WEBVTT - Monologue: OpenAI's Non-Profit Problem

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Zone Media. Hi, I'm Edzetron, and this is your weekly

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:19.480
<v Speaker 1>better offline monologue. Precarious. That's the nature of the GENERATIVAI industry,

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:21.919
<v Speaker 1>and especially open ai. A company that has never made

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a profit, has no pathway to profitability and is contingent

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>upon other companies spending tens of billions of dollars on

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>new infrastructure to power their models in the future. Throughout

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:34.480
<v Speaker 1>countless podcasts and newsletters, I've argued that all of these

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:37.200
<v Speaker 1>factors mean the open AI and by extension, the greater

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>GENERATIVEAI industry, will eventually collapse. Open ai is just one

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of a long line of dominoes, and it really only

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>takes one to four before the entire thing collapses. But

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>by comparison, I haven't really paid nearly as much of

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:51.919
<v Speaker 1>the attention as I should have to the unusual structure

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>of open ai, which I believe will also contribute to

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>its downfall. Open ai was initially started as a nonprofit

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>intended to further the safe development of artificial intelligence, if

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:04.839
<v Speaker 1>you believe them, Over time it morphed into an entirely

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:07.759
<v Speaker 1>different beast, becoming the most valuable startup in history, and

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the startup that has now raised the most capital in

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:14.119
<v Speaker 1>history sort of, but for legal reasons, it couldn't quite

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:17.039
<v Speaker 1>walk away from its nonprofit origins, and so we're now

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>left with this strange hybrid that consists of a nonprofit

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:23.320
<v Speaker 1>that owns much of open AI's intellectual property and assets,

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and a for profit business sort of tacked on awkwardly

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>at the side. In order to satiate its infinite thirst

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 1>for capital, open Ai must radically restructure the entire organization,

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>moving valuable assets and intellectual property from the nonprofit to

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the for profit entity. Their ability to raise money is

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>entirely contingent upon this, as generally investors don't plow tens

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:46.639
<v Speaker 1>of billions of dollars into philanthropic ventures where they will

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>never see a return. Indeed, many of open AI's previous

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>funding rounds have had caveats that would radically alter the

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:55.559
<v Speaker 1>terms of their deal if open ai fails to convert

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>into a for profit business. Last October, they raised six

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>point six billion dollars from a bevy of investors, but

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the deal included a covenant of sorts that should they

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>fail to convert into a full profit entity in two years.

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:12.079
<v Speaker 1>Of October twenty twenty six, the investment would convert into

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a loan. Open Ai would in effect have to return

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the capital to investors and potentially pay a punishing interest rate. Similarly,

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>open AI's latest forty billion dollar with soft Bank is

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>structured in a way where ten billion of the dollars

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>are contingent on open ai becoming a for profit business.

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>The point I'm trying to make is that for open Ai,

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:33.919
<v Speaker 1>this current structure represents an existential threat. In many ways.

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>It is more dire than any shortage of compute capacity

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:39.919
<v Speaker 1>or the fact that they spend billions of dollars more

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>than they'll ever make. So they just change structure, right,

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>what's the big deal? Well, this is a complex and

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>bureaucratic procedure that typically only happens in sectors like healthcare,

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>where hospitals are bought out by larger for profit companies.

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I struggle to think of any similar examples in tech,

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and even if those examples exist, they don't involve entities

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:01.639
<v Speaker 1>of the size in value of open Ai or indeed,

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the prominence. The transformation isn't something that Sam Mortman can

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>do unilaterally either. In essence, he needs that the consent

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of regulators and lawmakers in the State of California. We've

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:13.920
<v Speaker 1>already seen open aiy's moves be challenged but the likes

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:16.679
<v Speaker 1>of Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg, although these efforts did

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>not or have yet to amount to much, though there

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>is an upcoming trial with Elon mask over this. Part

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>of the complexity comes from the very nature of what

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>it means to be a nonprofit. Nonprofits enjoy certain tax benefits,

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 1>both from their exemption from taxation to the benefits that

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>come when a person makes a charitable donation to a

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>non profit. If you give money to the Red Cross

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>or a church or whatever, you can write that off

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>against your taxes. As a result, open ai is constrained

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>by what it can do with the assets that are

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>held within the nonprofit. Those assets are supposed to be

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>used for the benefit of society, it to serve some

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of charitable purpose. Open AI can't just transfer them

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>to a for profit entity. Doesn't work like that, nor

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>should it, even though they're very much trying to make it.

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Linked to this in the episode Notes, but a recent

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>petition against open AI's restructuring alleges that open ai has

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>already effectively broken the rules against how nonprofits should operate

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and manage their assets, but the first violation coming in

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen, right at the start of open AI's metamorphosis

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and around the time when it obtained its first billion

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>dollars worth of investment from Microsoft. Addressed to the Attorney

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:24.039
<v Speaker 1>General of California and signed by innumerable figures in California

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and national philanthropy, it articulates a compelling case that open

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:30.720
<v Speaker 1>ai has already broken the law in several meaningful ways

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and urges the state to take action to prevent a

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 1>further dilution of the open ai charitable mission. It describes

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>these violations as and I quote, factually complex but legally simple.

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 1>It claims that the twenty nineteen restructuring which created the

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 1>for profit element involved the wrongful transfer of assets from

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the nonprofit. This is bad in and of itself, but

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:52.919
<v Speaker 1>as time dragged on the influence and relevance of the

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 1>nonprofit wing over the for profit entity, the effectively ended.

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>It gives the example of the November twenty twenty three coups,

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>when Sam Altman was fired from the company over alleged

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>dishonesty about the safety processes surrounding model development, and also

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of other stuff like not telling the board

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>that chat GPT was coming out anyway. This firing, the

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:13.799
<v Speaker 1>letter states, came at the behest of the nonprofit directors.

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>As we all know. It didn't take sam Altman long

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>to return to the helm of open ai and the

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>same role that he'd left. Many of the board members

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 1>that had approved distermination left, and though they signed a letter,

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:25.839
<v Speaker 1>it was very much a they have me my family

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing, or I should say they have my

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:30.480
<v Speaker 1>stock units, and they were replaced by those who are

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>more aligned for the for profit goals of open Ai.

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:35.720
<v Speaker 1>The petition also makes the case that open ai is

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>renunciation of its commitment to open source research within its

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:41.159
<v Speaker 1>purpose clause, the thing that defines what a nonprofit is

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>for also represented in illegal diversion of assets. Open source

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>software benefits whoever uses it, whereas proprietary software, even if

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>it's provided for free, there's comparatively fewer benefits to society.

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.039
<v Speaker 1>You can't change your modify or improve a program, and

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>you're at the best. You're really at whatever the vendor

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:01.599
<v Speaker 1>wants to do as far as accessing or using the

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>platform or program or whatever it might do. In practice,

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>there's little open about open ai. They share little source

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>code and don't even provide specifics about the training data

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>they use. They're less concerned with public research and now

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 1>shrouds their development in the same cloak of secrecy that

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you would expect from basically any other tech company. Now

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 1>they're claiming they're going to release an open weighted model,

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>but it's bullshit. I'm sorry, that's not enough. Now, the

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>letter does make some specific demands. It wants the AG

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to investigate what assets were siphoned off from the nonprofit,

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:36.600
<v Speaker 1>block any conversion until the investigation is completed, and make

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>sure that all charitable assets are returned to the nonprofit,

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and indeed to create a truly independent entity separate from

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 1>Sam Morltman and the business interests of open ai, to

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:48.679
<v Speaker 1>act as a steward for these assets. If this petition

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>succeeded in delaying the conversion, open AI's future becomes much

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 1>more uncertain and perhaps may not even be possible. It'll

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>make it harder to raise new funds that would only

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:00.280
<v Speaker 1>increase their cash burners. Open ai will now be to

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>start making repayments and investments that were automatically converted into loans.

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Will it succeed, Maybe First, this petition doesn't come from

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>arrival with an extra grind against Sam Altman. Like Elon Musk,

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the Black Freedom Fund, the Asian Law Caucus in the

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 1>California Teamster's Public Affairs COUNTSL aren't exactly the natural adversaries

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>of Vaultman, unless they, of course, secretly hate people who

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>wear Patagolia vests, in which case I retract the entire

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>art sentence and also add that I heartily congratulate them

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>and agree with them. Moreover, this petition isn't framed about

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>tech or AI or AI safety, but rather something far

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 1>more simple. It's about what a nonprofit is and how

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:38.679
<v Speaker 1>it should be run. And if, as the letters authors argue,

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>open AI should be allowed to restructure without being challenged

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>or scrutinized, it will set a dangerous precedent that would

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>make it harder to protect the charitable mission of nonprofits

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and make them easier for them to be plundered. Like

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I'd argue open AI has, it's a strong case. While

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to tell if the Attorney General will take

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 1>it on, it could lay the groundwork for open AI's demise,

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure some of you would love them well. No,

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I might too.