1 00:00:08,520 --> 00:00:21,919 Speaker 1: Bodybags with Joseph Scott Morgan, Hello, my friends, coming to 2 00:00:22,079 --> 00:00:25,280 Speaker 1: you a little bit different today, actually in a hotel 3 00:00:25,360 --> 00:00:28,200 Speaker 1: room in Los Angeles, getting ready to do an episode 4 00:00:28,200 --> 00:00:31,680 Speaker 1: of Doctor Phil. We need to talk about the affidavit today. 5 00:00:32,200 --> 00:00:35,280 Speaker 1: Talk about some of the forensic aspects here, talk about 6 00:00:35,280 --> 00:00:39,319 Speaker 1: what the police might be looking for, what they might have, 7 00:00:40,360 --> 00:00:44,080 Speaker 1: and what is yet to be uncovered. I'm Joseph Scott 8 00:00:44,159 --> 00:00:52,400 Speaker 1: Morgan and this is Body Bags. Guys. I have been 9 00:00:52,440 --> 00:00:55,640 Speaker 1: on more media outlets than I can count over the 10 00:00:55,680 --> 00:01:02,280 Speaker 1: past I don't know, six weeks. I am so incredibly 11 00:01:02,280 --> 00:01:07,240 Speaker 1: grateful that I have got my friend, who I consider 12 00:01:07,280 --> 00:01:10,560 Speaker 1: one of my best friends in the world, Jackie Howard, 13 00:01:10,640 --> 00:01:15,480 Speaker 1: the executive producer for Nancy Grace's Crime Stories. Jackie is 14 00:01:15,560 --> 00:01:18,640 Speaker 1: joining me right now. She's in her studio. I'm here 15 00:01:18,680 --> 00:01:22,480 Speaker 1: in La Jackie. Wow, do we have a lot of 16 00:01:22,520 --> 00:01:26,640 Speaker 1: information to go through? I don't know. I don't know 17 00:01:27,120 --> 00:01:29,360 Speaker 1: that I actually thought that we would get this much 18 00:01:29,360 --> 00:01:33,200 Speaker 1: out of this nineteen page document that dropped, but it 19 00:01:33,360 --> 00:01:37,480 Speaker 1: landed in our laps, and boy, is it really causing 20 00:01:37,600 --> 00:01:40,360 Speaker 1: a lot of people to stop and think and reconsider 21 00:01:40,360 --> 00:01:43,240 Speaker 1: a lot of positions. I think it's something that you 22 00:01:43,319 --> 00:01:45,080 Speaker 1: and I should have a chat about today. What do 23 00:01:45,120 --> 00:01:47,319 Speaker 1: you think? Well, I think that you started out with 24 00:01:47,400 --> 00:01:50,440 Speaker 1: some wonderful browning points there, Joe. So thanks, But yes, 25 00:01:50,600 --> 00:01:53,640 Speaker 1: there's a lot of information to unfold. The first thing 26 00:01:53,680 --> 00:01:56,320 Speaker 1: I want to talk about, though, is how much do 27 00:01:56,400 --> 00:02:00,920 Speaker 1: you think that the police learned that was not included 28 00:02:01,560 --> 00:02:04,240 Speaker 1: in what was released? Well, I think you have to 29 00:02:04,280 --> 00:02:07,800 Speaker 1: start off at the baseline. You know, they only require 30 00:02:08,000 --> 00:02:11,919 Speaker 1: as much as is needed to get this thing before 31 00:02:11,919 --> 00:02:15,760 Speaker 1: a judge to draw up and arrest warrant. Okay, so 32 00:02:15,960 --> 00:02:20,640 Speaker 1: they're they're not They are not revealing everything that they have. 33 00:02:21,040 --> 00:02:24,120 Speaker 1: Trust me, this is only the tip of the iceberg. 34 00:02:24,680 --> 00:02:28,160 Speaker 1: And boy, what a volume of information that they have 35 00:02:28,280 --> 00:02:32,280 Speaker 1: presented us with. We've got everything from DNA, We've got 36 00:02:33,040 --> 00:02:37,640 Speaker 1: we've got pings relative to the movement of Brian Coberger 37 00:02:38,200 --> 00:02:43,720 Speaker 1: and his cell phone. We've got CCTV footage. The list 38 00:02:44,040 --> 00:02:47,760 Speaker 1: goes on and on. We've got trace evidence. You know 39 00:02:47,800 --> 00:02:50,120 Speaker 1: when you think about footprints and all of these sorts 40 00:02:50,120 --> 00:02:52,440 Speaker 1: of things that have that have come to light, and 41 00:02:53,000 --> 00:03:01,760 Speaker 1: probably for me what is most defining is we've sheath, Jackie, 42 00:03:01,800 --> 00:03:05,120 Speaker 1: We've got a knife sheath. If memory serves me right. 43 00:03:05,240 --> 00:03:08,600 Speaker 1: You called that saying if they can find that sheath, 44 00:03:09,080 --> 00:03:13,080 Speaker 1: they're set with DNA, and you obviously were right. So 45 00:03:13,520 --> 00:03:18,000 Speaker 1: the DNA that was found was found one spot on 46 00:03:18,040 --> 00:03:20,960 Speaker 1: that knife sheath. It was akbar as we know I've 47 00:03:21,000 --> 00:03:23,600 Speaker 1: been talking about for quite some time now, but the 48 00:03:23,800 --> 00:03:30,720 Speaker 1: sheath DNA was found in one spot on the clip, 49 00:03:30,880 --> 00:03:35,840 Speaker 1: the snap clip. I'm wondering, do we know where that 50 00:03:35,920 --> 00:03:39,280 Speaker 1: DNA came from? Was it blood DNA or is it 51 00:03:39,320 --> 00:03:43,240 Speaker 1: just skin cell DNA? Hard to say. It truly is 52 00:03:43,240 --> 00:03:44,920 Speaker 1: hard to say, and we don't have enough in from 53 00:03:45,080 --> 00:03:49,320 Speaker 1: We do know that there is a specific linkage to 54 00:03:49,720 --> 00:03:53,480 Speaker 1: the suspect, and that's important, at least at this juncture. 55 00:03:53,520 --> 00:03:55,920 Speaker 1: We will find out more what the sourcing of that 56 00:03:56,080 --> 00:04:01,360 Speaker 1: DNA is. There are many people that have openly opined 57 00:04:01,880 --> 00:04:03,880 Speaker 1: that this is probably going to be touched DNA, and 58 00:04:03,920 --> 00:04:06,720 Speaker 1: we've talked about touch DNA before on bodybacks. But just 59 00:04:06,880 --> 00:04:12,400 Speaker 1: kind of revisit this very very briefly. We sluf thousands 60 00:04:12,400 --> 00:04:16,080 Speaker 1: and thousands of skin cells, and the reason you sluft 61 00:04:16,120 --> 00:04:21,320 Speaker 1: them is that they're dead and so the DNA strand 62 00:04:21,880 --> 00:04:24,640 Speaker 1: or that it's just a partial of a strand that's 63 00:04:24,640 --> 00:04:30,520 Speaker 1: contained within what's referred to as touch DNA. So when 64 00:04:30,600 --> 00:04:35,120 Speaker 1: you find that bit of DNA, you have to go 65 00:04:35,200 --> 00:04:38,920 Speaker 1: back into lab and kind of reconstruct a DNA. But 66 00:04:39,040 --> 00:04:44,520 Speaker 1: it was sufficient enough to the task that when they 67 00:04:44,560 --> 00:04:48,240 Speaker 1: did recover the DNA, they were able to develop a 68 00:04:48,279 --> 00:04:54,240 Speaker 1: profile that eventually, you know, within I don't know ninety 69 00:04:54,400 --> 00:04:58,800 Speaker 1: nine point nine nine nine eight, I think percentage points 70 00:04:58,960 --> 00:05:04,200 Speaker 1: is likely hel and that's big. But yeah, that that 71 00:05:04,200 --> 00:05:07,039 Speaker 1: that gives us an idea that he actually had contact. 72 00:05:07,200 --> 00:05:10,560 Speaker 1: He had physical contact with a sheath. Some people say, ah, well, 73 00:05:10,800 --> 00:05:14,600 Speaker 1: you know it doesn't matter. That could come from anywhere. Okay, 74 00:05:14,880 --> 00:05:17,599 Speaker 1: that's fine. Yeah, I'll give you that. It could. It could. 75 00:05:17,839 --> 00:05:19,800 Speaker 1: He could have picked it up. I've heard some people 76 00:05:19,839 --> 00:05:21,120 Speaker 1: say he could have picked it up at a knife 77 00:05:21,120 --> 00:05:23,760 Speaker 1: and gun show and just handle the thing. And they're 78 00:05:23,760 --> 00:05:26,040 Speaker 1: calling it a button snap is actually what they're calling it. 79 00:05:26,040 --> 00:05:28,880 Speaker 1: And then he maybe he actuated the button snap, flicking 80 00:05:29,000 --> 00:05:33,279 Speaker 1: it back and forth, just said Okay, that's a starting spot, 81 00:05:33,320 --> 00:05:36,840 Speaker 1: that's not the ending spot, okay, and that's important here. Well, 82 00:05:36,880 --> 00:05:39,440 Speaker 1: that was my question because let me let me jump 83 00:05:39,520 --> 00:05:42,839 Speaker 1: in on it. That was my question. If this knife 84 00:05:43,080 --> 00:05:48,160 Speaker 1: sheath belonged to Brian Hoberger. Wouldn't they have found his 85 00:05:48,279 --> 00:05:54,800 Speaker 1: DNA on more spots than just that clip? Possibly, But 86 00:05:55,080 --> 00:05:58,279 Speaker 1: could he have worn gloves and taking those gloves off, 87 00:05:58,480 --> 00:06:02,640 Speaker 1: or could he have manipulated that knife sheath prior to 88 00:06:02,680 --> 00:06:06,640 Speaker 1: putting gloves on, wipe down the rest of the knife sheath, 89 00:06:07,800 --> 00:06:11,039 Speaker 1: but forgot to wipe off that specific area. Do you 90 00:06:11,080 --> 00:06:15,680 Speaker 1: see there's so many there's so many possibilities here that 91 00:06:15,760 --> 00:06:18,200 Speaker 1: we don't know the dynamic of it. We don't know 92 00:06:18,240 --> 00:06:20,480 Speaker 1: how much he's handled the scene. We don't know if 93 00:06:20,480 --> 00:06:23,160 Speaker 1: the sheath is new, if this is something he just 94 00:06:23,279 --> 00:06:26,640 Speaker 1: went out and picked up and bought. Why isn't there 95 00:06:26,640 --> 00:06:30,880 Speaker 1: other people's DNA on the scene. Maybe there are unknowns 96 00:06:30,880 --> 00:06:33,680 Speaker 1: on here. We never know at this point because they 97 00:06:33,680 --> 00:06:35,919 Speaker 1: haven't given us that information. You know, you have to 98 00:06:35,920 --> 00:06:37,880 Speaker 1: figure if he let's just say he went to a 99 00:06:37,960 --> 00:06:42,360 Speaker 1: stall at a gun show and he bought this from somebody. Well, 100 00:06:42,360 --> 00:06:44,520 Speaker 1: just think about the person that was selling it to him, 101 00:06:44,520 --> 00:06:47,320 Speaker 1: had to handle the thing and would hand it over 102 00:06:47,400 --> 00:06:50,799 Speaker 1: to him, would have manipulated it in some way. Well, 103 00:06:51,000 --> 00:06:54,200 Speaker 1: they don't say anything about unknowns that might be on 104 00:06:54,240 --> 00:06:57,680 Speaker 1: the exterior of the sheath. They only talk about that 105 00:06:57,760 --> 00:07:02,160 Speaker 1: one linkage that goes back to the accused that I 106 00:07:02,200 --> 00:07:05,640 Speaker 1: think that that's significant here. And again, we don't know 107 00:07:05,680 --> 00:07:08,240 Speaker 1: what the sourcing of the DNA is. You know, we 108 00:07:08,480 --> 00:07:11,960 Speaker 1: I'd mentioned touch DNA. You know, you can get DNA 109 00:07:12,080 --> 00:07:16,440 Speaker 1: that derives from you know, a multiple multiple sources. You know, 110 00:07:16,480 --> 00:07:19,320 Speaker 1: we can have sweat, you can get saliva, you can 111 00:07:19,320 --> 00:07:24,360 Speaker 1: get blood among other things you know that emanate from 112 00:07:24,360 --> 00:07:29,800 Speaker 1: our body essentially, and so we don't know specifically what 113 00:07:29,840 --> 00:07:34,120 Speaker 1: the source is at this particular time. And I think 114 00:07:34,320 --> 00:07:38,800 Speaker 1: another big question is is it possible that there might 115 00:07:38,880 --> 00:07:42,120 Speaker 1: be blood on the sheath? Is it possible? Yeah, that 116 00:07:42,480 --> 00:07:44,640 Speaker 1: it is possible that there could be blood, and it 117 00:07:44,720 --> 00:07:47,120 Speaker 1: might not necessarily be his blood, the accused. It might 118 00:07:47,160 --> 00:07:49,960 Speaker 1: be the victim's blood because it was laying there in 119 00:07:50,080 --> 00:07:53,000 Speaker 1: the bed. It wasn't laying on the floor, according to 120 00:07:53,000 --> 00:07:54,560 Speaker 1: what they're saying. It was laying there in the bed, 121 00:07:55,160 --> 00:07:59,000 Speaker 1: So that that's kind of interesting as well. Was there 122 00:07:59,040 --> 00:08:01,400 Speaker 1: any other kind of answer evidence that was found on 123 00:08:01,400 --> 00:08:04,600 Speaker 1: that sheath from any of the victims into bed now, hair, 124 00:08:05,480 --> 00:08:08,560 Speaker 1: any kind of body fluids from them, including blood, anything 125 00:08:08,600 --> 00:08:11,960 Speaker 1: that might be linkage to tie that back. It's not 126 00:08:12,040 --> 00:08:16,120 Speaker 1: just one person that you're considering when you're looking at 127 00:08:16,240 --> 00:08:20,000 Speaker 1: unknown sample. You consider everybody that's kind of in the 128 00:08:20,160 --> 00:08:24,800 Speaker 1: orbit of this environment at this particular time, and all 129 00:08:24,840 --> 00:08:26,760 Speaker 1: of these are going to be key. They will develop 130 00:08:26,800 --> 00:08:30,800 Speaker 1: profiles on all of these people moving forward. They're also 131 00:08:30,880 --> 00:08:34,720 Speaker 1: going to talk about anybody that may have handled this 132 00:08:35,160 --> 00:08:40,880 Speaker 1: sheath prior to Coburger having purchased it, if it was 133 00:08:40,920 --> 00:08:44,960 Speaker 1: a recent purchase, for instance, and they will develop those 134 00:08:45,040 --> 00:08:48,120 Speaker 1: as well if they find those unknown sources, and they'll 135 00:08:48,120 --> 00:08:51,320 Speaker 1: try to track those down as well. Again, what's the 136 00:08:51,360 --> 00:08:55,000 Speaker 1: beauty of this, Jackie is the fact that if you 137 00:08:55,160 --> 00:08:58,600 Speaker 1: have all of these other people that have touched it, 138 00:08:58,600 --> 00:09:01,320 Speaker 1: it's not just a matter of him physically touching the 139 00:09:01,520 --> 00:09:04,560 Speaker 1: knife and it being there at the scene. If you 140 00:09:04,679 --> 00:09:08,720 Speaker 1: have unknown DNA that you can tie back to other 141 00:09:08,760 --> 00:09:12,960 Speaker 1: people that are in his peripheral past, you can kind 142 00:09:12,960 --> 00:09:16,880 Speaker 1: of track the movement of that knife through time. You know, 143 00:09:16,960 --> 00:09:20,640 Speaker 1: if he went to purchase this thing, you know you 144 00:09:20,679 --> 00:09:23,760 Speaker 1: can find it famously. You know, there's been a number 145 00:09:23,760 --> 00:09:27,640 Speaker 1: of cases, for instance, involving sexual assault, where there be 146 00:09:27,679 --> 00:09:31,640 Speaker 1: a pair of underwear and you will actually find touch 147 00:09:31,760 --> 00:09:34,600 Speaker 1: DNA on the surface of a package of a previously 148 00:09:34,640 --> 00:09:38,199 Speaker 1: packaged pair of underwear that was packaged in maybe Southeast 149 00:09:38,200 --> 00:09:40,640 Speaker 1: Asia somewhere, and you'll find somebody's DNA on it that 150 00:09:40,720 --> 00:09:43,400 Speaker 1: handled it in a factory. Just let that sink in 151 00:09:43,480 --> 00:09:46,079 Speaker 1: just for a second. So the possibilities here are kind 152 00:09:46,080 --> 00:09:48,360 Speaker 1: of mind blowing when you think about it. What is 153 00:09:48,400 --> 00:09:52,000 Speaker 1: the volume of DNA that we're talking about here, and 154 00:09:52,120 --> 00:09:56,680 Speaker 1: how much would have been needed to match up with 155 00:09:57,160 --> 00:10:02,440 Speaker 1: the evidence taken from his Pennsylvania home. Well, I think 156 00:10:02,480 --> 00:10:09,320 Speaker 1: that that evidence from the Pennsylvania home is probably going 157 00:10:09,360 --> 00:10:15,680 Speaker 1: to be very rich if you consider that. Let's just 158 00:10:15,720 --> 00:10:19,400 Speaker 1: think about it. If you're talking about napkins, if you're 159 00:10:19,400 --> 00:10:21,439 Speaker 1: talking about like cups that he may have placed to 160 00:10:21,559 --> 00:10:25,960 Speaker 1: his lips, you know, anything that would be an intimate 161 00:10:26,000 --> 00:10:28,160 Speaker 1: contact with him. And when you think about a trash 162 00:10:28,240 --> 00:10:32,320 Speaker 1: bag and how we discard things, you know, in trashbags, 163 00:10:32,320 --> 00:10:35,199 Speaker 1: we're throwing stuff away and it's all kind of getting 164 00:10:35,240 --> 00:10:39,080 Speaker 1: jumbled up in there. There will be quite a number 165 00:10:39,120 --> 00:10:42,480 Speaker 1: of things that will come back to him. Certainly, certainly 166 00:10:42,480 --> 00:10:44,400 Speaker 1: there will be things in there that will come back 167 00:10:44,400 --> 00:10:47,760 Speaker 1: to his familial grouping. And again that's significant, right if 168 00:10:47,840 --> 00:10:51,280 Speaker 1: you can tie that one bit of DNA that they 169 00:10:51,360 --> 00:10:58,120 Speaker 1: found on this button snap back to this home all 170 00:10:58,200 --> 00:11:03,200 Speaker 1: the way over two thousand miles away in Pennsylvania, in Poconos. Well, 171 00:11:03,200 --> 00:11:06,920 Speaker 1: that's that's that's a that's a big piece of circumstantial slash, 172 00:11:06,920 --> 00:11:09,199 Speaker 1: physical evidence that you have there. If you're going to 173 00:11:09,360 --> 00:11:11,000 Speaker 1: move forward with this and go to court with it, 174 00:11:11,600 --> 00:11:15,520 Speaker 1: you know, how how can you explain that away? And 175 00:11:15,559 --> 00:11:19,840 Speaker 1: it's it's very very difficult. But my question is, given 176 00:11:19,920 --> 00:11:22,880 Speaker 1: the amount of DNA that we are led to believe 177 00:11:22,920 --> 00:11:26,000 Speaker 1: they pulled off of this sheath, it seems to be 178 00:11:26,120 --> 00:11:30,520 Speaker 1: very very small. So does that matter? I mean, is 179 00:11:30,559 --> 00:11:33,040 Speaker 1: that going to give Well obviously it did, but is 180 00:11:33,080 --> 00:11:39,040 Speaker 1: that going to give um forensic investigators enough to say 181 00:11:39,040 --> 00:11:41,920 Speaker 1: with you know, beyond a reasonable doubt that they matched. 182 00:11:42,200 --> 00:11:45,800 Speaker 1: Oh yeah, it's it's certainly more than enough. We're talking, 183 00:11:46,040 --> 00:11:50,000 Speaker 1: you know, at a molecular level here. That's how strong 184 00:11:50,520 --> 00:11:54,440 Speaker 1: the connectivity is. So it takes very little. It takes 185 00:11:54,640 --> 00:11:58,280 Speaker 1: very very little, Jackie, very very little. And you know, 186 00:11:58,760 --> 00:12:01,280 Speaker 1: let's think about you're already, okay, we're already kind of 187 00:12:02,080 --> 00:12:05,120 Speaker 1: a bit behind the eight ball. Would touch DNA because 188 00:12:05,160 --> 00:12:08,000 Speaker 1: it's not a complete strand because you know, like I said, 189 00:12:08,040 --> 00:12:11,360 Speaker 1: it's coming from a dead skin cell. It's slept of 190 00:12:11,400 --> 00:12:13,959 Speaker 1: assuming that that that it is touched DNA. Of course 191 00:12:13,960 --> 00:12:16,360 Speaker 1: it could be you know, a number of other things 192 00:12:16,360 --> 00:12:18,920 Speaker 1: as well. We don't have enough information right now, but 193 00:12:19,000 --> 00:12:24,400 Speaker 1: it does not require a tremendous amount of sample in 194 00:12:24,520 --> 00:12:27,760 Speaker 1: order to work back through this. For these DNA scientists 195 00:12:27,800 --> 00:12:31,520 Speaker 1: who are just incredibly brilliant and the technology they have 196 00:12:31,559 --> 00:12:36,480 Speaker 1: at their disposal, it's daunting when you're staring down the 197 00:12:36,520 --> 00:12:38,880 Speaker 1: barrel of this as a defense team. The father of 198 00:12:39,000 --> 00:12:44,319 Speaker 1: Kaylee Gonzolvis, has mentioned that his daughter's wounds were different 199 00:12:44,440 --> 00:12:48,880 Speaker 1: than the other victims, saying that she had gouges in 200 00:12:49,000 --> 00:12:52,920 Speaker 1: her body. I'm curious whether or not we would be 201 00:12:53,080 --> 00:12:58,720 Speaker 1: likely to see defensive wounds on either person that could 202 00:12:58,760 --> 00:13:02,840 Speaker 1: be definitively defined as they were trying to defend the 203 00:13:02,880 --> 00:13:07,079 Speaker 1: other person. Well well, yeah, and okay, here here's here's 204 00:13:07,080 --> 00:13:09,120 Speaker 1: something that you have to consider. At this point, we 205 00:13:09,160 --> 00:13:12,360 Speaker 1: don't know what position Mattie and Kaylee were actually in 206 00:13:12,480 --> 00:13:14,640 Speaker 1: in this bed. We know that they were in the 207 00:13:14,679 --> 00:13:18,840 Speaker 1: bed together, and to your point, you know, was was 208 00:13:18,920 --> 00:13:23,640 Speaker 1: one huddled over the other in a defensive posture attempting 209 00:13:23,679 --> 00:13:28,079 Speaker 1: to defend against any kind of strikes by the accused. 210 00:13:29,440 --> 00:13:31,200 Speaker 1: Is that is that what we're talking about? Or were 211 00:13:31,240 --> 00:13:35,120 Speaker 1: they both lyned in what would be considered quote unquote 212 00:13:35,160 --> 00:13:38,480 Speaker 1: a normal sleeping posture, you know, face up, facedown or 213 00:13:38,559 --> 00:13:42,560 Speaker 1: on their sides. You had mentioned earlier that it's it's 214 00:13:42,600 --> 00:13:44,960 Speaker 1: really hard I think for many of us to even 215 00:13:45,080 --> 00:13:49,960 Speaker 1: think that a stabbing could have taken place without one 216 00:13:50,000 --> 00:13:53,760 Speaker 1: person having been aware of it. You know, how how 217 00:13:53,760 --> 00:13:56,040 Speaker 1: do you get past that? You know, because this is 218 00:13:56,080 --> 00:14:00,360 Speaker 1: not like a gunshot wound, where uh, it's sudden and 219 00:14:00,520 --> 00:14:03,720 Speaker 1: you might have, I don't know, a pretty quick death. 220 00:14:05,200 --> 00:14:07,480 Speaker 1: There would have been pain associated with it. There would 221 00:14:07,520 --> 00:14:11,280 Speaker 1: have been an awareness at a very primal level. You know, 222 00:14:11,320 --> 00:14:13,960 Speaker 1: you would think that a scream would have emanated a 223 00:14:14,000 --> 00:14:17,000 Speaker 1: reaction of some kind. I think that it would be 224 00:14:17,040 --> 00:14:21,040 Speaker 1: speculative at best for forensic pathologists to be able to 225 00:14:21,040 --> 00:14:22,960 Speaker 1: get upon the stand and say, yet this person was 226 00:14:23,040 --> 00:14:27,360 Speaker 1: defending the other person from you know, an aggressor. Based 227 00:14:27,440 --> 00:14:33,239 Speaker 1: upon the examination of the wounds and again these comments 228 00:14:33,320 --> 00:14:42,400 Speaker 1: that the father is making, I have a difficult time 229 00:14:42,520 --> 00:14:47,160 Speaker 1: kind of measuring out how much information he knows about 230 00:14:47,200 --> 00:14:50,600 Speaker 1: the injuries on the other victims. Has he's spoken with 231 00:14:50,680 --> 00:14:53,800 Speaker 1: the family members of other victims and they've described injuries 232 00:14:53,840 --> 00:14:56,800 Speaker 1: to him, and he's been able to kind of compare 233 00:14:56,800 --> 00:15:01,560 Speaker 1: and contrast, if you will. That's that's very interesting that 234 00:15:01,640 --> 00:15:04,320 Speaker 1: he can make that statement, you know, and he uses 235 00:15:04,400 --> 00:15:08,960 Speaker 1: the term gauges, and that's not something that's generally associated 236 00:15:09,080 --> 00:15:14,960 Speaker 1: with forensic pathology, so that that's not something that a 237 00:15:16,000 --> 00:15:19,160 Speaker 1: forensic pathologist or a trained corner would say. We would 238 00:15:19,160 --> 00:15:22,880 Speaker 1: not say, well, they have gauge marks on them. Now, 239 00:15:23,120 --> 00:15:28,080 Speaker 1: I think a broader, broader thought here is was he 240 00:15:28,200 --> 00:15:31,280 Speaker 1: able to see her remains at the funeral home? And 241 00:15:31,360 --> 00:15:34,000 Speaker 1: if that's the case, he could be assessing this in 242 00:15:34,080 --> 00:15:36,560 Speaker 1: his own in his own way, I think famously. You know, 243 00:15:36,800 --> 00:15:41,360 Speaker 1: he made one of the early initial comments when he 244 00:15:41,480 --> 00:15:45,840 Speaker 1: was given a press conference, he alluded to this interesting 245 00:15:46,720 --> 00:15:50,920 Speaker 1: construct where he said, I paid for that. I paid 246 00:15:50,960 --> 00:15:52,760 Speaker 1: for that. I didn't know what he meant by that. 247 00:15:52,840 --> 00:15:55,960 Speaker 1: I didn't know was he talking about the funeral. Was 248 00:15:56,000 --> 00:15:58,200 Speaker 1: he talking about the funeral? Did he go to the 249 00:15:58,240 --> 00:16:02,920 Speaker 1: funeral home prior to his daughter's body being prepared and 250 00:16:02,920 --> 00:16:05,160 Speaker 1: he saw the remains? So I don't know. I don't 251 00:16:05,200 --> 00:16:07,680 Speaker 1: know where this is kind of bubbling up from, and 252 00:16:08,840 --> 00:16:11,840 Speaker 1: I would I think i'd be interested in seeing what 253 00:16:11,880 --> 00:16:16,080 Speaker 1: the actual forensic pathologist has to say about this case 254 00:16:16,200 --> 00:16:20,720 Speaker 1: and about everything that's connected to it in order to, 255 00:16:20,880 --> 00:16:24,000 Speaker 1: you know, kind of assess these injuries, because look, I mean, 256 00:16:24,080 --> 00:16:27,560 Speaker 1: he's a dad, He's going to be very very emotional 257 00:16:27,600 --> 00:16:30,040 Speaker 1: over this, and I don't know what he is saying 258 00:16:30,440 --> 00:16:55,080 Speaker 1: and what contexts he's saying this in at the scene 259 00:16:55,080 --> 00:16:58,480 Speaker 1: of a death, anything, and I mean anything that is 260 00:16:58,840 --> 00:17:03,040 Speaker 1: particularly an indoor scene, anything that is in that residence, 261 00:17:03,240 --> 00:17:08,359 Speaker 1: in that structure, has value because you just never know, 262 00:17:08,640 --> 00:17:10,600 Speaker 1: you never know where the road is going to lead 263 00:17:10,680 --> 00:17:16,639 Speaker 1: from an evidentiary standpoint. With that said, I would argue, 264 00:17:17,280 --> 00:17:22,159 Speaker 1: I would argue that perhaps aside from the evidence that 265 00:17:22,240 --> 00:17:26,760 Speaker 1: the bodies contain, one of the most important things, one 266 00:17:26,800 --> 00:17:32,119 Speaker 1: of the most important things here are the mattresses that 267 00:17:32,200 --> 00:17:34,720 Speaker 1: these bodies were found upon, because you're you're going to 268 00:17:34,800 --> 00:17:37,480 Speaker 1: learn a lot, You're going to learn so much from 269 00:17:37,520 --> 00:17:40,640 Speaker 1: the surfaces of these mattresses, You're gonna learn so much 270 00:17:40,720 --> 00:17:47,360 Speaker 1: from perhaps the interior of these mattresses'. It is what 271 00:17:47,359 --> 00:17:51,760 Speaker 1: we would term an evidence rich environment. Well, I had 272 00:17:51,800 --> 00:17:54,400 Speaker 1: a big lightbulb go off over my head, Joe as 273 00:17:54,600 --> 00:18:00,560 Speaker 1: we all watched as investigators removed those mattresses. Is from 274 00:18:00,560 --> 00:18:05,920 Speaker 1: the hall. Those mattresses, it looked like they were inside 275 00:18:07,359 --> 00:18:10,560 Speaker 1: I would have I guess a huge evidence bag or 276 00:18:10,600 --> 00:18:15,560 Speaker 1: a mattress bag or something. But they were loaded into 277 00:18:15,680 --> 00:18:19,239 Speaker 1: the back of a pickup truck. And the first thing 278 00:18:19,240 --> 00:18:21,520 Speaker 1: that went through my head was, that's not how Joe 279 00:18:21,560 --> 00:18:26,280 Speaker 1: Scott would do it. Am I right, Yes, you're absolutely right. 280 00:18:26,359 --> 00:18:32,560 Speaker 1: And this goes back to valuable sentimental objects that were 281 00:18:32,640 --> 00:18:38,680 Speaker 1: released from the scene already. You know, so you're releasing 282 00:18:38,720 --> 00:18:42,480 Speaker 1: these items from the scene that quote unquote have sentimental 283 00:18:42,600 --> 00:18:49,200 Speaker 1: value whatever that means. I have no idea what that means. Okay, 284 00:18:50,200 --> 00:18:55,359 Speaker 1: but yet you're going to keep these mattresses within the 285 00:18:55,480 --> 00:19:00,560 Speaker 1: environment and having not secured them to the point where 286 00:19:00,560 --> 00:19:03,240 Speaker 1: you're going to remove them to be analyzed. Because here 287 00:19:03,520 --> 00:19:06,439 Speaker 1: this is the key, pay very close attention to be 288 00:19:06,600 --> 00:19:10,520 Speaker 1: analyzed at the lab, you're going to leave them in there. 289 00:19:11,600 --> 00:19:16,320 Speaker 1: I don't I don't understand that. Most of the time, 290 00:19:16,640 --> 00:19:23,760 Speaker 1: when you're talking about mattresses that are involved in homicides 291 00:19:23,840 --> 00:19:27,760 Speaker 1: like this, that are arguably blood soaked, all right, contained 292 00:19:27,760 --> 00:19:32,359 Speaker 1: a tremendous amount of physical evidence that's going out the 293 00:19:32,400 --> 00:19:37,760 Speaker 1: door to the crime lab, like immediately, like that night, 294 00:19:37,880 --> 00:19:41,320 Speaker 1: you're going to make arrangements. They're going to be taken away. 295 00:19:41,760 --> 00:19:46,240 Speaker 1: And yeah, I saw it, and my jawhead floor when 296 00:19:46,280 --> 00:19:47,960 Speaker 1: I was I was looking at I was thinking, wait, 297 00:19:49,640 --> 00:19:52,000 Speaker 1: am I am I actually seeing this? When I saw 298 00:19:52,040 --> 00:19:56,160 Speaker 1: the footage of a mattress being placed into the back 299 00:19:56,240 --> 00:19:59,560 Speaker 1: of a pickup truck. And granted it appears to be 300 00:20:01,200 --> 00:20:05,760 Speaker 1: it's enveloped in something, all right, in some kind of 301 00:20:05,760 --> 00:20:09,760 Speaker 1: of you know, container of some type of pouch if 302 00:20:09,760 --> 00:20:12,399 Speaker 1: you will, to get it to the crime lab. But 303 00:20:12,440 --> 00:20:13,639 Speaker 1: you're going to put it in the back of a 304 00:20:13,640 --> 00:20:16,119 Speaker 1: pickup truck. That's that's what we're doing. Now, you're not 305 00:20:16,200 --> 00:20:18,520 Speaker 1: going to have a van, You're not going to have 306 00:20:18,600 --> 00:20:21,359 Speaker 1: some other resource that you can place this thing in 307 00:20:21,880 --> 00:20:26,199 Speaker 1: where it's protected from the elements completely and transported to 308 00:20:26,240 --> 00:20:29,679 Speaker 1: the lab. At that point, I don't understand the rationale 309 00:20:29,680 --> 00:20:35,760 Speaker 1: behind that, because the mattresses have fragile evidence on them. 310 00:20:36,119 --> 00:20:38,360 Speaker 1: You know, obviously we're talking about DNA, but we're also 311 00:20:38,400 --> 00:20:42,680 Speaker 1: talking about things like hair and fiber, and we're also 312 00:20:42,720 --> 00:20:46,240 Speaker 1: talking about the potential for tool marks. So what do 313 00:20:46,280 --> 00:20:49,160 Speaker 1: you mean by that, Well, let's just say that these 314 00:20:49,200 --> 00:20:55,160 Speaker 1: mattresses were the surface that the victims were lying upon. 315 00:20:56,680 --> 00:21:03,719 Speaker 1: If the perpetrator did not land the knife strike on 316 00:21:03,800 --> 00:21:07,080 Speaker 1: the body and mist and it went into the mattress, 317 00:21:07,840 --> 00:21:12,120 Speaker 1: then now you're transferring whatever was on the surface of 318 00:21:12,160 --> 00:21:16,440 Speaker 1: that knife to the interior of the mattress. So now 319 00:21:16,440 --> 00:21:19,199 Speaker 1: you're getting down into the substratum of the mattress. So 320 00:21:19,960 --> 00:21:24,639 Speaker 1: you've got this very dynamic environment that these attacks are 321 00:21:24,640 --> 00:21:28,560 Speaker 1: occurring in. One of the biggest areas for evidence capture 322 00:21:29,280 --> 00:21:31,440 Speaker 1: is going to be on the surface of this mattress 323 00:21:31,480 --> 00:21:37,040 Speaker 1: and potentially the interior of this mattress. So I was left, 324 00:21:37,080 --> 00:21:39,239 Speaker 1: you know, kind of with my mouth open, you know, 325 00:21:39,680 --> 00:21:43,320 Speaker 1: really really trying to understand what their purpose was in 326 00:21:43,440 --> 00:21:46,399 Speaker 1: removing them so late and after the fact. Well, and 327 00:21:46,520 --> 00:21:52,080 Speaker 1: looking at the news coverage, the mattresses were not removed 328 00:21:52,200 --> 00:21:57,320 Speaker 1: until about a month after the last time the investigators 329 00:21:57,320 --> 00:22:00,360 Speaker 1: were last seen taking items out of the home for 330 00:22:00,480 --> 00:22:05,440 Speaker 1: that reason and then questioning them how they moved them. 331 00:22:06,280 --> 00:22:10,560 Speaker 1: Obviously some of these investigators or seasoned investigators, So I'm 332 00:22:10,560 --> 00:22:14,480 Speaker 1: sure that there was a plan. So how do you 333 00:22:14,600 --> 00:22:19,840 Speaker 1: think with what they encased those mattresses in How were 334 00:22:19,920 --> 00:22:23,439 Speaker 1: they hermetically sealed to make sure that nothing got in. 335 00:22:23,800 --> 00:22:26,560 Speaker 1: I'm not necessarily worried about as much getting out as 336 00:22:26,600 --> 00:22:31,000 Speaker 1: I am of whatever is in there being contaminated. I 337 00:22:31,080 --> 00:22:34,840 Speaker 1: think we need to worry about both things, both aspects 338 00:22:34,880 --> 00:22:39,000 Speaker 1: to this. We do need to worry about things certainly 339 00:22:39,040 --> 00:22:45,200 Speaker 1: getting in as you stay at jack, anything from externally 340 00:22:45,600 --> 00:22:50,040 Speaker 1: that could find its way inside of this pouch that 341 00:22:50,280 --> 00:22:53,800 Speaker 1: might be outside of what you would expect to find 342 00:22:53,840 --> 00:22:58,199 Speaker 1: in the pristine, interior protected scene. All right, when you 343 00:22:58,280 --> 00:23:01,679 Speaker 1: hit that door, have you got to think secured to 344 00:23:01,720 --> 00:23:05,919 Speaker 1: the point where anything on the outside is not going 345 00:23:05,960 --> 00:23:08,240 Speaker 1: to find its way, you know, because the environment that 346 00:23:08,280 --> 00:23:12,359 Speaker 1: you're exiting is reasonably protected, you know, within the apartment 347 00:23:13,040 --> 00:23:16,760 Speaker 1: or the house as it is. But then you go 348 00:23:16,840 --> 00:23:21,000 Speaker 1: into an outdoor environment with this thing, and you have 349 00:23:21,080 --> 00:23:23,320 Speaker 1: to make sure that it is secured. Now to the 350 00:23:23,359 --> 00:23:29,320 Speaker 1: other point here losing things. If it's a if it's 351 00:23:29,440 --> 00:23:32,960 Speaker 1: a blood stain, for instance, and it has saturated into 352 00:23:33,000 --> 00:23:36,840 Speaker 1: the mattress, there's high possibility that you're going to be 353 00:23:36,880 --> 00:23:39,359 Speaker 1: able to, you know, protect that to a great degree 354 00:23:40,400 --> 00:23:43,800 Speaker 1: from you know, wind and rain, because you've got this 355 00:23:43,800 --> 00:23:48,400 Speaker 1: this covering on it. I'm really worried about fragile evidence, 356 00:23:48,440 --> 00:23:52,280 Speaker 1: certainly like touch, which is if you think about touched 357 00:23:52,440 --> 00:23:56,520 Speaker 1: in a being the consistency of ten times more fragile 358 00:23:56,520 --> 00:24:02,320 Speaker 1: than say, for instance, halcoulm powder that dainty and grass aisle. 359 00:24:03,359 --> 00:24:07,719 Speaker 1: It can actually, you know, kind of blow away. Also 360 00:24:07,800 --> 00:24:11,119 Speaker 1: to be considered our hair and fiber, which you know 361 00:24:11,160 --> 00:24:15,399 Speaker 1: any of us, know you know that have dogs or 362 00:24:15,480 --> 00:24:22,840 Speaker 1: have maybe we were finding hair on ourselves. Anything that's fragile, 363 00:24:22,880 --> 00:24:25,199 Speaker 1: it can either attach itself to us or it can 364 00:24:25,240 --> 00:24:29,280 Speaker 1: be blown away, and that would be a consideration as well. 365 00:24:29,320 --> 00:24:31,600 Speaker 1: You don't want to lose anything that you may have 366 00:24:31,680 --> 00:24:34,800 Speaker 1: captured up there in a scene. I hope that that 367 00:24:34,960 --> 00:24:40,960 Speaker 1: they had these these pouches secured on those mattresses before 368 00:24:40,960 --> 00:24:44,880 Speaker 1: they brought them downstairs. All of this is not as 369 00:24:44,960 --> 00:24:48,000 Speaker 1: concerning to me though, as the amount of time it's 370 00:24:48,080 --> 00:24:52,400 Speaker 1: taken and then the conveyance in which they chose to 371 00:24:52,440 --> 00:24:56,200 Speaker 1: do this with. And it goes more to the way 372 00:24:56,840 --> 00:24:59,640 Speaker 1: the lawyers are going to look at this, and particularly 373 00:24:59,720 --> 00:25:03,160 Speaker 1: the sense team, because they're going to take that that 374 00:25:03,359 --> 00:25:07,680 Speaker 1: videography that you and I both saw and at trial 375 00:25:08,480 --> 00:25:11,919 Speaker 1: they'll they'll run that. They'll run that on the screen. 376 00:25:12,400 --> 00:25:15,040 Speaker 1: And remember they don't have to prove anything, they just 377 00:25:15,080 --> 00:25:18,360 Speaker 1: have to kind of implant that doubt in their minds, 378 00:25:18,800 --> 00:25:20,640 Speaker 1: you know. And anybody up in this region, it's ever 379 00:25:20,720 --> 00:25:22,920 Speaker 1: ridden around a pickup truck. They've been in the bed 380 00:25:22,960 --> 00:25:25,280 Speaker 1: of a pickup truck. They know the wind blows. Anybody 381 00:25:25,280 --> 00:25:31,080 Speaker 1: that's ever moved period, moved, Yeah, anybody. And driving down 382 00:25:31,119 --> 00:25:34,399 Speaker 1: the interstate, you see mattresses and furniture on the side 383 00:25:34,400 --> 00:25:37,200 Speaker 1: of the road. I mean that was all I could 384 00:25:37,240 --> 00:25:40,280 Speaker 1: think of, truly, well, almost all I can think of 385 00:25:41,000 --> 00:25:44,560 Speaker 1: was Holy cow. I hope they have strapped those things 386 00:25:44,600 --> 00:25:48,719 Speaker 1: down really well, yeah, I do too. And you know, 387 00:25:48,800 --> 00:25:52,560 Speaker 1: just the physical security of the items themselves. It's It's 388 00:25:52,560 --> 00:25:54,680 Speaker 1: an odd thing, isn't it, Because you know, most of 389 00:25:54,680 --> 00:25:59,000 Speaker 1: the time when you're watching videography outside of crime scenes 390 00:25:59,000 --> 00:26:01,880 Speaker 1: and you see the you see the technicians walking out 391 00:26:01,880 --> 00:26:04,600 Speaker 1: of the door, they're generally carrying bags. You know, you 392 00:26:04,640 --> 00:26:08,520 Speaker 1: think about all the time, thousands and thousands of hours 393 00:26:08,520 --> 00:26:11,080 Speaker 1: of footage that we've seen, stuff that I've seen in 394 00:26:11,119 --> 00:26:14,159 Speaker 1: real time being out on scenes. You think about, you know, 395 00:26:15,160 --> 00:26:18,159 Speaker 1: paper bags that are sealed. You can see the evidence tape. 396 00:26:18,200 --> 00:26:20,480 Speaker 1: These things are sealed with and of course there's other 397 00:26:20,480 --> 00:26:23,480 Speaker 1: types of packaging that you can use, and then it 398 00:26:23,560 --> 00:26:25,199 Speaker 1: kind of goes into the back of a van and 399 00:26:25,280 --> 00:26:29,320 Speaker 1: it disappears, right, it just vanishes. That's not what happened 400 00:26:29,359 --> 00:26:33,080 Speaker 1: with this. It comes out of the house and it's 401 00:26:33,080 --> 00:26:36,080 Speaker 1: then planted in the back of a pickup truck. And 402 00:26:36,480 --> 00:26:40,840 Speaker 1: it gives you pause, It certainly does, and just hoping 403 00:26:40,840 --> 00:27:03,480 Speaker 1: that they haven't lost anything here. People have asked me, 404 00:27:03,760 --> 00:27:06,639 Speaker 1: how would you describe the forensics in this case. The 405 00:27:07,200 --> 00:27:10,640 Speaker 1: one word that kind of sums it up for me 406 00:27:10,840 --> 00:27:14,879 Speaker 1: is dense. There's so much. There's so much on so 407 00:27:14,920 --> 00:27:17,520 Speaker 1: many levels that it's hard, you know, just to kind 408 00:27:17,520 --> 00:27:19,440 Speaker 1: of sit here and way through it all. But there's 409 00:27:19,440 --> 00:27:22,720 Speaker 1: certain things that we can consider, and not everything's been 410 00:27:22,760 --> 00:27:25,240 Speaker 1: revealed yet. Jackie. One of the things that I've learned 411 00:27:25,280 --> 00:27:30,000 Speaker 1: from you is how you can prove that a certain 412 00:27:30,160 --> 00:27:34,240 Speaker 1: gun caused a certain wound? How are you going to 413 00:27:34,320 --> 00:27:38,000 Speaker 1: do that with a knife, especially a knife? You've not found, 414 00:27:38,320 --> 00:27:43,159 Speaker 1: great question, and let's let's let's look at what we 415 00:27:43,240 --> 00:27:47,439 Speaker 1: do have. What we do have is a sheath, okay, 416 00:27:47,520 --> 00:27:52,560 Speaker 1: which I think is a monumental piece of evidence and 417 00:27:52,560 --> 00:27:55,879 Speaker 1: it's going to play in court when this think finally 418 00:27:55,880 --> 00:28:00,119 Speaker 1: goes to trial. But along with that sheath you get 419 00:27:59,760 --> 00:28:03,960 Speaker 1: at least the beginnings of an identification. That is, provided 420 00:28:04,400 --> 00:28:08,639 Speaker 1: that the knife that was carried in that sheath is 421 00:28:08,680 --> 00:28:11,920 Speaker 1: the same type of knife that would have come with 422 00:28:11,960 --> 00:28:14,479 Speaker 1: the sheath, Okay, because you can't have a sheath and 423 00:28:14,600 --> 00:28:16,760 Speaker 1: carry a different type of knife in it. That's certainly 424 00:28:16,760 --> 00:28:22,560 Speaker 1: something that must be considered, all right. So to begin with, 425 00:28:23,200 --> 00:28:29,280 Speaker 1: what will happen is that the authorities the investigators will contact, 426 00:28:29,840 --> 00:28:35,440 Speaker 1: will contact the company that manufactures this knife, in particular, 427 00:28:35,560 --> 00:28:40,320 Speaker 1: specifically K Bar right. And if I remember correctly, on 428 00:28:40,360 --> 00:28:44,520 Speaker 1: the exterior of the sheath it is stamped with USMC. 429 00:28:45,520 --> 00:28:51,320 Speaker 1: It's got the Marine Corps emblem on it, okay, and 430 00:28:51,520 --> 00:28:55,560 Speaker 1: that is an identifier for that particular knife. There's probably 431 00:28:55,600 --> 00:28:59,200 Speaker 1: somewhere on there a serial number. So they'll contact the manufacturer, 432 00:28:59,280 --> 00:29:02,840 Speaker 1: will say, hey, look, we're working this case. We need 433 00:29:02,920 --> 00:29:07,920 Speaker 1: to get what are referred to as as knowns or 434 00:29:08,080 --> 00:29:12,960 Speaker 1: exemplars of this knife. So they'll ask for you maybe 435 00:29:12,960 --> 00:29:16,120 Speaker 1: two of these knives to come from the factory, and 436 00:29:16,160 --> 00:29:19,040 Speaker 1: they'll get the sheath and they'll get the knife itself, 437 00:29:19,120 --> 00:29:21,200 Speaker 1: all right, and this is something that they're going to 438 00:29:21,280 --> 00:29:23,880 Speaker 1: hang on to. Now, what they can do is that 439 00:29:23,920 --> 00:29:27,560 Speaker 1: they can actually take a look at the injuries, at 440 00:29:27,560 --> 00:29:32,640 Speaker 1: the injuries that these kids sustained, and the forensic pathologists 441 00:29:33,400 --> 00:29:38,080 Speaker 1: will look at the knife and come up with a 442 00:29:38,160 --> 00:29:41,480 Speaker 1: conclusion as to whether or not this particular type of 443 00:29:41,520 --> 00:29:43,720 Speaker 1: knife can generate this injury. Now, if you want to 444 00:29:43,760 --> 00:29:49,200 Speaker 1: take it a step further, if there are any marks 445 00:29:49,320 --> 00:29:56,080 Speaker 1: on any of the skeletal bodies within these remains, and 446 00:29:56,120 --> 00:30:02,760 Speaker 1: I'm talking about ribs, sternam spine, collar bone, any of 447 00:30:02,760 --> 00:30:09,080 Speaker 1: these areas, there is a potential that the samples of 448 00:30:09,120 --> 00:30:13,200 Speaker 1: these injured areas have been retained. This happens with great 449 00:30:13,240 --> 00:30:17,600 Speaker 1: frequency at autopsy. So you if there's what's referred to 450 00:30:17,680 --> 00:30:21,240 Speaker 1: as an insulted piece of bone, that piece of bone 451 00:30:21,280 --> 00:30:23,239 Speaker 1: would be removed from the body and it would be 452 00:30:23,280 --> 00:30:26,600 Speaker 1: retained by the crime lab or by theme. And once 453 00:30:26,600 --> 00:30:29,560 Speaker 1: you get that knife or a knife similar to that, 454 00:30:30,360 --> 00:30:33,960 Speaker 1: you will ask a tool mark expert at the crime lab, 455 00:30:34,440 --> 00:30:36,800 Speaker 1: maybe at the state crime lab, maybe with the FBI 456 00:30:37,880 --> 00:30:41,200 Speaker 1: to do a comparison. Give you, give us an idea, 457 00:30:41,280 --> 00:30:44,760 Speaker 1: what's your opinion here? Looking at this microscopically, at this 458 00:30:44,880 --> 00:30:47,400 Speaker 1: injury on the bone. Can you look at this knife 459 00:30:47,440 --> 00:30:51,120 Speaker 1: and say that this knife generated this injury and they 460 00:30:51,480 --> 00:30:54,120 Speaker 1: might can you know, they'll come up with an opinion 461 00:30:54,160 --> 00:30:56,440 Speaker 1: about it, you know, and a lot goes into it. 462 00:30:56,640 --> 00:30:58,720 Speaker 1: You can talk about the shape of the blade along 463 00:30:58,720 --> 00:31:02,080 Speaker 1: the long axis. All of these blades are unique to 464 00:31:02,080 --> 00:31:05,920 Speaker 1: the manufacturer. Those are things that they will explore. Now, 465 00:31:05,920 --> 00:31:09,400 Speaker 1: we don't have the actual knife to compare at this time, 466 00:31:09,680 --> 00:31:12,640 Speaker 1: not saying it's not going to make an appearance, but 467 00:31:12,800 --> 00:31:19,720 Speaker 1: in my experience with knife injuries, it's important to consider 468 00:31:20,440 --> 00:31:26,440 Speaker 1: that depended upon the quality of the blade and the 469 00:31:26,520 --> 00:31:34,280 Speaker 1: metal and the way it's forged is created, this type 470 00:31:34,280 --> 00:31:38,760 Speaker 1: of blade might chip. Okay, it might chip, and if 471 00:31:38,760 --> 00:31:42,360 Speaker 1: it chips, many times it'll chip within the body, particularly 472 00:31:42,360 --> 00:31:46,440 Speaker 1: if it's striking bony areas. You say, well, what can 473 00:31:46,480 --> 00:31:50,480 Speaker 1: you do with that? Well, before an autopsy is conducted, 474 00:31:50,560 --> 00:31:53,880 Speaker 1: one of the things that is done is you do 475 00:31:54,160 --> 00:31:58,520 Speaker 1: what is called an AP and a lateral X ray 476 00:31:58,680 --> 00:32:02,280 Speaker 1: of the body. AP means if anybody that's listening, you've 477 00:32:02,320 --> 00:32:05,080 Speaker 1: been to the docks office and they make you stand 478 00:32:05,840 --> 00:32:07,720 Speaker 1: to get a chest X ray and they make you 479 00:32:07,760 --> 00:32:11,320 Speaker 1: stand and put your shoulders to the wall. Um, they're 480 00:32:11,360 --> 00:32:13,640 Speaker 1: taking a chest X ray. That's an ap that's kind 481 00:32:13,680 --> 00:32:16,760 Speaker 1: of an overall view from that perspective, and then they 482 00:32:16,800 --> 00:32:18,720 Speaker 1: do a lateral you know, when you're in the X 483 00:32:18,800 --> 00:32:21,200 Speaker 1: ray room, they make you turn and profile and they 484 00:32:21,200 --> 00:32:24,479 Speaker 1: shoot you from that perspective. Well, that's a lateral and 485 00:32:24,520 --> 00:32:27,600 Speaker 1: so what do you do with those two two X rays. Well, 486 00:32:27,600 --> 00:32:29,880 Speaker 1: you look at them before you do the autopsy and 487 00:32:29,880 --> 00:32:35,000 Speaker 1: you say, Okay, anatomically, if I'm looking at this at 488 00:32:35,040 --> 00:32:37,560 Speaker 1: this image and I see a little metal storm right here, 489 00:32:38,080 --> 00:32:41,040 Speaker 1: it might be just to the right of the mid line, 490 00:32:41,120 --> 00:32:49,280 Speaker 1: maybe adjacent to the left upper lobe of the left lung, Okay, 491 00:32:49,400 --> 00:32:51,920 Speaker 1: then you flip it and you look at the lateral 492 00:32:51,960 --> 00:32:54,240 Speaker 1: perspective and you can get an idea of depth. So 493 00:32:54,280 --> 00:32:57,840 Speaker 1: you're not going in blind. The key is can you 494 00:32:58,600 --> 00:33:03,719 Speaker 1: can you find mind? Can you find that metallic body 495 00:33:04,080 --> 00:33:07,720 Speaker 1: and retrieve it? And if you can't. If you can't, 496 00:33:07,760 --> 00:33:10,680 Speaker 1: there's an off chance that you can submit that to 497 00:33:10,840 --> 00:33:14,880 Speaker 1: the crime lab and they could do a metallurgical analysis 498 00:33:14,880 --> 00:33:19,000 Speaker 1: on that. And very simple terms, what that means is 499 00:33:19,040 --> 00:33:25,120 Speaker 1: that that item has a specific chemical signature that is 500 00:33:25,280 --> 00:33:29,040 Speaker 1: unique to that manufacturer. You know how that blade is forged. 501 00:33:30,320 --> 00:33:34,040 Speaker 1: If it's is an amalgam of various different types of metal, 502 00:33:34,200 --> 00:33:35,880 Speaker 1: you know, how do they fold it in and all 503 00:33:35,880 --> 00:33:38,040 Speaker 1: those sorts of things, And that's that's kind of a 504 00:33:38,120 --> 00:33:43,360 Speaker 1: chemical signature. Additionally, what happens with knife wounds, and again 505 00:33:43,400 --> 00:33:45,280 Speaker 1: we don't have the knife, and we don't know at 506 00:33:45,280 --> 00:33:51,040 Speaker 1: this point, but many times, with sharp force injuries, the 507 00:33:51,160 --> 00:33:53,560 Speaker 1: tip of the knife, the very point of it will 508 00:33:53,600 --> 00:33:56,840 Speaker 1: actually break off and it will lodge, It will lodge 509 00:33:56,840 --> 00:33:59,760 Speaker 1: in the body. I've seen this happen any number of times, 510 00:34:00,120 --> 00:34:01,880 Speaker 1: and most of the time it goes back to the 511 00:34:01,920 --> 00:34:06,520 Speaker 1: structural integrity of the knife as it applies to the 512 00:34:06,640 --> 00:34:10,080 Speaker 1: quality of the manufacturer, you know how they make these things. 513 00:34:10,120 --> 00:34:13,799 Speaker 1: And secondly, the age of the blade. You know, how 514 00:34:13,800 --> 00:34:16,839 Speaker 1: old is this blade? And then how much stress has 515 00:34:16,880 --> 00:34:18,960 Speaker 1: the blade been put under. Well, let's think about what 516 00:34:19,000 --> 00:34:22,840 Speaker 1: we're talking about here, right, We're talking about four victims, 517 00:34:22,960 --> 00:34:28,400 Speaker 1: Jackie four. All right, This knife, I think, just from 518 00:34:29,120 --> 00:34:35,120 Speaker 1: a structural standpoint, has been involved in very in a 519 00:34:35,320 --> 00:34:41,680 Speaker 1: very intense, a very intense attack. So the more and 520 00:34:41,760 --> 00:34:45,840 Speaker 1: more these victims are stabbed, it would stand a reason 521 00:34:46,239 --> 00:34:48,680 Speaker 1: that the structural integrity of the blade could begin to 522 00:34:48,719 --> 00:34:51,480 Speaker 1: break down. People don't think about. You know, every time 523 00:34:51,520 --> 00:34:54,480 Speaker 1: you use a blade, say in your kitchen, to cut 524 00:34:54,520 --> 00:34:58,280 Speaker 1: something with that blade, even though you may have just sharpened, 525 00:34:58,320 --> 00:35:00,160 Speaker 1: it is not as sharp as it was before you 526 00:35:00,280 --> 00:35:03,680 Speaker 1: used it. And you keep that progression up without sharpening 527 00:35:03,719 --> 00:35:06,960 Speaker 1: the blade, it blunts the blade. And as the blade 528 00:35:07,000 --> 00:35:09,560 Speaker 1: gets blunted and you're still using the same amount of force, 529 00:35:10,120 --> 00:35:12,879 Speaker 1: you put stress on those edges and it can begin 530 00:35:12,920 --> 00:35:16,480 Speaker 1: to break down. It'll chip, it'll chip, and sometimes those 531 00:35:16,520 --> 00:35:18,600 Speaker 1: tips will break off. I just hope that they did 532 00:35:18,680 --> 00:35:22,200 Speaker 1: full body X rays prior to doing the autopsy. Let's 533 00:35:22,239 --> 00:35:25,359 Speaker 1: see if for once I know more than you do, Joe. 534 00:35:26,680 --> 00:35:30,200 Speaker 1: Not likely, but let's see. Come on, do you know 535 00:35:30,200 --> 00:35:37,799 Speaker 1: where the name Kbar came from? I do not who? Okay, 536 00:35:38,320 --> 00:35:42,320 Speaker 1: all right, let me let me enjoy it this moment. 537 00:35:43,040 --> 00:35:47,320 Speaker 1: So the name Kabar came from the company that manufactured 538 00:35:47,360 --> 00:35:52,759 Speaker 1: these knives was Union Cutlery. And the name Kabar reportedly 539 00:35:53,040 --> 00:35:56,439 Speaker 1: is derived from a story of a man who went 540 00:35:56,520 --> 00:35:59,879 Speaker 1: toe to toe with a bear. His rifle didn't kill, 541 00:35:59,880 --> 00:36:03,520 Speaker 1: it didn't inflict enough damage, and he went hand to 542 00:36:03,600 --> 00:36:06,799 Speaker 1: hand and finished off the bear with his knife from 543 00:36:06,920 --> 00:36:13,320 Speaker 1: Union cutlery. Hence the name k a bar came from 544 00:36:14,080 --> 00:36:19,080 Speaker 1: kill a bear. Wow, I had no idea. And plus, 545 00:36:19,200 --> 00:36:22,360 Speaker 1: you're originally from East Tennessee, so you guys would pronounce 546 00:36:22,600 --> 00:36:26,680 Speaker 1: bar like that, bear like that, right, So yeah, good 547 00:36:26,680 --> 00:36:29,120 Speaker 1: country folks would have said bar. Well, that's that's actually 548 00:36:29,200 --> 00:36:31,040 Speaker 1: kind of fascinating. I had to know. So I went 549 00:36:31,080 --> 00:36:32,799 Speaker 1: and I went and looked it up. And this is 550 00:36:32,840 --> 00:36:38,240 Speaker 1: coming from I'm getting this from the website Exquisite Knives 551 00:36:38,320 --> 00:36:42,200 Speaker 1: dot com. Well, you know, I would believe that it's 552 00:36:42,239 --> 00:36:45,480 Speaker 1: probably do you know that our marines and our sailors 553 00:36:45,520 --> 00:36:50,120 Speaker 1: and actually our coasties have carried k bars for a 554 00:36:50,160 --> 00:36:52,960 Speaker 1: long time. Of course, the sailors and the coasties have 555 00:36:52,960 --> 00:36:55,520 Speaker 1: a different utility for him. They'll you know, do work 556 00:36:55,520 --> 00:36:58,080 Speaker 1: on decks and that sort of thing, cut rope and 557 00:36:58,080 --> 00:37:00,759 Speaker 1: and you know, and do maintenance for marine corps. We 558 00:37:00,800 --> 00:37:02,400 Speaker 1: know what the Marine corps likes to use their k 559 00:37:02,520 --> 00:37:05,319 Speaker 1: bars for. And so it's a and that's who it's 560 00:37:05,360 --> 00:37:08,920 Speaker 1: most closely associated with. I think one last thing that 561 00:37:09,000 --> 00:37:12,880 Speaker 1: I want to get your take on is the footprint 562 00:37:14,040 --> 00:37:19,479 Speaker 1: that was left outside the surviving roommates door. Yeah, what's 563 00:37:19,480 --> 00:37:23,759 Speaker 1: that going to give us a lot? And not many 564 00:37:23,760 --> 00:37:26,239 Speaker 1: people are talking about it. I haven't really talked about 565 00:37:26,239 --> 00:37:29,239 Speaker 1: it a lot, but I think that it's significant. And 566 00:37:29,360 --> 00:37:33,000 Speaker 1: I'm kind of unclear based upon the affidavit because they 567 00:37:33,160 --> 00:37:38,799 Speaker 1: used they used an agent a Meato blue. That is 568 00:37:39,520 --> 00:37:44,319 Speaker 1: said that again, a Meato blue, and it is it's 569 00:37:44,560 --> 00:37:48,920 Speaker 1: used it. It's a it binds with protein and it 570 00:37:48,960 --> 00:37:53,320 Speaker 1: binds with protein in blood. And so you'll use it 571 00:37:53,400 --> 00:37:58,759 Speaker 1: to lift latent prints with all right, or two let's 572 00:37:58,800 --> 00:38:02,960 Speaker 1: say not lift, let's say document. Latent prints and latent 573 00:38:03,000 --> 00:38:08,080 Speaker 1: prince can either be handprints palm prints, but it can 574 00:38:08,120 --> 00:38:12,600 Speaker 1: actually also be footprints. And in this case that's how 575 00:38:12,640 --> 00:38:15,920 Speaker 1: they recognize this. They were applying this agent to the 576 00:38:15,960 --> 00:38:22,239 Speaker 1: floor and they came up with this analysis from the 577 00:38:22,280 --> 00:38:28,920 Speaker 1: scene and they established that this print, this print was 578 00:38:29,920 --> 00:38:33,000 Speaker 1: not only did they say what the print was, as 579 00:38:33,040 --> 00:38:37,440 Speaker 1: far as the shape, they used the term diamond, I think, Jackie. 580 00:38:37,440 --> 00:38:41,239 Speaker 1: They came back with the manufacturer and this is um 581 00:38:41,560 --> 00:38:45,160 Speaker 1: it's a van and for those that don't know, it 582 00:38:46,200 --> 00:38:48,719 Speaker 1: is a skatershoe For those that are not familiar. If 583 00:38:48,760 --> 00:38:53,080 Speaker 1: you're familiar with the movie Fast Fast Times at Ridgemont High. 584 00:38:53,080 --> 00:38:55,920 Speaker 1: There's a famous scene where Sean Penn takes pair of 585 00:38:56,000 --> 00:39:00,080 Speaker 1: vans and he takes it and he slaps itself and 586 00:39:00,120 --> 00:39:01,719 Speaker 1: the skull with it and says, hey, you know what 587 00:39:01,760 --> 00:39:04,879 Speaker 1: that is. That's my skull. And if you reflect, that's 588 00:39:04,880 --> 00:39:06,759 Speaker 1: a pair of vans. That's what those are. They just 589 00:39:06,840 --> 00:39:09,560 Speaker 1: kind of slip on. They look like deck shoes really, 590 00:39:09,640 --> 00:39:16,040 Speaker 1: but they're they're used for skating, they do. But why 591 00:39:16,120 --> 00:39:19,359 Speaker 1: is that significant? Well, it's significant. You know, we talk 592 00:39:19,400 --> 00:39:22,160 Speaker 1: a lot about DNA and you know the trace evidence, 593 00:39:22,200 --> 00:39:26,959 Speaker 1: but you know, when you get these manufacturer connections as well, 594 00:39:27,719 --> 00:39:30,000 Speaker 1: one of the questions, I think that it's really important. 595 00:39:30,040 --> 00:39:32,880 Speaker 1: I know that these guys are doing their due diligence 596 00:39:32,960 --> 00:39:37,759 Speaker 1: and asking these questions. Very simply put, did the suspect 597 00:39:38,960 --> 00:39:41,800 Speaker 1: own pair of vans? That seems very simplistic, but you 598 00:39:41,880 --> 00:39:44,040 Speaker 1: got to start somewhere right, Well, if he owned a 599 00:39:44,080 --> 00:39:47,439 Speaker 1: pair of vans, did he own this type of pair 600 00:39:47,480 --> 00:39:51,440 Speaker 1: of vans where it has this particular pattern? And also, 601 00:39:51,800 --> 00:39:58,399 Speaker 1: I don't know how robust this print was that they 602 00:39:58,400 --> 00:40:02,839 Speaker 1: had raised, but here's a very interesting aspect. If it 603 00:40:02,960 --> 00:40:08,279 Speaker 1: was significant enough that print that was left behind, you 604 00:40:08,360 --> 00:40:11,719 Speaker 1: might could tell something about the wear pattern. And when 605 00:40:11,719 --> 00:40:15,200 Speaker 1: I say wear pattern, I'm talking about maybe how old 606 00:40:15,200 --> 00:40:17,560 Speaker 1: the shoes were. Was it was it kind of a 607 00:40:17,600 --> 00:40:20,600 Speaker 1: faint kind of print? Was it something that looks like 608 00:40:20,640 --> 00:40:22,920 Speaker 1: it was generated from something that was worn down? Think 609 00:40:22,960 --> 00:40:25,360 Speaker 1: about a pencil within a racer. You know how the 610 00:40:25,400 --> 00:40:27,520 Speaker 1: eraser on a brand new pencil will look, you know, 611 00:40:27,680 --> 00:40:30,279 Speaker 1: like it'll have all the little curves on, it will 612 00:40:30,320 --> 00:40:33,520 Speaker 1: be perfectly round on the side. And but yeah, after 613 00:40:33,600 --> 00:40:35,440 Speaker 1: you use it for a while, you wear if you 614 00:40:35,520 --> 00:40:38,640 Speaker 1: wear it down, it has a completely different appearance to 615 00:40:38,680 --> 00:40:41,279 Speaker 1: it's the same thing. And also another thing that you 616 00:40:41,320 --> 00:40:47,800 Speaker 1: can analyze here is is perhaps if this how they step? 617 00:40:47,960 --> 00:40:52,400 Speaker 1: Do they pronate, do they supernate? You know? What? Do 618 00:40:51,280 --> 00:40:55,000 Speaker 1: they do they heal strike? Well, it all depends on 619 00:40:55,160 --> 00:40:57,560 Speaker 1: do they flex their feet in? Do they walk kind 620 00:40:57,560 --> 00:41:02,240 Speaker 1: of on the arch of their foot? Yeah? Well yeah, 621 00:41:02,400 --> 00:41:05,319 Speaker 1: some people used to use term not need you know, 622 00:41:05,400 --> 00:41:07,840 Speaker 1: you roll your feet in and you strike on the 623 00:41:07,840 --> 00:41:11,359 Speaker 1: the inter portionary foot or do you do you say, 624 00:41:11,520 --> 00:41:13,719 Speaker 1: list more to the outer edges of your foot or 625 00:41:13,800 --> 00:41:16,960 Speaker 1: kind of roll your feet out when you walk? And 626 00:41:17,320 --> 00:41:19,600 Speaker 1: then how are you a heel striker? Are you a 627 00:41:19,600 --> 00:41:22,400 Speaker 1: tow striker when you're walking or do you just shuffle? 628 00:41:22,480 --> 00:41:25,359 Speaker 1: Do you like plant your feet, you know, straight up 629 00:41:25,360 --> 00:41:28,319 Speaker 1: and down, almost like a piston. And you know, these 630 00:41:28,360 --> 00:41:31,760 Speaker 1: people that do this, this shoe analysis, are amazing people, 631 00:41:31,760 --> 00:41:34,279 Speaker 1: and they don't get a lot of credit because it's 632 00:41:34,320 --> 00:41:36,799 Speaker 1: a very it's a very fine science. There's a bit 633 00:41:36,800 --> 00:41:40,000 Speaker 1: of art involved in it too. But that footprint is 634 00:41:40,200 --> 00:41:43,040 Speaker 1: very significant, at least to my way of thinking. And 635 00:41:43,160 --> 00:41:46,799 Speaker 1: I'd have to ask if they raise the print with 636 00:41:47,080 --> 00:41:52,480 Speaker 1: something this agent that binds with the proteins in blood, 637 00:41:53,200 --> 00:41:55,720 Speaker 1: are we left to believe that this is a bloody 638 00:41:55,719 --> 00:42:03,880 Speaker 1: shoe print. I'm just as Scott Morgan and this is 639 00:42:04,000 --> 00:42:04,840 Speaker 1: body bags