Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunt. Russian meddling in our elections. Oh,
Speaker 1: looks like there's at least one case, but the Feds
Speaker 1: are calling out for the mid terms. We're talking about that,
Speaker 1: plus the other countries Russia, China and Iran that have
Speaker 1: tried to intervene as well. Plus what's going on with
Speaker 1: the caravan on the way to the border and the
Speaker 1: Democrats mobs continue to hound Republicans. That and more coming
Speaker 1: up on The Buck Sexton Show. This is the Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show where the mission or mission is to decode
Speaker 1: what really matters with actionable intelligence, manor mistake American, You're
Speaker 1: a great American Again. The Buck Sexton Show begins the
Speaker 1: other shameful acts, including what they're doing to our border
Speaker 1: by saying, we're not going to give you the laws
Speaker 1: that you need to protect our country, but we're taking
Speaker 1: it and we're doing it, and we have great things happening.
Speaker 1: This will be an election of Kavanaugh, the caravan, law
Speaker 1: and order, and common sense. There you're having, folks. Welcome
Speaker 1: to the Buck sex and Show. President Trump laying out
Speaker 1: what the stakes are and what the main issues are,
Speaker 1: what you should be aware of going into this mid term. Gosh,
Speaker 1: we're really getting into the final countdown here. It is
Speaker 1: getting closer than we had anticipated, isn't it. It's happening
Speaker 1: faster than well, it feels like faster every year. I
Speaker 1: guess I'm getting older. The common sense, Kavanaugh, the Wall mobs.
Speaker 1: This is what it all comes down to. What did
Speaker 1: the Democrats offer better governance, better ideas? No, better behavior?
Speaker 1: Definitely not. Trump knows that if he can just get
Speaker 1: Americans to pay attention to what's going on and not
Speaker 1: believe the narratives that they are being spoon fed by
Speaker 1: an insanely and maniacally anti Trump media, that will be
Speaker 1: in very good shape for these mid terms. But I
Speaker 1: feel like that, you know, there's a part of you
Speaker 1: that can't help. But say, I told yourself with this
Speaker 1: and and here we are with this one, and I
Speaker 1: know I shouldn't do that. Time we say bark, don't
Speaker 1: say that. But trust me in this case, in this case,
Speaker 1: it has deserved. One of the overlooked side effects of
Speaker 1: the insatiable media frenzy around Russia, collusion and all that
Speaker 1: is that now they don't have to even be a
Speaker 1: foreign adversary, doesn't even have to be particularly good at
Speaker 1: intervening in the election. They can actually undermine democracy, because
Speaker 1: that's what the Democrats say has happened. They can do
Speaker 1: that merely by doing anything, and it will call the
Speaker 1: election at some level the results into doubt, because whichever
Speaker 1: side loses now can point and we know the Democrats
Speaker 1: will do this over and over again. They can point
Speaker 1: and say, oh see, it was a close election, but
Speaker 1: it was because of those Facebook memes. It was because
Speaker 1: of the Russians spending a couple of million dollars on
Speaker 1: Facebook that my side didn't win, and that, in Putin
Speaker 1: and his oligarch's wildest dreams, there was absolutely no way
Speaker 1: they could have ever anticipated that whatever the success was
Speaker 1: that they had in the meddling the first time around,
Speaker 1: would be so repeatable and so easily achievable once again,
Speaker 1: because all you have to do is do any meddling,
Speaker 1: and you feed into this frenzy, this hysteria around it. Right.
Speaker 1: I mean, if you get ten Russians to start posting
Speaker 1: some memes on Facebook and then they write a little
Speaker 1: stuff in cyrillic and they say, oh gosh, you know,
Speaker 1: we're gonna really do everything we can to mess up
Speaker 1: the U S election. You're gonna have some media outlets
Speaker 1: that act like this is the bombing of Pearl Harbor
Speaker 1: all over again. They're gonna act like this is a
Speaker 1: tremendous threat to democracy. Um. And that's why when you
Speaker 1: look at this latest charge here, this is going to
Speaker 1: be they're gonna make a much bigger deal of this.
Speaker 1: This just came out today. They're gonna make a much
Speaker 1: bigger deal of this than uh, than they should. And
Speaker 1: it's because of all these political reasons. Quote. Federal prosecutors,
Speaker 1: it's in the Wall Street Journal today have charged a
Speaker 1: Russian national with conspiring to influence next month's midterm elections,
Speaker 1: according to a criminal complaint unsealed Friday, the first known
Speaker 1: case involving the November race. The Justice Department described Elena
Speaker 1: alex Avna, who's yea yeay Nova, who's yea yea nova. Wow,
Speaker 1: that's not an easy one of St. Petersburg, Russia, as
Speaker 1: the chief accountant of an effort funded by a Russian
Speaker 1: oligarch and two companies he controls, including a Russian company
Speaker 1: that's been indicted by Special Counsel Robert Mueller. Before the
Speaker 1: complaint was unsealed Friday, US intelligence agencies had to expressed
Speaker 1: concern over election interference, citing Russian, China, Chinese, and Iranian
Speaker 1: countries trying to interfere. They added that no evidence that
Speaker 1: voting or vote counts were affected. State and local governments
Speaker 1: prevented the attempts. Okay, what I've been saying along is
Speaker 1: it Now, if you're a foreign government that really doesn't
Speaker 1: like us, all you have to do is meddal a
Speaker 1: tiny little bit, just a just a little bit of meddling,
Speaker 1: and you get this greatly magnified effect. Because the media
Speaker 1: wants an excuse, Democrat Party wants an excuse for why
Speaker 1: Hillary lost. They got it with the whole Russian meddling nonsense.
Speaker 1: But now that they've convinced a lot of Americans that
Speaker 1: already one election was changed because of this, this can
Speaker 1: This is highly repeatable. You can do this over and over.
Speaker 1: It's not that difficult, and you don't have to be
Speaker 1: six sessful. Right, Because they took all context out of
Speaker 1: the discussion, it was no longer did they change votes?
Speaker 1: Did this actually shift the election in any particular state
Speaker 1: or in any meaningful way, or was this just throwing
Speaker 1: out there some memes and some fake Facebook stuff, and
Speaker 1: that shifted perception. You can never really gauge how much
Speaker 1: impact that shift had, but it did something, and something
Speaker 1: means that you can always say the election was tainted.
Speaker 1: Now Russia, China, Iran, any country doesn't even have to
Speaker 1: be sophisticated. They have the ability two with a minimum
Speaker 1: of any financial outlay, with a minimum of anything from
Speaker 1: their end, they can affect the outcome of an election. Right,
Speaker 1: they can change how much trust we have in electric process.
Speaker 1: And if you're looking to undermine democracy, the great irony
Speaker 1: here is that because the left and the Democrats hyper
Speaker 1: ventilated so much about the last Russian interference campaign, everyone
Speaker 1: that comes after this is likely to be it greatly
Speaker 1: exaggerated in the minds of a lot of people. And
Speaker 1: now whenever and whenever one side of the political aisle loses,
Speaker 1: there will be at least some faction within it that
Speaker 1: can say, see tainted election. You know this, this election
Speaker 1: was marred by outside efforts to try to change things.
Speaker 1: So and I would also note that the Russians and
Speaker 1: the Chinese, maybe even the Iranians, they're gonna get more
Speaker 1: sophisticated doing this too. They're not going to just stop
Speaker 1: at these relatively minor and innocuous Facebook campaigns. Uh. Some
Speaker 1: of the other things that I've been going on, they're
Speaker 1: going to get more advanced. But back to this, this
Speaker 1: federal complaint that just came out today. Uh, this is
Speaker 1: what it says in this journal piece. Ms Kuzya Nova. Sorry,
Speaker 1: I don't know how you say that. Kusia Nova managed
Speaker 1: the effort called Project Lakta, which targeted the U S
Speaker 1: election and worked a total operating budget of more than
Speaker 1: thirty five million dollars between January sixteen and June. The
Speaker 1: complaints said ms k I'll call her played a key
Speaker 1: role in what Project Lott described this information warfare against
Speaker 1: the United States. Information warfare is a pretty strong way
Speaker 1: of saying getting them to try to vote for one
Speaker 1: side of the political aisle or the other. Um. Remember,
Speaker 1: they're not trying to convince us to have a bloody
Speaker 1: revolution in the streets. They're trying to convince people to
Speaker 1: either vote for dram or vote for Hillary, or vote
Speaker 1: for whomever. UM. But I just think that we've lost
Speaker 1: we've lost so much of the ability to contextualize this
Speaker 1: and understand what really matters, what's really important, and what's
Speaker 1: not UM. They're they're getting way ahead of their skis
Speaker 1: on this one. So we've gotten out. Now we've got
Speaker 1: d o J charges about rush interference the midterms. Who
Speaker 1: wants to guess whether the Democrats are gonna wait and
Speaker 1: see how they do in the midterm before making a
Speaker 1: big deal of this all of a sudden, they're gonna
Speaker 1: unearth a lot more. There's gonna be so much more
Speaker 1: reporting on this one based on who wins or who doesn't.
Speaker 1: So we'll stay on this. I also want to talk
Speaker 1: to you about the mob mobs on the streets and
Speaker 1: the massive caravan of people heading for the border. We'll
Speaker 1: discuss this and team oh so much more. Uh, we've
Speaker 1: a bit of a freestyle Friday and effect here. Get
Speaker 1: a great way to kick off your weekend. We'll be
Speaker 1: right back. I am a coffee drinker, through and through
Speaker 1: team every day. It's how I get my day started,
Speaker 1: and it's how I pushed through the day multiple cups.
Speaker 1: And it's not something that I think has to go
Speaker 1: along with left wing politics. Okay, I'm sick of these
Speaker 1: comic coffee companies telling me that I need to kneel
Speaker 1: during the anthem or I need to worry about a
Speaker 1: bathroom policy, any of this other crap. How about just
Speaker 1: delicious coffee brought to you by veterans of the United
Speaker 1: States Armed Forces. That's what I drink every day, Black
Speaker 1: Rifle Coffee. Black Rifle Coffee was founded by former Special
Speaker 1: Operations vets and it is roast to order delicious coffee
Speaker 1: that can be delivered right to your door. This guarantees
Speaker 1: you're getting fresh, premium coffee with every order. No more lines,
Speaker 1: no more rushing to the check out, none of that stuff. Okay,
Speaker 1: Black Rifle makes a hell of a cup of coffee.
Speaker 1: Try for yourself. I'm making converts at my office left
Speaker 1: and right. Visit Black Rifle Coffee dot com, slash buck
Speaker 1: and receive fifteen percent off your order. That's Black Rifle
Speaker 1: Coffee dot com, slash buck for fifteen percent off Black
Speaker 1: Rifle Coffee dot com. Slash Buck. Mexico also issued a
Speaker 1: very clear statement saying if somebody is seeking asylum, Mexico
Speaker 1: is there along now with the u N to look
Speaker 1: at those claims. We want to make sure that those
Speaker 1: claims are legitimate. Make the track across Mexican. It's it's
Speaker 1: not in the interests of anybody to have those people
Speaker 1: make that trip. They're frequently tricked by, you know, humans,
Speaker 1: smuggling organizations. We have evidence that this caravan is also
Speaker 1: very much politically motivated. Evidence that the caravan is politically motivated.
Speaker 1: What exactly does he mean there? What is the what
Speaker 1: are the specifics? That was Geronimo Gutierrez, who's the Mexico,
Speaker 1: Mexico's ambassador to the u n UM. There's definitely a
Speaker 1: lot of people that are working with us. I actually
Speaker 1: spoke to some progressives because you know, I'm in the swamp.
Speaker 1: I know a lot of Democrats, and there are international
Speaker 1: organizations that are assisting these people along the way with
Speaker 1: this caravan route. They're definitely doing everything that they can
Speaker 1: two push them along and make sure that they make
Speaker 1: the full truck, make the full journey. There's some problems
Speaker 1: with this whole thing. First of all, it is very
Speaker 1: dangerous to do this. It is very dangerous for especially
Speaker 1: women and children to be traveling in this way, along
Speaker 1: this distance. They are going to be moved through drug
Speaker 1: cartel controlled territory. Many of them, I am sure, will
Speaker 1: be preyed upon by the cartels. They'll try to get
Speaker 1: them to carry drugs across You know, people say, oh, buck,
Speaker 1: but that's who would do that. If the cartels can
Speaker 1: grab some of you and you know, either offer you
Speaker 1: a lot of money or tell you that you know
Speaker 1: they will do terrible things to you. Unless you take
Speaker 1: drugs across the border, you might well do that. So
Speaker 1: it puts them in a dangerous situation. It's not safe
Speaker 1: to be doing this. I know that people say there's
Speaker 1: greater safety in numbers, and that's why this caravan is happening.
Speaker 1: But it's not safe. But on this issue of even
Speaker 1: claiming asylum, if you are an asylum seeker, then you
Speaker 1: tend to go and claim asylum in the first country
Speaker 1: you can where you realistically have a shot of staying
Speaker 1: and being safe. They're passing through Mexico on the way
Speaker 1: to the United States. What what does the Mexican government
Speaker 1: think of this whole thing? Why can't a large number,
Speaker 1: if not all, of these people, if Honduras is so
Speaker 1: dangerous that they can't they can't bear to go back
Speaker 1: to their home country. Why doesn't the Mexican government take
Speaker 1: them in. Why doesn't the Mexican government do more to
Speaker 1: make them feel safe and at home there? Remember we're
Speaker 1: talking about culturally, linguistically very similar countries, very similar and
Speaker 1: right next to each other. And you know, one thing
Speaker 1: that always stuck out to me when I was at
Speaker 1: the Syrian refugee camps on the Jordanian Syrian border was
Speaker 1: that every Syrian that I spoke to through a translator
Speaker 1: UH claim that they they were happy that they were safe,
Speaker 1: but they didn't want to go back home. They didn't
Speaker 1: want to abandon their country forever. They just wanted to
Speaker 1: not get killed while the war was raging, and then
Speaker 1: they wanted to return if they could. That was what
Speaker 1: I was told over and over again. Um. But what
Speaker 1: you see here with with a lot of these people
Speaker 1: who were making their way with this caravan of of
Speaker 1: immigrants through Mexico to the US border are people who
Speaker 1: they want to be in America. Now there's a part
Speaker 1: of me that says, yeah, I get it, right. Of course,
Speaker 1: people want to be in America, the greatest country on
Speaker 1: the face of the earth. But you know it shouldn't be.
Speaker 1: My country is uh, is not so great. So I'm
Speaker 1: going to claim that I'm under imminent threat of violence
Speaker 1: so that I get to go to the best country
Speaker 1: right away. If it were really about asylum. I mean
Speaker 1: you saw this with the migrants leaving the Mid East
Speaker 1: and going across Europe too. They didn't want to stop
Speaker 1: in Hungary, they didn't want to stop in you know,
Speaker 1: in Poland they wanted to or they didn't want to
Speaker 1: stop in Greece. I mean, that's really where they end
Speaker 1: up first when they crossed over from Turkey. UH. They
Speaker 1: want to get all the way up to either Germany
Speaker 1: or Sweden or one of those very robust economically UH
Speaker 1: and very friendly to refugees, UH, northern and Central European countries.
Speaker 1: That's what That's what the whole plan was. It wasn't
Speaker 1: just to get to a place where they were safe
Speaker 1: and not under imminent threat of of death. It was
Speaker 1: get to the place where you have to look the
Speaker 1: most generous welfare state, the greatest you know, economic assistance
Speaker 1: from from those that are either the n g o S,
Speaker 1: they're they're also the government. But there's a lot of
Speaker 1: things about this caravan that you're not being told and
Speaker 1: that you won't be told. I do not think that
Speaker 1: this was in any way a coincidence that this the
Speaker 1: largest yet, the largest caravan yet is on it square
Speaker 1: to the border. I think that they're trying to return
Speaker 1: the issue. They're trying to return to the issues that
Speaker 1: they think they were doing well on the left isn't international.
Speaker 1: These sorrows funded organizations are international. That's just the fact.
Speaker 1: People can get mad about. It's just a fact. And
Speaker 1: they recognize that they need some momentum other than just
Speaker 1: yelling about how Trump is a racist and a sexist
Speaker 1: and a massogist and all this. They need to create
Speaker 1: something beyond that, and this showdown at the border. I
Speaker 1: believe the left thinks is favorable for its political interests.
Speaker 1: I think that they in their minds, this will give
Speaker 1: them an opportunity to energize their base and create something
Speaker 1: that could give them the last push they need to
Speaker 1: at least take the House in the in the midterms.
Speaker 1: But think about what the long term incentives of this are.
Speaker 1: If we take this caravan, If this caravan is brought
Speaker 1: in the United States, let's say it's four thousand people,
Speaker 1: why don't the next four thousand people to say, yeah,
Speaker 1: we're gonna show up too, and the next four thousand people, yeah,
Speaker 1: we're gonna show up too. At what point do you
Speaker 1: realize you no longer have a legal immigration system worthy
Speaker 1: of the name. You just have a country that is porous,
Speaker 1: and you just to find a way to get into
Speaker 1: one of those one of those holes, get into one
Speaker 1: of those ways through the apparatus that's supposed to protect
Speaker 1: our borders, and end up in the United States for good.
Speaker 1: So much dishonesty on this issue from the left, it
Speaker 1: really drives me absolutely insane. You know that they're never
Speaker 1: forced to answer the question who shouldn't be allowed to stay?
Speaker 1: If you show up and you look like you're sad
Speaker 1: and hired and and hungry and needy from a country
Speaker 1: that's in bad shape. And I'm not saying, you know
Speaker 1: that's all, that's all very valid, But if you show
Speaker 1: from one of those countries, do you just automatically get
Speaker 1: to stay, Because then we've got a few hundred million
Speaker 1: people that I think really deserve to be in America
Speaker 1: right away. And Democrats won't admit this, but they're unwilling
Speaker 1: to tell all those people you do not get to
Speaker 1: stay in this country. Um. But there's been a confrontation
Speaker 1: on the on the border. This is a from USA today.
Speaker 1: A caravan of US bound migrants broke down a border
Speaker 1: crossing Friday and streamed onto a bridge on mexico southern
Speaker 1: border with Guatemala in the face of a heavy presence
Speaker 1: of Mexican and Guatemalan law enforcement officers. According to media reports,
Speaker 1: the travelers up to four thousand people, mostly from Honduras.
Speaker 1: We're stopped on the river crossing by the US based
Speaker 1: Spanish language network Telemundo. Some members of the caravan became
Speaker 1: so desperate they jumped from the bridge, trying to grab
Speaker 1: on to the makeshift wraps other migrants were using to
Speaker 1: cross the river New Mexico. Unbelievable site on the Mexican border,
Speaker 1: tear gas rocks being thrown. Caravan wants to enter. Not
Speaker 1: able to right now? We did. Telemundo anchor Jose Diaz
Speaker 1: balart Uh, the network, which has reporters traveling with the caravan,
Speaker 1: showed Mexican police line up along the fence, holding it
Speaker 1: up against the waves of migrants trying to push past.
Speaker 1: I mean, this this is look, this is a mob.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is a mob, but we can call
Speaker 1: it whatever. The people that are needy, that are hungry,
Speaker 1: that you know, I want to be in America, I
Speaker 1: get that, but this is a massive people, and they're
Speaker 1: trying to overwhelm the border. That's what this is. We
Speaker 1: cannot process them all, we cannot deal with them all.
Speaker 1: They know this, and so they show up and this
Speaker 1: is really using our humanitarian impulses in this country against us. UM.
Speaker 1: That's um. You know, you either believe in sovereignty, you
Speaker 1: believe in law and order, or you don't. And I
Speaker 1: know it's so easy to say just taking everybody, but
Speaker 1: just remember that as you look at what's going on
Speaker 1: in a lot of communities that have had tremendous financial
Speaker 1: strain put on them by the resettlement of illegal immigrants
Speaker 1: by refugees, that's just going to keep getting to be
Speaker 1: greater and greater. It's a function of mathematics, folks. You
Speaker 1: cannot have open borders in a welfare state, and we
Speaker 1: have a very big welfare state and something very very
Speaker 1: close to open borders. What's Trump gonna do about this?
Speaker 1: That is a huge question right now, and there's a
Speaker 1: huge question that we will tackle together in just a
Speaker 1: couple of minutes coming up your team, UM, So stay
Speaker 1: right there, stay with me. The g oop argument on
Speaker 1: immigration isn't one that's optimism based. It's fear based. This
Speaker 1: is a scare tactic, right, This is the president. This
Speaker 1: immigration is a scare tactic he's using to wrap up
Speaker 1: his supporters. When you talk about caravan, you're talking about
Speaker 1: white anxiety. You're talking about old white man angst. And
Speaker 1: so when they bring up the caravan, that's all we
Speaker 1: need to do is to bring up the pictures of
Speaker 1: children being separated from their families. So there, there, you
Speaker 1: have a selection of what they're gonna say. This is
Speaker 1: gonna be one of the biggest issues in the in
Speaker 1: the midterm election right now, I think, or one of
Speaker 1: the biggest news items I should say that could affect
Speaker 1: them in terms. And that's all by design. But you'll
Speaker 1: notice they say things like Trump just stokes fear about this.
Speaker 1: It's all about Trump stoking fear and fear of people
Speaker 1: from the South, fear of fear of brown people. They
Speaker 1: will say, you know anyone who's non white that they
Speaker 1: say all the same things all the time. What is
Speaker 1: the Democrats solution to this? I mean, that's somehow we
Speaker 1: never get to that question. We never get to pose that,
Speaker 1: we never get to hear what the answer is. What
Speaker 1: we hear a lot of flowery rhetoric, a lot of oh,
Speaker 1: but you know, what we need is what we need
Speaker 1: is comprehensive immigration reform. Right, what we need is an
Speaker 1: immigration system that works. The immigration system is broken, they say,
Speaker 1: all that stuff, What does that mean? What does it mean?
Speaker 1: How do you fix it other than amnesty? Do they
Speaker 1: want the border to continue being as it is? Okay,
Speaker 1: let's not even get into it as something this uh,
Speaker 1: you know, open ended and wide spread. Let's let's take
Speaker 1: it at the very straightforward level of what do democrats
Speaker 1: want when it comes to this caravan of people? What
Speaker 1: is their plan? Should the United States government say, okay,
Speaker 1: four thousand people who are just going to show up
Speaker 1: in a mass at the border should be allowed to
Speaker 1: stay in the country. We should just bring them in.
Speaker 1: Let's I think that is what they're they gonna say, Oh,
Speaker 1: that's the process for a sound. They're all from Honduras.
Speaker 1: From what we know, they're gonna say, you know, we're
Speaker 1: Honduras is very violent. We don't want to go back.
Speaker 1: We just want to be in America. Okay, And you say,
Speaker 1: all right, buck, well, you know we've got room for
Speaker 1: four thousand more people. Yes, of course, right, We've got
Speaker 1: room for When you say room, what does that really mean? Yeah,
Speaker 1: we've got the space. Obviously, we've got a lot of
Speaker 1: open space this country. But people need resources and they have,
Speaker 1: you know, they want they want political representation, and they
Speaker 1: it's it's not just to be in a place, it's
Speaker 1: also to be supported in that place. You say, okay, buck,
Speaker 1: we got obviously we're very wealthy country. We've got enough
Speaker 1: for four thousand people. Okay, fine, what about the next
Speaker 1: ten thousand? Oh no, that that that's not no. I
Speaker 1: would want to ask Democrat members of Congress, ask Democrats senators,
Speaker 1: what do we do when the next gang that shows
Speaker 1: up is I don't mean gang isn't like gangbangers, but
Speaker 1: you know what I mean? The next group, the next
Speaker 1: massive people. They call it a caravan, Right, this is
Speaker 1: the tournament they try to use. What do we do
Speaker 1: in the next caravan shows up of of ten thousand people? Okay,
Speaker 1: we're gonna let we gotta let them in. Do we
Speaker 1: let in the next ten caravans of ten thousand people each?
Speaker 1: After that? Why would anybody? Why would anybody wait years
Speaker 1: and years, pay thousands of dollars and deal with all
Speaker 1: kinds of annoying headaches, and I know they're not. It's
Speaker 1: not fun and a lot of times it's not fair.
Speaker 1: Why do that if all you have to do is
Speaker 1: show up in Mexico, walk to the border and say
Speaker 1: I'm fleeing a very dangerous situation in my home country. Well,
Speaker 1: what where are your papers? Well, I'm undocumented. I can't
Speaker 1: prove that. Well do you even speak Spanish? No? No,
Speaker 1: I don't. Well how do I know you're from Honduras?
Speaker 1: Oh you don't, But why don't we figure that out
Speaker 1: the immigration courts? Let me into America. Oh, I get
Speaker 1: my court date in four years. Great, I'll be sure
Speaker 1: to show up for that one. See you. Then, why
Speaker 1: would anyone waste their time? Right, this is the way
Speaker 1: to do it. Just go to Mexico, show up at
Speaker 1: the border, but show up in a big group, because
Speaker 1: the optics of it, which is what they're playing off
Speaker 1: of here, are Oh, we can't turn away this big
Speaker 1: group that looks really mean. Now we're going to have
Speaker 1: a well we don't want to look me in immigration policy.
Speaker 1: Every other country in the world has a we don't
Speaker 1: want to look me in immigration policy, or rather they're
Speaker 1: willing to have a we will look me in immigration
Speaker 1: policy that they'll tell people you can't come in. Every
Speaker 1: other country says now, sorry, you don't just get to
Speaker 1: come and stay here, and you say, well, you know,
Speaker 1: America is different, all right, There's there are other wealthy
Speaker 1: countries to there are plenty of places people could go,
Speaker 1: plenty of countries. They could go to. People in Honduras
Speaker 1: that want to fully Honduras, they could very easily head
Speaker 1: south and go to Colombia. They could go to other
Speaker 1: countries that are not nearly as violent right now. I mean,
Speaker 1: obviously there's a lot of violence in Venezuela, but not
Speaker 1: nearly as violent as what's going on in Honduras. Certainly
Speaker 1: they wouldn't constantly be in fear of their lives. No,
Speaker 1: people want to come to America because we're you know,
Speaker 1: we're We're a sweet deal if you can stay here.
Speaker 1: We're a a product that people want. America is something special.
Speaker 1: But it's not gonna stay special if the Democrats have
Speaker 1: their way. And I I do get frustrated with the
Speaker 1: demagoguery around this issue, because if it is mean to
Speaker 1: police the border, if it is mean to separate parents
Speaker 1: from their children at the border, if it is mean
Speaker 1: to detain people who come to the country illegally. Do
Speaker 1: we just stop doing that? Is this no longer a law?
Speaker 1: Has this essentially been written out of the books because
Speaker 1: nobody wants to see tearful CNN reporters like, oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: it's so horrible. Look what's going on. I don't know.
Speaker 1: By the way, the cost of our poorest border can
Speaker 1: be measured now by the tens of thousands of people
Speaker 1: who are dying every year from opioid overdoses, which are not,
Speaker 1: despite what the Left is telling you, now predominantly a
Speaker 1: problem of pharmaceutical companies and overprescribing and dirty doctors and
Speaker 1: all that that had been a problem, But now it
Speaker 1: is overwhelmingly illegal drugs, including illegal pharmaceutical grade drugs like
Speaker 1: fentanyl and car fentanyl that come to the southern border.
Speaker 1: So you've got thousands and thousands of Americans who are
Speaker 1: dying because we don't have good enough border security. This
Speaker 1: is the biggest national security challenge we face in in
Speaker 1: our existence right now as a country. And what are
Speaker 1: the Democrats offering nothing more more immigration courts to bring
Speaker 1: more people in faster. What do we do about the cartels?
Speaker 1: What do we do about the fact that our legal
Speaker 1: immigration system is starting to look like a joke. Oh,
Speaker 1: that's not a problem. They really want to they really
Speaker 1: want to manage or deal with They have no answers.
Speaker 1: But the good news is the American people, when this
Speaker 1: is posted them, they want an orderly immigration system. They
Speaker 1: want rule of law. I would never expect that I
Speaker 1: could just walk to the border of a foreign country
Speaker 1: and say, you know what I want to be. I
Speaker 1: want to part of this action. I want to stay here.
Speaker 1: You have a moral obligation to take me in, to
Speaker 1: defend me, to clothe me, to feed me, to give
Speaker 1: me health care. That's what happens now. You know, people
Speaker 1: talk about the previous waves of immigration. You didn't get
Speaker 1: to show up in America, you know, circa eighteen forty
Speaker 1: or or nineteen hundred and say, yeah, so you're gonna
Speaker 1: give me a lot of stuff so that I don't
Speaker 1: have to really like, I don't I don't have to
Speaker 1: struggle that much, right, I don't have to worry about
Speaker 1: They had to worry about starvation. I remember going to
Speaker 1: the Tenement Museum in New York City actually and uh
Speaker 1: learning there about what it was like for Irish and
Speaker 1: Italian and Jewish immigrants, particularly to the Lower East Side
Speaker 1: of of Manhattan, which was more tenements. They were these
Speaker 1: buildings that were just overflowing with people, you know, six
Speaker 1: in her rooms living six in the room, and you know,
Speaker 1: there would be horrible outbreaks of disease, and there was
Speaker 1: terrible malnutrition. And this was in New York City. And
Speaker 1: this was in the you know, turn of the twentieth century.
Speaker 1: There was no all I'm gonna go to you know,
Speaker 1: federal government services and I'm gonna I'm gonna expect to
Speaker 1: get Obamacare, and I'm gonna expect to get no, no,
Speaker 1: none of that. A large percentage of people that came
Speaker 1: to the country went back to their home country because
Speaker 1: it was too difficult here. They tried it here with
Speaker 1: us and work, they go home. Ultimately, as I've told you,
Speaker 1: and I don't want to be labor the point, but
Speaker 1: for Democrats is just about power. One of the great
Speaker 1: postures that Democrats as a party as an ideology love
Speaker 1: to take now is that they care so much about
Speaker 1: poor people. I know a lot of very very wealthy,
Speaker 1: well to do Democrats. This is one of their favorite gifts. Oh,
Speaker 1: they care so much about the less fortune. Oh, they
Speaker 1: care so much about uh, you know, illegal immigrants. They
Speaker 1: don't spend any time around them though. They don't want
Speaker 1: to deal with them. They don't want to see them.
Speaker 1: They're not around them. But they care so much. They
Speaker 1: care so much about these people. To them, it is
Speaker 1: just that it is a a fashion that they hold
Speaker 1: out in public so they can feel good about themselves
Speaker 1: in front of other wealthy, connected people that don't have
Speaker 1: to deal with the consequences of massive immigration into their communities,
Speaker 1: that don't have to deal with the downside of what
Speaker 1: illegal immigration does to the systems we have in place
Speaker 1: for assimilation where just to the school system, to emergency
Speaker 1: rooms at hospitals. That's not their problem, all right, But
Speaker 1: they wanted to be your problem, and they want to
Speaker 1: be smog and nasty and vicious to you when you
Speaker 1: try to raise this as an issue. They just don't care. Folks.
Speaker 1: I hope, I hope enough Americans are paying attention here
Speaker 1: what's going on. And Trump is on the front line
Speaker 1: here of do we have a country or not? Do
Speaker 1: we have borders or not? He answers in full thrown fashion. Yes,
Speaker 1: And we're seeing what the left answer is every passing day.
Speaker 1: The kind of plan that Donald has put forth would
Speaker 1: be trickle down economics all over again. I call it
Speaker 1: trumped up trickle down because that's exactly what it would be.
Speaker 1: That is not how we grow the economy. You could
Speaker 1: put half of Trump's supporters into what I call the
Speaker 1: basket of deplorable. The races, sex, is homopho, all big, xenophobic,
Speaker 1: is lamophobic, you name it respectfully. If that is your position,
Speaker 1: then I will talk only to white people. Wait, you
Speaker 1: want me to tell you what my husband thinks. My
Speaker 1: husband is not the secretary of State. I am. You
Speaker 1: know I'm not sitting here as some little woman standing
Speaker 1: by my man like Tammy Wynette, and I honor what
Speaker 1: he's been through and what we've been through together. And
Speaker 1: you know, if that's not enough for people in heck,
Speaker 1: don't vote for him. But something that you always carry
Speaker 1: with you, sauce I saw in my bags with Ho's us.
Speaker 1: Really yes, you know, for those of you who are
Speaker 1: concerned about my using personally male, I understand. And as
Speaker 1: I've said, I'm not making excuses. I've said it was
Speaker 1: a mistake and I regret it. By the way, you
Speaker 1: may have seen that I recently launched a Snapchat account.
Speaker 1: I love it. Those messages disappear all by themselves. Did
Speaker 1: you white preserver what like with a cloth or so?
Speaker 1: I don't know, Well, you know how it works a
Speaker 1: really did you try to like the I don't know
Speaker 1: how it works digitally at all. In retrospect, do you
Speaker 1: think Bill should have resigned in the wake of the
Speaker 1: Monica Lewinsky scamp? Absolutely not. It wasn't an abusive power.
Speaker 1: The fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it
Speaker 1: because of a protest or was it because of guys
Speaker 1: out for a walk one night to decide they go
Speaker 1: kill some Americans? What difference at this point doesn't make.
Speaker 1: How much do you miss her team? We wanted to
Speaker 1: give you a little mantas there's so you remember what
Speaker 1: it was like when you had to deal with Hillary
Speaker 1: all the time. Ah, yes, Hillary, You probably think to yourself,
Speaker 1: like most normal people would. Oh, Hillary has run for
Speaker 1: president unsuccessfully twice. There's no way that she would be
Speaker 1: so deluded and so self involved and so self important
Speaker 1: and megalomaniacal that she would run again. But oh, I
Speaker 1: do listen to that. Buck Sexton Fellow Sometimes on the radio.
Speaker 1: He can be quite an impish little little dude. And
Speaker 1: he has been sang for the last year regularly that
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton may run again. And I keep saying, I
Speaker 1: know everyone can say I'm crazy. I know everyone's gonna
Speaker 1: tell me I'm nuts, But oh guess what, Ah, you know,
Speaker 1: it's coming first time that I can think of. At
Speaker 1: least you have a top uh Clinton aide, Philippe Rains,
Speaker 1: who's a veteran spokesman and consiliari, saying that yes, it's uh,
Speaker 1: it's possible. Here's what he said. It's political quote. It's
Speaker 1: curious why Hillary Clinton's name isn't in the mix, either
Speaker 1: conversationally or in formal formal polling. As candidate, She's younger
Speaker 1: than Donald Trump by a year. She's younger than Joe
Speaker 1: Biden by four years. Is it that she's run before?
Speaker 1: This would be Bernie Sanders second time and Biden's third time.
Speaker 1: Is it lack of support? She had sixty five million
Speaker 1: people vote for her. It was a mistake for Democrats
Speaker 1: to punish Clinton for the mistake she made in chalking
Speaker 1: the loss up to her being a failed candidate is
Speaker 1: an oversimplification. She is smarter than most tougher than most,
Speaker 1: she could raise money easier than most. It was an
Speaker 1: absolute fight to the death. When asked about the likelihood
Speaker 1: of a running, Rains responded, it is somewhere between highly
Speaker 1: unlikely and zero, but it is not zero. Now. Let
Speaker 1: me tell you something right now. Uh, there is a
Speaker 1: very very higher than zero, much more realistic possibility than
Speaker 1: they're willing to talk about. Uh, that she will run.
Speaker 1: And that's why they started. It's at zero right now
Speaker 1: in terms of what the public really would expect and want.
Speaker 1: What they're trying to do is to start start rehabilitating
Speaker 1: that perception. They have to take it upon themselves to
Speaker 1: make the case, which is what here, the Hillary aid,
Speaker 1: What have I been telling you all along? There's an
Speaker 1: entire apparatus of people around her who believed that the
Speaker 1: height of their careers would come when she won that election.
Speaker 1: They have not gone away. They have not achieved what
Speaker 1: they set out to achieve, which was to get those
Speaker 1: different shops. And they all had the drapes picked out
Speaker 1: for their offices. They were ready to go, and that
Speaker 1: was all taken from they believe taken from them by
Speaker 1: the Russians. Right, they believe taken from them by this uh,
Speaker 1: this unholy alliance between Putin and Trump and all these
Speaker 1: terrible shenanigans that went on behind the scenes. So the narrative,
Speaker 1: as I've been telling you, is that the only way
Speaker 1: to set right what happened in the past, the only
Speaker 1: way to make it all better, was if they were
Speaker 1: able to now bring Hillary back and make her the president. Yes,
Speaker 1: it would be the third time around, but give Philippe
Speaker 1: Reigned some credit here. He's telling the truth about her
Speaker 1: age and about a number of times running. It makes
Speaker 1: more sense for Hillary to run than Biden or Bernie.
Speaker 1: Makes more sense first woman candidate won all those She
Speaker 1: beat Bernie in the last primary. But this is also
Speaker 1: how desperate they are for a candidate that the case
Speaker 1: for Hillary from the Democrat perspective, the case for Hillary
Speaker 1: is more rational than the case for most of the
Speaker 1: other candidates that the Democrats are thinking about right now.
Speaker 1: And they just you know what it is, They just
Speaker 1: can't stomach it. They just feel like they had to
Speaker 1: just choke down a lot of nasty stuff in order
Speaker 1: to push her once again after Obama came out of
Speaker 1: nowhere in that primary indefeater, they have to do this
Speaker 1: or they had to do it, and there's a recognition,
Speaker 1: I think, deep down with a lot of them that
Speaker 1: they may have to do it again, and they will,
Speaker 1: they will. I am telling you, I think the chance
Speaker 1: that Hillary Clinton runs right now, if you're really to
Speaker 1: give Vegas odds on this, is more along the lines
Speaker 1: of I'm not saying it's likely, but I'm saying it's
Speaker 1: a serious, a serious shot that she decides to run.
Speaker 1: And men, wouldn't that just be wild? We could replay
Speaker 1: the election in and all the same cast of characters
Speaker 1: all over again. I mean, I'm I'm not sure if
Speaker 1: people would you know, it would be a it would
Speaker 1: be a ratings bonanza. Um. And the good news is, folks,
Speaker 1: that I'm very confident that if that were to happen,
Speaker 1: guess what Trump would win again. I love Team Buck.
Speaker 1: I love doing this show every day because I get
Speaker 1: to share my thoughts with all of you all across
Speaker 1: the country and in some cases, all over the world.
Speaker 1: It's incredible. But I also want you to be able
Speaker 1: to share your thoughts with me and with each other
Speaker 1: and not have to worry about left wing bias or
Speaker 1: any of these social media moderators that decide that you're
Speaker 1: gonna get shadow band or you're just not gonna see
Speaker 1: things in your feet anymore that are conservative. You know,
Speaker 1: you can't talk about guns because that's bad. What about
Speaker 1: the Second Amendment? Oh, that must be bad too. Snippy
Speaker 1: dot com is the place you should go. Navy dot
Speaker 1: com is a new social media platform that gives you
Speaker 1: all the functionality that you're used to of posting, writing
Speaker 1: to each other, putting up videos, putting up photos, but
Speaker 1: it doesn't have any of that left wing bias nonsense.
Speaker 1: Snippy dot com is totally free to join, totally free
Speaker 1: to set up to post everything about it. S n
Speaker 1: i p p y dot com again s n i
Speaker 1: p p y dot com and also check out the
Speaker 1: Snippy app. The Democrats don't like being called an angry mob,
Speaker 1: but really that's what they've become. They've gone so far
Speaker 1: left they can't even believe that they're over there. They
Speaker 1: don't know what's going on. When you listen to Eric
Speaker 1: Holder talking about kicking, or Hillary Clinton's saying what she
Speaker 1: said which was so horrible you cannot be civil. They
Speaker 1: just don't see it. Maxine Waters constantly day in and
Speaker 1: day out, ranting and raving and they're losing it, and
Speaker 1: they shouldn't be. We should be a unified country. It'll
Speaker 1: happen someday. But the choice could not be more clear.
Speaker 1: Democrats produce mobs. Republicans produced jobs, jobs, not mobs. It's
Speaker 1: one of the rallying cries that Republicans have going into
Speaker 1: this midterm election, and I think it's a I think
Speaker 1: it's a powerful one because we see, we see how
Speaker 1: the mobs act, we see when they show up and
Speaker 1: where they show up and who they target. And we
Speaker 1: clearly struck a nerve, as we've seen because the people
Speaker 1: that try to run interference for the Democrats really don't
Speaker 1: like the usage of this term mob. But then they
Speaker 1: get into this other problem of well, hold on a second.
Speaker 1: If you don't like the term mob, maybe don't for mobs.
Speaker 1: Don't try to redefine mob to mean something else, which
Speaker 1: is what they did. As as astonishing as that was,
Speaker 1: um But Republicans talk about jobs, They talk about ways
Speaker 1: that cutting regulation helps small businesses, helps entrepreneurs. Democrats just
Speaker 1: want to get together in a big pity party and
Speaker 1: scream and yell and talk about fascism. This is where
Speaker 1: the the cultures of the two parties are right now.
Speaker 1: You know, look, I know we're talking about you roughly
Speaker 1: half the country on one side and roughly half the
Speaker 1: country on the other. So we're talking about tens of
Speaker 1: millions of people. How do you generalize tens of millions
Speaker 1: of people? Well, the truth is that the ideological core
Speaker 1: of either the right or the left is not an
Speaker 1: averaging of where everyone is. It's often where the vanguard,
Speaker 1: where the elite, the the leadership echelon takes it, and
Speaker 1: what the dominant culture is, which is usually top down.
Speaker 1: Now the dominant culture is for that political party, and
Speaker 1: right now, the Democrats have a culture of the mob,
Speaker 1: of being a bunch of political hooligans who like to
Speaker 1: track people down and engage in a kind of targeted
Speaker 1: stalking to harass them. In fact, we have just yet
Speaker 1: yet another instance of this where you have Ted Cruz,
Speaker 1: who you know is hated by the left. He's gonna
Speaker 1: be hated even more when he completely crushes Beata O'Rourke
Speaker 1: in that upcoming election. But Ted Cruz was confronted at
Speaker 1: an airport by yes, yes, that's right, another crazy leftist
Speaker 1: play three. It was a victory for women. Do you
Speaker 1: think that's today suser on the four women. Thank you, sir,
Speaker 1: God blessing women. I believe in due process. There talking
Speaker 1: about this, do you leave in a man lying about
Speaker 1: his alcoholics who in front of the Senate in purgery?
Speaker 1: Do you believe in perjury? Thank you for expressing your
Speaker 1: First Amendment rights? So why did you support a land
Speaker 1: that abuses women? Shame on you, Ted Cruise, A tad cruise.
Speaker 1: Shame on you, a tad cruise. Shame audio, Ted Cruise,
Speaker 1: Shame on you, Ted Cruise. Shame on you, Ted Cruise.
Speaker 1: She doesn't sound very well adjusted to me, just putting
Speaker 1: that out there. Why why do you? Why do you
Speaker 1: like someone who lies about his drinking? And he didn't.
Speaker 1: This was one of the more pathetic lies about Kavanaugh.
Speaker 1: He didn't lie about his drinking. He said he drank
Speaker 1: sometimes sometimes too much when you start to try to
Speaker 1: play around with well, look it's not too much. It's
Speaker 1: like way way too much. That's a lie that is
Speaker 1: completely subjective and that in no rational universe does that
Speaker 1: would that qualify as perjury. But you heard people's saying
Speaker 1: they'd be a lot about his drinking. He did not
Speaker 1: lie about his drinking. He said he didn't black out,
Speaker 1: and he said that he would drink too much sometimes.
Speaker 1: The Democrats went so far as to try to put
Speaker 1: high school and college beer drinking on trial in an
Speaker 1: effort to try to stop cabin It was pathetic. It
Speaker 1: just goes to show you that they have no scruples.
Speaker 1: Nothing stops them, nothing prevents them from, you know, just
Speaker 1: going all in on this stuff. But that was Ted
Speaker 1: Cruz in an airport being heckled, being you know, yelled
Speaker 1: at by people who are clearly angry at him. I
Speaker 1: wish I could be there well, for a lot of reasons.
Speaker 1: One is you just say to them, Ted Cruz didn't
Speaker 1: do anything to you. It would never occur to me,
Speaker 1: and I know it would never occur to any of
Speaker 1: you listening to this to go up to a stranger
Speaker 1: and just start getting up in that person's face and
Speaker 1: yelling at them because of what they stand for publicly,
Speaker 1: when it just it just would never occur to me. Now,
Speaker 1: I'm not saying to to somebody to engage somebody, and
Speaker 1: if you it's an elected representative, you go. But this
Speaker 1: is yelling, this is heckling, This isn't They're not trying
Speaker 1: to have a conversation that there's a shame shame tank crew.
Speaker 1: You're terrible. This is not meant to in any way
Speaker 1: be constructive. They're they're not engaging TED Cruise. They're mobbing
Speaker 1: TED Cruise. This is what they do. They like to
Speaker 1: form mobs. It also reminded me when she started to
Speaker 1: say all these women came forward to tell their stories.
Speaker 1: This was a sensitive area of the whole Kavanaugh situation
Speaker 1: that I don't think I spoke to you much about it.
Speaker 1: And it's not because I was unwilling to or didn't
Speaker 1: want to. I just had so much else going on there.
Speaker 1: But you had all these women who were coming forward,
Speaker 1: and we're telling their stories of being sexually assaulted. And
Speaker 1: that's if if any woman who wants to do that,
Speaker 1: that's obviously her right and she deserves, you know, support
Speaker 1: and sympathy. But that created this very dangerous to do
Speaker 1: process phenomenon of well it because something bad happened to
Speaker 1: me and the person lied and got away with it,
Speaker 1: or because I didn't bring charges because someone attacked me.
Speaker 1: Speaking again for other people here in the third person,
Speaker 1: it means that this this case should be influenced by that.
Speaker 1: That's that's crazy. This is just it's not just a foul,
Speaker 1: it's not just a logical fallacy. It's a dangerous thing
Speaker 1: for people to believe. You know. Imagine if I had
Speaker 1: a I was on trial for stealing, right, I was
Speaker 1: in trying trial for stealing for fraud, and people started
Speaker 1: showing up at my trial and they were saying, well,
Speaker 1: someone stole from me, so he must be guilty. You'd say, well,
Speaker 1: that's irrelevant. It's completely irrelevant. But for the left, it
Speaker 1: was a widespread talking point, the whole cabitall thing. You'd
Speaker 1: hear people and I saw other people that I know
Speaker 1: from the media world too. There were other talking heads
Speaker 1: who said, I want to come forward and talk about
Speaker 1: my sexual assault now. And again, that's fine for context
Speaker 1: and background and all that, but just because somebody was
Speaker 1: sexually assaulted by some guy who's not Brett Kavanaugh does
Speaker 1: not mean that that has anything to do with whether
Speaker 1: Brett Kavanaugh is guilty of any kind of sexual assault
Speaker 1: or not. This is really elementary stuff, and that this
Speaker 1: was something that people were losing sight of, and a
Speaker 1: lot of people are losing sight of just I think
Speaker 1: went to show how completely over the top and and
Speaker 1: over politicized. This entire thing had become there. There is
Speaker 1: a a mass hysteria in this country that Democrats have
Speaker 1: reached this point where I don't think that the king
Speaker 1: uh logically about many of these issues. They just want
Speaker 1: to show emotion, They want to show rage, and they
Speaker 1: want to signal their virtue to the world, and they
Speaker 1: don't want to engage in debates or discussions on any
Speaker 1: of this. They just expect that other people will listen
Speaker 1: to the m other people will hear their thoughts. And
Speaker 1: because especially the left, there's so much claiming a victims
Speaker 1: status now and everyone's saying, oh, I'm a victims, you
Speaker 1: have to listen to me, uh, Their expectation is that
Speaker 1: they won't have to justify these ideas, that that the
Speaker 1: justification just comes from the emotion behind it and from
Speaker 1: the identity of the particular speaker at the justification then
Speaker 1: becomes well because I feel this way, um, everyone else
Speaker 1: has to value my thoughts on it because I suffered
Speaker 1: some terrible tragedy. It was very troubling to see this happening.
Speaker 1: And it's a mob mentality. To bring this back to
Speaker 1: what Trump is saying here, you know, do you want
Speaker 1: people who easily get swept up into mob thinking to
Speaker 1: be the ones who are electing representatives who also whip
Speaker 1: up the mob in this way. And you know, there's
Speaker 1: been not nearly enough condemnation of the kinds of tactics
Speaker 1: that the left has been embracing recently. And I think
Speaker 1: there's been a lot. We know, there's been a lot
Speaker 1: of endorsing of it, but there's been not nearly h enough.
Speaker 1: And I find that find that disquieting, to say the least.
Speaker 1: So there you have it. But you know, if we're
Speaker 1: gonna talk to this quieting, stupid celebrities are all over
Speaker 1: the place. You know this, there's all kinds of dumb
Speaker 1: celebrities everywhere. You had Kristin or Christian or whatever bell
Speaker 1: saying that snow White is a cartoon character that gives
Speaker 1: her or it is a story, a fairy tale that
Speaker 1: troubles her now because of the lack of consent, because
Speaker 1: you know, he gets kissed while she's asleep in a
Speaker 1: coma from the magic spell. I didn't think people are
Speaker 1: trying to take any of this, uh literally um, but
Speaker 1: it turns out, it turns out I may be wrong
Speaker 1: on that. When it turns out that that there are
Speaker 1: people who take fairy tales literally. Um. But if we're
Speaker 1: gonna talk about celebrities who I don't know how it
Speaker 1: is that they are treated with as much risk back
Speaker 1: when it comes to their politics as they are. Um.
Speaker 1: But you know we've got to get into Ah, Rosie
Speaker 1: Rosie O'Donnell coming up here in in just a moment,
Speaker 1: Rosie O'Donnell, who has some thoughts to share with you
Speaker 1: that I'm not sure you want to hear, but you'll
Speaker 1: hear them all right. Oh, you know, we're gonna talk
Speaker 1: about feminism and how toxic it is later on in
Speaker 1: the show. But I just thought this is a funny,
Speaker 1: clean X. This is just a quick, quick throwaway. See
Speaker 1: what I did there? Quick throwaway. Kleenex is rebranding its
Speaker 1: man size tissues as extra large after complains of sexism
Speaker 1: that just broke today. You can't have man sized tissues
Speaker 1: any wore folks. They're only excel tissues now because it
Speaker 1: is sexist, That's right. They say it is sexist to
Speaker 1: call tissues man's size. Now is it sexist to refer
Speaker 1: to someone's large hands as man hands? Like in that
Speaker 1: Sinfeld episode? I assume it is too Oh man, these
Speaker 1: these people, it's like they don't have enough to do
Speaker 1: and and they've created such a sterea around this. Now,
Speaker 1: at least, I think you can still say Texas sized.
Speaker 1: I remember there were some restaurants. There was a chain
Speaker 1: of restaurants in New York where you'd get a mixed
Speaker 1: drink and if you ordered it Texas sized, it was huge.
Speaker 1: It was like if you filled your your stets in
Speaker 1: with a whole lot of um So co in line
Speaker 1: or something, which so is pretty gross. But regardless, uh
Speaker 1: clean X no longer man size. But Rosie O'Donnell, she's
Speaker 1: somebody that we are going to be discussing here in
Speaker 1: just a moment, because she's talking about the mob of
Speaker 1: the mom mob mentality. She's got some stuff to add
Speaker 1: to that in just a moment. Yeah. I got physically
Speaker 1: sick that night and I thought to myself, this cannot
Speaker 1: be happening. Because when he got the nomination, I thought, well,
Speaker 1: we just got away till election day. That's all I
Speaker 1: have to do is hold on till then, and then
Speaker 1: that he won. You know, it took me a good
Speaker 1: year to compose myself to be in public again. I
Speaker 1: took a year out of the the spotlight. And you,
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm sure you didn't. You would have wanted
Speaker 1: to be proven wrong. But the first thing he did
Speaker 1: was past the Muslim ban, just like I mean, he
Speaker 1: came into office and did all the things that you
Speaker 1: probably knew about him for when he was elected. What
Speaker 1: I wrote on Twitter was we should impose martial law
Speaker 1: until we make sure that the Russians weren't involved in
Speaker 1: the final tallies of the vote. And Bob Mueller has
Speaker 1: been died at thirteen Russians for electionline and people were like,
Speaker 1: martial law, what's wrong with you? You're a lunatic. He
Speaker 1: wants to send the military to the border, so I
Speaker 1: would have sent the military to the White House to
Speaker 1: get him. Pretty good idea. Uh, that's right. They all laughed.
Speaker 1: That was a whole panel of MSNBC analysts. Um they
Speaker 1: all laugh and and sure enough, um, they laugh, and
Speaker 1: they think it's also funny to talk about how the
Speaker 1: president United States they wished they had sent the military
Speaker 1: to to depose him. These are not rash and normal people. Uh,
Speaker 1: they have had they have had some kind of a
Speaker 1: mental break because look, I understand that it was a joke.
Speaker 1: It was not a funny joke, and it's a very
Speaker 1: weird thing to say. And if you had said that,
Speaker 1: if you had made jokes, just just think of it
Speaker 1: this way. If you had made jokes during the Obama
Speaker 1: administration about how you had hoped the military, you'd hoped
Speaker 1: the military would take it upon itself to depose Obama
Speaker 1: from office, nobody would have thought that was funny. And
Speaker 1: keep in mind that when Obama was was president or
Speaker 1: early honors presidency, we didn't have a special counsel that
Speaker 1: was completely fabricated by a collusion between the media and
Speaker 1: the Democrats to take down a presidency. Didn't have that.
Speaker 1: You didn't have senior government officials, including the deputy director
Speaker 1: and director of the f or former director and deputy
Speaker 1: of the FBI, who abused their power and could have
Speaker 1: even facing criminal charges because of the extent of that
Speaker 1: abuse us. You didn't have during the Obama administration federal
Speaker 1: government employees who were willing to leak highly sensitive information
Speaker 1: in violation of the law and violation of their oaths
Speaker 1: their ethics in order to smear senior Obama administration officials. Okay,
Speaker 1: you did not have anything even close to a deep
Speaker 1: state or a cabal. And yet even with all that,
Speaker 1: people would not have found it in the least bit
Speaker 1: funny to have made a joke about how Obama was.
Speaker 1: You know, the military should have deposed him, but there
Speaker 1: should have been martial law. Why does m why does
Speaker 1: Rosia o'donald even get to sit on MSNBC and have
Speaker 1: this discussion And what does she have to bring to
Speaker 1: the table. She's a a comedian slash actress who says
Speaker 1: incredibly ignorant things about politics all the time. Yet she's
Speaker 1: given this platform and it's hard to say on m
Speaker 1: s NBC, see even radio. Sometimes you stumble, yeah, stumble,
Speaker 1: it happens, um, But she's given it. I suppose they
Speaker 1: would say, because she has a following. But man, you
Speaker 1: want to talk about corrupting people's minds. Here a lot
Speaker 1: of political talk from from Rosie o'donnald, and that's that's
Speaker 1: not that's not encouraging to me, at least not not
Speaker 1: in the least Oh, and also we want to talk
Speaker 1: about corrupting minds. Corey Booker, who thinks he's gonna run
Speaker 1: for president in this country, likes to talk about how
Speaker 1: great things are in Canada right now, that's not a surprise,
Speaker 1: play Cliff Ted. Every country we're competing with is driving
Speaker 1: down the cost to college. Germany cost between zero and
Speaker 1: four percent of media income to go to college. Canada.
Speaker 1: I can't stand how they're out of Americans. Canada, Trudeau
Speaker 1: to be a great cost about six to seven percent
Speaker 1: meeting income to college. What does it cost in America
Speaker 1: fifty two meeting income? And what are other nations out
Speaker 1: of American in US? Why are they out investing infrastructure
Speaker 1: that we're moving the way? Why are they out investing
Speaker 1: in research and education? Yeah, explain why they're doing all
Speaker 1: those things, Corey Booker, Because they're not. Maybe you should
Speaker 1: stick to the silly speeches like I am Spartacus and
Speaker 1: leave the theorizing about investment and growth and industry and
Speaker 1: research and development to people actually know what the heck
Speaker 1: they're talking about. Uh, you know, there's a reason why
Speaker 1: people from all over the world, by the way, I
Speaker 1: want to come to university here. We're not Americans, aren't
Speaker 1: like yeah semity university somewhere else. That's not how it goes.
Speaker 1: Everybody wants to come here. So, while I do think
Speaker 1: college is too expensive, there there is a a component
Speaker 1: of this where it's what the market will bear, folks. Uh.
Speaker 1: And then he talked about research and development out American
Speaker 1: in US. What does that even mean in what way?
Speaker 1: It's just these are the things that Democrat politicians say
Speaker 1: because it sounds smart too, not very smart, pe pol
Speaker 1: I don't know that. It can be kind of harsh,
Speaker 1: but it's true. It's true. The Trump approaches just to
Speaker 1: say very straightforward, basic things to people that they know
Speaker 1: to be true, to talk to them like normal people
Speaker 1: and they get it, they're on board, and then to
Speaker 1: take action based upon those common sense things. I much
Speaker 1: prefer that to the kind of poll tested you know,
Speaker 1: out American, NG America or whatever. Oh my gosh, Corey
Speaker 1: Booker only slightly better chances of running for the presidency
Speaker 1: then then Hillary Clinton, I think, um or than Elizabeth Warren.
Speaker 1: Elizabeth Warren's not running. Hillary is definitely running before Elizabeth
Speaker 1: Warren runs. So that tells you about how good Elizabeth
Speaker 1: Warren's chances are. Right now. Last year you went with
Speaker 1: Paul Ryan, who's a boy scout, and that's fine but
Speaker 1: a little boring. So this year you want to spice
Speaker 1: things up again. Right, I get it. You wanted an
Speaker 1: Indian woman, but Elizabeth Warren failed her d n A test. Actually,
Speaker 1: when the President found out that I was Indian American,
Speaker 1: he asked me if I was from the same tribe
Speaker 1: as Elizabeth Warren. Wrecked. I think that's what the kids
Speaker 1: say wrecked. That is I smell. I smell burnt toast.
Speaker 1: That's what they say when I played basketball and somebody
Speaker 1: would go by you and square I smell burnt toast
Speaker 1: um or broken ankles. I heard that ankle break, you know.
Speaker 1: But wrecked is another version of that. Nicky Haley there
Speaker 1: at the Al Smith dinner talking about the Elizabeth Warren
Speaker 1: just I don't know. I mean the Elizabeth Warren maneuver
Speaker 1: earlier this week. I know We've talked about a lot.
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna get much more into it now, but
Speaker 1: that was the equivalent, the political equivalent of being the
Speaker 1: incredibly sun burned, pudgy kid who, in front of everybody
Speaker 1: at like the summer pool, just decides to go into
Speaker 1: the deep end, get up on the high dive, and
Speaker 1: for his first time, just goes for it without telling
Speaker 1: mom and dad, and just as one of those belly
Speaker 1: flops remember he's sunburned. You know that belly flop when
Speaker 1: you hear and see it and just go oh, like
Speaker 1: it hurts you to watch it, and it makes that
Speaker 1: splat sound that only the really bad, embarrassing belly flop
Speaker 1: can make. That's the that's politically what Elizabeth Warren did here.
Speaker 1: You're just like, oh my gosh, what is wrong with you?
Speaker 1: And CNN got caught up in it two. I mean
Speaker 1: you should have gone back and seeing the coverage they
Speaker 1: had on New Day and some of these and yeah,
Speaker 1: I know, I was arguing with the CNN exect on
Speaker 1: Twitter and they got turned into a few news stories
Speaker 1: in a few places because buck don't play. If CNN
Speaker 1: wants to try to try to bring the ruckets, they
Speaker 1: better they better come correct, as they say, because I
Speaker 1: am not. I'm not gonna sit around to look you
Speaker 1: are you sure? You guys are you know goldtender journalism? Please?
Speaker 1: I know what goes on over there. I've been over there, um,
Speaker 1: but but you know, you look at you look at
Speaker 1: what happened with Warren this week and CNN when they
Speaker 1: started their coverage of it, which you had Alison Camrado, like,
Speaker 1: dear Marry results have been dropped that showed oh yeah,
Speaker 1: the DNA results show that Elizabeth Warren can't do math,
Speaker 1: or isn't very smart or both, or is just I think,
Speaker 1: I think delusional if that's probably the most likely come there.
Speaker 1: But Nicky Haley did a good job at the All
Speaker 1: Smith dinner, and it was she had some great opportunities
Speaker 1: there and she took them with with some good jokes.
Speaker 1: And I do think that her move all along here
Speaker 1: has been She's good with she's in good with the
Speaker 1: Trump people. She's gonna help Donald Trump win a second term.
Speaker 1: She is a perfect candidate to run once Trump has
Speaker 1: had a second term. I don't people are saying Pence.
Speaker 1: I don't know about that. I don't see Pence at
Speaker 1: the at that level. But I've I've been wrong before,
Speaker 1: says everybody who tries to make these kinds of predictions.
Speaker 1: Speaking of predictions, I did say at least on rising
Speaker 1: earlier this week that Minuchan would not go Steve Minute
Speaker 1: in the Treasury Secretary would not go to Saudi Arabia
Speaker 1: after what had happened with Kashogi. We don't have really
Speaker 1: much the way of new developments on that. I would
Speaker 1: note there're still people who are spending a lot of
Speaker 1: time covering the story, but there's not a lot out
Speaker 1: there in terms of new verifiable facts. And I've got
Speaker 1: to say, um, you know, that's it's just gonna be
Speaker 1: at the end exactly what I thought, which is that
Speaker 1: the Saudis are going to say that this was a
Speaker 1: rogue operation. Um. But beating up on Trump was clearly
Speaker 1: what a lot of this has been about all along.
Speaker 1: And you know, and and Bernie Sanders, sometimes I get
Speaker 1: a little caught up and it's like, you know, he
Speaker 1: Bernie Sander. It's kind of funny's kind of old. You know.
Speaker 1: He's like, hey, I'm Bernie. It's burn these night, and
Speaker 1: the mood is right for socialism. Um. But then I
Speaker 1: remember that he's actually a far left progressive and and
Speaker 1: we'll say a lot of things that are very annoying
Speaker 1: and very very untrue. Uh. And he went after Trump
Speaker 1: on this whole issue of of kashogi is in the
Speaker 1: last twenty four hours. And I was disappointed in the
Speaker 1: burn play sixt he is not such a tough guy.
Speaker 1: What he has to deal with his billionaire friends in
Speaker 1: Saudi Arabia who just tortured and murdered a courageous journalists.
Speaker 1: Not such a tough guy on that one. Not such
Speaker 1: a tough guy when he's trying to actually read a
Speaker 1: balance sheet and recognizes that you can't give people free
Speaker 1: things forever with no one paying for them. No, not tough.
Speaker 1: Then I suppose Bernie's got Bernie's not gonna be either.
Speaker 1: It's just not It's just not there anymore that that
Speaker 1: that Bernie magic, such as it was, it's not there.
Speaker 1: But this is an ignorant position, the one that he
Speaker 1: takes here, that that somehow Trump is the one who suits.
Speaker 1: Trump is so cozy with Saudi Arabia. He's got all
Speaker 1: these business interests there, I asked a and ethics. He
Speaker 1: guys part of some ngo that does ethics or whatever.
Speaker 1: I forget what it's what it's even called. I said, So,
Speaker 1: what exactly is Trump's supposed to do here so that
Speaker 1: he doesn't get told all the time that he has
Speaker 1: business interests that are being affected by something. I get
Speaker 1: so bored with this. Oh, Trump owns this hotel or
Speaker 1: that hotel, and people are going there and spending money.
Speaker 1: There's they're gonna buy him. Okay, So I can now
Speaker 1: go to a hotel. Think about this, the way that
Speaker 1: they talk about Trump and Saudias and these business deals
Speaker 1: or or rather just his hotel, and how there are
Speaker 1: Saudias that will stay there in d c UH by
Speaker 1: liberal logic on this matter, I could go stay at
Speaker 1: a Hilton hotel somewhere and and think that I'm having
Speaker 1: influence on the thinking or the or really that that
Speaker 1: I've bought off Conrad Hilton or whoever the heir to
Speaker 1: the Hilton or the guys. I think it's Conrad Hilton.
Speaker 1: But that's liberal thinking. Now, that's right. The Saudias, by
Speaker 1: by spending some money in a hotel that Trump owns
Speaker 1: a part of UH, they now have too much sway
Speaker 1: over his over his foreign policy. I mean, that's that's
Speaker 1: pretty ridiculous. But it's the way that they want to
Speaker 1: take this now is you can't be a business owner,
Speaker 1: you can't be somebody who's in the private sector and
Speaker 1: be a president. You have to be a lifelong bureaucrat.
Speaker 1: I think that. I think the Democrats would prefer that.
Speaker 1: But the Saudi issue has just been turned into a
Speaker 1: bash Trump issue, and it's going to continue to be
Speaker 1: that because no matter what he does. Realistically, they're gonna
Speaker 1: be all over him and they're gonna say, oh, well,
Speaker 1: you know, and I've seen this reporting also about Jared
Speaker 1: and how you know Jared has had back channel conversations,
Speaker 1: and they talk about this like they've really discovered something,
Speaker 1: and I'm always amazed to say they haven't. They got nothing.
Speaker 1: I mean, they got less than Mueller with all this
Speaker 1: stuff here, but they stay with it anyway. They keep
Speaker 1: pushing the storyline that Trump is so sweet, it's so
Speaker 1: sweet to Saudi Arabia. He's just in the Saudi Arabian
Speaker 1: pocket it and you go back, you look at all
Speaker 1: the photos. Look at Obama was bowing to the King
Speaker 1: of Saudi Arabia, literally bowing to him. You can look
Speaker 1: at the photo, remember, And then they said it wasn't
Speaker 1: about and it's like, oh so Obama just kind of
Speaker 1: stumbled at exactly the moment that he shook this guy's
Speaker 1: hand for a photo. App he just but that wasn't
Speaker 1: something that was just a mean conservative thing. Obama used
Speaker 1: to bow to people because he thought it was sophisticated
Speaker 1: to be in foreign countries and bow all the time.
Speaker 1: It was not. It wasn't cool. I did not like
Speaker 1: seeing the president bow. It wasn't a big deal either,
Speaker 1: but it really was a thing. And I remember I
Speaker 1: had liberal friends. No, no, it is mama like to bow.
Speaker 1: He did, and he did like to go on the
Speaker 1: apology tour in the Middle East. How that work out? Syria, Libya, Iran, etcetera.
Speaker 1: Puizzlings meekly march in lock step behind a morally disabled president.
Speaker 1: I don't know how you do it. It's appalling. People
Speaker 1: are just trying to make liberals screaming cry and they
Speaker 1: laugh about it, right, Like there's a mug that the
Speaker 1: whole say liberal tears and they laugh as they drink it.
Speaker 1: The cruelty is the point of that. They voted for
Speaker 1: the cruel person who demeans and diminishes people. I don't
Speaker 1: understand how you overlook misogyny, sexism, racism. I don't understand
Speaker 1: how you can just sit back and say, you know what,
Speaker 1: all of that's okay because I'm gonna get you know,
Speaker 1: all of these judges elected, or I'm gonna get a
Speaker 1: tax break. I just think that there's that that that's
Speaker 1: not what it means to be American. You know, you're
Speaker 1: here in a pretty good overview there of what the
Speaker 1: real Democrat pitches to vote for them in the midterm election.
Speaker 1: It's not that they've got some idea of how to
Speaker 1: fix the economy. It's not that they have some plan
Speaker 1: in mind that's going to bring more jobs, or that
Speaker 1: will uh secure the border, will fix immigration, which really
Speaker 1: means fixed enforcement. We should stop saying fixed immigration and
Speaker 1: start saying fixed enforcement, because that's where the problem lies.
Speaker 1: But they really do think that they're going to get
Speaker 1: people that are not in vote by just calling everyone
Speaker 1: racist and misogynist and sexist. I find these to be
Speaker 1: among the most boring arguments that we are forced to
Speaker 1: have all the time, and and it really just goes
Speaker 1: I think too how deluded and brainwashed so many people
Speaker 1: on the left have become that they don't realize just
Speaker 1: how tiresome of these allegations are all the time. Oh everything,
Speaker 1: everything is racist, everyone is racist, everyone is sexist, everyone's
Speaker 1: a massagyist. And when you say this to people who
Speaker 1: don't care what a person's races, don't judge them by
Speaker 1: their skin color. And I love a lot of women
Speaker 1: in their lives and treat women with dignity all the time,
Speaker 1: and are completely respectful to women. They just start to
Speaker 1: tune out all the rest of it because it's cheap,
Speaker 1: it's dishonest. This as a line of attack against Trump
Speaker 1: and against everybody around him is just going for the
Speaker 1: lowest common denominator, and it's mud slinging in place of ideas,
Speaker 1: mudslinging in place of policy. And I had to I
Speaker 1: had to laugh with that one. I don't even know
Speaker 1: who it was. Which commentators like they're like taking mugs,
Speaker 1: let's say liberal tears. I'm drinking off, but I'm just like, like,
Speaker 1: my tears right now are real and like its flick?
Speaker 1: Why are they doing this to me? I wish that
Speaker 1: they would also get a little bit more of a
Speaker 1: sense of humor, a sense of humor that didn't revolve
Speaker 1: around mocking and ridiculing Christians and white males all the time.
Speaker 1: I mean white males, we can take it. I mean
Speaker 1: the stuff about Christians that they do is particularly nasty.
Speaker 1: You know, that's really it's not meant to be laughing
Speaker 1: with it's laughing at all the time. But liberals don't
Speaker 1: have a sense of humor anymore. This is why you
Speaker 1: see these polls about political correctness and how anybody who's
Speaker 1: paying attention to No, is it. Political correctness is a
Speaker 1: cancer in our society. It is destructive. It doesn't add
Speaker 1: anything to society, doesn't make us better as people. It
Speaker 1: just creates UH incentives to make politics all about personal
Speaker 1: destruction and also allows some of the most annoying, stone faced, unhappy,
Speaker 1: miserable pet people in our society to get to right
Speaker 1: and then rewrite rules about how all the rest of
Speaker 1: us have to live all the time. I've said it before,
Speaker 1: it's really important. Trump got a lot of support in
Speaker 1: the early days because he just had political correctness is garbage.
Speaker 1: He just said it's garbage. You didn't say, oh, you know,
Speaker 1: we shouldn't be so politically correct. But I understand why
Speaker 1: people are coming from it. No, no, no, it's garbage.
Speaker 1: And it is so destructive to society, so destructive to
Speaker 1: UH our ability to talk to each other as normal people,
Speaker 1: just have normal conversations. I get frustrated. I sit here,
Speaker 1: I do the show. There's so many times when I think, oh,
Speaker 1: that's a joke that I could make. It'll it'll run
Speaker 1: through my mind. It sset I can make that joke,
Speaker 1: and of the people listening of you the wonderful people
Speaker 1: who listen to this show, who do really mean so
Speaker 1: much to me every day of you would be like, oh,
Speaker 1: that's really funny, or maybe maybe even you know of
Speaker 1: you would think it was funny. Nine percent of you
Speaker 1: would think it wasn't that great, and then one percent
Speaker 1: it though, of the libs listening, or one percent of
Speaker 1: the people that includes media matters and some of the
Speaker 1: other maniacs that listen to this show, uh, they would
Speaker 1: have a problem with it, and they would take it
Speaker 1: and try to twist it and use it as a
Speaker 1: weapon against me. And it's just not worth the risk.
Speaker 1: And it's really hard to do any kind of comedy.
Speaker 1: It's really hard to because the comedy entails risks, right.
Speaker 1: You're you're trying to push bounties. You're trying to And
Speaker 1: I'm not a comedian, but I do some funny stuff
Speaker 1: here and there, and I certainly wish I could do
Speaker 1: even more amusing uh takes on commentary on politics than
Speaker 1: I do. But I just know that, you know, you
Speaker 1: you run up against this uh, this third rail that's
Speaker 1: a mobile third rail like that they it's not like
Speaker 1: it stays in one place. You don't know how close
Speaker 1: you're getting to it, because they'll change the rules and
Speaker 1: they'll change what's going on around you based upon their
Speaker 1: ability to get you when they want when they want
Speaker 1: to get you. It's just that's so uninspiring though. I
Speaker 1: mean back to the the way that they're using these
Speaker 1: calls of racism and massogyny, these allegations as really a
Speaker 1: primary primary means to get people to go out and
Speaker 1: vote for Democrats. That's the best they can do, you know.
Speaker 1: And they're they're talking about healthcare a little bit and
Speaker 1: basically Trump is a racist and Trump is a misogynist
Speaker 1: and all these other things. You know. They also seem
Speaker 1: to forget that we haven't forgotten that. Bill Clinton, Hey, ladies,
Speaker 1: I haven't seen you a little while. Want you to
Speaker 1: come over. Who wants to take a selfie with me?
Speaker 1: Just watch where that hand goes, you know, I just
Speaker 1: don't know. It's got a mind of its own. You know.
Speaker 1: Bill Clinton's out there as somebody who's still very respecting
Speaker 1: Democrats circles. In fact, Hillary went out and said recently,
Speaker 1: there's no power and balance with the president of the
Speaker 1: United States. She said, it's in an interview, what was
Speaker 1: it a week ago? There's no no, no power and
Speaker 1: balance between the President United States and an intern in
Speaker 1: the White House that he was having h relations relations
Speaker 1: with um. She still she still will say stuff like that,
Speaker 1: and of course she thinks she's still running for president,
Speaker 1: which is it should give us all nightmares, how but
Speaker 1: it really should be the stuff of bad dreams. But
Speaker 1: I think it could become our reality before before too long.
Speaker 1: This is the thing, though, there's a there's a joylessness
Speaker 1: at the heart of the Democrat political ideology. These days.
Speaker 1: It's all about making sure that no one You know
Speaker 1: that there used to be this old I forget who
Speaker 1: it is who said it. I want to say it's Menkin,
Speaker 1: but it might not be hl Mankan. But you know,
Speaker 1: a a Puritan is somebody who lives with the constant
Speaker 1: fear that someone somewhere might be having a good time.
Speaker 1: And you find that increasingly true of Democrats. You know,
Speaker 1: a a democrat is somebody who's constantly in fear of
Speaker 1: someone somewhere saying anything interesting, radical, new, different, you know,
Speaker 1: breaking down old paradigms and and enjoying themselves while they
Speaker 1: do it, you know, enjoying themselves while they try to
Speaker 1: show lenge the dominant political orthodoxy. Democrats get terrified by that.
Speaker 1: They so desire conformity and discussions all the time. In fact,
Speaker 1: they desire telling you what words you can use in
Speaker 1: the discussion, and who can and who can use what
Speaker 1: kinds of words. So many constraints put on this all always.
Speaker 1: I mean, I just it would be easy for me
Speaker 1: to switch, you know, in my head if I wanted
Speaker 1: to and become a Democrat, just call everybody every conservative
Speaker 1: everyone the other side is racist all the time. Everything
Speaker 1: is sexism, everything is intersectionality. It's just exhausting, though, isn't
Speaker 1: it to think that way? You think about what it
Speaker 1: really must be like to be some of these uh,
Speaker 1: just joyless radical feminists that I've seen recently and had
Speaker 1: to talk to a few times in the last few
Speaker 1: months because the whole cavitall situation, Who really do think
Speaker 1: of women as this terribly oppressed and marginalized minority in society,
Speaker 1: even though they're actually my majority by population, But they
Speaker 1: really think of themselves this way, And there's a constant
Speaker 1: chip on the shoulder attitude for all their interactions with men. Always.
Speaker 1: It's just not a good way to go through life.
Speaker 1: It's just not a happy, healthy way to be, and
Speaker 1: increasingly I think for Democrats, you know, it's a it's
Speaker 1: like a sugar high politically. You know, Oh, you get
Speaker 1: to do all the virtue signaling and you get to
Speaker 1: feel like you're so brave and tall on issues where
Speaker 1: you're taking what is the most convenient issue for you politically, socially,
Speaker 1: and professionally as a Democrat. But at the end of
Speaker 1: the day, isn't it just doesn't feel kind of hollowed
Speaker 1: or never have to really engage the other side and
Speaker 1: just call them racist and misogynists. I don't know. I
Speaker 1: hope people think about this as they go and they vote,
Speaker 1: or they think about whether they're they're going to vote
Speaker 1: or not. It's definitely worth spending some time on. I've
Speaker 1: got some in my hand right now. Black rifle coffee.
Speaker 1: It's like having a warm cup of freedom that keeps
Speaker 1: you energized and ready to fight the fights that matter.
Speaker 1: Black of a coffee is delicious. I mean, I'm kind
Speaker 1: of a fruit fru bourgeois city guy when it comes
Speaker 1: to my coffee, because I really do care where the
Speaker 1: beans come from, how they've been roasted, and how they taste.
Speaker 1: Black Rifle Coffee gives you all of that, and it's
Speaker 1: also a company that is owned and operated by veterans,
Speaker 1: including many members of US Special Operations who have gone
Speaker 1: out now into the world to create a fantastic brand
Speaker 1: that's all about patriotism, veterans, and freedom and some kick
Speaker 1: ass delicious coffee. To go to Black Rifle Coffee dot
Speaker 1: com slash buck, you'll get fifteen percent off your order.
Speaker 1: You could have it delivered right to your door. Couldn't
Speaker 1: be any easier. Again, it's all right there for you
Speaker 1: on the website Black Rifle Coffee dot com, slash buck.
Speaker 1: This should be the coffee that everyone who listens to
Speaker 1: this show drinks, and everybody should go to Black Rifle
Speaker 1: Coffee dot com slash buck. Here in Texas the big
Speaker 1: race Beato Rourke first, Ted Cruise. If you had to
Speaker 1: make it, this isn't right now. Who do you think
Speaker 1: you would support? I would probably for Beato of what
Speaker 1: I know that's from the beddo How did do Beto?
Speaker 1: Especially because I'm like a woman, I think I will
Speaker 1: go for the Democrat. Are there any accomplishments in his
Speaker 1: career you can point to that would make him a
Speaker 1: good person? Profess. Um, I am not aware of a
Speaker 1: lot of specific accomplishments that he has made. There any
Speaker 1: accomplishments of Bedos that you would point to, I don't
Speaker 1: know any, so I can't say anything that is there
Speaker 1: anything you can point to with things and be like, yeah,
Speaker 1: he's accomplished to this. Um, I think he's accomplished, like
Speaker 1: honestly getting his name out there. I think for not
Speaker 1: doing much, it sounds like he's really but it just
Speaker 1: be popular accomplishment though, like career accomplishments. I honestly couldn't
Speaker 1: point to anything. I'm just trying to you know, I'm
Speaker 1: not as educated as I would like to be. Those
Speaker 1: same people that are probably saying that Beto has no
Speaker 1: experience probably go to a job and they don't get
Speaker 1: hired and complain about the same thing. Oh, I don't
Speaker 1: have any experience, but who gives me that experience? It's
Speaker 1: the same concept, man, like, he may not have any experience,
Speaker 1: but there's probably the experience he needs to push this
Speaker 1: stuff forward, you know. Good, there's a difference between like
Speaker 1: an entry level job and the United States Senate though, right, Okay,
Speaker 1: I see what you're saying, But you can be um
Speaker 1: as informed about a physician without actually doing it. Can
Speaker 1: you think of any bit or work accomplishments unless you
Speaker 1: can go into jail for DW an accomplishment, then no. Wow,
Speaker 1: at least we had at least we had this one
Speaker 1: last woman there who knew something about Beato Aroor that
Speaker 1: was from campus or four. But I gotta say I
Speaker 1: love it, man. They they come out of the gate
Speaker 1: and they're just like, okay, so everybody we're gonna talk
Speaker 1: to on this campus pretty much, not everybody, but a
Speaker 1: lot of them they like they like Beto. Why do
Speaker 1: you like Beato? You know? The answer is because the
Speaker 1: media tells them to, because he's kind of young ish
Speaker 1: and they think he's telegenic and liberal. And this whole
Speaker 1: storyline is that he's going to be able to beat
Speaker 1: Ted Cruz. And the left hates Ted Cruise because he
Speaker 1: is a very smart conservative constitutionalists and they just don't
Speaker 1: want to have to deal with him. So they love
Speaker 1: this idea of going right into the heart of I mean, look,
Speaker 1: this is the equivalent of left if we sent a
Speaker 1: Republican Senate candidate to take on Kamala Harris. Right, there's
Speaker 1: somebody who's very important to the left in the stronghold
Speaker 1: of the Democratic Party, which is California. But you'll notice
Speaker 1: that they keep doing this, right, the Democrats keep saying
Speaker 1: this is what's happening, and then and then it doesn't happen,
Speaker 1: meaning that it's not close. And with Beeto, it's important
Speaker 1: to ask people what are his accomplishments or what does
Speaker 1: he stand for? Because you'll hear that they support him
Speaker 1: and they don't know what he stands for and they
Speaker 1: don't care because they've been told there is a brainwashing
Speaker 1: that goes on with the media. That's what this is.
Speaker 1: And you know, here's here's a perfect example of of
Speaker 1: the uh self licking ice cream code that is that
Speaker 1: that is the media. Here is CNNs Donna Bash, not
Speaker 1: Dana Donna Bash. And here's here's her talking about just
Speaker 1: just sort of setting the scene for this what really
Speaker 1: turned into an infomercial for Beto Rourke. I mean they
Speaker 1: just had a town hall. Was like, yeah, we'll have
Speaker 1: Beto rourkean let's let him go around and answer questions.
Speaker 1: That's how invested in this they are. Play clip six.
Speaker 1: According to CNN's latest Full Wolf, it's a seven point
Speaker 1: race and Ted Cruz has that seven point advantage. It
Speaker 1: was a bit tighter at the end of the summer.
Speaker 1: But the fact that we are even here in Ruby
Speaker 1: red Texas talking about a very hot senate race, a
Speaker 1: headliner senate race, is very telling. And one of the
Speaker 1: big reasons is because of the Democratic challenger, better Or Rourke.
Speaker 1: He has gotten national buzz in a very big way,
Speaker 1: particularly among Democrats from the East coast to the west coast,
Speaker 1: and of course here in Texas as well, particularly in
Speaker 1: the big cities. Yeah, he's got a lot of buzz,
Speaker 1: all right, I thought that was that was brilliant. She's like,
Speaker 1: the fact that we are even here in Texas talking
Speaker 1: about a very, very hot senate race is very telling.
Speaker 1: That's another way I've seen and saying, yeah, like, isn't
Speaker 1: it crazy that like here we are having to be
Speaker 1: covering this thing that we've made the decision to cover.
Speaker 1: So that tells you that, like it clearly has to
Speaker 1: be covered, right exactly, they are manufacturing this whole story.
Speaker 1: It's it's not I'm not saying there's nothing there, but
Speaker 1: it's not nearly as interesting or as close or anything
Speaker 1: else that they pretend A seven seven point deficit in
Speaker 1: the Senate race. Oh, and it's only trending up for
Speaker 1: Ted Cruz. I've been saying this, he's gonna win by
Speaker 1: ten points. It's not even close. It's gonna crush this guy.
Speaker 1: Remember it's a Senate race, it's not some district that
Speaker 1: you should think that they'd have a better sense of
Speaker 1: what's going to happen state wide. But they have no idea,
Speaker 1: none whatsoever. Or I shouldn't say they have no idea,
Speaker 1: that's not true. See, they want to tell people what
Speaker 1: they want to tell them. And they've been pushing this,
Speaker 1: this storyline all all along, Cinderella stories, Cindrea story out
Speaker 1: of nowhere. So they've been pushing this and now they're
Speaker 1: realizing that it's not actually gonna be anything like what
Speaker 1: they had pretended to. What's the same thing, as I
Speaker 1: said with John oss Off and with Wendy Davis and
Speaker 1: these other media darling candidates who get all this member
Speaker 1: media coverage, is money, folks. This is one thing that
Speaker 1: you that we never really get to talk about. But
Speaker 1: when we discussed the mainstream media advantage, and you get
Speaker 1: all these people who will go on media, go on
Speaker 1: media outlets and say, oh, we're going to take the
Speaker 1: money out of politics. When CNN decides that they're going
Speaker 1: to do flood the zone coverage of some uh, some
Speaker 1: favorite candidate of theirs who has no shot of really winning,
Speaker 1: it's essentially an in kind donation to that candidate. You know,
Speaker 1: when when they decide to really focus in and push
Speaker 1: a narrative on somebody, it looks what do most candidates
Speaker 1: spend their money on? Candidate? Or rather what do candidates
Speaker 1: spend most of their money on? Also, most of them
Speaker 1: do this, Uh, they spend most of their money on
Speaker 1: TV buys. That's where the money goes. That's right, getting
Speaker 1: their message out on TV, well they have to pay
Speaker 1: for that. And the campaigns also to say, you know,
Speaker 1: sponsored by a paid for by the blah blah block campaign.
Speaker 1: If if you have news networks that will just give
Speaker 1: you that coverage, give you that ability to reach audience
Speaker 1: for free, and do it in a very favorable way
Speaker 1: with soft you know, cream puff interviews and town halls
Speaker 1: where the other candidates not there at all. This stuff
Speaker 1: this is just an in kind donation. In CNN, MSNBC
Speaker 1: and others are giving in kind donations to Democrat candidates
Speaker 1: that they pick all the time, all the time, old book.
Speaker 1: What about Fox? Yeah, Fox supports conservative candidates. Foxes one,
Speaker 1: Network one. The left has ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, PBS, CNN.
Speaker 1: Those are the ones that come to mind right away.
Speaker 1: You know, BBC, BBC, America, Al Jazeera. That's right. We
Speaker 1: know all ja zeroys likes the Democrats. Oh, thanks, such it.
Speaker 1: It really is such a such a debak, such an embarrassment.
Speaker 1: Speaking of debacles, though Christian Cinema she has learned. We've
Speaker 1: learned subment some things about her, including that you know,
Speaker 1: she's like, yeah, maybe maybe fighting for the Taliban back
Speaker 1: in the day. If you're an American, you know, no
Speaker 1: big deal there. He's got no problem with that. I
Speaker 1: wanted to like Christian Cinema because I don't know, like
Speaker 1: the glasses and you know, her whole vibe. I wanted
Speaker 1: to be okay with her. I was obviously a McSally
Speaker 1: voter if I could vote there. But but Cinema has
Speaker 1: had a rough go because the more you find out
Speaker 1: about her, the more you find out she's just kind
Speaker 1: of a kookie leftist, and putting her in charge and
Speaker 1: giving her any power would be pretty insane play. Are
Speaker 1: you a Democrat? I am proud Democrat. Oh gosh, it's
Speaker 1: hard to say proud. I don't know that. I'm not
Speaker 1: sure that people are even proud of parties anymore because
Speaker 1: I feel like the parties are not doing a good job.
Speaker 1: So I would say that I'm a proud of Arizona.
Speaker 1: That's something I'm very proud of um. And I'm proud
Speaker 1: of the work that I have done in Washington, d C.
Speaker 1: And the work I've done in the state Senate, in
Speaker 1: the state House before going to Congress. But I'm not
Speaker 1: particularly proud of the parties, not proud of the parties. Well,
Speaker 1: you know, I've got news for your Christian cinema. I
Speaker 1: don't think the parties are not proud of you. I
Speaker 1: don't think I don't think a Democrat party is going
Speaker 1: to be all that excited about your candidacy when you
Speaker 1: get when you get pretty thoroughly walloped by mc sally,
Speaker 1: which is about to happen as well. Maybe these were
Speaker 1: the races that were they were telling us, we're gonna
Speaker 1: be close, gonna be really important to see what ends
Speaker 1: up happening with these races. You know, these are bell
Speaker 1: weathers for whether Trump is going to have a pretty
Speaker 1: clear pathway to re election in and nope, not the case.
Speaker 1: What we see is they were pushing this all along
Speaker 1: for their own purposes, and then they decided that in
Speaker 1: the last minute they're gonna start putting out these polls like, yeah, okay,
Speaker 1: maybe it wasn't as close as we said. Everything else,
Speaker 1: you don't say, folks, what a shock? What a shock? Um,
Speaker 1: It's just it's so typical. And that's why I really
Speaker 1: like holding their feet to the fire over this one,
Speaker 1: because they're just digging in even more. And we have
Speaker 1: all this empirical evidence now, all this data to show
Speaker 1: about how they call races close that aren't. And by
Speaker 1: the way, the races haven't even the elections haven't even
Speaker 1: happened yet. But I know, you know, Cinema is gonna lose.
Speaker 1: Uh you know, bid O'Rourke's gonna lose. You get these
Speaker 1: candidates the media is all excited about and act like, oh,
Speaker 1: it's gonna be amazing, and it's not amazing, and it
Speaker 1: never was gonna be amazing. It's just all mythology constructed
Speaker 1: by the Democrat dominated media apparatus. So yeah, I see
Speaker 1: it coming, you see it coming, and we'll continue to
Speaker 1: be right and the the mainstre I try not ever
Speaker 1: see the lamestream media because I think that's a little
Speaker 1: too corny. But the mainstream media is going to continue
Speaker 1: doing what they're doing as well, which is to lie
Speaker 1: and be wrong a lot. But let's remember Jim mccason
Speaker 1: is the same person that's been covering Trump and the
Speaker 1: campaign and had death threats directed at him. He's also
Speaker 1: had you know, people chanting in his face. CNN sucks.
Speaker 1: My good friend Don Lemon has had death threats blamed
Speaker 1: a lot of the Trump um rallies and sort of
Speaker 1: that forever on the death threats against a lot of
Speaker 1: CNN reporters in Atlanta. My colleague, former colleagues are afraid
Speaker 1: to go to work. So I think the tone comes
Speaker 1: from the top. I don't recall a time when we
Speaker 1: heard this kind of attack on freedom of the press,
Speaker 1: on our first Amendment, and I think it started with
Speaker 1: this president. Reporters are not the first Amendment. This this
Speaker 1: needs to be repeated over and over again for the
Speaker 1: people that go on TV and keep talking about this.
Speaker 1: You know, mainstream media does not equal the First Amendment.
Speaker 1: They're covered by the First Amendment. But you have the
Speaker 1: right to free speech just as any journalist does. There's
Speaker 1: no special rights for the press. They don't seem to
Speaker 1: understand this, and they really, I think, are having this
Speaker 1: panic over Trump one because he They just think that
Speaker 1: he culturally and stylistically represents something that's a a threat
Speaker 1: to them. I'm right, there's just all this all this
Speaker 1: stuff about Trump in general upsets them. But even beyond that,
Speaker 1: I gotta tell you, you know, they claim to be
Speaker 1: speaking truth to power. You have all these journalists are like, oh,
Speaker 1: we're so brave. We don't journalists think of themselves as
Speaker 1: incredibly brave and then cry like a bunch of babies
Speaker 1: all the time. This is something that I guess as
Speaker 1: somebody who's in the industry in some capacity, although I don't.
Speaker 1: I don't run around saying I'm a journalist. I do
Speaker 1: everything that journalists do. I just don't talk about myself
Speaker 1: in this third person like Buck is a great journalist,
Speaker 1: because I think it's weird. I think it's kind of
Speaker 1: an old fashioned model of looking at this business of
Speaker 1: information and analysis, which is really all an entertainment, which
Speaker 1: is really all media is but that was uh, one
Speaker 1: of the co hosts on the View, and she's saying
Speaker 1: that CNN people are afraid to go to work because
Speaker 1: of Trump. They're not afraid to go to work. Okay,
Speaker 1: They're more famous than they've ever been. They're incredibly especially
Speaker 1: the ones whose name as you know, they're incredibly highly paid.
Speaker 1: And if they weren't at Siena, and there's no other
Speaker 1: place on the planet that would be paying them what
Speaker 1: they're getting paid. And you know, what, what are we
Speaker 1: supposed to feel so sorry for them about because they what?
Speaker 1: Because they get death threats. Every conservative person of media
Speaker 1: I know gets death threats of any stature whatsoever. Happens
Speaker 1: all the time. Not only death threats, but constantly called
Speaker 1: the racist, constantly called the sexist, you know, told that
Speaker 1: they're rape apologists, and and suffer real professional consequences for
Speaker 1: having conservative views. That's what liberals, that's what's so funny
Speaker 1: to me, is that they just run around in this
Speaker 1: echo chamber of everyone agrees with them, Everyone tells them
Speaker 1: how great they are and how smart they are, and
Speaker 1: especially in the press and the media, they operate in
Speaker 1: this world where they're all kind of on the same team.
Speaker 1: All the time, and then they turn on they're like,
Speaker 1: oh my gosh, who the presidents saying mean things about us?
Speaker 1: You know, half the country has had to deal with
Speaker 1: most of their lives never hearing anyone in a position
Speaker 1: like the president that take it to the mainstream media
Speaker 1: and this left wing bias that is inherent and and
Speaker 1: just constant in so much of the reporting we see,
Speaker 1: and they just can't handle it out. I just think
Speaker 1: it's funny though, because they want to hold themselves up
Speaker 1: for being brave, like they're the last line of defense
Speaker 1: against the insanity that is Trump. And then when I
Speaker 1: say to them, what has Trump done to you that
Speaker 1: is so damaging? What? What is it that Trump has
Speaker 1: done that makes you think that you should be afraid? Like,
Speaker 1: oh no, what am I going to do? They don't
Speaker 1: have anything, No one's no one's losing their job because
Speaker 1: they've spoken out against Trump. In fact, people get book
Speaker 1: deals for speaking out against Trump. In fact, the entire
Speaker 1: media apparatus is designed to make it more appealing to
Speaker 1: be anti than pro Trump. Meanwhile, the people who are
Speaker 1: anti Trump think that what they're doing is so hard.
Speaker 1: Why because they go to rallies and people are mean
Speaker 1: to them. People are mean to conservatives all the time.
Speaker 1: People are any conservatives in the grocery store for just
Speaker 1: saying what they think, never mind being an actual conservative
Speaker 1: media figure. I'll tell you a quick funny story. I
Speaker 1: was at the Baltimore train station yesterday and a young
Speaker 1: man walked past me and I thought, okay, and you know,
Speaker 1: he kind of did that stop and look, you know,
Speaker 1: stopping weird stare thing first, not weird stare, but you
Speaker 1: don't even stopp an intense stare. And and he goes,
Speaker 1: he goes, hey, I was just watching you on Hill TV.
Speaker 1: And this was This was one of the first times
Speaker 1: this has ever happened, cause I usually think people see me,
Speaker 1: they'll be like, oh, you know, I'm hoping it's somebody
Speaker 1: from Team Bucks. Then it's like I'm stumbling upon one
Speaker 1: of my long lost family members, because if you're somebody
Speaker 1: listens to this radio show, we tend to be very tight.
Speaker 1: But no, it wasn't somebody who was a radio listener.
Speaker 1: He says, Oh, you know, it's I'm just watching you
Speaker 1: on TV on the Hill dot com. That's so cool.
Speaker 1: And he says, you know, I'm such a big fan
Speaker 1: of Crystal your co host, and I said, oh, Crystal
Speaker 1: is wonderful. He goes, yeah, I'm a community organizer in
Speaker 1: North Carolina. And he told me his name, and I said, well,
Speaker 1: I really you watching the show, but you know sure enough, Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's right, a community organized in North Carolina. I don't
Speaker 1: think he's listening to this radio show very much. But
Speaker 1: he was very nice, very polite, very polite gentleman, and
Speaker 1: he went about his way. It's kind of funny though, like, yeah,
Speaker 1: as soon as soon as he told me the community organizer,
Speaker 1: I don't think he listens to my radio show. I
Speaker 1: think you might just see me up on the hill.
Speaker 1: But this is not this is not really all that complicated.
Speaker 1: Is really not all that hard to figure out. The
Speaker 1: press generally does what is in their interest to do right,
Speaker 1: and for most people that means going where the jobs
Speaker 1: and the money are, which is to the left, and
Speaker 1: going to the place where you know that every other reporter.
Speaker 1: And think of it this way. If you're a conservative
Speaker 1: journalist or conservative media person and you're in the let's
Speaker 1: say you're in a press scrum outside the Oval office.
Speaker 1: The ten or fifteen people that are around you that
Speaker 1: all work for you know, Associated Press, the New York Times,
Speaker 1: the Washington Post, the you know, all this, Reuters, all
Speaker 1: the places. They all kind of like and agree. They
Speaker 1: all like each other, and they agree with each other
Speaker 1: in most political matters. If you happen to be the
Speaker 1: one person from Fox, the Daily Call or any of
Speaker 1: these places, you having to be the conservative from the
Speaker 1: Hill dot Com, for example, everyone around you thinks that
Speaker 1: you're some kind of a weirdo who is way too
Speaker 1: nice and favorable to the president his agenda all the time,
Speaker 1: and you're considered you're considered very much on the outside.
Speaker 1: So you know, I just I think we should just
Speaker 1: be honest about this stuff. I don't think we have
Speaker 1: to keep playing this game anymore. We go, Oh, it's
Speaker 1: so hard to go to work with, you know, and
Speaker 1: see it's such a bunch of babies. It's amazing. You know,
Speaker 1: they're they're always talking abou how they're on the front
Speaker 1: lines doing all this hard reporting. You know, it's like,
Speaker 1: just just slow your role. Most of the time when
Speaker 1: you're on the front lines droom reporting, you're staying at
Speaker 1: the four seasons. Okay, It's it's really not that hard.
Speaker 1: And you know, so they have a president that that
Speaker 1: pushes back a little bit on what is clearly fake news.
Speaker 1: I mean that that story that I told you that
Speaker 1: that Ann Coulter wrote her column on this Week about
Speaker 1: Anna Cabrera where she inserted the word white into two
Speaker 1: two very obvious, very well known statements by the president
Speaker 1: and his son. That was fake news. That was a
Speaker 1: huge instance of fake news. And it took them days
Speaker 1: to correct it. And it only happened because they hate
Speaker 1: the president. So we we know this, we know this. Um,
Speaker 1: it's just after a while I get sick of hearing.
Speaker 1: I really want to pull over the ambulance for some
Speaker 1: of these different TV news it's really the worst at
Speaker 1: seeing that because look, they've made their brand, they've made
Speaker 1: their bed. They should sleep in it. Their bed is
Speaker 1: we are going to stop Trump. We are anti Trump. Okay, Well,
Speaker 1: that's who you are, and that's what There is a
Speaker 1: there is an agenda the organization, There's no question about it.
Speaker 1: And that's why I want some CNN exact try to
Speaker 1: get all hissy with you. Early the week, I said,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, you guys are not nonpartisan journalists. You are
Speaker 1: very partisan. Own it. Stop being phonies, Stop being fake.
Speaker 1: You could say, yeah, that's right. I said it. Rock
Speaker 1: and roll, fellow patriots, we made ours go up to eleven.
Speaker 1: It's time for roll call, row call on a Friday,
Speaker 1: which means double row call. I hope you're all excited
Speaker 1: for the weekend. I am. I am ready for it.
Speaker 1: I have a very very fantastic weekend plan involving a
Speaker 1: lot of sleeping, a lot of eating. I'm gonna watch
Speaker 1: I'm watching. I'll tell you I'm watching Peaky Blinders on Netflix,
Speaker 1: which I know is a little bit I'm not particularly
Speaker 1: current right now. It's a little old, but wow, it
Speaker 1: is a really solid show. Although I have to say
Speaker 1: sometimes those guys from those tough towns circuit nineteen twenty England,
Speaker 1: it's tough to understand them a lot. Who this You go,
Speaker 1: You're like, wait, what, they're English people. If they speak
Speaker 1: a little English, you can be a little tough. Sometimes.
Speaker 1: I like it, though, I have to say I think
Speaker 1: it's a I think it's a pretty well done show.
Speaker 1: So if you're looking for one, you can check that
Speaker 1: one out. Rachel kicks off our roll call shield time
Speaker 1: about grittings from sunny southern California. I hope the swamp
Speaker 1: isn't getting to you too much. I was just wondering
Speaker 1: how the plans to make Rising a podcast for coming
Speaker 1: on thanks you know, Rachel, Um, there is no plan
Speaker 1: as of right now to make Rising a podcast. It's
Speaker 1: kind of fallen by the wayside. So maybe that's something
Speaker 1: that I can raise with my team and say, hey,
Speaker 1: I've got an idea Rising a podcast. Maybe we should
Speaker 1: go for that. Um. But the most important thing is
Speaker 1: that all of you listen to this, especially those of
Speaker 1: you who listen on radio no, that you can always
Speaker 1: listen on demand, and that we try to get the
Speaker 1: podcast up as early as possible. Usually these days podcast
Speaker 1: should be ready for your listening enjoyment by six Eastern
Speaker 1: maybe seven eastern each day, So we're getting it up
Speaker 1: earlier and earlier all the time. Uh, Timothy right shields
Speaker 1: high Buck. You ask for a miracle, I give you
Speaker 1: the FBI. Hans Gruber in Die Hard a friendly suggestion
Speaker 1: add some lighter fare mixing with the heavy duty news
Speaker 1: I had to listen to. Uh. I had to stop
Speaker 1: listening to Wednesday's show and you're discussing the various attacks
Speaker 1: on conservatives because I was losing like cool I must
Speaker 1: be I must be terrible living in the swamp. Keep
Speaker 1: fighting a good fight, and get married already, Shields High Timothy,
Speaker 1: all all fair points, And I know some days, trust me,
Speaker 1: really affects me. Some days the news cycle it feels
Speaker 1: a little bit like just getting beaten down by the
Speaker 1: whole thing is, especially when you have these stories of
Speaker 1: of conservatives who are getting attacked and and are being
Speaker 1: physically accosted and all this stuff. I mean, there's just
Speaker 1: no place in a civilized society for people to be
Speaker 1: not just physically attacked, but even hounded and mobbed in public,
Speaker 1: to be menaced in that way. It's completely completely unacceptable.
Speaker 1: So I'm with you on all that. And as for
Speaker 1: lighter fare, trust me, there are many days when I
Speaker 1: wish I could do more of a comedic segment towards
Speaker 1: the end of the show. But I'll tell you, comedy
Speaker 1: is something that you have to be both in the
Speaker 1: mood for and you have to be able to put
Speaker 1: forth the energy. And that's something that I can't say,
Speaker 1: uh is there all the time when you're doing all
Speaker 1: the things that I've got going on these days. To
Speaker 1: really do the comedy, I was just to remember when
Speaker 1: I was filling for Russia, Limball and Acasia like detail
Speaker 1: as a vice, like up here, like courts in targeted
Speaker 1: to talk about kinds of real ham der blasiard and
Speaker 1: some people loved it. You you, They would write to
Speaker 1: me like, oh, I couldn't stop laughing at other people
Speaker 1: like I think you're a really good political analysts. I
Speaker 1: don't like when you do voices. I don't like comedy.
Speaker 1: You're not a comedian. And it was such a stark
Speaker 1: separation between the two. There's nobody who's like, nah, it's
Speaker 1: kind of okay. You know. People are like it's kind
Speaker 1: of crap, or it's kind of amazing. So, you know,
Speaker 1: I guess it's like that old thing. You can't please
Speaker 1: all the people all the time. Eric writes, Buck, have
Speaker 1: you won any converts through exposing people to the truth
Speaker 1: in the blue bubbles they live in through your TV
Speaker 1: show that you know of? I hope. So I just
Speaker 1: wanted to say that I fear this caravan is being
Speaker 1: orchestrated to coincide with the mid terms, because we completely
Speaker 1: lost on the previous one. It's the only thing the
Speaker 1: left is really won within the last two years. The
Speaker 1: separating family's crap was brutal for our cause, and I'm
Speaker 1: afraid they're playing some three D chess here and it
Speaker 1: may pay off for them a shields high, Eric, I'm
Speaker 1: with you on all that. The last time the Democrats
Speaker 1: had a real, a real winner of a political issue
Speaker 1: in the last six months, by my estimation, is on
Speaker 1: the family separations at the border issue. That is where
Speaker 1: Democrats have really been able to uh, you know, gather
Speaker 1: up some some political momentum. And it's it's obviously very
Speaker 1: frustrating because I think that they're they're tremendously dishonest in
Speaker 1: how they approach all of that. Um. But let's just
Speaker 1: deal with the reality as it is. They sure enough,
Speaker 1: they are in fact um able to capitalize on that
Speaker 1: issue because it's very emotional issue for people. It really is. Uh,
Speaker 1: Cade is next year here. It's hey, Buck, I love
Speaker 1: the show as always, Well, Cade, love you as always. Bro.
Speaker 1: I saw the news about Mueller making his findings public
Speaker 1: after the mid terms. Can you devote some time talking
Speaker 1: about that and what that could potentially mean. I feel
Speaker 1: like this has been getting glossed over by the media. Okay,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna be talking about it a lot, especially as
Speaker 1: it gets closer, and then when it happens. I can't
Speaker 1: say that I know what's gonna shake out with all that.
Speaker 1: I can't say that I can predict it. I don't think.
Speaker 1: I don't think anybody knows really what's going on. I
Speaker 1: don't think anybody knows what the end state of all
Speaker 1: of all that's gonna be. I mean, I would I
Speaker 1: could bet money that there's not gonna be anything that
Speaker 1: affects President Trump. I would bet a lot of money
Speaker 1: on that one. But I I don't know what they've
Speaker 1: really got up there. Step. I think Muller's got nothing
Speaker 1: in the grand scheme of things. But nothing to a normal,
Speaker 1: well adjusted person is not going to be nothing to
Speaker 1: the Democrats. If he releases a report where he says
Speaker 1: that there is not necessarily criminal obstruction, but it was
Speaker 1: unethical the way that Trump fired Coma or something, Oh,
Speaker 1: they're gonna make a huge deal of it. And remember,
Speaker 1: and I've been preparing you for this for a long time.
Speaker 1: It's not a criminal matter when you impeach a president.
Speaker 1: It is a political matter. And so if the Mulla
Speaker 1: report clears Trump and his top associates of any possible criminality, conspiracy,
Speaker 1: any of that when it comes to Russia collusion. But
Speaker 1: it has some stuff in there that just doesn't look
Speaker 1: good or that can be interpreted in such a way
Speaker 1: that some people would take it as you know, unethical,
Speaker 1: slimy whatever, that could be used as fodder, that could
Speaker 1: be used as ammunition for the House, well, the Democrat
Speaker 1: controlled House, to engage in all kinds of nonsense and
Speaker 1: demagoguery around Trump and then push for impeachment. I mean,
Speaker 1: I really think that's what they're gonna do. They're gonna
Speaker 1: push for impeachment. They won't get removal, and they will
Speaker 1: impeach the president if they have the votes and if
Speaker 1: they have the majority, if they can, they will do it.
Speaker 1: Eric writes Buck. The only blue waves that are happening
Speaker 1: are the blue waves of new Democrat voters caravanting across
Speaker 1: South and Central America. Ah, I see what you did there, Eric.
Speaker 1: You are a clever fellow, and it is good to
Speaker 1: hear from you. Jonathan Hi Buck not entirely sure if
Speaker 1: this is the place for roll call, Well, guess what,
Speaker 1: my friend, johnath But the whoobee is the blanket from
Speaker 1: Michael Keaton's son in the movie, Mr Mom, if you
Speaker 1: haven't seen it, and like Michael Keaton, it's a must
Speaker 1: shields high. I haven't seen it, but I can't say
Speaker 1: I am a Michael Keaton fan, so I'm gonna probably
Speaker 1: I appreciate the heads up Jonathan on the Whoobee, but
Speaker 1: I don't think I'm gonna add Michael Keaton, Mr Mom
Speaker 1: to my Netflix que anytime soon. Uh Aries, writes Buck.
Speaker 1: You mentioned you've taken measures for your own safety about
Speaker 1: uh and while carving up a bunch of protests with
Speaker 1: a knife or completely caving in their mouths with brass
Speaker 1: knuckles would be would be good, it wouldn't look good
Speaker 1: on camera. So I'm assuming you're carrying pepper spray. My
Speaker 1: understanding is the m I p D, like a lot
Speaker 1: of pds, carry Saber five pepper spray, which is weaker
Speaker 1: than Saber red, which is weak as we can be.
Speaker 1: Stay away from water based OC sprays, even the so
Speaker 1: called law Enforce and great stuff unless it is a
Speaker 1: mix of O C and C S, which I haven't
Speaker 1: seen in a personal carry canister. Go with an alcohol
Speaker 1: based product like l E ten. Water based products take
Speaker 1: longer to work as they need time for the water
Speaker 1: to evaporate the alcohol based products work right away. You
Speaker 1: can literally stop a deranged man coming at you with
Speaker 1: a knife in his tracks with something like L ten
Speaker 1: Saber red, which is stronger than Saber five a spread
Speaker 1: of choice for the m I p D will not
Speaker 1: do that areas now, I'm my favorite. I like edged weapons,
Speaker 1: so I have a whole bunch of different edged weapons.
Speaker 1: I'm obviously I live in d C, which makes it,
Speaker 1: as a matter of policy, impossible to legally own a firearm.
Speaker 1: So I cannot have a firearm in d C. And
Speaker 1: people say, oh, because you were in the government care
Speaker 1: I'm like, yeah, please, I wish that does not give
Speaker 1: you any That does not give you any ability to
Speaker 1: get a firearm more easily having worked at the CIA
Speaker 1: or anything like, even if you had a topsic clearance
Speaker 1: as I did, and and weapons training as I did,
Speaker 1: they don't care. You cannot get a firearm any faster,
Speaker 1: anymore easily than anyone else. And that is by that
Speaker 1: is by design, I must say. So, let's see we
Speaker 1: guys here, Catherine, right, So, I've been following the resurgence
Speaker 1: of previous secure diseases eradicated in the US for over
Speaker 1: fifty years new strains of polio and TB, the CDC
Speaker 1: will only report, not diagnose. As we now have twenty
Speaker 1: million illegals, and I would add another five million to that,
Speaker 1: it seems to me that we have a huge problem.
Speaker 1: If America continues to allow people from other countries and ours,
Speaker 1: there will be no more America. We will no longer
Speaker 1: be a sovereign nation. Thinks it could be a good
Speaker 1: topic for a segment of your radio show, Catherine. Catherine,
Speaker 1: I agree, it's very concerning when you have the reintroduction
Speaker 1: of disease that has been eradicated previously. Immigration that is unrestricted,
Speaker 1: ie illegal immigration, can certainly play a role in that.
Speaker 1: But I gotta tell you, one of the big problems
Speaker 1: we're seeing with the pockets of UH, these whooping cough
Speaker 1: and all these other diseases that have come back up
Speaker 1: in this country, it has to do with elite liberal
Speaker 1: enclaves places like Palo Alto, California, where, for whatever reason,
Speaker 1: there is this mentality among some of the elites that
Speaker 1: they should not vaccinate their children for anything, for anything.
Speaker 1: And while people can say they don't like vaccinations, and
Speaker 1: I know I've I've gotten I've stumbled into that topic
Speaker 1: here before. I'm not gonna do that today. People get
Speaker 1: very passionate about it. Um. The reason that you're having
Speaker 1: those diseases pop up in places like Palo Alto, and
Speaker 1: the reason that Google employees as parents have vaccination rates
Speaker 1: equivalent to like Sudan in Africa is they do not
Speaker 1: understand the science. So that is not Oh, did I
Speaker 1: just go there. Let's just hey, I got an idea.
Speaker 1: Let's go into a another quick policy here. We'll come back.
Speaker 1: We'll do more roll call on something other than vaccines,
Speaker 1: because did I even talk about that. No? Probably not.
Speaker 1: We'll be right back like soft butter on warm toast.
Speaker 1: Time to spread some freedom coast to coast. It's time
Speaker 1: for roll call. Eric Buck to quote Mike Myers SML
Speaker 1: character Simon. I do like drawings, Jacky Monkey. Uh did
Speaker 1: this one for the hut Shields? High enough said, let
Speaker 1: me know if you want to turn it into merch. Wow,
Speaker 1: that's an amazing drawing this guy did. This guy? Eric
Speaker 1: is really talented. I'm being completely I wish I could
Speaker 1: show this all to you because I know I'm on radio.
Speaker 1: So one thing that doesn't translate very well is Hey,
Speaker 1: let me tell you how cool this this drawing is
Speaker 1: over radio. Uh but it's legit, man, this guy's got Eric.
Speaker 1: I am really impressed. And uh yeah, I mean, let
Speaker 1: me talk to you about this and this is this
Speaker 1: is really good stuff. I gotta say, you've done very
Speaker 1: very well for yourself here, Pablo. Right, So when President
Speaker 1: Trump is in office, he's responsible and must be severely
Speaker 1: punished or must severely punish the defending country. This is
Speaker 1: about Saudi Arabia. When Obama is in office and many
Speaker 1: people get beheaded by ice is he says, don't forget
Speaker 1: the terrible deeds done in the crusades in the name
Speaker 1: of Christ. What a double standard? Shields high buck from Pablo?
Speaker 1: And yeah, I look at the Obama administration in bolden
Speaker 1: dictators for eight years and this this line as you
Speaker 1: hear from people about Trump and e bolden dictators, it's
Speaker 1: just bizarre. Honestly to me. At this point, I just
Speaker 1: wish that everybody would would stop acting like that's a
Speaker 1: sensible thing to say. Um that Trump is emboldened dictators
Speaker 1: because he's reached out to dictators. But it's always under
Speaker 1: the you and I can be friend the Trump approaches. Hey, dictator,
Speaker 1: you and I can be friends. You and I can talk,
Speaker 1: we can we can try to make progress. Or you
Speaker 1: can act like a clown, do stupid things, and I
Speaker 1: will unleash Holy hell on you. That's not that's not
Speaker 1: coddling them. That's carrots and sticks. That's saying we can
Speaker 1: do this the night sway, which would be great for
Speaker 1: us and great for all of your people, and we
Speaker 1: could be friends sort of. Or you can continue firing
Speaker 1: missiles in the case of North Korea, you can continue,
Speaker 1: uh you know, acting provocatively in Ukraine and all the
Speaker 1: things that we talked about in the foreign policy realm,
Speaker 1: and they're gonna be consequences. And the thing is when
Speaker 1: Trump claims will be consequences, unlike with Obama, the big
Speaker 1: bad guys out there on the global seeing and they
Speaker 1: listen because they know it's they know it's for real.
Speaker 1: Um here we have after being forced to this is
Speaker 1: Dr Lee writes after being forced to listen to viscous
Speaker 1: diet tribe from a lead singer of uh Che Virtues
Speaker 1: who called I don't know what that is churches who
Speaker 1: called Ted Cruz horrible vittle names. I'm not sure I'll
Speaker 1: continue to attend my decades long tradition of the Austin
Speaker 1: City Limits Festival, which is a real shame. And she's
Speaker 1: not even from this country. She's a Scottish citizen. Actually.
Speaker 1: I don't know what this group is or this band,
Speaker 1: but clearly somebody's talking smack about Trump and you did
Speaker 1: not like it. And I agree with you on that one.
Speaker 1: Richard writes, Hey Buck, in my humble opinion, this ka
Speaker 1: Shogi thing stinks too high Heaven. The deep state media
Speaker 1: is acting as though it's anonymous Turkish sources are above reproach,
Speaker 1: but I've seen no convincing evidence the guys even dead.
Speaker 1: And the subject of his last column is just too
Speaker 1: cute by half. Wasn't there another journalist who recently got
Speaker 1: caught faking his own murder? Could that be related to
Speaker 1: this Shields High Richard? I don't think he's faking his death.
Speaker 1: I think that would be tough. I think that's not
Speaker 1: what's happened here. I think he was almost certainly brutally
Speaker 1: murdered by the Saudis, and with the official say so
Speaker 1: of the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia, which is this
Speaker 1: could be the beginning of a Tom Clancy novel. It
Speaker 1: really could, I mean in terms of how gripping this
Speaker 1: whole situation is. Ah and and then of course you
Speaker 1: have all the international implications from this, so we will
Speaker 1: have to see. Lisa writes. The term wooby was originally
Speaker 1: one by Mr Mom with Michael Keaton. It was his
Speaker 1: five year olds completely tattered and worn out blanket. Okay.
Speaker 1: Another another Michael Keaton reference on the show to jar
Speaker 1: Or also says buck a will be is like a
Speaker 1: security blanket. Okay. Say a tactical will be to just
Speaker 1: about any marine under thirty five, and they'll imagine they're
Speaker 1: used issue poncho liner. Good to know, Mark rightes Hey,
Speaker 1: Buck on a recent show, you mentioned Mika's father is
Speaker 1: a big New Brazinski as being a Secretary of State. Nope,
Speaker 1: he was Jimmy Carter's national security advisor. Cyrus Vance was
Speaker 1: the secretary of State. Well, Mark, you are correct, but
Speaker 1: save for the flavor, because the Buckman doesn't get it
Speaker 1: wrong very often. But yes, thank you for the thank
Speaker 1: you for making making sure that we get it get
Speaker 1: it right here. That's gonna be it for today in
Speaker 1: the Freedom Hunt, coming to courtesy of the Swamp in
Speaker 1: d C. Have a great weekend, everybody. We're gonna have
Speaker 1: some fantastic shows next week. Always a pleasure to have
Speaker 1: you hanging out with me here. Please do tell somebody
Speaker 1: about the show Shields High. I was just traveling on
Speaker 1: a train today and I thought, hold on a second,
Speaker 1: can I use this WiFi that's unsecure? It's a public network?
Speaker 1: Is that a good idea? Can I check my bank
Speaker 1: statement on this or even my email? You don't want
Speaker 1: to have to have these security concerns, and I'm somebody
Speaker 1: who's been trained to identify security risks, especially when you're
Speaker 1: interacting in the online world. That's why you want a
Speaker 1: virtual private network and the best one that you can
Speaker 1: find is Express VPN. Express VPN gives you all the
Speaker 1: security that you need so that you don't put your
Speaker 1: private information at risk when you're using the Internet, because
Speaker 1: you know they're constantly tracking with all these different apps
Speaker 1: and all these different social media applications. Express VPN has
Speaker 1: easy to use apps that run in the background on
Speaker 1: your computer, phone, or tablet. Keep your online activity safe
Speaker 1: today and find out how you can get three months
Speaker 1: free with Express vpn dot com. Slash buck that's express
Speaker 1: v pn dot com slash buck for three months free
Speaker 1: with a one year package Express vpn dot com slash
Speaker 1: buck