WEBVTT - Lower round wide receivers and breaking down the Beat Frank Stampfl draft...

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune in app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guests dude Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network Fantasy Best

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever. M Do Do Do Do Do Do Do

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Do don't do do do do do do?

0:00:56.160 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Didn't do Yo. This is the Fantasy Best Friends Forever

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>here on the Fantasy Sports Radio Network alongside Frankie Standfell.

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 1>I am Greg Susman. Gentlemen, General, Sir gel Man. What's

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>going on? Man? How much great you? How you doing today?

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm new for woll Man. It's Friday. First off, Yes,

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>t G I f as usual. Thank god it's Friday.

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:24.319
<v Speaker 1>Heading into this weekend. It's gonna be a fun weekend.

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I got four drafts in two days, so it's gonna

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>be a great time. But before we get into the

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:32.759
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers, Greg late round wide receivers. What a game

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>last night? Man, what a game? What a slobber knocker

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and offensive Juggernaut surprise you what's up? And I watched

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this game competitions on watch it. There

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:46.319
<v Speaker 1>are no making competitions on. So Judy had like a

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of food stuff on the DVR, like Beat Brunch

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>with Bobby as well as the Kitchen, and I was like,

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I can't watch this tonight. So there's not there was

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>nothing on TV last night at all. So I wanted

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>to watch from Netflix stuff, but you didn't watch the

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>shows that I was watching. So I was floating back

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>before and fourth between football and old game shows, you

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:10.639
<v Speaker 1>know what I I mean? Game shows. So I was watching Supermarket,

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Sweep Card, Sharks, Press your Luck, and watch all of

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>those exactly. It was awesome. And then we're also watching

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:23.519
<v Speaker 1>the football game, and man, Nick fols terrible, Like I

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:25.959
<v Speaker 1>can't have believe this dude on a Super Bowl. He's awful.

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Not just win a super Bowl, he won the Super

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Bowl Relly Special, Greggy Philly special last night. And I

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:34.799
<v Speaker 1>get it. They were playing with the twos and whatnot,

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>but like a lot of the decisions Nick Foles made

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>was horrific, absolutely horrific. It was gross. But I can't

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>they made the Browns look like the steel curtain they did,

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I can't know. I came out with a lot of

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>hot takes and takeaways from this game now, like I

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:47.799
<v Speaker 1>feel very I feel like I know a lot about

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:55.079
<v Speaker 1>the eat. Number one, Nick Foles sucks. Its great takeaway, right. Uh?

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Number two when small and pretty good, it look pretty

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>good when small is player on number three? That jone

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>is not going to pick his team. I don't think so. Yeah. Uh,

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>number four, that returner slash wide receiver who wore number

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>two last night for the Eagles. Don't make the team

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>give me their kick returner. He's pretty good. I love

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>that you have like on the bubble stuff happening right. Yeah,

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>that's to the Eagles. Frick Susman's on the bubble takes

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 1>for the Philadelphia Eagles. Anything for the Browns. Yeah, for

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the Browns. Defense are gonna be good. Defense is violent,

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>They are always looking at the turnovers. Browns are sleeper

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>defenses here. I actually don't think that's a bad take

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>at all. I mean, given Myles Garrett, what the main

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>thing you need on a defense? Obviously, is an elite

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>pass rusher, and I think we're gonna see Myles Garrett

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 1>come into his own this year. Obviously we know the

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>pedigree how early he was taken in the draft. You

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:48.839
<v Speaker 1>couple that with the fact that they tried to add

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>to the secondary they drafted Denzel Award as early as

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>they did, and they have solid linebackers who they have

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Jamie Collins, they have pieces along that defensive line to

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>work with Myles Garrett. So I think everything that you're

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>saying it's true. I think there can be a sleeper defense.

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Sleeper defense there you get to play the Bengals and

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Andy Dalton twice. I like David and joking, I think

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>he should be good this year. I would be a

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>tight end one top twelve end orderline tight and one

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>from me right now. Um and Jarvis Langer did be

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>covered with targets, which which we already know. So that's

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of my takeaways from the Browns. I don't really

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>have any Baker takeaways or Tyrod Taylor. Besides, he's tough.

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>He's who's tough Baker and Baker. That injury did not

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>look good. Initially, the wrist looked like he left the

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 1>game his almost like dangling. Everyone speculating that he has

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:35.360
<v Speaker 1>a broken arm, but he did return to this game.

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think either quarterback looked great by any means.

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:41.559
<v Speaker 1>I think that status quo the Eagles defense is very good.

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Carlos Hide looked very good once again. He had the

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>thirty three yard run. Uh so good Greg that I

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>saw him go in the fifth round of the Beat

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:52.119
<v Speaker 1>Frank Stanfeld Draft last night. Fifth round for Carl's Hide.

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 1>How was the Beat Franks Delo Draft? It was interesting,

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>it was fun. We had a surprise participant, Nando Dafino

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>joined party, so that was a good time. It turned

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 1>into beat Frank standfell and beat Nando Dafino. Um, and

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I did something I don't normally do. I drafted Rock

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Groundkowski in the third round. So we can get into

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:12.919
<v Speaker 1>that now, we can get into that later. What are

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you thinking? Well, you you mentioned right now, you mentioned

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the drafted to do it. Go go for it. Talk

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>to talk to me about it. I know he texted

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 1>it to me last night. I was like, you know what,

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I like it pretty good? Oh you know, yes? So

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:27.359
<v Speaker 1>it was. It was a best ball format, twenty four rounds,

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>full point PPR and I had the second overall pick,

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>so I started with I started with Levian Bell and

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 1>then I came back. I wasn't expecting this by any means,

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 1>but A. J. Green is just there sitting around at

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:43.720
<v Speaker 1>pick twenty three. Great, so I ended up taking him.

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>You know how I feel about him. I feel like

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>he's one of the last elite wide receivers in that

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>second round range. But Stefon Diggs went ahead of him,

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and Mike Evans went ahead of him as well. Um,

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>And then in the third round right there, I didn't

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 1>love so at the two three turn at pick twelve,

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Truck actually took uh And Howard and DeVante Freeman, so

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I might have taken one of those running backs with

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:07.599
<v Speaker 1>my third pick. And once they went UM, I was

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>considering taking Doug Baldwin as well. It's something I've been

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>saying that I would do if he's there on the

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>two three turn, and I took Rob Gronkowski because I

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>thought he was the best player available, So I was

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:20.840
<v Speaker 1>considering Doug Baldwin. I picked comes all the way back

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>to me. I picked four crazy four or five parent

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I end up getting Doug Baldwin. Yeah, So that was

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>that was a good time. I ended up with Doug

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Baldwin there, and then this is I mean, it would

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>have been the perfect draft if this happened Greg, But

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>so I'm picked two, it's the four or five swing

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 1>I take. I take Doug Baldwin. There, truck goes ahead

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:49.839
<v Speaker 1>takes Corey Davis and his other pick Chris Hogan. And

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I asked him afterwards, I said, if I took Chris

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 1>Hogan before Baldwin, would you have taken Baldwin? And he

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>said yes, I had to choose, and I had Baldwin

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>hire my ranking, so it's not even close. I'm happy

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I got Baldwin, but if I would have ended up

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>with a j. Green Baldwin and Chris Hogan is my

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers, who's who's receiver? Much better than that? I

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 1>took Josh Gordon with the very next pick, Dude. I

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>mean the fact that Josh Corny give me that wide

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>receiver one right and potentially so, and you have Gron

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the best time. Gordon has extreme right, and you have

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Levian Bell who did your RB to wind up being?

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>So I ended up getting uh. I got Jamal Williams

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>on the sixth seventh turn. It took Jamal Williams isak Row.

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>That's great, dude, it seems great. Yeah, And you know

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>some people, you know, I put the team out on

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and I showed it to like some of my friends,

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and we were chatting about it, and they were saying, like, oh,

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 1>you'r r B two is not good. I'm like, well,

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I have Levan Bell in a PPR. I think you

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>know he's gonna do enough where I don't need my

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>r B two to be amazing. Ideally, yeah, you'd want

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>it to be amazing. But in that third that early

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>third round range, it was Jerick McKinnon, Derrick Henry, Alex Collins.

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I like Collins, don't get me wrong, but early third

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>round um in a full point PPR, I don't know

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that I want to pull him up the draft board there.

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 1>And then so I didn't like any of the running

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:07.119
<v Speaker 1>backs there. And then at the four or five swing,

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the best available running back greg was Lamar Miller. Lama

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Milla sucks, and you know I'm not doing that. And

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to pull Marshall Lynch up the board

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>to the early fifth the early fifth round in a

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>full point PPR. So I'm like, you know what I'll

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 1>just wait, I'll just take to my opinion the best

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>player available. So I kind of did something I went

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>against like position scarcity and I just kind of went

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>for value based drafting. And this this brings up a

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 1>question that I have for you. Um, it's a strategy discussion,

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Christma bona strategy reach sound the alarm? We sound the alarm?

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 1>What is it? We have a strategy discussion? All right, right,

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>so we can't talk about it. We'd just like to

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>hear the rest of my draft. Not really anymore. I

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>feel like the guy did a good board, okay, So

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's how it turned out. I got Jamal

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Williams Isaia Coil as my R B two's um, I

0:08:57.280 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>ended up with like James Conner as a handcuff. I

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>got rex burkehead as well. We were talking yesterday, Oh,

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>how far does rex Burke had fallowed down the draft?

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you exactly where he felt to He

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>fell to the eight nine turn in a full point

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 1>PPR and the best ball was like, I'll take a

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:12.839
<v Speaker 1>shot on that. This was a guy that was going

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>in the fifth round just a couple of weeks ago.

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I know he's dealing with the knee injury. But I figured,

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>if I'm getting three rounds of a discount because of

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:21.679
<v Speaker 1>this knee injury right now, I'll take a shot if

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>he can help me a few weeks throughout the season

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>in the best ball format. I think that makes a

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 1>ton of sense. I got Pierre Garson at some wide

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>receiver depth. I ended up with both Cowboys wide receivers.

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I was like, look, one of these guys has to hit.

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>And I don't really plan on taking Alan Hern's going

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>into like every draft that I do, but I'm getting

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>him as my wide receiver five a lot of the times,

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think he has a chance to be this

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:44.679
<v Speaker 1>team's wide receiver one overall. Don't get me wrong, I've

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 1>taken shots on Gallop too, but I'm gonna continue to

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>do that. If you're getting these players at your wide

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>receiver five and they have the opportunity to be a

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>team's wide receiver one. We don't know who it's gonna

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>be between Gallup and Alan Hearns, but based on opportunity,

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I will take those guys as my wide receiver five.

