WEBVTT - A Broken Market Is Causing Mortgage Rates to Surge

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the All Thoughts podcast.

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe Wisnal. You know, Joe,

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking a lot about what higher interest rates

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>mean for the housing market, and we had that really

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:27.159
<v Speaker 1>good episode with Morgan Stanley's housing strategist, Jim Egan. He

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>walked us through a lot of the technicalities of the

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:34.880
<v Speaker 1>impact of higher rates on house prices. But I think

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>we could get even more detailed. Well, absolutely, because we

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:41.879
<v Speaker 1>talked about what is the impact of higher rights on housing,

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>but we didn't really talk about why have rates gone

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:47.160
<v Speaker 1>so much higher? And I know, like this is all

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I know about housing finance. I know the government like

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:53.319
<v Speaker 1>backstops a lot of or implicitly or explicitly actually I'm

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>not even sure anymore, but backstops all a lot of

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>it does it does even more. It's so like you

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>start with like the sort of risk free rate on

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:05.320
<v Speaker 1>like treasuries because it's government, and then you add some

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:08.040
<v Speaker 1>spread and that's like the average more and then I

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know anything beyond that. Well, that's a fair question

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:13.559
<v Speaker 1>that where does that spread come from? Why do people

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:17.039
<v Speaker 1>make additional money or why do they demand an additional

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:20.759
<v Speaker 1>premium for investing that's in something that has a guarantee

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 1>from the US government. Yeah, exactly right. This is the

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 1>part I don't understand, Like, if the if the asset

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>is backed by the US government, why don't we get

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>mortgages the same rate as treasuries? But it's not because

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>right now, a third year treasury somewhere on four percent

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:36.959
<v Speaker 1>and a third year mortgage is around seven percent. And

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>that's spread various quite a bit from time to time.

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:43.559
<v Speaker 1>So even as recently is last spring, the gap between

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a mortgage and a treasury had gotten down to less

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>than one percent. Now it's around three percent. Where did

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>that spread come from? And why does it change over time?

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Or two things? I just don't know the answers right well. Also,

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>that three percent spread is like at the highest that

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>it's been I think of all times. So like something

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>is happening in the mark it right now that is

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>different to the way it used to work, and I

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>think we need to dig into that. You know, we

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>spoke a little bit with Jim about it, but we

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 1>really need an expert. And I got to say I

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>was sort of bated by there was a tweet recently

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>It started with I'm not about to go on a

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>podcast to explain why, but this year has likely broken

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the market for mortgage backed security. That was a dare time.

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 1>It's like if he's like you did now, just like

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to go on a podcast, It's like,

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 1>all right, let's try us, let's see, let's see if

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>you can resist. Okay, well, here is the podcast to

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>explain why the MBS market seems to be broken. We

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>are going to be speaking with really the perfect guest.

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>We have Guillermo rodit Domingo's He is the managing director

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>at New River Investments, and he is going to explain

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>all of this to us in detail. One of our

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>super fans, I think really, I think so. He's one

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of the first to tweet them often so and we've

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>known him a long time. So very excited about this conversation.

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>So maybe it wasn't a dare, or maybe it was.

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:58.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, please pick me for the podcast, Guermo. We

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:00.799
<v Speaker 1>are delighted to have you on. Really looking forward to

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the conversation. I am very very very happy to be honest.

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 1>A bucket list item for me, and you know I

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:10.640
<v Speaker 1>do stay up until very late at night. So I

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>can listen to you know, odd Lots and tweet out

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:16.079
<v Speaker 1>my notes before anybody else wakes up. I love that.

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>That makes me happy. Okay, So why don't we start

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>out with Here's a very simple premise, is the current

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>moment in the mortgage market. And you know, when I

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.679
<v Speaker 1>say the mortgage market, I'm kind of talking about mortgage

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>back securities a k A m b S. A lot

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>of people will think back to you know, pre two

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 1>thousand eight times and think of them in that context.

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>But is this particular moment in the mortgage market different

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>or remarkable in some way? Like, can you give us

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:47.119
<v Speaker 1>some historical context around what we're seeing right now? Yes,

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>So this moment is special because it's not happening because

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>people are afraid people are not going to pay their mortgages.

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Is them because people are afraid house pics it's going

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to go down. It's a common nation of the fact

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>that mortgage backed securities went from being effectively short lived

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>assets because we went through a pretty epic refinancing boom

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>in two all of a sudden, rates going up, very

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>very very quickly, faster than anybody expected, pre payments going

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>effectively to zero, and a huge train on neutral funds

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>from tax payments that we're do for games from counter year.

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>That's you know, give or take one and a quarter

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars. That's probably the highest compared to GDP that

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>we've ever had. This kind of conspired to leave holders

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of mbs holding securities that have a much longer expected

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:51.920
<v Speaker 1>life than than they ex than they originally expected when

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:54.599
<v Speaker 1>they purchased them, and you know, the discount rate on

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>that longer life going up, which has been pretty disastrous

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to the prices of this product. This gets to an

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:05.919
<v Speaker 1>important nuance or an important thing. A person buys a

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>house and it takes out a thirty year fixed mortgage.

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:11.599
<v Speaker 1>Let's start really simple. They get a thirty year fixed mortgage.

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Someone owns that asset, but their expectation is not that

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>they're going to hold that for thirty years. They're not

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>thinking like, Okay, I'm gonna wait thirty years. What is

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the typical length via which that asset exists? How frequently

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>in normal times would it either get refinanced by the

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>homeowner or sold because the homeowner sells the house and

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the loan gets paid back automatically. On a basic on scenario,

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:41.479
<v Speaker 1>you would assume that you have a thirty year mortgage

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>transit weighted average life of the castles, because it's an

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>advertising a loan of about you know, fifteen years, and

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 1>we have some expectation of turnover. You know, people move,

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, people sell, sell their houses, or prepay their

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>loans for many different reasons, all sorts of life events,

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and you know that shortens the effective life to you know,

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>about half of that about seven years. And usually we're

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>assuming anywhere between six and eight percent of loans on

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>an annual basis transition, not because they are refinanced to

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:16.919
<v Speaker 1>their being a rave incentive, but from any other number

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 1>of reasons. During one we saw about thirty six percent

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:26.719
<v Speaker 1>of loan balances being extinguished each year. That's a lot,

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:29.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, Usually, you know we're expecting about half of

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>that sixteen. You'll recall in the first three course of

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the year we had pretty low rates and we got

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:37.839
<v Speaker 1>up to twenty and that was that was pretty high.

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>And you know t n which was a more normal year,

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:43.279
<v Speaker 1>we were at out seventeen. So you know, this fueled

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of extinguished singing over those balances, and you know,

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:51.040
<v Speaker 1>you you bought what you thought was a seven year asset,

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and you know, it turned out that it was, you know,

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a five year asset, and then happens and all of

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, you know, you're holding a ten year asset, right,

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:02.480
<v Speaker 1>So can we dig into this just a little bit

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>more because I seem to remember during the era of

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>low interest rates, so you know, after two thousand and eight,

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>when rates were just grinding lower and lower and lower,

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the big investors in MBS, the big buyers, and we

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>should probably talk about who those actually are. At some point,

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 1>they didn't want MBS to be prepaid because it basically

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 1>meant that they would get like a bunch of money

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that they then had to invest at even lower interest rates.

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Now we're in an environment of higher rates, and it

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>feels like MBS is not desirable because suddenly it leaves

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>you with an asset that has much longer duration than

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>you expected and much more exposure to interest rate volatility.

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Is that right? Yeah, that's correct. I think one way

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to look at it is a mortgage backed security is

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>essentially similar to a covered call in equity terms. That

0:07:57.080 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>means that you know you have all of the downside

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and you know very very little of the upside and

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you trade that in for a little bit of extra coupon.

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>And you know, when rates were going down, everybody was

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>upset about it because you know, treasury bonds were going

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>up and frist people are making money there. If you

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>have the NBS, you know you've got your money back,

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and then you want to buy new bonds. You know

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>you bought them at a lower yield. And right now

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing is all of a sudden, bond prices

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 1>are are going down, the yields are going up, and

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>you know you're not getting any castles, so you don't

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>get to reinvest the money. This is sort of a

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 1>key thing, and I just want to like make it clear.

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, everybody knows that a homeowner can always like

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 1>refinance their home, and people talk about like homeowners a

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>third year fixed has like a quote like free option

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to refinance their home if rates go down after them.

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>But essentially that free option for the homeowner is a

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>theoretical source of risk for the holder of the NBS.

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>So there's two ways for the MBS holder to lose. It.

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Sounds like one is, Okay, rates go up a lot

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and then you're not getting much payment done those bonds

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 1>or ready to go down and then you have to like,

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, eat that repayment. Yeah, and I mean I

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>would say that it's not a pre option. It's an

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>expensive option. Not always, but right now it is. We're

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about why our mortgages at you know, seven plus

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>when you know treasuries are at four. You know, just

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 1>a year ago, treasuries were two and fifty basis points lower,

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>but mortgages were basis points lower. Maybe this is a

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>good moment to sort of step back and talk about

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:41.559
<v Speaker 1>who the big buyers of mortgage backed securities actually are.

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>And one thing I would be curious to hear is

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>have they changed from pre two th eight to now?

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Because of course, I mean the big change has been

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve when it started quantitative easing. You know,

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 1>it bought a whole bunch of different types of bonds,

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 1>but one of those was NBA. Now that they're in

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 1>quantitative tightening mode, they've sort of stepped back from the market.

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:06.440
<v Speaker 1>So could you maybe talk a little bit about the

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem of who actually purchases these securities and the kind

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>of considerations that they're thinking about as they decide whether

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 1>or not to buy more or less MBS. The answer

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that nobody wants to tell you is that right now

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>there's no natural buyers right you know, and that's that's

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the problem. You see these spreads go really wide. The

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>problem is that who is the buyer right now? Right now,

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>there is no natural buyers. Postal thousand and eight, you

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>had you know, banks that had expanding deposits and you know,

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:39.080
<v Speaker 1>there was not to no loan growth, and so banks

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of building that gap with MS. Bonds funds had

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, pretty sizable inflows. And when you think about

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>bond funds, you know you're thinking about like people goes

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>total return fund or you know double lens total return fund.

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>These are these are funds that engage in you know,

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>marginal risk ging in a liquid securities in order to

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>boost the yield of their fund. And you know, as

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 1>long as you keep that a liquid portion to a

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:12.199
<v Speaker 1>small percentage of the fundacets, you know, you can enhance

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the yield for for the whole fund. Ever since the

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>start of the year, you know, bond funds have been

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>seeing weekly outflows, so there are certainly not buyers there.

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Federal Reserve is not a buyer. Banks

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 1>have demand for loans and managers at banks. You know,

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:30.839
<v Speaker 1>I thought that they were ready for the risk that

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>extension of MBS would entail, and it terms out that

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe they don't like it so much, so

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>they're not buyers of the product. We used to have

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>a pretty healthy demand for some of the cash flows,

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>particularly the more longer dated cash flows. There you would

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 1>get into you know, transition, but you'd have some demand

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 1>for that stuff from buyers in Asia, and they're in

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 1>over to be seen. And because of this prepayment risk,

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a very poorfeit for people that are in the

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 1>business of matching assets and liabilities because you know, if

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>you're in the business and matching assets and liabilities, you

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:09.479
<v Speaker 1>don't want your asset to get called because the liability

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 1>is not getting called. So you know, it's a nonstarter

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:15.559
<v Speaker 1>for them, very very few people who want to start.

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Can we just go back on prepayment risk specifically, And

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:37.839
<v Speaker 1>you made a good point that this option that homeowners

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:40.440
<v Speaker 1>have to refinance, it's not a free option. They pay

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 1>for it and the spread and that's spread is wide,

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>so just you know, seven percent mortgages four percent treasuries,

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:49.440
<v Speaker 1>you're actually paying a significant amount to borrow that money

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>is part of what investors are concerned about, or is

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 1>part of why that option is so expensive right now,

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>simply because there is concerned that like, Okay, there's the

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>spike rates due to the fight inflation, that's kind of temporary,

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and that rates might you know, reset lower significantly in

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:08.720
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years, and that we get this huge

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:12.319
<v Speaker 1>wave of like everyone who can refinances then. So it's

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>like if you're you know, if I'm buying a home

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>right now, I'm probably thinking, well, I really get I

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>really hope this's like inflation fight ends in a couple

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of years and that I can like refinance or something.

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:27.080
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right. Nobody wants to take their money at

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 1>this point. You know, if you've had cash up until now,

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:33.679
<v Speaker 1>you know you've done very well versus the losses that

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, everything else has taken. So if you're going

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 1>to put money to work now, why are you going

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to put it into an asset that you know that

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 1>may have capped upside? For most people, it's it either

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make sense or it's just not something that they're

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 1>willing to consider. You know, if rates go down and

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 1>you buy treasuries, you're gonna make up boatload of money.

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>If rates go down and you buy MBS, you might

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:01.319
<v Speaker 1>not make any money. Can you talk about like whether

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>or not there are forced buyers or buyers who have

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to buy MBS. And I'm thinking specifically of, you know,

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>situations where you might have a bond fund that's benchmarked

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 1>to a benchmark index, something like the Bloomberg Barkley's AGG

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. And I seem to recall there

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>was some discussion again in the mid two thousands that

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>it was unfair that the Barkley's index still included a

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>bunch of MBS when there wasn't actually that much MBS

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>in the market because the FED was buying it, and

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>MBS was a source of duration for a lot of

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the funds, and if they couldn't, you know, buy MBS,

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and they couldn't be as exposed to duration as the

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>benchmark index. And so you had people like Pimco actually

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>complaining that there wasn't enough MBS in the market. So

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of ironic that fast forward, you know, seven

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>years or something, and a lot of these big buyers

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>don't want to touch MBS with a ten foot poll

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>after complaining that, you know, they couldn't get enough of it.

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Anybody that tracks an index is not gonna be necessarily

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a forced fire because the funds that track an index

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily replicate it down to every single line item.

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>That's you know, incredibly difficult to do. In fix sincom,

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>where you know, you're talking about tens of thousands or

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of thousands of different bonds, and especially in NBS

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>where you don't have a fungible product, you know, there's

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, thousands of thousands of pools that are packaged

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>in different ways, and dealers will often sell you know,

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the entirety of an issuance to a single buyer, and

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>so there's no chance for anybody to really replicate It's

0:15:38.400 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>it's impossible to replicate an index, and so you know,

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>you have some leeway around that. And sure there's you know,

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>there's flows going into index trackers that are going to

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>replicate that, but there's also a lot of funds leaving,

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, a lot of flows out of different products

0:15:55.520 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>that are more heavily exposed two mbs and I wouldn't

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>be thinking about four spires. I'm thinking about four sellers. Sorry,

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Can you expand on that point a little bit more

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>like what would trigger a for sale of MBS. Let's

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>say you know you have uh total return fund at

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>at a large manager, you know, well known large manager,

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and you're participating in the MBS market. Is that way

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>you can get some extra spread for your clients and

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>you can get them, you know, a little bit of

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 1>a higher return. And all of a sudden, starting this year,

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you start getting massive outflows. And maybe you keep I

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know, five or ten percent of your assets in

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 1>super liquid securities and that's going to be bills and

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and one your treasuries or you know, to year notes,

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and all of a sudden, outflows keep coming. You run

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>through your bills, you run through your one year notes,

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, you run through your two year notes, and

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, you know, you're pre payments, which

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're coming in every month, and you were

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>cash flowing a lot from from those pre payment some nbs,

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden they totally stopped. So you you

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:07.119
<v Speaker 1>have outflows, you have no cash flow coming in, Well,

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have to sell something. And you know, unfortunately

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>for for many managers, we've been seeing since about March,

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of a relentless number of We call

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 1>them be wicks since for bids wanted in competition, it's

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:23.919
<v Speaker 1>essentially when you option off your bonds to the highest bidder.

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we've seen that a lot of these

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 1>options bring few or no participants. We have this period

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 1>of high inflation, so of course there's a lot of

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:36.360
<v Speaker 1>second guessing about all kinds of policies that we're going

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>on in one etcetera, fiscal, monetary, etcetera. And one of

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:45.399
<v Speaker 1>the criticisms of like why was the FED still buying

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:49.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, mortgage backed securities up until you know, relatively

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 1>recently in your view, can we quantify the degree to

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 1>which that FED buying depressed spreads? Or to put it

0:17:57.840 --> 0:17:59.679
<v Speaker 1>in another way, like, okay, we have this, you know,

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>this represent spread between mortgages and treasuries. Can we, like

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I can we decompose, like how much of that can

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>just be explained via the FEDS switching from being a

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>buyer to a seller of these assets. I can give

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:15.439
<v Speaker 1>you my best estimate, and so that would be for

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:19.120
<v Speaker 1>when you're talking about calendar year, I would say about

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to thirty basis points was from you know, QUI continuing

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:29.399
<v Speaker 1>maybe later than we needed to, we don't have a

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 1>counterfactual of no que to look at. And if we

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:36.400
<v Speaker 1>look at before their great financial crisis for that kind

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:39.640
<v Speaker 1>of counter factual, well, the market was a lot, there

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:45.200
<v Speaker 1>was a lot more private label and bs, the implicit

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>guarantees were maybe a little bit less implicit, and there

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 1>was less market share dominated by Jinny May, which is

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:55.400
<v Speaker 1>obviously an explicit guarantee. But I would say that if

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to compare to you know, the FED not

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>intervening at all, I think fifty basis points is not

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:05.880
<v Speaker 1>a bad guess, but you know, versus scenario, I would

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:08.439
<v Speaker 1>say about twenty five basis points. That's that's how much

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:11.719
<v Speaker 1>the depressive spread. Can you talk a little bit more

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>about what's going on with the banks? So they're a

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>big buyer of mbs, as you mentioned, and I've seen

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:22.199
<v Speaker 1>some discussion, you know, for instance, JP Morgan had a

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:25.120
<v Speaker 1>note a couple of weeks ago talking about how leverage

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and risk capital requirements for the big banks basically makes

