WEBVTT - NASA and AI: Decoding Our Universe

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. This season

0:00:04.320 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>on Smart Talks with IBM, Malcolm Glabwell is back, and

0:00:07.920 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>this time he's taking the show on the road. Malcolm

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>is stepping outside the studio to explore how IBM clients

0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>are using artificial intelligence to solve real world challenges and

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>transform the way they do business, from accelerating scientific breakthroughs

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to reimagining education. It's a fresh look at innovation in action,

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>where big ideas meet cutting edge solutions. You'll hear from

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>industry leaders, creative thinkers, and of course Malcolm Glabwell himself

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:39.879
<v Speaker 1>as he guides you through each story. New episodes of

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Smart Talks with IBM drop every month on the iHeartRadio app,

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Learn more

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>at IBM dot com slash smart Talks.

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 2>If I were to go back, I don't know, thirty

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 2>years in Kenya, what's the difference between then and now?

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 2>Intern of tree Cover, I'm talking to Philip, thego Special

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 2>Technology envoid to the Kenyan President.

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 3>Let's speak as if you think about we arena elevent

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 3>trol perscs and previously we were more than twenty percent.

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 3>So we are cutting trees more than we're planting them.

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 2>In thirty years, Kenya lost half its tree cover half.

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 2>And here's why that matters. Kenya is a mountainous country.

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Dotted throughout the highlands are dozens of what canyons call

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:34.919
<v Speaker 2>water towers, natural reservoirs, densely forested areas capable of absorbing

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 2>the enormous amount of water that falls on the country

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 2>during the rainy seasons. The tree roots and undergrowth secure

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 2>and capture moisture, then slowly release it into the rivers

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 2>that flow down into the country's low lying coastal areas.

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 2>But in recent years the water towers have depleted, settlements

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 2>have encroached on them, trees have been chopped down, thousands

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 2>of acres cleared, the natural reservoirs cease to hold nearly

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 2>as much water, so now Kenya is prone to extremes.

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Too much water flowing down from the highlands in the

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:12.360
<v Speaker 2>rainy season and too little water left during the dry season.

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 3>So you have a couple of hours of water, then

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 3>you have a couple of hours with no water that

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 3>taps off to be dry by the city authority. So

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 3>that's the significance of the water towers. We have when

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:24.800
<v Speaker 3>they cannot hold water.

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 2>Kenya desperately needed to restore its water towers by planting

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:33.239
<v Speaker 2>as many trees as humanly possible. So in the fall

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 2>of twenty twenty three, the Kenyan government took action. It

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:41.799
<v Speaker 2>started a national holiday, National Tree Growing Day, a day

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 2>to allow the citizens of Kenya to go out into

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:47.919
<v Speaker 2>the forest to dominate the Kenyan countryside and plant as

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:52.080
<v Speaker 2>many trees as they can, and the government decided on

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 2>a number.

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 3>The presidents really focus right around how to ensure that

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 3>we don't lose more for us was in this very

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 3>ambitious campaign around fifteen billion trees.

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 2>That's right, fifteen billion with a bee.

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 3>So imagine that number will tell you the ambition, not

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 3>as he tells you the deficit. It has to be

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 3>fifteen billion in the next eight years.

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:18.799
<v Speaker 2>Fifteen billion trees over eight years averages out to more

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 2>than five million trees per day. That's a lot of trees.

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 2>But with such a massive goal, how can you track

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 2>your progress? How do you know where to plant those

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:31.920
<v Speaker 2>trees so they'll have the most impact. How do you

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 2>monitor where older trees are still being cut down? Well,

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 2>the answer to those questions came from IBM and a

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 2>little space agency called NASA. That's right, folks, Smart Talks

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 2>is going to space. My name is Malcolm Glawell. You're

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 2>listening to the latest episode of Smart Talks with IBM,

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 2>where we offer our listeners a glimpse behind the curtain

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 2>of the world of technology. In this season, IBM has

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 2>gone inside elementary school classrooms, toured formulation labs at Loreel,

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 2>and spoken with the fan development team at Scuderia Ferrari HP.