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to have that discussion? Sound the alarm, Christmas,

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>sounding the alarm. We have a strategy discussion coming, So

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to ask you, Greg. I got into a

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 1>discussion with one of my friends about this, and he

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>was saying, you know, in the early third round, you know,

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I would have taken Alex Collins, I would have taken

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Royce Freeman. I'm pulling up the I'm pulling those running

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:30.720
<v Speaker 1>backs up the draft board. And I said, at some point,

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>how far do you pull guys up the draft board

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:36.440
<v Speaker 1>just based on position scarcity? And I wanted to just

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>ask you about this, like what would you have done?

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Would you have taken a grong, would you have taken

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver, or would you pull a running back

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:45.839
<v Speaker 1>up the draft board? Because you know very well when

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>you're on the turn, you can't really think about value

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>too much because there's a lot of picks before it

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:53.960
<v Speaker 1>comes back to you. So if you don't take your

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>running back there, you're gonna keep waiting and waiting. Ultimately,

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I like how my team turned out, but I think

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a good strategy discussion. Should you pull running backs

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>up the board if you're on the turn just based

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 1>on position scarcity or take the best value available? Right? So,

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 1>so I think format obviously depends is very dependent on

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>this answer. Right, this is football and pr and the

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>best ball. So I think it's a little bit differently.

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>You could take some shots at that RB two spot, um,

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>which is what you did in Jamal Williams and Isaia

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Karrell worked out really well for you. I think you

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>really do have to take the best player available more

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>more often than not, and then try and figure it out. Um.

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm on the other side of talked about this a lot.

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm on the other side of the drafting in my

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 1>my home league, and I'm going to take the best

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>running back, the best wide receiver available, and then in

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:38.319
<v Speaker 1>three four I don't think I need to take either one.

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I think I can take the best player. And for me,

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>like if Gronk happens to be there at the end

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:43.719
<v Speaker 1>of the third round, which he won't be, I'm going

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 1>to take him right like it's too good a value,

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>not too And I think the same holds true. And

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll say this, I'll never think about this in a

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 1>million years, but if I'm drafting at the end of

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the third round, early fourth and I got like Aaron

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers is still there, how am I not gonna take

0:11:56.920 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the best quarterback in the fourth round. I have to.

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's easy. It goes against everything we believe in,

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>but the value at that point is too good. So

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:06.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm all about value. I'm all about I don't care

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>about the position for the most part. Um I would

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I agree with everything you did. Aaron Rodgers is actually

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 1>there in the early fifth round. I would have taken him,

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and I strongly considered it. But I thought of it

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>like this. How often do you draft a team where

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you take a tight end and a quarterback in the

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>first five rounds and that team really performs up to

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>where you needed to be? Right? Like? I Like, that's

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>what I was thinking. Can I take a tight end

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:34.199
<v Speaker 1>and a quarterback in the first five rounds and be successful?

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 1>So you were at what before? I took Josh Gordon

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>as my wide receiver three that was the fourth round,

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>took Baldwin Forth. Okay, So thinking at that point I

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>had Bell, Gronk, A j Green, Baldwin, Do you take

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers? And I wrestled with it. I really really

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>thought about it. Was it for you between Gordon and Rodgers? Yeah?

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's tough because I think Gordon's certainly in

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that tier where it still has a potential to be

0:12:56.800 --> 0:13:00.199
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver one, which is really cool. I can't

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>say I wouldn't have taken Rodgers, but because you're in

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the fifth round, it is like, oh my god, you

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>can have the arguably best running back, best tighten, best

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 1>quarterback in fantasy. That's crazy. It's four point passing touchdown

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>for what it's worth. I think this is where scoring

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 1>format really comes back into account. In the full point PPR,

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>you you do have to have three wide receivers each

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:21.559
<v Speaker 1>week in the best ball formats, so you're three highest

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 1>scoring wide receivers, and I thought, if you need three,

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 1>that's why it took Josh Gordon. Who's your quarterback? I

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>ended up with Kirk Cousins, Dak Prescott, and Josh Allen.

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>That's fine, it's fine you Josh Allen with an L

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 1>O L next to it. That's correct. It's not very nice.

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I took him in. I don't know, it's not very nice.

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Very nice Bills fans and Josh Allen fans. It was.

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:46.959
<v Speaker 1>It was. It was between Josh Allen like Sam Donald

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty much the rookies. He took Alan Overdonald. I think,

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.559
<v Speaker 1>how dare you call us a Jets fan, and he's

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:56.239
<v Speaker 1>like Alan over Donald. You know, you know my Scottishish

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>ball team. I own Sam Donald. I like Sam darn

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 1>but I think for fantasy Josh Allen might offer more

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:03.559
<v Speaker 1>because I think he's gonna run the ball more. I

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 1>own Donald, and I own Baker Mayfield. Actually that lea.

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I have Baker Mayfield and Tyrod Taylor in that league.

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 1>That's my QB two. So if anything happens to Tyro,

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I have like a lot of I have a lot

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:15.839
<v Speaker 1>of moves I have to make before waivers are on,

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 1>like I own people that aren't on teams. Just kind

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of issue. What do you think about this team? Overall grade?

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 1>My starters are Andrew Luck and Patty Mahomes. I got

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Ricky Steels Jones to back up Rob Gronkowski as well.

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 1>There's yeah, of course, So I ended up with that

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 1>there's actually kickers in this league, so I took Mason

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Crosby and Stephen Houskin, not that matters. I ended up

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 1>with the Eagles defense and they have a bye week

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 1>in week nine, So I was looking at which teams

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 1>have a good matchup in week nine, and I found

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>out the Jets because the Miami Dolphins in Week nine.

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>So I took the Jets, and I figured that the

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Eagles are are going to be my top scoring defense

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>more often than not. Seeking of defenses, I want to

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>get into the nund to the Fino theory before we

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 1>move on the wide receiver after the break um. And

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the theory always was when you add up saxon turnovers

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 1>in the preseason, you find out who's being the most aggressive? Right,

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 1>which defensive are being most aggressive? So the Ravens played

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 1>who in the Hall of Indian You remember, m m

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember, mm hmmm. It's funny eight teen Hall

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 1>of Fame game. It was the Ravens and it was

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the Bears. Dammit all right because it was the Ravens

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>in the Bears, So those two teams have the most sacks, right,

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 1>makes sense? After that? You know who it was number one?

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>This isn't fair either Browns, Browns. They played the extra

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 1>game in the extra game, so really I want to

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>do this man handling the Eagles like Miles Garrett looked

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>like a freaking man possessed interceptions. Other than the Bears

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and the Ravens, you know who's the highest uh not?

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>The Clulan Browns, Cardinals, Cardinals. Yeah, I think people are

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 1>sleeping on their defense a little bit too much too

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>for they went the wrong way last year. But I

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>still think that they're a pretty good unit and to

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 1>have a defensive mind to head coach forced fumbles. Other

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>than the raven and Browns, two teams are in that mix.

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>You know who they are, the Falcons No, I don't know, Cardinals,

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals and Steelers Arizona Cardinals. Steelers Arizona Cardinals also have

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the eight sacks. The Arizona Cardinals folks or defense to

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>watch this weekend. I want to see what they do.

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Arizona Cardinals Cleveland Browns defense is a good surprise. You

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>about that. You know what's gonna happen. You know who

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals play this weekend, Greggy No. The decimated offensive

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>line of the Dallas Cowboys. So they're probably just going

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 1>to rack up more sacks, some more forced fumbles here

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>this weekend. I think people are sleeping on them a

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit too much. I think their defense fell apart

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit last year, and I think we've gone

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit too far the other side now or

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the Arizona Cardinals, I still think that they have some

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 1>talented players on that defense. Um, they have a shutdown corner,

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>they have a solid pass rush as well, and now

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>they have the defensive minded head coach. I think that

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals defense will bounce back. I'm I'm kind of

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 1>with you on this Nondo theory. Here of the Cardinals

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:07.160
<v Speaker 1>performing in the preseason. There you go. In case you're wondering.

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 1>The Arizona Cardinals in Week one face the Washington football team.

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Not a terrible start, not terrible. They don't have a

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:18.360
<v Speaker 1>running back. Cleveland Browns. They face Pittsburgh Chicago, they face

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Green Bad. Hey, why receivers come down next? Fantasy best

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Friends forever, from the NFL to the NBA. Daily Rohodo

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 1>dot Com is the place to win millions in daily fantasy.

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:32.919
<v Speaker 1>You can get the best DFS NFL coverage all season

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 1>long for a price of one, or dominate the entire

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:40.440
<v Speaker 1>daily Fantasy sports realm. Put the Elite package at month

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:42.639
<v Speaker 1>if you use the promo code f n t s Y.

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 1>If you get ten percent off your Daily Rodo package,

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>go to Daily Rodo dot com, pick your NFL Elite Package,

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>enter promo code f n t s Y and you'll

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>be on your way to becoming the next Daily Rhodo

0:17:53.720 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>millionaire Bridge Well well, well, well, Fantasy best friends forever.

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports Radio Network live with you as tradition continues

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 1>here on the Fantasy Sports Radio Network and remembers. Get

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>your season ticket right no out of fantasy glory with

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 1>the Roto Experts Exclusive Edge Fantasy Football Package. It is

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:36.679
<v Speaker 1>not just the draft kit, it's a full season package.

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 1>It takes you from draft data Championship Week. If these

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 1>are in depth analysis from some of your favorite fantasy

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>sports or radio experts, go to roto Experts dot com

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:49.399
<v Speaker 1>and use the promo code Frank no Tank. Frank the

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Tank off the Roto Experts Exclusive Edge Package set aside

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>a spot on the mantel for the eighteen Championship Trophy

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Roto Experts. Because the package the promo code is Frank

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the Tank. Go to Daily Rotor dot com slash sweat

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 1>because you have a chance to win twenty Well, you

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:11.120
<v Speaker 1>have a chance that will went up to million dollars

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to be honest with you, because Daily Roder dot com

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>is putting more than twenty five grand on the line

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 1>for his subscribers this NFL season by entering paid contest

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:21.120
<v Speaker 1>on fan duel and bringing you along with the free roll.

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 1>You're the chance to win huge this year. Alongside our

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:27.639
<v Speaker 1>CEO Jeremy Stein, one of the only men to have

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>one two separate million dollar prizes. Each week, will select

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 1>like subscribers to sweat with us and split of the profits.

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:38.399
<v Speaker 1>No profits that week, All good, Your neigue is tossed

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:40.880
<v Speaker 1>back in the hat. Next week, heads Daily Rotor dot

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 1>Com slash sweat and learn how to get in on

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the action and your share of twenty five thousand dollars.

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 1>That's Daily Rotor dot Com. The promo code is slash Sweat,

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 1>So Daily Rotor dot Com slash sweat. Alright, Frank, we

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>talked no wide receivers all week long. People are going

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>into their drafts. This weekend is a mo Tis weekend

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:04.119
<v Speaker 1>for drafts. Who do the people need to know about that?

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>We haven't spoken much about. Yes, we got into the

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver three discussion yesterday. We spoke about Alston Jeffrey

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:14.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit as well with Virginia zakas of inside injuries.

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I think we move on right after that. I think

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>outside the top forty is what we should touch on.

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Maybe some deep sleepers for those in Best Ball formats

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:25.199
<v Speaker 1>or even redraft. A lot of drafts are just happening

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>this weekend, so I think outside that's top forty. You know,

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>guys like Calvin Benjamin, Mike Williams, who I think we

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>all have some uh we have some suspicion that they

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:36.719
<v Speaker 1>could you know that they have upside this year. And

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys wide receivers as well as the Panthers wide receivers.

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 1>So I think Cowboys, Panthers, Calvin Benjamin, let's start there

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:47.159
<v Speaker 1>and talk about those guys. Great, all right, let's start there,

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>and let's start with with Kelvin Benjamin, the last guy

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:53.920
<v Speaker 1>that you mentioned here, Frank, because Benjamin is a sleeper

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 1>according to you. I'm in on the Calvin Benjamin train.

0:20:56.800 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I kind of always will pick somebody else instead of him,

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 1>But I don't tell people like a wi Max in

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>on Calvin Benjamin, what makes you like him so much? Well, first,

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:05.879
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you, why are you out on him?

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Besides the obvious reasons, just the obvious reasons. All right,

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 1>So who are you taking in his range when he's there?

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Rather Mike Williams, Probably I'd rather I don't. I wouldn't

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:17.680
<v Speaker 1>kill you for that, I'd rather Mike Williams other than that. Um,

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:20.439
<v Speaker 1>so he's my forty second ranked wide receiver. Where do

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>you have him? I'm all right, so we're pretty close.

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Um he's the start of my next tier. Who do

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:31.199
<v Speaker 1>you have right behind him? Like Williams? Right after that? Though, like,

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 1>is there anyone like once you get into this range,

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>like this is where he's falling too, and in my opinion,

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:37.959
<v Speaker 1>it's too far, like he shouldn't fall into like the

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>ninth tenth round of dress. To be honestly, this is

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:41.959
<v Speaker 1>this year that I do have him in, and maybe

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 1>I should have him at the end of my last year.

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>But the guys I have in this tier as well

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>as him, and again he's at the top of it.

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to make that clear. It's Mike Williams, Savante Parker,

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:56.439
<v Speaker 1>the Alan Hearns, um, Michael Gallant Combo. I have Rochard

0:21:56.480 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Matthews here at Mark He's Lee here who I like more, Um,

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Stills here also, which I would consider taking over

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:06.199
<v Speaker 1>Helven measurement. You like Marcas Lee more than Calvin Measurement.

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 1>They're in the same tire to me, they're as probably

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>rank them higher that if you like them more. I

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>don't like him that much. I mean, they're the same thing.

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>So the reason why I like Calevin menagement is is

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>just volume. If you look at targets right from last

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>year wide receiver targets of all the wide receivers who

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 1>had at least a hundred and thirty targets, as Bryant

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:29.160
<v Speaker 1>was the lowest to finish as wide receiver twenty five.

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 1>So this is just a volume play. Some other players

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 1>in that range who had this amount of targets. Golden

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Tate had a hundred and twenty targets, Mike Evans had

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and thirty six targets. So if you're gonna

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:42.400
<v Speaker 1>get I'll say the numbers of a hundred and undred

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and thirty targets just based on that volume alone. With

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 1>as inefficient as Josh Allen is going to be, like Calvin,

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:52.919
<v Speaker 1>management had an inefficient quarterback playing with him before, in

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Cam Newton. Cam Newton never has a high completion percentage.

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not saying that Josh Allen is the passion

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that Cam Newton is when Calvin Benjamin was playing with him,

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 1>But that's the reason why we're getting Benjamin at that discount,

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>so he's going outside the top forty wide receivers. I

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 1>think he has top thirty upside. He's not gonna catch

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>a ton of passes, but he can still finish with

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:16.719
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred, nine hundred yards and seven plus touchdowns just

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 1>based on the fact that he's gonna get a hundred

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and twenty plus targets on a team where the defense

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:24.119
<v Speaker 1>probably takes a step back. They might be trailing in

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>some games. I think they're gonna have to air it out.

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of those targets are gonna go

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Calvin Benjamin's way. Normally when we get into like this

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 1>range of wide receivers, I'll gladly take him as by

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:35.199
<v Speaker 1>water septer four, water receiver five. I get that. I

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 1>get that because of the touchdown possibility is so great.

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Like obviously the builders are gonna score touchdowns at some point,

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and Josh Allen does have the huge arm, Kevin Benjamin

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>a very big target outside of Kelvin Benjamin and Lasawn McCoy,

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>who's gonna score touchdowns for the scene, Chuck Clay Clay, Yeah,

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't score a lot of touch he catches a

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of passes. He's he's better in PPR, but you know,

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe he'll catch three or five touchdowns. They got to

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 1>score somehow. I think Kelvin Benjamin will be that somehow.

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Would rather own Kelvin Benjamin or Cooper Cup. Cooper Cup,

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I have him in the tier head he's really he's

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 1>clearly in that thirty to forty wide receiver range solid

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:13.399
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver three for me, I wouldn't actually want him

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>as my wide receiver three. I would want him as

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a backup maybe by a wide receiver four or my

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 1>flex ideally, but we spoke about it. He is Jared

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:25.119
<v Speaker 1>Goff's uh, he's Jared Goffs guy. He's he's go to weapon.

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 1>We saw that last year. He was top five in

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:30.879
<v Speaker 1>the league in red zone targets a year ago, and

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's really going to change. Brandon Cooks

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:36.399
<v Speaker 1>is not necessarily a red zone weapon. He's a guy

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 1>who's going to get the ball down the field. Robert

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Woods is that possession guy. He's gonna be there for

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>PPR to to move the change for the Rams. I

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>think once they get in the red zone, you look

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 1>for Cooper Cup. I don't think he's gonna vow you

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>in any one category. He's not gonna have a hundred receptions.

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 1>He's not gonna have a thousand yards, but sixty to

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>seventy receptions, eight hundred yards and you know, six seven touchdowns.

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I think Jared got I think that Cooper Cup is

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be in that range. Yeah. I have Cooper Cup.

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:05.119
<v Speaker 1>Actually one spot ahead of Kelvin Benjamin is he's at

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:07.399
<v Speaker 1>forty one. Benjaments at forty two, but again he is

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the last tier. That's true. So

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I have I have Cup in the tier head and

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I prefer to have Cup as well. Um also in

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the tier with Cup towards the end of it. It's

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Jordy Nelson. And I think Jordy Nelson is very similar

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:22.120
<v Speaker 1>to Kevin Benjamin and now he's a red zone guy.

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:24.239
<v Speaker 1>He's a volume guy that you just hope picks up

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a ton of pluchdowns essentially. I know you're not really

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 1>in on Jordy Nelson at all this year, Frank, and

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's kind of a mistake. Jordy Nelson is

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>a guy who's kind of tough for me to rank.

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I haven't met wide receiver forty nine. I just don't

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>want him anytime that I see him in the draft.

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:40.359
<v Speaker 1>But he's just a name that I look at and

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:42.919
<v Speaker 1>I'll just pass over. I just I don't know what

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:44.879
<v Speaker 1>he brings to the table for fantasy this year. Right,

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 1>if we continuously talk up about Amari Cooper and how

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be the focal point of the offense

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and how he's gonna get a hundred and thirty plus

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>targets this year, maybe a hundred and forty targets. How

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>many targets is Jordy Nelson actually going to get. Maybe

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:00.479
<v Speaker 1>he'll score some touchdowns this year, but we were just

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't know that he's going to score

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:04.159
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Touches's what he does. That's what he

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 1>did with Aaron Rodgers. Yeah, and now it's gonnas going

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:13.399
<v Speaker 1>to happen. I don't know that that's gonna happen. I

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 1>think what's over under in touchdowns for him? Six and

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>a half? I mean I just made that number up.

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what I actually I understand. What would

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you said that seven and a half? No, I think

0:26:24.840 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I think six probably being like that six seven range,

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 1>But like, how many receptions, how many yards are you

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:31.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna get? I think Amari Cooper is going to be

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:34.119
<v Speaker 1>a target hog for this team. I think, you know,

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:36.200
<v Speaker 1>John Gruden has talked a lot about running the ball

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:38.120
<v Speaker 1>as well, that they want to run the ball. They

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:40.879
<v Speaker 1>have Marshall Lynch, They've talked up Doug Martin. I'm not

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:43.120
<v Speaker 1>a big believer in Doug Martin. I just don't really

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 1>know where Jordy Nelson fits in here. Maybe Amari Cooper.

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:49.639
<v Speaker 1>The path to Jordy Nelson being great again is if

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Mary Marie Cooper sucks. Sure, that's how it's going to happen.

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's gonna happen. We're not here to

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 1>make make Jordy great again. Like I don't care about that.

0:26:57.080 --> 0:26:58.879
<v Speaker 1>I care just about him being valuable. It was like

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 1>number five whire he ver ranked the number forty nine.

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I haven't ranked it thirty nine. He's a wide receiver

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 1>four or five. You're not asking him to be great,

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 1>you're asking you to contribute. And maybe there's a little

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:11.159
<v Speaker 1>Greg Jennings effect. That's old Jake rule right where you

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:12.719
<v Speaker 1>just have an old veteran that's not gonna do all

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 1>that much on your bench. But the one thing that

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:17.439
<v Speaker 1>Jordy Nelson is great at is scoring. The one thing

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that Michael crabs she was great at was scoring. The

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 1>one thing that Mary Cooper is not great at is scoring.

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Jordy Nelson walks right into this Michael Crabstreet role, and

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it becomes early on a favorite target inside

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the red zone of Derek Carr, and I think people

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 1>are gonna want Jordy Nelson on the end of their

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:34.159
<v Speaker 1>mention this here. That's interesting to me that it sounds

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 1>like you have him ranked higher than the Cowboys wide

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 1>receivers I do. I just don't like that call because

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:42.399
<v Speaker 1>one of these guys can become the number one target

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 1>for Dak Prescott and Dak has never necessarily lean on

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>just one guy. Well, that was my point right two

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:50.119
<v Speaker 1>years ago, when Jack Prescott had this really good fantasy season,

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 1>who was the number one target? Cole Beasley? I guess

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Des Bryant was in and out of the line up.

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Terrence Williams did nothing, and Cole Beasley. Yeah, you could

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:58.439
<v Speaker 1>throw him to start him in a pinch, but at

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 1>that point I'd rather take the touchdown upsid a guy

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 1>like Jordy. So yeah, to answer your question, I do

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>have Judy add of both Dallas guys, what's the touchdown upside? Though?

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Ultimately with Jordan, like, if everything you think you said,

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 1>you said it over six nap, I'm taking that over.

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I think you get eight nine touchdowns. Yeah, you know,

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's crazy. I think he's probably closer

0:28:17.000 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 1>to that six seven range. I just think how many

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns is Derek are gonna throw this year? Realistically? I'll

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:26.639
<v Speaker 1>take the over on that too. No, what's the highest

0:28:26.640 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 1>he's ever done before? I don't know that. I mean,

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you're asking me he was injured his best season, get

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>injured the end of the year. You'll have it that

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 1>either twenty two and twenty seventeen, twenty and twenty sixteen,

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:40.960
<v Speaker 1>assuming he was a career high, right exactly. So I'll

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 1>tell you what you said, twenty five. I'll take the over.

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think Derek car is all that great either.

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Touchdowns He'll probably be in that range, I say, I'll

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 1>say thirty. So you're a little bit more And you

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 1>were the guy who was off John Gruden, right, you

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 1>have a little bit more faith in this offense than

0:28:57.040 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 1>you were leading. I think the Raiders may I think

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders may stink, but I think that certain guys

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>are gonna get there. If Derek car storing thirty touchdowns

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 1>round number, let's say that how many of those are

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Mark Cooper catching? Let's say eight? Agree with that, right,

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's say eight. So just using that, there's twenty two

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 1>other touchdowns to go around. Okay, how many is Jared

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>cook cut catching? Five? Okay, that's thirteen? Is that too high?

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 1>En up? Four? That's thirteen. You're leaving seventeen available. Seventeen

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns available. The other wide receivers are more. Tavis Bryant,

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 1>he's there, Seth Roberts is there, the architects. The architects,

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Seth Robert car does target in the red zone, because

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 1>that used to be very frustrating if you were to

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Mary Cooper owner, if you were a Michael Crabt your owner.

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 1>We know that in years past he randomly targets Seth

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Roberts in the red zone. Because I don't know how

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:53.479
<v Speaker 1>much Shorty Nelson what there's no upside here? Like, if

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you're taking a bench wide receiver, why wouldn't you take

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver that has upside? In my opinion, Jorty

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Nelson doesn't have upside. Maybe he could score touchdowns, but

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 1>he's not. Why can't he do with Michael crabst you

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 1>did last year? Why is that not realistic? What did

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Michael Crabt you do fifty eight receptions? He was also

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 1>banged up, he missed a couple of games, and he

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 1>suspended fifty eight receptions, eighteen yards and eight the year

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>before where he played a full season as a second

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver, and Mark Cooper right after everyone at Mark

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Cooper is basically a first round here as the wide

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:27.640
<v Speaker 1>receiver two in the Raiders offense in Michael Crabtree and

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 1>eighty nine receptions, a thousand yards and eight touchdowns. Well,

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 1>there's no way Jordy Nelson does that. I agree. Let's

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>say he has seventy five receptions and eight touchdowns. That's

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 1>a good season. It's a valuable fantasy season. Jordy Nelson's

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 1>seventy five receptions and eight touchdowns this year. I'll take

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:48.719
<v Speaker 1>the under on both easily. You can make some kind

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 1>of bed here if you want, You can make that happen.

0:30:51.160 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I just think I'd rather take a shot on one

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 1>of the Cowboys wide receivers emerging. I think there's more

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 1>upside there. Um they're gonna have to throw the balls

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:00.960
<v Speaker 1>to someone. I don't know how great the defenses. Yes,

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 1>they're going to run the ball a ton. I know

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 1>that they have Ezekiel Elliott, but I'll take a shot

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 1>on one of Gallup or Alan Herns emerging. And remember,

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Alan Herns has a season with double digit to sound

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns as well playing with the likes of Blake Bortles.

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Dak Prescott is a better quarterback than Blake Bortles. I

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 1>think Alan Herns is a competent NFL wide receiver. A

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of people have been bashing him. Uh, you know,

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Alan Herns can't be Fantasy relevant at this point. I

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 1>think that's hogwash. They went out and they signed him

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 1>for a reasons, So I'll take the shot on Alan

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Herns Michael Gallup. I just I don't think Jordy Nelson

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 1>has much left in the tank, and I can't really

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of faith in Derek Carr being able

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to make two Fantasy viable wide receivers when it comes

0:31:38.160 --> 0:31:40.719
<v Speaker 1>to Jordy Nelson. He's done it with Crabtree, He's done

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 1>it with Cooper, But I just don't think Jordy Nelson

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 1>is as sounded as Crabtree had been the past few years.

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I think Jordy Nelson's kind of done. Uh, you're probably

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 1>You're probably right that he's done. I mean we dropped

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 1>him last year. We we said he's not even he

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 1>can't perform well for Alon Rodgers, who performed well for

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 1>but I think that Jordy Nelson, there's just one thing

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>that he has left. It's the ability in the red zone.

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:07.880
<v Speaker 1>That's it. And for those saying I gotta need a haircut,

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I just got a haircut yesterday. What do you think

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:12.719
<v Speaker 1>I like it? It looks good, doesn't I walked out

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I was starting a boy band. You'd be one of

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the first guys out of called man. You know. The

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 1>funny thing is I walked as I was done. As

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 1>barber finished up. He's just like it's perfect, not too short,

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 1>not too long. Thank you. What's the name of your barber?

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Hell's kitchen barber. No, I mean like the guy who

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 1>actual so, I said, Vladimir, YOURII I usually go to

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 1>whoever is like available, So usually r l Um. Usually

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Ariel cut my hair. I I Reel or Steve, but

0:32:44.600 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Steve wasn't there, and Ariel had looked too along with

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the line. So just like Youriie cut yesterday here, you

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 1>did a good job trying to come back to Erie.

0:32:52.600 --> 0:32:57.840
<v Speaker 1>It looks like I think it's fine. I agree A

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 1>four four eight four or three six seven nine. Uh,

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to Joe in Florida. What's up, Joe? What's

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:06.640
<v Speaker 1>going on? What's going on? Man? I got the China.

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I got a third pick in our draft this weekend,

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'm trying to figure out, like who who pick

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 1>up with the first pick? In the second pick? You

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 1>know what way I should go with it with with

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 1>third pick is the PR League MR Whiteboard series. What

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>you got? Third pick? And this is a full point PPR,

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 1>fir point PPR. I'll take David Johnson and I've said

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 1>that before, Zekiel Elliott. I'll take him in the non

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:34.720
<v Speaker 1>PPR um. I think he could score more touchdowns. But

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:37.520
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson, you know that threat for a thousand rushing,

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:40.280
<v Speaker 1>a thousand receiving. We've seen an eight plus reception season

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 1>out of him. It's close between David Johnson and Zeke.

0:33:42.880 --> 0:33:46.520
<v Speaker 1>But I'll take I'll take dj There, there you go,

0:33:46.600 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 1>there you go, all right, listen PPR. David Johnson, the

0:33:51.600 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 1>potentially the number three pick there on the phone four

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 1>three six s seven nine to Darren in New Jersey.

0:33:57.600 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 1>It's up Darren. Hey, I have a question, um, how

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 1>confident are you guys with mark Ingram coming back to

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:10.840
<v Speaker 1>pick him as your number two running back? They have

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to back him up with like a Carlos Hide and

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the Painton Barber. Yeah, so you just curved on the situation,

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:18.719
<v Speaker 1>just go with like Horse Freeman. Right. So so I

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:20.719
<v Speaker 1>think it's a great, great question. And I had the

0:34:20.760 --> 0:34:22.960
<v Speaker 1>exact question that isn't the question. And I had the

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:26.799
<v Speaker 1>same exact opportunity Darren, that you did, right, Like I

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:29.279
<v Speaker 1>could have taken Royce Freeman um, and instead I went

0:34:29.320 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 1>with Mark. I went with mark Ingram um, and I

0:34:31.719 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>backed it up with Jamal Williams. And that was like

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 1>my combination, Jamal Williams and mark Ingram. I think, you know,

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Royce Freeman as good as he could be. Dvante Booker

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:41.160
<v Speaker 1>still looks at me the starter for now there. I

0:34:41.160 --> 0:34:46.000
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't exactly think, um, I don't exactly think

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:48.480
<v Speaker 1>that Vande Bookers will be able to hold on this job.

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 1>But I am confident that Marketing comes back and gets

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:53.279
<v Speaker 1>his touches. Now, maybe I'm reading too much into Sean

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Payton saying listen, we gotta find someone to take Ingram's

0:34:55.760 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 1>touches during the preseason and believing that, hey, it is

0:34:59.160 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Ingram's touches him was still a thing, right, So maybe

0:35:01.680 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm buying a little bit too much into that and

0:35:04.640 --> 0:35:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the love heat relationship between Sean Payton and mark Ingram.

0:35:07.360 --> 0:35:09.080
<v Speaker 1>But I still believe that mark Ingram is going to

0:35:10.320 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 1>has the talent to produce what he did last year.

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Al mccamarra is a guy that they

0:35:13.640 --> 0:35:15.840
<v Speaker 1>want touching the ball twenty five times a game. I

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 1>think they are going to have a second running back,

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think Jonathan Williams is good enough to

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 1>hold off Ingram when he comes back. I like mark Ingram, Yeah,

0:35:22.560 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 1>I agree, And we've spoken about a few running backs

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that you can draft to pair with mark Ingram. Jamal

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Williams makes a lot of sense. Even Carlos Good is

0:35:30.680 --> 0:35:32.479
<v Speaker 1>a fine one too, if you can make that happen

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:35.800
<v Speaker 1>for the last pick of your draft, Jonathan Williams the

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 1>mark Ingram replacement for mark Ingram until Marketingham comes back.

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 1>In the league that I drafted mark Ingram I picked

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:43.920
<v Speaker 1>up I picked up Jonathan Williams after Waivers ran to

0:35:43.960 --> 0:35:45.279
<v Speaker 1>make sure I had him to back him up too.

0:35:45.360 --> 0:35:47.000
<v Speaker 1>So there you go. I'll take a break. There's more

0:35:47.000 --> 0:35:48.920
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers come in your way and your calls eight

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:51.480
<v Speaker 1>four four eight four three six seven nine. The bfs

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:56.759
<v Speaker 1>roll on right after this. Why pay high rate when

0:35:56.800 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 1>you can play daily Fantasy Baseball and pay half the rate?

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Gun Fantasy Draft featuring half of r g PP and

0:36:01.800 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 1>head to head contest exclusive v I P experiences the

0:36:04.800 --> 0:36:07.439
<v Speaker 1>most flexible line up structures in the game. Fantasy Draft

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:10.239
<v Speaker 1>is the only DFS site that puts players first. They're

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:12.040
<v Speaker 1>also the only site to offer six of seven p

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:15.359
<v Speaker 1>g A scoring dropping your lowest golfer score. Registered today

0:36:15.440 --> 0:36:16.840
<v Speaker 1>with the grow at f n T s Y for

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:19.600
<v Speaker 1>a free four dollar entry into a guaranteed winner contest

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:22.520
<v Speaker 1>in the sport of your choice. Fantasy Draft daily fantasy

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 1>on a level playing field. All you people can't see,

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:49.239
<v Speaker 1>can't you see a reality? Every time down we can

0:36:49.400 --> 0:36:55.800
<v Speaker 1>make you right, because that nay too larger than life.

0:36:57.960 --> 0:37:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Having a karaoke party soon, make sure to by Greg Sussman,

0:37:01.480 --> 0:37:04.760
<v Speaker 1>leader of the boy band bet ds I is celebrating

0:37:04.800 --> 0:37:07.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty years as the industry's biggest and safest petting site.

0:37:07.360 --> 0:37:09.960
<v Speaker 1>They have great customer service, fast, easy payments and winnings.

0:37:10.160 --> 0:37:12.160
<v Speaker 1>You can play virtually every sport bet ds I with

0:37:12.200 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of wagering options, including liven game wagering on all

0:37:15.200 --> 0:37:17.520
<v Speaker 1>major sporting events, where you can make your play at

0:37:17.560 --> 0:37:19.879
<v Speaker 1>any time during the game. Bet ds I run sign

0:37:19.920 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 1>up and deposit promotions year round. For a limited time

0:37:22.760 --> 0:37:25.440
<v Speaker 1>using promo code fan t s Y. Bet d s

0:37:25.480 --> 0:37:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I is offering up to twenty on your first deposit

0:37:28.280 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 1>if you're willing to add here to roll over requirements,

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:32.839
<v Speaker 1>use promo code f and t s Y and try

0:37:32.920 --> 0:37:35.759
<v Speaker 1>bet DSi dot com and that's bet ds i dot com.

0:37:35.960 --> 0:37:40.440
<v Speaker 1>The promo code is f and t s Y. Also remember,

0:37:40.520 --> 0:37:44.319
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Factor is the only exclusively single entry DFS site.

0:37:44.760 --> 0:37:48.399
<v Speaker 1>They have free rolls registering all the time and great

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 1>promotions for free prizes. Keep a look at for Fantasy

0:37:50.960 --> 0:37:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Factors free million dollars of our contest opening about a

0:37:53.360 --> 0:37:55.879
<v Speaker 1>week before NFL kickoff. Go to Fantasy Factor dot com

0:37:56.080 --> 0:37:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's Fantasy Factor dot com. All right, Franky, let's

0:37:59.040 --> 0:38:02.040
<v Speaker 1>go back to the phone line eight for four, four, three, six, seven,

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:09.160
<v Speaker 1>nine and hit up Jan in California? What's up? Do

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 1>we have? Jan? Hello? Hello? Hello? What's up? Man? Hello?

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:20.239
<v Speaker 1>Got me? Hello? What's up? Hello? Dude? You gotta ask

0:38:20.280 --> 0:38:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you a question or something? Yeah? Yeah, yeah? What's up? Guys?

0:38:24.040 --> 0:38:27.600
<v Speaker 1>How are you guys doing? Just lovely? How are you? Hey? Man?

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I can't complain, so I gotta I got a ton

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of questions here. So it's my first time doing a

0:38:32.680 --> 0:38:36.440
<v Speaker 1>PPR format. You know, I've been doing standard UM for

0:38:36.440 --> 0:38:38.320
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years now, but my first time in

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 1>PPO format. I'm picking first. I'm kind of locked in.

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:45.759
<v Speaker 1>I got my mind made up on on girly, I

0:38:45.840 --> 0:38:48.320
<v Speaker 1>mean in tips for me. You know that that that

0:38:48.480 --> 0:38:53.480
<v Speaker 1>second and third round turn. You know it's it's too crucial. Um,

0:38:54.719 --> 0:38:57.279
<v Speaker 1>any any heads up that you can give me here?

0:38:58.040 --> 0:39:01.759
<v Speaker 1>You play with two wide receivers or three two wide receivers?

0:39:02.239 --> 0:39:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Um two? Uh yeah? Two running backs? Yeah? Yeah? Okay?

0:39:10.520 --> 0:39:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Well um yeah, you take the running back with the

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:15.640
<v Speaker 1>first overall pick. Honestly, it's always going to depend on

0:39:16.000 --> 0:39:19.120
<v Speaker 1>who's there. Um. I didn't expect agree falling to me

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:21.400
<v Speaker 1>last night in the second overall pick, So it just

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:23.959
<v Speaker 1>depends on who you have um on your big board

0:39:24.000 --> 0:39:26.440
<v Speaker 1>as your best players available. If there's a running back

0:39:26.480 --> 0:39:28.560
<v Speaker 1>you really like, I have no problem taking one running

0:39:28.600 --> 0:39:31.319
<v Speaker 1>back one wide receiver, especially because it's a two wide

0:39:31.360 --> 0:39:34.120
<v Speaker 1>receiver format and a flex. If it were if you

0:39:34.280 --> 0:39:36.760
<v Speaker 1>had to start three wide receivers, I'd be more inclined

0:39:36.800 --> 0:39:38.799
<v Speaker 1>to say, Okay, it's a PPR, you have to grab

0:39:38.880 --> 0:39:41.120
<v Speaker 1>two wide receivers there. But since you only start two

0:39:41.160 --> 0:39:43.520
<v Speaker 1>running backs and two wide receivers, it really comes down

0:39:43.560 --> 0:39:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to your best players available. If you think there's a

0:39:45.680 --> 0:39:47.880
<v Speaker 1>running back you really like, you take one running back

0:39:47.920 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and one wide receiver, and vice versa. If all the

0:39:50.160 --> 0:39:52.080
<v Speaker 1>running backs you like are gone, go ahead and grab

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 1>two wide receivers. Okay, okay, And also I picked on

0:39:58.680 --> 0:40:00.839
<v Speaker 1>the Standard League yesterday. Tell me what you guys think

0:40:00.880 --> 0:40:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of the squad right here, right go quickly, man, because

0:40:02.960 --> 0:40:04.319
<v Speaker 1>we have we have a bunch of called the callers.

0:40:04.360 --> 0:40:07.040
<v Speaker 1>You got you, dude, Oh my bad, mo badman. I'm

0:40:07.040 --> 0:40:09.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna make a quick all right. I got Andrew Luck

0:40:09.000 --> 0:40:12.879
<v Speaker 1>as my QB. We got t Y as my wide receiver. One.

0:40:13.560 --> 0:40:17.279
<v Speaker 1>I got s Quan as my running back. Lamar Miller

0:40:17.360 --> 0:40:20.120
<v Speaker 1>is my running back. To I got Keenan Allen actually

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:23.920
<v Speaker 1>is my other wide receiver. One. Kyle Rudolph is my

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:26.759
<v Speaker 1>tight end, and I got the juice. Go ahead and

0:40:26.800 --> 0:40:30.359
<v Speaker 1>bless them then as my flips. Hey, I love everything

0:40:30.360 --> 0:40:32.359
<v Speaker 1>about it except one thing. It's gonna remind you, sir

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:36.640
<v Speaker 1>that Lamar Miller sucks. Everything else is awesome. I really

0:40:36.719 --> 0:40:38.880
<v Speaker 1>like your team. Uh. With that, we had out to

0:40:38.920 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Rhode Island. Talk to Mike. Let's going on? Mike, Hey, guys,

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:45.359
<v Speaker 1>thanks for taking my Carl Gray show. I'm just looking

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:47.759
<v Speaker 1>for some fantasy advice. He has my situation. I'm in

0:40:47.840 --> 0:40:52.239
<v Speaker 1>a fourteen team PPR league and that's I've never been

0:40:52.280 --> 0:40:54.920
<v Speaker 1>in a league this lodge before. I have the sixth

0:40:55.040 --> 0:40:58.680
<v Speaker 1>overall pick looking at the a DP, my choice is

0:40:58.760 --> 0:41:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the most likely Alvin Kamara, se Juan or DeAndre Hopkins,

0:41:03.840 --> 0:41:06.479
<v Speaker 1>and I'm just kind of concerned. I have reservations about

0:41:06.560 --> 0:41:09.760
<v Speaker 1>both running backs, but also it could be big booms

0:41:10.360 --> 0:41:12.560
<v Speaker 1>where DeAndre I kind of just feel it's going to

0:41:12.600 --> 0:41:16.600
<v Speaker 1>be more consistent and take and then I'm concerned if

0:41:16.640 --> 0:41:18.919
<v Speaker 1>I do take DeAndre, what happens in the second round,

0:41:19.160 --> 0:41:21.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, fourteen, when that snakes all the way back

0:41:21.680 --> 0:41:25.080
<v Speaker 1>at the latest second round pick, who's gonna even be

0:41:25.200 --> 0:41:27.920
<v Speaker 1>less at running back. So just some advice on that,

0:41:28.040 --> 0:41:30.440
<v Speaker 1>and he thought, thank you. I think you have to

0:41:30.480 --> 0:41:32.799
<v Speaker 1>go with the running back in that spot, whether it's

0:41:32.800 --> 0:41:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Alvin Camara sac Markley. I'll let Frank pick. He's a

0:41:35.120 --> 0:41:38.879
<v Speaker 1>master that we have to have similar decision potentially tomorrow. Um,

0:41:39.920 --> 0:41:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you can take DeAndre Hopkins and and

0:41:42.239 --> 0:41:44.879
<v Speaker 1>play running back chicken there. You can't play wide receiver

0:41:45.040 --> 0:41:47.320
<v Speaker 1>chicken because realistically, the worst one that gets back to

0:41:47.320 --> 0:41:49.000
<v Speaker 1>he's probably a G. Green and you're you're gonna be

0:41:49.040 --> 0:41:50.800
<v Speaker 1>okay with that. So for me, it comes out of

0:41:50.800 --> 0:41:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Secon Barkley or Alvin Camara. Really your preference, Frank, in

0:41:53.520 --> 0:41:55.960
<v Speaker 1>this kind of league, who would you take? Yeah, and

0:41:56.000 --> 0:41:59.200
<v Speaker 1>a full point PPR league, I would take Kamara. I

0:41:59.239 --> 0:42:01.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's very use between him and Barkley. If you

0:42:02.600 --> 0:42:04.920
<v Speaker 1>if you trust the workload more of se Kwan Barkley

0:42:04.920 --> 0:42:06.719
<v Speaker 1>and that's what you want. I still think he can catch,

0:42:06.840 --> 0:42:09.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, forty fifty plus balls this year. I think

0:42:09.320 --> 0:42:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I would take the running back as well. Greg. I'm

0:42:11.120 --> 0:42:13.279
<v Speaker 1>with you. Um, I'm not sure a J. Green makes

0:42:13.320 --> 0:42:15.920
<v Speaker 1>it back because it's fourteen teams. It's a full point PPR,

0:42:16.000 --> 0:42:17.960
<v Speaker 1>so people might lean on the wide receivers a little

0:42:17.960 --> 0:42:20.319
<v Speaker 1>bit more, but I think you're guaranteed at least one

0:42:20.400 --> 0:42:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of Mike Evans, t Y Hilton, Doug Baldwin. I think

0:42:23.520 --> 0:42:27.920
<v Speaker 1>that combination is probably better than taking DeAndre Hopkins and then,

0:42:28.040 --> 0:42:30.000
<v Speaker 1>like you said, you play with running back chicken, where

0:42:30.000 --> 0:42:32.240
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna end up within a full point PPR. McCaffrey

0:42:32.320 --> 0:42:34.759
<v Speaker 1>is not making it back to you. It probably would

0:42:34.800 --> 0:42:37.719
<v Speaker 1>be close with DeVonta Freeman and Jordan Howard in the

0:42:37.760 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 1>full point PPR. I don't know how much you love

0:42:39.640 --> 0:42:41.839
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Howard as your RB one anyway, So I would

0:42:41.840 --> 0:42:44.120
<v Speaker 1>take Kamara or Barkley and then take the wide receiver

0:42:44.200 --> 0:42:46.200
<v Speaker 1>in the second round. I totally, I totally, totally agree

0:42:46.200 --> 0:42:48.080
<v Speaker 1>with the speaking of wide receivers. Um. I want to

0:42:48.080 --> 0:42:50.399
<v Speaker 1>go back to our late round wide receivers. Some guys

0:42:50.640 --> 0:42:52.640
<v Speaker 1>you may want to target late and imagine Kenny Stills

0:42:52.960 --> 0:42:55.880
<v Speaker 1>you had said yesterday. I like Kenny Stills. Hey, no

0:42:55.920 --> 0:42:58.520
<v Speaker 1>one's telling about Danny Amendola is a rack out catches.

0:42:58.560 --> 0:43:00.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you, at full point pbo are at least

0:43:00.760 --> 0:43:05.359
<v Speaker 1>early in the year you want to own Danny Avendola. Yeah,

0:43:05.440 --> 0:43:07.120
<v Speaker 1>he's more of a I think he's just like a

0:43:07.160 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 1>bench wide receiver. He's gonna be a bye week replacement

0:43:10.680 --> 0:43:12.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of guy. And it's kind of similar to the

0:43:12.800 --> 0:43:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Jordy Nelson debate. If I'm using my bench players more

0:43:16.160 --> 0:43:17.960
<v Speaker 1>more than often than not, I want to take high

0:43:18.040 --> 0:43:21.200
<v Speaker 1>upside players. I think, you know, if you want to say,

0:43:21.200 --> 0:43:23.000
<v Speaker 1>all right, I want to have a balance of solid

0:43:23.080 --> 0:43:24.880
<v Speaker 1>bench players that I can use on bye weeks and

0:43:25.000 --> 0:43:27.680
<v Speaker 1>guys that have upside. But more so you worry about

0:43:27.680 --> 0:43:30.359
<v Speaker 1>bye weeks once they're coming, you know, really weeks four

0:43:30.440 --> 0:43:32.200
<v Speaker 1>or five, six, seven, that's when you have to start

0:43:32.239 --> 0:43:34.640
<v Speaker 1>worrying about bye weeks. More so, I think early on

0:43:34.760 --> 0:43:36.280
<v Speaker 1>you really just want to have a lot of upside

0:43:36.280 --> 0:43:37.680
<v Speaker 1>on your bench to see if one of these guys

0:43:37.760 --> 0:43:40.319
<v Speaker 1>pops early on, and then you know, you you realize, oh,

0:43:40.360 --> 0:43:42.279
<v Speaker 1>I have a legit wide receiver three that I could

0:43:42.280 --> 0:43:44.600
<v Speaker 1>play for the rest of the year. So I like

0:43:44.760 --> 0:43:48.600
<v Speaker 1>taking shots on some more upside plays. Um instead, you know,

0:43:48.640 --> 0:43:50.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe take a shot on a guy like Anthony Miller,

0:43:50.600 --> 0:43:53.759
<v Speaker 1>who um Trabisky seems to be leaning on right now

0:43:53.920 --> 0:43:56.040
<v Speaker 1>in training camp. They're really talking him up. Even a

0:43:56.080 --> 0:43:58.440
<v Speaker 1>sterling shepherd who in PPR is gonna rack up a

0:43:58.480 --> 0:44:00.759
<v Speaker 1>ton of catches. Um, I think that makes a lot

0:44:00.840 --> 0:44:04.440
<v Speaker 1>of sense. James Washington. James Washington, I think is a

0:44:04.560 --> 0:44:06.800
<v Speaker 1>real like one of your last round picks here, but

0:44:07.280 --> 0:44:09.839
<v Speaker 1>he has showed up in the preseason. Let me tell

0:44:09.840 --> 0:44:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you that the contestant catches that James Washington has been

0:44:13.120 --> 0:44:16.080
<v Speaker 1>making throughout the preseason, he looks to be better than

0:44:16.120 --> 0:44:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Martavis Bryant already. And that's something I said to you

0:44:18.239 --> 0:44:20.200
<v Speaker 1>early on, Gregg. And that's why I like Big Ben

0:44:20.360 --> 0:44:23.200
<v Speaker 1>is the fact that they have Antonio Brown, Juju Smith Schuster,

0:44:23.520 --> 0:44:26.799
<v Speaker 1>James Washington, who a lot of people had as one

0:44:26.840 --> 0:44:29.200
<v Speaker 1>of their top three wide receivers being drafted off the

0:44:29.280 --> 0:44:31.799
<v Speaker 1>board in the NFL Draft. He went in the second round.

0:44:31.840 --> 0:44:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I think he adds that element back to the Pittsburgh

0:44:34.600 --> 0:44:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Steelers offense, and if anything were to happen to Juju

0:44:37.520 --> 0:44:39.960
<v Speaker 1>or to Antonio Brown, he steps in as that wide

0:44:40.000 --> 0:44:42.680
<v Speaker 1>receiver too. I like taking that step on James Washington

0:44:42.760 --> 0:44:44.880
<v Speaker 1>to Greg, Yeah, I think so too. I think, Uh,

0:44:45.360 --> 0:44:47.640
<v Speaker 1>James Washington is one of these perfect young players, uh

0:44:47.719 --> 0:44:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that you can take a shot at UM. I get it,

0:44:50.040 --> 0:44:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and I know that I'm literally doing exactly what we

0:44:53.239 --> 0:44:55.880
<v Speaker 1>tell you not to do with these older wide receivers,

0:44:55.920 --> 0:44:58.680
<v Speaker 1>with Danny Almondelos, the Jordy Nelson's, I get it. I

0:44:58.800 --> 0:45:01.560
<v Speaker 1>just see value there, man, and I just do I

0:45:01.640 --> 0:45:04.080
<v Speaker 1>still see value. Rashard Matthews too, who now we finally

0:45:04.120 --> 0:45:07.360
<v Speaker 1>know towards meniscus um and had surgery on that. It

0:45:07.480 --> 0:45:10.080
<v Speaker 1>looks like he'll be back in time. Now will that

0:45:10.200 --> 0:45:13.200
<v Speaker 1>be enough, um? Will that be enough time to make

0:45:13.239 --> 0:45:15.279
<v Speaker 1>a fantasy relevant I don't know, um, and I didn't

0:45:15.360 --> 0:45:17.360
<v Speaker 1>draft him on a team. Now, let me get the

0:45:17.440 --> 0:45:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Julian Edelman. We haven't spoken about him yet. He suspended

0:45:19.800 --> 0:45:22.399
<v Speaker 1>for four games to start the year. At what point

0:45:22.440 --> 0:45:26.239
<v Speaker 1>do you pull the trigger on Julian Edelman? And and

0:45:26.320 --> 0:45:28.239
<v Speaker 1>have you done it yet? I haven't ended up with

0:45:28.360 --> 0:45:30.200
<v Speaker 1>him on any league yet. I've done a lot of

0:45:30.280 --> 0:45:32.399
<v Speaker 1>Best Ball drafts, and I think it's kind of hard

0:45:32.480 --> 0:45:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to take players who are suspended for the first four

0:45:34.640 --> 0:45:37.360
<v Speaker 1>weeks in Best ball, UM, unless they're coming out a

0:45:37.440 --> 0:45:39.640
<v Speaker 1>really really big discount, because you know the first four

0:45:39.680 --> 0:45:41.759
<v Speaker 1>weeks you need to have rack up high scores as well.

0:45:41.960 --> 0:45:44.239
<v Speaker 1>Remember Best Ball gives you your optimal line up each week.

0:45:44.280 --> 0:45:45.920
<v Speaker 1>You don't set your line up, so I think it's

0:45:46.000 --> 0:45:48.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of tougher to take suspended players, but there's a

0:45:48.400 --> 0:45:52.800
<v Speaker 1>price for everybody. And I think obviously his best format

0:45:53.000 --> 0:45:56.200
<v Speaker 1>is PPR the range that I would start looking at

0:45:56.320 --> 0:45:59.120
<v Speaker 1>him in the full point PPR, I'd feel like the

0:45:59.200 --> 0:46:02.800
<v Speaker 1>seventh round is that fair? Like in that in that

0:46:02.880 --> 0:46:05.560
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver three like in that thirty five to forty

0:46:05.719 --> 0:46:08.239
<v Speaker 1>range and wide receivers, I think that's the time to

0:46:08.280 --> 0:46:10.360
<v Speaker 1>start looking at Julian Edelman in the PPR league. I

0:46:10.400 --> 0:46:13.359
<v Speaker 1>have Julian Edelman right now is my forty sixth range

0:46:13.400 --> 0:46:16.920
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver. UM, I have him forty second and this

0:46:17.080 --> 0:46:20.600
<v Speaker 1>is half point same. So in the full point I

0:46:20.680 --> 0:46:24.600
<v Speaker 1>move him up to thirty nine, so he's right in

0:46:24.680 --> 0:46:29.160
<v Speaker 1>that range with Pierre Garson, Nelson agil Are UM. I

0:46:29.200 --> 0:46:31.279
<v Speaker 1>think that's a good range because those guys are guys

0:46:31.320 --> 0:46:33.600
<v Speaker 1>that are gonna help you all year long. But I

0:46:33.680 --> 0:46:36.160
<v Speaker 1>think undoubtedly once Edelman comes back, he will be more

0:46:36.200 --> 0:46:38.320
<v Speaker 1>productive than those guys on a per game basis. But

0:46:38.400 --> 0:46:41.000
<v Speaker 1>if you want the consistency for throughout the entirety of

0:46:41.080 --> 0:46:43.759
<v Speaker 1>the season, and I think you you lean on one

0:46:43.800 --> 0:46:45.880
<v Speaker 1>of those other wide receivers. But if you're stacked, if

0:46:45.920 --> 0:46:48.480
<v Speaker 1>you have three wide receivers already, especially and you get

0:46:48.520 --> 0:46:50.799
<v Speaker 1>to like that seventh round range in a PPR league,

0:46:51.120 --> 0:46:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a good time to pull the trigger

0:46:52.719 --> 0:46:55.600
<v Speaker 1>on Julian Edelman in the half point, would you take him?

0:46:56.719 --> 0:47:04.239
<v Speaker 1>Would you take him before Helvin Benjamin. That's funny because

0:47:04.239 --> 0:47:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I actually have them ranked back to back, But I

0:47:07.280 --> 0:47:09.920
<v Speaker 1>will take Helvin Benjamin again, just for those targets all

0:47:10.000 --> 0:47:12.120
<v Speaker 1>year long. I think it's a very good question. Again,

0:47:12.160 --> 0:47:15.200
<v Speaker 1>it comes down to roster construction. Um, if you have

0:47:15.239 --> 0:47:16.879
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, if you have some more question marks

0:47:16.920 --> 0:47:19.160
<v Speaker 1>in your starting lineup at the wide receiver position, I

0:47:19.200 --> 0:47:21.120
<v Speaker 1>think I'd take Helvin Benjamin because I think there's more

0:47:21.160 --> 0:47:22.880
<v Speaker 1>of a chance that he can pop and he can

0:47:22.880 --> 0:47:24.640
<v Speaker 1>actually be a weekend and week out starter for you,

0:47:24.760 --> 0:47:28.200
<v Speaker 1>especially early on in the season. Julian edem disagree. I

0:47:28.239 --> 0:47:30.719
<v Speaker 1>think if you need if you have that risk, you

0:47:30.840 --> 0:47:32.759
<v Speaker 1>need a guy that can pop. Like you know, after

0:47:32.840 --> 0:47:35.680
<v Speaker 1>four weeks you're getting back Tom Brady's favorite. You have

0:47:35.800 --> 0:47:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to make it to four weeks first, of course, I

0:47:38.080 --> 0:47:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I get that, but like Helevin Benjamin, you have to

0:47:40.040 --> 0:47:41.640
<v Speaker 1>be in my opinion, you have to be strong at

0:47:41.680 --> 0:47:43.560
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver if you're gonna take a shot on Edelman,

0:47:43.600 --> 0:47:46.200
<v Speaker 1>because you can't you can't lose early on in the season, right,

0:47:47.239 --> 0:47:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I hear you, I hear you. I Edman is a

0:47:49.480 --> 0:47:51.120
<v Speaker 1>tough one because it's like we've talked a lot about

0:47:51.160 --> 0:47:53.040
<v Speaker 1>mark Ingram and I think about the difference. Right, that's

0:47:53.080 --> 0:47:55.279
<v Speaker 1>a good point Ingram is going in like the late fourth,

0:47:55.360 --> 0:47:57.920
<v Speaker 1>early fifth, and I'll look up the ADP right now,

0:47:58.000 --> 0:48:00.399
<v Speaker 1>but I'm pretty sure Edelman is going like the six

0:48:00.520 --> 0:48:02.879
<v Speaker 1>or seven. Does that make sense? Is that? Is that fair?

0:48:03.000 --> 0:48:05.839
<v Speaker 1>That should be going? Right? So I don't know. That's

0:48:05.880 --> 0:48:07.640
<v Speaker 1>what I'm hoping you to an answer. I don't know,

0:48:07.719 --> 0:48:10.040
<v Speaker 1>like why is Edlman going two rounds after mark Ingram?

0:48:10.200 --> 0:48:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Because for mark Ingram, like there's another running back there, right,

0:48:12.760 --> 0:48:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Alvin Kamara is on these teams. Saw what his upside

0:48:15.680 --> 0:48:16.960
<v Speaker 1>can be, and he's not going to get me back

0:48:17.000 --> 0:48:18.920
<v Speaker 1>to that. I think part of the reason Edelman is

0:48:19.000 --> 0:48:20.880
<v Speaker 1>going so much later is because he didn't play all

0:48:20.960 --> 0:48:23.239
<v Speaker 1>last year. He tours a c L last year, so

0:48:23.320 --> 0:48:25.400
<v Speaker 1>we almost but that's a good reason for him to

0:48:25.520 --> 0:48:29.680
<v Speaker 1>drop down the draft board past thirty years old? Is

0:48:29.680 --> 0:48:31.719
<v Speaker 1>it possible that you just forget how good Edelman is

0:48:31.800 --> 0:48:34.600
<v Speaker 1>with Tom Brady? Though? Because of that we know that, Look,

0:48:34.680 --> 0:48:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady has always targeted his slot receiver, regardless of

0:48:37.440 --> 0:48:40.120
<v Speaker 1>who it was, Wes Welker, Julian Edelman. He always targets

0:48:40.200 --> 0:48:42.360
<v Speaker 1>that guy. And I think he will be peppered with

0:48:42.440 --> 0:48:46.399
<v Speaker 1>targets why assuming he is effective once again? So why

0:48:46.440 --> 0:48:49.319
<v Speaker 1>don't you if we know he always targets that slot receiver? Right,

0:48:49.320 --> 0:48:51.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's what you're telling me, why don't we target

0:48:52.320 --> 0:48:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Julian Edelman in that sixth seven and take Eric Decker

0:48:54.600 --> 0:48:57.359
<v Speaker 1>with your last round pick? Why isn't there the same

0:48:57.400 --> 0:49:00.600
<v Speaker 1>even that Eric Decker makes the team, he's been got

0:49:00.680 --> 0:49:02.440
<v Speaker 1>off one camp. Then who's the slot receiver? It's not

0:49:02.480 --> 0:49:05.279
<v Speaker 1>Chris Ogan. That's not the Chrisogan's job. Who I think

0:49:05.280 --> 0:49:07.439
<v Speaker 1>they can use. I think they can use Chris Hogan

0:49:07.480 --> 0:49:10.160
<v Speaker 1>in a multitude of ways until Julian Edelman comes back. Okay,

0:49:10.200 --> 0:49:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and you're also telling me that Deckard there's a possibility

0:49:12.440 --> 0:49:14.160
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't make the team. Who are the wide receivers

0:49:14.160 --> 0:49:17.279
<v Speaker 1>on this team? I think the first four weeks you're

0:49:17.320 --> 0:49:20.080
<v Speaker 1>just gonna see a buttload of Gronk and Chris Hogan

0:49:20.160 --> 0:49:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and James White and James White. And they can use

0:49:21.960 --> 0:49:23.360
<v Speaker 1>James White at the slot too if they want to

0:49:23.360 --> 0:49:25.160
<v Speaker 1>get creative. And I think that's something that they can

0:49:25.239 --> 0:49:27.960
<v Speaker 1>do and they will do. But Julian Edelman right now,

0:49:27.960 --> 0:49:32.359
<v Speaker 1>according to Fantasy Pros full point PPR a DP, it's

0:49:32.360 --> 0:49:37.799
<v Speaker 1>picks seventy three in as wide receiver thirty off the board.

0:49:37.960 --> 0:49:42.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's round that's pretty high. That's high wide receiver

0:49:42.280 --> 0:49:45.719
<v Speaker 1>thirty off the board, but the round, the rounds not high.

0:49:46.080 --> 0:49:47.520
<v Speaker 1>It's the first pick of the seventh round, right, so

0:49:47.600 --> 0:49:50.920
<v Speaker 1>he's going exactly two rounds later than market correct markets

0:49:50.960 --> 0:49:55.359
<v Speaker 1>early fifth Julian Edelman's early seventh seventh in a full

0:49:55.400 --> 0:49:56.960
<v Speaker 1>point PPR. I think that's a good ring to grab

0:49:57.680 --> 0:49:59.879
<v Speaker 1>as your wide receiver. Four you have three wide receiver

0:50:00.480 --> 0:50:03.080
<v Speaker 1>like it a lot. Look. I have my doubts in him,

0:50:03.080 --> 0:50:04.879
<v Speaker 1>but at that point you can afford to take that chance.

