the professionals who worked for university and diamonds or pension

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 1>funds or what have you, recognize that the incentive structure

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and hedge funds is attractive. So you know, in a

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 1>normal state of the world where returns and not being

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 1>messed around by quantitative easing, you've got hedge funds which

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 1>have a few characteristics. One is that the manager has

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 1>his own money in the fund, so he's incentivised not

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to blow it up. So there's downside risk protection because

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, some of his own money, the infamous

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 1>skin in the game. Right. The second thing is that

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 1>because he's being paid two and twenty, he wants the twenty,

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 1>he wants to do the research necessary to drive a

0:28:56.160 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>return quite high. Because of that carry the profit share. Uh.

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Then there's the freedom of action. There's the fact that

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 1>you know you can go long and short, you can

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>use leverage, and that enables you to kind of combine

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 1>those two things in clever ways to target particular risks

0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that you want to take and then screen out other

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>risks you don't want to take. So I think there's

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of freedoms and a bunch of incentives that

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 1>come with the hedge fund structure that ought in normal

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 1>states of the world to make for good returns. So

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a famous quip that I tracked down the source,

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and I couldn't find the original source, but I did

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 1>trace the first publication in The Economist, which I'm paraphrasing.

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Hedge funds are a compensation scheme disguised as an asset class.

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 1>You're familiar with that. I don't know if you know

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 1>who originally penned that, But I definitely could go back

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 1>no further than I want to say, oh three or

0:29:57.440 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 1>oh four in the Economist what what should take on that?

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm familiar with that phrase. It's a compensation scheme, not

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 1>an asset class. I didn't know where it came from originally.

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I think, um this truth in that, in the sense

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that there are so many different styles of hedge fund

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the fascinations about writing my book was that

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 1>you could explain to the reader what event driven funds do,

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 1>what long short equity to what statistical albertrage funds do.

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 1>There's all these different styles of macro trading and so forth,

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 1>so there's no one style. So in that sense, it's

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 1>not one asset class. So of the various hedge fund managers,

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you spoke with, and you spoke to a large number

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 1>of them, who surprised you the most, Who who either

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 1>in what they said or their personas caused an arched eyebrow. Well,

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I think the character of George Soros is fascinating, and

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I spoke to him, But more importantly, I spoke to

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 1>a ton of people who worked for him, and that's

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>often the best way when you're doing a book to

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 1>really get a view of a person is to speak

0:30:56.760 --> 0:31:00.120
<v Speaker 1>to those who interacted and have an outside views. You

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 1>construct a set of many perspectives in one person. We

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:06.479
<v Speaker 1>have been speaking with Sebastian Mallaby. He is the author

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 1>of More Money Than God and more recently, the Man

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Who Knew the life and times of Alan Greenspan. Be

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:16.000
<v Speaker 1>sure and check out our podcast extras, where we keep

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the tape rolling and continue discussing all things green Span

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and hedge funds. Be sure to check out my daily

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 1>column on Bloomberg View dot com. You can follow me

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at rid Halts. We love your comments and feedback.

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Be sure and write to us at m IB podcast

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot net. I'm Barry rid Halts. You've been

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. If you're

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 1>having a business dispute, the process can be slow and

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 1>drawn out, especially if you rely on litigation in the courts.

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>You can wait for years before your case is resolved,

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and the longer your case proceeds, the more your case

0:31:56.200 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 1>can cost. Not with the American Arbitration Association arbitration or

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 1>mediation with the American Arbitration Association is faster. In fact,

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>nearly fifty of our cases settled prior to hearings a

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 1>d r dot org resolve Faster. Welcome to the podcast, Sebastian.

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for for doing this. This has

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 1>really been fascinating stuff. I know some of the Greenspan

0:32:20.760 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff is a little um wonkie for some people, but

0:32:23.760 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 1>there is a audience for that that absolutely is gonna

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 1>eat that up. And my head of research, Mike Patnick

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 1>in the office loves More Money than God. It's one

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of his favorite books that it helps him on some

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 1>research he's doing on a on another project. There's so

0:32:40.800 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 1>many questions I didn't get to. I really want to

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 1>um before we get to our standard questions, I have

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to I have to come back back to let's start

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. We didn't really talk about your time

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 1>at The Economist. You're working in London as a as

0:32:57.640 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a journalist, as a writer, you're covering international finance, and

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 1>then out of left field, you get a sign to

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 1>South Africa. How does that happen? It was the other

0:33:07.160 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 1>way around. Actually I went first to South Africa and

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 1>then I came back from London. So you're working in London,

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:15.960
<v Speaker 1>you and was that where you were first started with

0:33:16.000 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the economist. I joined the economist, I joined the Foreign

0:33:18.400 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Department and they put the new kid on the block

0:33:20.960 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 1>to do Africa because I guess it was the poorest

0:33:23.720 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 1>part of the world. And so the youngest guy got it.

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:28.680
<v Speaker 1>And I did that a bit in London, and then

0:33:28.720 --> 0:33:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I insisted on moving there. So I went to live

0:33:30.520 --> 0:33:33.000
<v Speaker 1>in Zimpa. So this this was your choice. This wasn't

0:33:33.040 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 1>them saying, all right, sent the kids to South Africa.

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Now I wanted to go live there. I was sick

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:40.280
<v Speaker 1>of being in London after a couple of years and

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 1>trying to follow Africa but not being in Africa. So

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I said, okay, I actually quit, and they kind of

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:49.719
<v Speaker 1>persuaded me not to quit by persuaded by giving me

0:33:49.760 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the option of where did you want to go in Africa?

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Where do you want to live? So I picked Zimbabwe,

0:33:54.360 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 1>which was kind of next to South Africa but not

0:33:57.040 --> 0:34:00.160
<v Speaker 1>in it at the time with apartheid still being there,

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 1>there were travel restrictions if you lived in South Africa,

0:34:03.600 --> 0:34:05.360
<v Speaker 1>and I think it also South Africa was was in

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:08.600
<v Speaker 1>a boring political phase where they were not going to

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 1>release Mandela, nothing was going to happen, and and of

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 1>course I was totally wrong. So as soon as I

0:34:13.040 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 1>got to Zimbabwe, political change began in South Africa, and

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:19.839
<v Speaker 1>I wound out spending a lot of time living out

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:22.759
<v Speaker 1>of a suitcase, traveling around. And when Mandela came out

0:34:22.760 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 1>of jail in there, I was twenty five years old

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 1>outside waiting for him to come out, and I knew

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:31.800
<v Speaker 1>my career would be downhill thereafter because nothing could be

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:36.520
<v Speaker 1>as exciting. So a UK citizen living in Zimbabwe has

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 1>greater travel freedom than a UK citizen living in South Africa?

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Was that the thinking? Yeah, at the time, that was

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the case, because if you had visa stamps from South

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:48.279
<v Speaker 1>Africa all over your passport and then you tried to

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:51.360
<v Speaker 1>go to another country, like I don't know, Tanzania, the

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Tanzanian government as a kind of protest against apartheid might

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 1>give you a hard time. That makes a lot of sense.

0:34:57.080 --> 0:35:01.600
<v Speaker 1>So you're you're you're covering now some Mandela, what was

0:35:01.640 --> 0:35:04.360
<v Speaker 1>that experience, like, did you get to interview him? How

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:09.200
<v Speaker 1>was your South African experiences? The South African experience was amazing.

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:11.440
<v Speaker 1>It was an incredible time of political change, and I

0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 1>wrote a book called After Apartite, which kind of laid

0:35:14.680 --> 0:35:17.720
<v Speaker 1>down what I thought the future would be like after

0:35:18.120 --> 0:35:21.879
<v Speaker 1>white minority rule ended, and I draw on a lot

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:23.919
<v Speaker 1>of my travels in the rest of Africa to try

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to understand how post white rule society has tended to develop.

0:35:30.719 --> 0:35:32.759
<v Speaker 1>And all of that was just a great experience in

0:35:32.800 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 1>my twenties to to have that adventure. Did you did

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 1>you ever get to interview Mandela? I didn't interview Mandela unfortunately.

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 1>That that and then from there you end up getting

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:45.880
<v Speaker 1>assigned to Japan. Yes, well, I came back to London

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of years and that's when I started

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:51.719
<v Speaker 1>to write about finance and it was a total learning experience.

0:35:51.719 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I remember just asking questions, just going to see fund managers,

0:35:55.680 --> 0:35:59.439
<v Speaker 1>traders whoever. Would see me and say, you know, I've

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 1>got some questions. I'm sorry, and then I would just

0:36:02.239 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 1>quiz them and quiz them and quiz them until they

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:06.480
<v Speaker 1>threw me out of their offices because you know, an

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Arab gone by. But by using the name of the economist,

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I got into a lot of offices and I am

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:14.279
<v Speaker 1>and I abused a lot of people's time to get

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:17.160
<v Speaker 1>my sort of education in finance. I'll let you in

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:19.920
<v Speaker 1>on a little secret. I use the name Bloomberg to

0:36:20.040 --> 0:36:22.200
<v Speaker 1>be able to sit with people like Sebastian Maloby and

0:36:22.200 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 1>talk about stuff like this. So that had to be

0:36:24.280 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 1>a culture shock. I'm thinking the UK, South Africa, Japan.

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:31.240
<v Speaker 1>If I asked someone picked three of the most wildly

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:35.200
<v Speaker 1>disparate cultures and societies, I don't think you can find

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:39.520
<v Speaker 1>three more different societies around the planet than those three, right,

0:36:39.520 --> 0:36:42.239
<v Speaker 1>And going to Japan in the early nineties was fascinating

0:36:42.320 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 1>because that was a time when people still believed that

0:36:46.120 --> 0:36:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the Japanese economic model might be superior to the Western one.

0:36:50.280 --> 0:36:54.160
<v Speaker 1>The Japanese miracle absolutely, and although the market had crashed

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:57.680
<v Speaker 1>in Um, it took a bit of you know that

0:36:57.760 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 1>one of those cartoon characters that runs off the edge

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 1>of the right and then keeps running, doesn't actually fall

0:37:02.640 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 1>until he looks down and notices it exactly. And so

0:37:05.160 --> 0:37:06.960
<v Speaker 1>we were in that moment where in Japan is kind

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of off the edge of the cliff but still levitating somehow,

0:37:09.840 --> 0:37:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and some people believe that it would be able to

0:37:12.040 --> 0:37:16.520
<v Speaker 1>scoot right back onto terra firma um and not fall.

0:37:16.880 --> 0:37:19.359
<v Speaker 1>And so there was a fascinating debate about the nature

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:22.920
<v Speaker 1>of capitalism, which model worked best, and so forth, and

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and so that was a great education. I know I

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:28.880
<v Speaker 1>missed pronouncing this. Kuritsu is the Japanese model of you.

0:37:28.880 --> 0:37:34.440
<v Speaker 1>You're stacking all these different industries and one vertically integrated company.

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:39.320
<v Speaker 1>My favorite example Mitsubishi Bank of Mitsubishi, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries,

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Mitsubishi real Estate, and Subisi Aviation. They were building these

0:37:43.880 --> 0:37:49.560
<v Speaker 1>giant companies made it challenging for Japan to allow their

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:52.520
<v Speaker 1>banks to to go into bankruptcy. It's a whole house

0:37:52.520 --> 0:37:54.839
<v Speaker 1>of cards on top of it. Yes, And I think

0:37:54.840 --> 0:37:58.480
<v Speaker 1>what's fascinating though, is that the kretsu system in Japan

0:37:58.640 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 1>is sort of cross shareholding banks lending on the basis

0:38:02.080 --> 0:38:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of a relationship. It's not arms length stock market capitalism

0:38:06.640 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 1>where people are trading bits of paper securities without having

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:15.120
<v Speaker 1>much direct contact with the companies or the entities that

0:38:15.200 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 1>issued those securities. So it's a much more kind of

0:38:18.760 --> 0:38:23.719
<v Speaker 1>hands on um. People said long termist version of capitalism,

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and when Japan collapsed, people thought, oh, well, that's obviously

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:29.040
<v Speaker 1>not a good model. But if you if you substituted

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the word Japan and you said instead Northern California, And

0:38:33.040 --> 0:38:35.480
<v Speaker 1>you think about the way that venture capital has been

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 1>so important in the technology stuff, and when it's venture capital,

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:45.080
<v Speaker 1>it's long termist. It is direct provision of capital to companies.

0:38:45.920 --> 0:38:49.440
<v Speaker 1>It is not about trading secondary claims and markets. And

0:38:49.520 --> 0:38:53.239
<v Speaker 1>it's been fabulously successful. Yeah, but you those are new

0:38:53.280 --> 0:38:58.960
<v Speaker 1>technologies and small startups. In Japan, it's almost dynastic in

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:04.080
<v Speaker 1>terms of the giant entities, these giant conglomerates, including many

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:07.520
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest companies in Japan and in the world.

0:39:08.000 --> 0:39:11.719
<v Speaker 1>It's a fascinating comparison. Um, I think it works better

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:15.279
<v Speaker 1>with small companies than it does with the big conglomerates. Yeah.

0:39:15.320 --> 0:39:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a good insight. And I think that um,

0:39:18.520 --> 0:39:21.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm not ready to say that markets and

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:24.480
<v Speaker 1>financial trading are a bad thing. I mean, I read

0:39:24.480 --> 0:39:27.840
<v Speaker 1>about hedge funds and I believe that they're often a

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:31.319
<v Speaker 1>good thing. Um. But it is interesting the way that

0:39:32.440 --> 0:39:36.359
<v Speaker 1>venture capital is finance, but without finance, I mean, people

0:39:36.400 --> 0:39:39.840
<v Speaker 1>don't use mathematical models. It's very much based on looking

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:42.319
<v Speaker 1>at the entrepreneur in the eyes and saying, does this

0:39:42.360 --> 0:39:44.239
<v Speaker 1>person have the stuff it takes to set up a

0:39:44.239 --> 0:39:46.600
<v Speaker 1>company and make it work. So it's a very different

0:39:46.680 --> 0:39:49.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of provision of capital that you get instead of

0:39:49.239 --> 0:39:51.600
<v Speaker 1>con Valley, and it clearly has worked, not to say

0:39:51.640 --> 0:39:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the least. So so we covered um, South Africa. You

0:39:55.520 --> 0:39:58.480
<v Speaker 1>were in Japan for how many years? Three years? Did

0:39:58.520 --> 0:40:01.880
<v Speaker 1>you learn Japanese? I did? Yeah? Are you still fluent

0:40:02.040 --> 0:40:08.560
<v Speaker 1>or or very rapidly after I left Japan? In that

0:40:08.640 --> 0:40:11.239
<v Speaker 1>whole world kind of fed off my mental map. Have

0:40:11.320 --> 0:40:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you been back since I haven't? It's terrible. I should

0:40:13.520 --> 0:40:15.919
<v Speaker 1>go back. It's one of the places on my list.

0:40:15.920 --> 0:40:19.440
<v Speaker 1>It looks like an absolutely fascinating country that that is

0:40:19.480 --> 0:40:24.200
<v Speaker 1>truly so different from from my experiences. It looks utally fascinating.

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about something a little closer to home, um,

0:40:28.440 --> 0:40:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the U k And and Brexit. You know, to an

0:40:32.520 --> 0:40:39.000
<v Speaker 1>outside observer, Britain looks spectacularly calm, considering there's a whole

0:40:39.040 --> 0:40:43.000
<v Speaker 1>bunch of big economic changes coming their way. What what's

0:40:43.040 --> 0:40:44.799
<v Speaker 1>your take on this? I know you've written about it

0:40:44.840 --> 0:40:50.560
<v Speaker 1>for the Washington Post. In fact, Brexit Britain seems shockingly calm.

0:40:50.640 --> 0:40:53.879
<v Speaker 1>Is your your headline? So? What is going on in

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:56.480
<v Speaker 1>in Great Britain? Well? I think the main thing that

0:40:56.520 --> 0:40:59.800
<v Speaker 1>happened is that I had assumed, and most people assumed

0:40:59.800 --> 0:41:04.440
<v Speaker 1>that if the Brexit vote succeeded, everybody would be terrified

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that the uncertainty of leaving Europe would cause consumers to

0:41:08.040 --> 0:41:11.440
<v Speaker 1>quit spending, and in fact, consumers did the opposite. They

0:41:11.440 --> 0:41:16.400
<v Speaker 1>went out and borrowed. Household debt ratios have actually, you know, risen,

0:41:17.080 --> 0:41:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and so people just refused to be scared. And I

0:41:19.719 --> 0:41:23.000
<v Speaker 1>think that it's kind of a behavioral insight that when

0:41:23.040 --> 0:41:26.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a political development that's very complex and it seems

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:29.120
<v Speaker 1>to be you know, yak yak yak, all those politicians

0:41:29.160 --> 0:41:32.040
<v Speaker 1>talking to each other, the average person just kind of

0:41:32.120 --> 0:41:35.800
<v Speaker 1>zones it out and goes off on a spending spree,

0:41:36.280 --> 0:41:38.480
<v Speaker 1>just ignoring what's coming down the pike. And I think

0:41:38.920 --> 0:41:42.200
<v Speaker 1>when the reality of Brexit hits and you suddenly find that,

0:41:42.600 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, your company cannot export without a customs check,

0:41:46.480 --> 0:41:50.360
<v Speaker 1>or that you yourself cannot travel and work in Spain

0:41:50.480 --> 0:41:54.160
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, I think when the reality hits, then consumers

0:41:54.360 --> 0:41:56.879
<v Speaker 1>will start to reign in their spending and then we'll

0:41:56.880 --> 0:41:59.799
<v Speaker 1>see the cost of Brexit. The expectation is if if

0:41:59.840 --> 0:42:05.920
<v Speaker 1>ah Brexit goes through the way, it's reasonably expected to

0:42:05.960 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 1>go through, meaning all the things we're referencing actually a car.

0:42:10.080 --> 0:42:12.440
<v Speaker 1>This is a pretty big hit to g d P,

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:15.959
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. Yes, I mean, you know, Britain joined the

0:42:16.000 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 1>European Union in the nine three so it's been a

0:42:19.640 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 1>long time of progressive integration into those markets of British

0:42:25.600 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 1>exports go to the rest of the European Union, so

0:42:29.320 --> 0:42:33.399
<v Speaker 1>losing full market access in those economies as a big deal.

0:42:34.120 --> 0:42:38.080
<v Speaker 1>And it's arguable that the Great Britain had the best

0:42:38.080 --> 0:42:40.440
<v Speaker 1>of both worlds. They were a full member, but they

0:42:40.480 --> 0:42:44.040
<v Speaker 1>still had their own currency. What I'm perplexed as to

0:42:44.120 --> 0:42:46.719
<v Speaker 1>why they would want to exit a situation that's so

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:50.120
<v Speaker 1>advantageous to them. Well, I'm perplexed too, and I you know,

0:42:50.280 --> 0:42:53.239
<v Speaker 1>I helped to set up a website that did fact

0:42:53.320 --> 0:42:58.640
<v Speaker 1>checking to point out the lies frankly of the side

0:42:58.640 --> 0:43:01.000
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to get out. Well, you don't. You don't

0:43:01.000 --> 0:43:02.959
<v Speaker 1>think we're gonna get the UK is going to see

0:43:02.960 --> 0:43:07.480
<v Speaker 1>four hundred million pounds a week for the National Institute

0:43:07.480 --> 0:43:09.120
<v Speaker 1>of Health. That's not going to happen. This is one

0:43:09.120 --> 0:43:10.840
<v Speaker 1>of those myths, right that they put out there on

0:43:10.880 --> 0:43:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the side of a bus that they read the post

0:43:12.840 --> 0:43:18.040
<v Speaker 1>truth campaign style. We try to say that truth mattered. Unfortunately,

0:43:18.080 --> 0:43:20.480
<v Speaker 1>not enough people listen to us it. I mean when

0:43:20.480 --> 0:43:22.480
<v Speaker 1>you look at the opinion polls and you say, well,

0:43:22.480 --> 0:43:25.200
<v Speaker 1>why do people vote for exit? The first thing was

0:43:25.239 --> 0:43:28.120
<v Speaker 1>a sort of nebulous belief that you'd get sovereignty back.

0:43:28.360 --> 0:43:31.000
<v Speaker 1>What does sovereignty mean? We live in a globalized world.

0:43:31.440 --> 0:43:34.600
<v Speaker 1>We are dependent on what happens in other countries is

0:43:34.640 --> 0:43:38.200
<v Speaker 1>banned to affect us, And so I think that's a shaimira.

0:43:38.360 --> 0:43:40.919
<v Speaker 1>What about the control of borders. We have an open

0:43:40.960 --> 0:43:43.480
<v Speaker 1>border policy. We want to control, we want to keep

0:43:43.480 --> 0:43:48.160
<v Speaker 1>bad elements out. Yes, so that is a politically potent line,

0:43:48.440 --> 0:43:50.560
<v Speaker 1>both here in the United States as we've seen, and

0:43:50.600 --> 0:43:54.960
<v Speaker 1>in and in Britain um. And you know, if you really,

0:43:55.000 --> 0:43:57.960
<v Speaker 1>really really want to keep foreigners out, I guess that's

0:43:58.000 --> 0:43:59.920
<v Speaker 1>your choice and people can vote like that. But if

0:44:00.160 --> 0:44:05.759
<v Speaker 1>was economically migrants positive, very positive, And I would say

0:44:05.800 --> 0:44:08.760
<v Speaker 1>even culturally. You know, the diversity that you have in London,

0:44:08.800 --> 0:44:12.200
<v Speaker 1>a very melting pot kind of city. You walk on

0:44:12.239 --> 0:44:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the street, you get in the subway, people are speaking French,

0:44:14.680 --> 0:44:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Arabic whatever. I like that. Plus the food is so

0:44:18.280 --> 0:44:22.520
<v Speaker 1>much better between the pizza, the Indian food and the sushi.

0:44:23.000 --> 0:44:25.279
<v Speaker 1>London is now a city you can actually enjoy your meal,

0:44:25.320 --> 0:44:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and that wasn't necessarily true thirty years ago. Yeah. I

0:44:28.239 --> 0:44:30.759
<v Speaker 1>left London to go live in Japan in nineteen two,

0:44:30.760 --> 0:44:33.919
<v Speaker 1>and it was not with that much regret. But when

0:44:33.920 --> 0:44:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I came back to live there in it's a fantastic place.

0:44:37.520 --> 0:44:41.399
<v Speaker 1>It's completely changed, and it's it's far more international and cosmopolitan,

0:44:41.480 --> 0:44:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and um, you would always oh, you would have always

0:44:44.160 --> 0:44:47.560
<v Speaker 1>assumed that about London, given the history of of the UK,

0:44:47.719 --> 0:44:50.440
<v Speaker 1>but that really wasn't necessarily the case for a long time.

0:44:50.840 --> 0:44:53.759
<v Speaker 1>And now you're a UK resident or US resident, I

0:44:53.800 --> 0:44:58.560
<v Speaker 1>now have this funny split existence. My wife annoyingly got

0:44:58.600 --> 0:45:01.920
<v Speaker 1>promoted so much that she has a great job in London,

0:45:02.680 --> 0:45:05.480
<v Speaker 1>editor in chief of the Economist magazine, and so we

0:45:05.520 --> 0:45:08.879
<v Speaker 1>live in London for that very good reason. But my

0:45:09.320 --> 0:45:12.200
<v Speaker 1>writing and my professional interests are mostly in the US.

0:45:12.760 --> 0:45:14.319
<v Speaker 1>So I'm here kind of half the time and in

0:45:14.360 --> 0:45:17.399
<v Speaker 1>London half the New York or d c B alright,

0:45:17.440 --> 0:45:20.520
<v Speaker 1>because I keep him in the phrase Nylon, which is

0:45:20.640 --> 0:45:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the New York London. Um um swap, let's um all right,

0:45:25.160 --> 0:45:28.440
<v Speaker 1>So let's leave the economists behind. But the only other

0:45:28.480 --> 0:45:31.560
<v Speaker 1>thing I have to ask, since you're in London so often,

0:45:31.719 --> 0:45:35.759
<v Speaker 1>I have to ask you about um Europe. How much

0:45:35.760 --> 0:45:41.120
<v Speaker 1>trouble is Europe in? Are we overstating the damage here?

0:45:41.160 --> 0:45:43.799
<v Speaker 1>We look at the banks in Europe, they're selling for

0:45:44.000 --> 0:45:46.360
<v Speaker 1>half of book in the U S it's one to

0:45:46.400 --> 0:45:49.520
<v Speaker 1>two times book. How much trouble is Europe really in

0:45:49.719 --> 0:45:52.200
<v Speaker 1>going forward? Or will they be able to resolve everything?

0:45:53.120 --> 0:45:57.319
<v Speaker 1>I think that the euro Zone um is still a

0:45:57.360 --> 0:46:00.800
<v Speaker 1>disaster waiting to happen. That is huge amounts of debt

0:46:01.680 --> 0:46:04.200
<v Speaker 1>uh and they still haven't gotten to a position where,

0:46:04.280 --> 0:46:08.200
<v Speaker 1>although growth has picked up a little bit, even nominal

0:46:08.280 --> 0:46:14.360
<v Speaker 1>growth is lower than the deficit in some of these countries.

0:46:14.360 --> 0:46:19.279
<v Speaker 1>So public borrowing is adding to the debt um. And

0:46:19.320 --> 0:46:22.480
<v Speaker 1>we're talking to southern Europe. Yeah, I mean in Greece

0:46:22.600 --> 0:46:25.520
<v Speaker 1>is the obvious one is true? Italy? I think Italy

0:46:25.560 --> 0:46:28.480
<v Speaker 1>more than Spain. But you know, I do think those

0:46:28.520 --> 0:46:30.920
<v Speaker 1>countries have a fundamental problem, which is that they are

0:46:30.960 --> 0:46:34.560
<v Speaker 1>locked into a monetary policy that is partly designed to

0:46:34.600 --> 0:46:38.799
<v Speaker 1>suit Germany and um, well, it certainly has helped Germany

0:46:39.360 --> 0:46:42.799
<v Speaker 1>over the past few decades, right, And I think that

0:46:43.600 --> 0:46:45.759
<v Speaker 1>there is no obvious if you just think about the

0:46:45.800 --> 0:46:50.800
<v Speaker 1>debt sustainability dynamics in a place like Italy with negative demographics,

0:46:51.360 --> 0:46:54.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure how they're going to stabilize that, and

0:46:54.400 --> 0:46:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I would be remiss if I did not ask you.

0:46:57.120 --> 0:47:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I've been reading about the increasing chatter that hey, maybe

0:47:02.880 --> 0:47:06.320
<v Speaker 1>when everybody figures out how expensive it's going to be

0:47:06.440 --> 0:47:11.560
<v Speaker 1>for the UK to actually exit um the EU, and

0:47:11.600 --> 0:47:16.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe Scotland reconsiders their vote and is there any realistic

0:47:16.360 --> 0:47:20.960
<v Speaker 1>possibility that they suddenly um get religion and decide to

0:47:21.360 --> 0:47:25.319
<v Speaker 1>stay in the EU with some some minor accommodations or

0:47:25.360 --> 0:47:27.479
<v Speaker 1>is that just a pipe dream? It's a pipe dream.

0:47:27.520 --> 0:47:30.560
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the political line up in Britain

0:47:30.719 --> 0:47:33.880
<v Speaker 1>right now, you have a Labor Party opposition which is

0:47:33.880 --> 0:47:37.040
<v Speaker 1>in total disarray, with a very left wing leader who's

0:47:37.239 --> 0:47:41.120
<v Speaker 1>extremely uncharismatic says it's not gonna come from him. Um.

0:47:41.200 --> 0:47:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Then you've got a bunch of regional parties um, including

0:47:44.880 --> 0:47:47.239
<v Speaker 1>mostly the Scottish National Party, that would like to stay

0:47:47.239 --> 0:47:49.719
<v Speaker 1>in Europe. But they're regional, they're not gonna, you know,

0:47:50.239 --> 0:47:52.839
<v Speaker 1>have much influence in in the heart of Britain, which

0:47:52.880 --> 0:47:56.840
<v Speaker 1>is England and then you're left with the governing Conservative Party,

0:47:57.400 --> 0:48:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and Theresa May is a of rather dug it, not

0:48:02.239 --> 0:48:06.719
<v Speaker 1>terribly imaginative or flexible leader, and she is doggedly proceeding

0:48:06.800 --> 0:48:09.279
<v Speaker 1>towards leaving the European Union, and she's not going to

0:48:09.360 --> 0:48:13.839
<v Speaker 1>be put off. Quite fascinating. There's a ton of questions

0:48:13.920 --> 0:48:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that I still want to get to, but I have

0:48:17.120 --> 0:48:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to get to my favorite questions, UM that I asked

0:48:21.560 --> 0:48:24.800
<v Speaker 1>all of my guests in the remaining fifteen twenty minutes

0:48:24.840 --> 0:48:28.120
<v Speaker 1>we have Before I hit those questions. There's there's one

0:48:28.520 --> 0:48:31.359
<v Speaker 1>other comment I had to ask you about. So your

0:48:31.400 --> 0:48:35.759
<v Speaker 1>father was the United Kingdom ambassador to Germany and later

0:48:35.760 --> 0:48:41.319
<v Speaker 1>an ambassador to France. That's a fascinating UM background. Did

0:48:41.320 --> 0:48:43.440
<v Speaker 1>you spend a lot of time growing up in Germany

0:48:43.520 --> 0:48:46.399
<v Speaker 1>or France? What was what? How did that impact um?

0:48:46.520 --> 0:48:49.759
<v Speaker 1>Your childhood? Well, when I was a kid, there were

0:48:49.880 --> 0:48:54.000
<v Speaker 1>two countries where I remember going on vacation from boarding

0:48:54.040 --> 0:48:56.560
<v Speaker 1>school even living there. In fact, one with New York.

0:48:57.160 --> 0:48:58.920
<v Speaker 1>My dad was in New York when I was between

0:48:58.920 --> 0:49:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the age of seven and ten, So I was a

0:49:01.160 --> 0:49:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Central park baseball playing gum chewing kid. Um. You can

0:49:05.920 --> 0:49:07.879
<v Speaker 1>tell by my accident that it really stuck a lot

0:49:07.960 --> 0:49:11.560
<v Speaker 1>now and so you can't you can't tell where I'm

0:49:11.560 --> 0:49:15.000
<v Speaker 1>from at all. I do such a good job hiding.

0:49:15.680 --> 0:49:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I know you grew up in London. The other thing

0:49:19.640 --> 0:49:21.680
<v Speaker 1>that happened was that we then moved from New York

0:49:21.680 --> 0:49:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to to Russia, to Moscow, and so I have these

0:49:25.200 --> 0:49:28.680
<v Speaker 1>weird memories of communist Russia. And so when when was

0:49:28.680 --> 0:49:32.000
<v Speaker 1>your father ambassador of Germany? Was that before your time

0:49:32.120 --> 0:49:35.480
<v Speaker 1>or or after? You're already out of the household by

0:49:35.480 --> 0:49:38.719
<v Speaker 1>that point, I was the economist correspondent in Africa. I

0:49:38.719 --> 0:49:42.080
<v Speaker 1>remember a funny experience actually sitting with a bunch of

0:49:42.120 --> 0:49:46.600
<v Speaker 1>reporters in Namibia right next to next to South Africa,

0:49:46.719 --> 0:49:50.160
<v Speaker 1>which was having a sort of historic election of independence.

0:49:50.960 --> 0:49:54.799
<v Speaker 1>And every single senior Africa reporter in the world had

0:49:54.840 --> 0:49:56.840
<v Speaker 1>come to Namibia and they were looking forward to getting

0:49:56.840 --> 0:49:59.440
<v Speaker 1>on the front page the next day, and on the

0:49:59.440 --> 0:50:01.640
<v Speaker 1>front page the next day. All there was was the

0:50:01.640 --> 0:50:04.880
<v Speaker 1>collapse of the Berlin Wall. And so Malaby Sor and

0:50:04.920 --> 0:50:07.920
<v Speaker 1>otherwise my dad, who was a master in Germany, was

0:50:07.960 --> 0:50:09.840
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the biggest story in the world

0:50:09.880 --> 0:50:13.359
<v Speaker 1>of a generation. And Mallaby Jr. That's me was Offen

0:50:13.600 --> 0:50:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Maybia and I'm afraid we're on page seventeen. Oh that's very,

0:50:16.640 --> 0:50:20.319
<v Speaker 1>very funny. So so let's um, let's jump into our

0:50:20.440 --> 0:50:25.560
<v Speaker 1>our favorite questions. Um, So, did you always know you

0:50:25.640 --> 0:50:29.839
<v Speaker 1>wanted to be a writer? Was that something that that

0:50:30.040 --> 0:50:32.400
<v Speaker 1>was in your future or or how did that come about?

0:50:32.719 --> 0:50:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Actually I was asked when I was at high school

0:50:34.880 --> 0:50:37.320
<v Speaker 1>around the age of sixteen to fill in some questionnaire

0:50:37.360 --> 0:50:38.800
<v Speaker 1>saying what would I like to do in the future,

0:50:39.280 --> 0:50:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and I wrote journalism and writing, So I've known it's something.

0:50:44.160 --> 0:50:48.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a combination of being fascinated with the craftsmanship of

0:50:48.200 --> 0:50:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the written word. I actually like fiddling around with semi

0:50:51.400 --> 0:50:55.200
<v Speaker 1>colons and sentences and and language. I just love language.

0:50:55.760 --> 0:50:59.359
<v Speaker 1>Um maybe that comes from having a French mother and

0:50:59.440 --> 0:51:01.479
<v Speaker 1>having grown up with a couple of languages in the house,

0:51:01.520 --> 0:51:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and then learning German and other languages later. So I

0:51:05.840 --> 0:51:08.399
<v Speaker 1>loved language. But I also love discovery. I love going

0:51:08.400 --> 0:51:11.439
<v Speaker 1>out talking to people, figuring out what makes them tick,

0:51:11.719 --> 0:51:15.160
<v Speaker 1>what their ideas are, and so that whole world of

0:51:15.239 --> 0:51:19.360
<v Speaker 1>understanding making sense of current events has been my passion.

0:51:19.840 --> 0:51:22.879
<v Speaker 1>Sounds sounds quite fascinating. Let's talk about some of your

0:51:22.920 --> 0:51:28.680
<v Speaker 1>early mentors who who guided your career when you were younger. Well,

0:51:28.760 --> 0:51:31.280
<v Speaker 1>when I joined the Economist magazine right out of college,

0:51:31.840 --> 0:51:34.560
<v Speaker 1>first as a sort of temporary intern position, and then

0:51:34.560 --> 0:51:39.239
<v Speaker 1>they kept me. Um, there were several older journalists who

0:51:39.239 --> 0:51:42.120
<v Speaker 1>were really terrific in terms of helping me to learn

0:51:42.120 --> 0:51:44.359
<v Speaker 1>how to write, how not to waste the reader's time

0:51:44.400 --> 0:51:47.480
<v Speaker 1>by really getting to the point quickly. I remember one

0:51:47.520 --> 0:51:51.640
<v Speaker 1>exercise where, um, you know, I was terrified when I

0:51:51.640 --> 0:51:53.279
<v Speaker 1>first joined the Economist, and I didn't know if I

0:51:53.280 --> 0:51:55.799
<v Speaker 1>could write stories that they would actually use. So I

0:51:55.800 --> 0:51:58.120
<v Speaker 1>would I would stay late and write a draft and

0:51:58.160 --> 0:52:01.480
<v Speaker 1>give myself basically a full all morning the next day

0:52:01.600 --> 0:52:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to crunch this small piece into an even smaller space

0:52:04.960 --> 0:52:07.640
<v Speaker 1>by taking out every piece of fat in the pros.

0:52:08.040 --> 0:52:10.720
<v Speaker 1>And I would spend four or five hours just taking

0:52:10.719 --> 0:52:13.840
<v Speaker 1>out redundant words. If I said in spite of I

0:52:13.840 --> 0:52:17.279
<v Speaker 1>would say, ah huh. If I changed that despite, I

0:52:17.320 --> 0:52:19.759
<v Speaker 1>can cut it from three words to one word. So

0:52:19.960 --> 0:52:23.200
<v Speaker 1>this obsessive polishing of language or something I learned from

0:52:23.200 --> 0:52:25.719
<v Speaker 1>my colleagues of the Economist. So so was the man

0:52:25.760 --> 0:52:28.600
<v Speaker 1>who knew originally eight words and now it's down to

0:52:28.680 --> 0:52:32.040
<v Speaker 1>six forty or how did that history affect You're writing

0:52:32.040 --> 0:52:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a book like this, so you're talking pages, they're not words,

0:52:34.400 --> 0:52:37.080
<v Speaker 1>But yes, did I say words pages? Yes? This was

0:52:37.120 --> 0:52:42.480
<v Speaker 1>originally so this is six How how large was this?

0:52:42.719 --> 0:52:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Because it's a giant topic and you covered decades in

0:52:45.680 --> 0:52:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the book, I did cut out two hundred pages. Really

0:52:49.320 --> 0:52:51.520
<v Speaker 1>is it painful? Because I know it's the worst thing

0:52:51.560 --> 0:52:55.600
<v Speaker 1>in the world to have to exercise your your precious words.

0:52:55.760 --> 0:52:57.680
<v Speaker 1>You see. The funny thing about me is it's not painful.

0:52:57.719 --> 0:53:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I actually love sitting there with ages at pros and

0:53:01.080 --> 0:53:04.480
<v Speaker 1>figuring out how to make it more beautiful by cutting

0:53:04.480 --> 0:53:07.839
<v Speaker 1>out the ugly bits. Less is more, to say the least.

0:53:07.920 --> 0:53:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's talk about writers who may have influenced you.

0:53:10.840 --> 0:53:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Who who do you admire? What writing or writers affected

0:53:15.600 --> 0:53:19.359
<v Speaker 1>your approach and your style? Well, I love reading, and

0:53:19.400 --> 0:53:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm a bit of a slow reader because I'm always

0:53:21.560 --> 0:53:24.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to learn from the book, both about the style

0:53:24.320 --> 0:53:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and about the content. I mean, Roger Lonstein is somebody

0:53:28.360 --> 0:53:30.680
<v Speaker 1>who when I started to write about hedge funds, you know,

0:53:30.719 --> 0:53:35.399
<v Speaker 1>I read both his Warren Buffett biography and I read

0:53:35.480 --> 0:53:38.560
<v Speaker 1>When Genius Failed. I thought those were both fantastic books

0:53:38.600 --> 0:53:42.239
<v Speaker 1>about and he gave you a delightful blurb for the

0:53:42.280 --> 0:53:44.680
<v Speaker 1>man who knew. He's been good about that. And so

0:53:44.760 --> 0:53:47.040
<v Speaker 1>i've I am getting a blurb from Summer writer that

0:53:47.080 --> 0:53:51.919
<v Speaker 1>you really admire. Sure, it's fantastic. Sure, and um so

0:53:51.920 --> 0:53:54.439
<v Speaker 1>so who else anybody else influence your approach? By the way,

0:53:54.520 --> 0:53:57.520
<v Speaker 1>for those of you who haven't read When Genius Failed,

0:53:57.960 --> 0:54:03.640
<v Speaker 1>it may be one of the all time great financial narratives.

0:54:03.680 --> 0:54:08.520
<v Speaker 1>It's just a wonderful, a fascinating tale, wonderfully told. A

0:54:08.520 --> 0:54:13.000
<v Speaker 1>long time ago, Joe lily Felt, the who became editor

0:54:13.000 --> 0:54:15.759
<v Speaker 1>of The New York Times, wrote a book called Move

0:54:15.840 --> 0:54:18.239
<v Speaker 1>Your Shadow. And this was based on his experience as

0:54:18.239 --> 0:54:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the South Africa correspondent. And that was a model of

0:54:22.040 --> 0:54:28.040
<v Speaker 1>taking a mixture of history analysis but also personal experience,

0:54:28.560 --> 0:54:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, describing himself in South Africa and putting himself

0:54:31.760 --> 0:54:34.439
<v Speaker 1>into the book. And I thought that the kind of

0:54:34.480 --> 0:54:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the range of um voices he could blend was a

0:54:40.040 --> 0:54:42.520
<v Speaker 1>lesson in how when you write a book, you've got

0:54:42.520 --> 0:54:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to change gears, right. You You shouldn't just write in

0:54:45.120 --> 0:54:47.359
<v Speaker 1>the same voice and at the same pace all the time.

0:54:47.680 --> 0:54:50.759
<v Speaker 1>You've got to have passages of analysis that you switch up.

0:54:50.800 --> 0:54:55.360
<v Speaker 1>With passages of narrative. Sometimes you cover three years and

0:54:55.480 --> 0:54:58.640
<v Speaker 1>three paragraphs. At the times you have thirty pages about

0:54:58.680 --> 0:55:01.480
<v Speaker 1>one day. It's that, you know, if you think about

0:55:01.560 --> 0:55:05.120
<v Speaker 1>making a movie, sometimes you use a wide angle lens,

0:55:05.520 --> 0:55:07.840
<v Speaker 1>other times it's a telephoto. You've got to think like

0:55:07.920 --> 0:55:11.120
<v Speaker 1>that with a book, to various variety and structure, and

0:55:11.160 --> 0:55:15.160
<v Speaker 1>that's what ultimately impacts what the final book looks like.

0:55:15.200 --> 0:55:17.279
<v Speaker 1>So so let's talk about books. What what are some

0:55:17.360 --> 0:55:20.880
<v Speaker 1>of your favorite books, be they finance or nonfinance fiction

0:55:20.960 --> 0:55:24.640
<v Speaker 1>or nonfinance nonfiction. You said you'd like to read. Tell

0:55:24.680 --> 0:55:27.240
<v Speaker 1>me what you're reading now and what have you enjoyed

0:55:27.239 --> 0:55:30.080
<v Speaker 1>in the past. Actually, I've I've become interested recently in

0:55:30.120 --> 0:55:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley and I read just now a book by

0:55:32.520 --> 0:55:37.520
<v Speaker 1>David Horowitz, who is the co founder with Mark Andres

0:55:37.560 --> 0:55:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and about recent Horowitz, And what's striking about that book

0:55:40.760 --> 0:55:46.520
<v Speaker 1>is how he describes the experience of being an entrepreneur

0:55:47.320 --> 0:55:51.359
<v Speaker 1>setting up companies. The sheer terror when you think you're

0:55:51.360 --> 0:55:53.480
<v Speaker 1>going to go bankrupt and you're gonna lose all your

0:55:53.520 --> 0:55:56.880
<v Speaker 1>investors money and all your friends who have sweated blood

0:55:56.920 --> 0:56:00.279
<v Speaker 1>working late working weekends for you. Um, you I'd have

0:56:00.320 --> 0:56:03.400
<v Speaker 1>to lay them off. And the kind of you know,

0:56:03.440 --> 0:56:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the visceral experience of being an entrepreneur in Silicon Valley

0:56:07.960 --> 0:56:10.920
<v Speaker 1>is something that came across to me very vividly reading

0:56:11.120 --> 0:56:15.040
<v Speaker 1>David Herbert's books called The Hard Thing About Hard Things.

0:56:15.200 --> 0:56:18.400
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty good. Anything else, what else? What else stands

0:56:18.440 --> 0:56:22.000
<v Speaker 1>out to you? Let's see. I read recently a study

0:56:22.040 --> 0:56:27.960
<v Speaker 1>offbeat book by the Austrian writer stefansk Um. I think

0:56:28.000 --> 0:56:31.480
<v Speaker 1>it's called the World of Yesterday, and it's essentially about

0:56:31.560 --> 0:56:40.480
<v Speaker 1>how cosmopolitan Europe of descended into the nightmare of Nazism.

0:56:40.520 --> 0:56:42.360
<v Speaker 1>And of course it's a book which today has a

0:56:42.360 --> 0:56:45.960
<v Speaker 1>certain resonance as you see these political trends appear to

0:56:46.000 --> 0:56:49.359
<v Speaker 1>threaten globalization, and this is about the unraveling of that

0:56:50.040 --> 0:56:53.200
<v Speaker 1>early globalization of the nineteenth century. That seems to be

0:56:53.239 --> 0:56:57.360
<v Speaker 1>a narrower slice than what lie quad Ahmed wrote about

0:56:57.440 --> 0:57:00.359
<v Speaker 1>in Lords of Finance. And he's another person who gave

0:57:00.400 --> 0:57:04.239
<v Speaker 1>you a fantastic blurb. Yes, I mean, Nakamen is a

0:57:04.239 --> 0:57:08.000
<v Speaker 1>fantastic writer, and that was a wonderful, wonderful book, wonderful

0:57:08.120 --> 0:57:12.719
<v Speaker 1>one if I totally agree, you know, brilliantly combining um,

0:57:12.880 --> 0:57:17.440
<v Speaker 1>substantive economic explanation with the color of the zeitgeist, you know,

0:57:17.480 --> 0:57:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the feeling of um, what that belly park was like

0:57:21.720 --> 0:57:23.880
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen twenties. You know, there's a there's a

0:57:23.880 --> 0:57:29.280
<v Speaker 1>little vignette there. I think of some French socialite arriving

0:57:29.440 --> 0:57:32.760
<v Speaker 1>furious with a French statesman and shooting him with a

0:57:32.800 --> 0:57:37.880
<v Speaker 1>pistol that was disguised in her scarf wrapped around the gun.

0:57:38.360 --> 0:57:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's just amazing sort of evocative writing and

0:57:43.800 --> 0:57:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the concept of telling the story of of the post

0:57:48.960 --> 0:57:53.760
<v Speaker 1>war era through four central bankers. I just thought it

0:57:53.800 --> 0:57:57.440
<v Speaker 1>was a brilliant conception and and so well executed. But

0:57:57.560 --> 0:57:59.880
<v Speaker 1>before we leave books, any other any other books you

0:58:00.040 --> 0:58:02.919
<v Speaker 1>want to reference anything, what are you reading right now?

0:58:04.280 --> 0:58:06.640
<v Speaker 1>So I just got done with this David Harrowitz Silicon

0:58:06.720 --> 0:58:08.919
<v Speaker 1>Valley book. I'm a bit of a Silicon Valley kick,

0:58:08.960 --> 0:58:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going to read. You know, one of the

0:58:12.920 --> 0:58:18.080
<v Speaker 1>famous venture capitalists is William Draper. He's written a memoir

0:58:18.160 --> 0:58:21.480
<v Speaker 1>about his time in the valley. So I'm really trying

0:58:21.480 --> 0:58:26.680
<v Speaker 1>to understand that very dynamic section of the American economy

0:58:26.720 --> 0:58:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and and what was the road of financing that. Have

0:58:29.200 --> 0:58:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you read The New New Thing Michael Lewis. Of course

0:58:31.840 --> 0:58:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I've read The New New Thing. It's an amazing but

0:58:33.960 --> 0:58:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Michael Lewis is the ultimate storyteller, and I have enormous

0:58:37.960 --> 0:58:41.200
<v Speaker 1>respect for his craft. Um. Yeah, I really enjoyed that

0:58:41.200 --> 0:58:43.840
<v Speaker 1>that book as well. UM. So we're down to our

0:58:43.920 --> 0:58:47.200
<v Speaker 1>last two questions, and and let me put both of

0:58:47.240 --> 0:58:50.360
<v Speaker 1>these to you. The first question is, so someone who

0:58:50.400 --> 0:58:53.800
<v Speaker 1>just graduates college or a millennial comes to you and says,

0:58:53.880 --> 0:58:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking about becoming a writer or a journalist. What

0:58:57.240 --> 0:58:59.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of a career advice might you give them? I

0:59:00.040 --> 0:59:03.960
<v Speaker 1>would say, don't do it, um, and then I would

0:59:03.960 --> 0:59:07.760
<v Speaker 1>be secretly pleased if they ignored my advice. So I

0:59:07.760 --> 0:59:09.200
<v Speaker 1>think you have to if you're going to be a

0:59:09.240 --> 0:59:12.800
<v Speaker 1>writer or a journalist, you have to really, really really

0:59:12.800 --> 0:59:15.280
<v Speaker 1>want to do it, because it's not the most compensate,

0:59:15.320 --> 0:59:20.880
<v Speaker 1>best compensated form of activity. Um. And you know, sometimes

0:59:20.920 --> 0:59:23.160
<v Speaker 1>if you write a book, it's lonely, you're stuck there

0:59:23.200 --> 0:59:26.080
<v Speaker 1>for a long period by yourself. You have to really

0:59:26.120 --> 0:59:28.480
<v Speaker 1>like it, um. And you know, there are a lot

0:59:28.520 --> 0:59:30.080
<v Speaker 1>of things you can do in life which are more,

0:59:31.160 --> 0:59:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, better paid for that amount of Given a

0:59:34.320 --> 0:59:37.240
<v Speaker 1>certain amount of education and skill, you can certainly make

0:59:37.280 --> 0:59:39.040
<v Speaker 1>more money elsewhere, so you have to really want to

0:59:39.080 --> 0:59:40.640
<v Speaker 1>do it. But if you do really want to do it,

0:59:41.160 --> 0:59:43.840
<v Speaker 1>then I think it's a wonderful way to spend your

0:59:43.880 --> 0:59:48.160
<v Speaker 1>life because you're out there understanding things, going off, speaking

0:59:48.160 --> 0:59:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to people, making discoveries. And our final question, what is

0:59:52.320 --> 0:59:55.880
<v Speaker 1>it that you know today about writing and journalism that

0:59:56.000 --> 0:59:58.400
<v Speaker 1>you wish you knew twenty five years ago when you

0:59:58.440 --> 1:00:01.680
<v Speaker 1>were first starting out. I think the main thing is

1:00:01.720 --> 1:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>that there's no substitute for discovering new stuff. That investigation

1:00:08.240 --> 1:00:12.000
<v Speaker 1>really really matters, because if you're just taking what is

1:00:12.040 --> 1:00:14.320
<v Speaker 1>generally known already and putting your own spin on it,

1:00:15.080 --> 1:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>then there's you know, a hundred other guys also doing

1:00:18.480 --> 1:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that and it's not distinctive. You've got to go find

1:00:21.200 --> 1:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I think I wish the profession as a whole had

1:00:25.880 --> 1:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>more resources to put into investigative reporting. Well, we're starting

1:00:30.640 --> 1:00:33.919
<v Speaker 1>to see things like pro Publica and other forms of

1:00:34.440 --> 1:00:40.560
<v Speaker 1>privately supported nonprofit um support for that, but at one

1:00:40.560 --> 1:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>point in time it was a thriving business that seems

1:00:43.640 --> 1:00:47.640
<v Speaker 1>to be under assault by both the Internet and and

1:00:47.960 --> 1:00:52.200
<v Speaker 1>alternative facts. Apparently it's too bad that you know, it's

1:00:52.360 --> 1:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>it's happening that way. I have UM in my Greenspan research,

1:00:56.280 --> 1:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I had some young researchers who helped me and they

1:00:59.720 --> 1:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>went did the work in the archives. And you know,

1:01:02.440 --> 1:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>one of them, called John Hill, was such an amazing

1:01:05.720 --> 1:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>researcher that I thought he would immediately be snapped up

1:01:09.240 --> 1:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>by a news organization after he moved on, and he

1:01:13.120 --> 1:01:15.400
<v Speaker 1>he did work at The Economist a bit. But he's

1:01:15.400 --> 1:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>telling me that finding a job as an investigative reporter,

1:01:18.760 --> 1:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>even though he is the best investigator I've ever met,

1:01:22.440 --> 1:01:25.960
<v Speaker 1>is tough. Wow, that that's amazing. We thank you so

1:01:26.040 --> 1:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>much for being so generous with your your time. Sebastian.

1:01:28.520 --> 1:01:32.040
<v Speaker 1>We have been speaking with Sebastian Mallaby. He is the

1:01:32.120 --> 1:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>author of The Man Who Knew and More Money Than God.

1:01:35.080 --> 1:01:40.320
<v Speaker 1>He is also UM a pole Vulcer scholar at the

1:01:40.360 --> 1:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Council on Foreign Relations. If people want to find your work,

1:01:44.280 --> 1:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I know they can access not just the books, but

1:01:46.880 --> 1:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you you still contribute to the Washington Post and any

1:01:50.520 --> 1:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>place else they can find your writings. Well. There's always

1:01:53.720 --> 1:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>a good collection on the Counsel and Form Relations website

1:01:56.480 --> 1:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>CFL dot org. But you know, Google is normally the

1:02:00.200 --> 1:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to these questions These days, Google is always the answer. UH.

1:02:03.360 --> 1:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>If you have enjoyed this conversation, be sure and looked

1:02:06.280 --> 1:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>up an inch or down an inch at any of

1:02:08.760 --> 1:02:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the other hundred and twenty five or so such conversations

1:02:13.560 --> 1:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>we've had in the past. UM, I would be remiss

1:02:17.560 --> 1:02:21.400
<v Speaker 1>if I did not thank my recording engineer, Medina. UH.

1:02:21.480 --> 1:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Riggs is my booker, and Michael Batnick is our

1:02:24.720 --> 1:02:29.600
<v Speaker 1>head of research. We love your feedback, comments and suggestions.

1:02:30.000 --> 1:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Be sure to write to us at m IB podcast

1:02:33.400 --> 1:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot net. I'm Barry Hults. You've been listening

1:02:37.600 --> 1:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. Masters in Business

1:02:42.080 --> 1:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>is brought to you by the American Arbitration Association. Business

1:02:45.480 --> 1:02:49.919
<v Speaker 1>disputes are inevitable, resolve faster with the American Arbitration Association,

1:02:50.320 --> 1:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the global leader in alternative dispute resolution for over ninety years.

1:02:55.160 --> 1:02:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Learn more at a d R dot org.