WEBVTT - Chip Fluctuations and Musk's SEC Probe

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:16.439
<v Speaker 1>And Caroline hide up Bloomberg's world head quarters in New York,

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and I made Ludlow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:23.279
<v Speaker 1>Technology in Caroline, big tech sounding or warning for three.

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>The market seems really calm about what they're seeing, managing

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>to shake off some of the chip concern even as

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>that isn't just around earnings but about geopolitics as well.

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>And we're back here in New York. They're they're in SF.

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>But we're both going to be looking at the Nasdaq

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:39.840
<v Speaker 1>one hundred best week in months. Hey, but not without

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 1>major fluctuations in the semiconductor space after Intel's dismal earnings

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and there's new curbs for China made chips. Then Elon

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Musk faces an SEC probe over his role in misguided

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>claims about Tesla's autopilot system the Bloomberg scoop and thousands

0:00:56.440 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>of tech workers got laid off after they came to

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the US on work is what one nonprofits doing about it?

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>But first I check in all these markets, and Ed

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 1>was talking about it, the fact that we see resilience,

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>even though there's some worrying signs amid a number of

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:11.399
<v Speaker 1>the earliers that came out this week, and we think

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>of the intels and Microsoft of course Texas instruments as well.

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>But then as that manages to push on up more

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>than a percentage point. In fact, we are really seeing

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>this particular index on a role highest in September over

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the last year, four straight weeks of growth that we've

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>seen four straight weeks of games. We haven't seen that

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 1>back since August two. Or Country World and Next also

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 1>gets a slight bid today, up about a quarter percent,

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:35.319
<v Speaker 1>nowhere near the enthusiasm in the US though many focused

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:37.559
<v Speaker 1>on the Federal Reserve next sweep. Many focused, of course

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>on what it means for interest rate path. We're looking

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg Commodity Index. Interesting me thinking ahead of China's

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>reopening after the looonar New Year next week, maybe some

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 1>money coming back out of copper for example. Let's look

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>it on. Let's look at what is a really for

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>out and out technology focus That is the socks. Because

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>as much as we saw that enthusiasm around the NASDAC head,

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>really the chip sector ruling US lower off by seven

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>tenths of ascent for the lived at Philadelphia Semiconductor Index. Yeah, look,

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to start on the positive here and focus

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>straight on Tesla. Really big jump on Friday, continuing the

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>momentum for earnings, but the thirty three percent gain on

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the week it's best week going back to May of

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:18.519
<v Speaker 1>two thousand thirteen. Clearly investors are believing what Elon must

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>has to say about momentum. The negative is behind me, right?

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Which is Intel having its worst week since December, It's

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:28.119
<v Speaker 1>biggest drop on Friday for a single session since September.

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Is this a question about what's happening in a cyclical

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 1>chip sector or is this a question about what is

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>happening with Intel specifically? That is the question that I have.

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>What is wrong with Intel? So great? We had the

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>best person talk with about this, Daniel Flax, Managing director

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 1>senior research analysts covering the technology sector broadly at New

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Burger Berman seven billions of course in assets under management.

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>That is the question what is wrong with Intel? Dan? Intel?

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>He is going through a multi year transition, and if

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:05.079
<v Speaker 1>we step back and think about the past decade, the

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:10.919
<v Speaker 1>company uh lost competitiveness. They weren't making products that were

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 1>as cutting edge as they had previously, and so what's

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>changed in the last couple of years is You've had

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>CEO Pat Gelsinger come back to the company really reinvest aggressively,

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>bringing new people like CFO Dave's inster UH whom we

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 1>think highly of along with Pat and and they are

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 1>working to to UH execute better on the product roadmaps,

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>UH deliver value to customers and certainly when we speak

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:38.839
<v Speaker 1>to the customers, Intel remains strategic and so looking out,

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a multi year journey still ahead for Intel.

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>But if they can make better products, I think UH,

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I think they can deliver value for customers and ultimately

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>for shareholders as well, then it's replating this out further.

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>How worried about you about the end markets? You know,

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>you look at PC, desktop, also servers, and what Intel

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>had to say about the first half of this year

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>in particular, what does that tell you about what's to

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>come for the technology sector. Certainly we're in a period

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>where where there's cyclical headwinds. Um If we think back

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>over the past couple of years, there was enormous demands

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>save for for PCs as one example, during lockdowns during

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>during during the worst of COVID, and so there's a

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>little bit of digestion of that. So I I expect

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>over the next several months the the industry will work

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>through UH. Inventories in PCs is one example. The economy

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>is slowing, its impacting enterprises as they spend. But if

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>we look out till later this year and really further

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:42.160
<v Speaker 1>into four I think we'll see better growth. And so

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the companies that have the products, that have the solutions UH,

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 1>those can benefit. And if we step back and look

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>at some of the secular trends, so for example, artificial

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>intelligence UH, the the ability to deliver value in areas

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>like drug discovery. Look at a company like in video

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:02.479
<v Speaker 1>it two faces cyclical headwinds, but they have tremendous growth

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:06.159
<v Speaker 1>drivers and product cycles in areas like the data center.

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>So we still see opportunities. Certainly their near term headwinds though.

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Talk about those headwinds that aren't just perhaps cyclical in nature, Daniel,

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>but they're also related to geopolitics, and the video is

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>just one of them, which of course has China exposure.

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking today of the the scoop really coming from

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg talking about how the Biden administration is getting closer

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to getting Japan the Netherlands to come on side to

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>limit China's access to the semiconductor technology that it so

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>wishes to build. How is that help or hindrance to

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 1>some of these US players. I think the geopolitical and

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the trade tension click. Clearly, it's been with US for

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:45.279
<v Speaker 1>several years and it's continuing to intensify. It is having

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 1>impact on some companies ability to ship the most advanced

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>technologies into markets like China. But but I think globally

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>demand for these products over the next several years is

0:05:57.000 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>likely to be healthy, and that's driven by by build

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>out example of the cloud in really this digital infrastructure.

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 1>And so in the near term the restrictions are going

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>to impact companies that that do sell in certain cases

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>with certain products into China. But I think ultimately that

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>demand UH does grow and those companies like a SM

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:21.359
<v Speaker 1>Lithography is one example, we will continue to have attractive

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>multi year growth prospects. What about the R and D

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:28.280
<v Speaker 1>that then is still needed as we see the cyclical nature,

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the fall away of PC demand, the fact that we're

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:33.280
<v Speaker 1>going to see slowing revenues that some analysts just said

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>we're what was phenomenal staggering was one of the words used.

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Are we're still going to have to see this sort

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:42.840
<v Speaker 1>of spend come in that means of seeing these fabs

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:44.599
<v Speaker 1>come up in the United States and all bringing it

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>closer shore. I think the build out in the United States,

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:53.280
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, in other geographies outside of Asia will continue,

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:56.279
<v Speaker 1>but but it's a multi year process to build them

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and to equip them, and and of course a modern

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 1>fab could cost around twenty billion dollars, so it's no

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 1>small financial undertaking. I think the the industry will remain cyclical.

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:09.359
<v Speaker 1>But but if we look out to the middle and

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>really the latter part of the decade, demand for silicon

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>is likely to continue growing. And that's because it's not

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>just in PCs and smartphones. It's really going everywhere. And

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>that I think is the bigger story in many ways

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 1>in terms of this transformation of the industrial landscape putting

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>intelligence into all sorts of devices. You have companies like

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Qualcom for example, that do that. So there's a lot

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>of growth even with cyclicality. Words an I want to

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>go to Calcom really quickly. They report next week. The

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>story there is about diversifying away from the smartphone. Do

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>you think that they'll buck the trend we've seen in

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>a limited way so sl far from the chip sector.

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>They're they're also going to be impacted by it by

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>some of the smartphone industry inventories that have built up.

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>But as we look out over the next several months,

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I think what we'll see is that China is beginning

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>to open up. China is an enormous market for smartphones

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and other mobile devices, and Quacom will benefit from that

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:08.559
<v Speaker 1>from that growth rebound. I think the bigger story, though,

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>beyond that, is their success in areas like automobiles, where

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>they have a thirty billion dollar design wind pipeline, and

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>so CEO Christiano amon I think is making the right investments.

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>They're diversifying the company and their intellectual property in key

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>areas like connectivity and security and automation are powerful and

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>valuable to customers. Daniel Gregg's have some time with the

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>have a wonderful weekend. Daniel Flax, Managing director, SENI to

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:35.439
<v Speaker 1>research analyst over a Newberger berm and really going through

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>whole host of names in the chip space. We've got

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>another one for you, because let's talk about in Vidia.

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>It's conserving pretty well of late and the president of

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the CEO, Jensen Kuang, who's been doing particularly well to

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:48.719
<v Speaker 1>be perhaps building his wealth, largely in part because of

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the sore and popularity of chat GPT. This man has

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 1>seen his fortune climb by three percent this year of

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:58.839
<v Speaker 1>eighteen billion dollars now is his overall fortune after videos

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>become basically a dominant player empowering AI applications, automous cars, robots,

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>to crypto, to mining. Of course, and speciality that's made

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>at one of Wall Street's top wages for how to

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>profit from the rapid business interest in AI. So I

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>guess in spite of Intel's fall, in spite of the

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>doom and the gloom ed, it feels as though in

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>particular there's some hope around chipmakers. Morgan Stanley actually had

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 1>this take on it. We do like some of the

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:27.839
<v Speaker 1>semiconductors down here that that look like they're starting to

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 1>put encycliculturals in the traditional sense. Some of the software

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>services companies nice pivot there from semiconductors to software companies.

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>And we can delve into one key software company now

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:45.679
<v Speaker 1>because Salesforce appointing three new independent directors to its board

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>as the pressure builds from activists and mrs. Of course,

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:51.200
<v Speaker 1>that's talked to be mostly Anna Baker for more on this,

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:53.559
<v Speaker 1>And really it was the scoop from d Hammond yesterday

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and from your team that we would likely to see

0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>these caster characters come onto the board, and well it

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>occurs to the Anna, So some of the casts of

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:05.200
<v Speaker 1>characters have come on the board Value Act. Uh you

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 1>know that mystery activist investor. We were trying to figure

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>out who else was in there besides Starboard, Elliott and

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Jeff of it. So this is really the start of something.

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Value Acts certainly will have an influence on the board.

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 1>They're very interested in, you know, corporate governance and making changes,

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 1>but in a friendly way with the company. But there's

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 1>still the question of what happened with these other activists

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>who are still very much involved. And the shares were

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>muted today, so um, you know, the news was received

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:37.199
<v Speaker 1>okay by the market, but I think there's going to

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>be some more action on this one. Leona. Let's stick

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>with that kind of main protagonist. Then I suppose for

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>one of a better description, who is Mason will fit

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:48.319
<v Speaker 1>and talk to us about Value Act. They track record

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 1>what it is they come into companies and do well.

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>They're based on your part of the world. San Francisco

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 1>may have a A A thirteen billion under management, and Mason

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Morpha is no stranger to tech apology. He sat on

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the Microsoft board for about four years from fourteen to seventeen.

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I heard the stock in that time doubled, So he

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:14.679
<v Speaker 1>will definitely bring that experience public board experience with him.

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Uh and you know they're they're known for making changes,

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned in a friendly way with the company,

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 1>So it'll be good to have some sort of uh

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 1>investor viewpoint on the board to help because the shares

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>are trading so great for Salesforce bloom Bosleyana Baker leading

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a big week for our deal's team out of New York,

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. Meanwhile, back here in San Francisco,

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>regulators investigating Elon Musk's role in shaping Tesla's self driving

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:46.079
<v Speaker 1>car claims. The review is part of an ongoing SEC

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>probe of the company's statements about its autopilot driver autopilot

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:54.239
<v Speaker 1>driver assistant system that, according to a Bloomberg surce, officials

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>awaghing whether Mosque specifically may have inappropriately made forward looking

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>statements and carry this this story, this reporting hot on

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the heels of that other scoot from Danna Hole in

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Sean o'caine earlier this month about the video right the

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:12.680
<v Speaker 1>emails where Elon Musk is directing the language used behind

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 1>how they described Autopilot in those nation stages, and the

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 1>SEC is just hot in his heels, isn't it? In

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>every sort of direction of this. But ultimately it all

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 1>comes down to the fact, and it's almost reminiscent of

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:26.559
<v Speaker 1>what he's just been in court trying to explain around

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>his tweet of funding secured. Is when you're a CEO,

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the leader of a business, the visionary, when you say

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>certain things, people believe them and they end up being

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>forward looking guidance basically whether or not he wants them

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:41.439
<v Speaker 1>to be. Yeah, and Boomberg's source pointing out this is

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 1>an extension of the existing SEC probe, which was originally

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>reported by a number of media outlets back in October.

0:12:56.880 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>It's Today's Bloomberg Big Take Daiy Albert Kurt Wagner taking

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 1>a deep dive into one of Elon Musk's most faithful supporters.

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>She Twitter's head of trust and safety and seems willing

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:12.839
<v Speaker 1>to overlook protocol to appease her new boss. Those cut

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Wagner joins us now on it. So, first and foremost,

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 1>who is Yeah, so Ella is the head of Trust

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:23.719
<v Speaker 1>and Safety at Twitter. So she's essentially in charge of

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the teams that work on you know,

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>keeping Twitter safe. Right. They used to fight misinformation, they

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>used to take down hate speech. Um. You know, this

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>is the same group that, for example, was responsible for

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 1>suspending President Donald Trump a few years ago. Right. And

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>so this is a pretty high profile job. A lot

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>of these decisions we've seen be very controversial over the years.

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>So the person who kind of runs trust and safety

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>at Twitter has always been a high profile role in

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.679
<v Speaker 1>that regard because the decisions that are made are so

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 1>important to free speech on the internet. Right. And so

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:59.839
<v Speaker 1>she stepped into a very senior position under Elon in

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>just the last couple of months. But that was what

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I found so interesting about this. You and I have

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>done a lot of reportings together over recent months and

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:09.679
<v Speaker 1>more than recent months, honestly, and that was the name

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I didn't recognize. You know, we we documented on a

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>day by day basis the people leaving Twitter those that

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 1>chose to stay. So now my question is what is

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>it that she's doing? You know, what is the crux

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 1>of your big tape story that you've learned about her

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>role within the building. Yeah, well you probably aren't familiar

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 1>with her name because she really just joined Twitter over

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the summer, just a few months before Elon Musk took over, Right,

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 1>So she was not necessarily a senior leader in the

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>way that a lot of employees were, someone who a

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of employees were familiar with by the time that

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the deal closed. Right. But what we you know, pointed

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>out in our big take and why I think this

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>is an interesting story is that, you know, they're kind

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>of bucking a lot of the trends of of of

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 1>trust and safety over at Twitter these days. Right. I mean,

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>this is a this is an organization that exists at

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and YouTube and all the other social players, and

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, the last couple of years, we've seen these

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>groups get really refined. Right. They have tons of policies,

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>they have tons of procedures. Um, there's a there's kind

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of a standard way of doing some of this stuff, right,

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and under Elon, a lot of that has gotten thrown

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>out the window. And so we've seen, um, you know,

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>for example, they're just got rid of their COVID misinformation policies.

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 1>One example, you may remember ed a few weeks ago

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>they just started suspending journalists, uh, sort of without a

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 1>great explanation, right, And so what we've seen is just

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of like this playbook that I think a lot

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>of folks are familiar with get tossed out. And that's

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>why we find it interesting. Well, give us some some

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of granularity around the decisions or actions that she

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>is carrying out I suppose on a month behalf. Yeah, Well,

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>typically these types of things would go through a strict process, right,

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, they might go through multiple teams, multiple layers,

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly multiple levels of review. And what we've seen, and

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>what we mentioned in our story was that, you know,

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>we've seen screenshots of things like, hey, we want this

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>account suspended on the order of Elon, or want to

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>suspend it on the order of Ella, right, and these

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>are just again not the way that usually these checks

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and balances tend to work. And so there's a lot

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>of people in the world of trust and safety who

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>are worried that there's simply just too much power being

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>held by one or two people here in this instance,

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and that you know, if they're not following a lot

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>of these checks and balances that were used to you know,

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 1>you don't know exactly where where that's going to end up, right,

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>And again, these journalists being sort of suspended out of

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the blue is just one example, but you can imagine

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>that being extrapolated to a bunch of different accounts. Her

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 1>rise or indeed her remaining. How have people talked about

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that and the way in which she's navigated her career

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>with Twitter? Sure? Well, I mean I think the issue

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 1>is not at all that Ella is is I'm incompetent

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>or anything like that. I mean, she's had a bunch

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>of really strong roles at tech companies before. She's described

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>to us as an incredible operator, someone who's very organized,

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 1>he's very passionate, who who's very um, you know, emotional

0:16:57.840 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>about the things that that she cares about. But I

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think she had much experience doing uh, you know,

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:05.360
<v Speaker 1>speech policy, right, Like a lot of times will see

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:07.959
<v Speaker 1>with trust and safety, their their academics or their lawyers,

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 1>or the people who have maybe spent their whole life

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 1>thinking about things like affection two thirty. That does not

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 1>that is not Ella's background, right, And so I think

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a little bit of concern Again, from people who

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:21.239
<v Speaker 1>were within Twitter's trust and safety, but even just like

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the broader industry that you know, she's now in a

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:26.919
<v Speaker 1>role that requires that type of nuance, and you know,

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 1>it's something that you build over time, and I'm just

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 1>not sure that she's been in that role long enough,

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>especially with Ellen and how he operates that it's instilling

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:36.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of confidence in people right now. Bloom bes

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Kurt wagging a great report saying keeping us posted on

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 1>what's happening inside the bird's nest. We'll get more from

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:44.679
<v Speaker 1>you next week, Thank you very much. Meanwhile, the information

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 1>says Apple plans to develop software to help users of

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 1>its mixed reality headset build their own acts. The company's

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:54.200
<v Speaker 1>working on its own are content for its three thousand

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:57.160
<v Speaker 1>dollar headset. According to the report, Apple hopes that even

0:17:57.200 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 1>people who don't know computer code can use the software

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to tell the headset via Syrie to build an a

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 1>r app. That application would then be available on its

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:10.199
<v Speaker 1>app store for others to download. Carrol, you reckon you

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 1>can be an app developer through the headset? Is that

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>within your skill set? Most definitely probably through chat GPT rank.

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean we've played around with the headsets I can't

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:22.639
<v Speaker 1>imagine going as far as sort of coding within it

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>or making a command to beyond video games. It's interesting

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 1>use case. Yeah, I mean, I'm going to leave it

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to the professionals, But I mean, who knows how creative

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 1>we can become when left to war own devices. I

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 1>first need the three thousand dollars you can give me

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that why I can then start doing it. Yeah, I mean,

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>this story about the headsets just not going to go away?

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Is it? Anyway? Coming up? More pain for Indian tycoon

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Galton at Danney's Corporate Empire will tell you the extent

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of the damages caused by that short sells report. That's next.

0:18:52.080 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 1>This is bloom Buck Who are Hindenberg Research? The u

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>S investment firm says it specializes in forensic financial research

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and publishing short sellers reports. Hindenberg's in the news again

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>with wide ranging allegations against conglomerates owned by galtam Adani,

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Asia's richest person. Founded by a guy called Nate Anderson,

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the firm's named after the seven Hindenburg disaster. Hindenberg says

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:39.399
<v Speaker 1>it looks for similar man made disasters that may be

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 1>floating around the market and aims to shed light on them.

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Hindenberg says it seeks results around covering hard to find

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>information from quote atypical sources, but warns investors, opinions and

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>investigative commentary are his own readers advised. The use of

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>its material is at your own risk. The firm really

0:19:56.840 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>hit the headlines in targeting electric truck making the killer,

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's founded Trevor Milton. They claimed Milton deceived investors.

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Ultimately Milton resigned. There was a criminal investigation and trial

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and Milton was found guilty of securities and Wye fraud.

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Now that you know what Hindenberg does, here's a little

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 1>bit more about why you heard about them this week.

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>It issued a report on Tuesday detailing wide ranging allegations

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:26.400
<v Speaker 1>of corporate malpractice at A Darni Enterprises following a two

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 1>year investigation. The market route that followed a raised more

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 1>than fifty one billion dollars of value this week across

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:36.199
<v Speaker 1>the Empire, which is owned by Gautamer Danny, Asia's richest man.

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 1>The Darney Group, the main listed part of the conglomerate,

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 1>disputed Hindenberg's allegations Thursday, but it's stopped just kept plunging.

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 1>The firm lost almost on Friday, biggest drop Carrow since

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:51.200
<v Speaker 1>seen an issue as he wants to raise funds. An

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 1>issue is well, because tell us why this is a

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:57.200
<v Speaker 1>technology story. What is it in the conglomerate that in

0:20:57.280 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>our industry? Two reasons One a on he's moved into

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 1>media companies. But to the thesis from Hindenburg is that

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 1>even his cement companies trade, they have multiples like text stocks,

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 1>and that for them was a worrying side. And Hindenberg,

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 1>again a short seller, take a caution what they say,

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:20.400
<v Speaker 1>but they see potential downside drop from where they think

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 1>these assets are really valued. Well, that's certainly made their

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:27.359
<v Speaker 1>impact from a monetary value perspective over there in India.

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to keep all over that sort of

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:39.879
<v Speaker 1>a story. Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. I'm Karen Hyde

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 1>back in New York, San Francisco based Ed Ludlow. You're there,

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and and actually both of us took a keen eye

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:48.120
<v Speaker 1>on what's happening in terms of earnings, particularly credit card

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:51.880
<v Speaker 1>giant American Express today right because their shares absolutely spiraling

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>higher up ten and it's because the company gave a

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty upbeat revenue forecast. They had record number of new

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:00.680
<v Speaker 1>cardholders two and I actually got to have a quick

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 1>chat with the CEO CT Scurry earlier this morning. He's

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about as resilient customer base, of course a pretty

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 1>premium customer ed, but he also has some really interesting

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 1>takes some technology, particularly when it comes to small businesses,

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 1>because he was saying, look, I've noticed that digital advertising

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 1>spenders down for those small businesses that I serve, And

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:21.640
<v Speaker 1>he said, to quote him, I don't know if that's

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 1>a function of the economy or a function of confusion.

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 1>And he's talking about the fact that at the moment

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>TikTok Twitter, where you're looking at meta at Google, the

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:34.920
<v Speaker 1>regulatory implications, some of the political implications of societal he's saying,

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot to deal with to try and digest

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 1>as a small business as to whether you want to

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:41.440
<v Speaker 1>be putting your money to work there. Well, he's interesting

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>on the other side, the consumer side as well, because

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I scroll my phone often, see a product

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I like on social jump jump into it. That's part

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>of the e commerce ecosystem for me. What jumped out

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 1>a company giving guidance for the year incidents, and I

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:56.360
<v Speaker 1>think it is a technology right because it's payment, it's

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:59.679
<v Speaker 1>people facilitating transactions, and great job getting on the phone

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:01.959
<v Speaker 1>because we need to know what's going on. Yeah, he

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>was really saying, I've got clarity out and I've got

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:08.159
<v Speaker 1>confidence to four Who else can say that and I can.

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you not many people in perhaps the

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 1>crypto world. I've got that sort of level of foresight

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:13.920
<v Speaker 1>right now. And let's just go to that now. Because

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Scaramucci Skybridge Capital, we know the kind of pain

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>that that's been in. It's lost in fact, and its

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>biggest funds after some pretty wrong way bets, whether it's

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:25.120
<v Speaker 1>crypto that they invested with or of course they now

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:28.880
<v Speaker 1>bankrupt FTX relationship. Let's bring in the one and only

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Shanali Bassak, who's about to head out to Miami to

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:34.440
<v Speaker 1>meet a few crypto players as well as hedge fund Glitterati.

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us about scar Mucci and how much he's

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 1>been burned by the space Listen. He has been pivoting

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Skybridge to focus more and more on crypto the last

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:45.120
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. And remember this is not just buy encryptocurrencies.

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>He had a stake in f t X in various

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 1>rounds of the financing, so he was really hurt in

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 1>November when FTX filed for bankruptcy. We also know there's

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:56.880
<v Speaker 1>another issue here that f t X Ventures had taken

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:59.400
<v Speaker 1>a stake here in Skybridge, and so that had come

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 1>up for a question and when they filed for bankruptcy

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 1>on whether he'd be able to buy his steak back. Now,

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the big issue here is Skybridge tumbled thirty nine percent

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>last year. It is significantly tumbled. A big question here

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 1>because they have limited withdrawals when it comes to Skybridge.

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:17.160
<v Speaker 1>What I know about Skybridge is a lot of the bitcoin,

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 1>for example, that they bought was that about eighteen thousand

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 1>dollars on average. So to some extent that they could

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>see some rebound this year, it would be hugely helpful

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>because of the route that they're facing. Because remember Skybridge

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:33.359
<v Speaker 1>is not just invested in cryptocurrencies and crypto kind of

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:36.159
<v Speaker 1>venture here. They're also invested in a lot of hedge funds.

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 1>And while some hedge funds have had a tough year,

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:40.639
<v Speaker 1>there are a couple that did a little better last

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 1>year too. So taking the good with the bad in

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>a tough year for Anthony Scaramuchi. I hope the audience

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 1>got the audible gasp from Caroline in the background because

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I gave a similar one there. I guess, I guess

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:52.399
<v Speaker 1>my question right. You're you're a fund. I think on

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the crypto side, they're looking a lot at private companies.

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 1>As you said, they also invest in some hedge funds.

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 1>That was how did they get them selves out that

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and back on the right track. Yeah, you know, I

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 1>can't help but talk already about this big Miami trip

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 1>that many hedge fund managers are making into this weekend

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 1>into next week, because starting Sunday night, starting Monday, you

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>have the Managed Funds Association, a big hedge fund community,

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 1>starting off with a series of events on restoring faith

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 1>in crypto at a reception also that's sponsored by coin Base.

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:28.680
<v Speaker 1>So you do have the crypto community really pushing here

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>to restore that faith. You have Mike Novograt speaking at

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a separate conference Eye Connections, also in Miami to start

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 1>restoring faith in crypto. You have a lot of fund

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:41.359
<v Speaker 1>managers alongside traditional fund managers talking to the same big

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>investors to bring people back in. In my own conversations,

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 1>what I'll tell you is that there are a lot

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>of people out there that still say, listen, bitcoin didn't

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:52.880
<v Speaker 1>fail last year, even though so much of the market did.

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:55.919
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of conversation among traditional asset managers that

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:58.120
<v Speaker 1>will be down there next week about whether they buy

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>some of these claims out of bankruptcy. And there is

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:03.879
<v Speaker 1>a lot of question around how to invest as a

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:06.679
<v Speaker 1>traditional investor. But again there are still a lot of

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 1>people who have felt a lot of pain from last year.

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Head Well, the big headline this Friday is the bloombergtion.

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 1>Ali Basso because off to Miami, So Miami watch out,

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure we'll get a lot of headlines from her,

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 1>not just have crypt over the world of fintech as well,

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and staying on fintech, Fidelity again slashing its valuation. This

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:28.880
<v Speaker 1>is interesting of ants group. According to filings, Fidelity cut

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 1>its estimate for ant by about nine percent to sixty

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 1>three point eight billion dollars as at the end of November.

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 1>That's down from two hundred and thirty five billion just

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>before ants i Po was halted in November, has been

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>overhauling its business to comply with Chinese government demands. As

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:49.880
<v Speaker 1>we have been discussing Caroline about the situation in mainland

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 1>China for some time now, I would have broader broaden

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:57.640
<v Speaker 1>out this discussion around valuations, particularly from the venture capital perspective,

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and bring in Blouziberry general part at Lucks Capital. Interesting

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 1>what we've just heard. There are lots of threads valuations

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 1>in China. But I just actually want to go with

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the week that was this. This has been a really

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:13.640
<v Speaker 1>volatile week, not just in terms of markets but headlines

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 1>markets to the upside. As a VC that's just heard

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 1>all of that from our program and sat through a

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>week like this, what's your experience of the week been.

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:26.440
<v Speaker 1>What's your takeaway from this week's news cycle? I mean,

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, Nazdak is up about ten percent this year, right,

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>so in some sense this is good news. But at

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, vcs we invest in early

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 1>stage technology companies for us at Lux Capital specifically, we

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 1>invest in the intersection of technology and sciences, and this

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:44.440
<v Speaker 1>is a great time to be building those companies. Great

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:47.680
<v Speaker 1>talent is becoming available. They're starting companies to solve real

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>world problems. You know, think about physical security, think about

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:54.359
<v Speaker 1>saving lives all the shootings and gun detection technology for example,

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that We've invested in drug discovery companies, automation, autonomy, bringing

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:01.399
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing back to the US. So regardless of what sector

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 1>you look at right now, there's interesting companies that are

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 1>getting founded and invested in. And the good thing is

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that nobody's looking at exits, you know, for these companies

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>in the next year or two. We're just making sure

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 1>these companies are fully funded and are able to create

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 1>great products and take them to market. Butw Caroline and

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I were reflecting on our weekly Twitter spaces earlier that

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the headlines on layoffs came right at the beginning of

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:28.959
<v Speaker 1>this week, and you there's been so many stories from

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:32.719
<v Speaker 1>the world of technology that you forget. Actually throughout it

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 1>have been some some pretty negative headlines, especially those around layoffs,

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 1>IBM Spotify being examples. Does that represent an opportunity for

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 1>a venture captists like you? Are you kind of putting

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 1>pressure on your portfolio founders to say, hey, go out

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>there and hire these people. They're on the market. My

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 1>inbox is filled with the regimes that have come in

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 1>from people who have been laid off from these companies,

0:28:56.440 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and I'm absolutely working hard to get them, you know, hired.

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 1>It's some of the best talent hired into our portfolio companies.

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 1>This is two years ago that we told our portfolio

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 1>companies to raise capital because we sort of knew in

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 1>some ways that the peak had arrived. We obviously didn't

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 1>know exactly when, but we wanted them to raise as

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>much capital as they're good to be able to survive

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the long term. And these companies that are sitting on

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 1>that capital now is not only able to hire these candidates,

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 1>but also able to acquire some other companies along the

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>way to bring more technology into the mix and and

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 1>bring it to their customers. Let's talk about hype or

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 1>not therefore, because amid some of the concerns and the

0:29:32.240 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 1>and the worries about the technology pulling back valuations, putting

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:39.280
<v Speaker 1>back people being like, go, there feels like there's another

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of n f T crypto vibe around AI. Can

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>you tell us about what you're feeling there? But as

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:49.239
<v Speaker 1>to whether you're getting that exuberance, what are we at

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the dawn of a new Internet stage? Uh? I think

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 1>there's something called the Gardner's hype cycle. So every new

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>technology it comes with its own hype and you just

0:29:59.440 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 1>have to sort of live through it and know that

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 1>there will be ups and downs along the way, and

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that's okay. Um, there is a lot of noise around AI,

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 1>but AI is also real. I think, you know, there's

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>something unique that happens with these you know, chat bots

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and LM and other things that have happened that when

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you have very large parameters we're talking about twenty billion

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 1>parameters or more, you start to see very interesting results.

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think people are now starting to figure out

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 1>how to utilize them to solve real world problems. So

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing you know, the applications of AI in new

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:35.240
<v Speaker 1>industries like healthcare, like education, like in construction, in autonomy

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and and and automation, and I think there's going to

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 1>be a real companies built. We're super excited about that.

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, you know, just like any other industry,

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't just say that for f t X, for crypto.

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 1>This same thing happened in the world of drones and

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 1>b R a R. You have to be just very

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 1>careful that you build real world companies that are solving

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 1>problems and creating real value for the customers at the end. Yeah,

0:30:56.840 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and real value is something that's now being questioned. For example,

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 1>for a public company like Tesla, which a lot of

0:31:02.800 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 1>it's big focus long term value is about automated driving.

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I know that's a narrative expertise for you. I know

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that's somewhere that you've been investing in with some of

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 1>your portfolio companies and leading that for Lux Capital. Where

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 1>are we in that overall hype cycle that we're just

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 1>talking through. I mean, look, there's some level of autonomy

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 1>available to all of us. You know, if you can

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 1>buy a car now, it will do self driving, it

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 1>will do lane keeping, you will update, uh, you know,

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:34.960
<v Speaker 1>new software will update more frequently. But obviously Tesla is

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 1>further advanced than most of the other automotive o EM's

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 1>out there. But I think automotive and autonomous technologies here.

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 1>But I also want to add that AI m L

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 1>similar technology platforms such as um fontomous driving is being

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 1>applied to other industries as well. Right distributed sensor sensors

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 1>are being used to detect guns and weapons that entrances

0:31:56.320 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to buildings. A I m L is being applied to

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 1>looking for threats in those systems. Completely different industry, you know,

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a company like Evolved Technologies focused on that, completely different

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 1>than autonomous technology. But using the same paradigms and using

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 1>some of the same technologies, and in some ways we

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:14.240
<v Speaker 1>call it the peace dividend of the autonomous wars, that

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 1>all the technology that's getting developed from autonomous cars are

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be used in many other industries and create

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:23.760
<v Speaker 1>value elsewhere as well. Fascinating. I've got to get you back.

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Really always loved speaking with the VC community at the

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 1>moment about where there is they really focused to be

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 1>getting the value below. We thank you so much, of

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>course below it's so very hears of course, the Black's capital.

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's check in though on some of the public side

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of the equation. We're just talking about Tessa and some

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of the other discussions. But I mean, chip stocks have

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>really been taking it hard, right then, Yeah, and I

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 1>want to go back to Intel because at one point

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 1>on Friday, the stocks down the most since October one.

0:32:49.120 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 1>It paired some of its declines. I think we had

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 1>our biggest drops since September, the worst week for this

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 1>stock in about five weeks. But you know, this kind

0:32:56.960 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 1>of killed the momentum, right, I know, then, has that

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 1>one d pushed higher Friday? The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index or

0:33:02.800 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 1>socks did react negatively but again paired some of its losses.

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 1>What was astonishing for the market is that expectations for

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Intel were already pretty low, and this was even worse

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 1>than that the forecast for the first quarter and outlook

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:18.720
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of the year, and with so many

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 1>chip names still to report next week and particularly get

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Qualcom right, Caroline, I think now we're probably bracing a

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit. You know, we're probably a bit concerned about

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the outlook, particularly for consumer electronics for the rest of

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Some of the turns of phrase being used by the analysts,

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Bernstein calling it astonishingly bad and stunning. So um, I mean,

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 1>just we hope, well, I suppose for many we hope

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 1>that it's not going to replicated next week were coming

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 1>up d Well, maybe next week we'll hear more of

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 1>this as well. Tech layoffs. Look, it's impacting workers on

0:33:52.400 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 1>temporary visas too. There is no one nonprofit that's trying

0:33:55.640 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 1>to learn a hand in all of that. We talk

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:15.600
<v Speaker 1>about it time and time again at tech companies cutting costs,

0:34:15.880 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 1>looking at the future that perhaps as a bit bleaker

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and in particular it's affecting the workers, isn't it. In particular?

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:24.240
<v Speaker 1>H one b visa holders whose status in the US

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 1>is directly tied to their employment, and so you and

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I we took to our audience. We got on overall

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the focus on Twitter because some companies like Spotify Day

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of the week when they announced layoffs,

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:37.759
<v Speaker 1>said they're going to be helping out the employees who

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:40.880
<v Speaker 1>were on visas. And interestingly, when we asked our audience,

0:34:40.920 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 1>should this be standard, said yeah, yeah, they should be. Yeah,

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:48.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, and I'm not surprised by that. Caroline.

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 1>Think about where I am in San Francisco, the Bay Area,

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:52.759
<v Speaker 1>even where you are on the East Coast, not just

0:34:52.880 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 1>New York, with cities like Chicago, other cities. Many of

0:34:56.480 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 1>these workers are here in this sector technology, whether they're

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:02.920
<v Speaker 1>on the s West Side or otherwise on visas. You know,

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:06.080
<v Speaker 1>it's just an incredibly difficult situation for them. We've got

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 1>a perfect guest to talk about this, Brad Henderson, CEO

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:12.960
<v Speaker 1>of P thirty three. This is a not for profit

0:35:13.480 --> 0:35:17.799
<v Speaker 1>in Chicago which is basically trying to directly help with this.

0:35:17.960 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Right Brad, You're basically saying, let's take what is an

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:26.239
<v Speaker 1>available portion of the workforce and find a solution here

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:29.359
<v Speaker 1>talk us through what you're trying to achieve. Sure, we're

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:31.520
<v Speaker 1>really trying to respond at this moment in time where

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 1>so many people are being laid off, and if you

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:37.640
<v Speaker 1>think about our workforce in the technical field, it is

0:35:37.640 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 1>far and born. Many of these individuals have sixty days

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:44.000
<v Speaker 1>right now to find a job or leave the country

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:47.360
<v Speaker 1>with their families. And so what excites us in Chicago

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:50.719
<v Speaker 1>is we're just stock full of these companies that do

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 1>real things in the real economy and read people's lives,

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and we're actually have tons of open positions, a hundred

0:35:55.920 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and sixty thou jobs in technical fields open in Chicago.

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Go today and really just to reach out to the

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 1>thousands of people around the country who are in dire

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 1>straits but highly skilled, and say, if you've got sixty

0:36:08.600 --> 0:36:10.400
<v Speaker 1>days and you want to find a great opportunity to

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 1>have an impact on a business that matters, go to

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 1>our website, apply to a job, and contribute to our economy,

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and talk to us about the fact that actually that

0:36:19.200 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 1>adds in many ways to diversity. When I think of

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:23.319
<v Speaker 1>h one b vs is, I think of all my

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:25.359
<v Speaker 1>husband was on one until we're lucky enough to get

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 1>our green cards. But there's also an awful lot of

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:31.359
<v Speaker 1>people coming from India in particular, this is people of color.

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:34.000
<v Speaker 1>That is this going to add diversity of thought as well?

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Over in Chicago. Sure, if you think about the long

0:36:37.160 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 1>term trajectory for tech, we are short in our country,

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:44.719
<v Speaker 1>hundreds and hundreds of thousands of jobs, talented people. I've

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:46.759
<v Speaker 1>apologized to have thousands of people. How where do you

0:36:46.800 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 1>find those folks? You're gonna have to find new channels.

0:36:49.560 --> 0:36:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Those channels exist for talented people in countries like India

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and countries in Africa and Europe, etcetera. And they exist

0:36:55.960 --> 0:36:58.480
<v Speaker 1>in other forms of diversity neighborhoods in Chicago that I

0:36:58.520 --> 0:37:01.200
<v Speaker 1>haven't always had access to jobs like this. In order

0:37:01.239 --> 0:37:03.200
<v Speaker 1>for us to meet the challenge of the technical age,

0:37:03.680 --> 0:37:05.799
<v Speaker 1>we need to find talent wherever we can find it,

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and diversity ends up being a huge strength and meeting

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:12.760
<v Speaker 1>those objectives. Brad was showing a graphic on the screen

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:15.400
<v Speaker 1>which outlines how severe some of the cuts have been

0:37:15.440 --> 0:37:20.319
<v Speaker 1>at names like Meta, Sales Force, Alphabet, Microsoft, IBM. Are

0:37:20.400 --> 0:37:23.279
<v Speaker 1>these the names where these workers that are reaching out

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:26.719
<v Speaker 1>to you coming from Are you literally getting interest in

0:37:26.719 --> 0:37:30.480
<v Speaker 1>inquiry from the technology sector. It's been two days since

0:37:30.520 --> 0:37:33.760
<v Speaker 1>their job board is up, We've had sixteen thousand unique

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:36.840
<v Speaker 1>visitors from all across the country. From the very names

0:37:36.840 --> 0:37:39.879
<v Speaker 1>that you're describing, we're getting to engage with people who

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:44.000
<v Speaker 1>may have been focused on engineering tweets, who now bet

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:46.239
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity to look at a company like Walgreens, which

0:37:46.280 --> 0:37:49.320
<v Speaker 1>is a Chicago based company who's using a digital technology

0:37:49.400 --> 0:37:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to transform healthcare UH and and really access those people

0:37:53.080 --> 0:37:55.760
<v Speaker 1>who had jobs in big tech on tweets and social

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 1>media projects can put them to work companies like Walgreens

0:37:59.200 --> 0:38:02.400
<v Speaker 1>solving critical healthcare challenges. We're seeing folks from all over

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:06.279
<v Speaker 1>the country respond to that how easy or difficult is

0:38:06.320 --> 0:38:09.080
<v Speaker 1>it to transfer an H one B visa? How much

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 1>is it going to have to be an uphill battle

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:13.919
<v Speaker 1>for some of these companies like a Walgreen space where

0:38:13.960 --> 0:38:16.719
<v Speaker 1>you are, who want to have this talent. This is

0:38:16.760 --> 0:38:18.719
<v Speaker 1>the best part about what we're trying to do here

0:38:18.800 --> 0:38:21.320
<v Speaker 1>is if you think about the broader question of reforming

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the U. S. Immigration system, that's really hard and going

0:38:23.960 --> 0:38:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to take a very long time. This program, there's actually

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>quite a misnomer that it's cumbersome or particularly costly. All

0:38:31.600 --> 0:38:34.279
<v Speaker 1>the companies we're working with our companies that already go

0:38:34.400 --> 0:38:37.200
<v Speaker 1>through this process, that already have budget to support these

0:38:37.239 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 1>workers transfers. So the jobs are just sitting there waiting.

0:38:40.480 --> 0:38:41.880
<v Speaker 1>And what we've done on our job board, I think

0:38:41.920 --> 0:38:44.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that's really made it so the

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:46.879
<v Speaker 1>workers around the country have responded to what we're doing

0:38:47.360 --> 0:38:49.800
<v Speaker 1>is all the jobs we posted, it's thousands of jobs

0:38:49.800 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 1>available at this site are ones that are H one

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:54.799
<v Speaker 1>B VISA eligible. And so the reality is this one

0:38:54.840 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 1>is actually pretty straightforward. They do this, it's affordable. They've

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:01.600
<v Speaker 1>got a process of aguaring and out every time someone applies,

0:39:01.640 --> 0:39:04.839
<v Speaker 1>and so for this particular program, it's just a matter

0:39:04.880 --> 0:39:07.880
<v Speaker 1>of doing the right thing and connecting the dots. Brad Henderson,

0:39:08.320 --> 0:39:10.759
<v Speaker 1>fixing a real problem right here right now for many

0:39:11.000 --> 0:39:13.400
<v Speaker 1>we thank you and indeed their families. It's the CEO

0:39:13.600 --> 0:39:17.319
<v Speaker 1>of P thirty three. And what an interesting way to

0:39:17.360 --> 0:39:19.799
<v Speaker 1>actually be looking at what is in many ways just

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:22.920
<v Speaker 1>a market inefficiency. There there's the people who want the work,

0:39:23.200 --> 0:39:25.160
<v Speaker 1>who need it very swiftly, and it's just trying to

0:39:25.160 --> 0:39:27.839
<v Speaker 1>find the right way to line them up. Yeah, I

0:39:27.880 --> 0:39:30.720
<v Speaker 1>cannot believe what he's just told us that their ports

0:39:30.840 --> 0:39:34.080
<v Speaker 1>or their board has been open for two days. Sixteen

0:39:34.200 --> 0:39:38.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand people have inquired and the majority of them all

0:39:38.400 --> 0:39:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, many of them is he put it from

0:39:40.320 --> 0:39:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the technology sector. You know. It shows what's happening in

0:39:43.520 --> 0:39:46.400
<v Speaker 1>real times in this economy and how quickly it's moving.

0:39:55.000 --> 0:39:57.560
<v Speaker 1>It's happening. We have a new stock marketing session and

0:39:57.600 --> 0:40:01.320
<v Speaker 1>it's artificial intelligence Q and umber of stocks and investors

0:40:01.320 --> 0:40:03.960
<v Speaker 1>destintly trying to get in on the AI tech trend

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the way they do it, or maybe they buy into

0:40:06.200 --> 0:40:09.160
<v Speaker 1>a small cat name like C three AI and makes

0:40:09.320 --> 0:40:13.759
<v Speaker 1>enterprise AI applications. It's stock on a record month so

0:40:13.840 --> 0:40:16.239
<v Speaker 1>far and getting like a buzz feed, its shared price

0:40:16.280 --> 0:40:19.359
<v Speaker 1>spiking three on the week because it announces a deal

0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:22.480
<v Speaker 1>with open ai to be using it within its content creation.

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:27.040
<v Speaker 1>We've also had little known voice AI makers like SoundHound

0:40:27.120 --> 0:40:29.600
<v Speaker 1>AI also on the upside. We're getting in video. The

0:40:29.640 --> 0:40:32.400
<v Speaker 1>chip maker which has its chips used by AI surfaces,

0:40:32.520 --> 0:40:35.239
<v Speaker 1>also getting bit up some on the month. This all

0:40:35.280 --> 0:40:40.480
<v Speaker 1>feels pretty reminiscent of the past. Quite recently, everyone was

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:42.719
<v Speaker 1>trying to have an n f T kind of part

0:40:42.760 --> 0:40:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of their business. Maybe back in seen you remember when

0:40:46.280 --> 0:40:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Long Island iced tea rebranded its company name as long Blockchain,

0:40:51.600 --> 0:40:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and therefore we also go back to the n nineties

0:40:54.280 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 1>when suddenly every company had an Internet strategy or changed

0:40:57.640 --> 0:41:00.719
<v Speaker 1>its name to dot com. These sort of fads do

0:41:00.880 --> 0:41:03.279
<v Speaker 1>come and go. The question is, as a one got

0:41:03.280 --> 0:41:07.480
<v Speaker 1>staying power, what do you think in fad or here

0:41:07.520 --> 0:41:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to stay? So it's a case by case basis right

0:41:10.719 --> 0:41:12.919
<v Speaker 1>on on all of these things, what the AI does,

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and the valuations, the money behind it. The buzz Feed story, Um,

0:41:18.440 --> 0:41:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm a journalist, you're a journalist being replaced by I.

0:41:21.680 --> 0:41:24.000
<v Speaker 1>But I get the business case. You know, buzz Feed's

0:41:24.000 --> 0:41:25.600
<v Speaker 1>got to feed the content on its site and you

0:41:25.640 --> 0:41:28.719
<v Speaker 1>look at the market response, all yeah, thankfully, I think

0:41:28.719 --> 0:41:30.799
<v Speaker 1>that's it's going to be. It's games and it's quizz as.

0:41:30.800 --> 0:41:33.399
<v Speaker 1>We hope that it's going to be really putting those

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:36.400
<v Speaker 1>AI applications towards. But what warriores me is it suddenly

0:41:36.400 --> 0:41:39.120
<v Speaker 1>becomes a scavenger hunt for the right ticker symbol, right

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the acronym that you're using when it comes when you

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:45.560
<v Speaker 1>summarize what your business does on a Bloomberg for example,

0:41:45.600 --> 0:41:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and what C three AIY s A R go like

0:41:48.960 --> 0:41:52.279
<v Speaker 1>no wonder, it's getting a load of interest. Yeah, and

0:41:52.360 --> 0:41:54.320
<v Speaker 1>look there's real momentum behind this dog. I think the

0:41:54.680 --> 0:41:58.719
<v Speaker 1>Friday rally was looking at a jump of around over

0:41:59.000 --> 0:42:02.160
<v Speaker 1>a few months basis. But the month to date performance

0:42:02.360 --> 0:42:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the stocks up six so far in January. And I

0:42:06.600 --> 0:42:10.000
<v Speaker 1>go to analyst recommendations on the Bloomberg only one by

0:42:10.280 --> 0:42:13.480
<v Speaker 1>on this three cells only, and there's seven holds. Like

0:42:13.719 --> 0:42:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the analysts looking at the stock aren't thinking that it

0:42:16.480 --> 0:42:18.359
<v Speaker 1>should have this sort of a price level at moment.

0:42:18.360 --> 0:42:22.080
<v Speaker 1>The overall price targets the next twelve months is sixty three.

0:42:22.160 --> 0:42:25.080
<v Speaker 1>It's more the euphoria on round. It feels a little

0:42:25.080 --> 0:42:28.000
<v Speaker 1>bit mini. Yeah, no fundamentals here. And then we spoke

0:42:28.040 --> 0:42:31.279
<v Speaker 1>about Jensen and the video earlier in the show. Right,

0:42:31.320 --> 0:42:35.280
<v Speaker 1>this is driving wealth and is driving valuation, Yeah, stonishing.

0:42:35.560 --> 0:42:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Next week we're going to have a lot more on

0:42:37.239 --> 0:42:39.839
<v Speaker 1>the driving wealth and valuations when it comes to earnings. Right,

0:42:39.960 --> 0:42:41.560
<v Speaker 1>But for so far, that does it for this additional

0:42:41.560 --> 0:42:44.799
<v Speaker 1>bloom bleg technology. Don't forget lots of earnings to come

0:42:44.840 --> 0:42:47.799
<v Speaker 1>next week and catch our podcast wherever you get it.

0:42:48.160 --> 0:42:49.839
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg