WEBVTT - Airbnb Sees High Travel Demand and Uber, Lyft Stocks Sink

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:05.520
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power Colli

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:10.879
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I'm Emily Check in San Francisco, and this

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology. Coming up. In the next hour, the

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:34.199
<v Speaker 1>Fed unleashes its most aggressive policy in decades to combat

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:37.160
<v Speaker 1>soaring inflation. Will talk with Liz Young of Sophi about

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>what it means for the economy, consumers and tech plus

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:44.599
<v Speaker 1>substantial demand for travel that is the message from airbnbco

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 1>Brian Chesky after a much better than expected earnings report.

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 1>They'll join me live to talk about how tourism is

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>rebounding and that provocative tweet about big changes to Airbnb

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>coming and one third of list market cap wipe out

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>in a single session. Uber releasing its results early to

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 1>prevent investor dragging them down to still Uber shares taking

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 1>a smaller lugdown even after beating estimates. We're gonna speak

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>with Lift president John Zimmer about the market reaction and

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:15.960
<v Speaker 1>what's next. All of that in a moment, but first

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to get a look at the markets and

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:20.400
<v Speaker 1>a big day for the US economy. The Federal Reserve

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:24.119
<v Speaker 1>has voted unanimously to raise a benchmark interest rate by

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>half a percentage point, stock soaring, bonds rising during FED

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>share j Pal's press conference. Bloomberg's Ed Ludlow is here

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:34.119
<v Speaker 1>with the reaction. I take it away. Yeah, the SMP

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>five hundred, the main gauge of US equities rising by

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>three percent. It's biggest jump since May really accelerating those

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>gains throughout that press conference, as we discussed, and that's

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>that one by more than three percent. We saw yields

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>pull back, especially the benchmark ten year treasury yield, off

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>five pound four basis points to two point nine four percent,

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and it was interesting to see bitcoin also get caught

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>up in this kind of risk on sentiment. We saw

0:01:56.960 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>in markets back above thirty nine thousand, pushing towards forty

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>dollars per token, caught up as eguties are rising. Now

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>come means by Bloombog terminal producer Marguerite points out to

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>me that this is the biggest jump in interest rates

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:12.799
<v Speaker 1>since two thousand. But here's the thing, the focus is

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>very much on inflation. The increase the f o m

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>c's target federal funds rate takes us to a range

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>of zero point five to one. You remember we got

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>that quarter percentage point hike in March, but for much

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>of the last two years, rates have been near zero

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>because the FED was trying to prop up the U

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>S economy cushion U S economy from the immediate impacts

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>of the COVID nineteen pandemic globally, but the gap between

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:39.360
<v Speaker 1>rates and where we see inflation, which is at its

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>highest level since the eighties, is the most on record,

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the spread between those two measures that we track in

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the US economy and FED power was saying that he

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>envisages fifty basis point hikes. At the next couple of meetings,

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 1>he got asked, well, could we see a seventy five

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>basis point hike. He said that that was not currently

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>being considered by the f O m C. Not the

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>only story of the day. M Of course, Lift and

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Uber two very different stories, but similar market reaction. Lift

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:09.359
<v Speaker 1>off by thirty biggest drop on record, a huge chunk

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>of its market cap lost after he gave a pretty

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>weak outlook, and there are concerns that it's gonna have

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>to spend heavy on driver incentives, which is going to

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>weigh on profit. Uber actually showed some strength interesting ebit

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 1>DAR forecast, but again the stock suffering in conjunction with

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>its industry peer lift. Big questions now about how these

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>two companies and bride Sharing stand on their own two

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 1>feet in this post pandemic world. Then all right, add

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>thank you lots to digest today. The Federal Reserve, as

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>i'd saying, giving a much needed boost to tech stocks

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>by ruling out a more aggressive rate hype path and

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>reassuring the US economy will stay strong. As you mentioned,

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>NASDAC nearly three biggest one day jump in a week.

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Liz Young, head of investment Strategy, it's so far joined

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 1>us now, So look, lot's going on here. What do

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>you think the ripple effects of this are really going

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to be on the macro environment over the next few

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>months and the next couple of years. Well, the reality

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>of it is that this is the first of probably

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>a few larger hikes that we're going to see. It

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>was important to get this first big fifty basis point

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:16.359
<v Speaker 1>hike behind us, because I think the anticipation was really

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>killing us as far as investor sentiment goes. But we're

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 1>probably still going to see another fifty in June. We

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>may see again another fifty in July. The ripple effects

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:31.919
<v Speaker 1>of those together should hopefully damp in demand to a

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>point that some of this supply demand stuff becomes more

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>imbalanced and we see concurrently a rollover in inflation. The

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>issue here, and I heard you guys just talking about

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the spread between the tenure Treasury UH and CPI and

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the spread between CPI and where the Fed Funds rate is.

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:50.839
<v Speaker 1>It's not that we're trying to get the Fed funds

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>rate and the CPI rate to meet anytime soon. It's

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that as the Fed funds rate moves up, we want

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>CPI to move down, and we want to see that

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>move down, hope fully with a quick pace, because that's

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 1>what's biting into the consumer. But the issue that we're

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:06.600
<v Speaker 1>probably going to face through summer is that we're sitting

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>at an eight and a half percent c p I number.

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Even if this is the peak, it's not as if

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>it's going to fall from eight and a half percent

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:15.280
<v Speaker 1>down to three percent overnight, So there's going to be

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 1>a gradual reduction. We're just hopeful that as we raise rates,

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:22.600
<v Speaker 1>hopefully for fifty basis points, and we go at it

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:25.279
<v Speaker 1>with a heavy enough hammer, that CPI comes back a

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>little faster than the Fed funds rate has to go up.

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 1>So look, tech equities are among many stocks that have

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>taken a giant hit this year. What does this mean

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>for tech stocks in particular? So tech stocks, if we

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>just use the nasdack to represent tech stocks, the Nasdaq

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 1>is in bear market territory. Maybe after today it's narrowly

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>out of bear market territory, but it probably should have been.

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>And given where evaluations were before we started to really

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:57.599
<v Speaker 1>worry about Fed rate hikes and monetary policy tightening, some

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>of that needed to come out of the system. Some

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of that bloat needed to come out of the system.

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:05.160
<v Speaker 1>So the correction that tech stocks have seen to this

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:08.919
<v Speaker 1>point I think makes sense given the inflated valuations that

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>we're at. Also, when you look though at some of

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 1>those tech stocks, they're still at pretty high valuation. So

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't sit here and say that they're not going

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to go down further and that there isn't more risk

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:23.280
<v Speaker 1>in the system. But long term, if we look back

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:25.840
<v Speaker 1>on this time period, let's say five years from now,

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>we're probably gonna look at it and say, you know what,

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:31.359
<v Speaker 1>some of those names were really good bargains at those levels.

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>So this isn't okay. Time to be looking at tech

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>as a longer term holding, and longer term here I'm

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 1>talking about two years, three years, five years, looking at

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:43.359
<v Speaker 1>it as a long term holding, and looking for the

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>companies that are high quality, that are still offering you

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>growth prospects, and that aren't over levered or aren't trading

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:53.279
<v Speaker 1>at unreasonable valuations given where we are in the cycle.

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's okay, just come towing back in. Okay,

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:58.039
<v Speaker 1>how do you look at a company like Lift though

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>losing of its value, Ubers earnings, We're a different story,

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>but we're also seeing them take a slight leg down today.

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Investors are looking at you know, both of these companies

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>as a gauge of the health of the consumer, right well,

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think there's a lot of different ways to

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>look at the gauge of the health of the consumer.

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I think what we're seeing is that, because as I mentioned,

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that bloat came out of the system.

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Now you're seeing companies actually react in the stock market

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>based on fundamentals. So we've gotten not as much of

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>a tail wind from low rates, and you see earnings

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>come out and companies are reacting to that. Generally speaking,

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the market overreacts in the short term. I also happened

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to think that this big rally we saw after the

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>FED meeting today was a slight overreaction and we probably

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>end up giving some of that back. So it's possible

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>that we just need the dusk to settle on some

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>of these companies that have drawn down quite a bit

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 1>more after earnings reports. But frankly, I want to see

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the market react to earnings. I want to see the

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>market actually paying attention to fundamentals and wanting to get

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>what it paid is for and holding companies more accountable

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>from a fundamental perspective instead of just relying on the

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>macro backdrop to drive prices. On the other hand, I'm

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>about to talk to Airbnb CEO Brian Chesky. Airbnb seeing

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>substantial demand through the rest of the year. They say,

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, are you at all concerned that some of

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the demand companies are seeing is pent up demand coming

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 1>out of the pandemic and that we're going to see

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>another reordering as we move into next year. Well, depending

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>on the sector that we're talking about, I think the

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>travel sector is still seeing some of that pent up

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:38.680
<v Speaker 1>demand that people had been waiting to unleash once they could.

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>The problem that the travel sector is going to face

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>in this inflationary environment is that prices are going up.

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Flights are more expensive, hotels are more expensive. All of

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the experiences that we were hoping to have are more

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:51.959
<v Speaker 1>expensive than they were a year ago. So I think

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 1>people are going to start to make different decisions on

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>that front. As far as pent up demand, as like

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>if we're looking at goods companies, looking at consumers actually

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>buying things in stores or things online, I think a

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:07.119
<v Speaker 1>lot of that pent up demand has already been unleashed,

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and now we're in a place where we can see

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:11.559
<v Speaker 1>steady demand. But I don't know that we're going to

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>see again that huge surgeon demand that we saw when

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>things started to open back up for the first time.

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, Liz Young sopha ahead of Investment Strategy. Great

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to have you back here on the show. Thank you everyone,

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>it seems wants to get away. Travel experts expect this

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 1>summer to be one of the best the industry has

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>seen after two years of pandemic lockdown. If Airbnb's earnings

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>or any indication it will be a busy summer indeed,

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>with CEO Brian Chesky seeing quote higher than historical demand,

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>joining us now to talk about that more. Airbnb CEO

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and co founder Brian Chesky himself Grime. Great to have

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you back on the show as always. I know some

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>of the trends you're seeing surpassed even your internal expectations.

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>What surprised you most about the demand you're seeing? Well,

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I think what surprised me maybe the most, was that

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I was expecting last year to be the biggest traveler

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>rebound that we had probably ever seen in a century.

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>You've never seen so much pent up demand, and I

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 1>think that that surprised me is we're seeing potentially even

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 1>more pent up demand this year, and maybe that's not surprising.

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I think people weren't quite comfortable crossing borders, and yet

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the delta strained, and I think you're gonna see this

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 1>summer travel season unlike we've ever seen before. And the

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>thing about travel is there are some things when they're

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:37.959
<v Speaker 1>taken away from you, you kind of don't want to

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>do them again. I don't think that's travel. I think

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the longer people can't travel, the more they want to travel.

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>The morning bushes they get, so you use the words

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>pent up demand there. And I'm curious how you think

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 1>this summer might compare to next summer. For example, are

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 1>you expecting the growth rate to slow down after people

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 1>get this out of their system a little bit? Um No,

0:10:57.440 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. I mean, number one, Asia probably

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>won't recover right away. It's going to take some time.

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>And you know that's where the large percent of the

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>world population lives. So I think that next year you're

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>going to see a huge amount of growth coming from Asia.

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be a little slower this year. We have

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of pent up demand for Europe and North America.

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>The thing Emily that would just say is this, there

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:20.679
<v Speaker 1>are new use cases that are here to stay. People

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 1>traveling to rural areas, people staying longer, people staying at

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:26.680
<v Speaker 1>me for a month or longer. But then our bread

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and butter historically has been cross border and urban and

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 1>that is now back at or above two thou levels.

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 1>So we're seeing a combination of the old trends coming

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 1>back plus new trends sustaining. That's going to continue, and

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 1>then eventually you're gonna have other geographies like Asia comes

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>So I'm pretty bullish the next couple years. How strong

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:46.839
<v Speaker 1>is the consumer in your opinion, because obviously, with inflation,

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the cost of flights are going up, the cost of

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:52.319
<v Speaker 1>travel more broadly is going up, And I wonder if

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>you think is there a point where inflation catches up

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 1>with the consumer and overwhelmed that pent up demand. I

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 1>think that it could affect travel more broadly, but I

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's very important for me to distinguish our business.

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, during the pandemic, we recovered faster than any

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 1>travel company. That's clear. I don't think that's a controversial statement.

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>And why is that. It's because we have nearly every

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>type of space and nearly every community at nearly every

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>price point. So when people feel like they can't fly

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:23.959
<v Speaker 1>they can't afford to fly, they can still get in

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 1>a car and book an air nearby. And I do

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people still want to go to

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the house. Airbing b's are typically still cheaper than a hotel,

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and so we're pretty resilient no matter how changing travel

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the man occurs. Lift meantime is getting pummeled today investors

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>not excited about their outlook. Obviously a different company, but

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>another sort of measure of consumer sentiment, and I wonder

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:48.839
<v Speaker 1>how you read that, you know, given that people need

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 1>this kind of transportation to get from place to place airbing,

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 1>b or not. I think that every company is different,

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and so I think that, Um, I think that the

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon of how people we're moving within cities is pretty

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:06.080
<v Speaker 1>distinct from the phenomenon of people traveling. And yes, people

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>do need uh you know, transportation within markets. But the

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>thing I would just know is about half our business

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>are for stays outside of cities, right, so we have

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of vacation rentals rural areas where ridesharing would

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>not be very prolific. Well, on that note, you are

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:22.680
<v Speaker 1>saying huge demand for homes, and I wonder how that's

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 1>translating into demand for urban travel. When do you think

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 1>tourism in cities will fully rebound. Well, it's already fully

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's already above at this very moment with Airbnb.

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I can't say it's above for everyone. I don't know

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:39.200
<v Speaker 1>if hotels are back to twenteen levels, but we are,

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 1>so I think it's already back. I think the summer

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>it will be back. But Emily, here's the difference. Before

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic really our business was dominated by urban areas

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and the way people travel. They would go to Vegas

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>or Los Angeles, or Rome or Paris. Now they're consideration

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>set involves hundreds thousand places all over the world. They're

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:00.120
<v Speaker 1>open to national parks, They're going to rural area to

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 1>go into small towns, so there's just a lot wider

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:06.559
<v Speaker 1>options now. Asking about the Apack region, the Apack region

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:10.119
<v Speaker 1>still struggling with COVID, what steps are you taking their

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to use your financial resources widely in that region where

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 1>there isn't much demand. Do you see things improving there?

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>But they are gradually improving. But money can't fix the problem.

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 1>People just need to get comfortable traveling and you need

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to start crossing borders again. That is inevitable. People will

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>eventually cross borders and travel in Asia more than they

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>ever have before. But until they're comfortable, that's not something

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 1>we can fix with money. The best thing we can

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>do is wait for that market to be ready. It

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>will certainly start coming back this year. I think you're

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna see a much bigger rebound for Asia probably next year.

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>But again that those questions are kind of beyond me.

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>This is really more a matter of where the recovery

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>is for the pandemic in those countries. Okay, So let's

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about something that's not beyond you, and that is

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 1>your work from Anywhere policy. You've announced that Airbnb employees

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>can work from anywhere, and I'm curious how you think

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that will impact recruiting and impact hiring. Well, I can.

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you one stat So we announced last thursday,

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>um it was April that you know, employees of Airbnb

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>can now work, live and work anywhere in the world.

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>If you move within the country you work, We're not

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>going to reduce your pay. A lot of companies do

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>location based pay. We don't do that. Within the country.

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>You can go to a hundred and seventy different countries,

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>live for nine days at a time. Since that announcement,

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>more than a hundred thousand visits have come to our

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Jobs and Careers page. A hundred thousand. So I think

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that gives you a sense. What it tells me is

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that flexibility is the future. After compensation, Flexibly will be

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the most important benefit employers can offer. The best people

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 1>aren't just in Silken Valley. They're not just in New York.

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>The best people are now everywhere in any company that

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>limits their talent pool to a commuting radius around their

0:15:56.120 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 1>office will be at a disadvantage. You justin now an

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 1>anti party crackdown, tightening up restrictions around Memorial Day and

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>July fourth. You know, still given despite the moves that

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>AIRBNBA has been making, we've seen people evade the rules.

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 1>We saw what happened in Pittsburgh and is shooting at

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 1>an Airbnb that's sadly uh, you know, killed two teenagers. Um,

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 1>what more steps do you think Airbnb could take in

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>this arena to make sure that people are always safe

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>when they're staying at an Airbnb. Yeah, well number one, Emily,

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>you just said it. We want to make sure that

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 1>people always feel safe when they're an Airbnb. And the

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>name of the game is we can always do more,

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and we're always trying to do more than we've done before.

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>So what we've done is we background check everyone United States,

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 1>every guest and host. We have a risky reservation system

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>where where we put reservations on high alert during certain holidays.

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>So this Memorial Day and this July we're going to

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>be very much on high alert about parties. We've banned

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>party houses, meaning you can't get an Airbnb for more

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 1>than sixteen people in a house that's deemed a party.

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>And so we're doing a lot of things. We're gonna

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 1>continue to get more and more aggressive. Um. The good

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>news is the incident rate has steadily been going down

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>over time. The bad news is one incident is always

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>one too many, so we have to continue to work

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 1>really hard. So you tweeted that you will be announcing

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the biggest change to Airbnb in a decade next week.

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>We're all on the edge of our seats. What more

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 1>can you tell us? Yeah, you want me to say

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:30.879
<v Speaker 1>it right now, I'll just I'll just yeah, I'll just

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>say this. Number One, I'm really excited because we have

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the biggest updates to our product in ten years. We've

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 1>been thinking about this for a very long period of time.

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't say a lot, but I'll just give a

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>couple of clues. Number One, there will be a whole

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 1>new way to search on Airbnb, and this new way

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>to search, it's going to be a new way to

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>find really interesting homes. And then the second thing is

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:52.200
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have a big step change to our service

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>level and the kind of customer service we offer. You'll

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>see a number of updates next week. I'm really excited

0:17:57.280 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 1>about it. It's May eleven, nine A M. E. Stern

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Right on our homepage. There will be a small video,

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 1>a short video, and you can get all the updates.

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:07.159
<v Speaker 1>Then we will be watching. I got to ask you

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:10.120
<v Speaker 1>about crypto payments. I know that was a top suggestion

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:13.200
<v Speaker 1>from your users. What progress have you made on that?

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>We've We've We've been steadily making progress, um in so

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 1>far that we've certainly researched it. We've looked at a

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:23.960
<v Speaker 1>number of ways that crypto could be used. Obviously, it's

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>a popular request for people to all pay with crypto

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 1>or be receiving money with crypto. But that's all about

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 1>all I can say right now. So look, you know,

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I know you've also been tweeting about web three and

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:38.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, curious about what it does and does not mean.

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>How do you see, you know, web three or crypto

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 1>opening up new possibilities for innovation or are some of

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:50.119
<v Speaker 1>these technologies potentially overhyped? Well? I think both are very possible, right.

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I was not around during the dot com days.

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I was in design school at the time, but um,

0:18:57.160 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>most of the companies during the dot Com era aren't around.

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 1>That being said, almost all the ideas from dot Com

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:06.639
<v Speaker 1>that didn't work now work in some later incarnation, So

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the technology is really exciting. I think

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the idea of empowering people over the world is really

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 1>exciting as well. But I also do think that, like

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>any new emerging technology, the vast majority companies will probably

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 1>not be around the future, but the ones that will

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>be around could be really really large. Look at the

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>dot com bubble, Amazon emerged from that. It was a

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:26.440
<v Speaker 1>huge company. So I do think there will be really

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 1>large companies emerging. But just like you know, there's a

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of speculation. All right, Well, looking forward to next week.

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 1>Brian open to speak with you again then May eleven.

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Brian Chesky, CEO of air VnB. As always, thank you

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:46.159
<v Speaker 1>for taking the time today. Coming up, why father? That

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 1>is a question being asked inside Twitter right now ahead

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of an impending sale that Elon Musk. More on what

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:56.639
<v Speaker 1>the company is doing to motivate staffers next, This is Bloomberg.

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>A few other stories were continuing to watch Twitter doing

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:20.679
<v Speaker 1>its best to quell concerns employees ahead of the Elon

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Musk pending acquisition. At an internal meeting, Twitter's VP of

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>product tried to appeal to worker sense of community, saying

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>they have a responsibility to each other. This according to

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>people familiar with the matter. Twitter, which employs more than people,

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>warned about a possible staff exodus and a regulatory filing

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:43.159
<v Speaker 1>this week. Musk has suggested cutting costs, including layoffs, as

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:46.440
<v Speaker 1>part of his plan to grow Twitter. The Securities and

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Exchange Commission is investigating Deity's chaotic debut in New York.

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 1>That is, when the ridehailing giant raised four point four

0:20:55.840 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars days before revelations of China's probe into data

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 1>security tank The stock before today DEDE had fallen since

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:10.119
<v Speaker 1>last summer's I P O, and the White House is

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>boosting support for quantum computing is trying to pours billions

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:16.640
<v Speaker 1>into the next generation technology. President Biden signing a couple

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 1>of tech focused directives Wednesday. One would require the country's

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>most vulnerable I T systems to adopt new standards against

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the threat of code cracking from quantum computers. Welcome back

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to bloomer technology. I'm emily changing in San Francisco. Let's

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>get back to earnings with lift shares. Tumbling after providing

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>a disappointing second quarter outlook, even as revenue in the

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 1>first quarter beat estimates. The right sharing company planning to

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:52.439
<v Speaker 1>spend more to attract drivers on the road ahead the

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:57.439
<v Speaker 1>stock following as much as its steepest ever drop in

0:21:57.560 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a single session. I want to bring in LIFT president

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:01.920
<v Speaker 1>and co found or John Zimmer for his take on

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 1>all of this. So, John, clearly investors are spooked here.

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:09.399
<v Speaker 1>What is your response to their response? Okay, it matters

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to us the response. We don't like it. Um, we

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>take it seriously. Uh, and we believe we're doing the

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 1>right thing for the long term shareholder value. Uh. You know, first,

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 1>reflecting on Q one, Q one was a good quarter.

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>It was a new COVID high for rides. We had

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>improvements on both the driver and rider's side. And and

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 1>obviously with the market reacted to was us saying in

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Q two, coming out of Q one, where we have

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the largest spike in COVID cases with Almer Khan, we

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:40.400
<v Speaker 1>want to make some additional investments in the market where

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>we see a lot of upside opportunity for return on

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 1>those investments. Um, and I think you know what the

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 1>market wants to hear is more guidance on what they're

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:51.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna get for that, and so we'll certainly do that

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 1>in the quarters to come. Uh. And it's on us

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to to prove it as we put up numbers in

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 1>in twe Q two, three and four. Dan, i'ves of

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 1>wed Bush. We're for to your spending guidance as in

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighties rock Star like disaster. You know, part of

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 1>what you're spending on is driver incentives. You know what

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>about concerns that lists this could lead to a race

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:15.680
<v Speaker 1>to the bottom, a subsidy war with Uber. Yeah, well,

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I think I think that prior statement is extreme and

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:21.160
<v Speaker 1>not not really tied to what we're doing here. Uh.

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 1>And and I'm not concerned about a subsidy battle there.

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>There are some fundamental investments were making. The one that

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:30.159
<v Speaker 1>we talked about and they got the most attention is

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:32.880
<v Speaker 1>on the driver's side. You had a lot of inorganic

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 1>things happening when you have spike in COVID, whether that's

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:42.680
<v Speaker 1>a quick reduction in demand, a quick increase in demand, uh,

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and the need to add a drivers quickly. We are

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 1>seeing drivers come back organically. In fact, you every year

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>we had sev new driver activations. But based on data

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing now, there's a lot more demand on the horizon,

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and we want to prepare for that in the most

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 1>responsible way. To have low E T A s UH

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and investing in drivers and investing in our marketplace technology

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to us, is a prudent way of doing that. You've

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>said the cost of incentives will be passed down in

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:17.439
<v Speaker 1>part to customers. Do you have any concerns about alienating writers. Um? Well,

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 1>we we always think about the price. I mean, that's

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 1>actually a big part of this investment is to make

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>sure we have the best E T A s uh

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 1>and the best prices in the marketplace. Um. And so

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I think we're tying a few separate things. When you

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>have dynamic pricing and prices go up, uh, those go

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:40.360
<v Speaker 1>down uh and are paid for by the writer. Um.

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 1>But we're making a few investments here, that being only

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:46.680
<v Speaker 1>one of them. So investors are also wondering if they've

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>overestimated the opportunity in ride sharing our higher prices here

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to stay. Is ride sharing a utility for the masses

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>or a luxury good? And how much growth is there

0:24:56.600 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 1>really to be had in the rider base? Yeah, I

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:05.639
<v Speaker 1>mean we're reporting on QUE one again Q one, we

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:09.920
<v Speaker 1>had growth year over year. Uh, you had four point

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:14.160
<v Speaker 1>three million more active riders than in a year ago.

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 1>And so UH we're we're seeing that growth. I think

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:19.919
<v Speaker 1>what's not being given credit anymore is the fact that

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:22.919
<v Speaker 1>we're coming out of a pandemic uh and and we

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:25.359
<v Speaker 1>need to in our business. Demand turns on a dime

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 1>and supply takes a few additional months or quarters uh

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:30.920
<v Speaker 1>to catch up, and we want to get ahead of that.

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:34.919
<v Speaker 1>But do you see right sharing as as a utility

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>for the masses or with higher prices? Is this something

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that a smaller group of people, only a smaller group

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>of people can afford. Know, a growing number of people,

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 1>as I just said, with the four million new active writers,

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:47.120
<v Speaker 1>are going to be turning into it. We just had

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:49.439
<v Speaker 1>two years where people were asked to wear masks and

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>not be around each other. We're coming out of that. UM.

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:56.879
<v Speaker 1>We we have continually seen historically and then now coming

0:25:56.880 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 1>out of the pandemic, more and more people turn to

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>this use case. We're gonna be bringing back shared rides,

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>which has been missing for for the pandemic, which is

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 1>a lower price product. UM we bring in other lower

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 1>price products with weight and save. So I'm not concerned.

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, the message we're saying is that we

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 1>see the demand coming back and therefore we want to

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 1>invest in supply. Now, Uber says they're not going to

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:25.159
<v Speaker 1>be spending significantly to maintain or increase supply. You know,

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 1>they're talking about tweaking their algorithms to make things more

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 1>transparent for drivers. For example. Is this something that lift

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 1>would consider other incentives to pull those levers to get

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:38.199
<v Speaker 1>drivers to come over. Yeah, this is not pure incentive.

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>So we're we're investing across the board in the experience

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>for drivers. Uh, and so a lot of that is

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 1>in our marketplace technology, whether that's maps that improve the

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:50.439
<v Speaker 1>experience and allow drivers to to earn more and have

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:54.919
<v Speaker 1>higher utilization, whether that's our pricing algorithm to fine tune

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 1>specific things that happen at say an airport when multiple

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:02.120
<v Speaker 1>planes on load at the same time, and all those

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:05.880
<v Speaker 1>improvements payoff as as rides continue to rebound, and we

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:08.439
<v Speaker 1>we feel strongly that these are the right investments to

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 1>drive the most growth in both the short and long term.

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:17.439
<v Speaker 1>How much overlap do you see in drivers versus you know,

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:20.400
<v Speaker 1>there's Uber drivers that you're competing with for for for

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:22.639
<v Speaker 1>people and for food. But are you also competing with

0:27:22.680 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 1>instat cart and grub hub and door diash and Amazon

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know Domino's Pizza. They need drivers too. Sure

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 1>with within the category of drivers, there's the highest earnings historically,

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:39.399
<v Speaker 1>on average have been found within the rides here segments. Also,

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:44.160
<v Speaker 1>we typically require uh newer vehicles UH and and background

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:47.160
<v Speaker 1>checks and driving record checks are always required on our platform.

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 1>That is not something on UH in these other industries

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 1>that you name. That is always the case. UH. And

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:54.919
<v Speaker 1>so there are segments of the population that want to

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 1>earn more uh and that have access to two newer

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 1>vehicles and are willing to go those background checks. Now,

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to move to another story, huge shore that

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 1>we're watching. I know you're watching the lead draft opinion

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>from the Supreme Court that signals that Roe versus. Wade

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:14.360
<v Speaker 1>could be overturned and soon. LIFT has already come out

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:17.200
<v Speaker 1>in support of women's reproductive rights. Uh. You said you're

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 1>going to defend drivers facing legal action in states like

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 1>Texas and Oklahoma, where we've seen anti abortion laws make progress.

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 1>What's your reaction to this draft opinion and what more

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:33.120
<v Speaker 1>is LIFT prepared to do. It's very concerning. As you said,

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:36.479
<v Speaker 1>we've been very clear on our viewpoint on women's right

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to choose their and have their reproductive uh, you know,

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 1>health access. UM. And we've made a donation to Play

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 1>in Parenthood, a significant donation to support their work on that. Uh.

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 1>We were the first to speak out on the laws

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 1>in Texas and then more recently in Oklahoma speaking out

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>as important as are the actions we take. And so

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 1>we're working to to make sure women who are coming

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 1>to a different state have access to transportation to make

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 1>that traumatic experience uh a bit less stressful. Uh. And

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and will continue to speak out when we think the

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 1>rights of our our community are at odds with with

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 1>what's happening in the world. If this issue is turned

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 1>over to the states, potentially half of states could enact

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 1>laws like this and some of those laws would be

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 1>triggered immediately. Is LIFT prepared to defend drivers on a

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:33.959
<v Speaker 1>national level? Yeah, I mean the specific laws that we

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 1>reacted to in in Texas and Oklahoma. In addition to

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 1>to disagreeing with the overall viewpoint and and believing that

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 1>women should have the right to choose, uh, there were

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 1>laws that said that a driver without them even knowing

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 1>where they're taking. Someone could be found criminally liable for

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:53.960
<v Speaker 1>taking someone to an appointment that they had no idea

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 1>where they were going. That that is wrong on many levels,

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:00.719
<v Speaker 1>and that is something we will continue to defend. Our

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>drivers from two have any concerns about alienating riders and

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>drivers by taking this stand, I mean, obviously, you know

0:30:08.040 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 1>you are running a business. Why speak out on this.

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 1>It's important for UH companies and individuals to speak out

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 1>when when they disagree with something. We've We've shown that

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>throughout our history. We're not afraid to speak up. We

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 1>think ultimately doing the right thing for society and speaking

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 1>to that UH can also be beneficial for the business.

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 1>But we care deeply about our impact UH and our

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 1>ability to impact the world around us. All right, John Zimmer,

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Lift President and co founder, thank you for stopping by.

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to stick with Lift and Uber. Now take

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 1>a culture look at the stock moves obviously that big

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 1>move from Lift and talk to us about the size

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and scope of these moves. Obviously we heard John Zimmer's

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 1>response there. He said he doesn't like it, but he disagrees. Yeah,

0:30:56.800 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 1>and you know, investors clearly concerned right dropping the stock

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>is significant, biggest drop on record. As you said, the

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 1>other way looking at it is you know, it's more

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 1>than three and a half billion dollars of market cap

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 1>loss in a single session. Coming me, it's my Bloomberg terminel.

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Look at this chart. This is the way I've been

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 1>thinking about this throughout the day that these two stocks,

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 1>in particular since their I p o s, both of

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 1>which took place in two thousand nineteen, of course, have

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 1>not performed well. Right. You see that as we emerged

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 1>through the the initial phase of the pandemic and things improved,

0:31:27.440 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 1>we saw a rebound, but actually as part of the

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of conversation around economic reopening one through the present day,

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 1>these stocks have seen declines and even Uber down as

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 1>much as sent one point on Wednesday, ended up dropping

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:42.920
<v Speaker 1>by the most in five weeks. There are a lot

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 1>of questions here about whether these two companies can stand

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:47.000
<v Speaker 1>on their own two ft. There were two quick charts

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to show you. The first lift. There are

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 1>some bright spots. One of them is revenue per rider,

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty high, around forty nine dollars in revenue per rider,

0:31:57.040 --> 0:31:59.480
<v Speaker 1>right now, way above where we were in two thousand nineteen.

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 1>But if they're going to spend on incentives growing the

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 1>top line through raising prices, that's not really satisfying for investors.

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Although a lot of Wall Street and this said this

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>was overdone because by investing in the drivers, and you

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 1>just heard it from John Timmer, that is a bullish

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 1>sign that lifts sees demand coming in the future. And

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 1>then finally on Uber, you know, they didn't farewell on

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the ext markets Wednesday, but lots of people pointing to

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 1>their different business model. Right orange part of the chart

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 1>is mobility rides, but delivery increasingly important. They have a

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 1>diversified business. And you heard Dorak Kostrasha here and I

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:35.600
<v Speaker 1>hope you asked him about this at some point. Well

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 1>what are they doing to win over drivers? They're saying,

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:39.840
<v Speaker 1>come to our platform, don't just drive people, you can

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 1>also do delivery. You have the choice and maximize the

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 1>money that you can earn. It's a really interesting differentiation.

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, Buddla. Thanks. Coming up, they're all NASDAC plays

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 1>in crypto markets and how that could grow with more

0:32:53.320 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 1>regulatory clarity. Talk about that coming up next time now

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:33.000
<v Speaker 1>for our Crypto report. And even with falling equities and

0:33:33.040 --> 0:33:34.960
<v Speaker 1>delayed i p O, some companies are still looking to

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:38.479
<v Speaker 1>make their stock market debuts, according to NASDACS Ceodina Freedman.

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:41.600
<v Speaker 1>But what insights does the NASTAC have and what role

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 1>will it play in crypto markets? Freeman spoke with bloom Brigs,

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Kaylee Lines and Guy Johnson earlier today. Take a listen.

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 1>NASAC today is actually a scale technology company that serves

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the broader capital markets and the broader financial system. So

0:33:56.840 --> 0:33:59.280
<v Speaker 1>we in fact have a big role to play in

0:33:59.400 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 1>facility and helping crypto markets as well as you know,

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 1>banks and brokers managed new digital assets. So we provide

0:34:06.760 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 1>our technology to a hundred and thirty other markets around

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the world, including UM. Actually, I think we're up to

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:15.360
<v Speaker 1>potentially tend crypto markets now that are leveraging our technology

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:18.879
<v Speaker 1>for trading, for surveillance, and for other means that they

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 1>have to make sure that they can grow and expand

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:24.320
<v Speaker 1>their business. We also have a very scaled anti financial

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:27.879
<v Speaker 1>crime technology solution where we are We've created a new

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:30.719
<v Speaker 1>module specific to digital markets to make it so that

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 1>banks can UM evaluate a mL risk as well as

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:36.880
<v Speaker 1>fraud risk in their digital wallets as well as in

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 1>their their more traditional accounts, so we have and we

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 1>also one third thing is we have a crypto index

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 1>that we've launched outside the United States. Index products we

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:47.239
<v Speaker 1>launched outside the United States, so we have a role

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:49.240
<v Speaker 1>to play there. But as a as a market operator,

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:51.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that we were still trying to understand the

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 1>regulatory landscape as well as you know, the overall maturing

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of it for the institutional use of crypto before we

0:34:58.560 --> 0:35:04.480
<v Speaker 1>make bigger decisions a market operator. NASA dack CEO aDNA

0:35:04.560 --> 0:35:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Freedman there, and it seems California's governor has heard aDNA

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Freedman's calls for more regulation. Governor Gavin Newsome just signed

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 1>an executive order to spur blotching innovation, making California the

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 1>first state in the US to start creating a regulatory

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 1>framework for Web three companies. Set in a statement, too

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:27.640
<v Speaker 1>often government lags behind technological advancement, so we're getting ahead

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:29.840
<v Speaker 1>of the curve on this, laying the foundation to allow

0:35:29.920 --> 0:35:42.319
<v Speaker 1>for consumers and business to thrive. I want to get

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 1>back now to the biggest story of the day, and

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:46.719
<v Speaker 1>that is the Fed's rate hike, the biggest since two

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand and the FED signaling more to come. All to

0:35:49.160 --> 0:35:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Tampa inflation. I'm joined now by Mark Goldberg, a partner

0:35:52.080 --> 0:35:55.239
<v Speaker 1>at Index Ventures, to give us some thoughts from the

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:58.320
<v Speaker 1>VC world, and he's also got some insights on fintech.

0:35:58.400 --> 0:36:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Mark Goldberg of Index, you so much for joining, Thank

0:36:00.920 --> 0:36:02.200
<v Speaker 1>you for having only It's a pleasure to be here.

0:36:02.239 --> 0:36:05.840
<v Speaker 1>So look, big macro economic changes of foot What is

0:36:05.840 --> 0:36:08.279
<v Speaker 1>your advice to founders right now in this moment? My

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:10.319
<v Speaker 1>advice is to build. I mean we're coming off a

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 1>year that was the most exciting, exuberant year in not

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:16.359
<v Speaker 1>just fintech but in the tech venture capital market in

0:36:16.560 --> 0:36:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a decade, and where money was was you know, available

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:22.200
<v Speaker 1>in spades, and now we're at a time where the

0:36:22.200 --> 0:36:24.480
<v Speaker 1>market has changed, and what we're telling our companies is

0:36:24.480 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a focus on building, not fundraising. So how do you

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:29.160
<v Speaker 1>build without funding? Well, the nice thing is because so

0:36:29.200 --> 0:36:32.600
<v Speaker 1>many of these great companies raised huge balance sheets last year. Um,

0:36:32.640 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 1>they have the luxury of not having to go back

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to market and so the distraction of you know, constantly

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 1>funding every six months twelve months has gone away. How

0:36:40.719 --> 0:36:43.040
<v Speaker 1>is this impacting VC sentiment? I mean, I know the

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:45.680
<v Speaker 1>private market valuations are going down. Can we expect that

0:36:45.719 --> 0:36:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to continue? The way it's impacting sentiment is the sentiment

0:36:49.480 --> 0:36:51.359
<v Speaker 1>is about as negatives. If you seen you know, if

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:53.880
<v Speaker 1>you saw Bill Girls tweet and just the broader sentiment

0:36:53.880 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 1>in south Park today it's negative. I think that's oversteered.

0:36:57.120 --> 0:36:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I think what we're seeing as an opportunity and if

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you look at indext other VC funds, the best investments

0:37:02.000 --> 0:37:04.480
<v Speaker 1>are made at times of um you know, on the

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:06.320
<v Speaker 1>other side of a cycle. And that's the opportunity we

0:37:06.360 --> 0:37:07.880
<v Speaker 1>have in front of it. So how is that impacting

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:10.600
<v Speaker 1>your strategy at Index? Well, we're focused on what we

0:37:10.640 --> 0:37:12.480
<v Speaker 1>always focus on, which is can we find the best

0:37:12.480 --> 0:37:15.080
<v Speaker 1>founders and can we get behind generational companies. I think

0:37:15.080 --> 0:37:17.560
<v Speaker 1>if that north star holds true today through cycles, we're

0:37:17.560 --> 0:37:21.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna be just fine. You're predicting a tsunami of fintech

0:37:21.440 --> 0:37:24.239
<v Speaker 1>m and a this year where specifically, I think what

0:37:24.239 --> 0:37:26.759
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see is a massive wave of consolidation. Again,

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:29.280
<v Speaker 1>last year was the party. This year is the hangover.

0:37:29.360 --> 0:37:31.879
<v Speaker 1>We saw a lot of excitement, and what's gonna happen

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:34.400
<v Speaker 1>now is that consolidation. The exciting thing though, is the

0:37:34.480 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 1>number of consolidators in the fintech space. You and I

0:37:37.000 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 1>had had this conversation five years ago, we would have

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 1>thought about fintech as a vertical. What it's done is

0:37:41.040 --> 0:37:43.640
<v Speaker 1>it has become totally horizontal. The acquires are not just

0:37:43.880 --> 0:37:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America JP Morgan, Goldman Sack. Now, it could

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:50.320
<v Speaker 1>be Apple, it could be Google, it could be Striped.

0:37:50.600 --> 0:37:53.359
<v Speaker 1>So the number of acquires has grown significantly. It's going

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 1>to be a really exciting year. Well, we see crypto

0:37:55.640 --> 0:37:58.520
<v Speaker 1>joining forces with traditional finances. That going to be part

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:00.080
<v Speaker 1>of the M and A. I think it might be.

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, the crypto yng to the web

0:38:02.680 --> 0:38:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to yang is absolutely possibility, and I think we'll start

0:38:05.560 --> 0:38:07.440
<v Speaker 1>to see those combinations in this year. You've made a

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:10.560
<v Speaker 1>number of predictions before the start of this year. You said,

0:38:10.560 --> 0:38:13.279
<v Speaker 1>fintech in the metaverse, gen Z on the rise, gen

0:38:13.360 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Z Traders on the rise, Stripe buying, open Sea, they

0:38:15.640 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 1>are rolling out some more crypto features. You know, which

0:38:18.600 --> 0:38:20.719
<v Speaker 1>of these things do you think is still going to happen? Well,

0:38:20.760 --> 0:38:22.399
<v Speaker 1>I think we still have seven months of the year,

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:23.840
<v Speaker 1>so I'm gonna wait on on a value in of

0:38:23.840 --> 0:38:25.360
<v Speaker 1>my prediction still then, But I think one of the

0:38:25.360 --> 0:38:27.840
<v Speaker 1>more exciting trends from last year is this fusion of

0:38:27.920 --> 0:38:30.239
<v Speaker 1>fintech and culture. And you know, we talked about the

0:38:30.480 --> 0:38:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, meme socks of last year in robin Hood,

0:38:32.560 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think what we're starting to see is that

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:38.759
<v Speaker 1>fusion of uh fintech entering the pop culture mainstream. The

0:38:38.800 --> 0:38:41.160
<v Speaker 1>way that cash app has a clothing store. Who would

0:38:41.160 --> 0:38:43.440
<v Speaker 1>have thought that a bank would be people would be

0:38:43.440 --> 0:38:45.319
<v Speaker 1>wearing the clothes from a bank. I think that is

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:47.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the durable trends that's going to propel us

0:38:47.080 --> 0:38:49.640
<v Speaker 1>in the next few years. Robin Hood is way down

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:53.120
<v Speaker 1>from last year, and the gen Z traders are on

0:38:53.239 --> 0:38:55.960
<v Speaker 1>robin Hood, so what's going on there? You know? I

0:38:55.960 --> 0:38:59.720
<v Speaker 1>think robin Hood's genius was the ability to democratize access

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:02.359
<v Speaker 1>to the stock market. And if you step back from

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:04.200
<v Speaker 1>robin Hood, that has been one of our biggest themes

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:06.200
<v Speaker 1>at Index, which is how do you think about serving

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:09.319
<v Speaker 1>the eighty million underserved Americans. Actually, one of my most

0:39:09.400 --> 0:39:12.839
<v Speaker 1>recent investments is called Nova Credit h They actually are

0:39:12.880 --> 0:39:15.680
<v Speaker 1>able to offer immigrants without credit score an ability to

0:39:15.680 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 1>get a mortgage or a car loan. And we think

0:39:18.640 --> 0:39:20.880
<v Speaker 1>expanding access is really one of the big themes we're

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:23.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna be working on this year. Now, you are investors

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:25.640
<v Speaker 1>in a company or were investors in a company called

0:39:25.680 --> 0:39:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Fast this you know one click checkout area which just

0:39:29.880 --> 0:39:33.440
<v Speaker 1>recently disappeared completely, just went under, said they ran out

0:39:33.440 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 1>of money. What happened there? Well, our investment in Fast

0:39:36.040 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 1>was around this concept, like you said, of one click out,

0:39:38.080 --> 0:39:41.120
<v Speaker 1>one check clickout, And what I think you saw with

0:39:41.239 --> 0:39:44.200
<v Speaker 1>anyone who's been through an Amazon checkout experience or Shopify

0:39:44.480 --> 0:39:47.399
<v Speaker 1>is there's an opportunity for streamline checkout. That was our

0:39:47.440 --> 0:39:50.440
<v Speaker 1>thesis behind Fast. Obviously it didn't work out. That's venture

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 1>capital m but we're still really excited about thesis and

0:39:53.440 --> 0:39:56.040
<v Speaker 1>getting behind grave founders. Now, let's talk a little bit

0:39:56.080 --> 0:39:58.279
<v Speaker 1>about spacks. Some are saying that SPACs are a four

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:00.120
<v Speaker 1>letter word, and you know, there are many good four

0:40:00.200 --> 0:40:02.480
<v Speaker 1>letter words, but there are a few not good for

0:40:02.719 --> 0:40:05.080
<v Speaker 1>letter words. What do you think about that? You know,

0:40:05.160 --> 0:40:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I think spots was an interesting innovation. But as with

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the broader market, um, you know, we're gonna see what's

0:40:09.680 --> 0:40:12.320
<v Speaker 1>durable and what was more of a you know, maybe

0:40:12.360 --> 0:40:14.640
<v Speaker 1>something that that didn't last as long. So where are

0:40:14.640 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you placing your bets within fintech? Yeah and beyond for me?

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Right now, what we're focused on is finding opportunities in

0:40:22.480 --> 0:40:25.839
<v Speaker 1>the fintech space consumer finance. I think there's this tremendous

0:40:25.880 --> 0:40:28.560
<v Speaker 1>generational shift. You mean, people that want to do banking

0:40:28.560 --> 0:40:31.280
<v Speaker 1>from their phone a lot, driven by the pandemic, versus

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:33.440
<v Speaker 1>doing it at a branch, so that you know, today

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:36.439
<v Speaker 1>less than ten percent of consumers use a digitally native bank.

0:40:36.800 --> 0:40:38.680
<v Speaker 1>That's going to change in the future. The secondary is

0:40:38.680 --> 0:40:40.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna be payments. So I think those are the opportunities

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:42.800
<v Speaker 1>were most excited about today. Now, you were an investment

0:40:42.800 --> 0:40:46.040
<v Speaker 1>banker during the Tesla I p O. What was it

0:40:46.120 --> 0:40:49.000
<v Speaker 1>like to work with Elon Musk back then? That was

0:40:49.040 --> 0:40:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of what do you think of him taking over Twitter?

0:40:52.120 --> 0:40:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Back then? It was quite the formative experience for a

0:40:54.440 --> 0:40:56.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty three year old straight out of college to get

0:40:56.480 --> 0:40:59.719
<v Speaker 1>thrown into that. I mean he was the same iconic

0:40:59.719 --> 0:41:01.680
<v Speaker 1>class to figure he was then as he is now.

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he had a few fewer zeros on his

0:41:04.040 --> 0:41:07.359
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet at that point, but the same attitude. Do

0:41:07.400 --> 0:41:09.160
<v Speaker 1>you like the idea of him only Twitter where we're

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:11.279
<v Speaker 1>looking at some of your tweets right now, so you're

0:41:11.320 --> 0:41:13.120
<v Speaker 1>on there. What I'm excited about is Twitter as a

0:41:13.160 --> 0:41:15.600
<v Speaker 1>private company, what they can do if they optimize for

0:41:15.760 --> 0:41:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the long run as opposed to quarterly earnings. So we'll see.

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:21.239
<v Speaker 1>There's so much uncertainty in the direction that he'll take

0:41:21.280 --> 0:41:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the company. But I like the idea of being private

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and seeing what they can build from there. I think

0:41:24.560 --> 0:41:26.640
<v Speaker 1>they should open source the algorithm. Is that going to

0:41:26.760 --> 0:41:28.840
<v Speaker 1>change things? You know? I can't speak to that, but

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it is going to be exciting what they

0:41:30.120 --> 0:41:32.319
<v Speaker 1>can focus on if they don't have the same short

0:41:32.360 --> 0:41:36.239
<v Speaker 1>term horizon. What about employees who want to leave a

0:41:36.239 --> 0:41:37.799
<v Speaker 1>lot of people there right now? They don't know if

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:40.000
<v Speaker 1>they we have literally have a story called why Bother?

0:41:40.160 --> 0:41:42.480
<v Speaker 1>That's what employees are thinking. We're going to have to see.

0:41:42.680 --> 0:41:44.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's obviously been a lot of negative sentiment,

0:41:44.680 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 1>but you know, if they can make the right long

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:48.560
<v Speaker 1>term bets, it's going to be an exciting platform for

0:41:48.640 --> 0:41:51.439
<v Speaker 1>years to come. All Right, Mark, Goldberg Index Ventures, thanks

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:53.400
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Thank you coming into the studio.

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate it. Thank you. That does it for this

0:41:56.320 --> 0:41:59.520
<v Speaker 1>edition of Bloomberg Technology. We'll be back tomorrow. I'm talking

0:41:59.520 --> 0:42:02.480
<v Speaker 1>to Uber CEO Dara Kasra Shay. He'll be joining us

0:42:02.520 --> 0:42:05.960
<v Speaker 1>live thirty a m. Eastern time. Tune in for that

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:07.880
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to miss it. We've also got an

0:42:07.880 --> 0:42:11.000
<v Speaker 1>action packed show Lisa Sue of a m D, and

0:42:11.160 --> 0:42:13.920
<v Speaker 1>much more coming up tomorrow. This is Bloomberg