Speaker 1: You're in the freedom hunt. Thanks for listening to The
Speaker 1: buck Sexton Show podcast. Get the latest from Bucket buck
Speaker 1: Sexton dot com. Before I get into all the latest
Speaker 1: on the Wokeness mafia and their latest victims, you've got
Speaker 1: to operate within the market and within the economy as
Speaker 1: it stands right now. And I know it feels choppy
Speaker 1: and uncertain and we're worried about inflation, but we still
Speaker 1: could be in the midst of something called the melt up,
Speaker 1: where there's just so much money slashing around and so
Speaker 1: much going on that the stock market could actually really
Speaker 1: hit even more historic gains. And this is why I
Speaker 1: need you to check out Carnival Trading. Carnivore Trading has
Speaker 1: spotted several key indicators, but they believe that the biggest
Speaker 1: profits are going to come to sectors that a lot
Speaker 1: of Wall Street experts are going to miss. So here's
Speaker 1: what Carnival Trading is. They're an elite squad of strategists
Speaker 1: who influence major Wall Street investors. And when you subscribe
Speaker 1: to Carnivore, you'll resee real time text alerts of explosive
Speaker 1: trades they're making for their elite clients. You can mirror
Speaker 1: their trades with your discount broker or pass. They guarantee
Speaker 1: you'll earn five times your monthly subscription or double your
Speaker 1: money back. That's five x your monthly fee. Just by
Speaker 1: mirroring their trades. The market looks to be on the
Speaker 1: verge of a massive upswing. Get off the sidelines and
Speaker 1: mirror carnivorous trades right now. You'll get two weeks free.
Speaker 1: Visit get our trades dot com and use promo code buck.
Speaker 1: That's get our trades dot Com promo code buck. See
Speaker 1: website for guarantee terms and conditions. Pass performance not a
Speaker 1: guarantee of future earnings. It's a problem that we have
Speaker 1: to deal with. I know there are a lot of
Speaker 1: people who would like to think that this will just
Speaker 1: go away, that if we just ignore it, we won't
Speaker 1: have to worry about it. But that's no longer a possibility.
Speaker 1: Your children and future generations, even if you don't have kids,
Speaker 1: this really matters because your children are being brainwashed into
Speaker 1: a cult of critical race theory or CRT. They are
Speaker 1: being taught to despise their country, to be embarrassed by
Speaker 1: its history, and yes, even to be ashamed of whiteness.
Speaker 1: If they're white. This on Fox News Right Now. A
Speaker 1: New York City father went viral after pulling his daughter
Speaker 1: out of the Brearley School after seven years, shared new
Speaker 1: details about the elite schools left wing culture in a
Speaker 1: new interview. We already do a horrific job in this country,
Speaker 1: Andrew Gutman said, teaching history, and now we're going to
Speaker 1: make that ten times worse. We're going to eradicate that
Speaker 1: our country doesn't survive not teaching history and civics, and
Speaker 1: as sure as hell doesn't survive teaching our children to
Speaker 1: hate their country and their history. Left Wing activism was
Speaker 1: the norm at the school, according to government, who said
Speaker 1: family were pressured to advocate for Black lives matter. Friends,
Speaker 1: these individuals who are pushing all this stuff, it's important
Speaker 1: for you to recognize they share the ethos of communists.
Speaker 1: Now I understand that the rejection of this, the gaffaws
Speaker 1: from the Democrat left be oh yeah, sure, we're just
Speaker 1: like we're just like Stalin or Mao, we are going
Speaker 1: to take all property and hold it in common. No,
Speaker 1: they're not able to do that yet. But their approach
Speaker 1: to intellectual pursuit, the way that they deal with argument
Speaker 1: and dissent is very much the same the way that
Speaker 1: they shut down ideas. Their notion that if you disagree
Speaker 1: with them, that is in and of itself proof of
Speaker 1: your deficiency. That all comes out of the Marxist playbook Gutman.
Speaker 1: This father here goes on. He says, the pressure to
Speaker 1: conform is so intense that if you stay silent, your
Speaker 1: rayst you have to be an activist. If you're not
Speaker 1: an activist for anti racism, for Black Lives matter, you
Speaker 1: are racist. You are a bad person, you are an appressor.
Speaker 1: You're not doing the right thing. This is what's going
Speaker 1: on all across the country. The Brearley School. I know.
Speaker 1: I'll tell you this. My high school sweetheart was a
Speaker 1: student at Brearley, so I know Brearley very well. My
Speaker 1: prom date, not junior prom. That was Ivanka. Yes, I
Speaker 1: know some of you are laughing, but it's actually true.
Speaker 1: Senior prom. My date was a Brearley student. She was
Speaker 1: my girlfriend, my first real high school girlfriend. And I
Speaker 1: know that institution and it has always been left wing
Speaker 1: but very elite at the same time. It is funny,
Speaker 1: isn't it to see these schools that are putting out
Speaker 1: statements that sound like they were written by you know,
Speaker 1: Ibrahm x Kendy or whatever the guy's name is, when
Speaker 1: they're really being written by Thurston. How the third these
Speaker 1: they don't call them head masters anymore. They call them
Speaker 1: head of school. The same way that you can't have
Speaker 1: a master bedroom anymore now it's a primary bedroom. I
Speaker 1: wonder if they're gonna have to change the Russell Crowe
Speaker 1: movie from Master and Commander to Primary and Commander. I mean,
Speaker 1: when does the madness stop. The other side cares more,
Speaker 1: the other side pushes harder, and they're relentless. That's why
Speaker 1: they keep winning. I understand that we have this limited
Speaker 1: government tricorn hat. Oh, leave me alone. I don't want
Speaker 1: to engage. I just want to be off the grid.
Speaker 1: And you have my food stored up in preparation. By
Speaker 1: the way, nothing wrong with that, but you do have
Speaker 1: to deal with the society around you. If you're in America,
Speaker 1: there is no private island you can go to somewhere
Speaker 1: where the left wing Marxist maniacs do not influence your
Speaker 1: life and are going to do it more and more
Speaker 1: unless you actually fight back again, did we have to
Speaker 1: engage here? We have to take action in response to
Speaker 1: what is just clear ideological brainwashing. This is what they're doing.
Speaker 1: They're doing it to your kids because that's when people
Speaker 1: are least able to push back on authority. And that's
Speaker 1: also when the synapses in your brain. That's also when
Speaker 1: when the functioning of your cognition are most easy, are
Speaker 1: most easily molded. So this is all on purpose. I mean,
Speaker 1: if you thought it was bad, it used to be.
Speaker 1: You know, when I was in grammar school, Yeah, we
Speaker 1: sang the Pledge of Allegiance. I went to a Catholic school,
Speaker 1: but we sang the Pledge of Allegiance and we were
Speaker 1: patriotic and we loved America and we learned that, you know,
Speaker 1: we're the good guys, and a lot of different wars
Speaker 1: and a lot of different big moments in history. And
Speaker 1: then you got to college and all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: you had all these commies running around that we're idolizing
Speaker 1: Karl Marks, and we're talking about radicalism and revolutions in
Speaker 1: American society and how it's all about ending the patriarchy
Speaker 1: and dealing with white culture and white supremacy and all
Speaker 1: this stuff. And we thought that maybe people could get
Speaker 1: through that without being affected by it without believing this nonsense,
Speaker 1: like it would be a passing phase, the same way
Speaker 1: that people think it's normal to drink five or six
Speaker 1: days a week in college, have beer with almost every
Speaker 1: meal and not understand that that's actually an alcohol abuse issue,
Speaker 1: and it's not fun or cute or good, and something
Speaker 1: that I wish I had known when I went to school,
Speaker 1: And then I wish I could tell everybody else going
Speaker 1: off to school. You know, it is possible to drink
Speaker 1: too much, even in your twenties. So I look at
Speaker 1: all this, and I realized that people assume that college
Speaker 1: kids would go out of it, But no, Now you
Speaker 1: have people running these companies. Now you have people who
Speaker 1: are making determinations at the highest level of the United
Speaker 1: States government and of our culture who are openly radical,
Speaker 1: openly Marxist, and want to teach your children that they
Speaker 1: live in a world of racial hierarchy. But in this hierarchy,
Speaker 1: whiteness is something for which people should be sorry and ashamed.
Speaker 1: You see, the the racial framework that I and conservatives
Speaker 1: want us to live in is one in which race
Speaker 1: is as important in our characterizations of one's more morality, decency,
Speaker 1: worth as a person races is like, you know, hair
Speaker 1: length or hair color or something something that no one
Speaker 1: cares about, doesn't matter, has no meaning. We're all human beings,
Speaker 1: we're all equal. That's the society we want to live in.
Speaker 1: That is the opposite of what is being taught to
Speaker 1: children in school now, children who are too young or
Speaker 1: in their formative years not able to push back on
Speaker 1: authority figures and suffer the consequences if they do. This
Speaker 1: is happening because of a number of factors that have
Speaker 1: come together. This is why it is worse now. This
Speaker 1: isn't just oh, conservatives all of the war on Christmas
Speaker 1: and now it's the war on wokeness. No, this is
Speaker 1: a problem now because the left has the full scale
Speaker 1: support top to bottom, not only of the traditional corporate
Speaker 1: news media, but and of academia, but now also of
Speaker 1: social media, which is a much more powerful tool for
Speaker 1: influencing opinions and minds than anything they've ever had before.
Speaker 1: They are programming us like gerbils all across the country,
Speaker 1: all right, like we just want to hit the pedal
Speaker 1: and get a few SIPs of water if we do
Speaker 1: the right thing. That's what social media is doing. These
Speaker 1: are addiction machines that are rewiring our brains to think
Speaker 1: a certain and very few people really have the ability
Speaker 1: to resist that quick serotonin hit from posting Black Lives
Speaker 1: Matter on their Facebook or their Instagram or whatever. It's
Speaker 1: such an easy way. We call it virtue signaling, but
Speaker 1: it's even more than that. It gives people a little,
Speaker 1: a little jolt of easy, unearned joy. Right, it's self congratulation.
Speaker 1: It's oh, look at me. Yeah, everyone's gonna think I'm great.
Speaker 1: And what do we have in response, Oh, Milton friedman In,
Speaker 1: Friedrich Hyaken in, you know, limited government. And look, those
Speaker 1: are brilliant men, and I've read their most important works
Speaker 1: and I celebrate them. But it's not gonna win this
Speaker 1: fight we're in right now. You know, we need a
Speaker 1: moment here of clarity where we understand that if we
Speaker 1: don't start to actually organize ourselves, if we do not
Speaker 1: mimic the tactics of the left, we will lose. This
Speaker 1: will be a very different country. Now. When I say
Speaker 1: the tactics, I mean taking control of institutions using the
Speaker 1: legal system on offense. We have to go on offense
Speaker 1: against the other side wherever we can. Now that can
Speaker 1: be trying to establish a neutral space for ideas, but
Speaker 1: it also can be one that is explicitly conservative, patriotic,
Speaker 1: celebrates America, celebrates the American founding, and we need that
Speaker 1: incorporations in schools because trying to preserve this idea of
Speaker 1: the non political space in America, we lost that battle.
Speaker 1: It's gone. There are no non political spaces now. It's
Speaker 1: all just a question of a vacuum. We've been trying
Speaker 1: to preserve a vacuum. No politics allowed here. Let's all
Speaker 1: just enjoy the big game. Let's all just be able
Speaker 1: to talk about the weather or sports teams, or how
Speaker 1: all politicians are crooks, and whether you're a CEO or
Speaker 1: a street sweeper, you know you had some common ground.
Speaker 1: You are Americans. The Left is destroying that. They have
Speaker 1: a hierarchy that they're putting in place, and they don't
Speaker 1: want anything to be non political. So we can either
Speaker 1: start to meet them on that battlefield, or you're just
Speaker 1: going to see more and more of the purge. That's
Speaker 1: really what this is. People are being purge from public life,
Speaker 1: from institutions, from positions of power, and they're not going
Speaker 1: to tire of this. On the other side, they're not
Speaker 1: going to stop. Do you want them to teach your
Speaker 1: ten year olds, if, assuming your children are white or whatever,
Speaker 1: teach your ten year olds in general, that whiteness is
Speaker 1: something to be ashamed over, that white supremacy has infiltrated
Speaker 1: all of America. Do you want them teaching your children,
Speaker 1: if your children are black or Hispanic, that about whiteness
Speaker 1: and about their white peers. No, this is insidious. This
Speaker 1: is damaging to the fabric of our society. The left
Speaker 1: has gone mad. Trump broke them. You have to remember that.
Speaker 1: And we are dealing now with people who are unhinged.
Speaker 1: They're unhinged by Trump, by their adherence to Fauciism, and
Speaker 1: by being drunk with the power of institutions all across
Speaker 1: America now that bend to their will right away. Consequences
Speaker 1: of slavery from its inception centuries ago to some modern
Speaker 1: day implications for Black Americans, we've seen a growing movement
Speaker 1: to reframe how American history is taught in public schools. Well,
Speaker 1: some parents are opposed to critical race theory as new
Speaker 1: curriculum art to please. Just because I do not want
Speaker 1: critical race theory taught to my children in school does
Speaker 1: not mean that I have aids. It's actually does is
Speaker 1: there's another example of Republicans turning kids into a wedge issue,
Speaker 1: just like their politically motivated attacks on transgender youth who
Speaker 1: just want to play sports. Did you hear the the
Speaker 1: snyde laughter of televised Moron Joy read woman who claimed
Speaker 1: publicly that she had an FBI investigation going on? Was
Speaker 1: This was her official word when it was found that
Speaker 1: she was making fun of gay people. But a few
Speaker 1: years back on her personal blog she was writing and
Speaker 1: making fun of mocking gay people. And then she claimed
Speaker 1: that there was an FBI investigation to look into the
Speaker 1: hacking of her blog. So somebody hacked into her semiliterate
Speaker 1: blog from over ten years ago to change a few
Speaker 1: words to make it seem like she was a homophobe.
Speaker 1: That was, in fact, what this MSNBC Time television host
Speaker 1: wanted America to believe. So she's a liar and not smart.
Speaker 1: And you heard her here say if you don't want
Speaker 1: your children being taught critical race theory, you are a racist.
Speaker 1: She laughs about it, right, Yeah, that's the attitude. Jessica
Speaker 1: laughs at this woman who's clearly very upset about it.
Speaker 1: A parent who's upset about it. Our critical race theory
Speaker 1: is intellectually laughable. It's flimsy, it's garbage. It doesn't stand
Speaker 1: up to any actual scrutiny. What does it mean? What
Speaker 1: are the outer limits? Why would we set up society?
Speaker 1: Why would we have this as our framework for understanding
Speaker 1: relations between people? What does critical race theory really teach
Speaker 1: us about how we can interact with each other better?
Speaker 1: Oh by making special allowances for people of certain skin
Speaker 1: colors at the expense of others because of historical wrongs?
Speaker 1: You know, I think the Jews, for example, might have
Speaker 1: a whole lot to say about historical wrongs done to them.
Speaker 1: Do they get a firmative action? What about Armenians? We
Speaker 1: just had the United States government say that Turkey committed
Speaker 1: a genocide against them. Do Armenians get special privileges? I
Speaker 1: just want to know why do Latinos under critical race
Speaker 1: theory get special privileges? There was no legalized regime of
Speaker 1: race discrimination and or slavery against them, So what exactly
Speaker 1: is that all about. No answers to any of this,
Speaker 1: No answers to any of this other than the Marxist
Speaker 1: left uses racial minorities and the history of mistreatment through
Speaker 1: real history of mystery ben of racial minorities in this
Speaker 1: country as a means of forcing their political opponents to
Speaker 1: bend the knee and do what they say, or else
Speaker 1: they'll slandry, or else they'll do exactly what Joy read
Speaker 1: did here. Yeah, that's right. If you don't want critical
Speaker 1: race theory tought. If you ever read I've read, you
Speaker 1: go back read Delgado, read some of the early scholars
Speaker 1: behind critical race theory, and they will tell you straight
Speaker 1: up that this comes from radical feminism, that it's built
Speaker 1: upon a foundation of radical feminism, a horrifically destructive and
Speaker 1: bad just framework for women to approach their lives. Radical
Speaker 1: feminism is misery. It is Look at all the radical feminists,
Speaker 1: they're all miserable. They're all vicious, miserable, sad people, because
Speaker 1: it sets up a society where men are some kind
Speaker 1: of enemy, and there they are man haters, and it's absurd.
Speaker 1: The whole thing is based upon resentment and based upon
Speaker 1: undermining some of the most beautiful things about human beings
Speaker 1: in human nature. That's what radical feminism does. They look
Speaker 1: at some of the other scholars, so called scholars, you know,
Speaker 1: Jacques Derrida, and Michel Foucaut and these other Yeah, that's right,
Speaker 1: a bunch of bombastic French scum. They are the intellectual
Speaker 1: foundation of the critical race theory movement. By the way,
Speaker 1: joy Reid couldn't tell you, she couldn't tell you a
Speaker 1: thing about any of them. Doesn't know. Maybe she could
Speaker 1: read what's said in the prompter about some of the
Speaker 1: intellectual forefathers, if you will, of this movement. One of them, recently,
Speaker 1: I believe it was. I believe it was Fuco was
Speaker 1: allegedly having sex with very underage This was published recently,
Speaker 1: very underaged children in during visits to North Africa. So
Speaker 1: a pedophile is the allegation. But these are French, French
Speaker 1: philosophers whose contributions are things like there is no truth,
Speaker 1: there is no such thing as what is true. Yeah
Speaker 1: it was it was Fuco who who was accused of
Speaker 1: being a straight up, I mean, a pedophile nine and
Speaker 1: ten year olds. But one of the great intellectual heroes
Speaker 1: of the left. I wonder why people don't really talk
Speaker 1: more about that, and who was their intellectual hero? A
Speaker 1: German philosopher named Heidegger. What do you want to know
Speaker 1: about Heidegger? Oh? I don't know. Maybe that he was
Speaker 1: a member of the Nazi Party, a card carrying member
Speaker 1: of the Nazi Party for more than a decade. But
Speaker 1: the left loves him. They don't really talk about that
Speaker 1: very much, do they. This is a rotten, godless, divisive,
Speaker 1: destructive movement. That is what critical race theory is. It
Speaker 1: is Marxism, which is just the elimination of human bonds
Speaker 1: and decency and its replacement with resentment for the purpose
Speaker 1: of achieving power centered around race instead of class. So yeah,
Speaker 1: parents don't want their kids learning that crap. I am
Speaker 1: a carnivore, you know this. I love meat. It's my
Speaker 1: favorite thing to cook. By far. I'll make some vettis too,
Speaker 1: just to seem healthy. But I'm all in all my proteins,
Speaker 1: and I know what the good stuff is. So that's
Speaker 1: why I go first and foremost every time into my
Speaker 1: freezer to get moik. That's right, meets from Monk are
Speaker 1: the best. I'm talking about grass fed and grass finished
Speaker 1: beef and lamb, pastured pork and chicken, wild corn, Alaskan salmon,
Speaker 1: all sent directly to your door. This is the best
Speaker 1: stuff you're gonna get every anywhere I've used this for
Speaker 1: roast chickens, for chicken breasts. My bacon now comes from Monk.
Speaker 1: I have all my different meats, filets, rib eyes, moink
Speaker 1: is the best quality. It's delicious and it's so convenient.
Speaker 1: They just send it to you. You put it in
Speaker 1: your freezer and then whenever you need it, you have
Speaker 1: grass fed, delicious beef, pork, you name it. Join the
Speaker 1: Monk movement today go to moinkbox dot com slash buck
Speaker 1: and listeners to this show get free ground beef for
Speaker 1: a year. That's one year of the best ground beef
Speaker 1: you'll ever taste, but for a limited time. Just go
Speaker 1: to this website now get your first monkbox, get it delivered.
Speaker 1: You will love this. It's such good stuff. I'm eating
Speaker 1: it all the time. M o I n K box
Speaker 1: moink bo dot com, slash buck. That's m o I
Speaker 1: n k moinkbox dot com slash buck. Question of fairness,
Speaker 1: That's why I oppose biological boys who were trans competing
Speaker 1: in girls sports in school. It just isn't fair and
Speaker 1: we have to protect girl sports. Caitlyn Jenner running for
Speaker 1: governor of Florida. I'm sorry, California. I'm so I'm so
Speaker 1: fixated on all of Ron de Santis is victory laps
Speaker 1: that I got Florida on the mine running for governor
Speaker 1: of California and has the celebrity, has the kind of
Speaker 1: profile where you gotta take it, you gotta take it seriously.
Speaker 1: And Caitlyn Jenner uh formerly known as as Chris Jenner,
Speaker 1: was a tremendous athlete as you know, and has an
Speaker 1: opinion here that I think I think is important for
Speaker 1: by here for the following reason. If the Left can
Speaker 1: get you, can force you through emotional blackmail and manipulation
Speaker 1: and all these different tactics, if they can force you
Speaker 1: formerly Bruce Jenner, pardon me, I think I said Chris Jenner,
Speaker 1: that would be the one that would that was the wife. Sorry,
Speaker 1: Bruce Jenner, thank you. Um. If the Left can get
Speaker 1: you to agree to things that are obviously false, if
Speaker 1: they can get you to say things that you know
Speaker 1: to be untrue, it breaks down your own sense of
Speaker 1: truth and your own sense of self. It degrades your
Speaker 1: ability to discern fact from fiction. Right to get you this,
Speaker 1: this is why you have in true brainwashing and indoctrination
Speaker 1: programs and communist states, there will be things like the
Speaker 1: endless repetition of falls because the endless repetitions of falsehoods,
Speaker 1: even if you at first recognize them as being wrong,
Speaker 1: you know you intellectually understand that. Over time it starts
Speaker 1: you start to question that. And the fact that you're
Speaker 1: saying at the fact that you're affirming that which is untrue,
Speaker 1: means that you are at some level complicit in the lie.
Speaker 1: Why do you think the left is so fixated on pronouns?
Speaker 1: Why do you think the left is so fixated on
Speaker 1: aspects of the transgender issue that are anybody with common
Speaker 1: sense would say have just gone completely overboard and are absurd.
Speaker 1: Sports is one of them. I remember doing this show
Speaker 1: almost a decade ago, and I would say, look, at
Speaker 1: some point, people are going to have to realize that
Speaker 1: if you have somebody who's a biological male in say MMA,
Speaker 1: that person is going to annihilate all of the women
Speaker 1: in that sport and it won't even be close. And
Speaker 1: that's because of the biological realities of a male, you know,
Speaker 1: biochemistry versus female biochemistry. And sure enough, there, I believe
Speaker 1: fallon Fox, there is a formerly male MMA fighter who's
Speaker 1: now fighter has fought as a female, and it's been.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's danger. You can kill somebody because male
Speaker 1: bone density, musculature, testosterone levels, everything is different. Okay, it's
Speaker 1: just the truth. And yet we have to pretend like
Speaker 1: we don't know this, and the Left becomes shrill and
Speaker 1: angry when they're confronted with this. And I've said this before,
Speaker 1: a middle range high school male athlete would be a
Speaker 1: dominant and I'm talking about just run of the mill,
Speaker 1: a dominant athlete on the female side in college in
Speaker 1: a sport where they had a basic level of proficiency
Speaker 1: just based on size, strength and speed. It's just the
Speaker 1: way it is. We all know this, but we're supposed
Speaker 1: to forget it. And you'd say, why, why is it
Speaker 1: so important? How many transgender athletes are there really who
Speaker 1: want to compete? And Caitlyn Jenner is transgender again, formerly
Speaker 1: known as Bruce, not Chris. Caitlyn Jenner is transgender, and
Speaker 1: so weighing in on this, holding this opinion carries a
Speaker 1: little bit more wake, It's a little bit more attention
Speaker 1: because basically, even Caitlyn Jenner is like, yeah, look, I
Speaker 1: am a female now according to Caitlyn Jenner, but I
Speaker 1: still understand that you can have men competing in women's sports.
Speaker 1: They play this game on the left two of When
Speaker 1: we engage on the issue, they either say why, you know,
Speaker 1: why is this so important to you? Right? This is
Speaker 1: gas letting, of course, because well why is it so
Speaker 1: important to Then they say you're a bigot, they won't
Speaker 1: act engage in the substance, or they pretend to be
Speaker 1: even dumber than they are. I don't believe that, you know,
Speaker 1: biological male has an advantage over females. You know what
Speaker 1: about you know, Ronda Rousey could kick your butt. It's like, okay,
Speaker 1: we're gonna find one woman who's like the best in
Speaker 1: the world at MMA and then compare it to you know,
Speaker 1: an out of shape couch potato guy and say, well,
Speaker 1: she could be him. But that's not what we're talking
Speaker 1: about though, that that that has no meaning in the discussion.
Speaker 1: But this is what they do. They either pretend it
Speaker 1: doesn't matter to them, They pretend that they that you're
Speaker 1: a bigot for opposing it. That's their favorite, of course,
Speaker 1: or they say that they can't even understand the most
Speaker 1: basic and obvious things. You see this with critical race
Speaker 1: theory in schools. There'll be a lot of pushback on
Speaker 1: this that that involves, well, what do you mean, Oh,
Speaker 1: we're not doing that, Mandro. This is just a part
Speaker 1: of the creek. Oh this isn't really. Oh they just
Speaker 1: want you to look away. Oh it's not really. It's exaggerated.
Speaker 1: This is just a Fox News phenomenon. This is just
Speaker 1: right wing media making a big deal out of nothing.
Speaker 1: They keep doing this to us. Gaslighting is one of
Speaker 1: the favorite tactics of the left. They make something a mission,
Speaker 1: they make something a crusade or dare I say, a jihad,
Speaker 1: and then the moment that we say, hold on a second,
Speaker 1: what are you doing, they go, oh, no, we're not
Speaker 1: doing you know, there's nothing going on here. It's just
Speaker 1: a little thing. Why are you exaggerating it? You must
Speaker 1: be bigoted? What that's the way this goes. You see
Speaker 1: it happening time and again. The left can't even really
Speaker 1: define what a woman is anymore, which should tell you
Speaker 1: a lot about their respect for science. They also babylon
Speaker 1: and coherently about why a fetus is not actually a
Speaker 1: baby and a separate human life. Because the more we've
Speaker 1: learned in the last twenty really last fifty, but certainly
Speaker 1: last twenty years about a baby in the womb. It's
Speaker 1: a baby, and viability has been getting earlier and earlier
Speaker 1: for a baby to survive outside the womb, as we know.
Speaker 1: But they reject science when it interferes with their power.
Speaker 1: But I bring up the transgender issue because I can
Speaker 1: understand for a lot of you in parts of the
Speaker 1: country where you don't have this left wing transgender movement,
Speaker 1: and if you don't engage with much of the left
Speaker 1: wing media, you feel like, well, how big of an
Speaker 1: issue is this. This hasn't happened in my kids' school,
Speaker 1: or this hasn't happened in my kids university. Yet. The
Speaker 1: point here is the mass psychological conditioning of society to
Speaker 1: agree to things that the left wants them to that
Speaker 1: are obviously false. A man is not a woman and
Speaker 1: a woman is not a man, and there is no
Speaker 1: medical way to change that reality. If they can get
Speaker 1: you to negate that, if they can get you to
Speaker 1: reject it, what else What other obvious truths can they distort?
Speaker 1: Have you complicit in distorting? That's the whole game. Given
Speaker 1: what research shows about transmission outside about the low risk
Speaker 1: of serious illness in children, are these CDC guidelines excessive?
Speaker 1: You know, I wouldn't call them excessive, Savannah, but they
Speaker 1: certainly are conservative. And I think what you're going to
Speaker 1: start to see is really, in real time, continually reevaluating
Speaker 1: that for its practicality. Because you're right. People look at
Speaker 1: that and they say, well, is that being a little
Speaker 1: bit too far right now? Yeah, because aren't we supposed
Speaker 1: to be fun. I mean, we've been told people have
Speaker 1: been preaching for a year. Follow the science. The science
Speaker 1: doesn't suggest those CDC guidelines are too sensible for little
Speaker 1: kids outside in nine degree he running around with masks. Yes,
Speaker 1: some money. You've asked me that question a couple of
Speaker 1: times before. I'm asking for two kids named Veil and Charlie,
Speaker 1: age six and four. Yeah. Well, you're right, the CDC
Speaker 1: makes decisions based on science. They will continually reevaluate that.
Speaker 1: You're right, it looks a bit strict, a bit stringent,
Speaker 1: But that's the reason why they keep looking at that
Speaker 1: and trying to reevaluate on literally in real time, whether
Speaker 1: or not that's the practical way to go. Let's get
Speaker 1: into the fundamental fallacy here first, before I start tearing
Speaker 1: apart just the sub mediocrity, lab coat, tyrant doctor Fauci. Okay,
Speaker 1: before I start having some fun with that, let's get
Speaker 1: into the fundamental fallacy that the CDC makes decisions based
Speaker 1: upon the science. Well, what's happened here is an intentional
Speaker 1: conflation in the mind of the public that has led
Speaker 1: them to believe that the science that the CDC is
Speaker 1: acting on is clear and that no reasonable person could
Speaker 1: come to a different conclusion. What they're really doing is
Speaker 1: conflating data and analysis, and they've been doing this all along.
Speaker 1: They can look at the fatality rate for children, for example,
Speaker 1: which from COVID is almost zero. It's about half this
Speaker 1: year in the last twelve months. The fatality from COVID
Speaker 1: for children I think under the under the age of
Speaker 1: twelve or maybe under the age of eighteen, is half
Speaker 1: what the flu was in twenty nineteen during that season.
Speaker 1: And we're talking about a couple of hundred people total,
Speaker 1: right in a nation of over three hundred and thirty million.
Speaker 1: And so what we have here is a group of
Speaker 1: bureaucrats sitting around saying, oh no, no, that's too many.
Speaker 1: Hashtag the science. But a lot of us say, well,
Speaker 1: hold on a second. That's society has been willing to
Speaker 1: pay a higher price to let children live their lives
Speaker 1: during flu season for as long as any of us
Speaker 1: have been alive, So why is the price too high
Speaker 1: to children? Now from COVID? Right? You see their rationalizations here.
Speaker 1: Their reliance on referring to this as the science is
Speaker 1: all a rhetorical ploy. They're making policy judgments, and their
Speaker 1: judgment sucks. That's the truth. That's what's really going on here. Okay,
Speaker 1: And you know these well, this nonsense the FUCI. I
Speaker 1: wouldn't call them excessive. I would say they're conservative, They're idiotic. Fauci,
Speaker 1: you little fascist. It's preposterous. You want to know how
Speaker 1: bad it is? Okay, here we go. This is from
Speaker 1: my buddy Robbie Java at reason dot com. Last week,
Speaker 1: the Centers for Reason Control for Disease they are for
Speaker 1: Anti Reason for Disease Control and Prevention, release new guidance
Speaker 1: to help summer camps mitigate their coronavirus risk. Given that
Speaker 1: summer camps involved both children and the outdoors, two factors
Speaker 1: that render COVID nineteen significantly less worrisome and will be
Speaker 1: opening in the wake of widespread vaccination, one might have
Speaker 1: expected the CDC to depart from its characteristic overcaution. Nope.
Speaker 1: This is among the most restrictive, unrealistic guidance the agency
Speaker 1: has released during the pandemic. It's more limiting than the
Speaker 1: CDC's guidance for vaccinated people exercising outdoors. Generally, if followed,
Speaker 1: summer campers would be miserable, deprived of physical contact, and
Speaker 1: in considerable danger of overheating. The government has essentially recommended
Speaker 1: that summer camps treat kids like prisoners. He's right through
Speaker 1: the guidance. It's stupid, beyond words. The people running the CDC,
Speaker 1: I'm just they're morons. Friends, They're morons. They would shame
Speaker 1: the DMV, never mind the CDC if they worked there.
Speaker 1: They are bureaucrats who want to keep their perks, want
Speaker 1: to keep their jobs, and so they do the lockdown
Speaker 1: libs bidding. That's their whole purpose, and they know it.
Speaker 1: Will Lenski knows it, Fauci over at NAIAD knows it.
Speaker 1: They all know it. This isn't about what's best for
Speaker 1: the children. They couldn't give a crap about the children. Tatters.
Speaker 1: The New York Times editorial page was respond to this,
Speaker 1: What does the Biden administration think of this? Again? Robbie
Speaker 1: Suave atreason dot com. Here's what he writes. Here are
Speaker 1: some of the restrictions. Everyone at the camp, including staff
Speaker 1: and every kid over the age of two, must wear
Speaker 1: masks at all times unless they are eating or swimming.
Speaker 1: I guess that's until they come up with, you know,
Speaker 1: rubber masks to go with the goggles. They should wear
Speaker 1: two layers of masks, especially when social difficult of a
Speaker 1: distancing is difficult, regardless of whether activities or indoors or outdoors.
Speaker 1: End quote, they want your child at summer camp. According
Speaker 1: to CDC, they want your eight year old, who is
Speaker 1: at effectively zero risk of COVID. If you're eight year
Speaker 1: old gets COVID, there is a substantially better chance that
Speaker 1: you're eight year old will die from a beasting than
Speaker 1: from COVID. But you know, I don't think you'll lock
Speaker 1: him in a bubble and refuse to let them go
Speaker 1: outdoors all summer. And they're telling you that he has
Speaker 1: to or she has to wear two masks outside in
Speaker 1: the summer heat. Double mask your kids. I mean, the
Speaker 1: CDC should be abolished. The DC should be torn down
Speaker 1: to the studs and rebuilt, and there should there should
Speaker 1: be rigorous effort to make sure that you don't just
Speaker 1: have a bunch of slimy Democrat bureaucrats looking to have
Speaker 1: low show jobs where they get some fancy title and
Speaker 1: nice perks to go to meetings and do very little.
Speaker 1: CDC is horrendous and this is just another example of it.
Speaker 1: The next one here Campers should be placed in cohorts
Speaker 1: and their interaction with people outside the cohorts should be limited.
Speaker 1: So there's gonna be little groups that your campers are
Speaker 1: allowed to be in, and then the other campers they're
Speaker 1: not really supposed to interact with them. Quote. There should
Speaker 1: always be at least three feet between campers of the
Speaker 1: same cohort and six feet between campers of different cohorts.
Speaker 1: Staff should keep six feet away from campers at all times,
Speaker 1: whether inside or outside. Distance should be maintained while eating,
Speaker 1: nap or riding the bus. The CDC suggests seating kids
Speaker 1: in alternating rows. I mean this, How much more of
Speaker 1: this can anybody listen to before you just say I
Speaker 1: really oh about wow? Buck's right. Fauci and the CDC
Speaker 1: upper echelon are unrealistic morons who have no understanding of
Speaker 1: how society really functions and don't care about. I love
Speaker 1: this thing that people keep doing. Now, well, well, why
Speaker 1: is it a big deal to wear a mask? Why
Speaker 1: don't you just wear a horse a horse hair shirt
Speaker 1: all the time to pay for your sins? Why not
Speaker 1: just be uncomfortable all the time. Why is that a
Speaker 1: big deal? Just put it on. You're not perfect. Just
Speaker 1: wear a horse hair shirt all the time. You know,
Speaker 1: it'll agitate your skin, it'll it'll it'll cause rashes and things.
Speaker 1: But you need humility in your life, right. This used
Speaker 1: to be a practice that the very religious and different
Speaker 1: you know, monks and people did in the Middle Ages.
Speaker 1: Why not wear a horsehair shirt off time? It's a
Speaker 1: great way to learn humility. Oh okay, why not wear
Speaker 1: a mask all the time? Same idiotic concept? Before I
Speaker 1: look to go to doctor fauci, You and I are
Speaker 1: a major league of baseball fans? Or what inning are
Speaker 1: we in as far as this COVID pandemic is concerned, Well,
Speaker 1: you know, we're at least halfway through. I hope we're
Speaker 1: seeing and I do believe. Well, if I'm not trying
Speaker 1: to be overly enthusiastic, about what's going on Visa VI,
Speaker 1: the vaccine program, which is so successful. But we've really
Speaker 1: got to not declare victory prematurely, so wearing the late innings,
Speaker 1: but it's not over. That's the thing. We really got
Speaker 1: to get people to appreciate we're going in the right direction.
Speaker 1: We're seeing the light at the end of the tunnel.
Speaker 1: But now is not a time to declare victory. It's
Speaker 1: a time to get more and more people vaccinated, just
Speaker 1: the way the President said today. We want to get
Speaker 1: to that goal. It's a doable goal, and I believe
Speaker 1: we'll get there. So you think the seventh, the eighth,
Speaker 1: in your late innings anything you're talking about, how about
Speaker 1: the bottom of the six that I'll go with the
Speaker 1: bottom of the sixth Let's not too bad. We're at
Speaker 1: the bottom of the sixth inning. So you know, we
Speaker 1: got many innings left. And you know, the fouch wants
Speaker 1: you to know that baseball could theoretically go on forever.
Speaker 1: So don't forget that because you know in six months,
Speaker 1: when when the foucher's telling you you still got to
Speaker 1: wear two masks, put your four year old in two
Speaker 1: masks and hermetically seal him but put the four year
Speaker 1: old in one of those ziplock bags, and maybe you
Speaker 1: poke a couple of holes in because you know oxygen.
Speaker 1: Put you put him in a ziplock bag with two masks,
Speaker 1: and then I want you to build a plexiglass barrier
Speaker 1: around the double mask six year old in the big
Speaker 1: ziplock the barrier, and then if possible, also put in
Speaker 1: the room with him one of those one of those
Speaker 1: machines that cleans the air, you know, as if that's
Speaker 1: really gonna do something. And maybe you know a little
Speaker 1: bit like in the old times when there was plague
Speaker 1: in Europe, you know, there was the bubonic plague, the
Speaker 1: Black Death, they would set up torches around the pope
Speaker 1: in a room because they thought that would keep So
Speaker 1: maybe some torches too, That's all. Why is that so hard?
Speaker 1: Why is it so hard for you to obey Fauci?
Speaker 1: What's the problem? Why won't you just listen to fouch
Speaker 1: Sky's the most damaging, reckless, worthless public health official of
Speaker 1: my lifetime. I mean, all you have to know is
Speaker 1: this guy has been elevated. He was in the the
Speaker 1: failing Trump COVID response is what they all said. Yeah,
Speaker 1: because also Trump is a responsible for COVID in Brazil,
Speaker 1: Western Europe, up India, China, Right, all these places that
Speaker 1: have had terrible COVID outbreaks. It's all Trump's fault because
Speaker 1: you didn't mask enough, because Trump said to inject bleach.
Speaker 1: Anyone who says the inject bleach thing, that's really a
Speaker 1: litmus test for somebody being a total imbecile. Anyway, Vouch
Speaker 1: has been a nightmare along. And as I was saying
Speaker 1: with the Fouch, you know, baseball can just go on
Speaker 1: and on and on. You need a winner. There's no
Speaker 1: there's no shootout, there's no automatic end. So I think
Speaker 1: that's important to keep in mind here too, the Vouch,
Speaker 1: this guy is the worst. Oh something I had to
Speaker 1: get to do You recognize that the the CDC confers
Speaker 1: with the teachers unions, with the slothful, disingenuous, dishonest teachers
Speaker 1: unions who have basically all had a year of paid
Speaker 1: sitting on the couch doing nothing. Yeah. Yeah, they've basically
Speaker 1: had that for a year. Not enough, not enough. They
Speaker 1: want more. They want more. A lot of them want
Speaker 1: they want more staff, so they have to do less
Speaker 1: actual teaching themselves. They want the ability to work from
Speaker 1: their couches forever if they want. I mean, you'd think
Speaker 1: the teaching would be one of those in purse teaching
Speaker 1: kids children, one of those important in person learning things
Speaker 1: or in person activities. But they don't care because teachers
Speaker 1: are all unfortunately part of a system as well, with
Speaker 1: the public school system that brainwashes them into the most
Speaker 1: left wing nonsense imaginable. Here's what the head of the
Speaker 1: American Federation of Teachers, Randy Weingart, and this woman's amazing,
Speaker 1: she's amazing. She's so perfect for the role too. It's
Speaker 1: all just you know, we just really want to teach,
Speaker 1: and teachers we're just so brave, and we just take
Speaker 1: care of the children, and we're all about the children.
Speaker 1: And actually they're about union members being unfiable, getting pay
Speaker 1: and benefits well beyond what the free market would give them.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's what the teachers Union's actually about. But
Speaker 1: she does a great job with the propaganda and right
Speaker 1: now after teachers have been putting and I know it's
Speaker 1: not all teachers. So for those of you you listening are
Speaker 1: teachers who want to be back in school and want
Speaker 1: to be back in person, I know it's not your fault.
Speaker 1: But you know, the system overall is terrible. We have
Speaker 1: had we've had kids out of school for a year.
Speaker 1: A lot of underprivileged kids particularly are never going to
Speaker 1: be able to catch up. And here's Randy Weingarten wants
Speaker 1: the teachers to take a bow right now because they've
Speaker 1: done such a good job. Play three. Every day should
Speaker 1: be teacher, nurse and public employee appreciation day or week.
Speaker 1: And frankly, it feels like I've said that every year,
Speaker 1: but especially this year. This year you've saved us. You've
Speaker 1: kept your students engaged and said, You've kept your patience
Speaker 1: as safe as humanly possible in a pandemic, and the
Speaker 1: services you provide, from public health to public safety have
Speaker 1: kept our communities gone. You are the front lines not
Speaker 1: just of the COVID nineteen pandemic, but of every crisis
Speaker 1: we've faced. To our educators and prsrps and support staff,
Speaker 1: you've turned down to dine over and over and over again,
Speaker 1: even when you're exhausted and scared, to help our students succeed.
Speaker 1: From pre k to hire it, you've moved mountains to
Speaker 1: begin the process of rebuilding and recovering so that our
Speaker 1: schools or places where educators and staff want to work,
Speaker 1: where parents want to send their kids, and where students thrive.
Speaker 1: What world she living in? Teachers are the front line.
Speaker 1: Teachers sat at home for months and months and months,
Speaker 1: even after we knew that children were safe from this,
Speaker 1: and very unlikely to give it to teachers. And people say, oh,
Speaker 1: but book, it's so dangerous. I'm sorry. The clerks at
Speaker 1: my neighborhood grocery store never missed the day. Did their
Speaker 1: lives not count? Does their safety not count? Say? Oh, well,
Speaker 1: that's grocery stores. That's what people don't need food. We're
Speaker 1: just gonna have the grocery store on an honor system
Speaker 1: that'll work out really well. These days. You should see
Speaker 1: the Dwayne read on the corner where I live. Everything
Speaker 1: of any value under lock and key. It's embarrassing. Everything
Speaker 1: of value that would be easy to sell or to
Speaker 1: carry out and you have to go press a button.
Speaker 1: You know, we'll starve. It needs assistance. You can't uh shaving,
Speaker 1: you know, shaving implements chocolate. That's what gets me so upset.
Speaker 1: I can't get chocolate squares without having to get assistance.
Speaker 1: But yeah, sure, we're gonna be on the a I
Speaker 1: asked the clerks once I said, what this had. People
Speaker 1: just come in here and steal all the time. They're
Speaker 1: on video and they don't care. It's not enough money
Speaker 1: for the m YP to do anything about it. People
Speaker 1: just come in and steal all the time. It's a
Speaker 1: society we live in now. So yeah, you need grocery
Speaker 1: store clerks as the point, and they do their jobs.
Speaker 1: I've been going I got COVID. I've been going into
Speaker 1: an office since I don't know now, since September October.
Speaker 1: All right, it's been a lot. I'm trying to remember
Speaker 1: the the way this all goes. But yeah, I've been
Speaker 1: going to the office for a long time. You know,
Speaker 1: Do I not count of my hero bock sex and
Speaker 1: all the front lines of doing media content? Oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: we should all no, no, no, all right, unless you
Speaker 1: were in a hospital, a COVID ward, a first responder
Speaker 1: dealing who has to be around routinely people with COVID,
Speaker 1: you don't get to do the whole I'm a COVID
Speaker 1: frontline hero thing. Sorry, teaches teachers, teach teaches, and they've
Speaker 1: got a little fauciite there. But Randy Weingarten's amazing. She
Speaker 1: is so full of crap. I mean, I've I've seen
Speaker 1: few people she's amazing at her job because she's so mendacious,
Speaker 1: She lies so effortlessly and give such a dishonest accounting
Speaker 1: of what's really going on with the teachers union, which
Speaker 1: is just all muscle for the Democrat Party. It's just
Speaker 1: all donations for Democrat politicians and votes for them to
Speaker 1: make sure that we continue to have failing public schools,
Speaker 1: without school choice, without accountability, and then when things fall
Speaker 1: apart in some of these communities and across society, we
Speaker 1: blame the cops. There's part of that they were most
Speaker 1: recently eligible, and there is an attitude that they'll be fine.
Speaker 1: Why should detect the vaccine? My argument is, yeah, maybe
Speaker 1: you'll be fine. And by the way, you don't know
Speaker 1: that either we've had a lot of young people who
Speaker 1: have died. Maybe you will get a long haul syndrome
Speaker 1: that we're not really sure what it is yet, but
Speaker 1: a lingering consequence of COVID. Or maybe you go home
Speaker 1: and kill your grandmother and wind up killing your grandmother
Speaker 1: so show some civic responsibility. Maybe your nose will turn
Speaker 1: color like neon green. Why would have turned neon green.
Speaker 1: We dont know all of the symptoms of the long hole.
Speaker 1: You know, long hole like when you're moving from one
Speaker 1: city to another, you say, that's a long haul. But
Speaker 1: with a long haul COVID, we don't know what it
Speaker 1: could be. It could be you all of a sudden
Speaker 1: grow a second head. Why would you grow a second head?
Speaker 1: I don't know. I look at the data and I
Speaker 1: make determinations based upon what is in my immediate political interest.
Speaker 1: And by that I mean making sure you're not thinking
Speaker 1: about me chasing ladies around and making sure that your
Speaker 1: grandma didn't actually get out of the nursing home in
Speaker 1: one piece because I'm an idiot. There you have the
Speaker 1: governor of New York from the media hailing him as
Speaker 1: the best to him being probably probably the worst, and
Speaker 1: telling everybody that a lot of young people have died.
Speaker 1: That's not true, that's not true. If vaccination was the
Speaker 1: key to end this whole thing. I've said this all along,
Speaker 1: and by the way, I know a lot of you
Speaker 1: are far more opposed this vaccine than I have been
Speaker 1: that I have said on the air. I want you
Speaker 1: to know that I do. I read your messages. I
Speaker 1: take it. I'm take it all on account. I don't
Speaker 1: think I know better than any of you. I'm just
Speaker 1: reading what I can about this. I know a lot
Speaker 1: of people. I mean this. No princess just got you know,
Speaker 1: her second vaccination. My whole family has been vaccinated. So
Speaker 1: I speak to you just from a place of honesty,
Speaker 1: which is that my loved one, the people that matter
Speaker 1: most to me have, with well one exception, all gotten vaccinated.
Speaker 1: And I'm personally planning to get vaccinated because I just
Speaker 1: I'm willing to take the risk of the vaccine to
Speaker 1: me in order to not have to deal with the
Speaker 1: totalitarian madness of New York City. Wyoming as a state
Speaker 1: has a lot of people that don't want to get vaccines.
Speaker 1: I get it, because if you're not an adent population,
Speaker 1: if you're not in a blue state, if you know
Speaker 1: and you just don't think that you should do it.
Speaker 1: I've never been for mandatory COVID vaccines, as you know.
Speaker 1: It's not like I've had to change my opinion on that.
Speaker 1: I think that's a total that's a non starter. And
Speaker 1: because a lot of you are telling you buck don't
Speaker 1: get it, don't get it, I have my I will
Speaker 1: tell you I have vaccine hesitancy because of one thing.
Speaker 1: I'm not worried about the side effects for me in
Speaker 1: five years. Am I gonna, you know, have like a
Speaker 1: you know, a lower you know, lower testosterone counter. I
Speaker 1: don't know, right I mean? And I think those of
Speaker 1: you that are saying, oh, it could affect you long
Speaker 1: long term, and you don't know, that's we don't know. No,
Speaker 1: there is no long term study on this. So that's
Speaker 1: that's just a fact. I'm not being anti vax my
Speaker 1: issue with the vaccine for somebody like me. And I
Speaker 1: really just want to take the moment too, because I
Speaker 1: get a lot of vaccine thoughts from all of you
Speaker 1: all over the country, and I just want you all
Speaker 1: to know you are heard. And by no means, not
Speaker 1: only do I not dismiss what you're saying, I agree
Speaker 1: that you could be a lot of you could be right,
Speaker 1: you know when you're talking to me about pregnant women,
Speaker 1: and then you should think, you know a lot of
Speaker 1: you could be right with this stuff in ways that
Speaker 1: I'm not even aware of. And I can see that too,
Speaker 1: See I know what I don't know. I'm not fauci.
Speaker 1: I don't pretend to know stuff that I don't know,
Speaker 1: crap about I know what I don't know. And on
Speaker 1: this one, there is certainly a judgment called you made
Speaker 1: my hesitancy is really a vaccine delay issue because I
Speaker 1: have yet to hear a compelling, a compelling reason why
Speaker 1: me as someone who had medically proven and I mean
Speaker 1: I had COVID one hundred percent. I mean I had
Speaker 1: all the symptoms, I had a positive test, I had
Speaker 1: the loss of taste. I mean I had everything right,
Speaker 1: I mean I had COVID as clear as you can
Speaker 1: get it. And I'm supposed to get a vaccine. But
Speaker 1: why if you really drill down into it, they think,
Speaker 1: they say, they do not know, and they could try
Speaker 1: to fact check me on this all day. They think
Speaker 1: that the vaccine gives more durable immunity than natural than
Speaker 1: the natural immunity you get from having it. They don't know,
Speaker 1: They absolutely do not know. They cannot prove this. So
Speaker 1: that's part one, right, And people say, oh, no, usually
Speaker 1: vaccines are much more effective than natural immunity. I talked
Speaker 1: to you an infectious disease docs who I've known for decades,
Speaker 1: and he said that's not always true. Depends depends on.
Speaker 1: It also depends on your immune system, right, if you
Speaker 1: have a pretty strong immune system, if your immune response
Speaker 1: is good. Not everyone has the same level of just
Speaker 1: immune function in general. Of course, people forget this, but
Speaker 1: I haven't heard a compelling explanation of that. I also
Speaker 1: have not heard a definitive explanation about on this issue.
Speaker 1: I may have a more extreme side effect reaction because
Speaker 1: of the fact that I just within the last two
Speaker 1: months had COVID. And so what does that mean for me?
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm essentially going to be getting a vaccine
Speaker 1: that tells my body if assuming I get it. I
Speaker 1: haven't gotten it yet, for those of you who are
Speaker 1: always asking. I do have an appointment scheduled to get
Speaker 1: it though, in a few weeks. But if I get
Speaker 1: it within this time period, I already have antibodies, and
Speaker 1: I'm going to take something that will that will program
Speaker 1: my immune system, so to speak, to create anybodies that
Speaker 1: I already have. Now, when you start looking at the
Speaker 1: inflammatory response that might be involved here and stuff. I've
Speaker 1: talked too doctors and they don't want to be you know,
Speaker 1: if they don't want people to threaten to take away
Speaker 1: their license or things. I thought the doctors, because this
Speaker 1: is about me, This is about my own health. So
Speaker 1: I really want to know who say yeah, you know,
Speaker 1: you know it because originally, just so you know, the
Speaker 1: CDC guidance was waited at least six months or three months.
Speaker 1: I forget if you've had it to get a vaccine
Speaker 1: and the guidances. If you had monoclonal antibody treatment, which
Speaker 1: I did not have, you definitely should wait. Well why
Speaker 1: should you wait for if you had monoclonal anybody treatment
Speaker 1: but not if your body produced anibodies naturally? What the
Speaker 1: heck is that all about? And you know, people just
Speaker 1: get testy with you and they shout at you and
Speaker 1: they say shut up, get it, And I say, hold on,
Speaker 1: why don't I have answers to these questions? So I'm
Speaker 1: just I just want to take a moment to say
Speaker 1: I have lots of questions, and I absolutely respect a
Speaker 1: lot of the questions and positions that you out there
Speaker 1: listening to the show have about this. So this was
Speaker 1: my moment. I just wanted to give a nod to
Speaker 1: all of you out there. There is a lot of
Speaker 1: stuff that remains unanswered here. Even if I still believe
Speaker 1: as I do that older people should get this on balance,
Speaker 1: and that people should be able to get it themselves
Speaker 1: by choice. But what prompted me to write this column
Speaker 1: was the obvious fact that far from fading away, it's
Speaker 1: actually gained momentum, and it's gone not only wider, but
Speaker 1: deeper down to the state local level of the Republican Party,
Speaker 1: to the point where you can no longer be elected
Speaker 1: to office as a Republican anywhere unless you sign onto
Speaker 1: this lot. Now that is bad enough, but when you
Speaker 1: then weaponize it by tying it to voter suppression initiatives
Speaker 1: in forty plus states, you create the possibility that in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty two, twenty twenty four that we could have
Speaker 1: minority rule. And when you do that, Joe, when you
Speaker 1: do that, you lay the foundations for civil war. Because
Speaker 1: if Republicans, based on a big liar able to change
Speaker 1: all these laws and suppress the vote so a minority
Speaker 1: can actually win in this country, I can tell you
Speaker 1: what will happen. Democratic disenfranchised voters will not stand for that,
Speaker 1: and we will be in a real pickle. And so
Speaker 1: my bottom line is, folks, this is so much more
Speaker 1: serious a moment than you realize. We are setting the
Speaker 1: fuse to a civil war. This is not a test. Now.
Speaker 1: Thomas Friedman is a blustering, narcissistic, wildly overrated writer. So
Speaker 1: just start with that, all right. He's this guy has
Speaker 1: been wrong on important issue after important issue for as
Speaker 1: long as I can remember. And you know, a lot
Speaker 1: of his stuff is trite and oversimplified, but he's known.
Speaker 1: You know, he's at a mustache a long time, he
Speaker 1: married a rich lady. He's at the New York Times,
Speaker 1: you know, and he goes on, he goes on Charlie
Speaker 1: Rose and the well not anymore, sorry, Charlie, but the
Speaker 1: fancy shows out there here he is saying, and I
Speaker 1: think this is so interesting that we're heading towards civil war,
Speaker 1: that's his phrase, because of what the Democrats will do.
Speaker 1: So essentially, the Democrats will be the ones that start
Speaker 1: the civil war in response to Republican voters suppression measures
Speaker 1: that allow a minority of the country to win an
Speaker 1: election or something like that. So it's the Democrats who
Speaker 1: are going to be the ones that actually take to
Speaker 1: the streets and violence. Isn't that fascinating? You have a
Speaker 1: Democrat administration now with essentially unified control of the House
Speaker 1: and the Senate, and we have to hear from this
Speaker 1: blowhard about how there may be a oh, that's right,
Speaker 1: you guessed it. There may be a civil war that
Speaker 1: the Democrats are threatening if they don't get their way here,
Speaker 1: my friends, this is where we really do have to
Speaker 1: get into a level of mass psychology and start to
Speaker 1: understand what's going on here. People who are liberals, leftists
Speaker 1: who identify with these causes, whether it's BLM or the
Speaker 1: Green New Deal or whatever, they they have lost all
Speaker 1: sense of proportionality and rationality. They are constantly being emotionally manipulated,
Speaker 1: they are constantly being they're they're constantly being used to
Speaker 1: advance political agendas, and they're they're a part of it,
Speaker 1: of course, but they don't understand even really what the
Speaker 1: long term game is here. And they're irrational. They really
Speaker 1: believe this stuff. They have internalized these political narratives in
Speaker 1: a way that allows them to justify anything in their heads.
Speaker 1: I mean, here's what Tom Freeman there was referring to
Speaker 1: this column, and usually I don't read from his columns
Speaker 1: or mentioned them, because I really think this guy's he's
Speaker 1: just kind of a blustering dumbass. He really is. But
Speaker 1: he's been The New York Times a long time, and
Speaker 1: you know he's the journals, the corporate journals, cite him
Speaker 1: as though he's a person of note and intellectual worth.
Speaker 1: There he goes. President Biden's early success in getting Americans vaccinated,
Speaker 1: pushing out stimulus checks, and generally calming the surface of
Speaker 1: American life has been a blessing for the country. Oh look,
Speaker 1: Tom Freeben writing press pieces for Biden. But it's also
Speaker 1: lulled many Americans into thinking that Donald Trump's big lie
Speaker 1: that the election was stolen, which propelled the capital insurrection
Speaker 1: on January sixth, would fade away and everything would return
Speaker 1: to normal. It hasn't. We are not, okay. America's democracy
Speaker 1: is still in real danger. In fact, we are closer
Speaker 1: to a political civil war more than at any other
Speaker 1: time in our modern history. Today's seeming political calm is
Speaker 1: actually resting on a false bottom that we're at the
Speaker 1: risk of crashing through at any moment, because instead of
Speaker 1: Trump's big life fading away, just the opposite is happening,
Speaker 1: first slowly and now quickly. Okay, first of all, what
Speaker 1: is a political civil war? What does that mean? And
Speaker 1: is SoundBite that we played for you. He just said
Speaker 1: a civil war? But so what is what is a
Speaker 1: a political civil war? Just wondering if we can establish
Speaker 1: that right now? Yeah, you know what I mean? Yeah
Speaker 1: you can't, because what the heck is that people managed
Speaker 1: each other in politics? That's called politics political civil war?
Speaker 1: Aren't we aren't we in the middle of that already?
Speaker 1: What am I? Anyway? It Isn't that just kind of
Speaker 1: the natural state of American politics right now? Yeah? We're
Speaker 1: fighting over stuff all the time. Civil war means something
Speaker 1: very different. Civil war means an internal armed conflict within
Speaker 1: a country for control. So is that what he's talking
Speaker 1: about or not? I think we should establish that. But anyway,
Speaker 1: they have to keep this specter of the insurrection and
Speaker 1: the big fear of Trump is and they have to
Speaker 1: keep that there because they're creating a circumstance where Biden
Speaker 1: cannot fail because he's not the insurrection. They're creating the
Speaker 1: circumstances for a narrative of success even if Biden continues
Speaker 1: to be the inept buffoon that we have seen all along,
Speaker 1: because no matter what, he won't be the insurrection. He
Speaker 1: won't be an insurrectionist and so that's good enough. Remember,
Speaker 1: in a sense that the tactics that were used, especially
Speaker 1: the propaganda tactics of the Biden of the Obama administration,
Speaker 1: are being replayed now with the Biden administration. One of
Speaker 1: the ways that they always set up the Obama administration
Speaker 1: in those early days was that remember we you know,
Speaker 1: we had the economy had been driven off a cliff,
Speaker 1: and Obama was going to fix it with his pen
Speaker 1: and his phone and the whole thing. But but you know,
Speaker 1: the Republicans drove the economy off a cliff, the worst
Speaker 1: economy since the Great Depression. That was so no matter
Speaker 1: what kind of worthless overspending politically expedient, socialist garbage the
Speaker 1: Obama administration trot it out, it didn't matter because the
Speaker 1: worst economy since the Great Depression was all we ever
Speaker 1: heard about, well with this Biden administration any So so
Speaker 1: that that that meant that any spending, any level of
Speaker 1: financial activism, if you will, from Obama, from the Obama
Speaker 1: administration wasn't aparently justified because of the crisis. The crisis, well, now,
Speaker 1: any degree of politicized law enforcement, of crushing your opponents,
Speaker 1: of terrifying them, that the Biden administration engages in is
Speaker 1: inherently justified because of the insurrection. January sixth is now
Speaker 1: the bloody shirt that they wave around to say, ce see,
Speaker 1: we have to monitor them online. We have to be
Speaker 1: treating Trump supporters like they're a clear and present danger
Speaker 1: to America, a threat to our very democracy itself. We
Speaker 1: have no choice but to do these things. That is
Speaker 1: what they say. That's the whole game. And that's why
Speaker 1: when you have FBI agents kicking in the door of
Speaker 1: a couple in Alaska that did nothing wrong, guns pointed
Speaker 1: at them first thing in the morning, guts. That's a
Speaker 1: pretty traumatic experience to go through. Think you're waking up
Speaker 1: in your home. Your home is your castle. You think
Speaker 1: you're safe, and guns just pointed at you from all
Speaker 1: over the place. And why because Pelosi wants her her
Speaker 1: stormtroopers from the DOJ to be running out there, terrifying
Speaker 1: anyone who wore a MAGA hat on January sixth. There's
Speaker 1: there's no media pushback against this at all. They think
Speaker 1: this is good. You're an insurrectionist. That's what they say
Speaker 1: to justify whatever it is they want to do. You know,
Speaker 1: in totalitarian regimes, they always have some term for the
Speaker 1: people who are the opposition that they want to suppress.
Speaker 1: They called them deviationists. In the early days when the
Speaker 1: Bolsheviks were fighting with the social Democrats and the Mensheviks
Speaker 1: and the Russian Revolution, anybody who was to be pushed
Speaker 1: out first of power and then pushed eventually into a
Speaker 1: prison cell for an execution shot at the back of
Speaker 1: the head was called a deviationist. If you go back
Speaker 1: into the history of the Soviet Union in the early days,
Speaker 1: you will find this to be the case. Deviation was
Speaker 1: the great sin, and then later, once Stalin was firmly entrenched,
Speaker 1: it was counter revolutionaries. You're a counter revolutionary, therefore you
Speaker 1: must be sent off to the Gulag. You're a counter revolutionary,
Speaker 1: therefore you must lose all of your rights, and no
Speaker 1: human decency needs be extended to you. Well, we don't
Speaker 1: have Stalin, but we do have terms used to demean
Speaker 1: like insurrectionist for anybody who opposes this government of left
Speaker 1: wing idiots. I do command Maintaney for her courage, for
Speaker 1: her patriotism, and I wish her well. Perhaps this challenge
Speaker 1: will make her stronger. I don't know, that's up to
Speaker 1: their caucus. I don't welcome their participation in our caucus,
Speaker 1: and I'm sure they don't welcome my participation. And there,
Speaker 1: Oh that's great, isn't it. Nancy Nancy Pelosi here giving
Speaker 1: us her seal of approval for Liz Cheney. What more
Speaker 1: do you have to know other than yes, Pelosi. Hey,
Speaker 1: this Chenney is a pitch here. I mean, Nancy Pelosi
Speaker 1: telling you that this Republican member of Congress should be
Speaker 1: praised for her bravery. If you weren't sure that she
Speaker 1: was selling out before, you're pretty damn sure now, aren't
Speaker 1: you doing the work of the other side. As long
Speaker 1: as this is something that goes on with conservatives, As
Speaker 1: long as this is something that continues to happen in
Speaker 1: this way, we're just gonna we're gonna suffer the consequences
Speaker 1: as conservatives. We're gonna lose when you have people from
Speaker 1: our side who are so desperate for the approval of
Speaker 1: the other side. And you know, Liz Cheney really wants
Speaker 1: to take us back to the gop of Bush Cheney,
Speaker 1: where we had what was conserved exactly. There was a
Speaker 1: lot of spending, there was expansion of medicare, There were
Speaker 1: a bunch of wars. We didn't need to fight. What
Speaker 1: was the big upside of that era? We had a
Speaker 1: week border security, the economy fell off a cliff. What
Speaker 1: exactly are we supposed to celebrate with all that? Oh, yeah, no,
Speaker 1: it doesn't. A lot of corporations happy, you know, very
Speaker 1: that was a very corporate friendly offshoring globalism, very very
Speaker 1: into that. America first, No, no, not America first, GOP
Speaker 1: corporate donors first. That's that was the attitude under Bush Cheney,
Speaker 1: and I think we should all remember that. And you
Speaker 1: see now with Bush even we're in a fight right
Speaker 1: now for the future of this country with the radical left,
Speaker 1: with Marxists calling themselves Democrats, and George W. Bush weighs
Speaker 1: in on the side of the Marxists against the party
Speaker 1: that at one point he was the president, the president
Speaker 1: of he's president of the whole country. But you know
Speaker 1: what I mean, he was the leader of the GOP,
Speaker 1: not a very good one. You know. They always said
Speaker 1: Bush was really dumb, and that I briefed him a
Speaker 1: couple of times in the Oval office. I mean, I
Speaker 1: was smarter than George Bush. That's not saying a lot,
Speaker 1: But even as a young guy, I just had greater
Speaker 1: facility and knew more than he did, which is a
Speaker 1: weird thing. When you're twenty six or twenty seven, you're
Speaker 1: talking new guy, you go, okay, so I just I'm
Speaker 1: quicker than you are. This is interesting. But he wasn't dumb.
Speaker 1: That was not true. He's not a dumb guy. He's
Speaker 1: just not a scholar. He's not an intellectual. He's not
Speaker 1: somebody who's particularly sharp. But he had pretty good political instincts,
Speaker 1: and you know, he had a decent BS detector. But
Speaker 1: he wasn't a very effective Republican president. You know. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we were attacked by al Qaeda, we were on a
Speaker 1: war footing. I supported then. I supported Cheney then because
Speaker 1: they were our guys against a bunch of barbarians who
Speaker 1: were trying to destroy Western civilization, trying to destroy America,
Speaker 1: but they were trying to do it through terrorism. Now
Speaker 1: we have people from inside the country trying to undermine
Speaker 1: Western civilization and try to destroy the bonds that hold
Speaker 1: us together as the American people through Marxism and critical
Speaker 1: race theory and the Green New Deal and this extreme
Speaker 1: reordering of American society along leftist principles or leftist power
Speaker 1: and Bush takes their side. Vanity is such a powerful tool,
Speaker 1: especially among people who have had a lot, especially among
Speaker 1: people who have been wealthy and have had influenced in
Speaker 1: their lives. Perception of their peer group really matters to
Speaker 1: them because at some level, I suppose they doubt how
Speaker 1: special they really are. They have doubts about whether they
Speaker 1: should have reached these rarefied heights, and so they want
Speaker 1: the people around them, They want their peer group to think, oh, well,
Speaker 1: he's one of the good ones. This is particularly for Republicans.
Speaker 1: He's not one of those maga hat wearing savages. He's
Speaker 1: one of the more refined Republicans who loses gracefully, who
Speaker 1: bends the knee to our whims. There's another person we
Speaker 1: shouldn't listen to about the future of the GOP in
Speaker 1: the face of this radicalism George Conway, psychotic anti Trumper
Speaker 1: play thirteen. So what happens to the Republican Party? I mean,
Speaker 1: what happens to people like yourself, to Liz Cheney, to
Speaker 1: others who are principled and have conservative principles that they believe. Oh,
Speaker 1: I mean, it's basically we're headed toward, essentially the destruction
Speaker 1: of the Republican Party as a serious as a serious party,
Speaker 1: at least as a potential majority party, I think precisely
Speaker 1: because they just can't make the numbers add up, and
Speaker 1: and you lose somebody like Liz Cheney again, as as
Speaker 1: Jamie points out, she is going to have more time
Speaker 1: on her hands to become a spokesperson for truth. And
Speaker 1: it's just a it's just an amazingly self destructive thing
Speaker 1: that the Republicans are doing. And they're doing it for
Speaker 1: they're being very, very shortsighted. They want to avoid primary challenges,
Speaker 1: but they're ultimately they're ultimately by by sticking to the
Speaker 1: big lie, they're ultimately see sowing the seeds of their
Speaker 1: own destruction. Can we get somebody on CNN talking about
Speaker 1: the GOP who's not a psychotic never Trumper, you know?
Speaker 1: Can we have that? Maybe? No, of course, I mean
Speaker 1: CNN is laughable, as we all know, CNN is an absurdity.
Speaker 1: But this is this is the way that they do
Speaker 1: things there, George Conway, let's here from Liz Cheney and
Speaker 1: George Conway about the future of the GOP. That's that
Speaker 1: those are really they really got their pulse on the
Speaker 1: finger on the pulse of the base. Sure they do.
Speaker 1: Our friend John Cardillo in the mix with us now
Speaker 1: formerly of the NYPD. He's a conservative commentator, TV and
Speaker 1: radio host. John. Great to have you with us. Always
Speaker 1: good to be with you, Buck. Thanks So, Facebook's oversight
Speaker 1: board upholds the Trump Band. This comes right after from
Speaker 1: the desk of President Trump. This website has launched. But
Speaker 1: let's start with that's kind of the response. Let's start
Speaker 1: with what you what do you make of this Facebook ruling? Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean, look, they're kicking the can down the road.
Speaker 1: Like a few people have said, not to be cliche,
Speaker 1: I don't think there was ever a doubt as to
Speaker 1: whether or not Facebook was going to do this. Fortunately,
Speaker 1: some governors are waking up. My governor here in Florida
Speaker 1: round Santas. Hopefully you're governor one day, Buck, if you
Speaker 1: come down, but if he just pat don't know if
Speaker 1: it's a would have in Florida, But Florida just enacted
Speaker 1: legislation that would ban well, there's a bill out there
Speaker 1: that would ban social media sites, would find them, could
Speaker 1: criminally prosecute them if they banned a statewide political candidate
Speaker 1: in Florida, and that I relate that to Trump, because
Speaker 1: I think Facebook's move here is pretty clear. Well they can,
Speaker 1: they can, you know, say all the nonsense they want.
Speaker 1: But this is clearly another instance of Facebook trying to
Speaker 1: control the debate and influence the twenty twenty two midterms.
Speaker 1: It's just remarkable, right, It's remarkable of this company, which
Speaker 1: is really one of the most valuable companies in the
Speaker 1: world right now. I mean, you look at it, it's earnings,
Speaker 1: it's reach, its ability to influence the conversation, not just
Speaker 1: in America but in places all over the world. That
Speaker 1: we're living in a reality where they've banned a former
Speaker 1: president from a former president of the United States is
Speaker 1: anathema now is ostracized digitally. I mean, I just think
Speaker 1: it's almost like this hasn't really soaked into people's minds yet.
Speaker 1: How extreme this is. Yeah, I think people everybody knows
Speaker 1: why they're doing it. Look, I think Facebook's credibility would
Speaker 1: be better sird that they came right out and said,
Speaker 1: we don't agree with Trump ideologically, we don't agree with conservatives.
Speaker 1: We're going to ban them from the platform, and then
Speaker 1: be honest about it. Let the States do what they do.
Speaker 1: Because because I have zero confidence that establishment Republicans will
Speaker 1: do anything. Democrats, we know won't do anything because the
Speaker 1: Lacon valleys on their side, but at least be honest
Speaker 1: about why you're doing it. They didn't kick this can
Speaker 1: down the road in ban Trump for six more months
Speaker 1: for any reason other than he's still a voice. He's
Speaker 1: a voice. I was actually at Trump International in West
Speaker 1: Palm Beach on Sunday. I saw the Foreign president when
Speaker 1: he came off the golf course. The establishment still shows up.
Speaker 1: He came off the golf course with Lindsey Graham. So
Speaker 1: the establishment is still showing up because they know they
Speaker 1: need Trump more than Trump needs them. And Facebook knows
Speaker 1: that as well, so they're going to do all they
Speaker 1: can to silence the guy John. I wonder how this
Speaker 1: is going to go now with Trump building. We hear
Speaker 1: all this stuff about Trump building his own platform, which
Speaker 1: would be great. You know, Parlor is back up and running.
Speaker 1: It feels though like it it's still like the eye
Speaker 1: of Sauron for the Lord of the Rings Fans is
Speaker 1: still on Parlor. So you can't really get a you know,
Speaker 1: have a true free speech platform yet. But I gotta
Speaker 1: check in with those guys. They don't have the same
Speaker 1: CEO anymore. I'm not entirely you know, sure how well
Speaker 1: that's working out at this stage. What can you tell
Speaker 1: us about whether if you know anything from the inside
Speaker 1: or just your perception of Trump building a platform for
Speaker 1: Trump supporters, you know what I mean? Because because right
Speaker 1: now the live or you know, the from the President's
Speaker 1: Desk thing they're doing. It's a communicate. It's it's helpful,
Speaker 1: but it's not It's not Twitter, it's not Facebook, right,
Speaker 1: I mean, it's more of a website. I mean, look,
Speaker 1: I don't say this in a domani way. It's more
Speaker 1: like a blob really. I mean, it's putting out his
Speaker 1: statements in one condensed format, so you don't have to
Speaker 1: go hunt around for them on Twitter through his various
Speaker 1: people that are pushing his content to Jason Miller's and
Speaker 1: all right now that Trump's been back, so it's a
Speaker 1: centralized destination where you can pick up those statements that
Speaker 1: his office is putting out. But it doesn't really have
Speaker 1: a social interaction component, you know. As for Parlor, I
Speaker 1: think I hate to say it, I think Parlor's probably
Speaker 1: done for this simple reason that they've been de platformed
Speaker 1: from the app stores for Apple and Android, and I
Speaker 1: don't see them being allowed back on again. Another liberal
Speaker 1: Silicon Valley company and leftist company Apple. They don't have
Speaker 1: to let Parlor back on, so all the sites back.
Speaker 1: It's really a web destination. And we all know that
Speaker 1: apps or apps, and without the on a mobile device,
Speaker 1: few people are going to type a URL into their phone.
Speaker 1: They want to go on the apps and to quit tweet,
Speaker 1: put something up quickly on Instagram, face Book, and in
Speaker 1: the past Parlor unless they get back on the app stores,
Speaker 1: I don't think they have too bright of a future.
Speaker 1: But as far as the social media platform, they keep
Speaker 1: talking about it. I have to tell you I was
Speaker 1: a little disappointed when I saw this what Trump launched.
Speaker 1: Because of his resources, money and the team of people
Speaker 1: he could put around him, this is pretty rudimentary. I
Speaker 1: thought it would have been something a bit more robust.
Speaker 1: I'm surprised too, So I'm glad to hear you say that,
Speaker 1: because you know, one thing that we have to be
Speaker 1: comfortable with on the right is being honest. You know,
Speaker 1: I keep telling people this because whenever I talk about
Speaker 1: honest about Trump specifically and things going on in Trump world,
Speaker 1: because I try to say, I criticize Trump the way
Speaker 1: a coach criticizes his team at halftime, right, I want
Speaker 1: him to win the game. I'm trying to and I
Speaker 1: want and I actually as you do too, John. And
Speaker 1: not only am I speaking to Trump supporters, I mean
Speaker 1: I speak to some of the people around him that
Speaker 1: try to influence him. So that's where I'm coming from
Speaker 1: on this. And I know that people are so used
Speaker 1: to the you know the rest of media trashing him
Speaker 1: all the time, being unfair to him, the Russia collusion
Speaker 1: lies that there's a an almost reflexive defensiveness from from
Speaker 1: some Trump supporters, but all things Trump, and I'm like, look, guys,
Speaker 1: as you point out, John, he's got the resources, the people,
Speaker 1: the talent to create an unsinkable aircraft carrier of free speech,
Speaker 1: as a platform, as an you know, whatever it may be.
Speaker 1: We gotta do this. You know, it has to happen
Speaker 1: because otherwise people keep saying he's gonna run in twenty
Speaker 1: twenty four, and he's gonna win. With the landscape the
Speaker 1: way it is right now, with Trump banned from Twitter,
Speaker 1: banned from Facebook, what do people think they're gonna let
Speaker 1: the Trump campaign run ads at all. Are you kidding me?
Speaker 1: I mean, he's he's dead in the he's I mean
Speaker 1: his campaign is dead in the water. No way. Yeah,
Speaker 1: in terms of social but you just touched on the
Speaker 1: biggest problem. So you know. I was a big Trump
Speaker 1: supporter still am, and I like Trump style is tweets
Speaker 1: made me laugh. I loved, absolutely loves what Donald Trump
Speaker 1: did to shake up the establishment. He educated Americans to
Speaker 1: just how corrupt DC is. I mean, there's a swamp
Speaker 1: under a swamp, under a swamp. You know this. You
Speaker 1: worked in the IC, you worked in DC. But what
Speaker 1: I've been very critical of trumbond is or what have
Speaker 1: been his personnel decisions. Now supported Trump ninety nine point
Speaker 1: nine percent of the time, But the minute you critique
Speaker 1: something he does, it could be keep Mint's previous as
Speaker 1: chief staff for too long, or allowing you know, John
Speaker 1: Smith or David Jones, hypothetical names remaining in positions when
Speaker 1: they're clearly never Trumpers. The hardcore Magus supporters don't think critically.
Speaker 1: They'll come out and they've attacked me up. You're a
Speaker 1: big never Trumper, Hey, Cardillo, you've turned into Joe Walsh.
Speaker 1: You're a closet democrat. I'm a closet democrat, but they
Speaker 1: don't realize you nailed it. Buck. When you support someone,
Speaker 1: it's incumbent upon you to guide them when they're going
Speaker 1: down the wrong path. And if you don't asleep critique
Speaker 1: the people you support. The analogy of a coach is outstanding.
Speaker 1: They can't win right a coaches have been to fill
Speaker 1: a player with a lot of talent who's playing poorly.
Speaker 1: Oh you're great, You've got all the talent in the world.
Speaker 1: You are well, you keep losing. You know, you could
Speaker 1: throw the ball ninety miles an hour. You throwing forty
Speaker 1: miles an hour because lazy, But you're outstanding. No, they're
Speaker 1: going to scream them in the locker room, tell them
Speaker 1: to get it together and teach them how to win.
Speaker 1: Too many on our side won't do that. When it
Speaker 1: comes to Trump. There's there's this unfortunate cult book mentality
Speaker 1: among many of them where they won't critique. They followed
Speaker 1: things like the QAnon phenomenon that a lot of us
Speaker 1: knew was just like a live action role play. Refused
Speaker 1: to critique, and I think it was a large reason
Speaker 1: that Trump had the personnel problems. He had not enough
Speaker 1: of his base was making noise. The biggest weakness of
Speaker 1: the Trump presidency that was self inflicted was personnel. You know,
Speaker 1: I've talked about this, and I tried. I talked to
Speaker 1: you know, I, you know, Jared and Avanco. That was
Speaker 1: not okay, and people were I got so much hate
Speaker 1: mail from Trump's, from fellow Trump supporters, and I know
Speaker 1: Jared Vaca. I don't dislike them as people. I just
Speaker 1: don't think that you should have your kids as your
Speaker 1: top advisors deciding who gets meetings with you when you're
Speaker 1: the president of the United States, especially when they're both Democrats,
Speaker 1: which they are, by the way, in case anybody was wondering, um,
Speaker 1: but but just you know, hold on. You know, we're
Speaker 1: speaking of John Cardillo, former m YPD conservative commentator. John.
Speaker 1: How many years in MYPD were you, by the way,
Speaker 1: I'm wanted, I think just over a decade. And then
Speaker 1: I had started a business. I loved it. I loved it,
Speaker 1: but I had started a business that was related and
Speaker 1: we uh, I just my schedule was too insane. I
Speaker 1: couldn't both do the job and run the company. And
Speaker 1: by that point I had investor money into the company.
Speaker 1: I had a fiducial responsibility to them, so I was
Speaker 1: able to invest out. So I wanted that, I asked, John,
Speaker 1: because you know you've seen I. You and I talk
Speaker 1: about the national security and law enforcement bureaucrats a fair amount.
Speaker 1: And I just gotta say, I was in the IC
Speaker 1: for for six years, and basically that whole time with
Speaker 1: with the Central Intelligence Agency. I spent a year at
Speaker 1: the NYPD, but I was still a CIA officer at
Speaker 1: the time. It's a whole other, a whole other thing. Um,
Speaker 1: here's the thing, John, This video that came out of
Speaker 1: the CI. It's a CIA recruitment video where this woman says,
Speaker 1: I'm a I'm a cis gender millennial with generalized anxiety
Speaker 1: disorder who used to suffer from imposter syndrome. I mean,
Speaker 1: I was waiting for her to like, you know, like
Speaker 1: pull some kind of disguise out at the end and
Speaker 1: be like just kidding, I'm actually like, you know, you're
Speaker 1: a Romanov and like dunked them done. Like the CIA.
Speaker 1: It was. It was so cringe inducing. And I just
Speaker 1: want to say to everybody, I've been getting all these
Speaker 1: different people I know in the agency who are saying
Speaker 1: this is so embarrassing for us, and we're already hammering
Speaker 1: the people you want to keep in the icy. This
Speaker 1: is just gonna hurt even more. Oh, it's terrible. First
Speaker 1: of all, I don't know what imposter syndrome is. I'm
Speaker 1: still lost on that one. And it's nice to know.
Speaker 1: You know. Matt Walsh, who turns out some really good work,
Speaker 1: made a good point. He said, anxiety is a normal
Speaker 1: human emotion, Like people get anxious an you're on a plane,
Speaker 1: it starts to turbulence. Hey, you get a little anxious, right,
Speaker 1: Why are we turning it into a mental disorder? And
Speaker 1: said And the other thing was Tucker said it, and
Speaker 1: I thought it was as brilliant. In the same video,
Speaker 1: they're basically saying, well, this woman doesn't check any boxes,
Speaker 1: but she's literally checking boxes about her identity. The entire
Speaker 1: thing was you nail that cringe worthy. But even worse, Buck,
Speaker 1: our enemies are laughing at us. You know, the Pakistani
Speaker 1: i SI, they're not an out intelligent service, no matter
Speaker 1: how much we like to say. They are. There adversaries,
Speaker 1: the the FSB, you know, all of these, the IRGC,
Speaker 1: they're watching this, laughing in our faces. That's the end.
Speaker 1: Could you imagine the IRG the Revolutionary Guard Court, they
Speaker 1: run more like the Naziss than an intelligence service, the IRGC.
Speaker 1: Could you imagine them jumping a video like that. I mean,
Speaker 1: we're being laughed at by the world's worst bad guys
Speaker 1: with video. It's terrible and it's just for everyone to see.
Speaker 1: There's wokeness infiltration from the highest level on down in
Speaker 1: the military. All my current informer military friends and colleagues
Speaker 1: tell me that, and I always say, you think it's
Speaker 1: bad there, go over to the State Department. I mean,
Speaker 1: they're experts in critical race theory, you know. I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, if you look at yeah, pedal bureaucracies are
Speaker 1: totally out of control. A real quick John before we
Speaker 1: let you go. Chauvin Juror comes out and says he
Speaker 1: lied in jury selection because he wanted to be on
Speaker 1: the jury. Turns out he was at a BLM protest
Speaker 1: before all this. Do you think Chauvin's gonna get a
Speaker 1: new trial? Yeah? He should. I mean they're calling the
Speaker 1: guy Juror fifty two. He's also got a name. He
Speaker 1: lied on the questionnaire and his back pedal is even worse. Well,
Speaker 1: they asked me if I was at a George Floyd
Speaker 1: specific protest. Oh come on, now, come on, you were
Speaker 1: a BLM protest where everybody was holding signs with George
Speaker 1: Floyd's name on them. You were at George Floyd protest.
Speaker 1: So I don't see how Chauvin isn't entered a new
Speaker 1: trial when the jury pool was that tainted and the
Speaker 1: juror lied. I just if Chauvin's not granted a new
Speaker 1: trial and the court that I ultimately hear this doesn't
Speaker 1: grant him one, then justice is absolutely dead in this
Speaker 1: nation and book. I'd say this for anybody. If it
Speaker 1: was a BLM protester and someone that hated BLM lied
Speaker 1: to get on the jury, I'd also want them to
Speaker 1: get a new trial, because if our justice system is
Speaker 1: going to operate that way, we're all in a lot
Speaker 1: of trouble. John Cardilla, everybody follow him on social media
Speaker 1: for not already at John Cardillo, John, I'll see you
Speaker 1: down in Miami soon, buddy, You got it my friend
Speaker 1: looking forward to it. Did you get the sense that
Speaker 1: he felt like we didn't need to keep working on
Speaker 1: the vaccine because we have the solution ride here. No, No,
Speaker 1: I mean to give credit to the former administration, or
Speaker 1: they put together Operation wharp Speed, which was really important
Speaker 1: in getting things rolling right now, or in the implementation stage,
Speaker 1: which is going really really very successfully in vaccine. You know,
Speaker 1: even the Foucher is willing to say, hey, look, we
Speaker 1: can't totally trash everything about Trump. We can't actually do that,
Speaker 1: because what he did with warp Speed was pretty good.
Speaker 1: Actually it was pretty decent. Yeah, you don't say the
Speaker 1: amount of bs that is constantly pedaled, I mean, Biden
Speaker 1: taking all this credit. We're talking about the vact Okay
Speaker 1: vaccines in distribution is you know, yeah, it's it's a
Speaker 1: major effort, but getting the vaccine, Having a vaccine is
Speaker 1: the most important step in the whole process. Without that,
Speaker 1: you got nothing. And I would just tell you I
Speaker 1: think that the way this was rolled out in some
Speaker 1: places like New York and again I'm sorry, I don't
Speaker 1: mean to make this New York centric, but it's just
Speaker 1: that's where I am right. Every state has a different
Speaker 1: version of this. In Florida, they got into publics, which
Speaker 1: then of course they attacked Ron de Santras for. But
Speaker 1: that meant you just went to the place you go
Speaker 1: to get groceries and stuff anyway, and you got your shot.
Speaker 1: In New York, it was go to some health center
Speaker 1: in the middle of god knows where and stand in
Speaker 1: line for hours and hours while the New York City
Speaker 1: Health bureaucracy, who could care less about how quickly they're
Speaker 1: getting this done, you know, calls you out nam a
Speaker 1: toe three toe seven number four three seven five. You know.
Speaker 1: It's like being at the DMV, except your life is
Speaker 1: at stake, right, I mean, accept yours. There's a health
Speaker 1: issue here, so you know, I think it could have
Speaker 1: been done a lot better than it was. I think
Speaker 1: it should have been in you know, we should have
Speaker 1: had the vaccines at every CVS and Walgreens across America.
Speaker 1: But the Democrats wanted to control this. This was an
Speaker 1: issue of fairness, you see, an issue of fair Okay. Yeah,
Speaker 1: they wanted to make sure that underserved communities would have
Speaker 1: access to the vaccine. I mean, just they got a
Speaker 1: CBS or a Dwayne Read or a Walgreens, you know,
Speaker 1: or a Kmart or a Costco. I think, you know,
Speaker 1: this is where human beings get their stuff wherever they
Speaker 1: are in America. You could put that, but nope, they
Speaker 1: wanted government control of it. As you know, White House
Speaker 1: Chief of Staff Ron Klain, this guy's scary. He's He's
Speaker 1: asked about why does Biden still walk around outside without
Speaker 1: a mask on Play eleven, Well, I say that he is.
Speaker 1: I mean, I think most of the time you see
Speaker 1: him outside, he's not wearing a mask. People catch him
Speaker 1: sometime pictures getting in or out of a car, he
Speaker 1: hasn't yet had a chance to take his mask off
Speaker 1: or is going into a building, so he, you know,
Speaker 1: puts it on for convenience. The President h wears doesn't
Speaker 1: wear his mask when he's outside. Generally. I'm here tonight
Speaker 1: unmasked outside. So I think we're all adjusting to this
Speaker 1: new CDC guidance. It's great guidance, right, I mean, everyone
Speaker 1: should feel better though we have made so much progress
Speaker 1: in a hundred days that deaths are down eight cases
Speaker 1: are down dramatically in forty of the fifty states. We're
Speaker 1: making a lot of progress. Being able to be unmasked
Speaker 1: outside as a result of that progress, and something we
Speaker 1: should all enjoy. We should have never been masked outside.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, I'm not going to take this as some
Speaker 1: kind of big concession from the lockdowners. Masks outdoors never
Speaker 1: were necessary, never as a general policy for people jogging,
Speaker 1: going biking, being outside in the air. But it was
Speaker 1: about control. Bend the knee, do what they say. And
Speaker 1: now it's so habitual for the virtue signaling libs. That's
Speaker 1: why Biden's walking around. Old man boy. He probably forgets too,
Speaker 1: you know. He should get one of those things you
Speaker 1: have when you forget your glasses so they put the
Speaker 1: rope behind them. He should get that for his mask.
Speaker 1: The show ain't over yet, folks. It's time for roll
Speaker 1: call for a do sir Mark? What is up? My man?
Speaker 1: What is the latest and greatest? Tell me all the things?
Speaker 1: How are you doing? How's the move? Packing going along?
Speaker 1: That's going as well as a can buck. It's gonna
Speaker 1: like to hear. Did you got your shots? Right? I got, yes,
Speaker 1: my one shot. I got the Johnson and Johnson. When's
Speaker 1: your next one? There is no second for the Johnson
Speaker 1: and Johnson. I thought the Johnson Johnson was a two
Speaker 1: for No, the Johnson Johnson's one shot and you're done.
Speaker 1: That's one of the reasons I got it, honestly. Oh,
Speaker 1: I guess actually that would be if it's one and done,
Speaker 1: that would be two and one anyway, Um, yeah, that
Speaker 1: makes sense then okay, And did you have any like
Speaker 1: sore arm or anything? Any problems? Sore arm? Was it?
Speaker 1: I was sore for a few days. Other than that
Speaker 1: I felt completely fine. Well look at that. You learned
Speaker 1: something new every day. I'm supposed to go in for
Speaker 1: the fiser, which feels like it's the big gun, you
Speaker 1: know what I mean. I'm on the list for the Fiser.
Speaker 1: I don't know. Have you had friends that have had
Speaker 1: a bad have had a bad you know, side effects situation. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I've had a kind of a mix of everything. Like
Speaker 1: the friends that I have that who have had COVID
Speaker 1: already had fairly bad reactions to the shot, but then
Speaker 1: they were fine after like you know, overnight or twelve
Speaker 1: hours or so. And then other friends who haven't had
Speaker 1: it or even have had it, have had no reaction.
Speaker 1: So I feel like it affects everyone differently. But a
Speaker 1: lot of people are saying they'd rather have, you know,
Speaker 1: a day of COVID symptoms than you know, actually getting COVID.
Speaker 1: I guess fair enough, fair enough. Well, let's let's get
Speaker 1: right to it, shall we. We have Jeremiah writing in
Speaker 1: Buck love the show. I especially love your daily monologue
Speaker 1: reminds me so much of Rush. Well, thank you, Jeremiah.
Speaker 1: That's very high praise. Anyway, For years, the left through
Speaker 1: follow the science at US regarding climate change, and while
Speaker 1: a lot of people did go along with it, the
Speaker 1: majority did not. NKA the pandemic. Now, I don't believe
Speaker 1: COVID was a hoax, nor do I believe it was
Speaker 1: intentionally released for some nefarious reset, but I believe it
Speaker 1: was definitely used and exaggerated by the left to move
Speaker 1: their agenda. Now they keep repeating their follow the science
Speaker 1: mantral like a broken record regarding COVID lockdowns and masks,
Speaker 1: so much so that the majority is listing, and soon
Speaker 1: the left will switch from follow COVID science to follow
Speaker 1: climate science, and I believe most people will finally go
Speaker 1: along with all of their garbage. I already see it
Speaker 1: with this infrastructure bill. We must fight this. We need
Speaker 1: to take back follow the science for actual science reality.
Speaker 1: And the only way we're going to achieve this is
Speaker 1: for the right to start behaving like the left and
Speaker 1: cooperate as one stop competing with each other. The Left
Speaker 1: succeeds because they work together as one. Jeremiah, first of all,
Speaker 1: thank you so much for your support and for your
Speaker 1: detailed note here. I would just say that there is
Speaker 1: a there's a clear advantage that the left has when
Speaker 1: it comes to collective action, their mindset, their sense of
Speaker 1: who they are, They just they like to do things
Speaker 1: as the group, and that is very powerful in a society.
Speaker 1: You know, we think of the individual first in all things.
Speaker 1: We think of what can I do to make my community,
Speaker 1: to make my family, to make life around me better?
Speaker 1: Leftist think of how can the community? How can all
Speaker 1: of us be mobilized toward this thing? And that is
Speaker 1: that is a clear advantage. You know, do we even
Speaker 1: have think about this? Do we even use the term
Speaker 1: community organizer on the right now? Now? We kind of
Speaker 1: we really use it as a term of disparage. You remember,
Speaker 1: Obama was a community organizer. That was really his career
Speaker 1: and until he was a politician and president and a
Speaker 1: lot of us, look, let's be honest, kind of mocked
Speaker 1: that whole Oh yeah, community organizer. Well, there's a lot
Speaker 1: of Marxist garbage that are that a community organizers engage in.
Speaker 1: But it is effective. I mean, when you read rules
Speaker 1: for radicals. When you learn about Saul Olynsky, and remember
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton wrote that guy a letter. She was so
Speaker 1: impressed with him, such a devotee of a Lynskiite political organizing.
Speaker 1: They got it works. It works. If you think of
Speaker 1: a Lensky as a left wing Machiavelli for twentieth century politics,
Speaker 1: which is really what he is, you you see how
Speaker 1: powerful it is. And if you think, if you you know,
Speaker 1: I like to cite Machiavelli. Machi Velli was really the
Speaker 1: Prince is written as a handbook for rulers, for a
Speaker 1: moral rulers in Renaissance era Italy to be successful in
Speaker 1: what they're doing. I mean this guy that was he
Speaker 1: was a condottieri. He was an advisor, a military vie.
Speaker 1: Condotieri was essentially a mercenary, but a mercenary leader. Right.
Speaker 1: So you think of a mercenary usually as someone you
Speaker 1: hire to be in your army and fight among the many.
Speaker 1: But a condotieri was like a mercenary general. That's that's
Speaker 1: a good way to think of it. You know, so
Speaker 1: a high level guy they'll be in charge that you
Speaker 1: hire for you to to run this. And it was
Speaker 1: really the the whole idea of the princess, that it's
Speaker 1: applicable for somebody in power. Now they've got you know,
Speaker 1: Machiavelli for the corporate boardroom and Machiavelli for this, you know,
Speaker 1: for the sports field whatever. Right, it's become a like
Speaker 1: a franchise throughout the centuries onto itself. Um. So yeah,
Speaker 1: that's that's where it is. Where was I on this, producer, Mark,
Speaker 1: I just lost my train of thought. I ended up
Speaker 1: in Renaissance era Italy and then I don't even remember it.
Speaker 1: I never really know how you get these places. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I know it's we we go on some wild, wild
Speaker 1: rides off the beaten path of the buck Sexton show,
Speaker 1: that's for sure. Oh, Jeremiah, collective action and uh and
Speaker 1: the what's its rules for radical Salinsky? So yeah, Jeremiah,
Speaker 1: there you go. Um, and thank you for love and
Speaker 1: the monologue. I appreciate that a lot. And as for
Speaker 1: COVID science, yes, we do need to take back what
Speaker 1: actual science is. And look, we need conservative scientists who
Speaker 1: will get out there and make the case not for conservatism,
Speaker 1: but that will break with the consensus of Remember, leftists
Speaker 1: want their politics in everything. It's not that there aren't
Speaker 1: scientists who are conservative in their outlook for politics and
Speaker 1: for life. It's that they just do science, whereas leftist
Speaker 1: scientists are doing left wing science, right. They they infuse
Speaker 1: their beliefs into all that they do. That's just their approach,
Speaker 1: you know. I mean it's a little bit like, you know,
Speaker 1: we have different religious beliefs. For example, there are some
Speaker 1: religions where your spiritual life is kept largely separate from
Speaker 1: your religious from your your secular life from the you know,
Speaker 1: the political authorities. There are other I mean Islam comes
Speaker 1: to mind. There are other belief systems where no, the
Speaker 1: religious system and the government system must be as one,
Speaker 1: they must be the same. So that's just a way
Speaker 1: of what I mean, they're infusing it in We we
Speaker 1: take a more you know, separation of church and state approach.
Speaker 1: Now that brings up a lot of stuff, but just
Speaker 1: in general, we take a more you know, you have
Speaker 1: government doing one thing and you have religious life in
Speaker 1: another sphere. Not that there isn't crossover, but the left's
Speaker 1: approach to this is kind of like Islamism or political Islam,
Speaker 1: where you have emms making decisions about where the roads
Speaker 1: are being built in what the tax rates supposed to be. Right,
Speaker 1: That's how the left views everything. That's why they infuse
Speaker 1: their ideology into sports. That's why they infuse their ideology
Speaker 1: into all entertainment. It's just like they It's central to
Speaker 1: who they are, all right, Julie rights, Footloose is a
Speaker 1: classic timeless tale of fighting against the man for the
Speaker 1: love of dancing. Just watch it. Not the remake though, anyway.
Speaker 1: The GOP needs to make ads listing and showing everything
Speaker 1: that Biden has done and ask is this what you wanted?
Speaker 1: Then throw up a pick of Harris and ask is
Speaker 1: this who you want next? The right needs to get
Speaker 1: down and dirty. If Trump taught us anything it is
Speaker 1: not it is to not be scared. Love. Your show
Speaker 1: makes my day to hear your analysis and opinions on
Speaker 1: the state of the country. Thank you well, Julie, that's
Speaker 1: very kind. Thank you so much. If I can be
Speaker 1: a source of information and enjoyment for you every day,
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm doing my job, so I feel really
Speaker 1: good about that. I appreciate that. And as for Footloose
Speaker 1: producer Mark on the movie on the producer Mark's penalty
Speaker 1: box movie scale, what out of ten? What do we
Speaker 1: give footloose. I mean, it's been a very long time
Speaker 1: since I've seen it, but an eight. Okay, Yeah, it's
Speaker 1: still like Ali, a clearly solid good movie. Yeah, it's
Speaker 1: not like a movie that I love so much I'm
Speaker 1: gonna see it a million times. But it's it's certainly
Speaker 1: in terms of just a film, it's a good movie. Right,
Speaker 1: So it's not like uncut Gems, which could charitably be
Speaker 1: given a negative four. Stop. Okay, I'm just making sure
Speaker 1: that's a good movie, negative four if I felt like
Speaker 1: being nice, all right, David, Hey, Buck, I literally just
Speaker 1: set up a customer's phone to get the podcast today.
Speaker 1: He's older, but a great guy that subscribes everything you
Speaker 1: talked about on the show. Hopefully you'll spread the word
Speaker 1: to take care man. Well, David, that's great. I would
Speaker 1: love I love it. Folks out there, if you're listening,
Speaker 1: you know, on your station, always remember you can listen
Speaker 1: on the iHeart app, which is free to your phone
Speaker 1: anytime anywhere. If you if you have the podcast the
Speaker 1: Apple podcast app, you can always listen to the Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show and it's it's just on your phone. It's
Speaker 1: so easy play it. You'll hear me. The sound quality
Speaker 1: is good, so you can listen to the show every day,
Speaker 1: whether you're in your car, have your radio handy or not.
Speaker 1: And it's once you get in that habit. I gotta
Speaker 1: tell you, it's really nice, very convenient. And please subscribe
Speaker 1: to my podcast so you can keep pressing play to listen.
Speaker 1: But if you subscribe, it downloads every day. It's there
Speaker 1: for you. It's ready to go. Subscribe to the Bucksxton
Speaker 1: podcast on Apple Podcasts, on iHeart app, pod Bean, Spotify,
Speaker 1: any of these places you can listen, all right, David,
Speaker 1: Oh no, that was David Francis. Hey Bucket producer Mark
Speaker 1: love the show. Well, Francis, you are a person of
Speaker 1: great taste. Could the eighty billion dollars requested for the
Speaker 1: irs be able to do more? To be able to
Speaker 1: do more? Audits have anything to do with employers trying
Speaker 1: to find employees to come back to work. Perhaps the
Speaker 1: writing on the walls that employers entertained paying their employees
Speaker 1: under the table so those employees can still claim unemployment. Yes,
Speaker 1: it's an illegal mess, but desperate times. And I have
Speaker 1: a challenge for you, complete one show without discussing masks
Speaker 1: at all. I'm in your court. I feel your pain,
Speaker 1: but I'm curious if you can do it. Thanks, guys.
Speaker 1: So Francis, first off, on the mask thing, I mean, look,
Speaker 1: I get it. I wish we could stop talking about
Speaker 1: it entirely. I think it's important because I think that
Speaker 1: it's the symbol from which all the other mentality and
Speaker 1: lockdowns flows. We are not done with this until we're
Speaker 1: done with masks. And I mean lockdowns, I mean the tyranny,
Speaker 1: I mean the government control all of it. So while
Speaker 1: I can appreciate that as a topic, it's something that
Speaker 1: we spend a lot of time on here. I cannot
Speaker 1: complete your challenge. I will not complete your challenge until
Speaker 1: it's done, until we're out of this. It's not a
Speaker 1: minor thing. It's not a forgettable thing. It's not you know,
Speaker 1: we have to keep hammering this, hammering this truth until
Speaker 1: enough people understand it as the truth and we finally
Speaker 1: get past this. So I I understand where you're coming from, man,
Speaker 1: and I can appreciate it. But yeah, that's where I
Speaker 1: am on that. And as for the irs thing and
Speaker 1: under the table paying dues, I don't I don't see that.
Speaker 1: I don't really see that as being I think the
Speaker 1: Democrats just want to tax us more, want to take
Speaker 1: more money, and you know, I want to make our
Speaker 1: lives more difficult. So that's that's what I see happening here.
Speaker 1: That's my They just want a bigger, stronger, scarier IRS.
Speaker 1: And I think they're gonna just like they did it
Speaker 1: under Obama. Remember they went after the Tea Party, and
Speaker 1: they went after anybody with Patriot in their name of
Speaker 1: their group. And remember that, Lois Learner, I haven't forgotten.
Speaker 1: The IRS is going to, shockingly, I'm sure the IRS
Speaker 1: is going to actually come after people who are as
Speaker 1: as a function of their politics. I think that's going
Speaker 1: to happen, all right, continuing with roll call, and remember
Speaker 1: Facebook dot com, slash Buck Sexton or Team buck at
Speaker 1: iHeartMedia Comic. If you want to email us Facebook, go
Speaker 1: to Facebook dot com slash book Sex and send a message.
Speaker 1: Producer Mark will sift through them. He will not only
Speaker 1: pick the ones that say Producer Mark is a handsome
Speaker 1: genius who is the man, the man that makes it
Speaker 1: all happen. You know, he will not only pick those ones.
Speaker 1: So don't think you're gonna just skip to the front
Speaker 1: of the line with those but he does read them first.
Speaker 1: All right, we have where do we go here? Michelle
Speaker 1: Mark I heard you briefly on last night's May third
Speaker 1: show in on Denver's Freedom Freedom FM. I could not
Speaker 1: agree with you more on what happened with Trump after
Speaker 1: the election. He cooked his own goose. He didn't show
Speaker 1: strong leadership period. Glad to know I'm not alone, am
Speaker 1: I thinking loved what he did for the country during
Speaker 1: his time, but not afterwards, and with the stroke of
Speaker 1: a pen it was all erased. Parties. Biden can do
Speaker 1: that like Trump did to Obama's stuff. I'd love to
Speaker 1: see Nicky Haley, Pompeo descend, and Leo Terrell in no
Speaker 1: particular order, but to handle the four critical positions president,
Speaker 1: vice president, Secretary of State, Secretary of Commerce, and doing
Speaker 1: the negotiations. If Trump can help in the background, great,
Speaker 1: But the four I have mentioned would make a strong team. Haley, Pompeo, DeSantis,
Speaker 1: Terrell a very interesting, very interesting. I'm I will tell
Speaker 1: you I have not I have not been impressed yet
Speaker 1: with Nicky Haley. I'm just gonna say that I don't
Speaker 1: get it, I don't see it, I don't you know nothing.
Speaker 1: There's just been what what's supposed to impress me about
Speaker 1: Nicky Haley? So that's it. And then Leo Terrell, I
Speaker 1: didn't even know he was running. Is he pretty smart?
Speaker 1: Is he running for something? I'm not sure I can check.
Speaker 1: I'd have to check out. I didn't know Leo. I
Speaker 1: mean Leo Terrell. He goes on. Yeah, he's an attorney
Speaker 1: who goes on Hannity Show a lot. I didn't know
Speaker 1: he was planning on running for anything. Well, maybe you
Speaker 1: just like him on him to show. That's cool. I'm
Speaker 1: just saying, that's an interesting name to throw in the
Speaker 1: mix there. You all know. My problem with the Santis
Speaker 1: is I have to keep that skepticism I have about
Speaker 1: all politicians. And he's just he keeps doing things I like,
Speaker 1: and he keeps showing results, and he keeps holding the line.
Speaker 1: And you know, I'm just waiting. I'm waiting for him
Speaker 1: to disappoint me, That's what. And I gotta keep on
Speaker 1: the back of my mind because you alway, you've always
Speaker 1: got to have that part of your brain that's saying
Speaker 1: I might get really disappointed by this politician. That's just
Speaker 1: a better safer place for you to be. Uh, you know,
Speaker 1: mentally so. And then oh and Pompeo. Yeah, I like Pompeo.
Speaker 1: Whenever I've interviewed him. He's been a good guy. He's
Speaker 1: very smart. He's takes no guff. So that's a word.
Speaker 1: You don't hear enough guff. You know, Biden's ruined malarkey.
Speaker 1: So I gotta I gotta find other old timey words
Speaker 1: like guff and cockamami and pruser Mark, do you have
Speaker 1: a favorite old timey, old old timer kind of word?
Speaker 1: Nothing I can say on the radio. Ah yeah, fair enough. Well, everybody,
Speaker 1: I hope you enjoyed this fabulous edition of the Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show. Like I said, pass the buck. If all
Speaker 1: you got one new person, all of you listening to
Speaker 1: me asking this right now, one new person, just try
Speaker 1: the Buck Sexton Show this week. I'd be huge. It'd
Speaker 1: be huge, huge, probably the hugest of all time. So
Speaker 1: you can share it with a text or an email,
Speaker 1: share the podcast and it's so easy to do. Until tomorrow, friends,
Speaker 1: she'll tie