1 00:00:09,720 --> 00:00:12,880 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene with 2 00:00:13,560 --> 00:00:16,520 Speaker 1: David Gura. Daily we bring you insight from the best 3 00:00:16,560 --> 00:00:22,279 Speaker 1: of economics, finance, investment, and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance 4 00:00:22,320 --> 00:00:27,000 Speaker 1: on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot Com, and of course 5 00:00:27,320 --> 00:00:34,000 Speaker 1: on the Bloomberg William Lee joining us now. He's the 6 00:00:34,080 --> 00:00:36,080 Speaker 1: chief economist at the Milk And Institute. He's our Bloomberg 7 00:00:36,640 --> 00:00:39,239 Speaker 1: Studios in Washington, DC. Bill, Great to speak with you 8 00:00:39,280 --> 00:00:42,199 Speaker 1: once again. Hey, Devora, let's start with that with this 9 00:00:42,240 --> 00:00:44,479 Speaker 1: parlor game. Given the news that we've gotten at the 10 00:00:44,479 --> 00:00:46,520 Speaker 1: President scheduled to meet with Janet Yelle a bit later 11 00:00:47,040 --> 00:00:49,199 Speaker 1: this week. What have we learned about what the presidents 12 00:00:49,200 --> 00:00:51,760 Speaker 1: and interested in in a future fed cheer from who 13 00:00:51,760 --> 00:00:54,080 Speaker 1: we've seen passed through the doores of the White House 14 00:00:54,080 --> 00:00:56,520 Speaker 1: over these last few weeks. I think like, unlike his 15 00:00:56,560 --> 00:00:58,760 Speaker 1: own behavior, I think Trump really wants someone he can 16 00:00:58,800 --> 00:01:01,640 Speaker 1: count on and is reliable and predictable, and so with 17 00:01:01,720 --> 00:01:04,200 Speaker 1: Janet Yellen, he's seen her performance, but then she's also 18 00:01:04,200 --> 00:01:05,840 Speaker 1: flip flopped a little bit, and since that, she was 19 00:01:05,880 --> 00:01:09,120 Speaker 1: a dog before and and and reluctant to to normalize 20 00:01:09,280 --> 00:01:12,800 Speaker 1: and now she's insistent on normalizing even though the data 21 00:01:12,840 --> 00:01:16,080 Speaker 1: are not coming in to support the two percent UH inflation. 22 00:01:16,160 --> 00:01:20,240 Speaker 1: Of course, the excuses what I've always called faith based forecasting, 23 00:01:20,280 --> 00:01:21,520 Speaker 1: which is I have a lot of faith in the 24 00:01:21,520 --> 00:01:23,640 Speaker 1: filter curve. I know it's gonna kick in, so trust me, 25 00:01:23,720 --> 00:01:26,319 Speaker 1: it's gonna come and we better start normalizing now. I 26 00:01:26,319 --> 00:01:28,639 Speaker 1: think the alternative for he, kind of like like John Taylor, 27 00:01:28,760 --> 00:01:32,319 Speaker 1: is that that we have a He presents a framework 28 00:01:32,400 --> 00:01:34,040 Speaker 1: and it's the Taylor rule, and the I think that 29 00:01:34,160 --> 00:01:36,160 Speaker 1: know Nothings on Wall Street says, oh my god, he's 30 00:01:36,200 --> 00:01:38,759 Speaker 1: such a hawkway going to get incredibly high interest rates. 31 00:01:38,840 --> 00:01:40,319 Speaker 1: And I think the one thing that we know about 32 00:01:40,360 --> 00:01:43,560 Speaker 1: John Taylor is that he's a sophisticated economist. He knows 33 00:01:43,800 --> 00:01:46,160 Speaker 1: when it is that he should not follow a rule, 34 00:01:46,520 --> 00:01:50,200 Speaker 1: uh exactly, even his own rule. And so with with John, 35 00:01:50,480 --> 00:01:53,200 Speaker 1: what we have is a more predictable framework that we 36 00:01:53,280 --> 00:01:55,880 Speaker 1: know he bases his decisions on. But he also takes 37 00:01:55,880 --> 00:01:58,080 Speaker 1: into account what's going on in the world. And the 38 00:01:58,160 --> 00:02:00,640 Speaker 1: key is he tells you how he gonna take into 39 00:02:00,640 --> 00:02:02,720 Speaker 1: account what's going on in the world and when he's 40 00:02:02,720 --> 00:02:05,720 Speaker 1: gonna get off the rule. So given the two choices, I, 41 00:02:05,880 --> 00:02:08,240 Speaker 1: of course was favorite John um and and And The 42 00:02:08,280 --> 00:02:11,680 Speaker 1: difficulty with yelling um in the language of the FOMC 43 00:02:11,919 --> 00:02:13,600 Speaker 1: right now is that a lot of it is based 44 00:02:13,639 --> 00:02:16,120 Speaker 1: on faith, and the faith that Wall Street and the 45 00:02:16,120 --> 00:02:19,000 Speaker 1: financial markets just don't have anymore, which is, we don't 46 00:02:19,000 --> 00:02:21,680 Speaker 1: believe inflation really is going to reach that two percent 47 00:02:21,919 --> 00:02:24,240 Speaker 1: in the near term. With respect to there's no nothings 48 00:02:24,240 --> 00:02:25,960 Speaker 1: you mentioned on on Wall Street, what would this mean 49 00:02:26,000 --> 00:02:28,560 Speaker 1: to to the markets? The implementations of more rules bathed 50 00:02:28,639 --> 00:02:32,280 Speaker 1: less faith based approach to monetary policy? Well so so, 51 00:02:32,280 --> 00:02:34,560 Speaker 1: so what's happening to the long race versus short rates? Um? 52 00:02:34,800 --> 00:02:38,400 Speaker 1: If you really believe that the FIT is gonna normalize 53 00:02:38,480 --> 00:02:42,280 Speaker 1: to the near three percent level, you have to ask 54 00:02:42,280 --> 00:02:44,920 Speaker 1: yourself what does that mean for inflation in the in 55 00:02:44,960 --> 00:02:47,040 Speaker 1: the in the long run, if you don't believe inflation 56 00:02:47,080 --> 00:02:49,560 Speaker 1: is gonna kick in, that means you're gonna get a 57 00:02:49,320 --> 00:02:51,600 Speaker 1: a flattening of that. You cerve the short race will 58 00:02:51,600 --> 00:02:52,959 Speaker 1: go up, but the long race of souls to be 59 00:02:53,080 --> 00:02:55,560 Speaker 1: nailed because there's no inflation and because the real rate, 60 00:02:56,000 --> 00:02:59,880 Speaker 1: the neutral real rate, is still near zero given that 61 00:03:00,040 --> 00:03:03,040 Speaker 1: we have no productivity growth. If you believe that, for example, 62 00:03:03,120 --> 00:03:05,800 Speaker 1: the tax increases will get to raise prouctivity and all 63 00:03:05,800 --> 00:03:07,680 Speaker 1: that kind of stuff. Uh, and our star is going 64 00:03:07,720 --> 00:03:10,480 Speaker 1: to start to rise. Then indeed, you will have a longer, 65 00:03:11,040 --> 00:03:14,079 Speaker 1: a longer, long run interest rate that's gonna be starting 66 00:03:14,080 --> 00:03:16,960 Speaker 1: to creep up. Now, now, what what was the fetchair 67 00:03:17,040 --> 00:03:20,120 Speaker 1: doing that circumstance, Well, the fet chair should be encouraging 68 00:03:20,160 --> 00:03:23,360 Speaker 1: those productivity increases. But that's that's going to come from 69 00:03:23,400 --> 00:03:26,200 Speaker 1: tax policy and quite frankly, from innovation, and that she 70 00:03:26,320 --> 00:03:29,280 Speaker 1: has no control over. The one thing you can do 71 00:03:29,520 --> 00:03:33,839 Speaker 1: is make market expectations go in incredible fashion to where 72 00:03:33,880 --> 00:03:36,400 Speaker 1: you really believe they're gonna go and and and right now, 73 00:03:36,560 --> 00:03:39,040 Speaker 1: given the amount of slack in the economy, even though 74 00:03:39,080 --> 00:03:41,520 Speaker 1: the unemployment rate is so low, and the unemployment rates 75 00:03:41,520 --> 00:03:44,520 Speaker 1: allows you measure slack, we know this slack because there's 76 00:03:44,520 --> 00:03:47,000 Speaker 1: a lot of there's no inflation, and there's also been 77 00:03:47,040 --> 00:03:49,720 Speaker 1: a lot of innovations supply shocks that have helped to 78 00:03:49,840 --> 00:03:53,280 Speaker 1: keep prices from going up. That is pricing power that 79 00:03:53,400 --> 00:03:57,360 Speaker 1: we have among producers, especially service producers, even are not 80 00:03:57,440 --> 00:03:59,520 Speaker 1: as strong as they used to be. So the likelihood 81 00:03:59,520 --> 00:04:02,160 Speaker 1: of rising inflation UH is also going to be very 82 00:04:02,160 --> 00:04:04,280 Speaker 1: low in the near term and and in the media 83 00:04:04,360 --> 00:04:06,960 Speaker 1: medium term. I mentioned a few moments ago Morgan Stanley's 84 00:04:07,000 --> 00:04:08,960 Speaker 1: latest numbers reporting the third quarter earnings for just a 85 00:04:08,960 --> 00:04:10,680 Speaker 1: few minutes ago, and I look at fixed sales and 86 00:04:10,680 --> 00:04:13,960 Speaker 1: trading beating estimates. I look at the investment banking beating 87 00:04:14,040 --> 00:04:16,120 Speaker 1: estimates as well. Going back to last week at the 88 00:04:16,120 --> 00:04:18,760 Speaker 1: banks reported, then we see um a lot of reporting 89 00:04:18,760 --> 00:04:21,720 Speaker 1: in line with expectations. Banks doing fairly well here in 90 00:04:21,960 --> 00:04:25,120 Speaker 1: the third quarter. What what is the role of rates, 91 00:04:25,120 --> 00:04:26,880 Speaker 1: the role of this conversation about fans and and what 92 00:04:26,880 --> 00:04:28,599 Speaker 1: we the fan and what we're seeing here from the 93 00:04:28,600 --> 00:04:30,560 Speaker 1: banks that last week and this weak I think you're 94 00:04:30,560 --> 00:04:32,640 Speaker 1: starting to see a shift in the role of banks. 95 00:04:32,720 --> 00:04:34,240 Speaker 1: And that's one of the things that we have milk 96 00:04:34,279 --> 00:04:37,280 Speaker 1: and are trying to to incentivize in our research agenda, 97 00:04:37,320 --> 00:04:39,839 Speaker 1: which is, let's consider what the role of banks and 98 00:04:39,839 --> 00:04:43,200 Speaker 1: intermediation is in a world where rates of return are low. 99 00:04:43,600 --> 00:04:46,599 Speaker 1: Public markets are trading at very low rates of return, 100 00:04:46,920 --> 00:04:50,239 Speaker 1: and investors are going into the private markets, private equity 101 00:04:50,279 --> 00:04:54,000 Speaker 1: and adventure capital, and these non traded markets are a 102 00:04:54,000 --> 00:04:57,000 Speaker 1: place where the large banks have a role of trying 103 00:04:57,000 --> 00:05:01,080 Speaker 1: to hook investors into and how they do that is 104 00:05:01,400 --> 00:05:03,880 Speaker 1: going to be the key to making money in the future, 105 00:05:04,120 --> 00:05:07,039 Speaker 1: whether it's bank lending or by way of starture products 106 00:05:07,040 --> 00:05:09,839 Speaker 1: to try to get the bank lending into the hands 107 00:05:09,960 --> 00:05:13,960 Speaker 1: of pension funds, insurance companies and longer term investors. So 108 00:05:14,040 --> 00:05:16,680 Speaker 1: the role of a bank and how a bank operates 109 00:05:16,680 --> 00:05:18,960 Speaker 1: in the future, that business model is going to have 110 00:05:19,040 --> 00:05:22,200 Speaker 1: to change to accommodate this new world of low inflation, 111 00:05:22,320 --> 00:05:26,520 Speaker 1: low real returns UM and and possibly more leverage UM. 112 00:05:26,680 --> 00:05:28,320 Speaker 1: One of the things that we always worry about, and 113 00:05:28,520 --> 00:05:30,400 Speaker 1: especially for someone like me from the I m F 114 00:05:30,440 --> 00:05:32,960 Speaker 1: where I used to be in charge of the the 115 00:05:33,000 --> 00:05:36,320 Speaker 1: analytic chapters of the Global Financial Stability Report, We're always 116 00:05:36,400 --> 00:05:39,520 Speaker 1: concerned that leverage is going to bring about weaknesses in 117 00:05:39,560 --> 00:05:43,200 Speaker 1: financial stability. But if you have a persistent low rate environment, 118 00:05:43,240 --> 00:05:46,400 Speaker 1: low inflation environment, then you could have more leverage that 119 00:05:46,480 --> 00:05:49,480 Speaker 1: could sustain the investment. William Lee with this, William Lee 120 00:05:49,480 --> 00:05:51,240 Speaker 1: of the Milk and Institute. Of