WEBVTT - 3/4/26: James Talarico Defeats Crockett, Dan Crenshaw Goes Down In Texas

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:01.599
<v Speaker 1>Hey, guys, Saga and Crystal here.

0:00:01.680 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 2>Independent media just played a truly massive role in this election,

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 2>and we are so excited about what that means for

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:08.760
<v Speaker 2>the future of the show.

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:10.719
<v Speaker 1>This is the only place where you can find honest

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>perspectives from the left and the right that simply does

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>not exist anywhere else.

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:17.080
<v Speaker 2>So if that is something that's important to you, please

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.599
<v Speaker 2>go to Breakingpoints dot com. Become a member today and

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:22.920
<v Speaker 2>you'll access to our full shows, unedited, ad free, and

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:25.600
<v Speaker 2>all put together for you every morning in your inbox.

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>We need your help to build the future of independent

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>news media and we hope to see you at Breakingpoints

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:33.519
<v Speaker 1>dot com.

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:38.560
<v Speaker 3>Election results in North Carolina, Texas, and Arkansas very bad

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:40.599
<v Speaker 3>news for Republicans, but first of all, very good news

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:41.160
<v Speaker 3>for you guys.

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 4>We're doing one more free Breaking Points.

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 3>Go to BP free twenty six go Breakingpoints dot com

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 3>you get a month free of this program.

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:51.559
<v Speaker 5>Sounds like we're trying to free the BP twenty six

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 5>and if we don't know who they are, but we

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 5>want to free them.

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 3>If you are the Senate Republican Leadership Fund, you just

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 3>burned through all of your money trying to keep Corning alive.

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 4>You really need this month free.

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 5>Get that corporate discount.

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 4>We'll take it exactly, all right.

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 3>So to discuss all this, we're joined by Dave Weigel

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 3>of Semaphore, David Serota of lever News.

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 4>Thank you, David, thank you.

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 6>Thanks.

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:16.479
<v Speaker 4>I appreciate you guys being here.

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 3>So let's start with and then we're going to do

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 3>a second segment later on the Republican primary, but let's

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 3>start with Tallo Rico and Crockett as Serota, So it

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:32.559
<v Speaker 3>seemed like this started out as a race that didn't

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 3>have any kind of ideological content to it, that it

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 3>was like different different styles, like different MSNBC styles really

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 3>that seemed to evolve as taller Rico and while I

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 3>want your take on this too, because I can follow

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 3>this clothes as tall Ico started embracing this top bottom

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 3>like we're taking on the billionaires, they're your real problem,

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 3>and Crockets stuck with the whatever the MSNBC stuff is,

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 3>whether what she was really.

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 7>Running it right, I'm not like a brand, like a

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 7>like a vibe.

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 6>I mean, look, it's all vibes, right, it's all vibes.

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 7>I think taller Ico clearly as the campaign went on,

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 7>recognized the the I guess we could call it proxy wise,

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 7>like the Bernie vibe, like if you call the anti

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 7>billionaire stuff like the Bernie vibe. Right, Like, I think

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 7>what I take away from this race is that people

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 7>like him have realized that there is that is the

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:34.359
<v Speaker 7>normal middle center of the Democratic Party.

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 4>Way, if people are getting the news from this show,

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 4>he won, yes.

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:44.919
<v Speaker 7>One, right, Like, I think we've seen in a series

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 7>of races that these candidates who are winning these primaries

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 7>have recognized that while there's this debate going on between

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 7>you know, Third Way and you know the so called

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:58.920
<v Speaker 7>left et cetera, et cetera, that actually there isn't really

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 7>much of a debate going on at the kind of

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 7>voter level over anti oligarch politics that is now the

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 7>just sort of mainstream normal of the Democratic Party, which

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 7>I you know, taking a.

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:13.639
<v Speaker 5>Long view now, I'm Crockett was running on that too,

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:14.519
<v Speaker 5>right yeah.

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, And like like I just turned fifty recently and

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 7>you're about as old as I am, Right, Okay, Like

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:25.679
<v Speaker 7>that may seem like a just like not all that interesting. Course,

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 7>like that has not been the way it's been up

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 7>until now. And so I look at that race and

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 7>I say, wow to think about how far we've come since,

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 7>like just Bernie ten years ago, Bernie five years ago.

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 7>That's my takeaway of a candidate who can kind of

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 7>code moderate, you know, vibe wise, code moderate, but be

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 7>the anti billionaire candidate.

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 5>I want to run that past you, Dave, because one

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 5>of the reasons I thought this was such an interesting

0:03:55.400 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 5>primary is you have the stylistic, the stylistic Q to

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 5>norms from Taller Rico, who's almost stylistically again like a

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 5>Biden candidate who says We're going to restore decency to Canada.

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 5>I like that exactly right, But then his policy prescription

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 5>he was trying to sell populism. Really, Crockett was kind

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 5>of the other way around. She had the style of

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 5>post Trump politics, but the substance of almost corporate dem politics.

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 5>It's hard to say because they're both kind of mixed.

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 5>And you were on the you were on the trail,

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 5>weren't like I was.

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 8>I was last week and David's right, And I would

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 8>start with Taller Rico picked and polarized enemies. The enemies

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:35.839
<v Speaker 8>were corporations that were working with Donald Trump to impoverish

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 8>you the voter.

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 5>This is a man who took money from mariam A

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 5>on a gambling Yeah.

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 8>I asked him, I think the opening interview asked him

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:43.840
<v Speaker 8>about that, and he had he had, he had an answer.

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 8>It was it was like, I'm not pure. That was

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:47.840
<v Speaker 8>specific thing. I'm not going to do that in this race.

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 8>It was Crockett did not run a very tight campaign,

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 8>did not use that as effectively she could. She had

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 8>lots of influence online calling him corrupt, but they got

0:04:56.680 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 8>really sidetracked into identity where U his some speech was

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 8>It's one of those in a boota judge way of

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:05.720
<v Speaker 8>some speech. It's very memorable because it doesn't change very much.

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 8>He would talk about inauguration Day and the wealthy people

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 8>sitting behind on Trump, talk about Elon Musk. The impact

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:16.919
<v Speaker 8>of the Stephen Colbert thing was him talking about the

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:20.840
<v Speaker 8>Trump administration opening the door for his supporters to own

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 8>corporate media and control what you see. He called it

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 8>the ultimate corporate cancel culture is the one thing he

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 8>called it. But it was about the enemy is these

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 8>people at the top who were dividing us. And it

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 8>wasn't evading issues or pivoting. It was that She was

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 8>less clear. She mentioned that a couple of times when

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 8>I was covering her. She had some big events, some

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 8>big conversations, but a lot more of what Democrats have

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 8>not had any success with, which is, how dare some

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 8>a felon, a thirty four thirty five count felon be

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:52.159
<v Speaker 8>allowed to serve in the governments like these? Get this

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 8>guy's corrupt? It was like, okay, well, yeah, Trump's crupture,

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 8>but who was behind him? And how are you being distracted?

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:00.040
<v Speaker 8>And every time you're watching a reaction to him, what

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 8>are you missing? It's this, it's it's it's it's this policy,

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:06.840
<v Speaker 8>it's this diminition of medicaid funding. It was bad but

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 8>enemy first, which is it's it's kind of obvious. But

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:11.720
<v Speaker 8>there have been lots of Democrats. I'll never get there,

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:13.839
<v Speaker 8>and they're very they're very loose, and they do not

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 8>say here's the bad guy. I will take on the

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 8>bad guy. You're going to prove your life's better for

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:18.840
<v Speaker 8>this reason. He did it all the time.

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:22.480
<v Speaker 7>So when I was writing speeches for Bernie Sanders, some

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 7>people some people would would.

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 6>Well, one I'd get raz how do you write a

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 6>speech for Bernie Sanders? He says the same thing over.

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:30.600
<v Speaker 7>I mean, that's like a that's why I got all

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 7>my hair trying to you know, put in new things.

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 3>But the question of why do people show up to

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:42.279
<v Speaker 3>hear what they've already heard? It was like I feel

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 3>like they a lot of people showed up on those

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 3>campaigns because they liked hearing somebody recount and name the

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:55.359
<v Speaker 3>villains the enemies, because it felt like no one else

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:57.919
<v Speaker 3>was naming them. And so when you say, you know,

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 3>when you point out that tall Rico was actually naming villains,

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 3>naming the enemy, I feel like that's like become code

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:08.159
<v Speaker 3>for authenticity, code.

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 6>For like I am willing to name villains.

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 7>I am the people who don't want you to name villains,

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 7>or the donors, like the money doesn't want you to

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 7>name that. And I think this question about what is

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 7>left and right? What is moderate? What is you know, liberal,

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 7>et cetera, et cetera. I mean the Third Way conference

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 7>this week right was all about how, you know, the

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 7>Democrats need to be moderate, they need to like reject

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 7>their left. I would ask a question like in this race,

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 7>who does the average voter think in the Texas primary

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 7>was the candidate on the left.

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 6>Or who was the moderate right?

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 7>I think those terms like don't mean anything anymore. That's

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 7>why I say, you know, when I when I when

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 7>I'm referring to you know, people ask where my politics,

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 7>I'm like, I'm not even sure the word.

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 6>Left or right or moderate or like. I don't think

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 6>these terms mean anything anymore.

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, certainly not to regular people who are trying to

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 3>follow this now. The Hispanic vote swung wildly to Democrats

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 3>this time. Either one of you can take this, but

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 3>Tom Bond, you're a Democratic data analysts, and we could

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 3>put this.

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 4>Up and post. He flagged that.

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 3>He says, Zapota County turn out in the primary there

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 3>yesterday was one and forty three percent the total number

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 3>of votes that Kamala Harris won in the general election.

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:35.320
<v Speaker 3>Republican Republicans very in this high profile manner, went and

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 3>redistricted Texas to try to add a couple of members.

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 3>And I want to get your take on this. It

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 3>may end up being an incredible own goal, shoot yourself

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 3>in the foot kind of moment. So he flags four

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 3>of the districts congressional districts, the ninth, twenty eighth, thirty fourth,

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 3>and thirty fifth that were redistricted in order to be

0:08:56.200 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 3>Republican districts in each one of them, Democratic primary turnout

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 3>was higher than GOP primary turnout in some cases by

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 3>like three or four thousand, other cases by twenty to

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 3>thirty to forty thousand more votes.

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:13.959
<v Speaker 4>So these are in order to get.

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 3>More districts, get more seats, you have to take a

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 3>seat where you normally win by thirty and you take

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 3>it down to like five or ten, and then you

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 3>take those voters and you spread them out. But if

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 3>it's a wave, all of a sudden, you've put all

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 3>of these districts in range of Democrats, which one do

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 3>you want to take.

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:39.199
<v Speaker 8>More in that direction than by sure back in Apkin analysis, Ben,

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 8>if it's just like a twenty twenty Hispanic breakdown, than

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:43.680
<v Speaker 8>those seats are hard for Republicans to win.

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 4>I've been to that region a lot.

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 8>I'd say there's a long period where Democrats are just

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 8>into denial that it could change because Donald Trump was

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 8>the nominatee and listen to what he says and look

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 8>at the numbers for Hillary Clinton. He destroyed. He got

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 8>destroyed in that region. The Tallerka campaign. I think everyone

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 8>knows Chuck Roaches writers, but he spent a lot of

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 8>time in the district He was very clear on ice

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 8>and making the argument that again Democrats I think are

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 8>mostly comfortable making, even if they don't like saying abolish. Well,

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 8>we agree with that immigration enforcement is good, but why

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 8>are they flagging down Hispanic people and seeing if they

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 8>have papers? That's popular there. Border patrol is very popular.

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 8>If you've been to the South Texas, people have employers. Well, yeah,

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 8>you know, you know the Blue Lives Matter flag. You'll

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 8>see a green line in a flag that's the border.

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 4>Patrol flag Myra Flora. Yeah, exactly.

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 8>And he was careful about that, but it was it

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 8>was spending time in that area. And also talking about religion.

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 8>I think there are gonna be a lot of criticisms

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 8>of how he talks about.

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 6>Religion, many from me.

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's a little more.

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:45.559
<v Speaker 8>Like gnostic than most Hispanic Catholics are comfortable with when

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 8>it comes to like the divinity or God's gender, et cetera.

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 5>Which, by the way, it's something that was hugely divisive

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 5>in the real Grand Valley for Democrats, this question of

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 5>like what's moderate what's not it's I agree, the labels

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 5>are really hard to say because it's like he runs

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 5>this is a kind of stylistic moderate. Where is he

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:04.680
<v Speaker 5>in some of these cultural issues Hispanic voters in the

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 5>real Grand Valley independent type Hispanic voters, that might be

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 5>an issue for them.

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 8>It was, and I did meet Hispanic voters per saying

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 8>their film family was Magga the last election. I very

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 8>forgot right wing Catholic family who share memes on Facebook

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:19.959
<v Speaker 8>and they can't believe they're Democrat, but they can send

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 8>them a Talla Rico video about something specific and say, well,

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 8>this is what I believe, and it was.

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 4>It's not going down the litmus.

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 8>The litmus tests of a Catholic voter who's pro pro life,

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 8>he's not going to match that. So a gender critical person,

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 8>he's not going to match that. But just talking about

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 8>faith in the way he did, quoting the Book of Matthew,

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 8>quoting the Sermon on the Mount, just doing that versus

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 8>the secularism they were used to from other Democrats. Beato

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:46.440
<v Speaker 8>or Work is not very comfortable doing that. A lot

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 8>of Democrats are not. They don't go to church very much,

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 8>they don't talk about it going to church. The fact

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 8>that he was a seminarian and talked about God at all,

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 8>I think I was maybe a little bit cynical about

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 8>that because when going in where I.

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:02.680
<v Speaker 4>Went there, but people just they had not heard that.

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 8>They were hearing democrats talking about shouting your abortion and

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 8>talking about he would talk about Christian nationalism, which I

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 8>think is more for the you know, John Oliver audience.

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 8>But the part they were hearing was we at least

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 8>quoting the Bible. I haven't heard a Democrat come hearing

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:17.200
<v Speaker 8>quote the Bible because he's not like Henry Quaihar who

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 8>knows the region. He's at least trying, and he made

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 8>some inroads that way. But that plus the ice thing.

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 8>This is and I've heard that from Arizona and from

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 8>other places too, that look, they're not saying abolish ice.

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 8>They're saying there has to be some goldilocks bull in

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:33.440
<v Speaker 8>the middle. That is that is protecting the border and

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 8>not chasing my friend down because he has a Mexican

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 8>flag on his truck because he's fifth generation.

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 4>He just has a Mexican flag.

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 5>Well, last point before we go to a needle, Alam

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 5>and you may have something to ads Rohoda. It's just

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 5>Crockett was flirting with like just dragging this out last night,

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 5>was saying, looks like there's cheating in Dallas, Jowny, and

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 5>this is what Republicans did. It was unclear what she

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 5>totally meant by that just a half an hour ago. Yes,

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:56.680
<v Speaker 5>so she really was going full.

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:57.079
<v Speaker 4>Stop the steal.

0:12:57.160 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 5>Last night pulled back from that, and so she has

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:03.080
<v Speaker 5>conceded as of this morning, but she was going in

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 5>that direction. I don't know, if you get anyone wants

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 5>to jump.

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:08.320
<v Speaker 7>I just wonder if all of this is actually something

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 7>like more simple that it is an anti system vote. Yeah, right,

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 7>like that. I mean, I'm just thinking through the last

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 7>many elections. The last time the party that was perceived

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 7>to be in power was re elected was twenty twelve,

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 7>right like, think about it, like Obama winning re election

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 7>and then like every election seems like a referendum on

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:39.199
<v Speaker 7>who is perceived to be in power. And so I think,

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:44.680
<v Speaker 7>you know, when it comes to dicing different voting segments,

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:46.599
<v Speaker 7>I think the larger question.

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:50.199
<v Speaker 6>Is maybe it's as simple as the whoever is perceived to.

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 7>Be the anti system candidate is going to be the

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 7>one to get that swing. Like we like our swing

0:13:57.120 --> 0:13:59.839
<v Speaker 7>voters Latino voters, are they working class voters? Maybe this

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 7>wing voter is like none of those categories, and it's

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 7>the anti system voter who feels like they keep voting

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:08.439
<v Speaker 7>for change and not getting any.

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 4>Change, which is in all of those voted for it.

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly so in Arkansas, will we don't even have

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 3>you go deep into this, but they had a Supreme

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 3>Court election. Kamala Harris lost Arkansas by thirty one points.

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 3>The Republican seems to have won it by about ten.

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 3>So a twenty one point swing in Arkansas not great

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 3>now a race that we covered a lot.

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 4>In North North Carolina four.

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 3>Valerie Fushi elected in twenty twenty two with an enormous

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 3>amount of crypto money and a PAC money. She evolved

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty six to a PAC money and AI money.

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 4>So better or worse, I don't quite a path on it,

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 4>wherever you can get it.

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 3>She vowed that she wouldn't take any A pack money,

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 3>so it got ended up getting rooted through this this

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 3>other pack. She raised very little herself, and so two

0:14:56.760 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 3>plus million dollars kind of rained down on her alam

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 3>in the last like week and a half two weeks

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 3>of the race. We can put up the results there

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 3>has not been called yet. The Fushi is up by

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 3>one thousand and twenty point twenty votes or something like that.

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 3>That's a little under one roughly one percent. Doesn't seem

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 3>like there are enough votes for ni Alam to come back.

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 3>But what it does suggest is that absent this two

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 3>million plus dollars and ni Alam had her own kind

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 3>of anti or pro Palestine super pac linked to Bernie

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 3>Hanna verdict old Bernie.

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 4>Can't beat them them. It's kind of organized.

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 3>Muslim money is finally kind of breaking onto the scene.

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 3>So she had some sport, nothing approaching what what Fushi had.

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 3>It does seem like that was decisive, Like without that

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 3>two plus million in the last couple of weeks, she

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 3>ends up. You know, food this incombent would have gone down.

0:15:57.440 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 3>What was was? What was your raid on this race?

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 7>I mean, my question coming out of this race is

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 7>how much is this going to change how all of

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 7>the other House Democratic incumbent campaign.

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 4>Nobody wants to win by it?

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 3>Right, you'd rather win by a thousand, Ye lose by

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 3>a thousand, but you'd like to like you You don't.

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 6>Like to have to work that hard, right? I mean?

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 6>And there was that, I think there was.

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 7>It was an Axios piece earlier this week that it

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 7>was thirty House Democrats now have primary challengers who've raised

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 7>more than.

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 6>One hundred thousand dollars.

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 3>Now one hundred thousand dollars not going to when you

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 3>a Democratic primary.

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 6>But it makes you nervous, right, I mean.

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 7>And I thought what was funny was it was like that,

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 7>you know, unnamed sources, the House Democratic leadership are like.

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 6>Enraged that there's so much money being.

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 7>Spent on And what my takeaway from it is they've

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 7>gotten so used to never having to fight at all

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 7>for their's party, for their parties nomination.

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 6>And again I go back to party exactly.

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 7>And the thing is, I wrote a book back in

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 7>two thousand and seven saying like this was going to

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 7>be a moment all the way back then.

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 6>That's how old we all are now, Okay, President, right, Okay,

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 6>we I there, you go. Okay. That the rage of.

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 7>That moment was going to be channeled in one direction

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 7>or the other. And I think what happened on the

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 7>left end of that spectrum was it was channeled into

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 7>the Democratic Party through through the Hope and Change brand,

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 7>and it was on the right it was channeled into

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 7>the Tea Party. And I think now the difference in

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 7>this moment is it's the same, if not more level

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:35.639
<v Speaker 7>of rage.

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 6>But the polls that show that the.

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 7>Democratic base is annoyed and angry and frustrated with its

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 7>own leadership was not a condition that existed back then,

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 7>And so I think that is what the current Democratic

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 7>Party leadership is just not used to and is sort

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 7>of scandalized by right because on the right in the

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 7>Republican Party, the idea of Republican primaries against incumbents, that's

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 7>become somewhat more normalized than in a like the idea

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 7>that like a Democrat like I live in Colorado, the

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:14.679
<v Speaker 7>idea that John Hickenlooper might have and he does have

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 7>a primary, Yeah, he's got a challenge, right, the whole idea,

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:21.680
<v Speaker 7>Like you talk to people in Democratic circles in Colorado,

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 7>it's like no one could possibly it's a blue state.

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 6>No one's going to put primary a sitting a senator.

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 7>I'm not sure what's going to happen in that race,

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 7>but I guess the point is it's a long way

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:35.679
<v Speaker 7>of saying the presumption for so long has been that

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 7>there will not be a challenge, that the people who

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 7>are in power are scandalized, and I think to come

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 7>back to this primary. I think every House Democrat is

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 7>going to look at that and be like, I don't

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:49.440
<v Speaker 7>want to have to run for just my party's nomination

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 7>and have to deal.

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 6>With something like that.

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:53.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and Dave, not every Democrat can get the kind

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 3>of help that she got from and particularly from Hakim Jeffreyes.

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 4>So he put her within days of.

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 3>In days of Niitlam launching her campaign, he put her

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 3>on this three person Democratic task force to write AI policy.

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:12.880
<v Speaker 3>And what that is is that is a giant signal

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 3>to the AI industry that you need to shower money

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 3>on this person. The others are Ted lew and Josh Gotttheimer,

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:24.440
<v Speaker 3>like both voracious fundraisers, Gottheimer in particular, and so they did.

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 3>They came in one point six million at last counting.

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 3>I bet when we get the final numbers it'll be

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 3>it'll be higher as anthropics Coalition of AI.

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:34.119
<v Speaker 4>So it's the AI safety people, the good guys.

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 3>But so he did that, and then then there was

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 3>also this pack that he's connected to that raised money

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:44.920
<v Speaker 3>from a pack, moved it through a separate pack so

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 3>that it could called Article one pack, so that she

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 3>could abide by her promise to not take any more

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 3>a pac moneies. But Jefferies can't do that for everybody.

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:58.199
<v Speaker 3>I mean maybe he can't, can he? So how are

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 3>to throw this question? How are how are House Democrats

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 3>responding to this? And you have any other thoughts from

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 3>covering this race?

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:07.159
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I covered more close of the twenty twenty two

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:11.159
<v Speaker 8>race when it was an open seat, and at that

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:13.639
<v Speaker 8>point it was a more fair map. But anyway, it

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 8>was a safe Democratic seat. And in that race which

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:20.879
<v Speaker 8>you've been setting up, it was very clear that Fouchet

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 8>was the pro Israel candidate. She got the APEC support,

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 8>it just was not in the democratic conversation as a

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:28.879
<v Speaker 8>top issue very Then how did she what did she

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:31.639
<v Speaker 8>do in the advance of this race? She disclaimed the

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:33.920
<v Speaker 8>APEC money. Now it helped her in the in the end,

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 8>but she made it very splashy at a town hall

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 8>announcement that she was not gonna take their support anymore.

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:41.479
<v Speaker 4>She co signed block the bombs.

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 8>She when the Iran war started, Nita was very quickly

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 8>as she went to her her house and couldn't add

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 8>at what she was against the wharf for. She didn't

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:50.919
<v Speaker 8>do that, just a less energetic candidate in general, but

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 8>she was opposed to the war too. So would she

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 8>have won had she not done that, I don't think so.

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 8>I don't think with that money. If she was running

0:20:57.280 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 8>as Dan Goldman that in that district she would she

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 8>would have lost. She needed to be critical of Israel.

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 4>Some things, she needed the pro Israel money, and she

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:04.880
<v Speaker 4>needed to be answered.

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:07.159
<v Speaker 8>Some memorable okay, well on voting for this person, and

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:09.640
<v Speaker 8>she's moving in the right direction. In twenty twenty two,

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 8>and this is I interviewed the then CEO of APAC

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:14.440
<v Speaker 8>and twenty twenty two about how they run ads and

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 8>what works. But in twenty tway two it was this

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 8>is good politics, but maybe we're going to do the

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 8>issue that's but we're not going to say this is

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 8>the best canon on Israel, going to say something else.

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 8>And now it's they're giving them a little bit of

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:28.360
<v Speaker 8>permission structure to denounce pro Israel politics just because maybe

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 8>they'll get there and they they don't want more voices

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 8>in Congress that are criticizing them.

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:36.400
<v Speaker 4>So I think that is one lesson for all these candidates.

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 8>And there's Illinois primaries in the next week, but for

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 8>all these races, if you have a progressive challenger, what

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 8>do you say on Israel? It's important that the permission

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 8>structure has been created for you to, you know, denounce

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 8>them three times and then and then and then get

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:53.680
<v Speaker 8>elected anyway. But what does that say about their their

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 8>the power of their issue. We could look at the polling,

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:58.919
<v Speaker 8>but I think this is even more more powerful to

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:01.640
<v Speaker 8>say that you cannot in order to survive a primary.

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:05.440
<v Speaker 8>By one point, she had to very performatively say and also,

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 8>I'm against the I don't she said genocide to the end,

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:10.920
<v Speaker 8>but I mean against what Israel's doing. I'm against the war, etcetera, etcetera.

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 8>You need two million dollars and that that's new.

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 6>I think.

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:16.639
<v Speaker 7>And just one other point, I think that it's interesting

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:19.439
<v Speaker 7>to think about the A pack issue and the AI issue.

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 7>The A pack issue, for a long time had been

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:28.880
<v Speaker 7>an issue where there wasn't as organized and motivated an

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:33.679
<v Speaker 7>anti constituency, so the money could go to candidates and

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 7>the candidates didn't have to worry about organized popular opposition

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 7>in a democratic primary.

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 8>They were kind of helping moderate or you're moderate and

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 8>you're going to get the APEC money.

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 7>To right, and the voters don't really care now the

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:52.199
<v Speaker 7>voters really care. Where I think I'm terrified about, like

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:54.399
<v Speaker 7>is the world going to survive? Are we going to

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 7>go into like sky net world? Is that the AI

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 7>money assume that there isn't a similarly organized voting block

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 7>against them. In other words, the AI money presumes for

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:10.639
<v Speaker 7>now that we can give a lot of money to

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 7>democrats get them to be pro AI, because they don't

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:17.959
<v Speaker 7>have to worry that in taking the money and in

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:22.200
<v Speaker 7>being pro AI, they're going to prompt an organized popular

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:26.919
<v Speaker 7>resistance with political consequences when they run for election. You

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 7>see that what you saw it with crypto too, right like,

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 7>and you think about these dynamics where where you want

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 7>a candidate to go out you know, if you're a progressive,

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:37.199
<v Speaker 7>maybe you want your candidate to go out there and

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:39.680
<v Speaker 7>say Crypto's terrible, or go out there and say AI

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 7>is terrible.

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 6>Why aren't they doing that? Well?

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 7>The answer is is because I think at a candidate

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:48.240
<v Speaker 7>by candidate level, they fear that if they speak up,

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 7>even if they sort of in their heart agree with

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 7>speaking up and against you know, deregulation of the financial

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 7>sector or AI et cetera, et cetera, that not enough

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 7>vote will care and all that will do is prompt

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 7>a flood of money again, They'll become the next Katie

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:05.919
<v Speaker 7>Porter and.

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 4>That set round exactly.

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, they very bragged about that, bragged about that. That's

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:12.639
<v Speaker 8>our example. That's like here shared Brown's head, Do you

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:13.160
<v Speaker 8>want to be him?

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, It's like it's like the money is organized on

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 6>those issues, but the people aren't.

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 7>A pack was exploiting that in the sense of the

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 7>money was organized, but the anti Apack people weren't organized.

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 7>Now that's an organized constituency in a way that that

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 7>does what happened.

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 8>One very small point is that a lom and the

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 8>ad I mentioned she did try to tie that to

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:37.679
<v Speaker 8>Bochet by saying, and she's supported by the sort of

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:41.920
<v Speaker 8>AI companies that are giving intelligent that are helping prosecute

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 8>this war, and the ones that are building the data centers.

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 8>And it was I think maybe she was a couple

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 8>of weeks early for that or a couple who knows

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:49.680
<v Speaker 8>how long the data started to make that argument, but

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 8>it wasn't it wasn't there yet. That's where she took it.

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 8>I think that's where people you're talking about will take it.

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, and I think the data the local data center

0:24:55.560 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 7>stuff will has the chance to actually create organized politically.

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 4>Yes, yeah, it's already been happening.

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 3>I would if I were her, I would have yeah,

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.239
<v Speaker 3>she said, you know, it's it's the AI used by

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 3>Ice and used by for the Venezuela and for the

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:13.160
<v Speaker 3>and then iron lateran here. But yeah, I think, yeah,

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:16.160
<v Speaker 3>it's the day the data because.

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 7>There is water and the energy of my electricity bills

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 7>against it, and they're coming in right really yeah, because

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:24.240
<v Speaker 7>otherwise it's like Crypto and AR.

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:26.200
<v Speaker 3>It's like a bank shot. It's a hard sell because

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:28.160
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people like crypto and a Yes.

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 5>And also we're looking at monster turnout in Texas, by

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 5>the way, I think that's something worth adding. It looks

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:35.439
<v Speaker 5>like right now that it's roughly double what it was

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 5>for Beto's not a hugely contested primary. In Bettle's case,

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 5>I think he won with like ninety percent of the vote,

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:43.399
<v Speaker 5>So you can understand why you would have a higher

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 5>turnout this time around. But that's a signal the DEM

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:50.399
<v Speaker 5>base is organized and energized and ready to go in November.

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:52.479
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, if you told somebody a month ago, Crockett's going

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 8>to be a million votes and say, oh, she's gonna win. Like,

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:57.119
<v Speaker 8>nobody gets a million votes in Texas Democratic primer.

0:25:56.880 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 5>That's usually the total. It's usually around a million. This

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 5>it looks like it's going north of two million.

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 7>Can I also say that, like, as somebody who has

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:10.399
<v Speaker 7>worked on campaigns, I do appreciate that if you know,

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 7>in broad strokes here that tall Rico seemed to run,

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:16.640
<v Speaker 7>as we were discussing before this run like a quote

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 7>unquote a real campaign.

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 6>Like organizers like.

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 7>The ads had a message sort of much more of

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:30.399
<v Speaker 7>a grassroots footprint than Crockett Crockett sort of, you know,

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:33.159
<v Speaker 7>I think basically ran as like like an influencer campaign,

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 7>like a purely influencer campaign, not like not as much

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:37.680
<v Speaker 7>of a real campaign.

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:38.639
<v Speaker 4>And I think.

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 7>I worry about turning campaigns into just I am with

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 7>my iPhone, you know, making TikTok videos, not really out

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:52.719
<v Speaker 7>in the community, and that being validated by voters. Like

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 7>I think there's something good about the person who was

0:26:56.520 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 7>whose campaign was more grassroots, more in the community, more

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 7>of a traditional campaign, was actually validated by voters and.

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:08.359
<v Speaker 3>Still used TikTok and Instagram in the service of that

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 3>rather than as a thing, right.

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 4>In itself.

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 5>Interestingly, he got more money from K Street Political had

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:14.160
<v Speaker 5>an analysis.

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:15.879
<v Speaker 6>But they both did.

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:23.719
<v Speaker 3>Let's move to the Republican results in Texas. We'll talk

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 3>about Ken Paxson and Corny who are going to go

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 3>to a runoff in a moment, but let's start with

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 3>Dan Crenshaw. So this is a very well known Republican.

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 6>You might have thought it very kind of reviled Republican.

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 4>It's such a case.

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:42.199
<v Speaker 3>Why do actually, I want to ask Emily, why do

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:42.880
<v Speaker 3>people hate this guy?

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 5>Why say that he got absolutely obliterated by the way,

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 5>it was fifty as of right now with ninety five

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 5>percent of the votes in, it's fifty five point eight

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 5>percent to forty point six percent. Crenshaw I believe got elected.

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:56.680
<v Speaker 5>I mean, this is he got trounced.

0:27:56.320 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 3>And Emily's very happy, and we're like, he seems like

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 3>the other Republicans. Tell us from Colorado where we have

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 3>like Lauren Bobert, and that would never happen to Lauren Bobert.

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 6>I don't think hate each other.

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 4>What's there. I'm sure they hate each other.

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:15.919
<v Speaker 5>He's I mean, he hates anybody who is aligned with

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:19.440
<v Speaker 5>Tucker Carlson, but he also very high profile, had picked

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 5>high profile fights with Sean Ryan, who was really popular

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:26.679
<v Speaker 5>with conservative podcast listeners. But you know, just on a

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:28.399
<v Speaker 5>substance of level, he was out of touch with the

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:33.199
<v Speaker 5>base on foreign policy. He's an insider trading, Maven. He

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:36.439
<v Speaker 5>loves to trade on inside he trades. Now that he's

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 5>losing accents, well, he was a he wouldn't call it,

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 5>he wouldn't call it insider trading. But of course he's

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 5>in Congress and he's trade, which is actually, interestingly enough,

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 5>one of the things that this White House has zeroed

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:52.480
<v Speaker 5>in on being an important part of the Trump agenda

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 5>for the midterm cycle. That's what they were at Capitol Hill,

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 5>cub talking about. That's what they're They're saying that Trump

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 5>is going to run Republican candidates twenty twenty six on

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 5>stopping congressional insider trading.

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 4>So do it, because the.

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 6>Insider trading should happen only in the White House.

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 5>It only happens on it's only in market trading people,

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 5>and it is a sacred task.

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 6>But anyway, so.

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 8>The can't create their own coins and have people buy

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 8>them for access.

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 5>Amazing, But he was his his self a grant listening

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 5>he's just my perspective, and he's self aggrandizing, uh anti

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 5>populist in ways that were wildly out of touch with

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 5>the moment and just made him a really bad guy

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 5>from my perspective. I think voters probably had a similar perspective.

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 5>But Figo, you've I think I've only ever talked to

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 5>him like once, and in that conversation, he was talking

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 5>to me about Tucker Carlson unprompted, so.

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 4>You set it up very well.

0:29:45.400 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 8>He also the the remap of the state gave him

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 8>areas he had not represented. They had not seen his

0:29:52.760 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 8>campaign as, and he stopped doing these. But are you

0:29:55.760 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 8>are you aware of his action movie ads the Michael

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 8>Lace for he would he would pair shoot into people's

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 8>districts to save them. That they hadn't seen those, but

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:08.719
<v Speaker 8>they had seen Tucker. Steve Toath who won Tucker had

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 8>a long interview with him four months ago. Didn't make

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 8>a lot of news because that's who outside of Southeast

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 8>Texas knows who Steve Toath is. But everything you said,

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 8>he was a interventionist, anti populist who was believed that

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 8>the not the part of the American First Movement, not

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 8>all of it was going to wreck the Republican Party,

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 8>and that if that is the people who are voting,

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 8>they might take objection to that.

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 4>It's really that simple.

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 8>And I was a little surprised that you were saying

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 8>you were surprised, but it wasn't on more people people's

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 8>radars because this is a project for years to get

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 8>rid of that guy. I don't know who first coined

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 8>ipatch McCain, but that was the way he was seeing

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 8>this is a long run. It might have been it

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 8>probably him, Yeah, but he did not cultivate support from

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 8>people who who didn't like him. In twenty eighteen, I

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 8>was I was also strugg chip Roy in the middle

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 8>of the basically he was doing that and.

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 4>Chip Roy is running for AG.

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:07.200
<v Speaker 8>He had TEDFI I finally say ted Crews endorsed to

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 8>endorse his opponent. A lot of Republicans wanted him gone,

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 8>so part of his personal but it wouldn't have been

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 8>possible if he wasn't.

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 4>So alienated from America first.

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 8>But I was gonna say, chip Roy running for AG

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 8>came in second to a Maggot candidate, and that was

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 8>more about Trump, but it was also sort of the heterodots.

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 8>Can we trust this guy. His instincts are not the

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 8>same as those of us who want to just keep

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 8>resources in the country who have questions.

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:30.960
<v Speaker 4>About the twenty twenty election.

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 8>And these are both guys who I think had bigger,

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 8>big profiles in DC because.

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 4>How media works.

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 8>You know, we're you're more interesting to the media if

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 8>you'll criticize your party for them.

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 4>Sometimes no interest in that.

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 8>In Texas, very a lot of love and confidence that

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 8>Donald Trump is doing the right thing. So if your

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:51.760
<v Speaker 8>brand is trashing not just Trump but influential speak conservative

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 8>thinkers and speakers, you've alienated more people than you'd alienate by,

0:31:55.800 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 8>you know, going to the rotary club and insulting. They

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 8>hear about that, and media diet has changed in ways

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 8>that clearly Crenshaw I think also has or had a

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 8>podcast he was trying to get the space. Yes that

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 8>they that was not as popular it's as it was.

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 7>I also wonder if in a race like this, how

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 7>much somebody like Crenshaw is hurt by the fact that

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 7>independent voters in an open price and open.

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:24.120
<v Speaker 4>Primary, Yeah, you just pull a ballot.

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:25.480
<v Speaker 6>Right, so but you have to choose.

0:32:25.640 --> 0:32:28.560
<v Speaker 7>In other words, how many independent voters were animated by

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:33.719
<v Speaker 7>voting for Tallarico and didn't come into a race, couldn't

0:32:33.720 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 7>pull up for somebody like Crenshaw, Right, Like, I mean

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 7>that in open primary states, you can be a candidate

0:32:43.320 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 7>in a primary and think you're going to be rescued

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 7>by or helped by independent voters. But if there's a

0:32:49.680 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 7>race higher on the ticket where most of the independent

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 7>voters are going to be voted, they can't come help you.

0:32:55.720 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 3>Right, that should be able to pick you want to

0:32:57.920 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 3>vote right race by race.

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:00.160
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, that's not how.

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 5>Granted, this is a pretty decisive margin so far, who

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 5>knows where. Yeah, I think that is.

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 4>A great point.

0:33:04.640 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 8>Definitely bigger than the surprise is definitely that bit that

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 8>Texas knew he was at risk, but not that he

0:33:09.440 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 8>was just walking in with white.

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:13.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and he's someone who came in with a lot

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 5>of momentum because people might remember he got made fun

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:18.400
<v Speaker 5>of as looking like a porn star by Pete Davidson

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 5>on SNL and everyone was like, he's a veteran. So

0:33:20.680 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 5>they brought him back on SNL and he was on

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:24.640
<v Speaker 5>Weekend Update and everyone was like, this is the way

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:27.960
<v Speaker 5>Republicans will win young voters. Dan Crenshaw knows how to

0:33:28.040 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 5>use new medium pop culture. So he had youth summits

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 5>Frenshaw youth summits of his own where conservative organizations. He

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 5>was trying to do like a mini seapack for young

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 5>people in Texas where conservative organizations would like by booths,

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:45.240
<v Speaker 5>and it never really got off the ground. But he

0:33:45.560 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 5>saw himself as a light for the Republican Party. And

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 5>this is a really decisive refutation of that. Let's talk

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:57.480
<v Speaker 5>about Ken Paxton. Ken Paxton, like Chip Roy, headed to

0:33:57.480 --> 0:33:59.720
<v Speaker 5>a runoff with John Cornyn. We can put F three

0:33:59.800 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 5>up on screen. This is the results, very very interesting

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:06.120
<v Speaker 5>results in this race. Cornyn overperformed what a lot of

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:10.960
<v Speaker 5>people expected. He's not quite a Crenshaw style figure. He's

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:13.360
<v Speaker 5>been around Texas for a long time. He's obviously a senator,

0:34:13.440 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 5>so he has probably more built in goodwill, but is

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:19.920
<v Speaker 5>definitely friendly with leadership. He's a member of the GOP establishment,

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 5>no question about that. Lots of people in Texas angry

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 5>about that post Ubaldi gun bill that Cornyn got behind.

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 5>That's definitely been a problem for him. Wesley Hunt pulls

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:33.120
<v Speaker 5>in through thirteen point five percent Senate Leadership Fund aligned

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:36.840
<v Speaker 5>with Cornin, then lashes out at Wesley Hunt as he's defeated,

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 5>and it's basically like, well, we could have avoided a

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:41.319
<v Speaker 5>runoff if you hadn't even gotten into this.

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 4>Corn votes Wellesley Hunt. Let's what do you think, Migel

0:34:45.320 --> 0:34:45.959
<v Speaker 4>by the end.

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 8>I don't think they are because the last two weeks

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 8>in Texas you'd see the ads. The last two weeks

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 8>was as Left going after Hunt. They wanted this number.

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 8>So what is their theory of this race. It is

0:34:57.480 --> 0:35:00.239
<v Speaker 8>get Cornyn above Packs by any margin at all. If

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:01.920
<v Speaker 8>it was a if it was like the polls were

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:05.560
<v Speaker 8>a month ago and it was Paxton forty three Cornyn

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:09.359
<v Speaker 8>thirty three, Hunt better than he did, then Trump would

0:35:09.360 --> 0:35:10.759
<v Speaker 8>look at that and say, this guy's a loser. I'm

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:12.839
<v Speaker 8>not going to endorse him. They just want Trump to

0:35:13.000 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 8>endorse John Cornan. Forget any other issue in the race,

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:19.880
<v Speaker 8>just endorse him. And right now, in other rooms, I

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:22.800
<v Speaker 8>am sure they're saying they got we got Tallerico, not Crockett.

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:25.919
<v Speaker 8>There's no runoff on their side, so we're not sure

0:35:25.960 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 8>Paxton could win. Texas Republicans are not that worried. I mean,

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:31.920
<v Speaker 8>they voted for this was the start I covered in

0:35:31.960 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 8>twenty twenty two running it for ag after all of

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:35.279
<v Speaker 8>his indictments.

0:35:35.440 --> 0:35:35.759
<v Speaker 4>George P.

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:37.719
<v Speaker 8>Bush was running as the savior who would save the

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 8>ag seed, and Paxton was fine. So it's tough to

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:44.120
<v Speaker 8>consence Republican voter. The people in DC who make these donations,

0:35:44.280 --> 0:35:47.640
<v Speaker 8>we're pretty well convinced that Paxton would blow it to Tallerriico,

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:49.319
<v Speaker 8>So they're going to do that today. We're not talking

0:35:49.360 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 8>about any ideological differences. They're really weren't any of the campaign.

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:54.840
<v Speaker 8>The entire argument against Hunt was that he was a

0:35:54.880 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 8>show voter, never showed up for votes. It was not

0:35:56.640 --> 0:35:59.800
<v Speaker 8>he voted wrong on something, it was just that and

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:02.560
<v Speaker 8>packs were just kind of he wasn't raising as much money,

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:05.440
<v Speaker 8>but he was kind of holding his powder because he

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:06.600
<v Speaker 8>knew he had this locked in.

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 4>He had.

0:36:07.000 --> 0:36:08.600
<v Speaker 8>I mean, this is similar what he got I think

0:36:08.640 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 8>in the his A Jube primary because he had two challengers.

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:13.839
<v Speaker 8>I think he did a little bit better. But that's

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:18.239
<v Speaker 8>that's the story. It's just there to the extent there

0:36:18.280 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 8>is a big Republican establishment. This has been their thing

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:24.480
<v Speaker 8>for years. Is just we can't really make a positive

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:27.360
<v Speaker 8>argument for our guy's individual record. We can say that

0:36:27.360 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 8>Trump loves them, So let's just like, wait this out

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 8>and see if we can get Tumpet in the race.

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:34.640
<v Speaker 8>And the Hunt thing, the Hunt theory was Cordon's so

0:36:34.719 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 8>weak that I can leap frog in and I'd easily win.

0:36:37.360 --> 0:36:37.920
<v Speaker 4>That's true.

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 8>And if Republicans blow this at some point, they'll say,

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:43.279
<v Speaker 8>why did we invest so much when we could have

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:45.319
<v Speaker 8>just easily held the seat with Wesley Hunt, who would

0:36:45.320 --> 0:36:47.680
<v Speaker 8>not have any any problem, no scandals. That was kind

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:49.319
<v Speaker 8>of the premises of a campaign. I'm a family man,

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:51.520
<v Speaker 8>I'm a Christian, I'm a veteran. Look at this resume.

0:36:51.560 --> 0:36:55.279
<v Speaker 8>It's incredible. I'll just hold the seat, no problem. You know,

0:36:55.320 --> 0:36:57.720
<v Speaker 8>you dance with them that brung you, and they knew Cornyn,

0:36:57.760 --> 0:37:01.040
<v Speaker 8>they wanted him back. So it almost depressing talk of

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 8>these races. But literally know any logical difference, it is

0:37:03.840 --> 0:37:05.799
<v Speaker 8>just we know this guy, let's help him out.

0:37:06.000 --> 0:37:07.319
<v Speaker 4>Screw this guy for opposing him.

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:09.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Now, the ban and the ban and wing will

0:37:09.520 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 3>argue that that's not the case. You know, they described

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:15.840
<v Speaker 3>Cornyn as a rhino, a liberal.

0:37:15.960 --> 0:37:20.359
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he voted for that gun will seriously well some

0:37:20.400 --> 0:37:20.640
<v Speaker 4>of it.

0:37:20.600 --> 0:37:23.239
<v Speaker 5>His vibes right, that he's friendly with McConnell world and

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:26.719
<v Speaker 5>fune world, and that he'll you know, throw Republicans under

0:37:26.719 --> 0:37:28.719
<v Speaker 5>the bus if he has to at any point, like

0:37:28.760 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 5>some of it's just like this guy's been around.

0:37:30.280 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 3>Also point yeah, he's probably not running for reelection. He's

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 3>like seventy seven or something, so he'd be eighty at

0:37:35.040 --> 0:37:36.640
<v Speaker 3>the end of this, so he would be beholden only

0:37:36.680 --> 0:37:39.880
<v Speaker 3>to people who are going to pay for his retirement. Paxton,

0:37:40.120 --> 0:37:43.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, was the first Republican AG to join Trump

0:37:43.400 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 3>and trying to overturn the twenty twenty election. Paston has

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:48.520
<v Speaker 3>gone after big tech all over the place.

0:37:50.560 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 8>To the Supreme Court back, He'll he'll file these lawsuits

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:58.359
<v Speaker 8>on on social issues that no other Republican. He'll get

0:37:58.360 --> 0:37:59.720
<v Speaker 8>to the head of the pack. I think him Andrew

0:37:59.719 --> 0:38:02.520
<v Speaker 8>Bailey in So that's an that if you are a

0:38:02.560 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 8>religious conservative, he is the one fighting for you.

0:38:04.560 --> 0:38:05.520
<v Speaker 4>And what's corn done.

0:38:05.360 --> 0:38:06.960
<v Speaker 5>On that even though he's a you know, yah, I'm

0:38:06.960 --> 0:38:07.440
<v Speaker 5>an aulterer.

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:09.160
<v Speaker 6>Well, it's always going around.

0:38:09.200 --> 0:38:12.200
<v Speaker 7>It's almost like who these It's always like who these

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:16.840
<v Speaker 7>politicians think they owe, right. I understand why Bannon and

0:38:16.960 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 7>Maga wants Paxton and not Cornyn because it's not I mean,

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:23.279
<v Speaker 7>you're right, maybe you go down like bill by bill,

0:38:23.400 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 7>issue by issue, it's pretty similar, but it's it's the

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 7>perception of who they think they answer to, right the

0:38:32.080 --> 0:38:35.719
<v Speaker 7>I think the perception probably among the MAGA folks is

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:39.279
<v Speaker 7>John Cornyn doesn't think he answers to us, yes, right, well, yeah,

0:38:39.320 --> 0:38:42.120
<v Speaker 7>he answers to that, yeah, yeah right. And Ken Paxon

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:44.880
<v Speaker 7>clearly does answer to us. Ken Paxson sees that his

0:38:44.960 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 7>political formula is by aligning with us all the time,

0:38:49.320 --> 0:38:50.160
<v Speaker 7>and that's what they want.

0:38:51.120 --> 0:38:52.880
<v Speaker 5>Well, last point that I was going to make is

0:38:53.200 --> 0:38:56.080
<v Speaker 5>so run off May twenty six, got a couple months

0:38:56.120 --> 0:38:59.440
<v Speaker 5>for that now. But also what the thread between our

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:01.920
<v Speaker 5>first segment on and Republicans I think that's interesting is

0:39:02.200 --> 0:39:04.919
<v Speaker 5>this is one of the first midterm cycles post twenty

0:39:04.960 --> 0:39:07.239
<v Speaker 5>twenty four. It's the first midterm cycle post twenty twenty four,

0:39:07.520 --> 0:39:12.120
<v Speaker 5>but it's also the independent media midterm cycle. Yeah right, Like,

0:39:12.400 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 5>are we pass the point of critical mass on independent

0:39:15.080 --> 0:39:17.920
<v Speaker 5>media changing these narratives in a way that does really

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:22.680
<v Speaker 5>hurt incumbents and herts establishment candidates. Where Anita Alam can

0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:26.279
<v Speaker 5>make a race uncomfortable, where Dan Crenshaw can get trounced,

0:39:26.440 --> 0:39:28.600
<v Speaker 5>and I mean, I don't know I think that's that

0:39:28.960 --> 0:39:32.839
<v Speaker 5>Tallarico can run ads on top versus bottom.

0:39:32.880 --> 0:39:35.720
<v Speaker 3>And it's up against huge money on the Republican side

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:39.040
<v Speaker 3>if you count the uncounted like C four and C

0:39:39.120 --> 0:39:39.480
<v Speaker 3>three money.

0:39:39.520 --> 0:39:41.120
<v Speaker 4>I'm curious if you would think this is correct.

0:39:41.480 --> 0:39:44.799
<v Speaker 3>I've seen the like Paxton crowd and backs and supporters

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:49.080
<v Speaker 3>saying it probably approaches one hundred million if you factor

0:39:49.160 --> 0:39:51.040
<v Speaker 3>mail and everything in that we don't know about yet.

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 8>And they made buy the last quarters yeah, yeah, they

0:39:53.120 --> 0:39:56.520
<v Speaker 8>bought every point yeah, and then behind tax in four

0:39:56.640 --> 0:39:58.520
<v Speaker 8>or five six million, like a lot of money, but

0:39:59.200 --> 0:40:01.120
<v Speaker 8>nowhere near one hundred million dollars.

0:40:01.320 --> 0:40:04.399
<v Speaker 3>They're now looking at potentially if if Trump can't figure

0:40:04.440 --> 0:40:07.600
<v Speaker 3>out a way to like nuke this primary, another one

0:40:07.680 --> 0:40:10.279
<v Speaker 3>hundred or two million spent over is it two months

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:10.839
<v Speaker 3>or three months?

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:11.400
<v Speaker 4>Is it June?

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:17.600
<v Speaker 3>It's Almo almost three months March April May of Republicans

0:40:17.640 --> 0:40:23.600
<v Speaker 3>like savagely attacking each other. So to spend one hundred

0:40:23.600 --> 0:40:25.840
<v Speaker 3>million dollars and to have a guy who's been in

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:32.000
<v Speaker 3>office for decades and before that was attorney general attacks

0:40:32.200 --> 0:40:34.360
<v Speaker 3>like they know who this guy is, and still he

0:40:34.360 --> 0:40:35.800
<v Speaker 3>gets forty one point nine percent.

0:40:38.840 --> 0:40:40.160
<v Speaker 4>Is it crazy to think that.

0:40:41.760 --> 0:40:44.239
<v Speaker 3>If corn spends another hundred million dollars the next three

0:40:44.239 --> 0:40:48.640
<v Speaker 3>months against Paxton and Packston beats him, that then he's

0:40:48.640 --> 0:40:51.920
<v Speaker 3>wounded enough that it's actually a toss up in Texas.

0:40:52.040 --> 0:40:53.920
<v Speaker 4>Or should we not pay.

0:40:53.760 --> 0:40:56.760
<v Speaker 3>Attention to Texas because we've been fooled so many times.

0:40:57.200 --> 0:41:01.000
<v Speaker 4>It's like fly this right. No, and Tallarico then loses

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:01.720
<v Speaker 4>by eight or something.

0:41:01.800 --> 0:41:05.399
<v Speaker 8>Well, and it would be unlike twenty twenty two twenty

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:08.520
<v Speaker 8>eighteen with Cruz. Kruz has his enemies in Texas, but

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:12.839
<v Speaker 8>better at raising money, has no scan whatever you think

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:14.520
<v Speaker 8>of him, does not have any personal scandals.

0:41:14.560 --> 0:41:15.000
<v Speaker 4>Family man.

0:41:15.040 --> 0:41:16.360
<v Speaker 8>It would be a weaker can it they had in

0:41:16.400 --> 0:41:19.880
<v Speaker 8>twenty eighteen a stronger Democrat? No, not not impossible. It

0:41:20.200 --> 0:41:22.839
<v Speaker 8>just what's happened. It's that Latino vote shift. If that's

0:41:22.840 --> 0:41:25.200
<v Speaker 8>what Ken Paxton's betting on, that the Rio Grand Valley's

0:41:25.239 --> 0:41:27.719
<v Speaker 8>point is going to lock in the race for him.

0:41:27.719 --> 0:41:29.000
<v Speaker 4>No, would it would be a tough race.

0:41:29.040 --> 0:41:30.640
<v Speaker 8>I don't think they're full of it when they say

0:41:30.920 --> 0:41:35.640
<v Speaker 8>that Paxton makes them spend money and Cornyn doesn't. It

0:41:35.680 --> 0:41:37.920
<v Speaker 8>would be a he's part of the establishment race, But

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:40.440
<v Speaker 8>it wouldn't be He would again have the money, and

0:41:40.840 --> 0:41:44.879
<v Speaker 8>they're just Paxton has not cultivated the sort of people

0:41:44.920 --> 0:41:46.719
<v Speaker 8>who can just keep dipping in. There are a lot

0:41:46.719 --> 0:41:49.120
<v Speaker 8>of in Texas and pax was very successful in twenty

0:41:49.120 --> 0:41:51.920
<v Speaker 8>twenty four and getting rid of in primaries. Republicans can

0:41:52.000 --> 0:41:55.200
<v Speaker 8>vote to impeach him in the state legislatives, but that's

0:41:55.200 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 8>a smaller investment.

0:41:56.080 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 4>That's two hundred thousand dollars. You can take a guy out.

0:41:58.160 --> 0:42:01.200
<v Speaker 8>It's not if tall Rico becomes a phenom as he

0:42:01.200 --> 0:42:04.360
<v Speaker 8>already kind of is and spends one hundred does Paxon

0:42:04.360 --> 0:42:06.160
<v Speaker 8>have one hundred? From the nerity s see no, And

0:42:06.200 --> 0:42:09.840
<v Speaker 8>you've seen turning point in groups that are still angry

0:42:09.920 --> 0:42:12.080
<v Speaker 8>that there wasn't that money for Blake Masters in Arizona,

0:42:12.200 --> 0:42:14.880
<v Speaker 8>but there was money to save Lucia Rakowski in Alaska.

0:42:15.360 --> 0:42:18.440
<v Speaker 8>It would be a continuing sore point for why should

0:42:18.840 --> 0:42:21.520
<v Speaker 8>grassroots people get to it now? Stant leadership funds the

0:42:21.520 --> 0:42:23.640
<v Speaker 8>opposite of grass roots. They don't don't they don't care

0:42:23.680 --> 0:42:25.560
<v Speaker 8>about that. But that is the sort of thing the

0:42:25.560 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 8>tellery we can talk about. My DC wants this this

0:42:29.040 --> 0:42:34.080
<v Speaker 8>to happen. I have some donors and that are in DC.

0:42:34.239 --> 0:42:36.759
<v Speaker 8>Sure we all do, but I but this this guy,

0:42:36.800 --> 0:42:39.360
<v Speaker 8>this guy, this guy owes people. And I don't the

0:42:39.480 --> 0:42:42.560
<v Speaker 8>elements of an argument there. And but yeah, pat Packs

0:42:42.680 --> 0:42:46.279
<v Speaker 8>is just uh, I do think it's underage. Just he's

0:42:46.320 --> 0:42:49.680
<v Speaker 8>the guy if if a social conservative wants to sue

0:42:49.800 --> 0:42:54.080
<v Speaker 8>abortion clinics or to investigate clinics that do gender medicine

0:42:54.080 --> 0:42:56.200
<v Speaker 8>for minders, he will do it. He is a But

0:42:56.600 --> 0:42:59.279
<v Speaker 8>Texans Texas Republicans have not sent one of those guys

0:42:59.320 --> 0:43:02.200
<v Speaker 8>to the Senate. They've sent more talented politicians who have

0:43:02.280 --> 0:43:04.360
<v Speaker 8>some appeal be on the conservative base. This would be

0:43:04.440 --> 0:43:05.920
<v Speaker 8>new for them if they try in Paxton.

0:43:06.000 --> 0:43:09.280
<v Speaker 3>Now, everybody, everybody says Paxson is the more vulnerable candidate,

0:43:10.280 --> 0:43:13.440
<v Speaker 3>the Paxton crowd that his defenders, They say the opposite.

0:43:13.440 --> 0:43:15.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm curious for your take off. This is cop or

0:43:15.040 --> 0:43:16.160
<v Speaker 4>if anything real to this.

0:43:16.480 --> 0:43:19.880
<v Speaker 3>Their argument is Cornan has spent one hundred million dollars

0:43:20.320 --> 0:43:21.200
<v Speaker 3>attacking our boy.

0:43:21.600 --> 0:43:22.560
<v Speaker 4>We love Ken Paxton.

0:43:22.960 --> 0:43:26.279
<v Speaker 3>We are so mad that how vicious you have been

0:43:26.320 --> 0:43:31.520
<v Speaker 3>to our guy. That if Cornyn wins effort, we're staying home,

0:43:31.719 --> 0:43:34.960
<v Speaker 3>and and that and that a chunk of Paxson voters

0:43:34.960 --> 0:43:35.960
<v Speaker 3>won't even vote at all.

0:43:37.040 --> 0:43:38.560
<v Speaker 6>I don't, I don't think I'm buying that.

0:43:38.760 --> 0:43:42.520
<v Speaker 7>I think what I what I The one grain of

0:43:42.560 --> 0:43:46.560
<v Speaker 7>truth I think is that there's an argument that John

0:43:46.640 --> 0:43:49.400
<v Speaker 7>Cornyn being the nominee makes it easier for Tallarico to

0:43:49.400 --> 0:43:54.040
<v Speaker 7>be the anti system candidate, right the the there in Washington,

0:43:54.440 --> 0:44:00.279
<v Speaker 7>I'm I'm and and you can imagine the exactly and

0:44:00.280 --> 0:44:04.759
<v Speaker 7>and and and tall Ico can do the whole. It's

0:44:04.800 --> 0:44:08.160
<v Speaker 7>both parties in Washington, like it's Washington is the problem,

0:44:08.200 --> 0:44:14.320
<v Speaker 7>whether Republican or Democrat, and and Paxson makes that harder, definitely.

0:44:13.960 --> 0:44:15.000
<v Speaker 6>Right, Paxton.

0:44:15.200 --> 0:44:18.719
<v Speaker 7>I think that then what Tallerico probably has to do

0:44:18.840 --> 0:44:22.160
<v Speaker 7>is it's more of an anti Trump campaign or an

0:44:22.200 --> 0:44:25.440
<v Speaker 7>anti base of the like sort of the the extremist

0:44:25.520 --> 0:44:27.600
<v Speaker 7>base of the that that's how it would be portrayed.

0:44:28.160 --> 0:44:31.560
<v Speaker 8>The Republican Yeah exactly, they they want to run against Paxston.

0:44:31.640 --> 0:44:32.040
<v Speaker 8>That's true.

0:44:32.239 --> 0:44:35.080
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, right, But I but I do think that like

0:44:35.360 --> 0:44:41.520
<v Speaker 7>Cornyn being that the old establishment, I guess, which is

0:44:41.600 --> 0:44:43.480
<v Speaker 7>kind of crazy, but can be portrayed as the like

0:44:43.680 --> 0:44:48.120
<v Speaker 7>country club Republican news right, Like that's a whole different

0:44:48.160 --> 0:44:51.000
<v Speaker 7>campaign that I'm not convinced is like not.

0:44:51.000 --> 0:44:53.120
<v Speaker 6>Effective, like I think it can be. Next to a

0:44:53.120 --> 0:44:55.719
<v Speaker 6>picture of Biden exactly exactly.

0:44:55.960 --> 0:44:58.200
<v Speaker 5>Oh yeah, I did see corner to sleep on a

0:44:58.239 --> 0:45:04.840
<v Speaker 5>plane recently with his path anyway to sleep on a plane.

0:45:04.840 --> 0:45:06.600
<v Speaker 5>But it was it was almost like Biden ask right,

0:45:06.640 --> 0:45:08.239
<v Speaker 5>except he was on a flight, so he should be.

0:45:08.160 --> 0:45:08.960
<v Speaker 4>Sleeping on a flight.

0:45:09.320 --> 0:45:11.120
<v Speaker 5>God bless anyone who could sleep on a plane. All Right,

0:45:11.160 --> 0:45:14.600
<v Speaker 5>we'll have to leave it there, everyone, Dave and Dave,

0:45:15.080 --> 0:45:15.719
<v Speaker 5>thank you so much.

0:45:15.719 --> 0:45:16.759
<v Speaker 6>Thank you, thanks for having me here.

0:45:16.800 --> 0:45:17.440
<v Speaker 4>This is a lot of fun.

0:45:17.480 --> 0:45:19.640
<v Speaker 5>We appreciate it. Go check out obviously some offore and

0:45:19.760 --> 0:45:21.799
<v Speaker 5>lever News. That's going to do it for us today.

0:45:21.840 --> 0:45:24.680
<v Speaker 3>Ryan, Yeah, and so again bringingpoints dot com. We got

0:45:24.719 --> 0:45:29.680
<v Speaker 3>that month free, so BP free twenty six. Yeah, people

0:45:29.800 --> 0:45:30.799
<v Speaker 3>share that with anybody else.

0:45:30.840 --> 0:45:33.280
<v Speaker 4>That's just for people who watch this segment.

0:45:33.560 --> 0:45:34.440
<v Speaker 6>No, this is for everybody.

0:45:34.480 --> 0:45:37.560
<v Speaker 4>Share it with a friend, with your friends, but not

0:45:37.960 --> 0:45:39.280
<v Speaker 4>just not like people.

0:45:39.320 --> 0:45:41.239
<v Speaker 5>You don't do not share it with John Cornyon under

0:45:41.280 --> 0:45:42.680
<v Speaker 5>any circumstance.

0:45:42.760 --> 0:45:45.719
<v Speaker 4>To have you just burned a hundred million dollars. Thanks guys,

0:45:45.800 --> 0:45:46.839
<v Speaker 4>thank you appreciate it.