WEBVTT - Divine Weapon: The Trident

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:17.639
<v Speaker 1>your Mind. My name is Robert Lamb, and I'm Joe McCormick. Joe,

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:24.320
<v Speaker 1>what do you think of when I say the word triedent? Uh? Gum?

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Is that the wrong answer? No? Wait, give me another shot.

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>All right? Okay? I think of Ariel's father in The

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Little Mermaid. I think he's got one. He does. Yes,

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>he has some form of trident, as I recall. Wait, No,

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that's not a good answer either, is it. No? Wait,

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 1>let's see. How about I think of the devil, right,

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the devil's got a trident? He does? He has that

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>that pitchfork, which is essentially a trident, a a three

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>pronged spear for you know, stabbing sinners in the backside.

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I imagine, why are you asking me about a particular

0:00:57.280 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>three tipped spear weapon, Robert, because that is what we

0:00:59.880 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>were talking about today here on Stuff to Blow Your

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Mind Now, Robert, when you said let's do an episode

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>about tridents, Originally I admit I have a skeptical I

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>was like, what is there to say about tridents? But okay,

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad I trusted you because we found some weird

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff about tridents. This is a topic that I think

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>it's been brewing for a while for me, because like

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I grew up seeing these images of you know, Neptune

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>or Poseidon with a trident, certainly at the Devil and

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the Pitchfork, and I never really thought about it that

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>much because on one level, it didn't look like a

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>very good weapon, Like I just I couldn't imagine like

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>really cool fighting scenarios with it. I was kind of awkward.

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>It looks awkward. Yeah, And then when you see it

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>used in gladiatorial combat, which we'll we'll discuss in this episode,

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>that too looks awkward in force, like that poor guy,

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:48.559
<v Speaker 1>uh forced to fight for his life and he's given

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>such a stupid weapon to do it with. You know,

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>it looks like it would be much better if you

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>were trying to accurately spear of fish and if you're

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>trying to like fight a gladiator in the arena. Yes,

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and and indeed that is one of the practical uses

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>of the trident, which will will also discuss here. But

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the thing is, I just I kept encountering

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the trident in various places. You know, different symbols of

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the trident. Um. You know, I went with my family

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>to Barbados and the flag. Uh, there has this this

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>really cool trident image if you start looking for it.

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>The trident seems to be everywhere and just cultures around

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the world. You know where the trident is not is

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 1>in nature. That's right. You look around for trident shapes

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>in nature. Now there are branching tree shapes everywhere in nature. Uh.

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you can maybe argue that I guess

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>there's some sort of trident things. They're like plants with

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>three leaf structures. There's like clover and stuff. But I

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.839
<v Speaker 1>try to think of like a three legged animals, say,

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 1>that would be a good analogy in nature for the trident.

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>But there's no such thing. There is no three legged

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>animal in nature, not a naturally occurring one. I mean,

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>do you do find dogs with three legs? Of course

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>there's one of the office. Oh yeah, yeah, Oh, I

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>mean three legged dogs are great, But yeah, there are

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>not animals that are supposed to have three legs. And

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of odd, isn't it. Like wouldn't you expect

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 1>there'd be at least one animal out there that has

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 1>three legs. But no, this does not occur. This is

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>just not something that d NA on Earth makes molecules do. Yeah. Yeah,

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and now you mentioned trees and streams and things of

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>this nature, and I do think that is probably part

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of the appeal of of the trident symbol. It implies

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>movement into vision. It's also a three in one image,

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>three points obeying the thrust of a single combatant, a

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>natural visual expression too, of power, both in the power

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>of of tool use and in the power of of

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>one commanding others to follow their command. So it's no

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>wonder that we see see various trident weapons in the

0:03:56.560 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>clutch of gods and demons or other beingings that are

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>that are that that we uh that that we embody

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>with power. Okay, So it sounds like you're setting up

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the trident as a kind of a divine tool or

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>divine weapon by virtue of its three prongs. Yeah, and

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that's where we see it all over the place. And

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>we'll get to those wonderful examples of the trident as

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:21.919
<v Speaker 1>the divine weapons. Is the some sort of of holy

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:25.359
<v Speaker 1>instrument that the gods use to u, you know, to

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:29.720
<v Speaker 1>inflict damage on the earth. Poor mortals and rival demons,

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:33.359
<v Speaker 1>and the stemming from that, we also get various holy

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 1>weapons and sacred items that are used by by warriors

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and rulers in various cultures. But then we also have

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 1>these just ancient tools that we also find around the world.

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Three pronged fishing spears. Now, why would three prongs be

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>especially useful in a fishing spear as opposed to any

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 1>other kind of spear, like say, a hunting spear. I

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>was thinking about this, and it seems to me correct

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 1>me if you disagree. The advantage of a three pronged

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:04.159
<v Speaker 1>spear might have to do with the properties of how

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>water interacts with light and the refraction of light as

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>it passes through the surface of a body of water. Oh, yes,

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about this, and you can, of course. The

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:16.039
<v Speaker 1>easiest way to experience this is to have like a glass,

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 1>a clear glass for half filled with water, and then

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 1>you stick a pencil in it and look at the

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>glass from the side and and and there's an optical

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 1>illusion that throws you off there. Yeah. So, if there

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>if there is difficulty in seeing exactly where you need

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>to stab to hit something in the water, especially if

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:35.359
<v Speaker 1>it's something like a fish, not like a whale or

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>something that's like a big easy target to him. But

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 1>if it's like a fish, I can imagine it being

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>sometimes difficult to aim correctly to hit the fish with

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>a single pronged spear. But if you've got more sort

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>of a range of attack points that you can aim

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>roughly perpendicular to the fish, then you might have a

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>better chance of getting it with somewhat approximate aim. Yeah.

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:59.159
<v Speaker 1>I like this hypothesis. This, Uh, this, this sounds reasonable.

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Now for whatever reason, uh, people have been using spears

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to fish with since very ancient times. Their fifteenth century

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 1>b c. Egyptian depictions of it. The Book of Job

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>refers to spear fishing as well. And today you can

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>still you can go online and you can shop for

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>fishing spears. You'll find quite a quite quite a few

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:22.599
<v Speaker 1>different types. You can get your two pronged or bident

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>style spears. You can get four or five pronged spheres.

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 1>You can get your three pronged tridents, which I see

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:32.279
<v Speaker 1>referred to as frog spears. I don't know white white

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>three is particularly good for for frogs versus these other models. Um,

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 1>but I was looking around about it, and I actually

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>looked up a Gizmoto article titled so you want to

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>go spear fishing for the very first time? And the

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>author shares the following quote spear tips. We used both J. B.

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:54.040
<v Speaker 1>L's three pronged barbed paralyzer thirty four dollars and basic

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>single point spear tip with fold out barbed. The paralyzer

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:00.840
<v Speaker 1>reduced the need for pinpoint accuracy, but wasn't quite as

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>good as the single point at retaining fish once they

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:07.719
<v Speaker 1>were speared. The compromises of life, Yes, now, I have

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:12.119
<v Speaker 1>to admit, for the longest, like basically up until this week,

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:15.559
<v Speaker 1>I just always assumed that the tridents that you see

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>held by various gods and beings and in these various

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:23.119
<v Speaker 1>myths and artistic depictions, I just assumed that they were

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>all fishing spears that had been you know, transformed from

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a mundane tool to a divine object. Because we see

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>this kind of movement a lot, right, We see God's

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>wielding things like hammers. Oh yeah, Thor's hammer. It's what's

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>it called mule near? That sounds right, mule dear? Okay,

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>so mule dear um. But you know it, it makes sense, right,

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you have these these these these objects, these tools, and

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>then when we we we create these gods, we give

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 1>them things signify various powers and acts. Um. There's a

0:07:56.360 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>there's one curious case two of the Chinese. He's a ruyee,

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>which is a scepter, a royal scepter, so a symbol

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of divine power, right, you know, you just one with

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>power would brandish it. It identifies that they have the

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>power to command people around. And then you can, if

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>you want, you can point it at various things and say, hey,

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 1>you give me that. Right, That's basically the function of

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>a scepter, except this particular scepter has also clearly been

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>used as a backscratcher. So there there's kind of you see,

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>different theories about this, whether it began as a backscratcher

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 1>or it is just a you know, just a symbol

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 1>of power that was then used as a backscratcher later on.

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 1>So divine emperor's itch too. Yeah. But but it's it's

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:43.959
<v Speaker 1>interesting because which which direction is the movement going. Is

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the object going from mundane, practical object to something that

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:51.439
<v Speaker 1>is merely symbolic, or is the movement going in the

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 1>other direction, something that has no practical purpose. But then

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a practical purpose emerges for it. Well, that's a really

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 1>good question. I would tend to assume that it could

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>go both ways, right, But which which did it go

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>in this case? Because obviously, yeah, practical tools take on divine,

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>divine aspects, especially when they become you know, embedded in

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:16.320
<v Speaker 1>our consciousness, like if we use them a lot, the

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>tool sort of becomes an extension of the body. So

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>in the same way that the body has a counterpart

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>in heaven. Of course, the tool is an extension of

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the body has a counterpart in heaven. I mean, there

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>is no actual Thor's hammer, But if you have a

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>king or an emperor with a divine scepter, you know

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>they've got it around. They might as well use it

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:37.680
<v Speaker 1>for things that they need. A big stick for scratching

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>backs might be one of those things. There might be

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 1>other things too. Now, coming back to tried dent's before

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 1>we proceed with some mythological examples, we should probably touch

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>on the the etymology of the word uh tri dent

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:52.559
<v Speaker 1>comes from the Latin tried dentists or three toothed as

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>opposed to buy dent, which we also have have referred to.

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:58.560
<v Speaker 1>And we'll referred to, which would be a two toothed

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>weapon which has enjoyed avoid arguably less symbolic success that

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you do see it pop up in artistic depictions. Now,

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:09.559
<v Speaker 1>I just thought of a great superhero superhero who fights

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>with the tuning fork, be like a musical superhero. It

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>would be called like the tuner. The tuner, yeah, tuner

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 1>is Yeah, that's essentially a bident. All right, So let's

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:24.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about some some mythic examples of trident use, or

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:27.959
<v Speaker 1>things that at least appear to be tridents and have

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>been treated as tridents by in various interpretations. Robert, please

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>please tell me you're gonna take me to ancient Babylon.

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Of course, we always go to ancient Babylon. It's the

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>best place to go all the best gods. Yeah, well,

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:42.559
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna actually check in with our old friend mar

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Duke here. Um. Mar Duke is often seen with an

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:50.359
<v Speaker 1>odd looking three toothed weapon, uh that is sometimes interpreted

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>as a form of trident. Now, mar Duke was a

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:56.319
<v Speaker 1>Babylonian thunder god who eventually rose up in the pantheon

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to the point that he became considered the prime god

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 1>of Babylon and was apparently described with fifty different names,

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and he's also the slayer of the primordial Tiamat uh.

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>And there's actually a wonderful uh image depicting this where

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>you see this uh, this winged of like lion, dragon

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>like monster and here comes mar Duke with these with

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>one of these weapons in each hand. Why would he

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>have a trident? Why would he have a phishing spear?

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Because there are plenty of other Babylonian gods that are

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>that are associated with the ocean, they would be the

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>ones to have the trident, right. Uh. So I was

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 1>reading about this, I found a book by Derek m

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Elsom titled Lightning, Nature and Culture, which has a lot

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>of info in it about various thunder and lightning gods.

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 1>So if that's if that's your jam, I highly recommend

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:47.439
<v Speaker 1>picking that up. But the author makes a connection between

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the trident weapon of mar Duke and not fishing, but lightning. Lightning,

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>of course, is a traditional weapon of mighty gods, right,

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's the weapon of Zeus, and Zeus is

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 1>sometimes depicted holding three thunderbolts in his hand. Elsa writes

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the images of successive storm gods in Mesopotamia depicted on

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>monuments and cylinder seals reveal developments in the depiction of lightning.

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Lightning was originally shown by two or three wavy or

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:18.959
<v Speaker 1>zigzag lines representing the celestial flames of its flashes or bolts.

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 1>They were later joined together at the bottom by a

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>short stem handle or sometimes a longer staff that the

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 1>storm god would hold and throw. The two pronged bident

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and and three pronged trident thunder weapon should not be

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 1>confused with Poseidon's trident, which usually has barbs on the

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>prongs like a fishing spear. He continues. An alternative development

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and imagery along with the addition of a short stem

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:48.960
<v Speaker 1>or staff to the lightning flashes, was that two or

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>three of the wavy lines were placed together to form

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>a bundle of lightning flashes. The middle of this bundle

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 1>was later modified and molded together to create a hand grip,

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and the single underbolt or karania was formed with two

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:07.680
<v Speaker 1>active ends. So what we're seeing here isn't a double

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 1>bladed trident sword as much as a clutch of three thunderbolts.

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>With the style drifting over the years. You know, I

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:17.679
<v Speaker 1>think I misspoke a minute ago when I said Zeus

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>is holding the three thunderbolts. Zeus is sometimes depicted holding

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>something that looks like a bundle of thunderbolts or something

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>like that. But specifically, what I was thinking of was

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the god a DoD or hadd, another ancient Near Eastern

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>storm god who clutched three thunderbolts exactly like you're talking

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>about it. It also reminds me of another odd weapon

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>slash symbol that one comes across in a Hindu iconography,

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:44.679
<v Speaker 1>and one that has also intrigued me in the past,

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the vadra. One finds the vadra either as an embellishment

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:51.560
<v Speaker 1>on the pommel of a sword or on both ends

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:54.319
<v Speaker 1>of a hilt in the same manner as this. Uh,

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>this this symbol that Marduke is holding, and also points

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:01.440
<v Speaker 1>out that this too is a highly hillis thunderbolt quote

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>shaped like a double ended flower bulb or club. That

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>is a wicked sword. I mean it looks like it

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>looks like a good old sword hat made out of

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>gold fire. Yeah. Yeah. If you if you want to

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 1>see this for yourself, just do an image search for

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>vadra that's v A j r A and then sword

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and you'll see some wonderful examples of this, But there

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>are also straight up tridents in the in the Hindu pantheon, right,

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>that's right. Shiva has a weapon that is known as

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the trishula, which we'll get to in a minute. But

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>before we get to Ta Shiva, we should probably talk

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about Poseidon or Neptune or well, first

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>we should take a break, and then when we come back,

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>we will get into the Greek god of the sea.

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, thank alright, we're back. Sorry to keep Poseidon

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>waiting like that, but but he's patient, right, he's not

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>so patient, right the Sidon, because Sidon holds the grudges,

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't Hey, he does. He's the enemy of Odysseus, that's right. Uh,

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and reaks a lot of havoc u in Odysseus's direction

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>with that try that symbolic divine weapon that he uses

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to just pretty much what make anybody's life miserable that

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>gets in his way? Now what I can't remember. How

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>does Poseidon use his his trident against Odysseus. Well, in general,

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>he uses it to basically just to stir things up,

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>quite literally, to to to stir up storms, devatating, devastating waves,

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to create new sources of water, just general geologic chaos.

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't is that the best use of tool physics?

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 1>If you're using a trident to stir things up, wouldn't

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>it be better if he had a powerful magic spoon

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>or something with a large flat surface to really get

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the waters churning like an or Yeah, it seems like

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 1>a tried. It might be better if you wanted to,

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what, like dissolve some sugar into the water.

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>This is a great question though, because it gets down

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to the heart of why does Poseidon have this weapon?

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Like I've having just grown up seeing images of Poseidon

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 1>my whole life, I just I never really questioned it,

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>like that's the weapon he has? And then when I

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>thought about it, I'm like, Oh, it's a fishing spear, right,

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>That's all there is to it. Well, yeah, he's got

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>of the sea. There's some fish in the sea, I think, right,

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>aren't there fish in the sea? That's what I'm told

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>makes sense now. The mythic origins of the weapon very

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>is one might expect with with myth and mythic traditions. Uh.

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 1>It was perhaps the work of of the master crafts

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>people or giants who were known as the Telconese who

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>also created Chronus's sickle, or it was the gift of

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the cyclothes that's plural for Cyclops. Now, didn't Poseidon have

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>a son who was a cyclops? He did? He did it?

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Gets it gets complicated, um, But this is what Apollodorus

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>had to say in the library, as translated by Fraser Okay.

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 1>And the cyclothes then gave Zeus thunder and lightning and

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>a thunderbolt, and on Pluto they bestowed a helmet, and

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>on Poseidon a trident. Armed with these weapons, the gods

0:16:56.760 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>overcame the Titans shut them up in Tartarus and appointed

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the hundred handers their guards. But they themselves cast lots

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 1>for the sovereignty. And to Zeus was a lot to

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the dominion of the sky, and to Poseidon the dominion

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>of the sea, and to Pluto the dominion in Hades.

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 1>So is it better to get the sea or to

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 1>get Hades. I always thought that, like Poseidon came in

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>second I was kind of my read. But that's that's

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 1>like kind of a land locked way of looking at it, right,

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I was that's me as a child in

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:32.199
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee thinking about about the ocean. But if you were

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a Greek, it might well be the opposite, or it

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 1>might well be the case that that Zeus and Poseidon

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>are on equal footing. Yeah, if you're a seafaring culture,

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>say a lot of your economy is based on trade

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>across the oceans or on fishing. Uh, you've got to

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>think that a god of the sea is much more

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:50.159
<v Speaker 1>consequential than we would normally consider a god of the

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 1>sea living in you know, some kind of landlocked area.

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Like you say, I mean the whims of the sea

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>decide your fortunes and then Hades. I mean certainly that

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:04.400
<v Speaker 1>had is. It's everybody right, there's no whims of Hades.

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Hades is just it's like death and taxes. So maybe

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 1>they all maybe they're these they are truly equal, uh,

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>portions of the cosmos. But this actually ties into some

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 1>of the research I was looking at. HB. Walters wrote

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:20.919
<v Speaker 1>a paper in that was published in the Journal of

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Hellenistic Studies. So we got we got an archaic but

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 1>scholarship here. Yeah, this is this is this one's a

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:30.400
<v Speaker 1>bit old, but but it actually reads really really well.

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 1>It's a very nicely written paper. But he discusses the

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>artistic evolution of the trident and discusses that that, you know,

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:40.959
<v Speaker 1>the writing of the trident predates any artistic depiction that

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>was then known. But if you look at the Iliad,

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:47.680
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing to indicate the shape of the trident. There's

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 1>there's merely the suggestion, based on the word choice, that

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:55.439
<v Speaker 1>it's composed of three parts in some key way. So

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>it could be like three sticks bound in the middle

0:18:57.880 --> 0:18:59.640
<v Speaker 1>or something, I guess. I mean, if it's if you're

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:03.160
<v Speaker 1>just looking at the word and there's some room for interpretation,

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>they're interesting. So Walters looked at various early artistic examples

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and he traced an interesting evolution for the depiction of tridents. Uh,

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 1>not from like a fishing spear to more elaborate uh,

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, three pronged weapons or symbols, but from a

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:22.119
<v Speaker 1>lotus bud to this barbed, three pronged spear that we

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:24.680
<v Speaker 1>associate with with the side and the neptin. Now, what's

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the significance of the lotus bud? Well, this is interesting.

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>This gets back to what was something we're talking about earlier.

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>The trident. The proper trident may not appear in nature,

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 1>but something like a lotus bud does, and has this

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>trifold design and instantly speaks to us with various you know,

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 1>symbology related to uh to you know, units of three.

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to come back to the significance of that

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:49.880
<v Speaker 1>symbology in a little bit. This lotus sceptor is apparently

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty common in Greek art and is typically held by

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a god or goddess, and Zeus himself is seen in

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>in various depictions with a with a very similar scepter.

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 1>So the idea is that this lotus bud scepter eventually

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 1>somehow morphed into the three pronged weapon. Yes, the idea

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:11.479
<v Speaker 1>here is that the lotus staff was the emblem of Zeus,

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:15.159
<v Speaker 1>and that there might have been just less distinction between

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:18.439
<v Speaker 1>Zeus and Poseidon among early Greeks, and the Poseidon might

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:21.400
<v Speaker 1>have been nothing short of Zeus's marine form. I've read

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:24.399
<v Speaker 1>the exact same thing, that Poseidon was in some sense

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the Zeus of the sea. Yeah, and uh, and so

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:30.680
<v Speaker 1>they simply had the same scepter. But then as time

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>goes by, as we as we have different artistic depictions

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a roll one after the other. You see this, uh,

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 1>this evolution, you see this uh, this distinction made and

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>this this thing. This scepter, the symbol that Poseidon is

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>holding gradually comes to resemble a phishing spear rather than

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the lotus scepter of Zeus. Oh. If this is a

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>correct explanation, this is fantastic because it matches up some

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:56.879
<v Speaker 1>stuff we've talked about on the show before that I

0:20:56.920 --> 0:21:00.040
<v Speaker 1>always really like where there there's a way of interpreting

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:05.880
<v Speaker 1>an artistic tradition as deriving from a misunderstanding of previous art.

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 1>One explanation for the origin of the unicorn tradition is

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 1>that possibly there were ancient depictions on say, uh, cylinder

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:18.440
<v Speaker 1>seals or something like that, of natural animals naturally occurring

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>two horned animals like the Arx or the ibex, but

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 1>they're depicted in profile, so it looks like they've only

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>got one horn shooting up out of their head because

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the horns are lined up with each other as the

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>animals in profile. And so people saw that misunderstood it,

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>thought that there was this one horned animal out there,

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and started the unicorn tradition. We don't know that's what happened,

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>but that's highly possible. Uh, And so maybe what's going

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 1>on here is a similar like misinterpretation of previous generations

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:50.919
<v Speaker 1>of artists depicting a god holding something. Yeah, it reminds

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 1>me of the line from member to echo about books

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 1>speaking to other books. But of course art works of

0:21:56.160 --> 0:22:00.679
<v Speaker 1>art speak to other works of art. Yeah, so that's correct.

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>That's really interesting, so Walter also. Walters also references the

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 1>work of John O'Neill, who argued that the Hindu through

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>shula which we're about to talk about, may have also

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 1>begun as a lotus, and the same origin might might

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 1>be placed on the floor de les as well, this

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>of course being the the symbol of what the New

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:23.119
<v Speaker 1>Orleans saints. I think that's what it is. Let the

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>good times are all but but he let the good

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>trident are all but but but. Walters doesn't completely agree

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 1>with O'Neill on this. He said, quote with these theories,

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:36.639
<v Speaker 1>I am not altogether inclined to agree, as explanation by

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>means of symbolism is always, though fascinating, a dangerous course

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 1>to pursue. Besides, my point is this that the lotus,

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 1>scepter and trident are not parallel forms, but that the

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 1>one grew out of the other, and that since the

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 1>lotus sceptor as an attribute of Poseidon is only found

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:55.640
<v Speaker 1>in these examples of early date, whereas the trident form

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>belongs to all periods, the lotus must be the earlier

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>form from which the other has been evolved by a

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:05.239
<v Speaker 1>process of differentiation. And he stressed that he was far

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>from certain on the matter. So he is saying his

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 1>opinion is they're not just parallels, but that the low

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:16.160
<v Speaker 1>des scepter came first and that turned into the trident. Correct, yes, now.

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Writer and classicist Robert Graves also had something to say

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 1>about this in his work Greek Myths uh the Greek

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Myths Pardon. He wrote, Poseidon's trident and zeus thunderbolt were

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 1>originally the same weapon weapon the sacred lab rates or

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>double acts, but distinguished from other when Poseidon became god

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:36.679
<v Speaker 1>of the Sea and Zeus claimed the right of the thunderbolt.

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 1>So this is the kind of acts you'd imagine like

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:41.120
<v Speaker 1>an orc holding or I don't know, maybe a dwarf too,

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:43.920
<v Speaker 1>in your fantasy that it's the acts with the blade

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:48.439
<v Speaker 1>on both sides. So Graves seem to be presenting like

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 1>a different type of evolution from a from a different

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of primordial symbol. But still he's talking about the

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 1>same sort of uh evolution of form Alright, so this

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>brings us back to Shiva. In Hindu traditions, Shiva is

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 1>is the destroyer of evil and also also the transformer,

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 1>not the robot kind, but a transformer of things and

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 1>states of affairs. Correct, yes, so so Shiva is one

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 1>of the Trimurty, the three gods of the cosmic lifespan

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Brahma is the creator, Vishnu is the sustainer, and Shiva

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 1>is the destroyer of worlds now. Shiva is often seen

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to brandish this trishula, which means three toothed or three

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>pronged uh and it. It is definitely a weapon as

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:36.879
<v Speaker 1>well as a symbol of power and uh. It's again

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 1>also attributed to possible lightning or lotus bud origins, and

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:43.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of symbolism wrapped in it to empire

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 1>and transcendental reality, the power of the tri murdy and

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:51.919
<v Speaker 1>the three shaktas of will, action and wisdom. And you

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 1>also see other Hindu deities that seemed to brandish such

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 1>a weapon, such as the goddess Durga who slays a

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 1>demon with it, as well as Parvati, the goddess of love,

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 1>fertility and devotion. There's even this origin story for Ganesha,

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the elephant headed Remover of Obstacles, in which Parvati creates

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a child out of tumoric paste and brings it to

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>life to guard her house while she's bathing. And but

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:19.880
<v Speaker 1>then this boy that she creates tries to start stop Shiva.

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Upon Shiva's arrival, and enraged, Shiva beheads the boy with

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the trishula, and angered by this, uh, Parvati demands that

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Shiva restore the boy, and he does so by placing

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 1>an elephant's head upon the body. WHOA, wait, how do

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you seems like beheading with a trishula would be difficult. Well,

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 1>it's not like a bladed In some depictions, though, the

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 1>outer the outer barbs take on a blade like appearance,

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of that Flora Lee's kind of appearance. So that's

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 1>that's the weird thing about the trident is that you

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 1>have your sort of basic pitchfork designs, but then sometimes

0:25:56.800 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 1>they're barbs, sometimes they're not barbs. Sometimes all three barbs

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 1>are the same length. Sometimes the ones in the outside

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>are longer, sometimes the central ones longer. Sometimes the ones

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:09.920
<v Speaker 1>on the outside have have kind of like outer blades

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to them. I can see that if the outside edges

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 1>of the outer barbs are sharp, it's sort of like

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 1>a cross between a spear and an ax. So I

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:19.440
<v Speaker 1>guess it's a polarm, you know, general pull on, Yeah,

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:20.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is this is a This is a

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 1>great point. Yeah. You see these trident like forms with

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>pole arms because range and leverage make them good weapons

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>to use against mounted soldiers, as well as the ease

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 1>of their construction and adaptability from farm tools. So if

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:37.399
<v Speaker 1>you had this, um, this, this three pronged blade, and

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:38.880
<v Speaker 1>you have blades in the edge, you can you can

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>you can really wave it back and forth as need be,

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 1>as well as stab with it. And the length of

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>it gives it not only reach but also power because

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>it's got a lot of weight, so you can essentially

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 1>just sort of drop it on your enemy. Yeah. Now

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 1>here's the question I had when I was looking into

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:55.200
<v Speaker 1>all this. It just suddenly dawned on me. I'm reading

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>about Poseidon and Neptune and Shiva, but there is another

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty popular of their figure, and at least more modern

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Western traditions. Uh, and that is Satan the devil who

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>has a pitchfork, Yes, which is you know, a pitchfork

0:27:10.800 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 1>being something you used to to move hay around. But

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 1>you look at it, it's clearly a trident. It is.

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes there may be I guess more or fewer prongs, um,

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:24.240
<v Speaker 1>depending on who's illustrating the devil or devil's but very

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 1>often you see a three pronged spear, you see a trident.

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:30.959
<v Speaker 1>Where did the devil get a trident? That is a

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 1>good question. I wondered about that because I am quite

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 1>sure the Bible does not say the devil has a pitchfork. Yeah,

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember any mention of a pitchfork. So as

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:45.119
<v Speaker 1>always I I love to get into some history of

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:48.399
<v Speaker 1>the devil um. So one answer I came across was

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:51.919
<v Speaker 1>in an academic work on the development of the idea

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:54.440
<v Speaker 1>of the Christian devil concept, and it was a book

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>called Devil, A Mask Without a Face by Luther Link,

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 1>published by the Universe Dave Chicago Press in two thousand four.

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I think I want to read this whole book because

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:06.199
<v Speaker 1>it was really interesting the part I read, and the

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 1>part I read about the trident was just early on,

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 1>so it seems like he gets into a lot of

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>interesting ideas. But Link writes about the how the idea

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of the devil that we have today like the devil

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you see in cartoons, the w C in popular representations.

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:25.440
<v Speaker 1>It's got three major influences. One of them is early

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:28.120
<v Speaker 1>readings of the New Testament. That's the most straightforward one,

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:32.199
<v Speaker 1>because though there is a Satan in the Hebrew Bible,

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 1>it is not really the same character that you see represented,

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 1>say in the Christian literature. For example, in the Book

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of Job, the Satan character that appears is does not

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:46.600
<v Speaker 1>seem to be like an evil adversary of God, but

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 1>seems to be more sort of a prosecutor figure who

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>is skeptical of the virtues of the created humankind and

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 1>wants to sort of like test our metal and and

0:28:57.320 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 1>expose us as frauds before our creator. He's he was,

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>He's just part of the court doing his job, which

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 1>is to bring up the counter argument to the ruler.

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 1>He's a nark. He's narking on humanity. Uh So, so

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of the Satan character and Joe. But then

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 1>later on you see this development in the Christian tradition

0:29:14.520 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 1>where where Satan takes on aspects of being an adversary

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 1>of God himself. Satan is more this evil figure representing Uh,

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>there's still some sort of prosecutor type elements that the

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>devil plays in the New Testament. For example in the

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Gospels when when Satan tempts Christ in the wilderness. Right.

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 1>So there again you see sort of like this prosecutor mindset.

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 1>It wants to show how weak you are, it wants

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 1>to make you fail. But then also there there's just

0:29:43.760 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 1>this devil as a personification of sin or evil, and

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 1>this definitely comes through and works like revelation. But then again,

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 1>there is a whole lot that people believe about the

0:29:53.000 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 1>devil that has nothing to do with the Bible. It's

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 1>not in the Bible at all. It comes from things

0:29:57.320 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 1>like Link points out the rebel angel character created by

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 1>John Milton in Paradise Lost and continued in Romantic literature

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 1>traditions and with poets like Blake and Badelaire, that this

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:13.719
<v Speaker 1>rebel angel character is not really a feature of the Bible.

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>It's more a feature of Milton and these other poets.

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 1>And then of course you've got the images created and

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 1>associated with the notion of Satanic cults and black Sabbats. Yeah,

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and this is where you see all this uh, this

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 1>pagan b steel imagery of of Satan as this uh this,

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 1>this shaggy uh you know, lord of Hell that engages

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 1>in all of these uh these crude acts with various

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 1>uh witches. Yeah, exactly, And we'll get more into where

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 1>those depictions come from in a minute. But with the

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 1>exception link says of one ninth century old Saxon manuscript,

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 1>all known literary descriptions of Satan were pretty closely based

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 1>on the text of the New Testament until about fifteen

0:30:56.480 --> 0:31:00.240
<v Speaker 1>eighty nine when Christopher Marlowe wrote Dr Faustus, And of

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 1>course that was a play he you know, early modern

0:31:02.800 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>play based on the faust legend, the idea of a

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 1>an alchemist or a secret of knowledge, someone who is

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 1>egotistical and wants to wants more power than he really

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 1>has coming to him, and does a deal with the

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 1>devil to get that power, but then of course realizes

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 1>only too late that the deal you make with the

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 1>devil is always a bad deal. And this is such

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>a staple of our of our Satanic literature. I guess

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you would say in storytelling that it we often we

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 1>often forget that it wasn't always baked into the pie, right,

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 1>But outside of literature. Now that that's when he was

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:38.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about literature outside of literature. In the more popular folklore,

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the image of the devil was informed by fantasies about heretics,

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and which is first appearing around the twelfth century and

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 1>developing more as time went on. And he says images

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 1>of the devil are really scarce in early Christian history,

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 1>that we have images of Satan as early as the

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:59.200
<v Speaker 1>ninth century, It really wasn't until about the thirteen hundreds

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 1>that the images of Satan took on the visual characteristics

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 1>we now associate with Satan and link rights. Indeed, mirroring

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 1>what we were talking about earlier, that the image of

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the devil's pronged weapon or pitchfork is almost definitely derived

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:17.640
<v Speaker 1>from the trident of Poseidon, so directly from this imagery

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:21.680
<v Speaker 1>of the gods of classical antiquity, which itself was probably

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 1>derived from these three bolts of lightning shown in the

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 1>grip of the ancient Babylonian storm god a DoD or Haddad,

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 1>which I mentioned earlier, and so Hadad. If you look

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 1>up pictures of him, there there will be these carvings,

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and he'll be in profile, walking kind of like an

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Egyptian hieroglyphic character walking or something like that, and a

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 1>DoD will have his hand out and he'll be holding

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:44.800
<v Speaker 1>what looks like lightning bolts, but he'll be clutching them

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:48.800
<v Speaker 1>like they're stalks of wheat, which is interesting, Yeah, like

0:32:48.840 --> 0:32:51.959
<v Speaker 1>a harvest of lightning. But so you might be wondering, now,

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, why would the god Poseidon's weapons show

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:58.400
<v Speaker 1>up in the hands of the Christian devil. That doesn't

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 1>make any sense. But this is actually part of a

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 1>very common motif in Christian history, not just Christian history,

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 1>but especially in Christian history, of adapting characteristics of another

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 1>person's religion or another religions god to serve as characteristics

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 1>of your religions, devils and demons, and so. One example

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 1>is that many of the names of the Christian and

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Jewish demons are taken from names of gods of other

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 1>religions of the ancient Near East. For example, one of

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 1>our favorites baelz Abub or bails Able, that's derived from

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the name of a Philistine god. See how Beelzebub contains

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Baal meaning lord, which was, you know, a god of

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the ancient Near East. Another one Dagon was a Mesopotamian god,

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:44.800
<v Speaker 1>later believed to be a Christian demon, and then became

0:33:44.800 --> 0:33:49.480
<v Speaker 1>part of the Lovecraftian mythost. Of course, the much reviled

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 1>evil demon Malok is believed to be a god of

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 1>some of the Canaanites, that the god of a child,

0:33:56.480 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 1>sacrifice and destruction, not to be confused with Mammon, who

0:34:00.200 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 1>represents just Greek right forever stooped over looking looking for

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 1>gold embedded in the roads of heaven. But yeah, so,

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 1>so you've got those kind of things. And then I

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:14.359
<v Speaker 1>found another interesting entry in a more encyclopedic work called

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the Classical Tradition from Harvard University Press, in they're right

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 1>that some medieval Christian artists relied on traditional representations of

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:26.239
<v Speaker 1>the Greek god Pan as a source for images of

0:34:26.239 --> 0:34:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the devil. So yet again taking gods from another religion

0:34:29.160 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 1>making them your devil, and so Pan being a god

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:36.520
<v Speaker 1>of shepherd's hunters, the wilderness, the rural areas had these

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:40.399
<v Speaker 1>goat like qualities of horns and hoofs, and its part

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of the more general tradition of satyr's and sylvans and fawns.

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:47.759
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like this idea of human religion, having to

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 1>work with like a prop closet of existing motifs, and

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:53.319
<v Speaker 1>they're like, we have this character, dress him up. Well,

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 1>what do we got? What we got this goat costume

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:58.400
<v Speaker 1>from Pan. Oh, yeah, we have this uh this tride

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:00.879
<v Speaker 1>end here that would along to the side. Uh roll

0:35:00.960 --> 0:35:03.800
<v Speaker 1>those out. Let's let's let's let's get those on a character. Yeah,

0:35:03.800 --> 0:35:06.839
<v Speaker 1>it's totally true. It's like fifties monster movies seeing if

0:35:06.880 --> 0:35:10.000
<v Speaker 1>they can like rework a costume or a prop from

0:35:10.200 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 1>last week's shoot into a new prop for this movie. Yeah,

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 1>what do we have. We have a guerrilla costume in

0:35:14.719 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a robot head. Let's make it work. Robot monster. Here

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:20.799
<v Speaker 1>you go. So anyway, the authors of this jury say

0:35:20.880 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 1>that the devil's horns, hoofs ears, tail, hairy lower body,

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:28.239
<v Speaker 1>all of these aspects are derived from the pan and

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the fawn tradition of classical antiquity. And people notice this.

0:35:32.880 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 1>The romantic poet Percy Shelley, who wrote Ozzymandias, look on

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 1>my works, you mighty in despair, he thought it was

0:35:38.480 --> 0:35:41.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty weird that people would give the attributes of fawns

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to the devil, as he found fawns quote quite poetical personages.

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 1>But the author's right that another major way the depiction

0:35:51.080 --> 0:35:53.799
<v Speaker 1>of the devil was influenced by classical art is the

0:35:53.840 --> 0:35:59.360
<v Speaker 1>devil's nakedness reflecting the naked heroes of classical art, like Hercules,

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and that most Christian medieval art tried to avoid nudity

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:05.760
<v Speaker 1>when possible, it would cover people up, but the devil

0:36:05.920 --> 0:36:09.359
<v Speaker 1>was often depicted as less covered, as more naked, more

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 1>like one of these heroes of ancient Greece. Huh yeah,

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean it also reminds me of these various paintings

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 1>of Poseidon or Poseidon, or just depictions of Poside where

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Poseidon is nude or nearly nude. Uh. Just this, you know,

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:25.719
<v Speaker 1>bearded man in the water with the trident. Yeah, exactly.

0:36:25.840 --> 0:36:30.240
<v Speaker 1>So granting the trident of Poseidon to the devil seems

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:33.279
<v Speaker 1>to be part of a larger medieval Christian project of

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:37.640
<v Speaker 1>associating Satan with the gods and the style of classical

0:36:37.719 --> 0:36:41.279
<v Speaker 1>antiquity of ancient Mesopotamia and of Greece and Rome. And

0:36:41.320 --> 0:36:43.759
<v Speaker 1>so I think that's pretty persuasive. But link makes it

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:46.799
<v Speaker 1>clear that there are no literary sources that will tell

0:36:46.920 --> 0:36:49.279
<v Speaker 1>us where Satan got his trident. Like you can't go

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:51.879
<v Speaker 1>into the texts of the time where they will say, hey,

0:36:51.920 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm putting a trident in Satan's hands because I want

0:36:55.200 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to make this comparison to Poseidon. It's all just inference

0:36:58.600 --> 0:37:01.400
<v Speaker 1>we have to make through the artistic traditions. Suddenly he

0:37:01.480 --> 0:37:03.560
<v Speaker 1>just has a trident in the same way that these

0:37:03.800 --> 0:37:06.880
<v Speaker 1>these depictions of the actual trident of Poseidon like, suddenly

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:08.839
<v Speaker 1>it looks a little more like a fork and a

0:37:08.840 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 1>little less like lightning bolts or a lotus, depending on

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:16.799
<v Speaker 1>which interpretation one relies on. Right, but Link says, you know,

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the devil and his demons are really first shown carrying trident,

0:37:20.320 --> 0:37:23.520
<v Speaker 1>says I mentioned earlier in some ninth century art. And

0:37:23.560 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 1>one good example of this I've got a picture of

0:37:25.680 --> 0:37:27.839
<v Speaker 1>for us here in the notes Robert. It's from the

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Utrecht Psalter, which is a widely recognized work of medieval art.

0:37:31.680 --> 0:37:35.239
<v Speaker 1>It's a collection of the psalms from the Bible illustrated

0:37:35.239 --> 0:37:38.600
<v Speaker 1>with pen and ink drawings, which are called illuminations. And

0:37:38.880 --> 0:37:41.120
<v Speaker 1>so I've got a drawing here that a company's Psalm

0:37:41.239 --> 0:37:44.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight. Of course, Psalm thirty eight, like a lot

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:45.719
<v Speaker 1>of the Psalms has a lot of woe is Me

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:48.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff in it, so it says, Oh Lord, rebuke me,

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 1>not in thy wrath, neither chasen me in thy hot displeasure,

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:55.240
<v Speaker 1>for thine arrows stick fast in me, and thy hand

0:37:55.360 --> 0:37:57.759
<v Speaker 1>presseth me sore. Who you didn't even get to the

0:37:57.760 --> 0:38:00.400
<v Speaker 1>stinking wounds. Oh no, do it, Robert right, I'm just

0:38:00.400 --> 0:38:03.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna cut to that part. My wound stink and are

0:38:03.239 --> 0:38:06.799
<v Speaker 1>corrupt because of my foolishness. So you know there's that

0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:09.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a T shirt design. I mean, a lot of

0:38:09.080 --> 0:38:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the psalms take this form. You know, it's like my

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 1>wound stink. Everything's bad, but I can rely on the

0:38:14.200 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Lord and they will feature a call for mercy. So

0:38:17.200 --> 0:38:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the illumination of Psalm thirty eight here shows the Psalmist

0:38:19.920 --> 0:38:22.759
<v Speaker 1>surrounded by three devils that are closing in on him.

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:26.000
<v Speaker 1>One is counting with his fingers, one of the devils

0:38:26.040 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 1>has a measuring tape that's kind of creepy, and the

0:38:29.160 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 1>third has a trident. He's just sort of holding this.

0:38:32.520 --> 0:38:34.839
<v Speaker 1>It's got the prongs coming out of the side. It's

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:38.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of right angles, and it looks very pointy and unpleasant. Yeah,

0:38:38.120 --> 0:38:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the prongs are really spread out there. I think you'd

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:41.919
<v Speaker 1>have to you have to have a really wide set

0:38:41.920 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of buttocks to stab with that. I mean, it emphasizes

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 1>what what you're saying, emphasizes that. A lot of times

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:51.040
<v Speaker 1>when you see the devil with the pitchfork, now it's cute,

0:38:51.080 --> 0:38:55.120
<v Speaker 1>it's in cartoons because is for poking your button, you know,

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:58.440
<v Speaker 1>poking you with a little like ow ow ow. Clearly,

0:38:58.680 --> 0:39:01.560
<v Speaker 1>these ancient depictions are are supposed to be more graphic

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 1>and horrifically violent in in their suggestion because after the

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:09.480
<v Speaker 1>ninth century, actually, Link writes that the trident almost completely

0:39:09.560 --> 0:39:14.440
<v Speaker 1>disappears from representations of Satan until the Renaissance, when it

0:39:14.480 --> 0:39:16.759
<v Speaker 1>shows up again in the devil's hands in the art

0:39:16.760 --> 0:39:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of the time. And so what happened in between the like,

0:39:19.560 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 1>how come in the ninth century eight you've got devils

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 1>with tridents? H you didn't have it before that? You've

0:39:25.080 --> 0:39:27.800
<v Speaker 1>got it. Then then it pretty much goes away throughout

0:39:27.800 --> 0:39:30.279
<v Speaker 1>most of the medieval period, and then it comes back

0:39:30.280 --> 0:39:33.680
<v Speaker 1>again in the Renaissance. Link writes that during this medieval

0:39:33.719 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 1>period where you don't see much trident, the devil is

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:39.200
<v Speaker 1>more often depicted when he's holding a tool or a weapon.

0:39:39.239 --> 0:39:42.480
<v Speaker 1>It seems to be a grapnell, which is a forked hook.

0:39:43.280 --> 0:39:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Not very nice. So why, yeah, why this shift? It's

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:48.799
<v Speaker 1>hard to be certain, but Links suggests there are a

0:39:48.800 --> 0:39:51.719
<v Speaker 1>couple of answers. One of them is the relative influence

0:39:51.760 --> 0:39:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of classical art, which would have depicted Poseidon or Neptune

0:39:55.680 --> 0:39:58.640
<v Speaker 1>with a trident. And so Link writes that classical art

0:39:58.680 --> 0:40:01.200
<v Speaker 1>fell out of favor with p bowl uh, and people

0:40:01.239 --> 0:40:04.879
<v Speaker 1>mostly lost access to it during the Medieval period. Then

0:40:04.920 --> 0:40:08.879
<v Speaker 1>interest in classical art reignited in the Renaissance. Thus the

0:40:08.920 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Poseidon sea god Neptune tried and came back and was

0:40:12.040 --> 0:40:14.920
<v Speaker 1>put into Satan's hands again when people started paying attention

0:40:14.920 --> 0:40:18.280
<v Speaker 1>to classical art again. Uh. And another thing is more practical.

0:40:18.480 --> 0:40:20.960
<v Speaker 1>During the medieval period in Europe, the use of the

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:25.160
<v Speaker 1>grapnel was common for torturing criminals and heretics, and it

0:40:25.200 --> 0:40:28.160
<v Speaker 1>became more widespread. And so if the goal of the

0:40:28.200 --> 0:40:31.120
<v Speaker 1>devil is to punish in torture sinners, and this was

0:40:31.280 --> 0:40:33.760
<v Speaker 1>very often how the devil was represented in the Middle Ages,

0:40:34.040 --> 0:40:37.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of as God's accomplice in your punishment, uh, it

0:40:37.520 --> 0:40:39.560
<v Speaker 1>makes sense that he would he would have access to

0:40:39.600 --> 0:40:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the weapons and torture devices that people were more familiar

0:40:43.200 --> 0:40:45.680
<v Speaker 1>with at the time. Yeah, that does. It makes sense

0:40:45.719 --> 0:40:48.160
<v Speaker 1>that he would use an instrument of torture rather than

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 1>something that resembles either an implement for fishing or moving

0:40:52.239 --> 0:40:56.480
<v Speaker 1>hay around or a polearm weapon that would often be

0:40:56.600 --> 0:40:59.279
<v Speaker 1>used as a way of rising up against authority. No,

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Satan is kind of a part of the cosmic authority

0:41:03.200 --> 0:41:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that is that is bearing down on you. Right, Yeah, exactly.

0:41:06.719 --> 0:41:08.799
<v Speaker 1>But I do want to point out at the end

0:41:08.880 --> 0:41:12.360
<v Speaker 1>here this discontinuity between the weapons or implements is actually

0:41:12.400 --> 0:41:16.279
<v Speaker 1>a pretty minor discrepancy compared to the huge differences in

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:19.719
<v Speaker 1>the way the Devil overall is described and depicted, Like,

0:41:19.760 --> 0:41:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the Devil is both a raging, hideous monster with animal

0:41:23.480 --> 0:41:27.440
<v Speaker 1>qualities and at the same time I subtle, attractive, persuasive tempter.

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:29.880
<v Speaker 1>And this is actually where links the title of his

0:41:29.920 --> 0:41:32.279
<v Speaker 1>book comes from, the mask without a face, that there's

0:41:32.320 --> 0:41:36.239
<v Speaker 1>sort of this infinitely elastic quality to the character of

0:41:36.280 --> 0:41:38.399
<v Speaker 1>the devil. All right, on that note, we're gonna take

0:41:38.400 --> 0:41:41.680
<v Speaker 1>one more break, but we'll be right back with more trident.

0:41:42.280 --> 0:41:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Thank thank thank Alright, we're back. So just a few

0:41:46.239 --> 0:41:50.200
<v Speaker 1>other mythical examples. I want to roll through here mythical

0:41:50.320 --> 0:41:54.200
<v Speaker 1>religious examples. Uh. You have Dallas trident bells, which are

0:41:54.239 --> 0:41:57.960
<v Speaker 1>bells with a decorative trident like motif on top that

0:41:58.000 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 1>represents the three divine teachers. And then you have this

0:42:01.719 --> 0:42:05.000
<v Speaker 1>is they found this really interesting. You have offering forks

0:42:05.040 --> 0:42:09.160
<v Speaker 1>in ancient Judaism and these are actually mentioned in First

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Samuel chapter two. Uh. So this is a little bit

0:42:12.760 --> 0:42:15.120
<v Speaker 1>just one more Bible reading here. This is from the

0:42:15.200 --> 0:42:18.640
<v Speaker 1>King James version, and the priest's custom with the people

0:42:18.920 --> 0:42:22.760
<v Speaker 1>was that when any man offered sacrifice, the priest's servant

0:42:22.840 --> 0:42:26.280
<v Speaker 1>came while the flesh was in seething with a flesh

0:42:26.280 --> 0:42:29.680
<v Speaker 1>hook of three teeth in his hand, and he struck

0:42:29.719 --> 0:42:32.800
<v Speaker 1>it into the pan or kettle or cauldron or pot.

0:42:33.200 --> 0:42:35.959
<v Speaker 1>All that the flesh hook brought up the priest took

0:42:36.000 --> 0:42:39.880
<v Speaker 1>for himself. So they did in shiloh unto all the

0:42:40.000 --> 0:42:43.479
<v Speaker 1>israel Lights that came thither. I did not remember that part,

0:42:43.640 --> 0:42:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah I don't. Yeah, you never remember, like the the

0:42:46.760 --> 0:42:50.560
<v Speaker 1>meat pot skewering scene from from Second Samuel. But there

0:42:50.600 --> 0:42:54.160
<v Speaker 1>you have it. You have a three toothed uh flesh

0:42:54.160 --> 0:42:56.520
<v Speaker 1>hook there, but not in the hands of the devil. No,

0:42:56.840 --> 0:43:01.040
<v Speaker 1>just in the hands of people working officially or the priests.

0:43:01.040 --> 0:43:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Now another trident that came up for us, Uh, is

0:43:05.080 --> 0:43:08.319
<v Speaker 1>a bit more mysterious, might be fittingly mysterious, because in

0:43:08.360 --> 0:43:11.200
<v Speaker 1>all of this there's this quest to figure you know,

0:43:11.360 --> 0:43:13.319
<v Speaker 1>figure out like what is the trident and what does

0:43:13.360 --> 0:43:15.920
<v Speaker 1>it represent? What is it stem for? And you you

0:43:16.040 --> 0:43:19.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of when you try and grasp it, it seeps

0:43:19.840 --> 0:43:23.360
<v Speaker 1>through your your fingers. Uh, tell us Joe about the

0:43:23.400 --> 0:43:27.479
<v Speaker 1>trident of Paracelsus. All right, we're about to venture into

0:43:27.520 --> 0:43:30.400
<v Speaker 1>some sketchy territory. So there is a lot of weird

0:43:30.520 --> 0:43:33.560
<v Speaker 1>looking work out there you can find about this supposedly

0:43:33.719 --> 0:43:38.840
<v Speaker 1>magical instrument known as the trident of Paracelsus. Paracelsus was,

0:43:38.880 --> 0:43:44.400
<v Speaker 1>of course the by name of Philippus Aureolus Theophrastus bombast

0:43:44.520 --> 0:43:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Us von Hohenheim, a sixteenth century Germans with Renaissance physician

0:43:49.239 --> 0:43:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and alchemist, and Paracelsus is. He's an interesting kind of

0:43:53.360 --> 0:43:56.080
<v Speaker 1>dual figure in history. On one hand, he was a

0:43:56.120 --> 0:43:59.640
<v Speaker 1>physician and did make some real medical observations and real

0:43:59.719 --> 0:44:02.480
<v Speaker 1>con ttributions to medical science, such as writing a clinical

0:44:02.560 --> 0:44:06.279
<v Speaker 1>description of the symptoms of syphilis. But he was also

0:44:06.320 --> 0:44:09.040
<v Speaker 1>an alchemist. He wanted to turn lead into gold, and

0:44:09.200 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 1>he was a prolific fount of ideas that would later

0:44:12.760 --> 0:44:16.400
<v Speaker 1>be the basis or similar to the basis for a

0:44:16.480 --> 0:44:19.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of quack medicine in the centuries to come. Just

0:44:19.280 --> 0:44:22.400
<v Speaker 1>one example, he wrote that in small enough doses quote

0:44:22.560 --> 0:44:26.800
<v Speaker 1>similia similibus curantur or what makes a man ill also

0:44:26.920 --> 0:44:29.399
<v Speaker 1>cures him, which is, of course, if you know anything

0:44:29.400 --> 0:44:32.480
<v Speaker 1>about quack medicine um. He of course, he wasn't the

0:44:32.520 --> 0:44:34.800
<v Speaker 1>only physician in history to suggest this, but if you

0:44:34.880 --> 0:44:37.719
<v Speaker 1>know anything about quack medicine, this helped contribute to the

0:44:37.760 --> 0:44:41.080
<v Speaker 1>strain of thinking that gives us the modern scourge of homeopathy,

0:44:41.160 --> 0:44:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the idea that like cures like, and that by taking

0:44:44.280 --> 0:44:49.320
<v Speaker 1>super deluded versions of a drug that would give you

0:44:49.480 --> 0:44:52.960
<v Speaker 1>some kind of symptom, you can cure that symptom. Homeopathy

0:44:53.080 --> 0:44:55.200
<v Speaker 1>is not a part of modern medical science. It is

0:44:55.239 --> 0:44:58.480
<v Speaker 1>not science based medicine and uh and it can actually

0:44:58.520 --> 0:45:01.160
<v Speaker 1>be really dangerous if people, in thinking that they get

0:45:01.200 --> 0:45:04.120
<v Speaker 1>tricked into some kind of homeopathy cure scheme and use

0:45:04.239 --> 0:45:07.279
<v Speaker 1>that instead of more proven methods. But as far as

0:45:07.360 --> 0:45:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the trident goes uh. The provenance of this concept was

0:45:10.840 --> 0:45:13.480
<v Speaker 1>difficult for me to figure out, but I think it

0:45:13.640 --> 0:45:18.439
<v Speaker 1>is likely not actually from Paracelsis. So several sources point

0:45:18.520 --> 0:45:22.080
<v Speaker 1>to the origin of this idea in the Archidoxies Magica

0:45:22.280 --> 0:45:25.279
<v Speaker 1>or the Supreme Mysteries of Nature, which is an early

0:45:25.360 --> 0:45:29.440
<v Speaker 1>modern grimoire about alchemy and the creation of magical talisman's.

0:45:29.800 --> 0:45:34.800
<v Speaker 1>It's attributed to Paracelsis, probably falsely, possibly by another author

0:45:34.960 --> 0:45:38.640
<v Speaker 1>or later editor of the works of Paracelsus. And I've

0:45:38.680 --> 0:45:42.480
<v Speaker 1>been scouring a seventeenth century English translation of this volume

0:45:42.520 --> 0:45:45.840
<v Speaker 1>in a slow loading PDF from the Library of Congress,

0:45:46.200 --> 0:45:48.880
<v Speaker 1>but I cannot find the reference to the trident in

0:45:48.960 --> 0:45:51.640
<v Speaker 1>this piece. Maybe it's in there, but if it is,

0:45:51.760 --> 0:45:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I I just went right over it and was never

0:45:53.760 --> 0:45:56.640
<v Speaker 1>able to find this thing. But I'm frustrated because I

0:45:56.719 --> 0:45:58.719
<v Speaker 1>spent forever trying to get these pages to load, and

0:45:58.800 --> 0:46:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I can't find the darn trident in there. But so

0:46:02.560 --> 0:46:06.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's in there. Supposedly, according to later writers, it

0:46:06.640 --> 0:46:10.120
<v Speaker 1>is a magic three pronged silver lemon used to cure

0:46:10.200 --> 0:46:14.200
<v Speaker 1>impotence and diseases of all of the generative organs, of course,

0:46:14.280 --> 0:46:17.279
<v Speaker 1>meaning generative organs are the genitals. I don't know if

0:46:17.280 --> 0:46:20.839
<v Speaker 1>I want to trident near my genitals, to be honest, Well,

0:46:20.880 --> 0:46:23.279
<v Speaker 1>it's complicated how you're supposed to use it. According to

0:46:23.360 --> 0:46:25.759
<v Speaker 1>these later sources, I'm not sure if it needs to

0:46:26.040 --> 0:46:28.080
<v Speaker 1>to be near your genitals. It might, it might not.

0:46:29.200 --> 0:46:34.000
<v Speaker 1>The instructions unclear. But the French magician and occult writer

0:46:34.200 --> 0:46:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Eliphas Levy, who lived eighteen ten to eighteen seventy five,

0:46:37.960 --> 0:46:40.720
<v Speaker 1>had plenty of thoughts about the profundity of the Trident

0:46:40.800 --> 0:46:44.960
<v Speaker 1>of Paracelsus, assuming that it really existed. Levy writes, quote,

0:46:45.280 --> 0:46:49.160
<v Speaker 1>herein is the power of the trident. It's halften foundation.

0:46:49.520 --> 0:46:52.400
<v Speaker 1>It is the universal law of nature. It is the

0:46:52.600 --> 0:46:55.840
<v Speaker 1>very essence of the word, realized and demonstrated by the

0:46:55.920 --> 0:46:59.759
<v Speaker 1>triad of human life, the Archaeus or mind, the oh

0:47:00.280 --> 0:47:04.320
<v Speaker 1>or plastic mediator, and the salt or visible matter. We

0:47:04.440 --> 0:47:07.520
<v Speaker 1>have given separately the explanation of this figure because it

0:47:07.640 --> 0:47:10.719
<v Speaker 1>is of the highest importance and denotes the compass of

0:47:10.800 --> 0:47:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the highest genius of occult sciences. I feel more and

0:47:14.160 --> 0:47:17.719
<v Speaker 1>more like like the trident is one of these symbols

0:47:17.800 --> 0:47:20.480
<v Speaker 1>that you can you can place it into any kind

0:47:20.520 --> 0:47:24.759
<v Speaker 1>of system of belief or philosophy, or even into the

0:47:25.200 --> 0:47:29.640
<v Speaker 1>various sciences, or or even just business, I guess. And

0:47:30.840 --> 0:47:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the the symbol the the one becoming three or three

0:47:34.040 --> 0:47:38.080
<v Speaker 1>things embodied with one thrust. It kind of leaches ideas

0:47:38.120 --> 0:47:40.600
<v Speaker 1>out of whatever you you you place it in. Yeah,

0:47:40.719 --> 0:47:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and it I mean so, I I admit that when

0:47:44.080 --> 0:47:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I read that um that Levy passage is just dribble

0:47:47.640 --> 0:47:49.719
<v Speaker 1>to me, like it's just you could It's almost like

0:47:49.800 --> 0:47:52.839
<v Speaker 1>you could substitute any words for any other words. Right,

0:47:52.920 --> 0:47:54.960
<v Speaker 1>But but but you can you can see where it's

0:47:55.000 --> 0:47:56.880
<v Speaker 1>like if you if you take the trident and you

0:47:56.960 --> 0:48:01.520
<v Speaker 1>stick it within alchemy or or or magic, it you

0:48:01.600 --> 0:48:06.160
<v Speaker 1>can explain things that are alchemical or magical through the

0:48:06.200 --> 0:48:07.840
<v Speaker 1>trident in the same way that you could use the

0:48:07.880 --> 0:48:11.000
<v Speaker 1>trident as a metaphor in various other fields. Well, I've

0:48:11.040 --> 0:48:14.680
<v Speaker 1>got a I've got a very loose general hypothesis about

0:48:14.719 --> 0:48:17.239
<v Speaker 1>what I think might be going on here, And so

0:48:17.320 --> 0:48:19.239
<v Speaker 1>see what you think about this. And I would love

0:48:19.280 --> 0:48:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to see if there's a way to test this against

0:48:21.040 --> 0:48:25.239
<v Speaker 1>other evidence from psychology, neuroscience, anthropology and all that. But

0:48:25.400 --> 0:48:29.560
<v Speaker 1>here here's my very rough hypothesis about why we have

0:48:29.760 --> 0:48:33.360
<v Speaker 1>a magical obsession with the trident and magical beliefs about

0:48:33.600 --> 0:48:37.920
<v Speaker 1>three bodied things, you know, like you've got a trinity

0:48:38.160 --> 0:48:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and religions there there are many like there are so

0:48:41.160 --> 0:48:47.080
<v Speaker 1>many holy threes. Uh. My non magical speculation is we're

0:48:47.120 --> 0:48:51.120
<v Speaker 1>obsessed with the magic power of threes because three, in

0:48:51.200 --> 0:48:54.239
<v Speaker 1>a way is really a magic number for reality. In

0:48:54.280 --> 0:48:57.360
<v Speaker 1>our minds, three is the number of a pattern. So

0:48:57.480 --> 0:49:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a correlation happens once. Say you are in your car

0:49:00.600 --> 0:49:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and you honk your car horn and a dog down

0:49:03.160 --> 0:49:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the street howls. So, first time that happens, that's just

0:49:06.160 --> 0:49:09.360
<v Speaker 1>an event. Then say it happens again, you hank a

0:49:09.440 --> 0:49:12.360
<v Speaker 1>second time, and the dog howls again, And now the

0:49:12.640 --> 0:49:15.480
<v Speaker 1>pattern detection software and your brain sort of goes on

0:49:15.600 --> 0:49:18.960
<v Speaker 1>high alert. You're like, oh, is something going on here?

0:49:19.640 --> 0:49:21.160
<v Speaker 1>And say if you do it a third time, you

0:49:21.239 --> 0:49:24.520
<v Speaker 1>hank again, dog howls again. You have established a pattern.

0:49:24.640 --> 0:49:26.759
<v Speaker 1>Now you know, you kind of know your brain works

0:49:26.880 --> 0:49:30.680
<v Speaker 1>this way. If something is correlated three times, you have

0:49:30.920 --> 0:49:35.919
<v Speaker 1>discovered a meaningful pattern. You've discovered a law. This is true,

0:49:36.120 --> 0:49:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and this pattern of threes is exactly what the pattern

0:49:38.480 --> 0:49:40.759
<v Speaker 1>of threes and jokes takes advantage of you know how

0:49:40.800 --> 0:49:43.239
<v Speaker 1>there's always a pattern of three and jokes. You tell, like,

0:49:43.360 --> 0:49:45.360
<v Speaker 1>if there's a you know, three men walk into a

0:49:45.440 --> 0:49:47.279
<v Speaker 1>bar joke, all three of them are going to say

0:49:47.360 --> 0:49:49.799
<v Speaker 1>something and have a you know something. A pattern will

0:49:49.840 --> 0:49:52.200
<v Speaker 1>be established with what happens to the first two men,

0:49:52.920 --> 0:49:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and then something weird will happen with what the third

0:49:55.560 --> 0:49:58.400
<v Speaker 1>one says or what happens to them. And what's happening

0:49:58.480 --> 0:50:01.560
<v Speaker 1>there is because there's a similarity with the first two things,

0:50:01.640 --> 0:50:04.360
<v Speaker 1>you're expecting the third one to match the pattern of

0:50:04.440 --> 0:50:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the first two. And by subverting your expectations, when we

0:50:08.280 --> 0:50:10.080
<v Speaker 1>see what happens to the third guy in the bar,

0:50:10.520 --> 0:50:12.920
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like you're violating a taboo. You know, you're

0:50:12.960 --> 0:50:16.320
<v Speaker 1>subverting somebody's expectation that they are going to discover a

0:50:16.440 --> 0:50:19.239
<v Speaker 1>pattern of correlations or a law. Huh yeah. And of

0:50:19.280 --> 0:50:21.920
<v Speaker 1>course we see this in so many different tales as well.

0:50:21.960 --> 0:50:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's the it's you see what the three

0:50:24.600 --> 0:50:28.359
<v Speaker 1>billy goats gruff exactly in Goldilocks, coming in and trying

0:50:28.440 --> 0:50:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the three porridge bowls, the three beds, etcetera. Totally exactly.

0:50:32.160 --> 0:50:36.080
<v Speaker 1>So three is the number of times something happens where

0:50:36.120 --> 0:50:40.680
<v Speaker 1>anecdote and then repeated anecdote become phenomena. And so I

0:50:40.760 --> 0:50:43.640
<v Speaker 1>suspect since one of the highest functions of our brain

0:50:43.760 --> 0:50:47.360
<v Speaker 1>is pattern recognition, and three occurrences of an event or

0:50:47.480 --> 0:50:50.399
<v Speaker 1>correlation is what it usually takes for us to feel

0:50:50.480 --> 0:50:54.040
<v Speaker 1>like we have confidently established a pattern. The number three

0:50:54.200 --> 0:50:56.400
<v Speaker 1>is in some sense kind of hard coded into us.

0:50:56.480 --> 0:51:00.560
<v Speaker 1>It's like a powerful indicator of significance and red gularity

0:51:00.680 --> 0:51:03.680
<v Speaker 1>in nature and in our minds, three becomes the number

0:51:03.880 --> 0:51:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of law. So anyway, that that's my guess. I wonder

0:51:07.280 --> 0:51:11.200
<v Speaker 1>if we're we're you know, we're suckers for three pronged instruments,

0:51:11.239 --> 0:51:13.759
<v Speaker 1>which seems like such a mundane and kind of dumb

0:51:13.920 --> 0:51:17.680
<v Speaker 1>thing to be obsessed with the magical powers of because

0:51:18.200 --> 0:51:22.840
<v Speaker 1>threes are inherently holy and powerful in our minds because

0:51:22.880 --> 0:51:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of our pattern seeking nature. Yeah, and and I like

0:51:25.960 --> 0:51:28.680
<v Speaker 1>this idea too, of of of power of being positioned

0:51:28.680 --> 0:51:30.919
<v Speaker 1>in the three and three, Like, if you have three

0:51:31.000 --> 0:51:34.800
<v Speaker 1>individuals voting on something, then there is an ability for

0:51:35.239 --> 0:51:37.800
<v Speaker 1>for two of them to agree and want to disagree,

0:51:37.840 --> 0:51:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and that there still is a decision. If you have

0:51:40.400 --> 0:51:44.239
<v Speaker 1>three individuals in a yoga class, then everyone has plausible deniability.

0:51:44.360 --> 0:51:48.239
<v Speaker 1>If someone farts safety and numbers, once you have three,

0:51:48.320 --> 0:51:51.640
<v Speaker 1>you have a group. Yes, but anyway, maybe maybe we

0:51:51.680 --> 0:51:56.000
<v Speaker 1>should leave depart the realm of of religion and magic

0:51:56.200 --> 0:51:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and psychology and go back to the gritty reality of

0:52:00.040 --> 0:52:03.200
<v Speaker 1>tools and weapons. Because when I think of tridents in

0:52:03.280 --> 0:52:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the real world and not as clutched by God's I

0:52:06.080 --> 0:52:09.279
<v Speaker 1>definitely think of gladiatorial combat. Yes, you think of the

0:52:09.520 --> 0:52:12.880
<v Speaker 1>rotarius or net fighter, one of the key types of

0:52:12.960 --> 0:52:18.000
<v Speaker 1>gladiators who fought with the trident, a net, a weighted net,

0:52:18.040 --> 0:52:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and a dagger. Now, of course, there were various different

0:52:21.320 --> 0:52:25.200
<v Speaker 1>types of gladiators that that that the Romans would use

0:52:25.239 --> 0:52:28.759
<v Speaker 1>in these gladiatorial sports, right they were. Each one was

0:52:28.840 --> 0:52:33.720
<v Speaker 1>a character armed with with some some array of weapons

0:52:33.760 --> 0:52:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and armor, and then they would engage in in combat.

0:52:38.120 --> 0:52:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I am continually astonished every time I really think about

0:52:43.080 --> 0:52:49.359
<v Speaker 1>the idea of gladiatorial games, and uh astonished when I realized, okay,

0:52:49.440 --> 0:52:52.160
<v Speaker 1>so this was real fighting to the death. In many

0:52:52.239 --> 0:52:54.840
<v Speaker 1>cases like that, they were actually fighting and trying to

0:52:54.920 --> 0:52:59.280
<v Speaker 1>injure and kill each other. Why hadn't they yet discovered

0:53:00.040 --> 0:53:03.560
<v Speaker 1>that you could achieve the same kind of dramatic entertainment

0:53:03.719 --> 0:53:09.080
<v Speaker 1>value simply by simulating dramatic fighting without actually hurting anyone. Well,

0:53:09.120 --> 0:53:12.360
<v Speaker 1>you might well ask the same question of of of today.

0:53:12.560 --> 0:53:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, because look look around we have We certainly

0:53:15.960 --> 0:53:20.480
<v Speaker 1>have um, we have such dramatic fair as say professional wrestling,

0:53:21.080 --> 0:53:23.840
<v Speaker 1>But then we also have we still have professional boxing

0:53:24.080 --> 0:53:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and uh in mixed martial arts in which individuals are

0:53:27.440 --> 0:53:32.200
<v Speaker 1>are still engaging in actual intentional violence against each other.

0:53:32.320 --> 0:53:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Though granted with with with rules in place, but even

0:53:35.520 --> 0:53:39.040
<v Speaker 1>with with gladiate gladiator sport, there were rules there, There

0:53:39.080 --> 0:53:41.320
<v Speaker 1>were there were there were quite a few rules to

0:53:41.560 --> 0:53:44.680
<v Speaker 1>to maintain a sense of order to everything. I mean,

0:53:44.719 --> 0:53:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's kind of the appeal of making people,

0:53:48.000 --> 0:53:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, engage in uh in violent acts against each other,

0:53:51.160 --> 0:53:53.759
<v Speaker 1>as that they're obeying these these set of rules that

0:53:53.840 --> 0:53:56.640
<v Speaker 1>you've established for them. Yeah, I mean, whether or not

0:53:56.760 --> 0:53:59.319
<v Speaker 1>you have rules, I mean, I understand why it can

0:53:59.360 --> 0:54:02.800
<v Speaker 1>be excited fighting to to watch people fight. We do

0:54:02.920 --> 0:54:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that in our fiction all the time, Like we've got

0:54:05.040 --> 0:54:07.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, you've got violent movies and TV shows where

0:54:07.719 --> 0:54:11.320
<v Speaker 1>there's mortal conflict between characters and you can get invested

0:54:11.400 --> 0:54:13.640
<v Speaker 1>in it and it gets you wrapped up in the narrative.

0:54:13.960 --> 0:54:16.320
<v Speaker 1>But it seems like that's so easy to do with

0:54:16.520 --> 0:54:18.200
<v Speaker 1>just like a play. You know, you don't have to

0:54:18.280 --> 0:54:20.480
<v Speaker 1>actually be hurting each other, and you can you can

0:54:20.560 --> 0:54:22.839
<v Speaker 1>have with a fake fight, you can have a better fight.

0:54:23.360 --> 0:54:27.480
<v Speaker 1>It tells a better story that and and also one

0:54:27.560 --> 0:54:31.839
<v Speaker 1>in which the right individual, the correct individual, wins. That's

0:54:32.040 --> 0:54:36.080
<v Speaker 1>very often the problem with a legit fight for entertainment

0:54:36.120 --> 0:54:39.560
<v Speaker 1>purposes is that it is either not a good contest

0:54:40.040 --> 0:54:43.200
<v Speaker 1>or the wrong individual wins. Like there's a there's an

0:54:43.239 --> 0:54:45.319
<v Speaker 1>individual that if they were to win, that would tell

0:54:45.360 --> 0:54:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the best story, and instead they're the one staring up

0:54:48.360 --> 0:54:50.359
<v Speaker 1>at the lights. Yeah, yeah, I guess I didn't mean

0:54:50.400 --> 0:54:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to get all sanctimonious and moralize here, but I don't know.

0:54:53.080 --> 0:54:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm gonna stand by it. I don't know.

0:54:55.000 --> 0:54:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Making people actually hurt each other for entertainment, it just

0:54:58.640 --> 0:55:00.719
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem great to me. I'm against it as well.

0:55:01.040 --> 0:55:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Uh it is. It is. When you look at the

0:55:03.440 --> 0:55:07.719
<v Speaker 1>Roman gladiatorial sport, it is both ridiculous and barbaric at

0:55:07.760 --> 0:55:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the same time. For instance, the Ritarius here fighting with

0:55:11.600 --> 0:55:15.480
<v Speaker 1>this trident, which was sometimes barbed but typically smooth. Generally

0:55:15.560 --> 0:55:18.560
<v Speaker 1>five semi centimeters between the spikes, and each cone spike

0:55:18.719 --> 0:55:21.960
<v Speaker 1>is about twelve to fifteen millimeters, and they were, in

0:55:22.480 --> 0:55:25.239
<v Speaker 1>essence a sea themed gladiator. You know, they're fighting with

0:55:25.320 --> 0:55:28.080
<v Speaker 1>a fishing net and a fishing spear, and sometimes they're

0:55:28.120 --> 0:55:31.680
<v Speaker 1>even fighting in flooded conditions, and they were often they

0:55:31.719 --> 0:55:35.080
<v Speaker 1>often seem to embody more feminine elements as well, compared

0:55:35.120 --> 0:55:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to the more armored masculine gladiator types such as the

0:55:38.880 --> 0:55:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Mermillio or the Secretur, which was essentially a fish had

0:55:44.640 --> 0:55:47.200
<v Speaker 1>a fish like helm, So you had a fisherman battling

0:55:47.280 --> 0:55:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a fish, someone dressed up as a fisherman battling someone

0:55:50.640 --> 0:55:53.359
<v Speaker 1>dressed up as a fish, and it might beat the death.

0:55:53.760 --> 0:55:59.120
<v Speaker 1>This prefigures the Mortal Kombat and the third act of Jaws. Now,

0:55:59.200 --> 0:56:01.880
<v Speaker 1>obviously this is a this is a violent Roman spectacle,

0:56:02.320 --> 0:56:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and and there are very they were very strict combat

0:56:04.960 --> 0:56:07.360
<v Speaker 1>rules set in place, so it's not it's not like

0:56:07.440 --> 0:56:10.440
<v Speaker 1>a real world example of of a trident. It's a

0:56:10.480 --> 0:56:15.279
<v Speaker 1>it's an artificial but potentially lethal combat scenario, right. But

0:56:15.360 --> 0:56:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I was wondering, like, to what extent is it? Is

0:56:17.440 --> 0:56:20.240
<v Speaker 1>it a practical weapon at all? Because it never seemed

0:56:20.280 --> 0:56:23.080
<v Speaker 1>practical to me. I would see these images of Zeus

0:56:23.239 --> 0:56:25.279
<v Speaker 1>or the Devil with a trident and it just did

0:56:25.360 --> 0:56:28.000
<v Speaker 1>not look like a good weapon choice. No. Yet again,

0:56:28.040 --> 0:56:30.480
<v Speaker 1>it looks kind of cartoony. It's like in those early cartoons.

0:56:30.520 --> 0:56:32.919
<v Speaker 1>It looks like it's for one cartoon character to poke

0:56:32.960 --> 0:56:35.080
<v Speaker 1>another one in the butt. Yeah, and so you wonder

0:56:35.160 --> 0:56:36.920
<v Speaker 1>we'll do do these gladiators with a tried and to

0:56:37.000 --> 0:56:39.759
<v Speaker 1>they trident? Are they? Are they to disadvantage? I mean

0:56:39.800 --> 0:56:42.279
<v Speaker 1>certainly they have a reach advantage, but then they don't

0:56:42.280 --> 0:56:44.719
<v Speaker 1>have much armor on uh, and all they can do

0:56:44.920 --> 0:56:47.960
<v Speaker 1>is if the if their opponent gets into close, they

0:56:47.960 --> 0:56:50.520
<v Speaker 1>would have to I guess, drop the trident and use

0:56:50.640 --> 0:56:53.719
<v Speaker 1>their dagger as a last resort weapon. So I was

0:56:53.760 --> 0:56:56.000
<v Speaker 1>looking into this just to see like did anyone did

0:56:56.040 --> 0:56:58.960
<v Speaker 1>they actually ever kill anyone with a trident? And I

0:56:59.080 --> 0:57:02.640
<v Speaker 1>found a paper was published in Forensic Science International from

0:57:02.680 --> 0:57:07.520
<v Speaker 1>two thousand five by Favian cons and Carl Groschmidt titled

0:57:07.760 --> 0:57:12.319
<v Speaker 1>head Injuries of Roman Gladiators What Yeah, whoa And they

0:57:12.360 --> 0:57:14.640
<v Speaker 1>point out that there's a lot of forensic evidence on

0:57:14.760 --> 0:57:19.520
<v Speaker 1>gladiator combat. Quote. The gladiator weaponry is well known through

0:57:19.600 --> 0:57:23.080
<v Speaker 1>historical sources at least one injury per known type of

0:57:23.160 --> 0:57:26.320
<v Speaker 1>offensive weapon could be identified, as well as evidence for

0:57:26.400 --> 0:57:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the most popular the gladiator trident, which was found to

0:57:29.800 --> 0:57:34.080
<v Speaker 1>be represented by one paramortem that means at the at

0:57:34.200 --> 0:57:37.360
<v Speaker 1>or near the time of death and to anti mortem

0:57:37.560 --> 0:57:41.880
<v Speaker 1>or before death injuries. Overall, the reportedly very strict nature

0:57:41.960 --> 0:57:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of combat rules for gladiator fights could be confirmed by

0:57:46.240 --> 0:57:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the absence of multiple paramortal traumatized individuals showing a lack

0:57:51.960 --> 0:57:56.200
<v Speaker 1>of the excessive violence commonly observed on medieval battleground victims.

0:57:56.560 --> 0:57:58.280
<v Speaker 1>So they were looking at human skulls here from a

0:57:58.320 --> 0:58:02.880
<v Speaker 1>gladiator cemetery in ancient Ephesus, which is a modern day Turkey.

0:58:03.520 --> 0:58:07.480
<v Speaker 1>This was originally unearthed in so Here's what they had

0:58:07.480 --> 0:58:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to say about their findings. Quote. Eleven individuals exhibited a

0:58:11.000 --> 0:58:15.920
<v Speaker 1>total of sixteen well healed uh anti mortal cranial traumata.

0:58:16.440 --> 0:58:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Five of the eleven individuals showed multiple trauma. Ten individuals

0:58:21.200 --> 0:58:25.160
<v Speaker 1>exhibited a total of ten paramortal cranial traumata. This is

0:58:25.240 --> 0:58:28.840
<v Speaker 1>a surprisingly high frequency of deadly head injuries, taking into

0:58:28.880 --> 0:58:32.080
<v Speaker 1>account that most of the gladiator types wore helmets. A

0:58:32.200 --> 0:58:36.200
<v Speaker 1>possible explanation could be the frequently reported death blow technique

0:58:36.520 --> 0:58:40.720
<v Speaker 1>used by the hammer carrying death god Dispater. Yikes, what

0:58:40.920 --> 0:58:43.000
<v Speaker 1>is going on there? Okay, so this was this was

0:58:43.080 --> 0:58:45.360
<v Speaker 1>new to me. I I'm not that well versed in

0:58:45.640 --> 0:58:51.440
<v Speaker 1>gladiator gladiatorial combat, but Dispater was a costumed arena servant

0:58:51.840 --> 0:58:54.960
<v Speaker 1>in character as a death god that would finish a

0:58:55.000 --> 0:58:58.840
<v Speaker 1>sufficiently wounded gladiator off with a hammer. That's horrible. Now,

0:58:58.920 --> 0:59:01.240
<v Speaker 1>they wrote quote, it is not known exactly how this

0:59:01.360 --> 0:59:04.960
<v Speaker 1>execution was performed, but um, I have to say I

0:59:05.080 --> 0:59:08.040
<v Speaker 1>have a powerfully strong guess about how they might have

0:59:08.080 --> 0:59:11.400
<v Speaker 1>carried this out. But as for trident wounds to the skull,

0:59:11.960 --> 0:59:15.360
<v Speaker 1>they all seem to have involved two, but not three wounds.

0:59:15.440 --> 0:59:18.840
<v Speaker 1>And that makes sense, right, because even with a reasonably

0:59:19.080 --> 0:59:21.600
<v Speaker 1>narrow trident, Uh, you know, how are you going to

0:59:21.720 --> 0:59:25.480
<v Speaker 1>land all three um teeth of that thing on the

0:59:25.600 --> 0:59:29.360
<v Speaker 1>human skull. I'm just trying to think how there are

0:59:29.400 --> 0:59:32.400
<v Speaker 1>these head wounds that are there in the evidence from

0:59:32.440 --> 0:59:36.000
<v Speaker 1>people's bones, but they appear to have survived also, like

0:59:36.520 --> 0:59:40.200
<v Speaker 1>some people died with apparently healed overhead wounds from from

0:59:40.240 --> 0:59:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the combat. Yeah. I mean, this is a this is

0:59:44.360 --> 0:59:47.400
<v Speaker 1>a brutal, brutal time and place as long as you're

0:59:47.400 --> 0:59:50.200
<v Speaker 1>able to continue and they don't have to call disspader

0:59:50.280 --> 0:59:52.320
<v Speaker 1>over there to to deal with you. Now, as for

0:59:52.480 --> 0:59:56.920
<v Speaker 1>other functional tridents and like military and combat history, where

0:59:57.040 --> 0:59:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you talked about pol arms a little bit, but I'll

1:00:00.000 --> 1:00:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to throw in that in that older book

1:00:02.160 --> 1:00:04.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Night of the Gods by John O'Neill that

1:00:04.640 --> 1:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>have referenced earlier, um, he describes an imperial Chinese trident

1:00:09.400 --> 1:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>with the third blade turned back toward the wheelder, So

1:00:13.320 --> 1:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>it's going to you know, uh, slicked back if you will.

1:00:16.400 --> 1:00:19.320
<v Speaker 1>So the first blade is for slicing, it's kind of

1:00:19.600 --> 1:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, very blade like the middle one is longer

1:00:22.480 --> 1:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's for stabbing, and then this other one comes

1:00:24.840 --> 1:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>back for slicing as well. So it was just an

1:00:27.640 --> 1:00:30.320
<v Speaker 1>interesting take on the trident design that I've never seen before.

1:00:30.520 --> 1:00:33.160
<v Speaker 1>So what kind of tried and does Aquaman have? This

1:00:33.360 --> 1:00:36.160
<v Speaker 1>is I'm glad you brought this up, Joe, because if

1:00:36.200 --> 1:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>you if you look at some of these comic book

1:00:37.640 --> 1:00:40.600
<v Speaker 1>images of Aquaman, he does have a trident, and very

1:00:40.680 --> 1:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>often it is depicted as just a trident, but other

1:00:43.480 --> 1:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>times there are extra barbs. So he ironically no longer

1:00:47.480 --> 1:00:51.520
<v Speaker 1>has a trident, he has uh tented dent or something,

1:00:51.840 --> 1:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of people pointed out with the new

1:00:54.360 --> 1:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>DC Cinematic Universe version of Aquaman, but you also see

1:00:58.800 --> 1:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>this in the comics. You see, uh, you see these

1:01:00.760 --> 1:01:04.400
<v Speaker 1>images of Aquaman with this ridiculous non trident in his hands.

1:01:04.880 --> 1:01:06.919
<v Speaker 1>Why do they do that? Do they not even? Wait?

1:01:07.560 --> 1:01:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Is is Aquaman related to Poseidon or Neptune? Or is

1:01:11.640 --> 1:01:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know my Aquaman or I'm not superversed in

1:01:15.120 --> 1:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the comic either, but I understand there is a lot

1:01:16.920 --> 1:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>they have injected a lot of of of like Greek

1:01:19.760 --> 1:01:23.680
<v Speaker 1>undersea mythology into the property. Yeah, yeah, is he played

1:01:23.720 --> 1:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>by cal Drogo, Yeah, Jason Momoa very striking as Aquaman. Well,

1:01:28.600 --> 1:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I say, give him three prongs. You know what they

1:01:31.560 --> 1:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>should really do with Aquaman is give him the impossible trident. Oh. Yes.

1:01:35.720 --> 1:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>This is the twentieth century optical illusion, which is, if

1:01:39.800 --> 1:01:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you start at first glance, you see a trident, you

1:01:43.040 --> 1:01:46.400
<v Speaker 1>see three prongs, like essentially a tuning fork with three prongs.

1:01:46.720 --> 1:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>But then when you start, when you really look at it,

1:01:49.000 --> 1:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>you realize there is no middle prong. It's it's it's

1:01:51.720 --> 1:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>just a bid dent as opposed to a trident. Yeah,

1:01:54.800 --> 1:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>it's an optical illusion. Well, actually there, I don't know

1:01:57.480 --> 1:02:00.920
<v Speaker 1>if there even are the two prongs on the side,

1:02:00.960 --> 1:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>because the three dimensional representation of them doesn't line up.

1:02:04.280 --> 1:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>So you're just given this repeatedly false perspective where one

1:02:08.880 --> 1:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>edge bleeds into another. The more you look at it,

1:02:11.240 --> 1:02:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the more it hurts your brain because you really want

1:02:13.760 --> 1:02:15.640
<v Speaker 1>to form a three D image out of it, and

1:02:16.160 --> 1:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>it's increasingly difficult to do. So this was not mc

1:02:19.880 --> 1:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>escher was it seems like it should be. It wasn't,

1:02:22.520 --> 1:02:25.520
<v Speaker 1>but but it's it's the very type of optical illusion

1:02:25.680 --> 1:02:28.240
<v Speaker 1>that he often played with. But see, that's perfect for

1:02:28.520 --> 1:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>for a god to have his weapons. So if you've

1:02:30.320 --> 1:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>got Aquaman and he's somehow like he's like the Thor

1:02:34.120 --> 1:02:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of d c uh, he's like a traditional Greek god character,

1:02:37.960 --> 1:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>he must have access to some kind of forbidden geometry.

1:02:41.000 --> 1:02:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Here you would get the forbidden geometry combined with the

1:02:44.440 --> 1:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>traditional trident of the sea god. I feel like this

1:02:46.840 --> 1:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>is the very kind of thing that surely Grant Morrison

1:02:49.040 --> 1:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>did this at some point, had a character with an

1:02:51.480 --> 1:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>impossible trident. Oh yeah, that seems perfect, all right, So

1:02:55.080 --> 1:02:57.360
<v Speaker 1>there you have it, the Trident. If you want to

1:02:57.400 --> 1:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>check out more episodes of Stuff to Blow your Mind,

1:02:59.600 --> 1:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>past episodes even on Mythic Weapons, head on over to

1:03:02.480 --> 1:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. That is where

1:03:04.120 --> 1:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you will find them, as well as links out to

1:03:05.600 --> 1:03:07.560
<v Speaker 1>our various social media accounts. And if you want to

1:03:07.560 --> 1:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>support the show, just rate and review us wherever you

1:03:10.320 --> 1:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts. Big thanks as always to our wonderful

1:03:13.560 --> 1:03:16.959
<v Speaker 1>audio producers Alex Williams and Tarry Harrison. If you would

1:03:17.000 --> 1:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>like to get in touch with us to let us

1:03:18.520 --> 1:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>know your feedback about this episode or any other, to

1:03:21.240 --> 1:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>request a topic for the future, to just say hi,

1:03:24.200 --> 1:03:25.800
<v Speaker 1>let us know where you listen from how you found

1:03:25.840 --> 1:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>out about the show, You can email us at blow

1:03:28.200 --> 1:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the Mind at how stuff works dot com. And now, Robert,

1:03:32.280 --> 1:03:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I am to understand you wanted to feature a bracing

1:03:34.560 --> 1:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>industrial easter egg for this show. Yeah, yeah, we've We've

1:03:37.760 --> 1:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>never featured any industrial music on the show before, but

1:03:40.440 --> 1:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>this is a perfect track to close out with. Yeah,

1:03:43.120 --> 1:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>this is a band you've interviewed before on our website,

1:03:45.600 --> 1:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I think, right, Robert, Yeah, so the band is three Teeth.

1:03:49.320 --> 1:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>They actually get their name from the trident tri dent

1:03:53.360 --> 1:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>three teeth, it seems appropriate that yeah, and this is

1:03:55.760 --> 1:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>this is the track Divine Weapon off the two thousand

1:03:58.000 --> 1:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>seventeen album shut Down Dot exc Yeah. I chatted with

1:04:01.200 --> 1:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the frontman, Alexi Mencola about the band's name and the

1:04:04.400 --> 1:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>use of trident symbolism a couple of years back, and

1:04:06.960 --> 1:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>when I reached out to them about using the track

1:04:08.920 --> 1:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>on this episode. Uh Lex also pointed out that the

1:04:12.000 --> 1:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Shutdown Dot e x C vinyl actually has a gatefold

1:04:15.800 --> 1:04:19.240
<v Speaker 1>trident when you open it that maps the trident of

1:04:19.800 --> 1:04:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of Paracelsus that we talked about earlier. And you can

1:04:22.640 --> 1:04:24.680
<v Speaker 1>find out more about that release and the band at

1:04:24.840 --> 1:04:28.160
<v Speaker 1>three Teeth that's with a numeral three teeth dot org

1:04:28.400 --> 1:04:30.600
<v Speaker 1>or look them up wherever you get your music. So

1:04:30.680 --> 1:04:33.040
<v Speaker 1>if you have an appetite for some industrial metal, here

1:04:33.120 --> 1:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>you go. S S S S y A. Try now

1:06:11.400 --> 1:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>wid how that called j our wa God where I

1:06:21.760 --> 1:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>jake b while by ain't I ain't will