WEBVTT - Slow-Walking Regulation On Vaping Is Being Challenged

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penl Podcast. I'm Paul Swinge You.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Brahma Wicks. Each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.959
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:21.759
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Time to check in with Bloomberg Opinion.

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>We're joined by opinion columnist Max Neeson. Max covers biotech, pharma,

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and healthcare for Bloomberg Opinion. He joins us here in

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>a Bloomberg eleventh three oh Studios. So, Max, yesterday the

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>President came out swinging pretty hard against the manufacturers of

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 1>vaping products. What's the story. Yeah, absolutely so. So this

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 1>is kind of coming into the news and become more

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:44.480
<v Speaker 1>controversial lately because there have been a spade of illnesses

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:48.599
<v Speaker 1>and deaths related to to vaping, and then more broadly,

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>over the past couple of years, we've seen the really

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>rapid uptake of these products by by teenagers, many of

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>them underaged, and a lot of them gravitating towards flavored products.

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>So the residents announcement yesterday focused on those uh they're

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna move towards trying to clear the market of these

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>flavored products that have been so popular and and also

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:12.040
<v Speaker 1>on top of that keep kind of press for for more,

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 1>more more to be done on the safety issue, which

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>is related but separate, I guess to the flavored and

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:21.320
<v Speaker 1>and the the use by teens. Max. How much is

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 1>this relegated to illegal vaping products that have been tied

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to certain uses of oil that when uh evaporated into

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the lungs can cause all sorts of problems. How much

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>is tied to the vaping products sold by the vehemoth

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>tobacco companies, So that that's still very much up in

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the air, it looks like from the data we have,

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and this is very limited because you know, the investigation

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>is still go ongoing. They're looking at samples in different products.

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>But but there is some evidence to suggest that a

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of the kind of acute issues are tied to

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>people using these sort of bootleg and black market products,

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>specifically H T hc UM. So people vaping marijuana have

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>been kind of overrepresented among those who've been sick. But

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>at this point, you know, we we know so little

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>about the safety of these products the long term impact

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:14.519
<v Speaker 1>that we can't really rule anything out. And then there's

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of the broader issue of you know, if if

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>we have these potentially emergent safety issues, how how much

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>should we be you know, letting these products get a

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>relatively unrelated foothold on the market, which sort of in

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the case in the past couple of years. Um, you know,

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the the FDA has been sort of slow to to

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>put a regulatory regime in place and then make companies

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>apply for approval and and do some some kind of

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>more rigorous testing. So I think even if the product

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:44.679
<v Speaker 1>the problem, you know, the most acute health problem is

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 1>tied to these illegal products, uh, it's still probably behooves

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the US government to take a more active role. And

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:54.959
<v Speaker 1>then specifically comes to the flavor products, Um, there's you know,

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>crystal clear evidence that that these are the ones that

0:02:57.200 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>teams gravity towards so a band makes sense. They're so

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>max That's kind of goes to you know, one of

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the areas I thought was very interesting, it's just how

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>did some of these how did these products get to

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the market with It seems to me just fund the

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:14.799
<v Speaker 1>outside is little to know f D a analysis approval

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 1>with so little known about the health risks. I'm just

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>surprised that we've It's almost like shutting the door after

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:24.799
<v Speaker 1>the horses kind of fled. That's exactly what we're seeing here.

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>So the FDA only gained sort of regulatory oversight over

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>this market back in it had been sort of even

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>more than it is now a no man's land, and

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>so that that sort of began to the initial process

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>of building a regulatory apparatus trying to figure out how

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>to regulate these. Initially, companies were supposed to have to

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>apply for approval by by two eighteen, but then when

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration came to power, they bumped that deadline

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>back and and that's the period when we saw Jewel

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of you know, hit the market and then create

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>this whole sort of a big trans Asian And I

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>think the motivation behind that wasn't necessarily a bad thing.

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>It's this hope that this could be as valuable cessation

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>device away for adult smokers to switch from combustible cigarettes.

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:16.159
<v Speaker 1>But we're now finding out with the embrace of this

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>by by from you know, non smokers, uh, and the

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>potential safety issues. I think that argument is sort of

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>going out the window, which makes that that decision to

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>slow walk the regulatory regime a little bit less defensible.

