WEBVTT - How Juries Work

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you should know, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh, and there's

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 2>Chuck and Jerry's hanging out too, if she exists, and

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:19.759
<v Speaker 2>this is stuff you should know.

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>That's right, And as he briefly saw, I'm in my

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>new studio. Fun episode number one after all these years,

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>a fresh start.

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 2>That's very nice. So let's mark this occasion jury Jury's

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 2>is the first episode in your new studio.

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>That's right, and it's funny. My chair, I ordered a

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>special little like chair for my new studio that matched

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the rest of it.

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 2>Then it's red velvet like the rest of your study.

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 1>It's close and it it arrived fifteen minutes ago.

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, Like is it all in one piece? Are

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 2>you sitting in it?

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Or yeah? It was all in one piece, thankfully. And

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the guy dropped it on the porch and I was like,

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>you're just in time, and he went for what I

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 1>was like, never mind, and I took it downstairs and

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:13.320
<v Speaker 1>like like I haven't even farted in it yet.

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh boy, well make sure you do during this first episode.

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>It's fresh as a daisy.

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 2>Let everybody know when you do, too, Okay, I will

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 2>all right, Chuck, have you ever been on a jury? No.

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I think we've talked about this at some point. But

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I was called once only believe it or not, at

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>my advanced age, and that was only a couple of

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:38.560
<v Speaker 1>years ago. And that thing where you know you can

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:41.320
<v Speaker 1>call in and they can say don't come. I called

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>in and they said you gotta come, right, So I

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>got to that next step where I go down there

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and in person, and then I actually got brought into

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>a courtroom and it was a last second, like we settled,

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>you can go home. Oh really, I was really close.

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I was like, all right, this is finally gonna happen.

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 2>So is that something you want to do? And let

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 2>me ask you this, would your answer now be different

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 2>than it was before you research this?

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Maybe because I used to definitely not want to, and

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>now I totally would want to, as long as it

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't screw up our work and our recording stuff, because

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:18.359
<v Speaker 1>that would really be awful.

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we could make it work, though, I mean, I

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 2>don't know what if you get on one of those

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 2>where you're like sequestered for a month, I don't know,

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:29.239
<v Speaker 2>We'll have to bring in told And I guess is

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 2>the temporary sit in. No, I've been called once and

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 2>I had just moved to a different county, Okay, and

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 2>called and told them that, and they were like, go

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 2>to hell, really, And I took that to mean I

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:44.399
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't come in.

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:47.919
<v Speaker 1>Oh oh, I thought you meant go to hell, like nice,

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>try buddy, get in here anyway.

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 2>No, it meant the opposite of that. And I was

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 2>surprised that a government official, even at county level, would

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 2>say something like that, right, But that's that's what happened.

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>This is a banger of an article by Livia Though.

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it's about juris everything you ever want to know

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 2>about juris, And there's actually a lot to know about jurys.

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 2>It's not just like the process of juries. It's actually

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 2>kind of pretty light as far as like understanding goes.

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 2>But there's a lot about juris culturally, and if you

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:24.839
<v Speaker 2>step back and really think about what juries do. Our

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 2>entire legal system, or the basis of our legal system,

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 2>is largely predicated on twelve random people who have no expertise,

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 2>typically in law or law enforcement or anything like that,

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 2>are asked to sit down and hear the facts of

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 2>a case that can be highly technical sometimes and then

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 2>decide a person's guilt or innocence, sometimes to the degree

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 2>that they will spend the rest of their life in

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 2>jail or be put to death. Well again, zero training,

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 2>zero experience. On one hand, it seems like total madness

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 2>that we would do this, but if you really look

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 2>at the reasoning behind it, it's saying like, we couldn't.

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 2>This is so important, We wouldn't entrust it to a bureaucracy.

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 2>We have to entrust it to your peers, to other

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:19.039
<v Speaker 2>people who could be in the same exact position that you,

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:22.280
<v Speaker 2>the defendant, are in someday, and we just need them

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 2>to take things a little more seriously than usual and

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 2>render a verdict.

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean it is a little scary when you

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>think about it, but it also, as Livia points out

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:35.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of right away, it's really heartening that on the whole,

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>like most people want to do a good job, and

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>then they go in there and try to do a

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>good job. I mean, you hear random news stories occasionally

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:46.720
<v Speaker 1>about these people that get on there that do something

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:50.280
<v Speaker 1>really stupid, either in the press or just period, and

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>those are fewer and further between. I think when most

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>people get on there, they're like, all right, this is

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>like kind of a solemn duty almost that mayan country

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 1>min my country entrusted me, and why I should try

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and do a good job as a citizen. Most people

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>behave that way.

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I get the impression that people don't go

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:13.839
<v Speaker 2>into it necessarily thinking like that. But once you're in

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 2>there and it's real and you're sitting in a courtroom.

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Like, I can't be the screw up right exactly exactly.

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 2>You want to just kind of blend in, and to

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:23.039
<v Speaker 2>blend in you have to act real legal legal.

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 1>I would have a hard time just with you know,

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I was a real class clown and you've seen me,

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and like when we used to have the big roundtable meetings,

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I just have a really hard time not cracking jokes, right,

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 1>So that would the whole thing would be tough for me.

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:41.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I could see a witness kind of like half

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 2>tripping on the way to the witness box and you'd

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 2>be like, boy, you're going. Then it's just dead silence

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 2>in the courtroom after that.

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's me.

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 2>So to kind of go back to the beginning, jurys

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:00.720
<v Speaker 2>are actually fairly old and they find their roots as

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 2>at least as far as the United States legal system

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 2>back in England, because the United States was birthed through

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 2>the birth canal of the Atlantic Ocean out of the

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 2>womb of England.

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:17.159
<v Speaker 1>That's right. And in twelve fifteen, the old Magna Carta

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>said that you know what a free man. Of course

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:22.919
<v Speaker 1>those were the words I use back then, but a

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>free person could not be imprisoned except by a judgment

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>of his peers. And as far as modern sort of

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:34.599
<v Speaker 1>trials by jury that we could think of today, that

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>basically started around the fifteenth century with the common law system,

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and before that it was just a bit of a hodgepodge.

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so that's where twelve people who are called to

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 2>hear the facts of the case, like we think of

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:52.040
<v Speaker 2>jury's today, like you said, but there were something similar

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 2>for the few hundred years before that. I think in

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 2>our Judicial Decisions episode we talked about King Henry the Second,

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 2>who basically came to powers like Okay, this is kind

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:02.720
<v Speaker 2>of crazy, We're going to come up with one legal

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 2>system for the whole country. Something that came out of

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 2>that was the process of finding people who maybe like

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 2>knew about a crime, who were witnesses to it, and

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 2>it usually assembled up to about twelve honest people giving

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 2>their kind of deposition and or rendering a judgment on it,

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 2>and then all they could find maybe, I guess so

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 2>out of like all those people that are only twelve

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 2>honest with me, right well, they didn't say sober, they

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 2>just said honest. Good point so, and from the very

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 2>outset in the United States, even prior to it being

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 2>the United States been in the colonies. We did another

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 2>episode on America's first murderer, IRA back in the day,

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 2>we actually meant United States first murderer.

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>It was John Billington, right yeah, And this was you know,

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the Pilgrims at Plymouth basically said right away that we're

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>going to do this new jury thing and it didn't

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>take long. Sixteen thirty the first due that we know

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of at least killed somebody and was tried by jury

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>for willful murder. I'm sorry to say, yeah, it is

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>by plain and notorious evidence. And then there's a few

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>amendments in the Constitution that grant trial by jury as

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a right. One is the sixth for criminal cases, the

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>seventh for most civil cases, federal civil cases, that is.

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>And even then it's not you know, we'll get into

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:32.439
<v Speaker 1>all this. It gets a little different with civil cases.

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>And then the old grand jury, which we're also going

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to talk about, is for capital crimes or maybe an

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 1>infamous crime, and that is covered by the fifth right.

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 2>So you typically are considered to have a right to

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 2>a jury, but not in every single case, like if

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 2>it's not particularly I guess egregious case or a case

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 2>where you could be convicted of anything less than six months,

0:08:57.720 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 2>you can misdemeanor.

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, great way to put but not all misdemeanors even.

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 2>No, no, because you can get more than six months

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 2>for some misdemeanors, trust me, but they but they typically are.

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 2>They don't give you necessarily a jury for that. Also,

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:16.680
<v Speaker 2>if there's certain courts like drug courts, mental health courts,

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 2>they're not meant to be adversarial. They're meant to be like,

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 2>let's come together and figure out the best way to

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:23.679
<v Speaker 2>support this person to get them back on the straight

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.559
<v Speaker 2>and narrow, or to help them with their mental health,

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 2>which apparently is not being addressed because they landed in

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 2>this court. Those don't necessarily have juries. They almost never do.

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 2>And the same with juvenile courts because they're not really

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 2>supposed to be adversarial either. Unless a child has really

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 2>screwed up and they're being tried as an adult, then

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 2>they do have a right to a jury probably every

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 2>single time, because if you're a juvenile being tried as

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 2>an adult, it's probably a pretty big offense that you're

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 2>being tried for.

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, is that even considered juvenile courts like in that building.

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 2>No, I know, it's just like a kid is now

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 2>in the adult system.

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>That's right. You can also say, you know what, I

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>waved my right to a jury trial, don't want one.

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to go with the bench trial, which means

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you want your judge to basically kind of handle the

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:19.079
<v Speaker 1>whole thing, like whether or not you're guilty or innocent,

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:21.599
<v Speaker 1>and we'll get up we'll get into the ins and

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 1>out to that a little bit later. But the judge

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>also is going to handle handle the sentencing. In the

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:32.319
<v Speaker 1>case of almost everything, it's you know, the jury they're

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 1>going to say, like, you know, what should this person

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:36.319
<v Speaker 1>serve because the jury probably be like, I don't know,

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 1>you tell me. Except for and this is a really

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>thorny kind of place here, capital punishment cases, the jury

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>decides whether or not to impose the death sentence, which

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>is I mean, I knew that, but it's to read

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:56.560
<v Speaker 1>it and to sort of really let that sink in

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:57.679
<v Speaker 1>is a lot.

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure, you said, we'll talk a little more

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 2>about why you would want a bench trial. But under

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:07.679
<v Speaker 2>normal circumstances in a criminal case, there's two kinds of

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 2>juris right. They're called the petty jury p E T

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 2>I T like pettiphores, and then there's the grand jury.

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 2>And it doesn't mean one's more important than the other.

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 2>It's literally a reference to the number of jurors involved.

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Petit.

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 2>I heard a legal person say petty. A couple of

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 2>legal people say petty. Don't you say petty four?

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but you also say petit for small as in

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that grand.

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes, but there's usually an E on the end. There's

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 2>no E on the end of this one, you know

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 2>what I'm saying. So with a petty jury, you usually

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 2>have twelve six for a civil case. A grand jury

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 2>can have up to like in the twenties of a lot. Yeah, yeah,

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 2>for sure. It's a lot of people you have to

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 2>go through and ask what their opinion is, you know, yeah,

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 2>and pretend you care.

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>And then you know it kind of varies between. You know,

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to have at least six for the federal

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 1>civil juries, but that number can go up, and then

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the grand jury, which is a different kind of jury,

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 1>And maybe we should just do one in grand juries

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 1>by itself at some point, because I think it's pretty fascinating.

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 1>But a grand jury isn't saying you're guilty or you're

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>innocent of a crime. A grand jury says, hey, prosecutor,

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>we think there is probable cause here, there's enough here,

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>somebody can you should go indict this person, and it's

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 1>still not illegal. It's just like a recommendation for indictment, right, Yeah.

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 2>And they may also say, hey, this is not this

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 2>is a pretty weak case. You should not indict this person,

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 2>or they might actually the prosecutor might not be able

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 2>to indict the person. I'm not one hundred percent sure

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 2>if the grand jury says no, but their their role

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:52.080
<v Speaker 2>is and that's also a really ancient institution, the grand jury. Yeah,

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 2>but their role is to basically cover people who may

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 2>not have been even convicted of a crime, but the

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 2>crime is serious that if they were publicly matched as

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 2>a possible suspect, their life could be ruined, their reputation

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 2>to be ruined. It affords that level of protection. It's

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:11.319
<v Speaker 2>also I guess we didn't say grand jury proceedings are

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 2>totally secret. There's a prosecutor, the grand jurors, and a

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 2>court reporter who's sworn to secrecy, and everything that goes

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 2>on in there. Everybody who comes in or goes out,

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 2>it's all very secret. And so one of the ways

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 2>that grand jury is often used is to protect timid

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 2>witnesses who might otherwise not give testimony. If you have

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 2>undercover cops who have to give testimony, that's a really

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:36.679
<v Speaker 2>great place for them to do that. And then also

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 2>again to just basically hear whether the prosecutor is a

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:42.440
<v Speaker 2>good enough case to indict the person or not. And then,

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 2>like you said, it may go on to an actual

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 2>jury trial, and those the jury trial is different in

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 2>that those people are there to hear the facts of

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 2>the case that is being tried against this person. They've

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 2>been indicted, they're now being tried for this offense. And

0:13:57.240 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 2>then the judge in that case. In a jury, they're

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 2>just the legal referee. They're just hey, they're just pointing

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:05.680
<v Speaker 2>out like, okay, you're allowed to do this, you're not

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 2>allowed to do that. They don't have anything to do

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 2>with the facts of the case. They're just the ref

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 2>The jury is the one hearing the facts of the

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 2>case and rendering a verdict based on that right.

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>So, oh man, that was good. You need to breeze

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>if you have been accused of a federal felony, because

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>you remember, there's state courts, there's federal courts, and the

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>rules are different for both, although you know a lot

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of times they're also the same. But if you were

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 1>accused of a federal felony, then you definitely have the

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>right to the grand jury, but you can waive that.

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>And then state courts also have their state grand juries,

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>except for Connecticut and Pennsylvania or the two states that

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 1>don't use grand juries for criminal indictments in their state.

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 1>And then if you're on a jury, they used to

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 1>call it the foreman. Of course they're getting with the

0:14:57.640 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>times and now they call it a four person it's basically,

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>uh kind of like the referee or manager of the jurors,

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and they're the ones in the room that voted on,

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>usually by the jury members. Sometimes they're chosen by the judge,

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>but more often than not seeing jury members, you know,

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 1>voting very early on in the proceedings, after everyone learns

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the various personalities, and this is the person that they're

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of running the room when everyone's sitting around and talking.

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>If people are getting out of line, they're like, hey,

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, we need to calm down. Clap loudly, Yeah,

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>we need to figure this thing out. If they you

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>represent the voice of the jury. So you're the one

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 1>that's going to stand up and say guilty or not guilty.

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>You're going to be dealing with the judge. Although you

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 1>can request to individually see the judge. Any member of

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the jury.

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Can do that, right like the procedures, you just go.

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, judge, judge, hey, you're holding you.

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 2>There's another big difference with a grand jury and a

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 2>petty jury, and that is that a regular jury, I'm

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 2>gonna stop calling petty jury, but a jury, they they

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 2>sit through one trial and it can be anywhere from

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 2>a day to a few days to months. Very rarely,

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 2>I think I saw most trials last less than a week.

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 2>A grand jury, you are seated for sometimes up to months,

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 2>and you meet on a weekly basis to hear the

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 2>different prosecutors' cases. So you're hearing multiple cases throughout a meeting,

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 2>and then you're meeting multiple times over the course of months.

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 2>So it's a it's a really different animal for sure, and.

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Also sequestered for that.

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 2>No, you're not. You're sworn to secrecy, but you're not

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 2>as far as I know, you're not. You're not sequestered.

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 2>But because it's so involved and you're so it goes

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 2>on for so long, it's typically made up of people

0:16:56.280 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 2>who have a lot of like free time, like we're retired.

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 2>People frequently make up like large proportions of grand juries

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 2>and things like that. Yeah, no shade or anything like that.

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:10.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm just saying, like, there's there's it's not necessarily a

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 2>perfect representation of the community like a jury's supposed to be.

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:18.359
<v Speaker 2>But then again, I don't think any jury really is.

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Right, because you know, these are people that quote have

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>time on their hands end quote.

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Right, it's five or fifteen. What are we gonna order dinner?

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, Uh, let's take a break. Ah, yes, yes,

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and we'll talk about to me, my most shocking stat

0:17:38.040 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 1>in this episode. All right, we're back, and this shot me.

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I knew that trials happened less frequently than I probably thought,

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>but I figured it was like, I don't know, half

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and half, maybe forty percent of the time you go

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 1>to trial, sixty percent you cop a plea. I was

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>newhere close, and we'll go by a couple of years here.

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Civil trials in nineteen sixty two in federal court, where

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 1>twelve percent went to jury trial. Today federal civil dispositions

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:37.360
<v Speaker 1>are one percent. Yeah, and then criminal you think, well,

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 1>criminal has got to be a lot more than that.

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 1>In the early eighties, criminal court was about twenty percent,

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and now two percent of criminal cases go before a jury.

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>And we're going to talk about all the reasons why,

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>but the biggest reason is ninety percent of the time

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>they take that plea deal. Eighty percent of the time

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:00.119
<v Speaker 1>the case is dismissed, and so you're down to two two.

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. State courts is very similar, although it varies from

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:07.160
<v Speaker 2>state to state, especially when it comes to civil lawsuits.

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:12.919
<v Speaker 2>But with civil trials in particular, probably the biggest reason

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:15.879
<v Speaker 2>why it's gone so far downhill as far as the

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 2>number of cases that make it to trial is because

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:24.680
<v Speaker 2>there's the procedural rules of discovery have been established where

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:29.159
<v Speaker 2>you have to basically each side shows their hand. Discovery

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 2>is so extensive and so sweeping that before you ever

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:34.960
<v Speaker 2>get to trial, you know exactly how weak or how

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 2>strong your opponent's case is, so they don't actually even

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:41.959
<v Speaker 2>bother to go to trial. Once discovery is over and

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 2>you see who's got the better case, then you move

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 2>on to a settlement phase. Typically, if the settlement doesn't

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 2>come to fruition, which it almost always does, they come

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:53.639
<v Speaker 2>to a negotiation and an agreement and that person pays

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 2>that person. Again, this is a civil case. If it doesn't,

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:59.120
<v Speaker 2>if they can't come to an agreement, then it goes

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 2>to trial. They almost always come to an agreement because

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 2>one side is clearly almost always better off than the

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 2>other side as far as legal standing goes.

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean it's funny. I never thought about it

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 1>until you said they have all their cards out. It'd

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>be like a game of poker played face up right,

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:19.439
<v Speaker 1>You get dealt and they're like, why bother even playing

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>this hand? Yeah, we know what you have. But I imagine

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>sometimes even there are like you have poker players, there

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 1>would be prosecutors or defendants that say, I'm really good

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>at bluffing. I'd kind of like to go through with this.

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:33.159
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, yeah, see see how I do.

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm sure all the Morgan and Morgan people love

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 2>to bluff, right, But it's kind of like, if you're

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 2>going to use a poker analogy, it's almost like you

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:45.120
<v Speaker 2>would fax the other poker player that you just pull

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 2>the jack of clubs essentially, you know, just little by little. Yeah,

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 2>lawyers loved to fact, they love to bluff, they love

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 2>to fax, and they love to drink until they get

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 2>ruinously drunk every day.

0:20:57.280 --> 0:21:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, in charge by the hour. The Supreme Court has

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 1>encouraged summary judgments, so that's also kind of you know,

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:09.159
<v Speaker 1>sped things along. And then contracts. There's a lot of

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>civil cases that are based around disputes like contract disputes,

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of contracts these days. Contracts these days.

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Why does it sound so wrong?

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:21.119
<v Speaker 2>It's so right though.

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>It is though, they have like direct language in there

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that says hey, and especially when you're dealing with big corporations,

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>they're very fond of saying like, hey, if if anything

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 1>ever happens between us, you're signing something here that says

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>that we don't have to go to jury trial because

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and we'll talk more about corporations, but Historically people aren't

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>shy about sticking it to a corporation.

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, corporations do not like to go in front

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:51.920
<v Speaker 2>of jury's But that contract thing, it's like you very

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 2>frequently agree to goes to go to arbitration or mediation. Right.

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 2>So that's the civil side, right Chuck. Yeah, Okay, so

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to the criminal side, it actually gets

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 2>a lot darker because the the reason why so many

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 2>people kap a plea ninety percent you said, kapp a

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 2>plea is twofold one is they issued sentencing guidelines in

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 2>the eighties that really like there's like you can really

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:23.639
<v Speaker 2>go to jail for a really long time for a

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 2>variety of crimes. But they included a little plumb in

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:30.959
<v Speaker 2>there that said, if you quote accept responsibility for your

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 2>crime and plead guilty, you're going to get a much

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 2>lower sentence or lesser sentence. And here's what it is.

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 2>So there's like a menu that prosecutors. If you ever

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 2>watch Law and Order, they always do this, like every

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:48.199
<v Speaker 2>episode they'll tell you like what you can get if

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 2>you go to trial, and then they'll tell you what

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 2>they'll give you if you kop a plea. There's actually

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:57.440
<v Speaker 2>like guidelines that say that it's not necessarily like the

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:00.679
<v Speaker 2>prosecutor of the DA who's saying like, I don't know,

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 2>let's say a month or something like that, there's guidelines

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:05.399
<v Speaker 2>for that. And so most people are like, I'm not

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 2>gonna roll the dice here, because there is a study,

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 2>Chuck that found that convictions after being tried, if you

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:16.919
<v Speaker 2>go to trial and you're convicted, you typically get five

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 2>times greater the sentence than you do if you cop

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 2>a plea deal. And believe me, the prosecutors are telling

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 2>people that every single time.

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:28.159
<v Speaker 1>I have never seen Law and Order. What I bet you,

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I bet you anything. This is how they say it.

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 1>If you plead, you'll get three to five maximum. But

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>if you don't, and they always say this, you're staring

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:41.680
<v Speaker 1>at eight to ten. They always say you're staring.

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 2>At They don't actually on Law and Order, but I

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:45.360
<v Speaker 2>could see where you were.

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 1>I thought you always stared at a big sentence. What

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>else are you gonna do?

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 2>They say, you're looking down the barrel at That's what

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Law and Order is doing for U. Wait, wait, no,

0:23:55.160 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 2>we can't go any further. I'm sorry, you've never seen

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 2>an episode of Law and Order, not one, this show

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 2>that's been around for literally thirty years.

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:07.120
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't ever seen it. It's been around, but it's

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>so good, Chuck, I've never seen Judge Judy.

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 2>All right, No, I mean just but it's not really good. Now.

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:19.959
<v Speaker 1>Just because it's been around doesn't mean I've seen it,

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:20.159
<v Speaker 1>you know.

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:23.640
<v Speaker 2>No, that's true. If you add the fact that it's

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 2>been around thirty years to the fact that it's been

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:29.160
<v Speaker 2>good for the majority of those thirty years, uh huh,

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 2>then it's it's strange. I'm not saying like you're ridiculous

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 2>for not having seen it. I'm just surprised.

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:37.719
<v Speaker 1>It's all sure well, or the very Lisa hasn't been on,

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>like when emme at somewhere for Christmas vacation or something

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 1>with a family member.

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there is a stretch where I don't even know

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 2>if A and E's still around, But there's a stretch

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 2>where A and E showed basically nothing but Law and

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Order all day every day. Yeah, they would just play

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 2>it like they started the first one and just play

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:56.199
<v Speaker 2>themsequentially and then start over when they got to the

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 2>most recent one.

0:24:57.520 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Those are called the years that Chuck didn't watch A

0:24:59.320 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and E.

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 2>Gotcha?

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>The other thing that can cut down on some criminal

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>cases sorry going to trial is that there's more pre

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>trial detention these days. So somebody sitting around in jail

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:15.159
<v Speaker 1>waiting for a trial as much likelier to say, you know,

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather just go home and cop the plea.

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:20.400
<v Speaker 2>That's where it gets really dark, because pre trial detention

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:23.680
<v Speaker 2>is meant to protect the community from people who might

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 2>otherwise comit another crime while they're on pre trial release,

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 2>or if they're a flight risk and they may not

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 2>show up at trial. That's it, but it seems to

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:35.679
<v Speaker 2>be used as a tool with prosecutors to lean on

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 2>people to take a plea by saying you could be

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 2>in here for months, for years before your your trial

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 2>comes up, and they'll be like, well, I just I

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 2>don't want to sit around that long, Let's just take

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 2>the plea. That's that's pretty bad that they do that.

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 2>And actually they found that if you are given pre

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 2>trialed attention, you're three times likelier to take a plea

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:58.639
<v Speaker 2>than somebody who is not detained pre trial.

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Right, But the I mean that part makes sense, but

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:05.119
<v Speaker 1>are those people do they not qualify as one of

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:07.919
<v Speaker 1>the two reasons, I mean, like not.

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:10.919
<v Speaker 2>To somebody is convinced to judge that, but it doesn't

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 2>necessarily mean that they are in every case. No, I

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 2>don't think that if you really sat down and look

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 2>case by case, that anywhere near one hundred percent of

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 2>them are a flight risk or risk to the community necessarily.

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:25.639
<v Speaker 2>But that risk to the community in particular, that is

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 2>so sweeping in scope that yeah, you can basically you

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 2>could anybody who's who's convicted or not convicted but charged

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:37.119
<v Speaker 2>with the crime enough that they can keep you in

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:40.120
<v Speaker 2>jail until your trial. You can make a case as

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 2>a threat to the community.

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Right, I got you. If you are chosen for a

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:50.120
<v Speaker 1>jury it's probably because you're either on a voter roll,

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:54.359
<v Speaker 1>you have paid taxes, or you drive a car and

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>you have a driver's license. There's the old wives sale

0:26:57.320 --> 0:26:59.639
<v Speaker 1>that if you don't register to vote, you're never going

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:02.439
<v Speaker 1>to get called for jury service. And that's not true.

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 1>You got to be eighteen, you got to live you know,

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:08.119
<v Speaker 1>you got out because you didn't live in that county.

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>You have to live in that judicial district for at

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 1>least a year. And then as far as whether or

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:16.919
<v Speaker 1>not you need to be able to speak English, you

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 1>have to be able to speak English enough to fill

0:27:18.600 --> 0:27:23.160
<v Speaker 1>out your juror qualification forms. I would guess without help.

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Didn't say that, surely that would be my guess.

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because they're not going to let your twelve year

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 2>old daughter, American born daughter come to trial with you,

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, right, Although they do make accommodations for people

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 2>with certain disabilities.

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:42.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. If you're blind, if you are hard of hearing,

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 2>they will provide an oral interpreter or a sign language

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:50.399
<v Speaker 2>interpreter for you. I read one lawyer talked about a

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 2>case where juror had back problems, so they'll let her

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:58.119
<v Speaker 2>lay down for the entire trial. If you want to

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 2>be on a jury, they will go to pretty great

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 2>links to accommodate you to make sure you can. The

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 2>thing is most people don't want to be on a jury,

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 2>so there's all sorts of creative ways to get out

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 2>of it.

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Would be mony of the judge was like, four, person,

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 1>will you read the verdict? Then you just hear your voice.

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 1>It's is like, all right, I'm getting up and you

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:22.119
<v Speaker 1>see somebody with bed ed rise from behind the jury box.

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:26.720
<v Speaker 1>What are some other means?

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Here we go. If you have been convicted of a felony,

0:28:30.720 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and you haven't had your rights restored yet if you're

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 1>currently charged with a felony. I think active military usually don't.

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>If you're a cop or if you're a government official,

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe some other public employees might be exempt. If you're

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:49.479
<v Speaker 1>over seventy, a lot of times you can get out

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 1>of it. If you've been on a jury in the

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 1>past two years, you can probably get out of it.

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 1>If you have a hardship, like you know, if you

0:28:56.840 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>go in there and you're like, hey, listen, I can't

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>miss work because I'm a single parent and I worked

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>by the hour, and I literally wouldn't be able to

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>put food on the table for my family, right. They

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 1>consider stuff like that. Even though you do get paid,

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 1>it's just almost always, it's just not very much. It's

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 1>like thirty to fifty to sixty bucks a day.

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Now, and some employers will pay you for the time

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 2>you're away. They should, they should, And I was trying

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 2>to find which ones do. The only one I could

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 2>find that stated it does is Amazon. But get this,

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 2>they they doc you the pay that the government paid you.

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 2>So like if you got paid fifty dollars a day,

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 2>you get your regular pay minus fifty dollars the government.

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 2>It's like, how much does it cost you even pay

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 2>that much attention? You know, it's a little crazy, but

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 2>they're the only ones who definitely say, yes, you don't

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 2>lose any time, you don't lose any money. So hats

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 2>off to them for that at least. But I thought

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 2>that that was a little penny pinching if you ask me.

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 1>It was. And you know, I get cases where it's

0:29:56.520 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>like a small business, where it would create a legitimate hardship, yes,

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to pay someone for not being there. So I'm not

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 1>just saying across the board, but if you're a big company,

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 1>then you should not say sorry, go serve your civil

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 1>duty and good luck paying your bills this month.

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and then you end up in court for stealing

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 2>bread because you had to be on a jury and

0:30:16.080 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 2>your job wouldn't pay you while you were.

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 1>On said jury stealing bread.

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Turn into Jean val John.

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I get that rev good.

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:28.360
<v Speaker 2>Also, federal employees are guaranteed to be paid for their

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 2>service on a jury, their regular pay, I should say,

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 2>from their job, right. But the thing is is actually

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 2>not likely, necessarily statistically speaking, that you're going to ever

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:45.959
<v Speaker 2>serve on a jury. I think A twenty twelve survey

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 2>found that twenty seven percent of all US adults said

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 2>they'd served on a jury at some point in time

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 2>in their life. So it's not like a given that

0:30:54.400 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 2>you're going to serve on a jury. And actually, I

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:00.680
<v Speaker 2>think about thirty two million people are called for jury

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 2>duty in the United States every year, that's federal and

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 2>state courts. Eight million of them report, right, So that

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 2>means what twenty four twenty six million, No, twenty four million,

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:16.720
<v Speaker 2>I got it, finally actually even show up.

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Just that's or don't share me, I should say, I

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 1>would be so afraid to just not show. Yeah, for sure,

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm too much of a rule follower to just roll

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the dice like that exactly.

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 2>But of those eight million that do show up, only

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 2>twenty two percent of them are selected as rural jurors

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 2>rule y.

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, I was watching those episodes not too long ago,

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Rule juror. Yeah, none of them knew how to sport.

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 1>It was even what she was saying, right, Yeah, they

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 1>like had to find the box, right.

0:31:48.520 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 2>So uh yeah, I think I saw in five point

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 2>thirty eight you have like a point zero nine percent

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 2>chance of ever being selected for jury duty or sorry,

0:31:57.120 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 2>in a given year.

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>By the way, that was a thirty record difference of

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 1>people are frustrated.

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah right, now go check it out.

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Now, we should talk about a very interesting part of

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:11.719
<v Speaker 1>the jury process, which is called jury selection, or if

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you're old school or French, you might call it wadir.

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:20.720
<v Speaker 1>And I watched a lot of attorney videos about vadir.

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 1>And again, this is the process by which attorneys can

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 1>go in ask questions of a potential jury pool to

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:30.480
<v Speaker 1>whittle it down to the twelve plus a few alternates.

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 1>And I was naive enough to think up until today

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 1>that all they were trying to do invadir was to

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:42.760
<v Speaker 1>just get impartial people in there that wouldn't have a

0:32:42.760 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 1>real slant in the case. And what I learned from

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 1>watching every attorney video that I saw was they are,

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 1>every single one of them are looking to get jurors

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 1>on their jury who will be sympathetic to their case.

0:32:57.400 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they're trying to do to slant the case.

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Are trying to the jury box as much as possible

0:33:02.640 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 1>in their favor.

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So the var dear process is actually pretty controversial,

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 2>but they can ask you all sorts of questions. I've

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 2>read that there's questionnaires that they give out now that

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 2>are asking increasingly like bizarre questions like what's the last

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 2>three books you read? I saw a question that one

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:26.240
<v Speaker 2>prosecutor very frequently uses as who who do you respect?

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 2>That somebody we all know more than anybody else, And

0:33:30.480 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 2>she said that most people, No, most people say their grandmother,

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 2>and she just dismisses them immediately because they clearly can't

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 2>follow directions because it said who we all know? Right?

0:33:40.760 --> 0:33:43.959
<v Speaker 2>Oh right, yeah, so they question right. They'll also scrape

0:33:44.000 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 2>your social media.

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 1>They will.

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 2>They'll they'll do whatever research they can on you to

0:33:49.440 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 2>see how you're going to vote, or to try to

0:33:51.440 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 2>just kind of suss out based on who you are,

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 2>how you present yourself, whether you're going to be rational,

0:33:57.120 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 2>and if you are going to be rational, which direction

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:01.080
<v Speaker 2>you would be likely to go.

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Olivia found a guy, an attorney who basically sort

0:34:07.320 --> 0:34:09.759
<v Speaker 1>of gives advice to other attorneys and what to do,

0:34:10.400 --> 0:34:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and he's like, here, you know, most people won't come

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:16.560
<v Speaker 1>right out and say they have bias, So just get

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:19.800
<v Speaker 1>them in a conversation, get them chit chatty, get them talking,

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and they'll probably reveal something they don't want you to

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:26.600
<v Speaker 1>know or pay attention to their body language, look at

0:34:26.640 --> 0:34:31.640
<v Speaker 1>their personality, like if they're really super opinionated, then they

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:33.440
<v Speaker 1>might be more likely to hang a jury, or if

0:34:33.480 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 1>they're really withdrawn and awkward around people, they might be

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:40.840
<v Speaker 1>more likely to hang a jury. And again, he was

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the one that said get on Facebook or Twitter or

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:46.480
<v Speaker 1>whatever and dig up their pass right exactly.

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 2>And so you also want to kind of lead them

0:34:49.840 --> 0:34:54.520
<v Speaker 2>in ways that they are not expecting to reveal their biases, because,

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 2>like you said, they're not going to just be like,

0:34:56.239 --> 0:34:59.880
<v Speaker 2>I actually have a problem with poor people, they would say.

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:02.239
<v Speaker 2>So instead of asking them like, do you have a

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 2>problem seeing poor people as your equal, you would say like,

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 2>I think we can all agree that we have trouble

0:35:09.120 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 2>seeing poor people as our equals, right, And then just

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 2>see who nods emphatically. We're all guilty of this, right, right, exactly.

0:35:16.200 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 2>That's kind of what they would do. And then interesting,

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:20.279
<v Speaker 2>you know, everybody raise your hand, that kind of thing.

0:35:22.000 --> 0:35:25.000
<v Speaker 2>So they're really trying to massage out of you who

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 2>you really are in ways that you might not even

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:30.920
<v Speaker 2>realize you are until they get to the people that

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 2>are they think are least likely to vote against their client.

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:38.280
<v Speaker 2>And I saw it described as not selecting a jury.

0:35:38.480 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 2>You actually deselect potential jurors until you end up with

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 2>twelve people left plus the alternates.

0:35:44.640 --> 0:35:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a good way to look at it. There's

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:53.880
<v Speaker 1>something else called peremptory challenge that and here's it's legally speaking,

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you can't eliminate someone on the basis of race or sex.

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:00.840
<v Speaker 1>And a peremptory challenge is when you say, listen, I

0:36:00.920 --> 0:36:02.719
<v Speaker 1>just want to throw this person out, and I don't

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:05.360
<v Speaker 1>want to give a reason why. We each get a

0:36:05.440 --> 0:36:08.960
<v Speaker 1>certain number of these that we don't have to explain.

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:12.120
<v Speaker 1>And that gets really tricky when you're talking about race

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 1>or sex, because basically, all you have to do if

0:36:15.040 --> 0:36:18.720
<v Speaker 1>the other attorney says, well, wait a minute, I object

0:36:18.760 --> 0:36:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to your peremptory challenge of this potential jur because they're black,

0:36:24.320 --> 0:36:26.239
<v Speaker 1>and that's the only reason you did that, And all

0:36:26.280 --> 0:36:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the other prosecutor whoever defendant, has to do is say, oh, well,

0:36:31.160 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that's not the reason. It's because of this right, and

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:37.319
<v Speaker 1>they basically are. I mean, it's not rubber stamped, but

0:36:37.360 --> 0:36:38.960
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of all you have to do is just

0:36:39.280 --> 0:36:40.640
<v Speaker 1>defend it with one other reason.

0:36:40.760 --> 0:36:43.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's all based on an eighty six Supreme Court

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:48.360
<v Speaker 2>case called Batsan versus Kentucky, where prosecutors used preemptive challenges

0:36:48.440 --> 0:36:52.040
<v Speaker 2>to remove all four African American potential jurors from the

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:56.000
<v Speaker 2>jury and the defendant was an African American accused of burglary,

0:36:56.040 --> 0:36:58.920
<v Speaker 2>so they tried to basically root out anybody that they

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:03.880
<v Speaker 2>thought would would vote against the guy's prosecution based on race,

0:37:04.440 --> 0:37:07.400
<v Speaker 2>and so that now it's called the Batsan challenge. The

0:37:07.520 --> 0:37:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court said, you can't do that, but they follow

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:12.960
<v Speaker 2>it up in nineteen ninety five on another one where

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:18.279
<v Speaker 2>a prosecutor dismissed the two African American potential jurors from

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 2>the jury pool because of their long hair and go tee,

0:37:22.719 --> 0:37:25.160
<v Speaker 2>and the Supreme Court said, that's fine, you can do that.

0:37:25.200 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, you don't have to give a reason that

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:29.600
<v Speaker 2>even makes sense. You just have to give a reason

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:31.760
<v Speaker 2>that's not based on race.

0:37:32.360 --> 0:37:35.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean, there are classes in training and there

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:39.640
<v Speaker 1>are manuals for prosecutors that basically say, here's how to

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:42.400
<v Speaker 1>get a black person off your jury. Blame it on this,

0:37:42.560 --> 0:37:44.759
<v Speaker 1>blame it on this, blame it on this, and you'll

0:37:44.800 --> 0:37:45.200
<v Speaker 1>be fine.

0:37:45.320 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And the US legal system has like a long

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:56.080
<v Speaker 2>standing history of like new and creative ways to keep

0:37:56.600 --> 0:38:01.560
<v Speaker 2>minorities off of juries because they feel, especially if you're

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:04.359
<v Speaker 2>a prosecutor, if you can get white men in there,

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:06.360
<v Speaker 2>you're probably going to get a conviction.

0:38:07.320 --> 0:38:10.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. There was a twenty twenty twelve study and this

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:13.880
<v Speaker 1>is North Carolina death penalty cases, and it found that

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:17.000
<v Speaker 1>black people were removed from juries twice as often as

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:21.160
<v Speaker 1>members of other races. And I think now, even like

0:38:21.560 --> 0:38:26.640
<v Speaker 1>if your support like the Black Lives Matter movement, it's

0:38:27.160 --> 0:38:29.719
<v Speaker 1>being debated right now, whether that's enough just cause to

0:38:29.719 --> 0:38:30.839
<v Speaker 1>get someone booted from a jury.

0:38:30.920 --> 0:38:34.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I think there's a lawsuit from a potential jury

0:38:34.200 --> 0:38:37.520
<v Speaker 2>that was dismissed because of that that's not been decided yet.

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but it's just so disrespectful.

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:42.799
<v Speaker 2>And then it also just presumes that you know, black

0:38:42.880 --> 0:38:46.400
<v Speaker 2>jurds wouldn't be able to set aside any bias like

0:38:46.480 --> 0:38:48.840
<v Speaker 2>any other jur would be able to and just do

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:52.400
<v Speaker 2>their civic duty. It's just pretty despicable all around. But

0:38:52.440 --> 0:38:55.319
<v Speaker 2>it's really really common from what I can tell, as

0:38:55.360 --> 0:38:57.280
<v Speaker 2>far as trials go. Criminal trials.

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:01.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's talk about this one more thing before we

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:04.960
<v Speaker 1>go to break it is the second great band name

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I failed to mention the first, but I think Voasder

0:39:08.480 --> 0:39:10.960
<v Speaker 1>is a great band name. Oh yeah, because I don't

0:39:10.960 --> 0:39:12.719
<v Speaker 1>even think we've said what it meant in French that

0:39:12.760 --> 0:39:13.880
<v Speaker 1>means to speak the truth.

0:39:14.440 --> 0:39:17.080
<v Speaker 2>It's maybe the best band name we've ever run across, Chuck,

0:39:17.200 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 2>So it's.

0:39:17.520 --> 0:39:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Kind of a hyphalutin band name, like, oh, you know

0:39:19.440 --> 0:39:21.759
<v Speaker 1>what it means to speak the truth in French. But

0:39:21.840 --> 0:39:26.279
<v Speaker 1>the next great man name is death qualified. Yeah. This

0:39:26.440 --> 0:39:28.799
<v Speaker 1>is if you are in a death penalty case. In

0:39:28.840 --> 0:39:32.400
<v Speaker 1>a capital case, a perspective juror is supposed to be

0:39:32.440 --> 0:39:37.320
<v Speaker 1>death qualified, meaning that you shouldn't be on the jury

0:39:37.400 --> 0:39:41.120
<v Speaker 1>if you are someone who will absolutely refuse to impose

0:39:41.120 --> 0:39:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the death penalty because of your moral and ethical stance

0:39:44.880 --> 0:39:45.720
<v Speaker 1>on the death penalty.

0:39:45.840 --> 0:39:47.879
<v Speaker 2>And that is a whole other ball of wax, because

0:39:47.920 --> 0:39:50.239
<v Speaker 2>if you root out the people who are opposed to

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:52.959
<v Speaker 2>the death penalty, all you have left on the jury

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:55.520
<v Speaker 2>are people who are in favor of the death penalty, right,

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:57.879
<v Speaker 2>So they're not only more likely to convict, they're more

0:39:57.960 --> 0:40:01.600
<v Speaker 2>likely to recommend death, which you don't really want. Like

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:04.640
<v Speaker 2>any you don't want it skewed one way or the other.

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:08.759
<v Speaker 2>In a case like that. But then secondly, also I've

0:40:08.760 --> 0:40:12.960
<v Speaker 2>read that just being talked to about the death penalty

0:40:13.040 --> 0:40:16.440
<v Speaker 2>and asked whether you would be able to render a

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:20.480
<v Speaker 2>judgment that recommended the penalty of death if it came

0:40:20.520 --> 0:40:24.600
<v Speaker 2>to that apparently has the effect on jurors of basically

0:40:25.560 --> 0:40:27.719
<v Speaker 2>making them think that the court thinks this guy is

0:40:27.719 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 2>so guilty that we have to talk about the death

0:40:29.560 --> 0:40:32.680
<v Speaker 2>penalty now, right, and that it actually stacks the deck

0:40:32.719 --> 0:40:36.480
<v Speaker 2>again against the defendant's favor as far as that goes,

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:38.640
<v Speaker 2>because they just go into it thinking that they're guilty,

0:40:38.920 --> 0:40:40.840
<v Speaker 2>and then all they're focused on is whether or not

0:40:40.880 --> 0:40:43.680
<v Speaker 2>they're going to give the guy the death sentence.

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Right. There was a case in nineteen sixty nine Witherspoon v.

0:40:48.680 --> 0:40:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Illinois where the Supreme Court said that even if you

0:40:53.040 --> 0:40:57.280
<v Speaker 1>have an opposition philosophically or ethically to the death penalty

0:40:58.120 --> 0:41:00.279
<v Speaker 1>doesn't necessarily mean you shouldn't be able to serve run

0:41:00.320 --> 0:41:05.040
<v Speaker 1>a jury in a capital case where you basically are saying, well, listen,

0:41:05.040 --> 0:41:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I may not believe in it, but I'm willing to

0:41:06.880 --> 0:41:10.640
<v Speaker 1>support the laws that are in place as being you know, valid,

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and so I will support those laws.

0:41:12.960 --> 0:41:15.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I was a very trick. Do you think you'd

0:41:15.800 --> 0:41:16.600
<v Speaker 2>be able to do it?

0:41:18.400 --> 0:41:21.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't want to answer that, Okay, I.

0:41:21.239 --> 0:41:24.120
<v Speaker 2>Asked myself, and I don't think I would. I'm not

0:41:24.160 --> 0:41:27.640
<v Speaker 2>opposed to the death penalty, and necessarily I'm kind of

0:41:27.680 --> 0:41:31.640
<v Speaker 2>like wishy washy on it, but I don't think I

0:41:31.640 --> 0:41:34.359
<v Speaker 2>could recommend somebody be put to death. I just don't

0:41:34.400 --> 0:41:35.560
<v Speaker 2>think I could do it.

0:41:35.040 --> 0:41:36.320
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty heavy.

0:41:36.680 --> 0:41:40.080
<v Speaker 2>It's super heavy. Although I mean, context is everything, right,

0:41:40.160 --> 0:41:43.200
<v Speaker 2>if this is like some ridiculously heinous crime and the

0:41:43.280 --> 0:41:46.040
<v Speaker 2>person I thought the person deserved to die, maybe I could.

0:41:46.080 --> 0:41:48.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. Now I understand why you didn't want

0:41:48.640 --> 0:41:51.800
<v Speaker 2>to answer that question after I've done my shpiel.

0:41:52.120 --> 0:41:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's heavy.

0:41:53.120 --> 0:41:54.000
<v Speaker 2>It is very heavy.

0:41:54.480 --> 0:41:57.279
<v Speaker 1>Too heavy for this sunny afternoon for me to make

0:41:57.320 --> 0:42:01.200
<v Speaker 1>that decision, right. Uh. I will make a decision on

0:42:01.280 --> 0:42:04.719
<v Speaker 1>the break though, because we are forty five minutes in

0:42:04.760 --> 0:42:07.120
<v Speaker 1>and we haven't even taken our second break sustained.

0:42:26.120 --> 0:42:28.400
<v Speaker 2>Wow, Chuck, we are forty five minutes and time flies

0:42:28.400 --> 0:42:34.120
<v Speaker 2>when you're talking about legal procedure. So another this is

0:42:34.120 --> 0:42:35.719
<v Speaker 2>what I was talking about at the very beginning. There's

0:42:35.760 --> 0:42:39.040
<v Speaker 2>so much interesting cultural stuff going on. With juris that

0:42:39.080 --> 0:42:41.520
<v Speaker 2>I had no idea about. And one thing that's kind

0:42:41.560 --> 0:42:44.160
<v Speaker 2>of come up recently is whether or not a jury

0:42:44.239 --> 0:42:47.080
<v Speaker 2>has to be unanimous, which I always thought it did,

0:42:47.080 --> 0:42:50.360
<v Speaker 2>but that's not always been the case actually, and it's still.

0:42:50.120 --> 0:42:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Not now now, I think. In twenty nineteen, the American

0:42:54.480 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Bar Association said that this is happening more and more

0:42:58.520 --> 0:43:01.800
<v Speaker 1>non unanimous verdicts, and these are usually in misdemeanor or

0:43:01.880 --> 0:43:05.480
<v Speaker 1>civil cases, and it's like a depends on the state

0:43:05.640 --> 0:43:08.840
<v Speaker 1>in the jury, but it's usually like three fourths or

0:43:08.880 --> 0:43:12.799
<v Speaker 1>maybe five six if it's just a six person set

0:43:12.840 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 1>of juries, set of juries, set of jurors. And you know,

0:43:17.760 --> 0:43:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know that. I thought it was kind of

0:43:19.160 --> 0:43:23.480
<v Speaker 1>across the board unanimous these days. In twenty twenty, Scotis

0:43:23.560 --> 0:43:28.080
<v Speaker 1>said that the sixth Amendment does require unanimous verdicts in

0:43:28.200 --> 0:43:33.000
<v Speaker 1>felony cases in the state in federal courts. But when

0:43:33.040 --> 0:43:36.799
<v Speaker 1>they made this law in twenty twenty, Oregon and Louisiana

0:43:36.840 --> 0:43:42.080
<v Speaker 1>were the only states that allowed non unanimous felonies. Everyone

0:43:42.120 --> 0:43:44.560
<v Speaker 1>else basically said you had to be unanimous on felonies,

0:43:45.280 --> 0:43:48.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think only I think only Oregon changed that

0:43:48.880 --> 0:43:50.759
<v Speaker 1>since then, that Louisiana dug in.

0:43:50.880 --> 0:43:53.319
<v Speaker 2>No, they both changed it. But Oregon said all those

0:43:53.360 --> 0:43:58.640
<v Speaker 2>people who were convicted non unanimously. Trial in Louisiana said.

0:43:58.600 --> 0:44:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Nah, that's really thorny two.

0:44:01.200 --> 0:44:04.760
<v Speaker 2>But those those non unanimous laws are from the thirties

0:44:04.760 --> 0:44:07.279
<v Speaker 2>that were meant to help dilute the jury so that

0:44:07.400 --> 0:44:09.640
<v Speaker 2>if you did end up with minorities on the jury,

0:44:09.800 --> 0:44:11.919
<v Speaker 2>you could let all the white people agree to have

0:44:12.000 --> 0:44:15.880
<v Speaker 2>the minority defendant, you know, put to death or something

0:44:15.960 --> 0:44:16.279
<v Speaker 2>like that.

0:44:17.360 --> 0:44:21.719
<v Speaker 1>Right, And speaking of capital sentencing, there are twenty seven

0:44:21.760 --> 0:44:24.680
<v Speaker 1>states that have the death penalty, and almost all of

0:44:24.719 --> 0:44:29.319
<v Speaker 1>them require unanimous vote for the death sentence except four

0:44:29.920 --> 0:44:37.160
<v Speaker 1>drum Roll Alabama, and very recently Florida passed legislation that said, nah,

0:44:37.200 --> 0:44:39.120
<v Speaker 1>we can put someone to death. It doesn't have to

0:44:39.120 --> 0:44:39.680
<v Speaker 1>be unanimous.

0:44:39.800 --> 0:44:41.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they're like Supreme Court, you said that it has

0:44:41.800 --> 0:44:44.160
<v Speaker 2>to be unanimous with felony cases. You didn't say anything

0:44:44.160 --> 0:44:48.399
<v Speaker 2>about death sentencing. So now in Florida, as little as

0:44:48.680 --> 0:44:51.920
<v Speaker 2>eight of the twelve jurors agreeing that the person should

0:44:51.920 --> 0:44:54.120
<v Speaker 2>be put to death means you will be put to death.

0:44:54.520 --> 0:44:58.399
<v Speaker 2>You can get the death sentence if three fourths of

0:44:58.440 --> 0:45:04.080
<v Speaker 2>the Yeah, reforce of the jury says, yeah, isn't that crazy,

0:45:04.320 --> 0:45:07.319
<v Speaker 2>And it was based as a reaction on well it

0:45:07.360 --> 0:45:11.120
<v Speaker 2>was past, I should say, as a reaction yeah, to

0:45:11.760 --> 0:45:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Disney taking a stand on don't say gay. It was

0:45:14.560 --> 0:45:18.600
<v Speaker 2>meant to be a real shot across Disney's bow. No,

0:45:18.719 --> 0:45:21.759
<v Speaker 2>it was a response to the Parkland shooter, the Marjorie

0:45:21.800 --> 0:45:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Stoneman Douglas High School shooting in twenty eighteen. The jury

0:45:26.200 --> 0:45:28.680
<v Speaker 2>could not agree on giving him the death sentence, so

0:45:28.719 --> 0:45:33.160
<v Speaker 2>he got life instead, and a lot of the state,

0:45:33.280 --> 0:45:37.279
<v Speaker 2>both liberal and conservative, were like, that is wrong. So

0:45:37.400 --> 0:45:40.200
<v Speaker 2>I think people who had wanted to pass that law

0:45:40.239 --> 0:45:43.759
<v Speaker 2>for a really long time saw their chance and they

0:45:43.800 --> 0:45:46.160
<v Speaker 2>did so. Yeah, that's how it is in Florida right now.

0:45:47.640 --> 0:45:49.799
<v Speaker 1>One of the last sort of technical things we could

0:45:49.840 --> 0:45:54.480
<v Speaker 1>cover here is something called jury nullification, and that is

0:45:54.800 --> 0:45:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a long standing tradition dating back to when colonial jury said,

0:45:59.640 --> 0:46:03.240
<v Speaker 1>you know what, these British taxes and laws aren't fair,

0:46:03.840 --> 0:46:06.279
<v Speaker 1>and so we're gonna even though the law says that

0:46:06.280 --> 0:46:09.280
<v Speaker 1>they're guilty, we're going to refuse to send a guilty verdict.

0:46:09.719 --> 0:46:12.880
<v Speaker 1>And that has happened a lot over the years. During abolition,

0:46:14.000 --> 0:46:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the fugitive slave clause said you have to you have

0:46:18.280 --> 0:46:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to help apprehend runaway slaves as a citizen if you

0:46:22.440 --> 0:46:24.080
<v Speaker 1>know that they're out there and you know about it.

0:46:24.520 --> 0:46:27.680
<v Speaker 1>And there were abolitionists who are like, no, I'm gonna

0:46:28.320 --> 0:46:31.600
<v Speaker 1>use my right for jury nullification to acquit these people,

0:46:32.280 --> 0:46:34.960
<v Speaker 1>because no one should have to apprehend runaway slaves.

0:46:36.040 --> 0:46:39.839
<v Speaker 2>On the other hand, conversely, it's also been used by

0:46:40.360 --> 0:46:46.000
<v Speaker 2>white juries to avoid convicting people who were involved in lynchings,

0:46:46.840 --> 0:46:49.640
<v Speaker 2>so it definitely cuts both ways. And then also it's

0:46:49.680 --> 0:46:53.359
<v Speaker 2>a way to kind of erode at laws that are

0:46:53.440 --> 0:46:55.560
<v Speaker 2>viewed as unjust or unfair, like it was used a

0:46:55.600 --> 0:46:59.239
<v Speaker 2>lot in prohibition cases issues a lot with marijuana possession.

0:47:00.400 --> 0:47:03.160
<v Speaker 2>And you said something about the jury exercising their right.

0:47:04.000 --> 0:47:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Some legal theorists say this is the right of the jury,

0:47:06.840 --> 0:47:09.160
<v Speaker 2>like it's up to them to make a decision and

0:47:09.200 --> 0:47:11.120
<v Speaker 2>to vote by their conscience, right.

0:47:11.800 --> 0:47:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:47:12.080 --> 0:47:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Other people are like, no, they're supposed to make a

0:47:14.800 --> 0:47:18.000
<v Speaker 2>verdict based on the law and their understanding of the law,

0:47:18.000 --> 0:47:20.920
<v Speaker 2>and they're flouting that in this case. But I think,

0:47:21.040 --> 0:47:23.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, as it stands, it's not something that gets

0:47:23.560 --> 0:47:28.959
<v Speaker 2>promoted a lot, but it is allowed. Like you can't

0:47:29.000 --> 0:47:31.719
<v Speaker 2>really do anything about it. You could appeal, I think,

0:47:31.760 --> 0:47:33.799
<v Speaker 2>but I don't know how often they do.

0:47:34.640 --> 0:47:36.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Like, it's not the kind of thing that they will,

0:47:37.760 --> 0:47:39.560
<v Speaker 1>like you inform the jury of how it all works.

0:47:39.600 --> 0:47:41.720
<v Speaker 1>They don't say. And by the way, there's also this option.

0:47:42.840 --> 0:47:44.879
<v Speaker 1>It's just I guess you just got to know about it.

0:47:45.600 --> 0:47:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I imagine the abortion laws they're going to be is

0:47:48.640 --> 0:47:50.400
<v Speaker 1>going to put this to the test in the near future.

0:47:50.560 --> 0:47:51.920
<v Speaker 2>I guess it depends on the state.

0:47:52.000 --> 0:47:56.919
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, you know, Yeah, and then this last bit

0:47:57.800 --> 0:48:01.680
<v Speaker 1>is fairly reassuring. I think. O Livia has this section

0:48:01.760 --> 0:48:05.960
<v Speaker 1>here titled should we trust juries? And we should generally

0:48:06.000 --> 0:48:10.880
<v Speaker 1>trust juries. There's been all kinds of studies and reviews

0:48:10.920 --> 0:48:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and things, and they all basically usually say the same thing,

0:48:14.520 --> 0:48:17.400
<v Speaker 1>which is, in general, juries are going to be or

0:48:17.520 --> 0:48:20.840
<v Speaker 1>durors are going to be fairly rational, they're going to

0:48:20.880 --> 0:48:23.160
<v Speaker 1>be methodical, and they're going to take it seriously.

0:48:23.360 --> 0:48:26.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And they found like they love studying juries because

0:48:26.960 --> 0:48:30.440
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of really interesting psychology to be found in,

0:48:30.719 --> 0:48:33.799
<v Speaker 2>like psychology of crowds and stuff by studying juries. And

0:48:33.840 --> 0:48:37.920
<v Speaker 2>they found that typically juries, when they do deliberations, go

0:48:38.000 --> 0:48:40.680
<v Speaker 2>one of two ways. They either go verdict driven, where

0:48:40.680 --> 0:48:43.480
<v Speaker 2>they basically take a straw pole and then they say, Okay,

0:48:43.560 --> 0:48:46.160
<v Speaker 2>most people think he's guilty, but these people think he's innocent.

0:48:46.360 --> 0:48:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Let's figure out how to get to either all innocent

0:48:48.840 --> 0:48:54.720
<v Speaker 2>or all guilty unanimous vote. Or they go evidence driven,

0:48:54.760 --> 0:48:56.759
<v Speaker 2>where they kind of lay all the evidence on the

0:48:56.760 --> 0:48:58.920
<v Speaker 2>table and they go through it together and then come

0:48:58.960 --> 0:49:02.160
<v Speaker 2>to a conclusion of inno sense or guilt. And it's

0:49:02.200 --> 0:49:04.840
<v Speaker 2>interesting that that's it, Like, those are the two like

0:49:04.880 --> 0:49:07.759
<v Speaker 2>and that people have organically figured out how to do that. Yeah,

0:49:07.760 --> 0:49:10.239
<v Speaker 2>and then it's basically like there's two paths and each

0:49:10.400 --> 0:49:12.640
<v Speaker 2>jury kind of figures it out on their own.

0:49:13.560 --> 0:49:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. As far as being in the room and changing

0:49:16.400 --> 0:49:21.000
<v Speaker 1>someone's mind, what Olivia calls the twelve angry men scenario

0:49:21.000 --> 0:49:26.080
<v Speaker 1>from the famous movie, that doesn't happen that often, and

0:49:26.360 --> 0:49:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that's the case where it's like one juror really sways

0:49:30.600 --> 0:49:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the jury in a different direction. Something

0:49:33.640 --> 0:49:36.319
<v Speaker 1>that does happen about ten percent of the time is

0:49:36.400 --> 0:49:39.680
<v Speaker 1>that the jury will end up with a different verdict

0:49:40.640 --> 0:49:43.240
<v Speaker 1>than what they previously kind of like near the beginning

0:49:43.280 --> 0:49:45.920
<v Speaker 1>of deliberations, thoughts like the whole jury will end up

0:49:45.920 --> 0:49:46.879
<v Speaker 1>sort of changing their mind.

0:49:47.000 --> 0:49:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they found that pro aquittal factions that are equal

0:49:51.680 --> 0:49:55.680
<v Speaker 2>in size to pro conviction factions are four times likelier

0:49:56.400 --> 0:50:00.239
<v Speaker 2>to sway the jury toward acquittal. There's just what's called

0:50:00.239 --> 0:50:03.520
<v Speaker 2>a leniency effect that the jury as a whole is

0:50:03.560 --> 0:50:08.920
<v Speaker 2>more likely to acquit than individual jurors. Yeah, pretty interesting stuff.

0:50:09.160 --> 0:50:11.600
<v Speaker 2>We talked a little bit about why you would want

0:50:11.600 --> 0:50:14.680
<v Speaker 2>to waive a jury trial, and there's it's strategically speaking,

0:50:14.719 --> 0:50:16.359
<v Speaker 2>it makes sense in some cases.

0:50:16.080 --> 0:50:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, I mean, statistically speaking, you are better off

0:50:21.640 --> 0:50:24.600
<v Speaker 1>with a judge, believe it or not. I think thirty

0:50:24.640 --> 0:50:27.799
<v Speaker 1>eight this was in twenty eighteen. A Few Research Center

0:50:27.840 --> 0:50:30.279
<v Speaker 1>report said that thirty eight percent of those who were

0:50:30.320 --> 0:50:33.520
<v Speaker 1>tried by a judge were acquitted, compared to fourteen percent

0:50:34.080 --> 0:50:36.359
<v Speaker 1>in front of a jury. And you know, if you're

0:50:36.400 --> 0:50:40.600
<v Speaker 1>meeting with your representative and like, you know, what should

0:50:40.640 --> 0:50:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I do? What should I do? They're going to say, hey, listen,

0:50:42.880 --> 0:50:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a judge is probably gonna believe cops more than a

0:50:46.120 --> 0:50:49.120
<v Speaker 1>jury might. If you have a really emotional case, a

0:50:49.200 --> 0:50:50.920
<v Speaker 1>jury is going to be more swayed by that kind

0:50:50.920 --> 0:50:53.680
<v Speaker 1>of thing. If you've got like a really good story,

0:50:54.719 --> 0:50:57.120
<v Speaker 1>you might It's easier to get an appeal if you're

0:50:57.480 --> 0:51:00.800
<v Speaker 1>in front of a jury trial, if it like technical

0:51:00.880 --> 0:51:03.440
<v Speaker 1>mumbo jumbo and it comes down to that, then a

0:51:03.440 --> 0:51:05.600
<v Speaker 1>bench trial was probably better because you might just end

0:51:05.719 --> 0:51:09.120
<v Speaker 1>up confusing the jury. And generally, you know, it's a

0:51:09.160 --> 0:51:16.719
<v Speaker 1>shorter experience, it's a little less oh, I don't know, dramatic.

0:51:16.760 --> 0:51:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess when you don't have twelve people staring at you,

0:51:19.480 --> 0:51:23.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, totally just one angry judge for sure.

0:51:23.200 --> 0:51:26.120
<v Speaker 2>So it really does pay to really stop and think

0:51:26.160 --> 0:51:29.520
<v Speaker 2>about what your case calls for, whether a bench trial

0:51:29.600 --> 0:51:30.560
<v Speaker 2>or a jury trial.

0:51:31.160 --> 0:51:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Just ask your lawyer that's right, I'll steer you in

0:51:34.440 --> 0:51:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the right direction.

0:51:35.320 --> 0:51:38.160
<v Speaker 2>There's another thing too, you kind of touched on. There's

0:51:38.200 --> 0:51:41.080
<v Speaker 2>a myth of the runaway jury, which is a myth

0:51:41.120 --> 0:51:45.200
<v Speaker 2>that was kind of developed by defendants of civil lawsuits,

0:51:45.280 --> 0:51:49.080
<v Speaker 2>especially big, deep pocketed defendants of civil lawsuits, that these

0:51:49.200 --> 0:51:51.680
<v Speaker 2>juries they don't listen to instruction, they do what they want,

0:51:51.719 --> 0:51:58.279
<v Speaker 2>and they pay out these enormous, gobsmacking business killing awards

0:51:58.320 --> 0:52:00.719
<v Speaker 2>to people who were you know who and fell in

0:52:00.800 --> 0:52:04.279
<v Speaker 2>the Kroger or something like that. And apparently studies show

0:52:04.320 --> 0:52:07.400
<v Speaker 2>that that's not really the case. That yes, jurys do

0:52:07.680 --> 0:52:11.799
<v Speaker 2>tend to pay out more the larger the corporation is,

0:52:11.920 --> 0:52:14.640
<v Speaker 2>or award more, I should say, the larger the corporation is.

0:52:14.960 --> 0:52:19.120
<v Speaker 2>But runaway is definitely nowhere near a reality. They still

0:52:19.160 --> 0:52:21.400
<v Speaker 2>typically act within the bounds of normalcy.

0:52:22.320 --> 0:52:24.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they've done mock jury's where they've put it to

0:52:24.840 --> 0:52:28.759
<v Speaker 1>the test, and yeah, you know, if you're I think

0:52:28.800 --> 0:52:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the one that Lvia found there was an attorney who

0:52:31.440 --> 0:52:34.480
<v Speaker 1>did one with a trip and fall cases and they

0:52:34.480 --> 0:52:36.200
<v Speaker 1>were mocked jurors and none of it was real. But

0:52:36.760 --> 0:52:40.160
<v Speaker 1>if it was like someone suing their neighbor, they awarded

0:52:40.160 --> 0:52:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the plane of like twenty two grand. If it was

0:52:41.920 --> 0:52:45.800
<v Speaker 1>your local mom and pop hardware store where you slipped

0:52:45.840 --> 0:52:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and fell, they'd award you seventy grand. But boy, if

0:52:49.000 --> 0:52:52.400
<v Speaker 1>it was home deep or lows one hundred thousand.

0:52:52.120 --> 0:52:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Dollars, man, you know they'd be sweating that. There's also

0:52:57.400 --> 0:52:59.520
<v Speaker 2>we talked about it before, but before we go, the

0:53:00.080 --> 0:53:02.960
<v Speaker 2>McDonald's coffee case from nineteen ninety four, where a woman

0:53:03.080 --> 0:53:07.200
<v Speaker 2>was awarded almost three million dollars for spilling McDonald's coffee

0:53:07.200 --> 0:53:10.680
<v Speaker 2>in her lap, and it was basically touted as an

0:53:10.719 --> 0:53:14.080
<v Speaker 2>example of runaway jury kind of stuff. But if you

0:53:14.760 --> 0:53:17.440
<v Speaker 2>are unfamiliar with that case or you're still walking around

0:53:17.440 --> 0:53:20.600
<v Speaker 2>thinking that it was a ridiculous award, you should definitely

0:53:20.680 --> 0:53:22.360
<v Speaker 2>find I don't remember the name of it, but there

0:53:22.440 --> 0:53:25.360
<v Speaker 2>was a great documentary done on it that really shows

0:53:25.440 --> 0:53:29.200
<v Speaker 2>just how poorly the media did their job on reporting

0:53:29.239 --> 0:53:32.040
<v Speaker 2>on that. Yeah, a good one.

0:53:32.760 --> 0:53:33.279
<v Speaker 1>It's a good one.

0:53:33.360 --> 0:53:35.120
<v Speaker 2>And then one more thing. The New York Times is

0:53:35.160 --> 0:53:37.560
<v Speaker 2>a really cool interactive thing where you can go on

0:53:38.200 --> 0:53:40.719
<v Speaker 2>and you go through like a kind of like an

0:53:40.719 --> 0:53:44.560
<v Speaker 2>interactive jury selection and decide. It tells you whether you're

0:53:44.680 --> 0:53:47.280
<v Speaker 2>likely or to be dismissed or chosen by the defense

0:53:47.400 --> 0:53:48.919
<v Speaker 2>or the prosecution. It's pretty cool.

0:53:49.600 --> 0:53:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I failed. What'd you get?

0:53:51.400 --> 0:53:52.439
<v Speaker 2>I got dismissed too.

0:53:53.160 --> 0:53:55.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I got dismissed. I felt bad too, because mine

0:53:55.960 --> 0:53:58.400
<v Speaker 1>was like a corporate case and it said like you

0:53:58.440 --> 0:54:01.799
<v Speaker 1>were more likely to come down in favor of the man. Basically, yeah,

0:54:01.880 --> 0:54:02.840
<v Speaker 1>he was like, no, I'm not.

0:54:03.080 --> 0:54:05.680
<v Speaker 2>No, let me retake minded too. It said the defense

0:54:05.840 --> 0:54:08.319
<v Speaker 2>loves you, but then the prosecution just cut you.

0:54:09.080 --> 0:54:10.920
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, oh what are you gonna do?

0:54:11.120 --> 0:54:14.200
<v Speaker 2>So? Yeah, that's it. That's it about juries. Everybody, if

0:54:14.200 --> 0:54:17.239
<v Speaker 2>you're ever called for jury duty, and you go, let

0:54:17.360 --> 0:54:20.960
<v Speaker 2>us know how it goes. And since I said that, everybody,

0:54:21.000 --> 0:54:22.200
<v Speaker 2>it's time for a listener Maya.

0:54:25.000 --> 0:54:28.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna call this just a quick NERF follow up. Hey, guys,

0:54:28.400 --> 0:54:30.640
<v Speaker 1>love The episode on NERF brought back a lot of

0:54:30.719 --> 0:54:33.719
<v Speaker 1>nostalgia from a kid being in the in the mid

0:54:33.760 --> 0:54:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to late nineties. I know you mentioned the NERF balls,

0:54:36.840 --> 0:54:39.160
<v Speaker 1>but you also spend a lot of time detailing the blasters.

0:54:39.760 --> 0:54:42.880
<v Speaker 1>You may have overlooked two of nrf's biggest toys, the

0:54:43.040 --> 0:54:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Nerf Fop and the Vortex Football. The NERF Hoop gave

0:54:48.040 --> 0:54:49.640
<v Speaker 1>my brother and I hundreds of hours of fund in

0:54:49.680 --> 0:54:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the basement pretending to be MJ or Kobe or Shack

0:54:54.160 --> 0:54:56.360
<v Speaker 1>depending on the day. It allowed us to be NBA

0:54:56.400 --> 0:55:00.279
<v Speaker 1>superstars in our own basement. So I've never heard of

0:55:00.320 --> 0:55:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the NERF hoop. I don't think.

0:55:02.040 --> 0:55:03.759
<v Speaker 2>I was just about to say, I can't believe we

0:55:03.840 --> 0:55:05.279
<v Speaker 2>failed to mention the NERF Hoop.

0:55:06.719 --> 0:55:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I didn't have one. So it was like

0:55:08.440 --> 0:55:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I had versions of it. I guess, like you hang

0:55:10.440 --> 0:55:11.000
<v Speaker 1>it on a door.

0:55:11.200 --> 0:55:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you had the serious Roebuck version probably, but at

0:55:15.520 --> 0:55:17.000
<v Speaker 2>the sooner and then it came with one of those

0:55:17.040 --> 0:55:19.160
<v Speaker 2>original nerf balls is like the basketball.

0:55:20.200 --> 0:55:21.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, maybe I did have one.

0:55:21.400 --> 0:55:24.799
<v Speaker 2>If there was ever somebody in an eighties movie who

0:55:24.880 --> 0:55:27.239
<v Speaker 2>was like trying to like hash out something in like

0:55:27.280 --> 0:55:31.120
<v Speaker 2>a bowl session, cool, somebody was shooting hoops on a nerfop.

0:55:31.680 --> 0:55:33.319
<v Speaker 1>Or they have one of those on like the edge

0:55:33.320 --> 0:55:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of their waistbasket right for like you know, stuff for

0:55:37.080 --> 0:55:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the cylindrical file. Yeah, the Vortex. I remember the Vortex

0:55:43.239 --> 0:55:43.719
<v Speaker 1>with my dad.

0:55:43.840 --> 0:55:44.160
<v Speaker 2>Just then.

0:55:45.280 --> 0:55:47.520
<v Speaker 1>The Vortex was allowed to be allowed us to be

0:55:47.600 --> 0:55:49.680
<v Speaker 1>NFL quarterbacks when we wanted to be throwing it further

0:55:49.719 --> 0:55:53.760
<v Speaker 1>than we ever could a regular football. The Vortex howler

0:55:54.120 --> 0:55:56.600
<v Speaker 1>was particularly fine as it whistled through the air, making

0:55:56.760 --> 0:56:00.760
<v Speaker 1>unmistakable sound I could still pick out today. I remember

0:56:00.840 --> 0:56:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the Vortex. I still have one. It's it's a little

0:56:03.040 --> 0:56:06.800
<v Speaker 1>small football with a big long sort of rocket tail fit.

0:56:06.719 --> 0:56:09.160
<v Speaker 2>And made a Wilhelm scream as it went through the air.

0:56:09.640 --> 0:56:11.920
<v Speaker 1>It did, and you can really chunk those things here.

0:56:11.960 --> 0:56:12.480
<v Speaker 2>A lot of fun.

0:56:13.480 --> 0:56:18.000
<v Speaker 1>So this is a Sandwicher listening starting in twenty twenty

0:56:18.680 --> 0:56:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and just passed into two. Sorry twenty eleven, So I

0:56:23.560 --> 0:56:28.880
<v Speaker 1>guess they're going backwards and there. Yeah, I got you,

0:56:28.960 --> 0:56:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I got you so start in twenty twenty. Started the

0:56:31.640 --> 0:56:34.680
<v Speaker 1>show though in twenty two thousand and six and is

0:56:34.719 --> 0:56:38.400
<v Speaker 1>now five years in up to twenty eleven. Yeah that

0:56:38.520 --> 0:56:43.360
<v Speaker 1>was Kevin. Kevin from McKinney, Texas. Will hear this in

0:56:44.360 --> 0:56:45.640
<v Speaker 1>by my math a couple of years.

0:56:45.960 --> 0:56:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Very nice, Thanks a lot, Kevin, your time banned it

0:56:49.120 --> 0:56:50.759
<v Speaker 2>And if you want to be like Kevin and point

0:56:50.800 --> 0:56:54.439
<v Speaker 2>out that we forgot something about your childhood, we want

0:56:54.440 --> 0:56:56.520
<v Speaker 2>to hear it. You can wrap it up, spank it

0:56:56.560 --> 0:56:59.319
<v Speaker 2>on the bottom, and send it off to stuff Podcasts

0:56:59.880 --> 0:57:05.840
<v Speaker 2>ieartradio dot com. Stuff you Should Know is a production

0:57:05.920 --> 0:57:06.719
<v Speaker 2>of iHeartRadio.

0:57:07.239 --> 0:57:10.440
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts my Heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:57:10.600 --> 0:57:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.