WEBVTT - Twitter, China, And Crypto (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Let's get over to

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Dan Ives right now web Bush Securities. He's a managing

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>director there and a senior equity analyst and a bowl. Um,

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess Dan, for you, this must be the perfect

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>time to go in and buy right. We had a

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>big drop on Friday, big drop today? Um are, Is

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 1>there is there ever point at which you're gonna say,

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you know what? This is over for now and let's

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>make Tesla, Apple, Microsoft all neutrals until m until the

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>crash is over. Yeah. Look, the fundamentals dictated change and

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>shift in terms of cloud, cybersecurity, electric vehicles, spending, like

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 1>we've done in many names. Then you turn cautious. But

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>it's like me and you have talked about for for years.

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>We're in the first second inning of what I view

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:17.559
<v Speaker 1>is the fourth in Dushia revolution. So I don't throw

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:21.319
<v Speaker 1>in the towel because of a macro and rates going higher.

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I view it is just a painful digestion period, but

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>not the end of what I view is tex stocks

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>in the long term movement higher. Dan, Here's what I

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>don't understand. You're seeing to have the sensitivity to rates,

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 1>have the sensitivity to simply risk off moves. The heavyweights

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>lead the SMP five hundred to records, they also lead

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:42.839
<v Speaker 1>the sell off and you can see that um really

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>in any of these red days that we see. But

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious if the likes of Apple, Microsoft, Tesla essentially

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>boast this ability to have very strong supply chains that

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>whether a lot of these issues that other companies are having,

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>then where's the problem? Why are these stocks selling off

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>so much? Look, I think you're seeing everyone head for

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:10.079
<v Speaker 1>the elevator at the same time, risk off scary headlines,

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:14.639
<v Speaker 1>reads moving higher in Fleah, So you're seeing the risk

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:16.679
<v Speaker 1>off track all at the same time. And that's why

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I like text doctors over sohow relative to growth that

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I've seen the last six years. And you can't paint

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>a Netflix, a Zoom, a Facebook Slash Meta with the

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>same brush as an Apple Microsoft, cybersecurity and cloud and

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:36.079
<v Speaker 1>it just speaks like that's why this is the most

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:39.239
<v Speaker 1>important earning season probably the last seventy years in terms

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:43.920
<v Speaker 1>of proving that the quote unquote massive slowdown off of

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a cliff is not happening across the board. That's sort

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:50.239
<v Speaker 1>of our thesis here in terms as we go through

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 1>what's really a key week for tech. By the way,

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>you don't cover Twitter that I know of, at least

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I can't see a rating on Twitter. Um, what are

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:02.640
<v Speaker 1>you think about the possibility of Elon must coming in

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:06.359
<v Speaker 1>and purchasing this company. Look, we've taught it's a game

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 1>of highest takes boker, And bottom line is the board

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>was looking at the altar, waiting for a white night,

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>a second bidder. They never came. Then Must details his financing.

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not antics. At that point clock Stock twelve board

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 1>had to go to negotiation table, and that's why it

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:27.639
<v Speaker 1>looks like a deal is going to happen, and it

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>just looked as a public company for dociary. I mean,

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>they ultimately thought that a second bidder would come, and

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I think in the streetside it's very skeptical at first,

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>but now you know, really like a glad path to

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>get the deal done. Dan, speaking of Twitter, and I

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>know it's not your coverage universe, but stick with me here.

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>One of the questions around Twitter when Jack Dorsey wasn't

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>charged was when he also created Square now known as

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Block I believe, and one of the concerns from a

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of investors was it would essentially split his attention.

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>He can't give one enough of his leadership, and that's

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>perhaps why he moved from Twitter to Square now known

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>as Block. You do cover Tesla? Is that a risk

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to Tesla? I think it's to perceive

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the risk and and it is a real risk relative

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to how it does. Must dive and deep end to

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:28.719
<v Speaker 1>the pool with Twitter in terms of Issy a chairman,

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:30.599
<v Speaker 1>because we we've that would be more of the role.

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not gonna be CEO, who have others that would

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:38.479
<v Speaker 1>ultimately as a private company, really try to transform Twitter.

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>But I think it does take attention at a time

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>that we're really going through just such an important time

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>for Tessa in terms of easy the shift among consumers.

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 1>You have the Giga factory build out in Berlin, Austin,

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>you have some of the issues clearly in China, which

0:04:57.120 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>is the hearts and longs, the Tesla story. And that's

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>why long perception you have to sell Pestler's shares is

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:06.719
<v Speaker 1>why the stock down look as a testa holder. Your

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>dream is not for Musque to buy Twitter. It's a negative.

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's why you see that reaction because

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>again the eyes of many you're trading in caviare for

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a pretzel on Broadway descriptive. Yeah, I'm hungry. I like it.

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>But if he stays chairman, I understand. And you know,

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:30.159
<v Speaker 1>we've obviously seen him do a couple of different jobs

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>with much greater success, arguably greater than Jack Dorsey. Right,

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:37.719
<v Speaker 1>SpaceX and Twitter at the same time. Dan, great to

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 1>have you on. Thanks so much for joining us. Dan ives.

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>They are Managing director Senior equity analyst at Wedbush Security,

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Andy Marsh plug Power, speaking of CEO and president of

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 1>plug Power. But it's not it doesn't do what you

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 1>think it does. Andy, I bet you a million people

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>think that you, um, you're all about e V technology,

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>but you're really about hydrogen and fuel cell technology. Right,

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>tell us our outline for us the difference, Well, I

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>think the mayor Hi match great being here. I think

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:18.359
<v Speaker 1>The major difference matter is, and I would separate is

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>it's be these and be these run on batteries or

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 1>as the Corvette as a hybrid unit with batteries and

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 1>there were, and a fuel cell runs on hydrogen and

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>plug power. With our recent deal with walmart's going to

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 1>be generating twenty tons of green hydrogen too for them,

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and a you know, a kilogram is a thousand tons

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>as one ton, and that's about thirty three to one

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:50.599
<v Speaker 1>hours of electricity. So we generate hydrogen, we provide the

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 1>fuel cells which make vehicles run like last mile vehicles

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and Class eight trucks. Yeah, that's another important difference, right

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>not um, you're not gonna be well, who knows what

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>happens and when Corvette comes out fully electric, but for

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>now you're not powering corvettes. You're powering what fork lifts

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>or trucks that get things, not the eighteen wheelers, but

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the final destination trucks. Right With our JB with Renault,

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 1>which is called i DA, we planned it over the

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 1>next four or five years deploy over a hundred thousand

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>vehicles and they will run on duel cells. They will

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>be powered by fuel cells and batteries will be hybridge,

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and that vehicle will be will be provided will be

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>powered by green hydrogen, which is generated by plug power.

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>We're building out five hundred tons of capacity here in

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the United States as well as in Europe with our

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>partner Acciona, which is the largest provider of renewable electricity,

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 1>which will be used to create green hydrogen. So you

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>mentioned your deal with Smart. I'm curious, who's coming next?

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Great question. You know, if you look at our chart

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 1>of customers, it includes people like Amazon, Home Depot and others.

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I would expect that, like any company, we leverage our

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>present relationships to build out our business with new products,

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and today I would think they're probably the prime candidates

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to who comes next? If you have Amazon in Walmart,

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean who else is there that's You've got the

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 1>whole market tied up? Why? Andy? Why you know the

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>stock has been in one sense beloved a darling the company.

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll say, Um, I remember when Matt Winkler put you

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 1>guys in an op ed about the importance of what

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>you do. And on the on the other hand, um,

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 1>it's been a tough run for the stock for shareholders

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>over the last year. You've come down, you know over

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the from the high year down about half. Why do

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 1>you think or what's the market getting wrong? Well, I

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>think that one item I think that's really critical matter

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 1>is that we have a very strong balance sheet. We

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>have over four billion dollars of cash in the bank

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>to build our plan. We won't be going to the market.

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I think then you take on fat top of that

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 1>that there's three advantages to hydrogen. One is that the

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 1>world is committed to producing their CEO two footprint, and

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the folks of Bloomberg believes hydrogeneral of it. The second

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:38.679
<v Speaker 1>item is that you know, we're creating jobs. I've been

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 1>sitting here with Mackenzie today reviewing the job creation that

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>plug Power and us in the hydrogen industry will will produce.

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:49.839
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be significant. And I think the third

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:53.080
<v Speaker 1>item is that hydrogen and fuel cells are critical to

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>national security. We're substitute for natural gas. I think that

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>in the market, opportunities are large. You know, we can

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 1>survive this short term dip in the stock price because

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the prospects long term are extremely positive and we have

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the balance sheet to support it. Balance sheet to support it.

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us a little bit about your cash, your debt.

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>One of the big I think rescuers maybe for lack

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of a better term, when it comes to stock prices

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>right now, is the amount of cushion, the amount of

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:28.719
<v Speaker 1>liquidity a company has talked to us about yours. Yeah,

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, we have over four billion dollars of cash.

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I foresee no need in the mid term to have

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 1>to be going to the market at all for cash.

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>And when I talk mid term, I'm talking three to

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>four years, all right, So very interesting set up there. Um.

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Is hydrogen power fuel cell gonna be used for electric

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 1>corvettes eventually? Does it go beyond I mean not the

0:10:56.800 --> 0:11:00.079
<v Speaker 1>corvette specifically, but Andy, you get my meaning, to to

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:02.839
<v Speaker 1>go beyond the last mile vehicles that you currently power.

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely and I think you know, Plug spend a lot

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>of time looking at Class eight vehicles and just to

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 1>give you a feel, Walmart has about ten thousand Class

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>eight vehicles. Moving to a hydrogen power Class eight vehicles.

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 1>We reduced their carbon output by two three tons per

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 1>year per truck. That's a big number. Is to help

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:30.479
<v Speaker 1>them reach their goal of one giga ton per year reduction.

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>So yes, we'll be there, Andy, Thanks so much. For

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 1>joining US. Andy Marsh there is the CEO and president

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>of Plug Power and UH as we have been discussing.

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>They deal with hydrogen and fuel cell technology. They put,

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:50.079
<v Speaker 1>for example, UM the power into lift trucks for Walmart

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:54.599
<v Speaker 1>and for Amazon and for a number of other big companies.

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>So UM plug Power. The ticker is p L Eugene

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 1>right now is trading at twenty one dollars and nineties

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 1>cents on the NAZ deck. Now let's talk China. I mean,

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:13.439
<v Speaker 1>this is the driver between everything we've seen happen today

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>in equity markets, the fallout in commodities with oil down

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 1>five per cent UM, even the UH fixed income markets.

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, on Friday we were talking about which economists

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:31.959
<v Speaker 1>could predict more rate rises from the Fed, right, I mean,

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>no Mura said fifty basis points now and then seventy

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>seventy five. Everyone else was saying fifty. Um. It was

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 1>like a contest. And now investors are clamoring to buy

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:45.199
<v Speaker 1>ten year debt. I mean, if you think the Fed's

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna raise rates that much, do you want to buy

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>today's paper? Um? I guess you do if you are

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>looking at what's coming out of only if you're freaked

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:58.199
<v Speaker 1>out about the possibility that she Jin Ping is gonna

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>stick to his COVID zero Paul to see the economy

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>be damned. Damien sass Hour joins us now from Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Is that what we're looking at, Damien, Well, look, I

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>mean it's very difficult to kind of think about where

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>US treasury yields are going. I mean, I don't put

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:14.319
<v Speaker 1>any stock and where anyone is saying the dollar or

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 1>treasuries are going to go from here. But look, I

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 1>mean if you just look at where we are relative

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>only a few months ago, I could not model a

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 1>scenario in which you're going to get a positive toll

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to return out of US fixed income. I just couldn't

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>do it. But today, given where yields are, it's definitely

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot more plausible. And so look, if you're looking

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:31.319
<v Speaker 1>for safe havens in a world in which there are none,

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 1>met um U s treasury is the long end of

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the curve is starting to look a little bit appealing.

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm very curious about the mobility data coming out of China.

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 1>This is something that I think a lot of uh

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Chinese strategist or China strategists like yourself, um are are

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>looking at. But what I don't understand is that if

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>you have this mobility data that is really just a

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:57.680
<v Speaker 1>function of COVID lockdowns, what is the read through into

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>exports for China, because that seems to be the ripple

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:02.079
<v Speaker 1>effect for the rest of the world. Well, I mean

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>that you're hitting right on the screws. I mean, I'm cretty.

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you want to talk about export data,

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:07.839
<v Speaker 1>this is the real reason that you want has come off.

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>It's because of the move in the Japanese yen, right,

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:12.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we saw the Japanese yen has gotten absolutely

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 1>crushed this month. And what that does is it makes

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:17.319
<v Speaker 1>Japanese exports that's that much more attractive relative to Asian

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>peers like South Korea, like China, and certainly our friends

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>in Beijing took stock of this. And look, I mean

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty three big figure move on a dollar u on

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 1>just this month. I mean that is a very very

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>big move. And this is an economy where they have

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>made it an absolute mandate to keep the volatility of

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>dollar yuan to to a minimum. And look they're they're

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>they're basically repricing it, They're basically rerating it. And look

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>this is nothing new for China watchers, It's nothing new

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>for emergeny market investors. This happens once every what three

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>or five years, and you know, on the back of

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>it you see something like China high yield debt basically

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>lose fifty percent of its value, which we have, or

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the equity market lose of its value year to date. Look,

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 1>you have to you have to weather that storm. This

0:14:58.560 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>is just the way it is when you're investing in

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and A. But look, if you are looking at the

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>technicals and I hate to look at technicals and and

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 1>use that as a as as a sort of a

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>written with which to invest, I mean, you look at

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>margin lending, it's it's it's at a very low level.

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 1>If you look at um, if you look at liquidity levels,

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean they're they're they're they're starting to improve.

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 1>So you know, you're starting to see you know, some

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 1>people kind of bottom feeding into Chinese equities. But for me,

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, the risk is just not there. I mean,

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>despite the light investor positioning, I mean, there's just so

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 1>much risk behind it. And given what's going on here

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>with the A d R listings in the US and

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the fact that many of then me get you know,

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 1>pushed out to Hong Kong. It's just not a recipe

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>for success of them. I mean I read in a

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg story a couple of hours ago that in Shanghai

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 1>workers in hasmat suits fanning out over the weekend to

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>install steal fences around buildings with positive COVID cases. Well,

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>what's the imagery to me is shocking. But my question

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>is how does the PBOC react, you know, how does

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the um fiscal stimulus piece uh coming sort of balance

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>that on the teeter totter of COVID zero versus economic growth. Well,

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 1>China has been very successful with the total social financing

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and injecting fiscal stimulus into the economy and doing it

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>in the right way. But you're absolutely right this economy,

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, investors have been waiting waiting for Godot I guess,

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>waiting for the PBOC to come in and start cutting

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>rates and for me, you know, what they have not

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>been able to achieve is, you know, to really get

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 1>in front of the curve, to really show that the

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>monetary support is sufficient to offset the GDP decline. So

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 1>what are we calling for, as we were calling for

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>last year, We're calling for more triple our cuts. I

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>think we're calling for something on the order of seventy

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 1>five BIPs of cuts this year. We're also calling for

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 1>another thirty BIPs of cuts to the medium to lending,

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the medium term lending facility. This is all good, but

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly it just doesn't look like it's going to be enough.

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 1>And if you just look at the reserves in China

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>three point one three point two trillion, it's they've got

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>tons of cushion there. One would think that they'd rather

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>not dip into that in order to supplement the economy,

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>that they'd rather you know, in age and monetary easing

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>in order to do it. But look, the verdict is

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 1>still at right now you've got China U S yield

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>differentials in verted. You should not see that. It's something

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>we rarely see. It's obviously being driven by US treasury

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>yields on one hand, but rest assured you know the

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 1>dollar you on cross rate follows that. Very few I

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:19.119
<v Speaker 1>think that bounces back by the way I do. I

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:21.400
<v Speaker 1>absolutely do. I think if if it's right now, basically

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>ideas you can get more buying US tenure treasuries than

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you can buying ten year debt in China, I think

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that China's hand is being forced here by

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:30.919
<v Speaker 1>the market. I think they're going to have to slash

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>rates in order to protect their economy. I mean, look,

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>you know it's a very different economy, right, and so

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>you know it remains to be seen. But if you

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 1>just look at all the health care signs, you look

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>at the entre offshore are China un basis where at

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 1>three hundred bits, that's like a two and two and

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:47.239
<v Speaker 1>a half standard deviation move or something like that. If

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:50.640
<v Speaker 1>you look at one month delta risk reversals on dollar

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>you on, I mean they are screaming of dollar call buying.

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, you've got Cinepeg, You've got PetroChina. You know

0:17:56.359 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 1>their big energy exporters all uh purchase protection against the

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 1>rising dollars. So you know, the concern is there, and

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 1>I think Beijing is finally getting the getting the hints hopefully, Damien.

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:09.199
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for joining us, Damian Sassaur. They're from

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. By the way, dropping a pop culture reference.

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>You can't do that with Critty. She's only what have

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>you seen waiting for good? But to class she hasn't

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:27.360
<v Speaker 1>seen Armageddon and she hasn't seen waiting for good. Have confused? Confused?

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:30.479
<v Speaker 1>Know what you're from Texas? That has nothing to do

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:31.920
<v Speaker 1>with it. You know what I've seen top gun and

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that's all that matters. Point, fair point, Damian, Thanks so

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. We had so much to talk

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 1>about with Shinali Bastik. I was thinking about you this

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>weekend because well I read your story The Mooch, which

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I loved, and then the plot can saga continues unbelievable.

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>If you don't know Gabe plotting is the I guess

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:03.360
<v Speaker 1>he is considered like genius hedge fund manager who ran

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:07.159
<v Speaker 1>Melvin Capital and got destroyed by Wall Street bets and

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the kind of uh bro vests on Reddit, and now

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>he came out with the He had the gall last

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 1>week to come out and say, you know what, I'm

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna start charging my investors more. Yeah, is that right? Basically,

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:24.640
<v Speaker 1>so he was going to reboot his fund and now

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 1>he's going back to the drawing board. He apologized. He

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.239
<v Speaker 1>said he we hear the phrase reboot a lot, but

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:32.479
<v Speaker 1>all I was reading was two and twenty. Yeah. Yeah,

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's the thing. You can't just reboot by

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:38.199
<v Speaker 1>pretending everything else didn't happen in the past. That that is,

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>if I had to draw this down to one line,

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>it's that. And the reason I wanted to kind of

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:46.200
<v Speaker 1>draw these stories together is that actually Anthony Scaramucci's firm,

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Skybridge was an investor in Melvin Capital. So yeah, really

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that's cool. So yeah, well that's the thing. These companies

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 1>are very intertwined. And when it comes to Gay plot again,

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 1>he's the next generation of fund managers, right, it's him,

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>It's stand sometime, it's all of these younger stars that

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 1>are hitting their first big sets of issues. And if

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 1>you look at Gay Platkin, he got caught up last

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:10.400
<v Speaker 1>year in that Reddit saga in the short squeeze, then

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>this year in the market draw downs, a lot of

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>pain among him and his peers. By the way, I

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 1>take back the term bro investors. That was not fair.

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of good bros in the world,

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and I don't mean to to to smear their good

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 1>name with bets. Well here's the problem. But the mooch

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:36.199
<v Speaker 1>fits I mean, right, well, here's the thing. I mean,

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>there's some bros involved, yes, of course, but however, a

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of these are you know, privy fund funds that

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>are privy to big institutional investors that are very unbrolike

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 1>and in fact don't love the bro behavior. So it

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>is definitely like this idea that you know, I'll even

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 1>read from our story Sussex Partners selects hedge funds on

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>behalf of clients big institutional investors. He they set told

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:02.679
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg that resetting high watermarks at new higher levels, it

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>ain't gonna cut it right, So you can't just start

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 1>over here after after some batt It's not hard for

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:12.439
<v Speaker 1>me to believe that Scaramucci and Melvin are in bed together.

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I was shocked that when I first heard, I think

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago, that Assault was going to

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:21.199
<v Speaker 1>go down to the Bahamas and hang out with my

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>boy Sam Bankman Freed. These two people don't seem like

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 1>peas in a pod, right, Anthony Scaramucci, who worked for

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump for eleven days, he was too Trump to

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>stay with the Trump administration. He's getting together the opposite.

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:46.159
<v Speaker 1>Actually super genius with this incredible like m I T Havenford, Loss,

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Sand Bankman Freed and by the way, liberal Biden donor,

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 1>they's hanging out with the Mouci Yeah, this is interesting.

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's you know, because Anthony Scaramucci had

0:21:57.560 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>spent some time in the Trump White House. There's this

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:02.439
<v Speaker 1>concept that he is, you know, trumpy, I guess. But

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 1>the thing is, now, in addition to setting up this

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 1>new conference, you know, we know Sam Bank from Freed

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 1>is a huge Democratic donor and a huge donor to politics.

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:13.119
<v Speaker 1>We know that Anthony Scaramucci actually is part of a

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>pack that's actually donating money or contributing money to both

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Democrats and Republicans. I guess they all they all pay

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>off politicians on both sides of the Aisland. The idea

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 1>here that they have is to really contribute to especially

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Democratic politicians who are pro crypto. They think it's going

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 1>to be a single issue vote into the midterms, into

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the next set of elections. So you know, yes, they

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:39.440
<v Speaker 1>have their pack that's on the side. But in addition

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to that, this week they were going to have a

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 1>thousand people. Now it's closer to two thousand people heading

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>down to the Bahamas in order to talk about crypto,

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 1>pump up the crypto industry and really get more people

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 1>excited about crypto. As Skybridge. By the way, he told

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:57.160
<v Speaker 1>me Anthony told me that Skybridge has really been gaining

0:22:57.160 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 1>from cryptocurrencies as some of these other hedge funds don't

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 1>do as well. They bought bitcoin at they're better than fire?

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Are you going to fight? What not to fire that already?

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Are you are not? Going? So my furious because I'm

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>going to milk in next week and so that there's

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of conferences going on. You've got to wonder

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:23.640
<v Speaker 1>how long this goes on for. Remember, people are still

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:25.959
<v Speaker 1>worried about COVID. I'm checking to see if I need

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:29.439
<v Speaker 1>to good test which people are still worried about COVID investors,

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:32.159
<v Speaker 1>anybody that's meeting up in large groups right now? A

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are. And by the way, have you

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>guys tried to get an uber in New York? It's

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>like seventy bucks to get forty blocks. So it is,

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, hard to get around because people are meeting

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 1>in mass and you know, next week it's time to

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 1>do that little COVID check to see how many people

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 1>went to these confermes. You're going to milk in. You

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty you just went to this oil conference that I

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 1>loved you at. What was that did a month ago?

0:23:56.800 --> 0:24:00.959
<v Speaker 1>Sara week Sarah week. What's your next conference? Uh? TVD

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the powers that you have not told me. I'll be.

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 1>But do we not have anyone going to the Bahamas?

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. So no, no, But you know, frankly, like,

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing, my this is, this is a Twitter

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:18.120
<v Speaker 1>People communicate of course through Twitter messages, and so my

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 1>my Twitter message inbox is chock full of everyone who's

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:24.439
<v Speaker 1>in the Bahamas. So I do feel like I'm getting by.

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll go, I'll be not the Tan. You should go.

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>You have a crypto show tomorrow? Yeah, and what when

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 1>does this conference kick off tomorrow? Oh? So maybe I'll

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:37.119
<v Speaker 1>just fly in after your show, my show. Um, if

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 1>anybody out there is listening with a private jet and

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 1>you're on your way feeling a little generous, is it?

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:47.959
<v Speaker 1>Are we? Are we going to hit a crypto winter here?

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean we're off what we were off another three

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>percent this morning. Now, it's a great question. There's a

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 1>lot of questions about at the Lunar Project and the

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:57.680
<v Speaker 1>buying of cryptocurrencies. There's a lot of questions around what

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:00.200
<v Speaker 1>is the next leg, you know, what's going to push

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>crypto actually higher. There was so much adoption last year

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 1>people are really excited about the Lightning network. We're talking

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:09.920
<v Speaker 1>to Jack Maller's later today of strike. That's a big form.

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 1>You know, if I told you that payments volumes surpassed

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Visa on the bitcoin network last year, you don't see

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 1>it in the price today. And so I just you

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 1>just reminded me about. Um. What I loved about your

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>interview with Scaramucci is he pointed out that he was

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 1>in a meeting like forever ago in Washington, d C.

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>With somebody from Treasury who was like, we should think

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:37.639
<v Speaker 1>about doing the digital dollar, and he was like how

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and they said, put it on the blockchain and he

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>was like, oh oh, that a wake up call for him.

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 1>And I thought that was just a brilliant little blurb

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:50.159
<v Speaker 1>from that from that story, So I recommend uh you

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 1>all always read Shnali's reporting. Do you have a newsletter

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I do every Friday? And how do we subscribe to that?

0:25:57.760 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe on the terminal and you can also

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>subscribe on my LinkedIn and you can just email me

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll put you on the letter. All right, Very cool,

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 1>many many options, Very very cool. All right. Snollie Bassett

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>covers Wall Street for US. Thanks for listening to the

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets podcast, you can subscribe and listen to interviews

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>of Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller three. Put

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>on fall Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney Before

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Radio