WEBVTT - The Original Augusta National (feat. Brian Schneider and Josh Pettit)

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:04.800
<v Speaker 1>The original Augusta National. The Augusta National that Alistair McKenzie

0:00:04.920 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and Bobby Jones built in nineteen thirty two was, in

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, one of the strangest and most interesting courses

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.480
<v Speaker 1>ever designed. So let's talk all about it. I'm Garrett Morrison,

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and this is designing golf, all right. Today's big question,

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>what's with all the template holes at Augusta National. I'm

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:35.199
<v Speaker 1>not sure if this is common knowledge, but a lot

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>of holes at Augusta were based in part on some

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>of the most famous holes in golf. And we know

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 1>this because Alistair McKenzie wrote about it in an article

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>called Plans for the Ideal Golf Course published in nineteen

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty two. He described all eighteen holes at Augusta, and

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>many of them, it turns out, were inspired by some

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>of his and his co designer Bobby Jones's favorite holes,

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>including several holes from the old course at Saint Andrew's,

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>which both he and Jones revered. In fact, their intention

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 1>at Augusta was to create a kind of inland American

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 1>version of the old course. Now a lot of these

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>influences are still detectable at Augusta, but it does take

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a bit of effort because the course has changed a

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 1>great deal over time. The original iteration of the course

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:34.559
<v Speaker 1>was much wider and less tried. It had only twenty

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:38.119
<v Speaker 1>two bunkers, many of which were very large and intricate.

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>The greens had these chaotic shapes with strange little tongues

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of jutting out in different directions. There was more

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>artificial mounding throughout the course. The seventh, tenth, and sixteenth

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>greens were completely different, located completely differently, and the sixteenth

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>hole in particular was just a different hole altogether. And

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>overall the course was just more rugged in appearance and

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:13.079
<v Speaker 1>eccentric in its design ethos. Which is not to say

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that Augusta National was better originally than it is now.

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:22.360
<v Speaker 1>It was just different and probably more in tune with

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the principles that Alistair Mackenzie outlined in that nineteen thirty

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>two article that I mentioned. So to understand the original

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>architecture at Augusta National, I think you have to know

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>a little about those so called template holes, and to

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>help with that, I'm going to bring on Josh Pettitt.

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Josh is a golf architect, but more important for our purposes,

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:49.119
<v Speaker 1>the founder of the Alistair Mackenzie Institute. And the first

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:52.920
<v Speaker 1>thing Josh told me about the template hole issue is

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that mackenzie and Jones really weren't trying to do template

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>holes in the way that we normally think of them.

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:04.239
<v Speaker 2>They both revered the old Course as the paramount example

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 2>of the greatest golf course, and they were trying to

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 2>take inspiration from many of these holes. They specifically were

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 2>not trying to copy them. And McKenzie goes out of

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 2>his way to write about that a lot. You know,

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 2>some people were sort of claiming they were building a

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 2>golf course that was just a copy, you know, a

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 2>bunch of holes that were copies of great holes, and

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, he didn't like that characterization. So, you know,

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 2>it's important to understand that he was really trying to

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 2>take the ideas, the concepts, the strategic concepts of those

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 2>holes and then apply them on a different landscape and

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 2>create like a new version of them, so much so

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 2>that he hoped, you know, he thought when they were done,

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 2>they'd done such a great job that that collection of

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 2>holes would then go on to inspire future architects to

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 2>do a similar kind of process.

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>So the first of these kind of remixed templates that

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about is the fourth hole.

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 3>The fourth hole that that part three.

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's like a mid length Part three, and

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 2>it's modeled after the eleventh at St. Andrews, the Eden

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 2>and I think many in that era would consider the.

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 3>Eden is the greatest short hole in the world.

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 2>So, yeah, you know that that green, it's it's flanked

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 2>by those two bunkers in the front, you know, similar

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 2>to the eleventh at Shane Andrews that has you know,

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 2>the hill bunker on the left and the strath on

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:24.280
<v Speaker 2>the right, and you know, you just don't want to

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:26.359
<v Speaker 2>miss long. If you're gonna miss, you're gonna miss short

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 2>in the middle sort of in that bowl there.

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 4>But you do not want to go long.

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:34.719
<v Speaker 1>If you go long on the fourth hole, you might

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>not be able to stop your chip or putt before

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>it runs off the front of the green. And that

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>is definitely a feature of the Eden hole at St. Andrews.

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of a strategic game of distance control. You

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 1>have these threatening bunkers toward the front of the green,

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>but if you're too scared of them and you go long,

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>you'll find yourself in an even worse position. Obviously, one

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:02.720
<v Speaker 1>thing that the fourth hole at Augusta National doesn't have

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>is the eden estuary framing the green. There was a

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>road pretty close behind the fourth Green, originally Berkman's Road,

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 1>but it was rerouted when the club lengthened the par

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>for fifth hole in the late twenty tens. Now, speaking

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of the fifth hole, it was actually inspired by an

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>even more famous hole at St. Andrews, the Road Hole.

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 2>So going back to this idea that they were trying

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 2>to not copy these holes, one of the reasons why sites,

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's sort of a fool's errand to try

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 2>to copy these holes, is because the visuals, the surrounding

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:42.160
<v Speaker 2>landscape is going to be completely different. And so yeah,

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 2>the example of St. Andrews, you have the eaton estuary,

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:49.479
<v Speaker 2>but I guess Nationally you don't. So that's why you

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 2>don't want to like directly copy these holes verbatim. But

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 2>in the case of the fifth hole, the road hole,

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 2>it's again it's just taking the strategy and then in

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 2>this case it's mirroring, it's sort of reversing it off

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 2>the tee. So you know, the road hole you play

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 2>out to the left and the dog leagus to the right,

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:09.839
<v Speaker 2>and you're trying to carry over the old course hotel

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 2>as close as you can to set up your angle

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:15.119
<v Speaker 2>of approaching the green.

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 3>The fifth that Augusta is the exact opposite.

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 2>It's a slight dog leg left, it's not as severe,

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 2>and the corner of the dog leg is made up

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 2>by what was just one big bunker. Now there's two

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 2>bunkers there and you know, some trees and so in

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 2>that case you want to play to the right to

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:37.840
<v Speaker 2>carry that as much as you can to then open

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 2>up your approach into the green there.

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Now the green itself there's no road bunker. Are there

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>any similarities between the fifth green at Augusta National and

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the and the road green?

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:53.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I think at first site, at first glance,

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:54.599
<v Speaker 2>you would say not really.

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 3>But it is kind of on a plateau. That's sort

0:06:57.440 --> 0:06:58.040
<v Speaker 3>of what he says.

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 2>It's sort of, you know, sort of raises up to

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 2>the sort of plateau green similar to that green, but

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 2>the green itself is very very different green, yet it

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have the road hole bunker there. So this is

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 2>I think another another example of where he was just

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 2>trying to take some of these ideas and apply them

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 2>onto a very different landscape, and then the result would

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 2>be like a very new end product that was like

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 2>not you know, you would see some resemblance, but also

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 2>had a lot of unique characteristic extended of itself. So

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 2>he was trying to take certain ideas and not copying everything.

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 2>So sometimes it was more like the t shot. Other

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 2>times it was more the way the green played, but

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 2>he wasn't trying to copy the whole from tea to

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 2>green and replicate that in any way.

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Finally, to round out this kind of three hole stretch

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of very well known templates or semi templates, the par

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>three sixth hole at Augusta National was, according to Mackenzie,

0:07:56.760 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>inspired by the Redan at North Barrackle Club in Scotland.

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 2>The green is set up in a way where it

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 2>allows you to feed a ball from the front right

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 2>of the green to the back left of the green

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 2>if there's a pin there, because there's a bunker in

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 2>the front left that's sort of guarding that. So there's

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 2>this kind of massive mounds sort of a buried elephant

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 2>sort of in the back right of the green, and

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 2>that mound if you kind of hit right into it

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 2>with your you know, probably like a mid iron in

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 2>those days, maybe a long iron for some people, and

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, the ground was firm. It was sort of

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 2>feed the ball back left to a pin right there,

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:37.199
<v Speaker 2>and that in a way, you know, that functions similarly

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 2>to how the Redan functions. He does say he kind

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 2>of like brags a little bit, and he says like,

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:46.199
<v Speaker 2>they didn't necessarily build a better version of the Red Dan,

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 2>but they built a more beautiful, more attractive version just

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 2>because of the surroundings and the visuals and the esthetic

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:53.439
<v Speaker 2>of the bunker.

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 3>And he really liked visually the way that hole looked.

0:08:57.040 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 1>So Augusta National originally had these re interpreted versions of

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the Eden, the Road and the Radan four, five, and six,

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 1>but the references to old links courses at Augusta just

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 1>kept going from there. The original seventh hole had a

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:18.839
<v Speaker 1>swale in front of its green that was inspired by

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the Valley of sin On the eighteenth hole at Saint Andrew's,

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:26.439
<v Speaker 1>and then the eighth green with those big mounds surrounding

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:30.559
<v Speaker 1>it was influenced by the punch Bowl seventeenth Green. Mierfield,

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I won't go through every illusion that Augusta National makes

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>to other courses, but suffice it to say that there

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of them, and if you're interested, I'd

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>recommend reading Mackenzie's article Plans for the Ideal Golf Course.

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>It's really interesting and informative, and you can find a

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>great reprinting of it on Josh's website, which is alistairmackenzie

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>dot org. But before we wrap up, there is a

0:09:56.800 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>broader question for me here about Alistair McKenzie and what

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>he was up to when he was helping Bobby Jones

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:09.200
<v Speaker 1>design Augusta National in the early thirties. Why do you

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:13.959
<v Speaker 1>think he was interested in incorporating influences in this way

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>at this point in his architectural career.

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 3>There's a couple of reasons. I think.

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 2>First of all, it was so much to do with

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 2>the fact that he was starting to get sites that

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 2>weren't very good sites. Now, not to say that the

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 2>site of Augusta wasn't a good site, but it was

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 2>a severe site to build on.

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't links Land, let's say.

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 2>And coming out of his time in South America, where

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 2>he spent a good amount of time in nineteen thirty

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 2>in Argentina and in Uruguay, a lot of those courses

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 2>that he designed, some of which didn't get built.

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:53.679
<v Speaker 3>He was using this idea of all these templates.

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:56.679
<v Speaker 2>He was referencing these all basically his favorite holes, his

0:10:56.720 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 2>inspiration because he was working on sites where he had

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:04.680
<v Speaker 2>in some cases zero features to work with and.

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 3>He would have to manufacture everything from nothing.

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 2>And then when he got to Augusta, he had been toiling,

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, he'd been toying with those ideas for a

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 2>couple of years. And then he and Bobby Jones, because

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:21.599
<v Speaker 2>of their shared reverence of the old course that was

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 2>essentially what they were trying to create. They were trying

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 2>to create what they called the world's ideal inland course.

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 2>They were trying to create like an inland version of

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Saint Andrews.

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 3>And so I think that gave.

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Him a creative license to pull from, you know, to

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 2>use those holes as inspiration.

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's such an interesting evolution for him because Mackenzie

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:50.079
<v Speaker 1>had spent so much of his career to that point

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 1>theorizing camouflage, theorizing ways to make courses look as though

0:11:56.320 --> 0:12:00.559
<v Speaker 1>they had not been constructed, that they had just been

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>sitting there all along, and not only theorizing that, but

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>practicing it and coming up with techniques to execute courses

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that looked completely natural, and Cypress Point might be the

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>height of that. For him, that might be the best

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>that he had ever done in that regard. And it's

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 1>almost like after Cypress Point, or maybe after Pasa Tiempo

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen twenty nine, he started thinking, Okay, well, what else.

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:31.960
<v Speaker 2>Is there as a great artist, which I think he was,

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 2>and he considered himself that he had that mentality of,

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:38.559
<v Speaker 2>you know, like Bob Dylan would say, a great artist

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 2>has to be careful never to arrive.

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 3>They're always in a constant state of evolving.

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:47.319
<v Speaker 1>And that gets to the heart of why I admire

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Alistair Mackenzie's career so much. To the very end, he

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:59.439
<v Speaker 1>was pushing and experimenting and trying to find new ways forward. Unfortunately,

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 1>he died in January nineteen thirty four, just a couple

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:07.679
<v Speaker 1>of months before the first Augusta National Invitation tournament later

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>renamed the Masters, And I've always wondered what he would

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 1>have done next, because for him, Augusta National was the

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:20.439
<v Speaker 1>beginning of something. It was the beginning of a new

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>design approach. And part of why I'd like looking back

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 1>at that first iteration of the golf course is that

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>it offers a glimpse of how creative and idiosyncratic Mackenzie's

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>late nineteen thirties designs might have been if he had

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:41.679
<v Speaker 1>gotten to build them now. Fortunately, we do have plenty

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>of historical information about the original Augusta National, so today's

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>golf architects can continue to learn from that version of

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the course and maybe build some of the stuff that

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Mackenzie didn't get to. One current architect who has been

0:13:56.040 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>inspired by the early Augusta is Brian Schneider. Brian is

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>a longtime Tom dok associate and the co designer of

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:07.599
<v Speaker 1>the Great Old Barnwell in South Carolina. Brian has a

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:10.959
<v Speaker 1>lot of interesting projects coming up, including a solo design

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:15.239
<v Speaker 1>at the Michael Kaiser Resort Old Shores in the Florida Panhandle,

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 1>and this new course, according to Kaiser himself, is going

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to draw some inspiration from the Augusta National of the

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>nineteen thirties. So who better to elaborate on this topic

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 1>than Brian Schneider. But real quick before we jump to him.

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>The Friday Golf Pro Shop is ready for major season. Specifically,

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>our Mackenzie Bunker illustration drawn by our own Cameron Hurtis,

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>is back, and you'll find it on b drafty favorites

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 1>like the Andy Hoodie and the Dewey Pocket T shirts,

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>as well as on various headcovers, hats, and much more. Plus,

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Cameron has a new T shirt that shows this Mackenzie

0:14:57.280 --> 0:15:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Bunker illustration in a new light, so make sure to

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>check that out. You can see all of this at

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>pro shop dotthfrid Egg dot com. All right, let's go

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>to Brian Schneider. All right, Brian Schneider, welcome back to

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the pod. Thank you for being here.

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 4>My pleasure, thank you for having me.

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>So I want to start with what I think is

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting part of your backstory, which is that

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 1>you worked maintenance at a bunch of great golf courses,

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>including Augusta National, earlier in your career. So could you

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 1>give me the background for that, Like what made you

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>decide to do that?

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 5>You know, it was relatively late in college for me.

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 5>I graduated in nineteen ninety seven from the University of Wisconsin,

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 5>and for most of my time in college I had

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 5>ideas about going to medical school and you know, kind

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 5>of getting into sports medicine or something along those lines.

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 5>And it was relatively late in my college career that

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 5>I decided to switch gears and get into golf some way.

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 5>I had an inkling that architecture interested me a bit,

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 5>but I wasn't entirely aware that architecture was really a

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 5>thing that you could do for a living.

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 5>I was aware of certain architects at the time, and

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 5>Pete Die had recently designed the original version of Black

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 5>Wolf Run in Wisconsin, which made a big splash, so

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 5>his was a name I was aware of, and I

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 5>traveled around a little bit, but you know, you know,

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 5>the entirety of the golf i'd played to that point

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 5>in my life was in the state of Wisconsin and

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 5>not too far away from where I lived, so I

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 5>hadn't been exposed.

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 4>To a lot of architecture.

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 5>But when I decided that maybe doing something in golf

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 5>sounded cool, Black Wolf Runt.

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 4>Was the first place I reached out to.

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 5>I'd played the golf course once or twice and thought

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 5>it was really cool and thought it'd be a neat

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 5>place to work. So I just sent a letter hate

0:16:57.400 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 5>Black Wolf Run, I'm looking for a job.

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 4>Can you hire me to do anything?

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:04.440
<v Speaker 5>And I don't know if they sent it around to

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:07.160
<v Speaker 5>various department heads. But the person I heard back from

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:10.360
<v Speaker 5>was a fellow named Steve Kurda, who was the superintendent

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 5>of the river course in nineteen ninety seven, and he

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 5>basically said, you know, that was spring of ninety seven.

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 5>You know, he said, y as we're opening up, we'll

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 5>certainly need some labor through the summer. If you want

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:26.160
<v Speaker 5>to come over, we've got an intern house I could

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 5>put you in. So I started working there before I

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 5>finished school. I graduated in May or early June or

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:35.119
<v Speaker 5>whatever it was, and I had been an athlete. I

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 5>was a wrestler in college and had always anticipated graduating

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:43.360
<v Speaker 5>in four years. I broke my ankle my third year

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:47.640
<v Speaker 5>in school, red shirted, which attacked another year of eligibility

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 5>on to the end of college. So I stuck around

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 5>for another year, and in order to remain eligible, I

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:57.160
<v Speaker 5>kind of had to preserve a class that I needed

0:17:57.160 --> 0:17:59.199
<v Speaker 5>to complete to graduate, and for me, that was I

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 5>think Biology on one.

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 4>So I was a.

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 5>Biochemistry and molecular biology major, and as you know, my

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 5>final semester of school, Biology one to one was the

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:11.919
<v Speaker 5>class I had to complete. At that point, I was

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:15.159
<v Speaker 5>pretty comfortable living in Sheboygen most of the time and

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 5>just going back to Madison for exams. So I started

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:22.360
<v Speaker 5>working there. That was a long story. Started working at

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 5>Blackwolf run as fall was coming along in the end

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:29.439
<v Speaker 5>of the season was creeping up. I decided that I

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 5>was going to send out resumes to another golf course

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 5>or several other golf coursesn't find somewhere to spend the

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 5>rest of the fall, and thought, well, this is really cool,

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 5>you know, like being on a golf course every day

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 5>is really neat. Well, I worked at Black Wulf from

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 5>the Straights course at Whistling Straits was under construction. I

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:46.360
<v Speaker 5>got to spend a fair bit of time out there

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 5>seeing that happen, and it was that it's like, Okay,

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 5>building golf courses is neat.

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 4>I want to do this.

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 5>By that point, I reached out to a handful of architects.

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:58.880
<v Speaker 5>I talked to Tom Doak, I talked to Bill Corr.

0:18:58.920 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 4>I believe.

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 5>I'd met a few other architects that had come through

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 5>Black Wolf while I was there, and for the most part,

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 5>especially Tom and Bill. You know, I asked for advice

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 5>and they they said, A, see as many golf courses

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 5>as you can, and b learn how to run equipment,

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:18.159
<v Speaker 5>and I wasn't, you know, financially, I wasn't in a

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 5>place where I could just travel around and play golf.

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 5>I never had access to private clubs, so I thought,

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 5>you know, one of the things I learned quickly at

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 5>black Wolf Run was that superintendents are really generous about

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 5>sharing their golf courses with people in that business and

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 5>people have an interest. So through that, I realized, I

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:35.639
<v Speaker 5>can see golf courses this way. If I work for

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 5>superintendents and work at cool places, that will open some

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:42.159
<v Speaker 5>doors for me to study other golf courses. So the

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 5>three letters I sent out went to Pine Valley, Crystal Downs,

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:48.360
<v Speaker 5>and the sand Hills, and the first superintendent to get

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 5>back to me was Corey Crandall at the sand Hills

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:53.879
<v Speaker 5>and said, you know, we're getting late in the summer.

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:55.640
<v Speaker 4>We shut down in October.

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:56.880
<v Speaker 5>If you want to come out for a few months

0:19:56.920 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 5>and help us get ready for winter, that'd be great.

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:00.440
<v Speaker 4>We could use the help. So I went on there for.

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 5>Two months until they shut down, and just something clicked

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 5>at that point, like Okay, I'm going to keep doing this.

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 5>And while I was at the sand Hills, I went

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 5>to Prairie Dunes and saw some of the other golf

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 5>courses out that way, which is not easy to do

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:15.880
<v Speaker 5>from the sand hills. And that was before a lot

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 5>of the golf courses in Nebraska existed that people rave

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 5>about today. But that was my way of seeing a

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 5>lot of golf courses. So from there I went to

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 5>Scottsdale for the winter, and then on to Riviera, where

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:32.640
<v Speaker 5>I worked for a legendary golf course superintendent named Paul

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:36.679
<v Speaker 5>Latshaw who had worked at Augusta National, and Oakamont and

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:38.640
<v Speaker 5>Congressional and a bunch of other places along the way

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:41.119
<v Speaker 5>and hosted a bunch of US opens and the handful

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 5>of masters. And his son was the superintendent of Marion

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 5>at the time, So one side worked for mister Latchaw Riviera.

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:50.880
<v Speaker 4>That opened a lot of doors.

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 5>Starting first with his working for his son Paul at Marion,

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 5>and then from Marion I went on to.

0:20:59.520 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 4>Shinnecock.

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 5>From Shinnacok, I went to Augusta, and I would later

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:05.880
<v Speaker 5>work at Pine Valley and the Old Course for a bit.

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 5>But the Augusta stint was, you know, obviously unique one.

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 5>They were all great opportunities, but Augusta, obviously it was

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:15.640
<v Speaker 5>a really exciting. You know, that was the first one

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:17.680
<v Speaker 5>they actually had me fly down for an interview and

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 5>they kind of pee in a cup and give them

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 5>my criminal history and whatever else. It was an interview

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 5>unlike anything else. You know, just coming down to make

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 5>seven bucks an hour? Do I really have to do?

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 5>I really have to buy a two hundred and fifty

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 5>dollars flight? Yeah, because you know I wasn't you know,

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:37.119
<v Speaker 5>I think I made a minimum wage or just above

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:39.640
<v Speaker 5>that for most of that time, and I literally lived

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 5>out of my you know, my meercury cougar for most

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:46.879
<v Speaker 5>of that time, which was great. I could play a

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 5>bunch of free golf at some really cool place. Doesn't

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:51.399
<v Speaker 5>get access to study as many golf courses as I

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:53.119
<v Speaker 5>could see. But my idea was, you know, I'm just

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 5>going to travel around. I'll get a job somewhere for

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:58.399
<v Speaker 5>three to six months, be able to study that golf

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:00.160
<v Speaker 5>course and then also see all the golf.

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 4>In the area that I wanted to see.

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:04.639
<v Speaker 5>And once I felt like I'd covered that all the

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 5>bases locally, I would send out more resumes and bounce

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 5>around and you know, got to walk and study five

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:15.440
<v Speaker 5>or six or seven hundred golf courses that way, and yeah,

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 5>in addition to work in some really cool places and

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 5>being able to mow grains and rake bunkers that some

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:22.919
<v Speaker 5>of the best golf courses in the world. There's a

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 5>lot to be learned through that experience about architecture and

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 5>building golf that's both interesting and great and also sustainable.

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 5>Understanding what it takes to maintain a golf course is

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 5>a really important part of understanding what you can build.

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, and I love this story. I knew a little

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>bit about it, but I hadn't hadn't got that gotten

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that level of detail from you about it before. And

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:50.119
<v Speaker 1>I love that because whenever occasionally I get young people

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:52.920
<v Speaker 1>emailing me and asking me how they can get into

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 1>golf architecture, and the first thing I tell them is

0:22:56.520 --> 0:22:58.919
<v Speaker 1>that you shouldn't be asking me, you know, ask somebody

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>like Brian Schneider, like that's it's not really my uh,

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>that's not what my career is. But uh. The second

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>thing I tell them is that you can go work

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 1>on these maintenance crews, and that is a hell of

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:14.200
<v Speaker 1>a good way to go see a bunch of great

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 1>golf courses. Because the superintendent community is so generous and

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Also they're looking for labor. I mean, there are these

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 1>are these are jobs that you can go get and

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>they're good jobs, and you get to see some amazing

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:29.119
<v Speaker 1>places and learn a ton not only about maintenance if

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that's what you end up wanting to go into, which

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>it might be, but also if you're if you have

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 1>this inkling that you want to pursue architecture, it's a

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 1>great first step to do. So you spend some time

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:44.160
<v Speaker 1>at Augusta National obviously walking the course. Did you spend

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 1>a fair amount of time like walk mowing the greens

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:50.119
<v Speaker 1>and just kind of going over the surfaces daily.

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I was fortunate too.

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:56.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, they let Mimo greens there, which is cool, amazing

0:23:57.320 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 5>fact that's pretty good at it. You know, they're always

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:02.159
<v Speaker 5>casual kind of tests between the guys in the maintenance

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 5>grew who could mow the straightest lines. There was a

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 5>local guy, Chris Anderson. I don't know what Chris is

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 5>up to these days. I suspect he's not working there anymore,

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 5>but you know, he was kind of the incumbent champ.

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:14.439
<v Speaker 5>So there was always a competition with Chris Tosy who

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 5>could try and knock him off. But the mowing greens

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:20.160
<v Speaker 5>at Augusta was in honor and a real treat.

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 1>What did that What did that experience teach you about

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the about the designs of those greens?

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:32.199
<v Speaker 5>You know that you know, Augusta along with a lot

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 5>of the other places that i'd worked, you know, to

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 5>create something great. You know, there's a certain level of

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:45.160
<v Speaker 5>severity involved, and that varies. You know, the greens at Shinnakok,

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 5>I'm not sure anyone would describe it severe necessarily, though

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 5>they can be at us open speeds. But the original

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 5>concept of Augusta was just different and based on strategic

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 5>co answert to the golf course that Mackenzie and mister

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:06.919
<v Speaker 5>Jones to instill there centered around bold green complexes, and

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 5>the boldness of the green complexes enabled them to really

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:12.879
<v Speaker 5>limit how many hazards they chose to build. I think

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 5>there were twenty two bunkers something like that too, right,

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:21.399
<v Speaker 5>And you know they didn't need many buckers to make

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 5>the holes interesting because the land itself supplied a lot

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:29.640
<v Speaker 5>of the interest, and the greens augmented what the topography

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:35.919
<v Speaker 5>had already supplied. So there were bold, wild greens and

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 5>that was the primary defense of the golf course.

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Is there a feature on one of the greens there

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that you think is underappreciated, something that stuck out to

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>you when you were walking over it.

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 5>You know, things have changed so much, but at the

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:54.480
<v Speaker 5>time the fourteenth and the fifth or two greens that

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:57.879
<v Speaker 5>really stood out to me as having you know, and

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 5>I hadn't been to St. Andrew's that point, but when

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 5>you study the old course as well, you know there's

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 5>something severe at the front of the green and then

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 5>a relatively either the green either runs away a little

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 5>bit from there or it's very shallow.

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 4>Once you get up top. So you've got to find in.

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 5>A way to negotiate that steep slope at the front,

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 5>and you don't have a whole lot of room up

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 5>top to fly the ball over that thing and try

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:25.199
<v Speaker 5>and stop it, especially for the average player, And that

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 5>used to be more true at Augusta. I mean a

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 5>the golf course plays shorter now than it ever has,

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:34.679
<v Speaker 5>I would say, and just the style of golf in

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty six versus the style of golf when I

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 5>was there in two thousand and certainly going back to

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:44.880
<v Speaker 5>the seventies and eighties has changed so dramatically that players

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:49.159
<v Speaker 5>can now just routinely flight over that contour and stop

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 5>the ball pretty quickly, and negotiating those severe fronting slopes

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 5>is less problematical these days than it used to be,

0:26:56.640 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 5>but it's still a brilliant feature for ninety nine point

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 5>nine percent of golfers out there, is you know, getting

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 5>a ball somehow on that top shelf and stopping before

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:07.640
<v Speaker 5>you roll off the back.

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 1>There's almost a genre of Augusta National Green that the

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:15.959
<v Speaker 1>fifth and the fourteenth embody. I think the first is

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:19.880
<v Speaker 1>also similar in this regard where you have what you're

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:23.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about, that false front or some kind of channel

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:25.879
<v Speaker 1>in front of it, like you find on the sixth

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 1>hole at St. Andrews or obviously the Valley of Sin

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 1>or even the seventeenth the Road Green with that kind

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:35.639
<v Speaker 1>of swoop up at the beginning, and then in Augusta

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 1>you get this, you know, it levels out into a

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>middle section where you find maybe some of the easier pins,

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 1>at least this is the case on the first hole,

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and then you get those back shelves, which can be

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 1>very difficult, or if they have more feeding contours like

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:57.879
<v Speaker 1>the fourteenth Green, then you can have some funnel pins

0:27:58.040 --> 0:28:01.399
<v Speaker 1>up there. But the fifth, the fourteenth, and the first

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 1>all kind of strike me as sort of similar, like

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:08.440
<v Speaker 1>where they they're not the same, but they are variations

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>on a theme in a way, with that false front

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and the back shelves. Is that something that I mean,

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 1>something that stuck out to me when I saw the

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 1>course for the first time. I wonder if that resonated with.

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:24.439
<v Speaker 5>You absolutely, and then seeing the old course after that, Yeah, certainly,

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:27.640
<v Speaker 5>all of a sudden it's you know, the light bulb

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 5>goes off and you understand that that you know, there's

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 5>so many of those brilliant greens on the old course

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:33.680
<v Speaker 5>where you know, there's just something at the front of

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 5>the green to negotiate and oftentimes tends to favor or

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 5>running shot of some sort that just kind of climbs

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 5>up and then settles on the back side. And once

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 5>you see that over and over it the old course,

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 5>you understand the way that feature was built into those

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 5>remaining greens at Augusta, and the original version of Augusta

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 5>had more of those, you know, the seventh was a

0:28:57.360 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 5>variation on that theme.

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 4>I think the seventeenth was also along those lines.

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 5>You know, there there were more greens in Augusta that

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 5>asked you to play shouts that way at a time

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 5>in golf history when more golf was played on the

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 5>ground than through the air.

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Absolutely, And it's you know, this is really the

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 1>what the Bart's template is supposed to be. It's this

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to run the ball up and over a slope

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and show your precision in that way. That's kind of

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 1>what those old course holes have. And it's what you

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 1>know when people played Augusta National more along the ground.

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess, I guess that's what those holes had. I mean,

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:36.000
<v Speaker 1>is there a way to bring this back to modern

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 1>golf architecture? Do you have any hope for for that

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 1>type of shot that lands short of a green and

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>runs up or through or over whatever some kind of

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting slope and gets there, Like, how do you recreate that?

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 4>I wish, you know, I wish.

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 5>I think it's it's a technology issue as much as anything.

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 5>I mean, the fact that people hit the ball further now,

0:29:57.240 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 5>but it's we're talking high level golf. I mean, the

0:29:59.440 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 5>average golf still runs a ball around and you know

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 5>that the average player can't just loft the ball way

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 5>up in the air and get to stop after two bounces.

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 5>So a lot of golf is still played that way.

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 5>I wish more was. You know, I love watching the

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 5>old shells wonderful world of golf matches and you see

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 5>some of the best players in the world running for

0:30:18.920 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 5>woods onto greens. Nobody does that anymore, but that was

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 5>just the way the game is played back then, you

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 5>know it. Yeah, I don't know how to get that back,

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 5>and I wish we could. I mean, wind and firm

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 5>greens are really the two things that force that to work.

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 5>I mean, if you're playing into the six at Saint

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 5>Andrews with a pretty severe tail wind and the green

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 5>is firm, you know, even the best players in the

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 5>world might have to think about approaching front hole locations

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 5>a little differently than they might on other days. But

0:30:53.080 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 5>that's you know, the Open Championship is really the one

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:00.240
<v Speaker 5>time of year we get to see that, you know,

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 5>the best players forced to play golf in a different

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 5>way on some days the gusts to really they don't

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 5>play those holes the same way anymore, which which is unfortunate.

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 5>I mean it's when I play golf, I'm rarely trying

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:18.160
<v Speaker 5>to score as well as possible. I just like hitting

0:31:18.760 --> 0:31:20.440
<v Speaker 5>the kind of shots that I think are fun and

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 5>to me, that's running.

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 4>The ball on the ground and.

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 5>Rolling around cool contours and at the front of greens

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 5>or in greens, and Saint Andrews is the sort of

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:32.960
<v Speaker 5>place that in North Berwick is another one. You know

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 5>a handful of golf courses in the UK that do

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 5>that better than anywhere, and it's just they're a riot

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 5>to play because that's the kind of golf I enjoy.

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 5>I don't know if all golf I don't think all

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 5>golfers enjoy the same things I enjoy, but I do

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 5>think that's a fun style of golf. And if you

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 5>can find ways to force good players to hit shots

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 5>like that, I think there are ways to doers. But

0:31:57.520 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 5>it certainly involves a little bit of wind in firm greens.

0:32:01.560 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 1>When you read what Alistair mackenzie wrote about Augusta National

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 1>early in the course's life, when you when you consider

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 1>what Bobby Jones thought about the course, you see how

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 1>much they were devoted to this idea that you're talking

0:32:17.720 --> 0:32:20.720
<v Speaker 1>about running the ball up onto the green. So many

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 1>of the holes were designed for that kind of shot.

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 1>The entire design of the hole kind of revolved around

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>this type of approach, and it is just interesting that

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't exist in the Masters more or less anymore,

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 1>unless unless you get some kind of exceptional set of

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:42.760
<v Speaker 1>conditions between firmness and wind in a particular april, which

0:32:42.800 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 1>is kind of rare. But I wonder if you know,

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 1>when you look at augusta nastional, do you think it

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:52.960
<v Speaker 1>ever really lived up to Mackenzie and Jones's hopes for firmness,

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Because it's kind of an interesting site for you know,

0:32:58.440 --> 0:33:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the old course of the America's right, because it's not

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a link sland site by any stretch of the imagination.

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 1>It's basically the opposite of that. Do you think it

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:09.960
<v Speaker 1>was ever like firm enough? Do you think it ever

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 1>played like Mackenzie and Jones wanted it to play.

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 4>I'd be surprised.

0:33:16.480 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think I've got to think plays today it

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 5>has the capacity to play more firm than never has,

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 5>just because there's so much infrastructure underground that enables that.

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 5>But the the soils don't generally lean themselves or lend

0:33:31.400 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 5>themselves towards fast and firm if the weather isn't cooperating,

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:39.840
<v Speaker 5>you know, you certainly with Georgia clay, it can get

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 5>baked out in rock hard, so at certain times of

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 5>the year, I suspect that, yeah, that might have been

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 5>a thing there, as you can play in the South

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 5>today and find you know, firm and bouncy bermuda courses

0:33:52.320 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 5>on southern.

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 4>Clay that can exist.

0:33:56.840 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 5>But it's entirely depend on the whether if it did

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:03.480
<v Speaker 5>or not. And I think that, you know, the seventh

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 5>hole at Augusta has changed so much, but the original

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 5>was very much built for a run up shot.

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 4>It was based.

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:11.880
<v Speaker 5>You know, there was a valley of sin on the

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 5>front left part of the green and a very shallow

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:16.319
<v Speaker 5>shelf beyond that, and I think as much as any

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:18.399
<v Speaker 5>of the holes there, it was a relatively short hole

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:20.960
<v Speaker 5>in design to play for that sort of shot. But

0:34:21.000 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 5>I think in the early days, I don't know if

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:24.760
<v Speaker 5>it was Byron Nelson or Sam Stein or someone actually

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:26.600
<v Speaker 5>drove the green on that hole and what maybe drove

0:34:26.640 --> 0:34:27.359
<v Speaker 5>over the green, but.

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 4>I don't know that never played quite the way they'd hoped.

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:32.320
<v Speaker 4>But I think.

0:34:32.280 --> 0:34:37.880
<v Speaker 5>Certainly the many written references to the old course and

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:40.719
<v Speaker 5>and the kind of the ambition for the style of

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 5>the golf course, you know, the old course played into

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 5>that so.

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:45.760
<v Speaker 4>Much, and in addition to a bunch of other places.

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I'd written an article a few years ago now,

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:50.800
<v Speaker 5>I think for the met Golfer about how you know

0:34:50.840 --> 0:34:52.879
<v Speaker 5>Augusta is the most famous Tembla course in the world,

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:55.320
<v Speaker 5>and you know so many of the holes in Augusta

0:34:55.360 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 5>were based on famous holes from the UK.

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:02.320
<v Speaker 4>And many of those from Saint Andrew's.

0:35:09.400 --> 0:35:12.799
<v Speaker 1>This episode of Designing Golf is brought to you by Mobjack.

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Mobjack belts are handcrafted in the USA by skilled artisans

0:35:18.640 --> 0:35:23.680
<v Speaker 1>using traditional cutting and stitching leather working techniques. They are

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:27.240
<v Speaker 1>made through small batch production, so you know they're special

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:30.799
<v Speaker 1>and they get individual attention from artisans. They're made out

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:35.399
<v Speaker 1>of Italian leather finished to the highest standards, and these

0:35:35.440 --> 0:35:39.440
<v Speaker 1>are like full leather backed belts with colorful woven patterns

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 1>made from fade resistant materials and their hardware is this

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 1>nickel plated solid brass. So this is a very high

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:52.040
<v Speaker 1>quality product. It feels good, it has that weight of

0:35:52.080 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 1>something that is handmade out of good materials. This is

0:35:56.680 --> 0:36:00.919
<v Speaker 1>not kind of mass produced, disposable sort of stuff. Right now,

0:36:01.040 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Mobjack is offering six new spring styles called Cashiers, Watchhill, Malibu, Chatham,

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Big Sky, and Gasparilla. So I'm gonna let you guess

0:36:13.160 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 1>what colors and patterns those are. These are very versatile.

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:20.560
<v Speaker 1>They can be worn with golf or business attire, and

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:24.840
<v Speaker 1>they're just a great alternative to the typical logo belt.

0:36:25.160 --> 0:36:28.719
<v Speaker 1>Nobody wants to have too many logos on them. If

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you have like four logos going on in your outfit,

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:33.920
<v Speaker 1>then maybe you need to reel it back a little bit.

0:36:34.360 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Use a mobjack belt to be a little bit more

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:41.239
<v Speaker 1>low key. So go to mobjack dot com. That's mo

0:36:41.320 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 1>ob jak dot com and use the code fried egg

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 1>for fifteen percent off. That's fried Egg at mobjack dot com.

0:36:51.239 --> 0:37:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Check it out. Well. So, since the conversation is just

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of naturally flowing there anyway, I want to get

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:08.000
<v Speaker 1>into some of your thoughts about the early Augusta National,

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:12.160
<v Speaker 1>basically the golf course as it existed in the nineteen thirties.

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:14.400
<v Speaker 1>And part of the reason I thought to have this

0:37:14.480 --> 0:37:18.600
<v Speaker 1>conversation with you, Brian, is that Michael Kaiser recently revealed

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that you'll be designing a course at the Old Shores

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Resort in Florida that might take some inspiration from that

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:33.239
<v Speaker 1>iteration of Augusta National. It's a very interesting project. We're

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 1>going to give it time to develop here because we

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:38.600
<v Speaker 1>need to get through the design process before we can

0:37:38.600 --> 0:37:44.319
<v Speaker 1>talk about specifics of it. But just in general, what

0:37:44.520 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 1>has been your thought process about being inspired by the

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:54.280
<v Speaker 1>early Augusta National. What do you find most inspiring about

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:58.000
<v Speaker 1>that early course and why have you wanted to apply

0:37:58.200 --> 0:38:01.080
<v Speaker 1>some of those ideas to your own architecture.

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:07.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, the context around Michael Kaiser and his project in

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:10.239
<v Speaker 5>Florida is based on conversations we'd had just about how

0:38:10.760 --> 0:38:15.200
<v Speaker 5>fascinating and unique the original version of Augusta National was.

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 5>You know that it was relatively hazard free and you know,

0:38:21.560 --> 0:38:27.240
<v Speaker 5>insanely wide fairways on really hilly ground, relatively few trees

0:38:27.239 --> 0:38:30.359
<v Speaker 5>at the time, and they certainly weren't much of a

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:34.440
<v Speaker 5>factor on the way the holes were played, and it

0:38:34.520 --> 0:38:40.000
<v Speaker 5>was based again largely on the topography. And you know,

0:38:40.400 --> 0:38:44.400
<v Speaker 5>the way with the entire place essentially mote is fairway,

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:46.960
<v Speaker 5>The way that balls could get away from the ideal

0:38:47.000 --> 0:38:50.200
<v Speaker 5>position and make shots into those bold and wild greens

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:54.400
<v Speaker 5>more complicated. Yeah, the coordination of the contouring in and

0:38:54.440 --> 0:38:59.080
<v Speaker 5>around the greens in conjunction with what was happening through

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:02.160
<v Speaker 5>the fairways made it a really compelling golf course without

0:39:02.160 --> 0:39:06.120
<v Speaker 5>a whole lot of bunkering necessary. And obviously the water

0:39:06.239 --> 0:39:08.879
<v Speaker 5>hazards have been a part of the golf course since

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:12.440
<v Speaker 5>the beginning, though they've all evolved and changed pretty substantially

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:15.719
<v Speaker 5>over the years. But I think it's the hilliness of

0:39:15.719 --> 0:39:20.000
<v Speaker 5>the ground and the vast areas of short grass.

0:39:19.719 --> 0:39:21.760
<v Speaker 4>Allowing your ball to roll and roll and roll.

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:26.719
<v Speaker 5>Out of position in conjunction with boldly contry green complexes

0:39:26.760 --> 0:39:30.319
<v Speaker 5>that made that something really unique and not something you

0:39:30.400 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 5>see replicated very often these days. I mean, GUS is

0:39:33.000 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 5>such an influential place, The Masters is such an influential event,

0:39:40.320 --> 0:39:43.880
<v Speaker 5>but the original version of Augusta National really isn't something

0:39:43.920 --> 0:39:47.040
<v Speaker 5>that I don't think people have sought to latch onto

0:39:47.120 --> 0:39:50.680
<v Speaker 5>his inspiration and design golf in that way very often

0:39:50.719 --> 0:39:51.440
<v Speaker 5>these days.

0:39:52.600 --> 0:39:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that the relatively minimal bunkering is something

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:01.160
<v Speaker 1>that makes that original course stand out a lot and

0:40:01.560 --> 0:40:05.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe is part of the inspiration that you can take

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:05.359
<v Speaker 1>from it.

0:40:06.239 --> 0:40:07.880
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely? Absolutely.

0:40:08.760 --> 0:40:13.319
<v Speaker 5>I'm not alone in thinking that bunkering is probably overused

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:18.000
<v Speaker 5>as a hazard, and there are reasons why there are

0:40:18.000 --> 0:40:20.319
<v Speaker 5>probably more bunkers on golf courses today than there were

0:40:20.440 --> 0:40:22.960
<v Speaker 5>twenty years ago. That have nothing to do with how

0:40:23.040 --> 0:40:30.960
<v Speaker 5>goalf holes play. But yeah, I think latching onto using

0:40:31.080 --> 0:40:37.400
<v Speaker 5>bunkers or artificial hazards sparingly is a very interesting one

0:40:38.440 --> 0:40:41.080
<v Speaker 5>and obvious the more interesting the piece of land is

0:40:41.080 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 5>you're working with, and the freedom through your client to

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:49.440
<v Speaker 5>build greens with substantial slope or contour allows you to

0:40:49.480 --> 0:40:51.359
<v Speaker 5>minimize how much bunkering you need to add to make

0:40:51.360 --> 0:40:52.080
<v Speaker 5>wholes interesting.

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:57.759
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think that so many current architects use

0:40:57.800 --> 0:41:00.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of bunkers. You said earlier that it doesn't

0:41:00.680 --> 0:41:03.520
<v Speaker 1>have much to do with how things play. Does that

0:41:03.520 --> 0:41:06.080
<v Speaker 1>implying that it has more to do with how they look?

0:41:06.640 --> 0:41:10.279
<v Speaker 5>Yes, yes, yeah, I'm not the first one to say that,

0:41:10.320 --> 0:41:15.560
<v Speaker 5>but yeah, Instagram and drone photography, and there are a

0:41:15.560 --> 0:41:18.759
<v Speaker 5>lot of marketing reasons for things to look cool, and

0:41:19.280 --> 0:41:21.440
<v Speaker 5>bunkers are an easy way to add visual interest.

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:24.760
<v Speaker 4>But they're also a crutch.

0:41:25.160 --> 0:41:28.080
<v Speaker 5>You know, It's very easy to add more sand here

0:41:28.080 --> 0:41:32.719
<v Speaker 5>and more sand there, But I think that's been pretty overdone,

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:36.279
<v Speaker 5>and the idea of simplifying things and pairing it back

0:41:37.320 --> 0:41:39.520
<v Speaker 5>is an interesting concept to pursue.

0:41:40.200 --> 0:41:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And that's why that original version of Augusta National

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:48.480
<v Speaker 1>might seem so strange or radical now because of that

0:41:48.480 --> 0:41:51.560
<v Speaker 1>that lack of color contrast. You know, we've kind of

0:41:51.600 --> 0:41:57.560
<v Speaker 1>trained our eyes to look for the framing of white

0:41:57.640 --> 0:42:01.520
<v Speaker 1>sand and green grass to help us understand what a

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:04.840
<v Speaker 1>golf hole looks like or what it's trying to convey,

0:42:05.560 --> 0:42:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and the original Augusta Nashville, by comparison, is is pretty bare.

0:42:10.880 --> 0:42:11.040
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:42:11.080 --> 0:42:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Another strange thing about it is those green shapes, the

0:42:14.239 --> 0:42:20.360
<v Speaker 1>wild kind of random tongues sticking out between bunkers and

0:42:21.360 --> 0:42:26.080
<v Speaker 1>doing all that sort of stuff. So is that something

0:42:26.120 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that you can see yourself adapting.

0:42:29.560 --> 0:42:31.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's an interesting point. It's not just the contouring

0:42:31.840 --> 0:42:35.120
<v Speaker 5>of the greens and the boldness that the shapes were bizarre. Yeah,

0:42:35.840 --> 0:42:38.640
<v Speaker 5>the fourth had that long, skinny tongue that couldn't have

0:42:38.640 --> 0:42:42.560
<v Speaker 5>been more than five or six steps wide, extending between

0:42:42.560 --> 0:42:45.800
<v Speaker 5>the front right bunker and the left bunker, the boomerang

0:42:45.840 --> 0:42:49.440
<v Speaker 5>shape of the original ninth de other were very eclectic

0:42:49.480 --> 0:42:51.560
<v Speaker 5>shapes that featured a lot of little lobes and tongues.

0:42:53.840 --> 0:42:56.839
<v Speaker 5>You know, it's easy to see why things like that

0:42:56.920 --> 0:43:00.480
<v Speaker 5>may not survive, because you know, there's certain they puts

0:43:00.520 --> 0:43:04.200
<v Speaker 5>on those greens where you couldn't get anywhere near the

0:43:04.200 --> 0:43:06.120
<v Speaker 5>golf you know, where the hole was cut in Certa,

0:43:06.440 --> 0:43:10.120
<v Speaker 5>certain situations you've missed in the wrong place, and golfers

0:43:10.120 --> 0:43:12.439
<v Speaker 5>tend to not like that too much, and superintendents don't

0:43:12.480 --> 0:43:14.719
<v Speaker 5>like that if you're pulling a wedge off the green

0:43:14.719 --> 0:43:20.400
<v Speaker 5>instead of trying to hunt around something. But you know,

0:43:20.840 --> 0:43:23.319
<v Speaker 5>one of the funny things about Augusta is that it's

0:43:23.400 --> 0:43:25.239
<v Speaker 5>one of the places. You know, they certainly have more

0:43:25.280 --> 0:43:28.719
<v Speaker 5>bunkers now than they did in nineteen thirty four, but

0:43:28.800 --> 0:43:32.920
<v Speaker 5>the bunkers are not something that people connect with Augusta visually.

0:43:33.040 --> 0:43:35.080
<v Speaker 5>You know, it's not the bunkers that make it pretty.

0:43:35.120 --> 0:43:37.560
<v Speaker 5>In fact, a lot of the bunkers are very plain

0:43:37.680 --> 0:43:41.640
<v Speaker 5>looking and slightly awkward in places. You know, it's the

0:43:42.280 --> 0:43:45.600
<v Speaker 5>rolling contouring and the greens and the surrounds and the

0:43:46.320 --> 0:43:49.200
<v Speaker 5>beautiful flowers and the trees, and you know, there's so

0:43:49.280 --> 0:43:51.480
<v Speaker 5>much else going on about that place that makes it

0:43:51.480 --> 0:43:55.640
<v Speaker 5>beautiful that an abundance of bunkers wouldn't really add to

0:43:55.680 --> 0:43:59.040
<v Speaker 5>that picture. And even though they've added some, the bunkers

0:43:59.080 --> 0:44:03.080
<v Speaker 5>aren't what make that pretty. So I think, you know,

0:44:03.239 --> 0:44:06.439
<v Speaker 5>leaning into that style if you've got a site that

0:44:06.440 --> 0:44:11.480
<v Speaker 5>that has ample natural beauty, because a great example of

0:44:11.520 --> 0:44:16.360
<v Speaker 5>how restraint in building for adding features or particularly bunkers

0:44:17.160 --> 0:44:20.319
<v Speaker 5>isn't necessary. Just you know, it goes back to the

0:44:20.320 --> 0:44:22.520
<v Speaker 5>idea of minimalism. Just let the site be the star

0:44:22.600 --> 0:44:24.359
<v Speaker 5>of the show and try not to do too much

0:44:24.360 --> 0:44:25.000
<v Speaker 5>and get in its way.

0:44:26.440 --> 0:44:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Something else that's really interesting about the nineteen thirties version

0:44:31.080 --> 0:44:33.279
<v Speaker 1>of Augusta National, and that might be a little bit

0:44:33.400 --> 0:44:38.280
<v Speaker 1>foreign to people who are familiar with the course right now,

0:44:39.120 --> 0:44:43.960
<v Speaker 1>is that it had all this interesting mounding. Some of

0:44:44.000 --> 0:44:46.080
<v Speaker 1>this remains, like if you think of the eighth green,

0:44:46.160 --> 0:44:48.839
<v Speaker 1>the mounding around the eighth green is still there. There

0:44:48.840 --> 0:44:51.280
<v Speaker 1>are still some greens like like six and a couple

0:44:51.280 --> 0:44:54.480
<v Speaker 1>of others that have mounding on the exterior of the

0:44:54.520 --> 0:44:59.000
<v Speaker 1>greens that is kind of representative of what the original

0:44:59.040 --> 0:45:02.719
<v Speaker 1>style was. But a lot more holes on the original

0:45:02.760 --> 0:45:07.440
<v Speaker 1>course had kind of this alpinization or not chocolate drops

0:45:07.440 --> 0:45:10.840
<v Speaker 1>that are bigger than that, but mounding that was intended

0:45:10.880 --> 0:45:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to be a meaningful hazard on the course. What do

0:45:15.040 --> 0:45:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you make of that aspect of the initial design at

0:45:18.400 --> 0:45:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Augusta National. Do you find that interesting?

0:45:21.040 --> 0:45:23.160
<v Speaker 5>The eleventh hole is a great example of that. You know,

0:45:23.200 --> 0:45:27.200
<v Speaker 5>there are there, I think two really prominent mounds on

0:45:27.239 --> 0:45:31.400
<v Speaker 5>the front right edge of the green that dictated strategy

0:45:31.880 --> 0:45:34.400
<v Speaker 5>back to the tee. You know, they very much influenced

0:45:35.080 --> 0:45:36.759
<v Speaker 5>where you wanted to leave your t shot depending on

0:45:36.760 --> 0:45:40.360
<v Speaker 5>where the hole was, and they were hazards that you

0:45:40.800 --> 0:45:42.719
<v Speaker 5>had to negotiate if you were out of position, but

0:45:42.760 --> 0:45:44.520
<v Speaker 5>you could also use them to help you steer a

0:45:44.520 --> 0:45:46.200
<v Speaker 5>ball around to those back left pins if you were

0:45:46.200 --> 0:45:47.520
<v Speaker 5>in the right place in the fairway and hit the

0:45:47.560 --> 0:45:49.160
<v Speaker 5>right right type of shot coming.

0:45:49.000 --> 0:45:49.520
<v Speaker 4>Into the green.

0:45:52.200 --> 0:45:56.359
<v Speaker 5>You know, the eleventh was a very complex hole back

0:45:56.360 --> 0:45:58.920
<v Speaker 5>in the day. That's certainly gotten much longer and much

0:45:59.000 --> 0:46:01.719
<v Speaker 5>narrower than it once was, and the options for how

0:46:01.760 --> 0:46:04.160
<v Speaker 5>to play that hole have been limited. But those mounds

0:46:04.200 --> 0:46:06.120
<v Speaker 5>near the green were a really important feature of that

0:46:06.200 --> 0:46:10.439
<v Speaker 5>hole that you know they've been I think they still

0:46:10.560 --> 0:46:14.680
<v Speaker 5>kind of exist, but in a decreased form, and because

0:46:14.719 --> 0:46:17.040
<v Speaker 5>the hole has been narrowed so much, they just don't play.

0:46:17.320 --> 0:46:19.920
<v Speaker 5>They don't affect strategy the way they used to. And

0:46:19.960 --> 0:46:22.920
<v Speaker 5>I think the seventeenth, if our call correctly, the seventeenth

0:46:22.960 --> 0:46:25.440
<v Speaker 5>was originally based on the fourteenth green, the old course

0:46:25.480 --> 0:46:27.520
<v Speaker 5>and had a really prominent mount in the front left

0:46:27.560 --> 0:46:31.200
<v Speaker 5>corner with some pins stuck behind it. That's another one

0:46:31.200 --> 0:46:34.719
<v Speaker 5>where they would have come into play, you know, every day,

0:46:34.760 --> 0:46:38.400
<v Speaker 5>for every day play. The fourteenth featured a moundered a

0:46:38.400 --> 0:46:42.120
<v Speaker 5>big mounded two in the approach on the right. Yeah,

0:46:42.120 --> 0:46:43.719
<v Speaker 5>there were quite a few of those hazards out there that,

0:46:43.760 --> 0:46:46.560
<v Speaker 5>for whatever reason, have been wiped out over the years.

0:46:47.040 --> 0:46:51.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, just reshaped or massaged in certain ways that you know,

0:46:51.920 --> 0:46:55.320
<v Speaker 1>have made them less impactful. I guess on the ball,

0:46:55.760 --> 0:46:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the ones on eleven, specifically short right of the green.

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:03.239
<v Speaker 1>I think the idea initially was that if you got

0:47:03.280 --> 0:47:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to the left side of that fairway, which was used

0:47:06.560 --> 0:47:08.279
<v Speaker 1>to be the outside of the dog lay, because the

0:47:08.400 --> 0:47:11.120
<v Speaker 1>leven was initially a big dog leg to the right,

0:47:11.680 --> 0:47:13.480
<v Speaker 1>if you got to the left side of the fairway,

0:47:14.000 --> 0:47:16.200
<v Speaker 1>then you could kind of hit your ball into those

0:47:16.280 --> 0:47:21.560
<v Speaker 1>mounds and it would start to arc toward the green

0:47:21.920 --> 0:47:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and you could kind of avoid the water hazard on

0:47:24.800 --> 0:47:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the left in that way. But now I think what

0:47:29.280 --> 0:47:32.360
<v Speaker 1>happens is if you play your ball into those it

0:47:32.400 --> 0:47:35.760
<v Speaker 1>filters more straight toward the water, so it doesn't quite

0:47:35.840 --> 0:47:40.160
<v Speaker 1>do what those mounds originally were meant to do. But

0:47:40.680 --> 0:47:43.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, since we so rarely see players feeding it

0:47:43.920 --> 0:47:47.960
<v Speaker 1>into the green in that way, the difference maybe doesn't

0:47:48.040 --> 0:47:51.080
<v Speaker 1>register that much. But you know, you were talking earlier

0:47:51.080 --> 0:47:54.000
<v Speaker 1>about all the interesting stuff that Augusta National has in

0:47:54.000 --> 0:47:58.320
<v Speaker 1>front of its greens. Those mounds used to be certainly

0:47:59.040 --> 0:48:02.239
<v Speaker 1>one of those one of those things that kind of,

0:48:02.880 --> 0:48:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, interacted with the ball when it would land

0:48:05.120 --> 0:48:07.680
<v Speaker 1>before the green and start running on.

0:48:08.760 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 5>And to the rest of my knowledge, they were all

0:48:10.120 --> 0:48:11.799
<v Speaker 5>mode at fairway height. You know, there were things that

0:48:11.880 --> 0:48:15.480
<v Speaker 5>you could depending on where you were, you could use

0:48:15.480 --> 0:48:17.759
<v Speaker 5>them to your advantage and run balls over and off

0:48:17.760 --> 0:48:19.840
<v Speaker 5>of them, But if you're on the wrong spot, you'd

0:48:19.920 --> 0:48:21.479
<v Speaker 5>most likely have to carry them and try and stop

0:48:21.480 --> 0:48:24.400
<v Speaker 5>a ball on the backside, which is a fascinating hazard

0:48:24.400 --> 0:48:24.879
<v Speaker 5>near a green.

0:48:26.320 --> 0:48:27.879
<v Speaker 1>I want to go back to something you were saying

0:48:27.920 --> 0:48:34.440
<v Speaker 1>earlier about the combination of Augusta National's with its hilliness

0:48:35.120 --> 0:48:39.399
<v Speaker 1>and the severity of the green complexes. There's something there

0:48:39.440 --> 0:48:45.400
<v Speaker 1>that really kind of supercharges strategy, right, because if your

0:48:45.400 --> 0:48:47.800
<v Speaker 1>ball gets moving on the wrong direction on one of

0:48:47.840 --> 0:48:50.680
<v Speaker 1>those really hilly sections of the property, on one of

0:48:50.760 --> 0:48:55.360
<v Speaker 1>those big slopes, then there's the chance that your angle

0:48:55.520 --> 0:48:58.720
<v Speaker 1>into the green on the next shot could really worsen

0:48:59.400 --> 0:49:04.200
<v Speaker 1>by magnitudes, right, whereas most courses you don't get that

0:49:04.400 --> 0:49:10.280
<v Speaker 1>extreme of a difference between different positions in the fair way.

0:49:10.760 --> 0:49:13.920
<v Speaker 1>So you were starting to discuss that a little bit.

0:49:13.960 --> 0:49:15.600
<v Speaker 1>But I want to I want to hear more about that.

0:49:15.640 --> 0:49:18.040
<v Speaker 1>What are kind of your thoughts about the nature of

0:49:18.080 --> 0:49:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the property paired with the with paired with the green complexes.

0:49:21.480 --> 0:49:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Why is that so important?

0:49:22.520 --> 0:49:26.760
<v Speaker 5>At Augusta there are a number of holes there where

0:49:26.920 --> 0:49:28.800
<v Speaker 5>you know they're built in the side slopes. Obviously, the

0:49:29.160 --> 0:49:32.439
<v Speaker 5>golf courses benched into the side of a big steep hill,

0:49:33.160 --> 0:49:35.719
<v Speaker 5>and quite a few of the holes run across the

0:49:35.760 --> 0:49:42.160
<v Speaker 5>side slopes, and to a lesser extent these days it

0:49:42.200 --> 0:49:45.200
<v Speaker 5>was still to a certain degree the ability to shape

0:49:45.960 --> 0:49:48.000
<v Speaker 5>you're shot off the tee on some of those holes,

0:49:48.080 --> 0:49:51.319
<v Speaker 5>to flay a draw into a ferry that's left right,

0:49:51.360 --> 0:49:53.280
<v Speaker 5>for instance, or a fade into a fairy that slops

0:49:53.320 --> 0:49:55.560
<v Speaker 5>the other way. It can help you keep a ball

0:49:55.560 --> 0:49:57.160
<v Speaker 5>in a certain part of the fairway. And when they

0:49:57.160 --> 0:50:04.600
<v Speaker 5>were very wide, you know that that matter more. Adding

0:50:05.640 --> 0:50:09.759
<v Speaker 5>trees and adding rough has kind of narrowed the fairways

0:50:09.800 --> 0:50:13.640
<v Speaker 5>to the point where the ideal position from which to

0:50:13.719 --> 0:50:17.480
<v Speaker 5>approach the green lives somewhere in that thirty.

0:50:17.120 --> 0:50:19.160
<v Speaker 4>Five yard forty range.

0:50:19.440 --> 0:50:21.720
<v Speaker 5>You know, the width that's provided to you now, Somewhere

0:50:21.719 --> 0:50:23.759
<v Speaker 5>in there generally is the place you want to be

0:50:23.760 --> 0:50:27.520
<v Speaker 5>coming in from. And when the fairways were eighty yards

0:50:27.600 --> 0:50:31.000
<v Speaker 5>wide as opposed to thirty five, allowing a ball to

0:50:31.120 --> 0:50:33.719
<v Speaker 5>roll another thirty yards down the hill to the left,

0:50:33.800 --> 0:50:36.280
<v Speaker 5>meant you were that much further away from the ideal position.

0:50:36.880 --> 0:50:38.799
<v Speaker 5>When you add trees and add rough your ball can

0:50:38.840 --> 0:50:43.239
<v Speaker 5>only roll so far away from the ideal position. And

0:50:43.280 --> 0:50:47.319
<v Speaker 5>I think you know that mister Jones had this most

0:50:47.360 --> 0:50:53.640
<v Speaker 5>brilliant kind of summary of strategic design when you talked

0:50:53.640 --> 0:50:56.880
<v Speaker 5>about the various ways, and it's reasonably the long quote

0:50:56.880 --> 0:50:59.080
<v Speaker 5>which I don't fully remember, but he talked about the

0:50:59.120 --> 0:51:01.840
<v Speaker 5>various ways in which you can penalize misplayed shots.

0:51:01.920 --> 0:51:02.360
<v Speaker 4>You know, one of.

0:51:02.360 --> 0:51:04.640
<v Speaker 5>Which is to immediately put you in a hazard at

0:51:04.640 --> 0:51:08.400
<v Speaker 5>a bunker. You know, the penalties immediate. You know, another

0:51:08.440 --> 0:51:12.360
<v Speaker 5>option is to let you get yourself into the wrong position.

0:51:12.680 --> 0:51:14.920
<v Speaker 5>And it's only until you've gotten to that bad position

0:51:15.000 --> 0:51:17.040
<v Speaker 5>you realize that you've been had and your second shot

0:51:17.120 --> 0:51:18.200
<v Speaker 5>is a lot more difficult.

0:51:18.560 --> 0:51:19.920
<v Speaker 4>You know, the penalty is not immediate.

0:51:20.239 --> 0:51:24.399
<v Speaker 5>It's in making the succession of the following shots more

0:51:24.440 --> 0:51:26.360
<v Speaker 5>difficult than they would have been if you put yourself

0:51:26.360 --> 0:51:29.080
<v Speaker 5>in the right position. And the original version with Gusta

0:51:29.160 --> 0:51:31.200
<v Speaker 5>was that, I mean, he gave you all the room

0:51:31.200 --> 0:51:34.200
<v Speaker 5>in the world to hang yourself and let you know,

0:51:34.480 --> 0:51:36.200
<v Speaker 5>let a tea. You know, left it up to the

0:51:36.200 --> 0:51:39.360
<v Speaker 5>golfer to determine their own preferred path from tee to

0:51:40.000 --> 0:51:43.760
<v Speaker 5>the whole orreas. Now, the golf course, like many American

0:51:43.840 --> 0:51:46.600
<v Speaker 5>championship golf courses, is much more prescriptive. I mean, it

0:51:46.760 --> 0:51:48.759
<v Speaker 5>tells you how the hole should be played. It doesn't

0:51:48.760 --> 0:51:50.840
<v Speaker 5>allow you nearly as much freedom to sort out your

0:51:50.880 --> 0:51:54.160
<v Speaker 5>own roof based on your own game. So it's a

0:51:54.239 --> 0:51:59.320
<v Speaker 5>less complex test now, I would say, certainly for the

0:51:59.360 --> 0:52:05.279
<v Speaker 5>average golfer. You know, the focus the Masters has always

0:52:05.320 --> 0:52:07.799
<v Speaker 5>been an important event in Augusta, but I think it's

0:52:07.840 --> 0:52:12.640
<v Speaker 5>the the vast disparity between the way the average golfer

0:52:12.680 --> 0:52:17.359
<v Speaker 5>plays golf now versus the professional golfer has really forced

0:52:17.800 --> 0:52:21.120
<v Speaker 5>Augusta to take their golf course in a direction that

0:52:21.239 --> 0:52:24.839
<v Speaker 5>challenges the better players. You know, that gap was far

0:52:24.960 --> 0:52:29.200
<v Speaker 5>narrower fifty years ago, seventy years ago. But I think

0:52:29.200 --> 0:52:31.040
<v Speaker 5>in order to challenge the best players in the world,

0:52:31.520 --> 0:52:35.799
<v Speaker 5>maybe the golf course is less compelling, less interesting, less

0:52:36.480 --> 0:52:39.959
<v Speaker 5>you know, provides less freedom than the original version did.

0:52:40.800 --> 0:52:42.920
<v Speaker 1>A great example of what you're talking about is the

0:52:42.920 --> 0:52:46.920
<v Speaker 1>fourteenth hole, yes, which I still love, but the original

0:52:47.000 --> 0:52:50.319
<v Speaker 1>version of that hole was pretty much wide open. You

0:52:50.360 --> 0:52:55.440
<v Speaker 1>could play anywhere within a very wide hole corridor. But

0:52:55.520 --> 0:52:57.479
<v Speaker 1>if you let your ball run down to the right

0:52:58.360 --> 0:53:01.239
<v Speaker 1>it kind of sits on a side slope, then your

0:53:01.280 --> 0:53:03.920
<v Speaker 1>next shot was going to be blind. So if you

0:53:03.920 --> 0:53:06.359
<v Speaker 1>weren't in control of your ball as you played out

0:53:06.360 --> 0:53:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to the right, then then too bad. You couldn't see

0:53:09.480 --> 0:53:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the green on your next shot. But also if you

0:53:12.719 --> 0:53:14.880
<v Speaker 1>avoided the bunker that used to be in front of

0:53:14.880 --> 0:53:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the tee and that took up the right side of

0:53:17.200 --> 0:53:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the fairway, if you played well away from that bunker,

0:53:21.160 --> 0:53:23.520
<v Speaker 1>there was a big mound in front of the green

0:53:23.560 --> 0:53:26.239
<v Speaker 1>that would block your view of it, and so you

0:53:26.320 --> 0:53:28.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of had to thread the needle there. You had

0:53:28.960 --> 0:53:31.759
<v Speaker 1>to hit a particular spot in the fairway, taking on

0:53:31.920 --> 0:53:34.759
<v Speaker 1>the bunker and also controlling your ball so that it

0:53:34.840 --> 0:53:37.439
<v Speaker 1>stayed in a certain place in the fairway in order

0:53:37.480 --> 0:53:39.640
<v Speaker 1>to have that good view of the green, and that

0:53:40.440 --> 0:53:43.160
<v Speaker 1>was how the strategy of the hole worked. Now there

0:53:43.200 --> 0:53:45.960
<v Speaker 1>are trees on either side, you don't have that bunker anymore.

0:53:46.120 --> 0:53:51.480
<v Speaker 1>The hole is bunkerless. But the challenge is threading your

0:53:51.520 --> 0:53:54.160
<v Speaker 1>ball kind of between the trees and holding it up

0:53:54.239 --> 0:53:58.920
<v Speaker 1>against the slope, keeping it from going into either tree line.

0:54:00.080 --> 0:54:04.719
<v Speaker 1>Very challenging shot, and it's a very good test for pros, right,

0:54:04.719 --> 0:54:08.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a great test of a drive for the pros.

0:54:08.480 --> 0:54:11.320
<v Speaker 1>It really shows whether they have control of their ball

0:54:11.719 --> 0:54:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and then playing into the green they also have to

0:54:13.640 --> 0:54:17.320
<v Speaker 1>have similar control off off of a pretty steep lie.

0:54:18.160 --> 0:54:20.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think that's a good example of how things

0:54:20.000 --> 0:54:23.200
<v Speaker 1>have shifted, where whereas before it was the land that

0:54:23.360 --> 0:54:26.839
<v Speaker 1>was the hazard and the topography and the blindness and

0:54:26.880 --> 0:54:28.600
<v Speaker 1>what your ball might do when it hits the ground,

0:54:29.200 --> 0:54:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and now trees have a lot to do with it.

0:54:32.200 --> 0:54:36.400
<v Speaker 5>I guess, right, yeah, And it's even more complex than that.

0:54:36.440 --> 0:54:42.040
<v Speaker 5>I mean, you spelled out the challenges of playing into

0:54:42.080 --> 0:54:44.919
<v Speaker 5>that green from the right, the blindness, and you're playing

0:54:44.960 --> 0:54:48.480
<v Speaker 5>that much further uphill at the same time, and you're

0:54:48.520 --> 0:54:50.520
<v Speaker 5>probably you know, adding a couple of clubs to your

0:54:50.520 --> 0:54:53.239
<v Speaker 5>approach shots. If as opposed, if you were staying up

0:54:53.239 --> 0:54:56.160
<v Speaker 5>the left, you could shorten the hole. But you know

0:54:56.320 --> 0:54:59.280
<v Speaker 5>there's additional complexity and that the green tilted and still

0:54:59.280 --> 0:55:00.279
<v Speaker 5>does pretty.

0:55:00.120 --> 0:55:01.080
<v Speaker 4>Hard from left to right.

0:55:01.400 --> 0:55:04.120
<v Speaker 5>Right with the lot of people you're playing, you know,

0:55:04.200 --> 0:55:06.120
<v Speaker 5>if you're out the right, you're playing into the green

0:55:06.160 --> 0:55:10.200
<v Speaker 5>from an advantageous angle. You're playing more into the slope.

0:55:10.480 --> 0:55:14.680
<v Speaker 5>So you've got that advantage at the expense of probably

0:55:15.360 --> 0:55:17.719
<v Speaker 5>a longer shot into the green and also the blindness

0:55:17.719 --> 0:55:18.240
<v Speaker 5>you mentioned.

0:55:19.200 --> 0:55:20.160
<v Speaker 4>So you've got your choice.

0:55:20.160 --> 0:55:23.120
<v Speaker 5>Are you comfortable with that in exchange for a preferred

0:55:23.200 --> 0:55:25.279
<v Speaker 5>angle into the slope of the green, or do you

0:55:25.320 --> 0:55:27.800
<v Speaker 5>want to cut off some distance and play up the

0:55:27.880 --> 0:55:29.640
<v Speaker 5>left and you might get a better view of the hole,

0:55:30.000 --> 0:55:31.680
<v Speaker 5>But the green tends to slide away from me a

0:55:31.719 --> 0:55:34.160
<v Speaker 5>little bit, and on some days, depending where the pin is,

0:55:34.200 --> 0:55:37.640
<v Speaker 5>you've seen many golfers kind of play a little cut

0:55:37.719 --> 0:55:39.319
<v Speaker 5>into the back of the left corner of the green

0:55:39.400 --> 0:55:41.360
<v Speaker 5>that just takes the two or three tiers and settles

0:55:41.400 --> 0:55:43.320
<v Speaker 5>within three feet of the pin. When it's cut, we

0:55:43.440 --> 0:55:45.120
<v Speaker 5>are on the right, which is one of the most

0:55:45.160 --> 0:55:47.960
<v Speaker 5>fascinating shots to watch on the golf course. So there

0:55:48.000 --> 0:55:49.680
<v Speaker 5>are days, depending on where the pin is cut, where

0:55:49.719 --> 0:55:51.480
<v Speaker 5>you might prefer to be up the left. There are

0:55:51.480 --> 0:55:53.279
<v Speaker 5>other days when you might prefer to be up the right,

0:55:53.320 --> 0:55:56.920
<v Speaker 5>and it offered that additional level of complexity and the

0:55:56.920 --> 0:55:59.560
<v Speaker 5>way the golf, the green itself, the green complex was

0:55:59.600 --> 0:56:02.879
<v Speaker 5>designed that it gave you the freedom to choose how

0:56:02.920 --> 0:56:05.680
<v Speaker 5>you want to play the hole. And of course not

0:56:05.719 --> 0:56:07.840
<v Speaker 5>everyone hits the shot they want to hit, so you

0:56:08.160 --> 0:56:11.440
<v Speaker 5>misplay your t shot and then you're stuck with what.

0:56:11.440 --> 0:56:12.040
<v Speaker 4>You're stuck with.

0:56:12.080 --> 0:56:14.839
<v Speaker 5>But it gave you so much freedom to choose how

0:56:14.880 --> 0:56:18.520
<v Speaker 5>you wanted to play the hole. And narrowing fairways, adding

0:56:18.600 --> 0:56:22.160
<v Speaker 5>rough adding trees limits those options and remove some of

0:56:22.200 --> 0:56:22.880
<v Speaker 5>the complexity.

0:56:24.520 --> 0:56:26.680
<v Speaker 4>But again to your point, still preserves the challenge of.

0:56:26.600 --> 0:56:28.640
<v Speaker 5>The golf course for the best players in the world,

0:56:28.719 --> 0:56:31.920
<v Speaker 5>but it's a more prescriptive, less.

0:56:33.440 --> 0:56:34.240
<v Speaker 4>Complex challenge.

0:56:34.239 --> 0:56:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I would say, so for you, when you're designing a

0:56:38.200 --> 0:56:42.040
<v Speaker 1>course that is primarily going to be four average golfers,

0:56:43.760 --> 0:56:46.719
<v Speaker 1>do you think a lot about the ground in the

0:56:46.760 --> 0:56:48.960
<v Speaker 1>way that we've just been talking about it with the

0:56:49.000 --> 0:56:51.399
<v Speaker 1>fourteenth hole? Is that something that for you is still

0:56:51.440 --> 0:56:52.920
<v Speaker 1>relevant for the average golfer.

0:56:54.800 --> 0:56:59.200
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, and you know, I admittedly I haven't had many

0:56:59.200 --> 0:57:02.000
<v Speaker 5>opportunities does e gulf of my own. You know, so

0:57:02.120 --> 0:57:04.040
<v Speaker 5>much of what I've done over my career has been

0:57:04.320 --> 0:57:07.680
<v Speaker 5>working for Tom and learn so much through him. But

0:57:07.680 --> 0:57:09.680
<v Speaker 5>I'll bring up Old Barn Well because it's one of

0:57:09.719 --> 0:57:12.720
<v Speaker 5>the few opportunities I've had, along with Blake Conan, to

0:57:12.760 --> 0:57:16.320
<v Speaker 5>design something from scratch, you know, one of the things

0:57:16.480 --> 0:57:17.040
<v Speaker 5>so I worked.

0:57:17.760 --> 0:57:18.400
<v Speaker 4>I worked the two.

0:57:18.320 --> 0:57:21.680
<v Speaker 5>Thousand Masters, and it wasn't until two years ago that

0:57:21.720 --> 0:57:25.640
<v Speaker 5>I'd gotten back to Augusta and I was shocked with

0:57:25.760 --> 0:57:27.480
<v Speaker 5>how much the golf course has changed. But one of

0:57:27.480 --> 0:57:30.120
<v Speaker 5>the things that I really loved and watching play, I

0:57:30.160 --> 0:57:31.680
<v Speaker 5>went back last year as well, so I went two

0:57:31.760 --> 0:57:33.480
<v Speaker 5>years in a row. One of the things I loved

0:57:33.520 --> 0:57:37.120
<v Speaker 5>seeing at Augusta, which is something that every great golf

0:57:37.160 --> 0:57:40.240
<v Speaker 5>course in America should take note of. The fairways are

0:57:40.280 --> 0:57:45.280
<v Speaker 5>really steep there, and balls stop in the fairways because

0:57:45.880 --> 0:57:47.720
<v Speaker 5>you know, they're overseed with rye grass.

0:57:47.440 --> 0:57:48.440
<v Speaker 4>Which is a little sticky.

0:57:49.240 --> 0:57:51.440
<v Speaker 5>But they're also not mowing the fairways as tight as

0:57:51.440 --> 0:57:54.240
<v Speaker 5>they can because if they did, all the balls row

0:57:54.320 --> 0:57:57.880
<v Speaker 5>to the flat low sides of the fairway. So the

0:57:57.920 --> 0:58:00.160
<v Speaker 5>balls stay on slopes in the fairways a go to

0:58:00.240 --> 0:58:07.920
<v Speaker 5>national in places, and on side slopes or down slopes

0:58:08.440 --> 0:58:10.600
<v Speaker 5>where balls don't stop on a lot of golf courses

0:58:10.640 --> 0:58:12.960
<v Speaker 5>in America now, our best golf courses are more in

0:58:13.000 --> 0:58:16.080
<v Speaker 5>their fairways, far tighter than they need to be, and

0:58:16.200 --> 0:58:19.320
<v Speaker 5>balls don't stick on side slopes anymore. That's that's a

0:58:19.400 --> 0:58:21.760
<v Speaker 5>really important part of the challenge at Augustin National. And

0:58:21.800 --> 0:58:25.840
<v Speaker 5>they get that, and they could mow the fairways twice

0:58:25.880 --> 0:58:29.000
<v Speaker 5>as short, and they choose not to because they recognize

0:58:29.040 --> 0:58:32.280
<v Speaker 5>the value of having difficult lies in the fairways and

0:58:32.360 --> 0:58:36.200
<v Speaker 5>trying to play a cut into a green when the

0:58:36.200 --> 0:58:39.880
<v Speaker 5>ball's eight inches above your feet is a tough shot.

0:58:40.680 --> 0:58:43.600
<v Speaker 5>And that still remains at Augustin National at an age

0:58:43.640 --> 0:58:45.720
<v Speaker 5>where they could maintain the golf course however they want,

0:58:45.760 --> 0:58:47.960
<v Speaker 5>they choose to leave their fairways a little longer and

0:58:47.960 --> 0:58:50.680
<v Speaker 5>a little stickier than most places do these days because

0:58:50.720 --> 0:58:55.120
<v Speaker 5>they recognize that challenge. So, getting back to my own

0:58:55.120 --> 0:58:58.400
<v Speaker 5>work old Barningwell, there are a number of holes there

0:58:59.000 --> 0:59:02.560
<v Speaker 5>where you know, if you're content to hit a two

0:59:02.680 --> 0:59:05.120
<v Speaker 5>hundred and forty yard te shot, you're in a relatively

0:59:05.160 --> 0:59:06.880
<v Speaker 5>flat spot and you can probably see where you're going

0:59:06.960 --> 0:59:10.360
<v Speaker 5>to go, and holes like the fifth, the eighteenth, the

0:59:11.320 --> 0:59:14.080
<v Speaker 5>twelfth more than any If you want to hit them

0:59:14.120 --> 0:59:16.080
<v Speaker 5>all three hundred yards off the tee, you're going to

0:59:16.160 --> 0:59:18.160
<v Speaker 5>run out of level space and you're probably going to

0:59:18.200 --> 0:59:20.720
<v Speaker 5>slide down a side slope and maybe be blind from there.

0:59:21.240 --> 0:59:22.560
<v Speaker 5>You might have a better angle, but you're not going

0:59:22.560 --> 0:59:23.920
<v Speaker 5>to see where you're going, and you're going to have

0:59:23.960 --> 0:59:26.160
<v Speaker 5>a shorter shot in because you've chosen to hit it

0:59:26.160 --> 0:59:30.080
<v Speaker 5>to a place. You've chosen to take driver to a

0:59:30.120 --> 0:59:32.520
<v Speaker 5>place where it'll shorten your approach shot. But we're not

0:59:32.560 --> 0:59:34.920
<v Speaker 5>going to you a great look at the green. So

0:59:35.720 --> 0:59:37.520
<v Speaker 5>we've designed those holes in a way where you can

0:59:37.600 --> 0:59:42.480
<v Speaker 5>choose your poison, you know, and I think most golf

0:59:43.800 --> 0:59:46.120
<v Speaker 5>instructor's advisor to tell you get just hit driver, hit

0:59:46.160 --> 0:59:48.800
<v Speaker 5>as far as you can, and we understand that most

0:59:48.840 --> 0:59:50.840
<v Speaker 5>people will do that, but we didn't want there to

0:59:50.840 --> 0:59:53.520
<v Speaker 5>be the advantage of length plus another.

0:59:53.240 --> 0:59:54.040
<v Speaker 4>Advantage, you know.

0:59:54.280 --> 0:59:56.960
<v Speaker 5>We want to counteract that a bit with it's going

0:59:57.000 --> 0:59:58.480
<v Speaker 5>to be blind for you, or you might have a

0:59:58.480 --> 1:00:00.680
<v Speaker 5>tougher angle into the green from that spot that the

1:00:01.080 --> 1:00:02.960
<v Speaker 5>land is going to push you into a place where

1:00:02.960 --> 1:00:04.840
<v Speaker 5>your angle is going to be a little tougher. So

1:00:05.400 --> 1:00:08.200
<v Speaker 5>we tried to incorporate that into that idea into a

1:00:08.240 --> 1:00:11.280
<v Speaker 5>number of the holes that Old Barnwell, utilizing the topography

1:00:11.280 --> 1:00:12.800
<v Speaker 5>through the routing and the golf course in a way

1:00:12.800 --> 1:00:15.920
<v Speaker 5>that we could challenge longer hitters will still give in

1:00:15.960 --> 1:00:19.520
<v Speaker 5>the shorter player, the player who chooses to lay up

1:00:20.240 --> 1:00:24.320
<v Speaker 5>other options. And the agronomy played into that too. You know,

1:00:24.320 --> 1:00:26.480
<v Speaker 5>when we were expecting the grasses for the golf course,

1:00:27.360 --> 1:00:30.160
<v Speaker 5>we had the conversation with our superintendents that we let's

1:00:30.240 --> 1:00:33.360
<v Speaker 5>choose a grass that doesn't have to be mown super

1:00:33.400 --> 1:00:35.680
<v Speaker 5>tight where balls will stop on these side slopes. And

1:00:35.680 --> 1:00:38.040
<v Speaker 5>I think for the most part that's worked out really well.

1:00:38.080 --> 1:00:41.600
<v Speaker 5>You know, they maintain the golf the fairways in a

1:00:41.640 --> 1:00:43.520
<v Speaker 5>way where balls will stay on those side slopes, and

1:00:43.520 --> 1:00:45.439
<v Speaker 5>I think that's a really important part of the challenge there.

1:00:46.120 --> 1:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>It's something that works really well at Old Barnwell because

1:00:49.160 --> 1:00:54.080
<v Speaker 1>partly because the fairways often have these broad slopes, and

1:00:54.160 --> 1:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>so there is that dimension to the game that you're

1:00:56.880 --> 1:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about where if you're in a certain position, you

1:00:59.560 --> 1:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>might be playing off of an uncomfortable lie ball below

1:01:03.560 --> 1:01:06.680
<v Speaker 1>your feet, ball above your feet, et cetera. And then

1:01:06.720 --> 1:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>you add that to the kind of potential for blindness

1:01:09.360 --> 1:01:11.880
<v Speaker 1>from certain angles and what the ball is doing as

1:01:11.960 --> 1:01:15.040
<v Speaker 1>it enters the green complex and you have a lot

1:01:15.080 --> 1:01:17.320
<v Speaker 1>of complexity at all Barnwell that I think you don't

1:01:17.320 --> 1:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>see at many other courses.

1:01:19.680 --> 1:01:21.480
<v Speaker 4>For sure, the.

1:01:21.480 --> 1:01:23.520
<v Speaker 5>Great sixth Hold, it's seminal, is one of the best

1:01:23.520 --> 1:01:26.120
<v Speaker 5>examples of that, you know, and it stares you in

1:01:26.160 --> 1:01:29.720
<v Speaker 5>the face. But you know, the fairway starts out relatively level.

1:01:29.760 --> 1:01:32.680
<v Speaker 5>It's a mid length Par four. Green sits up on

1:01:32.760 --> 1:01:36.920
<v Speaker 5>top of the hill, but you know, the closer you

1:01:36.960 --> 1:01:39.560
<v Speaker 5>get to the green, the more the fairway slopes from

1:01:39.640 --> 1:01:40.240
<v Speaker 5>left to right.

1:01:41.080 --> 1:01:43.520
<v Speaker 4>And the green sets up at an angle where you know.

1:01:43.480 --> 1:01:46.560
<v Speaker 5>It kind of runs from seven o'clock to one o'clock

1:01:46.640 --> 1:01:50.000
<v Speaker 5>or eight o'clock to two o'clock, and it's pretty narrow

1:01:51.360 --> 1:01:53.440
<v Speaker 5>right to left. So the further right you go, the

1:01:53.480 --> 1:01:56.040
<v Speaker 5>shell over the green gets. And you know, the further

1:01:56.120 --> 1:01:57.840
<v Speaker 5>you drive your ball, the more the fairway is going

1:01:57.880 --> 1:01:59.400
<v Speaker 5>to shove you to the right and of that tough angle,

1:01:59.400 --> 1:02:01.040
<v Speaker 5>and you're going to be that much further below the green.

1:02:01.640 --> 1:02:03.240
<v Speaker 5>If you're content to lay back a little bit, you

1:02:03.280 --> 1:02:05.240
<v Speaker 5>can find the left side of the fairway, which is,

1:02:05.840 --> 1:02:07.960
<v Speaker 5>you know, significantly higher than the right side and also

1:02:08.000 --> 1:02:09.080
<v Speaker 5>affords you a better angle.

1:02:09.520 --> 1:02:12.080
<v Speaker 4>It's a brilliant example of how.

1:02:11.960 --> 1:02:15.040
<v Speaker 5>To use topography to allow the golfer to make the

1:02:15.120 --> 1:02:18.760
<v Speaker 5>choice of which approach shot they prefer and hit their

1:02:18.760 --> 1:02:19.680
<v Speaker 5>t shot accordingly.

1:02:20.040 --> 1:02:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, getting back to the old version of

1:02:23.960 --> 1:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Augusta National real quick for a last couple of wrap

1:02:27.600 --> 1:02:31.360
<v Speaker 1>up questions. Here, is there one hole that you wish

1:02:31.400 --> 1:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>would be restored to its initial version.

1:02:38.520 --> 1:02:40.200
<v Speaker 5>I don't know if I'd go that far, but I

1:02:40.200 --> 1:02:43.360
<v Speaker 5>would love to see the original version of the tenth,

1:02:43.400 --> 1:02:47.680
<v Speaker 5>which was a wildly different hole than the current iteration,

1:02:47.720 --> 1:02:49.120
<v Speaker 5>which I think is a great hole in a very

1:02:49.200 --> 1:02:54.360
<v Speaker 5>challenging hole. But you know, that massive squiggly fairway bunker

1:02:54.800 --> 1:02:57.800
<v Speaker 5>that really doesn't come into play for anyone these days,

1:02:58.000 --> 1:03:00.880
<v Speaker 5>you know, is the kind of one remaining example of

1:03:00.960 --> 1:03:03.400
<v Speaker 5>the original bunkering style out there, and that was a

1:03:03.400 --> 1:03:06.080
<v Speaker 5>green side bunker originally, you know, the green sat the

1:03:06.120 --> 1:03:08.120
<v Speaker 5>original green sat in a hollow to the right of that,

1:03:09.640 --> 1:03:13.000
<v Speaker 5>and it was plagued by maintenance issues and I think

1:03:13.360 --> 1:03:16.880
<v Speaker 5>one of the first masters there were a few inches

1:03:16.920 --> 1:03:18.400
<v Speaker 5>of water in it on one of the days and

1:03:20.000 --> 1:03:22.000
<v Speaker 5>they had to play around a big puddle in the green.

1:03:23.200 --> 1:03:24.880
<v Speaker 5>So it got moved pretty quickly after, I think by

1:03:24.960 --> 1:03:26.960
<v Speaker 5>nineteen thirty seven to thirty eight, and then pushed back

1:03:26.960 --> 1:03:29.600
<v Speaker 5>to where it is today and it's a brilliant green

1:03:29.720 --> 1:03:33.360
<v Speaker 5>by Perry Maxwell. But the original version of that hole

1:03:33.440 --> 1:03:36.960
<v Speaker 5>I think was drivable, or very nearly drivable, and you

1:03:37.000 --> 1:03:38.320
<v Speaker 5>had to keep your ball out to the right and

1:03:38.320 --> 1:03:40.760
<v Speaker 5>if you pulled to the left you were kind of

1:03:41.680 --> 1:03:45.520
<v Speaker 5>blind into that shallow green and over the big sprawling bunker.

1:03:45.560 --> 1:03:47.440
<v Speaker 5>And it wasn't a hard hole, I don't think, but

1:03:47.480 --> 1:03:49.479
<v Speaker 5>it was a pretty unique hole and a fun clever hole.

1:03:50.080 --> 1:03:52.240
<v Speaker 4>And there aren't many.

1:03:51.440 --> 1:03:56.120
<v Speaker 5>Just fun, clever, easy holes in Augusta, Nashville anymore. So

1:03:56.160 --> 1:03:58.760
<v Speaker 5>I don't think it would make for a very compelling

1:03:58.800 --> 1:04:00.200
<v Speaker 5>hole for the pros, but I think it was a

1:04:00.240 --> 1:04:04.960
<v Speaker 5>unique hole and just a fun short part three that

1:04:05.040 --> 1:04:06.040
<v Speaker 5>Mackenzie exceled at.

1:04:06.520 --> 1:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to see somebody try that hole on another course,

1:04:09.400 --> 1:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>because it is really cool. I mean it just to

1:04:11.720 --> 1:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>give people an idea of how the strategy changed when

1:04:14.480 --> 1:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>they move the green. Everybody knows about the speed slot. Now, right,

1:04:18.960 --> 1:04:20.920
<v Speaker 1>you hook your ball around the trees to get to

1:04:20.960 --> 1:04:23.280
<v Speaker 1>that speed slot, that big hollow that's in the left

1:04:23.320 --> 1:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>half of the fairway, and if you get down into that,

1:04:26.160 --> 1:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>then that's the best place to be. You get the

1:04:28.400 --> 1:04:31.440
<v Speaker 1>distance advantage, you get an angle advantage going into a

1:04:31.480 --> 1:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>green that slopes from right to left. That's what you

1:04:34.000 --> 1:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>want to get to and you have to hit a

1:04:35.760 --> 1:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>very hard shot to get there. So it makes sense.

1:04:38.520 --> 1:04:42.040
<v Speaker 1>But what people always forget is that on the right

1:04:42.080 --> 1:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>half of the fairway and the tenth fairway, there's this

1:04:43.960 --> 1:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of plateau and that's where you used to want

1:04:47.640 --> 1:04:51.600
<v Speaker 1>to be in order to approach the old tenth Green,

1:04:51.640 --> 1:04:54.480
<v Speaker 1>which was tucked, as you said, into that little saddle

1:04:54.880 --> 1:04:58.320
<v Speaker 1>to the right of the big Mackenzie bunker. And so

1:04:58.400 --> 1:05:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the challenge was staying up on the place and not

1:05:01.400 --> 1:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>letting your ball run down the speed slot, because if

1:05:03.560 --> 1:05:05.280
<v Speaker 1>your ball round down the speed slot, then you have

1:05:05.360 --> 1:05:09.360
<v Speaker 1>this crazy shot over the big bunker to a green

1:05:09.400 --> 1:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>that you couldn't see from down below. And it's so

1:05:14.040 --> 1:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the original hole made total sense as strategically as a

1:05:17.800 --> 1:05:21.160
<v Speaker 1>short part four, and it's such a clever hole. But

1:05:21.280 --> 1:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the way they reversed the strategy when they moved the

1:05:24.480 --> 1:05:29.040
<v Speaker 1>green back was also really smart, you know, like it's

1:05:29.040 --> 1:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>still a pretty good strategic hole, even though they changed

1:05:33.440 --> 1:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the part of the fairway that you want to be in.

1:05:35.680 --> 1:05:36.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:05:36.400 --> 1:05:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I always thought that was really interesting.

1:05:38.280 --> 1:05:42.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's a fascinating evolution and both very clever to

1:05:42.360 --> 1:05:45.240
<v Speaker 5>your point, in both using the ground contour in ways

1:05:45.240 --> 1:05:46.440
<v Speaker 5>that make the whole really interesting.

1:05:46.960 --> 1:05:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Is there a hole that you think became better

1:05:50.160 --> 1:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>over time at Augusta National where you look at the

1:05:52.640 --> 1:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>original and you say, Okay, I can see why they

1:05:56.160 --> 1:05:56.840
<v Speaker 1>did what they did.

1:05:59.160 --> 1:06:00.280
<v Speaker 4>I mentioned it earlier.

1:06:00.440 --> 1:06:03.320
<v Speaker 5>The original fourth Green had that long tongue in the front,

1:06:03.320 --> 1:06:06.720
<v Speaker 5>which seemed like a very odd, odd thing to include.

1:06:07.040 --> 1:06:07.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:06:07.280 --> 1:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know when you would ever use it, because

1:06:08.720 --> 1:06:10.280
<v Speaker 1>you can't really use it to run your ball up.

1:06:10.320 --> 1:06:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Nobody's like aiming for that.

1:06:12.440 --> 1:06:14.800
<v Speaker 5>No, I don't know if it's better or worse, but

1:06:14.960 --> 1:06:17.000
<v Speaker 5>you know, it's certainly less original than it used to be,

1:06:17.080 --> 1:06:18.960
<v Speaker 5>but probably more.

1:06:19.000 --> 1:06:20.240
<v Speaker 4>Sensible than it once was.

1:06:24.040 --> 1:06:26.320
<v Speaker 5>A lot of length has been added to the golf course, certainly,

1:06:26.360 --> 1:06:30.160
<v Speaker 5>and nowadays that's necessary. You know, there are a handful

1:06:30.160 --> 1:06:33.520
<v Speaker 5>of holes that still really well reflect the original intent.

1:06:35.760 --> 1:06:39.439
<v Speaker 5>The thirteenth, you know, I hate in general the idea

1:06:39.440 --> 1:06:42.880
<v Speaker 5>of needing to add lengths to golf courses, but it

1:06:42.880 --> 1:06:46.000
<v Speaker 5>does feel like that's getting closer to presenting a really

1:06:46.040 --> 1:06:51.280
<v Speaker 5>scary second shot and a hole that had gotten easy.

1:06:51.280 --> 1:06:53.600
<v Speaker 5>He's not the right word, but players are here hitting

1:06:53.840 --> 1:06:56.200
<v Speaker 5>very short clubs into that hole not too long ago,

1:06:56.240 --> 1:06:59.760
<v Speaker 5>and it's fun to see that second shop. You're really

1:06:59.760 --> 1:07:00.520
<v Speaker 5>scared one again.

1:07:02.920 --> 1:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the hole has some tension back, you know, yes,

1:07:06.440 --> 1:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>if you imagine that, Like the original thirteenth hole is

1:07:08.440 --> 1:07:11.520
<v Speaker 1>four hundred and sixty something arts, which now for the

1:07:11.560 --> 1:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Masters field is a short for so what are you

1:07:16.200 --> 1:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna do? Got to move?

1:07:17.080 --> 1:07:19.280
<v Speaker 4>The tell sixteenth is one I would like to see.

1:07:19.280 --> 1:07:20.400
<v Speaker 4>I mean, that's interesting.

1:07:20.480 --> 1:07:24.280
<v Speaker 5>The sixteenth is a very compelling hole during the tournament.

1:07:25.000 --> 1:07:27.240
<v Speaker 5>The lower hole locations are really fun to watch, and

1:07:27.280 --> 1:07:30.280
<v Speaker 5>it's it's always amusing when somebody gets stuck up top

1:07:30.600 --> 1:07:33.160
<v Speaker 5>when the pins down below. But it's a really it's

1:07:33.160 --> 1:07:35.680
<v Speaker 5>a fun hole to watch, and it's you know, it's

1:07:35.680 --> 1:07:38.720
<v Speaker 5>one of those holes where you're you're engaged for the

1:07:39.320 --> 1:07:41.920
<v Speaker 5>you're engaged with what the ball is doing for a

1:07:41.960 --> 1:07:44.280
<v Speaker 5>really long time. You know, it takes a while for

1:07:44.320 --> 1:07:46.280
<v Speaker 5>a ball to come to rest on that green, and

1:07:46.320 --> 1:07:48.880
<v Speaker 5>I think that's one of the things that makes golf

1:07:49.080 --> 1:07:52.520
<v Speaker 5>interesting to watch and certainly interesting to play, is you know,

1:07:52.800 --> 1:07:55.360
<v Speaker 5>the amount of time your ball is rolling on the ground,

1:07:55.440 --> 1:07:59.360
<v Speaker 5>and sixteen presents that pretty well. But the original version,

1:07:59.400 --> 1:08:00.800
<v Speaker 5>I think was also so it would have been a

1:08:00.840 --> 1:08:02.480
<v Speaker 5>really fun hole for them to watch. It was a

1:08:02.480 --> 1:08:05.000
<v Speaker 5>wild green to the left side of the creek that's

1:08:05.040 --> 1:08:08.080
<v Speaker 5>now the pond on the left side of the current

1:08:08.280 --> 1:08:09.080
<v Speaker 5>sixteenth green.

1:08:10.960 --> 1:08:13.120
<v Speaker 4>It looked like a pretty neat, shorter.

1:08:13.320 --> 1:08:17.519
<v Speaker 5>Maybe easier hole, but also a very cool green in

1:08:17.520 --> 1:08:18.200
<v Speaker 5>a really neat.

1:08:18.040 --> 1:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Setting, very neat idea for a part three again, something

1:08:22.200 --> 1:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>that you know, maybe maybe somebody should try at another course.

1:08:25.080 --> 1:08:28.240
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, the green kind of almost had a reverse

1:08:28.320 --> 1:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>radan characteristic to it, I guess where there's a big

1:08:30.960 --> 1:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>kicker slope on the left where it looked like if

1:08:33.160 --> 1:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>you're playing the ball along the ground, which you might

1:08:34.920 --> 1:08:37.559
<v Speaker 1>not be because short par three, but if you did,

1:08:37.640 --> 1:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>then that would kind of funnel your ball over to

1:08:40.720 --> 1:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the right side of the green. But yeah, interesting hole.

1:08:44.560 --> 1:08:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Today's current hole. I mean, people don't talk about it enough.

1:08:47.360 --> 1:08:49.680
<v Speaker 1>That is a Robert Trent Jones golf hole. You know,

1:08:50.360 --> 1:08:53.680
<v Speaker 1>entirely pretty much fully Yeah, not pretty much fully fully.

1:08:53.920 --> 1:08:57.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, almost changed more than any because it's an entirely

1:08:57.360 --> 1:08:57.760
<v Speaker 5>new hole.

1:08:58.280 --> 1:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely, Well, Brian, it's been very fun talking to

1:09:01.760 --> 1:09:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you about the original Augusta National. I'm looking forward to

1:09:04.560 --> 1:09:06.639
<v Speaker 1>seeing your your projects coming up in the next couple

1:09:06.680 --> 1:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>of years. I know you've got a lot of interesting

1:09:09.120 --> 1:09:12.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff on the horizon. What are you working on right now,

1:09:12.240 --> 1:09:13.719
<v Speaker 1>anything you want to let people know about.

1:09:14.840 --> 1:09:17.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I'm very fortunate to have some cool opportunities, and

1:09:18.920 --> 1:09:20.800
<v Speaker 5>the one I'm actively involved in right now is the

1:09:20.840 --> 1:09:22.760
<v Speaker 5>second golf course, So the second big golf course at

1:09:22.760 --> 1:09:27.200
<v Speaker 5>Old Barnwell and Aiken, and a very different piece of land,

1:09:28.040 --> 1:09:30.320
<v Speaker 5>routed very differently than the first one. So trying to

1:09:30.360 --> 1:09:34.760
<v Speaker 5>create something complimentary but also on a really beautiful piece

1:09:34.760 --> 1:09:37.719
<v Speaker 5>of sandy land for a club that's become a really

1:09:37.720 --> 1:09:38.960
<v Speaker 5>lovely place to spend time.

1:09:40.360 --> 1:09:41.680
<v Speaker 4>So we're well into that.

1:09:41.840 --> 1:09:44.719
<v Speaker 5>We've got most of the green shaped at this point,

1:09:44.720 --> 1:09:47.960
<v Speaker 5>there's a little bit of grass going down. I've got

1:09:48.000 --> 1:09:51.160
<v Speaker 5>another project, a strange coincidence. I'm also building another golf

1:09:51.160 --> 1:09:54.559
<v Speaker 5>course in Aiken called New Haven New Holland Golf Club,

1:09:54.640 --> 1:10:00.800
<v Speaker 5>New Holland, New Holland Golf Club for my old friend

1:10:00.880 --> 1:10:04.160
<v Speaker 5>Jeff Warren, which is maybe twenty five minutes from Old Barnwell,

1:10:05.439 --> 1:10:08.160
<v Speaker 5>and that's a place where, you know, all the things

1:10:08.200 --> 1:10:11.600
<v Speaker 5>we've been saying about the restraint involved in kind of

1:10:11.600 --> 1:10:15.639
<v Speaker 5>the simplicity the original golf course at Augusta National. It's

1:10:15.680 --> 1:10:17.439
<v Speaker 5>a beautiful piece of land and that lends itself really

1:10:17.439 --> 1:10:21.080
<v Speaker 5>well to golf, and I think we're taking a very

1:10:21.360 --> 1:10:23.920
<v Speaker 5>restraint approach to how we're gonna build and design it.

1:10:24.479 --> 1:10:25.479
<v Speaker 4>So that's a fun one as.

1:10:25.360 --> 1:10:28.919
<v Speaker 1>Well, very cool looking forward to it. Yeah, the Achin area, obviously,

1:10:28.960 --> 1:10:32.840
<v Speaker 1>as everybody knows, is exploding, and you've been a big

1:10:32.880 --> 1:10:34.960
<v Speaker 1>part of that. So when people go to the Masters

1:10:34.960 --> 1:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>these days, they have a lot of options in the

1:10:37.640 --> 1:10:40.200
<v Speaker 1>ac and area. Many of these clubs open their doors

1:10:40.520 --> 1:10:43.719
<v Speaker 1>during Master's Week, sometimes even the week before Master's Week,

1:10:44.040 --> 1:10:46.679
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, during during that time in April

1:10:46.680 --> 1:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>you can go play Old Barnwell, which is one of

1:10:48.920 --> 1:10:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the best modern courses that you can play anywhere. And

1:10:52.720 --> 1:10:54.840
<v Speaker 1>then you know, obviously, Brian, you have a couple of

1:10:54.920 --> 1:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>projects coming up there that are going to add to

1:10:57.160 --> 1:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>this scene. So pretty cool place. Thanks for coming on

1:11:00.400 --> 1:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the pod. Fun to talk to.

1:11:01.400 --> 1:11:03.479
<v Speaker 4>You appreciate that yet my pleasure.

1:11:10.080 --> 1:11:13.719
<v Speaker 1>This episode of Designing Golf was produced by Will Balsam.

1:11:14.120 --> 1:11:17.519
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Will once again make sure to check out

1:11:17.560 --> 1:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the Fried Egg Golf Pro Shop at pro shop dot

1:11:20.840 --> 1:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Thefrida Egg dot com. My colleague Meg Atkins does a

1:11:24.120 --> 1:11:27.320
<v Speaker 1>great job stocking the pro shop with really cool items,

1:11:27.840 --> 1:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and in particular, the major season Mackenzie Bunker illustration done

1:11:33.360 --> 1:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>by Cameron Hurtis is just so cool. I have it

1:11:36.280 --> 1:11:39.200
<v Speaker 1>on a few items myself. It's kind of subtle, it

1:11:39.240 --> 1:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't scream at you, but it's also instantly recognizable. Lots

1:11:44.200 --> 1:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>of cool stuff at pro shop dot the fried Egg

1:11:47.360 --> 1:11:50.240
<v Speaker 1>dot com. It's a great way to support our company.

1:11:50.720 --> 1:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for listening. Enjoy the Masters, and we'll be

1:11:54.080 --> 1:12:08.560
<v Speaker 1>back again soon after the Masters with another episode.