WEBVTT - Why Does the Universe Have a Speed Limit? (feat. Sean Carroll)

0:00:00.920 --> 0:00:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Sign Stuff, a production of iHeartRadio. I'm

0:00:04.600 --> 0:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>hoorhe cham and today we are answering the question can

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:12.000
<v Speaker 1>we go faster than lights? Like the fastest thing in

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the universe? And what would happen if you tried to

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:18.079
<v Speaker 1>go faster. We're going to talk to a couple of

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:23.599
<v Speaker 1>experts about this, including a famous theoretical physicist and a

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>historian of special relativity. So buckle up, put your helmets on,

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>because we are going to ludicrous speed to answer the

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>question can we go faster than light?

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 2>Hey?

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Everyone? Okay, So today's question is a pretty deep one.

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>It goes to the very heart of what the laws

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 1>of physics in our universe are, and it has huge

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>consequences for what it means to have an orderly and

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 1>logical existence and reality. It's such a huge question that

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>it even stumped Einstein. So I knew I needed a

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of help, which is why I called two very

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>smart friends of mine. And according to them, there are

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>three ways to answer this question. The first way is

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to think about how fast light can go. Here's my

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:27.119
<v Speaker 1>conversation with my first friend, famous theoretical physicist, New York

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Times bestselling author and host of the Mind Skate Podcast,

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Professor Sean Carroll. Cool, and I might crack some jokes.

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>That's the tone of the episode. That's okay, that's allowed.

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:44.759
<v Speaker 1>We're allowed to entertain the podcast. All right, Well, thank

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>you doctor Carrol for joining us. Thanks very much for

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>having me. Please tell us who you are and what

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you did. My name is Sean Carroll. I'm a physicist

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:54.559
<v Speaker 1>and philosopher at Johns Hopkins University. I think about where

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the universe came from, what it's made of, what the

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:59.559
<v Speaker 1>laws of physics are awesome. Have you ever gone faster

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>than this of light? I never have. I've gone stoller

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>in the speed of light many many times.

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 2>I guess.

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Just to start us off, what is the speed of light?

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:10.920
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of something you can think about at different

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>levels of sophistication. To be honest, the speed of light

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>is the speed that light travels at in empty space.

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>So one very quick thing to get straight is that

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>light itself can travel at different speeds. Light travels at

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 1>a different speed through air or water than it does

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>through empty space. So when we're being a little bit

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>more careful, we say the speed of light in vacuum.

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:35.639
<v Speaker 1>That's the special thing that's what people really care about.

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 1>That means that it's a speed of light when there's

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:40.519
<v Speaker 1>nothing in the way, kind of nothing for the light

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to bump into. Okay, so the first thing to know

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 1>about how fast light moves is that it has a speed.

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:50.559
<v Speaker 2>It may seem.

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Instantaneous when we turn on a light or a flashlight,

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>but it does take time for light to go places,

0:02:57.120 --> 0:03:00.079
<v Speaker 1>and this is something you can measure. For example, you

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>can shoot a laser at the moon and then see

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>how long it takes before it bounces back. If you

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:08.640
<v Speaker 1>did that, you'd see it takes about two point six seconds.

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Or you could send the.

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Radio signal, which is also light, to Mars and you

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>see it takes about fifteen minutes on average for the

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>signal to go there and come back. The second thing

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to know about how fast light moves is that it

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:27.799
<v Speaker 1>depends on what it's moving through. If it's moving through

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>nothing or a vacuum, then it moves at its maximum speed,

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>which is about three hundred thousand kilometers per second. At

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>that speed, light can go all the way around the

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Earth seven times in one second. But if it moves

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>through air or water or something transparent, then light slows

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>down and the denser that thing is the slower light

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>will move. So in a vacuum, light moves at about

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>three hundred thousand kilometers per second, but through water it

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>moves two hundred and twenty five thousand kilometers per second.

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>If it moves through glass, it's two hundred thousand kilometers

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>per second, And if it's a diamond, light moves at

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and twenty four thousand kilometers per second, or.

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 2>Almost two and a half times slower.

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's because even though these things are transparent, the

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>atoms still interact with the light. So when we think

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>about light traveling through water or glass or air, we

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>think it's transparent, it's just going right through, right, But

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:39.039
<v Speaker 1>in fact, the light is being affected by the medium

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>it's moving in, by the very gentle electromagnetic interactions with

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>all the atoms that it might bump into. That's why

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>when you pass light through a prism, it will be

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:52.039
<v Speaker 1>broken up into different wavelengths. Right, it'll become it'll be

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the pink Floyd Dark side of the Moon album cover,

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>and white light becomes all the colors of the rainbow.

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>It gets psychedelic. You know, I'm not going to say

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>how you should best experience dark side of the moon.

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>That up to personal choices. Now, a lot of people

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>think the reason that light slows down when going through

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 1>something like air or water is that it's bumping into

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>all the atoms that are there. But that's not quite right.

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>The reason is a little technical, but basically, light is

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 1>an electromagnetic wave, and when it goes through water or

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>a diamond, the wave makes the electrons in the atoms

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>that are there wiggle, and the wiggling causes a kind

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:37.479
<v Speaker 1>of counter electromagnetic wave that when you add it to

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the original light wave, it slows it down. And it's

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>a good problem set for undergraduates learning this stuff for

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the first time, because it's actually quite miraculous. It's the

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>net effect of all of the atoms has a sort

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>of simple calculable effect on what the light is doing.

0:05:57.000 --> 0:06:00.720
<v Speaker 1>It changes its speed. Okay, what does mean for the

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:04.119
<v Speaker 1>first way of answering the question can we go faster

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 1>than light? Is that you can imagine setting up an

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>unfair race. On one side, you would shoot light through

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:15.919
<v Speaker 1>a long piece or rod of a dense material like

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>glass or diamond, so that the light would be going

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 1>at half or less of its normal speed, and next

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 1>to it, you would hop into a rocket with nothing

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>in front of it but empty space. Now, you still

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:33.280
<v Speaker 1>have to go pretty fast, thousands of times faster than

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:37.119
<v Speaker 1>any human has ever gone before. But technically you could

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 1>beat the light going through that rod. If you had

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:43.040
<v Speaker 1>enough fuel, you could get up to a speed that's

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:47.279
<v Speaker 1>faster than that light beam, Which means that technically, one

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>way to answer the question can we go faster than light?

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Is yes, in an unfair race. All right, you're probably thinking, sure, Jorge,

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>but that's cheating. And I imagine you clicked on this

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>episode to find out if you could go faster than

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>light without cheating. That is, can you go faster than

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the speed of light in a vacuum? After all, that's

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the question that's going to make it practical or not

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>if he could ever go to distant stars or even

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to other galaxies. But here the answer is a lot trickier, because,

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>as it turns out, the speed of light isn't just

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>how fast light can go. It sets a universal speed limit.

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Here's how Professor Carroll puts it. The slightly more sophisticated

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>way of saying it is the universe has a speed

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>limit built into the laws of physics, there is a

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 1>fastest speed at which anything can go, and unlike any

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>other speed, this speed is absolute. It is not relative.

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter how you're moving through the universe, you

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>are going to measure the same speed limit relative to you.

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 1>It just so happens that light travels at this speed

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>when it's moving in vacuum. But other things do as well.

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Gravitational waves, for example, also move at the speed of light.

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>So it's really a feature of space time itself. It's

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>a crucially important feature. It says that there are things

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to our past, there are things to our future, and

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>there are things sort of sideways to us, things that

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>are neither in our past and our future, because we

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>can't get there without going faster than the speed of light,

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>which is not allowed. All right, when we come back,

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna dig into everything Professor Carroll just said, and

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna go into the mind of Albert Einstein as

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>he wondered the same question we are asking today, what

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>would happen if he could catch up to a lightbeam.

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Stay with us, we'll be right back.

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 2>We come back.

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we're answering the question, can we go faster than light.

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>And as I mentioned, there are three ways to answer

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>this question. The first is to cheat. You can slow

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>down light by making it go through something like water

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:19.199
<v Speaker 1>or a diamond, and you could then technically beat it

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 1>in a race. The second way to answer this question

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 1>is to ask if we can go faster than the

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>fastest light can go, which is the speed of light

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 1>in a vacuum. And here the answer is trickier because

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>if you ask any physicists on Earth this question, they'll

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>probably tell you the answer is no. And so for

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:41.319
<v Speaker 1>this segment, I thought i'd take you through the history

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of how physicists arrived at this answer, because it definitely

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 1>wasn't by trying to go faster than light.

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 3>It sort of came in waves. It wasn't always clear

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 3>to people for all time that light even had a

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 3>finite speed. Some people wonder if light simply was instant,

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 3>as if it traveled at an infinite speed, and a

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 3>bunch of people wondered, maybe that's not right.

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>That's my other friend, Professor David Kaiser. He's a theoretical

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>physicist and a historian of science at the Massachusetts Institute

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:18.439
<v Speaker 1>of Technology or MIT. According to doctor Kaiser, it took

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>a few hundred years since humans started doing serious science

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 1>in the fifteen hundreds, with people like Galileo to figure

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>out that light wasn't instantaneous and then it moved at

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a certain speed. And that's at the stage for a

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 1>young teenager named Albert Einstein to ask a very simple question.

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 3>That's what sets up a pretty amazing intellectual journey that

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 3>leads to people like a young Albert Einstein and many others.

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 3>Right around the turn of the twentieth century. In the

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 3>early nineteen hundreds, Einstein was wondering, even as a teenager

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 3>really before he was doing very formal schooling. In this

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 3>he wondered, what would happen if I could catch up

0:10:58.080 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 3>to a light wave? What would I see?

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 1>What teenager Einstein wondered was, well, if light doesn't move

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>infinitely fast, if it moves at a set speed, what

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>would happen if you went faster and faster, could you

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>eventually catch up to a beam of light? And if

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>you did, what would it look like?

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 3>And so he had these wonderful, very visual, kind of

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 3>imaginary thought experiments in his head as a sixteen year old,

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 3>and he realized, well, if there's a surfer on an

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 3>ocean wave, and they're going at the same speed. If

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 3>they look from side to side, at least momentarily, they'll

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:36.200
<v Speaker 3>see this wave kind of frozen, right, because they'll be

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 3>moving with the crest of the wave. There's some time

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 3>they would see basically a wave frozen in time, not

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:46.080
<v Speaker 3>zipping past them. And Einstein wondered, well, why can't I

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 3>do that with a LightWave, or what would happen if

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 3>I if I zoomed up and traveled at the same

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:52.199
<v Speaker 3>speed as a light wave, but I see a frozen

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 3>wave like that frozen ocean wave as a surfer.

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>In other words, Einstein wondered, as a sixteen year old,

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>if you can catch to light, would you essentially freeze

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 1>light or make it look like it's standing still? And

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 1>this question bothered Einstein. Okay, so then Einstein had this

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 1>idea that he nurtured since he was sixteen. And by

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the way, when I was sixteen, I was definitely not

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the nature of the universe. Not too loud,

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>that's right here we are.

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:25.959
<v Speaker 3>So then what happened and then he got bothered by

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 3>that he was reading for fun as a teenager and

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 3>early college did there's still pretty new theory worked out

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 3>by people like James Clark, Maxwell and Hendrick Herritt's and others.

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 3>That was just scoring like win after win in describing

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:42.439
<v Speaker 3>all these other things about light. It was like better

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 3>than anyone even imagined. It would match all these experiments

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 3>to high accuracy. It was a theory not only of

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 3>optics but also electric field magnetic fields. But in none

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:54.079
<v Speaker 3>of those solutions was there a sense that you could

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:57.560
<v Speaker 3>slow light down to zero. Wow, there was no mathematical

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 3>solution of these otherwise beautiful and very powerful equations that

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 3>showed a LightWave frozen in space.

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 1>So for young Einstein, this idea of going faster than

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>light and catching up to a lightbeam and seeing it

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>frozen wasn't allowed according to the other theories of the day.

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:19.440
<v Speaker 1>It seemed to be true according to lots of experiments,

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:22.679
<v Speaker 1>and so he came up with a pretty radical solution.

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 3>And so Einstein got bugged by that, and he wouldn't

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 3>let it go. Whereas other teenagers might think about other things.

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 3>For one, he got there and he realized one way

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 3>to remove this uncomfortable paradox would be to say, what

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 3>if the speed of light always has the same value,

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:43.439
<v Speaker 3>even if I'm moving fast. What if every person who's

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 3>even in motion would measure the speed of light to

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 3>have that same speed of speed of light in vacuum.

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:50.439
<v Speaker 3>If that's the case, that if he was careful to

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 3>say if whoa, then no one could ever catch up

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 3>with a light wave.

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 1>That's a huge leap. I mean it almost sounds like

0:13:57.120 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>a crazy idea.

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 3>It is not what most people were I think, that's

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:01.200
<v Speaker 3>for sure.

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:04.959
<v Speaker 1>Okay, here's Einstein's idea. What if you did try to

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>catch up to a lightbeam, you might start going faster

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and faster behind it, trying to catch up to it,

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and you would expect it to get closer to you.

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>But what if instead it never does. What if the

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 1>light beam always moves away from you at the speed

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>of light, no matter how fast you go.

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 2>And this is very strange.

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 1>And different than what we experience in our everyday life.

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>In our daily lives, we're used to speeds adding up.

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>For example, if you're driving down the highway at sixty

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>miles per hour and your kid in the back seat

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>throws a toy at you at ten miles per hour,

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 1>then to someone outside the car, they would see that

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 1>toy going at seventy or sixty plus ten miles per hour.

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>But Einstein said, what if that doesn't happen for light?

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>For example, what if you're going sixty miles an hour

0:14:57.000 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>in your car and you turn on the headlights. Expect

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the light from your headlights to go the speed of

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 1>light plus to sixty miles an hour that the car

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 1>is moving. But Einstein said, nope, that light still only

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>goes at the speed of light. You and the car

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 1>would see the light go at the speed of light,

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and someone standing on the highway would also see it

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 1>going at the speed of light. And this weird but

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>simple idea that light always seems to go at the

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 1>speed of light no matter who looks at it basically

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>revolutionized our understanding.

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Of the universe.

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Although it wasn't immediately a big hit, the.

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 3>First reaction Einstein's work was no reaction at all. He

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 3>was out of the way. He wasn't in an academic position.

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 3>He was, you know, frankly, kind of a nobody put

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 3>it this way. He didn't even get a promotion at

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 3>the patent office.

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>But eventually other people did notice Einstein's work.

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 3>Nonetheless, more time goes by, he's able to get a

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 3>fewer people to read the work and take it seriously,

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 3>and a few of them actually were beginning to do

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 3>things like write their own review articles and pay more attention.

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 3>So over a period that stretches nearly to a decade,

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 3>more and more of the professional scientists begin to pay attention.

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you might be wondering, what does this have to

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>do with going faster than lights? Well, it turns out

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that Einstein's sort of simple idea has some really weird

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>consequences for how the universe works. You might have heard

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that time slows down when you're going really really fast.

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 1>That comes from Einstein's idea. Or that things look shorter

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>when they're going super fast. That's also from Einstein's crazy idea.

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 3>And he's very clear, I'm going to assume this right

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 3>and then say what will follow from that? And even

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 3>more stream sounding things followed from that, even in that

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 3>first nineteen to oh five paper. So from this postulate

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 3>he deduces other consequences. If you're zipping by on the

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 3>train at some high speed, you and I will disagree

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 3>on whether two events happened at the same time. This

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 3>becomes known as the relativity of simultaneity. Another thing he

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:05.440
<v Speaker 3>begins to realize is that we're going to disagree on

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 3>the measurements of lengths if we're moving at a relative speed.

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 3>So it's called length contraction. And the third one is

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 3>time dilation. So if we have identical clocks that we're holding,

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:18.159
<v Speaker 3>but you're racing past me at some outrageously high speed,

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:20.440
<v Speaker 3>I will watch your clock tick more slowly.

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 1>The last main consequence of Einstein's idea is that nothing

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>can ever go faster than the speed of light. How

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:32.440
<v Speaker 1>do we go from the speed of light, whether it's

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the same in all directions, to concluding that it's a

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:37.639
<v Speaker 1>speed limit for everything.

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:41.439
<v Speaker 3>Partly because from Einstein's own equations, as you try to

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 3>get closer and closer to the speed of light, the

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:47.120
<v Speaker 3>difference in measured clock rate, all these mismatches in lengths

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 3>of meter six times on clocks, even also things like

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 3>the masses, the way we measure mass, These things all

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 3>rise and in fact become infinite. And that's like saying

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:59.679
<v Speaker 3>it would take basically an infinite amount of energy to

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.880
<v Speaker 3>go as fast as that light beam does, and I can't.

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 3>I have no source of infinite energy.

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, infinity can be a bummer, all right. When we

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:13.440
<v Speaker 1>come back. We're gonna talk more about this explanation, whether

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>we've ever actually tried to go faster than the speed

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:19.159
<v Speaker 1>of light, and then I'm gonna ask our experts what

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 1>they think would happen if we ever did break this

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:25.200
<v Speaker 1>speed limit. So stay with us.

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to sign stuff.

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>And we're back.

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:37.679
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:40.640
<v Speaker 1>We're asking the question can we go faster than light?

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:45.679
<v Speaker 1>And so far we have two different answers. The first

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 1>is yes, you can go faster than light if you

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 1>slow down light by making it go through water or diamond.

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>The second answer seems to be no, if you mean

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>whether we can go faster than light in a vacum.

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>As we learn, it seems that the universe has a

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>speed limit, and the speed limit says nothing can ever

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:10.680
<v Speaker 1>go faster than the speed of light in a vacuum. Now,

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I know what you're thinking right now, which is have

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 1>we actually tried to go faster than the speed of light?

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>And the answer is yes. Since about the nineteen thirties,

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>scientists have been building particle accelerators. These are huge machines

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 1>that can take small particles like protons or electrons and

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:33.880
<v Speaker 1>speed them up to go faster and faster. These accelerators

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 1>have been getting bigger and more.

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:36.719
<v Speaker 2>Powerful over the years.

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 1>They've been pushing the limits of how fast we can

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>make something go. The largest accelerator right now, the Large

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Hadron Collider in Geneva, Switzerland, is a seventeen mile long

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:51.920
<v Speaker 1>circular tunnel that can speed protons up to ninety nine

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:57.400
<v Speaker 1>point nine nine one percent of the speed of light.

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 1>What happens if you try to go faster, uh, not much.

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>As you get closer to the speed of light, it

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:07.679
<v Speaker 1>gets harder and harder to make things go faster. To

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>actually reach the speed of light, it will take an

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 1>infinite amount of energy. Here's how doctor Carrol explains it.

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:20.679
<v Speaker 1>All right, so we have this speed limit, and what

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:22.879
<v Speaker 1>happens if you try to go faster than that? You

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>can try. The thing is that one of the equations

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:31.719
<v Speaker 1>that Einstein bequeathed to us is a formula for how

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:34.479
<v Speaker 1>much energy it takes to go at a certain speed.

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>We all have heard of equals mc squared. Right, energy

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>is vast times the speed of light squared. That's a

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:42.919
<v Speaker 1>formula for what the energy is for an object with

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 1>zero velocity. If an object is moving with respect to us,

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 1>it also has what we call kinetic energy, and its

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>energy becomes bigger, and so there's a different formula as

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 1>that velocity goes closer and closer to the speed of light.

0:20:57.320 --> 0:21:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Einstein's formula for the energy says that the energy goes

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:05.120
<v Speaker 1>to infinity. So the problem is that it would require

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 1>more than an infinite amount of energy to accelerate yourself

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>faster than the speed of light. It's one of the

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 1>ways of thinking about the fact that really you cannot

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:16.439
<v Speaker 1>go faster than the speed of light. If you tried,

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>you would get closer and closer from our reference frame,

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 1>but you would never make it all the way there

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 1>is because you only have a finite amount of energy

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:26.119
<v Speaker 1>to push you. Would you say then that the reason

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:28.959
<v Speaker 1>we have a speed limit is because it takes an

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>infinite amount of energy to go faster than light. I

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 1>would say that fact, but I would say it the

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:35.639
<v Speaker 1>other way around. I would say that it takes in

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>front of energy because we have a speed limit. It's

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the speed limit that is really just fundamental. The existence

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:44.639
<v Speaker 1>of a speed limit is really the defining feature of

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 1>space time, according to Einstein. Okay, and this brings us

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 1>to the big question, why does the universe seem to

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:57.399
<v Speaker 1>have this speed limit. After all, it seems weird that

0:21:57.440 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 1>we live in a universe where you can't just go

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:03.640
<v Speaker 1>faster and faster, that there is some sort of arbitrary

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 1>rule that curbs your speed and gives you strange phenomena

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:13.119
<v Speaker 1>like time flowing differently for different people. I asked doctor

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Carol this question. Okay, so now the question is why

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>do we have this speed limit in the universe. That's

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:24.359
<v Speaker 1>an excellent question, And as we see, it is not

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 1>hard to bump up into questions where the answer is

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 1>there's no necessary reason why, Like maybe there's no such

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 1>thing as why it is a feature of the universe

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that there is this speed limit. It doesn't seem necessary

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 1>if you think about all the possible laws of physics.

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>But since relativity came along, we know that the universe

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:48.679
<v Speaker 1>has this feature, that there is a speed limit. But

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:51.400
<v Speaker 1>do we have any kind of physical explanation for why

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>we have this speed limit? I don't know if that's

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:57.399
<v Speaker 1>even a plausible question. You know, when you say what

0:22:57.480 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 1>is the physical explanation for something? When you really ask

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>is why is it? That it could not have been different?

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Eventually you just say, look, that's the way it is. Okay,

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:09.879
<v Speaker 1>that's more or less where we are with the speed

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:12.440
<v Speaker 1>of light. It's just the way it is. It's annoying

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:16.640
<v Speaker 1>that it's that way, because space opera becomes unrealistic when

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 1>it takes hundreds of years travel from one star to

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 1>another in your spaceship. But could it have been different?

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:24.439
<v Speaker 1>As far as we know it could have been different.

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:27.440
<v Speaker 1>We're just stuck with what we have. Okay. I get

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>this question all the time. So I wrote this book

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:31.360
<v Speaker 1>for kids called Oliver's Great Big Universe, which you read,

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for that. And I go around schools talking

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>about the book. And one of the biggest questions I

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 1>always get is what if I go faster than light?

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>And I always say you can't, you can't go. No, No,

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know you can't. But what if you did?

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 1>And I say no, you can't, and they keep going no,

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:50.679
<v Speaker 1>but what if he did? So John, why should I

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>tell these kids? So we think that there are laws

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:58.440
<v Speaker 1>of physics, right, that it's not anything goes in the universe,

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 1>that apples fall down from trees. They don't just fly

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 1>up into the air when they fall off the tree. Right,

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:06.359
<v Speaker 1>that the sun rises in the east, not in the West,

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light.

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:12.360
<v Speaker 1>So it's not a choice that you have, or it's

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:16.360
<v Speaker 1>not a matter of willpower or technological capability or anything

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 1>like that. You know, despite what you learn in Star

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Trek and Star Wars, they're changing the laws of physics

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:25.879
<v Speaker 1>because they want to have sort of a Western or

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 1>naval battle kind of feeling about what is going on

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:31.880
<v Speaker 1>in outer space. But outer space is actually a very

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>different thing. So if you wet faster than the speed

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of light, that would mean that everything we think we

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 1>know about the laws of physics is wrong. So if

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:46.440
<v Speaker 1>someone asks what would happen, I got to say, Man,

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea what would happen? Because you're telling

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:52.199
<v Speaker 1>me I don't know anything other laws of physics, so

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 1>I have no way of saying what would happen. It

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 1>would go against everything we've observed as humans in the

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>history of humanity. Okay, what doctor Carl is saying is

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that scientists don't actually know why we have the speed

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 1>limit in the universe. It's just a feature or a

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:15.959
<v Speaker 1>rule that's built into it. There might be other universes

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>with a different speed limit, or even a universe out

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:21.680
<v Speaker 1>there without the speed limit, where the speed of light

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 1>is infinite. But that's just not the universe we live in,

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:29.639
<v Speaker 1>all right. I said at the beginning, there are three

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>ways to answer this question of whether we can go

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:35.920
<v Speaker 1>faster than light, and so far we have a yes

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:40.159
<v Speaker 1>if you cheat and slow down light. No, if you

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>follow the rules that we've observed about the universe. And

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>now the third way to answer this question is if

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>we put on our imagination heads and wonder about what

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:55.640
<v Speaker 1>we don't know about the universe. To be a little

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 1>bit more fair, you know, physicists love to let their

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>imaginations run free. So we have imagined particles that could

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 1>go faster than the speed of light. We've even given

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 1>them a name. They're called tachions, and unlike ordinary particles

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>that can only go slower than the speed of light,

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>tachions can only go faster than the speed of light.

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:21.199
<v Speaker 1>They can never slow down. Okay, so tachions are a

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>totally theoretical idea with no basis in experiments, but they

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 1>are technically sort of possible in the laws of physics,

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and if they do exist, it would let.

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Us do some pretty amazing things.

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>If you could go faster than the speed of light,

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:43.160
<v Speaker 1>you could go to the past just as easily as

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to the future, rather than me going fashion the speed

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 1>of light. Let's say I had a flashlight that could

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>shoot out tachions and they could go faster than the

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>speed of light. Right, I could send a signal to

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 1>myself yesterday, because going fashion in the speed of light

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:59.159
<v Speaker 1>is just as bad as going to the past. Uh. Like,

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>if I shoot it at Alpha Centauri, will get there yesterday,

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of, it very well could. And then if they

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:06.640
<v Speaker 1>shoot it back, yeah, it'll get back two yesterdays ago.

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>There you go. So yeah, future me, if you have

0:27:10.800 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>a taki in flashlight, please beat me the numbers for

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow's winning lottery ticket. All right, Like I said, tak

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:22.159
<v Speaker 1>ins are purely theoretical, which puts this answer in the

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe category. Until then, I guess we all have to

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>be law abiding citizens of the universe and live knowing

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:33.880
<v Speaker 1>there is a speed limit to the universe, which our

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:38.880
<v Speaker 1>expert argues is maybe not such a bad thing. You know,

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the speed of light has a bad reputation because it

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:45.239
<v Speaker 1>prevents us from being star wars. Right, it prevents us

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 1>from colonizing the galaxy and starting a galactic empire. But

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess the lesson I would say is it also

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:56.120
<v Speaker 1>brings a measure of control and predictability to the universe

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that you wouldn't otherwise have. What it means is that

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 1>nothing you can do right here, right now instantaneously affects

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:08.440
<v Speaker 1>things infinitely far away. So it's kind of a better

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:12.119
<v Speaker 1>behaved universe. When there is a speed limit. You can't

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 1>instantly reach out and touch someone a gagillion light years away.

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 1>It seems less chaotic, I think, is what you're trying

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 1>to say, Like, not everyone's feeling everyone at the same time,

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. It's a little more orderly. It takes time

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:28.399
<v Speaker 1>for signals to travel. It calms down the universe to

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:30.640
<v Speaker 1>have this speed limit on there. It's like if everyone

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:33.919
<v Speaker 1>was forced to use mood and the like internet speed,

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:36.679
<v Speaker 1>maybe our lives would be a little bit more orderly

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and less chaotic. Yeah, the galaxy is not that big.

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>You just have to be patient. So maybe it takes

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 1>tens of thousands of years to cross it if you

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>go close to the speed of light, but that's nothing.

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 1>The universe is fourteen billion years old, you know, like,

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 1>be patient, we'll get there. The speed of light is

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 1>a good thing, I see, just adjust the perspective of time.

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell that to the fourth graders that I talked to.

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Just be patient. I'm sure that hell far good luck

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 1>with that. They'll be very understanding. I'm sure they always are,

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 1>all right. I think that answers our question for today.

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Can we go faster than light? The answer seems to

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 1>be yes, sort of, No, not really maybe if there

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 1>are new things about the universe that we haven't discovered. Now,

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 1>why do we have the speed limit? We don't actually know.

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 1>That's just the way the universe we live in is.

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:29.960
<v Speaker 1>If you live in the universe where this is not true,

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 1>send us a note. We'd love to take your experience

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 1>for a spin. Thanks for joining us. See you next time.

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 2>You've been listening to science Stuff.

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 1>The production of iHeartRadio written and produced by me or Hitchm,

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 1>edited by Rose Seguda, executive producer Jerry Rowland, and audio

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>engineer and mixer Kasey peckrom And you can follow me

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>on social media. Just search for PhD Comics and the

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>name of your favorite platform. Be sure to subscribe to

0:29:58.000 --> 0:30:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Sign Stuff on the iHeartRadio app, podcasts, or wherever you

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, and please tell your friends we'll be

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 1>back next Wednesday with another episode. All right, that was fantastic.

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I'd taken more than of your time

0:30:14.360 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 1>than I promise.

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, we've just discussed time is relative. Class, running slowly fine,

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 3>We always talked for ten minutes. It's fine.

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's right. When when a professor is putting at

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>sabbatical speed, time dilates and becomes meaningless

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 3>You are exactly know, exactly that's right,