WEBVTT - Wikipedia Is All The Web Has Left ft. Molly White

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>All Zone Media. Hello and welcome to Better Offline. I'm

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>your host ed zetron. Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>used by over a billion people a month, one that,

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>despite being maintained entirely by an army of free and

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 1>at times anonymous contributors, remains one of the most reliable

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 1>sources of information on the Internet. Wikipedia's sixty two million

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>articles are edited by over one hundred thousand contributors, and

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:42.199
<v Speaker 1>these contributors have somehow done a better job maintaining the

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>quality and validity of the information than any of the

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:50.200
<v Speaker 1>information provided by any of the major platforms today. Wikipedia

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>is funded entirely through the Wikimedia Foundation, a nonprofit organization

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>funded through public donations and grants, and has the staff

0:00:57.160 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>of over seven hundred people. Yeah, and I'll thank you.

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Most people have absolutely no idea how intricate the webs

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 1>encyclopedia is. And today I'm joined by Gorilla Warfare, a

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:10.319
<v Speaker 1>Wikipedia editor that's made over one hundred and thirty thousand

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>edits in the span of eighteen years across two accounts.

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>You'll likely know her better as researcher and critic Molly White,

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the creator of the Citation Needed newsletter and web three

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>is going great. All right, Molly, thank you for joining me,

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me. So, I don't know how I

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>was to ask this book, Why should people actually care

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>about Wikipedia today?

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, I think Wikipedia is one of the

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 2>highest quality resources there is on the web today. I

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 2>think everyone uses it sometimes without even realizing it. Given

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 2>that Wikipedia data powers so much of you know, AI chat,

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 2>GPT responses or home assistants that are answering your questions

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 2>or sirie. So I think keeping the quality of information

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 2>on Wikipedia high, or even improving it even further, is

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 2>one of the most important things that we need to

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 2>be focusing on.

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>But one of the big critiques of it. And I know,

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and this is very much a podcast for people who

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:17.959
<v Speaker 1>might be techy, but people also who are just being

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 1>exposed to tech outside of the consumer realm. How is

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>it reliable? Because that is the big that's the big question.

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 1>How is this something you can trust?

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think, like a lot of things, you need

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 2>to take it with a grain of salt and understand

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 2>that there is variation on Wikipedia between you know, some

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 2>very high quality articles that have been reviewed by hundreds

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:42.360
<v Speaker 2>of people versus some that are fairly new and you know,

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 2>being created still. So I think it's important to realize

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 2>that there is the possibility that whatever you're reading is

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 2>not reliable, and there is some onus on the reader

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 2>to verify that what they're reading is correct. But I

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 2>think that generally speaking, the quality control and Wikipedia is

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:03.519
<v Speaker 2>actually pretty good. There are a lot of editors who

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 2>are constantly maintaining the platform, making sure that the material

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 2>on there is you know, well sourced, it's coming from

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 2>high quality, reputable publications, and that you know, it is

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 2>meeting the criteria that Wikipedia puts in place. And I

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 2>think the result of that is that the content on

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Wikipedia tends to be very high quality.

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>And how does the actual moderation work, So what goes

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>into a Wikipedia page?

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's a little bit ad hoc. There's not really

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 2>a process in which every page has to go through

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 2>a set of criteria or anything like that. Generally speaking,

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 2>anyone can edit Wikipedia and you know, contribute to the

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 2>best of their ability, and when someone does something that

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 2>is not in line with Wikipedia's requirements, then hopefully, you know,

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 2>the idea is that hopefully someone will come along and

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 2>notice that, revert the change or improve it. So that

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 2>it does meet the criteria. And I realize that sounds

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 2>very like slap dash, and it is to some extent,

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 2>but because of the sort of processes that have developed

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 2>over the years, it actually works pretty well. Where most

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:22.599
<v Speaker 2>pages do you get you know, a fairly strong set

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:25.719
<v Speaker 2>of people who are you know, taking a look at

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 2>the changes that are coming in, making sure that they

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 2>are appropriate for the encyclopedia and you know, allowing them

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 2>to remain or you know, discussing them and reverting them

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:37.599
<v Speaker 2>if necessary.

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Talk to me a little bit about that process though.

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 2>What happens well someone you know, if someone goes and

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 2>makes an edit to a page. Generally speaking, there are

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 2>you know a fair number of people who are patrolling

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:53.600
<v Speaker 2>recent changes to the encyclopedia, you know, not necessarily even

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 2>watching that page specifically, but just looking at new edits

0:04:56.320 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 2>that are coming in and you know, checking them for reliability.

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, is there a source included, does the edit

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 2>past this, you know, the smell check. There's also some

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 2>automated processes involved that will try to filter out edits

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:17.359
<v Speaker 2>that are abusive or you know, match certain patterns. And

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:21.039
<v Speaker 2>then there's the you know, there's a lot of editors

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 2>who have you know, various pages that they're interested in

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:28.159
<v Speaker 2>or they have expertise in on what's called their watch list,

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:31.040
<v Speaker 2>and so they take a look at changes to those

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 2>pages every once in a while and see if you know,

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 2>everything looks all right or if there needs to be

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 2>improvements or edits to you know, what's been added to

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 2>bring them back into line with the quality that we expect.

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 1>So is there an organization? I know there's the Wikimedia Foundation,

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 1>we know that, but is there is there a moderate

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>to chat? Is there a place where people congregate or

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 1>is this just entirely I don't want to say decentralized,

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>but disorganized.

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's certainly disorganized there. Yeah, so there are there

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:06.719
<v Speaker 2>are actually kind of a bunch of places where people congregate,

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:10.599
<v Speaker 2>and some people use some of them and some people don't.

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 2>But you know, there's there are various places on the

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:18.919
<v Speaker 2>encyclopedia that are you know, project specific pages where people

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 2>discuss issues that are coming up or flag you know,

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 2>things that need more attention. You know, not everyone has

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 2>like the ability, for example, to block an editor who's

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 2>being disruptive, So editors who can't do that themselves will

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 2>report it for people who can and then there's you know,

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 2>more real time places like we still use IRC, believe

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 2>it or not, but there's also.

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>For that and for listeners. By the way, IRC is

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>what a thirty year old sharewab product.

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's basically one of the first online chat protocols.

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I was a polarist IRC guy. But for listeners as well,

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>discord is very very much I believe Discorde is actually

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>somehow built on IOCA. That's a different episode thought.

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure if it actually is or if it

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 2>just interoperates well with it. But there's also a Wikipedia

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Discord now for people who don't want to go figure

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 2>out how IRC works. So you know, there's a bunch

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 2>of different places where people can chat and talk about

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 2>working on the project, different formats.

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>And there's no compensation of any kind.

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 2>Correct, not unless you are, you know, an employee of

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 2>the Wikimedia Foundation, who is you know, writing the actual

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 2>media wiki software or you know, performing one of those tasks.

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 2>But that's a very small organization in comparison to the

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 2>number of people who edit the encyclopedia, the vast majority

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 2>of whom do so for you know, for free. Technically,

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 2>you there are some people who edit Wikipedia articles for

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 2>pay as a part of like PR strategies and stuff.

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 2>But that's a whole can of worms and it's somewhat controversial.

0:07:56.920 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's actually a good question. So I run a

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>p off and I know that that people will come

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>along on both sides and say, can you get me

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a Wikipedia page? And then others will say for this

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>incredibly large sum of money, I can do this for you.

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>And it feels like those people are fighting a losing battle.

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the rare cases where capitalism can't really win.

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>And how is it that Wikipedia is so resistant to

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff?

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 2>Right, So there's a lot of resistance from the wikimedia

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 2>community towards people who are editing for promotional purposes, because,

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:35.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, the whole point of the project is it

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 2>supposed to be an encyclopedia, not an advertising space, not

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 2>a resume, you know, not a place to promote your

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:45.959
<v Speaker 2>business or your product. But of course people want information

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:49.559
<v Speaker 2>on Wikipedia about them, and so there are some people

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:52.679
<v Speaker 2>who are able to sort of tread that line where

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 2>they understand wikimedia policies very well. They understand, you know,

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 2>what is allowed as far as writing about, you know,

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 2>a company without being promotional they understand what that you know,

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 2>organization or company or person would need to accomplish in

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 2>order to you know, achieve those notability requirements, and then

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 2>they can write about them, and they do so very transparently.

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:18.319
<v Speaker 2>You know, they disclose that they are doing so for compensation,

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 2>you know that they've been hired by that person or organization,

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 2>and they go through the process and it's very you know,

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:29.839
<v Speaker 2>carefully orchestrated. But there are also a bunch of people

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 2>who do so sort of on the you know, on

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:35.559
<v Speaker 2>the sly and they don't really disclose that they're doing

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 2>it for pay. Those are often the people who will

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 2>sort of cold call you, like if you've gotten emails,

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 2>they're like, hey, I can make you Wikipedia page. A

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 2>lot of those are sort of scammy, uh, not so

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 2>reputable organizations, and you know, generally speaking, they actually have

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 2>a pretty hard time doing what they claim that they

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.559
<v Speaker 2>can do because they don't tend to understand the policy

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 2>as well. They try to shoe horn articles into Wikipedia

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 2>about subjects that are not notable or that are too promotional,

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 2>and so they tend to get taken down, much to

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 2>the dismay of the people who pay them. Quite a

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 2>lot of money. So if you're listening to this and

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 2>you've heard from one of those people, I would not

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:16.079
<v Speaker 2>recommend hiring them.

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Just become more important, which I guess is kind of

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the question. How does Wikipedia actually judge notoriety? What is important?

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So, generally speaking, the notability requirements is, you know,

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 2>it basically goes on how much coverage a subject has

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 2>received in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 2>So you know, if a big newspaper or several newspapers

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 2>write about you in detail, chances are you might be notable,

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 2>en not for Wikipedia article. On the flip side, if

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 2>you're just publishing press releases that's not independent of you,

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:59.319
<v Speaker 2>that probably doesn't qualify. If there's just one brief mention

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 2>of you a reliable source someplays, that's probably not sufficient.

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 2>So that's sort of the general guideline. There are other

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 2>sort of more specific requirements for some sorts of like

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 2>specific types of topics, you know, like sports players and

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 2>things like that. But generally speaking, even if someone meets

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 2>one of those guidelines, they've already met that general guideline,

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 2>where you know, it's just about the amount of coverage

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:27.439
<v Speaker 2>in reliable sources and that can be pressed, that can

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 2>be academia, can be books, you know, anything that sort

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:33.080
<v Speaker 2>of qualifies as a reliable source.

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Now recently seen it, one of the largest tech sites

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>actually found itself downgraded in reliability or were you aware

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>of that situation? Did you see that happen?

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 2>I saw the conversations about it. I wasn't a participant

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 2>in them, but I sort of watched it happen.

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:06.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So for the listeners seen it has hundreds of

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that hundreds of millions of views a month. It's one

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of the most notable websites, frankly, and has been for decades.

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 1>So what happened there? Why was this significant website considered

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>less reliable by Wikipedia?

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? So Wikipedia has these discussions pretty frequently about different

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 2>sources and whether or not those sources are generally reliable

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 2>or sometimes reliable or usually not reliable. And in order

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 2>to sort of prevent people from having to have that

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 2>same conversation every single time they want to cite a

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 2>source that's heavily cited, you know, like CE or you know,

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 2>the New York Times or something like that, we have

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 2>this list of very commonly discussed sources where we just discuss,

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, we outline the general reliability of that source.

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 2>And what you're referring to is a recent discussion where

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 2>some editors decided we really needed to revisit the general

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:06.679
<v Speaker 2>reliability of c net, which was previously considered fairly reliable

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 2>for sourcing on Wikipedia, and the reason for that is

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 2>that there had been a pretty noticeable change in the

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 2>quality of the UH material that they were publishing, where it,

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, it no longer had the level of accuracy

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 2>that it once did. You know, the articles that were

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 2>being published didn't seem to be being edited well or

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 2>fact checked well. And so we decided that, you know,

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 2>if you're just if you're planning to use c net

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 2>as a source, you should really consider this, and you know,

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:42.200
<v Speaker 2>consider that it's probably not even as reliable as it

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 2>once was, and maybe use something else, because you know,

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 2>they've started using AI generated content and stuff like that

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 2>that has you know, noticeably affected the quality of the

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:55.200
<v Speaker 2>articles that they publish.

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 1>And what is the what are the ramifications of that downgrading?

0:13:58.120 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean? Practically?

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:03.320
<v Speaker 2>It means that, for you know, if you're writing a

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 2>new article in Wikipedia and you want to use c

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 2>net as a source, you are somewhat discouraged from doing so. Now,

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:14.079
<v Speaker 2>it means that where c net has been used as

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 2>a source already, editors are going to be looking to

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, improve that sourcing, generally by swapping it out

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 2>with something that's more reliable. Although, you know, as notability

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 2>changes in these publications, sometimes older content that was written

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 2>or published prior to a change at the organization will

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 2>be considered reliable, whereas newer content that's being created now

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 2>and might be using you know, AI or other tools,

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 2>is not considered reliable anymore. So, for example, we have

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 2>a couple of sources where we'll say that, you know,

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 2>anything they published before twenty fifteen is fine, but anything

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 2>after that you should take with a grain of salt.

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 2>So I think that's partly the case with c net

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 2>now as well.

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think that Wikipedia is so much better

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 1>at quality control than I don't know, Google, Well.

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a very different set of incentives at play.

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, Google is a profit driven corporation. They have

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 2>other motivations besides providing the person who is using their

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 2>search engine with the most relevant results. You know, that

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 2>is ostensibly what they do, but they also have motivations

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 2>around generating ad revenue and clicks for you know, different

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 2>groups that are using their service or advertising with them.

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Wikipedia doesn't have those sometimes conflicting incentives. You know, the

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 2>goal of Wikipedia is to deliver the highest quality information

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 2>that we can, and we're not you know, there's no advertisements.

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 2>We're not trying to surface some specific set of content

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 2>for people based on who is paying, you know, or

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 2>or not paying. It's really just that one incentive, and

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 2>I think that simplifies things because we can all sort

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 2>of get behind that one goal and you know, we

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 2>aren't trying to juggle multiple things that are sometimes very

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 2>much in conflict with one another, as I think we've

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 2>seen with Google, where you know, that goal of providing

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 2>the highest quality information to the search user has been

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 2>very much challenged by the other incentives at play.

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>So you've edited Wikipedia for about eighteen years. I think

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the simplest question is why do you still do it?

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Why did you start? Why do you continue? Well?

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 2>I started because I was a curious kid who discovered

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 2>that I could and that was exciting for me, and

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 2>I have I don't know. I think there are just

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 2>some people out there who have like a very specific

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 2>type of brain where Wikipedia just like sort of tickles

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 2>it just right, you know, and like doing that kind

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:58.520
<v Speaker 2>of editing and you know, curation just appeals to me.

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 2>I find it really enjoyable. But I also think that,

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:08.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, the project is a really wonderful, uh creation,

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:10.919
<v Speaker 2>you know, and I think it provides a really important

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 2>service to the people who have access to it, which

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 2>is almost anyone. I mean, it's anyone with an Internet connection,

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 2>and there are even ways to get access to Wikipedia

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 2>without an Internet connection. And so I think that, you know,

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 2>maintaining a quality source of high you know, reliability material

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 2>is incredibly important and arguably getting only more important as

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 2>other sources of that same type of content, you know,

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 2>are becoming degraded in the way that you just described

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 2>with Google for example. So you know, I'm very passionate

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 2>about it. I think providing high quality information to everyone

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 2>is one of the most important things that sort of

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 2>humanity needs to achieve, and so I find that very

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 2>strongly motivating.

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>And is there any pressure a toll from the Wikimedia Foundation?

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Do they push people around a toll A not going

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>either way. I'm just wondering what influence they have on

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the platform.

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a kind of an unusual relationship between the

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Wi Community Foundation and the editing community. It's sometimes a

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 2>little bit adversarial, which is sometimes a little confusing to

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:18.880
<v Speaker 2>people who are new to the project. But I would

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 2>say no, the Wi Commedia Foundation generally takes a pretty

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 2>hands off approach towards the projects that you know, it

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of supports. The Wikimedia Foundation almost never comes in

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:34.399
<v Speaker 2>and says, hey, you need to delete that, or you

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 2>need to you know, do something very specific with the content.

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 2>There are some very edge cases with like legal requests

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 2>and things like that where they can sometimes do that,

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 2>but they are very very conservative on when they will

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:50.239
<v Speaker 2>do that, and for the most part they take that

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 2>very hands off approach. The Wi Community Foundation is mostly

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 2>concerned with, you know, paying the bills, keeping the site online,

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 2>developing the soft where that actually powers the encyclopedia and

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 2>the editing infrastructure and all that, and then you know,

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 2>trying to contribute and grow the editing community and that

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 2>type of thing. But they are pretty hands off when

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:14.680
<v Speaker 2>it comes to editing, which I think is actually quite good.

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 2>It allows the community to you know, organically develop its

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 2>own policies and protocols and things like that, and you know,

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 2>without the Wikimedia Foundation sort of putting its thumb on

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 2>the scale.

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:33.360
<v Speaker 1>So more practical question, as an editor, what do you do?

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:36.399
<v Speaker 1>Is it just editing? The reason I ask this is

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you've provided me with your Wikipedia editor page, and there's

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>things like on block reblog, blog thanks. What do you

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 1>do as an editor? What is what are these numbers about?

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:49.399
<v Speaker 1>Because it feels like there's kind of a niche social

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>network and inside it.

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's a lot that happens behind the scenes besides

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 2>just you know, opening up a page and writing something new.

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 2>I do do so of that, you know, I do

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 2>write pages from scratch once in a while, or I'll

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 2>go in and edit something if a page is missing

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 2>something or need something. But there's also a whole bunch

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:12.120
<v Speaker 2>of other sort of administrative work I guess that goes

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 2>on behind the scenes, where I will sometimes you know,

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 2>patrol articles. That's sort of what I had described earlier,

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 2>where people will watch the recent changes to the project

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 2>and try to just filter out anything that looks abusive

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:30.440
<v Speaker 2>or you know, disruptive or honestly just less than productive.

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:33.879
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes I try to, you know, go around and welcome

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 2>new editors who are just joining the projects and hims

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:38.359
<v Speaker 2>they need help, and so I'll try to sort of,

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, show them the ropes a little bit. And

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 2>then there's you know, the blocking and deletion and things

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 2>like that, where people who are known as administrators on

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 2>the project can block an editor who is regularly being

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 2>disruptive or delete a page if it doesn't meet the

0:20:56.800 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 2>requirements that we have defined in our policies and things

0:20:59.880 --> 0:21:01.640
<v Speaker 2>like that, and so I do some of that as well.

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:04.159
<v Speaker 1>So how does one become an administrator?

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 2>So there's a whole process called request for admanship where

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 2>you either put yourself up, you nominate yourself as a candidate,

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 2>or someone else who thinks that you would be a

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 2>good administrator will do so. And then there's a long

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 2>process where you answer some questions and then the wikimedia

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:27.119
<v Speaker 2>community votes pretty much on whether or not you you know,

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 2>have the experience, the you know, the mindset basically, the

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 2>right attitude towards contributing, and then there's a vote pretty

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 2>much and if you pass the threshold, then you are

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 2>nominated or you know, you become an administrator at that point.

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 2>So it's something that happens, you know, fairly regularly. I

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 2>did it in twenty ten, I think but you know,

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 2>various people go through it pretty often.

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 1>Have you seen more people joining as editors or is

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 1>there more people or less people editing these days?

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 2>I would say there's been sort of a slow decline

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:22.159
<v Speaker 2>in the number of people who are joining if you

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 2>look at you know, people who join as like a

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 2>user and then continue to edit somewhat frequently versus you know, not.

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:33.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm not just talking about people who like correct a

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 2>typo once in a while, but the sort of like

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 2>regular contributors is sort of yeah, it's it's either flatlining

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 2>or declining to some extent. Uh, And it has been

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:47.199
<v Speaker 2>for a really long time, and so it's sort of

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 2>this continual discussion that happens within Wikipedia about you know what,

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 2>what do we do about that? How do we encourage

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 2>more people to join, How do we make the project

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 2>more welcoming to new people who want to get involved?

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, something that I try to focus on as well,

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:04.680
<v Speaker 2>just because I think it's really important to not only

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 2>contribute to the encyclopedia, but make sure that other people

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 2>are aware that they can and you know, doing so

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:11.919
<v Speaker 2>if they have the desire to do so.

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Are they training materials? Is there an onboarding process?

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:21.159
<v Speaker 2>There are. In fact, there are many of such things

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:24.719
<v Speaker 2>that different people have created, and the Wi Community Foundation

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:27.160
<v Speaker 2>themselves has gotten a little more involved in recent years

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:30.120
<v Speaker 2>and trying to make that sign up process a little

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 2>bit more friendly, so you know, when you first create

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 2>an account, it doesn't just drop you into the editor

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 2>like good luck, you know, which is kind of what

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 2>it used to do. Now there's some little widgets and

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 2>things that will guide you through making your first edit

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 2>and you know, finding an article that maybe needs some

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 2>improvement so you can give it a shot. Those types

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:52.199
<v Speaker 2>of things are being developed, and then there's you know,

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 2>community resources to try to encourage people to do the same,

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 2>which are just created by different editors for various purposes.

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Is there any automation Yep, there's there's quite a lot.

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:10.440
<v Speaker 2>There are Wikipedia editing bots that uh perform various tasks,

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:15.679
<v Speaker 2>everything from you know, fixing vandalism to you know, introducing

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:19.160
<v Speaker 2>archive links so that if a source link goes down,

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:21.239
<v Speaker 2>you know you can still get a copy of that

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 2>source material, all kinds of things like that. There's anti

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 2>spam stuff, you know, where it looks for spammy links

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 2>and removes it. So yeah, there's there's quite a bit

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 2>of automation, both by community members. Well, so some of

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:37.479
<v Speaker 2>it's yeah, some of it's community members who who you know,

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 2>create bots and maintain them. I would say it's probably

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 2>the majority community members, but there you know, there's also

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 2>the media Wiki software itself, which is maintained by the

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 2>Wikimedia Foundation, but they don't really do much of the

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 2>editing side of things, so most of the editing stuff

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:53.439
<v Speaker 2>is community based.

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Has there been any discussion of AI or integrating AI

0:24:57.840 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>or anything like that.

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 2>There has been quite a lot of discussion of AI,

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 2>and it's mostly been around two things. The sourcing situation.

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:13.439
<v Speaker 2>So can you consider AI generated material to be a

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:18.199
<v Speaker 2>reliable source? Generally speaking? The answer has been, know that

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 2>you have to be very cautious when you know, typing

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 2>something into chat gpt, because a lot of times you'll

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:27.199
<v Speaker 2>get back something that is not accurate at all. And

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:30.440
<v Speaker 2>then there's also been discussion around can you use AI

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 2>generated content, you know, as you know, can you tell

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 2>chat gpt or something like that to go make an

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 2>edit for you know, can you use content that chat

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 2>gpt has written, as you know, content that you put

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:46.440
<v Speaker 2>into a Wikipedia article, And the answer there has largely

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 2>been yeah, you can, but you have to be really

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 2>careful about it, and you have to sort of take

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:57.440
<v Speaker 2>full responsibility for anything that you have generated and put

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 2>into a Wikipedia article, because you know, it's still up

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 2>to you to fact check it and things like that.

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 2>As far as integrating AI into Wikipedia to try to

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 2>i don't know, generate article content or something more generally,

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:15.480
<v Speaker 2>that is not something that the community has seemed particularly

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:18.439
<v Speaker 2>interested in doing, and I suspect it would introduce a

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 2>lot of problems. There were some sort of past attempts

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 2>at doing things sort of like that in the translation space,

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:31.399
<v Speaker 2>where the wikimedia software would try to encourage people to

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:35.239
<v Speaker 2>translate articles from one version of Wikipedia to another, and

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 2>that was a largely unsuccessful experiment, I think, where too

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 2>many people were just pasting in machine translation or you know,

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 2>not doing the right kinds of quality control. So we

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 2>have to be really cautious around that type of thing.

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 1>So I think it was a year or two ago

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk said he wanted to buy Wikipedia for a

0:26:56.600 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. Just so well clear that is impossible.

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:04.639
<v Speaker 2>Right, yeah, I mean Wikipedia is not for sale. I

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 2>don't think there's any you know, genuine interest on either

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 2>side for Wikipedia to be sold. I think Elon is

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 2>also particularly not interested in it. He just has a

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:17.439
<v Speaker 2>long standing beef with Wikipedia.

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:20.679
<v Speaker 1>Which understandably because they tell the truth, which is not

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a big thing for mister Musk. Now, so you've done

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:27.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of advocacy recently about editing and saying why

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 1>people should become editors, But I kind of want to

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 1>hear your sales. Why should the average person edit Wikipedia?

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, I think, honestly, there's probably one hundred

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 2>answers for that, and it depends very much on the person.

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, I do it because I love it. I

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 2>find it really enjoyable. Some people do it because they

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 2>think that the resource of Wikipedia is incredibly important and

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 2>needs to be maintained. You know, that's also a factor

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 2>for me. But I think it's okay to also just

0:27:57.840 --> 0:27:59.439
<v Speaker 2>do it just for fun. You know, I think you

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:02.440
<v Speaker 2>don't have to have some big driving motivation behind it.

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:06.119
<v Speaker 2>But I do think that, you know, especially now as

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 2>the web is somewhat under threat from this sort of

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:16.640
<v Speaker 2>AI generated junk that's being you know, becoming so prevalent

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 2>in search results in any particular website that you go visit,

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 2>it's really important to make sure that there is this

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:28.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, human reviewed material out there that is as

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 2>high quality as possible and that really values you know,

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:37.440
<v Speaker 2>the quality of information, accuracy, reliability, you know, neutral point

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:40.719
<v Speaker 2>of view, those types of things above just you know,

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 2>spitting out as much content as possible with little regard

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 2>for its accuracy or reliability. And so I think that

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, now more than ever, projects like Wikipedia are

0:28:51.960 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 2>incredibly important, and you know, maintaining them as other parts

0:28:56.640 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 2>of the web begin to degrade, is going to only

0:28:59.880 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 2>be become, you know, a more important thing to do.

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 1>It kind of feels like as this prevalence of AI

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 1>generated content grows, we kind of need user generated content well,

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 1>never as it's being killed off.

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's kind of ironic. I think, you know that

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 2>we're starting to see this proliferation of this AI generated

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 2>content that's really just quantity over quality, and in doing so,

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 2>it's sort of killing the quality content that is often

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 2>the source material for the AI itself. You know, we're

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 2>seeing this decline in journalism, for example, where some outlets

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 2>are laying off their media teams, you know, instead of

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 2>instead hoping that they can use AI to just churn

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 2>out articles. But you know those same AI tools that

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 2>they're using were trained on journalism. They were trained on

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 2>the types of stuff that is no longer being created,

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 2>and so you end up with this potentially really circular

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 2>situation where AI could start ingesting AI generated content and

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 2>entering this really massive quality spiral.

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I think what Jason Sadowski calls habsburg AI. Yeah, the

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 1>inbreeding about it, keep going, sorry.

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, it's a great terms. He always has great

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 2>terms for things. But yeah, I mean I think that

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, we really people are very excited about AI,

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 2>and they believe that AI will just continue to get

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 2>better and better and better without really thinking that critically

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 2>about what is required to create like a high quality,

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, large language model, and something like Wikipedia is honestly,

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 2>like incredibly important to creating any quality large language model.

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:44.719
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think every large language model out there

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 2>pretty much uses Wikipedia as a source material.

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Chat GPT was trained on it, right.

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I think basically all of them were.

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 2>And so you know, if you enter that very circular

0:30:56.240 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 2>loop where that training material gets worse and worse and worse,

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 2>I think AI will get worse and worse and worse.

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 2>And so making sure that there is you know, very

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:10.240
<v Speaker 2>high quality information out there that is not being in shitified.

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 2>To use Corey Doctor's term, bye by this AI, you know,

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 2>junk that's being created is I think very important just

0:31:21.000 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 2>to you know, general knowledge, but also I think it

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:26.360
<v Speaker 2>should be very important to those people who care so

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 2>much about AI.

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. It's ironic as well because the sources of information

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:35.400
<v Speaker 1>we've come to rely upon, like Google and Being to

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 1>some extent I guess, are so dependent on using generator comment.

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 1>But really it just they've choked it. They're choking it

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 1>as we speak. Is Wikipedia seeing less traffic or more traffic?

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Is it? How is this affecting it?

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 2>I honestly don't know. I guess I could look at

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Wikipedia traffic that's my dub. Yeah, But I mean I

0:31:57.600 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 2>think there is, you know, to some extent, with Google

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 2>and these various software projects that ingest Wikipedia data. You know,

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:10.479
<v Speaker 2>sometimes they do draw that attention away from the source,

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, where they'll just highlight the first paragraph of

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 2>Wikipedia and search results and people never click through to

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 2>the Wikipedia article. That's a pretty common phenomenon. You know.

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 2>News sources are sometimes upset about that also. But I

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 2>think one thing that's useful about Wikipedia is that Wikipedia

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 2>doesn't really have the same incentive to draw clicks as

0:32:30.920 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, an ad supported news source might, and so.

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 1>To selected on search.

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 2>But it is, yeah, exactly, It's like to some extent,

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 2>as long as the information is getting out there, we

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:46.600
<v Speaker 2>don't really care how and so you know, I guess

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:49.480
<v Speaker 2>there's some question of like, is it actually bad for

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 2>traffic to be redirected away from Wikipedia? I could probably

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 2>make that argument in both directions.

0:32:57.000 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, Molly, thank you so much for joining me today.

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Where can people find you?

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 2>You can find me at Mollywaite dot net. I also

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 2>read a newsletter at Citation Needed dot news.

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, thank you so much for joining me.

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for having me.

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Now, listeners, I'm going to do something a little bit

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 1>off based, if you will. Molly and I just talked

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 1>about Wikipedia, and I realize it feels weird to advocate

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 1>for something on a objective media platform, though I think

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 1>we all agree that I have my biases and my

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>things that I care about more and that I'm angry about,

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think we all do. But I must state

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:39.720
<v Speaker 1>how important keeping Wikipedia alive is. This platform, despite the

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 1>fact that's editable by everyone, is more reliable than Google

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:45.520
<v Speaker 1>is at the moment, it's more reliable than a lot

0:33:45.560 --> 0:33:49.960
<v Speaker 1>of media publications. As we speak, the user generated Internet

0:33:50.040 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 1>is being destroyed, it is being sold off for parts,

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 1>it's being turned into a rot economic catastrophe. Something like

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Wikipedia is truly important. Really. Again, it's weird to advocate

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 1>for any product or thing, but I encourage you, and

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I know it's weird to say, but please go and

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:10.200
<v Speaker 1>edit Wikipedia. Please sit down and edit whatever it is.

0:34:10.400 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Learn the ropes. This is one of the few community

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 1>organized Internet things that actually exist that we can help with.

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 1>It's a thing you can do today to change the Internet,

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to fight for what's right. And yeah, these publications are

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:27.839
<v Speaker 1>funded in part by tech publications. The Wikimedia Foundation has

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 1>taken money from Google. But as you've heard from Molly,

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:33.959
<v Speaker 1>who I trust deeply and you should do, they do

0:34:34.160 --> 0:34:37.840
<v Speaker 1>have a firewall between them. This is one way you

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:40.879
<v Speaker 1>can fight back, and I implore you to do so,

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 1>even if it's one editor, even if it's one page.

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:47.160
<v Speaker 1>You keep an eye on, follow the training documents, join

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:52.799
<v Speaker 1>the party. Please try. I understand that it's impossible to

0:34:52.840 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 1>ask for money, and I should never do so, but

0:34:55.680 --> 0:35:00.279
<v Speaker 1>your time, your attention on Wikipedia is genuinely important. It

0:35:00.400 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 1>sounds silly. I know we've all kind of thought it's

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:06.839
<v Speaker 1>just Wikipedia, anyone can edit it. But I'm worried. I'm

0:35:06.880 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 1>worried for the Internet as it stands. I'm worried the

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Internet sources are going to become more centralized, more focused

0:35:14.160 --> 0:35:18.319
<v Speaker 1>on the big take platforms. Please protect what's left of

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the good Internet. Edit Wikipedia today. I'm serious. At times,

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:25.040
<v Speaker 1>it can feel a little hopeless out there. It can

0:35:25.080 --> 0:35:27.400
<v Speaker 1>feel like there's nothing we can do against these trillion

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:30.960
<v Speaker 1>dollar enterprises, and to some extent, there's nothing we can do.

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 1>We really can't. We can't stop Sundar Pashai, we can't

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:39.239
<v Speaker 1>stop Sam Ortman. What we can do is help reinforce

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:43.279
<v Speaker 1>what made the Internet great. What we can do is

0:35:43.360 --> 0:35:47.319
<v Speaker 1>contribute to open source. What we can do is edit Wikipedia,

0:35:47.760 --> 0:35:51.799
<v Speaker 1>even a little, Even those little contributions matter. This is

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 1>what made the Internet what it is today, and we

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:58.359
<v Speaker 1>can fight for it and we can protect it. Thank

0:35:58.400 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you for listening, Thank you for listening to Better Offline.

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:13.080
<v Speaker 1>The editor and composer of the Better Offline theme song

0:36:13.160 --> 0:36:15.799
<v Speaker 1>is Matasowski. You can check out more of his music

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:19.479
<v Speaker 1>and audio projects at Matasowski dot com. M A T

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:23.719
<v Speaker 1>T O S O W s KI dot com. You

0:36:23.760 --> 0:36:26.240
<v Speaker 1>can email me at easy at better offline dot com

0:36:26.320 --> 0:36:28.279
<v Speaker 1>or check out better offline dot com to find my

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 1>newsletter and more links to this podcast. Thank you so

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:34.719
<v Speaker 1>much for listening. Better Offline is a production of cool

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Zone Media. For more from cool Zone Media, visit our

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:40.640
<v Speaker 1>website cool Zonemedia dot com, or check us out on

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:44.279
<v Speaker 2>App, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.