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:34.400
<v Speaker 1>it much more difficult for them to hold onto these assets,

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 1>to hold onto mbs, and so they haven't been buying

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 1>as much of them, and that's one reason why that's

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:42.880
<v Speaker 1>spread between benchmark rates i e. Treasuries and mortgage rates

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:46.120
<v Speaker 1>has been going up. Is that a valid analysis or

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>is this another excuse for big banks to complain about

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 1>various regulatory requirements. I think it's a valid criticism. I

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 1>think it was just last week or pride of that

0:19:57.600 --> 0:19:59.640
<v Speaker 1>to them and said that, you know, they don't want

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 1>any aret of the conforming mortgage space, but they're not

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>participating that at all. Currently. The capital requirements they don't

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 1>make it prohibitive for banks to participate. It just means

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 1>that if they have demand for loans, well that's more

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 1>attractive to them, and so they're not going to participate

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>in something that is like relatively less attractive. You know,

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>if they can originate a lot of personal loans were

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:32.680
<v Speaker 1>not conforming loans or credit to their their corporate borrowers,

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>they're probably going to focus on those activities instead of

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:39.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, buying mbs. The other part of it is

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>that everybody kind of assumed a certain base level of

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 1>prepayments that in retrospect was not sustainable. I don't want

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>to say sustainable, but you know, everybody kind of assumed

0:20:56.960 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 1>that there will be a flour like that even if

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:03.680
<v Speaker 1>rates went out pre payments wouldn't decline past a certain point,

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 1>and they did, and maybe you bought a bond and

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>you thought, well, worst case scenario, rates go up, and

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:11.440
<v Speaker 1>then you know the duration of it. You know, it

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>goes from from three years to five years, and you know,

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>it turns out that now you're looking at six and

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, you thought you would be comfortable with five,

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:20.640
<v Speaker 1>but it turns out that you don't feel so comfortable

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 1>with five, and now you have six on top of it,

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:27.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, And so there's just a general lack of

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>appetite for this. And you see this a lot. I mean,

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>you know managers and banks that are just you know,

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>normal people, and they have the same biases and reactions

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 1>as all of us. And you know, you get you

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 1>get burned by something you don't want to do it again,

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:44.119
<v Speaker 1>and they just got burned by the extension risk of them. Yes,

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>in the intro, since you mentioned the difference between conforming

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and nonconforming loans, and in the intro, I was like, wait,

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you like Fanny and Freddie still exist because I kind

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:56.159
<v Speaker 1>of forgot about them and tratically like give me like

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:58.879
<v Speaker 1>a really like me and look like what it is?

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 1>What I mean, I just roll my eyes. She was

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 1>she was surprised that her co host could say something

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:06.160
<v Speaker 1>so stupid, like do Fanny and Freddy? But I actually

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know what's going on with them because I just

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 1>they're like penny stocks now and I don't really know

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 1>what happened. So could you talk a little bit about

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 1>like what they do now? Like what is their role?

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:18.920
<v Speaker 1>How big is the difference between the conforming versus nonconforming?

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Like where do things stand with the g c s. Well,

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 1>they're a huge part of the market. I can't tell

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:28.199
<v Speaker 1>you the exact percentage right now. I actually don't have

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:30.879
<v Speaker 1>the number in front of me. Jenny May has been

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 1>growing their share over the last decade, but you know,

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:37.959
<v Speaker 1>Fannie and Freddy are still huge players. And you know

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>their role is that DIVII loans from from originators and

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>then they know they package someone to two MBS and

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 1>saw them at the market, and they're not in the

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 1>business of, you know, speculating on racist spread. You know,

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>they basically just facilitate moving those loans from loan originators

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 1>to the the private buyers in the in the market,

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 1>and as part of that, they guarantee the credit of

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the loans and that's about fifty five basis points effectively.

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:18.400
<v Speaker 1>There's you know, there's gonna be some variation there because

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, some borrowers or more credit worthy than other borrowers,

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and and certain types of loans are penalized. But I've

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 1>ruled that. I think that people don't really consider is

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:34.640
<v Speaker 1>that you know, they do have certain policies. They act

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>to an excellent sort of policy, right, you know, earlier

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>this year, at the end of January, I believe NIM

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 1>came out and said, hey, we're gonna restrict credit and

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 1>increase the price of credit for borrowers that are borrowing

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:59.679
<v Speaker 1>for an investment property or a vacation home. And especially

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 1>if you know, if that vacation if you're trying to

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>refinance that vacation home, and especially so if you're trying

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:09.400
<v Speaker 1>to take cash out you know, on on every finance,

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:14.439
<v Speaker 1>and especially so if the loan to value ratio is high.

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 1>They kind of saw that there was a little bit

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 1>of frath going on, you know, with with people trying

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:25.679
<v Speaker 1>to build you know, many real estate empires and you know,

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>buy a bunch of properties to airbnb them, and and

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:32.679
<v Speaker 1>they said, hey, no, no, no, this is this is

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 1>not what these institutions are for. We don't want to

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 1>encourage this. So we're gonna we're gonna actually restrict how

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 1>much money you know, we're gonna give you. We're gonna

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:44.199
<v Speaker 1>make that money more expensive. But they can't, you know,

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>just change the price from like one day to another.

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:48.679
<v Speaker 1>They have to give you a certain amount of notice.

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:51.640
<v Speaker 1>And there's customs in this market. And so they said,

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:56.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, any loan that is, you know, delivered to

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>us after a certain date, like you know, we're gonna

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:02.360
<v Speaker 1>pay less for if it has any of these characteristics.

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:07.119
<v Speaker 1>And you know what happened was that, you know, originators

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:09.439
<v Speaker 1>talked to their perspective borrows and said, hey, you know,

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 1>let's get these loans done right now, because they're gonna

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna shut the faucet off. And sure enough, as

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:19.159
<v Speaker 1>we saw in April numbers and we saw the origination

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and balanced. So the Feds out of the market because

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 1>it's winding down its balance sheet and we probably wouldn't

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:47.200
<v Speaker 1>expect it to start buying up nbs anytime soon. Probably

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the banks are out of the market for the various

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:55.439
<v Speaker 1>reasons that you describe duration, risk, interest rate volatility, A

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of them are in the process of rebuilding up

0:25:58.040 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>their capital levels, especially potentially ahead of a recession and

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:06.399
<v Speaker 1>some loan losses going up. What's the trigger for the

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:10.399
<v Speaker 1>big buyers to come back and start buying mbs again

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and maybe start to bring that spread down or is

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 1>that just not going to happen anytime soon and we're gonna, yeah,

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be stuck with a new normal of higher

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 1>interest rates or higher mortgage rates, I should say. So,

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 1>let me just fill in this one buyer that we

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>haven't talked about yet, and that is going to be

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 1>your highly leveraged balunce sheets. And this this is essentially

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds and mortgage reads. And I guess what, you know,

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>we could call shadow banks. I hate using that term

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>because it's kind of, you know, become associated with. Yeah,

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>it has connotations that that I don't particularly agree with.

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:52.880
<v Speaker 1>But you know, these are institutions or you know, operators

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 1>that want to behave like banks in terms of you know,

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 1>participating in having a maturity mismatch and a liquidity mismatch

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:05.479
<v Speaker 1>and earning that spread and using a lot of leverage

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:07.439
<v Speaker 1>to achieve it. But they also don't want like the

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>regulation that comes with like being a bank and the

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:12.360
<v Speaker 1>costs associated with being a bank. I think the one

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that is most visible in the market is mortgage rates, right,

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and and they basically borrow a bunch of money by

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of mbs, do some hedgen they can't be

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 1>like completely unhedged, and then whatever the spread is, you know,

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:31.439
<v Speaker 1>to take a big fee for themselves and then they

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 1>pay the rest of the villain. And these instruments are

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, pretty popular with current yield focused investors and

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 1>like income focused investors, and they've been a sizeable participant,

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 1>right And so as long as repo is reasonably easy

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:49.679
<v Speaker 1>to get and it's not too expensive, and there's a

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 1>decent spread between where you borrow and the yield you get,

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>they're out there. You know, they're participating in this market

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:59.919
<v Speaker 1>buying those bonds. Some of these rates are you know,

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 1>effectively captive to loan originators. I'm not going to name

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 1>names because I don't want to make anybody mad, but

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot of these originators are in the

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:15.119
<v Speaker 1>business of originating these loans and immediately selling them to

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a read that is associated with the same management. And

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 1>as long as you know the book value was underneath

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the share price. They were very active in issuing you

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:28.399
<v Speaker 1>know who shares, thereby raising more capital and thereby, you know,

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 1>being able to increase how many bonds they bought. And

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that trade is broken. Now there's not you know, there's

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 1>not enough yield left. Repos is harder to get and

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 1>it's one of the reasons that things are very difficult

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:43.640
<v Speaker 1>for this product is because using mbs as collateral for

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a loan is a lot harder and more expensive than

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 1>using investment grade credit level of treasuries. I was going

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>to ask just on this point, I mean, why can't

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 1>you do what every major financial player seems to do

0:28:57.760 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 1>when it comes with a liquid bonds and just put

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 1>it in like an E t F wrapper and improve

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 1>margins on it that way. That is the question that

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I was hoping you would ask. E t F s

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 1>need to track a reference basket. And as we've mentioned,

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and you know we talked about earlier, this is a

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 1>market that is full of individual securities that are not

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 1>funcible and they're not liquid. A lot of times a

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 1>particular bond will only have one owner for its entire life.

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 1>That makes it particularly unsuited for wrapping around you know,

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 1>wrapping it in an e t F. The other part

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 1>of it is that, you know, we do have some

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 1>ets that folks some mortage backed securities. They don't really

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 1>get a lot of flows. Whoever the end user is

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of e t F s seems to want either investment

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 1>grade credit or government bonds. There's really very little appetite

0:29:56.440 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 1>for mbs wrapped in an e t F product. I

0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>can speak as to why, but you know, I do

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 1>monitor the flows pretty closely, and we just don't see that.

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 1>So I just have one last question. And you know,

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that's going on right now that

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 1>we talked about on our last housing episode is there's

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 1>been this big affordability shock and so you know, no

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 1>one wants to buy homes at these levels. Probably not

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people want to sell. Expectations that you

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:27.640
<v Speaker 1>just have this like very frozen dormant market. The monthly

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 1>payments at these prices, and these mortgage rates are just

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 1>like way too high. Do you see finance innovating beyond here?

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Like could we see a fifty year mortgage, could we

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 1>see a hundred year mortgage? Or other things? Or maybe

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the return of like you know, non fixed rate mortgages

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 1>come back in popularity after a long time dormation. Yeah,

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 1>like we'll be talking about like are we going to

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>see the return of like finance finding ways to lower

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 1>that monthly cost for perspect of home buyers. Unfortunately, not

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 1>an adjustable rate product works when you have a steep

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 1>yield curve. But you know, right now we're we have

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a pretty flat yield curve, and so you know, if

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 1>you're paying you a rate based on the short rate,

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that's not going to be great. The market might be

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit reduced because people are less worried about

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the duration, but it's not going to help that much

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 1>past thirty years. Increasing the immortization time doesn't really reduce

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the monthly payment. We've we've had attempts at you know,

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>doing forty years pretty recently, and it just doesn't help

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 1>lower the monthly payment. The thing that helps lower the

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 1>monthly payment is bringing the spread down, and you know,

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 1>having rates at a lower level. And I just want

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to clarify when I talk about the NBS spread, you know,

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about the spread between uh, you know, a

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 1>generic mortgage backed security and by generic, I know I

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 1>just said that this product is not fungible, but you know,

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about the products. It's called t b A

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 1>stands for to be announced. It essentially product that hasn't

0:32:01.880 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 1>been delivered to the market yet. You can think of

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 1>it as like futures for nbs, and that is you know,

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 1>at the highest level, and you know, probably about twelve years.

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, if we use the you know, last week's

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 1>rates it was about one it's about the same today.

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 1>That's really really high. A year ago that rate would

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 1>have been you know, about eight basis points. And so

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've seen about you know, one percent added

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>to a borrowers page just from that spread. But apart

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:39.240
<v Speaker 1>from that spread, you know, we also have the spread

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 1>that is captured by the g c s and that's increased,

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 1>not much, but it's increased by about five basis points.

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 1>And there's also originators, right, Originators have to make money,

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and part of you know, what they make is that

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the difference between what borrowers pay and at what level

0:32:58.760 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 1>they sell the loan to Fannie Freddie. And you know,

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 1>we've seen that go up, you know, depending on the week.

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:12.040
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty volatile, but you know between fifty basis points there,

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:15.760
<v Speaker 1>which brings you to something that I think you guys

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:17.719
<v Speaker 1>will find interesting. And I don't think enough people are

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 1>paying attention to Originators make money based on how many

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 1>dollars of volume they put through, right, so their costs

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 1>are tied to the number of loans that they process.

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Loan originators their main costs as out of like you know,

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 1>like office space and whatever is that they have, you know,

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 1>these loan officers and you know, and their assistance, you know,

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 1>chase borrowers, making sure that they have all the paperwork,

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 1>making sure that you know, they're getting everything in before

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the deadlines. It's a very call centered type of job,

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 1>making sure that you know everything is according to the rules.

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 1>And those costs are kind of like on a per

0:33:56.920 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 1>loan basis, but the money that they make really is

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 1>based on like how much dollar volume they do, and

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:10.720
<v Speaker 1>so you know, bigger loans mean more profits. And last

0:34:10.800 --> 0:34:12.719
<v Speaker 1>year and the year before that, they were you know,

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:15.359
<v Speaker 1>they were doing many many loans, but they were also

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 1>doing like bigger loans, right, and you know, because they

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 1>have this incentive to write you a bigger loans so

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 1>they can make more money, they would remind you, hey,

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 1>you know you're doing every finance I see that you know,

0:34:26.640 --> 0:34:28.919
<v Speaker 1>you're you know, dropping the rate that you're paying from

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:31.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, three point five to two point seven five.

0:34:32.440 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, you new lower payment that turncome drops and

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:38.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, would you like to borrow against your existing

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:41.560
<v Speaker 1>home equity? And a lot of people said, you know yeah,

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 1>And we had an incredible amount of equity withdrawn from housing,

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:50.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, about a trillion dollars last year. We had

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:53.719
<v Speaker 1>a decent sized chunk this year. That's also you know,

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 1>when you think about like wise inflation so high, you know,

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 1>where's all this money coming from? All trillion came out

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:02.080
<v Speaker 1>from that way. So they were employing a lot of

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:06.279
<v Speaker 1>people doing this, right, And now you know, we've had

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the amount of dollars that flow through these originators declined

0:35:11.760 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 1>by more than half. You know, we were seeing in

0:35:14.640 --> 0:35:18.239
<v Speaker 1>some months two d and fifty billion dollars you know,

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:22.920
<v Speaker 1>being originated and now we're closer to a hundred and

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:26.759
<v Speaker 1>well there's just not that much work too, and and

0:35:27.480 --> 0:35:29.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, you want to keep people around because like, well,

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:30.920
<v Speaker 1>what if the business comes back, right, you want to

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:32.880
<v Speaker 1>be able to ramp up. But you know, one of

0:35:32.880 --> 0:35:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the things that we are likely to see is, you know,

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:41.840
<v Speaker 1>this is a commission based business. And so as the

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:44.719
<v Speaker 1>flow drives up and the commissioner's dry up, there's gonna

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:47.279
<v Speaker 1>be some attrition and staffing. And then what you're gonna

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 1>see is something similar to what we saw in where

0:35:52.080 --> 0:35:55.960
<v Speaker 1>in the second half when everybody was rushing to refinance

0:35:55.960 --> 0:35:59.359
<v Speaker 1>and mortgage, originators said, you know, we don't have enough

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:03.719
<v Speaker 1>people to handle this loan pack line. So they, you know,

0:36:03.760 --> 0:36:06.480
<v Speaker 1>they did what anybody else in that situation does, and

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 1>they raised their prices and they you know, they kept

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:13.319
<v Speaker 1>a larger amount of you know, the the coupon that

0:36:13.760 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the borrower is paid. And so as we go through

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 1>this slowdown lending, we're likely to see attrition to this

0:36:23.760 --> 0:36:28.720
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote supply chain of lenders. And if pressure rates

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:31.839
<v Speaker 1>were to come down again, that doesn't necessarily mean that,

0:36:32.160 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the rates available to borrowers are going to

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:37.719
<v Speaker 1>come down, because in that case, originators are going to

0:36:37.840 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 1>have enough pricing power to defend their unit economics and

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 1>keep a larger portion of that coupon. You know, I

0:36:46.520 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 1>love it when guests come on the show and talk

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:51.440
<v Speaker 1>about incentives, because there are a bunch of incentives at

0:36:51.440 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 1>play here. There's the incentives of banks like choosing exactly

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:57.120
<v Speaker 1>what to put in their portfolio, or big investors making

0:36:57.120 --> 0:37:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the choice between treasuries versus mbs, but the loner senators

0:37:00.480 --> 0:37:02.279
<v Speaker 1>as well. Well, I was just gonna say, this is

0:37:02.280 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a supply chain episode, because what you're describing, or what

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:08.880
<v Speaker 1>you described, is the physical like literally not even a

0:37:08.920 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 1>financial but the physical capacity to process all this paperwork.

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 1>And I remember when it was really constrained in early

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 1>because rates collapsed, but you know, there was just this flood,

0:37:19.320 --> 0:37:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and so there was like this sort of like physical

0:37:21.440 --> 0:37:24.640
<v Speaker 1>constrained like a supply chain. Anyway, I think that's like

0:37:24.640 --> 0:37:26.799
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating point that and now as you say, it's

0:37:26.840 --> 0:37:29.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna ripple and we're gonna have like hollowed out supply

0:37:29.680 --> 0:37:32.239
<v Speaker 1>chains that will keep mortgage rates even higher if rights

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:37.959
<v Speaker 1>come down, and it doesn't just happen in originators. Everybody

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:43.240
<v Speaker 1>loved complaining about prepayments, but prepainments keep this industry allowed.