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>So this is actually the implications of this are pretty vast,

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:36.159
<v Speaker 1>because you've seen the big tobacco companies come out and

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>try to present vaping products as a safer alternative. I mean,

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>that really has been the future of some of these

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:46.040
<v Speaker 1>tobacco companies. And I'm wondering, do you think that regulators

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 1>are prepared to force tobacco companies to stop using that,

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to stop saying this is safer when there's not necessarily

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the evidence to back it. So I think that's beginning

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>to a certain extent. I recently. I think earlier this

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:02.720
<v Speaker 1>week we saw the f D send a letter to

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Jewel about about some of its marketing practices, and then

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>when they actually start having to apply for marketing approval,

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's not just about safety, but it's about

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>what kind of claims you can make on the market.

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's an area where where there's definitely room

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:19.359
<v Speaker 1>for the for a regulatory crackdown, And you know, it

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>may very well be that over time that this does

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:25.279
<v Speaker 1>prove to be a safer alternative in some cases. I

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>think the issue is that, you know, unlike Europe, where

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:30.359
<v Speaker 1>these are pretty well regulated and you can make a

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>better a better case, potentially, we just have a lot

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>of people that are using this for for something other

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>than switching or cessation, and uh, until we have a

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>much stronger marketing and regulatory regime where we're you know,

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not a market that that can really make

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that claim broadly. Thank you so much, Maxneis and Bloomberg

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Opinion healthcare columnist joining us, and of course you can

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:54.159
<v Speaker 1>read all of his columns as well as all the others.

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>They're really fantastic. Read them on the Bloomberg terminal O

0:05:57.160 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>P I n go, or you can read them at

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com slash Opinion. It's quantitative easing forever. That

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>is the message from the European Central Bank, which cut

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 1>illustrates further below zero today and revived bond purchase until

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 1>whatever today in an announcement. Interestingly, the bond market reaction

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 1>has been a full circle. Yields sharply higher on the

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:35.599
<v Speaker 1>front end in Germany. You've got the euro strengthening versus

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 1>the dollar after initially weakening to try to help us

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>make sense of all of these market moves and going

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 1>forward what some of the e CPS actions will mean

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:45.720
<v Speaker 1>for the currency. Jukes joins US now Global Fixing come

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>strategist for so see it's a general So kid, why

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:52.919
<v Speaker 1>is the market responding? Perhaps not the way that Mario

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Draggy would have wanted. Um, Well, the turnaround came pretty

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 1>much after all. The news came in so um that

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 1>he announced the quantity of easing details in the first

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 1>ten minutes of his of his talking what they were

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>going to do, the new lower revised forecasts on growth,

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>concerns about inflation or all of that's in the front

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and we were going down at that point. And then

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>after that, really there's no new negative news for the currency.

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>That came through, just a Q and A session, a

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>joke about how the one thing everyone agreed about was

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>that the DISCO policy ought to do more of the

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>work from now on in UM and the market just

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>mounted back the other way. Hindsight trading would be a

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:38.119
<v Speaker 1>wonderful thing to be allowed to do, but the market

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>was barrish to the euro has been for a long time.

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>We were expecting something, We got a package, and we

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>just needed a constant diet of of of euro negative

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>news and and maybe this sort of summarizes up where

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Mario Mario dragging has got to as he as he

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>closes out his time at ECB effectively, UM, it's really

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>hard work to push the euro down any further. The

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>minute you stopped talking, it just doesn't want to go

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>on going down because we're really historical week levels. So kids,

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>from your perspective, how effective do you think the moves

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>we saw today from the ECB could really be on

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the European wide economy? UM? Pessimistic, but by instinct, I mean,

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of the the caveat to that is

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>what would happen if you didn't do them, in sense of,

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, what would happen in terms of the currency.

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>If he'd come around and done nothing today, we might

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:36.439
<v Speaker 1>have shot that up, we might have shot Bundy olds that,

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>we might have done things that would have been damaging

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to everybody except President Trump's happiness at breakfast. And so

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>so you have to you have to start off them that.

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>But I don't get a sense really that UM continuing

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:56.319
<v Speaker 1>to supply more and more bond buying, keeping bond shields

0:08:56.520 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>really low, having further negative interest rates really has much

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of an impact. And I don't know underlying credit growth,

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 1>which isn't really the problem that you know, Europe suffering

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 1>from a world trade slowdown and suffering from a global

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>disinflation problem. It's suffering Germany in particular, suffering from what's

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:18.200
<v Speaker 1>happening in China. Um, to my mind, if you want

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to offset weakness in China, why not offset it since

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>it affects Germany most with easier fiscal policy in Germany

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 1>to upgrade some of their roads and some of their infrastructure,

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that would be a fine thing to do from that country.

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>But but but but putting the financial sectors of the

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>point that's closer to the one where they're going to

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>charge people. Um, they're going to charge people fees on

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 1>their checking accounts if we push much further and so on.

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that that's I don't know that that

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 1>really boosts economic activity much. Let's talk about QI forever.

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>What's the easy to be going to buy? I mean,

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>they own so much of the of the regions dead

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 1>at this point, are they just basically going to own

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:01.199
<v Speaker 1>all of it at some point and then start buying

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>up buildings and stocks and I think that's sort of

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the piece. I mean, this isn't QUEI forever until you

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>change the capital key, until you turn around and you

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>increase the pool of what it is they are allowed

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to buy. So this is this is qui with um,

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, slightly slower pace of bond buying than some

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>people have expected. But for as long as for as

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>long as they want to keep on going, or for

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:26.199
<v Speaker 1>as long as there's anything for them to buy, or

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>for as long as there's anything to buy, until they

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>change what they're allowed to buy. But they'll have to

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>they'll have to cross that bridge. And in a sense,

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>it was that piece. Is part of what happened today

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>is saying, well, what does Quei forever mean? I'm only

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 1>going to buy you know I can. I'm only going

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>to buy these particular biscuits. I'll buy them forever. No,

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:46.559
<v Speaker 1>you'll buy the muntil they run out. And that's how

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>it works. Um so so I think we we well,

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll cross that bridge another day. But I thought you

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 1>could interpret this if you really wanted to, as a

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>plea from Mario dractures were either going to really you know,

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:02.079
<v Speaker 1>challenge our man date by expanding what we buy or

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you guys in charge of fiscal policy, you've got to

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>come and help. That's exactly where I want to go,

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>kit were Marry Drawing made several references to the need

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>for fiscal stimulus from some of the leading European economies.

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>In reality, how much influence does the ECB have over

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:25.199
<v Speaker 1>individual countries in their fiscal policy. Um, she may be

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>more with Christine Lagarde at the ECBs and with Mario

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Dragging in a sense that you know, um, she's a

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:36.079
<v Speaker 1>She's seven heavyweight. At every big I m F G

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 1>seven meeting you've you've you've had She's She's been there,

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:42.319
<v Speaker 1>she you know, has been involved. Mayo drag has has been,

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, the savior of the Eurozone really sorting it out.

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:47.319
<v Speaker 1>Without him, I don't know where we would have been

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>for the last um eight years since he since he

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>turned up. Um So I think they have an influence.

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>But counter to that, there's a lot of dogma in Europe.

0:11:57.400 --> 0:12:01.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, politicians don't like aggressive fiscally, particularly in Germany.

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 1>And if you remember back to the G seven meeting

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>UM in southwestern France and Burrits, there was nothing in

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the communicuet about major threats to global growth. You know,

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>there was plenty of things that were discussed, but I

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't I didn't hear President mac Hall talking about, you know,

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the dangers of another European recession anywhere in there and

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>what they needed to get together to do for a

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 1>big growth push. So I don't think the politicians are

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>quite on the same page as the markets and central

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 1>banks yet. I mean, Europe at least on growth, to

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>be honest. But yeah, that's not to say that that's

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 1>not to say they'll ignore Christine Lagarde. I think that

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:42.680
<v Speaker 1>would be wrong. The thing they do that. I do

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>want to just bring you some breaking news. CNBC is

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>coming out and reporting the White House is not considering

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:52.320
<v Speaker 1>an interim China deal, and you're seeing the rally and

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:55.079
<v Speaker 1>status pair back a bit with a NAZDAC up now

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>just for tents of a percent in the SMP up

0:12:57.400 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 1>two tenths of a percent. And I wonder when we

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>talk of about headwinds to growth, whether we're really just

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:05.559
<v Speaker 1>talking about trade disputes. I mean, how much of what

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:08.559
<v Speaker 1>central banks do at this point kit will be dictated

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 1>almost entirely upon whether there is some sort of easing

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and global trade tensions um. Yeah. The trouble with the

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 1>global trade ens is they come and go and come

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and go and come and go, and time passes, if

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>you like, in the sense that uh, you know that

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:26.679
<v Speaker 1>that that the impact on corporate profitability for example, just

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>continues to um feeds through and that's not something it's

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>going to go away. Beast planted on my desk a

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 1>couple of hours ago from my colleague Albert Edwards, who

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:38.839
<v Speaker 1>is known as one of the big bears of most

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:43.559
<v Speaker 1>things in the markets, warning about you know what the

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 1>profit cycle and what it means for recession risks and

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and my senses and I'm really sort of feels sitting

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>in the UK every day that uncertainty about trade with

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>deals on off, tariffs up, not uf postponed, but not

0:13:56.840 --> 0:14:00.080
<v Speaker 1>postponed forever. What's going to happen? Time goes on in

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:03.679
<v Speaker 1>that process and on the procession risk grows globally. Kid

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Duke's chief Global ex Strategists for Society General, joining us

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>from London, Thank you so much for your thoughts on

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the E C. B UH news we had this morning.

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>This week, Lisa and I were in Boston for the

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Boston Fintech Week, where we met a lot of cool

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneurs bringing their technology to the financial services industry. One

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 1>of the participants at the Boston Fintech Week is Mike Massaro,

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>CEO of fly Wire. UM. Mike joins us here from Boston. Mike,

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. So we think about finance,

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>fintech and just bringing more technology to financial services. Give

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 1>us a little sense of what your company, fly Wire

0:14:56.880 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>is all about. Sure, thanks Paul, thanks for having me. Uh.

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Flywire really helps with global cross border payment challenges. So

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 1>we look at vertical markets such as education, healthcare, travel, uh,

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and they're really complicated when comes to how money moves

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 1>around the world and uh, and what we're doing is

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>we're making that much much simpler. We're making it easy

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 1>for people to pay, for instance, from China to attend

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>a place like Harvard UM and and those transactions have

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>typically gone over the banking rails historically. And what fly

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Wire has done is we've made it a lot easier

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>for those institutions, uh, you know, educational, medical, or travel

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>companies to to collect money all over the world. So

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 1>what are some of the obstacles that make this much

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>more difficult than people might imagine, Which is send over

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>your money and be done with that. You know, one

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>thing is the transaction size. Right, A lot of consumers

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>we think about buying you know, five or ten or

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 1>even things on e commerce when the transaction size goes

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>north of thousands of dollars, sometimes tens of thousands of

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>dollars um only so many consumers can even put a

0:15:57.600 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>transaction of that size on a credit card, so they

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 1>need other ways to pay, traditionally through their bank accounts

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>or alternatives, um. And so it's really difficult for the

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>billers or the receivers of money as well to manage

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 1>all the changing dynamics and payments. Right, as much as

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 1>everybody's trying to make payments easier, they're probably the most

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>complicated they've ever been. Right, More global commerce, more regulation,

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>more security vulnerabilities, all of those things make it more challenging. So, uh,

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, both the receivers have had a hard time

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>with it, but it also the payers haven't had a

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>great experience because there aren't great ways to pay outside

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the traditional international bank wire. So, Mike, one of the

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 1>big issues I know for all of us, all consumers,

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>as we transact more and more online, is security. Give

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>us a sense of kind of how you guys approach

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 1>security because you're talking about, as you mentioned, kind of

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 1>some some bigger sums of money. Yeah, you know, it's

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 1>critical to be part of that trusted environment, right. So

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, flyware doesn't help you send money anywhere. Right,

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 1>it's very purpose built, so we work with the receivers.

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's a it's a trusted receiver on one side.

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 1>In many ways, it's almost like a closed loop, right,

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:07.160
<v Speaker 1>because the money ultimately is going to Yale or Mass

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 1>General Hospital, u c L A Medical Center um OR

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>or you know somebody like um USC from an educational perspective,

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>so you know that one side of the transaction, you

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:19.159
<v Speaker 1>know it's where it's going to go, and you know

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:21.199
<v Speaker 1>the purpose of those funds. So that in it in

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 1>itself is a big game changer when it comes to

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:26.360
<v Speaker 1>cross border payments. And then the challenge that we had

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:28.199
<v Speaker 1>to do is we had to build a platform that

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:31.439
<v Speaker 1>could understand all the regulatory and security requirements within the

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 1>various countries. Uh. So you know, for instance, in places

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 1>like China, India, Korea, you have various kind of checks

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that have to occur either with the financial system or documentation.

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>You have to collect to make sure the funds can

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>securely move and so that's part of what we've done,

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>is as as building Flower and the technology platform we've

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:52.639
<v Speaker 1>built in to really check that we're both satisfying the

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:56.399
<v Speaker 1>security and compliance requirements within the country, but also taking

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 1>that effort in that those issues away from our clients,

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:01.160
<v Speaker 1>which are the ones receiving them. Any Mike, a lot

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of people going to blockchain and actually that these cross

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 1>border payments are a key place for blockchain products crypto

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>assets to play an important role to basically transfer something

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 1>in a very easy, seamless way. Is that something that

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 1>is on your horizon at all that your company is

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>looking into? Yeah, you know, I think we're always I'm

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:25.399
<v Speaker 1>a big believer in the underlying blockchain technology associated to

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>validating transactions or having a shared kind of global ledger.

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I think crypto has turned a little more into speculation lately. UM,

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think ultimately if you look years and years out,

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 1>UM there is likely to be a digital cryptocurrency based

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>off some kind of fiat currency. UM. I think how

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 1>long that takes to develop? I think people have been

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 1>wrong so far. UM. I think it's going to take time,

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:47.679
<v Speaker 1>But I think it will get there. Uh. And the

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:49.880
<v Speaker 1>way we look at the world is if people want

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to pay in a certain method, UM, we want to

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 1>make sure Flywire has that method available, whether they're using PayPal,

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 1>American Express, Visa, or their bank or something like Allie

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 1>pay wee chat in China. We want to have all

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 1>those methods there. So, you know, if crypto really takes

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 1>off from a consumer perspective, UM, and the and they're

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:10.720
<v Speaker 1>looking for a certain cryptocurrency, UM, that's something that Flywire

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:12.879
<v Speaker 1>would definitely consider. So, Mike, what are some of the

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>areas of growth for your company right now? Is more

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and more people transact online. You know, there's there's really

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>uh it really falls into three different buckets. Geographic expansion

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>for US UH. You know, if you look at the

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:28.399
<v Speaker 1>verticals were in education, healthcare, and travel, they are truly

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:32.360
<v Speaker 1>global industries. Uh. And so there are students crossing borders

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to study from places like UM China to Australia or

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:40.440
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand. Right there's obviously one point one million students

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:43.919
<v Speaker 1>coming to the United States every year. UM. International patients

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 1>are the same way, They're crossing borders all the time

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>for medical care. UH. And and anybody that lives in

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>a majorly developed city. Um. You know, all the all

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the top hospitals in the United States have international patient programs.

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>So geographic expansion really getting out there and making sure

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>more people know about the fly Wire solution. And then

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I would say the second um is around more capabilities.

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Right where our clients asked us to help with cross

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>border they're actually now looking because payments get more complicated,

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 1>they're actually looking for us to just offload all their payments, right,

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 1>and so we're starting to expand and do that as well. UM,

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:19.400
<v Speaker 1>So you've got kind of geographic expansion, you have providing

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 1>more products and services related to payments for existing clients.

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>And then it's the vertical expansion. Right. We just launched

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>this travel sector a year ago. It's growing over year

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:31.879
<v Speaker 1>on year for us, and we're helping people as they

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 1>travel around the world just make it easier to pay for,

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, an adventure trip or a luxury trip. Mike Massaro,

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:39.919
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being with us. Mike Massaro

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 1>is chief executive officer of fly Wire, based in Boston.

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:47.919
<v Speaker 1>He is in Boston today for the Fintech Week conference

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 1>and he's participating in it on a panel called a

0:20:50.800 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 1>personalization of payments and a purpose driven market. There's more

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:13.919
<v Speaker 1>than a thirty trillion dollars of assets undermanaged that are

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 1>subject to non traditional criteria such as environmental, social governance

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and impact analysis in order to determine where they are

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:24.719
<v Speaker 1>going to go. Where those dollars are going to go,

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the question is how much does this money actually change

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>company behavior or create social value? Here to answer that,

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Vicram Gandhi, Professor at Harvard Business School. He also has

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 1>been an investment banker for twenty three years at Morgan

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Stanley and Credit Swiss. You're also he's also on the

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:46.879
<v Speaker 1>board a senior advisor to the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board.

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:49.239
<v Speaker 1>Professor Gandhi, thank you so much for being with us.

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>So let's start there. How much social value are these

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 1>E s G funds actually creating? At least? I think

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the whole spectrum, as you mentioned

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the thirty trillion dollars, still a majority of that is

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:04.679
<v Speaker 1>what one would call negative screens, and that is excluding

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 1>stocks that you don't want to own your portfolio. A

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:10.640
<v Speaker 1>big trend and that is really around fossil fuels, etcetera. Recently,

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 1>but there's been a tobacco, alcohol, religious beliefs in the past,

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and the question remains as to whether those negative screens

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>actually create value. I think they in terms of changing behavior.

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a reflection of values, but not necessarily

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 1>changing behavior because for every seller there's a bar and

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:32.400
<v Speaker 1>unless there's an overwhelming um uh majority on the cell side,

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to increase the cost of capital essentially

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 1>necessarily of the companies. But what we are seeing is

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 1>a is a pretty conscious trend towards moving from that

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:43.639
<v Speaker 1>aspect to what one would call e s G integration

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:49.680
<v Speaker 1>as well as engagement. And the debate about divestiturevis engagement continues,

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:53.679
<v Speaker 1>but there's more and more large institutional investors beyond just

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>making public announcements about it, actually focusing on the engagement

0:22:57.080 --> 0:23:01.639
<v Speaker 1>side to push companies to change behavior with with a

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>with an eas G, with with an e s G

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 1>framework in mind. So yeah, so victims. So in my

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 1>experiences we're talking and just before we went on airs,

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>just this seems to in my experience come primarily from

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Europe first, i e. The focus on e s G,

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>environmental sustainability, governance, impact investing, um is it. Where where

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>are we in terms of the United States and some

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>of the big mutual funds and then the big companies

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and how are they adapting if at all. Well, it's clearly,

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 1>as you said Europe, nearly half the assets in Europe,

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, off the trill trillion that you said, half

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the half the assets in Europe have some sort of

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>E s G overlay. That number is closely in the US,

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:43.400
<v Speaker 1>but the growth has been pretty strong. And I think

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>if you look if you talk to the large pension plans,

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 1>even some of the passive investors UM, they clearly are

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 1>are focused on the fact that if you are a

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 1>long term holder of stocks UM and the passive in

0:23:56.800 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the index investors by definition are they own the market.

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 1>Is that if you don't factor an E s G

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 1>into your analysis, you probably are not making good investment decisions.

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>So that the discussions gone from let's tick the box, Okay,

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:11.640
<v Speaker 1>we've looked at s G, We've gone on our Bloomberg

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 1>terminal and found our E s G metrics and done

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 1>it to moving on to risk management, saying this is

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 1>a core part of risk management. And then I think

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>we're also starting to see trends in some of the

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 1>pension plans of incorporating E s G to generate alpha

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>is that how do we bring in s G factors?

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:29.959
<v Speaker 1>But companies that are actually doing it well because they

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>are potentially alpha generators. So I think that trend is

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 1>there and in fact is accelerating. Professor Gandhi, how much

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 1>alpha are we talking about? Can you give us an example? Well,

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>for example, one of the leaders and you have a

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>case on this in our course. And you know, we've

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:47.440
<v Speaker 1>written about twenty two new cases here for our course,

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:50.119
<v Speaker 1>me and our colleague of mine, which we teach in

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the NBA class at Harvard UH. One one of the

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 1>cases there is a company called Generation Investment Management which

0:24:57.160 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>was set up by David Blood and vice president Gore

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and who and they incorporate E s G into the

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 1>investment process right from the start. And they have fifteen

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:08.680
<v Speaker 1>years now they've been in existence and gone from a

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:11.440
<v Speaker 1>few hundred millions to now they've managed about twenty five billion.

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 1>They have generated consistently generated alpha on on on their portfolio.

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:21.360
<v Speaker 1>And we're starting to see um various other plans. As

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I said, allocate some percentage of their assets to this

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:29.120
<v Speaker 1>to this UH asset. The investing style if you Will

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:33.400
<v Speaker 1>has a head fund industry writ large. How have they

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:36.400
<v Speaker 1>in terms of adopting this, I mean they're looking for

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:38.920
<v Speaker 1>any edge they can degenerate alpha And if I guess

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 1>he made the incredible pitch to them that this isn't

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 1>their best interests, I would think that way they would

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:45.359
<v Speaker 1>make a part of their investment process. Yeah. So I

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 1>think they're there too. Um if you if you view

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 1>them as long term investors, they are bringing in as

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:54.439
<v Speaker 1>risk management. But another interesting case we did was on

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 1>John A Partners. As you know, they're a pretty active

0:25:57.119 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>investor and an activist investor in fact, and they announced

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 1>last year that they were going to set up a

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar fund to bring in their activist mindset by

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 1>by identifying companies that are underperforming necessarily on the E

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 1>s G front and pushing that and that using their

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:17.159
<v Speaker 1>activist methodology with the E s G framework. So I

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 1>think you're clearly seeing more of that. Um, you're probably

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 1>seeing less of it in hedge funds though compared to

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I say long only managers that have a longer term perspective,

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>because risk management for them becomes a key issue. I

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:33.160
<v Speaker 1>do also think that to make change happen, this mindset

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:36.880
<v Speaker 1>of quarterly earnings versus long term investing has to change.

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering, giving your role as a senior advisor to

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, how are you advising

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>they take into account some of these E s G criteria.

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:49.880
<v Speaker 1>So as if you talk to the Canada's c p

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 1>p i B, you know when they talk about a quarter,

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 1>they're talking about not ninety days, They're talking about twenty

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 1>five years. That's quarter for them, So you know they

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:03.399
<v Speaker 1>have they they'll be having more inflows uh than outflows

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 1>for the foreseeable future. And they're going to go from

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 1>four hundred billion Canadian roughly now to seven eight hundred

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:10.679
<v Speaker 1>billions in just five or seven years. So they have

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a very long term horizon. And from a risk management perspective,

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 1>they are proactively incorporating e s G when they make

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>any investment decision. I mean, I've advised them on making

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:24.160
<v Speaker 1>investments in India and Asia, etcetera. And I could see

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that that that this this mechanism of dick the box

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:31.160
<v Speaker 1>due diligence to risk management, and now they're also experimenting

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:34.160
<v Speaker 1>on incorporaing e s G from an alpha generation perspective.

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Just I guess broadly speaking, you've been you know, looking

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:40.159
<v Speaker 1>at this for a while. Are there certain industries that,

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 1>for lack of a better word, screen well from an

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 1>e S dre impact and maybe some industries that don't.

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 1>So an interesting case which we have written was on

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>State Streets. So State Street Or a couple of years

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 1>ago on Women's Day launched an e t F called

0:27:56.840 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 1>SHE and it was seeded by large pension plan basically

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to identify investments where the leadership both on the board

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 1>as well as leadership there was a significant of agenda

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 1>or diversity, not because there was a social aspect to it,

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 1>but it was also that you know, there's been enough

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 1>studies which show that doversity leads to business better business

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:21.400
<v Speaker 1>decisions which will lead to hopefully financial performance and stock prices.

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 1>And when they did but they couldn't veer away from

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the index too much. And so when they did that analysis,

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>they found that they would be heavily overweight on consumer durables,

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 1>consumer staples, some of the consumer oriented companies, and highly

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 1>underweight on technology, energy and financial services. So that kind

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 1>of would be uh interesting dynamic as to it shows

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 1>that on those e S g Metrics that they looked

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 1>at the diversity between the industries. Very interesting. Vicar and Gandhi,

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joinings professor at Harvard Business School.

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate your thoughts on impact investing an E. S. G.

0:28:56.840 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast.

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe in listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. Paul Sweeney, I'm on

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at pt Sweeney. I'm Lisa abram Woyits I'm on

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Lisa abram Woits one. Before the podcast, you

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio