WEBVTT - Defining Anarchism feat. Andrew

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>All the media. Hello, and welcome to it could happen here,

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>because it could. My name is Andrew Sage and I'm

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>also Andrewism on YouTube and at time of recording, the

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>year is still technically new, so I wanted to start

0:00:20.239 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>it off with some refreshers on anarchism. In the first episode,

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll look at the meanings of anarchism, authority, and anarchy,

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and the next time we'll look at free association, mutuality,

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:34.160
<v Speaker 1>mutual aid, and throllo solidarity. And don't worry, next month

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll be getting back into the Latin American Anarchism series,

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>as I still haven't done Uruguay and Mexico yet. Oh.

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I'm not talking to myself. I'm here

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>with the one and only be along.

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I keep, I keep forgetting that you do an

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 2>actual throws actually saying the name.

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, not to worry.

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 3>I've only been doing this for several hundred episodes. Now

0:00:57.280 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 3>you'd think you'd think, but no, now you got it.

0:00:59.160 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>You got it.

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 3>Hell, I'm excited to do this.

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Also excited for the Mexico episodes, because Mexican anarchism is

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 2>a trip Irguaan anarchism is also a whole lot of

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 2>people digging tunnels out of prisons.

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:13.040
<v Speaker 3>But we'll get we'll get We'll get to that later.

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>We will, we will. So I'm supposed to start off

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>with I want to find out And I asked this

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:22.040
<v Speaker 1>question with tongue in cheek, of course, how familiar but

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>you say you are with anarchism.

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, I have a very silly like kind of

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 2>like how did I like actually finally become an anarchist

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:36.960
<v Speaker 2>because I've been around anarchists for a long time, But

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 2>like the thing that like actually convinced me to be

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 2>an anarchist is I sat down and I got a

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 2>bunch of like anarchist history books while library I started

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 2>reading them, so like.

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Marx Nott Lao and I'm sorts of people.

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 2>So specifically was a lot of like krups like how

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 2>to Shooseo and Puranicism intoward Japan, which I've talked about

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 2>on the show one hundred billion times. So I actually

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 2>I think I've read Capaletes Anarchism Latin America around that

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 2>time too.

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a very good resource.

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, so pretty pretty familiar with stuff.

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, we'll see, we'll see. I'm excited to talk

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 3>about it.

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, we'll see, is right, because let's say

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>ippened an anarchists. But I was first introduced to anarchism,

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:26.399
<v Speaker 1>I would say somewhere around twenty seventeen twenty eighteen through

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Christian anarchism. Actually that was during my deconstruction. I stumbled

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>upon Christian anarchism and briefly flated with it, but didn't

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:37.919
<v Speaker 1>really get seriously into the studying of anarchists m until

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>like Lee twenty nineteen, Rearly twenty twenty around the time

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and leads in towards twenties when I started my channel.

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's say I've been studying anarchism for about five years. Seriously,

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I'm now getting started, you know, like

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm now sett into that grasp what it is. And

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I think is there's so many interpretations of anarchism, you know,

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>so many different schools of thought. I mean, that's not

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to say that it can't be find or that any

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>attempts to define anarchism is like exclusionary or on anarchist.

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>And I see that out of that argument floating around

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>it like, well, no, you can't define anarchism because that's

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>actually authoritaria. But you know, there are such a thing

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 1>as as definitions, but there is room, of course for

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>a negotiation of meaning.

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's it's a very it's a very well usually

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.639
<v Speaker 2>it's a very syncratic ideology. It pulls from a lot

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 2>of different places, and it pulls mosts a different of

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 2>its own strands.

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, exactly. But let's say if you had to

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>like define anarchism like right now, like, what would you

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>say is a not un negotiable basic fundamental definition for you?

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the opposition to hierarchy on a basic level,

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 2>the opposition to the state, to capitalism, to patriarchy, to

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 2>systems of hierarchical power is I guess, like the the

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 2>baseline definition. And then also in terms of what it's,

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, the replacement for that can be a lot

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 2>of things. But yeah, it's it's the building of a

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 2>society where we don't have power over one another. I

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 2>think it's like a very baseline kind of thing.

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that's that's pretty solid for me. I

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 1>find it fairly similarly, I would say that I think

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the opposition to authority is the most simplant part, you know,

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 1>I would say the definition I've been sort of workshopping

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 1>sculpting over time and as a right. So I really

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>like to play with words a bit and find the

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:32.119
<v Speaker 1>best ways to put things. So for me, what I've

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>come up with is that anarchism is the political philosophy

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and practice that opposes all authority along with its justifying dogmas,

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:47.039
<v Speaker 1>and proposes the unending pursuit of anarchy, a world without rule,

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 1>where self determination, mutuality, and free association form the basis

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>of our society. And so basically the rest of this

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>episode is going to be me breaking down how I

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>came to this definition, what I'm expounded upon with this definition,

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 1>So for one, just taking a look at the structure

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>of it, we are looking at an oppositional stance and

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>a propositional stance, opposing and proposing. You know, we're not

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>just for the negation of all things, although there are

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:22.359
<v Speaker 1>schools of anarchisms that do lead in that direction. But also,

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 1>of course, we want to be constructive. We're not as

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 1>some people seem to presume, you know, obliterating the states

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and then leaving warlords in their weak you know.

