WEBVTT - Tech News: South Korea Brings the Hammer Down on Apple

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Jothan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and I love all things tech. And before we get started,

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to say I hope that all of you

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>are all safe and well and that your loved ones

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 1>are as well. Here in the United States, we've seen

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Hurricane Ida cause enormous damage along the coast of Louisiana.

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Large parts of that region are without power. There are

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>emergency situations all over there. If any of y'all are

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>out that way, please stay safe and take care of

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:48.160
<v Speaker 1>yourselves and of each other. And really that goes out

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 1>to everyone. A little kindness goes a long way. But yes,

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm definitely thinking of all of you out there,

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>hoping that you're staying safe. All right, let's get to

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the tech news for Tuesday, August thirty one, twenty one.

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Here in America, there's a brewing battle between the US

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>government and companies like Apple and Google over whether or

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>not requiring app developers to use the Apple and Google

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>in app purchasing systems for all in app purchases is

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>anti competitive. Now, this gets a little muddled, so we're

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>going to use an example to kind of clear things up.

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>So let's say that you are a developer, an app developer,

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and you create a SimCity like game, and in that game,

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>players can you know, zone and build out virtual cities.

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.839
<v Speaker 1>And in this game, maybe you've built some in app purchases,

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and that way players can pay to access say certain

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 1>types of resources or types of buildings, or they might

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>be able to speed up construction or otherwise take you know,

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>shortcuts in the game, which without these shortcuts would take

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>a really long time to play out. Well, right now,

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>both Google and Apple take a cut that's anywhere between

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>fifteen tot of all in app purchases for stuff like

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:12.079
<v Speaker 1>that is if it's a smaller developer, is if they

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:15.359
<v Speaker 1>are you know, considered to be a larger developer, and

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you have no other option but to go that route, Like,

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>you have to play by those rules because both Apple

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:24.640
<v Speaker 1>and Google say that trying to work around that means

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>your app will not be allowed in those app stores. Also,

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 1>this is different if your app is used to purchase

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 1>real stuff out in the real world. So for example,

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>let's say you run a taco restaurant and you develop

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>an app so people can order tacos to pick up

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>at your store. They just use the app, they say

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>what they want, it goes to you, They pay for

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>it and everything. They just come in and pick it

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>up and go. Well, Apple and Google don't take a

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 1>cut of those kinds of purchases. It's only for things

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>that are in app. Also, I would like some of

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>your finest tacos. I don't know why you've been holding

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>out on me for so long. Anyway, here in the

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 1>United States, government offices and congress people are beginning to

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:09.799
<v Speaker 1>push back on this practice, saying it is any competitive

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and it traps developers and systems that they have no

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:16.799
<v Speaker 1>control over. While that's playing out here over in South Korea,

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>things have taken a more drastic turn. The South Korean

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 1>government passed a bill that now bands Apple and Google

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:26.960
<v Speaker 1>from forcing developers to use this kind of in app

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>purchasing system. They can use it if they want to,

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 1>but they're not forced to according to this new band.

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>So now companies like Epic Games, which makes the game Fortnite,

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>could do the thing that got Epic in hot water

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>with Apple in the first place, and that was that

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Epic gave players a way to buy in game Fortnite

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>currency without going through Apple's in app purchase system. Also,

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>while it doesn't get much coverage, Google was equally miffed

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>at Epic for the exact same reason. It will be

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see how Apple and Google respond to this.

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>According to CNBC, the Apple App Store grows more than

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>sixty four billion dollars in twenty twenty, a princely some now.

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Keep in mind, that's what the app store brought in.

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Not all of that money actually is going to Apple.

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:18.719
<v Speaker 1>Apple gets a chunk of it, but a lot of

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>that money is also going to various developers. However, it

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>still represents a major source of revenue for Apple. Also,

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple doesn't actually report on how much the app store

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>makes in particular in its quarterly earnings reports. Instead, the

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>company lumps that into a category called Apple Services, and

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>that includes other stuff as well. But however you slice it,

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the app store is one of the contributing factors to

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Apple's colossal success as a modern tech company. I should

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>add that the company also sees a lot of revenue

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 1>from its physical products like iPhone and mac computers, so

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not like Apple's just turning into an app store,

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of like how a lot of people point to

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Valve and say Valve very rarely makes any games these days.

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Now it's more of an online game store. If other

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 1>countries follow South Korea's lead, Apple and Google could see

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:14.719
<v Speaker 1>important revenue streams diminish as a result. And now for

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>a curious story about Apple that shows how serious the

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 1>law he is is. Here in the United States, So

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>more than a decade ago, Apple was in a long,

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>ugly legal battle with the telecommunications company Nokia, the Finnish company.

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Nokia was at the time the largest worldwide smartphone and

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:37.159
<v Speaker 1>mobile phone manufacturer, and at the heart of the legal

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:40.479
<v Speaker 1>battle were a series of patent disputes, and each company

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:43.359
<v Speaker 1>was claiming that the other company had violated one or

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>more patents that they they held. So Nokia saying hey

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>you violated X, Y and Z, and Apple saying hey

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>you violate A, B and C. And it all was

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>going into all these different court cases. Now it recently

0:05:57.000 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>came to light that in one of these court cases,

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 1>and this case happened way back in two thousand eleven,

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the judge who was presiding over the case turned out

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to actually have held some stock in Apple. I don't

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 1>know how much stock the judge held that has not

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>yet been reported as of the recording of this podcast,

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:19.239
<v Speaker 1>but it was at least some stock. Typically, in cases

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:22.599
<v Speaker 1>like this, if a court judge has a conflict of interest,

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>they are required to recuse themselves from the case. They

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:31.159
<v Speaker 1>cannot over see the case because clearly they might otherwise

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 1>find their judgments swayed by their own personal, you know,

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>financial interest in one of the parties involved in the case.

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:42.359
<v Speaker 1>This judge did not recuse himself. Now it sounds to

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>be like the judge might have held Apple stock and

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>perhaps just forgotten about it. That could be the case

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>if the judge had a pretty wide stock portfolio, right like,

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the judge might not have been aware of it. Moreover,

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:58.160
<v Speaker 1>in that particular case, the end result actually favored Nokia

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>more than it favored Apple. So even if the judge

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 1>had been aware of the stock, I mean, he should

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>have disclosed that, but it didn't seem to impact his

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 1>decision upon the case. However, rules are rules, and these

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 1>rules state that if a judge discovers a conflict of interest,

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>then that judge is required to report on it, even

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>if the case happened a decade ago or longer. So

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>on August, this particular judge filed a letter revealing the conflict,

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and now both Apple and Nokia have the opportunity to

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>respond to this revelation by October. But here's some other

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting things to consider. Nokia's smartphone and cell phone business

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>entered into a state of decline not long after these lawsuits,

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and Samsung overtook Nokia to become the the global leader

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>in smartphone and mobile phone manufacturing UH, and of course,

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Apple has grown in popularity year over year. Eventually, Microsoft

0:07:56.640 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>swooped in and purchased Nokia's mobile phone divis Vision and

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>had it for itself, and so these days Nokia doesn't

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>even have its own mobile phone division. It's got a

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>couple that are related to Nokia, but not like its

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>own in house mobile phone manufacturing department. So Microsoft would

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 1>then go on to sell off the Nokia assets after

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>it became clear that Microsoft's own mobile phone efforts were

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>flailing against Android and iPhone handsets. Fox con took ownership

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>of those assets. At that point. The Nokia brand, which

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:38.680
<v Speaker 1>did not go along with this whole Microsoft Fox Cotton

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>transaction UH, is actually licensed to another company called hm

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>D Global. So Nokia is not Nokia anymore. It's a

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a brand name that's held by a different company,

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and Nokia doesn't really have a a financial stake in

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>him D Global. So while this disclosure is interesting, it

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>sounds to me like there's not really going to be

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 1>any big brew haha to come out of it, because

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of all water under the bridge at this point.

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if anyone would hold any specific objections

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:13.319
<v Speaker 1>at this stage, and as far as I know, the

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>judge doesn't stand to face any um, you know, any

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>any punishment for this. Uh. Like I said to me,

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like it came out of an oversight as

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 1>opposed to a purposeful uh you know, obfuscation of a

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:34.440
<v Speaker 1>conflict of interest. Next, any of y'all who have listened

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 1>to my show for years will know that I have

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>had conflicting feelings when it comes to stuff like autonomous

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>cars and smart infrastructure. I was really hot on it

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>for a while. Then I became a little more hesitant. Uh,

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>not like resistant to it, but more more like someone

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 1>who went in bright eyed and bushytailed and then thought, oh,

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the reality of this is different. For um the ideal. Now,

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 1>on the one hand, if you assume everything works properly,

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>technologies like autonomous cars and smart city infrastructure would drastically

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>reduce the number of accidents that happened on the road,

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and that also means a big reduction in injuries and fatalities.

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>That would be incredible. And then of secondary importance, it

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>could also reduce traffic congestions, so folks would spend less

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>time sitting in a car in order to get to

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>where they're going, and that also means fewer carbon emissions.

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:33.559
<v Speaker 1>And obviously we're moving more toward electric vehicles, but that's

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>going to take some time. So the benefits of this

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>technology are really you know, they're enticing, they they're compelling. However,

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I did say, we have to assume everything's working properly,

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and that's where we are hit. You know, a really

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 1>big sticking point. We're seeing that play out in the

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:54.200
<v Speaker 1>UK country that has deployed digital signs across hundreds of

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 1>miles of roads that connect to a software platform and

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the signs are meant to display stuff like need limits

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 1>or information about lane closures and that kind of thing.

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>It's part of the UK's smart Motorways initiative. Unfortunately, this

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:13.680
<v Speaker 1>past April that system crashed three times, the system that

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>would send information to these digital signs across hundreds of

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:20.199
<v Speaker 1>miles of road, and that left the signs stuck in

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 1>whatever their last message was, even if conditions were changing.

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:28.679
<v Speaker 1>So staff working for this department in the UK are

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:33.200
<v Speaker 1>reportedly worried that future computer crashes could lead to motorists

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>getting the wrong information and that this could ultimately contribute

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>to serious car accidents. And that sounds like it's a

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>reasonable fear, because one of the things that Smart Motorways

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 1>project is doing is not just putting out digital signs.

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:52.359
<v Speaker 1>They're actually removing the hard shoulder along the side of motorways,

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>which is the place where you would normally pull over

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 1>if your car were experiencing problems and that way you

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>would be out of traffic. They are replacing those hard

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>shoulders with an additional lane of traffic to be used

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>just in normal day to day use. The digital signs

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>are supposed to signal a large red X to indicate

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that a lane is occupied when a vehicle has to

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 1>be pulled over because it's no longer operational for whatever reason. Right,

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>So you've got a breakdown or a flat tire or something,

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>well you would come to a stop in this lane

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of traffic, and then these signs are supposed to say, hey,

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>don't travel in this lane of traffic because there's a

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>car that's stopped up ahead. Maybe the driver is even

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>out of the car trying to fix their vehicle. Maybe they're,

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, trying to change a tire or something. And

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 1>if the system crashes during one of those incidents, which

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:49.680
<v Speaker 1>happened a lot by the way, I mean, I'm sure

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 1>you've seen as you've traveled, like it's pretty common to

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>see at least a couple of cars pulled over on

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the side of the road in different places where motorists

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 1>are having to deal with unexpected problems. Well, if the

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>system crashes, then those signs don't update and you don't

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:07.440
<v Speaker 1>get those red exits, which means that you could have

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>drivers traveling at full speed down that fourth lane of travel,

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and then you could have potentially cataclysmic collision. You could

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>have fatalities as a result of this has gotten to

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the point where some of the staff have started giving

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the system a new name. The system has the proprietary

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>name d Knack d Y n A C. And some

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>of the staff have called it die now, which is

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty grim stuff. So here's an example where a technological

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>solution could potentially make a problem worse. Now. I'd argue

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 1>this is also because the decision to add that fourth

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 1>lane and not have a hard shoulder there really contributes

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 1>to the the problem at hand. So this is a

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>combination of technological fails and I don't know, Hubris maybe

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of the staff are saying we need

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 1>to have a backup, we need to have that hard

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 1>shoulder and not to get rid of it, and I

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:08.680
<v Speaker 1>tend to agree with the staff on this one. We've

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>got a few more stories to cover, but before we

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>get to that, let's take a quick break. We're back.

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>So Patreon is making some interesting moves lately. The company

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>has acquired a New York based recruiting firm called Clear Talent,

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and from what Reuters is reporting, it sounds like Patreon's

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 1>goal is to expand beyond being a platform that creative

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>types can use in order to monetize their talents. If

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you're not familiar with Patreon, the general way it works

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>is that creators of all different kinds will establish an

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 1>account and then they generally offer one of two things

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to their followers. Some creators will establish a monthly subscription fee,

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and you subscribe, you pay a certain subscription and sometimes

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>this is and different tiers, with subscribers getting access to

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>content that relates to those tears. So you might have

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>like a five dollar per month charge and that provides

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you with access to a certain subset of content, and

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>then if you were to upgrade to ten dollars a month,

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>you would get additional content and so on. Another way

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that creators can choose to go is to instead to

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 1>have subscribers pay only when new content comes out, So

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 1>instead of it being a flat fee every month, it's

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a let's say, let's say you're a video content creator.

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Every time a new video comes out, then a charge

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 1>would go out to your followers. But otherwise, uh, if

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>you went like several weeks without creating a new video,

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 1>then no one would get charged. So there are different

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 1>ways of going about it. Anyway. Now, Patreon seems to

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>be heading in a direction to try and become more

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>of a one stop shop as far as content creators go,

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's supposed to give them other ways to manage

0:15:56.880 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 1>their businesses. So it's almost like a small business toolkit

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 1>in a way. UH that could include stuff like ways

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>to sell merchandise and other add ons in addition to

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the money that creators earn uh from subscription models, and

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 1>it could be a really good way for creatives to

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 1>manage their businesses. It's challenging to both be a creative

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>content person and to oversee all the business elements of

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 1>your endeavors. This does mean that creators will see some

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of that money go towards the platform rather than to themselves.

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>That's just the nature of things. But on the flip side,

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 1>they get heightened visibility because Patreon is a visible platform,

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of the hassle of managing your business

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>is removed from the operational standpoint. I think, based on

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the very little I know, that this could be a

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 1>good move for all parties, but we're obviously gonna have

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 1>to pay attention to make sure. In the past, we've

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>covered how various online platforms have tried to tackle the

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:06.199
<v Speaker 1>huge problem of misinformation and disinformation campaigns. So Twitter tags

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 1>labels on stuff and bands accounts that are repeat offenders.

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Facebook takes down groups, although you could argue they don't

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 1>take them down as quickly as new ones pop up.

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 1>But one platform I have not talked about is Reddit.

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:22.959
<v Speaker 1>Last week, a number of sub credits And if you're

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>not familiar with Reddit, uh, it's kind of like a

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 1>user generated link farm in a way, but it's organized

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>in various fields of interest, so you can think of

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>subredits as sort of like channels of Reddit that focus

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 1>on specific interests or topics. Anyway, a bunch of subredits

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>petition the administrators of Reddit to do something about the

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:50.440
<v Speaker 1>proliferation of disinformation about COVID nineteen that is running rampant

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>on the platform. The subredits claim that Reddit has done

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>little to curtail disinformation campaigns about stuff like vaccines and

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:02.879
<v Speaker 1>masks in the spread of COVID nineteen, and thus is

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 1>contributing to people getting a false view of how things work,

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:10.879
<v Speaker 1>which subsequently puts more people at risk of getting sick

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>or worse. Reddit has effectively sequestered a subreddit that focused

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 1>on these topics, so you could still access it if

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 1>you were a member of it, but otherwise you wouldn't

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>come across it. But according to the subredits, it really

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>hasn't done much else to stop the spread of false

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 1>information on the platform. So in protest, large groups of

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 1>subredits have switched to private membership, which means you can't

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>just pop in there and brows the posts in that subredit,

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:41.920
<v Speaker 1>or leave a message on there or anything like that. Effectively,

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:46.119
<v Speaker 1>to the outside world, these subredits are going dark, but

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>they're not completely going dark, because anyone who actually is

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:52.680
<v Speaker 1>an existing member of those subredits can still access them.

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>But clearly the admins of these subredits will be able

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to give the boot to anyone who tries to spread misinformation,

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 1>essentially saying that's not welcome in this community. Meanwhile, the

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>same subreddits are continuing to appeal to Reddit and to

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>go beyond Reddit by talking about this in other forums

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and to news media outlets in order to take a

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>more active stance against misinformation. The company's official stance is

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that red is a place where users can hash it

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>out for themselves, and that sounds an awful lot like

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:28.639
<v Speaker 1>what Mark Zuckerberg said about Facebook, that it's not the

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:32.680
<v Speaker 1>platform's responsibility to take sides in this kind of thing.

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>There is, however, a really big problem with this, because

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not just like a debate, and this is a

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:43.400
<v Speaker 1>problem that people have known about for centuries. And that's this.

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>It's way easier for lies to spread than it is

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 1>to get the truth to take hold. Or, as Mark

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:54.119
<v Speaker 1>Twain did not put it, a lie can travel halfway

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:57.360
<v Speaker 1>around the world before the truth puts on its shoes. See,

0:19:57.359 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of folks actually attribute that quote to Mark Twain.

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 1>That's incredibly fitting because it wasn't Mark Twain who coined

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that phrase. In fact, the earliest variation of this saying

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 1>that I have found came from seven from a sermon

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 1>delivered by a guy named Thomas Franklin. But that misinformation

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you know about Mark Twain allegedly saying this has traveled

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 1>far and wide. In some other versions it's Winston Churchill

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:26.440
<v Speaker 1>who gets the credit rather than Mark Twain. But all

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of that just proves the point, right, It just proves

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the truth that these lies travel far and wide much

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:35.479
<v Speaker 1>easier than the truth does. So if you give equal

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:40.640
<v Speaker 1>ground to truth and falsehoods, as if falsehoods have some

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of legitimacy to them, falsehoods run away with it

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 1>because they don't require the burden of reality. So I

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 1>am fully on the side of the sub credits in

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>this case. In semi related news, Axios reports that Facebook

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>will be tweaking its ranking algorithm. That's the algorithm that

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 1>determines which posts you and to see when you log

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>into Facebook and you check out your news feed. Apparently

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>this will include de emphasizing elements that lead to people

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 1>figuring out how to you know, kind of gain the system,

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 1>like a prediction of how likely someone is going to

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>engage with specific content. So just as a quick refresher

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>to remind yourselves how Facebook works. Facebook makes a lot

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>of money. In fact, the vast majority of its revenue

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:33.200
<v Speaker 1>through advertising. So the more time you spend on Facebook,

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the more ads you will encounter. That means that Facebook

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:41.160
<v Speaker 1>will make more money based off your visit. Because you're

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>spending more time, you're seeing more ads, Facebook makes more money.

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:47.680
<v Speaker 1>One way to convince you to spend more time on

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Facebook is for Facebook to serve up stuff that gets

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 1>a big reaction out of you, so that you comment

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:57.920
<v Speaker 1>on things or you share them. If these posts are

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:00.920
<v Speaker 1>actually ads and you are engaging with them, that's even

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>more valuable for Facebook. And you're also giving Facebook more

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>information about yourself, which makes you easier to advertise to.

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Now a lot of the time this content that gets

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 1>heavily engaged is pretty darn toxic stuff and frequently includes

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>misinformation for the same reasons I was just mentioning in US.

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:25.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, the previous news item. So folks who wanted

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to spread certain messages, like a propaganda campaign, they could

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:33.959
<v Speaker 1>build that into their posting strategy to get more circulation

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of their work. Well, now Facebook is going to take

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>away some of that, making these types of campaigns a

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 1>little less effective. Facebook is likely to show less news

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>content in general, and less political content in particular. Uh.

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:55.679
<v Speaker 1>The company has run numerous tests with focus groups that

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>showed that users really liked it when less of that

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:01.880
<v Speaker 1>stuff was popping up in our news feeds. Now, these

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>changes are likely to roll out gradually, you know, kind

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:08.239
<v Speaker 1>of over a long time frame. It's possible that we

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:12.119
<v Speaker 1>won't even notice the changes happening because they'll happen so gradually.

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 1>But according to Axios, we should expect the Facebook of

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the future to be slightly less political, which I think

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 1>is a good thing. There's a new rule in place

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to combat what the Chinese government says is an addiction

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:30.160
<v Speaker 1>among China's youth. And it's not drugs, it's video games. Yep,

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>they come a long way since pac Man. So the

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Chinese government has ordered online gaming companies to build in

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 1>time restrictions to prevent kids in China from falling into

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the deep void of video game addiction. According to the

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>new rules, anyone under the age of eighteen will have

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 1>their game time restricted to between eight pm and nine pm,

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 1>so one hour a day, and the government issued a

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>warning that the video game companies would need to put

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 1>into place reliable verification processes to make sure kids weren't

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 1>skirting the rule by like using adult ideas to log

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 1>into games to get around the age gating system. The

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:08.679
<v Speaker 1>government says it will increase inspections to these companies to

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>make sure that they are up to code on this stuff.

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:13.639
<v Speaker 1>And while I'm skeptical that the companies are going to

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 1>be able to get around kids who are determined to

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>find ways to circumvent the rules, I can at least

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:23.399
<v Speaker 1>sympathize with this initiative. And that's because games are built

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:26.679
<v Speaker 1>upon a reward system. You play a game, you achieve something,

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:29.880
<v Speaker 1>your brain releases a hormone that says, hey, good job you,

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and you feel nice, or maybe you get really close

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:35.160
<v Speaker 1>to achieving a goal. But the only you fall just short,

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and then your brain either says try again, you can

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:40.479
<v Speaker 1>do it, or if it's like my brain, it's as

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:44.480
<v Speaker 1>stupid game, stupid game, cheats. I hate it. I'll just

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:48.160
<v Speaker 1>play one more turn. Anyway, The whole addiction angle might

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:51.439
<v Speaker 1>be a bit extreme, but there is definitely an element

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 1>of truth to it. Whether this was leading to a

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 1>downfall of Chinese society or not is another matter. I

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 1>suppose and find the mark your calendars for October five,

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:07.119
<v Speaker 1>Windows users, because that's when Windows eleven releases, the newest

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>version of the operating system. It will be a free

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:13.400
<v Speaker 1>upgrade for PCs that are running qualified versions of Windows

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 1>ten and are rated to support Windows eleven. It will

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 1>come standard on new pecs as the official Windows OS

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 1>moving forward. One thing that will not be included, at

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:28.440
<v Speaker 1>least not at launch, is support for Android apps. Microsoft

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:30.919
<v Speaker 1>says that support is coming, but did not give a

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 1>precise date for when that will happen when Microsoft also

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:36.879
<v Speaker 1>has the system to determine when users will get to

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 1>install OS on their machines, So apparently Microsoft is doing

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 1>this on a gradual rollout, and they will prioritize newer systems,

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:48.159
<v Speaker 1>new or more powerful ones and older ones will be

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:51.200
<v Speaker 1>further back in the queue. Honestly, that kind of makes sense.

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>New oss tend to have bigger resource demands, some older

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>systems might not be a great fit for that, and

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like this rollout will be pretty ratual in

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that some systems, like perhaps the oldest ones that can

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 1>still support Windows eleven, will not get the update until

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 1>possibly sometime in the middle of next year. Of course,

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 1>that's not necessarily a bad thing. I often remind myself

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that it's typically wise to wait a little bit before

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 1>jumping on a new operating system or even a new

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:24.879
<v Speaker 1>piece of hardware, because invariably there's going to be issues

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and problems that pop up that need to get worked out,

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and often it's less of a headache to just sit

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:32.919
<v Speaker 1>back and wait a bit for all of that to

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 1>play out, rather than to jump on board early and

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to go through all of those issues in real time.

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I say this to you as much as I say

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>it to myself, yet again, because recently I jumped on

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the Android twelve beta and ran into numerous little issues. Again,

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 1>that was a beta, so it's to be expected. I mean,

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:54.200
<v Speaker 1>that's that's on me these days. I'm back on to

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Android eleven and happy as can be anyway. October, plan

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:04.119
<v Speaker 1>your part ease. Now you know those PC operating system

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:10.159
<v Speaker 1>release parties, they get wild Man. There's punch and that

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 1>wraps up the news for Tuesday, August again. Stay safe,

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 1>stay well, and I will talk to you again really soon.

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Text Stuff is an I Heart Radio production. For more

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from i heeart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app,

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:34.879
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows