WEBVTT - Here's What It Takes to Make a Great Company

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Hey, they're aud Loots listeners. It's Tracy Alloway.

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 2>And Joe Wisenthal.

0:00:04.280 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>We are very excited to announce that Audlots is going

0:00:07.800 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to Washington That's right.

0:00:09.760 --> 0:00:11.560
<v Speaker 2>For the first time, we are going to do a

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:16.439
<v Speaker 2>live public odd Lots recording in our nation's capital. That's

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 2>going to be March twelfth in Washington, DC at the

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Miracle Theater and guests will be announced in the coming days,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 2>but in the meantime you can find a ticket link

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 2>at Bloomberg dot com slash odd.

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 3>Lots, Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Aught Thoughts podcast.

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Joe Wisenthal.

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Joe, you told me you read a fiction book last year, right,

0:00:57.040 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>just one.

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 2>I read it, so I read too much nonfiction Like

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 2>a lot of dudes. I think it's nonfiction is very

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:08.399
<v Speaker 2>bro coded. My goal for twenty twenty five was to

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 2>read at least one novel, and I did it. I

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:13.040
<v Speaker 2>already satisfied my goal. It's not even the end of

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 2>January yet, so back to reading random history and philosophy

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 2>and all that stuff.

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Very very ambitious. You're one fiction book can I make

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>a suggestion for another.

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 3>Fiction book you should read, please.

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:28.759
<v Speaker 1>So there's a book by Margaret Atwood called Orx and Craik,

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's sort of a sci fi thing, but I

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>think about it quite a lot nowadays because she has

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:40.320
<v Speaker 1>this vision of society in the future, and in that society,

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:44.679
<v Speaker 1>companies are the most important part of it. It's not

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>about countries anymore. It's all about what company you work for,

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and the companies are kind of the ones providing all

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the social services like healthcare and housing. Basically you're a

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>citizen of a company instead of a country. And I

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of think about it a lot because I feel

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 1>like we're sort of moving in that direction where companies

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 1>are becoming more powerful, they're becoming more interesting in many

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:11.959
<v Speaker 1>ways and more important to society than ever.

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking it up right now, I hadn't heard of it.

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 2>It came out in two thousand and three. Maybe at

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:20.360
<v Speaker 2>that time it was sort of seen as futuristic, but

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty five it does not even sound futuristic

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 2>or controversial at all. And we could go on about

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 2>what that means, but I just like basically accept the

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 2>premise that that's true now twenty five.

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, great, so you have your second fiction book to read.

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>But the reason I bring it up is because I

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>think we should do more on these stories of companies

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>in general. And so I am very pleased to say

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that we do, in fact have the perfect guests to

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:48.679
<v Speaker 1>discuss this. I'm very excited about this. I'm a fan

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>of their podcast. Lots of people are fans of their podcast.

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>We're going to be speaking with Ben Gilbert and David Rosenthal,

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the co hosts of the Acquired podcast. So Ben and David,

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for coming on all thoughts.

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 4>Thank you great to be here, Thanks for having us

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 4>all right, may it was so good career.

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 5>Thank you.

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Tracy and I were talking about like who should start

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 2>this one, and I was like, Tracy, you do it,

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 2>and it was much better than what.

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:17.959
<v Speaker 1>I Well, thank you everyone. That's very nice. Ben and

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>David maybe give us the uh, the elevator pitch for

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the podcast just before we begin.

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 4>Well.

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 5>Acquired is a ten year old podcast that started, like

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:32.079
<v Speaker 5>many company journeys in obscurity, with nobody listening, and slowly

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 5>doubled year over year over year. Now I bet, I bet,

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 5>uh Yeah, we're now fortunate to be one of the

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 5>top few off of the number one tech podcast on

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 5>Apple and Spotify. Which is a little funny because we

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 5>study these companies that are very often not tech companies now,

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 5>but we look at companies like TSMC and Bars, the

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 5>company behind M and M's ikea, Meta ermez Costco, and

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 5>we really try to through conversation David and I tell

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 5>the entire history of the company from founding to today,

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 5>analyze it and really try to answer the question why

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 5>did the company that we are studying work and work

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 5>at such extreme scale?

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 4>And Tracy it's the reason we do it is literally

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 4>just like you said, you know, the institutions that these companies,

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 4>the biggest companies you know around the world have become

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 4>are you know, they're quasi governmental at this point. You know,

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 4>you can make an argument they're more important than government.

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 4>Somebody said to Ben a few months ago when when

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 4>talking about acquired you know, in two hundred years, I

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 4>don't know if people are going to know the name

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 4>Joe Biden, but they're sure as hell going to know

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 4>the name Mark Zuckerberg. We're like, WHOA, that's that's a

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 4>crazy idea but might be true.

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I can't. They're a bunch of random

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.840
<v Speaker 2>presidents from one hundred years ago that I certainly I

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 2>couldn't name, or if I could name them, wouldn't know

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 2>anything about them. Going back to Tracy's fantastic intro, you know,

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:59.159
<v Speaker 2>there's sort of two things I guess about companies, which

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 2>is one is I guess the business model, the product

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:05.159
<v Speaker 2>that they sell. You know, you build something and then

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 2>you try to sell it for more money that you

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 2>built it for. And then there is this sort of

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:13.799
<v Speaker 2>like the internal empire, and there's the culture, and there's

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 2>just the way they work. And these are fundamentally sort

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 2>of like different questions. Do you how do you think

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 2>about like what a company is? Because I get they're

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 2>really portrays it's intro. There are multiple ways to describe it,

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 2>like what is a company that is?

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 4>You know, we typically spend four to six hours on

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 4>an episode trying to answer that question.

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 4>It's what we've tended to find is the only pattern

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 4>that tends to really exist across these greatest, biggest companies

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 4>in the world is that they are each totally idiosyncratic

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 4>in some really one or multiple really really really important

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 4>to mentions. And so I think I would say, you know,

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:05.119
<v Speaker 4>for those incredibly successful, you know institutions of our time,

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 4>what they are is they are something unique that no

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:16.039
<v Speaker 4>other institution, you know, company, corporate, governmental, otherwise can well.

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:19.919
<v Speaker 4>TSMC that we just covered, we just interviewed the founder

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 4>of Morris Chang in Taiwan, which is an incredible experience.

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 4>You know, they make all the leading edge chips in

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 4>the world, so you know, to the extent that computing

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 4>and compute is important in our world, like all of

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 4>it flows through TSMC. There is nobody else in the

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 4>world that has the capability to make the incredibly powerful

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 4>chips at the leading edge that they do.

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:46.280
<v Speaker 5>I think our episodes tend to hinge on this question,

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:50.039
<v Speaker 5>in what way is this company singular? Because nothing gets

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:54.159
<v Speaker 5>to five hundred billion dollar trillion dollar scale without being

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 5>the only one that can do X. And in TSMC's case,

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:02.839
<v Speaker 5>they're the only company that doesn't ever compete with their customers.

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 5>They're purely a foundry. They are not also a chip designer,

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 5>and they're the only ones capable of doing what is

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 5>the current technology generation two nanometer process the most sophisticated

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 5>leading edge chips, and almost every big company you look

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 5>at that has been successful over in a long period

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 5>of time or reached outlier status is singular in some

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 5>way like that.

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 4>And TSMC, it's like it's wild because of that, that

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 4>is the only thing that matters there. They are in

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 4>this you know, island nation of you know, depending on

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 4>who you ask, disputed sovereignty. It's insane. There's something like

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 4>six or seven percent of the country's GDP and like

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 4>I think, like fifteen percent of the stock market you know,

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 4>of the equity value of companies in the country. Yet

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 4>it exists, and yet the world order, you know, at

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 4>least thus far, has reorganized itself around it.

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>So the way I kind of think of your podcast,

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the analogy that I use is you're the business equivalent

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of Dan Carlin's hardcore history. Like these are long episodes

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>where you are digging very deep into the profile of

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a particular company. But as you mentioned, you also do

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>interviews or you weave interviews into your company profiles, and

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>you just did that one with Morris Chang, the TSMC founder.

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that really surprised me in that

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 1>interview was he said he never fired people and never

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>did performance reviews. What did you guys, think of.

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 5>That, it's really interesting. So David and I got to

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 5>read an unauthorized translation of his Chinese only memoir to prepare,

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 5>and he went into great length in the memoir explaining

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 5>the philosophy, and the idea is that performance reviews are

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 5>entirely separate from the idea of who should get laid

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 5>off if there's a layoff. Performance reviews are specifically about

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 5>coaching you on how to be a better employee for

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 5>the company next year, so both the employee and the

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 5>company benefit if there is a layoff. There should be

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 5>an entirely different way of determining where we need to

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 5>trim to cut budget versus looking at people's performance reviews.

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 5>And Morris goes so far as to believe that in

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 5>his industry, with his business model, you should actually never

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 5>lay people off. And I think that comes from the

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 5>fact that, a if you believe the economy or your

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 5>industry is going to turn around within twelve or eighteen months,

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 5>you know it's not actually worth it to lay people off,

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 5>pay a whole bunch of severance, need to hire people back,

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 5>need to retrain them. But the other big part is

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 5>Moore's law marches on and so.

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:39.200
<v Speaker 4>If you believe in Moore's law, you will always need more.

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 5>Yes, and you'll need more people, you'll need more machinery,

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 5>you'll need more capacity. And the semiconductor industry is so

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 5>cyclical that part of the way that he believes you

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 5>can kind of avoid these huge gluts and then you

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 5>know bubbles. Basically this boom and bust of the semiconductor

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:59.959
<v Speaker 5>industry is to sort of behave less in this whiplash

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 5>like fashion where oh no, there's a little bit of

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:04.679
<v Speaker 5>an asset bubble and you know, stocks are in a

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:06.439
<v Speaker 5>draw down, so we need to lay off people.

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 4>Oh my god.

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:10.560
<v Speaker 5>And I think he sort of blames layoff as a

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 5>piece of the massive cyclicality of the industry.

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 4>And he had a really scarring experience around this back

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 4>when he was at TI Texas Instruments. So, I mean,

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 4>the crazy thing about Morris he didn't start TSMC un

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 4>till he was fifty six years old. He's not Taiwanese's.

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 4>He was born in China but then became an American citizen.

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 4>He had a whole incredible career in the semiconductor industry

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 4>in America. Long before starting TSMC, he ran TI's semiconductor

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:40.439
<v Speaker 4>group and before Intel and.

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 5>Really what you might chuckle about, like TI they make

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 5>those calculators for high school students, right.

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 4>But before Intel and for the first like ten years

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 4>of Intel's existence, they were the pipsqueak and TI was

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 4>the semiconductor giant, and Morris ran the semiconductor division at TI.

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 4>And at some point part of how they really lost

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:05.560
<v Speaker 4>the crown to Intel was the corporate you know, the

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 4>CEO decided we need to have La off for whatever reason,

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, gyrations were going on in the stock market

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:13.439
<v Speaker 4>or whatever. They ended up as a result of that.

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if they're directly laid off, but as

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 4>a result, the Moss team mos metal oxide semi conductor

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 4>some of the uh yeah, which was sort of the

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 4>next generation of silicon. That team within TI left the

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:33.959
<v Speaker 4>company started a new company called Moss Tech. And then

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 4>anybody who knows anything about semi conductors knows, you know,

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 4>Moss was like the key technology that Intel leveraged and

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 4>like you know, really helped expand More's law and t

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 4>I just totally missed out on that because they you know,

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 4>parted ways with this really important group and like, who

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 4>knows what's going to be really important in the future.

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:54.319
<v Speaker 2>So this actually gets to something that is a very recurrent,

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 2>odd lotch theme. And of course when I described what

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 2>companies are sort of in the theoretical sense, you know,

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:05.559
<v Speaker 2>one thing I didn't mention is their preservation of collective

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 2>knowledge and memory.

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 2>So TSMC may be the best in the world at

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 2>producing chips, but there is no individual at TSMC that

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 2>knows how to build chips, right, It's a collective process

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 2>and there's no one person that stores it all in

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 2>his head and just can walk across. And you see

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 2>this in the failings of certain American manufacturers. They do

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 2>have these layoffs and then they're like out of practice

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 2>and they get rusty. And we talk about it a

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 2>lot in the nuclear industry and the plan industry, et cetera.

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Talk to us maybe TSMC, but also other examples of

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 2>the company as this sort of knowledge preserver.

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 4>Totally. Well, TSMC is so vivid in our minds right

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 4>now because we just were there and we toured the

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 4>science park Kinschy Science Park in Taiwan, where not only TSMC,

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 4>but the whole semiconductor ecosystem is located. Like media texts there,

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:56.559
<v Speaker 4>arms there, you know, Apple's there, like, you know, it's

0:12:56.600 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 4>like a it's all all right there, right together. You

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 4>are so incredibly correct that there is no one person.

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 4>There's not even a group of one thousand people who

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 4>know how to make chips or know what TSMC is.

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 4>You can't just like airlift, you could take all the buildings,

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 4>you could take a bunch of people out of there,

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 4>and like, you cannot recreate this. It is a whole

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 4>ecosystem contained in one physical location.

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 5>I think it's fair to say it's the most complex

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 5>process that humankind has created and the most complex product,

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 5>like the science and technology in R and D that

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 5>goes into etching a two nanimeter wafer for use in

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 5>whether it's AI chips from Nvidia or you know, the

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 5>chips in our MacBooks or iPhones from Apple. That is,

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 5>you know, there's a joke in the semiconductor industry that

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 5>this is a technology given to us by aliens. That's

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 5>how sort of insane it is.

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 4>It is the closest thing to magic in the modern world.

0:13:56.679 --> 0:13:59.199
<v Speaker 5>Yes, I think that's exactly right, and so yeah, I

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 5>think lots of indust have examples of what you're talking about,

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 5>This idea that the culture of the company contains this

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 5>sort of fabric of knowledge that not one person can have,

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 5>but is blown out to its extreme in semiconductors.

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>So if we agree that companies are sort of collections

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of institutional knowledge, more broadly, I guess I'm wondering how

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>much of a role does management play? Then, Like, are

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>there instances that you've studied where management has made a real,

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>real difference?

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 4>Yes, of laughing, Meta Facebook is like such an extreme

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 4>example of this, Like, yes, Meta, And I'm sure Mark

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 4>would be the first to say, is just like TSMC,

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:02.359
<v Speaker 4>a collection of all the people and knowledge and processes.

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 4>And if Mark were to go start another company, he

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 4>couldn't recreate you know, Meta and Facebook. But there have

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 4>been so many moments in the history of that company

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 4>where a decision or a set of decisions made solely

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 4>by Mark have completely changed its course and enabled it

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 4>to become what is it, you know, before this most

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 4>recent draw down one and a half trillion dollar market

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 4>cap company.

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 5>I would say I draw a distinction between management and leadership.

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 5>I think management tends to play a role in stabilizing

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 5>companies and creating companies that are maybe one two standard

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 5>deviations away from the mean. On the positive side. You know,

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 5>how to create good companies, and leadership is how to

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 5>create great companies. These founder led companies Jensen and Mark

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 5>Zuckerberg and Forrest Mahers and in the case of the

0:15:56.720 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 5>Eminem's you know, Snickers Candy Corporation, and Bill Gates in

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 5>the case of Microsoft, Dehak in the case of Visa.

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 5>These are people that are visionary, that have an idea

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 5>of the way the world should work. John Collinson has

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 5>this great quote that when you look around the world

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 5>as a museum of passion projects, and I think it's

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 5>the leadership of these like true visionaries that you know,

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 5>when they first started, you didn't know for sure they

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 5>were going to be right or not. But in hindsight

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 5>it was it was their leadership, their stubbornness, their stick toitiveness,

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 5>and their insistence that their way of arranging the world

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 5>around them was correct that ended up actually shaping the

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 5>world and creating the biggest companies on Earth.

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, I have a question since you started off

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 2>by talking about performance reviews, and here's something that I

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 2>think about some time, which is that let's say you

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 2>have like a Mark Zuckerberg starting Facebook in his dorm room,

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 2>or Larry and SERGEI and Google in their garage and

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 2>they have this cool technology and they're growing, and that

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 2>it's eventually they hit a point where someone comes to

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 2>them and says, you know what, we really need to

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:07.199
<v Speaker 2>like write an HR manual, we really need to like

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:10.399
<v Speaker 2>come up with all this stuff. And I think about myself,

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:11.919
<v Speaker 2>that would be the point where, like, you know what,

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm selling the company I hate. I hate dealing with.

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Like Joe, I hate paperwork.

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to like write a manual. I don't

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 2>want to start having performance reviews. I don't want to

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 2>like come up with all these like HR policies. This

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:28.159
<v Speaker 2>sounds like a headache. I'm curious, though, like, because you

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 2>talk about these visionaries, how do they sort of accept

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 2>the fact that as they get bigger, certain aspects of bureaucracy,

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 2>which they probably find kind of annoying to are sort

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 2>of must haves.

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:44.919
<v Speaker 5>With scale hm, I would push back that it's must have.

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 5>I think it is most common to have it. But

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 5>I am of the opinion that you can accomplish the

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:55.400
<v Speaker 5>same set of tasks through process and through culture.

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 2>They all have, right, they all have rules, they all

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:02.640
<v Speaker 2>have like man, I mean, eventually, like they all have

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 2>a HR department, and they have a specialization all that stuff.

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:10.160
<v Speaker 5>One hundred x more than others like you. Look at Nvidia,

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:12.880
<v Speaker 5>and I honestly believe this is true from speaking with Jensen,

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:15.360
<v Speaker 5>from interviewing him, from speaking with a number of directs,

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:21.120
<v Speaker 5>from spending time at headquarters. It is a pretty unstructured

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 5>environment with comparatively few people. I think, what's in Nvidia's

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:27.159
<v Speaker 5>head count, David something and.

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:30.880
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, compared to the other tech giants.

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 5>Five to ten x less less than the other big

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 5>tech companies, way less process.

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Small, Yeah, according to twenty nine thousand people, twenty nine thousand,

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 2>six hundred, All right, keep going, keep going, And.

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 5>What's Apple somewhere in one hundred thousand, Microsoft's like one

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 5>hundred and sixty seventy thousand. I mean, it's a comparatively

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:52.199
<v Speaker 5>small headcount company. And I really do think you can

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:58.679
<v Speaker 5>accomplish tasks through incredibly strong culture or process, and usually

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:00.680
<v Speaker 5>it's the sum of both. But it's always interesting to

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 5>see which companies are able to lean much more heavily

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:07.160
<v Speaker 5>on You would just never violate some tenet of our culture,

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:09.639
<v Speaker 5>and therefore we don't need rigid process around it.

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 4>And it's funny, you know, it's not you can kind

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 4>of go one way or the other or somewhere in

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:17.639
<v Speaker 4>the spectrum. So with Jensen, and in Nvidia's case, clearly

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 4>that's how he loves to operate. Forest Mars at the

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 4>Bars company was the total opposite end of the spectrum.

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 4>Forrest was one of the most idiosyncratic entrepreneurs in American history.

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 4>And because the company is so private and the family

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 4>is so private, it's not as well known. We did

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 4>an episode audit.

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 5>By the way, I said, Candy and Pet company worth

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:41.360
<v Speaker 5>probably over one hundred billion dollars, totally privately held.

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 4>Totally owned by the family one hundred percent. Forrest was

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 4>so extreme on process, so he just instituted this set

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:51.640
<v Speaker 4>of rules that were completely crazy to the outside world

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 4>at the time, but like we're how he wanted to

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 4>organize things, and then everybody in the company just fell

0:19:57.320 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 4>in line with the rules. So stuff like they're no office,

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:02.360
<v Speaker 4>there's no conference rooms. Well there are a few conference rooms,

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:04.119
<v Speaker 4>they don't have doors on them, they're made of glass.

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 4>Everybody open floor plan. This is in the nineteen thirties.

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 4>Imagine this, like no executive offices, no perks.

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 5>A large bonus is determined if you are on time

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:16.199
<v Speaker 5>to meetings or not.

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:19.919
<v Speaker 4>And everybody punched a time card, including him, the CEO.

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:23.440
<v Speaker 2>By the way, Tracy, I can think of another privately

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 2>owned company with open floor plans and all glass windowed offices.

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, do you guys punch a time card? We don't.

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:34.919
<v Speaker 1>We kind of do, yeah, kind of, kind of.

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:36.679
<v Speaker 2>Some of this sounds from it. We don't get a

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 2>bonus for showing up at a meeting time. Some of

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:41.719
<v Speaker 2>this sounds familiar anyway, keep going.

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, And the way that he did this is you know,

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 4>again these were radical, radical concepts for like you know,

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:51.439
<v Speaker 4>pre war and post war America and Europe at the time. Uh.

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 4>He just said, like, we are all about performance here.

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 4>We're all about the company's bottom line, and if the

0:20:57.280 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 4>company performs well, you will make an sane amount of money.

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 4>And so his goal was, like, assuming we outperform our targets,

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:07.400
<v Speaker 4>everybody you know, on their salarly base should make three

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 4>times what an average salary for their job would be

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:12.640
<v Speaker 4>elsewhere in the industry. And so like, you just set

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:14.639
<v Speaker 4>up those incentives and you set up those hard rules,

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 4>and you're going to get people to follow them.

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Wait, so I don't know that much about the Mars

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:22.919
<v Speaker 1>company other than you know, Eminem's are delicious and all

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>of that. But when you're researching a privately held company,

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 1>like that's what's the actual research process for you? Like

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>how do you dig up information on a company where

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>you know there aren't as many like public publicly available

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 1>documents and financial statements.

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 5>We rely heavily on the or at least historically. We're

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 5>now getting more primary source access, but historically on the

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 5>writing of great journalists and so usually there is a

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 5>canonical book of someone who got close, like in the

0:21:56.359 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 5>case of Renaissance Technology, the ultra Secretive Asset Man out

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 5>of uh Stocket, New York.

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:04.919
<v Speaker 4>I think that's right, David.

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 5>There's a great book by Greg Zuckerman called The Man

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 5>Who Solved the Market. Like pretty investigative journalism work, David,

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:11.680
<v Speaker 5>there's one here in the Yeah.

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 4>For Mars, there's a book written by Joel Glenn Brenner.

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 4>She was a reporter at the Washington Post in the

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 4>eighties and nineties. It's called Emperors of Chocolate. It's so good.

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 4>She got access to Mars by calling them, calling headquarters

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 4>every single day for a year and then finally they

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:33.159
<v Speaker 4>relented and gave her access. It's the only book ever written.

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 4>It came out in like the late eighties early nineties,

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 4>so we used that and then and then we talked

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 4>to her. So we talked to her from Mars, We

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:42.359
<v Speaker 4>talked to Greg for Rentech. We talked to these people,

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:44.159
<v Speaker 4>and we say like, okay, like you know, tell us

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 4>about this, like what was the process of getting access?

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 4>You know, what are you sure about? What are you

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:49.679
<v Speaker 4>not sure about? What do we really need to highlight

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:53.360
<v Speaker 4>what's happened since? And also is.

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 5>Even if a company, for example, when we did Envidia

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 5>in early twenty twenty to which gosh, what a ride

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 5>it's been since we covered the company. Back then there

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:07.159
<v Speaker 5>wasn't a book yet There's about to be two books,

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 5>and so that requires sort of piecing together the story

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 5>over a lot of different ways. David's favorite is finding

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 5>industry talks that have been posted to YouTube, and so

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 5>there's usually some mid level manager that is talking about

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 5>something like in a presentation. They all excited because they

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 5>get to go and present to their peers. There's always

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:30.199
<v Speaker 5>gold in there, and I don't think it's like investment

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 5>Alpha necessarily, and I'm not sure it's competitive information where

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 5>the company's like, oh, we wish this wasn't presented, but

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 5>it really does. If you're trying to understand the story

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 5>of how the company became successful, really helps you find that.

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:43.120
<v Speaker 4>And it's often the founders themselves too. I mean, gosh,

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:46.440
<v Speaker 4>in that Nvidia case, there was a talk that Jensen

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 4>gave at against the State University on the setting of

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 4>OSU and it was recorded I don't know, probably sometime

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 4>in the nineties, early two thousands, and he's, you know,

0:23:56.760 --> 0:23:58.919
<v Speaker 4>it's a totally different Gensen, it's a totally different company,

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 4>and he's completely candid, straightforward talking about his journey. And

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, when we found it, it had like I

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:08.119
<v Speaker 4>don't know, a couple hundreds views on YouTube. This stuff

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:08.640
<v Speaker 4>is out there.

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:27.439
<v Speaker 2>There's an obsession among a lot of investors with the

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 2>idea of founder led companies, and that's really exciting someone

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 2>who's still there, who still has that original vision. But

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, obviously a lot of companies are just too

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:40.640
<v Speaker 2>old to still be founder led, or companies thrived through

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 2>multiple CEOs. Regardless, what patterns have you realized is there

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:49.359
<v Speaker 2>a real difference with founder led companies or is this

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 2>sort of just a survivorship virus. Some founder led companies

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 2>have done really well, and we remember all of those,

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 2>some flame out and no one talks about them, et cetera.

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:03.439
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious what patterns or anti patterns you observe.

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 5>Okay, well, first of all, it's all survivorship bias. Everything

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:11.159
<v Speaker 5>we've talked about so far. Actually, I'm glad, yeah, I

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:12.199
<v Speaker 5>was gonna follow anyway.

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 4>Past performance is not an indicator of future success here.

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:19.360
<v Speaker 5>We have not brought up a single company on here

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 5>that A has failed or B is a middling success. No,

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:27.440
<v Speaker 5>ten billion dollar companies have sort of crossed our lips

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 5>this conversation. We have decided on acquired. We love understanding

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 5>what made the extreme outliers work so well. The great

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 5>irony is that is not a playbook that you can repeat.

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:39.439
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:41.360
<v Speaker 5>It's like holding that lottery ticket up in the air

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 5>and professing to everyone. Like the great webcomic x XKCD.

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:48.639
<v Speaker 5>There's this amazing comic where he's holding the lottery ticket

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:51.880
<v Speaker 5>on a stage saying I just kept playing and if

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:55.120
<v Speaker 5>you keep playing too, you too can win the lottery.

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 5>And I think it is you know, we should wave

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:02.160
<v Speaker 5>our arms around and say, if you run Mark Zuckerberg's

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 5>exact decision process will not create case BRI. I mean

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 5>that it's just you weren't there at that exact time

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 5>and that exact place.

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 2>I always think about those Twitter threads where it's like,

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 2>this is the daily routine of the CEO. He gets

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 2>up at flour am, it takes a cold shower, and

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:19.640
<v Speaker 2>then meditates for half an hour, and then eats raw

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:22.680
<v Speaker 2>oats and then takes his kids to school, et cetera.

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 2>You're not going to start a billion dollar company by

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 2>following what you saw on a Twitter.

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 4>Humans are really really bad at distinguishing correlation from causation.

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that's another now xCD comic, isn't it.

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:36.200
<v Speaker 5>Oh yeah, x XKCD.

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh sorry XKCD. Dyslexia strikes again.

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 5>It's not the easiest name to remember or pronounce. But

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 5>I will say, though, I think if your goal is

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 5>how do I start a trillion dollar company? How do

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:53.680
<v Speaker 5>I start one of the thirty forty to fifty most important, largest,

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 5>most successful, durable companies on the planet. Founder lead companies

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 5>have a much higher probability of being that, And as

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:06.399
<v Speaker 5>you point out, time has a lot to do with that.

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:08.719
<v Speaker 5>You look at Arimez. This is a you know what

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 5>is one hundred and fifty year old company. The original

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 5>founder is not going to be the person running that,

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 5>but close control is a key to the success of

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 5>that business and so many others where they control their

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:23.879
<v Speaker 5>own destiny, they don't have to answer to the whims

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:26.440
<v Speaker 5>of shareholders ike as another great example. Mars is a

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 5>great example. It might be a hired CEO in the

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 5>case of Mars, or it might be a close family

0:27:32.840 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 5>member in the case of Aermez. That David, you're common

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 5>on the sixth generation family member. But there is a

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:42.159
<v Speaker 5>flexibility to adhere to the ethos of what makes the

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:46.359
<v Speaker 5>company special. That either founder control, family control, or just

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:50.919
<v Speaker 5>sort of tight original shareholder control lets you do in

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:54.400
<v Speaker 5>a way that if you're publicly traded, eventually the specialness

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 5>gets beat out of you. You start believing that the

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 5>consultants are right when you hire that and they say

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 5>you should be like everyone else, or that the public

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 5>equity investors that are trying to compare you against your

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:09.919
<v Speaker 5>comps and use the same numbers to compare you, but

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 5>not really understand actually the way my business works you

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 5>should analyze it in a completely different way, because that

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:17.520
<v Speaker 5>is what makes it special. You just you lose the

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 5>ability to keep your search.

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 4>This amazing story from Ermez's history of Jean Louis Dumat

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:27.639
<v Speaker 4>who was I think the third either the third or

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 4>fourth generation family member to run the company in the eighties,

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 4>late seventies, early eighties, and Mez it kind of I

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 4>don't want to say fallen on hard times, but they

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 4>were much much smaller relative to their peers in the

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 4>luxury industry, and Gucci was on the rise. You know,

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 4>it was the tom four Days at Gucci and they

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 4>were everywhere, and they brought in some consultants. I don't

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 4>know which firm, you know it recommended like, oh okay,

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 4>I mes should basically throw in the talent, follow the

0:28:56.960 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 4>Gucci Plight book of like machine production, high volume, lots

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 4>of skews, be everywhere, license your brand, license your brand. Yeah,

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:08.239
<v Speaker 4>things you could never imagine them as doing today. And

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 4>Jean Leus just said like basically, no, an f you

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 4>and we will never work with consultants ever again, and

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 4>we're going to double down on hand crafted, you know,

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 4>unique history, scarcity, and that's what they did and so

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 4>they built up, you know, over the ensuing decades they

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 4>have seven eight thousand artisans that hand make the majority

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 4>of their items in France. Like what other company is is,

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, a one hundred plus billion dollar company where

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 4>everything is handmade by artisans.

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 5>This was a dead craft. They spent thirty years reviving

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 5>the number of craft people, and.

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 4>They started schools, to trade schools to teach people to

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 4>do this because it wasn't getting passed on, you know,

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 4>through generations anymore, because all the other luxury companies had

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 4>moved to machine production.

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 5>I think, when it comes down to it, the lesson

0:29:56.040 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 5>is the most successful companies are created by leaning into

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:04.959
<v Speaker 5>the thing that makes them special, not by trying to

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 5>be like everyone else.

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I like the idea that in some alternate reality they

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 1>listen to the consultants and I in fact have a

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 1>burken bag, but I guess, I guess it wouldn't be

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 1>as special, all right. So the other thing that people

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 1>are obsessed with, in addition to founder led companies is

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the idea of disruption, right and disruption is certainly in

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the news right now, given the Deep Seek sell off

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like that. And Joe and I recorded an

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 1>interview with Howard Marx a little while ago, and one

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 1>of the things he talks about is how there's no

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:43.720
<v Speaker 1>guarantee that the big or best companies of today are

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be around forever. So if you go back

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and look at some businesses that were big in the

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 1>s and p. Five hundred, like back in the sixties,

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 1>they aren't there anymore. So names like Kodak or Avon,

0:30:56.920 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 1>remember the Avon lady and Simplicity pattern was in the

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 1>s and p. Five hundred. That's a company that made

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 1>patterns so people could make their own clothes. Like it's

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of hard. Yeah, it's hard to imagine that now.

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 1>But in the podcast you're discussing successful companies, But how

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 1>do you view, I guess a company's longevity, Like what

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 1>factors determine whether a business is sustainable for decades versus

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 1>being just a flash in the pan.

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 4>It's funny.

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:28.640
<v Speaker 5>Not only is this a great question, it's actually the

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 5>most important question because if let's say something compounds at

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:37.120
<v Speaker 5>a fixed rate, and let's even say that rate is low,

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 5>it's a five percent per year growth company, what actually

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 5>matters is your growth in years twenty eight, twenty nine

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 5>and thirty on a thirty dollar horizon. And it's if

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 5>whether or not you're able to grow ten percent this

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 5>year in year two or three or four and wildly

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 5>exceed your targets, that's completely irrelevant, versus can you survive

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 5>till you're twenty eight and do five percent two percent,

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 5>you know, like a modest growth at scale in case.

0:32:05.560 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 4>One hundred and nine, year one hundred and ninety, you know.

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 5>Yes, yes, and we've experienced this.

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 4>It acquired.

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 5>It's the craziest thing that you know, last year we

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 5>grew from five hundred thousand listeners to a million listeners. Okay,

0:32:16.440 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 5>it's one hundred percent growth. That is high growth were

0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 5>we a public company. It's kind of like middling pathetic

0:32:21.800 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 5>growth if you are an early stage startup. And yet

0:32:25.560 --> 0:32:27.800
<v Speaker 5>the fact that it happened in our tenth year is

0:32:27.840 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 5>actually the thing that matters. I wouldn't have cared. I

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:33.840
<v Speaker 5>would take that over growing at eight, you know, eight

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 5>hundred percent in year two any day. And so i'

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 5>you're getting at the core ethosis of like, what really

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 5>matters when you're creating something very valuable in the world

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 5>is the out years of the compounding. Now to actually

0:32:45.920 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 5>answer the question. David, you look like you've been thinking

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:48.320
<v Speaker 5>about it.

0:32:49.120 --> 0:32:51.719
<v Speaker 4>I love what you did there, and then you're like,

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:53.920
<v Speaker 4>oh so the really hard thing that like if you

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 4>actually knew, you would probably be the greatest.

0:32:56.000 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to remember that for this podcast. Like Joe, Joe,

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you look like you have something to say.

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 4>Oh boy, oh boy. I think it's you know, every

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:07.400
<v Speaker 4>company without fail. I mean, look at this deep seat

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 4>crisis right now is going to face crises on some

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, irregular pattern. You know, you don't know when

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 4>they're going to come over X many years, but like,

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:20.120
<v Speaker 4>if you're in business long enough, you will face crises.

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:22.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we have faced crises with our little two

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 4>person company here, and then it's just you know, can

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 4>you navigate that crisis and emerge on the same or better,

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 4>you know, compounding trajectory that you were before.

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:34.800
<v Speaker 5>And to your point earlier, David, that this okay, I'll

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 5>try to really answer the question. Every company is special

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 5>in some way, singular in some way, and the thing

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 5>that gives any individual company its durability is different and

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 5>related to its specialness. So for Aermez, it's the uncompromising

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:56.640
<v Speaker 5>commitment to craftsmanship and the durability of their products and

0:33:56.720 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 5>protecting their brand and making the hard choice over and

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 5>over and never never making the easy choice, such that

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:07.920
<v Speaker 5>it is instilled in the psyche of generations of customers,

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:10.720
<v Speaker 5>like customers who pass things down and word of mouth

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 5>that they have this this extreme premium luxury associated with

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 5>their brand, that you know, if they made little trade

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:25.240
<v Speaker 5>offs like, oh, let's juice the price. Let's raise burkeinbag

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 5>prices fifty percent this year, or let's have a whole

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:30.759
<v Speaker 5>bunch of these get made in this machine. They kind

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:33.879
<v Speaker 5>of look saddlestitch, but isn't saddlestitch? These would trade off

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:39.279
<v Speaker 5>against their sort of durability over time. But that's not

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:43.280
<v Speaker 5>the way every company does it, Like Microsoft, for example,

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:47.439
<v Speaker 5>does it through product bundling. The fact that they now

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:51.160
<v Speaker 5>have so many pretty good pieces of software that they

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 5>can bundle together and sell in one enterprise agreement to

0:34:54.120 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 5>a company and have a full solution versus needing to

0:34:57.320 --> 0:34:59.800
<v Speaker 5>have the best individual widget to do the task for

0:34:59.800 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 5>an given thing. This turned out, over time to be

0:35:03.800 --> 0:35:07.520
<v Speaker 5>an incredibly durable business model that you know, really didn't

0:35:07.560 --> 0:35:11.320
<v Speaker 5>exist before Steve Baumer sort of invented it in the

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 5>late nineties.

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:15.799
<v Speaker 2>I just have one last question. You know, obviously, if

0:35:15.800 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 2>you're talking about the great and this is something that

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:21.120
<v Speaker 2>we talk a lot about on the show, But if

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:24.879
<v Speaker 2>you're talking about the great companies today, there are great

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:28.920
<v Speaker 2>companies in luxury, they are great companies in pet food

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:32.560
<v Speaker 2>and candy, but the vast majority of them are going

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 2>to be big tech giant. Those are the biggest, most

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 2>successful companies in the world. And then to your recent point,

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:41.919
<v Speaker 2>what's really extraordinary to me and I think to investors

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:45.920
<v Speaker 2>is how big they still compound in the out years.

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:48.879
<v Speaker 2>So we're talking about companies that in many cases are

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:53.080
<v Speaker 2>more than forty years old and yet still growing at

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:58.239
<v Speaker 2>just extraordinary clips given their size. Is this truly sort

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 2>of a historical like if we looked at like, you know,

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 2>if we looked at the really big companies thirty years

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:07.600
<v Speaker 2>ago or something, you know, you have like oil companies

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:09.960
<v Speaker 2>or General Electric, et cetera, And they were big and

0:36:10.000 --> 0:36:13.320
<v Speaker 2>they were doing really well, but they had slowed down

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:16.240
<v Speaker 2>quite a bit by the time they had like gotten

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:19.600
<v Speaker 2>to the whatever the equivalent is. And it seems like

0:36:19.760 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 2>we're really in sort of uncharted territory by the speed

0:36:23.640 --> 0:36:27.799
<v Speaker 2>with which these tech giants specifically could still grow at

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:28.880
<v Speaker 2>their level of maturity.

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:35.800
<v Speaker 4>Yes, uh, this is the consequence of Moore's law. Moore's

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:37.799
<v Speaker 4>law and what we like to refer to as the

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 4>Meritz corollary to Moore's law, which is Michael Meritz, who

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 4>was a longtime partner at Sequoia, invested in Google, YEAHO

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:49.360
<v Speaker 4>and Striper among others, and a journalist before joining Suoya

0:36:50.160 --> 0:36:54.719
<v Speaker 4>for us, All, yeah, the folks probably know, you know

0:36:54.800 --> 0:36:57.160
<v Speaker 4>Moore's law, but in this case, you know, the relevant

0:36:57.640 --> 0:37:01.880
<v Speaker 4>and interpretation of it is that the both demand and

0:37:02.000 --> 0:37:05.480
<v Speaker 4>supply for computing power you know writ large forgetting a

0:37:05.560 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 4>specific definition of it, but like the ability to compute

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:13.960
<v Speaker 4>things will double every eighteen to twenty four months, and

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:18.800
<v Speaker 4>that spiritually has held true since gosh what nineteen sixty

0:37:18.800 --> 0:37:21.960
<v Speaker 4>eight maybe, and so we're many many years down the

0:37:21.960 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 4>compounding curve of that, and it is still relatively true.

0:37:25.760 --> 0:37:28.600
<v Speaker 4>The Merits corollary to it is that as long as

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:33.920
<v Speaker 4>Moore's law holds, the world will find uses for that

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 4>increased compute power and demand for it. And so if

0:37:38.239 --> 0:37:43.239
<v Speaker 4>you believe that the market size for computing technology writ

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:45.719
<v Speaker 4>large is going to grow, if you look at like

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 4>the entire technology market. It's going to roughly grow at

0:37:49.160 --> 0:37:52.120
<v Speaker 4>the same pace as Moore's law, which is exponential. That's

0:37:52.120 --> 0:37:55.319
<v Speaker 4>the reason it's exponential. And it's sixty plus years into

0:37:55.360 --> 0:37:58.200
<v Speaker 4>compounding at this point, and the world has never seen

0:37:58.239 --> 0:37:58.920
<v Speaker 4>anything like it.

0:37:59.280 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 5>And so I think if you take big tech writ large,

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:06.960
<v Speaker 5>it probably is true that big tech will continue to

0:38:07.000 --> 0:38:10.799
<v Speaker 5>get bigger than ever because the market cap of technology

0:38:10.840 --> 0:38:16.400
<v Speaker 5>companies in some will continue to follow the Moors Law curve. However,

0:38:16.880 --> 0:38:20.480
<v Speaker 5>I think it's a little bit disingenuous because every ten

0:38:20.560 --> 0:38:23.319
<v Speaker 5>years or so we have a new entrant to big

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:27.120
<v Speaker 5>tech who is surfing the wave of the most recent.

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:29.720
<v Speaker 4>New market created by more exactly.

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:33.880
<v Speaker 5>Exactly, and so whether it was mainframes or mini computers,

0:38:34.000 --> 0:38:37.680
<v Speaker 5>or the PC or the Internet or emotion or AI, like,

0:38:37.719 --> 0:38:39.919
<v Speaker 5>each one of these brought one or two or three

0:38:40.480 --> 0:38:42.960
<v Speaker 5>brand new entrants and we sort of liked that. We

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:44.719
<v Speaker 5>called them fang and then we called them Mamma, and

0:38:44.719 --> 0:38:46.960
<v Speaker 5>now we call them the Magnificent Seven. But like, these

0:38:46.960 --> 0:38:50.040
<v Speaker 5>are actually different companies and n Video was not a

0:38:50.080 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 5>part of the conversation even three years ago.

0:38:52.160 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Can you give us a scoop and maybe tell us

0:38:54.719 --> 0:38:56.239
<v Speaker 1>what you're working on next.

0:38:58.320 --> 0:39:01.520
<v Speaker 5>Dave, related to our listener, is what was your specific hint?

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:03.440
<v Speaker 5>A different type of TikTok, not that.

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 4>Kind of TikTok. Yeah, we uh, we do little hints

0:39:06.200 --> 0:39:09.520
<v Speaker 4>on our emails when we release episodes. We do a

0:39:09.560 --> 0:39:12.359
<v Speaker 4>little riddle of what the next episode is going to be. Yes,

0:39:12.440 --> 0:39:15.759
<v Speaker 4>a different type of TikTok is our next episode. But

0:39:16.040 --> 0:39:21.360
<v Speaker 4>we've got some watch yeah guess yeah.

0:39:21.440 --> 0:39:24.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, Ben and David, that was so much fun.

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for coming on Odd Lots and yeah,

0:39:28.120 --> 0:39:31.480
<v Speaker 1>everyone go listen to Acquired and Odd Lots. Listen to

0:39:31.520 --> 0:39:32.080
<v Speaker 1>both of us.

0:39:32.920 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 5>Oh, we should say, uh, way back four years ago

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 5>when we first did our TSMC episode, there was a

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:42.279
<v Speaker 5>great Odd Lots that we both listened to that was

0:39:43.560 --> 0:39:47.080
<v Speaker 5>yes with Tim to talk about t SMC and UH

0:39:47.160 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 5>in particular, I think it was the relationship with Smith

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:53.400
<v Speaker 5>the Chinese competitor. Oh, thank you lots, Thank you so

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:54.960
<v Speaker 5>much for having us on and thanks for being a

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:56.320
<v Speaker 5>part of our research process.

0:39:56.840 --> 0:39:58.279
<v Speaker 1>That was so much fun. Thank you.

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:11.759
<v Speaker 3>Joe.

0:40:11.800 --> 0:40:12.640
<v Speaker 1>That was really fun.

0:40:13.000 --> 0:40:14.640
<v Speaker 4>Well, I love talking to other podcasters.

0:40:14.800 --> 0:40:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I know it's very easy because you can kind of

0:40:17.120 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 1>just let them talk.

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:20.799
<v Speaker 2>I know, they're really getting. That was really fun. I

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:24.359
<v Speaker 2>like the point, the sort of acknowledgment that like none

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 2>of them. It's fun to listen to these stories of

0:40:27.040 --> 0:40:30.160
<v Speaker 2>amazing outliers, but none of their playbooks are going to

0:40:30.280 --> 0:40:31.080
<v Speaker 2>work for you.

0:40:31.160 --> 0:40:32.120
<v Speaker 4>Probably right.

0:40:32.480 --> 0:40:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, here's where I almost think that looking at corporate

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:40.520
<v Speaker 1>failures like bad businesses is kind of more useful in

0:40:40.560 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 1>some senses, because if you're trying to identify, you know,

0:40:43.800 --> 0:40:48.640
<v Speaker 1>things like survivorship bias and other heuristics that we might

0:40:48.680 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 1>all have in our heads, you kind of need to

0:40:51.120 --> 0:40:54.400
<v Speaker 1>look at where people failed as well as where they succeeded.

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, I did actually learn a lot from that.

0:40:57.360 --> 0:41:01.839
<v Speaker 1>So the point about TSMC and idea of well, when

0:41:01.840 --> 0:41:06.720
<v Speaker 1>you're in an extremely cyclical industry, maybe yeah, don't do layoffs.

0:41:06.719 --> 0:41:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you don't want to lose a bunch of institutional

0:41:09.719 --> 0:41:12.400
<v Speaker 1>skill and knowledge every like three or four years and

0:41:12.440 --> 0:41:13.520
<v Speaker 1>then have to rebuild it.

0:41:13.600 --> 0:41:16.120
<v Speaker 2>This seems like something that has really plagued a lot

0:41:16.160 --> 0:41:19.600
<v Speaker 2>of big American manufacturers, and I guess that you know,

0:41:19.640 --> 0:41:23.479
<v Speaker 2>obviously TSMC is a publicly traded company, but it does

0:41:23.520 --> 0:41:26.799
<v Speaker 2>seem like this idea of sort of being able to

0:41:26.880 --> 0:41:31.640
<v Speaker 2>ignore outside investors and the importance of close held inness

0:41:31.680 --> 0:41:35.839
<v Speaker 2>within a company. And so obviously there's private companies like

0:41:35.880 --> 0:41:39.160
<v Speaker 2>a Mars, But then there's companies like a lot of

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:43.080
<v Speaker 2>the American tech giants, where the founders have a different

0:41:43.120 --> 0:41:46.360
<v Speaker 2>class of share structure that gives them like ten times

0:41:46.440 --> 0:41:49.360
<v Speaker 2>more votes than the other public And it does seem

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:52.880
<v Speaker 2>like to some extent, for better or worse, probably for

0:41:52.960 --> 0:41:57.360
<v Speaker 2>corporate performance. Often the better that the ability of the founders.

0:41:57.440 --> 0:41:59.560
<v Speaker 2>They know, we are really not going to do anything,

0:41:59.640 --> 0:42:02.320
<v Speaker 2>and you're never going to vote us off the board

0:42:02.520 --> 0:42:04.400
<v Speaker 2>or whatever. We are not going to change how we

0:42:04.440 --> 0:42:08.440
<v Speaker 2>do things. In many cases that seems to be an advantage,

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:09.680
<v Speaker 2>an advantage.

0:42:09.960 --> 0:42:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Never go public, Never do performance reviews, Never write a

0:42:14.920 --> 0:42:20.799
<v Speaker 1>employee manual I have. Yeah, I'm certainly that's true. All right,

0:42:20.840 --> 0:42:21.600
<v Speaker 1>shall we leave it there.

0:42:21.680 --> 0:42:22.439
<v Speaker 2>Let's leave it there.

0:42:22.600 --> 0:42:25.680
<v Speaker 1>This has been another episode of the Oudlots podcast. I'm

0:42:25.719 --> 0:42:28.879
<v Speaker 1>Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway and.

0:42:28.840 --> 0:42:31.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm Jill Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart.

0:42:31.800 --> 0:42:35.120
<v Speaker 2>Follow our guests Ben Gilbert He's at Gilbert and David

0:42:35.200 --> 0:42:39.759
<v Speaker 2>Rosenthal He's at DJ Rosent. Follow our producers Kerman Rodriguez

0:42:39.800 --> 0:42:42.520
<v Speaker 2>at Kerman armand dash O Bennett at Dashbot and kill

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Brooks at Cale Brooks. From our odd Loots content, go

0:42:45.600 --> 0:42:48.400
<v Speaker 2>to Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots. We have transcripts,

0:42:48.400 --> 0:42:51.080
<v Speaker 2>a blog, and a newsletter, and you can chat about

0:42:51.120 --> 0:42:53.239
<v Speaker 2>all of these topics twenty four to seven in our

0:42:53.320 --> 0:42:56.200
<v Speaker 2>discord discord dot gg slash hoblines.

0:42:56.520 --> 0:42:58.839
<v Speaker 1>And if you enjoy odd Lots, if you like it

0:42:58.880 --> 0:43:02.240
<v Speaker 1>when we talk about what makes companies successful, then please

0:43:02.320 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 1>leave us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform.

0:43:06.120 --> 0:43:08.960
<v Speaker 1>And remember, if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can

0:43:09.000 --> 0:43:12.439
<v Speaker 1>listen to all of our episodes absolutely ad free. All

0:43:12.480 --> 0:43:14.560
<v Speaker 1>you need to do is find the Bloomberg channel on

0:43:14.680 --> 0:43:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening.