WEBVTT - Buck Brief - Ned Ryun

0:00:11.697 --> 0:00:14.977
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Make sure

0:00:14.977 --> 0:00:17.977
<v Speaker 1>you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or

0:00:18.017 --> 0:00:19.737
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts.

0:00:20.377 --> 0:00:22.857
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to the Buck Brief. Our friend Ned Ryan in

0:00:22.897 --> 0:00:25.137
<v Speaker 2>the mix right now. He's the founder and CEO of

0:00:25.337 --> 0:00:27.017
<v Speaker 2>American Majority.

0:00:27.937 --> 0:00:28.137
<v Speaker 1>Ned.

0:00:28.137 --> 0:00:29.817
<v Speaker 2>Always good to see you, man, Thanks for being here.

0:00:30.297 --> 0:00:31.857
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, absolutely good to be with you. Buck.

0:00:32.017 --> 0:00:36.257
<v Speaker 2>So I know you amidst all of the oh my gosh,

0:00:36.297 --> 0:00:39.817
<v Speaker 2>what's going to happen? And Trump is facing all these trials,

0:00:40.417 --> 0:00:43.977
<v Speaker 2>you seem to be pretty confident that not only will

0:00:44.017 --> 0:00:49.177
<v Speaker 2>they fail to derail Trump legally, but that also the

0:00:49.217 --> 0:00:51.937
<v Speaker 2>public reaction to this might be more favorable to Trump

0:00:52.017 --> 0:00:54.617
<v Speaker 2>than the Democrats realize. Tell me more.

0:00:55.897 --> 0:00:58.217
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so it really started dawning on me. I'll share

0:00:58.217 --> 0:01:00.097
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of an incident that took place. I

0:01:00.177 --> 0:01:03.937
<v Speaker 1>was golfing with my father in law, who not really political,

0:01:04.737 --> 0:01:06.977
<v Speaker 1>I would argue, not really a big fan of Trump's.

0:01:07.377 --> 0:01:09.137
<v Speaker 1>As we were golfing, he said, do you know, it's

0:01:09.137 --> 0:01:11.177
<v Speaker 1>really started to dawn on me? So I would consider

0:01:11.257 --> 0:01:13.617
<v Speaker 1>him Buck a normy, right, a normy. He doesn't really

0:01:13.657 --> 0:01:16.697
<v Speaker 1>follow politics. He votes, He's a pretty frequent voter. Not

0:01:16.777 --> 0:01:18.897
<v Speaker 1>the biggest fan of Trump, but all of a sudden

0:01:18.897 --> 0:01:21.497
<v Speaker 1>it's dawning on him that what's taking place with all

0:01:21.537 --> 0:01:24.337
<v Speaker 1>of these different lawsuits and charges being brought against Trump,

0:01:25.537 --> 0:01:28.737
<v Speaker 1>there's no real basis to this. This is political lawfare.

0:01:28.777 --> 0:01:31.777
<v Speaker 1>The basis of this is politics, trying to take out

0:01:31.857 --> 0:01:34.657
<v Speaker 1>Biden's chief political opponent. And so he was sharing with

0:01:34.697 --> 0:01:38.337
<v Speaker 1>me this conversation and more and more, I've been proposing

0:01:38.337 --> 0:01:40.377
<v Speaker 1>a theory. There are a lot of fatalists out there

0:01:40.377 --> 0:01:43.697
<v Speaker 1>that say one of these cases going to bring down Trump, right,

0:01:43.777 --> 0:01:46.057
<v Speaker 1>that it's going to take him down, take him off

0:01:46.097 --> 0:01:48.817
<v Speaker 1>the ballot, he will not be the nominee. I have

0:01:48.977 --> 0:01:51.737
<v Speaker 1>proposed a theory that people need to look at the

0:01:51.777 --> 0:01:55.297
<v Speaker 1>flip side of the coin and realize there might be

0:01:55.297 --> 0:01:58.257
<v Speaker 1>a real benefit for Trump here when it breaks on

0:01:58.297 --> 0:02:00.097
<v Speaker 1>the other normies out there that areld be voting in

0:02:00.137 --> 0:02:03.457
<v Speaker 1>the fall elections. This is political lawfare. And I'm starting

0:02:03.457 --> 0:02:05.537
<v Speaker 1>to see my theory play out pretty well. I think

0:02:05.577 --> 0:02:07.817
<v Speaker 1>the Color out of case from the Supreme Court last week,

0:02:08.297 --> 0:02:09.737
<v Speaker 1>I think it might go down nine to nothing.

0:02:10.817 --> 0:02:11.057
<v Speaker 3>Buck.

0:02:11.097 --> 0:02:13.857
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that it will. Obviously it's not gonna win,

0:02:13.897 --> 0:02:16.737
<v Speaker 1>but I think it will be a definitive rebuke of Colorado.

0:02:16.817 --> 0:02:20.337
<v Speaker 1>So there's one case gone, the Fanny Willis case in Georgia.

0:02:20.897 --> 0:02:22.657
<v Speaker 1>I think that's imploding in front of our eyes in

0:02:22.697 --> 0:02:26.097
<v Speaker 1>real time as we watch all this start to collapse.

0:02:26.737 --> 0:02:29.377
<v Speaker 2>I think I think Fannie Willis thinks to Fannie Willis

0:02:29.457 --> 0:02:32.297
<v Speaker 2>case is falling apart. I mean, I don't think that

0:02:32.297 --> 0:02:33.497
<v Speaker 2>that's much up for debate.

0:02:33.577 --> 0:02:37.377
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and now we're starting to see reports coming out

0:02:37.457 --> 0:02:43.457
<v Speaker 1>of from Breitbart that Bragg, Willis, and Smith we're all

0:02:43.497 --> 0:02:47.777
<v Speaker 1>meeting with the White House to coordinate their lawsuits against Trump.

0:02:47.817 --> 0:02:51.697
<v Speaker 1>As that starts to break into the public conscience, they're

0:02:51.737 --> 0:02:54.977
<v Speaker 1>gonna it's going to be more and more people realizing, Yeah,

0:02:54.977 --> 0:02:56.857
<v Speaker 1>there was no basis for this. I mean, this is

0:02:56.897 --> 0:03:00.617
<v Speaker 1>literally a campaign tactic of the Biden White House to

0:03:00.737 --> 0:03:04.217
<v Speaker 1>take out their chief political opponent, but legal basis to it.

0:03:04.457 --> 0:03:07.097
<v Speaker 1>There really is no legal basis to anything that is

0:03:07.137 --> 0:03:09.097
<v Speaker 1>taking place. And I think we're going to see more

0:03:09.097 --> 0:03:11.617
<v Speaker 1>and more of these cases to fall apart as more

0:03:11.657 --> 0:03:14.017
<v Speaker 1>pressure is put on them as we move into the

0:03:14.097 --> 0:03:16.857
<v Speaker 1>spring and summer, and again during the summer, people going

0:03:16.897 --> 0:03:19.697
<v Speaker 1>to go they're trying to take out chief political opponent

0:03:19.737 --> 0:03:22.297
<v Speaker 1>with an abuse of the legal system. We're going to

0:03:22.337 --> 0:03:23.817
<v Speaker 1>be voting for Trump, and I think you're going to

0:03:23.857 --> 0:03:26.297
<v Speaker 1>see a surge surge for Trump in the spring and

0:03:26.337 --> 0:03:30.097
<v Speaker 1>summer going into the rn C and DNC conventions.

0:03:31.297 --> 0:03:34.057
<v Speaker 2>I like how you're thinking on this one. Do you

0:03:34.097 --> 0:03:37.937
<v Speaker 2>see any any alarms going off for the people who

0:03:37.977 --> 0:03:42.137
<v Speaker 2>pay attention to races and know what's happening in swing

0:03:42.217 --> 0:03:46.017
<v Speaker 2>you know, swing district, Swing States. This third congressional in

0:03:46.297 --> 0:03:48.737
<v Speaker 2>Long Island that we lost, I think there's a case

0:03:48.737 --> 0:03:50.657
<v Speaker 2>you made that it just wasn't a strong candidate for

0:03:50.697 --> 0:03:53.217
<v Speaker 2>the Santos seat. I know there'll be another election soon

0:03:53.257 --> 0:03:57.217
<v Speaker 2>on this one, but you know, they they ran Trump,

0:03:57.297 --> 0:04:02.177
<v Speaker 2>democracy stuff, abortion stuff, and a candidate who was, oh, yeah,

0:04:02.297 --> 0:04:04.297
<v Speaker 2>I want to secure the border, right. I mean, all

0:04:04.297 --> 0:04:06.697
<v Speaker 2>of a sudden, Democrats are starting to run people. Does

0:04:06.777 --> 0:04:09.097
<v Speaker 2>that concern you that that may be the approach they

0:04:09.097 --> 0:04:10.497
<v Speaker 2>take in a more national level.

0:04:12.057 --> 0:04:14.497
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, on the abortion issue. I mean I saw a

0:04:14.497 --> 0:04:18.297
<v Speaker 1>play out in Virginia in our last year's elections, and

0:04:18.337 --> 0:04:20.737
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Republicans ran away from the issue. If

0:04:20.737 --> 0:04:23.377
<v Speaker 1>they had confronted it, those that did they won and

0:04:23.497 --> 0:04:26.617
<v Speaker 1>what were very very narrow state legislative elections in Virginia.

0:04:26.697 --> 0:04:30.017
<v Speaker 1>But you can't fight something with nothing, and I think

0:04:30.057 --> 0:04:32.537
<v Speaker 1>Republicans have better start figuring out how they're going to

0:04:32.577 --> 0:04:35.937
<v Speaker 1>be taking This abortion issue had on Glenn Youngkin here

0:04:35.937 --> 0:04:39.257
<v Speaker 1>in Virginia went right at it buck and he proposed

0:04:39.297 --> 0:04:42.257
<v Speaker 1>a fifteen week ban exceptions for the life of the mother,

0:04:42.377 --> 0:04:45.137
<v Speaker 1>rape and incest. And it was actually, in what I

0:04:45.177 --> 0:04:48.697
<v Speaker 1>consider a purple state, a pretty solid issue for Glenn Youngkin.

0:04:48.817 --> 0:04:51.537
<v Speaker 1>So any Republicans that were running for the state legislature

0:04:51.617 --> 0:04:54.137
<v Speaker 1>last year did pretty well. Those that ran away a

0:04:54.137 --> 0:04:57.497
<v Speaker 1>lot of them lost. But my takeaway from this special

0:04:57.537 --> 0:05:01.537
<v Speaker 1>election that just happened in New York was this, again

0:05:01.817 --> 0:05:04.497
<v Speaker 1>some of the functional aspects of the elections in which

0:05:04.537 --> 0:05:07.377
<v Speaker 1>Democrats got out and voted early, they voted by mail,

0:05:07.537 --> 0:05:09.857
<v Speaker 1>and guess what happened on election day in some parts

0:05:09.897 --> 0:05:14.417
<v Speaker 1>of district eight inches of snow. And I commented in

0:05:14.457 --> 0:05:17.297
<v Speaker 1>a tweet or on X whatever we call it these

0:05:17.377 --> 0:05:20.657
<v Speaker 1>days the day after this to me is another lesson

0:05:20.697 --> 0:05:23.977
<v Speaker 1>for Republicans that they better learn coming into the fall elections.

0:05:24.697 --> 0:05:25.337
<v Speaker 3>Vote early.

0:05:26.017 --> 0:05:27.977
<v Speaker 1>If you don't want to vote by mail, go vote

0:05:28.017 --> 0:05:31.377
<v Speaker 1>in person early before election day. Again, there's so many

0:05:31.417 --> 0:05:34.657
<v Speaker 1>unforeseen things happen like a snowstorm on election day. Let's

0:05:34.657 --> 0:05:36.017
<v Speaker 1>get our votes in. And that's one of the things

0:05:36.337 --> 0:05:40.097
<v Speaker 1>I'm really really working out. But that gotten some good news.

0:05:40.137 --> 0:05:42.097
<v Speaker 1>We're going to get some good funding for American Majority Action.

0:05:42.137 --> 0:05:44.777
<v Speaker 1>We are going to be doing absentee ballot generation, absentee

0:05:44.777 --> 0:05:48.097
<v Speaker 1>ballot chase, and some key presidential battleground states to really

0:05:48.097 --> 0:05:50.977
<v Speaker 1>get Republicans to understand we've got to get eighty plus

0:05:51.057 --> 0:05:53.937
<v Speaker 1>percent of those absentee ballots in. Vote early, get your

0:05:54.017 --> 0:05:56.897
<v Speaker 1>vote in, thank it, do not wait until election day.

0:05:57.337 --> 0:06:00.577
<v Speaker 1>Let's start really getting that into our mindset. And if

0:06:00.617 --> 0:06:01.937
<v Speaker 1>we can do that, if we can get to eighty

0:06:01.937 --> 0:06:05.537
<v Speaker 1>plus percent of absentee ballots coming in, I like our chances.

0:06:05.577 --> 0:06:08.017
<v Speaker 1>But I will point out one thing that's a concern

0:06:08.097 --> 0:06:10.897
<v Speaker 1>to me. I know there's some lawsuits that are fighting this.

0:06:11.857 --> 0:06:14.417
<v Speaker 1>We have to look at Arizona. There's an issue in

0:06:14.417 --> 0:06:19.017
<v Speaker 1>which non citizens are getting ballots for federal elections. The

0:06:19.337 --> 0:06:21.537
<v Speaker 1>Left's not going to sit there and go, oh gosh,

0:06:21.657 --> 0:06:24.457
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've got a Grand Paul dementia in the

0:06:24.497 --> 0:06:28.577
<v Speaker 1>White House. You know, we're all these different things. Trump's

0:06:28.577 --> 0:06:30.097
<v Speaker 1>going to win. Oh well, now, They're going to be

0:06:30.097 --> 0:06:32.177
<v Speaker 1>playing all sorts of games, and I think it's incummon

0:06:32.217 --> 0:06:34.617
<v Speaker 1>upon Republicans to be making sure we stay ahead of

0:06:34.657 --> 0:06:37.457
<v Speaker 1>the curve this time, change our tactics, but be on

0:06:37.577 --> 0:06:40.657
<v Speaker 1>top of the legal law fair in regards of how

0:06:40.697 --> 0:06:43.937
<v Speaker 1>these elections are being held, especially in the presidential background states.

0:06:44.617 --> 0:06:48.177
<v Speaker 2>I totally agree. So I'm glad that someone's watching this

0:06:48.297 --> 0:06:53.417
<v Speaker 2>who has the ear ears of people that are in

0:06:53.417 --> 0:06:57.017
<v Speaker 2>Trump's orbit, including Trump himself, because I believe, very strongly

0:06:57.137 --> 0:06:59.297
<v Speaker 2>ned this is going to be a tight battle no

0:06:59.337 --> 0:07:02.737
<v Speaker 2>matter what who is. People argue with me about, oh,

0:07:02.817 --> 0:07:04.737
<v Speaker 2>but Biden. So I'm like, I don't care how old

0:07:04.777 --> 0:07:07.217
<v Speaker 2>Biden is. I don't care how decrepit he is. They

0:07:07.377 --> 0:07:10.777
<v Speaker 2>they show up on election day with you know, ninety

0:07:10.857 --> 0:07:13.017
<v Speaker 2>seven percent of what they need to win, you know,

0:07:13.177 --> 0:07:14.417
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this is the problem.

0:07:15.337 --> 0:07:17.137
<v Speaker 1>But but I would say this book, it's because it's

0:07:17.177 --> 0:07:19.817
<v Speaker 1>not really about persuading voters anymore. It's how many ballots

0:07:19.857 --> 0:07:22.217
<v Speaker 1>are in the universe that they've created that they can

0:07:22.257 --> 0:07:24.537
<v Speaker 1>actually collect. It has nothing to do with persuasion. It

0:07:24.577 --> 0:07:27.257
<v Speaker 1>has how many ballots are you going are you going

0:07:27.297 --> 0:07:27.617
<v Speaker 1>to collect?

0:07:27.617 --> 0:07:27.737
<v Speaker 3>Well?

0:07:27.737 --> 0:07:31.377
<v Speaker 2>The vote machinery basically right, it's it's understanding exactly.

0:07:31.497 --> 0:07:34.417
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I mean you can put up a vegetable

0:07:34.497 --> 0:07:39.017
<v Speaker 1>which quite frankly twenty two and they won, right, So

0:07:39.257 --> 0:07:40.977
<v Speaker 1>it's not even necessary about the quality of the cannon.

