WEBVTT - Don’t Blame Market Turmoil On Machines: Salient’s Ben Hunt

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Let's

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>find out what's real when it comes to markets. Ben

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Hunt is chief investment strategist for Salient. They are based

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>in Houston, and he is also one of the bloggers

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 1>for a website it's called the Epsilon Theory and you

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>can follow them also on Twitter at Epsilon Theory. Ben Hunt,

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe just tell people why is it called epsilon theory.

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>That's a great question. Tim, It's great to be here,

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>by the way, Thanks you and Lisa for having so.

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>It's called Epsilon theory after the standard formula that you

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>learned about. Well, what goes into a portfolio? Right? We

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>talked about a portfolio and its returns being a combination

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 1>of alpha. Everybody knows what alpha is, right, That's that

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>special sauce that you bring to to get better. It

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>is to be honest, and the execution is a unicorn.

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>That's that's that's well put, Lisa. And also everyone knows

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:33.040
<v Speaker 1>what beta is, which is, okay, I want to get

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the market. I want to get the returns of the

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>world or the market gives to you. But if you

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>if you look at that equation, right, and it's always

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 1>set up as an equation in your textbooks and the like,

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>which is a whole another thing. Yeah, yeah, well the

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>equation is absolutely actually alpha plus beta plus this E

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>term out there E for epsilon, which is E for error. Right,

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that that in all of econometrics, you've always got that

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>error term that's sitting out there. And the point about

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>epsilon theory is that, well, actually, let's unpack that error

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 1>term a bit, because it's not just all randomness and

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and um what they call stochastic error in statistics. That's

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>where market behavior lives. That's that's where game theory lives,

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>that's where history lives, that's where market behavior lives, and

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>there are patterns to that. It's not just random their patterns.

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>There's a way to get real market information out of that.

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>So that's what I'm trying to explore all right. So

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:41.239
<v Speaker 1>that's a great place to start with understanding market behavior.

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>In the past few weeks, a lot of people say

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 1>that it was the market behavior of computers, and that

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>they took over everything and created a big mass, and

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:52.119
<v Speaker 1>then humans were left to try to darn these darn machines.

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Why were they? Why were they so complicated? H and

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:58.919
<v Speaker 1>other people were saying, well, people were just nervous, and uh,

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>stocks are a good And then we had a ton

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of investment managers come on and we would ask them,

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>all right, so are you buying and they said, well,

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>not yet. What was The fundamentals are sound? Correct, correct,

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the fundamentals are sound? Are you buying? Not so much?

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Exactly every single one? So what's going on here? Well,

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll say this first, a couple of points to quit. First,

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>it ain't the machines, right, it really isn't. And I

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>say that from a perspective of well, it's only we

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:31.079
<v Speaker 1>managed about thirteen billion, right, so you know, not a

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>huge fish. But we know what we're doing and we've

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>got a wide range of strategies. A chunk of those

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>strategies are these systematic strategies, including the boogeyman du jour

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>risk parity. Right. So we've been in this for a lot.

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I know I know right, right, and and what I

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>think is important to tell everyone about risk parity. I'll

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>use that as the example here. These strategies are barges.

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>They're not speedboats, right, and they and they react, they

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>do react, and they react to volatility, but it's historical

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 1>volatility they look at. And so I will tell you

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>from our strategy and they say, we're not one of

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the giants here like in a q R or a Bridgewater,

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>but the bones of all of these strategies are very similar.

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>So I know what we're doing. I'm highly confident that

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I've got a strong sense of what those other risk

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 1>parity strategies are doing. We're not selling on a on

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:28.720
<v Speaker 1>a Monday when the markets declining. We don't even take

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the VIX, which is what most people think of when

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>they think of volatility. That's a forward looking thing. We

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:37.919
<v Speaker 1>don't even use that. We don't even use that. These

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:43.600
<v Speaker 1>strategies are barges. And that ain't it. What is it?

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>What is it? What is it? What was it? I'll

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>tell you what I think what I what I think

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>it is, because this is what we're wrestling with with

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 1>our own strategies and and asset management. In my conversations,

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I think this is what everyone is wrestling with. How

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:03.160
<v Speaker 1>how do you invest best in a world where inflation

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 1>isn't going down, but it's starting to go up? How

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>do you invest our our portfolios off sides for a

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>world where inflation is increasing, not decreasing. That's a big change. Look,

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to go back thirty years to really

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>be in in an inflationary environment. And even if you

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>were investing thirty years ago, and I certainly was, and

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know a many people who were. Even if

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:33.720
<v Speaker 1>you were, those muscles they've atrophied a lot. So so

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I believe so strongly that every asset owner in the

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>world is wrestling with these questions. And when you get

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:46.279
<v Speaker 1>an event like that kind of hot wage number we

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>had on Friday, February of the two, those wheels start turning.

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>You start thinking, well, am I off sides? Is my

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>portfolio right here? And when you've got a market that

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>has very low i'll call it volume to it, that

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>it has really quite thin liquidity to it. It doesn't

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>take a lot of people changing their minds about where

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>their portfolio sits to have an outsized impact in the market.

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>All Right, I'm gonna make you dig a little deeper. Good.

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:23.840
<v Speaker 1>What is coyote math? Alright, that's something I've written about recently,

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's I like to use these kind of examples

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 1>from Yeah, I'm this dilettante farmer out in the wilds

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 1>of Connecticut, right, So we have coyotes out there, and

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:37.919
<v Speaker 1>you are, well, I am, I am, and and the

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I admire the coyotes, right because they're smart, they're clever,

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:47.279
<v Speaker 1>they're they're much smarter than my dogs, for example, My my,

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>my dogs don't even know they exist. But they're too

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>clever by half. They're too clever by half. And what

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean by that it's the same thing with Wiley

0:06:56.320 --> 0:07:00.279
<v Speaker 1>coyote from the Looney Tunes, always scheming and planning. And

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that's the case with with real world coyotes. But it's

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>also true for the coyotes in our business, because this

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>business of financial advice and financial management attracts people who

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>are frankly too clever by half. All right, So real quick,

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds, what has been your biggest allocation shift concept

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>shift that you think investors should know based on the

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>signs of nascent inflation. So what you have to distinguish

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 1>between is inflation going up and interest rates going up.

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>There are two different things. They follow each other, but

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>that connection between inflation going up and interest rates going

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>up is the thing that everyone needs to be focused on.

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>And this is why, Lisa, to your question, people say, oh,

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the fundamentals are sound, but I'm not investing. It's because

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the fundamentals have not been a sufficient condition to invest

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>for eight or nine years. Now. What you have to

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>have is some notion of Okay, I like the fundamentals,

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>but what are the central banks going to do? What

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>are they going to do about interest rates? So we

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>can talk about inflation going up, but it's thinking about

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>interest rates as well. Ben Hunt, a pleasure having you on.

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. Thank You'll let you go back

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 1>to your coyotes. Ben Hunt, chief investment strategist at Salient,

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>which is based in Houston, Texas and overseeing about thirteen

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars of bassets. There has been so much focus

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:43.839
<v Speaker 1>in the past few weeks on Russian interference in US

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 1>elections and UH their encroachments in the cyber world of

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the US, but there are many other states sponsored actors

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>out there trying to infiltrate UH the technological ecosystem of

0:08:57.280 --> 0:08:58.719
<v Speaker 1>the U S. And here to talk about that is

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>John halt Quist, director of intelligence analysis for fire Eye

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>based in Washington, d C. He joins US Now, John,

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being with US. I wanted

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to start with North Korea. Fire Eye has identified them

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>as behind a very sophisticated state sponsored cyber attacker. Can

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you give us a sense of what that effort looks

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>like and what they would or have or will target

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 1>in the US. So, we released recently released a report

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>on a group that we call APT thirty seven. They're

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>a North Korean hacking group that's been primarily focused on

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>South Korea carrying out espionage sort of a classic mission

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 1>for quite a long time. But we've seen them since

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 1>actually UH start developing missions outside of South Korea. They've

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>shown up in Japan, Vietnam, in the Middle East. UH,

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and our concern is that this is another tool that

0:09:56.200 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>could be used by the North Korean regime to project power. UM.

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>They a lot of the activity that we hear about

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>North three and hacking activity has actually been attributed to

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>another group UH. This team has been able to remain

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:16.319
<v Speaker 1>relatively obscure, which makes them an ideal choice for attack

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 1>operations or even crime because they're not as well known.

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 1>What have they attacked so far that you've been able

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to trace? So most of their operations now appear to

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>be uh focused on sort of classic intelligence operations, are

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>classic intelligence collections, so uh things like defectors or sanctions

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>or unification efforts. Even the Olympics have been have they've

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>targeted individuals associated with the Olympics? Um, So they're right

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>now doing a lot of the low and quiet activity,

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>which is precisely the side type of activity we see

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 1>most nascent capabilities first focus on. For instance, the other

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>acting groups that have been that are out of North

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 1>three that they are very well known, first appeared to

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>US as espionage operations mostly focused in South Korea. So John,

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I know, perhaps it's premature to talk about whether North

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:20.359
<v Speaker 1>Korea will be able to infiltrate the US cyber ecosystem,

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>but I'm wondering, from your perspective, what areas are the

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 1>most vulnerable in the US. And uh do any of

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 1>these sort of state sponsored actors work together? Do they? Uh?

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, do you have a sense of how many

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 1>there are trying to infiltrate a system at any given time.

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>So UH, as far as working together, we're always concerned

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 1>that lessons are being passed between some of these countries

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>that have longs like Russia, uh Iran and North three.

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 1>They have long standing relationships in military and move military

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>armaments and the training which sween them. We haven't necessarily

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>seen that play out from our visibility. Um our biggest

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 1>concern is that they're actually learning from each other though

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>as far as their offensive actions go. So each time

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>one of these actors carries out a major attack, a

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>disruptive attack, or um more of an influenced type of

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>attack that we saw during the elections, there each each

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>one of them is sort of pushing the edge for

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the other and pushing the norms and the red lines

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:32.440
<v Speaker 1>that the other other actor feels now more comfortable operating within.

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 1>So UH, in that in that regard, they are sort

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>of learning from each other. Would you would you say

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>that all heads of information technology or even the boards

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:48.720
<v Speaker 1>of major corporations need to ask themselves are you happy?

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>And I use that term because that's what you describe

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:54.320
<v Speaker 1>something tell people about are you happy? And why they

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>need to be particularly wary. So one of one of

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the concerns that we've had with any North Korean actor is, um,

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:06.319
<v Speaker 1>are they are they going to carry out some sort

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>of disruptive and destructive attack And uh, that's one of

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the tools that we came across with regards to this actor.

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>They do have a destructive tool that could be used

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:20.080
<v Speaker 1>in a wiper type attack. It's a fairly simplistic attack,

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 1>um and that's the name of the tool, and uh,

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a fairly simplistic attack, but it can have a

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of pretty strong effect on a on an organization

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>if they can wipe uh, you know, wipe important systems simultaneously.

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>And that's happened on several occasions already. From a lot

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>of that is the Russians, Russian actors that have done

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that quite recently with a with a ransomware attack and

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>it actually caused billions of dollars and damages to the economy.

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>So it's a very real concern. So John, just real

0:13:56.720 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>quick here, which organization in the US is most vulnerable

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>at this point? Well, it's because they because a lot

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 1>of their it's of the incidents focus on critical infrastructure. Uh,

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 1>there's record that that recognized that represents often the biggest opportunity.

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>We anticipate that any sort of major disruptive or destructive

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>attack would focus on an area like that, and there's

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of other incidents UM that have that

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>have played out like that. Uh. It's important to also

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>remember that critical infrastructure is not just utilities. I think

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of people to often focus on utilities,

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>but UM logistics and finance. UM. I want to thank

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>you John hould Quist, director of Intelligence Analysis or fire

0:14:47.920 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Eyed talking about cyber attacks. Everybody wants it, but now

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Apple wants to get it even more directly. Jack Farchie

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>is the senior Energy and Commodities reporter for Bloomberg is

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>based in London. Jack tell us the story about Apple

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and why does it want its own direct supply of cobalt. Yes,

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 1>we've had this amazing shift in the cobalt market really

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>in a matter of a little over a year, where

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the change in expectations for electric vehicles. You've seen almost

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 1>every major automaker come out with with forecasts for how

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>many electric vehicles they're going to build in the next

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>few years. Glen Core, who reported results today, had a

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 1>nice little toss up. They said it's going to be

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a ninety billion dollars of investments announced by the

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 1>auto industry in electric vehicles, and that's had a huge

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>impact on the cobalt market because cobalt is an essential

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>commodity in the in most lithium ion batteries which are

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>used in electric vehicles, where cobalts also uses in licking

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>iron batteries in gadgets like smartphones and tablets and laptops

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 1>until now, in fact still now, Apple is probably one

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>of the largest end users of cobalt in the world.

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Apple gadgets along with things companies like Samsung UH some

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 1>of the largest users of cobalt um As these car

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 1>companies are beginning to come out with huge forecasts for

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>how many electric vehicles are going to build over the

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>next five or ten years, they are going out into

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the market, people like VW BMW going into the market

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and seeking to sign big long term deals to buy

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>up supplies of cobalt to ensure they're gonna have enough

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>cobalt to build all the electric vehicles they want to

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 1>UH and now we're seeing Apple doing the same thing, essentially,

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 1>looking at what's happening in the in the car market

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and what some of the car companies are doing, and

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>in our in our understanding, wanting to make sure that

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>they are going to have enough cobalt to UH to

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>build to carry on building iPhones and iPads into the future.

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:07.639
<v Speaker 1>All right, So who does Apple currently buy cobalt from?

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 1>And basically who's going to be losing business as Apple

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>cuts out the middleman and goes direct to the miners.

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:16.640
<v Speaker 1>It's not so much a question of Apple losing business

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. Apple would go and buy batteries from

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 1>battery producers, who in turn are buying components of batteries

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 1>from people who produced those who in turn are buying

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 1>the WAW materials in a in a supply chain that

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>goes down the chain. So at the end of the day,

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:34.479
<v Speaker 1>Apple is not gonna, we don't think, immediately start building

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 1>batteries of itself. They're just it's it's a question of

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:39.919
<v Speaker 1>securing the supply of cobalt for their supply chain, for

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the companies in their supply chain. Now, a cobalt is

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>a byproduct of mining for copper and nickel primarily, that's right,

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Where does it come from? Well, that's one of the

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:55.399
<v Speaker 1>main problems. The vast majority of it, about thirds uh,

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's a number that's set to grow, comes from

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Republic of Congo, which is not the most

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Even if it were the most stable country in the world,

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that would be a pretty significant concentration risk for any

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>commodity UM. But uh, Democratic Republic of Congo is not

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the most stable country in the world. They've just announced

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 1>a big planned increase in taxes on on minors uh,

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:23.919
<v Speaker 1>and so that's a big concern. So I'm looking at

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:29.160
<v Speaker 1>cobalt prices and they have skyrocketed in the past few years.

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Wean just to give you a sense, from the end

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of twenty sixteen, they've more than doubled uh. And I'm

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 1>just wondering it is the actual demand going to keep

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>up with the perceived demand that is driving prices now?

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in other words, is applicant to lock in

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 1>prices that are much higher than which you might be

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>able to get later on. That's a very good question.

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I think from what we have heard about the discussions

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>that are going on in the market, it's not so

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>much a question of locking in prices as locking in supply.

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>So probably believe the deals that have done. Not just

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about Apple here, but v W, BMW, the big

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>car companies, some of the battery makers like Samsung, SDI

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 1>are also saying that they're seeking long term cobalt deals.

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 1>They're probably gonna have a floating price, so it will

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:15.200
<v Speaker 1>be whatever the market price is. It's more a question

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:18.199
<v Speaker 1>of of locking in supply. Whether the price stays at

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>this very high level is another question. If the shortage

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that some people are looking at and fearing for the

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 1>future does materialize, then you'd have to say that prices

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 1>would go higher. But that's several years down the line.

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm surprised that they're not lacking in a price for

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a long term contract. It's very hard to lock in

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a price in in the cobalt market where it's going.

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:43.919
<v Speaker 1>It's gone through this kind of um real complete paradigm

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 1>shift because of electric vehicles. So the price has tripled,

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 1>as you said, in the past eighteen months. Who knows

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>what the right price is? Yeah, it's it's very it's

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>very hard to say, you know, you do you you take

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 1>five different forecasts for what electric vehicle production UH and

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:04.399
<v Speaker 1>UH and and sales are going to be in UH,

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 1>and they're wildly different. UH so who can tell you

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:08.959
<v Speaker 1>what the correct price for cobalt in five or ten

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:11.119
<v Speaker 1>years time. Nobody can. Jack Fartie, thank you so much

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:14.119
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Jack Farchie, senior Energy and Commodities reporter

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 1>for a Bloomberg News coming to us from our London bureau.

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:21.360
<v Speaker 1>You can find his story on the website Bloomberg dot

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>com or the terminal itself. Yes, let's talk about housing.

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 1>US existing home sales in the month of January falling

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:42.919
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more than three percent. Here to help

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 1>us understand what's going on is Brad Hunter. He is

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the chief economist of Home Adviser. They're based in West

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Palm Beach, Florida. He can be followed on Twitter at

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Bradley Hunter. Alright, at Bradley Hunter. What what's your view

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 1>of the of the housing market and this time that

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 1>we saw on the run rate of about five point

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>four million units morning, Pim. Well, Yeah, I think that

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 1>clearly the housing number was lower than expected, and I

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>think there are three different things that play. Number one

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:17.360
<v Speaker 1>is the inventory and that's what everybody's talking about right now,

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>three point four months of supply of unsold inventory. And secondly,

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>uh in January mortgage rates were starting to edge up,

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and of course they've gone up a lot more since then,

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think they will go up a lot more

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:34.680
<v Speaker 1>going forward. And the third factor is that prices were

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>up also in this reading, and uh, I think that

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the rate of home price appreciation is going to slow.

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:47.200
<v Speaker 1>So Brad Home Advisor helps homeowners figure out how to

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 1>renovate their homes in an effective manner. Correct. Yeah, we

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>connect where the marketplace that connects homeowners with the pros

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that they need to get their projects done. So, just

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 1>can you give me a sense of what you're seeing

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 1>from that perspective and what it tells you about the

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of mental state of homeowners? In other words, are

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:09.880
<v Speaker 1>they looking to invest in their homes and expand them

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>because they don't want to move out? Or are they

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 1>investing in their homes in order to sell them at

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a higher price. Can you get a sense of that? Yeah? Sure, Well, uh,

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 1>we just talked about the low inventory situation and it's

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>actually part of a vicious cycle. Um. Low supply of

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>homes for sale causes people to stay frustrated and I

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:34.719
<v Speaker 1>have trouble getting the home that they want, So some

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>of them say, you know, I'm just gonna stay put

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and remodel the house that I have. A lot more

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 1>people are looking to move because they are tired of

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>their current home, according to research from n A are

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 1>than people who are moving for a job that's in

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>a different area or what have you. So that further

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 1>reduces inventory because people stay put and then the cycle

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:59.159
<v Speaker 1>just lather, rense, repeat, right. Um. The other thing that

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm noticing is trend I'm calling nesting is investing. There's

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>all this stock market volatility, and I think it's going

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:10.159
<v Speaker 1>to drive some people to say, you know what, instead

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 1>of staying fully invested in the stock market, up all

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:15.399
<v Speaker 1>some of my chips off the table, and maybe go

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>ahead and reinvest in my home and you know, expand

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:22.879
<v Speaker 1>or improve the property. And you know, that's a pretty

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>safe investment in terms of any risk. On the downside, Brad,

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you note that the size of home improvement or renovation

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 1>projects is increasing. Expand on that, sure, we're seeing more

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 1>what we call major renovation projects. Our year end survey

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:44.680
<v Speaker 1>actually showed that most home improvement companies and professionals saw

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>an increase in the size of their average job, whereas

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>only five point eight percent reported a decrease in the

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 1>average size of the job. So people are taking on

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>projects that they had deferred years ago. Now that the

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 1>economy is stronger, and more importantly, either equity in their

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:04.399
<v Speaker 1>home is much higher. They're saying, Okay, you know what,

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>it's time to do that kitchen update that I've been

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>wanting to do, Or it's time to turn that basement

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>into a man cave or into a rental unit, or

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:16.439
<v Speaker 1>redo the garage or the tile or whatever it is

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that they've been wanting. So they're taking on more discretionary projects,

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>more of what I called lifestyle projects. I'm wondering bread

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 1>which parts of the country are seeing the fastest rates

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 1>of spending on home improvement. For the past few years,

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:38.920
<v Speaker 1>it was the markets that we're seeing the greatest increases

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>in home prices and therefore homeowner equity, So San Francisco,

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 1>San Diego, New York, Miami, Seattle, Portland's and now it's

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 1>starting to shift. Those markets are starting to um kind

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 1>of slow down because they've had these very, very rapid

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 1>increases during the slowdown, and so now that some of

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the interior markets and second tier markets are starting to

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:12.360
<v Speaker 1>take off in a big way. So Milwaukee Columbus, Tampa,

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>markets like that are starting to see um very strong growth.

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>And uh I've been working with the Harvard Joint Center

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:25.199
<v Speaker 1>on Housing studies and they are predicting strong growth in

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 1>those kinds of markets and and uh I can to

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>continue to watch those with them. So, Brad, does that

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 1>imply to you the prices in the big cities that

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:36.639
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned are going to stagnate while they continue to

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:42.159
<v Speaker 1>accelerate in the more central parts of the country. Right, So,

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I think what we're going to see is um these

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:49.680
<v Speaker 1>continued increases in homeowner equity. We've seen already at doubling

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 1>in equity in the country in the past five years.

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:57.360
<v Speaker 1>That's huge, and so the markets that have already experienced

0:25:57.359 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 1>a big boom are going to just taper down. But

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the the the rest of the country is now just

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:06.920
<v Speaker 1>playing catch up and just quickly bred Any any change

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:08.879
<v Speaker 1>in where people are going to be buying homes because

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of changes in tax laws and the deductability of interest payments, Yeah,

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:17.159
<v Speaker 1>I actually don't think that the tax law change is

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 1>going to have a huge impact on the aggregates home

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>sales numbers. It could shift the mix geographically or even

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:28.879
<v Speaker 1>um across the different strata, for example, luxury home buying.

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 1>The luxury home buying population, if you will, will start

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to enjoy higher after tax income, which will help home

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 1>buying and remodeling at the high end and in the

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 1>expensive markets, and the rest of the housing market won't

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 1>be affected very much either way in my opinion. Brad Hunter,

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. Bread Hunter chief

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:50.200
<v Speaker 1>economist for Home Advisor, which is based in West Palm Beach.

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:54.920
<v Speaker 1>We will continue attracking the housing data that we just received,

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>as well as the auctions later today of US Treasury.

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast.

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:07.679
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Abramo wits one. Before the podcast, you can always catch

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 1>us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.