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 2>In this episode, how IBM is partnering with NASA to

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 2>build geospatial models using data from satellites to better understand

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 2>our Earth and Solar system.

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 4>Five four three two one zero all engine running liptoff.

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 4>We have a liptoff thirty two minutes past the hour

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 4>liftoff on Apollo eleven.

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 2>IBM has worked on space related projects since before I

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 2>was even born. Im all for Man, A team of

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 2>four thousand IBM engineers helped create the Saturn five rocket

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 2>that took Neil Armstrong to the Moon. Arm And when

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 2>I think of NASA, I tend to picture the moon landing,

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 2>or the team of people back in Houston guiding the

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Apollo mission, or the Hubble telescope or astronauts aboard the

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 2>International Space Station. What I didn't think about until now

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 2>are NASA's geographers.

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:18.039
<v Speaker 5>In order to go places, you need at map things.

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 2>This is Kevin Murphy, chief Science Data Officer at NASA's

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 2>Science Mission Directorate.

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 5>But I think that there's an assumption that NASAs all

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 5>about rockets and astronauts, and certainly that's a really large

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 5>part and important part in NASA.

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 2>NASA sends people to space and looks out of the stars,

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:41.160
<v Speaker 2>but NASA also looks down at the Earth. The agency

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 2>has about one hundred and fifty satellites that use radar, lightar, landset, aquatera,

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:52.599
<v Speaker 2>cloudset AURA, low Earth orbit, medium Earth orbit, geostationary orbit,

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 2>on and on. In one sense, NASA makes hardware. They

0:05:57.200 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 2>build rockets and spacecraft and all those delights that circle

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:06.720
<v Speaker 2>the Earth. But fundamentally NASA also collects data. It's scientists

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 2>and the engineers people like Kevin want to make the

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 2>best use possible of all the information gathered by all

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 2>those many dozens of instruments.

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 5>Right now, we gather around twenty five petabytes of new

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 5>observational data per year. In the next couple of months,

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:28.720
<v Speaker 5>we're about to launch a high resolution Global Radar when

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 5>that launches, will double how much we collect every year

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 5>to about fifty petabytes of information.

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:39.160
<v Speaker 2>Actually, since we recorded this conversation, NASA launched that global

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 2>radar what they call NYSAR. So NASA is already generating

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 2>new data at the rate of fifty petabytes each year.

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 2>To put that in perspective, a single petabyte could hold

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 2>about five hundred billion pages of standard printed text. Now

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.480
<v Speaker 2>can anyone sort of apply to use this data is.

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:01.480
<v Speaker 5>They don't even have to apply. It's free and open data.

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 5>It advances how we understand what we do on Earth

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:09.280
<v Speaker 5>and how we see ourselves within the universe. People can

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 5>take it for so many different downstream applications. So you

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 5>can go to our websites today, you can search through

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 5>our tools, and you can download information from the Mars rovers,

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 5>you can download information from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter or

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 5>any of the Earth Science Data satellites.

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 2>And give me an example of a really cool application,

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 2>a really cool use that someone I don't know in

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 2>academic or whatever has used your data for. It is there?

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 5>It okay? So one of the really kind of cool

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 5>but unexpected observations that we had is that we launched

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 5>a pair of satellites in their early two thousands called Grace,

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 5>and these satellites orbit the Earth and they can measure

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 5>very precisely the distance that they're away from each other

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 5>as they orbit the Earth. And as you go into

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 5>gravity wells, you can actually see a satellite accelerate and

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 5>the other one accelerate after it, right, And using that information,

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 5>we were trying to map kind of the gravity fields

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 5>of Earth. What what they found is that they can

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 5>actually map below kind of the mass of Earth to

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 5>where water storage is. For instance, so aquifers, right, so

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 5>you can monitor through gravity how much water is being

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 5>depleted or added to an aquifer or the density of glaciers.

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 2>So, just to back up for a moment, the presence

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 2>and density of water deposits below the Earth's surface have

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:38.079
<v Speaker 2>an effect on gravitational fields that are being measured in space.

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 5>Correct.

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:42.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And so does that tell you presuming you learn

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 2>things like where there's an aquifer where you didn't think

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 2>there was an aquifer.

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 5>Or if it's being depleted faster? Yeah?

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So who's using that kind.

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 5>Of data All sorts of different organizations, whether they're you know,

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 5>NGOs or government agencies or people that are planning a

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:00.439
<v Speaker 5>large agricultural product.

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 2>How did you Was that an intentional desis?

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:03.959
<v Speaker 5>It wasn't It was accidental.

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 2>It was accidental. NASA has assembled a historically unprecedented mountain

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:15.079
<v Speaker 2>of data about the physical world, free and open to anyone,

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 2>and the possibilities for how that information can be used

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 2>are so vast that even NASA is still uncovering them.

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 2>When I was a kid, I loved legos. I had

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 2>a huge bin full of them. At the time, legos

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 2>were really just colored bricks of various sizes. They weren't

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 2>as complicated as they are today. And what I realized

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 2>even then was that there were more possibilities in a

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 2>box of Legos than I could ever imagine on my own.

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 2>I played with my brother and he would show me

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:47.200
<v Speaker 2>something that hadn't occurred to me. And I go to

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 2>my friend Bruce's and see that he was off on

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 2>some legos tangent that I'd never even thought of, like

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 2>a cool bridge or a castle or a truck. I

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 2>used legos one way, Bruce used his legos in a

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 2>completely different way. NASA's data treasure Trove is like a

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 2>very very big box of legos, And here's the question.

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 2>With so much data, containing so many possible connections, could IBM,

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 2>and specifically IBM's artificial intelligence help NASA scientists uncover patterns

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 2>and connect systems in a way they've never done before.

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 6>Everything started with a question, right.

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm talking to one Bernabe Moreno, director of IBM Research

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 2>in Europe.

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 6>As we advance AI, we have new tools to understand this,

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 6>around this, understand the world, understand the language, and understand

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 6>our planets. And the question that we were asking ourselves

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 6>was all these new advances that we see in language.

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 6>It was a post GPT moment. Could we apply the

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 6>same idea and the same architecture and technology to a

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:56.560
<v Speaker 6>data about our planet.

0:10:57.200 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 2>The advent of AI created a new opportunity. What if

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 2>all of NASA's mountain of data could be organized, analyzed,

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 2>understood by artificial intelligence. The original idea was to create

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 2>a geospatial foundation model for the Earth, and from there

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 2>create additional specialized models for other scientific priorities of NASA,

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:23.079
<v Speaker 2>and finally quit an AI system that can understand all

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 2>the data across those specialized models in order to uncover

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 2>hidden insights and relationships. Together, these models could unlock an

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:36.960
<v Speaker 2>infinite number of potential applications. I asked Kevin Murphy at

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 2>NASA about the beginning of these Earth models.

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.559
<v Speaker 5>Has some colleagues, and we were investigating in a number

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 5>of different avenues of using AI with our data, but

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 5>also kind of the management and stewardship of the data,

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 5>so not only like the observations, but how we make

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 5>it available to people, make it discoverable. And they said, hey,

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 5>we see these transform architecture. We think that they can

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:05.199
<v Speaker 5>be applicable to some of the sequential observations that we make.

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 5>We'd really like to work with IBM on that. And

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 5>I was like, I'm really skeptical, but because I hadn't

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 5>seen those types of tools really produce results that were

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 5>commensurate with the amount of effort you put into them, right,

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 5>So we were getting some really good results and deep

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:27.720
<v Speaker 5>learning approaches, but they took a lot of effort.

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 2>But Kevin came around quickly.

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 5>When we typically develop a new data product or an algorithm,

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 5>it takes anywhere from you know, twelve months, eighteen months,

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:44.719
<v Speaker 5>twenty four months to go from data and hypothesis to

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 5>results which is validated. We were able to get approximately

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 5>the same precision for some well known types of benchmarks

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 5>with and I think it was about four months of

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:57.560
<v Speaker 5>starting the work.

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, so it happened faster than you thought, much faster.

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:06.560
<v Speaker 2>In twenty twenty three, IBM and NASA launched a foundation

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 2>model trained on NASA's harmonized landset sentinel to satellite data

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 2>across the continental United States. They named the model Prithvi,

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:20.439
<v Speaker 2>the Sanskrit word for Earth. The first version of Prithvi

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 2>used only Earth observation images and just that was enough

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 2>to totally change Kevin's idea of what foundation models could do.

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 2>But they didn't stop there. IBM and NASA were encouraged

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 2>at how well Prithvy worked for Earth observation tasks, so

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 2>they decided to create a more complex version of Prithvy

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 2>that could understand whether and climate data. They hoped this

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 2>new version of Prithvi would allow researchers to answer new

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 2>questions about the Earth, from short term weather forecasting to

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 2>longer term climate effects. Imagine you have a map of

0:13:56.800 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 2>all the different temperatures, pressures, clouds, rainfall and more from

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 2>around the globe. With this map, IBM and NASA could

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:10.560
<v Speaker 2>implement advanced tasks. They could track the formation of al Nino,

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 2>or predict how the path of a hurricane would change

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 2>if the ocean temperature went up by half a degree.

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 6>I would always remember this moment was when we created

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 6>the Weather and Climate Foundational Model. The senior methodologist of NASA,

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 6>it was like, I cannot believe that it has changed the

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 6>way I think about the AI and ever since, he's

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 6>been kind of preaching with this A sample.

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 2>One and his team then took the model and decided

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 2>to test it, really tested it. Took away ninety nine

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 2>percent of the data points and ran the experiment again.

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 2>What they were trying to figure out is if the

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 2>model had learned enough about the basic principles of the Earth,

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 2>the underlying physics of the way the planet works, to

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 2>fill in the blanks on its own with just one

0:14:57.000 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 2>percent of the original data, would it still be accurate

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 2>in its predictions. What happened. The model crushed it so

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 2>it was able to extrapolate on the basis of one

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 2>percent of the data what the entire picture looked like.

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 6>Yes, because pre learned everything right.

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it learned the kind of principles of exactly Yeah.

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh wow, that's very very impressive. So at that moment

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 2>when you realize you could do that and just curious

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 2>about your emotional I mean, did you jump up and down?

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 2>What did you do?

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 6>So it's like, wow, it was a very emotional meeting

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 6>because you know, having this person say now I'm convinced right, Yeah,

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 6>it was kind of a quite a special moment. These

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 6>moments make your life as a researcher.

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Ibm And as a launch prithe for Weather and Climate

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty four and while ibm And as a

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 2>scientist could use Prithvy to run interesting experiments, they were

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 2>even more excited about how Prithy could help people in

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 2>the real world. So let's go back to Kenya Ambassador

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Philip Diego and the country's great tree planting project.

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 3>So on those initial months, there was a massive effort,

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 3>including a couple of national holidays for tree planting. Yes,

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 3>where the entire cabinet was sent.

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Ah, did you plant trees.

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 5>As I did?

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 3>Oh my god, I said, the entire cabinet plus someone

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 3>we have to be seen.

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Are you good at the planet? Two weeks ago?

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's very easy to go hole put a tree

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 3>in the ground.

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 2>Well wow, what planting a tree is easy? But remember

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 2>it has to happen fifteen billion times. IBM research has

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 2>been operating in Nairobi since twenty thirteen, and what ken

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 2>you wanted, at least in the beginning was straightforward. The

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 2>prith Fee model that IBM and NASA built could be

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 2>used to essentially make the world old's greatest map, and Kenya,

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 2>with IBM's help, could use that model to make the

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 2>world's greatest map of Kenya. The first step was to

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 2>lay a grid across a topography of the country, break

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 2>the forest into manageable bite sized pieces, each of which

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 2>could be analyzed separately.

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 3>So because our forest is massive when you look at

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 3>it in terms of green hite, but only lay it,

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 3>you're able to break it into pieces, like into boxes.

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 3>And for us that was important because then it's easy

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:33.400
<v Speaker 3>to tackle it when it's in a greed system than

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 3>just as a massive forest. So that was also what

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:38.120
<v Speaker 3>the model was able to do.

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 2>Then the model painstakingly sorted through each of those boxes

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 2>and look for what Philip calls hotspots, so.

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 3>You can see, for example, very quickly which other areas

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 3>are being eroded very fast, and that you need to

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 3>quickly protect. Yeah, because you sometimes and that's where you

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 3>want to target, right, I mean it's not possible to

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 3>do everything at the same time.

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:00.199
<v Speaker 2>Do you have a definition of a hotspot and how

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:02.440
<v Speaker 2>many hotspots are there according to that definition?

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:03.920
<v Speaker 5>Oh, there are a lot.

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 3>So we have more than forty water towers, and I'll

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 3>tell you all of them have hotspots. And the hot

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:14.479
<v Speaker 3>spots in my definition areas that are being degraded faster

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 3>and in a very unusual way. Right, you can literally

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 3>see how human activity is seriously degrading that particular area

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 3>that if you do not have a direct intervention, we'll

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 3>lose the entire forest. So that's the hotspot for us,

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 3>because you think about cutting one hundred trees a day

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 3>and cutting a million trees a day, So that's a

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:34.680
<v Speaker 3>hot spot. You want to look at places where there's

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 3>just unusually high activity of deforestation in a hotspot.

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:42.120
<v Speaker 2>The size of each box in the grid was ten

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:45.880
<v Speaker 2>by ten meters, about half a tennis court. That's how

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:50.119
<v Speaker 2>closely they were examining the forest, so very crudely. The

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 2>model ingests all of this satellite data and it helps

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 2>you answer some very specific questions like where should we

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 2>prioritize our tree planning efforts which areas down to an

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 2>extraordinary level of specificity are eroding most quickly. You know,

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 2>all those kinds of practical questions about how to direct

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 2>your strategy.

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 3>So if you think about a smart forest, right, and

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:17.679
<v Speaker 3>that's really for us, we're calling it smart fencing, smart forests,

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:21.400
<v Speaker 3>everything that's smart because of AI. If you think about

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 3>your usual what you can see with your eyes and

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:27.879
<v Speaker 3>then the satellite layer which just zooms in and you

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 3>see green. So what the model has been able to

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 3>do is to create a smart layer, right, and then

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:37.440
<v Speaker 3>that smart layer you can actually see many things, from analytics,

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 3>to the greeds, to a dashboard, one a lot. So

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 3>about to layer to those blocks. You can quantify degradation

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 3>by blocks. You can match integrations, you can match reforestation.

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:50.920
<v Speaker 2>I asked Philip to imagine what it would have been

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:53.880
<v Speaker 2>like to attempt the tree planting project in an era

0:19:54.080 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 2>before AI. His answer was, plant fifteen billion trees, restore

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:05.160
<v Speaker 2>the water towers. Impossible with Prithvy on Kenya's side, though

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 2>it's really happening. What should be clear by now is

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 2>how versatile Prithvie can be. I want to know how

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 2>to combat deforestation. Prith vy can model that I want

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 2>to know when the best time in the year to

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:20.120
<v Speaker 2>plant your crops is. Prithvy can help predict that too.

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Last year, six months after IBM started helping Kenya with reforestation,

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Kenya needed Prithvy's help on something else and it was

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 2>an emergency.

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 3>So something was happening in the world that we sort

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 3>of had these flats that we didn't expect.

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 2>In the spring of twenty twenty four, Kenya was hit

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 2>with thunderstorms and torrential rain, days and days of it.

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 3>And so I got a call from the Red Cross

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:50.439
<v Speaker 3>then one of my friends, and they're like, Ambassador, we

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:53.639
<v Speaker 3>need a little bit of help on how we deal

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:56.400
<v Speaker 3>with response because what we are seeing is unusual, right

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 3>because no man, you would only have one area. All

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:02.680
<v Speaker 3>of a sudden, we had an entire country flooding. In April,

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 3>we had about three hundred kilometers square kind of total

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 3>land flooded, which is unusual for Kenyon. And so when

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 3>I got this call, we were like, Okay, there's someone

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 3>could did with IBM. We only did one function for

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 3>the trees. It was actually a climate model, and we said,

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 3>can we use this to help us better respond to

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 3>floods and So that was how we started having this

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 3>discussion with IBM in terms of repurposing the model to

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 3>help us deal with this new challenge around floods.

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Again, prithvy is versatile. Prithvie could use everything it knew

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:47.680
<v Speaker 2>about the land, the forests, and infrastructure to analyze how

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 2>and where and when floods would occur. The Kenyan government

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:54.439
<v Speaker 2>could then use the model to help the Red Cross

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:58.920
<v Speaker 2>organize its response, show areas that needed to be evacuated

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:01.640
<v Speaker 2>or safe place is with the Red Cross could set

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 2>up camps. That information was invaluable.

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 3>Historically, what has happened is that they would set up

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 3>camp based on population congregation right where people assembly is

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 3>where they set up a camp, not based on any data,

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 3>right simply because people are there, they will come there

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 3>to provide services and emergency response. What we realize is

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 3>that that model doesn't work. So what we've been able

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 3>to do with IBM is be able to to sort

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 3>of give Red Cause very specific locations or options where

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 3>to set up camps. So if people come here, just

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 3>tell them no, move here, that's the safe place you

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:40.320
<v Speaker 3>really want to go. So I think for me that

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:42.680
<v Speaker 3>was really amazing. So we're calling them a very funny

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:44.920
<v Speaker 3>word for it, flood assembly points. We always have fire

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:47.359
<v Speaker 3>fire assembly points, but now we can say we have

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 3>literally flat assembly points that are safe or citizens.

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:57.679
<v Speaker 2>That's fascinating. So the model has ingested this incredibly granular

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 2>picture later of of the topography and weather patterns of Kenya.

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 2>It's just giving you a set of useful predictions about

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 2>how you should shape your response.

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and what we did remember is that, as I said,

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:18.200
<v Speaker 3>it was a full multistate called capability. What IBM gave

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 3>us was a base map. We didn't have that before,

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 3>and a base model. So you cannot have these layers

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:25.359
<v Speaker 3>up on layers, up on layers to be able to

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:29.719
<v Speaker 3>make intelligent decisions.

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Throughout my reporting on this episode, I've been really impressed

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:37.160
<v Speaker 2>by what Prithvie can do. But it doesn't stop at

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 2>floods and reforestation. Prithvie has also been used to look

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:45.200
<v Speaker 2>at wildfires and floods in the UK, and Kevin told

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 2>me that researchers in Africa have even used prithvy to

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 2>identify locust breeding grounds, which could help them prevent swarms

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:57.919
<v Speaker 2>that destroy crops. But all these are issues on land.

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I always say to people. Seventy percent of

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:02.440
<v Speaker 7>our landmask is ocean.

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:05.719
<v Speaker 2>Kate Rice is the director of the heart Tree Center,

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:10.880
<v Speaker 2>which focuses on adopting AI into UK's public and private sectors,

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 2>and one of those sectors is the blue economy oceans, fish, shellfish.

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 2>But oceans are huge, and getting data from motions is difficult.

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 7>So you're dealing with something where there's not a lot

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:30.440
<v Speaker 7>of people walking around collecting data. So the real difficulty

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:35.159
<v Speaker 7>is understanding that collecting enough data to make anything makes sense.

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 7>And oceans are very complex in terms of their interaction

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:45.440
<v Speaker 7>with our climate and how they interact with the climate,

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 7>so understanding the physics space models is pretty challenging too.

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:56.119
<v Speaker 2>Once again, enter IBM. IBM created a new geospatial model

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 2>to help us better understand our oceans. Heart Tree and

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 2>along with the Plymouth Marine Laboratory, the UK Science and

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:07.679
<v Speaker 2>Technology Facilities Council and the University of Exeter have all

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 2>partnered to focus the model's power on the waters around

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 2>the United Kingdom, which ultimately will help the UK's blue economy.

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:20.399
<v Speaker 7>You get these major blooms in algae, so the ocean

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:23.359
<v Speaker 7>goes green and you might see it in lakes as well.

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 7>Now if you are shell fishing and that's what you're harvesting,

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 7>you can't harvest cockles muscles to be very colloquial when

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:38.920
<v Speaker 7>you have algae blooms because they're poisonous.

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>So there are.

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:41.879
<v Speaker 7>Certain times the year where you can harvest, and there

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:44.879
<v Speaker 7>certain times of year you can't. If you keep having

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:48.479
<v Speaker 7>the algal blooms. Just to put it on an economic terms,

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:52.400
<v Speaker 7>that's a problem. So if we look at it that way,

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 7>that's an issue. So we really do need to try

0:25:56.840 --> 0:26:01.119
<v Speaker 7>and understand where these algore blooms will happen, when they

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:04.640
<v Speaker 7>will happen, and how to limit them, because obviously, if

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 7>you're shell fishing as your livelihood, that's going to really

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 7>impact you.

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:13.919
<v Speaker 2>Kate told me that understanding these algal blooms, how they form,

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 2>why they form, and how they move would allow people

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 2>to better manage them.

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:22.159
<v Speaker 7>What is it you're putting in the water. Are you

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:26.400
<v Speaker 7>putting fertilizers in the water in the near shore environment

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 7>that is causing those algal blooms? Is it because we

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 7>are heating up the oceans and particularly our near shore

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 7>environments that is causing that. I don't know. I'm not

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 7>a specialist, but that's what you're trying to figure out.

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:45.120
<v Speaker 7>Is there something we are doing that is creating those

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:50.400
<v Speaker 7>environments that is causing those algal blooms or is it natural?

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 7>And natural is always a difficult one because I would

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:56.960
<v Speaker 7>say we live in a very managed environment, particularly in

0:26:57.000 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 7>the UK, very few landscapes on natural Most of it

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 7>is managed in some way. Are we managing it in

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 7>an appropriate way? Is there changes in how we behave

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:09.399
<v Speaker 7>that could make things better?

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Not that I needed more examples to sell me and

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 2>how useful the Prithvian models are, but Kate gave me

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 2>a few more use cases that reinforced just how exciting

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 2>foundation models are for our oceans.

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 7>These big brown seaweeds can really help with carbon sequestration.

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 7>Imagine if we could improve the environment enough so that

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 7>we could have more of that, so that we could

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 7>SEQUENTI more carbon. The other thing is wind power. In

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 7>the UK, we have a lot of offshore wind farms

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 7>and we're doing really well with our renewable energy resources.

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:46.440
<v Speaker 7>So where do we put that and how does that

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 7>impact sand movements? So these sandbars and things aren't static,

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 7>they move, so understanding that is really important for where

0:27:56.280 --> 0:28:00.880
<v Speaker 7>you're going to put your suboceanic infrastructure. You've got cables

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:04.160
<v Speaker 7>going across the oceans. If we're going to use our

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:08.920
<v Speaker 7>oceans more, we need to understand what that environmental impact

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 7>is going to be long term.

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 2>The Ocean Model launched at the end of September twenty

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:24.240
<v Speaker 2>twenty five. The research is only beginning. When I sat

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 2>down with Kevin Murphy at NASA, I wanted to understand

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:30.959
<v Speaker 2>where all of this impressive work was going. And one

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 2>of the signature aspects of this work is that it's

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 2>not just for IBM and NASA researchers. Anyone can use

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 2>these models.

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 5>So before, if you were a researcher, or let's say

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 5>you were a farmer or maybe a technology informed person

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 5>that was interested in something like this, you would have

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 5>to learn about how to do remote sensing, how to

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 5>calibrate the imagery, how to stitch it together because you

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 5>know they come in kind of postage stamps that you

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 5>have to squashed, and then you'd have to learn about

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 5>the algorithms necessary to do all the processing right, So

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 5>a lot of work and then you could actually do

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 5>the mapping that you were interested in. Today, what you

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 5>can do is you can go to hugging face, which

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:17.959
<v Speaker 5>is where this model exists in the open using kind

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:20.719
<v Speaker 5>of our open science principles, and you can apply it

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 5>to future or historical observations without having all of that

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 5>background information.

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 2>And with the partnership between NASA and IBM, these foundation

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 2>models are multiplying. The new version of Prithvi I mentioned

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 2>launched in September twenty twenty four. Then in August turing

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 2>twenty five, NASA and IBM launched another foundation model called Syria,

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 2>based on data from the Sun. Soria can help predict

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 2>solar flares which can disrupt communications and increase radiation for

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 2>high altitude flights. And then there's the Ocean model I

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 2>talked about with Kate Royce. So what does the future

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 2>look like for all the foundation models built from NASA data?

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 2>If I wanted to look five or ten years out

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 2>to understand erosion patterns in a coastal town, you.

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 5>Could give me. Eventually, I think we'll get there. Yeah,

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 5>you know, we've really only been doing this for the

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 5>past few years. There is a lot of I think,

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 5>capabilities to still discover and uncover with how we use

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 5>these models for, like especially long term predictions, like you're talking.

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:31.880
<v Speaker 2>About what do you think you can't do and that

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 2>you really love to do. What's the kind of like

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 2>great white whale problem.

0:30:36.200 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 5>We can't do this today, but I'd like to be

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 5>able to do it in the future, which is really

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 5>the linking of the models together. Right. So, right now

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 5>we have these isolated areas where you know, we have

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 5>the harmonized lansat sentinel or geospatial model. We have the

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 5>weather model which can look at short term predictions. We're

0:30:56.040 --> 0:31:00.720
<v Speaker 5>building out the heliophysics model to look at the dynamics.

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 5>But they're probably going to have to be additional models

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 5>built so that we can understand how they interact with

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 5>one another, right, And that is you know, kind of

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 5>towards a digital twin of kind of the Solar system

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 5>or Earth systems, which which I think is a big

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 5>Harry problem, but if we understand it, we might be

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 5>able to address some of the questions that you just

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 5>asked about prediction.

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 2>So if you linked all of those models together, basically

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 2>what you're saying is, can I you say a digital twin,

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 2>you're essentially replicating holistically how our world works.

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 5>Yep?

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 2>And do you think that is achievable?

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 5>I don't think it's immediately achievable, but based on kind

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 5>of the progress that we've seen in the last three

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 5>or four years, I think it's more achievable today than

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 5>it was then.

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Do you think you'll see it in your Yeah, sure,

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:56.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm hopeful, and I've got a couple.

0:31:56.680 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 5>Of years left.

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 2>Smart Talks with IBM is produced by Matt Ramano, Amy Gains, McQuaid,

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 2>Trina Menino, and Jake Harper. Were edited by Lacy Roberts.

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Engineering by Nina Bird Lawrence, mastering by Sarah Buguerer, music

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:31.120
<v Speaker 2>by Gramoscope, Strategy by Tatiana Lieberman, Cassidy Meyer and Sophia Derlin.

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Special thanks to the team at NASA's Science Mission Directorate.

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Smart Talks with IBM is a production of Pushkin Industries

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:45.719
<v Speaker 2>and Ruby Studio at iHeartMedia. To find more Pushkin podcasts,

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 2>listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:54.120
<v Speaker 2>listen to podcasts. I'm Malcolm Glawell. This is a paid

0:32:54.160 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 2>advertisement from IBM. The conversations on this podcast don't necessarily

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:19.440
<v Speaker 2>represent ib m's positions, strategies or opinions. Since we recorded

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:24.560
<v Speaker 2>this episode, IBM and NASA released Syria, their solar weather model.

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 2>In early testing, it showed a sixteen percent improvement in

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 2>solar flare prediction accuracy. This is the kind of improvement

0:33:33.040 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 2>that helps protect our satellites, our power grids, and our

0:33:36.800 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 2>GPS systems from the Sun's unpredictable nature. And the next

0:33:41.400 --> 0:33:45.520
<v Speaker 2>step in this partnership another model coming in twenty twenty six.

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 2>Looking beyond the Earth and the Sun. The universe of

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 2>possibilities just keeps expanding.