0:07:41.017 --> 0:07:42.977
<v Speaker 1>And I keep on reminding people, Yeah, some of these

0:07:43.017 --> 0:07:45.657
<v Speaker 1>polls look really good Trump versus Biden. I consider them

0:07:45.697 --> 0:07:48.937
<v Speaker 1>a mirage because when push comes to shove, it's he's

0:07:48.977 --> 0:07:52.297
<v Speaker 1>not winning North Carolina by eight points, He's not going

0:07:52.377 --> 0:07:55.257
<v Speaker 1>to win Arizona by five. You know, some of these

0:07:55.337 --> 0:07:56.977
<v Speaker 1>numbers are going to shrink and it's going to get

0:07:57.017 --> 0:07:59.777
<v Speaker 1>much tighter. We better have our functional aspect of collecting

0:07:59.897 --> 0:08:03.137
<v Speaker 1>ballots in place, clicking on all cylinders, because you know

0:08:03.217 --> 0:08:03.657
<v Speaker 1>they will.

0:08:04.137 --> 0:08:07.057
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Look, then we'll come back into this in a second.

0:08:07.097 --> 0:08:08.897
<v Speaker 2>I want to ask you how you think things are

0:08:08.897 --> 0:08:12.097
<v Speaker 2>looking on the on the Senate side. This couldn't come

0:08:12.177 --> 0:08:14.377
<v Speaker 2>at a better time in our society. I'm talking about

0:08:14.377 --> 0:08:18.137
<v Speaker 2>Patriot defender. As you know, our rights are under attack

0:08:18.257 --> 0:08:22.217
<v Speaker 2>these days, and people can be targeted for political reasons.

0:08:22.297 --> 0:08:25.897
<v Speaker 2>Wokeness if you will comes for them, and it can

0:08:25.937 --> 0:08:28.137
<v Speaker 2>be very expensive. You can lose your job, you can

0:08:28.177 --> 0:08:30.297
<v Speaker 2>have all kinds of financial problems that come from this,

0:08:30.697 --> 0:08:34.217
<v Speaker 2>but Patriot Defender has your back. Patriot Defender provides a

0:08:34.297 --> 0:08:37.537
<v Speaker 2>no cost legal defense to protect your rights, freedom's reputation,

0:08:38.017 --> 0:08:40.337
<v Speaker 2>and your way of life. Speak about a school board

0:08:40.377 --> 0:08:43.337
<v Speaker 2>meeting about vaccine mandates and suffer the consequences, your legal

0:08:43.337 --> 0:08:45.657
<v Speaker 2>defense is covered. If your right to free speech is

0:08:45.657 --> 0:08:49.137
<v Speaker 2>denied and you suffer consequences, your legal defense is covered.

0:08:49.537 --> 0:08:53.017
<v Speaker 2>Company is called Patriot Defender and their website is patriot

0:08:53.057 --> 0:08:56.017
<v Speaker 2>defender dot com. Patriot Defender will provide both open and

0:08:56.137 --> 0:08:59.377
<v Speaker 2>concealed carry self defense, and your right to defend yourself

0:08:59.377 --> 0:09:01.537
<v Speaker 2>and your family when you need to will be protected.

0:09:01.817 --> 0:09:05.417
<v Speaker 2>Also provide irs audit assistance. So if your business, your income,

0:09:05.537 --> 0:09:08.537
<v Speaker 2>or your reputation or harmed your the weaponization of government

0:09:08.657 --> 0:09:11.577
<v Speaker 2>entities plenty of that going on on, Patriot Defender can

0:09:11.577 --> 0:09:14.697
<v Speaker 2>provide you with a no cost legal defense. Patriot defender

0:09:14.777 --> 0:09:16.697
<v Speaker 2>dot com. I'm a partner in this business. I'm a

0:09:16.737 --> 0:09:20.017
<v Speaker 2>member as well. I believe in Patriot Defender patriot defender

0:09:20.497 --> 0:09:22.977
<v Speaker 2>dot com. We'll cover what others won't to protect you

0:09:22.977 --> 0:09:25.537
<v Speaker 2>your livelihood and your rights. Ned how are we looking

0:09:25.617 --> 0:09:26.137
<v Speaker 2>for the Senate?

0:09:26.457 --> 0:09:28.417
<v Speaker 3>I'm optimistic, I am.

0:09:28.537 --> 0:09:32.337
<v Speaker 1>I mean you look at the pickup opportunities in Montana,

0:09:32.497 --> 0:09:36.257
<v Speaker 1>West Virginia, Ohio. You know, I think, you know, I

0:09:36.257 --> 0:09:39.697
<v Speaker 1>even think Hogan in Maryland, Governor Hogan, who I'm not

0:09:39.737 --> 0:09:41.817
<v Speaker 1>a fan of it all, but he's running for the

0:09:41.817 --> 0:09:42.497
<v Speaker 1>Senate in Maryland.

0:09:43.657 --> 0:09:45.137
<v Speaker 2>Can I ask you this? And I'm not trying to

0:09:45.137 --> 0:09:47.057
<v Speaker 2>get your new troubles and Tho's a little controversy about

0:09:47.097 --> 0:09:50.097
<v Speaker 2>this in some other places recently, with some folks saying things,

0:09:50.617 --> 0:09:52.497
<v Speaker 2>is Hogan the best we can hope for in Maryland?

0:09:52.497 --> 0:09:52.617
<v Speaker 3>Though?

0:09:52.657 --> 0:09:54.657
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I feel like Maryland is a communist state.

0:09:54.737 --> 0:09:56.697
<v Speaker 2>So are we going to do better than the weakest

0:09:56.697 --> 0:09:58.697
<v Speaker 2>Republican of all Republicans? I don't think so.

0:09:59.617 --> 0:09:59.697
<v Speaker 3>No.

0:10:00.097 --> 0:10:01.697
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'll share a little bit of a story.

0:10:01.697 --> 0:10:04.057
<v Speaker 1>When my dad was in the House, one of his

0:10:04.097 --> 0:10:05.977
<v Speaker 1>colleagues was Chris Shayes out of I believe it was

0:10:05.977 --> 0:10:09.177
<v Speaker 1>Connecticut five. I liked Chrischaes. Chris Shayes was a very

0:10:09.217 --> 0:10:13.017
<v Speaker 1>nice gentleman. I would say we probably got sixty maybe

0:10:13.017 --> 0:10:15.177
<v Speaker 1>seventy percent of the vote that we wanted out of him.

0:10:15.217 --> 0:10:18.057
<v Speaker 1>And guess what, I was great with that because that

0:10:18.137 --> 0:10:19.897
<v Speaker 1>he was the most conservative member you were going to

0:10:19.897 --> 0:10:21.777
<v Speaker 1>get out of that part of the country. I think

0:10:21.777 --> 0:10:24.377
<v Speaker 1>the same is true with Larry Hogan. Larry Hogan gives

0:10:24.417 --> 0:10:27.617
<v Speaker 1>Republicans the best shot. He's already won statewide multiple times

0:10:28.017 --> 0:10:29.937
<v Speaker 1>to actually pick up a Senate seat. Is he going

0:10:29.977 --> 0:10:32.497
<v Speaker 1>to be a conservative rock star? Not even close. Are

0:10:32.497 --> 0:10:34.857
<v Speaker 1>we probably going to get fifty sixty to seventy percent

0:10:34.857 --> 0:10:36.737
<v Speaker 1>of what we want out of him? Yes, which is

0:10:36.977 --> 0:10:38.857
<v Speaker 1>sixty seventy percent of what we'd get a better than

0:10:38.857 --> 0:10:41.177
<v Speaker 1>we'd have a Democrat. So I think people need to

0:10:41.177 --> 0:10:43.617
<v Speaker 1>be realistic. Where you're in a deep red state, you

0:10:43.657 --> 0:10:45.857
<v Speaker 1>go for the most conservative person that can win the general.

0:10:46.177 --> 0:10:48.337
<v Speaker 1>When you're in a blue state like Maryland, you take

0:10:48.377 --> 0:10:50.217
<v Speaker 1>the best you can and it's going to be an

0:10:50.257 --> 0:10:54.537
<v Speaker 1>improvement on any Democrat that would otherwise represent Maryland in

0:10:54.577 --> 0:10:55.017
<v Speaker 1>the Senate.

0:10:55.057 --> 0:10:56.257
<v Speaker 3>So how are you.

0:10:56.257 --> 0:10:58.577
<v Speaker 2>Feeling about Do you know Kerry Lake? Do you know

0:10:58.657 --> 0:10:59.137
<v Speaker 2>Kerry a bit?

0:11:01.937 --> 0:11:04.417
<v Speaker 3>I do. I do very well, But I've mattered, We've talked.

0:11:05.017 --> 0:11:07.097
<v Speaker 2>I'm not asking a personal question. I'm just wondering, you know,

0:11:07.137 --> 0:11:09.017
<v Speaker 2>I want to see if you feel like, oh, I'm

0:11:09.057 --> 0:11:11.657
<v Speaker 2>super close with Kerry's so I can't Is she gonna

0:11:11.657 --> 0:11:13.097
<v Speaker 2>win this Arizona Senate seat?

0:11:13.897 --> 0:11:14.817
<v Speaker 3>If Cinema runs.

0:11:15.497 --> 0:11:18.657
<v Speaker 1>If Cinema runs as the independent, and you've got a Democrat, Republican,

0:11:18.737 --> 0:11:21.697
<v Speaker 1>and Independent in the race, and it really only takes

0:11:21.697 --> 0:11:23.577
<v Speaker 1>forty to forty two percent of the vote to win,

0:11:23.657 --> 0:11:27.537
<v Speaker 1>Cary Lake can win if Kris if Kirsten Cinema decides

0:11:27.537 --> 0:11:30.137
<v Speaker 1>that she's dropping out and obviously endorses the Democrat because

0:11:30.137 --> 0:11:33.257
<v Speaker 1>she essentially is a Democrat. No, there's no way, there's

0:11:33.257 --> 0:11:35.217
<v Speaker 1>no way that Cary Lake can win that. And I've

0:11:35.257 --> 0:11:38.297
<v Speaker 1>got real concerns about the damage or impact it might

0:11:38.337 --> 0:11:39.617
<v Speaker 1>have on Trump in Arizona.

0:11:39.697 --> 0:11:41.497
<v Speaker 3>But if it's a three way race.

0:11:41.337 --> 0:11:44.017
<v Speaker 1>In which Cinema decides I'm running, I've raised enough money

0:11:44.057 --> 0:11:46.857
<v Speaker 1>to be a legitimate, solid, you know, third party contender.

0:11:48.057 --> 0:11:50.017
<v Speaker 1>You could you could win that race with forty forty

0:11:50.017 --> 0:11:51.537
<v Speaker 1>two percent of the vote and carry Lake can pull

0:11:51.537 --> 0:11:53.297
<v Speaker 1>that vote percentage off.

0:11:53.337 --> 0:11:53.857
<v Speaker 3>She could do that.

0:11:54.857 --> 0:11:57.177
<v Speaker 1>But I have to tell you, Buck, of all the

0:11:57.577 --> 0:12:01.257
<v Speaker 1>pick up opportunities that Republicans have in the Senate this year,

0:12:01.657 --> 0:12:03.617
<v Speaker 1>you kind of rank them in order of best chance

0:12:03.657 --> 0:12:05.097
<v Speaker 1>where you're going to get the you know, the best

0:12:05.097 --> 0:12:08.457
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to pick up races. I could maybe make an

0:12:08.537 --> 0:12:11.897
<v Speaker 1>argument that Arizona's fifth on the list for the big

0:12:11.937 --> 0:12:14.097
<v Speaker 1>money like the NRSC and all these other people are

0:12:14.097 --> 0:12:16.857
<v Speaker 1>going to put significant funds into these pickup races. So

0:12:17.497 --> 0:12:19.617
<v Speaker 1>I would argue one of the big problems that Kerry

0:12:19.697 --> 0:12:22.057
<v Speaker 1>Lake is going to have is the outside money making

0:12:22.137 --> 0:12:25.377
<v Speaker 1>significant investments into the state. I just don't see it

0:12:25.417 --> 0:12:26.217
<v Speaker 1>happening right now.

0:12:26.297 --> 0:12:30.697
<v Speaker 2>And what about Montana against Tester the Democrat incumbent there,

0:12:30.897 --> 0:12:33.777
<v Speaker 2>I mean Rosendale. Yeah, yeah, you think we can pull

0:12:33.777 --> 0:12:34.297
<v Speaker 2>that one off?

0:12:35.257 --> 0:12:39.257
<v Speaker 3>I do. I mean, he's a known quantity. It can happen.

0:12:39.497 --> 0:12:41.937
<v Speaker 1>Tester's a lot stronger than people think he is, which

0:12:41.977 --> 0:12:44.337
<v Speaker 1>is very frustrating because he basically rubber stams anything that

0:12:44.417 --> 0:12:45.177
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Schumer does.

0:12:45.897 --> 0:12:46.497
<v Speaker 3>He does not fit.

0:12:46.857 --> 0:12:49.097
<v Speaker 2>They get a Chuck Schumer Democrat in Montana. You know,

0:12:49.257 --> 0:12:51.777
<v Speaker 2>that's the fundamentally the question is it just Bozeman? Is

0:12:51.817 --> 0:12:53.297
<v Speaker 2>that big now? In terms of population?

0:12:53.457 --> 0:12:57.497
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Yeah, I mean you've got to understand the blue

0:12:57.537 --> 0:13:01.177
<v Speaker 1>state migration into some of these red states. It's problematic,

0:13:01.337 --> 0:13:05.297
<v Speaker 1>it really is. And Tester is able to pull off

0:13:05.337 --> 0:13:08.417
<v Speaker 1>this stick where I'm all for Montana, I represent you

0:13:08.497 --> 0:13:09.937
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff, and he goes back to DC and

0:13:10.217 --> 0:13:13.257
<v Speaker 1>votes in lockstep with Chuck Schumer. But never underestimate the

0:13:13.257 --> 0:13:16.097
<v Speaker 1>power of incumbency, right, the power of incumbency. He's been there,

0:13:16.097 --> 0:13:17.937
<v Speaker 1>what two terms is he going for a third time?

0:13:17.977 --> 0:13:20.857
<v Speaker 1>I believe power of incumbency is very hard to beat

0:13:20.897 --> 0:13:23.817
<v Speaker 1>Buck and that, you know, I think we've got a

0:13:23.817 --> 0:13:26.777
<v Speaker 1>real shot at taking him out, But never underestimate that

0:13:26.857 --> 0:13:29.817
<v Speaker 1>power of incumbency and his name, ID and everything across

0:13:29.817 --> 0:13:32.697
<v Speaker 1>the state, and the fact that Chuck Schumer and national

0:13:32.777 --> 0:13:34.497
<v Speaker 1>Democrats are going to be plowing a ton of money

0:13:34.497 --> 0:13:37.857
<v Speaker 1>into that race to prop him up. So I think

0:13:37.897 --> 0:13:39.817
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be It's definitely one of the top three

0:13:39.857 --> 0:13:43.697
<v Speaker 1>pickup opportunities for Republicans. But on the other side, how

0:13:43.697 --> 0:13:45.497
<v Speaker 1>good a campaign is going to be run against him?

0:13:45.537 --> 0:13:48.217
<v Speaker 1>So there's some dynamics that still need to play out,

0:13:48.217 --> 0:13:50.177
<v Speaker 1>and there'll be decisions made I think on some funding,

0:13:50.617 --> 0:13:52.657
<v Speaker 1>you know, coming into late summer early falls to how

0:13:52.697 --> 0:13:54.777
<v Speaker 1>serious a pickup opportunity is. We'll see where the polls

0:13:54.857 --> 0:13:56.097
<v Speaker 1>lead and how the campaigns are run.

0:13:56.377 --> 0:13:58.577
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk Pennsylvania here in a second. But first up,

0:13:58.777 --> 0:14:01.497
<v Speaker 2>are you wondering where everyone's talking about Belize these days?

0:14:01.657 --> 0:14:05.377
<v Speaker 2>Whoa boy Belize is fantastic, It's fun imagine visiting a

0:14:05.417 --> 0:14:09.937
<v Speaker 2>country that's just a couple of hours from say Miami, Atlanta, Dallas, Houston,

0:14:10.497 --> 0:14:13.417
<v Speaker 2>and you can enjoy a rainforest in white sand beaches

0:14:13.497 --> 0:14:15.977
<v Speaker 2>in the same day. Belize is fun because you can

0:14:15.977 --> 0:14:18.657
<v Speaker 2>float through caves, down a jungle river, climb an ancient

0:14:18.697 --> 0:14:21.697
<v Speaker 2>Mayan ruin, swim with nurse sharks and rays, cast for

0:14:21.737 --> 0:14:24.457
<v Speaker 2>a grand Slam the Ultimate, and fly fishing on the flats,

0:14:24.697 --> 0:14:27.697
<v Speaker 2>snorkel or scuba dive the longest living reef in the world.

0:14:27.777 --> 0:14:31.017
<v Speaker 2>Or simply relax, enjoy the beach bars, playing live music

0:14:31.057 --> 0:14:34.177
<v Speaker 2>and dance under the stars before you know the sun

0:14:34.217 --> 0:14:36.537
<v Speaker 2>comes up, and also have the best lobster dinner you've

0:14:36.537 --> 0:14:38.577
<v Speaker 2>had in a very long time. Don't take my word

0:14:38.577 --> 0:14:41.017
<v Speaker 2>for it, Go visit, go check it out. Belize is

0:14:41.057 --> 0:14:44.617
<v Speaker 2>amazing for so many reasons. Download your free Belize handbook

0:14:44.657 --> 0:14:49.097
<v Speaker 2>and God go to belizeesfun dot com. That's Belize is

0:14:49.337 --> 0:14:53.697
<v Speaker 2>fun dot com. Ned Pennsylvania, tell tell me that McCormick

0:14:53.737 --> 0:14:55.457
<v Speaker 2>can get this thing done. Man, tell me that he

0:14:55.497 --> 0:14:55.937
<v Speaker 2>can do it.

0:14:57.057 --> 0:14:58.377
<v Speaker 3>Sure, is that what you want to hear?

0:14:58.817 --> 0:15:01.177
<v Speaker 2>Many I'm worried too, because the people I know who

0:15:01.257 --> 0:15:05.617
<v Speaker 2>know Pennsylvania say that it's a blue state with a

0:15:05.617 --> 0:15:07.337
<v Speaker 2>lot of red residents living in it. You know what

0:15:07.377 --> 0:15:10.417
<v Speaker 2>I mean that effectively, the machinery of the Democrat Party

0:15:10.457 --> 0:15:13.217
<v Speaker 2>is so much better than the Republican machinery there that

0:15:13.777 --> 0:15:17.097
<v Speaker 2>you're you're starting out like five points. Even if you

0:15:17.097 --> 0:15:19.017
<v Speaker 2>think you're ahead, you're five points behind.

0:15:20.097 --> 0:15:23.857
<v Speaker 1>I joked that Pennsylvania is you know, Philadelphia and Pittsburgh

0:15:24.017 --> 0:15:29.377
<v Speaker 1>massive blue. You know, bastions in between is basically northern Alabama.

0:15:30.377 --> 0:15:33.337
<v Speaker 1>The problem being that the Philadelphia machine and a little

0:15:33.337 --> 0:15:37.097
<v Speaker 1>bit behind at the Pittsburgh machine just overwhelms, you know,

0:15:37.137 --> 0:15:40.857
<v Speaker 1>that central part of the state. I just I mean, McCormick,

0:15:40.937 --> 0:15:43.657
<v Speaker 1>sure is he probably a good fit for the state.

0:15:43.737 --> 0:15:45.977
<v Speaker 1>Sure can he win on a good night?

0:15:46.497 --> 0:15:46.937
<v Speaker 3>Maybe?

0:15:47.777 --> 0:15:51.617
<v Speaker 1>I have not looked at Pennsylvania. I've done electoral maps,

0:15:51.857 --> 0:15:55.097
<v Speaker 1>you know, for the for the presidential race. I have

0:15:55.217 --> 0:15:57.657
<v Speaker 1>not put Trump down as winning Pennsylvania. And he can

0:15:57.697 --> 0:15:59.417
<v Speaker 1>still win. I mean, I've done a map, and you

0:15:59.417 --> 0:16:04.097
<v Speaker 1>don't need to win Pennsylvania. I'm I'm skeptical that we

0:16:04.137 --> 0:16:06.257
<v Speaker 1>are going to win either the presidential or at the

0:16:06.297 --> 0:16:07.977
<v Speaker 1>center race in Pennsylvania this year.

0:16:07.977 --> 0:16:08.737
<v Speaker 3>But who knows?

0:16:09.297 --> 0:16:12.457
<v Speaker 2>What's what are the flips from twenty twenty that you

0:16:12.537 --> 0:16:15.017
<v Speaker 2>feel most confident about right now.

0:16:16.337 --> 0:16:17.497
<v Speaker 3>I mean, listen, Arizona.

0:16:17.577 --> 0:16:20.857
<v Speaker 1>Despite my concerns about the non citizens getting federal ballots,

0:16:20.937 --> 0:16:22.977
<v Speaker 1>you have to understand, there've been people doing really good

0:16:23.017 --> 0:16:27.577
<v Speaker 1>voter registration for Republicans down there. It's about they've added

0:16:27.617 --> 0:16:31.497
<v Speaker 1>about sixty seven thousand, fifty seven thousand registered Republicans, so

0:16:31.537 --> 0:16:34.617
<v Speaker 1>now it's two hundred and seven thousand registered Republican advantage

0:16:34.617 --> 0:16:36.897
<v Speaker 1>over Democrats. You know, a third of the state is

0:16:36.937 --> 0:16:40.777
<v Speaker 1>registered is independents, so you've added a significant pool of

0:16:40.817 --> 0:16:43.537
<v Speaker 1>new Republican voters since twenty twenty two.

0:16:43.657 --> 0:16:44.697
<v Speaker 3>So I like that.

0:16:45.177 --> 0:16:47.457
<v Speaker 1>We've been doing some data work. There's one hundred and

0:16:47.497 --> 0:16:51.217
<v Speaker 1>seventy four thousand Republicans still registered that did not vote

0:16:51.257 --> 0:16:53.777
<v Speaker 1>in the twenty twenty two elections that have not gotten

0:16:53.777 --> 0:16:55.897
<v Speaker 1>an absentee bouots. So you look at those numbers and go,

0:16:56.737 --> 0:16:58.617
<v Speaker 1>you know, we put the right investment, the right work

0:16:58.617 --> 0:17:02.537
<v Speaker 1>into Arizona. I like that Nevada, Nevada. I look at

0:17:02.537 --> 0:17:05.017
<v Speaker 1>that they were two hundred thousand ballots in Clark County alone,

0:17:05.017 --> 0:17:09.057
<v Speaker 1>which is Las Vegas, between Republicans and the Independent Conservative

0:17:09.057 --> 0:17:11.417
<v Speaker 1>Party that were not returned. In twenty twenty two. So

0:17:11.497 --> 0:17:14.177
<v Speaker 1>that's a target rich environment. You know, I feel good

0:17:14.177 --> 0:17:16.897
<v Speaker 1>about our chances in Wisconsin. There are a lot of

0:17:16.937 --> 0:17:18.937
<v Speaker 1>people that need to get an absentee ballot that are

0:17:18.977 --> 0:17:23.897
<v Speaker 1>Hunter's pro Second Amendment, that have not really been as engaged.

0:17:23.457 --> 0:17:24.097
<v Speaker 3>As they should be.

0:17:24.177 --> 0:17:26.097
<v Speaker 1>And again it's a state that Trump only lost by

0:17:26.097 --> 0:17:28.977
<v Speaker 1>twenty thousand votes one in twenty sixteen, only lost by

0:17:28.977 --> 0:17:32.737
<v Speaker 1>twenty thousand in twenty twenty. North Carolina I feel good about.

0:17:32.777 --> 0:17:34.297
<v Speaker 1>I think we're going to have a really strong effort

0:17:34.297 --> 0:17:35.017
<v Speaker 1>to hold that state.

0:17:35.737 --> 0:17:36.377
<v Speaker 3>Georgia.

0:17:36.937 --> 0:17:38.617
<v Speaker 1>I have to tell you Georgia to me, I do

0:17:38.657 --> 0:17:41.337
<v Speaker 1>not put together a map that doesn't include Georgia going

0:17:41.337 --> 0:17:44.697
<v Speaker 1>to Trump. We have to win Georgia. And you know,

0:17:44.737 --> 0:17:46.897
<v Speaker 1>there's some efforts going on in that state that I like.

0:17:47.017 --> 0:17:49.097
<v Speaker 1>There's more work that needs to be done inside of Georgia,

0:17:49.137 --> 0:17:50.937
<v Speaker 1>but those are the states I'm looking at it. If

0:17:50.977 --> 0:17:54.617
<v Speaker 1>Trump can take all those states, hold North Carolina, and

0:17:54.657 --> 0:17:58.457
<v Speaker 1>get Georgia, Wisconsin, Nevada, and Arizona, Yeah, it can be done.

0:17:58.497 --> 0:17:59.857
<v Speaker 1>The numbers show that it can be done.

0:18:00.377 --> 0:18:01.697
<v Speaker 2>Who's Trump's VP going to be?

0:18:02.937 --> 0:18:04.897
<v Speaker 3>I have no idea. I really don't.

0:18:05.177 --> 0:18:07.297
<v Speaker 2>I I was honesteak.

0:18:08.097 --> 0:18:11.097
<v Speaker 1>I was a big fan of Kim Reynolds, governor of Byowa.

0:18:11.457 --> 0:18:14.417
<v Speaker 1>I don't think she did herself any favors. I get

0:18:14.417 --> 0:18:17.097
<v Speaker 1>it that she liked the Santis fine, fair enough, you know.

0:18:18.857 --> 0:18:21.417
<v Speaker 1>I think she really kind of was just put it

0:18:21.457 --> 0:18:24.217
<v Speaker 1>mildly irritated Trump. But I would love to have seen

0:18:24.217 --> 0:18:26.457
<v Speaker 1>her be the VP for Trump. I don't know. I've

0:18:26.457 --> 0:18:29.937
<v Speaker 1>heard Carson's name, Ben Carson's name thrown out there. I

0:18:29.937 --> 0:18:31.937
<v Speaker 1>even saw jad Vance's name throw up, but I have

0:18:31.977 --> 0:18:34.977
<v Speaker 1>not I have no insider knowledge on who who is

0:18:35.017 --> 0:18:35.457
<v Speaker 1>going to be.

0:18:36.217 --> 0:18:39.577
<v Speaker 2>Do you have any crazy prediction that you feel confident

0:18:39.617 --> 0:18:41.297
<v Speaker 2>about between now and the end of the year and

0:18:41.377 --> 0:18:44.537
<v Speaker 2>the world of politics, anything that you wanner throw out there?

0:18:44.657 --> 0:18:46.457
<v Speaker 2>This is the good news. Ned are you going to

0:18:46.537 --> 0:18:48.457
<v Speaker 2>replay this if you're right? So you can just it

0:18:48.537 --> 0:18:50.737
<v Speaker 2>is a free shot, like anything you think could happen.

0:18:51.817 --> 0:18:54.897
<v Speaker 1>Ah, gosh, Okay, here we go. I'll make a prediction.

0:18:55.257 --> 0:18:57.617
<v Speaker 1>Republicans keep and add to their majority in the House,

0:18:57.937 --> 0:19:00.817
<v Speaker 1>we take back the Senate more convincingly than people think

0:19:00.857 --> 0:19:02.457
<v Speaker 1>we will, and Trump wins the White House to give

0:19:02.537 --> 0:19:03.217
<v Speaker 1>us the trifecta.

0:19:03.257 --> 0:19:04.737
<v Speaker 3>Coming into January of twenty twenty five.

0:19:05.817 --> 0:19:10.457
<v Speaker 2>All right, I like it. I like where your head

0:19:10.537 --> 0:19:13.937
<v Speaker 2>is on this one. My friend Ned Ryan, future White

0:19:13.937 --> 0:19:16.777
<v Speaker 2>House Chief of Staff, you heard it here first, Ned Ryan, everybody,

0:19:17.657 --> 0:19:19.777
<v Speaker 2>thank you for hanging out. Thanks for work you do

0:19:19.777 --> 0:19:21.377
<v Speaker 2>an American majority. We'll see you soon, buddy.

0:19:22.017 --> 0:19:23.137
<v Speaker 3>I appreciate it. Thanks, Bun