WEBVTT - TechStuff Classic: DNA Forensics

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland, Diamond executive producer with iHeart Radio and how

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the tech are you? It's time for a tech Stuff

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>classic episode. This episode is called d n A Forensics.

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>It originally published on October seventh, two thousand fifteen. In

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:34.839
<v Speaker 1>this episode, Ben Bolan, host of such shows as Ridiculous

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 1>History as well as Stuff they Don't want you to

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 1>know and as a tireless producer, the kind of person

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>you can ask to be on your show and he'll

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:48.199
<v Speaker 1>say yes, even if he's already committed to like a

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>billion other things, and he'll somehow find a way to

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>do all of them. I don't understand this man anyway.

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>He joined the show to talk about DNA forensics. Hope

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>you enjoy this classic episode. Ben has had people mark

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:04.680
<v Speaker 1>all over him and crayon today. I'm not gonna ask

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 1>why I don't get into personal lives in the show. Well,

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's a big deal. Whenever I could

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 1>be on the show and I wanted to do something special,

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>my suits at the cleaners got a bunch of sharpies

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and asked people to go nuts. It's kind of like

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>body paint, but really they'll super like on the cheap

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>because we just can't. We don't have that in our budget, honestly, right,

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>not yet. But Hope springs eternal. And what's weird about

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>having um all these all these colors and markers all

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>over me is that anything I touched literally is leaving

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 1>a trace. Yeah, and that kind of you know, we

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>were going to have a really in depth conversation on

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:44.039
<v Speaker 1>how catalytic converters work, but once I noticed you're doing that,

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I thought, why don't we talk about DNA forensics, like

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the traces people leave behind. So that's why I decided

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to switch in the last minute. I hope you can

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>roll with it. Oh yeah, yeah, yeah yeah. And just

0:01:56.240 --> 0:02:00.040
<v Speaker 1>in in you know, Ben and I have talked a

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit about our our mutual interest in the true

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>crime uh discipline, the whole the whole true crime like field,

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and it turns out we're not the only ones in

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:11.799
<v Speaker 1>the office. There are certain people in the office who

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 1>have a really deep interest in this sort of stuff,

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and so we thought, you know, it'd be kind of

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>fun to explore the concept in different shows. So if

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>you listen to all of How Stuff Work shows, you

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>may have noticed things popping up here and there that's

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>not entirely by accident, and so, uh really was one

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>of those things where as we all started talking, we're like, hey,

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, I would like to do something in that

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and we can kind of It's almost like an easter

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>egg for those of you who subscribe to lots of

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>different shows, and you should let us know if you

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:44.359
<v Speaker 1>thought it was really cool. So from the technology standpoint,

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:47.640
<v Speaker 1>we thought DNA forensics would be really really interesting to

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>cover and to talk about how it actually works. Uh,

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:54.639
<v Speaker 1>what are the processes, what are some of the challenges,

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:56.959
<v Speaker 1>What are some of the things that people are doing

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 1>with DNA forensics now that might end up helping uh,

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>like investigations in the future where could it actually end

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>up giving us a false positive, because there there is

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the possibility of that as well. But to start it

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:12.839
<v Speaker 1>all off, we really kind of have to lay the groundwork. Yeah,

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna I was just gonna ask you. I

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 1>hate to be the bad kid in class right now,

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>but what's what's DNA d oxy ribonucleic acid, man, Yeah,

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 1>that's that's what it is. It's so obviously you know,

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:31.080
<v Speaker 1>anyone who's had science class, like a biology class anything recently,

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you know all about DNA. But you know, we gotta

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:37.119
<v Speaker 1>build from the ground up. So DNA is a molecule

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>that carries the genetic instructions that govern the development, function,

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and reproduction of organisms. DNA is found in all of

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>your cells. Essentially, an entire blueprint of what makes you

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>you is in every single one of your cells in

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the form of d N A UH. And the molecule

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>is in that double helix form. So that says, if

0:03:58.040 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you were to make a ladder and then twisted in

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>to a twisty shape, that's the DNA double helix. The

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>rungs on that letter are made up of pairs of

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>what we call nucleotides, alright, So each rung on the

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>ladder is two different nucleotides that that bond together. Uh.

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>There's adenine and thymine. Those always pair up together. So

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>those are your two base pairs of nucleotides that will

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>always join. And then there's guanine and cytosine and those

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>always join. And it's the sequence of these pairs that

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>end up determining what makes you you. Right yeah, yeah,

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 1>so it could be. And these pairs can affect multiple

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the order of these pairs can affect multiple characteristics. Sure, yeah, absolutely.

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>And also what's really interesting to me is that point

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>nine of all the DNA that is in you is

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>shared with every other human Like we we have ninety

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:02.359
<v Speaker 1>nine of our DNA in common, which means the stuff

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>that makes you who you are as indifferent from every

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:09.360
<v Speaker 1>other person makes up just point one percent of your DNA.

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:11.840
<v Speaker 1>But that's all it takes. Is that point one percent.

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 1>That's about three million base pairs that are unique to

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you unless you have an identical sibling. Ah ah the

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>old Now this goes into um, this verges into some

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 1>good detective fiction. Now, yes, that old The evil twin, Yeah, exactly,

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't me. It was my evil twin or or

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>evil triplet or evil quadruplet really which we did an

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>ill fated brain Stuff but it was, oh my gosh,

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:40.159
<v Speaker 1>we did. We did. Yeah. If you if you watch

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:42.720
<v Speaker 1>brain Stuff the video series and you look up how

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>twins work, Ben and I did a funny At the time,

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I thought I still thought there were parts of it

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:55.919
<v Speaker 1>that were funny. Honestly, Ben, I still fully enjoy it,

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 1>but my sense of humor is very corny. So but

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>if you want to see you want to see me

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and Ben dressing up in two different types of outfits,

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>like we're the the good Ben and Jonathan and then

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:08.919
<v Speaker 1>there's the evil Ben and Jonathan and we each have

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>an eyepatch. Jonathan I were talking and it was it

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>was strange because when we were talking about doing this

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:18.480
<v Speaker 1>episode and said, well, how could we represent evil twins

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:23.280
<v Speaker 1>like I patch is clearly because you know, the the

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>goatee is not gonna work for right, because it wasn't

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:27.720
<v Speaker 1>like neither of us were going to end up shaving

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:30.039
<v Speaker 1>just so that I can be the good twin. But

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:32.119
<v Speaker 1>both of us are the kind of person who would

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 1>have an I patch. And actually I ended up taking

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>a quick walk to a nearby toy store to pick

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>some up um. So, at any rate, if you do

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>have an identical sibling, your identical sibling shares your DNA.

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:46.160
<v Speaker 1>There they are identical like the d N. If you

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 1>were to compare the two and look at those base pairs,

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be the same all the way down, right,

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's one of the that's one of the exceptions.

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Really the exception so our DNA can be found in

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:03.159
<v Speaker 1>twenty three pairs of chromosomes. That's what humans have. Not

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:06.919
<v Speaker 1>all animals have that many, so have fewer, and etcetera, etcetera.

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>So chromosomes are ribbons of protein essentially have a strand

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>of DNA that are wrapped up in that and within

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>each pair, one chromosome comes from your mother, one chromosome

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>comes from your father, and that's what uh you know,

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>those are the ingredients that come together to create the

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>unique individual that is you and or your identical siblings.

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, if we took look at each person's DNA

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:33.239
<v Speaker 1>and pay attention to the order of those base pairs,

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>we get something like a d NA fingerprint. It is

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 1>unique to that person. But we can't just look at

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>one section. We have to look at several different sections

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>also known as loci in the in the parlance of

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>forensics to get a robust fingerprint profile. So, just as

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>we would look at a fingerprint and look for points

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 1>of comparison to from from a from a fingerprint that

0:07:57.000 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>we've gathered from a suspect, let's say, and a fingerprint

0:07:59.880 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>that is left at the scene of a crime, you

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>would have to look at several different points to make

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>sure that all those points correspond to one another to

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>say that there's a match. Same thing with DNA DNA forensics,

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>you would look at several different locations along a strand

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>of DNA and see if the same sequence of nucleo

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>tides were appearing on both sets, because that would tell

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 1>you what are the statistical probabilities of the person that

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 1>you suspect and the the evidence that was left behind

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 1>are one and the same, right, Okay, So each time

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a new location, the more loci there are, the

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:40.439
<v Speaker 1>more certitude you have that you've got your catch. Yeah,

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 1>if you were to say, look at just one location,

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 1>then that would mean you would have a very you know,

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>there's actually quite a good chance depending upon the sequence,

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that coincidence could could completely explain away any any uh

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>duplication there. Right, So it could just be coincidence. It

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>could be that this person just coincidentally has that same sequence.

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>As you add more loci, that becomes less and less likely.

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh FBI. The FBI has thirteen that they suggest, so

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 1>thirteen specific loca that's their standard, and that that results

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>in about a one in a billion chance that if

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you were to take all thirteen loca and compare the

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 1>two strength you know, the stuff that was left at

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the evidence and the suspect or whatever is in the database.

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 1>If you were to compare the two and they were

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>to come up equal at all thirteen, it's a one

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:41.200
<v Speaker 1>in a billion chance that somebody else besides the person

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at possesses that. So seven of the six

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>other people in the world. Yeah, it's like flash forward

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 1>to that day in court where someone's doing that horrible

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>reference joke and going, so you're saying that there's a chance. Yeah,

0:09:56.040 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>And honestly, people who are analyzing the stuff they speak

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 1>in statistical probabilities, because you cannot say for certain that

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 1>this person left behind that DNA. You can say, like,

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>what is the statistical probability that they did? And then

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>you look at other elements of the case, right like saying,

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 1>all right, can we put the person in that area,

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:21.560
<v Speaker 1>because let's say that it's in a small town. Well,

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>if it's a one in a billion chance and you

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>know that the suspect was in that small town, that's

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a pretty darn compelling yeah, because why are the chances

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of the other one of the other six people in

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:37.679
<v Speaker 1>the entire world was also in that small town. Not good,

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Ben and I will be back to talk more about

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 1>DNA forensics after we take this quick commercial break. So

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>where do we get the DNA evidence from? Well, stuff

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>that people leave behind, Uh, a much anything that has cells,

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>like living tissue that was left behind our living or

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff where living cells could have been in before being

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 1>deposited at the crime scene. So stuff like blood or

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>saliva or semen or skin cells, mucus, ear wax, sweat. Yeah,

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 1>all of that, All of that can leave behind cells

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>that we can pull DNA from that. What about hair,

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>hair not so much, not not not for traditional DNA

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:34.719
<v Speaker 1>hair follicles, yes, but hair itself is dead. Those are

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:39.479
<v Speaker 1>dead cells. So you can do some some DNA analysis,

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>but not the the standard kind that most people use

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 1>in DNA. For instance, Uh, fingernails, same thing, but fingernails

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>often come with other tissue attached to it, and that's

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>where you find the DNA. So if we want to

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:56.679
<v Speaker 1>look at the history of people actually saying hey, why

0:11:56.679 --> 0:12:00.839
<v Speaker 1>don't we use this this DNA stuff to try and

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 1>help with investigations, you've got to look back to the

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighties when a brit named Alec Jefferies, who now

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>you may refer to as Professor Sir Alec John Jefferies

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:20.679
<v Speaker 1>f R S hang okay, good, Professor Sir Alec John Jeffries, FRS. Uh,

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that would be his full title. Now. He hit upon

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:27.479
<v Speaker 1>the idea of using DNA as a means of genetic fingerprinting,

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and he realized that the unique sequences of DNA could

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:32.440
<v Speaker 1>serve as a means to link an individual to a

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>scene where DNA samples were found. And his process was

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>first applied in the court system in nineteen eight five.

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 1>In that case, it was an it was an immigration case.

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:43.199
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't like a murder or a rape or something

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>like that. It was to ascertain if the identity of

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 1>a British boy was actually related to a family who

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 1>had originally immigrated to the United Kingdom from elsewhere. And

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>he did. Uh. The first time it was used in

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a criminal case would be nine seven. That was yeah,

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:06.679
<v Speaker 1>not not long after, and that wasn't a case. Uh.

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>The The suspect was named Colin Pitchfork, which is a

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>heck of a name. Talking about nominative determinism, Yeah, and

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 1>he was arrested on suspicion of rape and murder, and

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>he was the first criminal cut as a result of

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 1>DNA screening. So this was DNA screen that led to

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>his capture. He actually confessed to his crimes, so the

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>DNA didn't lead to his conviction. He confessed UH and

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:34.200
<v Speaker 1>he received life in prison as a result. So I

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>wanted to talk a little bit before we get into

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 1>some of the pros and cons about what actually happens

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>with DNA because you hear like DNA forensics and you're like, well,

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>what goes into that? Yeah, this is a great thing

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to contextualize right now because there are a lot of

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:55.479
<v Speaker 1>fans and tech stuff who have probably seen and scoffed

0:13:55.480 --> 0:14:02.199
<v Speaker 1>at the various entertaining but inaccurate crimes shows c s I,

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>CSI being the big one, Like they're there are are

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:08.319
<v Speaker 1>FRIENDSIC specialists who say that c s I is probably

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the most damaging things that have happened to

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>their their career path ever because people have unrealistic expectations, specifically,

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>juries have unrealistic expectations, which can hurt a trial case

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 1>because juries will often one want DNA UH data when

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not even relevant to a case. Like they're like

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not necessary for them to make a determination in

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a case, but they want it because it's one of

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>those things that people associate with. Oh, d NA gets

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>you the the locked in answer was that person there

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 1>were they not there? Um, just run the DNA enhanced

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the photograph. I see what the problem right? Exactly. Yeah,

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>let's pull up one of those three dimensional holographic images.

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>We're just we're just throw every single science fiction CSI

0:14:56.400 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>trope in there, so early friends. Now, this actually used

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>a process called restriction fragment length polymorphism or r f LP,

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and that involves taking a sample of DNA that has

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 1>repeating base pairs, like they can repeat from anywhere between

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>one and thirty times. They're called variable number tandem repeats

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>or v N t r s. And what they would

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>do is they would dissolve this DNA in an enzyme

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 1>to break the strand at specific locations along that the DNA.

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 1>So uh saying like, um, when there are this many repetitions,

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>this enzyme is going to break the strand at that point,

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>so that way we can measure how long the strand

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 1>DNA is in and out point. Yeah, So imagine that

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 1>you've got like a ribbon, right, And let's say that

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>little ribbon is maybe three ft long, and you're going

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>to cut out a six inch segment of that ribbon.

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Use this enzyme, and it cuts it at the very

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>specific locations along that strand that you want. You do

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the same thing with the material that was left behind

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>at the scene. So let's say you've got you've got

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>your your DNA sample from your suspect, you've got the

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>sample from the scene, and you compare the two and

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>you're essentially measuring them against each other, like literally measuring

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the length of them, because it's those repeating pairs that

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 1>determine how long that segment is. So if the two

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 1>are about the same length, or actually they are the

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 1>same length, then you know, or at least you you

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>have a good uh inclination to say that this person

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 1>was the one who left behind that DNA. That's not

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>really used that frequently anymore, but more frequently now we

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 1>use a method called short tandem repeat analysis, which is

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>more reliable, more popular, And in this method, analysts take

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>a sample of DNA and they count the repetition of

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>those base pairs along certain locations the loci of that sample.

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>So for or five base pair repeats, like where you

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 1>get you know, your your those nucleo tied pairings I

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:08.159
<v Speaker 1>talked about, sometimes those pairings repeat in a sequence, right,

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:14.200
<v Speaker 1>They look for uh, preferably four or five base pair

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 1>repeat segments. So that way, because it's less likely than

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>if you would have two or three in a row. Yeah,

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the more you have in a row, the less likely

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>you're going to find that exact same repetition in another

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>in an unrelated person's DNA. And these are by the way,

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>called tetra nucleotide or penta nucleotide repetitions because of the

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>number tetra being four, penta being five. Um. There, those

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 1>are best in order to indicate an accurate match. So

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the FBI, like I said, says, thirteen specific locai to

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:48.360
<v Speaker 1>find this, you would do this in thirteen different locations

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 1>along the strand of DNA. And if you were to

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>find these, uh, these base pair repeats that are identical

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>in both and both samples, that's a really good indication

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 1>that they belong to the same person. And this this

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>investigation technique, while it is while it's pretty solid and

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>there's solid science behind it, it doesn't work in every

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 1>in every case, it's not a silver bullet, and this

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 1>is kind of some dark territory. Yeah yeah. In fact,

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:21.639
<v Speaker 1>there there are a lot of reasons why, uh, this

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 1>can be this can be problematic. Um. One other thing

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about before we get into the challenges,

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>specifically things like contamination and chain of possession and this

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 1>chain of custody, thank you, before we get into that,

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>is to talk about all right, So you know, I

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>gave these these overviews of how they're analyzing the DNA,

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:46.920
<v Speaker 1>but one of the big issues here is that often

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:50.360
<v Speaker 1>when you're in the field and you're looking for anything

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that has you know, remnants of DNA on it, you

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>may not have a very large sample to work with, Right,

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:00.200
<v Speaker 1>So you've got a tiny amount of d and a

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:03.439
<v Speaker 1>how do you make sure you can do the tests

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 1>you need with a tiny little amount? And the answer

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>is you duplicate the crap out of it? What how? Yeah? Okay,

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>So this is this is gonna get super weird because

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna get into molecular biology and chemistry. But starting it,

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to Okay. So they use a process called

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 1>polymerase chain reaction or PCR to duplicate a specific region

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>of the DNA in a sample. So this process was

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 1>developed in three by Carrie Mullis who actually he won

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>a Nobel Prize in chemistry for his work in this field.

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 1>And what they'll do, because they'll take samples of DNA,

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:40.479
<v Speaker 1>they'll take a string of DNA. So you've got your

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 1>double helix right, and then you heat it to between

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 1>ninety four and ninety six degrees celsius for a few minutes. Yeah,

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 1>so it's almost boiling um for a few minutes. And

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>this is to d nature the sample, which means that

0:19:56.920 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the DNA straightens out, so it's no longer a twisted ladder,

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:03.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a ladder, and the rungs split apart. So those

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>base pairs split and you get two strands, two half

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 1>strands of DNA, all right, So then you end up

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 1>changing the temperature. You lower it to between fifty and

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>sixty five degrees celsius for a few minutes. That first

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:21.360
<v Speaker 1>one only takes a few minutes to so you lower

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 1>it down to fifty to six degrees celsius for a

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 1>few more minutes. That allows the left and right primers.

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>These are small sections of DNA that have matching nucleo

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 1>tides to the two separated pieces that you've created. Think

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:39.399
<v Speaker 1>of them as almost like half zippers. So you've got

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the right and left half of a zipper on either

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 1>like they're they're spreading out there there there's apart from

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:49.119
<v Speaker 1>one another. You've got a small section that interlocks with

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 1>each side. Because that you've got the the complementary base pairs. Uh,

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:58.880
<v Speaker 1>those will then connect to those sections. Now that's only

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a tiny little part overall part of the full DNA.

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>But um. They then raise the temperature to seventy two

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>degrees celsius for a few minutes to allow the tach

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>polyme race. Now this is the material that can then

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 1>build and synthesize new DNA to the two separate strands.

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 1>So if you think about it like a video game.

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:24.239
<v Speaker 1>All right, so you get your little you get your

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>little segment that's locked onto the half ladder of DNA,

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the stuff you started off with in the first place.

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>At one end of that, imagine that you get a

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 1>little bitty blob, all right, a little big blob just

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 1>builds the corresponding rungs and goes down the line rebuilding

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:44.639
<v Speaker 1>the DNA. And it doesn't you know, there's one on

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>both sides. There's a primer on each half strand of DNA,

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 1>so at the end of this process you end up

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>with two strands of d N. A. Okay, we've got

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 1>more to say in this classic episode of tech stuff

0:21:57.800 --> 0:22:11.159
<v Speaker 1>after these quick messages. Now you started with one, but

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 1>because you've used this molecular biology slash chemistry approach, you've

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 1>been able to duplicate it. And then you repeat that process,

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 1>so you do it again. Those two become four, the

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:24.120
<v Speaker 1>four become a You see how this expands very rapidly.

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>You do it over and over, so that way, even

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>if you started with a very small sample of DNA,

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 1>by the end you've got plenty to work with, so

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to worry about you know, we had

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:38.159
<v Speaker 1>one little drop of sweat at the scene and and

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 1>we blew it on on a test that didn't work out.

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:43.399
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to worry about that. I'm sorry to

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 1>be like, uh, emotionally or mentally a nine year old here, Jonathan,

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 1>but can we can we make it a booker? I

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 1>just love picture in us as cops or like no,

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>no one knows who stole the bus. We have only

0:22:56.080 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 1>this single the mysterious picker has struck again. Yeah, okay,

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>so you're in Yeah, well we weren't talking about urine.

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>We were talking about the boogers, all right, you got me.

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 1>But this is but this is a great that that's

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 1>a great explanation of how this occurs. Because given that

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you're essentially destroying the evidence every time that you you

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:24.640
<v Speaker 1>conduct this kind of this, this kind of investigation, than

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:28.880
<v Speaker 1>being able to reproduce it is fundamental. Yeah, it's absolutely

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>key because again, if you do not have very much

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 1>of that material, then you really have to be careful.

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 1>And there are a lot of things that can complicate this,

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and that's kind of where we were leading to a

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit earlier. There are a lot of reasons why

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 1>you cannot just say that DNA forensics is going to

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>solve you know, the crimes out there as long as

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 1>someone's left something behind. Because even though it's versatile, even

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>though we have this amazing capability, life is weird and

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 1>things can go wrong, and they can go wrong either

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>accidentally or on purpose. So one thing that can happen

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:07.920
<v Speaker 1>is multiple people could be involved in a an incident

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:11.679
<v Speaker 1>crime of some sort, and so the more people who

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>are involved, the harder it is. To be absolutely certain

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>that the DNA samples you're working with all linked to

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:23.920
<v Speaker 1>a specific individual. In fact, there are currently some changes

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 1>in the way DNA can be handled UH in cases

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:30.639
<v Speaker 1>court cases actually to the point where it's in the

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>legal case since UH in Texas and other places as well,

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and so forensics labs are having to put in greater

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:42.680
<v Speaker 1>restrictions because forensics analysts would go into testify in court

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>cases and say, there's a one in a billion chance

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 1>this belonged to someone else. But if you start the

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 1>factor in that there is more than one person's DNA

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:54.640
<v Speaker 1>found at the scene and the contamination issues that result

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 1>from that, then people would say like, all right, well,

0:24:57.119 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 1>really it's more like one in a thousand or one

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 1>in a hundred. And then at this point you might say, well,

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:05.359
<v Speaker 1>the DNA evidence is not strong enough for it to

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:09.399
<v Speaker 1>be a compelling argument for the guilt or innocence of

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:12.879
<v Speaker 1>a person, because there's enough like if you're in a

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 1>really dense urban area and you say there's a one

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 1>and a hundred chance that's you know, it's it's hard

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to say that shouldn't introduce reasonable doubt that it doesn't

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>meet the burden of reasonable doubts. But and then you

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 1>have to try to chase down all the other possibilities.

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's if there are multiple people involved. But

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 1>even if there's not multiple people involved, obviously you have

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to be very cognizant of the possibility of contamination. Yeah, okay,

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>we we can talk about this a little bit, because

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>we this is something that you might not see on

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood as often as you see it in real life. Yes, exactly, Jonathan.

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:03.120
<v Speaker 1>So let's say you know the Let's say you're the detective,

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 1>right and Noel is the prosecutor, and I'm the I'm

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the JABRONI at the scene. You was supposed to pick

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 1>up the stuff and bring it, right, Yeah, So you're

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you're your job is to actually go in and collect

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the evidence before anyone else can go through that area, right, Yeah,

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>because as soon as you introduce other people, then you've

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 1>introduced other DNA that could be left at the scene.

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 1>But I've been having a I've been having a crazy

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>time work lately, and I've been cutting corners a little

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and everybody knows. Nobody said anything yet because it's not

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a big deal yet. But here's what happens. Uh, while

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:44.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm on while I collect the evidence. Let's see, I

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:47.119
<v Speaker 1>get blood samples, and I'm on the way back. I

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:50.439
<v Speaker 1>stop it cook out because my diet is as much

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of a train wreck as my life, and and because

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm personable, I shake hands with six people as I'm

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 1>walking back into our holding, right, I don't wash my hands.

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>And I also kept the sample for some reason, in

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:10.159
<v Speaker 1>the bag from cookout. Yeah, that would there there might

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 1>be a chance that that was encountered some form of

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 1>contamination from the scene to the point where you get

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to the lab and then you you run the d NA. Yeah, right, Well,

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>clearly the suspect was a roast pig. Right, Yeah, clearly

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 1>suspect was a roast pig. Or even more dangerously, Uh,

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 1>clearly the suspect, Uh, the suspect maybe someone that already

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 1>pings in our database, who just got out of prison

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:39.760
<v Speaker 1>for grand theft auto and now works out of cookout. Yeah. Yeah,

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:42.639
<v Speaker 1>that's I mean that that's a you know, it's it

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 1>seems like it's a convoluted example, except for the fact

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 1>that this is the source of stuff that can happen r. Yeah,

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not. I would say it's possible, but that one

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 1>is not plausible. No, No, But but the example you

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:56.359
<v Speaker 1>give does show that there has to be great care

0:27:56.760 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the the people who come in to collect the evidence

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 1>have to do so before there can be a lot

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:05.360
<v Speaker 1>of disturbance of the crime scene. Because the more disturbance

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>there there is, like I said, the more chances other

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 1>people will leave behind DNA skin cells, or or um

0:28:12.400 --> 0:28:14.959
<v Speaker 1>sweat or blood or whatever it might be. Um might

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>be that there were other people who were involved in

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 1>it who have no or you know, people who maybe

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:24.119
<v Speaker 1>the person who stumbled upon the scene left something behind

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:28.399
<v Speaker 1>without intending to, like cutting a hand on a on

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a piece of glass or something, letting themselves into see

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 1>what's happened. Yeah, even something as simple as that. So

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 1>there's there's that you have to be aware of contamination there.

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 1>You also have to be aware of contamination through the

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 1>moment you've collected it, all the way through the testing phase.

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 1>So that's where the chain of custody comes in. By

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the way, if you ever see people like putting stuff

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>in plastic bags in order to preserve it, that's pretty

0:28:53.520 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 1>much a fiction because plastic will will contain moisture, right anything,

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Any moisture that's in the bag will stay there and

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 1>moisture can can degrade DNA samples, so usually they're actually

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 1>put in paper, so it's usually a paper envelope or

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a paper bag that's quickly labeled, and then there's this

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 1>chain of custody that must be documented through the entire

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 1>process until it gets to the lab, and then at

0:29:21.600 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the lab. Even at the lab, they have to be

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 1>very careful with the equipment they're using. They have to

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>make certain that it's completely clean and that way you

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 1>don't end up cross contaminating from a previous test into

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 1>your current test. That's happened a couple of times. There

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>actually been a couple of cases. Yeah, there was a

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 1>case where, uh, there was a victim of a crime

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and there was another crime that was committed, and the

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 1>initial DNA test results of the crime that was committed

0:29:50.200 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 1>came back with the victim from the other crime as

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 1>a positive. And they realized that the reason why that

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 1>was happening was that there were two different DNA tests

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that had been performed, and the victim from the first

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>one that their DNA had not been completely cleaned out

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of the system before they started doing the next test,

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and so they were getting these false positives, and they

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:11.960
<v Speaker 1>knew it couldn't have been the victim because the victim

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 1>was the victim was victimized, the victim was not capable

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 1>of committing that crime. Um. So it was already like

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 1>one of those things that proved that there was an

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 1>issue here. And in almost every case, in fact, I'll

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>go ahead say the vast majority of cases, this has

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 1>to do with a person either mistakenly or purposefully, not

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 1>following procedure or not making certain that that everything is

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 1>on the up and up. Rather than the process itself

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 1>being a failure, it's it's it's a human error, either

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>intentional or otherwise introduced typically um. And so another thing

0:30:51.880 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 1>that you have to worry about is whether or not

0:30:54.320 --> 0:31:00.240
<v Speaker 1>someone has purposefully introduced DNA. There have been cases where

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>in order to try and either uh, to hide one's

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 1>involvement in a crime or to implicate someone else specifically

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 1>in a crime, people have left behind samples of DNA

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 1>in order to throw people, throw investigators off the track.

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Whether again, whether it is to protect yourself, like let's

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 1>say that you committed the crime and you leave behind

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the DNA of you know, your uh, your your hated cousin.

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 1>So that your cousin takes the rapid you don't, or

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 1>you're an investigator and you're like, well, there's this really

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 1>awful guy, and we want to get him for this crime.

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 1>We really like him for this crime, but we don't

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 1>have the direct evidence for him. However, I do have

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:47.560
<v Speaker 1>this DNA from a separate incident. I can leave this

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:50.320
<v Speaker 1>behind the crime scene collected, and therefore we can finally

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 1>get the guy. I'm pretty sure he did it anyway,

0:31:52.840 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, solid solid. Yeah. So that's again, this is

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:02.240
<v Speaker 1>not something that happens all the time. It's not not

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 1>something that's even prevalent, but it's it's one of those

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 1>things that you have to be aware of. That's why

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 1>these things like the chain of custody is so important

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to maintain. I have a question, sure, uh, And I

0:32:13.920 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I'm jumping ahead here, no, please ask,

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:19.200
<v Speaker 1>But I was kind of foreshadowing this while we're asking

0:32:19.360 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 1>about hair follicles. So the it sounds like the home

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 1>run for UH, for DNA testing would be something, as

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 1>you said, containing living cells, so blood, bodily fluid, stuff

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:38.960
<v Speaker 1>like that. But if that's a home run, the kind

0:32:39.000 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of stuff that people are much more likely to leave

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 1>behind would be things like hair follicles or flakes of skin.

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, so, what what's the deal with that? How

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:52.720
<v Speaker 1>how does that work? It's still the same same process

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that these are things that can leave

0:32:55.000 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 1>behind traces of DNA, like as long as as long

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 1>as for instance, let's say that you have h you're

0:33:03.360 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 1>at a murder scene scene and you are you are

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 1>investigating one of the things, You're going to look for

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 1>our traces of any skin under the victim's fingernails, because

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that that's a an indication that the victim fought back

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:20.840
<v Speaker 1>against his or her murderer and may in fact have

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 1>samples of that skin underneath his or her fingernails. And

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:28.920
<v Speaker 1>so you can collect that and then do the same

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 1>process I was talking about. You can extract the DNA

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 1>from those cells and then do the same process to

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 1>duplicate that DNA and then run it either against suspects

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 1>DNA or or use a database. We mentioned the databases

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 1>briefly to a little bit about yeah, let's do that,

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 1>because there are a couple of different ones. There there

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:51.280
<v Speaker 1>are state databases, there's a national database, and then there's

0:33:51.320 --> 0:33:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the FBI's database. Uh So, These are all databases that

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 1>contain the DNA information of various people who have been

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:04.120
<v Speaker 1>booked for specific types of crimes. It's not every crime.

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Don't worry, the FBI does not have your genetic blueprint

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:10.520
<v Speaker 1>because one time you purposely parked in a handicap spot.

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 1>Although Jonathan and Nolan I do judge you for that, Yes,

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:17.839
<v Speaker 1>we think you should definitely never do that. If you don't,

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 1>if you do not have a the handicap label, uh,

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 1>then don't park in that spot. But now these are

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 1>specifically pretty serious crimes where that's really the only way

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:34.880
<v Speaker 1>that they that that the state or federal government is

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:40.360
<v Speaker 1>allowed to to collect a DNA sample from you to

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:42.879
<v Speaker 1>use in this database when they've got a lot of people.

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I've got some statistics here to yeah, please hit me. Okay,

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:49.719
<v Speaker 1>so let's let's go with the big one, right, Okay,

0:34:50.000 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 1>The big one here in the States is the National

0:34:53.320 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 1>DNA Index or in d I S. That's the that's

0:34:57.239 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the Fed's, that's the FBI. It contains a little under

0:35:00.640 --> 0:35:05.359
<v Speaker 1>twelve million offender profiles, specifically eleven million, eight hundred twenty two,

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:08.759
<v Speaker 1>nine hundred and twenty seven. It has to a little

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:12.560
<v Speaker 1>over two million R s D profiles and a little

0:35:12.600 --> 0:35:16.240
<v Speaker 1>over six hundred thousand forensic profiles. That's as of June.

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:21.759
<v Speaker 1>If you visit the FBI's website, you can learn a

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:27.719
<v Speaker 1>lot about their biometric analysis, which does also contain print work.

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:30.600
<v Speaker 1>It's it's sort of a mixtape of all the stuff

0:35:30.680 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 1>that they could use to investigate. And here's the thing

0:35:34.040 --> 0:35:36.160
<v Speaker 1>you can do if you live in the US and

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:38.400
<v Speaker 1>you would like to feel a little bit less comfortable

0:35:38.480 --> 0:35:42.040
<v Speaker 1>each day. Okay, it's there's a breakdown by state, so

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 1>you can see how many offender profiles are are located

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 1>in your state. Here in Georgia, in our case, it's

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:53.680
<v Speaker 1>two hundred nine five thousand, nine hundred and thirty eight.

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Considering the population of Georgia, that is a significant number. Right.

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:02.960
<v Speaker 1>You can see the forensics profiles, the arrestees. You can

0:36:03.000 --> 0:36:08.319
<v Speaker 1>also see the number of investigations aided in labs participate. Now,

0:36:09.120 --> 0:36:10.719
<v Speaker 1>one of the things I want to point out is

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:14.279
<v Speaker 1>that this also goes back into the drawbacks or the

0:36:14.400 --> 0:36:19.000
<v Speaker 1>challenges of forensics, is that forensic labs can get really

0:36:19.120 --> 0:36:21.920
<v Speaker 1>backed up with this stuff, Like the backlogs can be

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:25.719
<v Speaker 1>can be crazy because while I I you know, I

0:36:25.840 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that process just for duplicating the DNA. That can

0:36:28.600 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 1>take a couple of hours to do that process, and

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:34.320
<v Speaker 1>then of course you've got all the cleaning of the

0:36:34.400 --> 0:36:36.200
<v Speaker 1>material that has to happen in order for you to

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 1>be able to use it again. That's not that doesn't

0:36:39.239 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 1>even involve the actual analysis of the DNA that tends

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:48.840
<v Speaker 1>to require a forensic specialist to do this. It's not

0:36:49.000 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 1>like it's all automated, although there are more and more

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:56.399
<v Speaker 1>automated systems that help, but generally speaking, it's it's sort

0:36:56.440 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 1>of an augmented approach where you still have forensic expert

0:37:02.000 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 1>do the the look you know they're doing. They're looking

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:07.800
<v Speaker 1>at the DNA to look at those base pairs and

0:37:07.880 --> 0:37:12.040
<v Speaker 1>actually makes certain visually that they are in fact identical.

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:17.279
<v Speaker 1>So it takes a lot of time. And meanwhile, while

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you're doing all this, more samples are coming in, so

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:23.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a backlog that starts to build up, and depending

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:26.480
<v Speaker 1>upon the area and the number of labs that are available,

0:37:27.000 --> 0:37:29.960
<v Speaker 1>it might be a very serious backlog. And there was

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:32.480
<v Speaker 1>also a pre existing backlog because if we look at

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:36.439
<v Speaker 1>how recently this occurred and off air we talked about

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:38.840
<v Speaker 1>this in the course of your research. You send in

0:37:38.960 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 1>some great stuff about cold cases. Yeah, so there was

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:46.439
<v Speaker 1>already a built in backlog for this technology, and they're

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 1>already been cases of people who were in jail for years, decades, Yeah,

0:37:51.280 --> 0:37:55.839
<v Speaker 1>who were innocent. Yeah, yeah, where the DNA evidence ended

0:37:55.920 --> 0:37:58.400
<v Speaker 1>up clearing them like it could not possibly have been

0:37:58.480 --> 0:38:03.120
<v Speaker 1>that person. Um. And you know, actually, that's when I

0:38:03.200 --> 0:38:06.200
<v Speaker 1>say that there are some serious restrictions and tax us

0:38:06.280 --> 0:38:10.279
<v Speaker 1>about this multi person DNA approach. It's specifically so that

0:38:10.960 --> 0:38:15.879
<v Speaker 1>there is every attempt to make certain that innocent people

0:38:15.960 --> 0:38:19.879
<v Speaker 1>aren't incarcerated. There is a huge obviously there's a huge

0:38:20.400 --> 0:38:25.040
<v Speaker 1>pressure on law enforcement to to assign guilt and uh

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and bring somebody in for particularly awful crimes. And there's

0:38:30.160 --> 0:38:32.840
<v Speaker 1>an enormous pressure because of course, the community wants to

0:38:32.880 --> 0:38:35.080
<v Speaker 1>feel safe, they want to feel that something is being done.

0:38:36.000 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 1>That has to be balanced against making sure you get

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the right person. Yeah. Yeah, because we know that we

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:47.320
<v Speaker 1>live in an age of instant gratification. Yeah, things should

0:38:47.320 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 1>be right immediately and right the first time and right

0:38:52.760 --> 0:38:56.360
<v Speaker 1>now and right now, yes, the three rights. But unfortunately

0:38:56.440 --> 0:38:59.359
<v Speaker 1>the wheels of justice hows those saying go. Man, they

0:38:59.480 --> 0:39:03.400
<v Speaker 1>grinds low but exceedingly fine. Yes, as opposed to go

0:39:03.560 --> 0:39:05.960
<v Speaker 1>round and round. Yes, the wheels in the bus. I

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 1>was thinking, you know we would be here, terrible lawyers. Yeah,

0:39:10.040 --> 0:39:12.120
<v Speaker 1>we would be Actually, I know I would be. I

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:15.800
<v Speaker 1>remember participating in a mock trial in school and not

0:39:16.000 --> 0:39:18.319
<v Speaker 1>knowing what the heck I was doing? What was your

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:21.360
<v Speaker 1>what was your rule? I was defense and it was terrible.

0:39:21.719 --> 0:39:23.840
<v Speaker 1>It was terrible. I did not want to do it.

0:39:24.000 --> 0:39:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I was. I was. I was bullied into it and

0:39:27.080 --> 0:39:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I it was awful. I could see you doing like

0:39:29.600 --> 0:39:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a judge or maybe a bailiff who's over it, like

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:39.120
<v Speaker 1>sit down. Yeah, no, I was. Uh my my client

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 1>would have gotten the chair. It was terrible for a

0:39:42.320 --> 0:39:45.680
<v Speaker 1>very minor offense too, That's how bad I was. We'll

0:39:45.800 --> 0:39:49.760
<v Speaker 1>wrap up this discussion about DNA forensics after this quick break.

0:39:59.719 --> 0:40:02.799
<v Speaker 1>So I away getting back into DNA forensics. Uh so, yeah,

0:40:02.920 --> 0:40:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned cold cases. I've got one specific one I'll mention,

0:40:06.280 --> 0:40:09.359
<v Speaker 1>and it's not it's one that has not been um

0:40:10.080 --> 0:40:12.600
<v Speaker 1>seen to completion yet. In other words, there there hasn't

0:40:12.640 --> 0:40:15.600
<v Speaker 1>been a conviction yet in this case, but it does

0:40:15.719 --> 0:40:21.240
<v Speaker 1>show how how far reaching this can go. So in December,

0:40:23.520 --> 0:40:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the body of a young lady named Crystal Lynn bez

0:40:26.920 --> 0:40:31.280
<v Speaker 1>bes Lana, which was found along the Provo River in Utah.

0:40:32.280 --> 0:40:35.400
<v Speaker 1>She was seventeen years old when she was killed, and

0:40:35.600 --> 0:40:40.000
<v Speaker 1>she had been sexually assaulted and murdered, uh perhaps bludgeoned

0:40:40.040 --> 0:40:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to death with rocks. That was what the police believed

0:40:43.200 --> 0:40:45.440
<v Speaker 1>at the time. Now, the original investigator of the crime,

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:49.200
<v Speaker 1>it was a guy who became the the deputy sheriff,

0:40:49.239 --> 0:40:53.919
<v Speaker 1>I believe, but Todd Bonner decided to continue investigation even

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 1>long after all the leads were drying up, like they

0:40:57.120 --> 0:41:02.600
<v Speaker 1>just could not find any leads, and in a lab

0:41:02.719 --> 0:41:06.600
<v Speaker 1>was able to extract what's called touch DNA. It was

0:41:06.719 --> 0:41:10.359
<v Speaker 1>left behind on a granite rock that the police had

0:41:10.440 --> 0:41:14.880
<v Speaker 1>believed was used in killing this young lady, and the

0:41:15.320 --> 0:41:18.960
<v Speaker 1>lab used a vacuum instrument to pull this touch DNA

0:41:19.160 --> 0:41:21.719
<v Speaker 1>off the granite rock and then put it through this

0:41:21.840 --> 0:41:27.920
<v Speaker 1>analysis process and the results ended up matching DNA from

0:41:28.120 --> 0:41:31.680
<v Speaker 1>a suspect that people were interested in but had no

0:41:31.880 --> 0:41:35.400
<v Speaker 1>direct connection to the crime. The suspect's name was Joseph

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Michael Simpson, and they got the sample DNA from a

0:41:40.080 --> 0:41:44.520
<v Speaker 1>discarded cigarette butt he had tossed us a cigarette but

0:41:44.680 --> 0:41:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the cops scooped it up, they tested the DNA, they

0:41:47.520 --> 0:41:52.719
<v Speaker 1>found a match. They arrested him back in Uh, he

0:41:53.200 --> 0:41:56.680
<v Speaker 1>has a previous conviction for murder. He had actually been

0:41:56.760 --> 0:42:01.759
<v Speaker 1>out on parole for eight months for before Brasilanta, which

0:42:01.880 --> 0:42:04.239
<v Speaker 1>is death. Yeah, so he had been in jail for

0:42:04.360 --> 0:42:07.640
<v Speaker 1>several years but got paroled and then uh, eight months

0:42:07.760 --> 0:42:11.640
<v Speaker 1>later Brisilana, which was dead, and he's been linked to

0:42:11.719 --> 0:42:15.040
<v Speaker 1>this and arrested for the crime. Now that being said,

0:42:15.760 --> 0:42:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the last I checked into this case, you know, that

0:42:18.080 --> 0:42:20.439
<v Speaker 1>was back in the last I checked into this case.

0:42:20.560 --> 0:42:24.399
<v Speaker 1>It's still not it still hasn't been tried. There's been

0:42:25.719 --> 0:42:30.640
<v Speaker 1>request for more evidence on the prosecution side, including uh

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:36.279
<v Speaker 1>an actual DNA sample from Simpson himself to confirm that

0:42:36.440 --> 0:42:39.839
<v Speaker 1>the findings are in fact accurate, so in other words,

0:42:39.920 --> 0:42:43.360
<v Speaker 1>not just from the cigarette, but but from Simpson in custody.

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:47.600
<v Speaker 1>And then there's also a request to get a print

0:42:47.680 --> 0:42:51.239
<v Speaker 1>sample because of a partial print that was left behind

0:42:51.320 --> 0:42:55.520
<v Speaker 1>on the victim herself. So, uh, this case is not

0:42:55.680 --> 0:42:58.920
<v Speaker 1>one that's like cut and dry and it's definitive, but

0:42:59.080 --> 0:43:02.440
<v Speaker 1>it does Indica eight that this approach is able to

0:43:02.520 --> 0:43:07.040
<v Speaker 1>start pulling up connections that otherwise would have been unlikely

0:43:07.200 --> 0:43:10.040
<v Speaker 1>or even impossible to make. And this brings us to

0:43:10.600 --> 0:43:13.320
<v Speaker 1>this is just a sidebar, Okay, this brings us to

0:43:14.160 --> 0:43:16.960
<v Speaker 1>a dangerous thing. And you know, of course that I

0:43:17.160 --> 0:43:20.040
<v Speaker 1>who can sometimes be a cartoon of myself and am

0:43:20.120 --> 0:43:23.600
<v Speaker 1>required to mention this. What do you think about the

0:43:23.719 --> 0:43:28.200
<v Speaker 1>idea of blanket DNA sampling? They're taking every citizen. You know,

0:43:28.440 --> 0:43:32.759
<v Speaker 1>some prominent members of the UK legal system have advocated

0:43:32.840 --> 0:43:37.000
<v Speaker 1>this for all British citizens, and Kuwait is doing the

0:43:37.080 --> 0:43:40.120
<v Speaker 1>same thing. Well, let me put it to you this way. Okay.

0:43:42.920 --> 0:43:45.200
<v Speaker 1>There's always the argument that some people will make that

0:43:45.320 --> 0:43:47.239
<v Speaker 1>if you're not doing anything wrong, then what do you

0:43:47.320 --> 0:43:49.439
<v Speaker 1>have to fear? Right, Well, here's what you have to fear,

0:43:49.680 --> 0:43:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna tell you. Okay. So there have been at

0:43:53.520 --> 0:43:57.839
<v Speaker 1>least a couple of companies that have shown that through

0:43:58.200 --> 0:44:01.279
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of your DNA, they and do a

0:44:01.440 --> 0:44:05.839
<v Speaker 1>very similar process to duplicating DNA, which means that they

0:44:05.880 --> 0:44:09.160
<v Speaker 1>can synthesize your DNA, which means then that if your

0:44:09.200 --> 0:44:12.720
<v Speaker 1>DNA can be synthesized, it could be created and dropped somewhere.

0:44:12.840 --> 0:44:15.640
<v Speaker 1>And you had never been to that place. Oh wow,

0:44:15.880 --> 0:44:18.640
<v Speaker 1>So you all of a sudden, you get a summons

0:44:18.800 --> 0:44:23.879
<v Speaker 1>for some horrendous crime in uh Iceland or something. You say,

0:44:24.000 --> 0:44:26.439
<v Speaker 1>I've never been Yeah, this is the weirdest thing because

0:44:26.440 --> 0:44:29.719
<v Speaker 1>I've never been there. Like, but this is match to

0:44:29.800 --> 0:44:32.600
<v Speaker 1>your DNA. There's a one and a billion chance that

0:44:32.719 --> 0:44:35.799
<v Speaker 1>someone else did this, um and you you know that's

0:44:36.080 --> 0:44:38.520
<v Speaker 1>that's a thing like, that's we're in a world where

0:44:38.560 --> 0:44:42.080
<v Speaker 1>technologically it is possible to do this. Now, is that

0:44:42.239 --> 0:44:46.520
<v Speaker 1>likely to happen? It's definitely, like and it's in the

0:44:46.800 --> 0:44:50.440
<v Speaker 1>realm of possibility, but not plausibility. However, as long as

0:44:50.480 --> 0:44:54.000
<v Speaker 1>it's possible, then I would argue that it is too

0:44:54.120 --> 0:44:58.920
<v Speaker 1>invasive to demand from your population that everyone submit to

0:44:59.280 --> 0:45:03.319
<v Speaker 1>d n A like submitting a DNA sample and yeah, yeah,

0:45:03.400 --> 0:45:05.920
<v Speaker 1>what about well, let's take a step further. What about

0:45:06.000 --> 0:45:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the idea that there would be what about the idea

0:45:10.360 --> 0:45:13.840
<v Speaker 1>that this stuff, which is you set a blueprint in

0:45:14.000 --> 0:45:18.319
<v Speaker 1>some ways. Also it's it's similar to metadata. Okay, let's

0:45:18.400 --> 0:45:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I can see where you're saying. So the ability then

0:45:22.000 --> 0:45:25.399
<v Speaker 1>to build this enormous sample size let's say the entire

0:45:25.520 --> 0:45:28.000
<v Speaker 1>population of the UK. I think right now they're only

0:45:28.080 --> 0:45:31.320
<v Speaker 1>at maybe five of the population because you have to

0:45:31.400 --> 0:45:35.040
<v Speaker 1>get you know, you have to get pinched. So if

0:45:35.120 --> 0:45:38.920
<v Speaker 1>they had this enormous sample size, then they could start

0:45:39.040 --> 0:45:44.760
<v Speaker 1>comparing and collating and analyzing this stuff on a larger

0:45:44.920 --> 0:45:50.000
<v Speaker 1>scale such that they would be able to possibly again

0:45:50.120 --> 0:45:55.440
<v Speaker 1>possibly not plausibly, uh predict um not epo genetic trends,

0:45:55.480 --> 0:45:59.320
<v Speaker 1>but but predict the likelihood of someone incurring a certain

0:45:59.400 --> 0:46:03.239
<v Speaker 1>disease or something. Well, we're getting into more of a

0:46:03.320 --> 0:46:08.160
<v Speaker 1>genomic sequencing at that point. Yeah, yeah, when you're when

0:46:08.160 --> 0:46:11.160
<v Speaker 1>you're getting into genomic sequencing, it's it's much further, it's

0:46:11.239 --> 0:46:14.920
<v Speaker 1>much it's a much longer process. Because again, this is

0:46:15.120 --> 0:46:18.200
<v Speaker 1>very close to when they call a genetic fingerprinting. It

0:46:18.760 --> 0:46:20.759
<v Speaker 1>makes sense to call it that because you're really just

0:46:20.880 --> 0:46:25.680
<v Speaker 1>looking at the physical resemblance of two strands, right, Like

0:46:25.880 --> 0:46:28.360
<v Speaker 1>like two drawings and there are two drawings of ladders,

0:46:28.440 --> 0:46:30.239
<v Speaker 1>and if the two drawings of ladders are the same,

0:46:30.320 --> 0:46:32.120
<v Speaker 1>then you know you've got a one and a billion

0:46:32.280 --> 0:46:36.480
<v Speaker 1>chance of it not being that person. So that's a

0:46:36.560 --> 0:46:39.640
<v Speaker 1>lot different than going through and identifying things like which

0:46:39.760 --> 0:46:42.520
<v Speaker 1>genes do want I mean, we still don't even know, right,

0:46:43.880 --> 0:46:46.600
<v Speaker 1>So in case you guys are not terribly familiar with

0:46:46.760 --> 0:46:50.799
<v Speaker 1>with genetics. The genes can be pretty complicated things. Think

0:46:50.800 --> 0:46:54.720
<v Speaker 1>about like a giant switchboard. Right, You've got an enormous switchboard,

0:46:54.760 --> 0:46:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and there's like a thousand switches on little metal toggle switches,

0:46:59.200 --> 0:47:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the classic up down toggle switches. Right, unlabeled. That you

0:47:03.600 --> 0:47:07.440
<v Speaker 1>have a bank of lightbulbs in front of you, also unlabeled.

0:47:07.840 --> 0:47:10.759
<v Speaker 1>You flip one switch and one lightbulb comes on. You

0:47:10.800 --> 0:47:13.920
<v Speaker 1>flip a second switch, that lightbulb stays on. Three other

0:47:14.000 --> 0:47:16.479
<v Speaker 1>lightbulbs come on. You turn off the first switch. Only

0:47:16.600 --> 0:47:18.839
<v Speaker 1>one lightbulb goes off, and you start thinking, Okay, wait,

0:47:18.960 --> 0:47:22.240
<v Speaker 1>what how is this? Well, that's the thing about genes

0:47:22.360 --> 0:47:24.960
<v Speaker 1>is that they it's not so simple as to say

0:47:25.000 --> 0:47:29.040
<v Speaker 1>that this one gene is in charge of this one trait.

0:47:29.800 --> 0:47:32.400
<v Speaker 1>It's it can be much more complicated, where it's a

0:47:32.640 --> 0:47:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a selection of genes that some are active, some are

0:47:36.040 --> 0:47:40.120
<v Speaker 1>not active. Um So, because of that, even if you've

0:47:40.120 --> 0:47:44.960
<v Speaker 1>got all the DNA from an entire population, you might

0:47:45.040 --> 0:47:48.279
<v Speaker 1>be able to say, well, this one person suffered from

0:47:48.600 --> 0:47:52.839
<v Speaker 1>a particular inherited disease. Let's examine the DNA and then

0:47:53.160 --> 0:47:55.080
<v Speaker 1>compare it to other people who have suffered from that

0:47:55.160 --> 0:47:57.160
<v Speaker 1>same disease and see where the points of comparison are.

0:47:57.239 --> 0:48:00.600
<v Speaker 1>But that is I mean, it's a monu mental task

0:48:00.800 --> 0:48:06.760
<v Speaker 1>because you just it's beyond taking points along a strand

0:48:07.040 --> 0:48:10.879
<v Speaker 1>and comparing the them against a second sample. Right, it's

0:48:10.960 --> 0:48:14.399
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's another it's almost like a an order

0:48:14.480 --> 0:48:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of magnitude greater in the amount of effort that you

0:48:17.239 --> 0:48:19.360
<v Speaker 1>have to take. Yeah, that's a really good way to

0:48:19.440 --> 0:48:22.080
<v Speaker 1>put it. And that that a squatches some of my

0:48:22.760 --> 0:48:25.920
<v Speaker 1>apien predictions. I do have one other question, all right,

0:48:26.239 --> 0:48:31.960
<v Speaker 1>So we talked about in identical twins, right there, there

0:48:32.160 --> 0:48:37.279
<v Speaker 1>is another, Um, there's another possibility where a person could

0:48:37.400 --> 0:48:40.600
<v Speaker 1>get pinched with the wrong DNA. Are you going with

0:48:40.680 --> 0:48:44.399
<v Speaker 1>a clone? What's your Well, there's a there's another possibility. Wait,

0:48:44.520 --> 0:48:46.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe not. It's not the same as identical twins, but

0:48:47.480 --> 0:48:54.200
<v Speaker 1>it throws another monkey wrench into this. Uh uh chimeras.

0:48:54.920 --> 0:49:01.319
<v Speaker 1>Oh interesting, Yeah, okay, uh, all right, Well I want

0:49:01.360 --> 0:49:03.279
<v Speaker 1>to hear your thought process on this, because this is

0:49:03.360 --> 0:49:06.719
<v Speaker 1>not something I specifically looked into, because chimerism is not

0:49:06.960 --> 0:49:11.120
<v Speaker 1>that it's super rare. Yeah, it's not that it's like

0:49:11.280 --> 0:49:15.080
<v Speaker 1>an episode of SPU for that time. Um, And so yeah,

0:49:16.000 --> 0:49:18.759
<v Speaker 1>it's true though it sounds crazy. And you guys talked

0:49:18.760 --> 0:49:20.960
<v Speaker 1>about this on one of your other shows, right yeah,

0:49:20.960 --> 0:49:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and Forward Thinking, we talked about cameras and yeah. It

0:49:24.480 --> 0:49:26.040
<v Speaker 1>was one of those things where where the more you

0:49:26.120 --> 0:49:30.480
<v Speaker 1>talked about it, the more the more like unsure I

0:49:30.680 --> 0:49:34.440
<v Speaker 1>was that I was reflecting reality because it seems so weird.

0:49:34.920 --> 0:49:38.200
<v Speaker 1>It seems very very strange. So it's a person composed

0:49:38.280 --> 0:49:44.279
<v Speaker 1>of two genetically distinct types of cells. So you might have, um,

0:49:44.760 --> 0:49:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the first time I was discovered it was

0:49:47.000 --> 0:49:49.640
<v Speaker 1>related to blood type, right, yeah, I believe, So I

0:49:49.680 --> 0:49:54.080
<v Speaker 1>believe you're correct. So somebody had more than one blood type,

0:49:54.120 --> 0:49:56.920
<v Speaker 1>which is already so trippy to me. I just felt

0:49:56.960 --> 0:50:00.680
<v Speaker 1>like to do the to do just to this topic,

0:50:01.000 --> 0:50:04.279
<v Speaker 1>we would have to mention that that is one of

0:50:04.360 --> 0:50:10.880
<v Speaker 1>those very very exceedingly rare cases where DNA testing is

0:50:10.920 --> 0:50:14.480
<v Speaker 1>not again a silver bullet. Yeah, so you could in

0:50:14.600 --> 0:50:19.600
<v Speaker 1>a bizarre like this is almost like a science fiction novel. Yeah,

0:50:19.760 --> 0:50:21.879
<v Speaker 1>Like to the point where you're like, for this to work,

0:50:23.200 --> 0:50:25.440
<v Speaker 1>so many things would have to fall in line perfectly

0:50:25.520 --> 0:50:27.840
<v Speaker 1>that you might as well say it's impossible. But imagine

0:50:27.880 --> 0:50:30.360
<v Speaker 1>that you have a scenario in which you have a

0:50:30.440 --> 0:50:33.520
<v Speaker 1>chimera and DNA is left behind at the scene, but

0:50:33.600 --> 0:50:36.920
<v Speaker 1>it's only one type of DNA somehow, and then the

0:50:37.040 --> 0:50:40.600
<v Speaker 1>sample they get is somehow just the other type of DNA,

0:50:40.719 --> 0:50:47.440
<v Speaker 1>thus exonerating your your perpetrator um practically. Yeah, there's no,

0:50:48.480 --> 0:50:52.080
<v Speaker 1>it's impossible. The only way that that could really affect

0:50:52.160 --> 0:50:54.880
<v Speaker 1>it is if there were somehow a chimera on the

0:50:55.800 --> 0:50:59.240
<v Speaker 1>involved in this scene and it became a contaminating factors,

0:51:00.120 --> 0:51:03.360
<v Speaker 1>then they would say, well, aside from the victim, it

0:51:03.480 --> 0:51:05.960
<v Speaker 1>seems it appears that there were three people here. Yes,

0:51:06.239 --> 0:51:09.279
<v Speaker 1>that that would certainly, that would certainly cause problems, right,

0:51:09.360 --> 0:51:12.680
<v Speaker 1>that would certainly cause confusion in the whole process. But

0:51:12.760 --> 0:51:14.760
<v Speaker 1>it's also so rare for someone to be a criminal.

0:51:14.960 --> 0:51:18.839
<v Speaker 1>I think it's already yeah, begging beggaring belief right right,

0:51:18.920 --> 0:51:21.360
<v Speaker 1>like like like you you already have. Like if you

0:51:21.520 --> 0:51:24.160
<v Speaker 1>think of the population of people who have some form

0:51:24.280 --> 0:51:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of of that, you know, the chimera DNA thing going on,

0:51:29.600 --> 0:51:33.319
<v Speaker 1>and then within that population, what percentage of those people

0:51:33.400 --> 0:51:38.120
<v Speaker 1>are our master yeah, are are committing these sort of crimes.

0:51:38.600 --> 0:51:42.799
<v Speaker 1>It's got to be pretty pretty small number. Sorry, man,

0:51:42.920 --> 0:51:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, I just had to bring it up. No, No,

0:51:44.760 --> 0:51:46.759
<v Speaker 1>it's fine, like you know, it's it's you know, but

0:51:47.040 --> 0:51:51.200
<v Speaker 1>what if so one other thing I wanted to talk about.

0:51:51.320 --> 0:51:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I almost forgot about this. So did you read up

0:51:54.600 --> 0:52:00.319
<v Speaker 1>about the um the technology of reconstructing a person's face

0:52:00.680 --> 0:52:06.359
<v Speaker 1>using just DNA material, and you, like you you had

0:52:06.400 --> 0:52:09.200
<v Speaker 1>sent that to me off there, And I was initially

0:52:09.400 --> 0:52:13.239
<v Speaker 1>skeptical when I was looking at it, but I'm out.

0:52:13.400 --> 0:52:16.759
<v Speaker 1>It's it's called Snapshot, and it's from a company called

0:52:16.800 --> 0:52:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Parabond and Snapshot what it's what it attempts to do

0:52:20.760 --> 0:52:24.680
<v Speaker 1>is take the information from a DNA sample and create

0:52:25.120 --> 0:52:28.359
<v Speaker 1>a essentially a police sketch of a person, a three

0:52:28.520 --> 0:52:34.160
<v Speaker 1>dimensional uh representation of what a person might look like. Now,

0:52:34.239 --> 0:52:36.480
<v Speaker 1>when I say might look like, you've got to be

0:52:36.760 --> 0:52:39.560
<v Speaker 1>super generous with this because if all you have is

0:52:39.600 --> 0:52:42.239
<v Speaker 1>the DNA, if that's all you have, like you don't

0:52:42.360 --> 0:52:46.920
<v Speaker 1>have any any knowledge of what the person's face looks like,

0:52:47.000 --> 0:52:50.440
<v Speaker 1>otherwise how old they are, they're height, or anything. What

0:52:50.640 --> 0:52:54.080
<v Speaker 1>you'll be able to do is probably approximate their skin tone,

0:52:54.680 --> 0:52:59.759
<v Speaker 1>their ethnicity, their gender, at least their biological gender there,

0:52:59.800 --> 0:53:02.960
<v Speaker 1>they're hair color, their eye color, that kind of stuff,

0:53:03.040 --> 0:53:05.080
<v Speaker 1>whether or not they have freckles, that kind of thing.

0:53:06.040 --> 0:53:08.640
<v Speaker 1>But beyond that, you're not gonna be able to tell

0:53:08.640 --> 0:53:10.840
<v Speaker 1>their age. You're not gonna tell their higher weight, So

0:53:11.040 --> 0:53:13.960
<v Speaker 1>you can't you can't tell how heavy said or thin

0:53:14.120 --> 0:53:16.120
<v Speaker 1>they may be. How you don't know how much how

0:53:16.239 --> 0:53:19.600
<v Speaker 1>much like what sort of wrinkles would you need to

0:53:19.600 --> 0:53:22.919
<v Speaker 1>add in if they're you know, if they're older. Yeah,

0:53:22.920 --> 0:53:25.360
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't know any of that. Uh, And you wouldn't

0:53:25.400 --> 0:53:28.359
<v Speaker 1>know their skull shape, Like you wouldn't know their face shape, right,

0:53:28.520 --> 0:53:31.160
<v Speaker 1>like the DNA wouldn't. So, so what you can do

0:53:31.320 --> 0:53:34.200
<v Speaker 1>is create like a very generic looking person but with

0:53:34.400 --> 0:53:38.000
<v Speaker 1>those traits. So it may not be so useful in

0:53:38.160 --> 0:53:41.919
<v Speaker 1>the sense of using this as a means of trying

0:53:41.960 --> 0:53:45.400
<v Speaker 1>to track down the suspect there may not come in handy.

0:53:45.480 --> 0:53:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Where it might help is if you have unidentified remains.

0:53:49.680 --> 0:53:52.760
<v Speaker 1>So let's say you've found the remains of a person

0:53:53.040 --> 0:53:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and you're able to extract some DNA information, but you're

0:53:56.120 --> 0:54:00.560
<v Speaker 1>not able to ascertain the identity of this this person. Uh.

0:54:00.800 --> 0:54:03.880
<v Speaker 1>This would allow you once if you have the person's

0:54:04.040 --> 0:54:06.320
<v Speaker 1>like skull, like if if that's part of the remains

0:54:06.360 --> 0:54:08.800
<v Speaker 1>that are left behind, you then know at least the

0:54:08.880 --> 0:54:12.440
<v Speaker 1>dimensions of the skull. And there are also other technologies

0:54:12.719 --> 0:54:15.680
<v Speaker 1>that allow people to approximate lot of person's face looks

0:54:15.719 --> 0:54:19.680
<v Speaker 1>like based upon their skull shape. So combining those two

0:54:20.360 --> 0:54:22.759
<v Speaker 1>where you you say, all right, this is what they're

0:54:22.840 --> 0:54:25.800
<v Speaker 1>they probably look like based upon the the shape of

0:54:25.880 --> 0:54:30.120
<v Speaker 1>their skull. Plus here are their characteristics that they had

0:54:30.320 --> 0:54:32.960
<v Speaker 1>according to their d n A, then you might be

0:54:33.120 --> 0:54:36.560
<v Speaker 1>able to create a few different looks for that particular

0:54:36.719 --> 0:54:41.399
<v Speaker 1>individual that might help in identifying who that person was. Yeah,

0:54:41.520 --> 0:54:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and that that I think is the most tremendous possibility

0:54:45.640 --> 0:54:49.640
<v Speaker 1>of this technology, absolutely right, because we're seeing already that

0:54:50.600 --> 0:54:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the study of d n A and and the application

0:54:54.239 --> 0:54:58.720
<v Speaker 1>of this sort of science has fundamentally changed the nature

0:54:58.880 --> 0:55:02.120
<v Speaker 1>of crime and investor negation. Yeah, to the point where

0:55:02.320 --> 0:55:07.160
<v Speaker 1>again it can affect juries, uh and there and their

0:55:07.680 --> 0:55:11.480
<v Speaker 1>perception of a case to the So so it can

0:55:11.520 --> 0:55:13.560
<v Speaker 1>be a frustration, right, like if you have if you

0:55:13.640 --> 0:55:17.040
<v Speaker 1>have other lines of evidence that clearly indicate that the

0:55:17.120 --> 0:55:20.440
<v Speaker 1>person accused of the crime has committed it, but because

0:55:20.800 --> 0:55:24.520
<v Speaker 1>there was there was no DNA evidence, or maybe there

0:55:24.600 --> 0:55:27.080
<v Speaker 1>was some problem with the chain of custody, that can

0:55:27.760 --> 0:55:31.439
<v Speaker 1>create enough doubt in a jury's mind, a jury that's

0:55:31.440 --> 0:55:33.640
<v Speaker 1>been conditioned to believe the DNA evidence is the end

0:55:33.640 --> 0:55:36.440
<v Speaker 1>all be all that it can it can cause problems

0:55:36.719 --> 0:55:38.520
<v Speaker 1>in that case. This is this is the thing, is

0:55:38.560 --> 0:55:42.200
<v Speaker 1>that human beings were messy, right, Like we're not just

0:55:42.320 --> 0:55:44.680
<v Speaker 1>messy and that we leave DNA behind. We're messy in

0:55:44.800 --> 0:55:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the way we try to process information. And so sometimes

0:55:49.520 --> 0:55:52.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you go through an entire process of

0:55:53.600 --> 0:55:58.080
<v Speaker 1>when a crime is committed, to figuring out who potentially

0:55:58.160 --> 0:56:01.759
<v Speaker 1>did it, to apprehend that person, to then trying that

0:56:01.880 --> 0:56:04.840
<v Speaker 1>person for the crime, to then deciding whether or not

0:56:04.920 --> 0:56:08.279
<v Speaker 1>they're guilty. I mean, there's so much stuff going on

0:56:08.480 --> 0:56:12.000
<v Speaker 1>through that whole process. I hope you enjoyed that classic

0:56:12.080 --> 0:56:16.160
<v Speaker 1>episode with Ben Bolan guest hosting. Was a lot of fun.

0:56:16.239 --> 0:56:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Having him on always is fun. Occasionally you might hear

0:56:19.600 --> 0:56:22.320
<v Speaker 1>me pop on his show Ridiculous History as a character

0:56:22.360 --> 0:56:26.600
<v Speaker 1>called the Quister, where I am even more obnoxious than

0:56:26.680 --> 0:56:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I am on this show. And I know that's hard

0:56:29.560 --> 0:56:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to believe, but it is true. If you would like

0:56:33.000 --> 0:56:35.200
<v Speaker 1>to reach out with suggestions for topics I should cover

0:56:35.280 --> 0:56:36.960
<v Speaker 1>on future episodes of Tech Stuff, there are a couple

0:56:36.960 --> 0:56:39.160
<v Speaker 1>of different ways of doing that one is to download

0:56:39.239 --> 0:56:42.319
<v Speaker 1>the I heart Radio app, navigate over to the text

0:56:42.360 --> 0:56:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Stuff page, use little microphone icon, record a message up

0:56:45.920 --> 0:56:47.680
<v Speaker 1>to thirty seconds in length letting me know what you

0:56:47.680 --> 0:56:50.560
<v Speaker 1>would like me to cover, or you can reach out

0:56:50.600 --> 0:56:52.960
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. The handle for the show is text Stuff

0:56:53.280 --> 0:56:57.239
<v Speaker 1>H s W and I'll talk to you again really soon.

0:57:03.480 --> 0:57:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Text Stuff is an I heart Radio production. For more

0:57:06.560 --> 0:57:09.960
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from I heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app,

0:57:10.080 --> 0:57:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.