course you've for him 121 00:05:51,279 --> 00:05:55,000 Speaker 1: for years at the City Group. I'm Bloomberg Surveillance. Good morning, 122 00:05:55,040 --> 00:05:59,119 Speaker 1: David Gerin, Tom Keene thrilled the you're with us UH 123 00:05:59,160 --> 00:06:02,119 Speaker 1: this morning Billy, I'm looking at sort of the mix 124 00:06:02,160 --> 00:06:06,080 Speaker 1: of our economics and our markets. And also I should 125 00:06:06,080 --> 00:06:09,320 Speaker 1: point out Pound Sterling, David Gurrow South on Governor Kearney's 126 00:06:09,360 --> 00:06:12,880 Speaker 1: comments on oh too, that's a significant drop. There was 127 00:06:13,360 --> 00:06:17,240 Speaker 1: a Swiss strength here, Swiss frank strength of the comments 128 00:06:17,240 --> 00:06:19,960 Speaker 1: as well. But you know, Billy, I I look at 129 00:06:19,960 --> 00:06:23,000 Speaker 1: all this discussion and as you mentioned, the new business model, 130 00:06:23,720 --> 00:06:28,160 Speaker 1: which means technology financial technology. Absolutely it was a it 131 00:06:28,240 --> 00:06:31,400 Speaker 1: was a backstory at i m F World Bank, which 132 00:06:31,440 --> 00:06:35,479 Speaker 1: is the total mystery we have of the technological impact 133 00:06:35,520 --> 00:06:40,240 Speaker 1: and effect on all of our listeners. It's extraordinary, isn't it. Absolutely? 134 00:06:40,279 --> 00:06:42,160 Speaker 1: And I think one of the things that that we're 135 00:06:42,200 --> 00:06:44,920 Speaker 1: misjudging is that, um, you know, I often have said 136 00:06:44,960 --> 00:06:47,080 Speaker 1: to you, you you know, I think the shadow economy, that 137 00:06:47,160 --> 00:06:50,240 Speaker 1: new economy, the sharing economy, is really quite small, because 138 00:06:50,279 --> 00:06:52,400 Speaker 1: Alan Kruger's estimate it shows that it's about one percent 139 00:06:52,520 --> 00:06:54,520 Speaker 1: of GDP. So you can say, oh my god, we 140 00:06:54,560 --> 00:06:58,840 Speaker 1: should ignore that. But the pricing power influence of AIRPNB 141 00:06:59,160 --> 00:07:02,640 Speaker 1: and and and and uber really is very pervasive. And 142 00:07:02,680 --> 00:07:05,120 Speaker 1: I think that's the thing what most economist are underestimating, 143 00:07:05,160 --> 00:07:08,120 Speaker 1: the positive supply shocks that are coming from these innovative 144 00:07:08,160 --> 00:07:12,880 Speaker 1: ways of getting services and goods to people. And that's 145 00:07:12,880 --> 00:07:17,120 Speaker 1: a glorial phenomenon. But Mr Alper's wonderful book on the 146 00:07:17,160 --> 00:07:20,680 Speaker 1: supply side economy and the supply shock is you put it, 147 00:07:20,800 --> 00:07:25,120 Speaker 1: there's the supply shock mean a new adjustment in our 148 00:07:25,160 --> 00:07:30,040 Speaker 1: traditional economics because there's too much stuff out there literally 149 00:07:30,080 --> 00:07:33,080 Speaker 1: because of technology. Well, I think what what this new 150 00:07:33,120 --> 00:07:36,240 Speaker 1: technology is giving is free entry. And if you have 151 00:07:36,320 --> 00:07:38,680 Speaker 1: free entry, that means that you don't have the kind 152 00:07:38,680 --> 00:07:42,000 Speaker 1: of monopolistic pricing power that people use in trade profit margins. 153 00:07:42,200 --> 00:07:44,160 Speaker 1: And so so it's really not so much that we 154 00:07:44,160 --> 00:07:46,960 Speaker 1: have too much stuff out there, but but the stuff 155 00:07:47,000 --> 00:07:50,080 Speaker 1: that we have. If if we really like one particular thing, 156 00:07:50,400 --> 00:07:52,440 Speaker 1: five competitors are gonna come and give us that same 157 00:07:52,480 --> 00:07:55,200 Speaker 1: thing very easily. And that's the key to the difference 158 00:07:55,240 --> 00:07:57,480 Speaker 1: in this new world versus what we had before. And 159 00:07:57,560 --> 00:08:00,559 Speaker 1: that's why the filmed current model has to be adjusted. Billy, 160 00:08:00,680 --> 00:08:16,160 Speaker 1: thank you so much. With the Milk and Institute, you 161 00:08:16,240 --> 00:08:19,520 Speaker 1: pick up Foreign Affairs magazine and usually you're angry because 162 00:08:19,680 --> 00:08:21,680 Speaker 1: you immediately see on the cover that this is going 163 00:08:21,720 --> 00:08:25,640 Speaker 1: to be brilliant. It's on current politics, or international relations. 164 00:08:26,200 --> 00:08:28,160 Speaker 1: And then David, you pick it up and the covers 165 00:08:28,360 --> 00:08:32,360 Speaker 1: America's forgotten wars. I'm like, what, why am I looking 166 00:08:32,360 --> 00:08:34,640 Speaker 1: at this? It's like, I don't get it. And then 167 00:08:34,679 --> 00:08:39,160 Speaker 1: from the first page, which is a heartbreaking analysis of Afghanistan, 168 00:08:39,920 --> 00:08:42,880 Speaker 1: it is every page of value, including a huge history 169 00:08:42,960 --> 00:08:46,959 Speaker 1: David Gura of Stalin and Hitler, which I found just riveting. 170 00:08:47,920 --> 00:08:50,280 Speaker 1: Taking through the rest, there's a rock, there's Syria. Gidding 171 00:08:50,320 --> 00:08:52,240 Speaker 1: Rose joins us now he's the editor of foreign affairs 172 00:08:52,240 --> 00:08:54,960 Speaker 1: magazine Choice US in our Blomberg eleven three oh studios. 173 00:08:55,200 --> 00:08:56,520 Speaker 1: It strikes, but we don't have a good sense at 174 00:08:56,520 --> 00:08:59,040 Speaker 1: how wars end these days. Yes they're forgotten, but they 175 00:08:59,040 --> 00:09:01,200 Speaker 1: don't end in the same way I did in the past. 176 00:09:01,200 --> 00:09:03,760 Speaker 1: When you look at Afghanistan, say, what's the the end game? 177 00:09:03,840 --> 00:09:06,160 Speaker 1: Is their consensus about how that conflict is going to 178 00:09:06,240 --> 00:09:08,360 Speaker 1: come to a close? Well, the best way to think 179 00:09:08,400 --> 00:09:12,880 Speaker 1: about that is war is a military action to achieve 180 00:09:13,040 --> 00:09:17,559 Speaker 1: some political result. And we tend to think, as Americans 181 00:09:17,559 --> 00:09:19,960 Speaker 1: in particular, about the military side of things, and so 182 00:09:20,000 --> 00:09:23,040 Speaker 1: we think that wars are about fighting and about bombs 183 00:09:23,040 --> 00:09:25,600 Speaker 1: and about guns and the generals and so forth, and 184 00:09:25,640 --> 00:09:27,560 Speaker 1: beating up the enemy like as if it's some boxing 185 00:09:27,559 --> 00:09:29,920 Speaker 1: match in a large scale when the fight ends when 186 00:09:29,960 --> 00:09:33,040 Speaker 1: you knock the other guy out, But in reality it's 187 00:09:33,080 --> 00:09:36,880 Speaker 1: a political gesture. This was klauss whole point. And the 188 00:09:37,000 --> 00:09:39,800 Speaker 1: goal of the war is not just a better piece 189 00:09:40,080 --> 00:09:45,000 Speaker 1: like a Catholic social doctrine, but a stable political situation. 190 00:09:45,160 --> 00:09:48,800 Speaker 1: So the way to end a war is to create 191 00:09:48,960 --> 00:09:52,960 Speaker 1: a polity after the fact that can survive on its own, 192 00:09:53,120 --> 00:09:55,680 Speaker 1: or to take the territory and bring it into yourself 193 00:09:55,720 --> 00:09:58,880 Speaker 1: and conquer it. Now, the basic problem that we had 194 00:09:59,080 --> 00:10:01,679 Speaker 1: in Iraq and in Afghanistan and many of these other 195 00:10:01,679 --> 00:10:04,800 Speaker 1: conflicts that were engaged in is we don't have a 196 00:10:04,840 --> 00:10:09,800 Speaker 1: path to creating a stable country to leave behind after 197 00:10:09,800 --> 00:10:12,679 Speaker 1: we leave, and so we kind of don't really know 198 00:10:12,720 --> 00:10:14,559 Speaker 1: what to do because if we walk away everything, we'll 199 00:10:14,559 --> 00:10:16,160 Speaker 1: go back to Hell in a hand basket. But if 200 00:10:16,200 --> 00:10:19,160 Speaker 1: we stay, it's kind of difficult. So that's the fundamental challenge. 201 00:10:19,160 --> 00:10:22,079 Speaker 1: There's no good easy answer. And what this package really 202 00:10:22,160 --> 00:10:26,320 Speaker 1: is about is how American strategic officials, how people who 203 00:10:26,400 --> 00:10:29,800 Speaker 1: seriously take foreign policy with the respect that it deserves 204 00:10:30,080 --> 00:10:33,240 Speaker 1: and military policy are trying to think through what US 205 00:10:33,280 --> 00:10:37,680 Speaker 1: policy should be in a variety of context Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq, 206 00:10:38,080 --> 00:10:41,959 Speaker 1: dealing with the Russian Eastern Front, cyber count homeland security, 207 00:10:41,960 --> 00:10:43,959 Speaker 1: and so forth. So it's an attempt to say this 208 00:10:44,000 --> 00:10:46,440 Speaker 1: is what serious professionals would be talking about if we 209 00:10:46,440 --> 00:10:49,720 Speaker 1: were actually having the conversation on American national security that 210 00:10:49,760 --> 00:10:52,199 Speaker 1: we should be having. Stanley with Crystal retired General Stanley 211 00:10:52,240 --> 00:10:54,360 Speaker 1: of Crystal writing with a former lieutenant colonel from the 212 00:10:54,360 --> 00:10:56,800 Speaker 1: Afghan Special Operations for US as he worked with while 213 00:10:56,800 --> 00:10:58,920 Speaker 1: he was in Afghanistan. What did you hear from the 214 00:10:58,920 --> 00:11:01,839 Speaker 1: President when he spoke about the future of Afghanistan a 215 00:11:01,880 --> 00:11:05,880 Speaker 1: few months ago? Now, he wasn't completely praised for for 216 00:11:05,880 --> 00:11:07,160 Speaker 1: what he had to say, but there were many who 217 00:11:07,240 --> 00:11:09,880 Speaker 1: thought he was delivering a serious speech, thinking seriously about 218 00:11:09,880 --> 00:11:12,240 Speaker 1: the future of that that conflict. What did you hear 219 00:11:12,240 --> 00:11:14,800 Speaker 1: from him as he addressed the troops. I thought the 220 00:11:14,840 --> 00:11:20,280 Speaker 1: Afghanistan speech was okay. It was less segregious than some 221 00:11:20,360 --> 00:11:23,440 Speaker 1: of the other ones. Um, it was written for him 222 00:11:23,520 --> 00:11:26,640 Speaker 1: and he said some of the right words. Um. I 223 00:11:27,200 --> 00:11:29,520 Speaker 1: we have a real problem now with the President because 224 00:11:29,559 --> 00:11:31,880 Speaker 1: we've never had a situation in which the most important 225 00:11:31,920 --> 00:11:34,200 Speaker 1: player in the world is somebody whose words can't be 226 00:11:34,240 --> 00:11:37,680 Speaker 1: taken seriously. And so, uh, we actually have a piece 227 00:11:37,679 --> 00:11:39,640 Speaker 1: coming up in a future issue that I'm thinking of 228 00:11:39,679 --> 00:11:43,360 Speaker 1: when the working title after credibility. But it really is 229 00:11:43,360 --> 00:11:45,480 Speaker 1: an interesting question. So I tend not to look at 230 00:11:45,480 --> 00:11:47,600 Speaker 1: the president's speeches at this point, and I think most 231 00:11:47,640 --> 00:11:50,320 Speaker 1: world leaders and most other people don't because he says 232 00:11:50,360 --> 00:11:53,040 Speaker 1: different things different days. Doesn't really clam to understand what 233 00:11:53,120 --> 00:11:55,760 Speaker 1: he's saying. And so it's better to watch US foreign 234 00:11:55,760 --> 00:11:59,240 Speaker 1: policy as if it's a TV with the sound turned off, 235 00:11:59,559 --> 00:12:01,480 Speaker 1: to whom were you're listening. Then if the sound has 236 00:12:01,520 --> 00:12:04,240 Speaker 1: turned off and you've got the radio one, I'm not listening. 237 00:12:04,360 --> 00:12:08,080 Speaker 1: I'm actually watching. And so what you see is again 238 00:12:08,240 --> 00:12:12,000 Speaker 1: essentially like what happened with Obamacare, which is the President 239 00:12:12,320 --> 00:12:15,520 Speaker 1: and some of his advisors have clearly decided they would 240 00:12:15,520 --> 00:12:19,640 Speaker 1: like to disrupt, destroy, and overturn the existing American farm 241 00:12:19,679 --> 00:12:23,520 Speaker 1: policy structure. Unfortunately, they don't have the power to do that, 242 00:12:23,559 --> 00:12:25,560 Speaker 1: and they don't have any idea of what to replace 243 00:12:25,600 --> 00:12:28,920 Speaker 1: it with. So having tried to screw it up and failed, 244 00:12:28,960 --> 00:12:32,120 Speaker 1: because the professionals and other allies and so forth have 245 00:12:32,240 --> 00:12:36,640 Speaker 1: kept the basic structure intact, the President is now petulantly 246 00:12:37,320 --> 00:12:40,240 Speaker 1: trying to destroy it through unilateral action, the same way 247 00:12:40,280 --> 00:12:44,640 Speaker 1: he's doing Obamacare. So basically, the Iran Deal decertification is 248 00:12:44,679 --> 00:12:47,480 Speaker 1: exactly the same kind of move as the loss of 249 00:12:47,520 --> 00:12:51,720 Speaker 1: the subsidies for Obamacare. It's a kind of spiteful attempt 250 00:12:51,800 --> 00:12:56,160 Speaker 1: to screw up a decent program that was actually potentially working, 251 00:12:56,640 --> 00:12:59,839 Speaker 1: even though he can't g rid of it with something better. Gidding, 252 00:13:00,080 --> 00:13:01,880 Speaker 1: thank you so much for being with us today on 253 00:13:01,960 --> 00:13:05,520 Speaker 1: television and radio. Can't say enough about Foreign Affairs magazine. 254 00:13:05,559 --> 00:13:10,640 Speaker 1: Whatever your politics, um, just article to article, just terrific reading. 255 00:13:10,679 --> 00:13:14,200 Speaker 1: I might point out the book review Joshua Green Mr 256 00:13:14,280 --> 00:13:17,839 Speaker 1: Bannon in the back of the book talks about the 257 00:13:17,880 --> 00:13:20,520 Speaker 1: importance of Mr Bannon and the drive forward. He'll be 258 00:13:20,559 --> 00:13:22,439 Speaker 1: on with me yet today on TV as well. Mr 259 00:13:22,480 --> 00:13:27,680 Speaker 1: Bannon will be Mr Creed. There you go, Coast to coast. 260 00:13:27,679 --> 00:13:31,240 Speaker 1: Good morning, Bloomberg one or six one FM Boston. This 261 00:13:31,480 --> 00:13:45,440 Speaker 1: is Bloomberg Doug cast with us. And because we're gonna 262 00:13:45,440 --> 00:13:48,200 Speaker 1: be with them for substantial time, we start with the 263 00:13:48,400 --> 00:13:52,679 Speaker 1: Joy and Douglas casts. Life of lining up a Dodgers 264 00:13:52,880 --> 00:13:59,480 Speaker 1: Yankees room. Could that happen? Doug Cass Oh yeah, I 265 00:13:59,559 --> 00:14:02,400 Speaker 1: think that. I think that they were a bit spent. 266 00:14:02,520 --> 00:14:04,720 Speaker 1: I know I was, and a lot of the fans 267 00:14:04,720 --> 00:14:07,600 Speaker 1: were after the Cleveland series coming back from the top 268 00:14:07,720 --> 00:14:10,520 Speaker 1: of it, and what how exciting would it be for 269 00:14:10,559 --> 00:14:13,080 Speaker 1: everyone if they came back from the two zero deficit 270 00:14:13,160 --> 00:14:16,640 Speaker 1: in this series. I think I just think they were exhausted. Yes, 271 00:14:16,640 --> 00:14:19,040 Speaker 1: they was a great game, and they finally broke out 272 00:14:19,080 --> 00:14:21,000 Speaker 1: and hitting, and that's what what was missing in the 273 00:14:21,000 --> 00:14:23,360 Speaker 1: first two games. You mean, I think I think the 274 00:14:23,360 --> 00:14:26,880 Speaker 1: world is looking for uh you know my background, but 275 00:14:26,920 --> 00:14:29,160 Speaker 1: I do believe that the world is looking forward to 276 00:14:29,200 --> 00:14:34,880 Speaker 1: a Dodger Yankee series. I was I can't get cast 277 00:14:34,920 --> 00:14:37,520 Speaker 1: ever been on with this for I mean, I mean, 278 00:14:37,640 --> 00:14:41,640 Speaker 1: it's like six unreal doug one more thing on baseball 279 00:14:41,680 --> 00:14:45,360 Speaker 1: To me, the Yankees pitching staff is almost Dodgers, like 280 00:14:46,040 --> 00:14:49,000 Speaker 1: from another time and place. I mean, they don't have 281 00:14:49,200 --> 00:14:51,560 Speaker 1: a weak picture. They make you know, there's levels of 282 00:14:51,600 --> 00:14:54,120 Speaker 1: them in that. But I think it's been way under sold. 283 00:14:54,800 --> 00:14:57,400 Speaker 1: Don't look at the last three games when they give 284 00:14:57,480 --> 00:15:01,320 Speaker 1: up to three rounds. Yeah right, okay, nothing. I just 285 00:15:01,360 --> 00:15:04,240 Speaker 1: needed the hitting too, and that's what happens. Jim Palmer 286 00:15:04,320 --> 00:15:08,360 Speaker 1: there and if the judge gets hot along with yes, 287 00:15:08,400 --> 00:15:12,760 Speaker 1: indeedy we got something going for us. Okay, yes, we 288 00:15:12,800 --> 00:15:15,400 Speaker 1: have to explain that to our global audience. Mr Gregorius 289 00:15:15,880 --> 00:15:19,560 Speaker 1: filled the biggest shoes in sports this year of one Djter, 290 00:15:20,360 --> 00:15:23,520 Speaker 1: Mr Gregorius has done better than good. And also a 291 00:15:23,520 --> 00:15:27,000 Speaker 1: shout out to James Palmer of Baltimore Orioles, who just 292 00:15:27,080 --> 00:15:30,440 Speaker 1: predicted it. He nailed the Houston Call earlier this year 293 00:15:30,440 --> 00:15:33,400 Speaker 1: with Douglas Cass. Okay, Doug Onto Investment, you've been a 294 00:15:33,520 --> 00:15:39,160 Speaker 1: pinata for being short down two six. I want you 295 00:15:39,240 --> 00:15:42,440 Speaker 1: to review, and Doug is such a class act he'll 296 00:15:42,480 --> 00:15:45,800 Speaker 1: do this clearly. I want you to review how a 297 00:15:46,000 --> 00:15:52,840 Speaker 1: short survives in a bullmarket. Well. In preparation for this interview, 298 00:15:54,040 --> 00:15:57,880 Speaker 1: as important as it is to me, I was speaking 299 00:15:57,960 --> 00:16:02,400 Speaker 1: yesterday um with of our mutual acquaintances, Richard Fisher, the 300 00:16:02,440 --> 00:16:06,800 Speaker 1: former Dallas Fed president, and he reminded me of something 301 00:16:07,080 --> 00:16:10,960 Speaker 1: his mother inculcated into his head when he was a kid. 302 00:16:11,080 --> 00:16:15,800 Speaker 1: She said, skepticism is the chastity of the intellect. It's 303 00:16:15,840 --> 00:16:20,320 Speaker 1: not to be surrendered lightly. Uh rich is mom, whose 304 00:16:20,400 --> 00:16:27,680 Speaker 1: name was Babe Fisher, was a stoic Norwegian South African 305 00:16:27,920 --> 00:16:32,160 Speaker 1: woman and mother and very smart, much like my bronx 306 00:16:32,240 --> 00:16:35,480 Speaker 1: wise Grandma Kovac. So my advice is you might not 307 00:16:35,560 --> 00:16:38,120 Speaker 1: want to listen to my cautious advice, but one would 308 00:16:38,160 --> 00:16:41,640 Speaker 1: be wise to listen to mother Fisher's advice to stay 309 00:16:41,720 --> 00:16:46,480 Speaker 1: chased and dog. And this goes to another great short 310 00:16:46,600 --> 00:16:51,320 Speaker 1: James Chanos. When you have skepticism, skepticism like that you 311 00:16:51,520 --> 00:16:55,200 Speaker 1: the answer on position sizing is you bet small amounts 312 00:16:55,280 --> 00:16:59,200 Speaker 1: of money. That's really, as we discussed in our last 313 00:16:59,240 --> 00:17:05,760 Speaker 1: segment about well five weeks ago, the key to um 314 00:17:05,800 --> 00:17:09,680 Speaker 1: maintaining your investment health as a short biased investor the 315 00:17:09,680 --> 00:17:13,240 Speaker 1: way Jim and I are is to keep positions small, 316 00:17:13,760 --> 00:17:20,600 Speaker 1: to have remarkably uh strict risk disciplines consistent with one's 317 00:17:20,680 --> 00:17:26,040 Speaker 1: time frames and risk profile or risk appetite, and to take, 318 00:17:27,160 --> 00:17:29,880 Speaker 1: to be quite honest, a lot of very small losses 319 00:17:30,560 --> 00:17:34,879 Speaker 1: to prepare yourself what is inevitably going to be a 320 00:17:34,960 --> 00:17:38,840 Speaker 1: rather large decline. You remember Warren Buffet's famous quote, A 321 00:17:38,960 --> 00:17:41,560 Speaker 1: ball market is like sex. It feels the best right 322 00:17:41,600 --> 00:17:44,800 Speaker 1: near the appropriate Radio Ken. I got to go to 323 00:17:44,840 --> 00:17:48,199 Speaker 1: our chief technical director, Ken Failure. Is this appropriate for 324 00:17:48,320 --> 00:17:53,800 Speaker 1: radio anything? Warren Buffett says, it's appropriate. Okay, David, jump 325 00:17:53,840 --> 00:17:55,679 Speaker 1: in here and save the interview. Let me we've been 326 00:17:55,720 --> 00:17:58,639 Speaker 1: talking a little bit about technology, the role of changing technology, 327 00:17:58,720 --> 00:18:00,800 Speaker 1: Dug And I know you've written about Tesla in recent 328 00:18:00,840 --> 00:18:02,920 Speaker 1: weeks looking at that company for US yesterday with the 329 00:18:02,960 --> 00:18:05,080 Speaker 1: announcement of a number of layoffs at that company. The 330 00:18:05,080 --> 00:18:07,480 Speaker 1: company is behind them producing it's it's it's model three. 331 00:18:07,520 --> 00:18:09,840 Speaker 1: What do you observe from Elon one of Elon Musk's 332 00:18:09,840 --> 00:18:14,240 Speaker 1: company over these recent weeks? I still, you know, I 333 00:18:14,800 --> 00:18:17,040 Speaker 1: I have a one of the getting back to your 334 00:18:17,040 --> 00:18:20,119 Speaker 1: prior question, you know, how do you survive as a 335 00:18:20,200 --> 00:18:24,359 Speaker 1: short short seller? You know market advance that has no 336 00:18:24,520 --> 00:18:28,040 Speaker 1: dips um? Is that one of the things is a 337 00:18:28,119 --> 00:18:30,720 Speaker 1: non starters. You stay away from shorts that you might 338 00:18:30,760 --> 00:18:34,680 Speaker 1: believe are shorts like Netflix and Tesla where the short 339 00:18:34,720 --> 00:18:38,760 Speaker 1: interest as measured by the number of shorts divided by 340 00:18:38,880 --> 00:18:42,240 Speaker 1: the float, which is the outstanding shares less insider holdings. 341 00:18:43,200 --> 00:18:45,959 Speaker 1: Is when that is when the short ratio is large, 342 00:18:46,320 --> 00:18:48,479 Speaker 1: or when the short interest as a percentage of the 343 00:18:48,520 --> 00:18:51,639 Speaker 1: average daily volume is large. That's a non starter to 344 00:18:51,680 --> 00:18:55,520 Speaker 1: me because I prefer I prefer to short companies that 345 00:18:55,600 --> 00:19:00,560 Speaker 1: sell widgets. I understand whose business model UM is being 346 00:19:00,560 --> 00:19:04,040 Speaker 1: misinterpreted by the bullish consensus. So you stay away from 347 00:19:04,080 --> 00:19:06,320 Speaker 1: shorts like that, we're short interest. In this way, you 348 00:19:06,320 --> 00:19:10,159 Speaker 1: get you're not involved in short squeezes, which is the 349 00:19:11,800 --> 00:19:14,960 Speaker 1: which is basically the death knel to most amateur short sellers. 350 00:19:16,680 --> 00:19:20,840 Speaker 1: And uh, you know you mentioned Netflix. Did anything change 351 00:19:20,840 --> 00:19:22,679 Speaker 1: about your perspective yesday? In light of the earnings that 352 00:19:22,720 --> 00:19:24,320 Speaker 1: we got, the fact that this company still you know, 353 00:19:24,359 --> 00:19:28,119 Speaker 1: added five million new subscribers over the last quarter. What 354 00:19:28,200 --> 00:19:29,800 Speaker 1: are the what are the warning signs? What is it? 355 00:19:29,800 --> 00:19:33,000 Speaker 1: What's what's the alarm that you see with that company? Now? Well, 356 00:19:33,040 --> 00:19:36,520 Speaker 1: I'm actually writing something up right now for UM the 357 00:19:36,600 --> 00:19:39,560 Speaker 1: Street and Real Money pro UM. And the issue there 358 00:19:39,600 --> 00:19:44,480 Speaker 1: is valuation. We know evaluation as well as investor's sentiment 359 00:19:45,240 --> 00:19:50,320 Speaker 1: is particularly poor timing tool. But when you have you know, 360 00:19:50,359 --> 00:19:54,960 Speaker 1: a hundred and twenty three multiple two last twelve months 361 00:19:54,960 --> 00:19:59,960 Speaker 1: trailing ibbitda um it and it makes your hair stay 362 00:20:00,040 --> 00:20:02,640 Speaker 1: end up on your neck, you should be concerned. So 363 00:20:02,760 --> 00:20:06,320 Speaker 1: I call on Netflix. I'm actually writing a piece right 364 00:20:06,359 --> 00:20:11,320 Speaker 1: now called sell Netflix, don't short Netflix. But the problem 365 00:20:11,400 --> 00:20:16,080 Speaker 1: with the markets UM, as I've mentioned, is technology from 366 00:20:16,119 --> 00:20:22,000 Speaker 1: two standpoints. The fangs f A Engine save Netflix. To me, 367 00:20:22,920 --> 00:20:28,080 Speaker 1: UH face a situation where their technologies have advanced much 368 00:20:28,080 --> 00:20:33,520 Speaker 1: more rapidly than regulations, particularly anti antitrust regulations. So they 369 00:20:33,560 --> 00:20:40,400 Speaker 1: face this this existential political and antitrust risk which overnight 370 00:20:40,640 --> 00:20:45,320 Speaker 1: could diminish their um, their profit growth, profit and then 371 00:20:45,400 --> 00:20:48,480 Speaker 1: top line sales growth forecasts. So this is why I 372 00:20:48,480 --> 00:20:51,560 Speaker 1: would avoid all the thanks in terms of technology away 373 00:20:51,600 --> 00:20:55,000 Speaker 1: from it. We um. You know, there's a number of 374 00:20:55,000 --> 00:20:58,720 Speaker 1: things that that you know, makes makes me think that 375 00:20:58,760 --> 00:21:01,959 Speaker 1: we live in headshaking times and the role of technology 376 00:21:02,000 --> 00:21:04,280 Speaker 1: on the market. I've been writing about the last week 377 00:21:04,359 --> 00:21:07,600 Speaker 1: or so, which is very important. True, Douglas Castle Seabree's investment. 378 00:21:07,640 --> 00:21:10,040 Speaker 1: We've gotten the baseball out of the way as much 379 00:21:10,080 --> 00:21:13,800 Speaker 1: as you can, um, Doug. One of the really downsides 380 00:21:14,040 --> 00:21:16,679 Speaker 1: of this October has been having an intern who's a 381 00:21:16,720 --> 00:21:22,280 Speaker 1: Dodgers fan. It's it's proven very stressful. She is in 382 00:21:22,320 --> 00:21:25,480 Speaker 1: the National League ball and all that, and we we've 383 00:21:25,520 --> 00:21:27,080 Speaker 1: talked maybe we'll get some time here we can talk 384 00:21:27,119 --> 00:21:29,600 Speaker 1: about the d H as well. Right now, let's talk 385 00:21:29,640 --> 00:21:33,520 Speaker 1: about the alpha in investment, which is dead out there, 386 00:21:33,560 --> 00:21:37,720 Speaker 1: you know. Doug Reminiscence the classic book. When it's boring, 387 00:21:37,760 --> 00:21:40,000 Speaker 1: you go away, except we're not. It's a long time 388 00:21:40,040 --> 00:21:45,240 Speaker 1: boring here. What do you do in a boring market? YEA, well, 389 00:21:45,480 --> 00:21:52,320 Speaker 1: I we are in this virtuous cycle and this is 390 00:21:52,400 --> 00:21:56,080 Speaker 1: to me the root of my concern. Um. We've had 391 00:21:56,080 --> 00:22:01,000 Speaker 1: this bull market in complacency which has been mulated by 392 00:22:01,040 --> 00:22:05,199 Speaker 1: obviously the excess liquidity provided by central bankers around the world. 393 00:22:05,840 --> 00:22:09,160 Speaker 1: This has served up the virtuous cycle of fund flows 394 00:22:09,240 --> 00:22:13,280 Speaker 1: into ever popular e t s that by not when 395 00:22:13,320 --> 00:22:16,879 Speaker 1: stocks are cheap, but when inflows are readily flowing. And 396 00:22:16,880 --> 00:22:19,800 Speaker 1: then we have the dominance of technology which I mentioned 397 00:22:19,800 --> 00:22:23,840 Speaker 1: to day before, the dominance of risk parity, volatility trending 398 00:22:24,640 --> 00:22:27,600 Speaker 1: who worship at the altar price momentum brought on by 399 00:22:27,640 --> 00:22:31,240 Speaker 1: those e t s who are agnostic to value to 400 00:22:31,359 --> 00:22:34,159 Speaker 1: balance shes to income statements. And then finally we have 401 00:22:34,200 --> 00:22:37,280 Speaker 1: the reduced role of active investors like edge funds. So 402 00:22:37,400 --> 00:22:39,280 Speaker 1: all the slack is picked up by the quants in 403 00:22:39,359 --> 00:22:41,879 Speaker 1: the e T F and this is created an almost 404 00:22:41,880 --> 00:22:46,240 Speaker 1: systemic buy and the mentality and conditioning and give you 405 00:22:46,400 --> 00:22:50,000 Speaker 1: two stats that I'm sure you don't know about. Uh, 406 00:22:50,040 --> 00:22:53,960 Speaker 1: this is also being exacerbated this conditioning and this consistent 407 00:22:54,080 --> 00:22:59,280 Speaker 1: buying by the fact that in there was sevent listed 408 00:22:59,359 --> 00:23:04,440 Speaker 1: securities individual securities not ets. Today there are thirty nine 409 00:23:04,560 --> 00:23:10,400 Speaker 1: hundred UM. De listing takeovers have reduced it is secondly 410 00:23:10,440 --> 00:23:14,560 Speaker 1: of the remaining shares companies that are listed, those undred 411 00:23:15,000 --> 00:23:19,440 Speaker 1: seventeen of their shares in those public companies that remain 412 00:23:19,840 --> 00:23:23,520 Speaker 1: have been retired through buybacks. So all this has created 413 00:23:23,520 --> 00:23:28,200 Speaker 1: as favorable supply and demand and UM. It's coupled with 414 00:23:28,240 --> 00:23:33,280 Speaker 1: this precarious positioning by speculators, by speculators who have profited 415 00:23:33,320 --> 00:23:36,880 Speaker 1: by shorting volatility and have gotten so one sided by 416 00:23:36,920 --> 00:23:40,520 Speaker 1: shorting the vixed futures that any quick market sell off 417 00:23:41,040 --> 00:23:44,480 Speaker 1: is going to be exacerbated into a flash crash, much 418 00:23:44,520 --> 00:23:49,040 Speaker 1: like portfolio insurance's role in the previous lodge down draw 419 00:23:49,119 --> 00:23:53,480 Speaker 1: down in October. And in turn, if this occurs and 420 00:23:53,480 --> 00:23:56,199 Speaker 1: I would say it's occurring, David and Tom, but the 421 00:23:56,240 --> 00:24:00,680 Speaker 1: probability of it is growing exponentially, in turn will force 422 00:24:01,040 --> 00:24:04,879 Speaker 1: the very leverage quant funds, those risk parodies UM to 423 00:24:05,080 --> 00:24:08,359 Speaker 1: de risk and to reduce the chances of a fast 424 00:24:08,480 --> 00:24:12,320 Speaker 1: upturn back in the markets. All end by saying the 425 00:24:12,480 --> 00:24:15,800 Speaker 1: virtuous cycle could end if et F start to sell, 426 00:24:16,560 --> 00:24:21,240 Speaker 1: who is left to buy? David, what's the role Dug 427 00:24:21,320 --> 00:24:23,600 Speaker 1: that the economy is playing in your thesis at this point? 428 00:24:23,600 --> 00:24:25,479 Speaker 1: And we've been talking awful lot here about who might 429 00:24:25,520 --> 00:24:28,400 Speaker 1: be the next to FED share with the macroeconomic landscape, 430 00:24:28,400 --> 00:24:30,960 Speaker 1: But looks like, how do you fold that into to 431 00:24:31,119 --> 00:24:34,560 Speaker 1: what you're looking at and what you're investing in. Well, 432 00:24:35,440 --> 00:24:38,679 Speaker 1: you know, I believe that history doesn't repeat itself, but 433 00:24:38,760 --> 00:24:43,680 Speaker 1: it rhymes. And since post World War Two we've had 434 00:24:43,800 --> 00:24:50,679 Speaker 1: thirteen FED rate hiking cycles. UM ten had landed into recession. 435 00:24:51,520 --> 00:24:54,399 Speaker 1: So to me, the question is next year, will you know, 436 00:24:54,520 --> 00:24:59,399 Speaker 1: in the face of a mature economic recovery with a 437 00:24:59,480 --> 00:25:06,440 Speaker 1: lot of UM political and regular regulatory UM black swans 438 00:25:06,440 --> 00:25:09,480 Speaker 1: over the horizon, are we gonna have a recession or 439 00:25:09,520 --> 00:25:12,320 Speaker 1: we're gonna have a soft landing. I don't remember the 440 00:25:12,400 --> 00:25:15,720 Speaker 1: last time we had subpar growth of say two to 441 00:25:15,880 --> 00:25:18,760 Speaker 1: and a quarter percent real g d P and had 442 00:25:18,800 --> 00:25:21,879 Speaker 1: an economic downturn. But there's little room for era. I 443 00:25:21,920 --> 00:25:25,560 Speaker 1: do know. If you read the Baron's Big Money poll 444 00:25:25,640 --> 00:25:29,359 Speaker 1: over the weekend, seven percent of investors think the market 445 00:25:29,359 --> 00:25:32,240 Speaker 1: will be higher in twelve months. So to me, they're 446 00:25:32,240 --> 00:25:36,960 Speaker 1: betting on tax reform, which looks increasingly problematic. And then 447 00:25:37,000 --> 00:25:40,000 Speaker 1: obviously there's the message of the bond market. And if 448 00:25:40,040 --> 00:25:43,560 Speaker 1: you look at the two tens curve with the five 449 00:25:43,760 --> 00:25:48,800 Speaker 1: thirty curve, they're about eighty basis points and eight basis points, respectively. 450 00:25:49,280 --> 00:25:53,120 Speaker 1: And these are essentially at ten year lows, and they're 451 00:25:53,280 --> 00:25:56,560 Speaker 1: talking there's giving you a message on growth. Do Cass? 452 00:25:56,560 --> 00:25:58,439 Speaker 1: Thank you so much? How did the Dodgers look against 453 00:25:58,440 --> 00:26:01,919 Speaker 1: the yesties of the Yankees? Um? I think that the 454 00:26:02,000 --> 00:26:06,520 Speaker 1: Yankees will beat the Dodges in six? Well what about 455 00:26:06,560 --> 00:26:12,639 Speaker 1: the Astros? Who? And we'll leave it there. Doug Cass 456 00:26:12,640 --> 00:26:14,720 Speaker 1: with Seabrees, thank you so much. We say good morning 457 00:26:14,760 --> 00:26:19,320 Speaker 1: in Houston, sirius XM Channel one nineteen. I think we lost, 458 00:26:19,400 --> 00:26:21,239 Speaker 1: you know, think like like you know, we had a 459 00:26:21,280 --> 00:26:23,360 Speaker 1: big audience down to Texas. You think they just all 460 00:26:23,440 --> 00:26:26,640 Speaker 1: hung update Well, they would stay with us. I'm just saying, 461 00:26:26,760 --> 00:26:30,920 Speaker 1: Dug Cass bleeds Yankee blue. Do you realize we got 462 00:26:30,960 --> 00:26:34,880 Speaker 1: through that entire two blocks without once mentioning the red 463 00:26:34,920 --> 00:26:38,280 Speaker 1: sox of boss? Very true? Doug cast are Citrus League 464 00:26:38,280 --> 00:26:42,119 Speaker 1: correspondent with him in the very season, which is the 465 00:26:42,160 --> 00:26:46,560 Speaker 1: off season for him, but yeah, okay, Doug Castries Partners. 466 00:26:46,560 --> 00:26:49,479 Speaker 1: He's been very cautious on the market to short and 467 00:26:49,560 --> 00:26:53,320 Speaker 1: it has been sport because he has very clearly stated 468 00:26:53,359 --> 00:26:57,040 Speaker 1: out on his different writings and different appearances as well. 469 00:27:05,920 --> 00:27:10,040 Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and 470 00:27:10,119 --> 00:27:15,520 Speaker 1: listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast 471 00:27:15,600 --> 00:27:19,119 Speaker 1: platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keene. David 472 00:27:19,160 --> 00:27:23,360 Speaker 1: Gura is at David Gura. Before the podcast, you could 473 00:27:23,359 --> 00:27:26,480 Speaker 1: always catch us World one. I'm Bloomberg Radio