WEBVTT - Hoops Tonight  - Warriors and Celtics pull off comebacks

0:00:01.240 --> 0:00:07.600
<v Speaker 1>The volume Lakers Tonight is presented by FanDuel Sports Book.

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.720
<v Speaker 1>There's no better place to make every moment more than

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 1>with FanDuel. You get great odds in markets for the

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:16.480
<v Speaker 1>NBA and HL college and so much more. It's America's

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:19.440
<v Speaker 1>number one sports book. It's super easy to use. Plus

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>you can combine multiple bets from the same game into

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a same game parlay. If you are new, just download

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the FanDuel Sports Book app to get started. Now sign

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>up with promo cod json T so they know I

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:35.200
<v Speaker 1>sent you. Twenty one plus in president Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Indiana, Louisiana,

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Permitted parishes only, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, Tennessee, Virginia

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>or West Virginia. First online real money wager only. Refund

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>issued as non withdrawalable site credit that expires in fourteen days.

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Restrictions apply see terms at sports book dot FanDuel dot com.

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Gambling problem called one eight hundred, next step or text

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>next step to five three three four two in Arizona

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>one eight eight eight seven eight nine seven seven seven

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>seven or visit CCPG dot org slash chat in Connecticut

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>one eight hundred gambler or visit FanDuel dot com slash

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>RG in Colorado, Indiana, New Jersey, in Virginia one eight

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>seven seven seven seven zero stop in Louisiana one eight

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred to seven zero seven one one seven for confidential help.

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:30.959
<v Speaker 1>In Michigan one eight seven seven eight hope and why

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>or text hope and Why to four six seven three

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 1>six nine in New York. In Tennessee redline dial one

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred eight eight nine nine seven eight nine in Tennessee.

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Visit www one eight dot one eight hundred gambler dot

0:01:46.720 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>net in West Virginia. All right, welcome to Hoops Tonight,

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>presented by FanDuel. Here at the volume, I am Jason Tamp.

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Happy Monday, everybody. I hope all of you are having

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 1>a fantastic start to your week. Very very strange game there,

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:21.359
<v Speaker 1>but I did expect it to be strange for those

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of you guys who have been listening to the show

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 1>over the course of the last couple of days. You know. Um,

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:32.640
<v Speaker 1>this specifically is a one game sample size of the

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:37.519
<v Speaker 1>way that strangeness can impact any basketball player. Talk a

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:42.080
<v Speaker 1>lot about rhythm in the way that uh no, you know,

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>if all two shots are the same, right like, if

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I've a wide open shot for Steph Curry on the

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>right wing, why does one go in and one doesn't. Well,

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it is like dialing things in and

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>feeling comfortable. And this was the textbook type of wicked

0:02:57.440 --> 0:03:00.240
<v Speaker 1>curveball of a basketball game. That is the kind the

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>thing that can throw really good basketball players out of whack,

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and I thought it was super interesting. We're going to

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>dive into the weeds of this game on all fronts.

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>We are also going to get into Boston Milwaukee a

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:14.679
<v Speaker 1>little bit more, and then if you guys stick around

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>form the end of the show, we're gonna go over

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 1>some of the biggest questions going on in the NBA

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>right now, including reaction to Nicola Yokits winning his second

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>consecutive m v P, and a bunch of other good stuff.

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>So we got an action pack show for you for

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>you guys tonight, I appreciate you coming to hang out.

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>A couple of quick housekeeping notes before we get started.

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Make sure you like this video and subscribe to the

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Volumes YouTube channel so that you don't miss any more

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>of our videos. We will be live every day this week,

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>so make sure you come back after every one of

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>our games, and make sure you follow me on Twitter

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>at underscore Jason lt. That's the place where I release

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>all of the video content that backs up the things

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>that I talked about specifically on the show. It's a

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>great way to kind of get a visual representation of

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>some of the concepts that I've been talking about here.

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>But let's get started with Golden State Memphis. So you know,

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I talked to you guys right after the John Morant injury.

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I said that I said that the Grizzlies were not

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a better team without Jaw, but they were a different team.

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:18.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, with John Morant on the floor, it's very heliocentric,

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>it's very him at the top of the key of

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:23.719
<v Speaker 1>making every decision, so obviously it impacts other players rhythm

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>on the floor. And then secondly, John Morant is the

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 1>worst defensive player on this roster, or at least in

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the rotation by a long shot. Tis Jones, who's, you know,

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>not a fantastic defensive player, is a much better defensive

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>player than Jaw. And so when you pump all of

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:42.839
<v Speaker 1>those job minutes out of the lineup and you replace

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>them with a little bit more Taias Jones and a

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>little bit more size and athleticism, you get a much

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>better defensive team. This season, when Jah was off the floor,

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the Grizzlies were about five points better per one possessions

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 1>on the defensive end of the floor. They actually were

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>better in their overall net rating with Jaw off the floor.

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>And again it's not because Jaw is, you know, hurting

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the team or the team is better without him. But

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>in the small sample sizes that they went without him

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>actually wasn't even that small. They played twenty five games

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I think without him this year. But in those games

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 1>they played a different brand of basketball. It was more bruising,

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 1>more physical, more defensive oriented, and they ran through a

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of teams this year, a lot of good teams.

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 1>We saw that Brooklyn Nets team with Katie and Kyrie

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:32.719
<v Speaker 1>walk into Memphis without Jaw and get beat towards the

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>end of the season. They are a really, really difficult

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>team to deal with. They were already one of the

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>biggest and most athletic teams in the league without Job

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 1>or with Jaw. Taking him out of the lineup and

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 1>putting another bigger player in there was inevitably going to

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:50.839
<v Speaker 1>cause that type of curveball you know that defensive that

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:54.799
<v Speaker 1>increased defensive pressure completely through Golden State out of whack.

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>In that first half, Jordan Pool and Steph only played

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty forty eight available minutes. You know, obviously if both

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 1>players played the full half, they could have played forty

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:07.599
<v Speaker 1>eight minutes. They only played thirty. I thought that was

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:11.159
<v Speaker 1>a direct reaction from Mike Brown to the increase in

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:14.040
<v Speaker 1>size and then struggling with the physicality. They played Clay

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Thompson twenty one first half minutes, which I mean, again,

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>even if you are trying to fight the size, I

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:22.799
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have done that. But again, like Mike Brown's getting

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>tossed into the fire there. He hasn't been coaching the

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>team all season. He's just thrown into that spot. So

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>obviously it's it's tough to hold him super accountable for

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>for that. But I thought that was an interesting reaction

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:35.479
<v Speaker 1>to Memphis coming with a ton of size. You saw

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:37.720
<v Speaker 1>it directly affect their shooting. We talked about how in

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>game game two the Warriors Stars shot horrible. Step shot horrible,

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:47.039
<v Speaker 1>Clay shot horrible, Jordan Pool shot horrible, Andrew Wiggins shot horrible.

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Then they all got going in game three, well, this

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:51.599
<v Speaker 1>curve ball from Memphis threw them all out of whack again.

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:55.159
<v Speaker 1>In the first half. Jordan Pool, Steph Andrew Wiggins, and

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Clay Thompson were one for seventeen from three, one for seventeen,

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:01.040
<v Speaker 1>And there were some good looks in there, don't get

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:02.840
<v Speaker 1>me wrong, but a lot of it was you could

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>just tell they were thrown off by the whole rhythm

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of the game and the way that it changed. They

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>had eleven first half turnovers, which led to nine points

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>for the Grizzlies. That's, you know, sloppiness, and I'm struggling

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>with some of the length and athleticism that was on

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the floor, you know. I I thought it was a

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>really really interesting decision to go back to Steven Adams

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>in the lineups line up from Taylor Jenkins. He has

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>been completely removed from the rotation in this playoff run. Obviously.

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, we saw him play I think three minutes

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>in Game two of the Minnesota series before he basically disappeared.

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>He only played six minutes total in games one through three. Well,

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>they played him twenty seven minutes tonight. Fifteen rebounds, six

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>offensive rebounds. It was plus eleven, just a dominant performance

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>from Steven Adams coming in off the bench and in

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that big guy role. You know, that's the interesting thing

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>about what Taylor Jenkins did in this specific scenario. Do

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>you guys remember how I was super critical of Doc

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Rivers for the way that he went about games one

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and two in that Miami Philly series. I told you, guys,

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I thought that they could never hope to play their

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>same style against Miami without Joe l Embiide and when

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>there's never a chance because at that point it's the

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>loss of talent. So I thought it was a terrible

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>idea to go rolling into Miami with your centers, with

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Jordans on the floor, with Paul Reid on the floor,

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and try to play traditional conventional basketball against a team

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>that just has more talent than you. I thought that

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>was a really poor decision. I thought their best opportunity

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>to win down in Miami was to go crazy and weird,

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 1>because in a small sample size, weird can work. And

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 1>tonight's a great example of that. You know, you when

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Philly went with all guards and wings, they had a

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 1>ton of success down there in Miami because it was

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>it's just weird. Eyes don't know where to stand guy's perimeter.

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, gard guards that are typically guarding you know,

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>perimeter players suddenly are you know, dealing with a bigger

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>wing in the post. You'll have big guys that are

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 1>traditionally hanging around the basket having to chase a shooter

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 1>around or having to cover a ton of ground of rotation.

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>It throws everybody off. But instead, you know, Doc Rivers

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 1>went conventional and got his butt kicked. I thought it

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>was really interesting that Taylor Jenkins was like, no, I'm

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna go weird. I'm gonna go huge. I'm gonna play

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Steven Adams, even though I haven't been able to play

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 1>him at all in this entire playoff run. We're just

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:37.559
<v Speaker 1>going to physically mall Golden State in this game, and

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 1>that's that. That was their best chance to muck things

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>up and get that going the way that they did.

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>To Golden State's credit, they battled back, and I a

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of that credit I give to Steph you know

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>uh In in that game in particular, as as a

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>result of the way that the thing's got tight, you know,

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>sweaty palms, lots of pressure. You're down by eight to

0:09:57.840 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>ten points in the second I think they were actually

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>down by eleven at one point, a lot of guys

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>start pressing. You saw that from like Clay Thompson. It

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 1>was just like, you know, quick shots and transition, quick

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:10.559
<v Speaker 1>tough shots around the rim, over penetrating when you when

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>you're attacking a close out. Jordan Pool like guys. Jordan

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Pool was so good in Game three as an initial

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>dribble drive creator, getting that like first step on somebody

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to get into the lane. But because everyone was shooting poorly,

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 1>guys were playing off of Jordan Pool like got Jordan

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Pool would start to kind of mix up with his

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>rhythm dribbles as he's getting ready to attack and the

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 1>defender's back pedaling, and it's hard because do you take

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>a quick pull up three at the early in the

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>possession when your team's not shooting particularly well, Like that's

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>a it's a it's a It gets in your head

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, it becomes complicated, and you could tell

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that that was disrupting a lot of what they were doing.

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:51.199
<v Speaker 1>It two steps credit. He just came into that fourth

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>quarter and was like, I need to make some plays,

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and he made some places, got to the rim. I

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>thought it was really smart that he started punishing Steven Adams.

0:10:57.520 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Like again, like we talked a lot about how styles

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 1>makes you know, it's not that you know. I'm a

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>big believer in small ball. That's why I'm a big

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 1>believer in this Warriors team. But regardless of if a

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>if a small ball team plays against a big team,

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the small ball team is not guaranteed to win. The

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>small ball team has to do small ball things really well.

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:23.959
<v Speaker 1>Look at like so for instance, like I always talk

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:26.679
<v Speaker 1>about the give and take of going small. If a

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:29.079
<v Speaker 1>team goes big, you can expect that and you're small,

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>you can expect them to get a lot offensive rebounds.

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:35.479
<v Speaker 1>You can expect them to bully you in specific matchups

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 1>like driving to the rim through thinner, smaller defenders or

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>posting up thinner, smaller defenders. Like that's part of the deal, right,

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Like that that's gonna happen. You can expect to face

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>stiff rim opposition, right Like you can expect you can

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 1>expect when you're attacking the basket against this team and

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 1>they're big, that you're gonna have to deal with a

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of big bodies around the basket. Those are all

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the trade offs, right. But the flip side of that is,

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you have a massive skill advantage, a massive foot speed advantage,

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and like quickness, and you have a massive straight line

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>drive speed advantage, like sprinting up and down the floor.

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>You have advantages on the floor. And so what it

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:15.840
<v Speaker 1>becomes is what wins. Is it the big team that's

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>being more physically imposing and winning all those altercations and

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>containing all of the small ball things that you do,

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>because if that's the case, you'll lose to the big team.

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I personally am a big believer in that small ball style,

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 1>but it has to be played well. And in that

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:33.719
<v Speaker 1>first half, especially through the first three quarters, really Go

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and Stay just wasn't playing well. They were losing those

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 1>physical physical altercations all over the floor. They were struggling

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>in individual matchups. Jaren Jackson Jr. Kudos to him, Like

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>he figured out about halfway through that game that outo

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Porter Jr. Just could not keep him from getting to

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the basket, and he just started rip him through and

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:52.079
<v Speaker 1>going to the rim and he was getting whatever he wanted.

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 1>And again, that's always been Jaren Jackson's game, is that

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 1>bullyball game. And I don't know what took him so

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>long to understand that that was his biggest advance image

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>in this series. But tonight he got that figured it out.

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 1>He got that figured out, and he was attacking the basket.

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>But again Memphis was winning the style fight. There were

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 1>two different styles on the floor and they were playing better.

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>But as the game progressed, you know, and you know,

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Golden State. I thought Tim Leigler did a really nice

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:21.560
<v Speaker 1>job breaking this down with J. J Reddick on on

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 1>their podcast that they did the other day, and they

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:26.320
<v Speaker 1>were talking about how, you know, Golden State has a

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:29.079
<v Speaker 1>tendency to get out of what makes them very good.

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 1>This is what happened in the two thousand eight team playoffs,

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>if you guys remember against Houston, and its credit to Houston,

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 1>they did it by switching everything and kind of throwing

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>off all of the split cuts and off ball actions

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:44.719
<v Speaker 1>and on ball actions that Golden State runs. But they

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>got ice so heavy and Katie and Steph both kind

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of fell into it in that series and they got

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>out of whack. Their ball movement stopped and it became

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>a matchup attacking series and James Harden and Chris Paul

0:13:56.960 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>were having as much success attacking matchups. Stephen KD were

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, and one of the biggest indicator. Obviously Chris

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Paul went out and it caused it took that kind

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of question out of the equation. But had Chris Paul

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 1>stayed healthy, that series would have come down to could

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Golden State have gotten back into their style of basketball?

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Golden State style bass basketball is movement. It's multiple passes

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>on every possession. It's multiple getting your defense in in

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>a ton of rotations, you know, because as we always

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>talked about, especially against elite defenses, they'll communicate well on

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the first action. They might communicate well and engage on

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the second action, but that third action, that fourth action,

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 1>that's when you start having guys have tougher responsibilities, more

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>difficult you know, communication type of situations, and they botch

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:46.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff and then you start to get open shots, especially

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>against a young team like this Memphis team. But they

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>go through these extended stretches sometimes where they forget that

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>they did back in two thousand eighteen in the playoffs,

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and they did it a little bit tonight, and all

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, it was like early shots, quick in

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the possession. All of a sudden, it was like transition

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 1>pull up threes. All of a sudden. It's it's difficult

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>shot make, and you know some of it is like

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>like Steph, I've never seen Steph missed that many wide

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>open shots. Like some of it you gotta. But that

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 1>gets in your head then, right, and then you start

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>forcing things even more. You start to feel like it's

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>not your night. Especially for guys like Clay Thompson and

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Georgian Jordan Pool. You saw a lot of that. But

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to their credit, they reined it in and they got

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 1>it together in that fourth quarter and they got going.

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a really really weird game. You know. I don't

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>know how you could say it translates forward, because again

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>it's the the small sample sizes the advantage of the

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>weird team, right Like, obviously, if Philly played a seven

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 1>game series against Miami with no bigs by game three

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>or game four, Eric Spoelster is going to figure out

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 1>ways to consistently exploit you for not having any size

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>on the floor. Right, But in that first game or two,

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>you have your advantage. You know, this was the game.

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>If you were Memphis, you had to win because you

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 1>made things super weird. If you win this game, maybe

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you can eat out one more of those in your

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>buzz saw in front of your home crowd. But like

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 1>at the longer this goes, they're gonna have a lot

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>of time over the course of the next couple of

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>days to dig into the film see where their areas

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 1>opportunity were. There's no way in the world that Memphis

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 1>should get away with having Steven Adams on the floor

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>for more than half the game against your five out attack.

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 1>It just shouldn't happen. So Golden State's got a lot

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of stuff that they got to figure out, but they're

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>all readily available adjustments. And again, this is game five,

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>they should have a much better opportunity to um to

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>make Memphis pay for being as big and as slow

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 1>as they were. A couple of quick shout outs I

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>just talked about Jaren Jackson. I thought he had a

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>monstrous two way performance. Just you know, that guy's young

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 1>and he doesn't see the floor super well, and it's

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be hard for him to be as impactful

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>as he's capable of and consistently enough at this phase

0:16:56.680 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>in his career. But he's gonna be really good because,

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 1>like man, there was a moment there in that game

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 1>where he just suddenly it dawned on him that no

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 1>one could guard En, and he was just going to

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the room every time and just quick little rip throughs

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and stuff and just you know, getting the defender on

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 1>his hip and then making shots off the glass, you know,

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 1>extremely tough left handed layup off the glass there and

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:19.159
<v Speaker 1>crunch time. Just an unbelievable performance. And then credit to

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Tyas Jones, you know his I remember when ty Jones

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:26.640
<v Speaker 1>was coming out of college, he was kind of you know, uh,

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>portrayed as the the like prototypical point guard, like the

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:33.679
<v Speaker 1>guy that is just the guy who can run a team,

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, which is not a thing that you see

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 1>too often in the NBA these days, because most guards

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 1>are high, pick and roll heavy, like really like mechanical

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>decision makers. If he gets caught on the screen, I'm shooting.

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:47.479
<v Speaker 1>If he's kind of caught on the screen, it's still there.

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna drive into the lane further. If I'm gonna

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>get into my floater, I'm gonna get to my pull

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>up shot, I'm gonna get all the way to the rim,

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and if someone absolutely forces me to, then I'll give

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:58.479
<v Speaker 1>the ball up. You know. That's the way most guards

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 1>are wired in the NBA these days are just aren't

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:02.879
<v Speaker 1>many guys like Tyas Jones who can just execute and

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 1>run a team, and he didn't really nice job of

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that tonight, so credit to him. But good, good, good

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:10.160
<v Speaker 1>comeback win from from a Golden State. Like I said,

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Steph in the fourth quarter was incredible. I thought Kevin

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Looney came in and gave some really important minutes. There

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 1>was a monster play from Jordan's Pool after defensive stop

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 1>or he whipped that behind the back dribble and actually

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:22.679
<v Speaker 1>threw it way out in front of him and like

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:24.680
<v Speaker 1>chased it down and got it and got all the

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:26.640
<v Speaker 1>way to the rim for the layup in transition. That's

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that freak of nature straight line speed that Jordan Pool

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>has that was so good. Traymond Green had a monster

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>block on Jaren Jackson Jr. On one of the final

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.919
<v Speaker 1>possessions where he uh where Jaren Jackson kind of forced

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>like a pull up three off the dribble and he

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 1>blocked it. Clay Thompson had a big defensive play towards

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the end of the game on Desmond bain So for

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>for a team that had a lot of guys that

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>had rough nights out of Porter Junior struggled guarding Jaren

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Jr. But he was the only guy making shots.

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>You know. Andrew Wiggins had a massive block on Desmond

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:58.879
<v Speaker 1>Bay and going down the lane. So everyone had a

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 1>rough night in a Golden State Jersey, but everybody came

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.680
<v Speaker 1>through and made the big plays. And that's what the

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:10.720
<v Speaker 1>championship teams do. And I mean again, I still my

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 1>concerns the Golden State remain the same that they've been

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:15.679
<v Speaker 1>this entire playoff run. Like because they're up three one now,

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 1>they're probably gonna win this series, probably gonna go to

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:19.719
<v Speaker 1>the next round. They're gonna face someone like Phoenix or Dallas, right,

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 1>but consistently in this series, they've struggled a little bit

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>with memphisis size, so that's gonna be their big flaw.

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:30.639
<v Speaker 1>But every team has flaws. Dallas is flaws after Luca,

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:33.919
<v Speaker 1>the offensive creation is super inconsistent, and they don't have

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 1>great defensive personnel, although they've been guarding super well. Phoenix's

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>biggest flies you've seen is when they play against a

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>good dribble drive team like Dallas is all of a sudden,

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 1>like Chris Paul starts to struggle a little bit guys

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 1>like Mchail Bridges and Cam Johnson starts to struggle a bit.

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Devin Booker is really the only guy who's been good

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:52.879
<v Speaker 1>on the road in Dallas. So you're seeing Phoenix is

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 1>showing some limitations and shot creation against really good defensive teams,

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>which is exactly what happened to them in the NBA

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Finals against Milwaukee Boston. We just we're gonna talk about

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>them here just a minute. Their offense goes through these

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 1>extended stretches where they're sloppy. So all these teams have flaws.

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not trying to act like Golden States the

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 1>only team with the flaw. It's just this is their

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 1>specific flaw. When they play teams that are very big

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and physical, it can cause them some issues. Tonight they

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>were able to overcome it. I thought there was a

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 1>big step for them. Obviously, that will be the matchups

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>are the things that determine these types of outcomes, and

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what happens when they move further along. But

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:29.159
<v Speaker 1>three one in this there is the only team in

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the second round that has a three one lead right

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:35.160
<v Speaker 1>now is Golden State. Before we move on to Boston Milwaukee,

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:38.640
<v Speaker 1>a couple of quick housekeeping notes like earlier, like this video,

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 1>and subscribe to the Volumes YouTube channel. We're gonna be

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 1>going live every day this week, so make sure you

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 1>come back after every big game, and make sure you

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:49.679
<v Speaker 1>follow me on Twitter at underscore Jason lt. That is

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the best place to see any video content that breaks

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:54.360
<v Speaker 1>down the things that I talked about on the game

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:57.160
<v Speaker 1>on the show. So let's talk about Boston and Milwaukee

0:20:57.160 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 1>for a minute. So super super interesting game. You guys,

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 1>most of you who been following the show for a while,

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 1>you know where I stand. I picked Boston originally in five,

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:07.119
<v Speaker 1>and then when Milwaukee stole Game one, I stayed on Boston.

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I just thought it would be a longer series. And

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:12.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, tell to Janice in particular his credit. He's

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>done an unbelievable job dragging this series out. Boston is

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:21.399
<v Speaker 1>the better team. They from January three on they were

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the number one offense in the league and the number

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>number one defense in the league. They were the number

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>one defense by a big margin. They had a five

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>point per one hunder possession advantage over the second best team.

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Boston has like literally utterly dominated that Brooklyn team. And

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I know everyone wants to slander Kevin Durant, and I

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:40.640
<v Speaker 1>know everyone wants a slander Steve Nash and Kyrie Irving,

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and they're an easy target. But Brooklyn was good when

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:47.159
<v Speaker 1>Katie and Kyrie played. So that's how it goes. And

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:50.639
<v Speaker 1>and and Boston ripped him to shreds okay. Milwaukee, on

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, was the twentieth ranked defense in the

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 1>NBA after the All Star break. They struggle like guarding

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the perimeter. They've only been good at guarding the paint.

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:01.400
<v Speaker 1>That's always been their defensive identity. And so that's why

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I picked Boston. And the series is broken down in

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting manner, and your honest to me is

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the only reason it's as competitive as it has been.

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 1>And so it's a credit to him. And like I

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>have to say, I have I have been so unbelievably

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.360
<v Speaker 1>blown away and impressed by Janice in this playoff run.

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, as I've told you guys many times, I

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 1>am slow to move guys to the top. It's just

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the way I'm wired. Big lebron fan here didn't think

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:28.199
<v Speaker 1>he was the best part in the league until two

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 1>thousand and twelve. That's the manner in which that I

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>make these decisions for me personally, I just take it slow.

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I give a lot of respect in leeway and margin

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 1>for error, in benefit of the doubt to the guys

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 1>that have done it year and year in and year

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 1>out right. That's just the way I am. But Janice

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 1>is making it unassailable at this point that he is

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 1>by himself at the top of the league. He looks

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 1>comfortable against this Boston defense, which is completely insane. I've

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 1>said this on the show before and I stand by it.

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I think Boston is the best sensive team of this era.

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:04.640
<v Speaker 1>They've at any given moment, they always have five good

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>defensive players on the floor. They can guard almost every position.

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:11.120
<v Speaker 1>They switch, they can do drop they they double and recover.

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:14.679
<v Speaker 1>They're active off the ball there. They can block shots

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:16.480
<v Speaker 1>at the rim, they can block shots on the perimeter.

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>They are a frightening defensive team. They make Kevin freaking

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:26.679
<v Speaker 1>Durant look lost. And I have never seen Kevin freaking

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Durant look lost. Even in his bad playoff moments in

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the past, he never looked as bad as he did

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 1>against this Boston defense. And Janice just looks completely in

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>control when he has the ball. Now, again, basketball is

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 1>a team sport. It's not always gonna manifest as a win.

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 1>That's why I picked Boston. But I've been blown away

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:53.439
<v Speaker 1>by Jhannice is passing. He is now like is he

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 1>is he Lebron or Yokitchener Luca or CP three with

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the past? No, but he's in one of the tears

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>right below there. And that's a remarkable accomplishment for a

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:06.920
<v Speaker 1>guy who didn't grow up playing this game, who literally

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>learned it on the fly. It's just unbelievable stuff. He's

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>starting to break down Boston's wall a little bit too.

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:17.159
<v Speaker 1>That's Milwaukee's chance to keep this series going longer, is

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:19.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, as the series is progressed. At the start,

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 1>it was Boston's guys were stonewalling on us, and then

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:26.679
<v Speaker 1>now it's like, you're honest, is starting to run them

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:29.160
<v Speaker 1>over a little bit. This game, in that second half,

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:32.120
<v Speaker 1>he's starting to go right around him, like the Boston

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>players aren't even holding their ground anymore as they're starting

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 1>to wear down. And that's the impact he had on

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Phoenix in the NBA Finals last year. It's an impact

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:42.880
<v Speaker 1>he had on Brooklyn in the Conference semis last year.

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:45.199
<v Speaker 1>That's what he does to you, He just slowly but

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 1>surely breaks you down because he's the most physically imposing

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 1>player of this era, and that's how it goes. A

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:55.160
<v Speaker 1>couple other quick notes on Boston's front al Horford playoff

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:58.160
<v Speaker 1>career high thirty points tonight just an absolute monster. He's

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 1>an example of the way matchups and scheming can lead

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:04.399
<v Speaker 1>to a specific player having a ton of success. Do

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 1>you guys remember in the two thousand fifteen NBA Finals,

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>You Warriors fans will remember this vividly well, But do

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you remember how Andrey Guadala kept making corner threes and

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:19.479
<v Speaker 1>as a result, his scoring numbers were inflated and he

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 1>was guarding Lebron as the primary defender, so he got

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a finals m v P. But anybody who was watching

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the series understood what was actually happening in that series

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>was Steph was running high pick and roll with Dre,

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and Cleveland had in their scheme a trap of every

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>staff curry pick and roll. So whoever was guarding Dre

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>like Tristan Thompson, or and whoever was guarding Steph like

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:44.639
<v Speaker 1>Kyrie Irving, those two guys would go Steph and they

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:46.920
<v Speaker 1>dumped the ball over the top. Excuse me, they dumped

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:49.119
<v Speaker 1>the ball over the top to Draymond. Draymond would roll

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:51.439
<v Speaker 1>down the lane. Lebron would come over and help and

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>shut off Draymond on the on the short roll, and

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:56.639
<v Speaker 1>Draymond would kick to the left corner. Every single time.

0:25:57.280 --> 0:26:00.639
<v Speaker 1>Always wide open was Andrea Guadala and he would make

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the shot. And so the points are going to Andre Gudala.

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>But it's a scheme thing, and it's Steph that was

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:11.119
<v Speaker 1>creating that. That's why that happened, right, That's why I

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 1>thought Steph got so awfully robbed of his Finals MVP

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 1>that he deserves and that he has in my book. Right,

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 1>But that's the way scheming can lead to a role

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:25.159
<v Speaker 1>player getting fantastic shots and it having an impact on

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a series. That's what happened to Al Horford in this series,

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's happened like crazy in the last couple of games.

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>NBA drop coverage is designed to take away the paint

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and when you chase the guard over the top of

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the screen and the biggest waiting in the paint, both

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>of those players are going with the guy who has

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the ball, essentially, and when you're rolling to the basket

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 1>with a traditional role man like Clink Capella, You're okay

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>because the guy who's in drop coverage, the big man

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:52.680
<v Speaker 1>who's in drop coverage, can guard both the role man

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:55.679
<v Speaker 1>and the guard as long as the other guy chases

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 1>him and funnels him to the basket. Right. But if

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I have Al Horford set this screen and I have

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:03.920
<v Speaker 1>him popped to the three point line and the biggest

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:06.199
<v Speaker 1>still in drop around the basket and the guard is

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>still chasing the other guard over the top of the screen,

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 1>Horford is going to be open every single time. And

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 1>so he's been wide open and picking pops all series long,

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and he's and he's been knocking him down in off

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:21.439
<v Speaker 1>ball situations. If if Brook Lopez, as part of the

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Milwaukee defense, wants to hawk the paint, then Al Horford

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 1>just sits in the week side corner and now Jayson

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Tatum all he has to do is get by Wesley Matthews,

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 1>apply a little bit of rim pressure so that Brooke

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:37.439
<v Speaker 1>commits easy kick pass out to Al Horford in the

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:41.359
<v Speaker 1>corner and he's making them. You know again, Like a

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of times, fans, especially fans of a losing team,

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:47.359
<v Speaker 1>will focus on shot shot value, right or shot I

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 1>should say shot outcome. Oh that they made all their shots.

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Al Horford couldn't miss tonight. You know, I can't believe

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Boston's making all these threes. They're wide open. It's shot

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:02.120
<v Speaker 1>quality determined shot out for the most part, especially over

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:05.879
<v Speaker 1>a large sample size. Yes, in a weird game like

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Golden State Memphis tonight, you might get some weird outcomes

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:11.720
<v Speaker 1>on open shots. But for the most part, especially when

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 1>you become familiar with the team, wide open shots for

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 1>good shooters are probably gonna go in, and they did,

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and they're gonna keep going in. Boston shot wide open

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 1>threes in the first round. There were wide open threes

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 1>through games one through three of this series. I don't

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>know what they shot tonight because I haven't seen the

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:31.960
<v Speaker 1>stats yet, but they've made all their open shots tonight.

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 1>That's scheming. That's Andrea Guadala hitting corn quarter threes in

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the two thousand fifteen finals. That's how this works. So

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 1>credit to Al Horford. I'm not trying to undercut him

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>by at all, but I just think it's super interesting

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the way that scheming can lead to an individual performance

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>as great as that last touch on this series Jayson Tatum,

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, awful, awful, awful Game three, and the mark

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>of greatness is bounced back. You know, obviously consistency is

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the old mint mark of greatness, but not everyone's Lebron.

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Lebron is Lebron is great in every playoff game. But

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you know what, He's gonna go down as the second

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 1>best basketball player of all time, maybe the first. Okay,

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 1>So that's that standard, and Janice is quickly trending in

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that trend did that direction himself. But like Jayson Tatum

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 1>had a really bad game in game in Game three,

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and he bounced back, made a ton of big shots

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:22.200
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the game that I used to

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the game. A couple of I thought that the story

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>of the game for Tatum was attacking the paint. It

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 1>was played early in the game in transition where he

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 1>put his head down and he dunked on Brook Lopez

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 1>like you like you wouldn't believe. It was frightening, just

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:40.479
<v Speaker 1>a vicious tone setting message sending dunk. And as a result,

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 1>he made seven made paint field goals in this game.

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 1>So gotten to the paint, made seven shots only three

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 1>in game three. So his relentlessness attacking the basket was

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 1>a big part of him getting going tonight. Made an

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 1>impossible lay up down the stretch of that game to

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 1>ice it too. You know, and and shots a action

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 1>has been the story of this entire series for Boston.

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>When they've been able to get out of the half court,

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:07.960
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, when they've been able to keep the game

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 1>in the half court and keep Milwaukee out of transition,

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 1>they've dominated, but they've lost games in transition. They were

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty points down in fast breakpoints in game one, they

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 1>lost even in fast breakpoints. In game two they won

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:25.959
<v Speaker 1>down ten and fast break points. In game three they lost.

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's that's the way that that dynamic shifts

0:30:28.800 --> 0:30:30.959
<v Speaker 1>on their ability to keep control of the game. Tatum

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:32.480
<v Speaker 1>was a big part of that tonight. I thought his

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>his shot selection was really really smart, much better job

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>keeping his teammates involved the only in one assist in

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 1>game three at five assists tonight, so credit to Jayson Dante.

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 1>We did a deeper dive on this game earlier. You

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 1>can find it on our YouTube stream. Did thirty minutes

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:46.720
<v Speaker 1>on this game, got into a ton of the details,

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 1>So go on to our YouTube page later and you

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 1>can check that out there. We're gonna bring my guy

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Carson on. UM. Make sure you liked this video and

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to our channel. Make sure that you guys hang

0:30:56.920 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 1>out every night this week. We're gonna be going live

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 1>after every big game, and make sure you follow me

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at underscore Jason lt for video content. We're

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna bring my guy Carson on and we're gonna do

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 1>five big questions. What's up my guy? Oh, we're good, Jason.

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Hope you guys enjoyed my big there where nobody could

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>hear me. Let's go modern technology. It's amazing how this

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff works. Okay, Yeah, I am on your side here.

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean I have said, I think several times on

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:28.239
<v Speaker 1>the show that I'm a big Yokich advocate, and I

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 1>just think it's incredibly difficult to hold the Nuggets relative

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 1>lack of playoffs success. I mean, they won a series

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 1>last year, obviously without Jamal and with a roster that

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't compare in terms of talent to the top teams

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 1>out west. It was an abysmal defensive Portland team. But

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a regular season award first and foremost, his regular

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>season production efficiency on off data, you know, just the

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 1>eye tests in terms of how he empowers that offense undeniable,

0:31:55.200 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and even in terms of playoff performance, I mean he

0:31:56.920 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 1>put up thirty one thirteen and six on fifties out

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent from the field. The Nuggets offense

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 1>was better in the playoffs than it was in the

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 1>regular season. But it's just a matter of a massive

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 1>talent deficits. So I think people are very unfair at

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 1>times with the Yoka stuff, and I just don't think

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a good way to evaluate a guy's merit looking

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:18.800
<v Speaker 1>at an individual playoff series in which the team is

0:32:18.840 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 1>totally outclass talent wise and saying, well, that negates a

0:32:21.440 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 1>regular season. That just doesn't make sense to me. Yeah,

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the whole like best players should win

0:32:28.480 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 1>every series thing is kind of like a it's it's

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 1>a skip any less line of thing thinking. I have

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:35.600
<v Speaker 1>a huge problem with it. To me, it just doesn't

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:40.160
<v Speaker 1>it's low brow. It it disrespects the game of basketball

0:32:40.200 --> 0:32:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and what it actually means. Like talk to guys like

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Lebron and Steph two guys who are the two most

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 1>successful players of this era, and they will tell you

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 1>time and time again that it's their teammates that that

0:32:50.880 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 1>have carried them to this point, not carried them, but

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 1>that have helped them get to this point. I mean,

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious your thoughts, Carson, what do you think of

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 1>What do you think of my idea that in a

0:33:00.760 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 1>field of flawed candidates you default to the guy who

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 1>was the best player in the league this year I

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 1>thought Janice. I do think that that's interesting, But I

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 1>think kind of the key point is what you also

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:15.120
<v Speaker 1>touched on, and that the Bucks, in terms of encourt

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 1>performance this year, outscored their opponents by less with Janice

0:33:19.080 --> 0:33:21.920
<v Speaker 1>on the floor than the Denver Nuggets did with Yokich

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:23.240
<v Speaker 1>on the floor. And it's like, to me, once you

0:33:23.320 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 1>reach that point, it's okay, you know, what more does

0:33:25.360 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Yokich have to do? I think that's a sound line

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 1>of thinking. But I just think the overachievement in team

0:33:31.760 --> 0:33:35.280
<v Speaker 1>success for the Nuggets and the relative underachievement for the Box,

0:33:35.320 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to me, makes up for that best player in the

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 1>world kind of default factor. That's a really solid case, Carson.

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I can't argue with you there. My final thought on

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 1>it is no problem with Yokich deserving m v P.

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Don't feel like it's a travesty This isn't Russell westbroke

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand seventeen. But it just I personally in

0:33:56.400 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 1>this situation would have gone with the honest. But I

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 1>don't have any problem with the case. Yeah, and I

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 1>will say, just to the best player in the series

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:08.560
<v Speaker 1>point that you touched on, it's like the Warriors had

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 1>five of the six best players in that series. You know,

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:13.479
<v Speaker 1>Yokich is the loan exception there, so it's very tough

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 1>to look at that as Okay, one guy is determinative

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of everything there. All right, now we're rolling Jason, everybody

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 1>can hear me. We're talking about Yokis. We're feeling great.

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about a couple of other superstars here, both

0:34:27.080 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of whom are maybe in the midst of a comeback

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>here got their series even from down two oh to

0:34:32.120 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to a piece. We're talking about the Sixers and the

0:34:35.120 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 1>MAVs here, led by Joel Embiad and Luca don Che. So, Jason,

0:34:38.480 --> 0:34:40.320
<v Speaker 1>who do you think has the better chance of actually

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:47.239
<v Speaker 1>successfully leading that comeback all the way and beat or Luca? Okay,

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:50.319
<v Speaker 1>let me before I answer this, let me clearly differentiate

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 1>between who I think is the better player and who

0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 1>a better playoff player and who I think actually has

0:34:56.600 --> 0:34:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a better chance of leading to come back. I think

0:34:58.560 --> 0:35:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Embiad has a better chance of leading to come back

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 1>because I'm actually picking the sixers at this point. I

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:05.239
<v Speaker 1>did a deep dive on this. You guys can find

0:35:05.239 --> 0:35:08.520
<v Speaker 1>it on our video on our YouTube channel from earlier today.

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:11.799
<v Speaker 1>Did a ton of film study on on games three

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and game four. The there is a dynamic taking place

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 1>with Miami that they can't score with Joel Embid on

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the floor. So Joel Embiid as the defensive ful chrum

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:24.440
<v Speaker 1>plus everything. They figured out some really interesting stuff with

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:28.360
<v Speaker 1>with his post ups today or yesterday, Like they Miami

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 1>was doing this really interesting like front backside help things.

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 1>So they were switching pick and rolls with Embad and

0:35:34.360 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 1>happily putting guards on Embiid and happily letting him go

0:35:37.640 --> 0:35:39.799
<v Speaker 1>post them up. But they were just fronting him and

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 1>then helping from the backside, so nothing was open. Well.

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:45.239
<v Speaker 1>Philly had some really interesting counters today where they use

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:48.719
<v Speaker 1>some player movement and some ball movement to capitalize on

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:51.480
<v Speaker 1>those fronts to get easy shots for Joel Embiid. I

0:35:51.480 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 1>think they have more chess moves to make in this

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:56.759
<v Speaker 1>series because I think they have better players to utilize

0:35:56.760 --> 0:35:58.719
<v Speaker 1>in the half court. I thought it was a damn

0:35:58.800 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 1>shame that Doc Rivers went down to Miami and tricked

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:02.879
<v Speaker 1>off those first two games the way that he did,

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 1>But I mean all at all, Like Embiad, I think

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:08.200
<v Speaker 1>is actually going to win the series now, Luca he

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:11.719
<v Speaker 1>has a chance to, but I think Phoenix is so

0:36:11.800 --> 0:36:15.080
<v Speaker 1>much better that they'll pull it off. My thing is like,

0:36:15.080 --> 0:36:17.279
<v Speaker 1>like in a vacuum, would I rather have Luca or

0:36:17.320 --> 0:36:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Embiid for a playoff series? I value that half court

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:25.440
<v Speaker 1>surgery to such a high extent that I'm always going

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to default to a guy like Luca, Whereas, like for

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Joel Embiid, maybe for an eighty two game season, his

0:36:30.719 --> 0:36:34.400
<v Speaker 1>defensive capabilities are more valuable, but and beads more likely

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 1>to lead to come back because his team has a

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 1>better chance of winning. But I still think Luca is

0:36:38.640 --> 0:36:42.239
<v Speaker 1>a better playoff player, if that makes sense. Yeah, I

0:36:42.320 --> 0:36:45.279
<v Speaker 1>completely agree with you every step of the way there.

0:36:45.320 --> 0:36:48.440
<v Speaker 1>And even when Luca is having an offshooting night like

0:36:48.480 --> 0:36:51.960
<v Speaker 1>he did in Game four, you just feel the pronounced

0:36:52.000 --> 0:36:55.480
<v Speaker 1>playmaking impact. You see him just effortlessly collapsing the defensive

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:59.440
<v Speaker 1>whatnot creating so many open threes so frequently, And I

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:01.799
<v Speaker 1>mean the guy is well, maybe he's not the top

0:37:01.840 --> 0:37:04.440
<v Speaker 1>playoff score ever anymore, maybe he's back down to number two,

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 1>but like his playoff production is unfathomably great. But I

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 1>also agree with you and that the Sixers are I

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:14.520
<v Speaker 1>think a better team facing certainly on inferior team in

0:37:14.560 --> 0:37:16.719
<v Speaker 1>Miami as compared to the Suns, and they're just in

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 1>much better position. It's really, I think a very tall

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:23.240
<v Speaker 1>task to ask Luca to overcome just the talent deficit

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that they're facing against the Sun's team that is so complete.

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 1>What do you think he would have to do to

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:33.319
<v Speaker 1>actually get them to that point? Like how incredible would

0:37:33.360 --> 0:37:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Luca have to be? And what would have to go

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:38.640
<v Speaker 1>right around is too he's gotta make shots. I mean, like,

0:37:38.680 --> 0:37:42.880
<v Speaker 1>what's crazy is Lucas Lucas having a really good offensive

0:37:42.920 --> 0:37:45.920
<v Speaker 1>series overall when you factor and everything he's bringing to

0:37:45.920 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the table. I mean, you have to have a really

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:49.960
<v Speaker 1>good offensive series from Luca to be too two with

0:37:50.000 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the team like the Suns. But he was one for

0:37:52.320 --> 0:37:54.680
<v Speaker 1>ten on on his threes again against Phoenix. I think

0:37:54.680 --> 0:37:56.759
<v Speaker 1>it was you do you remember that that. Do you

0:37:56.760 --> 0:37:59.440
<v Speaker 1>remember the exact percentage in your TikTok that that Luca

0:37:59.520 --> 0:38:01.839
<v Speaker 1>shot on playoffs step back threees? Do you remember off

0:38:01.840 --> 0:38:03.799
<v Speaker 1>top of your head? I think it was forty six

0:38:03.840 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 1>point three? Guys? How insane is that? Like, obviously I

0:38:08.640 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 1>think it was coming into that series, are coming into

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:13.720
<v Speaker 1>game two or game three that series, But to shoot

0:38:13.840 --> 0:38:18.880
<v Speaker 1>just under on step back threes in the playoffs is

0:38:18.920 --> 0:38:22.359
<v Speaker 1>a ridiculous level of efficiency. And he's been shooting like

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:24.880
<v Speaker 1>ship in this series. So like my thing is, like

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm picking Phoenix to win the series. Still my guess

0:38:28.719 --> 0:38:34.400
<v Speaker 1>is in seven games. But Dallas chance is basically exactly

0:38:34.440 --> 0:38:37.279
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing. Jalen Brunson getting things going a little

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 1>bit more, you know, Uh, Spencer Dinwoody spot impact much

0:38:41.719 --> 0:38:44.960
<v Speaker 1>much better defense. Reggie Bullock and and uh and Reggie

0:38:45.000 --> 0:38:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Bullock and Dorian Phinnie Smith have been unbelievable on the

0:38:47.520 --> 0:38:50.919
<v Speaker 1>defensive end. They've gone away from power for a little

0:38:50.920 --> 0:38:52.719
<v Speaker 1>bit more. In a little bit more, Maxi kleeb because

0:38:52.719 --> 0:38:55.040
<v Speaker 1>it opens things up for them scoring in the half court.

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:57.279
<v Speaker 1>A lot of a lot of good things going on,

0:38:57.560 --> 0:39:00.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's how it's too too. But you win this

0:39:00.520 --> 0:39:04.480
<v Speaker 1>series with Luca going into Phoenix in game five and

0:39:04.600 --> 0:39:06.960
<v Speaker 1>going seven for ten on step back three is instead

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of one for ten on step back three. So to me,

0:39:09.320 --> 0:39:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that will be the because that's kind of like a

0:39:12.080 --> 0:39:14.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of those difficult shots he takes, the step backs

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and the turnarounds in the posts and stuff like that.

0:39:16.320 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Those are like the way he bails out the end

0:39:18.600 --> 0:39:20.840
<v Speaker 1>of possessions when things when they've run their actions a

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:22.600
<v Speaker 1>few times and they didn't get an open three out

0:39:22.640 --> 0:39:25.000
<v Speaker 1>of it, they'll go back to Luca in an io

0:39:25.239 --> 0:39:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and he'll take those shots. So like they are rescue

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:30.520
<v Speaker 1>possessions and they haven't been scoring on the rescue possessions.

0:39:30.560 --> 0:39:33.480
<v Speaker 1>So if Lucas starts scoring on those rescue possessions, that'll

0:39:33.520 --> 0:39:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that'll be a wins it. The great example of what

0:39:35.200 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about is James Harden last night. Like James

0:39:38.080 --> 0:39:40.439
<v Speaker 1>Harden last night was making the step back three and

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:42.640
<v Speaker 1>as a result, he was able to rescue a bunch

0:39:42.680 --> 0:39:45.160
<v Speaker 1>of possessions and next thing you know, Philly has a

0:39:45.239 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred twenty points against a really good Miney defense. Well

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:51.959
<v Speaker 1>let's get back to that series for a second here, Jason,

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:56.760
<v Speaker 1>because you mentioned obviously these sort of Doc rivers masterclass

0:39:56.840 --> 0:39:59.120
<v Speaker 1>of messing things up in those first couple of games.

0:39:59.160 --> 0:40:01.799
<v Speaker 1>But we are back even at two games a piece

0:40:01.840 --> 0:40:05.040
<v Speaker 1>now between Philly and Miami. So do you think there's

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:08.040
<v Speaker 1>any chance that Doc is actually doing a good job now, Jason?

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:13.680
<v Speaker 1>He is? He flat out his Like, I mean, this

0:40:13.760 --> 0:40:16.480
<v Speaker 1>is this kind of reminds me of the Rudy Gobert situation,

0:40:16.719 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 1>where like, if you guys remember with Rudy Gobert, the

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:23.680
<v Speaker 1>narrative surrounding him kind of exploded to the point where

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:25.920
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't matching what was actually happening on the court.

0:40:26.160 --> 0:40:28.960
<v Speaker 1>The theory was, oh, you can score on Rudy Gobert,

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:31.279
<v Speaker 1>and it was like, actually, no, no, no, you can

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:35.680
<v Speaker 1>score on the jazz. But Rudy Gobert is basically like

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:38.160
<v Speaker 1>literally like like R two D two in Star Wars

0:40:38.200 --> 0:40:39.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to plug all the holes in the in the

0:40:40.000 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 1>in the little electrical board, right or I guess that

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:47.520
<v Speaker 1>was B B eight, But I'm butchering Star Wars references.

0:40:49.320 --> 0:40:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Star Wars reference anyway. My point is is, like Empeed

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:57.520
<v Speaker 1>is is uh, Gobert is always plugging all these holes

0:40:57.560 --> 0:40:59.680
<v Speaker 1>for them, and so he ended up catching the bad

0:40:59.760 --> 0:41:03.839
<v Speaker 1>rip Tatian for what was basically a roster construction issue, right,

0:41:03.960 --> 0:41:06.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, And and that's kind of like I'm not

0:41:06.360 --> 0:41:10.480
<v Speaker 1>under selling docs previous failures, like and I have super

0:41:10.520 --> 0:41:13.560
<v Speaker 1>critical of what he did to start this series. I

0:41:13.600 --> 0:41:16.520
<v Speaker 1>thought he was. I thought, and again, like, it's hard

0:41:16.560 --> 0:41:18.640
<v Speaker 1>to convince the traditional basketball coach has been around for

0:41:18.680 --> 0:41:21.360
<v Speaker 1>a long time to do something crazy like bench the

0:41:21.400 --> 0:41:24.359
<v Speaker 1>two centers you have to play five wings all game long.

0:41:24.440 --> 0:41:26.360
<v Speaker 1>But that that's just what I would have done. But

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:30.640
<v Speaker 1>that's that's Monday morning quarterbacking. So it's it's irrelevant overall,

0:41:30.680 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 1>though in this playoff run, I thought he outcoached Nick

0:41:33.200 --> 0:41:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Nurse that I need to really. I thought it was

0:41:35.600 --> 0:41:37.600
<v Speaker 1>genius the way that he pushed the ball so much

0:41:37.640 --> 0:41:40.839
<v Speaker 1>in transition early in that series. That that's always been

0:41:40.840 --> 0:41:43.240
<v Speaker 1>a weakness of Phillies and he turned it into his strength.

0:41:43.320 --> 0:41:45.279
<v Speaker 1>And that's one of the biggest reasons why people were

0:41:45.280 --> 0:41:47.920
<v Speaker 1>picking Toronto. People like myself for picking Toronto was I

0:41:47.920 --> 0:41:49.799
<v Speaker 1>thought they'd be able to win the transition battle, and

0:41:49.800 --> 0:41:53.759
<v Speaker 1>Philly won the transition battle. They did. Doc did a

0:41:53.800 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 1>really good job coaching up on the defensive end of

0:41:56.080 --> 0:42:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the floor that series, particularly basically just daring Toronto to shoot,

0:42:00.920 --> 0:42:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and it burned them a couple of times, obviously when

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:05.520
<v Speaker 1>they were up three. Oh, but they won a big

0:42:05.560 --> 0:42:09.120
<v Speaker 1>game in Game six on the road by daring Toronto

0:42:09.160 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 1>to shoot and they went ice cold. And then in

0:42:11.200 --> 0:42:13.600
<v Speaker 1>this series, and I've I've I've broke this down just

0:42:13.600 --> 0:42:15.440
<v Speaker 1>a minute ago. I won't go too much further into it,

0:42:15.480 --> 0:42:18.400
<v Speaker 1>but like his his the dynamics he's been using to

0:42:18.480 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 1>counter the way that Miami has guarded and Beat has

0:42:21.080 --> 0:42:24.839
<v Speaker 1>been really really smart. He's mixed in some zone you know.

0:42:24.960 --> 0:42:27.399
<v Speaker 1>There there's there's a lot of there's a lot of

0:42:27.480 --> 0:42:30.319
<v Speaker 1>high level chess moves going on on on behalf of

0:42:30.360 --> 0:42:32.759
<v Speaker 1>Doc Rivers, and then you gotta give him some credit.

0:42:32.920 --> 0:42:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Like I've always said on the show, like we have

0:42:35.280 --> 0:42:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to be critical, like I I there's no universe for

0:42:38.200 --> 0:42:40.680
<v Speaker 1>where Carson and I can put on a good show

0:42:41.440 --> 0:42:44.400
<v Speaker 1>or we're just pandering with propaganda all day long. Like

0:42:44.480 --> 0:42:46.920
<v Speaker 1>we have to be critical. But the flip side of

0:42:46.960 --> 0:42:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that is we have to be fair. If if we

0:42:49.200 --> 0:42:51.719
<v Speaker 1>are critical of players like James Harden or critical of

0:42:51.760 --> 0:42:54.840
<v Speaker 1>coaches like Doc Rivers when they do play well or

0:42:54.880 --> 0:42:56.960
<v Speaker 1>coach well, I think it's important for us to call

0:42:57.000 --> 0:42:58.359
<v Speaker 1>that out as well. And I think Doc has done

0:42:58.400 --> 0:43:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a really good job in this playoff run. Yeah, I

0:43:01.960 --> 0:43:04.680
<v Speaker 1>agree with you in the improvement and I think obviously

0:43:05.280 --> 0:43:07.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people keepd in on the DeAndre Jordan playing.

0:43:07.960 --> 0:43:10.479
<v Speaker 1>You talked about that a lot. The most hilarious stat

0:43:10.520 --> 0:43:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to me was that the Sixers were sixty three points

0:43:13.560 --> 0:43:16.719
<v Speaker 1>per one possessions worse with him on the floor. Very

0:43:16.760 --> 0:43:19.480
<v Speaker 1>small sample size and three playoff games. But obviously, you know,

0:43:19.760 --> 0:43:22.239
<v Speaker 1>Doc actually made the move that it didn't seem like

0:43:22.239 --> 0:43:23.880
<v Speaker 1>he was gonna make. And we haven't seen DJ and

0:43:23.920 --> 0:43:26.600
<v Speaker 1>they've won back to back games now and there's definitely

0:43:26.600 --> 0:43:30.840
<v Speaker 1>progress on that front. Let's pivot to another Eastern Conference

0:43:30.840 --> 0:43:33.640
<v Speaker 1>series here, one that we already touched on a bit today.

0:43:34.040 --> 0:43:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Celtics Bucks Who wins Game five? Jason, I think the

0:43:39.360 --> 0:43:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Celtics are gonna win comfortably. You know, Like I told

0:43:44.640 --> 0:43:48.919
<v Speaker 1>you guys in the show that we did Saturday night,

0:43:49.120 --> 0:43:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was Saturday night, might meant it might

0:43:51.200 --> 0:43:55.799
<v Speaker 1>have been Sunday. I said that I predicted Boston would

0:43:55.800 --> 0:43:58.040
<v Speaker 1>win by ten to fifteen points in Game three. In

0:43:58.120 --> 0:44:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Game four, which they had a ten point lead late,

0:44:00.960 --> 0:44:02.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I'm not actually sure what the final score

0:44:02.800 --> 0:44:05.160
<v Speaker 1>ended up being. UM and then I thought they'd go

0:44:05.239 --> 0:44:08.600
<v Speaker 1>home and win comfortably at home, Like I think they'll

0:44:08.600 --> 0:44:12.440
<v Speaker 1>feed off the home crowd and not not necessarily a blowout,

0:44:12.480 --> 0:44:14.200
<v Speaker 1>but it'll be one of those games where they're stiff

0:44:14.280 --> 0:44:16.840
<v Speaker 1>arming Milwaukee the whole game. And then I think Games

0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:19.080
<v Speaker 1>six will be a really really close game that I

0:44:19.120 --> 0:44:22.520
<v Speaker 1>think Boston will win. And the main reason why is

0:44:22.560 --> 0:44:27.919
<v Speaker 1>like Boston has a clear cut pathway to victory. Keep

0:44:27.960 --> 0:44:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the game in the half court, play smart offense. Do

0:44:31.760 --> 0:44:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the same thing you've been doing for damn near five

0:44:34.160 --> 0:44:37.000
<v Speaker 1>months now, and that's play the best defense of this era.

0:44:37.440 --> 0:44:40.959
<v Speaker 1>If you do that, you're going to win. Every time

0:44:41.000 --> 0:44:43.040
<v Speaker 1>that the wheels have gone off the rails for Boston

0:44:43.080 --> 0:44:45.840
<v Speaker 1>in this series, it's been quick threes off the dribble

0:44:45.880 --> 0:44:49.040
<v Speaker 1>early in the shot clock, quick threas in transition early

0:44:49.080 --> 0:44:51.279
<v Speaker 1>in the shot clock, driving into the teeth of the

0:44:51.320 --> 0:44:54.200
<v Speaker 1>defense and trying to finish over shot blocking and getting blocked.

0:44:54.560 --> 0:44:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I pointed out earlier today, I think there were thirty

0:44:56.520 --> 0:44:58.640
<v Speaker 1>seven for forty eight or something crazy like that on

0:44:58.719 --> 0:45:02.240
<v Speaker 1>two's tonight. So the much better execution to get higher

0:45:02.320 --> 0:45:05.400
<v Speaker 1>quality two point shots at the rim or near the rim.

0:45:05.440 --> 0:45:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Everything for this entire series has come down to offensive

0:45:08.400 --> 0:45:11.319
<v Speaker 1>execution for Boston. Can they keep their ship together long

0:45:11.440 --> 0:45:15.280
<v Speaker 1>enough to get quality shots often enough to keep Milwaukee

0:45:15.280 --> 0:45:18.160
<v Speaker 1>out of transition, because when they get in transition, it's

0:45:18.239 --> 0:45:19.879
<v Speaker 1>Jannest dribbling the ball off the court with the head

0:45:19.880 --> 0:45:21.640
<v Speaker 1>of steam and no one can do a damn thing

0:45:21.680 --> 0:45:24.280
<v Speaker 1>with him. It's like, it reminds me of prime Lebron

0:45:24.360 --> 0:45:27.279
<v Speaker 1>James all the all the Lebron comps continue with the

0:45:27.360 --> 0:45:29.200
<v Speaker 1>honest thing. And they're very different players in a lot

0:45:29.200 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 1>of different ways. But one of the ways they're very

0:45:31.239 --> 0:45:34.759
<v Speaker 1>similar is Lebron was one man fast break. When he

0:45:34.800 --> 0:45:37.239
<v Speaker 1>got a steel or a block or rebound or whatever,

0:45:37.280 --> 0:45:38.959
<v Speaker 1>and he started running the floor. There was just nothing

0:45:39.000 --> 0:45:40.800
<v Speaker 1>you can do with him. And and that's what Janice

0:45:40.800 --> 0:45:43.799
<v Speaker 1>has been doing in this series. And so I think, like,

0:45:44.480 --> 0:45:47.560
<v Speaker 1>is it I'm not counting out Milwaukee. You'd be stupid

0:45:47.560 --> 0:45:50.440
<v Speaker 1>to do so with how good Janice is and and

0:45:50.480 --> 0:45:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you also would be stupid to count out with Milwaukee

0:45:52.760 --> 0:45:57.280
<v Speaker 1>with how often Boston has denigrated back into terrible offense.

0:45:57.840 --> 0:46:00.920
<v Speaker 1>But I would hope at this point, they have enough

0:46:01.680 --> 0:46:04.680
<v Speaker 1>evidence to show them clearly the way that they need

0:46:04.680 --> 0:46:06.759
<v Speaker 1>to play, and they'll play that way and get the

0:46:06.840 --> 0:46:09.680
<v Speaker 1>job done. There's I think there's a very good chance

0:46:09.719 --> 0:46:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Milwaukee does win in Game six at home, but I'd

0:46:12.960 --> 0:46:15.480
<v Speaker 1>still pick Boston comfortably in a Game seven. So I

0:46:15.480 --> 0:46:19.640
<v Speaker 1>think I think Boston's in good shape at this point. Yeah,

0:46:19.680 --> 0:46:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you there. I think that I don't know

0:46:22.480 --> 0:46:24.880
<v Speaker 1>if I'm ever comfortable taking either of these teams to

0:46:24.960 --> 0:46:27.840
<v Speaker 1>win comfortably, largely just because of the honest factor in

0:46:27.880 --> 0:46:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the level he's playing at right now. But the Celtics

0:46:30.239 --> 0:46:32.200
<v Speaker 1>are just a better basketball team. There are more complete

0:46:32.200 --> 0:46:35.959
<v Speaker 1>basketball team, and the half court difference that you've touched

0:46:35.960 --> 0:46:39.520
<v Speaker 1>on a lot is significant, But the honest factor is frightening.

0:46:39.560 --> 0:46:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think it's quite enough. With obviously the

0:46:43.080 --> 0:46:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Bucks down Middleton all Right played in this series real quick.

0:46:50.360 --> 0:46:54.839
<v Speaker 1>I think he has done his best in a really

0:46:54.840 --> 0:46:59.480
<v Speaker 1>difficult matchup. I think that he has emphasized just like

0:46:59.600 --> 0:47:04.359
<v Speaker 1>the overwhelming physical advantage he has over like I don't

0:47:04.360 --> 0:47:08.040
<v Speaker 1>know every other player in the league. I think that obviously, um,

0:47:08.080 --> 0:47:11.359
<v Speaker 1>it's been really high volume. I think that's been essential though,

0:47:11.360 --> 0:47:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and Drew has been really high volume two. But they're

0:47:13.680 --> 0:47:16.160
<v Speaker 1>just are no other creators on this roster, right, It's

0:47:16.200 --> 0:47:18.440
<v Speaker 1>like everything falls on them when you don't have Middleton.

0:47:18.520 --> 0:47:21.040
<v Speaker 1>There isn't that release valve. So it's okay, honest, find

0:47:21.080 --> 0:47:24.360
<v Speaker 1>a way, try and get downhill and playmaking, create a

0:47:24.360 --> 0:47:26.040
<v Speaker 1>shot for somebody. And he's done that. I mean, the

0:47:26.040 --> 0:47:29.520
<v Speaker 1>playmaking has been there, the finishes have been tough. Obviously,

0:47:29.600 --> 0:47:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the jump shooting hasn't been particularly good. The overall efficiency

0:47:32.680 --> 0:47:36.399
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been good. Um, But given that, I think he's

0:47:36.400 --> 0:47:38.880
<v Speaker 1>had as pronounced of an impact as he could have.

0:47:38.960 --> 0:47:42.279
<v Speaker 1>And obviously there's been huge defensive moments. So I feel

0:47:42.320 --> 0:47:45.360
<v Speaker 1>like this is really just a testament to his status

0:47:45.400 --> 0:47:46.879
<v Speaker 1>as I think he's the best player in the world.

0:47:46.920 --> 0:47:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I know that you've talked about thinking he might just

0:47:48.560 --> 0:47:51.319
<v Speaker 1>be in a tear of his own. It feels to

0:47:51.360 --> 0:47:54.680
<v Speaker 1>me like when a guy is at his worst in

0:47:54.840 --> 0:47:58.239
<v Speaker 1>terms of, you know, just purely scoring the basketball and

0:47:58.320 --> 0:48:01.560
<v Speaker 1>shot making to an extent, then you really see what

0:48:01.640 --> 0:48:03.319
<v Speaker 1>the floor is in terms of impact, and it just

0:48:03.360 --> 0:48:05.360
<v Speaker 1>feels like nobody has a higher floor right now. And

0:48:05.360 --> 0:48:08.239
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of what he's proven. So I think it's

0:48:08.239 --> 0:48:12.319
<v Speaker 1>been impressive, even if like his you know, production and

0:48:12.320 --> 0:48:17.000
<v Speaker 1>efficiency won't even compare to a normal Janna series. Yeah,

0:48:17.000 --> 0:48:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that he's done about as good a job

0:48:20.840 --> 0:48:24.160
<v Speaker 1>as you could possibly do against this Boston defense. Like

0:48:24.200 --> 0:48:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I I just again, I know, I know, I've been

0:48:27.520 --> 0:48:29.680
<v Speaker 1>on this Boston defense like NonStop, and I know that

0:48:29.680 --> 0:48:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that's been kind of like my little hill that I've

0:48:32.120 --> 0:48:35.000
<v Speaker 1>been on, but like it's not. It's just based on

0:48:35.040 --> 0:48:38.200
<v Speaker 1>what I've seen in film, and like there is nothing

0:48:38.239 --> 0:48:41.920
<v Speaker 1>easy against this this defense, and he has literally he

0:48:42.680 --> 0:48:45.239
<v Speaker 1>this is like it's like you're in the desert, and

0:48:45.360 --> 0:48:48.640
<v Speaker 1>in the entire Sahara desert, there's this one rag that

0:48:48.719 --> 0:48:51.200
<v Speaker 1>at one point, like twelve hours ago, was wet, and

0:48:51.239 --> 0:48:54.040
<v Speaker 1>it's like sitting on the in Janice is just squeezing

0:48:54.239 --> 0:48:57.400
<v Speaker 1>every drop of available water out of this thing. Like

0:48:57.440 --> 0:49:01.440
<v Speaker 1>that he has. He has hit the absolute peak of

0:49:01.480 --> 0:49:03.600
<v Speaker 1>what you could have expected from him in this series.

0:49:03.640 --> 0:49:06.520
<v Speaker 1>And it's too too. And they were trailing in the

0:49:06.640 --> 0:49:09.719
<v Speaker 1>final minute of Game three and Game one Boston mailed

0:49:09.760 --> 0:49:11.640
<v Speaker 1>in in a lot of different ways. So like that's

0:49:11.680 --> 0:49:13.160
<v Speaker 1>just how great Yanna say is. If I if I

0:49:13.160 --> 0:49:17.000
<v Speaker 1>had one piece of criticism i'd send his way, like

0:49:17.120 --> 0:49:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the jump shots are just turnovers, Like he's not making

0:49:19.600 --> 0:49:21.719
<v Speaker 1>nearly enough of them to take them. They always lead

0:49:21.760 --> 0:49:24.400
<v Speaker 1>to run outs. The other way, I get why he

0:49:24.440 --> 0:49:26.400
<v Speaker 1>takes them there to save his legs. So I'm not

0:49:26.480 --> 0:49:30.320
<v Speaker 1>criticizing him in that regard. My thing is like that

0:49:30.320 --> 0:49:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that part of his game is still so so, so

0:49:32.560 --> 0:49:35.640
<v Speaker 1>so far away from being a really reliable piece of

0:49:35.680 --> 0:49:40.000
<v Speaker 1>his game. Yeah, I think that's a perfectly fair criticism.

0:49:40.040 --> 0:49:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a fair criticism of Janice honestly, and

0:49:43.239 --> 0:49:46.799
<v Speaker 1>almost any series or game that he's played his basketball career,

0:49:46.840 --> 0:49:48.759
<v Speaker 1>like it feels like he takes them out of a

0:49:48.840 --> 0:49:50.759
<v Speaker 1>feeling kind of an obligation or like you talked about

0:49:50.760 --> 0:49:55.080
<v Speaker 1>conserving that. Yeah, yeah, exactly. I think he's two of

0:49:55.160 --> 0:49:57.640
<v Speaker 1>sixteen from three now, so I mean you're right, that's

0:49:57.800 --> 0:50:01.360
<v Speaker 1>those are effectively turnovers. So all right, last question for

0:50:01.440 --> 0:50:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you here, Jason. The Golden State Warriors are the title

0:50:05.640 --> 0:50:15.120
<v Speaker 1>favorites at this point? Should they be? Oh? Man, See,

0:50:15.160 --> 0:50:19.560
<v Speaker 1>what makes this tough is like I think Boston's best

0:50:19.719 --> 0:50:24.560
<v Speaker 1>punch is the best punch. I think when their defense

0:50:24.680 --> 0:50:28.080
<v Speaker 1>is locked in and they're running smart offense, no one

0:50:28.120 --> 0:50:31.920
<v Speaker 1>can beat them. But one of the reasons why my

0:50:32.040 --> 0:50:36.040
<v Speaker 1>prediction has been so flaky in this series is they've

0:50:36.120 --> 0:50:40.840
<v Speaker 1>so consistently gotten out of whack offensively, because that's what

0:50:40.920 --> 0:50:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you expect from a team that doesn't really have a

0:50:42.840 --> 0:50:45.520
<v Speaker 1>true point guard, right, Like they don't have they don't

0:50:45.560 --> 0:50:47.960
<v Speaker 1>have a true point forward point guard guy who's used

0:50:48.000 --> 0:50:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to running a team. They have Marcus Smart, who's kind

0:50:52.520 --> 0:50:54.560
<v Speaker 1>of like he pretends to be, but he's not really

0:50:54.560 --> 0:50:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that type of guy. And then Jaalen Brown and Jason Tatum, who,

0:50:57.320 --> 0:50:59.279
<v Speaker 1>to Tatum is obviously better than Brown at passing, but

0:50:59.320 --> 0:51:02.239
<v Speaker 1>he's not great. I looked down uh, the Philly the

0:51:02.320 --> 0:51:04.759
<v Speaker 1>Philly Miami series. I think both of those teams are

0:51:04.800 --> 0:51:07.960
<v Speaker 1>worse than both of Milwaukee and Boston going out west,

0:51:09.480 --> 0:51:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Like the Phoenix matchup is really tricky with Golden State

0:51:13.600 --> 0:51:16.920
<v Speaker 1>because they can they can attack some very specific weaknesses

0:51:16.920 --> 0:51:19.520
<v Speaker 1>of Golden State. So like I think if I was

0:51:19.680 --> 0:51:24.600
<v Speaker 1>ranking contenders at this point, i'd have Boston one, Phoenix

0:51:24.800 --> 0:51:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to Golden State three. So I don't know that I

0:51:28.680 --> 0:51:31.480
<v Speaker 1>call them the favorite, but I think all three of

0:51:31.520 --> 0:51:35.239
<v Speaker 1>those teams are very close. Like I'm I think it's

0:51:35.239 --> 0:51:37.200
<v Speaker 1>a clear one to three for me, but all of

0:51:37.200 --> 0:51:40.000
<v Speaker 1>them are separated by the slightest of margins. So like,

0:51:40.320 --> 0:51:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't be surprised if Boston lost to Phoenix in

0:51:43.239 --> 0:51:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the finals, wouldn't be surprised if Boston lost to Golden

0:51:46.120 --> 0:51:48.520
<v Speaker 1>State in the finals. Hell, guys, I wouldn't be surprised

0:51:48.520 --> 0:51:51.480
<v Speaker 1>if Boston lost the series to Milwaukee still just by

0:51:51.480 --> 0:51:54.600
<v Speaker 1>getting out of whack offensively. So like I, I don't

0:51:54.600 --> 0:51:56.560
<v Speaker 1>think there's a I don't think there's a bona fide,

0:51:56.680 --> 0:51:59.200
<v Speaker 1>clear cut favorite in the field. To be honest with you,

0:52:01.120 --> 0:52:04.120
<v Speaker 1>it is really interesting because it's like the Warriors are

0:52:04.120 --> 0:52:07.200
<v Speaker 1>an overwhelming favorite in terms of betting odds, but at

0:52:07.239 --> 0:52:10.320
<v Speaker 1>fandal you have them plus one five, which is really

0:52:10.360 --> 0:52:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think great value, and then Phoenix plus Boston

0:52:14.600 --> 0:52:17.319
<v Speaker 1>plus four ten. It doesn't feel right to me, Like,

0:52:17.360 --> 0:52:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the Warriors would be number one out

0:52:20.680 --> 0:52:22.959
<v Speaker 1>of that group for me. I think that you could

0:52:23.000 --> 0:52:26.520
<v Speaker 1>argue maybe that they've had the most impressive performance purely

0:52:26.560 --> 0:52:28.719
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the postseason, and that they haven't really

0:52:28.719 --> 0:52:31.680
<v Speaker 1>had like a single let down game. There are a

0:52:31.680 --> 0:52:34.520
<v Speaker 1>couple of losses, you know, still really highly contested, and

0:52:34.520 --> 0:52:37.600
<v Speaker 1>obviously they only have two losses in these playoffs, but

0:52:38.280 --> 0:52:39.879
<v Speaker 1>I I don't know that I would even have them

0:52:39.880 --> 0:52:42.600
<v Speaker 1>one out of those three, Which of those three teams

0:52:42.640 --> 0:52:45.680
<v Speaker 1>do you feel like has the most glaring weakness, like

0:52:45.719 --> 0:52:50.479
<v Speaker 1>the biggest red flag or concern for you? Oh, Man,

0:52:54.040 --> 0:52:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I it's a toss up between Golden State in Boston.

0:52:57.200 --> 0:53:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Golden State goes through these extended stretches were they take

0:53:00.600 --> 0:53:05.000
<v Speaker 1>really bad shots, so does Boston. Golden State also has

0:53:05.040 --> 0:53:09.040
<v Speaker 1>a size weakness that would be something that would concern me.

0:53:10.760 --> 0:53:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, gosh, again, we're talking about very very tiny

0:53:15.160 --> 0:53:19.280
<v Speaker 1>margins here, because even Phoenix's offense can be really stilted

0:53:19.280 --> 0:53:22.720
<v Speaker 1>when Chris Paul gets thrown out of whack. So again

0:53:22.719 --> 0:53:24.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a small margin. But I would say, yeah, I'd

0:53:24.560 --> 0:53:26.839
<v Speaker 1>say Golden State probably is the biggest hole there because

0:53:26.880 --> 0:53:30.239
<v Speaker 1>they go through extended stretches of poor shot selection which

0:53:30.400 --> 0:53:32.760
<v Speaker 1>can derail their offense, and then they have a size

0:53:32.800 --> 0:53:35.080
<v Speaker 1>weakness and size where they can get punished. And I thought,

0:53:35.320 --> 0:53:38.280
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying is has been very clearly demonstrated tonight

0:53:38.360 --> 0:53:42.480
<v Speaker 1>in this Memphis game. I think that's fair. I will

0:53:42.520 --> 0:53:44.560
<v Speaker 1>always think about and You've talked about it a ton

0:53:44.600 --> 0:53:49.840
<v Speaker 1>particularly in this series, the offensive decision making aspect with Boston,

0:53:49.920 --> 0:53:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the lack of that traditional lead guard element like leads

0:53:54.400 --> 0:53:57.840
<v Speaker 1>scoring and playmaking guard. There was a time earlier this

0:53:57.920 --> 0:53:59.440
<v Speaker 1>year where I thought like that was going to be

0:53:59.480 --> 0:54:02.360
<v Speaker 1>there on wing. You know that the two wings being

0:54:02.640 --> 0:54:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you guys by so far wasn't gonna work, that they

0:54:04.640 --> 0:54:08.759
<v Speaker 1>weren't good enough playmakers, and so I do always find

0:54:08.800 --> 0:54:11.320
<v Speaker 1>myself a bit weary of those lapses in those moments,

0:54:11.320 --> 0:54:13.640
<v Speaker 1>But I think they've come so far that, you know,

0:54:13.719 --> 0:54:16.440
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, that is no longer an issue.

0:54:16.480 --> 0:54:19.400
<v Speaker 1>But I think that those are probably the two weaknesses

0:54:19.480 --> 0:54:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to identify. I don't think Phoenix can be there unless

0:54:21.960 --> 0:54:25.040
<v Speaker 1>it's like what we've talked about, where if cpre book

0:54:25.080 --> 0:54:27.920
<v Speaker 1>goes down, they don't creation. But other than that, they

0:54:27.920 --> 0:54:35.120
<v Speaker 1>are pretty incredibly solid. Yeah, to Golden State's credit, they've

0:54:35.160 --> 0:54:38.560
<v Speaker 1>always kind of like snapped back into gear. They go

0:54:38.640 --> 0:54:41.120
<v Speaker 1>through these extended stretches, but they always snap back, and

0:54:41.640 --> 0:54:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a credit to their experience, because like I've been

0:54:45.160 --> 0:54:48.040
<v Speaker 1>critical of Golden State compared to Phoenix in Boston here

0:54:48.040 --> 0:54:49.719
<v Speaker 1>in the last five minutes, but a lot of it

0:54:49.800 --> 0:54:53.799
<v Speaker 1>is like comparing very very good teams in the big

0:54:53.920 --> 0:54:56.920
<v Speaker 1>leg up that Golden State has his experience with. The

0:54:57.000 --> 0:55:00.400
<v Speaker 1>big reason why Boston has gotten so out of whack

0:55:01.440 --> 0:55:04.000
<v Speaker 1>is because they don't have the same amount of experience

0:55:04.120 --> 0:55:06.880
<v Speaker 1>in these huge moments. They do have a lot of experience.

0:55:06.920 --> 0:55:08.400
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about it here on the show. They've been

0:55:08.400 --> 0:55:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to the conference finals multiple times this group, but for

0:55:11.960 --> 0:55:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the most part, they're like Golden State, clear level up

0:55:15.520 --> 0:55:18.240
<v Speaker 1>of experience. They've been in probably twice as many playoffs

0:55:18.280 --> 0:55:20.600
<v Speaker 1>series over over this recent history. They've been to the

0:55:20.600 --> 0:55:24.359
<v Speaker 1>finals five times like Golden State has has. Just they've

0:55:24.400 --> 0:55:26.680
<v Speaker 1>just they're they're not going to be scared by anything

0:55:26.719 --> 0:55:28.960
<v Speaker 1>like this. I don't think Steph or Draymond were scared

0:55:29.000 --> 0:55:30.719
<v Speaker 1>of this game tonight. When they were down eleven and

0:55:30.800 --> 0:55:32.680
<v Speaker 1>that third quarter, they knew what they were up against.

0:55:32.680 --> 0:55:35.040
<v Speaker 1>And so if there's one leg up that they have

0:55:35.120 --> 0:55:40.920
<v Speaker 1>on their competition, it's that experience. Yeah, that is all

0:55:41.000 --> 0:55:44.040
<v Speaker 1>we have for tonight. I sincerely appreciate your support. Like

0:55:44.080 --> 0:55:47.279
<v Speaker 1>we said earlier, we're gonna be live every night this

0:55:47.320 --> 0:55:49.239
<v Speaker 1>week after the big games. At the end of the night,

0:55:49.280 --> 0:55:51.880
<v Speaker 1>please come hang out with us. Like can subscribe to

0:55:52.040 --> 0:55:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the Volumes YouTube channel, subscribe to our newsletter, and last

0:55:55.600 --> 0:55:57.560
<v Speaker 1>but not least, follow me on Twitter at underscore Jason

0:55:57.719 --> 0:56:00.880
<v Speaker 1>lt for video content. As always, I'm blown away and

0:56:00.920 --> 0:56:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm so appreciative of you guys coming to hang out

0:56:03.160 --> 0:56:04.799
<v Speaker 1>with us on these shows, and I will see you

0:56:04.840 --> 0:56:12.560
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow night. The Volume