0:37:43.239 --> 0:37:45.920
<v Speaker 1>It kept massive amounts of flow going through the system.

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 1>It keep you know, originators employed, It kept appraisers employed,

0:37:52.120 --> 0:37:56.280
<v Speaker 1>It kept people on the south side employed. It meant

0:37:56.280 --> 0:37:58.240
<v Speaker 1>that you know, if you were on the buy side,

0:37:58.400 --> 0:38:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know you were buying all these billions of

0:38:01.080 --> 0:38:03.640
<v Speaker 1>dollars worth of products and it's like rapidly prepaying and

0:38:03.680 --> 0:38:05.680
<v Speaker 1>you have to you know, kind of recycle that money

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and kept those traders employed. Generally, more flow is good,

0:38:11.760 --> 0:38:15.279
<v Speaker 1>there's more to do. People in this business love to

0:38:15.600 --> 0:38:18.560
<v Speaker 1>be big accounts. It helped and helped with that. You know,

0:38:18.600 --> 0:38:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you were saying, hey, you know, I'm doing like X

0:38:21.000 --> 0:38:22.759
<v Speaker 1>amount of business with you, and that X was like

0:38:22.760 --> 0:38:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a very big number that kept doing. The good graces

0:38:25.280 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of the South Side kept your coverage happy, you know,

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:32.720
<v Speaker 1>salesman for for bonds, especially on the primary market where

0:38:33.440 --> 0:38:35.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, they always had lots of products and there

0:38:35.640 --> 0:38:39.839
<v Speaker 1>was always buyers for that product. So everybody got said

0:38:39.840 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 1>by this refinancing and pre payments flow and that disappeared,

0:38:45.560 --> 0:38:50.640
<v Speaker 1>you guys reported Bloomberg reported recently that you know, BMO

0:38:50.760 --> 0:38:55.760
<v Speaker 1>cut of their staff, and Wells Fargo has been cutting

0:38:56.000 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the people that they have associated with this, and I

0:38:58.640 --> 0:39:00.640
<v Speaker 1>can tell you from from talking to people that have

0:39:00.800 --> 0:39:04.160
<v Speaker 1>known for for ten or fifteen years, it's it's tough

0:39:04.160 --> 0:39:07.320
<v Speaker 1>out there. People used to have a steady source of clients.

0:39:07.600 --> 0:39:10.840
<v Speaker 1>You know that we're pretty reliable buyers of new issues

0:39:10.920 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 1>every month, and suddenly they're just not there. They're not present.

0:39:15.960 --> 0:39:20.719
<v Speaker 1>There's more supply on the secondary market from you know,

0:39:20.760 --> 0:39:23.000
<v Speaker 1>these fund out flows that we talked about, and from

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:25.880
<v Speaker 1>level balance sheets that have to reduce their leverage because

0:39:26.120 --> 0:39:30.359
<v Speaker 1>higher interest rates and less favorable borrowing conditions have made

0:39:30.360 --> 0:39:34.719
<v Speaker 1>it on economic for them to hold this paper. It's

0:39:34.760 --> 0:39:37.279
<v Speaker 1>not good for for anybody. And so we're going to

0:39:37.320 --> 0:39:40.279
<v Speaker 1>see attrition in the origination space. But we're also going

0:39:40.320 --> 0:39:42.479
<v Speaker 1>to see attrition on the cell side, you know, whether

0:39:42.560 --> 0:39:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that involves sales or structuring or trading. You know, by structuring,

0:39:47.040 --> 0:39:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean the trenching of these securities into into different

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:54.480
<v Speaker 1>risk profiles. All right, Germa, we tease this episode by

0:39:54.480 --> 0:39:57.040
<v Speaker 1>saying we were going to go into detail on what's

0:39:57.080 --> 0:40:00.440
<v Speaker 1>going on with the MBS market, and you definitely delivered

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:03.120
<v Speaker 1>on that promise. So thank you so much. Really appreciate

0:40:03.160 --> 0:40:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you coming on odd lots, even though you said on

0:40:05.120 --> 0:40:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Twitter that you would never do at Yeah, you weren't

0:40:07.520 --> 0:40:10.000
<v Speaker 1>going to go on a podcast. I meant that. I

0:40:10.080 --> 0:40:13.759
<v Speaker 1>meant that, but then but then you DM me and

0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, and I talked to I talked to Power

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Sin and I was like, I don't really love doing media,

0:40:20.440 --> 0:40:22.759
<v Speaker 1>and he's like, but it's OK, you can't say no,

0:40:22.800 --> 0:40:24.719
<v Speaker 1>and I said, I know, I can't. I can't say no.

0:40:25.440 --> 0:40:27.520
<v Speaker 1>We got to leave this part, and no one shouldn't

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:29.560
<v Speaker 1>say no. That was so good I learned. That was

0:40:29.640 --> 0:40:34.440
<v Speaker 1>so helpful. Now I actually understand your tweets. All right,

0:40:34.520 --> 0:40:52.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Thank you guys. So Joe, well, first of all,

0:40:52.719 --> 0:40:55.839
<v Speaker 1>I would never give you a mean look. I rolled

0:40:55.920 --> 0:40:59.239
<v Speaker 1>my eyes with love. Okay, thank you that. It makes

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:02.400
<v Speaker 1>me feel better. Feeling pretty down for the first few minutes. Sorry,

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:04.839
<v Speaker 1>but I thought that was a really interesting conversation. And

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:06.800
<v Speaker 1>so first of all, you know, it's not it doesn't

0:41:06.800 --> 0:41:09.279
<v Speaker 1>happen that often that someone comes on and says a

0:41:09.440 --> 0:41:12.080
<v Speaker 1>market is essentially broken, or it used to happen a

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:14.640
<v Speaker 1>lot more when the FED was in various markets and

0:41:14.680 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 1>everyone would come in and say, oh, it's broken or distorted,

0:41:17.080 --> 0:41:19.719
<v Speaker 1>But then the FED left, and now people don't seem

0:41:19.760 --> 0:41:22.960
<v Speaker 1>to be talking about that as much. It was so good.

0:41:23.120 --> 0:41:25.799
<v Speaker 1>That answered so many questions. I mean just started like

0:41:25.880 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I told you, you know, I did not always understand

0:41:28.719 --> 0:41:31.400
<v Speaker 1>like why if we have Fannie and Freddie or Jinnia

0:41:31.480 --> 0:41:34.280
<v Speaker 1>may backing mortgages, like why can't we just get mortgages

0:41:34.320 --> 0:41:36.520
<v Speaker 1>at four percent, like the treasury if they're if they

0:41:36.640 --> 0:41:39.760
<v Speaker 1>has the government guarantee. So that was just really helpful

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:44.239
<v Speaker 1>understanding like why now in particular, the spread is so

0:41:44.440 --> 0:41:47.240
<v Speaker 1>high in part but there are obviously many reasons because

0:41:47.239 --> 0:41:50.000
<v Speaker 1>of like sort of the cost of that option going up,

0:41:50.000 --> 0:41:53.319
<v Speaker 1>because of course everyone wants to refinance. The question do

0:41:53.320 --> 0:41:55.919
<v Speaker 1>you asked about the natural bus so much good stuff there. Well,

0:41:56.000 --> 0:41:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the other thing I would say, I know, everyone's interested

0:41:58.360 --> 0:42:00.839
<v Speaker 1>in the mortgage market because it's house and people are

0:42:00.880 --> 0:42:03.319
<v Speaker 1>interested in housing. But the other reason I find this

0:42:03.640 --> 0:42:06.840
<v Speaker 1>so interesting is it's sort of a microcosm of some

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:10.160
<v Speaker 1>of the more like structural critiques that you're starting to

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:13.440
<v Speaker 1>hear about about who's going to be the natural buyer

0:42:13.560 --> 0:42:16.120
<v Speaker 1>for all types of bonds, so not just mbs, but

0:42:16.200 --> 0:42:19.640
<v Speaker 1>also things like treasuries, other government bonds. I mean, we

0:42:19.760 --> 0:42:22.960
<v Speaker 1>just had a massive kerfuffle with guilts in the UK.

0:42:23.680 --> 0:42:26.120
<v Speaker 1>And so if you think that because of all these changes,

0:42:26.160 --> 0:42:29.439
<v Speaker 1>because we were in this new era of higher interest rates,

0:42:29.520 --> 0:42:33.600
<v Speaker 1>higher interest rate volatility, that's going to lead to structurally

0:42:33.880 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 1>higher spreads, then that basically means like that's kind of

0:42:38.200 --> 0:42:41.719
<v Speaker 1>a drag on growth and a dragon returns potentially. I

0:42:41.760 --> 0:42:44.600
<v Speaker 1>was looking while we were talking. I was like looking

0:42:44.640 --> 0:42:47.400
<v Speaker 1>at some like mortgage reads on the term or just

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the price. I just don't do it so brutal, if

0:42:50.440 --> 0:42:52.920
<v Speaker 1>you know. Also, I love that last point, and I

0:42:52.920 --> 0:42:56.240
<v Speaker 1>remember that from like early because right, like rates collapse

0:42:56.640 --> 0:42:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and so if you have a house, you're like, yeah,

0:42:58.000 --> 0:43:00.279
<v Speaker 1>I want to refight, right, but everyone to doing it,

0:43:00.760 --> 0:43:03.799
<v Speaker 1>So then you know they lacked the capacity, and so

0:43:03.840 --> 0:43:05.840
<v Speaker 1>then they charge more because they're like, well, if you

0:43:05.840 --> 0:43:07.480
<v Speaker 1>want to get through, if you want to have our

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:09.960
<v Speaker 1>workers do the paperwork, you're gonna have to pay more.

0:43:10.200 --> 0:43:12.279
<v Speaker 1>And then they hire a bunch of people and then

0:43:12.320 --> 0:43:15.560
<v Speaker 1>it's like okay, then you're late when the spread collapses

0:43:15.600 --> 0:43:18.319
<v Speaker 1>because they have no pricing power anymore. So it really

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:20.440
<v Speaker 1>like this idea that like there is this like finance

0:43:20.480 --> 0:43:23.880
<v Speaker 1>supply chain where it's going to say, by people, So fascinating.

0:43:23.960 --> 0:43:27.600
<v Speaker 1>We managed to turn a highly technical financial markets episode

0:43:27.680 --> 0:43:32.040
<v Speaker 1>into basically a supply episode as a quintessential odd lots episode.

0:43:32.080 --> 0:43:34.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, shall we leave it there, Let's leave it there. Okay.

0:43:34.480 --> 0:43:37.400
<v Speaker 1>This has been another episode of the All Thoughts podcast.

0:43:37.440 --> 0:43:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on Twitter at

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe Wisn't all. You can follow

0:43:42.719 --> 0:43:46.080
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter at the Stalwart, follow our producer Carmen

0:43:46.160 --> 0:43:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Rodriguez at Carmen armand also check out the odd Lots

0:43:50.880 --> 0:43:53.600
<v Speaker 1>newsletter if you go to Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots.

0:43:53.640 --> 0:43:55.239
<v Speaker 1>Tracy and I we write every week. We don't talk

0:43:55.280 --> 0:43:57.440
<v Speaker 1>about it enough, do we, Tracy, No, we actually write

0:43:57.560 --> 0:44:00.000
<v Speaker 1>quite a lot. So you can get summaries of the interviews,

0:44:00.120 --> 0:44:02.360
<v Speaker 1>you can get transcripts, you can get other things that

0:44:02.440 --> 0:44:05.319
<v Speaker 1>Joe and I find interesting. Plus the weekly newsletter that

0:44:05.520 --> 0:44:10.000
<v Speaker 1>also includes reading recommendations from some of our guests are

0:44:10.000 --> 0:44:11.719
<v Speaker 1>going to be anyway. Yeah, check it out. Just check

0:44:11.760 --> 0:44:14.480
<v Speaker 1>it all out at Bloomberg dot com slash odd LODs,

0:44:14.760 --> 0:44:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and of course you could check out all of the

0:44:16.680 --> 0:44:21.160
<v Speaker 1>podcasts Bloomberg onto the handle at podcasts. Thanks for listening