0:50:05.640 --> 0:50:07.160
<v Speaker 1>You can take the risk there because if he comes

0:50:07.200 --> 0:50:09.600
<v Speaker 1>back and he's giving you his normal you know, six

0:50:09.680 --> 0:50:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to ten catches a game, even if it's for fifty

0:50:11.840 --> 0:50:13.719
<v Speaker 1>yards in PPR, he's gonna be at least a flex

0:50:13.800 --> 0:50:15.880
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver every single week. That's gonna do it for

0:50:16.080 --> 0:50:18.719
<v Speaker 1>us on YouTube. We appreciate you watching us all week long.

0:50:18.719 --> 0:50:20.920
<v Speaker 1>We're to be back on Monday with our expert lea

0:50:21.000 --> 0:50:23.000
<v Speaker 1>recap with the GST Draft. We have the Carton and

0:50:23.120 --> 0:50:25.359
<v Speaker 1>Friends Draft. I will do all those recaps on Monday.

0:50:25.400 --> 0:50:28.120
<v Speaker 1>The Fantasy Football Frenzy with Corey Parson and jum Day

0:50:28.160 --> 0:50:30.040
<v Speaker 1>comes your way next. If you're listening to us on

0:50:30.160 --> 0:50:32.960
<v Speaker 1>a podcast or live radio, we continue the next five minutes.

0:50:33.080 --> 0:50:34.480
<v Speaker 1>If you are on a podcast, make sure you give

0:50:34.560 --> 0:50:37.480
<v Speaker 1>us five stars. Subscribe to our channel. Uh and lu

0:50:37.640 --> 0:50:40.319
<v Speaker 1>comment please, we really appreciate it. Before we wrap up

0:50:40.320 --> 0:50:42.719
<v Speaker 1>the wide receiver conversation, Frank I went into the rookie

0:50:42.719 --> 0:50:44.719
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers because we haven't really named any of them

0:50:44.760 --> 0:50:46.799
<v Speaker 1>this week. We spoke about Calvin Ridley a little bit

0:50:46.800 --> 0:50:48.319
<v Speaker 1>early on in the week. We just spoke about James

0:50:48.360 --> 0:50:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Washington a little bit as well, and Michael Gallop. Okay,

0:50:51.800 --> 0:50:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the only one we haven is the Maryland Turp. Greggy

0:50:54.400 --> 0:50:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and Anthony Miller mentioned him a little bit earlier on,

0:50:57.280 --> 0:50:59.839
<v Speaker 1>but really I didn't like, really we've got in death,

0:51:00.000 --> 0:51:03.600
<v Speaker 1>when do you take these guys. I've seen them going

0:51:04.320 --> 0:51:06.680
<v Speaker 1>in like the nine tenth round range as you're getting

0:51:06.719 --> 0:51:09.400
<v Speaker 1>him as your wide receiver five. And this is again

0:51:09.440 --> 0:51:12.120
<v Speaker 1>what I'm talking about, is like, why would you grab

0:51:12.200 --> 0:51:14.920
<v Speaker 1>a Danny Amendolo. Why would you grab you know, some

0:51:14.960 --> 0:51:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of these older veterans. When you take a shot on

0:51:16.560 --> 0:51:19.160
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver who you know they use early round

0:51:19.200 --> 0:51:20.960
<v Speaker 1>draft picks on these guys for a reason. Like why

0:51:21.040 --> 0:51:24.359
<v Speaker 1>did the Panthers draft Dj Moore If they love uh

0:51:24.480 --> 0:51:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Devin Funcius, if they love Greg Olsen stild? The answer

0:51:27.800 --> 0:51:30.920
<v Speaker 1>is they wouldn't. So they clearly like DJ Moore and

0:51:30.960 --> 0:51:33.439
<v Speaker 1>they're looking for a more explosive all around wide receiver

0:51:33.560 --> 0:51:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's why they went out and got him. I

0:51:35.600 --> 0:51:40.480
<v Speaker 1>just do I worry about the Panthers receiving options overall

0:51:41.080 --> 0:51:42.600
<v Speaker 1>because I just feel like they're going to take away

0:51:42.640 --> 0:51:44.719
<v Speaker 1>from each other each week. I don't know that any

0:51:44.760 --> 0:51:46.480
<v Speaker 1>guy is going to be the number one target in

0:51:46.520 --> 0:51:49.200
<v Speaker 1>this offense. You can argue that Greg Olsen is the

0:51:49.239 --> 0:51:51.560
<v Speaker 1>go to guy for Cam Newton. I think he's kind

0:51:51.600 --> 0:51:53.319
<v Speaker 1>of lost a step. I think the foot injury from

0:51:53.400 --> 0:51:56.759
<v Speaker 1>last year um is a legitimate thing, and maybe it's

0:51:56.800 --> 0:51:59.880
<v Speaker 1>something that can Linger again this year. But like do

0:52:00.000 --> 0:52:02.160
<v Speaker 1>e J. Moore can have weeks where he pops off,

0:52:02.200 --> 0:52:04.439
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be weeks where, you know, Devin Funchu scores

0:52:04.480 --> 0:52:06.480
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown because he's the big receiver in the red zone.

0:52:06.520 --> 0:52:09.280
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know that there's a go to option

0:52:09.360 --> 0:52:12.520
<v Speaker 1>in this game outside of like Christian McCaffrey. To be honest, okay, Um,

0:52:13.160 --> 0:52:15.120
<v Speaker 1>we haven't really talked all that much abou Kenny Golladay.

0:52:15.200 --> 0:52:17.239
<v Speaker 1>I know you you've pointed out with Marvin Jones when

0:52:17.280 --> 0:52:19.759
<v Speaker 1>Golladay was out, Marvin Jones spikes and Marvin Jones out

0:52:20.160 --> 0:52:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Golladay spikes, You can't Kenny Gollad anywhore. I haven't taken

0:52:25.080 --> 0:52:27.600
<v Speaker 1>him yet. I think he's more of a standard non

0:52:27.719 --> 0:52:30.800
<v Speaker 1>PPR play because he has touchdown upside. But again, he

0:52:30.960 --> 0:52:34.600
<v Speaker 1>is clearly third fickle in this offense in the passing game, Um,

0:52:34.960 --> 0:52:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Golden Tate, Marvin Jones. I think they're gonna be there's

0:52:38.200 --> 0:52:40.400
<v Speaker 1>and I continue to say this, I think the Lions

0:52:40.440 --> 0:52:43.239
<v Speaker 1>offense is gonna be more balanced. So I don't know

0:52:43.440 --> 0:52:46.720
<v Speaker 1>that they can support three fantasy viable wide receivers unless

0:52:46.760 --> 0:52:49.360
<v Speaker 1>something were to happen to Marvin Jones. Maybe this is

0:52:49.400 --> 0:52:51.719
<v Speaker 1>more so a play if you take Golden Tate or

0:52:51.719 --> 0:52:54.319
<v Speaker 1>take Marvin Jones. Just grabbed Kenny Golladay as your wide

0:52:54.320 --> 0:52:56.000
<v Speaker 1>receiver five or six at the end of the draft,

0:52:56.080 --> 0:52:58.160
<v Speaker 1>little handcuff action in case one of them gets hurt

0:52:58.280 --> 0:53:01.040
<v Speaker 1>like that. I like that. What about the Jackson wide

0:53:01.040 --> 0:53:03.440
<v Speaker 1>re series? How do you rank them? I feel the

0:53:03.480 --> 0:53:06.160
<v Speaker 1>way about the Jaguars receivers that they do about Jordy Nelson.

0:53:06.400 --> 0:53:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Anytime I see one of them, I just I like

0:53:08.920 --> 0:53:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Mark Easley. I think Mark Easley is a talented player.

0:53:11.360 --> 0:53:13.320
<v Speaker 1>But again, you have to look at what teams do

0:53:13.400 --> 0:53:16.040
<v Speaker 1>in the off season if they love Marki's leo that much. Yes,

0:53:16.120 --> 0:53:18.200
<v Speaker 1>they brought him back, they gave him some money, but

0:53:18.360 --> 0:53:21.200
<v Speaker 1>they also signed Dante Moncreeves. They also have Keel and

0:53:21.239 --> 0:53:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Cole And they drafted uh D D Westbrook last year

0:53:24.120 --> 0:53:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and they drafted D J. Chart this year too. It's

0:53:26.800 --> 0:53:28.680
<v Speaker 1>is it just that they want wide receiver death or

0:53:29.360 --> 0:53:31.080
<v Speaker 1>is that that they're not sold on these guys as

0:53:31.080 --> 0:53:33.480
<v Speaker 1>their wide receivers. I don't think Blake Bortles is all

0:53:33.520 --> 0:53:35.440
<v Speaker 1>that great. I don't think the Jaguars are going to

0:53:35.719 --> 0:53:38.040
<v Speaker 1>have a ton of passing volume this year. Honestly, any

0:53:38.080 --> 0:53:40.880
<v Speaker 1>time I see a Jaguars wide receiver on the boards,

0:53:41.080 --> 0:53:43.759
<v Speaker 1>I just look in another direction. Did anybody any other

0:53:43.800 --> 0:53:45.400
<v Speaker 1>wide re siers that we have not mentioned that you

0:53:45.560 --> 0:53:47.160
<v Speaker 1>just want to give a shout out? So I think

0:53:47.239 --> 0:53:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Cam Meredith is worth mentioning as well. He was a

0:53:49.400 --> 0:53:51.480
<v Speaker 1>guy who popped a little bit in the preseason. We

0:53:51.560 --> 0:53:53.359
<v Speaker 1>were talking about him, and now he's kind of falling off.

0:53:53.440 --> 0:53:55.840
<v Speaker 1>We haven't talked about him again since then. But I

0:53:55.920 --> 0:53:58.719
<v Speaker 1>think a late round wide receiver at the second or

0:53:58.760 --> 0:54:00.880
<v Speaker 1>third option in this passing game for the Saints, I

0:54:00.880 --> 0:54:02.799
<v Speaker 1>think he's worth taking a shot as your wide receipter. Five.

0:54:02.840 --> 0:54:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Is there a wide receiver handcuffs? Say Geronimo or Jeronimo?

0:54:06.120 --> 0:54:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Else Bronimo. We're done. The Frenzy's up next, and Frankie Stamford,

0:54:10.040 --> 0:54:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm Greg Susman. We'll do it all again on Monday,

0:54:12.800 --> 0:54:13.320
<v Speaker 1>we hope.