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:35.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Baconin sucks in a lot of ways, but the

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:39.039
<v Speaker 2>creative verge is a destructive one has the order of

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 2>events correctly, where like the point is to create something.

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Exactly exactly, And as you know, Bikinnan is one of

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the rely a thinkers of anarchism, though I've never really

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 1>been partial to him, you know, yeah, to me usually

0:05:56.960 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I've been more of a Krapotkin and Mali Testa a guy.

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>But lately, as as you know, so problematic as he

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>is as well, I haven't getten into a bit more.

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I recently got the pictures of put On Reader that

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 1>Ian McKay put together for a k Press.

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 3>Extremely problematic guy, oh boy, Yeah, but he.

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Certainly wrote a lot. And so when I think through

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and seecret what jim stones of his of his work

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I can find, you know, yeah, I think that's that's

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>important to sift through.

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 2>He's a He's a mixed and baffling figure who also

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 2>was a pretty large influence on Marx if you like

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 2>read him, even though Marx hates him, which is very funny.

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Marx also didn't always understand step Honestly, I don't think

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>necessarily always had like a very consistent application of his ideas,

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 1>hence the misogyny. Despite being an anarchiss and becoming a

0:06:57.040 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>politician at one point in his life and all that jazz.

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and people may know this who listen to this show,

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 3>but the term libertarian was invented by anarchists specifically to

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 3>describe how they were different from ver Dawn because they

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 3>weren't sexist, Like, it's the whole.

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Thing actually, wasn't away of that.

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 2>That's yeahs interesting, Yeah, that's why, and that's why in

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 2>most parts of the world libertarian is like is a

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 2>term that means anarchist. It's just it's mostly largely in

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 2>the US where that's not a thing because the right

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 2>libertarians like took it.

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, unfortunately, the US's cultural hegemony has sort of

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>propagated that American version of the term as the popular one.

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, yeah, whether you're talking about anarchists or libertarians

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>or mutualists, you're all getting it from basically that same

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of original phool of the late nineteenth century early

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>frankieinth century thinker and I were sort of using their

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of explorations to build something up a political philosophy.

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>But in my definition I call it a political philosophy,

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 1>but that can be a contentious way of describing it.

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, anti politics is a tilm that's used to

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>describe opposition to or distrust in traditional politics. Social politics

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>is usually associated with the art and science of government.

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 1>So there are anarchists who would argue that anarchism is

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>not a political philosophy, it's actually an anti political philosophy.

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 3>I think these people are very okay.

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:33.200
<v Speaker 2>This is one of the things about being an anarchist, right,

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:34.559
<v Speaker 2>this is the thing thing about being a leftist, and

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 2>it's something you have to be able to set aside

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 2>when you have to do things. But a lot of

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:40.680
<v Speaker 2>veg A leftists is being annoyed at other leftists. And

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 2>I could put together an actual, detailed theoretical critique of

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 2>anti politics, but mostly the people who talk about anti

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 2>politics just annoy me.

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 3>It's like an affect thing.

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I feel you to me, It's like it's a I

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>like to pick up, look around at, you know, play

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:01.200
<v Speaker 1>with fur little bit, put it back down kind of thing.

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:05.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'd like limited to it, but I think

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's good to look at more than one

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 1>ankle of definition and an understanding. Yeah, I mean, of course,

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I suppose a critique that could be made of define

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>anarchism as anti politics is a sort of a narrowing

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:20.839
<v Speaker 1>of the definition of politics suggest that sort of art

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and science of government when politics can also be defined

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 1>really broadly as just about the relationships between people and groups,

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>which anarchism is concerned with primarily. So, but I do

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 1>find it an interesting point to wrestle with, and so

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>other than it being a political philosophy or anti political philosophy,

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:43.079
<v Speaker 1>we could also define an anarchism as a practice. This

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:46.319
<v Speaker 1>is something that I believe Greeber did in his life.

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 1>He saw anarchism. In one interview he said, code it's

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>possible to act like an anarchist, to behave in ways

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 1>that will work without bureaucratic structures of coatient to enforce them,

0:09:56.600 --> 0:10:00.199
<v Speaker 1>without calling yourself an anarchist or anything. In fact, to

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>us act like anarchists, even communists a lot of the time.

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>To be an anarchist for me is to that self

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 1>consciously as a way of gradually bringing a world entirely

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>based on those principles into being and good. So this

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>is basically the idea that anarchism is not just something

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:16.839
<v Speaker 1>you think in ahead. It's a method of change or

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>something that you practice. It's something that the facts anarchists

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>don't even want to call themselves anarchists because they see

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 1>anarchist about something that you do rather than something that

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:25.319
<v Speaker 1>you are.

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that was a graverline.

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 2>I think Cala Gwynn kind of had a similar relationship

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 2>towards calling yourself an anarchist.

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's that's possible. That that sounds really, really familiar.

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think I think a line was like, she

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 2>didn't feel like she could because you had to do it.

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, it's a it's a pretty common way of

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 2>thinking about anarchism that I like a lot.

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:54.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure. Another part of the definition of anarchism

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that I put forward is the opposition to all authority,

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:01.319
<v Speaker 1>and that a statement could actually get me some pushback,

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 1>getting in some trouble with some anarchists. Surprisingly, and I'm

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>sorry I blame Nome Chomsky, Oh my god, as a historian,

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>as a linguist, okay, whatever. Sure, but it was not

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:18.560
<v Speaker 1>historically controversial among anarchists to say that you were opposed

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 1>to all hierarchy and all authority.

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:23.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, the definitions of those terms do get confused

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 1>often because, like a lot of words in the English language,

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:29.679
<v Speaker 1>they do have multiple meanings. You know, you don't want

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:32.840
<v Speaker 1>to fall into the equivocation fallacy, where you use a

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:34.679
<v Speaker 1>word or phrase in one way and then you use

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>it in another way in the same argument. So someone

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>might say, for example, anarchism opposing authority is stupid because

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>authority just means having a difference in expertise or a

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:46.679
<v Speaker 1>difference in influence, or that hierarchy opposition to hierarchy is

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:49.439
<v Speaker 1>stupid because you know food chains or you know the

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 1>hierarchy of needs. But as you know, anarchists will focused

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>on very specific things or we use these terms, so

0:11:56.200 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 1>arguing against it with other definitions doesn't make sense. And

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>by hierarchy is anarchists are French as stratification of society,

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:09.079
<v Speaker 1>which gives some individuals, groups, or institutions authority of others.

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 1>An authority refuses to recognized right above others in a

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:16.559
<v Speaker 1>social relationship, to give commands, enforced obedia to control, property,

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>to exploit, and so on. And I really don't see

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the benefit in Chomsky's sort of unjust authorities or unjust

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>hierarchy is approach to define him anarchism.

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because I mean the thing about hierarchies is that

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 2>every hierarchy argues it's just like you would get slave owners,

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 2>like doing these whole speeches about like the inherent morality

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 2>of slavery, like it's not actually a it's not actually

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 2>like an ethical position that leads you to like the

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 2>opposition to hierarchy, because again, every every hierarchy is self justice,

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 2>is self justifying.

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Exactly, which is why I say oppositions all authorities and

0:12:56.840 --> 0:13:00.720
<v Speaker 1>they're justifying dogmas because all of them have dogmuds, including

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the example that Chomsky uses, which is typically of the

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 1>parent pulling their child away from traffic. That is not

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 1>an exercise of authority. And the relationship between a parents

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and a child is something that kind of should be interrogated,

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, that is a KaiA taking relationship primarily a

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 1>relationship of responsibility. It does not have to be a

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 1>relationship of authority, and the sense and I suppose yeah,

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and the way.

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 2>That it turns into a relationship of ownership is something

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 2>that genuinely can and should be opposed. But it's also

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 2>something that like gets a lot harder to oppose when

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:39.839
<v Speaker 2>you're sort of stuck up on this like, well, actually, no,

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:43.080
<v Speaker 2>it's good because this is authority or whatever. So I

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 2>think the way that Chomsky obfuscates the stuff makes it

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:48.439
<v Speaker 2>harder to actually do politics.

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>That's useful exactly because then it also makes it its

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>hard of people to set a question. The authority the

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>more comfortable with, or the hierarchy is the more comfortable with.

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>So you'll see that way. So gold On you can say,

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 1>although we don't actually oppose all hierarchities, you know, your

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>parents thing, and you really you see in ground in

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:09.079
<v Speaker 1>a sense, because you make it harder to identify and

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 1>really question those things, because you're you're shutting down that

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:15.679
<v Speaker 1>avenue of questioned it, you know. And so when we

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 1>speak of authority, we're really speaking about that right, the

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 1>right the authority that gives to certain people over other people,

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, privileges that are recognized and enforced, and a

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>right being a sort of a priority that is above others.

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, the right of authority is a guarantee to

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>actions or resources that absolve the individual holding that right

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>of consequences. The right of authority compels and supporting the

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>desires and needs of those below that authority. So you know,

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>authorities have the right to command recognized and enforced by

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the underlings. You know, they're the right to enforce the

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>obedience of the underlings are the right to control all

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the properties the earth has been carved into. You know.

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>The right absorbs them of certain consequences and sort of

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>goes in one direction. It's a unilateral sort of thing.

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>So the authority can take your house, you know, the bank,

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the government, the landlord. They can take your house, but

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>you can't take theirs. You know. An authority can assault you,

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 1>whether be a soldier, police officer, whatever, you cannot assault them.

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>An authority can take the fruits of your labor. They

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>could take from these wealth of what you produce, but

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>you can't take from them. That's theft, right. An authority

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>cannot be an authority by themselves. They have to have

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>authority over They have to have a hierarchical social relationship

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that deprives some their benefit. An Anarchists oppose authority because,

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, among other reasons, those subjects of authority become controlled,

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>They become dependent, exploited, prevented from accessing their full potential

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and even their bare necessities. A really that prevented from

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>accessing their full potential is why a lot of anarchists

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>have spent a lot of time targeting or approached to

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 1>pearance in an approach to entry heat. You know, just

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 1>this morning I was reading a bit of Emma Goldmun

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>as she was talking about Phaer's schools. The way that

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>she speaks also she was an excellent rights and excellent speaker,

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>but the way that she did so, and the way

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 1>she approached and recognize this need to tap into our potential,

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>particularly from young to prevent it from being limited by

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the impositions of authority. It's just extremely profound. It's necessary,

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>acessary to start at particularly at that age, but really

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 1>at any age, to break away from that condition that

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>that recognizes and enforces and obeys and accepts authority and

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the right of authority. You know, if everybody, if everybody,

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>including their underlings, decided tomorrow not to recognize and enforce

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the authority of presidents, of kings, of capitalists, that freight

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>would be gone in an instant. Also, when he starts

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>with us being able to actually question, to challenge, to

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>resist authority, and that's something that has existed since humans

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>have been in humans throughout history, we see this sort

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 1>of compulsion to resist authority, and that sort of seed

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>of resistance is what anarchists hope to have thresh.

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 3>Fortunately, we have to go to ads.

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Disaster fiasco, your principles in shambles.

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:27.120
<v Speaker 3>But here here's ads.

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 1>We are back. So, like I said before, authority gets

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 1>confused with a lot of different things. Force and violence

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:40.880
<v Speaker 1>is the main one. It's one that Marxists in particular love,

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:44.160
<v Speaker 1>that sort of conflation of authority with any use of force.

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:47.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, the slave resistant a slave owner is actually

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>an example of authority.

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:55.159
<v Speaker 2>Incredibly silly people who are otherwise reasonably intelligent will just

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 2>say this stuff. It's like, really, what are we doing here?

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Just come on? Yeah, yeah, I mean force and violence

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 1>associated with authority, and there they can be a mechanism

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:10.919
<v Speaker 1>of defending an authority. But they're not in and of

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>themselves authority. They're not the source of authority. They don't

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>cost you authority, and you could just as easily use

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>them to resist authority. Yeah.

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:20.360
<v Speaker 2>I want to go back to the slavery thing specifically

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 2>about authority, because the argument that it's an imposition of

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:26.159
<v Speaker 2>authority for slaves to free themselves is an argument that

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 2>was specifically made by the Southern plantation class. Like that

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 2>was that was their argument about federal tyranny, was that

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 2>specific argument. So it's probably not a good theoretical basis

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 2>for understanding what authority is. If if if you're if

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 2>you're making the same argument as the Southern plantation class,

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna just just cause it's gonna leave the.

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:48.119
<v Speaker 1>One out there exactly exactly. And really we have to

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>understand violence. Forces are things that are used by authorities.

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>But if I punch somebody in the face, that doesn't

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>make me an authority over them. You know, if I

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>defend myself from me in a punch, that doesn't mean

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:02.159
<v Speaker 1>me in authority of the person trying to punish me.

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:04.920
<v Speaker 1>The source of authority is really about that that right,

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 1>that position, that recognized right above others, that position, that

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>social relationship above others. That's what grants authority. It's recognition.

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:16.880
<v Speaker 1>The general of an army is not an authority because

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 1>he's holding a gun to the heads of all the

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 1>other soldiers and making them do things. The generals here

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:25.920
<v Speaker 1>is to be a recognizing authority because of his position

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and the privileges and rights and powers that that position

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:34.360
<v Speaker 1>gives him. If tomorrow all the soldiers decided to till

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.920
<v Speaker 1>in on their general, as has happened historically, that is

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent possible. That is an instance of four

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:45.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of violence being used to resist authority rather than

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>being used to, you know, be authority. Another thing that

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:56.679
<v Speaker 1>gets confused with authority is influence or or respect. So

0:19:56.840 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>influence is really something I mean, I might find somebody's

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>a ees or qualities or achievements admirable, right, so I

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>respect that about them. That does mean they have an

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 1>authority over me. I might be inspired by someone in

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>a way that affects my character or development, will behavior.

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>But again that isn't that influence doesn't automatically trust into authority.

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>You'll find that a lot of the anarchists think because

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:22.120
<v Speaker 1>of the late nineteenth twentieth century, they were very influential.

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>They were not authorities, but they had a profound impact

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>on the people around them, and they were profound inspiration

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 1>to us even to today.

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's there's a paper I always think about where

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 2>I found it, like a kind of liberal, well like

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 2>a maybe center lefty academic writing about Mela Tessa, who

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:42.160
<v Speaker 2>we've we've talked about a lot on this show. There's

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 2>an Italian anarchists did a whole bunch of stuff. So

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 2>when the Italian revolutions are happening in nineteen eighteen, nineteen nineteen,

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:51.959
<v Speaker 2>like Baltesa comes back to Italy because he'd been all

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:53.639
<v Speaker 2>over the world doing a whole bunch of other stuff,

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 2>and he gets called like like Italy's Lenin.

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 1>For those who listened to some of my Anarchists History episodes,

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you know that he kind of shows up sometimes. You

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 1>know that he shows up an easier literally everywhere. He

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:08.160
<v Speaker 1>shows up all over the place.

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all for Latin America is in the US, and

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, and so he gets called like the Leadin

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:15.439
<v Speaker 2>of Italy. And this paper was about like was he

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 2>act Did he actually act like Lenin? And the conclusion

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 2>that they came to was like, well, no, he didn't

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:21.360
<v Speaker 2>try to. He didn't come back to Italy to type,

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 2>to seize control of the country like he simply did

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:25.439
<v Speaker 2>not because he was an anarchist, because that's what it

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:28.920
<v Speaker 2>means to sort of, you know, have influence, but not.

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:33.159
<v Speaker 1>Like rule exactly exactly. And that really gets into some

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:37.159
<v Speaker 1>of the interesting conversation around anarchism and leadership and the

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 1>different ways ad can sort of interpret the concept of leadership.

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 1>But I'll see that for another discussion. There are two

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>other things that authority gets confused with that. I want

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 1>to address the first is coordination. And what's interesting with

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>coordination is that it's very much tied to authority a lot.

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 1>In the present day. You know, a lot of the

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>rules we have in the current system, coordination authority get

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>tied up together. So you have a manager of an enterprise,

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and that manager coordinates all of the workers in that enterprise,

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:10.639
<v Speaker 1>but the manager also has authority over those workers, you know,

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to fire, to discipline, to go all these sorts of things.

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Or a general in an army might have a coordination

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 1>role of ensurance that there's communication between various militias or

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, various regiments, and that the soldiers within that

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:30.159
<v Speaker 1>regiment know exactly what their goal is, what their task is,

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:32.399
<v Speaker 1>and how they can go about to accomplishing it. That

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:34.920
<v Speaker 1>there's in many ways a coordinating role, but it's also

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>tied up with the authority of the general, as in

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the right above the soldiers, you know, to command them,

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 1>to enforce, obeliens, to punish, and that sort of thing.

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:45.920
<v Speaker 1>So we get tied up between a coordination and authority

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot. But coordination does not have to be ties

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of authority in its simplest form of coordination can just

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:56.159
<v Speaker 1>be the communication of information between parties to ensure they

0:22:56.240 --> 0:23:00.640
<v Speaker 1>work together smoothly and effectively. That can and already does

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 1>take place between equals. So, okay, here's a good example.

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, you're trying to move a couch into a

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 1>house or an apartment. And for those of you who

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>have had to squeeze a couch and through a doorway,

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you kind of know what I'm talking about is already

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:18.199
<v Speaker 1>because you have to kind of come at this at

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a certain angle. You know, the the size of our

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:24.880
<v Speaker 1>doorway and the dimensions of a coach require very particular approach.

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>So you might have somebody who stands to this side

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and the talent person okay, all right. So it's likely

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:31.639
<v Speaker 1>in this way because when you lift in a heavy coach,

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you kind of just want to put it down. You know,

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:38.239
<v Speaker 1>you can't really think, okay, what anger should take it out?

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:40.120
<v Speaker 1>So you might have somebody in a position to say,

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>all right, back up, okay, come forward, okay, So it's

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>slightly into the left, that kind of thing. That's a

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 1>coordinative rule. But that person there's an an authority over

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>anybody there. It's just communicating information to ensure the shared

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:55.439
<v Speaker 1>task that the people involved have can be executed effectively.

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>So that's a long way of saying that we can't

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 1>have coordination and organization in our It doesn't have to

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>be or it doesn't have to involve authority. Finally, one

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of the pet favorites of confusion is the confusion between

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:14.879
<v Speaker 1>authority and expertise. Authority and expertise really example of the

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>equivocation I was talking about earlier, because authority is a

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 1>synonym for expertise by certain definitions, but the kind of

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>authority and I suppose has nothing to do with expertise,

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:29.920
<v Speaker 1>which is what Baquen was talking about with his authority

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the book maker argument. Now, if I could go back

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 1>in time, I would just go and tell the quien listen,

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:38.159
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people are not going to read this

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 1>in full. I understand the full context. So maybe don't

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 1>use the word authority here. Maybe be more specific and

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:48.160
<v Speaker 1>use the word expertise or something so people don't get confused,

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:50.920
<v Speaker 1>because I mean reac in context, it becomes very clear.

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>But they are people who take the title of that article,

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:57.160
<v Speaker 1>or they take one quote or one passage just taken

0:24:57.200 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 1>out too context from the whole, or they take like,

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 1>for example, it's a version of that article that is

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:05.639
<v Speaker 1>cut off from the entire thing on on Marxist dot org.

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I think so it's like an incomplete version of that

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>text available in one page, and then the full versions

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of yourble in the anarchists life very incredible. See have

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:17.440
<v Speaker 1>people who basically use that article to argue that actually,

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, vi Cutan wasn't against authority, but in context

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense what he's talking about authority. They he's

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 1>specifically talking about expertise, and he still says that in

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the end he's not going to be commanded by that

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>expert He's just going to take their perspective into account

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:37.440
<v Speaker 1>because he understands the incompleteness of his own perspective. That

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>is a very different relationship from the sort of commander

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 1>in support nation that we see in an authoritarian relationship.

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>And while expertise often gets conflated with authority in positions

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>in the current system, that often is damaging to authority itself.

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>If you think about the relationship people have, for example,

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:57.400
<v Speaker 1>with and this is a sort of a contentious one,

0:25:57.480 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>but even if the relationship people have with like their

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 1>own like poostyl doctor, the family doctor, wh is the

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>relationship that they might have with a public health professional.

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 1>When people go into the postel doctor, it's very easy

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 1>for them to sort of, you know, accept that sort

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 1>of expertise. They have a relationship with them, they understand them,

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:17.480
<v Speaker 1>they trust them. One of the case maybe of course

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 1>their places where because healthcare is and accessible, people don't

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>have that relationship with the doctor. But you know, so

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm speaking internationally here.

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Also I need to put the trans note here,

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:31.120
<v Speaker 2>which is that like it is very hard if you're

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 2>trands to find a doctor that you personally trust, because

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 2>oh boy.

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>That is true.

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 3>That that is a time, that is true.

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>That's that's the influence of you know, CISTA a patriarchy,

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's its impact.

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and so it's also it's also an example of

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 2>why you can't just sort of blindly accept the authority.

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 2>You can't accept the authority of people who have expertise

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 2>because it's like sometimes they don't exactly exactly like a

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 2>lot of times, in fact, the credentials don't actually meant

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 2>that this person knows anything about trans health care, like

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:02.880
<v Speaker 2>the ASCO exactly.

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:05.199
<v Speaker 1>It often just me and said the police. Sun has

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>been given the stuff of approval by an institution that

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 1>has been granted authority. Yeah, but the institution being granted

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 1>authority does not necessarily or should not have a monopoly

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>on expertise and often does not in practice have the

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:18.959
<v Speaker 1>full of the sun, and the people who produced by

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:21.359
<v Speaker 1>that institution don't necessarily have that full of crafts and

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:23.960
<v Speaker 1>everything to see that you know, they can be treated

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 1>as an unquestioned authority all expert.

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it's something that you have to have a

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 2>kind of balance between what you know, kind of like

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:37.159
<v Speaker 2>neoliberal like technocracy where you get like we put the

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 2>experts in charge and the quote unquote experts running the economy,

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:42.199
<v Speaker 2>like did two thousand and.

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Eight all come out to that right wing think down?

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, it's and then on the other hand, the

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of like reflexive contrianism and desire to build a

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 2>new expert that gets you like RFK Junior as the

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:58.920
<v Speaker 2>future like secretary of Health and Human Services. So you know,

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:01.119
<v Speaker 2>you have to sort of like Jesus, yes, you have

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:04.400
<v Speaker 2>to sort of like balance between sometimes these people fuck

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:07.399
<v Speaker 2>up and also, vaccines are good. This is not a

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:10.360
<v Speaker 2>problem that requires us to like fly through the pin

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:12.200
<v Speaker 2>of a needle. We do have to have a little

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:14.399
<v Speaker 2>bit of I don't know, it's not that difficult of

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:17.440
<v Speaker 2>a problem to deal with, but but the way that

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 2>the authority is construed has created a sort of backlash

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 2>to it that has been used to sort of delegitimate, genuine,

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:27.879
<v Speaker 2>useful expertise and create sort of like false expertise.

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and that's exactly the points I was going to

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:32.680
<v Speaker 1>make to the institution of authority and the fact that

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 1>authorities so frequently, you know, mess up and so frequently

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>like abuse the trust of people, increase the sense of mistrust,

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:43.640
<v Speaker 1>a rightful and valid mistrust in authorities that it can

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 1>often be misdirected or exploited towards ends that are not

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 1>necessarily equivalent. So, because these people in public health positions

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 1>are tied up with the government, people already don't trust

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 1>any legitimate expertise that they may have gets solid essentially

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 1>by that person of authority, poisoned by their association with

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 1>a government that has clearly proven itself to not have

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the best interests of people in mind. All right, So,

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 1>just to get back to the definition again, anarchism as

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a political philosophy and practice that opposes all authority along

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 1>with its justifying dogmas, and proposes the unending pursuit of anarchy,

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>a world without rule, where self determination, free association, and

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>mutuality form the basis of our society. So, I mean,

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I've spoken a bit about that. Those justified dogmas came

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 1>at Stromsky a little bit, and we spoke about how

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of incoherent because every ideology opposes unjust hierarchies.

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's important that anarchism calls out all

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the justifications. I'm sure you could think of some of

0:29:57.800 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the main justifications that tend to be used. One of

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the oldest justifications is, of course, the divine rights of kings.

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that one's mostly been broken. Hopefully we don't have

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 2>to deal with that shit any war. But I you know,

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, I have I have eternal cynicism.

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Maybe the maybe the American people you

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>in for the Trump dynasty, Yeah, we're going to create

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>their god king. Oh yeah, as imperial presidency. But yeah,

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean in more liberal circles, the justification for authority

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 1>is usually the social contract theory that individuals implicitly consent

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to authority. But I don't know about umia. Nobody asked

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 1>for my consent, and also I don't have any way

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:42.960
<v Speaker 1>of relinquishing my consent. Yeah, so is it really consensual?

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 2>No, Like some some fucking assholes at Philadelphia like two

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 2>hundred years ago were like, we're going to set up

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 2>a thing, and also slavery is good.

0:30:52.560 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 3>It's like, really, like, what do we doing here?

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 2>How?

0:30:57.360 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 3>What meaningful way did I agree to this?

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Exactly. And it's not like I can step out

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 1>of it. I mean, you hold the monopoly on literally

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:09.720
<v Speaker 1>every inch of territory on earth, some stately some claim

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to some part of the world. There's no escape, So

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not a contract that you can opt out of.

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 1>You know. You know. Another justification that authorities tend to

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:21.720
<v Speaker 1>use as an idea of meritocracy and economic darwin itsell

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 1>that the best of the best, they rise to the top,

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 1>that they are not really any systemic inequalities or structural barriers.

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:31.800
<v Speaker 1>That this is a survival to the fittest, and the

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:35.520
<v Speaker 1>fittest win, and the losers are losers, and they fail

0:31:35.560 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>because they're losers. That's a very cynical sort of take

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that I don't think many people openly espouse outside of

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 1>like right wing circles, but it's definitely one of the

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 1>justifications for authority that gets used. Another one is also

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:51.760
<v Speaker 1>in conservative circles, the idea of natural hierarchy. The idea

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:54.720
<v Speaker 1>is that hierarchies are part of the natural ordel. You know,

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 1>people will use avolutionary biology or the just texts or

0:31:57.920 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 1>pseuo scientific claims to justify the inequality between genders or

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 1>races or classes. Colonial and imperialists Poulos, for example, would

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 1>justify their dominance by claim and cultural superiority. The these

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 1>ideas have the white man's buddhen and civilizing missions to

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 1>enforce the authority over other people's and their lands, and

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that justification, while questioned and challenged to be, still is

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 1>at the basis at the root of almost every institution

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:26.360
<v Speaker 1>in our modern rogue.

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's something I think is going to become increasingly

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 2>visible in the US over the next few years, coming

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 2>out of a period where it was like slightly more offiscated.

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 2>But you know, all of the people who are about

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 2>to be coming into power, if you if you spend

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 2>like even the tiniest amount of time, you will see

0:32:44.880 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 2>them start talking about like fucking racial IQ shit, and

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 2>like all of this really pretty pretty explicit ideology that

0:32:54.160 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 2>they have that like of this sort of like racial

0:32:56.880 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 2>superiority that they think they have. That's like, you know,

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 2>there's like motivating ideological factor and also the thing of

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 2>the users sort of justify their power.

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's unfortunately become in more and more open and

0:33:09.080 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 1>common and to see that sort of discourse on mainstream

0:33:13.160 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 1>platforms like Twitter. The necessity of order an efficiency tends

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 1>to also be used as a justification for authority, you know,

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the idea that authority is needed to maintain order, to

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:30.520
<v Speaker 1>keep things in place, to make decisions. And this is

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:34.840
<v Speaker 1>really ignoring the capacity that people have already proven historically

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and presently to organize cooperatively, to organize without authority, to

0:33:40.440 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 1>take on horizontal and decentralized approaches, because it's something that

0:33:44.760 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 1>is treating complexity as synonymous with hierarchy, that you have

0:33:49.440 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 1>to organize this way, you know, it ignores all the

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>inefficiencies hybureaucratic systems, It ignores all the harm caused by

0:33:56.280 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 1>authoritarian systems. That just says that you know, we need

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 1>this thing, these things function, but we don't.

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 2>One of the weirder artifacts of the twenty tens was

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 2>David Raber had an argument with Pure Teel where like

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 2>they like did a debate and what a Raber's arguments

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:13.440
<v Speaker 2>is like, well, what do you mean, like our technical

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 2>or technological systems mean that we have to organize society

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 2>in a way like it like it is is the

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:22.160
<v Speaker 2>argument that you're making that technological possibility makes us less free.

0:34:22.680 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 3>It's like, no, sucks, what are you talking about?

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 1>And you know this is all people like who make

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:33.800
<v Speaker 1>these arguments don't necessarily have an understanding of our systems.

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 1>The Internet is not organized by one central body. The

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:40.399
<v Speaker 1>Internet is already fairly the yes centralized. It's become more

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 1>centralized upon platforms. But as an infrastructure, the Internet is

0:34:45.600 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 1>really a network of nodes that are all over the

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:52.680
<v Speaker 1>world and all over space. Or we could take for example,

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:57.719
<v Speaker 1>the International Postal system. All the mail that gets distributed

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:01.960
<v Speaker 1>around the world internationally is one central global body that's

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:05.880
<v Speaker 1>in charge of that. It's multiple organizations that coordinate their

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:08.600
<v Speaker 1>activities to ensure that you know, you get your mail.

0:35:09.680 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Or we look at even basic supply genes of goods

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and resources, it's not all handled by one central industrial body.

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not all handled by the government or by one corporation.

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:26.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a set of relationships between groups, between companies, between

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:31.360
<v Speaker 1>mining companies and resource exstruction companies, and shipping companies and

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:36.840
<v Speaker 1>processing plants and factories and toys. All these networks already

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:40.719
<v Speaker 1>not undertaken entirely by one central body. They may be

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:45.480
<v Speaker 1>organized internally hierarchically, but that can very easily change. Finally,

0:35:45.560 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 1>final justification I want to get into is this idea

0:35:47.719 --> 0:35:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that that authority is the lesser evil. That authority might

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:55.320
<v Speaker 1>be imperfect, but it's preferable to boost alternatives like total anarchy.

0:35:55.960 --> 0:35:57.920
<v Speaker 1>And of course some people say anarchy here that the

0:35:58.040 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 1>means in the pejorative sense, or mean like actual anarchy

0:36:01.719 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 1>in the sense of the political philosophy, means in the

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:07.279
<v Speaker 1>sense of instead of having one central authority, they have

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:09.879
<v Speaker 1>one to compete in authorityre in poem, it's a bunch

0:36:09.880 --> 0:36:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of warlow its fights in full power. That is not

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 1>anarchy in the sense of anarchists pursue that is, you know,

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:20.120
<v Speaker 1>patsy authority fighting predominance, which is if you think about

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 1>really how historically states came in.

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:23.880
<v Speaker 2>To be in Yeah, I was like, what do you

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:26.440
<v Speaker 2>think we have now, like, what do you think that

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:28.840
<v Speaker 2>like one hundred and ninety something states are doing? Like

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:31.680
<v Speaker 2>I I don't know, and I feel like a lot

0:36:31.719 --> 0:36:35.239
<v Speaker 2>of these arguments are just describing the current state of

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:37.719
<v Speaker 2>affairs and going well, it could be like that. It's like, oh,

0:36:37.800 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 2>what if how would like communes deal with war? It's

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:44.360
<v Speaker 2>like when't the Communists are going to war with each other?

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 2>It's like, well, okay, like what look at the world

0:36:46.680 --> 0:36:49.800
<v Speaker 2>right now and ask yourself the question, how are states

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:51.160
<v Speaker 2>dealing with the problem of war?

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:52.680
<v Speaker 3>And the answer is they're dealing with a problem of

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:55.320
<v Speaker 3>war by going to war with each other? Like what

0:36:56.040 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 3>are we doing here?

0:36:57.400 --> 0:37:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Exactly? Exactly. So the more positive side of the definition

0:37:01.920 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of anarchy is one that I haven't quite gotten into yet,

0:37:04.800 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and I haven't broken down the ideas of mutuality and

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:11.000
<v Speaker 1>free association. But I'll save all that for the next episode.

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:13.960
<v Speaker 1>If you can't wait until then, my videos on how

0:37:14.040 --> 0:37:17.600
<v Speaker 1>anarchy works and what ANARCHI needs should whet your appetite.

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:21.279
<v Speaker 1>But until then, I've an Andrew sage. You can find

0:37:21.320 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 1>our YouTube at Andrewism and feature not seeing true this

0:37:24.680 --> 0:37:27.200
<v Speaker 1>is it could happen here the show where we chronicle

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:29.919
<v Speaker 1>collapse as it happens and explore how do I build

0:37:29.920 --> 0:37:32.920
<v Speaker 1>a better future, and in my case ocasion, I take

0:37:32.920 --> 0:37:35.800
<v Speaker 1>a look at the past as well. And that's it.

0:37:36.600 --> 0:37:37.880
<v Speaker 1>All power to all the people.

0:37:40.920 --> 0:37:43.360
<v Speaker 3>It could Happen Here is a production of cool Zone Media.

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 2>For more podcasts from cool Zone Media, visit our website

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:49.239
<v Speaker 2>cool zonemedia dot com, or check us out on the

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:52.279
<v Speaker 2>iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever.

0:37:52.040 --> 0:37:54.840
<v Speaker 3>You listen to podcasts, you can now find sources for

0:37:54.920 --> 0:37:58.040
<v Speaker 3>It could Happen Here. Listened directly in episode descriptions. Thanks

0:37:58.080 --> 0:37:58.560
<v Speaker 3>for listening.