WEBVTT - Affirm's Max Levchin Breaks Down How Buy Now, Pay Later Really Works

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of The Odd Laws podcast.

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:22.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm Joe, wasn't Thal.

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 4>And I'm Tracy all the way Tracy.

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 2>It feels like everybody, whether they want to come after

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:32.159
<v Speaker 2>the banks, right, there is this effort so many of

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 2>our episodes, whether we're talking about crypto, whether we're talking

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 2>about private credit, whether we're talking about payments, it's this goal,

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 2>this dream of like, let's chip away at some of

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 2>these bank businesses or these businesses that were associated with

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 2>some sort of legacy institutions.

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 5>The banks.

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 2>They mostly seem to be doing pretty well still, but

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 2>there's this dream that they can all be sort of

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 2>like disintermediate away, or that each one of these functions

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 2>that they do can be better done somewhere else.

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So let's see. I have been in financial journalism

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 4>for all my most twenty years now, which is kind

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:04.479
<v Speaker 4>of crazy and makes me feel very old. But for

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 4>as long as I can remember, someone has been trying

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 4>to either reinvent bank lending or reinvent the payment space.

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:15.680
<v Speaker 4>And I guess I can see a few reasons. So like, genuinely,

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 4>some payment architecture is really old fashioned especially in the

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 4>US where you know, sometimes you still have to write

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 4>a check for something. Yeah, blows my mind. The US

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:27.040
<v Speaker 4>didn't get chips for a really long time, chips and

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 4>credit cards and stuff like that. But also if you

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 4>think about the payment and lending and financial market just

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 4>in general, it's one of the biggest out there, right,

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:41.320
<v Speaker 4>Like you're talking about all the economic activity basically, and

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 4>so if you can get a tiny slice of that

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 4>through interchange or fees, then you can see how people,

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 4>you know, people are really interested in that space.

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 2>No completely, and we know that there are a lot

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 2>of fintech companies for a long time, I mean some

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 2>of the most you know, the earliest Internet success stories

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 2>period where you know, this is deaf, nothing new, And

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 2>of course one of the first ever was PayPal, which

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 2>recognized that with the Internet was going to come all

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 2>kinds of new opportunities for payments and sort of quasi

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 2>peer to peer, literal peer to peer transactions.

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 3>Et cetera.

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 2>PayPal is still, of course extremely important part of the

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 2>payments infrastructure. But yeah, there's so much going on. But

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 2>to your point, lots of companies have gotten those little

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 2>slices and made incredible fortunes.

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we also did an episode on buy Now, Pay

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:31.520
<v Speaker 4>Later a couple months ago, and there are clearly some

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 4>interesting questions brought up by the expansion of that space,

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 4>and you and I talked about how wherever you go

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 4>on the internet nowadays, you get like, you know, probably

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:43.360
<v Speaker 4>at least two or three little buttons that offer you

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 4>installment loans on your purchases. And obviously the concern is

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:49.359
<v Speaker 4>whether or not people are taking out credit that they

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 4>shouldn't necessarily be. There's a big discussion about that, and

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 4>also the transparency of the credit that they're taking.

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 2>Out right, and we'll get into this. There are pros

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 2>and cons. I guess relative to credit cards. Thing with

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:03.079
<v Speaker 2>credit cards is that there is decades and decades of

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:05.080
<v Speaker 2>data on them, and we know how they're used, and

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 2>there's really good risk profiling and scores and all this

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 2>credit scoring and all this stuff. BNPL is sort of

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 2>more novel. And so therefore, to what degree do we

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 2>know how as as an asset or as a function

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 2>it performs across different cycles. Do we know the cohort

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 2>of people who use BNPL as well as we know

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:24.359
<v Speaker 2>the people the types of people who use credit cards

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 2>seems a little bit, at a minimum, a bit more ambiguous. Absolutely, Well,

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 2>we've hinted at what we're going to be talking about.

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned PayPal, We talked about BNPL. We are going

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 2>to be speaking with one of the original members of

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 2>the PayPal mafia. We're going to be speaking with Max Levchin.

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:43.839
<v Speaker 2>He is the founder and CEO of a firm one

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 2>of the biggest BNPL companies publicly traded to Max. Thank

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 2>you so much for coming on Odd Lots.

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 5>Thank you for having me. I'm a big fan of

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 5>the show. Thank you a bit of a privilege to

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 5>be here.

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for saying that on the recording, and so

0:03:57.360 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 2>we always love hearing it, but we love when we

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 2>love when it's on the public record as part of

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 2>the episode, Thank you so much. Where did you get

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 2>the idea to start affirm but prompted it?

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 6>But a two sided coin, both sides bad of personal

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 6>experience actually tying neatly to the PayPal story. So I

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:21.919
<v Speaker 6>came to the US at sixteen from Soviet Union, and

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 6>so you can imagine I understood very little about borrowing

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 6>and credit and things like that. And so I got

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 6>my first credit card on campus at college at eighteen,

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 6>didn't fully understand what I was signing up for, certainly

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 6>didn't read the fine print where it said zero percent asterisk,

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 6>don't worry about it.

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 5>Borrowed a bunch of money, financed my.

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:43.799
<v Speaker 6>First startup from that very same credit card, promptly got

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 6>into more than I could afford to pay for. Startup failed,

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:52.559
<v Speaker 6>eventually got some nasty calls from collectors, paid it off,

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:57.480
<v Speaker 6>and four years later or five years later, took this

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 6>little company PayPal Public was basically an penalty wealthy overnight

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 6>went to buy a fancy car that you know, as I.

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 5>Originally deserved it the right page of twenty three I.

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 6>Wanted to show off to my then girlfriend now wife

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 6>and was declined for credit. And not only did I

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 6>feel completely screwed by the moment where I found out

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 6>that you're supposed to make the minimum payment and by

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 6>the way, interest a cruise into principle, and this seemingly

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:25.160
<v Speaker 6>low APR is actually not what it seems to be

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 6>because I missed some date of the specific amount that

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:31.159
<v Speaker 6>I was supposed to pay. It bit me again five

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 6>years later it was like, oh, by the way, wreck

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.599
<v Speaker 6>your credit rating too, so you can't get alone for anything,

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 6>even as you're sort of proudly sticking a finger at

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 6>the article and newspaper saying, you know, the company public

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:46.359
<v Speaker 6>youngests whatever. And so that was the thing that stayed

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 6>with me for years. My friends would prank me at restaurants.

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:52.159
<v Speaker 6>They would ask the wait staff to tell me that

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:53.720
<v Speaker 6>my credit card was declined, which by then was a

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 6>different credit card.

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 5>But when I would turn deep purple and basically be like,

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:00.920
<v Speaker 5>oh my god, like it happened again, Like what? And

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:03.279
<v Speaker 5>you know, eventually I knew the joke. But I was

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 5>in my mid.

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 6>Thirties when I realized that that's now more likely a

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 6>joke than that credit score.

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 5>Bite from eighteen.

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 6>So in my late thirties, I sat down with a

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 6>friend from high school, college and PayPal. You know, I

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 6>have many of these friends who's I met when I

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:19.919
<v Speaker 6>was just getting my feet wet in America, and ultimately,

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 6>you know, we built this amazing company together. And asked

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 6>him the obvious question, twenty years too late, why didn't

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 6>we try to fix that yuck that comes with having

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:33.359
<v Speaker 6>credit cards as a young person, And he said, you know,

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:36.480
<v Speaker 6>I don't know, but we built so much great AI

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 6>at PayPal, fighting fraud and doing all these really interesting things.

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 6>Surely we could do a better job scoring credit for

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 6>young people like you were at eighteen and then twenty three.

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 6>Then what currently happens? And that was sort of the

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 6>seminal moment, and a couple of years later.

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 5>We started a firm.

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:55.919
<v Speaker 4>So I have a bunch of questions already. Firstly, what

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 4>kind of car was it? Did you get it?

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 6>In the end, I had to pay cash for right,

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:03.159
<v Speaker 6>I actually wired money, and it would begin like an

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:06.160
<v Speaker 6>eight am visit to a dealership, ended up like it's

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 6>five pm. You're wired, hasn't cleared yet, you can't drive

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:12.239
<v Speaker 6>off the slot and drama at the time.

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 5>Don't judge me.

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 6>It was a black hardtop Mercedes convertible.

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 3>No judgment at all.

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 4>I'm judging a little bit.

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 5>I was really young.

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 6>I was very much trying to impress the girl who

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 6>is now my wife and the mother.

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 5>It clearly works.

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 4>Okay, another question, So.

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, I just I love those those Mercedes. I

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 2>think that's there's one of the if I have some

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 2>rough conception, no judgment, I think those are great design cars.

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 4>Anyway, Should we just talk about cars?

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 3>We could?

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 4>Okay, Well, you mentioned the underwriting process. And this, in

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 4>my mind, is supposed to be what makes the buy now,

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 4>pay later BNPL model different. Right, Like the underwriting process

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 4>is more technologically driven, perhaps more nuanced. Talk to us

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 4>about what you do differently versus you know, a credit

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 4>card company or a bank or someone like that.

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 6>Sure, and you're pulling in a thread that's gonna take

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 6>a long time to Onwinyl, try to be fiffy, but

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 6>this is where the rage kicks in. So one of

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 6>the things that happens with credit cards, at the very core,

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 6>they tell you a bunch of things they don't actually want.

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 5>You to do.

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 6>So credit card business model is a crull of interest

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 6>into principle. So this exponential function of your signing up

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 6>for apr X but you don't actually know what's gonna

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 6>cost you, is all the fact that as you make

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 6>the minimum payments or whatever the payments you're making, whatever

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 6>you're haven't paid off, the interest that you've recrued folds

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 6>right into the principle, and it compounds and compounds and compounds,

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 6>and so the longer you take to pay it back,

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:46.319
<v Speaker 6>the more it will cost. Which seems obvious, but it's

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 6>impossible for most merimortals to predict, and they love it

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 6>when you're late because they are late fees which are fixed,

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 6>and so the less you spend, the higher the percentage

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:00.239
<v Speaker 6>the late feed represents. So it's this sort of amazing

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 6>business model, which is why you know one of your

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 6>recent episodes puzzled over how are these rates so high?

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 5>The rates themselves are actually not the problem. The problem

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 5>is the structure.

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 6>As you fold interest into principle and pay and pay

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 6>and pay late.

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 5>Fees, it can be extraordinarily expensive.

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 6>And so from the very beginning of affirm we ask

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 6>the question, how can we make a product where you

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 6>don't have this weird misalignment of interests where the lender

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 6>tells you please pay your bills on time, but when

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:32.439
<v Speaker 6>they're saying soda vocea is, but not too on time,

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 6>and ideally take as long as possible because that's when

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 6>we make the most money.

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 5>So the obvious answer is, of course obvious.

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 6>Make a plan that you commit as a lender that

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 6>you'll never change, and don't charge.

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:46.959
<v Speaker 5>Late fees, and that's it.

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 6>If you agree to those design principles, you are not

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:52.560
<v Speaker 6>going to make more money if someone is late and

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 6>you're not going to make more money. If they take

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 6>longer to pay you back, obviously you'll make less money.

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 6>Because getting money to lend isn't free either. We have

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 6>to pay for our source of capital as everybody else does,

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 6>which means that it immediately rotates you sort of one

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 6>hundred and eighty degrees where you say I only want

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 6>to lend money when I have a lot of conviction

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 6>the person is going to pay me back on time,

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 6>because if they don't, I am just going to lose money.

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 6>And so we put those two principles down in the ground,

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 6>very very early on. It's literally written down to the

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 6>foundation of the company. We will not misalign ourselves with

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 6>our borrowers. From that came a lot of things like, hey,

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 6>we need to understand your cash flow.

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 5>We don't really care what your credit rating is.

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:34.199
<v Speaker 6>Maybe you gained it, maybe it's an accurate, maybe your

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:36.440
<v Speaker 6>eighteen year old immigrants does not matter.

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 5>We need to understand what your actual capability is.

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 6>We have to have the right to tell you you

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 6>are over extending yourself, not just once every few years

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 6>when you renew your credit card agreement, but for every transaction.

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 6>You have to be able to underwrite and decide yes

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 6>or no for every single moment that you create these

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:55.559
<v Speaker 6>payment plans, because that allows us to not lose money

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 6>because we are aligned with you. When you pay us

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:00.199
<v Speaker 6>back on time, we'll make some money. If you do own,

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 6>we're just going to be a warse off. And so

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:05.719
<v Speaker 6>that is the foundation of Affirm's take on bnpl Many

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 6>people have come along since and sort of change the

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:10.439
<v Speaker 6>model a little bit. They introduce laid fees, all kinds

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 6>of other fees we never have and never will. But

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 6>even with those modifications, the model is still better than

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 6>credit cards because of this individual underwriting moment and in

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 6>our case, no fees of any kind.

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Just to be clear, So let's say I wind up

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 2>at some website and maybe I want to buy like

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 2>some Nikes or something like that, and I see the

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 2>Affirm option. How do you know how good of a

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 2>credit I am in that moment?

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 6>So it's not an effort free thing for you to

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 6>use a firm. You'll have to click on a firm

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 6>and we will ask you, if we've never seen you before,

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 6>we'll ask you to provide some information for us. That

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 6>information will allow us to tap into the standard set

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 6>of records that the credit bureaus.

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:50.559
<v Speaker 5>Aggregated about you.

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 6>If there's enough data there for us to use our

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 6>custom credit score, we'll render a decision based on that.

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:59.199
<v Speaker 6>If there's not, we'll actually say, hey, we don't fully

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 6>understand your personal financial situation. We would like to have

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 6>a peek at your bank account cash flow and decide

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 6>how your cass and flows relative to your ability to

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 6>pay us back. All of this is made possible with

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 6>really good news technology, So this takes seconds, even though

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:17.319
<v Speaker 6>it probably takes about as long to do as it takes.

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:17.719
<v Speaker 5>To describe it.

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 6>But we'll look through your personal financial state of right

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 6>now and make a decision not just whether it's he

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 6>yes or no, but also how much of a risk

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 6>you have of that financial situation changing and that price

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 6>is the credit?

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 4>Do you use any creative data points you mentioned checking

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 4>against the type of item that people are buying, So

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 4>that's one thing I imagine could be interesting, like if

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 4>people are buying groceries on installment, does that mean they're

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 4>more of a credit risk than someone who's I don't know,

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 4>buying a computer or a big ticket item. And then

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 4>the other thing I'm very curious about, and I think

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:52.840
<v Speaker 4>I've told this story before on add lots. But I

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 4>remember going to see a startup that eventually failed, and

0:12:57.400 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 4>they were in the peer to peer lending space, and

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 4>they describe some of the stuff they were doing with

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 4>underwriting where they were like trying to measure people's impulsiveness

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 4>by how quickly they moved a slideer for a loan

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 4>and stuff like that, which freaked me out a little

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 4>at the time.

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:15.560
<v Speaker 5>It would freak me out too.

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 6>So, no, we do not do telemetry as a variable

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 6>into underwriting. So before I get into what we do use,

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:30.319
<v Speaker 6>it bears mentioning that the variable to use in underwriting

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 6>is a very very highly regulated domain of lending and underwriting.

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 5>There's lots and lots of laws going back quite far.

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 6>Things like Fair Credit Act and any other sort of

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 6>subsequent additions to both federal and state level law that

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 6>prohibits you from using kind of the obvious things you

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 6>wouldn't want people to use, like your race or your gender,

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:53.440
<v Speaker 6>or your age or your creed cannot be a factor.

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 6>It's actually a federal offense to do that. And so

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 6>we don't do any of those things. We go as

0:13:57.080 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 6>far as to say if it correlates to some of

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 6>those things, we also could use it, and that too

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 6>is a subsequent law as well.

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 5>So so first of all, we're very very.

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 6>Thoughtful about making sure we don't step into a prohibited territory.

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 6>It's called prohibited basis as the fancy term in the industry.

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 6>What we can use and what we do use. As

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 6>you mentioned, merchants share with us what's being purchased. Despite

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 6>the burrito gate that sometimes comes back in the press,

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 6>people don't actually use a firm to finance Mexican food

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 6>or other cuisines. They do sometimes use a firm for groceries,

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 6>but it mostly is, or almost entirely really is for

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 6>things like I'm throwing a giant party and I need

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 6>several hundred dollars worth of food stuffs, and that's a

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 6>lot to pay down with my debit cards, so I'm

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 6>going to use a firm instead. So the average sized

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 6>transactions for us is roughly three hundred dollars. So it

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 6>gives you a sentence for what people use a firm for.

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 6>So that's just you know, apper pos where it's being used.

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 6>What we gleaned from the information about what's being purchased.

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 6>One good mental model, which this is like an approximation,

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 6>but a decent one. If the useful life of the

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 6>item is meaningfully shorter than the time it takes you

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 6>to pay it back, you may find yourself questioning the

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 6>quality of the item long afterwards disappeared. And so a

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 6>natural question we should be asking is what do we

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 6>understand about this item, but also maybe the item's history

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 6>of quality before we say, oh yeah, sure by this

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 6>thing that's going to be out in six months and

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 6>pay for it over two years. So maybe the most

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 6>useful thing I can say about actually what variables, what

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 6>new variables w we've introduced into our underwriting, vast, fast,

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 6>vast majority of them, In fact, all of them actually

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 6>influence a decision we make by one or two percent

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 6>at most. Anytime someone tells you I found this magic

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 6>variable and if I just look at that, it's like

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 6>thirty percent better underwriting or five percent better in defaults,

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 6>they are lying, probably to themselves more than to you,

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 6>but they're definitely lying. Anything like that just immediately becomes

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 6>brittle as the macroeconomic reality changes, as people suddenly don't

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 6>care about the item or whatever it is that they

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 6>found that's this magic bullet of like suddenly I know

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 6>who's a good risk.

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 5>It just disappears. And so you actually.

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 6>Want lots and lots of subtle factors that are also

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 6>compliant with all the various regulations, helping you shape a

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 6>score that will tell you how likely this person is

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 6>to pay back.

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 5>That's what we use.

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Let's go back to the just the core of the

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 2>business model. So let's imagine there is a shirt that

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 2>costs one hundred dollars and I have an opportunity to Okay,

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna buy it with a firm, so to be

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 2>four payments of twenty five dollars and there's no interest,

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 2>and so for me, that is almost a free lunch

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 2>because the time value of money, et cetera. All Right,

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:05.959
<v Speaker 2>I'm spreading this out over four payments.

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 4>You're gonna work that hundred extra and.

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:10.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna that extra, that extra seventy five dollars after

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:11.880
<v Speaker 2>the first payment, I'm gonna know.

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:13.680
<v Speaker 5>As you should. Yeah, great way, okay.

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:16.920
<v Speaker 2>So I'm gonna make that first payment and i'm gonna

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:19.120
<v Speaker 2>then that seventy five dollars. I'm gonna put that into

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:22.159
<v Speaker 2>an index fund. Okay, And so you make money because

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 2>the retailer is paying you a cut because that you've

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 2>brought someone into the door. So talk about how is

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:32.119
<v Speaker 2>that cut determined, how much are they paying you for that,

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 2>and how competitive is it against other potential BNPL companies

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:39.639
<v Speaker 2>or perhaps new entrants that haven't come into the market yet.

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Talk to us about how that price is for him.

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:44.159
<v Speaker 4>This is my question too, because when you go to

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 4>check out, you see buttons, and the buttons I presume

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:51.199
<v Speaker 4>don't mean that much to people. You just click one

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 4>of them. So how do you differentiate yourself?

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 6>So we've been around for nearly fifteen years, and the

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 6>way differentiated ourselves by the way we basically don't advertise.

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 6>When you see us a checkout, that's when you learn

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:07.640
<v Speaker 6>about AFFIRM at some point, and then you come back

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 6>to use again.

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 5>And we have incredible retention rates.

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 6>People who have used a firm a couple of times

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 6>basically with ninety percent probability we'll come back to use

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 6>a firm again, not necessarily the next week. In fact,

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 6>we average something like five plus transactions per year, but

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:26.159
<v Speaker 6>when it matters to them, they will use AFFIRM. And

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:29.479
<v Speaker 6>the way we differentiated ourselves is we were there for

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 6>them when they needed us and if they ever stumbled.

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:33.919
<v Speaker 6>Our best customers are the ones that email us or

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 6>call us and say, hey, I was late to pay

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 6>my bill, something happened. What's the layed fee? And we

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:41.160
<v Speaker 6>tell them there isn't one. That's the moment when they

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:43.719
<v Speaker 6>grasp how we're different from the rest of the industry,

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.359
<v Speaker 6>and that that's probably why they come back to us

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:48.919
<v Speaker 6>as often as much as they do. Something like ninety

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:51.919
<v Speaker 6>five percent of our transactions come from repeat customers. So

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:53.639
<v Speaker 6>just to give you a sense for the loyalty that

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:57.120
<v Speaker 6>we've engendered in our user base without ever making promises,

0:18:57.320 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 6>you know, on broadcast media.

0:18:59.000 --> 0:18:59.400
<v Speaker 5>If you will.

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 6>So that's why they come back to the business model points.

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 6>So first of all, probably worth expanding the aperture a

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 6>little bit. So we offer both interest free and not

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 6>interest free loans. The pain four that Joe described is

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 6>exactly as it sounds. So in our case, there are

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:18.680
<v Speaker 6>no fees of any kinds. So if you see hundred

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 6>dollars shirt and you say it's going to be four

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 6>payments of twenty five.

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 5>Dollars, that is it.

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:24.959
<v Speaker 6>You cannot You can take a decade and you wouldn't

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 6>be able to use a firm pretty soon after you

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 6>went well past the wind over payment. So the punishment

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 6>for being late for too long is, hey, you need

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 6>to pay us back actually before you can do this again,

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:38.879
<v Speaker 6>which I think stands to reason much more than actually,

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:40.640
<v Speaker 6>let us hit you with a thirty eight dollars laid feet.

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 6>But that's besides the point. So that's one form of transaction.

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:46.200
<v Speaker 6>We also have what we call longer term zeros, which

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:51.440
<v Speaker 6>is for a thousand dollars fancy suit, you could potentially

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 6>get a loan from a firm for twenty four months

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 6>or even thirty six months, which will also be zero.

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 6>In both of those cases, it's the retailer that's effectively

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 6>paying your interest. I value of money becomes more expensive

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 6>than period six months, so you've nailed the business model there.

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 6>In some situations, the retailer just doesn't have the margin

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 6>or isn't interested in paying your interest, and so they'll say, look,

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:12.159
<v Speaker 6>you're going to use credit card, you'll pay some interest.

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 6>If you're going to use a firm, it's okay for

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 6>us to have this transaction happen if you are willing

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 6>to pay interest to affirm. And in that scenario, you

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:21.639
<v Speaker 6>will see both the principle and interest, will calculate it

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 6>for you, both the rate and the dollars, and we'll

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:25.439
<v Speaker 6>show you the schedule, and before you commit to any

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 6>of that, you will see and agree to the schedule.

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:28.119
<v Speaker 5>That we agree on.

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 6>In the latter case, the consumers paying us something, the

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:33.439
<v Speaker 6>merchant is probably paying us something significantly less than what

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:36.200
<v Speaker 6>they're paying us if they're absorbing the cost of interest,

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 6>the cost of time, value of money. The business model

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 6>is really really simple in our case to understand the

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 6>value is fixed, so whoever is paying us almost doesn't matter.

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 6>That has to cover the fixed cost of underwriting, servicing,

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 6>all the usual bits. Leave a little bit for us

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 6>to actually be a profitable company, which we are, and

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:56.400
<v Speaker 6>also absorb the probability of default, which, by the way,

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:58.880
<v Speaker 6>all the way back to these alignment of incentives an

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 6>easy check so the work like this whole idea of like, oh,

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:03.400
<v Speaker 6>you know, you're just not going to a profit when

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 6>people stumble. Our delinquency rates are about half the industry

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 6>of credit cards. That should give you a sense for

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:13.399
<v Speaker 6>we don't make nearly as many mistakes, or perhaps we

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 6>are not willing to let people go late because we

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:17.959
<v Speaker 6>don't benefit from it.

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:20.719
<v Speaker 5>Back to this model. That's how it works.

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:24.680
<v Speaker 6>The competitiveness of this industry is just like any other

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 6>competitiveness is of any payment industry. Payments are notoriously a

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 6>competitive world. There's actually never been a monopoly in payments,

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 6>full stop. There's a fun puzzle Wiser used to do

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:36.119
<v Speaker 6>this cocktail parties, like name a monopoly and payments. It

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:37.640
<v Speaker 6>turns out there has never been one.

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:40.200
<v Speaker 4>Interesting toughs cocktail party.

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:40.440
<v Speaker 3>Yah.

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:43.199
<v Speaker 5>I you know there's a reason I'm a fan of

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 5>the show, right.

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 6>I listen to you a pine and all sorts of

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:50.200
<v Speaker 6>esthetic things with great gusta, and so I think that's

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 6>We'll tell you everything you want to know about the

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 6>competitiveness of the space. But we have decided from the

0:21:56.119 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 6>very beginning that we want transparency and honesty with everyone

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:03.120
<v Speaker 6>involved with our borrowers. That's why we say everything upfront.

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 6>That's why we tell them, here's your disclosure on exactly

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:07.399
<v Speaker 6>the rates and the schedules with our merchants.

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 5>We tell them, here is the price.

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 6>You will have to pay us. If that's where you're paying.

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 6>If you can't don't want to, that's fine. We will

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 6>probably not be the right one for you. We won't

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 6>make it up elsewhere. We're not going to take it

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 6>out of the consumer's hide when they least expect it.

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 6>That's just not the brand. There are definitely cheaper providers

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:25.680
<v Speaker 6>out there. There are plenty of brands that I'll say

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:29.359
<v Speaker 6>we're just like a firm, but way less expensive for merchants.

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:32.399
<v Speaker 6>What that really means is that's because we charge all

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:34.120
<v Speaker 6>sorts of hidden feats, we have all sorts of other

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:37.479
<v Speaker 6>ways of taking it out of consumer skin. What this

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 6>means practically, with fifteen years of experience is consumers as

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 6>they cast their eye over the list of buttons, they say, well,

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 6>the one I want to use is the one that's

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 6>not going to get me if I stumble. And that

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:50.920
<v Speaker 6>makes for twenty four million active users in the last

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 6>twelve months, and we feel like we've we've.

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:54.880
<v Speaker 5>Kept our promise and the consumers keep coming back.

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 4>Just reiterating Joe's question.

0:22:57.440 --> 0:22:57.640
<v Speaker 5>Though.

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:01.880
<v Speaker 4>On the merchant side again, I imagine they're getting offers

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 4>from a bunch of different installment lenders BNPL companies, and

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 4>I don't think they do. They care much about the underwriting.

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 4>It's not really their problem, it's your problem, right, So

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 4>I assume the thing they care most about is the fee,

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 4>which seems.

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 6>Like they actually care about three things. Okay, so they

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:24.680
<v Speaker 6>absolutely care about the fee like that.

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 5>That would say, which which.

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 6>Can range from as low as less than credit cards.

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 6>So typical credit card rate today is on the order

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 6>of between two and a half and three percent, depending

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:36.719
<v Speaker 6>on the size of the merchant.

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:39.400
<v Speaker 5>But that's kind of the average in the industry.

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:44.960
<v Speaker 6>We will definitely meet you around those numbers at the

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:49.640
<v Speaker 6>absolute lowest and goes up all the way to let's say,

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 6>low single digit percentage points when you are subsidizing consumer interest.

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 6>So we are not a cheaper than credit cards provider

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 6>like that. That's not you know, don't want anybody tell

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 6>that illusion. They care about the rate more than the rate.

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 6>They care about incremental sales. So if your next marginal

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:10.639
<v Speaker 6>buyer is either a no thanks, or it will cost

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 6>you five percent. If you have the margin of better

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 6>than five percent, you don't want the items staying on

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 6>your shelves. You would like to pay this five percent

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 6>to get the marginal buyer.

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 5>To say yes.

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:22.919
<v Speaker 6>And so because of that incentive, which I think is

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 6>easy to follow, you do have lots and lots of

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:28.919
<v Speaker 6>merchants that say, all right, So what I really care

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 6>about then is the approval rates, which is the second

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:33.639
<v Speaker 6>variable they care about. So as people come through and say, hey,

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 6>I'm not going to use a credit card, not interested

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:38.439
<v Speaker 6>in buying unless I have an installment loan, let's say,

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:40.639
<v Speaker 6>from a firm, they need to know that that rate

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:42.879
<v Speaker 6>is going to be high enough. Otherwise why have a

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 6>button that just sits there and looks pretty. And so

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 6>our rates are typically higher than the rest of the

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:50.119
<v Speaker 6>industry because we are so obsessed with underwriting, because we

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 6>have no crutches, eg Late.

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 5>Fees, and so this underwriting thing, we don't really.

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 6>Try to explain it to merchants at all. What we

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 6>do say is look at our approval rates. If you

0:24:57.720 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 6>see their approval rates are meaningfully higher than the industry,

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:02.400
<v Speaker 6>you know you're gonna get value from this. That's why

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:04.919
<v Speaker 6>it's worth paying more than credit cards. And so that

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:07.359
<v Speaker 6>is true, and that's what they do. The third piece

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:10.640
<v Speaker 6>they do care about. Every merchant knows that the second transaction,

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 6>as they want the first transaction, costs them probably more

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 6>than the margin in it. They're paying Google, they're paying Facebook,

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 6>They'll soon be paying an LM provider or a child

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 6>about provider to drive that first transaction in they want

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 6>to sell you another thing, So they very much care

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 6>about if they had sold that first transaction using a

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 6>buy out pay Lada provider, it better not harm their

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 6>brand because if they buy out Paylada provider is harassing

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 6>the consumer for paying them back or has late fees

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 6>or has unexpected fees, it's going to create.

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:42.879
<v Speaker 5>Negatively to the merchant's brand.

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 6>And so they actually do care about late fees in

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 6>a way that has less to do with financial consequences

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 6>more with will people come back to us and use

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 6>a firm again, or will they be like, ah, I

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:55.640
<v Speaker 6>hated that merchant. I got into some bad transactions. So

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 6>that they care about all these things through their own.

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Lens, that makes a lot of sense. So let's say

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 2>I start accepting your premise. Okay, this is per se

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 2>better than credit cards. One reason that people can't just

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 2>quit credit cards generally is not every place takes by

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:14.719
<v Speaker 2>now pay later. People want something in their wallet, right

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 2>that they want something at the restaurant and wherever it

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 2>is that they know it's going to be accepted now.

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 2>For you are launching a card or you have a card.

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 5>Right, we have a card.

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:25.639
<v Speaker 2>Ye, so you have a card, but I'm curious. You know,

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:29.199
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned, you referenced that recent episode that we did

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:31.919
<v Speaker 2>with Omar Drexler, and one of the things that he

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:35.399
<v Speaker 2>said about cards is they're very costly to advertise. The

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:39.399
<v Speaker 2>marketing expenditure for the card companies is very high. You

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:41.880
<v Speaker 2>mentioned that you don't do a lot of advertising. I'm

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 2>curious though, on the card component specifically, you know, if

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:49.119
<v Speaker 2>you want to be quote top of wallet to consumers.

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 2>The first thing I think I've read that phrase, I thought,

0:26:54.400 --> 0:27:00.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to quaint myself with the industry. So if

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 2>you want to be top of wallet for the consumer

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 2>in the card, can you do that with an advertising

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 2>light model or do you really need to spend to

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 2>get significant wallet share?

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:12.880
<v Speaker 5>You can?

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:16.159
<v Speaker 6>The card is available to our users. So this is

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 6>not a thing that you will see on Times Square displays.

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 6>This is a thing you find out from a firm.

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:25.680
<v Speaker 6>Once you are a borrower, once you're actually in good standing,

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:28.639
<v Speaker 6>you qualify for the affirm card as the Hey you

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:30.159
<v Speaker 6>really liked us, didn't you?

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 5>This was great.

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:33.359
<v Speaker 6>You're transacting five times a year. If you want to

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:37.360
<v Speaker 6>take us with you to your retail shopping experiences, restaurant

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 6>or otherwise.

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:39.120
<v Speaker 5>We have a way.

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:42.119
<v Speaker 6>It's called the Affirm Card. It's actually pretty magical. The

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 6>card is a dual mode card. It switches from debit

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 6>to credit explicitly as you tell it to. So when

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:50.920
<v Speaker 6>you're buying a burrito, we expect you to use the

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 6>debit mode, which just literally takes the money from your

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 6>account and that's it. There's no interest obviously, is just

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 6>a pay now transaction. If you're buying a TV, you

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 6>can buy it out with Affirm. In the app, you say, hey,

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 6>my next transaction, I want that to be a twelve

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 6>months maybe to zero percent loan because the retailer wants

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 6>you to have it interest free. Maybe you're paying some interest,

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 6>but you're setting up that transaction in the app, and

0:28:12.320 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 6>then your card is ready when you tap it next time,

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:15.520
<v Speaker 6>it becomes.

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:18.880
<v Speaker 5>A loan automatically. It's a pretty magical experience. It's super popular.

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 6>It's the thing that we haven't needed to advertise because

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 6>we went from we have this card idea to about

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:27.679
<v Speaker 6>twelve percent of our users having one very very quickly,

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:30.680
<v Speaker 6>because it's just a really really good product. Again, our

0:28:30.760 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 6>user their mindset has long been changed from revolving is okay,

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:37.679
<v Speaker 6>I don't understand it, but I don't care to. I

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 6>don't like revolving. I don't want to pay LID fees.

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 6>I don't want to pay excess of interest. This affirm

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 6>thing is neat the card is a logical next step.

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 6>It's how much more can I have of this type

0:28:45.600 --> 0:29:00.960
<v Speaker 6>of financial life?

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 4>How much insight do you have into how much people

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 4>are borrowing from other BNPL lenders. So the sort of

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 4>stacking issue, which has been discussed multiple.

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 5>Times now it's a great question.

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:18.520
<v Speaker 6>We have a decent insight in the sense that we

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 6>understand pretty well the overlap between user basis. So there

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 6>are two prongs to this answer. This one it's worth

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 6>delving into pretty deeply because this is where we differ

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 6>from the rest of the industry pretty significantly. So before

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 6>I get into the stacking part, I'll address the overlap.

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 5>So we do a lot of studying just externally through surveys.

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 6>Also, because when we log into your bank account, or

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 6>we ask a provider to log into your bank account

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 6>and pull in some of your transactional data, we get

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 6>a glimpse into what else you're spending money on. So

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 6>we to have a decent sense for where else you

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 6>might be using Buy now, Pay later, And to date,

0:29:56.840 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 6>the user base overlap with other providers quite minimal, so

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 6>there's not a whole lot of stacking possibility, simply because

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 6>people who use a firm tend to stay with affirm.

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 6>They sometimes stray and use other providers, but it's quite

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:13.719
<v Speaker 6>minimal for a meaningfully lower transactional amounts. I think we

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 6>average a significantly higher average transaction relative.

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 5>To the rest of the industry.

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 6>So far, that's not been a problem in the long term. You,

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 6>of course, can make the argument like, sure, right now,

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 6>you guys are all still tiny.

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:26.480
<v Speaker 5>You're going really quickly.

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 6>Everybody's taking a bite out of the credit card industry.

0:30:28.800 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 6>What happens five years from now when everyone is signed

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 6>up for their favorite DNPL and they're now signing up

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:37.400
<v Speaker 6>for a second one. The right way to address this problem,

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 6>and this is the right way, and it's traditionalist of me,

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 6>but I really do believe is the right way is

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 6>for everyone to report to the credit bureaus. Today, when

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 6>we tap into one of the three major credit bureaus,

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 6>we see what you're borrowing and relatively current state of

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 6>you're borrowing from other traditional source of credit, and it

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 6>is a variable that we use inside of our own

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 6>underwriting affirm today is the only one that furnishes. That's

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 6>another fancy industry term. Delivers the data of both positive

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 6>and negative as you're on time, you're not on time

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 6>to the credit bureaus. The rest of our competitive set,

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 6>generally speaking does not, although everyone has experimented a little bit.

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:19.720
<v Speaker 6>From the very beginning, we saw the idea of building

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 6>credit history and improving credit scores for people who are

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 6>on time as a key value proposition for our borrower.

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 6>We are not going to be the only lender for

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 6>our consumers. They need to borrow for a car, they

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 6>need to borrow for a house one day. That means

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 6>whatever they're doing with us, especially if they're doing well,

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 6>which ninety seven percent of our consumers are doing really,

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 6>really well. They're on time all the time, it has

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 6>to reflect in their permanent record somehow. So we've been

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 6>furnishing basically from the very beginning. It took a long

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 6>time to persuade not just the credit bureaus but also

0:31:51.640 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 6>the companies that provide traditional credit scores to understand the

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 6>data we furnish and treat it in the right way

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 6>so that when you are in time, the score go up,

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 6>when you're not on time, the scores go down, et cetera.

0:32:02.120 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 6>And so we did all that work basically on a

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 6>volunteer basis over the last decade and today right now,

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 6>the state of the industry is if you are a

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:14.240
<v Speaker 6>b input for the NPL provider and you're not furnishing data,

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 6>you kind of have no excuse. We pioneered this, We

0:32:17.720 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 6>did all the work, We worked with the score builders

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:22.600
<v Speaker 6>and the credit bureaus, and we're now sending all of

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 6>our data.

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 5>And so we want everyone to join us.

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 6>Because most people do pay on time, their credit histories

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 6>should reflect their good repayment, but also people who should

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:33.680
<v Speaker 6>not be borrowing should be reflected. And I think that

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 6>that's just really really important. If I can do one

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 6>bit of advertising on your show, its wont before affirm

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 6>it will be all of you out there. If you

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:45.960
<v Speaker 6>are in a buyout pay lator industry, furnish your damn data.

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 6>It will help consumers and it will eventually accreate to

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 6>your brand too. But for now we are the only

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 6>major one.

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 4>Wait, what's the resistance then, because it seems kind of obvious.

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 4>If everyone cares about the underwriting, you would want more

0:32:57.760 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 4>data out there, so why not provide it?

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:04.239
<v Speaker 6>So I don't want to pretend that I understand all

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 6>the motivations, but I think a basic inferential thought might

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 6>occur that if you're making a lot of money from

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 6>late fees, it's a cool thing to tell your consumers.

0:33:15.440 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 5>Don't worry.

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 6>You can just pay me off anyone go on your

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:20.840
<v Speaker 6>permanent record. And if you don't make any money from

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 6>late fees, you have no incentive to tell your consumers,

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 6>Oh it's okay, just pay me something and we won't

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 6>tell on you. The interesting connection between late fees and lack.

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 5>Of reporting is unfortunately the underlying fact.

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 6>And because we don't make any money from late fees,

0:33:37.320 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 6>because we don't charge any we're very pro reporting.

0:33:40.440 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 2>Just out of curiosity, since you're talking about late fees

0:33:42.880 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 2>and credit and all that stuff. Here we are recording

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 2>this on December second, twenty twenty five. You take the

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 2>temperature of the consumer for us. I don't think you're

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 2>doing seeing any signs of growing mispayments or anything.

0:33:54.680 --> 0:34:02.479
<v Speaker 6>Like that, not as of December second. The important thing

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 6>to understand, I'm asked this question fairly often. I am

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:08.400
<v Speaker 6>a great I am the firm is a great lens

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:12.760
<v Speaker 6>into the financial hearts and minds of North American consumer.

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 6>We're outperated in the US, Canada and now UK. It

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 6>is a specific set of people. These people are more

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:21.480
<v Speaker 6>financially responsible. They made a conscious choice. They picked us

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 6>not just because it's installment pay and DA it's convenient.

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:27.760
<v Speaker 6>It's also because we told them we don't charge lazies.

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 6>It's also because we told them you hate the asterisk

0:34:30.239 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 6>next to zero percent. We don't have any asterisks. One

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 6>of our core values is no fine print, and we

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 6>mean it on and on and on and so it

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 6>stands to reason that firm consumers will be probably much

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:44.279
<v Speaker 6>later into any kind of a macroeconomic earthquake territory, if

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:46.840
<v Speaker 6>there was one to come. But as of right now,

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 6>we feel quite good about our book and also about

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 6>the US consumer.

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to ask you a question, and I'm gonna

0:34:55.320 --> 0:34:57.840
<v Speaker 2>mention a competitor. I won't make you name the competitor,

0:34:57.840 --> 0:34:59.439
<v Speaker 2>but I'll just say it my question and then ask

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 2>you about so. One of your competitors, Klarna, recently announced

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:05.320
<v Speaker 2>a new dollar peg stable coin and I'm very cynical,

0:35:05.719 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 2>and so when I see like random companies announcing some

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:11.439
<v Speaker 2>crypto thing like, sometimes it makes sense, but often it's like, well,

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 2>maybe is this just a good press release or something

0:35:13.680 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 2>like that. And I haven't really looked at the Klarna one,

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. But for you affirm right now when you

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 2>look at as someone who has been in the internet

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 2>payment trenches for literally decades right now, do stable coins

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:30.239
<v Speaker 2>or anything crypto unlock anything for you right now when

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 2>you think about the future and you think about opportunities

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 2>that you can't do with traditional rails.

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:39.320
<v Speaker 5>The short answer is, I don't think so. Now.

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:42.560
<v Speaker 6>I'm also very cynical, so I think you're unfortunately tapping

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 6>into the exact same mind flow.

0:35:45.360 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 5>That you have. This is our way of loading.

0:35:47.239 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Them to want to come on the podcast and have

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 2>you against it.

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:51.439
<v Speaker 3>But keep going, keep going.

0:35:52.160 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 5>I you know, I am confident that.

0:35:56.320 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 6>There is some thought that went to the press release,

0:35:58.239 --> 0:35:59.799
<v Speaker 6>so I don't think it's a pure press release.

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:02.880
<v Speaker 5>So I will.

0:36:03.760 --> 0:36:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about it.

0:36:04.360 --> 0:36:06.160
<v Speaker 2>I won't make you, We're not gonna make you speculate

0:36:06.200 --> 0:36:07.440
<v Speaker 2>on your competitor, but just tell.

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 5>Sure.

0:36:09.920 --> 0:36:14.480
<v Speaker 6>I will straw man the reasons why Yes, so why not?

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:16.560
<v Speaker 6>As obvious, I think you probably can do it much

0:36:16.560 --> 0:36:17.399
<v Speaker 6>better job than I can.

0:36:18.280 --> 0:36:19.880
<v Speaker 5>The why yes, So there are a couple of reasons.

0:36:19.920 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 6>One, in general, if you have a lot of cross

0:36:24.239 --> 0:36:29.640
<v Speaker 6>border commerce for an exchange, the complexity of just diligence

0:36:29.719 --> 0:36:34.840
<v Speaker 6>around you, everything from sanctions to reserve accounts, et cetera.

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:36.960
<v Speaker 6>You can squint a little and say, you know what,

0:36:37.040 --> 0:36:40.480
<v Speaker 6>if we just lived in dollar pegged stable coins everywhere,

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:42.879
<v Speaker 6>all at once, it would be a little bit easier.

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 5>And I think that's true.

0:36:45.000 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 6>E commerce is not a very significantly cross border discipline.

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 5>And so before you sort of say, oh, it.

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 6>Wouldn't it be amazing if I bought lots of things

0:36:54.280 --> 0:36:58.440
<v Speaker 6>from Zanzibar and just paid them with affirm but they

0:36:58.440 --> 0:37:01.000
<v Speaker 6>got stable coin as a settlement currency, they'll be very

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 6>happy because they want dollars in this thing is essentially

0:37:03.160 --> 0:37:03.800
<v Speaker 6>dollar equivalent.

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 5>It's a good story.

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 6>Just most people in the US don't buy a lot

0:37:06.120 --> 0:37:07.920
<v Speaker 6>of things from Zanzibar like they buy some things in

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:10.520
<v Speaker 6>other countries. But most of the time, because we all

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:12.480
<v Speaker 6>want things shipped to us very very quickly, we're probably

0:37:12.520 --> 0:37:15.280
<v Speaker 6>buying it from a US subsidiary. That's ware houses somewhere

0:37:15.280 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 6>pretty close to the US, and.

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:18.560
<v Speaker 5>So it's not that big of a market just yet.

0:37:18.600 --> 0:37:20.720
<v Speaker 6>But in like five years, if you see me putting

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:22.800
<v Speaker 6>out a press release, it's not because I finally realized

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:25.560
<v Speaker 6>that I'm missing out, is because there's enough cross border

0:37:25.600 --> 0:37:29.320
<v Speaker 6>commerce in our scale where it starts to make a difference.

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:31.479
<v Speaker 6>That's the best I got in terms of why would

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:34.280
<v Speaker 6>you want to do this? The obvious of why nots?

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 6>It's like, well, maybe you want to move money around

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:40.640
<v Speaker 6>person to person, but that's not our business. Maybe you

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:44.560
<v Speaker 6>want to believe that one day Joe will have a

0:37:44.960 --> 0:37:47.879
<v Speaker 6>wallet full of stable coins. I really have a hard

0:37:47.880 --> 0:37:51.240
<v Speaker 6>time imagining you sporting a whole bunch of different kinds

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:55.280
<v Speaker 6>of branded dollar pegged effectively equivalent stable coins, like a

0:37:55.320 --> 0:37:57.839
<v Speaker 6>coupon book of I got my firm stable coin and

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:00.799
<v Speaker 6>my brand XYZ stable coin, and I'm going to choose

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:02.440
<v Speaker 6>between the two, Like none of that maybe.

0:38:02.320 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 2>Solve the rule? What about for like rewards, that's one

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 2>thing that credit cards currently have that like, oh, I

0:38:08.120 --> 0:38:10.400
<v Speaker 2>get miles, Like could there be something with if I

0:38:10.520 --> 0:38:12.400
<v Speaker 2>use this stable coin, I get remitted?

0:38:12.400 --> 0:38:14.440
<v Speaker 3>But I don't know. I'm I'm just throwing stuff.

0:38:14.160 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 6>Out there, so for what it's worth, I spend a

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:21.480
<v Speaker 6>lot of my time contemplating the word ecosystem and mostly

0:38:21.600 --> 0:38:24.479
<v Speaker 6>raging against it because it is one of the less

0:38:24.480 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 6>documented wealth transfers. And by the way, the credit card

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:30.640
<v Speaker 6>industry in general is a regressive wealth transfer where people

0:38:30.640 --> 0:38:34.759
<v Speaker 6>who never revolve transactors like probably both of you and me.

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:37.240
<v Speaker 6>When I use credit cards, which is really rare these days,

0:38:37.680 --> 0:38:38.920
<v Speaker 6>we're paying our bills at the end of the month.

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:40.839
<v Speaker 6>We're not paying a penny of interest. I think Joe

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:42.880
<v Speaker 6>on the record saying you've never paid any interest, and

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:44.840
<v Speaker 6>so I think that's that's a nice place to be

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:47.640
<v Speaker 6>if you can afford it. Telling people that they should

0:38:47.719 --> 0:38:49.239
<v Speaker 6>just not bar and paid off at the end of

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:51.520
<v Speaker 6>the month is an incredibly lead the meat cake equillent

0:38:51.520 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 6>for the twenty first century. Payments lots of people in

0:38:54.239 --> 0:38:56.360
<v Speaker 6>America revolve half the country revolves at a ten thousand

0:38:56.400 --> 0:39:01.160
<v Speaker 6>dollars and so the idea of those people caring about

0:39:01.160 --> 0:39:02.440
<v Speaker 6>rewards is sort of preposterous.

0:39:02.480 --> 0:39:02.799
<v Speaker 5>They do not.

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:05.239
<v Speaker 6>They care about making their minimum payment. People who are

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:07.800
<v Speaker 6>figuring out which reward scheme they want to be a

0:39:07.880 --> 0:39:12.879
<v Speaker 6>part of. I'm just not so convinced that they're going

0:39:12.960 --> 0:39:16.319
<v Speaker 6>to be calculated expanding their horizons to have more stable coins,

0:39:16.320 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 6>because ultimately they're just getting dollars.

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:19.439
<v Speaker 5>In the world of a firm.

0:39:19.480 --> 0:39:21.640
<v Speaker 6>People that we serve every single day, twenty four million

0:39:21.680 --> 0:39:23.880
<v Speaker 6>of them in the last twelve months, they really really

0:39:23.920 --> 0:39:26.520
<v Speaker 6>care about the interest rates they pay because a lot

0:39:26.560 --> 0:39:29.319
<v Speaker 6>of them understand that the alternative is revolving and so

0:39:29.440 --> 0:39:31.919
<v Speaker 6>for them being told, hey, your reward is a zero

0:39:31.920 --> 0:39:36.359
<v Speaker 6>percent loan is incredibly powerful. And so before we get

0:39:36.360 --> 0:39:40.400
<v Speaker 6>into using our hard earned revenue into stable coins, we

0:39:40.440 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 6>will just give it back to the consumers in a

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:43.240
<v Speaker 6>form of no interest.

0:39:44.080 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 4>So we talked about how you make money, but we

0:39:46.680 --> 0:39:50.279
<v Speaker 4>should talk a little bit about your cost side as well.

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:53.000
<v Speaker 4>I think you mentioned funding earlier. So you have to

0:39:53.000 --> 0:39:56.200
<v Speaker 4>get money from somewhere, and you're paying for that money.

0:39:56.680 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 4>What levers do you have to pull if the cost

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:02.759
<v Speaker 4>of money goes up? And again, I'm aware that we're

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:05.680
<v Speaker 4>recording this in early December and everyone expects an imminent

0:40:05.800 --> 0:40:09.080
<v Speaker 4>rate cut, But in theory, if interest rates were to

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:12.760
<v Speaker 4>go up, what could you do to offset that additional cost.

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:16.560
<v Speaker 6>So the most important thing to understand about our business

0:40:16.880 --> 0:40:22.480
<v Speaker 6>from the capital sourcing part of the game. Everyone understands

0:40:22.560 --> 0:40:26.440
<v Speaker 6>that rates are are super volatile, but you know, if

0:40:26.480 --> 0:40:28.600
<v Speaker 6>you look back a couple of years, they were very volatile,

0:40:28.719 --> 0:40:32.160
<v Speaker 6>if for a brief not so shining moment, and so

0:40:32.360 --> 0:40:35.400
<v Speaker 6>we all knew if possible. So all of our contracts

0:40:36.440 --> 0:40:40.120
<v Speaker 6>with various lenders of money to us but also people

0:40:40.200 --> 0:40:45.400
<v Speaker 6>who will buy our loans, they all adjust fairly gently

0:40:45.480 --> 0:40:47.520
<v Speaker 6>over a course of a fairly long period of time.

0:40:47.600 --> 0:40:52.719
<v Speaker 6>So it's not about can we deal with rising costs

0:40:52.719 --> 0:40:55.239
<v Speaker 6>of credit for us? It's how quickly do they change

0:40:55.280 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 6>for us? And of course we understand that they might

0:40:57.200 --> 0:41:00.640
<v Speaker 6>change quickly. Therefore a lot of our contracts stipa that, hey,

0:41:00.760 --> 0:41:04.040
<v Speaker 6>if they do move up, the adjustments to our cost

0:41:04.200 --> 0:41:07.000
<v Speaker 6>will go fairly slowly over a period of time. So

0:41:07.200 --> 0:41:10.200
<v Speaker 6>the more likely outcome in December is probably a downward

0:41:10.239 --> 0:41:12.800
<v Speaker 6>motion of the credit rates, or perhaps they stay steady.

0:41:13.320 --> 0:41:16.399
<v Speaker 6>But just the same as I described, we're not going

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:19.040
<v Speaker 6>to wake up to twenty five free basis points of

0:41:19.120 --> 0:41:21.600
<v Speaker 6>incronal revenue. It will eventually come to us in a

0:41:21.640 --> 0:41:24.400
<v Speaker 6>form of in chronal margin, but it will take its

0:41:24.440 --> 0:41:26.919
<v Speaker 6>time because these contracts are just both up and down

0:41:27.040 --> 0:41:29.160
<v Speaker 6>quite slowly, and we're in no way unique.

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:30.200
<v Speaker 5>In the industry. Everybody does that.

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:33.400
<v Speaker 6>The levers we have to deal with such cost changes

0:41:33.719 --> 0:41:36.840
<v Speaker 6>are exactly what you would expect, so we will either

0:41:37.080 --> 0:41:39.400
<v Speaker 6>pass it through to the consumers and moving up in

0:41:39.440 --> 0:41:41.600
<v Speaker 6>the increments or down of twenty five basis points is

0:41:41.640 --> 0:41:44.520
<v Speaker 6>not that significant then most people, I think generally don't

0:41:44.560 --> 0:41:48.600
<v Speaker 6>care that much. In some cases we actually choose to

0:41:48.640 --> 0:41:53.200
<v Speaker 6>tell hey, merchant X, you are providing these rates for nothing.

0:41:54.040 --> 0:41:56.120
<v Speaker 6>You should continue doing so, but the cost to you

0:41:56.160 --> 0:41:59.759
<v Speaker 6>will go up a tiny bit because the rates have

0:41:59.800 --> 0:42:02.480
<v Speaker 6>change now because of time value of money the merchants

0:42:02.520 --> 0:42:04.880
<v Speaker 6>pay us in real time, essentially as the transaction is consummated,

0:42:04.920 --> 0:42:07.200
<v Speaker 6>the true cost to them is truly deminimus. And so

0:42:07.640 --> 0:42:09.600
<v Speaker 6>in either of these two cases, so long as the

0:42:09.600 --> 0:42:13.040
<v Speaker 6>movements are not very violent, it's not that major a

0:42:13.080 --> 0:42:14.560
<v Speaker 6>component of our business.

0:42:14.760 --> 0:42:17.760
<v Speaker 2>I just have one last question, AI, So setting aside

0:42:17.840 --> 0:42:21.000
<v Speaker 2>the technology for the underwriting, which I'm sure is a

0:42:21.080 --> 0:42:25.799
<v Speaker 2>very high tech, data intensive application, and setting aside that

0:42:25.840 --> 0:42:29.640
<v Speaker 2>probably many of your engineers on staff are using code

0:42:29.640 --> 0:42:33.239
<v Speaker 2>generating for that, just putting your tech, your tech had on.

0:42:33.440 --> 0:42:36.800
<v Speaker 2>As someone who oversees a large organization people looking for

0:42:37.040 --> 0:42:40.880
<v Speaker 2>how large language models in particular are being deployed in

0:42:40.960 --> 0:42:44.239
<v Speaker 2>productive capacity at a firm today. Is any of this

0:42:44.400 --> 0:42:48.799
<v Speaker 2>technology in use in production and saving human hours in

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:50.239
<v Speaker 2>some respect or another.

0:42:50.680 --> 0:42:53.280
<v Speaker 5>Yes, emphatically. So.

0:42:53.280 --> 0:42:58.960
<v Speaker 6>So we just wrapped up the cyber weekend Turkey, five

0:42:59.560 --> 0:43:02.840
<v Speaker 6>Black Friends, Deciber Monday, whatever whatever you want to call yesterday,

0:43:03.040 --> 0:43:05.840
<v Speaker 6>which was wonderful. And I don't actually have the stat

0:43:05.920 --> 0:43:08.560
<v Speaker 6>yet because I will get the report immediately after this

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:14.880
<v Speaker 6>podcast is recorded. Well, I probably can't pre announce our results.

0:43:15.040 --> 0:43:18.360
<v Speaker 6>We report early next year, but we will have handled

0:43:18.600 --> 0:43:22.799
<v Speaker 6>tens of thousands of consumer contacts, people saying everything from hey,

0:43:22.880 --> 0:43:26.880
<v Speaker 6>I just borrowed money from you, and I don't understand

0:43:26.920 --> 0:43:29.479
<v Speaker 6>when my first payment is due, and you know, maybe

0:43:29.520 --> 0:43:31.560
<v Speaker 6>it's because they hadn't read the email as clearly or

0:43:31.680 --> 0:43:33.800
<v Speaker 6>were everything all the way down to I just borrowed

0:43:33.800 --> 0:43:35.600
<v Speaker 6>money and I realized that I need a refund because

0:43:35.600 --> 0:43:37.319
<v Speaker 6>I actually have no intention of buying this thing and

0:43:37.440 --> 0:43:38.759
<v Speaker 6>all that stuff and a lot of it. We try

0:43:38.800 --> 0:43:41.120
<v Speaker 6>to serve them in real time as they're kinds of acting,

0:43:41.120 --> 0:43:43.760
<v Speaker 6>but plenty of people contact us right after or maybe sometime,

0:43:43.880 --> 0:43:47.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, after the purchase. A huge percentage of that

0:43:47.120 --> 0:43:49.040
<v Speaker 6>is handled entirely by AI.

0:43:49.320 --> 0:43:51.080
<v Speaker 5>Now. Now that has not.

0:43:51.239 --> 0:43:55.440
<v Speaker 6>Caused us to lay off our wonderful customer service staff

0:43:55.560 --> 0:43:56.000
<v Speaker 6>at all.

0:43:56.320 --> 0:43:57.840
<v Speaker 5>What it has allowed us to do.

0:43:57.960 --> 0:44:01.279
<v Speaker 6>Is to go really deep into specialization. AI is very

0:44:01.360 --> 0:44:04.719
<v Speaker 6>very good today at handling basic questions. It can do

0:44:04.960 --> 0:44:06.799
<v Speaker 6>cool things like look up for your account and say, no,

0:44:06.880 --> 0:44:09.360
<v Speaker 6>you're not late, you are a mistaken, don't worry about it,

0:44:09.480 --> 0:44:11.560
<v Speaker 6>or yes you're related, but we don't charge late the

0:44:11.680 --> 0:44:14.680
<v Speaker 6>so just please make yourself current and we'll move on.

0:44:15.000 --> 0:44:17.560
<v Speaker 6>All of that can be handled by AI. One flee

0:44:17.840 --> 0:44:21.640
<v Speaker 6>if it's something like I changed my name or I

0:44:21.719 --> 0:44:24.600
<v Speaker 6>changed where I live right as I was consummating this transaction.

0:44:24.760 --> 0:44:26.319
<v Speaker 6>There are all sorts of crazy things that come up

0:44:27.000 --> 0:44:28.840
<v Speaker 6>that is something that a human can handle. AI models

0:44:28.880 --> 0:44:31.560
<v Speaker 6>are not smart enough yet to handle some of these things,

0:44:31.600 --> 0:44:34.520
<v Speaker 6>and also frequently enough. We wouldn't want the possibility of

0:44:34.600 --> 0:44:38.080
<v Speaker 6>hallucination to derail what is a good customer relationship. So

0:44:38.360 --> 0:44:41.319
<v Speaker 6>we've been able to move our human helpers into a

0:44:41.440 --> 0:44:46.080
<v Speaker 6>much more sophisticated, much more specific role. So the theme

0:44:46.120 --> 0:44:48.920
<v Speaker 6>in our customer service for last year has been specialization.

0:44:48.960 --> 0:44:50.560
<v Speaker 5>Specialization, specialization, where.

0:44:50.320 --> 0:44:53.680
<v Speaker 6>We train people now to serve very very specific subset

0:44:53.719 --> 0:44:56.200
<v Speaker 6>of problems because they can be effective and move faster,

0:44:56.320 --> 0:44:58.440
<v Speaker 6>and so these tools are actually making them more efficient

0:44:58.800 --> 0:45:00.799
<v Speaker 6>by letting them focus on just a very specific thing

0:45:00.840 --> 0:45:01.319
<v Speaker 6>that they're good at.

0:45:01.400 --> 0:45:02.360
<v Speaker 5>So that's one example.

0:45:02.680 --> 0:45:06.000
<v Speaker 6>We track all sorts of interesting metrics about AI tool

0:45:06.080 --> 0:45:10.680
<v Speaker 6>usage internally. The interesting or sort of random factoid, our

0:45:10.719 --> 0:45:14.240
<v Speaker 6>engineering group is not the single largest consumer of AI tools.

0:45:14.560 --> 0:45:17.279
<v Speaker 5>I will not reveal exactly who it is. And by

0:45:17.320 --> 0:45:18.879
<v Speaker 5>the way, like vast majority of or.

0:45:18.840 --> 0:45:22.760
<v Speaker 2>Engineering US a hunt or something.

0:45:22.880 --> 0:45:28.120
<v Speaker 6>It's actually finance. Our finance group uses these tools obsessively.

0:45:29.000 --> 0:45:30.600
<v Speaker 6>I'm cheating a little bit here, So for a very

0:45:30.600 --> 0:45:31.960
<v Speaker 6>long time. It's not the case anymore, but for a

0:45:32.040 --> 0:45:34.040
<v Speaker 6>very long time because we are so AI and mL

0:45:34.120 --> 0:45:38.360
<v Speaker 6>heavy company. One of the core requirements for any employee,

0:45:38.400 --> 0:45:40.239
<v Speaker 6>but certainly in finance, was you have to know how

0:45:40.239 --> 0:45:42.480
<v Speaker 6>to read code and probably write code, and so huge

0:45:42.520 --> 0:45:44.280
<v Speaker 6>percentage of what we do in our finance group actually

0:45:44.320 --> 0:45:46.359
<v Speaker 6>looks a lot like coding and a lot of tough

0:45:46.400 --> 0:45:49.200
<v Speaker 6>for engineering and so but they're somehow maybe because it's

0:45:49.200 --> 0:45:51.800
<v Speaker 6>a smaller group on average, but they're great adopters of

0:45:51.840 --> 0:45:54.800
<v Speaker 6>these tools. Our legal team use it all the time.

0:45:55.200 --> 0:45:58.000
<v Speaker 6>We have literally hundreds of thousands of very custom contracts.

0:45:58.040 --> 0:46:00.239
<v Speaker 6>Every time a merchant pays your interest for you, they

0:46:00.280 --> 0:46:03.480
<v Speaker 6>signed up for it contractually. That's a custom contract. Imagine

0:46:03.520 --> 0:46:04.520
<v Speaker 6>managing half a.

0:46:04.440 --> 0:46:05.480
<v Speaker 5>Million of these things.

0:46:05.719 --> 0:46:08.640
<v Speaker 6>They're all carefully written and bespoken, so AI can read

0:46:08.680 --> 0:46:12.040
<v Speaker 6>and find errors and corrections, et cetera, et cetera. So

0:46:12.080 --> 0:46:13.400
<v Speaker 6>one of the things that we're responsible for as a

0:46:13.400 --> 0:46:17.440
<v Speaker 6>regulated business is we cannot allow merchants to advertise our

0:46:17.480 --> 0:46:20.080
<v Speaker 6>service incorrectly. We're actually on the hook when a merchant

0:46:20.120 --> 0:46:23.400
<v Speaker 6>says something like hooray a firm interest free for everyone.

0:46:23.480 --> 0:46:25.560
<v Speaker 6>It's not true. Some people will actually pay some interest.

0:46:25.600 --> 0:46:26.000
<v Speaker 5>Sometimes.

0:46:26.280 --> 0:46:28.439
<v Speaker 6>We are responsible for finding that and telling the merchant

0:46:28.520 --> 0:46:31.239
<v Speaker 6>please stop saying things that aren't strictly speaking true. AI

0:46:31.280 --> 0:46:34.320
<v Speaker 6>tools are amazing at reading both loads of advertising copy

0:46:34.320 --> 0:46:36.000
<v Speaker 6>and saying, hey, wait a second, that is inaccurate.

0:46:36.040 --> 0:46:37.719
<v Speaker 5>We got to fire off an email and tell this

0:46:37.719 --> 0:46:38.520
<v Speaker 5>merchant to fix it.

0:46:38.840 --> 0:46:41.200
<v Speaker 6>So you can sort of imagine a flood of ideas

0:46:41.200 --> 0:46:44.160
<v Speaker 6>that we had when the CHGBT moment happened and put

0:46:44.160 --> 0:46:45.320
<v Speaker 6>it to work for the last few years.

0:46:46.160 --> 0:46:49.120
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to end with a sort of theoretical question,

0:46:49.360 --> 0:46:53.080
<v Speaker 4>big picture theoretical question. But if you could design the

0:46:53.120 --> 0:46:59.160
<v Speaker 4>ideal payment system from scratch, complete scratch, you know, using

0:46:59.200 --> 0:47:03.279
<v Speaker 4>today's technolog there's no legacy card networks, maybe not even

0:47:03.400 --> 0:47:07.000
<v Speaker 4>legacy banks. What would it look like and how much

0:47:07.160 --> 0:47:12.440
<v Speaker 4>of a firm's current business model would survive in that environment?

0:47:14.600 --> 0:47:16.279
<v Speaker 6>Oh, I think it would look an awful lot like

0:47:16.320 --> 0:47:21.279
<v Speaker 6>a firm. Affirm is my personal attempt to build a

0:47:21.440 --> 0:47:22.920
<v Speaker 6>system that I can.

0:47:22.760 --> 0:47:23.719
<v Speaker 5>Be proud about.

0:47:24.080 --> 0:47:27.080
<v Speaker 6>One of the core things we tell people who join us.

0:47:27.239 --> 0:47:31.359
<v Speaker 6>One of the reasons we had such a black and

0:47:31.400 --> 0:47:34.960
<v Speaker 6>white no laid fees, no compounding, no deferred interest, none

0:47:34.960 --> 0:47:37.920
<v Speaker 6>of the yuck is because I wanted the smartest people

0:47:37.960 --> 0:47:40.680
<v Speaker 6>that would have otherwise gone to Wall Street and trade

0:47:40.719 --> 0:47:43.640
<v Speaker 6>it in quant fonds to join us and build the

0:47:43.680 --> 0:47:47.319
<v Speaker 6>system that they could be proud about. It's very hard

0:47:47.360 --> 0:47:48.920
<v Speaker 6>to be proud about a thing that makes half its

0:47:48.920 --> 0:47:51.719
<v Speaker 6>money on lead fees, and that's why we don't do it.

0:47:51.719 --> 0:47:55.960
<v Speaker 6>And so what we've built is biased, as I am,

0:47:56.160 --> 0:47:59.160
<v Speaker 6>is pretty darn great. It really is something that I'm

0:47:59.200 --> 0:48:01.200
<v Speaker 6>very proud about. I think the totality of the team

0:48:01.239 --> 0:48:02.920
<v Speaker 6>here takes an enormous amount of pride and how we

0:48:02.960 --> 0:48:06.480
<v Speaker 6>went about building this. It is dependent and intertwined with

0:48:06.560 --> 0:48:09.960
<v Speaker 6>the legacy systems. But even as we go through card

0:48:10.040 --> 0:48:14.600
<v Speaker 6>rails to use another industry jargon, or many other systems

0:48:14.600 --> 0:48:16.880
<v Speaker 6>that have existed, when we tap into capital and markets,

0:48:16.880 --> 0:48:19.160
<v Speaker 6>which has certainly been here long before we came about,

0:48:19.520 --> 0:48:23.759
<v Speaker 6>and everything else in between, we maintain the moral integrity

0:48:23.840 --> 0:48:28.680
<v Speaker 6>of the product, and it's DNA all the way through.

0:48:29.440 --> 0:48:31.920
<v Speaker 6>We might pay late fees if we borrow money to

0:48:31.960 --> 0:48:34.080
<v Speaker 6>a lend, we haven't because obviously we're on a pretty

0:48:34.120 --> 0:48:36.800
<v Speaker 6>tight chip here it will not be passed through.

0:48:37.040 --> 0:48:38.840
<v Speaker 5>We take an incredible.

0:48:38.360 --> 0:48:43.320
<v Speaker 6>Amount of pride in the diligence we exercise within the system,

0:48:43.640 --> 0:48:45.520
<v Speaker 6>all the way down to leaving a penny on the

0:48:45.560 --> 0:48:48.319
<v Speaker 6>table for our partners to keep because we refuse to

0:48:48.360 --> 0:48:50.479
<v Speaker 6>make more money than we said we would. I would

0:48:50.520 --> 0:48:54.480
<v Speaker 6>love to have a blank sheet design, exercise and payments,

0:48:54.680 --> 0:48:56.480
<v Speaker 6>but I think what would emerge is a system that

0:48:56.560 --> 0:48:58.799
<v Speaker 6>looks a lot like a firm, just doesn't have some

0:48:58.920 --> 0:49:00.520
<v Speaker 6>of the nineteen eighties it.

0:49:01.760 --> 0:49:04.719
<v Speaker 2>Max Levchin, founder and CEO of a firm, So great

0:49:04.760 --> 0:49:08.480
<v Speaker 2>chatting with you, very illuminating, helpful conversation, and I appreciate

0:49:08.520 --> 0:49:09.440
<v Speaker 2>you coming on odlots.

0:49:10.120 --> 0:49:11.799
<v Speaker 5>Thank you so much, and again I am a fan

0:49:11.840 --> 0:49:12.560
<v Speaker 5>of the show and.

0:49:14.440 --> 0:49:17.040
<v Speaker 6>I love being able to see myself inside of a

0:49:17.040 --> 0:49:18.120
<v Speaker 6>thing that I actually listened with.

0:49:18.400 --> 0:49:19.759
<v Speaker 3>Very kind of you to say thank you so much.

0:49:19.800 --> 0:49:33.600
<v Speaker 3>That was great, Trucy. I thought that was great.

0:49:33.640 --> 0:49:36.799
<v Speaker 2>I thought that was really interesting and just sort of

0:49:37.200 --> 0:49:39.600
<v Speaker 2>understanding the real nuts and bolts about how the money

0:49:39.600 --> 0:49:43.160
<v Speaker 2>has made and what's different about BNPL companies from the

0:49:43.160 --> 0:49:46.040
<v Speaker 2>credit card companies, to my mind, very helpful conversation.

0:49:46.200 --> 0:49:46.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:49:46.480 --> 0:49:49.600
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, I thought it was really interesting, the discussion about

0:49:49.640 --> 0:49:53.680
<v Speaker 4>why other BNPL companies don't want to report to the

0:49:53.719 --> 0:49:56.759
<v Speaker 4>credit bureaus and things like that. I wonder if that'll

0:49:56.840 --> 0:50:01.040
<v Speaker 4>change anytime soon. Maybe politicians will start getting interested in it,

0:50:01.080 --> 0:50:03.000
<v Speaker 4>regulators as the space expands.

0:50:03.160 --> 0:50:05.840
<v Speaker 2>The thought that I had listening to Max was he

0:50:06.000 --> 0:50:09.440
<v Speaker 2>mentioned the sort of the regressiveness of the points system. Right,

0:50:09.560 --> 0:50:12.960
<v Speaker 2>So there's people like us who rarely roll their credit

0:50:12.960 --> 0:50:15.760
<v Speaker 2>card debt but get frequent fire miles or other rewards,

0:50:15.760 --> 0:50:18.760
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. But that's paid for by the people that roll. Now,

0:50:18.880 --> 0:50:22.800
<v Speaker 2>if a firm is targeting, they're not they're clearly targeting

0:50:22.840 --> 0:50:25.480
<v Speaker 2>people who are not thinking about points, right, they're thinking

0:50:25.480 --> 0:50:27.880
<v Speaker 2>about people who really do need to extend their payments

0:50:27.920 --> 0:50:30.520
<v Speaker 2>or implicitly roll and say we have a better option.

0:50:30.680 --> 0:50:33.560
<v Speaker 3>So it's sort of cleaving off, if you know, if this.

0:50:33.680 --> 0:50:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Grows, the firm is still just a twenty two billion

0:50:35.600 --> 0:50:39.759
<v Speaker 2>dollar company by market cap, but this grows, You've got

0:50:39.760 --> 0:50:43.200
<v Speaker 2>to wonder, like, if the maximum version where you've cleaved

0:50:43.280 --> 0:50:47.040
<v Speaker 2>off a significant number of people who roll, what happens

0:50:47.040 --> 0:50:50.319
<v Speaker 2>to the points ecosystem for the people like us?

0:50:50.400 --> 0:50:50.600
<v Speaker 5>Now?

0:50:50.640 --> 0:50:52.759
<v Speaker 2>Granted I don't think like, oh what about the poor

0:50:52.800 --> 0:50:55.280
<v Speaker 2>frequent flyer and all the great rewards are getting?

0:50:55.440 --> 0:50:57.960
<v Speaker 4>But is just someone think about the point?

0:50:58.080 --> 0:51:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, someone please think about the points accumulators who never

0:51:01.480 --> 0:51:03.879
<v Speaker 2>go into debt or who never like roll their debt.

0:51:04.000 --> 0:51:05.839
<v Speaker 2>But it is interesting to think about if you could

0:51:05.880 --> 0:51:08.319
<v Speaker 2>like cleave off that, then a big part of the

0:51:08.360 --> 0:51:11.680
<v Speaker 2>business model of credit card the legacy card companies could

0:51:11.680 --> 0:51:15.040
<v Speaker 2>potentially be unstable, and part of the appeal of going

0:51:15.080 --> 0:51:17.520
<v Speaker 2>to any credit card that offers a lot of rewards

0:51:17.800 --> 0:51:21.640
<v Speaker 2>could decline if revolvers moved to this alternate payments model.

0:51:21.760 --> 0:51:23.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's a really good point on points.

0:51:24.160 --> 0:51:24.560
<v Speaker 5>Thank you.

0:51:24.600 --> 0:51:26.239
<v Speaker 4>That one was a little obvious I'm sorry, No.

0:51:26.280 --> 0:51:27.840
<v Speaker 3>It's good. I like that one. It was straightforward. I

0:51:27.880 --> 0:51:28.680
<v Speaker 3>actually got this one.

0:51:28.719 --> 0:51:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Actually, you know what, I really also appreciated that

0:51:32.160 --> 0:51:35.200
<v Speaker 2>Max had substantive answers for things that they're doing with

0:51:35.280 --> 0:51:38.200
<v Speaker 2>AI that aren't just code generation, even if it sounds

0:51:38.200 --> 0:51:40.319
<v Speaker 2>like the Finance Department is probably still using it for

0:51:40.400 --> 0:51:42.640
<v Speaker 2>code generation, Like that makes a lot of sense, like

0:51:42.680 --> 0:51:45.560
<v Speaker 2>being able to proactively scan websites to say who is

0:51:45.920 --> 0:51:48.600
<v Speaker 2>claiming something that's not true about affirm et cetera.

0:51:48.760 --> 0:51:51.520
<v Speaker 3>So maybe there are productive uses of all this technology.

0:51:51.200 --> 0:51:54.879
<v Speaker 4>Or sending out millions and millions contracts automatically totally all right,

0:51:54.920 --> 0:51:55.600
<v Speaker 4>shall we leave it there.

0:51:55.719 --> 0:51:56.399
<v Speaker 3>Let's leave it there.

0:51:56.440 --> 0:51:58.760
<v Speaker 4>This has been another episode of the All Thoughts podcast.

0:51:58.840 --> 0:52:01.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can find me at Tracy Alloway.

0:52:02.120 --> 0:52:04.960
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Jill Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart.

0:52:05.239 --> 0:52:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Follow our guest Max Levchin, He's at m Levchin. Follow

0:52:08.200 --> 0:52:11.360
<v Speaker 2>our producers Kerman Rodriguez at Kerman Erman, dash Ol Bennett

0:52:11.360 --> 0:52:14.839
<v Speaker 2>at Dashbot, and Kelbrooks at Kelbrooks. And from our odd

0:52:14.880 --> 0:52:17.239
<v Speaker 2>Laws content. Go to Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots.

0:52:17.280 --> 0:52:18.400
<v Speaker 3>We have a daily newsletter.

0:52:18.400 --> 0:52:19.160
<v Speaker 5>And all of our.

0:52:19.040 --> 0:52:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Episodes, and you can chat about all of these topics

0:52:21.440 --> 0:52:24.520
<v Speaker 2>twenty four to seven in our discord discord dot gg

0:52:24.640 --> 0:52:25.719
<v Speaker 2>slash odd lots.

0:52:25.800 --> 0:52:28.120
<v Speaker 4>And if you enjoyed this conversation, if you like it

0:52:28.160 --> 0:52:31.080
<v Speaker 4>when we talk BNPL business models, then please leave us

0:52:31.200 --> 0:52:34.600
<v Speaker 4>a positive review on your favorite podcast platform. And remember,

0:52:35.000 --> 0:52:37.640
<v Speaker 4>if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to

0:52:37.760 --> 0:52:40.839
<v Speaker 4>all of our episodes absolutely ad free. All you need

0:52:40.880 --> 0:52:43.400
<v Speaker 4>to do is find the Bloomberg channel on Apple Podcasts

0:52:43.440 --> 0:53:07.680
<v Speaker 4>and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening, Bead